Imposing antecedent global change conditions rapidly alters plant community composition in a mixed-grass prairie

Soil acidification alters root morphology, increases root biomass but reduces root decomposition in an alpine grassland

Soil acidification has been expanding in many areas of Asia due to increasing reactive nitrogen (N) inputs and industrial activities. While the detrimental effects of acidification on forests have been extensively studied, less attention has been paid to grasslands, particularly alpine grasslands. In a soil pH manipulation experiment in the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau, we examined the effects of soil acidification on plant roots, which account for the major part of alpine plants. After three years of manipulation, soil pH decreased from 6.0 to 4.7 with the acid-addition gradient, accompanied by significant changes in the availability of soil nitrogen, phosphorus and cations. Plant composition shifted with the soil acidity, with graminoids replacing forbs. Differing from findings in forests, soil acidification in the alpine grassland increased root biomass by increasing the fraction of coarse roots and the production of fine roots, corresponding to enhanced sedge and grass biomass, respectively. In addition, litter decomposability decreased with altered root morphological and chemical traits, and soil acidification slowed root decomposition by reducing soil microbial activity and litter quality. Our results showed that acidification effect on root dynamics in our alpine grassland was significantly different from that in forests, and supported similar results obtained in limited studies in other grassland ecosystems. These results suggest an important role of root morphology in mediating root dynamics, and imply that soil acidification may lead to transient increase in soil carbon stock as root standing biomass and undecomposed root litter. These changes may reduce nutrient cycling and further constrain ecosystem productivity in nutrient-limiting alpine systems.

Ambient changes exceed treatment effects on plant species abundance in global change experiments

The responses of species to environmental changes will determine future community composition and ecosystem function. Many syntheses of global change experiments examine the magnitude of treatment effect sizes, but we lack an understanding of how plant responses to treatments compare to ongoing changes in the unmanipulated (ambient or background) system. We used a database of long-term global change studies manipulating CO₂ , nutrients, water, and temperature to answer three questions: (a) How do changes in plant species abundance in ambient plots relate to those in treated plots? (b) How does the magnitude of ambient change in species-level abundance over time relate to responsiveness to global change treatments? (c) Does the direction of species-level responses to global change treatments differ from the direction of ambient change? We estimated temporal trends in plant abundance for 791 plant species in ambient and treated plots across 16 long-term global change experiments yielding 2,116 experiment-species-treatment combinations. Surprisingly, for most species (57%) the magnitude of ambient change was greater than the magnitude of treatment effects. However, the direction of ambient change, whether a species was increasing or decreasing in abundance under ambient conditions, had no bearing on the direction of treatment effects. Although ambient communities are inherently dynamic, there is now widespread evidence that anthropogenic drivers are directionally altering plant communities in many ecosystems. Thus, global change treatment effects must be interpreted in the context of plant species trajectories that are likely driven by ongoing environmental changes.