Large (>3.8 cm) clear cell renal cell carcinomas are morphologically and immunohistochemically heterogeneous

To characterize small renal cell carcinoma using diffusion relaxation correlation spectroscopic imaging and apparent diffusion coefficient based histogram analysis: a preliminary study

PURPOSE

To study the capability of diffusion-relaxation correlation spectroscopic imaging (DR-CSI) on subtype classification and grade differentiation for small renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Histogram analysis for apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) was studied for comparison.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 61 patients with small RCC (< 4 cm) were included in the retrospective study. MRI data were reviewed, including a multi-b (0-1500 s/mm2) multi-TE (51-200 ms) diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) sequence. Region of interest (ROI) was delineated manually on DWI to include solid tumor. For each patient, a D-T2 spectrum was fitted and segmented into 5 compartments, and the volume fractions VA, VB, VC, VD, VE were obtained. ADC mapping was calculated, and histogram parameters ADC 90th, 10th, median, standard deviation, skewness and kurtosis were obtained. All MRI metrices were compared between clear cell RCC (ccRCC) and non-ccRCC group, and between high-grade and low-grade group. Receiver operator curve analysis was used to assess the corresponding diagnostic performance.

RESULTS

Significantly higher ADC 90th, ADC 10th and ADC median, and significantly lower DR-CSI VB was found for ccRCC compared to non-ccRCC. Significantly lower ADC 90th, ADC median and significantly higher VB was found for high-grade RCC compared to low-grade. For identifying ccRCC from non-ccRCC, VB showed the highest area under curve (AUC, 0.861) and specificity (0.882). For differentiating high- from low-grade, ADC 90th showed the highest AUC (0.726) and specificity (0.786), while VB also displayed a moderate AUC (0.715).

CONCLUSION

DR-CSI may offer improved accuracy in subtype identification for small RCC, while do not show better performance for small RCC grading compared to ADC histogram.

Clinicopathological and Molecular Characteristics of Macroscopically Yellowish-Colored Chromophobe Renal Cell Carcinoma Compared to Non-Yellowish-Colored Chromophobe Renal Cell Carcinoma

Each histological variant of renal cell tumors has a unique color. The yellowish color of clear cell renal cell carcinoma (CCRCC) is explained by the presence of intracytoplasmic lipid and glycogen accumulation. Color changes in CCRCC are correlated with clinicopathological and metabolic changes, as well as biological behavior. We analyzed and compared the clinical, histopathological, and immunohistochemical features and gene expression profiles, in lipid metabolism of yellowish-colored ChRCC (ChRCC-Y), non-yellowish-colored ChRCC (ChRCC-N), and CCRCC. Of 14 ChRCCs, we retrieved 6 ChRCC-Ys. Patients with ChRCC-Y are younger than those with ChRCC-N, and the tumor is not predominant in males. ChRCC-Ys are smaller than ChRRC-Ns. Three ChRCC-Ys exhibited individual discrete tubule formation. No ChRCC-Ns exhibited individual discrete tubule formation. Two of 6 ChRCC-Ys showed relatively diffuse adipophilin positivity. No ChRCC-Ns demonstrated diffuse positivity for adipophilin. The expression of SCD, FDFT1, and E2F1 showed a tendency to be lower in ChRCC-Y than in ChRCC-N. The expression of PDGFB showed a tendency to be higher in ChRCC-Y than in ChRCC-N. This study demonstrated ChRCC-Y did not indicate an increase in lipid and cholesterol metabolism and that ChRCC-Y did not have the common molecular alteration of CCRCC. The absence of such metabolic acceleration in ChRCC-Y might support the biological indolent behavior. Furthermore, we revealed that macroscopic color changes might be correlated with various clinicopathological features and immunohistochemical and molecular changes from different perspectives. We believe further characterization of RCC, including tumor heterogeneity, is needed to improve the management of patients with RCC.

The highest Fuhrman and WHO/ISUP grade influences the Ki-67 labeling index of those of grades 1 and 2 in clear cell renal cell carcinoma

Nuclear grade is one of the most important prognostic factors in clear cell renal cell carcinoma (CCRCC). Although CCRCCs usually have intratumoral heterogeneity with various nuclear atypia including nucleolar prominence, it is unclear whether a similar degree of nuclear grade component demonstrates the same proliferative activity. We aimed to reveal whether the presence of a higher nuclear grade has an effect on proliferative activity among each assigned nuclear grade in CCRCCs. We enrolled 129 CCRCC patients containing at least two different nuclear grades. We separately assessed nuclear grade using the Fuhrman and World Health Organization and International Society of Urologic Pathologists (WHO/ISUP) grading systems. In addition, we selected blocks containing different nuclear grade and assessed the Ki-67 labeling index (LI) for each using a computer-based analysis system. Ki-67 LIs significantly correlated with both Fuhrman and WHO/ISUP grades (P < 0.001 and P < 0.001). Of note, the LIs among Fuhrman and WHO/ISUP grades 1 and 2 were also statistically significant according to the highest nuclear grade (P < 0.01 for both grades 1 and 2). Our data suggests that the highest nuclear grade influences the proliferative activity in tumor components regardless of the morphologically assigned nuclear grades. The exact evaluation of Ki-67 LI in CCRCC can provide a more precise information of the malignant potential.

HIF-1α and HIF-2α differently regulate tumour development and inflammation of clear cell renal cell carcinoma in mice

Mutational inactivation of VHL is the earliest genetic event in the majority of clear cell renal cell carcinomas (ccRCC), leading to accumulation of the HIF-1α and HIF-2α transcription factors. While correlative studies of human ccRCC and functional studies using human ccRCC cell lines have implicated HIF-1α as an inhibitor and HIF-2α as a promoter of aggressive tumour behaviours, their roles in tumour onset have not been functionally addressed. Herein we show using an autochthonous ccRCC model that Hif1a is essential for tumour formation whereas Hif2a deletion has only minor effects on tumour initiation and growth. Both HIF-1α and HIF-2α are required for the clear cell phenotype. Transcriptomic and proteomic analyses reveal that HIF-1α regulates glycolysis while HIF-2α regulates genes associated with lipoprotein metabolism, ribosome biogenesis and E2F and MYC transcriptional activities. HIF-2α-deficient tumours are characterised by increased antigen presentation, interferon signalling and CD8⁺ T cell infiltration and activation. Single copy loss of HIF1A or high levels of HIF2A mRNA expression correlate with altered immune microenvironments in human ccRCC. These studies reveal an oncogenic role of HIF-1α in ccRCC initiation and suggest that alterations in the balance of HIF-1α and HIF-2α activities can affect different aspects of ccRCC biology and disease aggressiveness.

PRMT1 expression in renal cell tumors- application in differential diagnosis and prognostic relevance

BACKGROUND

Protein arginine methyltransferase-1 (PRMT1) is associated with the progression of various tumor types and the process of epithelial to mesenchymal transition (EMT). However, the expression of PRMT1 in renal cell tumors (RCT) is unknown.

METHODS

We evaluated PRMT1 immunohistochemical (IHC) expression on tissue microarray (TMA) of 208 specimens of RCT, including clear cell renal cell carcinomas (ccRCC), papillary RCC type I and II (pRCC I and II), chromophobe RCC (chRCC), renal oncocytomas (RO), collecting duct carcinomas - Bellini (CDC) and multilocular cystic renal cell neoplasms of low malignant potential (MLCRN-LMP). Moreover, a subset of ccRCC, pRCC, chRCC, RO were also studied using conventional sections. PRMT1 expression in tumor tissue was compared to the IHC expression of EMT-related transcription factors (ZEB1, RUNX1, and TWIST1) and cell surface markers (ß-catenin, N- and E-cadherin). Additionally, qRT-PCR expression of PRMT1 in ccRCC, pRCC, and chRCC was evaluated and the results were compared to the mRNA PRMT1 transcript profiling data in The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and Genotype-Tissue Expression (GTEx) cohort.

RESULTS

PRMT1 immunoreactivity was observed in the majority of ccRCC, RO, all MLCRN-LMP, but in a minority of chRCC (p = 0.044), and it was associated with low grade and low stage ccRCC (p = 0.014; p = 0.044, respectively). ZEB1 immunoreactivity was noted in all RO, in minority of chRCC and neither of MLCRN-LMP (p < 0.001). The majority of PRMT1-negative ccRCC was negative to ZEB1 and showed cytoplasmic expression of TWIST1 (p = 0.028; p < 0.001, respectively). PRMT1 positive ccRCC mostly expressed RUNX1 (p = 0.019). PRMT1 and ZEB1 expression were associated with better cancer-specific survival in patients with ccRCC (p = 0.029; p = 0.009, respectively). In multivariate analysis, ZEB1 expression was an independent prognostic factor for cancer-specific survival (hazard ratio [HR], 0.367; p = 0.026). Significant IHC heterogeneity was observed in PRMT1, ZEB1 and TWIST1 expression (p < 0.001). Homogenous loss of PRMT1 was associated with high grade and high stage ccRCC, while the homogenous loss of PRMT1 and ZEB1 was more frequent in patients who died of ccRCC (p = 0.017; p = 0.040; p = 0.044; p = 0.009, respectively). Relative mRNA-PRMT1 expression in both cohorts was down-regulated in tumor tissue compared to non-tumor parenchyma (p = 0.009). Unlike in our samples, mRNA-PRMT1 expression in the TCGA cohort was not correlated to ccRCC tumor stage or grade. PRMT1, ZEB1, and TWIST1 expression were not associated with EMT related aberrant ß-catenin expression, a gain of N-cadherin or loss of E-cadherin expression. Only RUNX1 was associated with a gain of N-cadherin (p = 0.003).

CONCLUSIONS

IHC expression of PRMT1 may be characteristic for low grade and low stage ccRCC, while the homogenous loss of PRMT1 may be significant for high grade and high stage ccRCC. Both, PRMT1 and/or ZEB1 expression, could be associated with better survival of the patients with ccRCC.

Potential impact of PD-L1 (SP-142) immunohistochemical heterogeneity in clear cell renal cell carcinoma immunotherapy

Intratumor heterogeneity (ITH) detection remains a challenge in modern oncology because it can have a direct impact on the success of new therapies. Anti-PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapy is an emerging treatment modality that is showing great promise for clear cell renal cell carcinoma (CCRCC) patients with advanced disease. Patient selection for such therapy relies upon the immunohistochemical detection of PD-1/PD-L1, however the degree of ITH for these markers among tumor cells and/or inflammatory mononuclear infiltrates remains unknown. Therefore, we analyzed PD-L1 (SP-142) expression in the tumor inflammatory cells of 22 CCRCC cases with the aim to define the pattern of PD-L1 expression, and to compare the reliability of current tumor sampling protocols (RS) with a multisite tumor sampling strategy (MSTS). While the RS protocol identified 5/22 (22.7%) of cases that were positive for PD-L1 expression, MSTS identified 10/22 (45.45%) of cases. This suggests that RS may miss a proportion of CCRCC patients that might benefit from immunotherapy. In addition, MSTS demonstrated that positive and negative regions of PD-L1 expression are very variable within each tumor.

High levels of intratumor heterogeneity characterize the expression of epithelial-mesenchymal transition markers in high-grade clear cell renal cell carcinoma

Immunohistochemistry is a basic routine in establishing the diagnosis of many tumors. However, immunomarkers are often irregularly distributed across different regions of the same tumor, alternating positive and negative areas without any apparent cause. Full identification of this type of intratumor heterogeneity is crucial for patients since the expression of many markers is linked to the prognosis and/or treatment of some tumors. We have quantified this variability testing 406 tumor samples from eight clear cell renal cell carcinomas using four epithelial-mesenchymal transition markers (vimentin, ZEB-1, β-catenin, and E-cadherin) and two different sampling protocols. Routine sampling included an amount of 59 samples (average, 7.3 samples/case) and multisite tumor sampling did a total of 347 samples (average, 43.3 samples/case). High variability of immunostaining was detected with E-cadherin and ZEB-1 in all high-grade cases. Irregular patterns of expression were detected in all tumors including all histologically homogeneous low-grade tumors. Multisite tumor sampling protocol detected a significant decreased number of E-cadherin, β-catenin and ZEB-1 positive samples in high-grade tumors. We conclude that high levels of intratumor heterogeneity characterize the immunohistochemical expression of epithelial-mesenchymal transition markers in high-grade clear cell renal cell carcinomas. Multisite tumor sampling protocol outperforms routine sampling in detecting immunohistochemical intratumor heterogeneity.

Pathological Bases and Clinical Impact of Intratumor Heterogeneity in Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Intratumor heterogeneity is an inherent event in tumor development that is receiving much attention in the last years since it is responsible for most failures of current targeted therapies. The purpose of this review is to offer clinicians an updated insight of the multiple manifestations of a complex event that impacts significantly patient's life.

RECENT FINDINGS

Clear cell renal cell carcinoma is the most common renal tumor and a paradigmatic example of a heterogeneous neoplasm. Next-generation sequencing has demonstrated that intratumor heterogeneity encompasses genetic, epigenetic, and microenvironmental variability. Currently accepted protocols of tumor sampling seem insufficient in unveiling intratumor heterogeneity with reliability and need to be updated. This variability challenges the precise morphological diagnosis, its molecular characterization, and the selection of optimal personalized therapies in clear cell renal cell carcinoma, a neoplasm traditionally considered chemo- and radio-resistant. We review the state of the art of the different approaches to intratumor heterogeneity in clear cell renal cell carcinomas, from the simple morphology to the most sophisticated massive sequencing tools.

Biobanking of Fresh-Frozen Cancer Tissue: RNA Is Stable Independent of Tissue Type with Less Than 1 Hour of Cold Ischemia

BACKGROUND

The effects of preanalytical variables in tissue processing and storage periods on RNA quality of tissues have been well documented in each type of cancer. However, few studies have been performed on a comparative assessment of the impacts across different cancer tissues, even though it is well known that RNase activity is highly variable in various tissue types and RNase-rich tissues have been found to yield low-quality RNA.

METHODS

We investigated the impacts of cold ischemia times and long-term storage on RNA integrity in various types of cancer tissue, which had been fresh-frozen and collected at the Samsung Medical Center Biobank. RNA quality was also evaluated with regard to histopathological variables. We analyzed RNA integrity number (RIN) data, which had been obtained from our quality control (QC) processes over the last 7 years. Approximately 2% of samples were randomly selected and processed to measure RIN quarterly and after 6 years of storage for QC purposes.

RESULTS

Fresh-frozen tumor tissues yielded high-quality RNA regardless of tumor type and histopathological features. Up to 1-hour cold ischemia times and up to 6-year storage times did not adversely influence RNA integrity. Only 3 samples showed RIN of <7 out of a total of 396 analyzed tumor tissues.

CONCLUSIONS

Tissue quality was not adversely affected by long-term storage or limited variations of cold ischemia times. The low-quality samples could be correlated with the structural composition or intratumoral heterogeneity of tissues. The strict application of standardized protocols for tissue collection is the key for high-quality biobanking.

Heterogeneity in renal cell carcinoma

INTRODUCTION

In recent years, molecular characterization of renal cell carcinoma has facilitated the identification of driver genes, specific molecular pathways, and characterization of the tumor microenvironment, which has led to a better understanding of the disease. This comprehension has revolutionized the treatment for patients with metastatic disease, but despite these advancements many patients will develop resistance leading to treatment failure. A primary cause of this resistance and subsequent treatment failure is tumor heterogeneity. We reviewed the literature on the mechanisms of tumor heterogeneity and its clinical implications.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was performed using the MEDLINE/PubMed Index.

RESULTS

Intertumor and intratumor heterogeneity is possibly a reason for treatment failure and development of resistance. Specifically, the genetic profile of a renal tumor differs spatially within a tumor as well as among patients. Genomic mutations can change temporally with resistant subclones becoming dominant over time.

CONCLUSIONS

Accounting for intratumor and intertumor heterogeneity with better sampling of cancer tissue is needed. This will hopefully lead to improved identification of driver mutations and actionable targets. Only then, we can move past the one-size-fits-all approach toward personalized treatment based on each individual׳s molecular profile.

A divide-and-conquer strategy in tumor sampling enhances detection of intratumor heterogeneity in routine pathology: A modeling approach in clear cell renal cell carcinoma

Intratumor heterogeneity (ITH) is an inherent process in cancer development which follows for most of the cases a branched pattern of evolution, with different cell clones evolving independently in space and time across different areas of the same tumor. The determination of ITH (in both spatial and temporal domains) is nowadays critical to enhance patient treatment and prognosis. Clear cell renal cell carcinoma (CCRCC) provides a good example of ITH. Sometimes the tumor is too big to be totally analyzed for ITH detection and pathologists decide which parts must be sampled for the analysis. For such a purpose, pathologists follow internationally accepted protocols. In light of the latest findings, however, current sampling protocols seem to be insufficient for detecting ITH with significant reliability. The arrival of new targeted therapies, some of them providing promising alternatives to improve patient survival, pushes the pathologist to obtain a truly representative sampling of tumor diversity in routine practice. How large this sampling must be and how this must be performed are unanswered questions so far.  Here we present a very simple method for tumor sampling that enhances ITH detection without increasing costs. This method follows a divide-and-conquer (DAC) strategy, that is, rather than sampling a small number of large-size tumor-pieces as the routine protocol (RP) advises, we suggest sampling many small-size pieces along the tumor. We performed a computational modeling approach to show that the usefulness of the DAC strategy is twofold: first, we show that DAC outperforms RP with similar laboratory costs, and second, DAC is capable of performing similar to total tumor sampling (TTS) but, very remarkably, at a much lower cost. We thus provide new light to push forward a shift in the paradigm about how pathologists should sample tumors for achieving efficient ITH detection.

A divide-and-conquer strategy in tumor sampling enhances detection of intratumor heterogeneity in routine pathology: A modeling approach in clear cell renal cell carcinoma

Intratumor heterogeneity (ITH) is an inherent process in cancer development which follows for most of the cases a branched pattern of evolution, with different cell clones evolving independently in space and time across different areas of the same tumor. The determination of ITH (in both spatial and temporal domains) is nowadays critical to enhance patient treatment and prognosis. Clear cell renal cell carcinoma (CCRCC) provides a good example of ITH. Sometimes the tumor is too big to be totally analyzed for ITH detection and pathologists decide which parts must be sampled for the analysis. For such a purpose, pathologists follow internationally accepted protocols. In light of the latest findings, however, current sampling protocols seem to be insufficient for detecting ITH with significant reliability. The arrival of new targeted therapies, some of them providing promising alternatives to improve patient survival, pushes the pathologist to obtain a truly representative sampling of tumor diversity in routine practice. How large this sampling must be and how this must be performed are unanswered questions so far.  Here we present a very simple method for tumor sampling that enhances ITH detection without increasing costs. This method follows a divide-and-conquer (DAC) strategy, that is, rather than sampling a small number of large-size tumor-pieces as the routine protocol (RP) advises, we suggest sampling many small-size pieces along the tumor. We performed a computational modeling approach to show that the usefulness of the DAC strategy is twofold: first, we show that DAC outperforms RP with similar laboratory costs, and second, DAC is capable of performing similar to total tumor sampling (TTS) but, very remarkably, at a much lower cost. We thus provide new light to push forward a shift in the paradigm about how pathologists should sample tumors for achieving efficient ITH detection.

Snail heterogeneity in clear cell renal cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Intratumor heterogeneity may be responsible of the unpredictable aggressive clinical behavior that some clear cell renal cell carcinomas display. This clinical uncertainty may be caused by insufficient sampling, leaving out of histological analysis foci of high grade tumor areas. Although molecular approaches are providing important information on renal intratumor heterogeneity, a focus on this topic from the practicing pathologist' perspective is still pending.

METHODS

Four distant tumor areas of 40 organ-confined clear cell renal cell carcinomas were selected for histopathological and immunohistochemical evaluation. Tumor size, cell type (clear/granular), Fuhrman's grade, Staging, as well as immunostaining with Snail, ZEB1, Twist, Vimentin, E-cadherin, β-catenin, PTEN, p-Akt, p110α, and SETD2, were analyzed for intratumor heterogeneity using a classification and regression tree algorithm.

RESULTS

Cell type and Fuhrman's grade were heterogeneous in 12.5 and 60 % of the tumors, respectively. If cell type was homogeneous (clear cell) then the tumors were low-grade in 88.57 % of cases. Immunostaining heterogeneity was significant in the series and oscillated between 15 % for p110α and 80 % for Snail. When Snail immunostaining was homogeneous the tumor was histologically homogeneous in 100 % of cases. If Snail was heterogeneous, the tumor was heterogeneous in 75 % of the cases. Average tumor diameter was 4.3 cm. Tumors larger than 3.7 cm were heterogeneous for Vimentin immunostaining in 72.5 % of cases. Tumors displaying negative immunostaining for both ZEB1 and Twist were low grade in 100 % of the cases.

CONCLUSIONS

Intratumor heterogeneity is a common event in clear cell renal cell carcinoma, which can be monitored by immunohistochemistry in routine practice. Snail seems to be particularly useful in the identification of intratumor heterogeneity. The suitability of current sampling protocols in renal cancer is discussed.

Intratumor heterogeneity in clear cell renal cell carcinoma: a review for the practicing pathologist

Intertumor heterogeneity, defined as the spectrum of morphological differences found in similar tumors in different patients, is a well-known event for pathologists. However, recent molecular studies have pointed to intratumor heterogeneity as one of the most important issues in human neoplasia in the next years. Clear cell renal cell carcinoma is an example of an intrinsically heterogeneous neoplasm, and some of the most salient advances in the knowledge of intratumor heterogeneity have been developed on it. This review intends to analyze this phenomenon in this tumor from the practicing pathologist's point of view. A careful study of the surgical specimen and an exhaustive tumor sampling are mandatory to keep relevant information. Currently accepted protocols designed for renal tumor sampling may be insufficient. As a result, a different approach to tumor sampling is advisable to ascertain that intratumor heterogeneity, if present, will be well represented in the selected material.