Endoscopic implantation of polymethylmethacrylate augments the gastroesophageal antireflux barrier: a short-term study in a porcine model

An Atomistic Study of the Tensile Deformation of Carbon Nanotube-Polymethylmethacrylate Composites

There has been growing interest in polymer/carbon nanotube (CNT) composites due to an exceptional enhancement in mechanical, structural, thermal, and electronic properties resulting from a small percentage of CNTs. However, the performance of these composites is influenced by the type of polymer used. PMMA is a polymer of particular interest among many other polymers because of its biomaterial applications due to its biocompatibility, non-toxicity, and non-biodegradability. In this research, we utilized a reactive force field to conduct molecular dynamics simulations to investigate changes in the mechanical properties of single-walled carbon nanotube (SWCNT)-reinforced Poly (methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) matrix composites. To explore the potential of SWCNT-reinforced PMMA composites in these applications, we conducted simulations with varying CNT diameters (0.542-1.08 nm), CNT volume fractions (8.1-16.5%), and temperatures (100 K-700 K). We also analyzed the dependence of Young's modulus and interaction energy with different CNT diameters, along with changes in fracture toughness with varying temperatures. Our findings suggest that incorporating a small amount of SWCNT into the PMMA polymer matrix could significantly enhance the mechanical properties of the resulting composite. It is also found that the double-walled carbon nanotube has roughly twice the tensile strength of SWCNT, while maintaining the same simulation cell dimensions.

Endoscopic Treatment of Reflux: A Comprehensive Review

The last decade has seen the rise of multiple novel endoscopic techniques to treat gastroesophageal reflux disease, many of which are efficacious when compared with traditional surgical options and allow relief from long-term dependence on antacid medications. This review will explore the latest endoscopic treatment options for gastroesophageal reflux disease including a description of the technique, review of efficacy and safety, and future directions.

Bulking agents in gastrointestinal endoscopy: present applications and future advances

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Bulking agents are inert materials injected into an organ to affect the physical properties of the organ for a therapeutic purpose. Various agents have been developed to aid in the treatment of diseases like gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), fecal incontinence, obesity, malignancy, hemostasis, and tissue dissection. Here, we review the state of the art in bulking agents in gastrointestinal endoscopy, past failures, current limitations, and where we see the field heading in the future.

RECENT FINDINGS

Though bulking agents have been trialed for various different gastrointestinal diseases, there are currently limited uses in gastrointestinal endoscopy. Though various agents have been trialed for GERD, numerous complications and adverse events have limited its current use. However, for the treatment of fecal incontinence endoscopic bulking agent therapy is a reasonable option. Though in early stages of exploration, bulking agent therapy for enteric protection from radiotherapy may be a promising tool to improve treatment of pancreatic cancer. Bulking agents for tissue dissection have substantially improved lifting agents and complex polyp removal. Bulking agent therapy has not really been explored for endoscopic bariatric therapy or hemostasis but may be a fruitful area for exploration in the future.

SUMMARY

Bulking agent therapy has been trialed for various gastrointestinal diseases with mixed success. There is currently a therapeutic roll in the endoscopic management of fecal incontinence and tissue dissection. A future role in the treatment of GERD, obesity, malignancy, and hemostasis seem feasible.

Dextranomer hyaluronic acid copolymer effects on gastroesophageal junction

OBJECTIVE

The outcomes of fundoplication for gastroesophageal reflux disease are suboptimal in many children, and alternatives are clearly needed. Dextranomer hyaluronic acid (DxHA) copolymer, an agent with proven efficacy in vesicoureteral reflux, was studied with respect to its effects on the gastroesophageal junction (GEJ).

METHODS

Twelve New Zealand white rabbits underwent measurement of lower esophageal sphincter pressure followed by laparotomy and injection into the muscular layer of the GEJ (controls, 1.0 mL saline; low-dose DxHA [0.5 mL]; high-dose DxHA [1.0 mL]). After a 12-week survival period, the animals underwent manometry, sacrifice, and necropsy. Organs were examined histologically by pathologists blinded to the injection delivered.

RESULTS

All animals survived. Weight gain was equal in the 3 groups. There was no significant difference in mean lower esophageal sphincter pressure from baseline in any group (control 2.3 mmHg [95% confidence interval, CI -3.3 to 7.9]; low-dose group 3.2 mmHg [95% CI -0.8 to 7.2]; high-dose group -4.0 mmHg [95% CI -18.95 to 10.95]). Histologically, DxHA injection produced an intramural implant, with a foreign body giant cell reaction, and fibroblastic infiltration with collagen deposition. High-dose injection did not consistently result in a qualitative increase in the magnitude of the reaction. There was no mucosal injury or luminal stenosis.

CONCLUSIONS

In this first study evaluating the effects of DxHA injection at the GEJ, a histologic bulking effect was observed without obvious functional complications. The agent may have a role in the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Gastric yield pressure and gastric yield volume to assess anti-reflux barrier in a porcine model

Anti-reflux barrier (ARB) resistance may be useful to test new treatments for gastroesophageal reflux (GER). The ARB has been estimated by increasing gastric yield pressure (GYP) and gastric yield volume (GYV) in animal models but has not been validated. This study aimed to develop an experimental model suitable for assessing the ARB resistance to increasing intragastric pressure and volume and its reproducibility in a seven-day interval. Ten two-month-old female Large-White swine were studied. Intragastric pressure and volume were recorded using a digital system connected to a Foley catheter inserted through gastrostomy into the stomach. GYP and GYV were defined as the gastric pressure and volume able to yield gastric contents into the esophagus detected by esophageal pH. A sudden pH drop below 3 sustained during 5 min was considered diagnostic for gastric yield. Animals were studied again after seven days. On days 0 and 7, there were no significant differences for GYP (mean ± SD = 7.66 ± 3.02 mmHg vs. 7.07 ± 3.54 mmHg, p = .686) and GYV (636.70 ± 216.74 ml vs. 608.30 ± 276.66 ml; p = .299), respectively. Concordance correlation coefficient (ρc) was significant for GYP (ρc = 0.634, 95% CI = 0.141-0.829, p = .006), but not for GYV (ρc = 0.291, 95% CI = -0.118 to 0.774, p = .196). This study demonstrated an experimental model, assessing the ARB resistance. GYP seems to be a more reliable parameter than GYV for assessment of ARB resistance.