Laparoscopic versus open nephrectomy in 210 consecutive patients: Outcomes, cost, and changes in practice patterns

Laparoscopic versus open nephrectomy in resource-constrained developing world hospitals: a retrospective analysis

Background

Laparoscopic nephrectomy is the standard of care for nephrectomy in most developed countries. Its adoption in our setting has been limited due to lack of equipment and expertise. This paper sets out to show that laparoscopic nephrectomy is technically feasible in the state sector in South Africa.

Methods

A retrospective chart review was performed of all patients having undergone nephrectomy over a five-year period at two state hospitals in KwaZulu-Natal Province, South Africa. Demographic information, pre-operative imaging findings, operative information and post-operative outcomes were analysed.

Results

Nephrectomy was performed in 196 patients. Open nephrectomy (ON) was the intended surgical approach in 73% (n = 143) and laparoscopic nephrectomy (LN) in 27% (n = 53). The conversion rate from LN to ON was 11% (n = 6). For malignancies, there was no difference in surgical resection margin status across the ON, LN and conversion groups; however, tumour size was larger in the conversion group compared to the LN group. Estimated blood loss and transfusion rates were lower in the LN group. The average length of hospital stay was shorter in the LN group (5 vs 10 days). High dependency unit (HDU) admission rate was lower in the LN group (12.1%) compared to the ON group (50%) and the conversion group (40%). No difference in high-grade complications was noted between the ON and LN groups, and more patients in the LN group (82.5%) had no complications compared to the open group (9.9%).

Conclusion

LN is non-inferior to ON in terms of operative time, oncology outcomes and high-grade complications. LN is superior in terms of blood loss, transfusion rate, length of hospital stay and overall complication rate. LN appears to show technical feasibility in the state sector and highlights the need for laparoscopic training.

Totally Laparoscopic Aortic Surgery: Comparison of the Apron and Retrocolic Techniques in a Porcine Model

This study evaluated the learning curve for a second-year general surgery resident and compared 2 totally laparoscopic aortic surgery techniques in 10 pigs: the transretroperitoneal apron approach and the transperitoneal retrocolic approach. Five end points were compared: success rate, percentage of conversion, time required, laparoscopic anastomosis quality, and learning curve. The first 3 interventions required an open conversion. The last 7 were done without complications. Mean dissection time was significantly higher with the apron approach compared with the retrocolic approach. The total times for operation, clamping, and arteriotomy time were similar. All laparoscopic anastomoses were patent and without stenosis. The initial learning curve for laparoscopic anastomosis was relatively short for a second-year surgery resident. Both techniques resulted in satisfactory exposure of the aorta and similar mean operative and clamping time. Training on an ex vivo laparoscopic box trainer and on an animal model seems to be complementary to decrease laparoscopic anastomosis completion time.

The efficacy of unilateral laparoscopic nephrectomy in the pediatric hypertensive patient

BACKGROUND

Secondary hypertension due to a poorly functioning or non-functional kidney may be refractory to medical management. In such cases, nephrectomy can improve or cure hypertension. With the routine use of laparoscopy, nephrectomy can be performed in a minimally invasive manner, but surgery still carries inherent risks and complications.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study is to evaluate the outcomes of laparoscopic nephrectomy performed for secondary hypertension and identify potential predictors of postoperative hypertension resolution.

METHODS

After obtaining approval from institutional review board, patients from January 2002 to March 2018 who underwent laparoscopic nephrectomy were identified using Current Procedural Technology codes. All charts were then manually reviewed to isolate those patients with secondary hypertension present preoperatively. Patient demographics, urologic history, and laboratory and imaging findings were recorded for all patients. Serial blood pressures were recorded at all renal visits along with any antihypertensive medication changes. Postoperative outcomes and complications were also noted for all patients.

RESULTS

A total of 20 patients (7 girls, 13 boys) underwent laparoscopic nephrectomy to treat hypertension at an average age of 10.6 years (range 1.7-17.0 years). Etiology of a solitary non-functional kidney was vesicoureteral reflux in 10 of 20 patients, multicystic dysplastic kidney in 5 of 20, ureteropelvic junction obstruction in 2 of 20, ureteral obstruction in 1 of 20, and renal artery stenosis in 2 of 20 patients. At time of surgery, 3 of 20 patients were on two antihypertensives, 10 of 20 were on one antihypertensive, and 7 of 20 proceeded to surgery with no medical management. In the 30-day postoperative period, no complications were noted. Hypertension improved in 10 of 20 (50%) patients, all of whom were not on any antihypertensive medications after surgery. Hypertension persisted in 4 of 20 (20%) patients, requiring the same antihypertensive regimen and worsened in 6 of 20 (30%) patients, requiring increased doses and/or additional antihypertensives. Average follow-up time was 2.7 years. No significant predictors of postoperative hypertension result were identified when comparing the groups of responders and non-responders.

DISCUSSION

While laparoscopic nephrectomy for a non-functioning kidney in the setting of hypertension is a safe procedure, the cure rate for hypertension in the cohort appears to be on the low side of what was previously reported. While the small sample size is a main limitation, it is among the largest sample sizes for pediatric hypertensive patients. Previously shown predictors were not predictive in the similar-sized cohort.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients should be carefully counseled on the risks and benefits of nephrectomy to treat hypertension, the importance of continued follow-up after nephrectomy, and the possible need for chronic medical management with antihypertensives.

Incidence of surgical wound infection in renal surgery. The effect of antibiotic prophylaxis appropriateness. A prospective cohort study

OBJECTIVE

To assess compliance with the antibiotic prophylaxis protocol for patients who underwent renal surgery and its effect on the incidence of surgical wound infection.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We performed a prospective cohort study and assessed the overall compliance and each aspect of the antibiotic prophylaxis (start, administration route, antibiotic of choice, duration and dosage) and reported the compliance rates. The qualitative variables were compared with the chi-squared test, and the quantitative variables were compared with Student's t-test. We studied the effect of antibiotic prophylaxis compliance on the incidence of surgical wound infection in renal surgery, with the relative risk.

RESULTS

The study included 266 patients, with an overall compliance rate of 90.6%. The major cause of noncompliance (3.8%) was the start of the prophylaxis, and the incidence rate of surgical wound infections was 3.4%. We found no relationship between antibiotic prophylaxis noncompliance and surgical wound infections (RR=0.26; 95%CI: 0.1-1.2; P>.05). Laparoscopic surgery had a lower incidence of surgical wound infections than open surgery (RR=0.10; 95%CI: 0.01-0.79).

CONCLUSIONS

The antibiotic prophylaxis compliance was high. The incidence of surgical site infection was low, and there was no relationship between the incidence of surgical site infection and antibiotic prophylaxis compliance. The incidence of infection was lower in laparoscopic surgery.

Laparoscopic Versus Open Radical Nephrectomy for Renal Cell Carcinoma: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study is to summarize and quantify the current evidence on the therapeutic efficacy of laparoscopic radical nephrectomy (LRN) compared with open radical nephrectomy (ORN) in patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC) in a meta-analysis.

METHODS

Data were collected by searching Pubmed, Embase, Web of Science, and ScienceDirect for reports published up to September 26, 2016. Studies that reported data on comparisons of therapeutic efficacy of LRN and ORN were included. The fixed-effects model was used in this meta-analysis if there was no evidence of heterogeneity; otherwise, the random-effects model was used.

RESULTS

Thirty-seven articles were included in the meta-analysis. The meta-analysis showed that the overall mortality was significantly lower in the LRN group than that in the ORN group (odds ratio [OR] =0.77, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.62-0.95). However, there was no statistically significant difference in cancer-specific mortality (OR=0.77, 95% CI: 0.55-1.07), local tumor recurrence (OR=0.86, 95% CI: 0.65-1.14), and intraoperative complications (OR=1.27, 95% CI: 0.83-1.94). The risk of postoperative complications was significantly lower in the LRN group (OR=0.71, 95% CI: 0.65-0.78). In addition, LRN has been shown to offer superior perioperative results to ORN, including shorter hospital stay days, time to start oral intake, and convalescence time, and less estimated blood loss, blood transfusion rate, and anesthetic consumption.

CONCLUSION

LRN was associated with better surgical outcomes as assessed by overall mortality and postoperative complications compared with ORN. LRN has also been shown to offer superior perioperative results to ORN.

A novel method for texture-mapping conoscopic surfaces for minimally invasive image-guided kidney surgery

PURPOSE

Organ-level registration is critical to image-guided therapy in soft tissue. This is especially important in organs such as the kidney which can freely move. We have developed a method for registration that combines three-dimensional locations from a holographic conoscope with an endoscopically obtained textured surface. By combining these data sources clear decisions as to the tissue from which the points arise can be made.

METHODS

By localizing the conoscope's laser dot in the endoscopic space, we register the textured surface to the cloud of conoscopic points. This allows the cloud of points to be filtered for only those arising from the kidney surface. Once a valid cloud is obtained we can use standard surface registration techniques to perform the image-space to physical-space registration. Since our methods use two distinct data sources we test for spatial accuracy and characterize temporal effects in phantoms, ex vivo porcine and human kidneys. In addition we use an industrial robot to provide controlled motion and positioning for characterizing temporal effects.

RESULTS

Our initial surface acquisitions are hand-held. This means that we take approximately 55 s to acquire a surface. At that rate we see no temporal effects due to acquisition synchronization or probe speed. Our surface registrations were able to find applied targets with submillimeter target registration errors.

CONCLUSION

The results showed that the textured surfaces could be reconstructed with submillimetric mean registration errors. While this paper focuses on kidney applications, this method could be applied to any anatomical structures where a line of sight can be created via open or minimally invasive surgical techniques.

WITHDRAWN: Surgical management of localised renal cell carcinoma

This review is being updated and replaced following the publication of a protocol (Krabbe L‐M, Kunath F, Schmidt S, Miernik A, Cleves A, Walther M, Kroeger N. Partial nephrectomy versus radical nephrectomy for clinically localized renal masses [Protocol]. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2016, Issue 2. Art. No.: CD012045. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD012045) for a new review with a narrower scope. It will remain withdrawn when the new review is published.

The editorial group responsible for this previously published document have withdrawn it from publication.

Prospective study of preoperative factors predicting intraoperative difficulty during laparoscopic transperitoneal simple nephrectomy

OBJECTIVE

To prospectively study and identify, the preoperative factors which predict intraoperative difficulty in laparoscopic transperitoneal simple nephrectomy.

PATIENTS AND METHOD

Seventy seven patients (41 males and 36 females) with mean age of 43 ± 17 years, undergoing transperitoneal laparoscopic simple nephrectomy at our institute between February 2012 to May 2013 were included in this study. Preoperative patients' characteristics recorded were: Gender of patients, history of intervention, palpable lump, BMI, urine culture, side, size of kidney, fixity of kidney on USG, perinephric fat stranding on preoperative CT scan, periureteral fat stranding, perinephric collection, enlarged hilar lymph nodes, renal vascular anomalies, differential renal function on renogram. Preoperative factors of these patients were noted and intraoperative difficulty in the surgery was scored between 1 (easiest) to 10 (most difficult or open conversion) by a single surgeon (who was a part of all studies either as operating surgeon or assistant). Using SPSS 15.0 software, multivariate and univariate analysis was done.

RESULTS

In multivariate analysis presence of pyonephrosis on preoperative evaluation and BMI < 25kg/m(2) were found to be statistically significant factors predicting intraoperative difficulty during laparoscopic simple nephrectomy. On univariate analysis following factors were associated with increased surgeon's score: Lower BMI, palpable kidney, pyonephrosis, history of renal intervention, perinephric fat stranding, right side, fixity of kidney on USG with surrounding structures.

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest that presence of pyonephrosis as identified on preoperative imaging and a BMI of less than 25 Kg/m(2) are the most significant factors predicting intraoperative difficulty during laparoscopic simple nephrectomy.

Laparoscopic versus open wedge resection for gastrointestinal stromal tumors of the stomach: a single-center 8-year retrospective cohort study of 156 patients with long-term follow-up

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to compared laparoscopic (LWR) and open wedge resection (OWR) for the treatment of gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs).

METHODS

The data of 156 consecutive GISTs patients underwent LWR or OWR between January 2006 and December 2013 were collected retrospectively. The surgical outcomes and the long-term survival rates were compared. Besides, a rapid systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted.

RESULTS

Clinicopathological characteristics of the patients were similar between the two groups. The LWR group was associated with less intraoperative blood loss (67.3 vs. 142.7 ml, P < 0.001), earlier postoperative flatus (2.3 vs. 3.2 days, P < 0.001), earlier oral intake (3.2 vs. 4.1 days, P < 0.001) and shorter postoperative hospital stay (6.0 vs. 8.0 days, P = 0.001). The incidence of postoperative complications was lower in LWR group but did not reach statistical significance (4/90, 4.4% vs. 8/66, 12.1%, P = 0.12). No significant difference was observed in 3-year relapse-free survival rate between the two groups (98.6% vs. 96.4%, P > 0.05). The meta-analysis revealed similar results except less overall complications in the LWR group (RR = 0.49, 95% CI, 0.25 to 0.95, P = 0.04). And the recurrence risk was similar in two group (RR = 0.80, 95% CI, 0.28 to 2.27, P > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

LWR is a technically and oncologically safe and feasible approach for gastric GISTs compared with OWR. Moreover, LWR appears to be a preferable choice with mini-invasive benefits.

Laparoscopic management of advanced renal cell carcinoma with renal vein and inferior vena cava thrombus

OBJECTIVE

To report the results and oncological efficacy of laparoscopic radical nephrectomy (LRN) in patients with renal cell carcinoma with renal vein and inferior vena cava thrombus.

METHODS

We performed retrospective record review of 41 patients who underwent LRN along with venous thrombectomy at 2 Canadian centers from 2002 to 2012 by dedicated laparoscopic surgeons.

RESULTS

The mean age and body mass index of the 41 study patients (34 males and 7 female) were 64.4 years and 28.7 kg/m(2), respectively. Median tumor size was 9.3 cm; 39 patients had renal vein thrombus, and 2 had inferior vena cava thrombus. Nine patients (22%) had metastatic disease to begin with and underwent laparoscopic cytoreductive nephrectomy. Median estimated blood loss, operative time, and length of stay were 100 mL (range, 50-400 mL), 134.5 minutes (range, 99-183 minutes), and 4 days (range, 4-6 days), respectively. There were 4 (9.7%) grade 2 complications. There was no intraoperative death. Mean duration of follow-up was 42 months (range, 6-107 months). Of 32 patients with localized disease, 4 (12.5%) died of progressive disease, 3 (9.3%) died of unrelated causes, and 3 patients (9.3%) were lost to follow-up. Twenty-two patients (68.7%) were alive at a mean follow-up of 47 months.

CONCLUSION

LRN and venous thrombectomy for advanced renal tumors with venous thrombus are safe procedures in experienced hands with significant laparoscopic skills. The short-term oncological data are encouraging and advocate the efficacy of this procedure in this subset of patients, although longer follow-up is required in larger number of patients to further define its role.

A triangle method: simple suture retraction for the left lobe of the liver during laparoscopic gastric surgery

BACKGROUND

Efficient retraction of the left lobe of the liver is mandatory for laparoscopic gastric surgery because of the lesser curvature of the stomach, the gastroesophageal junction, and the gastrohepatic ligaments that are covered by the left lobe. We attempted to introduce our simple and safe method for lifting up the liver by suturing the pars condensa and the right diaphragmatic crus at the same time.

STUDY DESIGN

Between March 2011 and February 2012, 85 patients (52 men and 33 women) underwent laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer using our liver retraction method. Our procedure included combined suturing of the pars condensa and the right crus and retrieval of the thread on both sides of the xiphoid process. The end result is a triangle-shaped sling with the left lobe sitting on it.

RESULTS

There were 65 totally laparoscopic distal gastrectomy, 18 totally laparoscopic total gastrectomy, and two laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy cases. The mean patient age was 58.7 years (range, 28-82 years), and average body mass index was 24.5 kg/m(2) (range, 16.7-32.0 kg/m(2)). In all cases, we acquired adequate exposure of the surgical field without the help of another instrument, and there were no procedure-related complications such as hepatic laceration, bleeding, or bile leakage.

CONCLUSIONS

Our liver retraction method is a simple, safe, and effective procedure for laparoscopy-assisted gastrectomy as well as totally laparoscopic gastrectomy. It can be also useful in other types of laparoscopic gastric surgery.

Comparing costs of robotic, laparoscopic, and open partial nephrectomy

Abstract Background and Purpose: Laparoscopic and robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (LPN and RPN) are common minimally invasive alternatives to open partial nephrectomy (OPN) for management of renal tumors. Cost discrepancies of these approaches warrants evaluation. We compared hospital costs associated with RPN, LPN, and OPN.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Costs were captured for 25 patients in each group who underwent RPN, LPN, or OPN at our institution between November 2008 and September 2010. Variable costs included operating room (OR) time, supplies, anesthesia, and inpatient care costs. Fixed costs included equipment purchase and maintenance. Impact of variable and fixed costs were estimated using sensitivity analysis.

RESULTS

Overall variable costs were similar for RPN, LPN, and OPN ($6375 vs $6075 vs $5774, P=0.117, respectively). OR supplies contributed a greater cost for RPN and LPN than OPN ($2179 vs $1987 vs $181, P<0.0001, respectively), while inpatient stay costs were higher for OPN compared with LPN and RPN ($2418 vs $1305 vs $1274, P<0.0001, respectively). Sensitivity analysis of variable costs demonstrates that RPN and LPN can represent less costly alternatives to OPN if hospital stay for RPN and LPN is ≤2 days and OR time <195 and 224 minutes, respectively. Inclusion of fixed costs made OPN less expensive than LPN and RPN unless use of the robot increases and operative times are reduced.

CONCLUSION

By minimizing OR time and hospital stay, RPN and LPN can be cost equivalent to OPN regarding variable costs. When including fixed costs, RPN and LPN were more costly than OPN, but equivalence may be possible with improvements in efficiency.

Determination of patient concerns in choosing surgery and preference for laparoendoscopic single-site surgery and assessment of satisfaction with postoperative cosmesis

background and purpose: Laparoendoscopic single-site (LESS) surgery offers potential improvements in cosmesis and recovery over standard laparoscopy (SL). We report the factors with which patients are most concerned in choosing surgery and how these affect preference for LESS. In addition, we rate the satisfaction of scars after laparoscopy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients followed after a laparoscopic procedure completed two surveys. First, patients rated, on a 5-point Likert scale, the importance of pain, recovery time, cost, treatment success, scars, and complications in choosing surgery. In addition, they were asked their preference for LESS. In the second survey, the impact of scars on body image and cosmesis was assessed.

RESULTS

Seventy-nine patients (median age 54.8 years, 65% male and 35% female) were treated for malignancy (53), donation (15), and benign indications (9). Treatment success (4.71 ± 0.81) and complications (4.22 ± 1.16) were most important, followed by pain (3.43 ± 1.21) and convalescence (3.65 ± 1.11), P<0.05. Cost was rated 2.68 ± 1.38, and cosmesis was 2.22 ± 1.13 (P<0.005). Cosmesis score increased in females (2.59 ± 1.08 vs 2.02 ± 1.12), patients <50 years (2.59 ± 1.09 vs 2.02 ± 1.12), and benign surgical indication (3.33 ± 1.12 vs 2.07 ± 1.06), P<0.05. LESS was preferred in 30.4%, SL in 39.2%. Concern for cosmesis was associated with LESS preference (48.5% vs 17.8%, P=0.004). Sex, age, and surgical indication also influenced this. On the body image scale, patients scored a mean 18.8 ± 1.5 of 20. Patients rated scar appearance 8.31 ± 1.80 of 10.

CONCLUSION

Patients who were treated with laparoscopy were most concerned with success and complication. Preference for LESS was influenced by concerns for cosmesis, sex, age, and surgical indication.

Conversions in laparoscopic renal surgery: causes and outcomes

PURPOSE

We examined conversions in laparoscopic renal surgery, evaluating the causes and outcomes.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A single institution review of all laparoscopic renal surgeries, excluding renal donors, over a nine-year period was performed. Cases were evaluated for intraoperative results, conversions, and complications.

RESULTS

399 laparoscopic renal surgeries were identified (394 available for review) with 41 conversions (31 open, 8 hand-assisted, 2 retroperitoneal). Intraoperative and postoperative complications occurred in 3.0% and 12.2%, respectively. The most common reason for conversion was a lack of progress (20), followed by difficult anatomy (8), tumor thrombus (5), and bleeding (4). Open conversion rates for hand-assisted laparoscopic (HAL), transperitoneal laparoscopic, retroperitoneal laparoscopic (RPL), and robot-assisted were 17.1%, 6.9%, 13.2%, and 1.8%, respectively, although HAL and RPL were more often used for bilateral procedures, previous abdominal surgery, and large specimens (P<0.05). Surgical indication significantly impacted perioperative outcome, where autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease and partial nephrectomy were associated with the highest rate of open conversion (13%), while nephroureterectomy had the highest rate of complications (40%). Cases in which there were large specimens weighing over 1500 g were converted in 40% of cases vs 8.2% for smaller specimens, P<0.001. Previous abdominal surgery did not impact conversion rate (11.9% without vs 9.3% with previous surgery, P=0.401). Cases that were converted had a significantly higher blood loss, operative time, transfusion rate, hospital stay, and complication rate (P<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Rate of conversion to an open procedure is significantly impacted by surgical indication, specimen size, and surgical technique. Any conversion is associated with an increased perioperative morbidity.

Survey of urologic laparoscopic practice patterns in Saudi Arabia

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Laparoscopic surgery is taking a greater role in the management of many urologic diseases. We performed a survey whose aim was to define laparoscopic practice patterns among urologists in Saudi Arabia.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In March 2009, detailed questionnaires about urologic laparoscopic practice patterns were distributed to 352 urologists who were working in Saudi Arabia. The questions related to age, residency training, and amount of laparoscopy performed.

RESULTS

The overall response rate was 42%. A total of 21% of certified urologists in Saudi Arabia performed no laparoscopy, 24.8% devoted less than 5% of their practice time, and 54.3% devoted 5% or more of their practice time to laparoscopic surgery. Of the respondents, 27.5% stated that they had adequate training during residency to perform laparoscopy. Both age and time in practice were inversely related to the amount of time devoted to laparoscopy (P = 0.001). Of those who were affiliated with a university, 70% devoted more than 5% of their operative time to laparoscopy. Urologists in the Ministry of Health were the least to perform a significant volume of laparoscopy. The two most important reasons mentioned for performing laparoscopy were a faster recovery period and reduced morbidity. The main laparoscopic procedures, according to the proportion of urologists who perform laparoscopic surgery, were varicocelectomy, 38%; simple nephrectomy, 27%; renal cyst decortications, 23%; adrenalectomy, 20%; radical nephrectomy, 20%; pyeloplasty, 18%; and orchidopexy, 17%.

CONCLUSIONS

Urologic laparoscopic practice in Saudi Arabia is still in its early stages. Accordingly, more laparoscopic procedures should be implemented in the local training programs.

Surgical management of localised renal cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Surgical excision remains the core to the management of localised renal cancer and several studies have evaluated the safety and clinical effectiveness of laparoscopic surgery and other recently introduced interventions for the localised disease.

OBJECTIVES

To identify and review the evidence from randomised trials comparing different surgical interventions in localised renal cell carcinoma.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Randomised or quasi randomised trials comparing various surgical interventions in the management of adults with surgically resectable localised renal cancer. RCTs were identified by searching The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL, Issue 3, 2009), MEDLINE (Silver Platter, from 1966 to August 2009), EMBASE via Ovid (from 1980 to August 2009), and a number of other data bases.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Studies were assessed for eligibility and quality, and data from published trials were extracted by two reviewers.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently assessed trial quality and extracted data.

MAIN RESULTS

No randomised trials were identified meeting the inclusion criteria reporting on the comparison between open radical nephrectomy with laparoscopic approach or new modalities of treatment such as radiofrequency or cryoablation. Three randomised controlled trials compared the different laparoscopic approaches to nephrectomy (transperitoneal versus retroperitoneal) and found no statistical difference in operative or perioperative outcomes between the two treatment groups. There were several non-randomised and retrospective case series reporting various advantages of laparoscopic renal cancer surgery such as less blood loss, early recovery and shorter hospital stay

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The main source of evidence for the current practice of laparoscopic excision of renal cancer is drawn from case series, small retrospective studies and very few small randomised controlled trials. The results and conclusions of these studies must therefore be interpreted with caution.

Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy - safety in a small-volume transplant center

INTRODUCTION

Laparoscopy is a standard surgical option for live donor nephrectomy (LDN) at the majority of transplant centers. Equivalent graft survival with shorter convalescence has been reported by several large volume centers. With the arrival of an experienced laparoscopic surgeon in 2002, we began to offer laparoscopic LDN at our institution. We report our experience as a large volume laparoscopic surgery program but a low volume transplant center.

METHODS

A retrospective review of the previous 34 LDN (17 open, 17 laparoscopic) performed at the University of Missouri were included. A single laparoscopic surgeon performed all laparoscopic procedures. Hand assisted laparoscopy was performed in 15 and standard laparoscopy with a pfannenstiel incision in two. Open procedures were performed through anterior subcostal or flank incision. A single surgeon performed all open procedures.

RESULTS

There was no statistical difference in age, body mass index or American Society of Anesthesiologies Score between the two groups. Mean operative time, estimated blood loss and hospital stay were 229 minutes, 324 cc and 2.2 days respectively in the laparoscopic group compared to 202 minutes, 440 cc and five days for the open group. Average warm ischemia time was 179 seconds. Recipient creatinine for the two groups at one week, one month and one year was not statistically significantly different. Each group had one graft loss due to medication noncompliance.

CONCLUSION

For small transplant centers with an advanced laparoscopic program, laparoscopic LDN is a safe procedure with comparable outcomes to major transplant centers.

Treatment of upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma

Upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma (UUTUC) is relatively rare, occurring in only 5% of all urothelial cancers. It has not been as extensively studied and reviewed as carcinoma of the bladder. UUTUC has a propensity for multifocality, local recurrence, and development of metastases, which argues for an aggressive treatment approach. Open radical nephroureterectomy (ORNU) with removal of an ipsilateral bladder cuff still remains the gold standard treatment for patients with UUTUC and a normal contralateral kidney, which, however, is being challenged by minimally invasive approaches, such as endoscopic and laparoscopic approaches. They are rapidly evolving as reasonable alternatives of care depending on grade and stage of disease. Adjuvant therapy seems to be safe, although its efficacy is debatable. Immunotherapy appears to be most effective in patients with upper-tract carcinoma in situ. Chemotherapy and radiotherapy also show some improvement in recurrence rates, but there have been no randomized, prospective trials. Gene and molecular-targeted therapy is expected. Several controversies remain in our management, including a selection of endoscopic versus laparoscopic approaches, management strategies on the distal ureter, the role of lymphadenectomy, and the value of immunotherapy, chemotherapy, radiotherapy and genetics and molecular markers in UUTUC. Aims of this paper are to critically review the treatment of UUTUC.

Maximizing the donor pool: use of right kidneys and kidneys with multiple arteries for live donor transplantation

BACKGROUND

Studies have shown donor and recipient outcomes to be equivalent for laparoscopic donor nephrectomy (LDN) and open donor nephrectomy. In the past, LDN has been avoided in the procurement of the right kidney or organs with multiple arteries. This study compares procurement of right and left kidneys as well as procurement of single- and multiple artery organs.

METHODS

A review of all LDNs at a single institution between August 2000 and December 2007 was performed. The data included estimated blood loss (EBL), need for transfusion, operative time, warm ischemia time, length of hospital stay (LOS), and delayed graft function. Arterial supply was assessed using renal arteriogram or computed tomographic (CT) angiography. Outcomes for multiple versus single artery and left versus right LDN were compared. Student's t-test and chi-square test were used for statistical comparison.

RESULTS

A total of 230 LDNs were performed. Multiple arteries were present in 37 donors. The right kidney was procured from 36 donors. No significant difference in EBL, transfusions, operative time, or LOS was noted between multiple and single or right and left LDNs. Warm ischemia time was significantly longer for multiple arteries (mean, 83 s) than for single arteries (mean, 63 s; p = 0.007), and for right kidneys (mean, 86 s) than for left kidneys (mean, 62 s; p = 0.001). No significant difference in delayed graft function was seen in the comparison of multiple (21.6%) and single (11.4%) artery organs (p = 0.11) or of right (13.9%) and left (12.9%) kidneys (p = 0.79).

CONCLUSIONS

The presence of multiple arteries or the need to procure the right kidney does not affect the operative outcome of laparoscopic donor nephrectomy. Warm ischemia time may be greater for these groups, but this does not result in delayed allograft function. The laparoscopic approach should be the standard of care even when expansion of the donor pool includes organs with multiple arteries and procurement of the right kidney.

Hand-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy after 60 cases: comparison with open partial nephrectomy

BACKGROUND

Partial nephrectomy is the surgical standard of care for favorably located, small renal tumors. As the incidence of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and detection of small kidney masses have increased over the past 20 years, minimally invasive management of these lesions has become more common. We report our single-institution experience with hand-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (HALPN) compared with open partial nephrectomy (OPN).

METHODS

Relevant outcome and demographic information was collected prospectively for HALPNs (N = 60) and retrospectively for OPNs (N = 40). A p-value of < 0.05 denotes statistical significance.

RESULTS

Average tumor size (2.6 cm HALPN versus 2.6 cm OPN, p = 0.97) was similar. Mean operative times were shorter for HALPN compared with OPN (161 versus 191 min, p = 0.027). HALPN was also associated with less blood loss (mean 120 cc versus 353 cc, p = 0.0003). Warm ischemia time was shorter for HALPN (mean 27.0 min versus 33.0 min, p = 0.035), as was hospital stay (mean 4.9 days versus 6.9 days, p = 0.007). Although four HALPN renal tumors required intraoperative margin re-excision (based on immediate gross evaluation by a pathologist), the final positive margin rate was 0%. A 5% final positive margin rate was observed in the OPN group. There were two conversions from HALPN to HAL radical nephrectomy and no conversions to an open technique. The HALPN minor complication rate was 18.3% versus 32.5% for OPN (p = 0.10). Complications included delayed bleeding (1, 2.5% OPN), urine leak (2, 5% OPN; 2, 3.3% HALPN), hypoxia, and nausea or fever lasting >3 days. Tumor pathology was as follows: 80.7% and 80% RCC, 12.3% and 8% oncocytoma, and 7% and 12% angiomyolipoma, for HALPN and OPN, respectively in each case.

CONCLUSIONS

HALPN is associated with diminished blood loss, operating time, warm ischemia time, positive margin rates, and length of stay compared with OPN. In our institution, HALPN is the standard approach for patients with small, surgically accessible renal tumors.

Strategies in the management of renal tumors amenable to partial nephrectomy

PURPOSE

The laparoscopic approach to radical and partial nephrectomy is becoming the standard of care for treating patients with renal tumors. Hand-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (HALPN) provides some advantages over the pure laparoscopic approach which include manual manipulation of the kidney, tactile feedback, and timely specimen removal.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We describe our technique for HALPN and emphasize the implementation of an in-room pathologist to examine gross margins during the period of renal arterial occlusion. Between 2004 and 2007, 46 patients underwent HALPN performed by the same surgeons. Mean patient age was 59.5 years and mean tumor size was 2.55 cm. Twelve of these patients underwent significant concomitant procedures.

RESULTS

Our mean operating time was 173.26 min (range 90-306 min) and our mean warm ischemic time was 28.32 min (range 14-54 min). Average estimated blood loss was 116.82 ml (range 10-1000 ml) with no transfusions. Thirty-six (78%) tumors were renal cell carcinoma, seven (15%) were oncocytomas, and three (7%) were angiomyolipomas. The average length of stay was 5.17 days (range 3-9 days) and there were no positive margins. There was one postoperative bleed (2%) and two postoperative urine leaks (4.3%).

DISCUSSION

In our institution, the hand-assist approach to laparoscopic partial nephrectomy has resulted in favorable perioperative outcomes. The use of an in-room pathologist to provide real-time assessment of gross tumor margins has allowed us to achieve a 0% positive final margin rate. We believe that the use of an in-room pathologist during the timely extraction of the specimen made possible by the hand-assisted approach provides a great advantage over pure laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. This low positive margin rate is also the result of maintaining a bloodless field of resection with temporary renal arterial occlusion as well as the avoidance of visual tissue distortion with cold, sharp scissor dissection.

The EZ Trainer: validation of a portable and inexpensive simulator for training basic laparoscopic skills

PURPOSE

We assessed the face and content validity of a new portable laparoscopic trainer, the EZ Trainer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The portable, affordable EZ trainer system was conceived, designed and commissioned by academic surgeons from the departments of urology at our 2 institutions with the express purpose of advancing laparoscopic surgical training. A total of 42 participants, including general surgeons, obstetricians/gynecologists, urologists and industry representatives, assessed the face and the content validity of the trainer using a standard questionnaire. Participants were stratified into high (greater than 30 laparoscopic cases per year) and low (less than 30 cases per year) volume laparoscopists.

RESULTS

Of the participants 96% rated the trainer as a realistic laparoscopic training format. Of high volume laparoscopists 81.5% rated the trainer as comfortable to use, 92.6% found that the trainer was a realistic practice format, 70.4% would purchase the trainer for personal use and 85.2% would recommend that the trainer be made available to surgical residents in their discipline. Of low volume laparoscopists 87% rated the trainer as comfortable to use, 93.3% found that the trainer was a realistic practice format, 73.3% would purchase the trainer for personal use and 80% would recommend that the trainer be made available to diverse surgical residents.

CONCLUSIONS

The EZ trainer system has face and content validity as a portable laparoscopic trainer across a broad range of surgical disciplines.

Financial Analysis of Laparoscopic Versus Open Nephrectomy in the Pediatric Age Group

The authors compared the cost of laparoscopic nephrectomy to open nephrectomy in the pediatric age group. One hundred seventeen consecutive laparoscopic nephrectomies performed by a surgeon with extensive experience with this approach between April 2003 and August 2006 were included. A control group of 24 consecutive open nephrectomies performed by urologists who do not use the laparoscopic approach were also included. Inclusion criteria for surgery were a poor or nonfunctioning kidney related to severe obstructive or refluxing nephropathy and a multicystic dysplastic kidney. The length of operation, length of stay, and disposable equipment used were recorded and the different approaches were compared statistically with an unpaired t test. The mean (standard deviation [SD]) duration of the procedure was 79 minutes (32) in the laparoscopic group and 85 minutes (35) in the control group (P = 0.41). The mean (SD) cost of the disposable instruments used during the operation was pounds sterling274 (160) in the laparoscopic group and pounds sterling20 (5) in the control group (P = 0.0001). The mean (SD) hospital stay was 1 night (0.43) with a mean (SD) cost of pounds sterling677 (291) in the laparoscopic group, and 3 nights (2) with a mean (SD) cost of pounds sterling2031 (1354) in the control group (P = 0.0001). The mean (SD) total cost of the procedure was pounds sterling951 (451) for the laparoscopic group and pounds sterling2051 (1359) for the open one (P = 0.0001). In our experience, the laparoscopic approach in the pediatric age group is 54% less expensive than the open approach.

The Role of the Anesthesiologist in Fast-Track Surgery: From Multimodal Analgesia to Perioperative Medical Care

BACKGROUND

Improving perioperative efficiency and throughput has become increasingly important in the modern practice of anesthesiology. Fast-track surgery represents a multidisciplinary approach to improving perioperative efficiency by facilitating recovery after both minor (i.e., outpatient) and major (inpatient) surgery procedures. In this article we focus on the expanding role of the anesthesiologist in fast-track surgery.

METHODS

A multidisciplinary group of clinical investigators met at McGill University in the Fall of 2005 to discuss current anesthetic and surgical practices directed at improving the postoperative recovery process. A subgroup of the attendees at this conference was assigned the task of reviewing the peer-reviewed literature on this topic as it related to the role of the anesthesiologist as a perioperative physician.

RESULTS

Anesthesiologists as perioperative physicians play a key role in fast-track surgery through their choice of preoperative medication, anesthetics and techniques, use of prophylactic drugs to minimize side effects (e.g., pain, nausea and vomiting, dizziness), as well as the administration of adjunctive drugs to maintain major organ system function during and after surgery.

CONCLUSION

The decisions of the anesthesiologist as a key perioperative physician are of critical importance to the surgical care team in developing a successful fast-track surgery program.

Long-Term Follow-up of Hand-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Nephrectomy for Organ-Confined Renal Cell Carcinoma

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the efficacy and long-term outcomes of hand-assisted laparoscopic radical nephrectomy (HALRN) in treating clinically localized renal cell carcinoma.

METHODS

We analyzed the data from 54 patients who underwent hand-assisted laparoscopic radical nephrectomy (HALRN) and 70 patients who underwent conventional open radical nephrectomy (ORN) in our institution from January 1998 to December 2002 for clinical Stage T1N0M0 or T2N0M0 renal cell carcinoma. The data were collected retrospectively by reviewing the medical records. All specimens were confirmed by pathologic examination. We compared the surgical results and long-term oncologic outcomes between the two groups.

RESULTS

The median follow-up period in the HALRN group was 44.5 months (range 16 to 73) and in the ORN group it was 68 months (range 43 to 93). Patient age, sex, body mass index, pathologic parameters, and American Society of Anesthesiologists classification were not significantly different between the two groups. The HALRN group had a significantly longer operative time (204 minutes versus 181 minutes, P = 0.03) and less blood loss (161 mL versus 630 mL, P <0.01). The complication rates for the ORN and HALRN groups were similar (10% and 7.4% respectively, P = 0.62). No conversions to an open procedure or intraoperative mortality occurred in the HALRN group. The average hospital stay, length of wound, and parenteral narcotic analgesic dose were significantly less in the HALRN group. The 5-year disease-free rate and disease-specific survival rate were comparable in the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of our study have shown that HALRN is a less-invasive technique with 5-year disease-free and disease-specific survival rates comparable to those after ORN in treating patients with clinically localized renal cell carcinoma.

The efficacy and safety of laparoscopic nephrectomy in patients with three or more comorbidities

OBJECTIVES

Laparoscopic surgery for kidney treatment is a common procedure. However, the efficacy of this procedure in patients with several comorbidities has not been well investigated. We conducted a retrospective comparison of results of laparoscopic surgery between patients with several comorbidities and patients with no comorbidity to access the efficacy and safety of this procedure.

METHODS

The subjects were 20 patients with three or more comorbidities (group A) and 46 patients with less than three comorbidities (group B). These 66 patients were 48 men and 18 women with a mean age of 62.3 years (age range, 24-83 years). The data from these two groups were compared for American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) physical status score, previous surgical history, duration of surgery, estimated blood loss, tumor size, complications during and after surgery, conversion rates, time to oral intake, and length of hospital stay.

RESULTS

The initial ASA score and age were significantly higher for the patients with comorbidities (P < 0.0001, P = 0.0008, respectively). All other variables before, during, and after surgery were similar for both laparoscopic groups. However, the incidence of atelectasis of laparoscopy was higher than that of open surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic nephrectomy for patients with comorbidities is safe and minimally invasive. Further investigation to prevent atelectasis is necessary.

Conventional and Hand-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Nephrectomy: Comparative Analysis of 271 Cases

PURPOSE

To compare the outcomes of patients undergoing conventional laparoscopic radical nephrectomy (CLRN) and hand-assisted laparoscopic radical nephrectomy (HALRN) at our institution.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We prospectively and retrospectively reviewed the files of consecutive patients who underwent HALRN (N = 158 patients) from April 2001 to May 2005 and CLRN (N = 113) from August 2002 to May 2005 for clinical stage T(1-3)N(0-1)M(0-1) renal-cell carcinoma. Clinical and perioperative variables of the two groups were compared. Patients were well matched with regard to baseline parameters except that patients undergoing CLRN were 8 years older (P < 0.001) and had higher American Society of Anesthesiologists scores (P = 0.001).

RESULTS

Significantly different outcomes were faster operative time (P < 0.001), greater use of narcotic analgesia (P < 0.001), and longer hospitalization (P < 0.001) with HALRN. For the other variables analyzed, including blood loss, incision size, and complication rates, the two approaches were not significantly different.

CONCLUSIONS

Within the limitations of a retrospective study, HALRN was a faster operation than CLRN but was associated with greater use of narcotic analgesia and longer hospitalization. Overall, the similarities between these two approaches outnumber the differences, some of which may be explained by surgeon-specific practices. Both modalities offer patients excellent immediate cancer control while minimizing perioperative morbidity.

Pararektale Miniinzision zur streng retroperitonealen Nephrektomie in der Lebendspende

PURPOSE

In this study we present the technique of a strictly retroperitoneal donor nephrectomy via a pararectal mini-incision.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Data of 34 living kidney donations were analyzed. All donors underwent a pararectal mini-incision and strictly retroperitoneal nephrectomy (MIDN).

RESULTS

Total operation time, perioperative use of pain medication, length of hospital stay after successful mobilization, and return to full enteral nutrition and regular digestion were evaluated retrospectively. Total operation time for MIDN was 132+/-26 min. The total average application was 22.2+/-19.4 mg of opioid in morphine equivalent dosage (MED), 7.7+/-6.1 g metamizol, and 512+/-325 mg NSAR during hospital stay, which was 4.9+/-1.4 days. Patients were mobilized primarily 2.9+/-8.0 h after surgery. Mobility was achieved 33.8+/-15.8 h after surgery. Enteral nutrition with fluids was started after 1.9+/-7.0 h, full enteral nutrition was accomplished after 37.4+/-19.0 h, and normal digestion returned 58.6+/-23.0 h after the procedure.

CONCLUSIONS

The strictly retroperitoneal nephrectomy via a mini-incision is an elegant, minimally traumatic, safe, and quickly learnable method, resulting in short hospital stays, good cosmetic results, and a low grade of complications.

Cost Trends for Oncological Renal Surgery: Support for a Laparoscopic Standard of Care

PURPOSE

There may be inherent costs associated with the cultivation of laparoscopic expertise. We compared the cost trends for laparoscopy during the development of our program with that of open surgery for renal neoplasms.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the records of 381 patients treated surgically for renal cortical neoplasms from 1998 to 2003. Demographic information and cancer specific data were recorded on each subject. Direct variable costs, which are directly traceable to the patient care service provided and vary with patient volume, were used to analyze cost. Temporal trends were assessed using multivariate models developed to determine smoothed mean costs by year.

RESULTS

Although it was initially more expensive, by 2003 mean costs were lower for laparoscopic than for open radical nephrectomy ($5,157 vs $5,808). This reflected a significantly lower annual increase in direct variable costs for laparoscopy vs open surgery even after adjustment for patient age, sex, race and clinical stage (p = 0.013). Although a similar trend was observed when comparing nephron sparing procedures vs open surgery, this did not attain statistical significance. In addition to surgical technique, only higher clinical stage was independently associated with increased direct variable costs after adjustment for operative year (p <0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Relative to their open counterparts the costs of laparoscopic treatment of renal cortical neoplasms have increased at a lower rate in the last 6 years. When considered in the context of the well established benefits of laparoscopy, our findings lend additional support in favor of laparoscopy as the standard of care.

Cost Containment in Laparoscopic Radical Nephrectomy: Feasibility and Advantages over Open Radical Nephrectomy

PURPOSE

To highlight the impact of the laparoscopic experience of the surgical team on achievement of satisfactory results with cost containment in performing laparoscopic radical nephrectomy (LRN).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We compared the cost components of 15 consecutive uncomplicated LRNs performed in 2001 (LRN01) with 15 consecutive uncomplicated laparoscopic radical nephrectomies performed in 2003 (LRN03) and with 15 consecutive uncomplicated procedures performed at our institution by the same surgical team in the year 1999 matched for patient age, tumor size, and disease stage. The groups were comparable in demographics.

RESULTS

The operative times were 250, 225, and 195 minutes in the LRN01, LRN03, and open-surgery groups, respectively, while the lengths of postoperative stay were 3.8, 3.1, and 6.5 days. Operating room costs, excluding the disposable instruments, were 11.00 /min for the open surgery and 10.00 /min for laparoscopic nephrectomy, and the cost of the postoperative stay was 300 to 310 per day. The cost of disposable instruments was 952.18 for LRN01 and 146.37 for LRN03. The overall costs were 4155.00 for the open-surgery group, 4672.00 for LRN01, and 3336.37 for LRN03.

CONCLUSIONS

Cost containment in laparoscopic nephrectomy is possible. A proper team learning curve and the employment of reliable reusable instruments is the key to reducing costs, making this procedure as economically advantageous as the equivalent open procedure.