Treatment of digital pyogenic flexor tenosynovitis: single open debridement, irrigation, and primary wound closure followed by antibiotic therapy

Treatment of Pyogenic Flexor Tenosynovitis in the Emergency Department Setting With WALANT Technique

BACKGROUND

The standard of care for treatment of pyogenic flexor tenosynovitis (PFT) involves antibiotic therapy and prompt irrigation of the flexor tendon sheath, traditionally performed in the operating room. With the acceptance of wide-awake local anesthesia no tourniquet (WALANT) hand surgery and its potential ability to minimize time to flexor tendon sheath irrigation, we sought to determine whether closed irrigation of the flexor tendon sheath could be safely and effectively performed in the emergency department setting with WALANT technique.

METHODS

A retrospective review was conducted of the senior author's hand surgery consultations over a 12-month period. Six patients were identified who were diagnosed with PFT and subsequently underwent irrigation of the flexor tendon sheath using WALANT technique. Patient outcomes such as length of hospital stay, need for reoperation, infectious etiology, perioperative complications, and postprocedure range of motion (ROM) were identified.

RESULTS

Six patients with diagnosis of PFT underwent irrigation of the flexor tendon sheath in the emergency department with local anesthesia only. The irrigation procedures were all well-tolerated. One patient required reoperation due to lack of appropriate clinical improvement following initial irrigation. Four of 6 patients regained their preinjury ROM while the remaining 2 patients had mild proximal interphalangeal joint extension lag. There were no complications associated with the procedures.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgical treatment of PFT with closed irrigation of the flexor tendon sheath in the emergency department utilizing WALANT technique was safe, effective, and well-tolerated. Local anesthesia alone can be used effectively for irrigation procedures of the flexor tendon sheath.

A Comparison of Parenteral and Per-Oral Antibiotic Usage in Pyogenic Flexor Tenosynovitis: A Retrospective Study

Introduction Pyogenic flexor tenosynovitis (PFT) is a common hand infection that can cause significant morbidity. Although treatment involves surgical debridement and inpatient intravenous (IV) antibiotics, there is a paucity of literature guiding antibiotic use. This study aims to determine if the use of postoperative outpatient oral antibiotics leads to poor outcomes compared to IV antibiotics given in an institutional setting. Methods A retrospective review of 110 patients treated post-operatively with either outpatient oral or inpatient IV antibiotics at our institution from 2016-2019 was performed. All patients underwent surgical debridement. Primary outcomes analyzed included readmission, repeat surgery, and amputation. Clinical parameters including age, diabetes, smoking, duration of symptoms, involvement of surrounding structures (felon, dorsal abscess, osteomyelitis, septic arthritis), culture growth, Michon classification, and duration of antibiotics were analyzed as possible risk factors for poor outcome. The level of evidence of this study is Level 3 Retrospective Cohort Study. Results Seventy-five patients were treated with outpatient oral antibiotics and 35 patients were treated with inpatient IV antibiotics. The oral antibiotics group received antibiotics for 13.1 +/- 9.9 days compared to 18.1 +/-10.4 days in the IV antibiotic group. Patients in the oral antibiotic group had a significantly shorter length of hospitalization at 0.6 +/-1.8 days compared to 3.6 +/-1.8 days in the IV antibiotic group. The readmission rate for the oral antibiotic group was 10.7% compared to 5.7% in the IV antibiotic group. This difference was not statistically significant except in patients who had involvement in surrounding structures. There was no significant difference in repeat surgeries or amputations between the groups. Conclusions The use of outpatient oral antibiotics after surgical debridement for PFT does not significantly increase rates of readmission, repeat surgery, or amputation, except in cases with the involvement of surrounding structures. On subgroup analysis, anaerobic infection and diabetes were significantly associated with amputations. Post-operative oral antibiotics and immediate discharge may be considered for PFT after adequate surgical debridement with close outpatient follow-up in the absence of surrounding structure involvement and diabetes.

New frontiers of tendon augmentation technology in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine: a concise literature review

Tissue banking programs fail to meet the demand for human organs and tissues for transplantation into patients with congenital defects, injuries, chronic diseases, and end-stage organ failure. Tendons and ligaments are among the most frequently ruptured and/or worn-out body tissues owing to their frequent use, especially in athletes and the elderly population. Surgical repair has remained the mainstay management approach, regardless of scarring and adhesion formation during healing, which then compromises the gliding motion of the joint and reduces the quality of life for patients. Tissue engineering and regenerative medicine approaches, such as tendon augmentation, are promising as they may provide superior outcomes by inducing host-tissue ingrowth and tendon regeneration during degradation, thereby decreasing failure rates and morbidity. However, to date, tendon tissue engineering and regeneration research has been limited and lacks the much-needed human clinical evidence to translate most laboratory augmentation approaches to therapeutics. This narrative review summarizes the current treatment options for various tendon pathologies, future of tendon augmentation, cell therapy, gene therapy, 3D/4D bioprinting, scaffolding, and cell signals.

Die Spül-Saug-Drainage zur Therapie der septischen Tenosynovialitis der Fingerbeugesehnen

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

Pyogenic flexor tenosynovitis within the flexor tendon sheath requires urgent treatment to avoid tendon necrosis and loss of the finger. Objective of this article is the treatment by revision and postoperative continuous irrigation via a closed irrigation system.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From 1.1.2007 to 31.12.2016 54 patients with a pyogenic flexor tenosynovitis were treated by revision and closed continuous irrigation. Besides the evaluation of the patient´s records with respect to the involved fingers and hand, duration of hospitalisation, and required revision surgery, 33 patients (19 males, 14 females) with an average age of 51 (8-85) years were re-examined on average after 21 (4-38) months. Re-examination included measurements of the mobility of the involved fingers and thumbs, grip and pinch strength, pain using the numeric rating scale (BRS), and DASH score. The overall result was graded according to the grading system by Buck-Gramcko for flexor tendon reconstruction.

RESULTS

Hospital stay was 9 (3-26) days on average. In 11 patients revision surgery was required including 3 re-installations of the continuous irrigation system, 2 ray amputations, and 1 finger amputation at the level of the proximal interphalangeal joint. The re-examined patients averaged a grip strength of 84 (23-163) % of the unaffected side. On average pain at rest was 0,2 (0-4), pain at daily living activity 1,2 (0-8) on the NRS, the DASH score 16,8 (0-58) points. According to the rating system for flexor tendon function there were one poor, one fair, 5 good and 26 excellent results.

CONCLUSIONS

Continuous irrigation by a closed irrigation system for pyogenic flexor tenosynovitis is a successful procedure with a low amputation rate. The functional results are predominantly good and excellent.

[Pyogenic Flexor Tenosynovitis]

Pyogenic flexor tenosynovitis (PFT) is still the most serious infections of the hand. If the typical cardinal signs of PFT according to Kanavel exist, the indication for surgery should be made immediately. The consequential damage of a delayed surgery with enormous restrictions on the movement of the fingers due to the destruction of the sliding layers and massive adhesions are so serious that conservative therapy attempts are very difficult to justify. The results of Hand therapy after delayed surgery are often disappointing. The rapid surgical intervention and the early opening and relief as well as the irrigation of the tendon sheath can end the disease, the destruction of the sliding layers and the severe pain almost immediately. Quick recognition and quick action are important. With early intervention, normal hand function can often be completely restored.

Surgeon level of expertise reported in Journal of Hand Surgery (American Volume) and (European Volume) publications

The purpose of the study was to evaluate the trend in documentation of surgeon level of expertise among the Journal of Hand Surgery (American Volume) and the Journal of Hand Surgery (European Volume) publications. A review of Journal of Hand Surgery (American Volume) and Journal of Hand Surgery (European Volume) databases for level of expertise between January 2015 and October 2019 was performed. Of 1042 articles identified, all 115 (20%) reporting level of expertise were published in Journal of Hand Surgery (European Volume). Since 2015, there has been an increase in reported level of expertise in Journal of Hand Surgery (European Volume) (2015: 8 (7%); 2016: 15 (13%); 2017: 22 (19%); 2018: 28 (24%); 2019: 42 (37%)). In the same period, no publications have reported level of expertise in Journal of Hand Surgery (American Volume). Documenting level of expertise may provide readers with additional information for incorporation of novel techniques into their practices. It may identify procedures that require a baseline level of expertise for effective performance. Further evaluation of level of expertise criteria may improve the reliability of the numeric scale, while widespread adoption of this scale will allow future outcome analysis by level of expertise.

Risk factors for reoperation in primary hand infections: a multivariate analysis

INTRODUCTION

Severe hand infection might cause severe morbidity including stiffness, contracture and possibly amputation. The purpose of this study was to analyse the current epidemiology of adult acute hand infections in a European Hand Surgery Centre and to identify risk factors for secondary surgery.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed a cohort of 369 consecutive patients with primary infection of the hand that were admitted to our department and required operative treatment. The following variables were recorded: demographics, medical history, cause and location of infection, laboratory values, cultured microorganisms and reoperation rate. Univariate logistical regression was used to identify variables associated with reoperation and backward selection was applied to identify the final multiple variable model.

RESULTS

The mean age at the time of operation was 50.5 years (SD 16.1, range 19-91) and 65.6% of patients were male. Sharp cuts or lacerations were the most common cause (29.0%) for hand infections. 81 different species were cultivated and in 47 patients (12.7%), the cultures were positive for more than one organism. Staphylococcus aureus was the most common cultured organism (19.5%). There were relatively few cases of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (2.2%). 80 patients (21.7%) needed more than one operation. We identified three risk factors for reoperation in a multivariate analysis: an elevated value of C-reactive protein at the time of admission, involvement of multiple sites and bacterial growth in culture.

CONCLUSION

The rate of infections with MRSA in this European cohort was lower compared to reports from the USA. Thus, hand surgeons should choose their empiric antibiotic therapy depending on their patient population. The knowledge of risk factors for severe hand infections might help surgeons to identify patients at risk for additional surgery early.