Ascomycin macrolactam derivative SDZ ASM 981 inhibits the release of granule-associated mediators and of newly synthesized cytokines in RBL 2H3 mast cells in an immunophilin-dependent manner

Pimecrolimus protects neuron-like SH-SY5Y cells against anti-inflammatory and anti-oxidant effects of both microglial secretome and hydrogen peroxide

Calcineurin inhibitors have been found to exhibit a preventive role against neuroinflammation, which represents a crucial underlying mechanism in neurodegenerative diseases (ND). Additionally, they possess suppressive effects on the activation of apoptotic pathways, which constitute another mechanism underlying such diseases. Given that pimecrolimus, a calcineurin inhibitor, impedes the synthesis of pro-inflammatory cytokines, such as interleukin (IL)-2, IL-4, and IL-10, and influences apoptotic processes, it is noteworthy to test its potential neuroprotective properties. Thus, the objective of this investigation was to assess the potential protective effects of pimecrolimus against the degenerative consequences of both microglial secretomes and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), an oxidant agent. The survival rates of HMC3 microglia cells, neuron-like differentiated SH-SY5Y (d-SH-SY5Y) cells, and their co-culture were determined using the 3-(4,5-Dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-Diphenyltetrazolium Bromide (MTT) method. Furthermore, the levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines IL-1β and IL-6, and anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-10 were measured using ELISA kits, besides total antioxidant and oxidant capacities in conditioned media of cells. Additionally, the effect of pimecrolimus on neurite length in these cell groups was evaluated through morphological observations. This study revealed, for the first time, that pimecrolimus exerts preventive effects on neurodegenerative processes by virtue of its anti-inflammatory and -antioxidant activities. It holds promise as a potential treatment option for ND.

Nonsteroidal Topical Immunomodulators in Allergology and Dermatology

The purpose of this study was to review currently available literature data concerning pathomechanisms of action, indications, treatment efficacy, as well as side effects of nonsteroidal immunomodulators used in dermatology, primarily for the treatment of allergic dermatoses. MEDLINE search was undertaken using the key words “Topical Immunomodulators, Dermatology and Allergy”. Full articles, and nothing but full articles, were used.

Pimecrolimus Is a Potent Inhibitor of Allergic Reactions to Hymenopteran Venom Extracts and Birch Pollen Allergen In Vitro

Pimecrolimus (Elidel, SDZ ASM 981) is an anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory 33-epichloro-derivative of macrolactam ascomycin, with low potential for affecting systemic immune responses compared with other calcineurin inhibitors, cyclosporin A and tacrolimus. Despite numerous studies focused on the mechanism of pimecrolimus action on mast cells, only the single report has addressed pimecrolimus effects on other typical FcεRI-expressing cells, the basophils. Patients allergic to birch pollen (n = 20), hymenopteran venoms (n = 23) and 10 non-allergic volunteers were examined. Primary human basophils pre-treated or not with 0.5-50 μMol pimecrolimus were exposed to various concentrations of recombinant Bet v 1a allergen, bee or wasp venom extracts and anti-IgE for 20 min, and then examined for the expression of CD45, CD193, CD203c, CD63 and CD164 using flow cytometry. The externalization of basophil activation markers (CD63 and CD164) was equally inhibited through pimecrolimus in cells activated by recombinant pollen allergen, hymenopteran venom extracts and anti-IgE. Although the individual response rate was subject to strong variation, importantly, pre-treatment with pimecrolimus lowered the number of activated basophils in response to any of the stimuli in the basophils from all patients. The inhibition was concentration-dependent; approximately half of the basophils were inhibited in the presence of 2.5 mMol pimecrolimus. Pimecrolimus is a valuable new tool for the inhibition of hyper-reactive basophils in patients with pollen allergy and a history of anaphylactic reactions to bee or wasp venoms. Further research should address short-term use of pimecrolimus in vivo in a wide spectrum of allergic diseases.

Пимекролимус в лечении атопического дерматита у детей. Вопросы безопасности и эффективности. Опыт пятилетнего применения

A growth in the incidence rate for atopic dermatitis (AD) in infants has been observed for this decade. Early formation of AD (at the age of 3-6 months) is observed in 45% of infants, and in 60% of infants - during the first year of life. As many as 65% of children (by the age of 7) and 74% of children (by the age of 16) suffering from AD have a spontaneous remission of the disease. As many as 20-43% of children suffering from AD further develop bronchial asthma, and the incidence rate of allergic rhinitis is twice as high. In spite of the fact that topical corticosteroids (TCS) are prescribed frequently enough, there is a need in the non-hormonal therapy due to poor compliance with the TCS treatment regimen in connection with side effects. Treatment of AD is often complicated by the colonization with Staphylococcus aureus and inefficacy of the external therapy with topical corticosteroids because many patients with AD have a high level of IgE against the superantigen of Staphylococcus. 1% pimecrolimus cream (PIM) and TCS were compared in a long-term large-scale study involving younger children suffering from mild to moderate AD. Materials and methods. The five-year open-label study involved 2,418 children, who were randomized into groups receiving PIM (n = 1205; in case of an aggravation - short-term administration of TCS) or TCS (n = 1213). The main goal of the study was to compare the safety of these two methods of treatment; an auxiliary goal was to confirm the long-term efficacy of PIM. Treatment was considered to be successful if the score based on the IGA scale was 0 (clean skin) or 1 (almost clean). Results. The effect in both groups of the drugs - PIM and TCS - was fast, and the success of treatment was recorded for >50% of patients by Week 3. In both groups, treatment was determined to be successful after 5 years in >85% of patients, and treatment of manifestations of AD on the face was efficient in 95% of all subjects. In the PIM group, the need in steroids was considerably lower than in the TCS group (7 days of administration vs. 178 days in the TCS group). In both groups, there were adverse events similar by their nature and frequency, and no disorders of humoral or cellular immunity were revealed. Conclusions. The long-term administration of PIM in case of mild to moderate AD in children was revealed to be safe and had no effect on the immune system. When PIM was used, the need in corticosteroids was considerably reduced (steroid-preserving effect). These data confirm that PIM is as efficient as TCS and can be used as the first-line therapy for mild to moderate AD in infants and younger children.

Safety and efficacy of pimecrolimus in atopic dermatitis: a 5-year randomized trial

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Atopic dermatitis (AD) primarily affects infants and young children. Although topical corticosteroids (TCSs) are often prescribed, noncorticosteroid treatments are needed because compliance with TCSs is poor due to concerns about their side effects. In this longest and largest intervention study ever conducted in infants with mild-to-moderate AD, pimecrolimus 1% cream (PIM) was compared with TCSs.

METHODS

A total of 2418 infants were enrolled in this 5-year open-label study. Infants were randomized to PIM (n = 1205; with short-term TCSs for disease flares) or TCSs (n = 1213). The primary objective was to compare safety; the secondary objective was to document PIM's long-term efficacy. Treatment success was defined as an Investigator's Global Assessment score of 0 (clear) or 1 (almost clear).

RESULTS

Both PIM and TCSs had a rapid onset of action with >50% of patients achieving treatment success by week 3. After 5 years, >85% and 95% of patients in each group achieved overall and facial treatment success, respectively. The PIM group required substantially fewer steroid days than the TCS group (7 vs 178). The profile and frequency of adverse events was similar in the 2 groups; in both groups, there was no evidence for impairment of humoral or cellular immunity.

CONCLUSIONS

Long-term management of mild-to-moderate AD in infants with PIM or TCSs was safe without any effect on the immune system. PIM was steroid-sparing. The data suggest PIM had similar efficacy to TCS and support the use of PIM as a first-line treatment of mild-to-moderate AD in infants and children.

Macrolactam Immunomodulators (Tacrolimus and Pimecrolimus): New Horizons in the Topical Treatment of Inflammatory Skin Diseases

Tacrolimus and pimecrolimus are new macrolactam immunomodulators which were developed for the treatment of inflammatory skin diseases, mainly atopic dermatitis. In this article, we review the pharmacologic properties of the drugs, their side effects, and their clinical uses.

Mutational biosynthesis of tacrolimus analogues by fkbO deletion mutant of Streptomyces sp. KCTC 11604BP

Tacrolimus (FK506) is an important macrocyclic polyketide showing antifungal and immunosuppressive activities, as well as neuroregenerative properties. Tacrolimus biosynthetic machinery should incorporate the shikimate-derived 4,5-dihydroxycyclohex-1-enecarboxylic acid (DHCHC) as a biosynthetic starter unit into the biosynthetic line of tacrolimus. fkbO is a homologue of rapK encoding chorismatase related to the biosynthesis of starter unit DHCHC from chorismate in the rapamycin biosynthetic gene cluster. FkbO and RapK are good targets for mutational biosynthesis to produce novel analogues of tacrolimus, ascomycin, and rapamycin, which could be important drugs for clinical application in the treatment of cancer and immune and neurodegenerative diseases. To make novel tacrolimus analogues, we prepared an fkbO in-frame deletion mutant, Streptomyces sp. GT110507, from a tacrolimus high producer. We scrutinized the cyclic carboxylic acids that were possibly incorporated instead of DHCHC by precursor-directed mutasynthesis using Streptomyces sp. GT110507 to lead tacrolimus analogues. Among them, trans-4-hydroxycyclohexanecarboxylic acid and 3-hydroxybenzoic acid were successfully incorporated into the tacrolimus backbone, which led to the production of 31-desmethoxytacrolimus and TC-225, respectively. Especially, adding of trans-4-hydroxycyclohexanecarboxylic acid produced a high amount (55 mg/L) of 31-desmethoxytacrolimus. Interestingly, in the rapK mutant, it has been reported that the incorporation of cyclohexanecarboxylic acid (CHC) led to 39-desmethoxy rapamycin. However, in Streptomyces sp. GT110507, CHC is not successfully incorporated. This discrepancy should reflect the differences in the DHCHC biosynthesis mechanism and/or substrate specificity of starter unit loading machineries (FkbP and RapP) of tacrolimus and rapamycin.

A randomized study of the safety, absorption and efficacy of pimecrolimus cream 1% applied twice or four times daily in patients with atopic dermatitis

BACKGROUND

Pimecrolimus cream 1% (Elidel), a non-steroid inhibitor of inflammatory cytokines, is effective in the treatment of atopic dermatitis, without corticosteroid-related side effects such as skin atrophy. It is indicated for twice-daily application. More frequent applications might be expected either to enhance efficacy or increase toxicity. This study compared the safety, efficacy and systemic absorption of pimecrolimus administered twice daily (recommended dose) and four times daily early in the treatment of patients with moderate to severe atopic dermatitis.

METHODS

Adolescent and adult patients with moderate to severe atopic dermatitis were randomly assigned to a twice daily (BID) treatment group (n = 24) or a four times daily (QID) group (n = 25). During days 1-7, patients in the QID group applied pimecrolimus four times daily, and patients in the BID group applied pimecrolimus twice daily plus vehicle equivalent twice daily. During days 8-21, all patients were required to use pimecrolimus twice daily and had the option to use up to two further daily treatments (pimecrolimus in the QID group and vehicle equivalent in the BID group). Blood sampling occurred 2, 4, and 6 hours after the first morning application on days 1 and 5 and then prior to the first morning application on days 8 and 15, and any time on day 22.

RESULTS

Only 3 (12%) QID patients and 4 (17%) BID patients reported adverse events (primarily mild, transient application-site burning) with no significant difference between treatment groups in the frequency, type, or severity of adverse events. The median daily number of applications in the QID group during days 8-21 when two additional doses were optional remained at four. Pimecrolimus blood levels from a subgroup of 22 patients showed no difference in systemic exposure between the two dosing regimens. All but three (one in the QID group, two in the BID group) patients had blood levels below the limit of quantification; the highest single blood level of pimecrolimus measured in any patient was 1.37 ng/ml (QID group). Both the QID and BID regimens improved the signs and symptoms of atopic dermatitis similarly as measured by improvements in pruritus severity score, Investigator's Global Assessment, Eczema Area and Severity Index, percentage of body surface area affected, and patient's self-assessment of disease control.

CONCLUSIONS

The data suggest that increasing pimecrolimus application from twice daily to four times daily to treat moderate to severe atopic dermatitis for up to 3 weeks does not alter the safety profile nor does it increase the efficacy of treatment. Systemic absorption of pimecrolimus applied BID and QID is minimal and is not different between dosing regimens. Patients and physicians familiar with the potential hazards of overuse of topical corticosteroids should be reassured that if pimecrolimus is applied at twice the recommended BID dose for short periods of time, there is no effect on safety, tolerability, or systemic absorption.

Impact of topical calcineurin inhibitors on quality of life in patients with atopic dermatitis

This review considers randomized trials of topical calcineurin inhibitors in atopic dermatitis that have included quality-of-life (QOL) data. Relatively few trials were identified and several different QOL measures have been used, partly because trial subjects included adults, children, and the parents of affected infants. Tacrolimus 0.1% and 0.03% ointment and pimecrolimus 1% cream were found to be superior to vehicle treatment in terms of QOL for active AD. In adults, tacrolimus 0.1% ointment provided a greater improvement in QOL than the 0.03% strength. Pimecrolimus 1% cream was superior to vehicle treatment for flare prevention in the studies that contained QOL outcomes but no data are available for tacrolimus ointment in this regard. QOL data comparing topical calcineurin inhibitors with other active treatments such as topical corticosteroids are sparse and it would be useful for future randomized trials to include QOL measures as a primary outcome.

An exploratory study to evaluate the efficacy of pimecrolimus cream 1% for the treatment of pityriasis alba

BACKGROUND

Use of topical corticosteroids for the treatment of pityriasis alba is limited by their potential side-effects, such as skin atrophy especially with long-term use on the face. Pimecrolimus cream 1% is a topical calcineurin inhibitor that has anti-inflammatory properties, lacks the cutaneous side-effects associated with steroids, and provide a potential benefit for the treatment of pityriasis alba.

METHODS

This 10-patient, prospective, single-arm, open-label, single-center, 12-week, investigator-initiated proof of concept study assessed the efficacy, safety, and patient acceptance of pimecrolimus cream 1% twice daily. In addition to pimecrolimus cream, patients used facial emollient containing SPF 15 sunscreen and mild soap-free cleanser. Efficacy assessments were Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) of disease severity and evaluation of uneven skin color, scaling, eczema, follicular keratosis, and pruritus. All efficacy assessments were reported on a 4-point scale (0 = none to 3 = severe).

RESULTS

Of the 10 patients enrolled (aged: 12-35 years), all had intensive sun-exposure, 90% had skin type IV-V, and 80% completed the 12-week treatment. At baseline, mean IGA was 1.20 (mild-moderate), uneven skin color was 2.3 (moderate-severe) and scaling was 1.2 (mild). IGA decreased to 0.25 by week 12, uneven skin color improved by week 3 with near complete resolution by week 12 (mean = 0.38) and scaling resolved at week 3. Pruritus, eczema, and follicular keratosis remained at low levels from baseline throughout the course of the study. Patients consistently reported satisfaction with the treatment ("satisfied" or "very satisfied"). No adverse events were reported.

CONCLUSIONS

Pimecrolimus cream 1% may represent an alternative for the treatment of pityriasis alba.

Results of a randomized, double-blind, vehicle-controlled efficacy trial of pimecrolimus cream 1% for the treatment of moderate to severe facial seborrheic dermatitis

BACKGROUND

Seborrheic dermatitis is commonly treated with anti-inflammatory products, including topical corticosteroids. Pimecrolimus cream 1% also exerts anti-inflammatory activity by inhibiting T-cell cytokine production.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to compare the efficacy and safety of twice-daily pimecrolimus for treatment of moderate to severe facial seborrheic dermatitis.

METHODS

This double-blind, vehicle-controlled, 4-week trial randomized patients with seborrheic dermatitis to pimecrolimus or vehicle (1:1). Clinical assessments (erythema [0-3] and scaling [0-3] combined for a total area score [0-6]) were performed at weeks 0, 2, and 4. Inclusion criteria included total area score 4 or greater and erythema 2 or greater. The prespecified primary variable, change from baseline in total area score at week 4, was analyzed using a two-sample t test for intent-to-treat and per protocol populations.

RESULTS

In all, 96 adults of mean age 59.6 years, 88.5% male, were randomized (n = 47 pimecrolimus; 49 vehicle). At week 4, the mean change from baseline in total area score was 3.7 versus 3.3 for pimecrolimus and vehicle groups, respectively (intent-to-treat: P = .1913; 95% confidence interval (CI) for difference [-0.195, 0.961]). Per protocol analysis (n = 41 pimecrolimus; 46 vehicle) indicated a significant difference between groups (mean change 3.9 pimecrolimus vs 3.2 vehicle; P = .0156; CI [0.129, 1.197]). The superiority of pimecrolimus was observed as early as week 2 (intent-to-treat: P = .0062; CI [0.132, 0.777]; per protocol: P = .0012; CI [0.410, 1.593]). No drug-related serious adverse events occurred. The most frequent drug-related adverse events were local, mild, and transient (pimecrolimus = 26%; vehicle = 12%).

LIMITATIONS

Generalizability is limited by the elderly male study population.

CONCLUSION

This study suggests that pimecrolimus cream 1% is an effective and well-tolerated treatment for moderate to severe facial seborrheic dermatitis.

Pimecrolimus Cream 1% for Treatment of Vulvar Lichen Simplex Chronicus: An Open-Label, Preliminary Trial

BACKGROUND

To evaluate efficacy and safety of pimecrolimus cream 1% twice daily for treatment of vulvar lichen simplex chronicus (LSC).

METHODS

Patients in this 12-week, open-label study had biopsy-proven vulvar LSC. Inclusion criteria were patient-reported Visual Analog Scale for Pruritus Relief > or = 3 (VAS-PR, 0 cm = no itching to 10 cm = severe itching) and Investigator's Global Assessment > or = 2 (IGA, 0 = no disease to 3 = severe disease). Safety was evaluated by adverse event reports and pimecrolimus blood level measurements.

RESULTS

Twelve women aged 25-53 years were enrolled. The median pruritus score (VAS-PR) decreased from 6 (min. 4.9, max. 9.0) at baseline to 0 cm at week 4 (max. 4.2), week 8 (max. 3.1) and week 12 (max. 2.1). Seven patients reported complete resolution of pruritus by week 4. Median IGA decreased from 2.5 (min. 2, max. 3) at baseline to 0 (min. 0, max. 2) at week 12. Erythema, excoriation, and lichenification improved for all patients. Pimecrolimus blood concentration for all samples was below the limit of quantification, 0.3 ng/ml. No adverse events were reported.

CONCLUSIONS

In this exploratory study, signs and symptoms of vulvar LSC improved for all women and pimecrolimus cream showed a favorable safety profile. Larger prospective studies are needed to further evaluate pimecrolimus for treatment of vulvar LSC.

Topical pimecrolimus and tacrolimus transiently induce neuropeptide release and mast cell degranulation in murine skin

BACKGROUND

The topical calcineurin inhibitors pimecrolimus and tacrolimus have been demonstrated to be an effective new anti-inflammatory therapy. The only clinically relevant side-effect reported is transient application site burning and stinging itch at the beginning of topical therapy.

OBJECTIVES

In order to understand the underlying mechanism of this effect, we examined whether or not the compounds are able to stimulate neuropeptide release in normal murine skin as well as in a mouse model of experimentally induced irritant contact dermatitis.

METHODS

Balb/c mice were treated with 1% pimecrolimus cream or 0.1% tacrolimus ointment. Untreated and corresponding vehicle-treated mice served as controls. Skin specimens were investigated by light, immunofluorescence and electron microscopy as well as enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and polymerase chain reaction.

RESULTS

Topical application of pimecrolimus and tacrolimus was followed by an initial release of substance P and calcitonin gene-related peptide from primary afferent nerve fibres in murine skin during the early inflammatory response. The release of the neuropeptides and their binding to mast cells (MCs) led to MC degranulation. Mediators of MCs such as histamine and tryptase may induce pruritus and burning by binding to the corresponding receptors (histamine receptor 1, proteinase-activated receptor 2) on sensory nerve fibres, which explains the initial side-effects during therapy with calcineurin inhibitors.

CONCLUSIONS

It may be speculated that calcineurin inhibitors directly stimulate intracellular signalling pathways or bind to ion channels such as transient receptor potential vanilloid 1 or receptors involved in nociception.

Atopic dermatitis

Atopic dermatitis is an especially common and frustrating condition, and the prevalence is increasing. The disease can adversely affect the quality of life of patients and caregivers. Significant advances in our understanding of the pathogenesis have led to improvements in therapy. Patient and caregiver education, avoidance of potential triggering factors, optimal skin care, and pharmacotherapy offer the potential for good control for most patients.

The Immunosuppressant Cyclosporin A Antagonizes Human Formyl Peptide Receptor through Inhibition of Cognate Ligand Binding

Cyclosporin A (CsA) is a fungus-derived cyclic undecapeptide with potent immunosuppressive activity. Its analog, cyclosporin H (CsH), lacks immunosuppressive function but can act as an antagonist for the human formyl peptide receptor (FPR). More recent studies have shown that CsA also inhibits fMLF-induced degranulation in differentiated HL-60 promyelocytic leukemia cells. However, it is unclear whether CsA interferes with ligand-receptor interaction, G protein activation, or other downstream signaling events. In this study we used human neutrophils, differentiated HL-60 cells, and rat basophilic leukemia (RBL)-2H3 cells expressing human FPR (RBL-FPR) to identify the action site of CsA. In functional assays, CsA inhibited fMLF-stimulated degranulation, chemotaxis, calcium mobilization, and phosphorylation of the MAPKs ERK 1/2 and the serine/threonine protein kinase Akt. CsA also blocked Trp-Lys-Tyr-Met-Val-D-Met (WKYMVm)-induced functions in RBL-FPR cells. Concentrations for half-maximal inhibition with CsA are generally 6- to 50-fold higher than that of CsH. CsA was compared with another immunosuppressant, ascomycin, relative to the inhibitory effects on FPR-mediated chemotaxis, calcium mobilization, and degranulation. In these experiments, ascomycin produced no inhibitory effects at low micromolar concentrations (1-4 microM), whereas the inhibitory effects of CsA were prominent at comparable concentrations. Finally, CsA dose-dependently inhibited the uptake of fNle-Leu-Phe-Nle-Tyr-Lys-fluoresceine and [3H]fMLF or [125I]WKYMVm binding to FPR. However, CsA and CsH did not show any obvious inhibitory effect on FPR-like 1-mediated cellular functions. These results demonstrate that CsA is a selective antagonist of FPR and that its inhibition of fMLF-stimulated leukocyte activation is at the level of cognate ligand binding.

Discovery of Topical Calcineurin Inhibitors and Pharmacological Profile of Pimecrolimus

Using a newly developed model of allergic contact dermatitis in pigs, calcineurin inhibitors of the tacrolimus and ascomycin type were shown to have a highly anti-inflammatory action after topical application. These findings provided the first pharmacological evidence of the efficacy of this novel class of topical agents in the treatment of inflammatory skin diseases, and, thus, their potential to become the first alternative to corticosteroids in more than 40 years. As a result of a large research program into ascomycins, pimecrolimus (Elidel(R), SDZ ASM 981) was selected for development due to its favorable pharmacology and safety profile, alongside tacrolimus (Protopic(R), FK 506). In vitro, pimecrolimus inhibits the transcription and release of pro-inflammatory cytokines in T cells. Similar to the corticosteroids, betamethasone-17-valerate and dexamethasone, pimecrolimus is effective at nanomolar concentrations. Targeting mainly T cells, pimecrolimus has, however, a more specific mode of action. Moreover, in contrast to corticosteroids, pimecrolimus has no effect on Langerhans' cells, the professional antigen- presenting dendritic cells of the skin that are crucial for local immunosurveillance. When applied topically, pimecrolimus exerts a high and selective anti-inflammatory activity in the skin, shows minimal percutaneous absorption, and has a low potential to affect systemic immunoreactions. Pimecrolimus cream 1% has proven to be well tolerated, safe, and highly effective in clinical studies in patients with atopic dermatitis.

Modulation of Atopy Patch Test and Skin Prick Test by Pretreatment with 1% Pimecrolimus Cream

BACKGROUND

In a subgroup of patients with atopic eczema (AE), aeroallergens are relevant eliciting factors. The atopy patch test (APT) was proposed as inflammation model for AE.

OBJECTIVE

It was the aim of this study to investigate the effect of pretreatment with 1% pimecrolimus cream (Elidel) on the APT and skin prick test (SPT).

METHODS

In a randomized, controlled, double-blind study, 20 patients with AE and positive SPT and APT screening reaction to house dust mite Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus, cat dander, grass or birch pollen were enrolled (age 20 +/- 11 years, 55% males). For 2 weeks, patients twice daily applied pimecrolimus and vehicle control to marked fields on their backs and forearms. Then, APT was performed (200 index of reactivity/g extracts in petrolatum; Stallergènes, France) on both fields on the back and SPT was performed on the pretreated forearms.

RESULTS

Including only patients with different readings (n = 13), stronger APT suppression of at least 1 ETFAD (European Task Force on Atopic Dermatitis) grade in the pimecrolimus area versus intraindividual control was observed in 10 of these patients after 48 and 72 h (p < 0.05; 90% CI 50.5-93.4). Including all 20 subjects, the analysis still showed a borderline significance compared with the vehicle (p = 0.0564). SPT with histamine and aeroallergens showed a median 7.5-10% reduction in actively pretreated areas (p = 0.086). Immunohistochemical analysis in 2 patients revealed an induction of interferon-gamma in primecrolimus-pretreated skin.

CONCLUSION

APT can be used as a model for AE skin inflammation. It was shown for the first time that pimecrolimus pretreatment has a potential to suppress the development of lesions induced by aeroallergen exposure in patients with AE.

Onset of pruritus relief with pimecrolimus cream 1% in adult patients with atopic dermatitis: a randomized trial

BACKGROUND

Pimecrolimus cream 1% (Elidel, Novartis Pharmaceuticals AG) effectively improves/relieves pruritus associated with atopic dermatitis (AD), but few data are available regarding the timing of relief. The purpose of this study was to investigate the timing of pruritus relief produced with pimecrolimus in adults with mild/moderate AD and moderate/severe pruritus.

METHODS

Patients were randomized to 7 days of treatment with pimecrolimus (n = 100) or vehicle (n = 98). Pruritus severity was assessed daily on a 4-point scale (0 = absent, 3 = severe), reflecting the previous 24 h experience. Patients who completed this core study were eligible to enter a voluntary 5-week, open-label extension study.

RESULTS

A significant effect was noted within 48 h of treatment, with pruritus improving in 56% of pimecrolimus-treated patients and 34% of vehicle-treated patients (P = 0.003). Pruritus relief was maintained during the remainder of the core and extension phases, and was accompanied by an improvement in the Investigator's Global Assessment score.

CONCLUSION

Pimecrolimus cream 1% significantly reduced pruritus within 48 h.

Safety and tolerability of 1% pimecrolimus cream among infants: experience with 1133 patients treated for up to 2 years

Pimecrolimus is a calcineurin inhibitor developed for the topical treatment of atopic dermatitis. During the clinical development of 1% pimecrolimus cream, 1133 patients 3 to 23 months of age with mild to severe atopic dermatitis were treated for up to 2 years. The objective of this review is to discuss the safety and tolerability of 1% pimecrolimus cream among infants, on the basis of the combined results from all studies (4 pharmacokinetic studies and 6 clinical trials) conducted among these patients. Pimecrolimus blood concentrations measured for 35 patients were consistently low (< or =1 ng/mL in >80% of samples), irrespective of the disease severity and extent, and remained low during intermittent treatment for up to 1 year. The level of systemic exposure to pimecrolimus among infants was comparable to that observed for older pediatric patients enrolled in the same studies and treated in the same way with 1% pimecrolimus cream, which indicated that young pediatric patients are not at higher risk of significant percutaneous absorption of topically applied pimecrolimus, despite their large skin surface area/body mass ratio. The 6 clinical trials included a total of 1098 infants, who were treated for periods ranging from 4 weeks to 2 years. Most of these patients (60%) had moderate to severe disease at baseline. The most frequently reported adverse events were common childhood disorders such as nasopharyngitis, pyrexia, upper respiratory tract infections, ear infections, and bronchitis. During the double-blind (DB) studies or DB phases of studies, the incidence rates for the most frequently reported adverse events were similar for patients who received 1% pimecrolimus cream and patients who received the vehicle, except for the incidence of teething, which was higher among the pimecrolimus-treated infants (relative risk: 2.02; 95% confidence interval: 1.32-3.27). Treatment with 1% pimecrolimus cream was not associated with an increase in the overall incidence of nonskin infections, compared with the vehicle (relative risk: 1.015; 95% confidence interval: 0.88-1.18). The incidence density (ID) rates for total bacterial, fungal, parasitic, and viral skin infections during the DB studies or DB phases of studies were comparable for patients treated with 1% pimecrolimus cream and patients who received the vehicle. The ID rate of herpes simplex virus infections was 0.8 cases per 1000 patient-months of follow-up monitoring among patients treated with 1% pimecrolimus cream and 1.7 cases per 1000 patient-months of follow-up monitoring among patients who received the vehicle. Considering all 1098 infants treated with 1% pimecrolimus cream in DB trials and open-label studies, the ID rate of clinically diagnosed eczema herpeticum was 1.3 cases per 1000 patient-months of follow-up monitoring. Burning and erythema were the most frequently reported application site reactions, with ID rates of 2.0 and 1.2 cases per 1000 patient-months of follow-up monitoring, respectively. No sign of immunosuppression was found among infants treated intermittently with 1% pimecrolimus cream for up to 2 years; they demonstrated normal immune responses to vaccinations and did not show increases in the incidence of systemic infections or skin infections over time.

Pharmacological targeting of catalyzed protein folding: the example of peptide bond cis/trans isomerases

Peptide bond isomerases are involved in important physiological processes that can be targeted in order to treat neurodegenerative disease, cancer, diseases of the immune system, allergies, and many others. The folding helper enzyme class of Peptidyl-Prolyl-cis/trans Isomerases (PPIases) contains the three enzyme families of cyclophilins (Cyps), FK506 binding proteins (FKBPs), and parvulins (Pars). Although they are structurally unrelated, all PPIases catalyze the cis/trans isomerization of the peptide bond preceding the proline in a polypeptide chain. This process not only plays an important role in de novo protein folding, but also in isomerization of native proteins. The native state isomerization plays a role in physiological processes by influencing receptor ligand recognition or isomer-specific enzyme reaction or by regulating protein function by catalyzing the switch between native isomers differing in their activity, e.g., ion channel regulation. Therefore elucidating PPIase involvement in physiological processes and development of specific inhibitors will be a suitable attempt to design therapies for fatal and deadly diseases.

Treatment of infants with atopic eczema with pimecrolimus cream 1% improves parents' quality of life: a multicenter, randomized trial

Atopic eczema begins primarily in infancy or early childhood, and sleep loss due to night-time pruritus can have a considerable impact on patients' and parents' quality of life (QoL). In this study, infants (n = 196) with mild to severe atopic eczema were randomized 2:1, double-blind, to receive either pimecrolimus cream 1% (Elidel, Novartis Pharma, Nürnberg, Germany) or the corresponding vehicle bid for 4 wk, followed by a 12 wk, open-label phase and a 4 wk, treatment-free, follow-up period. The parents' QoL was measured at baseline and at the end of the double-blind phase, using the questionnaire 'QoL in Parents of Children with Atopic Dermatitis' (PQoL-AD), thus data presented here refer to the initial 4-wk treatment phase only. After 4 wk of double-blind treatment, an increase in the mean percentage change from baseline in eczema area and severity index of 71.5% was observed with pimecrolimus, compared with 19.4% with vehicle. The increase in efficacy was paralleled by the following mean percentage changes from baseline in the five domains of the questionnaire in pimecrolimus and vehicle, respectively: psychosomatic well-being: 14.6% vs. 6.2%; effects on social life: 6.7% vs. 2.3%; confidence in medical treatment: 10.0% vs. 3.7%; emotional coping: 16.1% vs. 6.5%; acceptance of disease: 19.6% vs. 7.0%. Analysis (ancova) of the dependent variable difference from baseline and the covariate baseline value revealed values of p < 0.05 for all five domains, despite the very short duration of the study. It is concluded that improvements in atopic eczema in infants achieved by treatment with pimecrolimus have a significant beneficial effect on the QoL of parents.

Efficacy and tolerability of three different doses of oral pimecrolimus in the treatment of moderate to severe atopic dermatitis: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Adult atopic dermatitis (AD) can seriously affect quality of life of patients and their families, and patients' disease is frequently not satisfactorily controlled with topical therapy. There is a need for alternatives to topical treatment in patients with moderate to severe AD.

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the efficacy and safety of oral pimecrolimus, and to determine the response to three different doses in the treatment of AD.

METHODS

In a double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, dose-finding study, patients with moderate to severe AD were randomized to receive either placebo, or oral pimecrolimus 10, 20 or 30 mg twice daily. The study consisted of a pretreatment phase, a 12-week double-blind treatment phase, and a 12-week post-treatment phase.

RESULTS

In total, 103 patients were randomized. A clear, dose-dependent therapeutic effect of pimecrolimus treatment was observed, with a statistically significant onset of efficacy at week 2 and the greatest reduction from baseline of the Eczema Area and Severity Index of 66.6% at week 7 in the 30 mg twice daily dose group. Oral pimecrolimus was well tolerated and there were no signs of nephrotoxicity or the induction of hypertension.

CONCLUSIONS

These data demonstrate the clinically relevant efficacy and short-term safety of oral pimecrolimus in adults with moderate to severe AD. Longer-term studies in larger cohorts are now required.

Pimecrolimus for the treatment of inflammatory skin disease

Pimecrolimus (SDZ ASM 981, Elidel ) is an ascomycin macrolactam derivative and a cell-selective inhibitor of inflammatory cytokines specifically developed to treat inflammatory skin diseases. Pimecrolimus combines high anti-inflammatory activity in the skin with a low potential to impair systemic immune reactions. Multi-centre studies have proved the efficacy and safety of pimecrolimus cream in patients with atopic dermatitis (AD) and confirmed that it is suitable for short-term treatment and long-term management of AD in adults, children and infants as young as 3 months. Topical application in humans is not associated with the atrophogenic side effects observed with corticosteroids. Pimecrolimus blood levels remained consistently low after repeated topical application and no clinically relevant drug-related systemic adverse events have been reported among the 8000 patients treated in clinical trials so far. Short-term, Phase I/II and Phase II trials of pimecrolimus administered orally in psoriasis and AD have shown that this drug is highly effective in a dose-dependent manner in patients with these diseases and has high safety profile. This finding is confirmed by pharmacogenomic blood analysis. Available data thus indicates that pimecrolimus, in both the cream and oral formulations, may represent a new option for the treatment of inflammatory skin diseases.

Pimecrolimus - an anti-inflammatory drug targeting the skin

Pimecrolimus is the most recent member of calcineurin inhibitors available for the therapy for inflammatory skin diseases. It targets T-cells and mast cells and inhibits the production and release of cytokines and other inflammatory mediators, as well as the expression of signals essential for the activation of inflammatory T-lymphocytes. Pimecrolimus has a cell-selective mode of action. In contrast to corticosteroids, it does not affect, e.g., Langerhans'cells/dendritic cells (LC/DC), as demonstrated in vitro with human monocyte-derived DC and in vivo with epidermal LC in mice, nor human primary fibroblasts. As shown in vitro with human skin and by comparison of clinical pharmacokinetic data from patients with atopic dermatitis, pimecrolimus permeates less through skin than tacrolimus and much less than corticosteroids. It, thus, has a lower potential for transcutaneous resorption after topical administration, resulting in a lower risk of systemic effects. Pimecrolimus has high anti-inflammatory activity in animal models of skin inflammation, including a model reflecting neurogenic inflammation, but a more favourable balance of anti-inflammatory vs. immunosuppressive activity than tacrolimus. Pimecrolimus does not affect sensitization in a murine model of allergic contact dermatitis and has a lower potency in various models of immunosuppression after systemic administration, compared to tacrolimus. In conclusion, the results of preclinical studies show that pimecrolimus has a selective pharmacological profile, suited for effective and safe treatment for inflammatory skin diseases.

Current concepts and review of pimecrolimus in the treatment of psoriasis

The ascomycine macrolactam derivative pimecrolimus has a gene profile of broad anti-inflammatory activity without evidence of toxicity. It exhibits excellent clinical tolerability after 4 weeks and 12 weeks, respectively, of oral treatment, and it is highly effective in a concentration-dependent manner in patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis. Although not yet approved, oral pimecrolimus promises to be a novel, highly effective, and well-tolerated drug in the systemic treatment of psoriasis and other T-cell-mediated skin diseases.

Long-term efficacy and safety of pimecrolimus cream 1% in adults with moderate atopic dermatitis

BACKGROUND

Pimecrolimus cream 1% is a non-steroid, selective inflammatory cytokine inhibitor indicated for atopic dermatitis (AD).

OBJECTIVE

To compare the safety and efficacy of pimecrolimus cream 1%-based treatment versus conventional therapy in adults with moderate AD.

METHODS

Patients were randomized to receive pimecrolimus cream 1% (n = 62) or vehicle (n = 68) at the first signs/symptoms of AD, for 24 weeks as required. A moderately potent topical corticosteroid (prednicarbate 0.25% cream) was allowed in both groups to treat flares.

RESULTS

Corticosteroids were required on fewer days in the pimecrolimus group, compared with the vehicle group (9.7 vs. 37.8%, p < 0.001). Furthermore, 59.7% of pimecrolimus-treated patients experienced no flares during the study period, compared with 22.1% of vehicle-treated patients (p < 0.001). Pimecrolimus cream 1% was well tolerated throughout the study.

CONCLUSION

For adults with moderate AD, pimecrolimus cream 1% is well tolerated, reduces the incidence of flares, reduces/eliminates corticosteroid use, improves long-term disease control and enhances the patients' quality of life.

Pimecrolimus 1% cream for cutaneous lupus erythematosus

Topical treatment of cutaneous lupus erythematosus usually includes potent glucocorticosteroids. However, prolonged use causes adverse side effects including skin atrophy as the foremost concern. In contrast to glucocorticosteroids, the anti-inflammatory and immunosuppressive macrolactam pimecrolimus has no atrophogenic potential. Affected areas of 11 patients with different forms of lupus erythematosus were treated with pimecrolimus 1% cream under semiocclusive conditions twice daily for 3 weeks. Skin involvement before and after therapy was assessed by means of a clinical score. In all patients, significant regression of skin lesions was observed after therapy (P <.001). This was an open and uncontrolled study on a limited number of cases. We suggest that pimecrolimus 1% cream could be an efficacious and safe treatment option for cutaneous lupus erythematosus.

Immunohistochemical study of serotonin in lesions of psoriasis

OBJECTIVE

To study the role of serotonin in the pathogenesis of psoriasis.

METHODS

Immunohistochemical techniques were used to study the expression of serotonin in the lesions of patients with psoriasis.

RESULTS

Expression of serotonin was significantly stronger in the prickle cells, sweat gland cells, sebaceous gland cells, and hair roots of the lesions in the progressive stage of psoriasis than in the static stage. There was no difference in serotonin expression between the vulgaris type and the pustular type. No expression of serotonin occurred in the specimens of normal skin.

CONCLUSION

Serotonin probably plays an important role in the pathogenesis and activity of psoriasis.

Recent Advances in Treatment Strategies for Atopic Dermatitis

A wide range of different therapeutic regimens are used for atopic dermatitis. Although many treatment modalities are well established worldwide among clinicians, only the minority of these therapy recommendations are based on results of randomised controlled trials (RCTs). To close the gap between such 'generally' recommended therapies and therapies that are based on data from controlled trials, this review focuses not only on the pharmacological and clinical aspects of the currently proven agents, but also on the advantages and disadvantages of therapies that have not yet been completely tested.A review of the available literature concerning the pharmacological profile and also the level of evidence of therapeutic efficacy of all currently known topical and systemic agents for the treatment of atopic dermatitis reveals a large gap between the knowledge concerning the pharmacological action in vitro and the evidence of clinical efficacy in many cases. We agree with the conclusion of previous reviews that numerous therapies for atopic dermatitis urgently require more independent RCTs and especially comparative trials (e.g. corticosteroids vs calcineurin inhibitors). These are required in order to facilitate the choice of therapeutic strategy for the individual treatment of atopic dermatitis, with its broad spectrum of clinical manifestations and potential complications in adult patients and, particularly, in children.Finally, we also review preclinical trials with several new drugs. Immunomodulators appear to promise a new dimension for the future of therapy for atopic dermatitis, especially for severe and otherwise refractory forms or as alternatives to corticosteroids, that is, to treat facial atopic eczema without the risk of adverse effects.

Pimecrolimus: a review of its use in atopic dermatitis

Pimecrolimus (Elidel) is a topically active, nonsteroid, calcineurin inhibitor that has shown efficacy in controlling symptoms of atopic dermatitis in adult and pediatric patients. Topical pimecrolimus 1% cream is approved in the US for the short-term and intermittent long-term treatment of mild-to-moderate atopic dermatitis in non-immunocompromised patients aged >/=2 years who do not respond well to, or may have adverse effects with, conventional treatments. Pimecrolimus 1% cream is an effective and well tolerated treatment for atopic dermatitis in infants, children, adolescents, and adults. Pimecrolimus is effective at reducing the incidence of disease flares and, thus, the need for rescue treatment with topical corticosteroids. The drug also improves the health-related quality of life (HR-QOL) of children and adolescents, and improves the QOL of parents of children with atopic dermatitis. Furthermore, pimecrolimus does not cause skin atrophy, a problem commonly associated with topical corticosteroids, and is not associated with clinically relevant systemic adverse events. Thus, topical pimecrolimus 1% cream is an effective treatment option for the management of mild-to-moderate atopic dermatitis.

Investigational therapies for psoriasis

As the pathogenesis of psoriasis is better understood, specific targeted therapies are being developed. In addition to alefacept, etanercept, efaluzimab, and infliximab, discussed in separate articles in this issue, numerous other investigational therapies are currently in clinical trials, some of which will likely be approved in the future. We review the most promising of these therapies and their mechanisms of action.

Effects of immunomodulators on airways hyperresponsiveness to adenosine induced in actively sensitised Brown Norway rats by exposure to allergen

We have recently demonstrated a marked and selective augmentation of the bronchoconstrictor response to adenosine in actively sensitised Brown Norway (BN) rats challenged with ovalbumin (OA). The augmented response is mediated by 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT) released as a consequence of mast cell activation. We describe here the effects of budesonide, a clinically used glucocorticosteroid, IMM125, a hydroxyethyl derivative of D-serine-cyclosporine, MLD987, a close analogue of ascomycin and SAR943, a rapamycin derivative, on the hyperresponsiveness to adenosine induced in actively sensitised BN rats by exposure to allergen. Bronchoconstrictor responses to adenosine elicited 3 h following intratracheal (i.t.) instillation of OA, 0.3 mg kg(-1) were reduced dose-dependently by budesonide, IMM125, and MLD987, given i.t. 25 and 1 h prior to allergen challenge. In contrast, SAR943 had no effect on responses to adenosine. Responses to methacholine and 5-HT were minimally affected by these agents. Bronchoconstrictor responses to bradykinin were dose-dependently reduced by budesonide, but unaffected following IMM125, MLD987 or SAR943 pre-treatment. Challenge with OA at a dose of 0.3 mg kg(-1), induced increases in bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid, leukocyte numbers, eosinophil peroxidase (EPO) and myeloperoxidase (MPO) activities and protein concentration measured 24 h post challenge. Budesonide (1 mg kg(-1) given i.t. 25 and 1 h prior to OA challenge) induced reductions in the BAL fluid parameters of inflammation; IMM125 and MLD987, at a dose of 1 mg kg(-1) had no significant effect whereas SAR943 reduced lymphocyte numbers. Thus, budesonide, IMM125 and MLD987 block the hyperresponsiveness to adenosine induced by allergen challenge in sensitised rats. In the case of budesonide the effect is associated with a powerful, generalised anti-inflammatory effect although an effect directly on the mast cells is also likely. With IMM125 and MLD987, the effect is seen at doses that are not anti-inflammatory and may reflect direct suppression of mast cell activation by these agents.

Forsythia fructus inhibits the mast-cell-mediated allergic inflammatory reactions

Mast cells are key as effector cells in the early phase allergic inflammation and in diverse immunological and pathological processes. Forsythia fructus (F. fructus) has used as a traditional medicine for inflammatory diseases. In the present study, we determined the effect of F. fructus extracts on compound 48/80-induced paw oedema and vascular permeability in vivo. In addition, we investigated in vitro whether F. fructus has inhibitory effects on compound 48/80-induced histamine releases from rat peritoneal mast cells (RPMC), and on phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA) plus A23187-induced tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) releases from human mast cells (HMC-1). In mice orally administrered F. fructus (100 microg/g) for 1 h, compound-48/80-induced oedema and vascular permeability were significantly reduced rather than those receiving intravenous injection of ketotifen, mast cell stabilizer. F. fructus dose-dependently inhibited the histamine release induced by compound 48/80 from RPMCs. Moreover, F. fructus had no cytotoxic effects on cell viability and had inhibitory effects on TNF-alpha secretion from HMC-1. These results suggest that F. fructus is a potential herb medicine for treatment of inflammatory diseases through downmodulating mast cell activation.

Pimecrolimus cream in the long-term management of atopic dermatitis in adults: a six-month study

BACKGROUND

Pimecrolimus cream (Elidel, SDZ ASM 981), a non-steroid inhibitor of inflammatory cytokines, is effective in the treatment of atopic dermatitis (AD). We assessed whether early treatment of AD signs/symptoms reduces the need for topical corticosteroids.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the efficacy and safety of pimecrolimus cream 1% in the long-term management of adult AD.

METHODS

192 adults with moderate to severe AD were randomised (1:1) for twice daily (b.i.d.) treatment of early signs or symptoms of AD with either pimecrolimus cream 1% or vehicle cream (control group) to prevent progression to flares. Treatment was given as needed for 24 weeks. In the event of flares, a moderately potent corticosteroid (prednicarbate 0.25% cream) was permitted as rescue medication in both groups. The percentage of days on which a topical corticosteroid was used to treat disease flares was the main outcome measure.

RESULTS

Corticosteroid medication was used on 14.2% (95% confidence interval, CI: 8.3-21.1) of the days of the 24-week treatment period in the pimecrolimus group and on 37.2% (95% CI: 30.4-44.0) of the days in the control group (p < 0.001). In total, 44.8% (43/96) of patients in the pimecrolimus group did not experience a flare compared with 18.8% (18/96) of patients in the control group. The median time to first flare was 144 days in the pimecrolimus group and 26 days in the control group (p < 0.001). Pimecrolimus treatment was also associated with improvement in signs and symptoms of AD, pruritus, patients' self-assessment and quality of life.

CONCLUSIONS

Pimecrolimus cream 1% b.i.d. is an effective, well-tolerated, long-term treatment for AD in adults, substantially reducing the number of flares compared to a conventional therapy and consequently reducing or eliminating the need for corticosteroid treatment.

[Development and pre-clinical aspects of pimecrolimus]

Pimecrolimus (SDZ ASM 981), an ascomycin derivative, inhibits the phosphatase calcineurin and blocks the production of inflammatory cytokines in T cells. In contrast to corticosteroids, pimecrolimus has a cell selective mode of action, exerting e.g. no effect on dendritic cells, which have a central function in the skin-associated immune system. Pimecrolimus shows less permeation through skin than corticosteroids and tacrolimus which indicates a lower potential for systemic side effects after topical application. In animal models pimecrolimus has a marked dose-dependent anti-inflammatory activity. However, treatment with pimecrolimus does not induce skin atrophy in contrast to corticosteroids. In contrast to tacrolimus, pimecrolimus does not impair the primary immune reaction in the sensitization phase of allergic contact dermatitis and has generally less effect on systemic immune reactions. In summary, the pharmacological profile of pimecrolimus suggests high clinical efficacy together with excellent safety.

Calcineurin antagonists differentially affect mediator secretion, p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase and extracellular signal-regulated kinases from immunologically activated human basophils

BACKGROUND

Basophils participate in allergic diseases by invading affected tissues and secreting histamine, leukotriene (LT)C4, IL-4 and IL-13 following FcepsilonRI cross-linking. A reduction of basophil mediator production is therefore of considerable therapeutical interest. Macrolactam derivatives, which inhibit calcineurin activation, may be candidates for antiallergic therapy as they reduce both symptoms of inflammatory skin disease in animal models and mast cell degranulation.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the effects of the calcineurin antagonists ascomycin and cyclosporin A on IgE-dependent mediator release from human basophils.

METHODS

Basophils were purified by Ficoll density centrifugation, elutriation and negative selection. Histamine release was measured spectrofluorometrically; LTC4, IL-4 and IL-13 secretions were assayed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Lysed cells were subjected to Western blotting using specific antibodies to phospho-p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) and extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK)-1 and -2.

RESULTS

Ascomycin (0.01 nm to 1 micro m) and cyclosporin A (0.1 nm to 10 micro m) strikingly inhibited (maximally 100%) anti-IgE-induced histamine and cytokine release from basophils, and these actions were unaffected by IL-3 priming. Ascomycin, however, was less potent at blocking LTC4 secretion, whereas cyclosporin A was unable to block production of this mediator. In immunoblotting studies, ascomycin and cyclosporin A reduced IgE-dependent p38 MAPK activation but were less potent at reducing ERK phosphorylation in basophils.

CONCLUSION

Calcineurin antagonists like ascomycin and cyclosporin A block IgE-dependent basophil degranulation and cytokine synthesis. Calcineurin may target p38 MAPK activation, but seems to have less activity on ERK phosphorylation. This is paralleled by a reduced or even absent effect of calcineurin antagonists on eicosanoid production.

Safety and efficacy of nonsteroid pimecrolimus cream 1% in the treatment of atopic dermatitis in infants

OBJECTIVE

The safety and efficacy of a 1% cream formulation of pimecrolimus, a selective, nonsteroid immunomodulator, was studied in infants with atopic dermatitis (AD).

METHODS

During a 6-week double-blind phase, 186 infants with mild/moderate AD were randomly assigned to twice-daily pimecrolimus cream 1% or vehicle. All patients were subsequently treated with open-label pimecrolimus for 20 weeks.

RESULTS

At the end of the double-blind phase, 54.5% and 23.8% of patients in the pimecrolimus and vehicle groups, respectively, were clear or almost clear of AD (P <.001). Similar improvements were observed in the Eczema Area and Severity Index, pruritus assessment, and the care giver's assessment. By the first return visit, 69.9% and 36.5% of pimecrolimus and vehicle-treated patients, respectively, achieved absent or mild pruritus. Efficacy during the double-blind phase was maintained throughout the open-label phase. Vehicle-treated patients transferring to open-label pimecrolimus rapidly achieved disease control comparable to those receiving continuous pimecrolimus. There were no significant differences between groups in application site reactions or skin infections. Most adverse events were mild or moderate and unrelated to treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Pimecrolimus was safe in infants with AD, with rapid and sustained efficacy. Pimecrolimus holds promise as a valuable new treatment option for the youngest patients with AD.

Spotlight on topical pimecrolimus in atopic dermatitis

Pimecrolimus (SDZ ASM 981), an ascomycin derivative, is a nonsteroid, has anti-inflammatory activity, and has demonstrated efficacy in reducing symptoms of atopic dermatitis in adult and pediatric patients when applied topically. Compared with vehicle, topical pimecrolimus 1.0% cream was significantly more effective at reducing symptoms of atopic dermatitis, as measured by the Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI), in infants aged 3 to 23 months, children aged 2 to 17 years, and adults. The median reductions from baseline in the total EASI score in adults after treatment with pimecrolimus 1.0% or corresponding vehicle twice daily for 3 weeks were 47 and 0%, respectively. In infants and children, treatment with pimecrolimus 1.0% twice daily for 6 weeks resulted in significant decreases in mean EASI scores compared with vehicle. The severity of pruritus was significantly reduced in patients of all age groups after topical treatment with pimecrolimus 1.0% cream. Compared with vehicle, the incidence of eczematous flares was also reduced by intermittent long-term use of topical pimecrolimus 1.0% in adults, children and infants. Sixty-one percent of children treated with pimecrolimus for 1 year completed the first 6 months of treatment without experiencing a flare, compared with 35% of patients who received vehicle. Furthermore, the use of topical corticosteroids for the treatment of uncontrolled flares in adults, children and infants was lower in the pimecrolimus groups than in the vehicle groups. Topical pimecrolimus 1.0% cream is well tolerated in atopic dermatitis patients of all age groups. There were no clinically relevant systemic adverse events reported from any of the studies in patients with atopic dermatitis. The most frequently reported adverse events pertained to application site reactions, such as burning and a feeling of warmth. In conclusion, topical pimecrolimus 1.0% cream has shown efficacy in the treatment of mild to moderate atopic dermatitis in infants, children and adults. Although tolerability data concerning infants and children have not yet been published in full, the drug appears to be well tolerated in all age groups, and there have been no reports of clinically relevant systemic adverse events. Furthermore, pimecrolimus has shown no potential for skin atrophy, a problem commonly associated with treatment with topical corticosteroids. Topical pimecrolimus 1.0% provides a promising and well tolerated treatment option in the management of infants, children and adults with mild to moderate atopic dermatitis.

Long-term management of atopic dermatitis in infants with topical pimecrolimus, a nonsteroid anti-inflammatory drug

BACKGROUND

Pimecrolimus cream 1% (Elidel, SDZ ASM 981), a nonsteroid selective inhibitor of inflammatory cytokines, is effective in the treatment of atopic dermatitis (AD). In this study we compared early intervention with pimecrolimus cream with treatment with a vehicle control.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this investigation was to assess whether early treatment in infants of AD signs/symptoms with pimecrolimus could influence long-term outcome by preventing disease flares.

METHODS

In this 1-year, double-blind controlled study, 251 infants aged 3 to 23 months with AD were randomized 4:1 to a pimecrolimus-based regimen (n = 204) or a conventional treatment regimen (n = 47). Both groups used emollients for dry skin. Early AD signs and symptoms were treated either with pimecrolimus cream to prevent flares or, in the control group, with vehicle. Vehicle was used to maintain blinding conditions. In the event of flares, moderately potent corticosteroid was permitted in both groups. The primary efficacy end point was the incidence of flares at 6 months.

RESULTS

Pimecrolimus significantly reduced the incidence of flares compared with control treatment (P <.001), with 67.6% versus 30.4% of patients completing 6 months with no flare and 56.9% versus 28.3% completing 12 months with no flare. Overall corticosteroid use was substantially lower in the pimecrolimus group: 63.7% versus 34.8% of patients did not use corticosteroids at all during the study. Pimecrolimus was also more effective than control treatment in the long-term control of pruritus and the signs of AD. There were no clinically significant differences in incidence of adverse events between the 2 treatment groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment with pimecrolimus of early signs and symptoms significantly modified the disease course in infants by reducing the incidence of flares and improving overall control of AD. Pimecrolimus was safe and well tolerated.

Topical pimecrolimus: a review of its clinical potential in the management of atopic dermatitis

Pimecrolimus (SDZ ASM 981), an ascomycin derivative, is a nonsteroid, has anti-inflammatory activity, and has demonstrated efficacy in reducing symptoms of atopic dermatitis in adult and paediatric patients when applied topically. Compared with vehicle, topical pimecrolimus 1.0% cream was significantly more effective at reducing symptoms of atopic dermatitis, as measured by the Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI), in infants aged 3 to 23 months, children aged 2 to 17 years and adults. The median reductions from baseline in the total EASI score in adults after treatment with pimecrolimus 1.0% or corresponding vehicle twice daily for 3 weeks were 47 and 0%, respectively. In infants and children, treatment with pimecrolimus 1.0% twice daily for 6 weeks resulted in significant decreases in mean EASI scores compared with vehicle. The severity of pruritus was significantly reduced in patients of all age groups after topical treatment with pimecrolimus 1.0% cream. Compared with vehicle, the incidence of eczematous flares was also reduced by intermittent long-term use of topical pimecrolimus 1.0% in adults, children and infants. Sixty percent of children treated with pimecrolimus for 1 year completed the first 6 months of treatment without experiencing a flare, compared with 35% of patients who received vehicle. Furthermore, the use of topical corticosteroids for the treatment of uncontrolled flares in adults, children and infants was lower in the pimecrolimus groups than in the vehicle groups. Topical pimecrolimus 1.0% cream is well tolerated in atopic dermatitis patients of all age groups. There were no clinically relevant systemic adverse events reported from any of the studies in patients with atopic dermatitis. The most frequently reported adverse events pertained to application site reactions, such as burning and a feeling of warmth. In conclusion, topical pimecrolimus 1.0% cream has shown efficacy in the treatment of mild to moderate atopic dermatitis in infants, children and adults. Although tolerability data concerning infants and children have not yet been published in full, the drug appears to be well tolerated in all age groups, and there have been no reports of clinically relevant systemic adverse events. Furthermore, pimecrolimus 1.0% cream has shown no potential for skin atrophy, a problem commonly associated with treatment with topical corticosteroids. Pimecrolimus 1.0% cream provides a promising and well tolerated treatment option in the management of infants, children and adults with mild to moderate atopic dermatitis.

Pimecrolimus (Elidel, SDZ ASM 981)--preclinical pharmacologic profile and skin selectivity

The ascomycin macrolactam derivative pimecrolimus (Elidel, SDZ ASM 981; Novartis Pharma AG, Basel Switzerland) is a cell-selective inhibitor of inflammatory cytokines specifically developed for the treatment of inflammatory skin diseases, such as atopic dermatitis, allergic contact dermatitis, irritant contact dermatitis, and plaque-type psoriasis. It inhibits the production of inflammatory cytokines in T cells and mast cells and prevents the release of preformed inflammatory mediators from mast cells. Topically administered pimecrolimus is as effective as the high-potency corticosteroid clobetasol-17-propionate in a pig model of allergic contact dermatitis (ACD). Unlike clobetasol, however, it does not cause skin atrophy. Given orally, pimecrolimus is as potent or superior to tacrolimus (FK 506) in treating ACD in mice and rats. Pimecrolimus also effectively reduces skin inflammation and pruritus in hypomagnesemic hairless rats, a model that mimics acute signs of atopic dermatitis. Pimecrolimus shows only a low potential to impair systemic immune responses when compared with tacrolimus as shown in rats in (1) the localized graft-versus-host reaction, (2) the antibody formation to sheep red blood cells, and (3) kidney transplantation. Pimecrolimus permeates through pig skin in vitro at a 10-times lower rate than tacrolimus, indicating a lower potential for percutaneous absorption in vivo. The data suggest that pimecrolimus combines high anti-inflammatory activity in the skin with a low potential to impair systemic immune reactions.

The ascomycin macrolactam pimecrolimus (Elidel, SDZ ASM 981) is a potent inhibitor of mediator release from human dermal mast cells and peripheral blood basophils

BACKGROUND

The ascomycin macrolactam pimecrolimus (Elidel, SDZ ASM 981) has recently been developed as a novel and cell-selective inhibitor of inflammatory cytokine secretion; it has fewer adverse effects than currently available drugs.

OBJECTIVE

In this study, we investigated the capacity of pimecrolimus to directly inhibit in vitro mediator release from human skin mast cells and basophils.

METHODS

Purified cutaneous mast cells or basophil-containing peripheral blood leukocytes were obtained from healthy human donors and preincubated with pimecrolimus (0.1 nmol/L to 1 micromol/L) in the absence or presence of its specific antagonist (rapamycin), cyclosporin A (100 nmol/L to 1 micromol/L), or dexamethasone (1 micromol/L) and then stimulated with anti-IgE or with calcium ionophore A23187 plus phorbol myristate acetate. Cell supernatants were kept for analysis of histamine, tryptase, LTC4, and TNF-alpha.

RESULTS

Pimecrolimus caused a strong and dose-dependent inhibition of anti-IgE--induced release of histamine from mast cells and basophils (maximally 73% and 82%, respectively, at 500 nmol/L pimecrolimus) and of mast cell tryptase (maximally 75%) and a less pronounced inhibition of LTC4 (maximally 32%) and of calcium ionophore plus phorbol myristate acetate--induced mast cell TNF-alpha release (90% maximum at 100 nmol/L pimecrolimus). In contrast, inhibition achieved during mast cell histamine release was maximally 60% with cyclosporin A and only 28% with dexamethasone.

CONCLUSION

These data demonstrate a marked inhibitory capacity of pimecrolimus on mediator release from human mast cells and basophils with a potency exceeding that of cyclosporin A and dexamethasone. Pimecrolimus might thus be expected to be effective in the treatment of mast cell-- and basophil-dependent diseases.