Long-term oncologic results of laparoscopic D3 lymphadenectomy with complete mesocolic excision for right-sided colon cancer with clinically positive lymph nodes

Tailored lymph node dissection in right hemicolectomy: a retrospective study focusing on the anterior tissue of the superior mesenteric vein surgical trunk

Background

The optimal extent of lymph node dissection in right hemicolectomy for colon cancer remains a topic of debate. This study aimed to refine lymph node dissection strategies by investigating the histopathological characteristics of the anterior tissue of the superior mesenteric vein (SMV) surgical trunk.

Methods

One hundred sixty-two patients underwent surgery, with their medial resection border determined to be either to the right or left of the SMV. Pathological and perioperative variables were assessed, and the anterior tissue of the SMV was analyzed to quantify lymph nodes and nerve fibers.

Results

Of the patients included, 84 were in the SMV-right group and 78 in the SMV-left group. After propensity score matching (PSM), the SMV-left group with dissection extending to the left side of the SMV and removal of the anterior tissue of SMV surgical trunk, retrieved more lymph nodes (36.9 vs. 26.8, P < 0.001) than the SMV-right group. However, there was no difference in node-positive staging. The SMV-left group also experienced more postoperative complications (16.7% vs. 1.7%, P = 0.011) and prolonged postoperative defecation times (4.2 vs. 3.5, P = 0.035), accompanied by a higher resection of nerve fibers (12.1 ± 4.2/case). Multivariate analysis identified tumor location above the ileocolic vein (ICV) root and elevated preoperative CA 19-9 levels as independent risk factors for metastasis to main lymph nodes.

Conclusion

Right hemicolectomy with extended lymph node dissection improves lymph node retrieval but increases complication risks and prolongs bowel recovery time. For patients with tumors located below the ICV root, a more limited dissection with the right side of the SMV as the medial boundary may be a preferable option, given the low rate of main lymph node metastasis.

Preoperative CT-Scan Angiography Reconstruction Before Right Colectomy with Complete Mesocolon Excision: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Complete mesocolon excision (CME) and central vascular ligation for right colonic cancers have been developed to improve oncological outcomes. However, it has been linked with a higher risk of morbidity and technical difficulties in operating near major vessels. This study investigated the impact of preoperative surgical planning utilizing CT reconstruction on surgical outcomes in right colectomy with CME.

METHODS

This systematic review and meta-analysis followed PRISMA and AMSTAR 2 guidelines. The analysis included clinical trials and observational studies comparing outcomes after preoperative CT scan reconstruction (navigation group) vs. no preoperative CT reconstruction (control group).

RESULTS

Four eligible studies (published between 2013 and 2023) were included, comprising 420 patients (203 in the navigation group and 217 in the control group). Preoperative navigation was associated with significantly lower blood loss (SMD = - 77.50; 95% CI [- 126.77, - 28.22], p = 0.002), shorter operative time (SMD = - 24.44; 95% CI [- 33.33, - 15.55], p < 0.00001), and a higher number of harvested lymph nodes (SMD = 1.39; 95% CI [0.58, 2.20], p = 0.0007). There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in terms of overall morbidity (OR = 0.82; 95% CI [0.28, 2.40], p = 0.71), intraoperative complications (OR = 1.39; 95% CI [0.37, 5.26], p = 0.63), anastomotic leak (OR = 1.10; 95% CI [0.16, 7.63], p = 0.92), or hospital stay (SMD = - 0.06; 95% CI [- 0.48, 0.37], p = 0.80).

CONCLUSION

Preoperative navigation using CT reconstruction could help better delineate the complex vascular anatomy of the right colon. It may reduce operative time and increase the yield of harvested lymph nodes.

Survival analysis in pT1-3 and paracolic lymph-node invasion colorectal cancer: the prognostic role of positive paracolic lymph-node ratio for adjuvant chemotherapy

PURPOSE

Several studies have observed that some stage III colorectal cancer (CRC) patients cannot benefit from standard adjuvant chemotherapy. However, there is no unified screening standard to date.

METHODS

Consecutive patients with pathologically confirmed colon adenocarcinoma treated in 3 centers between January 2016 and December 2018 were included. Patients were divided into four groups according to different stages and positive paracolic lymph-node ratio (P-LNR) [Cohort 1: pT1-3N0M0, Cohort 2: pT1-3N + (P-LNR ≤ 0.15)M0, Cohort 3: pT4N0M0, Cohort 4: stage III patients except for pT1-3N + (P-LNR ≤ 0.15)M0], and further overall survival was compared by Kaplan-Meier method. The univariate and multivariate analyses were employed for cox proportional hazards model.

RESULTS

We retrospectively reviewed 5581 consecutive CRC patients with, and 2861 eligible patients were enrolled for further analysis. The optimal cut-off value of P-LNR in our study was 0.15. There was no significant difference in OS (91.36 vs. 93.74%) and DFS (87.65 vs. 90.96%) between stage III patients with pT1-3N + (P-LNR ≤ 0.15)M0 and those with pT1-3N0M0. Further analysis demonstrated that CRC patients with pT1-3N + (P-LNR ≤ 0.15)M0 were less likely to benefit from 8 cycles of CAPOX or FOLFOX chemotherapy and suffered fewer adverse events from declining chemotherapy. Comparing with 0-4 cycles versus 8 cycles, the overall survival rates were 91.35 versus 90.19% (P = 0.79), and with a DFS of 87.50 versus 88.24% (P = 0.49), the duration of adjuvant chemotherapy was not an independent risk factor for patients with pT1-3N + (P-LNR ≤ 0.15)M0 (HR: 0.70, 95% CI 0.90-1.30, P = 0.42).

CONCLUSION

The concept of P-LNR we proposed might have a high clinical application value and accurately enable clinicians to screen out specific CRC patients who decline or prefer limited chemotherapy.

TRIAL REGISTRY

The clinical trial registration number: ChiCTR2300076883.

Are Metastatic Central Lymph Nodes (D3 volume) in right-sided Colon Cancer a Sign of Systemic Disease? A sub-group Analysis of an Ongoing Multicenter Trial

OBJECTIVE

Assess outcomes of patients with right-sided colon cancer with metastases in the D3 volume after personalized surgery.

BACKGROUND

Patients with central lymph node metastasis (D3-PNG) are considered to have a systemic disease with a poor prognosis. A 3-dimensional definition of the dissection volume allows the removal of all central nodes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

D3-PNG includes consecutive patients from an ongoing clinical trial. Patients were stratified into residual disease negative (D3-RDN) and residual disease positive (D3-RDP) groups. D3-RDN was further stratified into 4 periods to identify a learning curve. A personalized D3 volume (defined through arterial origins and venous confluences) was removed " en bloc" through medial-to-lateral dissection, and the D3 volume of the specimen was analyzed separately.

RESULTS

D3-PNG contained 42 (26 females, 63.1 SD 9.9 y) patients, D3-RDN:29 (17 females, 63.4 SD 10.1 y), and D3-RDP:13 (9 females, 62.2 SD 9.7 y). The mean overall survival (OS) days were D3-PNG:1230, D3-RDN:1610, and D3-RDP:460. The mean disease-free survival (DFS) was D3-PNG:1023, D3-RDN:1461, and D3-RDP:74 days. The probability of OS/DFS were D3-PNG:52.1%/50.2%, D3-RDN:72.9%/73.1%, D3-RDP: 7.7%/0%. There is a significant change in OS/DFS in the D3-RDN from 2011-2013 to 2020-2022 (both P =0.046) and from 2014-2016 to 2020-2022 ( P =0.028 and P =0.005, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Our results indicate that surgery can achieve survival in most patients with central lymph node metastases by removing a personalized and anatomically defined D3 volume. The extent of mesenterectomy and the quality of surgery are paramount since a learning curve has demonstrated significantly improved survival over time despite the low number of patients. These results imply a place for the centralization of this patient group where feasible.

Effect of complete mesocolic excision (cme) on long-term survival after right colectomy for cancer: multivariate meta-analysis and restricted mean survival time estimation

INTRODUCTION

Debate exists concerning the impact of complete mesocolic excision (CME) on long-term oncological outcomes. The aim of this review was to condense the updated literature and assess the effect of CME on long-term survival after right colectomy for cancer.

METHODS

PubMed, MEDLINE, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched through July 2023. The included studies evaluated the effect of CME on survival. The primary outcome was long-term overall survival. Restricted mean survival time difference (RMSTD), hazard ratio (HR), and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were used as pooled effect size measures. GRADE methodology was used to summarize the certainty of evidence.

RESULTS

Ten studies (3665 patients) were included. Overall, 1443 (39.4%) underwent CME. The RMSTD analysis shows that at 60-month follow-up, stage I-III CME patients lived 2.5 months (95% CI 1.1-4.1) more on average compared with noCME patients. Similarly, stage III patients that underwent CME lived longer compared to noCME patients at 55-month follow-up (6.1 months; 95% CI 3.4-8.5). The time-dependent HRs analysis for CME vs. noCME (stage I-III disease) shows a higher mortality hazard in patients with noCME at 6 months (HR 0.46, 95% CI 0.29-0.71), 12 months (HR 0.57, 95% CI 0.43-0.73), and 24 months (HR 0.73, 95% CI 0.57-0.92) up to 27 months.

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests that CME is associated with unclear OS benefit in stage I-III disease. Caution is recommended to avoid overestimation of the effect of CME in stage III disease since the marginal benefit of a more extended resection may have been influenced by tumor biology/molecular profile and multimodal adjuvant treatments.

Lymph node mapping with ICG near-infrared fluorescence imaging: technique and results

PURPOSE

Lymphadenectomy represents a fundamental step during gastrointestinal cancer resection, as the removal of an adequate number of lymph nodes is crucial to define the stage of the disease and prognosis. Lymphadenectomy during gastric and colorectal resection and adrenalectomy for cancer are technically demanding and can be associated with risk of bleeding. To date, lymphadenectomy is often performed without any visual aid. Indocyanine green fluorescence for lymph node mapping can provide better intraoperative visualization. The purpose of this review is to report the current evidence on this topic.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A systematic research of the electronic databases Medline, Embase and Google Scholar was conducted from the inception to December 2022.

RESULTS

This review summarizes the current evidence of techniques and results of fluorescence guided lymphatic mapping during gastrointestinal and adrenal surgery.

CONCLUSION

According to this review, ICG guided lymphadenectomy for gastrointestinal tumours and adrenocortical carcinoma is feasible and safe. In gastrointestinal tumours it allows higher number of harvested lymph nodes.

Bach Mai Procedure for complete mesocolic excision, central vascular ligation, and D3 lymphadenectomy in total laparoscopic right hemicolectomy: a prospective study

PURPOSE

Total laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with complete mesocolic excision (CME), central vascular ligation (CVL), and D3 lymphadenectomy is still the most challenging colon procedures for gastrointestinal surgeons. We herein report the technical details and our preliminary experience of Bach Mai Procedure - a novel-combining (cranial, medial to lateral, and caudal) approach with early resection of the terminal ileum.

METHODS

The dissection stage was central vascular isolation and ligation by a combined multiple approaches in the following four steps: cranial approach, dissecting along the inferior aspect of pancreatic isthmus to reveal the middle colic vessels and the anterior aspect of the superior mesentery vein and then exposed the right gastroepiploic vein and the trunk of Henle; medial-to-lateral approach, exposing the surgical axis - the superior mesenteric vascular axis and then early resection of the terminal ileum to open the dissection from the bottom up; and caudal approach, radical ligation of the ileocecal artery and right colic artery (central vascular ligation), lymph node dissection (D3 lymphadenectomy), and resecting the Toldt fascia of the colon to release the entire right colon from the abdominal wall.

RESULTS

In 12 months, there were 32 cases of primary right-sided colon malignancies that have undergone tLRH_{D3, CME/CVL} based on the Bach Mai Procedure. In 3 cases (9.4%), the tumor site was hepatic flexure. The median of lymph node number (LNN) was 38, with the maximum number which was 101. No serious postoperative complications (grade 3 or higher) neither inhospital mortality was detected.

CONCLUSION

This Bach Mai procedure, a novel-combining approach with early resection of the terminal ileum, is technically feasible and safe for tLRH_{D3, CME/CVL}. Further investigations and follow-up must be proceeded to evaluate the long-term outcomes of our technique.

Robot-assisted versus laparoscopic short- and long-term outcomes in complete mesocolic excision for right-sided colonic cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Complete mesocolic excision (CME) surgery is increasingly implemented for the resection of right-sided colonic cancer, possibly resulting in improved 5-year overall and disease-free survival compared to non-CME surgery. However, it is not clear what surgical platform should be used. The aim of this study was to compare the following outcomes between robot-assisted and laparoscopic CME-surgery for right-sided colonic cancer: (i) short-term clinical outcomes, (ii) pathological specimen quality, and (iii) long-term oncological outcomes.

METHODS

Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews were searched from inception until August 2021. Pooled proportions were calculated by applying the inverse variance method. Heterogeneity was explored by I-square and supplemented by sensitivity- and meta-regression analyses. The risk of bias was evaluated by either MINORS or Cochrane's risk-of-bias tool (RoB 2).

RESULTS

Fifty-five studies with 5.357 patients (740 robot-assisted and 4617 laparoscopic) were included in the meta-analysis. Overall postoperative morbidity was 17% [95% CI (14-20%)] in the robot-assisted group and 13% [95%CI (12-13%)] in the laparoscopic group. Robot-assisted CME was associated with a shorter hospital stay, lower intraoperative blood loss, a higher amount of harvested lymph nodes, and better 3-year oerall and disease-free survival. MINORS and RoB2 indicated a serious risk of bias across studies included.

CONCLUSIONS

This review which includes predominantly non-randomized studies suggests a possible advantage of the robot-assisted CME compared with a laparoscopic technique for several short-term outcomes.

Definition and reporting of lymphadenectomy and complete mesocolic excision for radical right colectomy: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Several procedures have been proposed to reduce the rates of recurrence in patients with right-sided colon cancer. Different procedures for a radical right colectomy (RRC), including extended D3 lymphadenectomy, complete mesocolic excision and central vascular ligation have been associated with survival benefits by some authors, but results are inconsistent. The aim of this study was to assess the variability in definition and reporting of RRC, which might be responsible for significant differences in outcome evaluation.

METHODS

PRISMA-compliant systematic literature review to identify the definitions of RRC. Primary aims were to identify surgical steps and different nomenclature for RRC. Secondary aims were description of heterogeneity and overlap among different RRC techniques.

RESULTS

Ninety-nine articles satisfied inclusion criteria. Eight surgical steps were identified and recorded as specific to RRC: Central arterial ligation was described in 100% of the included studies; preservation of mesocolic integrity in 73% and dissection along the SMV plane in 67%. Other surgical steps were inconstantly reported. Six differently named techniques for RRC have been identified. There were 35 definitions for the 6 techniques and 40% of these were used to identify more than one technique.

CONCLUSIONS

The only universally adopted surgical step for RRC is central arterial ligation. There is great heterogeneity and consistent overlap among definitions of all RRC techniques. This is likely to jeopardise the interpretation of the outcomes of studies on the topic. Consistent use of definitions and reporting of procedures are needed to obtain reliable conclusions in future trials. PROSPERO CRD42021241650.

Oncological outcomes following minimally invasive surgery for pathological N2M0 colorectal cancer: A propensity score-matched analysis

INTRODUCTION

Whether minimally invasive surgery (MIS) is safe and effective for patients with N2M0 colorectal cancer (CRC) remains controversial. This study aimed to compare short- and long-term outcomes between MIS and open surgery (Open) groups for patients with pathological (p)N2M0 CRC, and evaluate the oncological outcomes of MIS for pN2M0 CRC.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 125 consecutive patients with pN2M0 CRC who underwent curative surgery between 2010 and 2017, using propensity score-matching (PSM) analysis.

RESULTS

Median follow-up was 59.4 months. After PSM, we enrolled 68 patients (n = 34 in each group). The conversion rate was 9.6% for the entire patient cohort and 5.9% for the matched cohort. In colon cancer (CC), short-term outcomes were similar between groups. On the other hand, in rectal cancer (RC), estimated blood loss, rate of anastomosis leakage, and length of postsurgical stay were lower in the MIS group than the Open group. R0 resection was achieved in all patients with MIS. No surgical mortality was encountered in any group. No significant differences were found between groups in terms of 3-year local recurrence rate, overall survival, cancer-specific survival, or recurrence-free survival among the entire patient cohort or the matched cohort, regardless of the primary tumor site (CC or RC). Surgical approach (MIS vs Open) had no significant influence on survival outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

MIS is a safe and effective option for patients with pN2M0 CRC, with acceptable short- and long-term outcomes comparable to the open approach. MIS can be considered for patients with pN2M0 CRC.

Mid-term oncological outcomes after complete versus conventional mesocolic excision for right-sided colon cancer: a propensity score matching analysis

BACKGROUND

The correct extent of mesocolic dissection for right-sided colon cancer (RCC) is still under debate. Complete mesocolic excision (CME) has not gained wide diffusion, mainly due to its technical complexity and unclear oncological superiority. This study aims to evaluate oncological outcomes of CME compared with non-complete mesocolic excision (NCME) during resection for I-III stage RCC.

METHOD

Prospectively collected data of patients who underwent surgery between 2010 and 2018 were retrospectively analysed. 1:1 Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to balance baseline characteristics of CME and NCME patients. The primary endpoint of the study was local recurrence-free survival (LRFS). The two groups were also compared in terms of short-term outcomes, distant recurrence-free survival, disease-free survival, and overall survival.

RESULTS

Of the 444 patients included in the study, 292 were correctly matched after PSM, 146 in each group. The median follow-up was 45 months (IQR 33-63). Conversion rate, complications, and 90-day mortality were comparable in both groups. The median number of lymph nodes harvested was higher in CME patients (23 vs 19, p = 0.034). 3-year LRFS rates for CME patients was 100% and 95.6% for NCME (log-rank p = 0.028). At 3 years, there were no differences between the groups in terms of overall survival, distant recurrence-free survival, and disease-free survival.

CONCLUSION

Our PSM cohort study shows that CME is safe, provides a higher number of lymph nodes harvested, and is associated with better local recurrence-free survival.

Risk factors of central area lymph nodes metastasis for guiding optimal right colon cancer surgery: A retrospective multicenter study.. [DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-1991182/v1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0]

Background: D3 or CME lymphadenectomy for right colon cancer (RCC) with lymph nodes metastasis (LNM) is strongly recommended but the anatomical landmark remains controversial. Central LNM predicted poor prognosis in RCC and determined the extent of lymphadenectomy. Methods: Data for 1712 RCC patients treated with D3/CME lymphadenectomy were reviewed. These patients had been treated in 9 centers. A total of 1023 RCC patients were enrolled in the derivation cohort while 689 patients were enrolled in the validation cohort. Results: The overall central LNM incidence was 12.58% (215/1712). In the derivation cohort, univariate and multivariate cox regression analyses revealed that preoperative N staging based on CT scan (OR=7.85, 95% CI, 4.53-14.51, p<0.001), tumor differentiation (OR=0.53, 95% CI, 0.33-0.86, p=0.01) and intraoperative view of tumor movability (OR=0.53, 95% CI, 0.33-0.86, p=0.02) were significant independent factors. Areas under receiver-operating characteristic curves (AUC) for assessing central LNM in the derivation and validation cohorts were 0.802 and 0.750, respectively. The risk-scoring system for patients with RCC was also established. A score of 0 points was the optimal cut-off value for central LNM. Compared to patients in the low-risk group, patients in the high-risk group exhibited worse overall survival outcomes (p<0.001).Conclusions: The established model can be used for preoperative assessment of the risk of central LNM in RCC patients, and for determining the landmark for D3/CME lymphadenectomy, therefore might contribute to decreased therapeutic complications and improved clinical outcomes.

Propensity-score-matched analysis of D2 and D3 right hemicolectomy for colon cancer

BACKGROUND

Complete mesocolic excision with D3 lymph node dissection in right-sided colon cancer is associated with improved oncological outcomes, but can potentially be associated with higher rates of complications compared to conventional D2 right hemicolectomy. This study aims to evaluate the oncological and perioperative outcomes of patients who underwent D3 right hemicolectomy, comparing to conventional right hemicolectomy.

METHODS

From 2015 to 2020, 360 patients underwent right hemicolectomy for colonic malignancies. Data was retrospectively analysed from a prospectively collected database. A propensity-score-matched analysis was performed between the two groups to evaluate their outcomes.

RESULTS

About 88(24.4%) patients underwent D3 right hemicolectomy, with the rest undergoing D2 right hemicolectomy. After propensity-matched analysis, D3 right hemicolectomy had a higher lymph node yield (median of 26 versus 23, p = 0.005), lower overall recurrence rate (11.7% versus 25.7%, p = 0.03), and lower overall mortality rate (14.5% versus 30.1%, p = 0.02) There were no significant differences in the complication rates. There were no anastomotic leaks. D3 right hemicolectomy was associated with an improved 3-year disease-free survival (DFS) with a hazard ratio of 0.63 (P = 0.21), and also an improved 3-year overall survival (OS) with a hazard ratio of 0.68 (P = 0.31).

CONCLUSION

D3 right hemicolectomy is associated with a higher lymph node yield, without increasing morbidity or mortality. It is also associated with significantly lower recurrence and overall mortality rates in this study. Short term 3-year DFS and OS also trend towards favouring D3 right hemicolectomy. However, this study is limited by the small sample size and retrospective nature.

Comparison of Vascular Invasion With Lymph Node Metastasis as a Prognostic Factor in Stage I-III Colon Cancer: An Observational Cohort Study

Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic impact of vascular invasion (VI) in comparison with that of lymph node metastasis (LNM) in non-metastatic colon cancer.

Methods: Patients who underwent curative surgery for stage I-III colon cancer were divided into four groups depending on the status of VI and LNM (Group I: VI-/LNM-; Group II: VI+/LNM-; Group III: VI-/LNM+; Group IV: VI+/LNM+). Group III was subdivided according to the nodal (N) stage (Group IIIA: VI-/N1; Group IIIB: VI-/N2). Oncological outcomes were compared between Groups II and III.

Results: In total, 793 non-metastatic colon cancer patients were included. Group II [hazard ratio (HR) 2.34, 1.01–5.41] and Group III (HR 1.91, 1.26–2.89) were independently associated with poor disease-free survival (DFS). The 5-year DFS rates were comparable in Groups II (71.6%) and III (72.5%) (P = 0.637). When Group III was subdivided into Groups IIIA and IIIB, DFS deteriorated in the following order: Groups IIIA, II, and IIIB. The 5-year DFS rates were 79.7, 71.6, and 61.4% in Groups IIIA, II, and IIIB, respectively. Group II had a tendency toward early recurrence. The 1- and 2-year DFS rates were 76.3 and 71.6% in Group II and 88.3 and 79.8% in Group III, respectively (P = 0.067 and 0.247). All recurrences in Group II were distant metastases.

Conclusion: VI is a prognostic factor as significant as LNM and may be a stronger prognostic factor than N1 stage in non-metastatic colon cancer. Furthermore, a potential association was observed between VI and recurrence patterns, such as early recurrence and distant metastasis.

Nomogram for predicting chylous ascites after right colectomy

BACKGROUND

Chylous ascites following right colectomy has a high incidence which is a critical challenge. At present, there are few studies on the factors affecting chylous ascites after right colectomy and especially after D3 Lymphadenectomy. A predictive model for chylous ascites has not yet been established. Therefore, we created the first nomogram to predict the incidence of chylous ascites after right hemicolectomy.

AIM

To analyze the risk factors for chylous ascites after right colectomy and establish a nomogram to predict the incidence of chylous ascites.

METHODS

We retrospectively collected patients who underwent right hemicolectomy between January 2012 and May 2021 and were pathologically diagnosed with cancer. Multivariate logistic regression was used to analyze the influencing factors of chylous ascites and a nomogram was established. The predictive ability was assessed by the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.

RESULTS

Operative time, the type of operation (standard or extended), the number of lymph nodes retrieved, and somatostatin administration were considered important risk factors. Multivariate logistic regression and nomograms can be used to accurately predict whether chylous ascites occurs. The area under the ROC curve of the model is 0.770. The C-statistic of this model is 0.770 which indicates that it has a relatively moderate ability to predict the risk of chylous ascites.

CONCLUSION

We found a novel set of risk factors, created a nomogram, and validated it. The nomogram had a relatively accurate forecasting ability for chylous ascites after right hemicolectomy and can be used as a reference for risk assessment of chylous ascites and whether to prevent it after surgery.

A systematic review and meta-analysis of variants of the branches of the superior mesenteric artery: the Achilles heel of right hemicolectomy with complete mesocolic excision?

AIM

Dissection with subsequent ligation and resection of arteries at their origin (central vascular ligation) is essential for adequate oncological resection during right hemicolectomy with complete mesocolic excision. This technique is technically demanding due to the highly variable arterial pattern of the right colon. Therefore, this study aims to provide a comprehensive evidence-based assessment of the arterial vascular anatomy of the right colon.

METHODS

A thorough systematic literature search through September 2020 was conducted on the electronic databases PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science to identify studies eligible for inclusion. Data were extracted and pooled into a meta-analysis using MetaXl software.

RESULTS

A total of 41 studies (n = 4691 patients) were included. The ileocolic artery (ICA), right colic artery (RCA) and middle colic artery (MCA) were present in 99.7% (95% CI 99.4%-99.8%), 72.6% (95% CI 61.3%-82.5%) and 96.9% (95% CI 94.2%-98.8%) respectively of patients. Supernumerary RCA and MCA were observed in 3.2% and 11.4% respectively of all cases. The RCA shared a common trunk with the ICA and MCA in 13.2% and 17.7% respectively of patients. A retro-superior mesenteric vein course of the ICA and RCA was observed in 55.1% and 11.4% respectively of all cases.

CONCLUSION

The vascular anatomy of the right colon displays several notable variations, namely the absence of some branches (RCA absent in 27.4% of cases), supernumerary branches, common trunks, and retro-superior mesenteric vein courses. These variations should be taken into consideration during right hemicolectomy with complete mesocolic excision to ensure adequate oncological resection while minimizing intra-operative complications.

The Medial Border of Laparoscopic D3 Lymphadenectomy for Right Colon Cancer: Results from an Exploratory Pilot Study

BACKGROUND

Opinions vary on the medial border of D3 lymphadenectomy for right colon cancer. Most surgeons place the medial border along the left side of the superior mesenteric vein, but some consider the left side of the superior mesenteric artery as the medial border.

OBJECTIVES

This study investigated the clinical outcomes of laparoscopic D3 lymphadenectomy for right colon cancer with the medial border along the left side of superior mesenteric artery.

DESIGN

This was a retrospective study.

SETTINGS

The study was conducted in specialized colorectal cancer department of 5 tertiary hospitals.

PATIENTS

Patients receiving laparoscopic D3 lymphadenectomy for right colon cancer from January 2013 to December 2018 were included.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

After propensity score matching, 307 patients receiving laparoscopic D3 lymphadenectomy along the left side of the superior mesenteric artery were assigned to the superior mesenteric artery group and 614 patients were assigned to the superior mesenteric vein group. Univariate, multivariate, and Kaplan-Meier analyses were performed to assess the clinical data.

RESULTS

The short-term outcomes were similar between the 2 groups; however, the superior mesenteric artery group had a higher rate of chylous leakage (p < 0.001). More lymph nodes were harvested from the superior mesenteric artery group than from the superior mesenteric vein group (p = 0.001). The number (p = 0.005) of metastatic lymph nodes and the lymph node ratio (p = 0.041) in main nodes were both higher in the superior mesenteric artery group. The 2 groups had similar long-term survival, but the superior mesenteric artery group tended to show better disease-free survival in patients with stage disease III (p = 0.056).

LIMITATIONS

This was a retrospective, nonrandomized study.

CONCLUSION

Laparoscopic D3 lymphadenectomy along the left side of the superior mesenteric artery, except for a higher rate of chylous leakage, had short-term outcomes comparable to the superior mesenteric vein group. The superior mesenteric artery group tended to achieve better disease-free survival in patients with stage III disease, but further study is required to better elucidate differences in these approaches because risks/benefits do exist.

Brazilian society of surgical oncology: Guidelines for the surgical treatment of mid-low rectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third leading cause of cancer in North America, Western Europe, and Brazil, and represents an important public health problem. It is estimated that approximately 30% of all the CRC cases correspond to tumors located in the rectum, requiring complex multidisciplinary treatment. In an effort to provide surgeons who treat rectal cancer with the most current information based on the best evidence in the literature, the Brazilian Society of Surgical Oncology (SBCO) has produced the present guidelines for rectal cancer treatment that is focused on the main topics related to daily clinical practice.

OBJECTIVES

The SBCO developed the present guidelines to provide recommendations on the main topics related to the treatment of mid-low rectal cancer based on current scientific evidence.

METHODS

Between May and June 2021, 11 experts in CRC surgery met to develop the guidelines for the treatment of mid-low rectal cancer. A total of 22 relevant topics were disseminated among the participants. The methodological quality of a final list with 221 sources was evaluated, all the evidence was examined and revised, and the treatment guideline was formulated by the 11-expert committee. To reach a final consensus, all the topics were reviewed via a videoconference meeting that was attended by all 11 of the experts.

RESULTS

The prepared guidelines contained 22 topics considered to be highly relevant in the treatment of mid-low rectal cancer, covering subjects related to the tests required for staging, surgical technique-related aspects, recommended measures to reduce surgical complications, neoadjuvant strategies, and nonoperative treatments. In addition, a checklist was proposed to summarize the important information and offer an updated tool to assist surgeons who treat rectal cancer provide the best care to their patients.

CONCLUSION

These guidelines summarize concisely the recommendations based on the most current scientific evidence on the most relevant aspects of the treatment of mid-low rectal cancer and are a practical guide that can help surgeons who treat rectal cancer make the best therapeutic decision.

Modified complete mesocolic excision with central vascular ligation by the squeezing approach in laparoscopic right colectomy

PURPOSE

Complete mesocolic excision (CME) and central vascular ligation (CVL) are becoming the standard procedure in laparoscopic right-sided colectomy. However, the approach to CME and CVL has not been established, although several useful approaches have been reported. The squeezing approach described herein is a novel procedure to perform modified CME and CVL in laparoscopic right colectomy.

METHODS

The squeezing approach features retroperitoneal mobilization followed by cranial mesocolic mobilization and lymph node dissection using a cranial approach followed by a caudal approach. Dissection of the regional lymph nodes along with central vascular ligation was performed along the anterior wall of the superior mesenteric vein. In total, 177 patients (mean age, 70.6 years; male-to-female ratio, 90:87) who underwent laparoscopic right-sided colectomy were retrospectively assessed. Descriptive statistics for patient characteristics were calculated.

RESULTS

The mean operative time and blood loss were 169 min and 37 mL, respectively. Seven patients (4.0%) required conversion to open surgery, and major postoperative complications occurred in five patients (2.8%) with no anastomotic leakage. Histological R0 resection was achieved in all cases of stages 0-III colon cancer. The 5-year recurrence-free survival rates were 100% (n = 19), 100% (n = 40), 87% (n = 46), and 81% (n = 43) in pathological stages 0, I, II, and III, respectively. Node recurrence occurred in one case near the root of the middle colic artery.

CONCLUSION

The novel squeezing approach in laparoscopic right colectomy could be safely performed in terms of the technical and oncological aspects.

D3-lymphadenectomy enhances oncological clearance in patients with right colon cancer. Results of a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

D3-Lymphadenectomy, together with complete mesocolic excision (CME), were introduced to provide oncological results after right colon cancer. The aim of this systematic review with meta-analysis was to assess the short and long-term outcomes of right-sided hemicolectomy with CME + D3 as compared with classic right hemicolectomy. Secondary aims included the prevalence of D3-metastasis and skip metastasis when performing CME + D3.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A systematic review with meta-analysis was conducted, according to PRISMA methodology.

RESULTS

29 studies were enrolled (2592 patients). No differences were accounted in morbidity variables associated with the measured techniques. CME + D3 was significantly associated with a greater distance between the tumour and the closest vascular tie, a longer colonic resection, a wider resection of mesentery and an increased number of harvested lymph nodes. Regarding to long-terms outcomes, we found a significant decrease in local recurrence in patients undergoing CME + D3 (HR:0.17) and a significant improvement in 3-year and 5-year overall survival rates (HR:0.53 vs. HR:0.57, respectively), as well as an improving survival in patients with stage II and III disease. Overall prevalence of patients with lymphatic metastases in D3-territory was of 8.6% and 2.2% of skip metastases.

CONCLUSIONS

CME + D3 is a feasible surgical procedure that allows to obtain specimens with higher quality oncological resection, without greater associated morbidity, thus improving survival in patients with stage II and III right colon cancer.

Updates on Robotic CME for Right Colon Cancer: A Qualitative Systematic Review

Background. Complete mesocolic excision (CME) is a surgical technique introduced with the aim of ameliorating the oncologic results of colectomy. Various experiences have demonstrated favorable oncologic results of CME in comparison with standard colectomy, in which the principles of CME are not respected. The majority of the literature refers to open or laparoscopic CME. This review analyses current evidence regarding robotic CME for right colectomy. Methods. An extensive Medline (Pub Med) search for relevant case series, restricted to papers published in English, was performed, censoring video vignettes and case reports. Results. Fourteen studies (ten retrospective, four comparative series of robotic versus laparoscopic CME) were included, with patient numbers ranging from 20 to 202. Four different approaches to CME are described, which also depend on the robotic platform utilized. Intraoperative and early clinical results were good, with a low conversion and anastomotic leak rate and a majority of Clavien–Dindo complications being Grades I and II. Oncologic adequacy of the surgical specimens was found to be good, although a homogeneous histopathologic evaluation was not provided. Conclusions. Further large studies are warranted to define long-term oncologic results of robotic right colectomy with CME and its eventual benefits in comparison to laparoscopy.

Complete Mesocolic Excision and D3 Lymphadenectomy versus Conventional Colectomy for Colon Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUNDS

Previous systematic reviews suggest that the implementation of 'complete mesocolon excision' (CME) for colon tumors entails better specimen quality but with limited long-term outcomes. We performed a meta-analysis to compare the pathological, perioperative, and oncological results of CME with conventional surgery (CS) in primary colon cancer.

METHODS

Embase, MEDLINE and CENTRAL databases were searched using Medical Subject Headings for CME and D3 lymphadenectomy. The systematic review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines.

RESULTS

A total of 18,989 patients from 27 studies were included. Postoperative complications were higher in the CME group (relative risk [RR] 1.13, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.04-1.22, I² = 0%), while no differences were observed in terms of anastomotic leak (I² = 0%) or perioperative mortality (I² = 49%). CME was associated with a higher number of lymph nodes harvested (I² = 95%), distance to high tie (I² = 65%), bowel length (I² = 0%), and mesentery area (I² = 95%). CME also had positive effects on 3- and 5-year overall survival (RR 1.09, 95% CI 1.04-1.15, I² = 88%; and RR 1.05, 95% CI 1.02-1.08, I² = 62%, respectively) and 3-year disease-free survival (RR 1.10, 95% CI 1.04-1.17, I² = 22%), as well as decreased local (RR 0.35, 95% CI 0.24-0.51, I² = 51%) and distant recurrences (RR 0.71, 95% CI 0.60-0.85, I² = 34%).

CONCLUSIONS

Limited evidence suggests that CME improves oncological outcomes with a higher postoperative adverse events rate but no increase in anastomotic leak rate or perioperative mortality, compared with CS.

Complete mesocolic excision and D3 lymphadenectomy with central vascular ligation in right-sided colon cancer: a systematic review of postoperative outcomes, tumor recurrence and overall survival

BACKGROUND

In right-sided colon cancer surgery, currently there is a great deal of discussion and debate regarding complete mesocolic excision (CME) versus conventional right hemicolectomy (CRH) on postoperative outcomes and oncological results. Our aim was to perform a systematic review of the short- and long-term outcomes of CME to standardize surgical approach in patients with right-sided colon cancer.

METHODS

A systematic review was performed examining available data on randomized and non-randomized studies evaluating the role of CME and D3 lymphadenectomy in the treatment of right-sided colon cancer, in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) standards.

RESULTS

After literature search, 919 studies have been recorded, 110 studies underwent full-text reviews and 30 studies met inclusion criteria. The total number of CME procedures was 5931. Postoperative complications was reported in 28 studies with pooled overall complications of 1.88% for CME surgery. Six studies reported 0% of overall postoperative complications and they demonstrated a low incidence of complications following CME procedure. Anastomotic leak was reported in 27 studies with pooled proportion of 0.92% after CME resections. There were 16 papers reporting overall survival following CME procedure, with a mean of 85% of patients survived at 5 years. Mean 5-year overall survival was 93.05% in stage I patients, 89.76% in stage II patients and 79.65% in stage III patients. Local and distant recurrence were included in 21 studies, reporting tumor recurrence rate of 12.25% following CME. 5-year tumor recurrence was 5.8% in stage I patients, 7.68% in stage II patients and 15.69% in stage III patients.

CONCLUSIONS

CME does not increase the risk of postoperative complications and significantly improves the long-term oncological impact. Prospective multicentre studies results are needed to verify if CME could be considered standard surgery for right colon cancer.

Impact of D3 lymph node dissection on upstaging and short-term survival in clinical stage I right-sided colon cancer

BACKGROUND

D3 lymph node dissection is becoming the standard procedure for the treatment of advanced right colon cancer and has shown increasing evidence of its oncologic benefit. However, a clear indication for its application is lacking and data on this topic is unsatisfactory. Thus, the necessity for D3 lymph node dissection in clinical stage I right colon cancer remains controversial.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed data from clinical stage I right colon cancer patients who underwent radical surgery at three hospitals of Korea university medical center between January 2015 and June 2018. We compared surgical complications and short-term oncologic outcomes between D2 and D3 lymph node dissections in these patients.

RESULTS

Among 512 patients, 122 (23.8%) were clinical stage I. Of these, 88 and 34 patients received D2 and D3 lymph node dissection, respectively. There were no statistically significant differences in clinicopathologic variables and surgical outcomes between the two groups. Upstaging occurred in 16 patients (47.1%) in the D3 group and 23 patients (26.1%) in the D2 group. There were four recurrences in the D2 group but no recurrence in the D3 group. Log-rank tests showed no statistically significant difference in disease-free survival rates between the two groups (p = 0.210).

CONCLUSION

There was no significant difference in disease-free survival rates between D2 and D3 lymph node dissection in clinical stage I right colon cancer patients. However, recurrence occurred in the D2 group. Efforts to improve the accuracy of clinical staging are required and more studies with better quality are needed.

Comparison of postoperative recovery of patients who underwent laparoscopic-assisted radical resection of right colon cancer with modified triangular anastomosis or tubular anastomosis: a retrospective cohort study

Background

We compared the advantages and disadvantages of modified triangular anastomosis and tubular anastomosis for digestive tract reconstruction in patients undergoing laparoscopic-assisted radical resection of right colon cancer.

Methods

This was a retrospective cohort analysis of 92 cases of laparoscopic-assisted resection of right colon cancer, treated from June 2017 to June 2018, at the Huai’an No. 1 People’s Hospital in China. Patients were divided into a modified triangular anastomosis group (n = 33) and a tubular anastomosis group (n = 59). In the modified triangular anastomosis group, digestive tract reconstruction was conducted using side-to-side anastomosis of the ileo-transverse colon with a 60-mm linear stapler. The common entry hole was closed with a running suture. The tubular anastomosis group underwent end-to-side anastomosis of the ileo-transverse colon with a tubular stapler anchor placed at the end of the ileum.

Results

At baseline and perioperatively, there were no significant between-group differences in age, sex, body mass index, tumor location, pathological stage, or tumour size (P > 0.05). There were also no significant between-group differences in operation time, estimated blood loss, the number of harvested lymph nodes, the first postoperative flatulence time, hospitalisation time, or postoperative complications (P > 0.05); however, the total cost of hospitalization for the triangular anastomosis group was significantly lower than the tubular anastomosis group (P < 0.05).

Conclusion

Modified triangular anastomosis is a safe and feasible procedure for laparoscopic-assisted radical resection of right colon cancer. These results affirm the safety and effectiveness of total laparoscopic radical resection of right colon cancer. Given the equivalent outcomes between the two procedures, the modified triangular procedure may be more a more cost-effective option for clinical application.

Fluorescence-guided D3 lymphadenectomy in robotic right colectomy with complete mesocolic excision

BACKGROUND

In robotic right hemicolectomy for cancer, appropriate lymphadenectomy is essential. Visualization of draining lymph nodes and blood flow with near-infrared (NIR) fluorescence DaVinci^® imaging system is a recent development. We present the technique of robotic right colectomy with complete mesocolic excision (CME) and D3 lymphadenectomy using Indocyanine Green (ICG) endoscopic submucosal injection to intraoperatively identify tumour lymphatic basin.

METHODS

The day before surgery, in patients scheduled for robotic right colectomy an endoscopic submucosal injection of 3 mg of ICG solution around the tumor is realized. Robotic right hemicolectomy is performed with suprapubic trocars layout and "bottom to up dissection", realizing a CME with central vessel ligation and D3 lymphadenectomy. Site of primary tumor and lymphatic basin are visible with the FireflyTM camera modality.

RESULTS

From July 2016 to July 2020, 85 patients received a robotic right colectomy with CME and D3 lymphadenectomy. In 50 patients, ICG submucosal injection was performed: visualisation of the site of primary tumour and of LN in the D3 area was possible in all cases; in 17/50 patients (34%), LN out from anatomical lymphatic basin were identified. No side effects were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

In this series, submucosal ICG injection showed to be feasible and safe. The accuracy in identification of D3 lymphatic basin was high, thus permitting an image-guided radical lymphadenectomy. Fluorescent technology represents an interesting innovation to ameliorate surgery of colon cancer.

Metastasis to lymph nodes around the vascular tie worsens long-term oncological outcomes following complete mesocolic excision and conventional colectomy for right-sided colon cancer

BACKGROUND

Oncologic outcomes after complete mesocolic excision (CME) in colon cancer are under investigation. The aim of our study was to compare CME and conventional colectomy (CC) in terms of pathological and oncological outcomes for right colon cancer and to evaluate the impact of lymph node metastasis around the vascular tie on survival.

METHODS

Consecutive patients with right colon cancer who had CME or CC between January 2011 and August 2018 at two specialized centers in Turkey were included. Statistical analyses were performed with respect to demographic characteristics, operative and pathologic outcomes, harvested and metastatic lymph nodes around the vascular tie (LNVT), recurrences, and survival.

RESULTS

There were 91 patients in the CME group (58 males, mean age 64 ± 16 years) and 192 patients in the CC group (96 males, mean age 66 ± 14 years). The mean number of harvested lymph nodes (CME: 42 ± 15 vs CC: 34 ± 13, p = 0.01) and LNVT were higher in the CME group (CME: 3.2 ± 2.2 vs CC: 2.4 ± 1.6, p = 0.001). LNVT metastases were 7.7% and 8.3% in the CME and CC groups, respectively (p = 0.85). Three-year overall and disease-free survival rates were 96.4% and 90.9% in the CME group and 90.4% and 87.6% in the CC group in stage I-III patients (p > 0.05). In stage III patients, the 3-year overall survival (92.5% vs 63.5%, p = 0.03) and disease-free survival (85.6% vs 52.1%, p = 0.008) were significantly better in LNVT-negative patients than in LNVT-positive patients.

CONCLUSION

LNVT metastasis seems to be the key factor associated with poor disease-free and overall survival in right colon cancer regardless of the radicality of surgery.

Primary Tumor-Related Complications and Salvage Outcomes in Patients with Metastatic Rectal Cancer and an Untreated Primary Tumor

BACKGROUND

For rectal cancer with unresectable metastases, current practice favors omitting interventions directed at the primary tumor in asymptomatic patients.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to determine the proportion of patients with primary tumor-related complications, characterize salvage outcomes, and measure survival in patients with metastatic rectal cancer who did not undergo upfront intervention for their primary tumor.

DESIGN

This is a retrospective analysis.

SETTING

This study was conducted at a comprehensive cancer center.

PATIENTS

Patients who presented between January 1, 2008, and December 31, 2015, with synchronous stage IV rectal cancer, an unresected primary tumor, and no prior primary tumor-directed intervention were selected.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The main outcome measured was the rate of primary tumor-related complications in the cohort that did not receive any primary tumor-directed intervention. The Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression analysis were used to determine whether complications are associated with survival.

RESULTS

The cohort comprised 358 patients with a median age of 56 years (22-92). Median follow-up was 26 months (range, 1-93 months). Among the 168 patients (46.9%) who eventually underwent elective resection of the primary tumor, the surgery was performed with curative intent in 66 patients (18.4%) and preemptive intent in 102 patients (28.5%). Of the 190 patients who did not undergo an upfront or elective intervention for the primary tumor, 68 (35.8%) experienced complications. Nonsurgical intervention for complications was attempted in 34 patients with an overall success rate of 61.8% (21/34). Surgical intervention was performed in 47 patients (including 13 patients for whom nonsurgical intervention failed): diversion in 26 patients and resection in 21 patients. Of those 47 patients, 42 (89.4%) ended up with a colostomy or ileostomy.

LIMITATIONS

This study was conducted at a single center.

CONCLUSION

A significant proportion of patients with metastatic rectal cancer and untreated primary tumor experience primary tumor-related complications. These patients should be followed closely, and preemptive intervention (resection, diversion, or radiation) should be considered if the primary tumor progresses despite systemic therapy. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B400. COMPLICACIONES RELACIONADAS CON EL TUMOR PRIMARIO Y RESULTADOS DE RESCATE EN PACIENTES CON CÁNCER DE RECTO METASTÁSICO Y UN TUMOR PRIMARIO NO TRATADO: Para el cáncer de recto con metástasis no resecables, la práctica actual favorece la omisión de las intervenciones dirigidas al tumor primario en pacientes asintomáticos.Determinar la proporción de pacientes con complicaciones relacionadas con el tumor primario, caracterizar los resultados de rescate y medir la supervivencia en pacientes con cáncer rectal metastásico que no se sometieron a una intervención inicial para su tumor primario.Análisis retrospectivo.Centro oncológico integral.Pacientes que se presentaron entre el 1 de enero de 2008 y el 31 de diciembre de 2015 con cáncer de recto en estadio IV sincrónico, un tumor primario no resecado y sin intervención previa dirigida al tumor primario.Tasa de complicaciones relacionadas con el tumor primario en la cohorte que no recibió ninguna intervención dirigida al tumor primario. Se utilizó el método de Kaplan-Meier y el análisis de regresión de Cox para determinar si las complicaciones están asociadas con la supervivencia.La cohorte estuvo compuesta por 358 pacientes con una mediana de edad de 56 años (22-92). La mediana de seguimiento fue de 26 meses (rango, 1 a 93 meses). Entre los 168 pacientes (46,9%) que finalmente se sometieron a resección electiva del tumor primario, la cirugía se realizó con intención curativa en 66 pacientes (18,4%) y con intención preventiva en 102 pacientes (28,5%). De los 190 pacientes que no se sometieron a una intervención inicial o electiva para el tumor primario, 68 (35,8%) experimentaron complicaciones. Se intentó una intervención no quirúrgica para las complicaciones en 34 pacientes con una tasa de éxito global del 61,8% (21 de 34). La intervención quirúrgica se realizó en 47 pacientes (incluidos 13 pacientes en los que falló la intervención no quirúrgica): derivación en 26 pacientes y resección en 21 pacientes. De esos 47 pacientes, 42 (89,4%) terminaron con una colostomía o ileostomía.Único centro.Una proporción significativa de pacientes con cáncer de recto metastásico y primario no tratado experimentan complicaciones relacionadas con el tumor primario. Se debe hacer un seguimiento estrecho de estos pacientes y considerar la posibilidad de una intervención preventiva (resección, derivación o radiación) si el tumor primario progresa a pesar de la terapia sistémica. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B400.

Efficacy and Safety of Complete Mesocolic Excision in Patients With Colon Cancer: Three-year Results From a Prospective, Nonrandomized, Double-blind, Controlled Trial

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study was to evaluate the oncological outcomes of complete mesocolic excision (CME) in colon cancer patients.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

CME is considered a standard procedure for colon cancer patients. However, previous evidence regarding the effect of CME on prognosis has fundamental limitations that prevent it from being fully accepted.

METHODS

Patients who underwent radical resection for colon cancer were enrolled between November 2012 and March 2016. According to the principles of CME, patients were stratified into 2 groups based on intraoperative surgical fields and specimen photographs. The primary outcome was local recurrence-free survival (LRFS). The clinicopathological data and follow-up information were collected and recorded. The final follow-up date was April 2016. The trial was registered in ClinicalTrials.gov (identifier: NCT01724775).

RESULTS

There were 220 patients in the CME group and 110 patients in the noncomplete mesocolic excision (NCME) group. Baseline characteristics were well balanced. Compared with NCME, CME was associated with a greater number of total lymph nodes (24 vs 20, P = 0.002). Postoperative complications did not differ between the 2 groups. CME had a positive effect on LRFS compared with NCME (100.0% vs 90.2%, log-rank P < 0.001). Mesocolic dissection (100.0% vs 87.9%, log-rank P < 0.001) and nontumor deposits (97.2% vs 91.6%, log-rank P < 0.022) were also associated with improved LRFS.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings demonstrate that, compared with NCME, CME improves 3-year LRFS without increasing surgical risks.

Indocyanine Green Fluorescence Imaging-Guided Laparoscopic Surgery Could Achieve Radical D3 Dissection in Patients With Advanced Right-Sided Colon Cancer

BACKGROUND

The optimal lymph node dissection with central vascular ligation is an important part for oncological outcomes after laparoscopic right-sided colon cancer surgery. Few studies have examined the clinical value of indocyanine green fluorescence imaging-guided D3 dissection for right-sided colon cancer.

OBJECTIVES

We assessed the clinical value of indocyanine green fluorescence imaging-guided laparoscopic surgery in improving the radicality of lymph node dissection for right-sided colon cancer by comparing the outcomes of conventional laparoscopic surgery.

DESIGN

The data were retrospectively reviewed and analyzed.

SETTING

This study was conducted at a single university hospital.

PATIENTS

A 1:2 matched case-control study included 25 patients undergoing fluorescence imaging-guided laparoscopic surgery and 50 patients undergoing conventional laparoscopic surgery for clinical T3 or T4 right-sided colon cancer between June 2016 and December 2017.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The extent of D3 dissection and pathological results (tumor stage, lymph node yield, and number of metastatic lymph nodes) were analyzed.

RESULTS

The 2 groups were similar in baseline characteristics. The numbers of harvested pericolic and intermediate lymph nodes were not different between the 2 groups. The numbers of central lymph nodes (14 vs 7, p < 0.001) and total harvested lymph nodes (39 vs 30, p = 0.003) were significantly higher in the fluorescence group than in the conventional group. In the multivariate analysis, the use of indocyanine green fluorescence imaging was an independently related factor for the retrieval of higher numbers of overall and central lymph nodes. The number of metastatic lymph nodes was not significantly different between the 2 groups.

LIMITATIONS

The results of this study were limited by its small patient numbers and retrospective nature.

CONCLUSIONS

Real-time indocyanine green fluorescence imaging of lymph nodes may improve the performance of more radical D3 lymph node dissection during laparoscopic right hemicolectomy for advanced right-sided colon cancer. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B150. LA CIRUGÍA LAPAROSCÓPICA GUIADA POR IMÁGENES DE FLUORESCENCIA VERDE INDOCIANINA PODRÍA LOGRAR UNA DISECCIÓN RADICAL D3 EN PACIENTES CON CÁNCER DE COLON AVANZADO DEL LADO DERECHO: La disección óptima de los ganglios linfáticos con ligadura vascular central es una parte importante para los resultados oncológicos después de la cirugía laparoscópica de cáncer de colon del lado derecho. Pocos estudios han examinado el valor clínico de la disección D3 guiada por imágenes de fluorescencia verde indocianina para el cáncer de colon del lado derecho.Evaluamos el valor clínico de la cirugía laparoscópica guiada por imagen de fluorescencia verde indocianina para mejorar la radicalidad de la disección de ganglios linfáticos para el cáncer de colon del lado derecho mediante la comparación de los resultados de la cirugía laparoscópica convencional.Los datos se revisaron y analizaron retrospectivamente.Este estudio se realizó en un solo hospital universitario.Un estudio de casos y controles emparejado 1:2 incluyó a 25 pacientes sometidos a cirugía laparoscópica guiada por imágenes de fluorescencia y 50 pacientes sometidos a cirugía laparoscópica convencional para cáncer de colon derecho clínico T3 o T4 entre Junio de 2016 y Diciembre de 2017.Se analizó el alcance de la disección D3 y los resultados patológicos (estadio tumoral, rendimiento de los ganglios linfáticos y número de ganglios linfáticos metastásicos).Los dos grupos fueron similares en las características basicas. El número de ganglios linfáticos pericólicos e intermedios recolectados no fue diferente entre los dos grupos. El número de ganglios linfáticos centrales (14 vs 7, p < 0.001) y el total de ganglios linfáticos recolectados (39 vs 30, p = 0.003) fueron significativamente mayores en el grupo de fluorescencia que en el grupo convencional. En el análisis multivariante, el uso de imágenes de fluorescencia verde indocianina fue un factor independiente relacionado para la recuperación de un mayor número de ganglios linfáticos centrales y globales. El número de ganglios linfáticos metastásicos no fue significativamente diferente entre los dos grupos.Los resultados de este estudio fueron limitados por su pequeño número de pacientes y su naturaleza retrospectiva.Las imágenes de fluorescencia verde indocianina en tiempo real de los ganglios linfáticos pueden mejorar el rendimiento de la disección más radical de los ganglios linfáticos D3 durante la hemicolectomía derecha laparoscópica para el cáncer de colon avanzado del lado derecho. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B150.

Complete mesocolic excision for colon cancer: is it worth it?

Total mesorectal excision (TME) has been the miracle surgical technique which has since allowed the outcomes of rectal cancer to surpass that of colon cancer. Complete mesocolic excision (CME) attempts to adopt the same principles as that of TME and apply it to colon cancer surgery. Initial retrospective case series and comparative studies have shown promising oncological outcomes. CME entails the en bloc removal of a sufficient length of colonic specimen within an intact peritoneal envelop with extended lymphadenectomy through a high central ligation of vessels. This technique, standardizing the method for resection of right sided colon cancer, has witness promising perioperative and oncological data for both open and laparoscopic methods. However, most data available are mostly retrospective with a glaring lack of level 1 evidence. Despite the technique showing similar outcomes to that of conventional colectomy, parts of the procedure put the patient (and surgeon) at risk of potentially catastrophic complications. As promising as the initial results of CME has been, more well-designed randomized control trials are necessary to justify the increased risks taken and effort to mount the learning curve for CME.

Right Colectomy with Extended D3 Mesenterectomy: Anterior and Posterior to the Mesenteric Vessels

BACKGROUND

In right colectomy for cancer, complete mesocolic excision and D3 lymphadenectomy each leave behind lymphatic tissue anterior and posterior to the superior mesenteric vein (SMV) and artery (SMA). In this article, we present D3 extended mesenterectomy: a surgical technique that excises the lymphatic tissue en bloc with the right colectomy specimen.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A 3D map of the mesentery of the right colon was reconstructed from staging CT-angiogram scans. The surgical technique of right colectomy with D3 extended mesenterectomy consisted of eight steps: 1) reveal the SMV and SMA; 2) isolate the ileocolic artery; 3) isolate the middle colic artery; 4) resolve the anterior mesenteric flap; 5) specimen de-vascularization; 6) colectomy; 7) resolve the posterior mesenteric flap; and 8) anastomosis.

RESULTS

One-hundred-seventy-six patients (77 men) 66 years of age were operated upon from February 2011 to January 2017. There were 169 adenocarcinomas: 16.0% Stage I, 49.1% Stage II, 33.7% Stage III, 1.2% Stage IV. Tumor locations were 50.6% cecum, 41.5% ascending colon, 4.5% hepatic flexure, and 2.3% transverse colon. Mean operating time was 200 minutes, blood loss 273 ml, and length of stay 7.9 days. There were 9 anastomotic leakages and 15 reoperations. One patient underwent small bowel resection due to SMA tear. There was no postoperative mortality. The mean number of lymph nodes per specimen (40.9) was comprised of 27.1 in the D2 volume and 13.8 in the D3 volume. The mean number of metastatic lymph nodes was 1.2 in the D2 volume and 0.13 in D3. There were 7 patients with lymph node metastasis in D3, 2 of whom had node metastasis solely within D3.

CONCLUSION

This study shows that 1.2% of patients would have been incorrectly diagnosed as Stage II if extended D3 mesenterectomy had not been performed. Similarly, lymph node metastases would have been left behind in 4.1% of patients if extended D3 mesenterectomy had not been performed.

Robotic Extended Right Hemicolectomy with Complete Mesocolic Excision and D3 Lymph Node Dissection

BACKGROUND

Recent studies have shown the benefits of complete mesocolic excision and extended lymphadenectomy (D3 lymph node dissection) in patients with colon cancer.1^-3 METHODS: We present the case of a 62-year-old male with hepatic flexure adenocarcinoma. No metastatic disease was identified by computed tomography. A robot-assisted extended right hemicolectomy with complete mesocolic excision, D3 lymph node dissection, and resection of the mesentery with intact visceral peritoneum was performed.

RESULTS

The trocars are placed in the right lower (8 mm), lower midline (8 mm), and left upper (12 mm) quadrants. The camera port is placed superior to the umbilicus, and the assistant port is placed in the left lower quadrant. The robotic right lower port is used to place the cecum on tension in order to outline the ileocolic pedicle. The assistant retracts the transverse colon cephalad to outline the superior mesenteric artery and vein. Using two robotic arms, the surgeon begins dissection over the superior mesenteric vein inferior to the ileocolic pedicle. Cephalad dissection along the superior mesenteric vein proceeds with reflection of the mesentery and D3 lymph nodes laterally to allow en bloc resection. The ileocolic and middle colic vessels are identified, ligated and divided at their origins. The plane is then developed between the right colon mesentery and the retroperitoneum, including Gerota's fascia, duodenum, and head of the pancreas, in a medial-to-lateral fashion, with care taken to ensure an intact visceral peritoneum is maintained. The proximal transverse colon, hepatic flexure, and ascending colon are mobilized by taking down lateral attachments. The intervening mesentery is transected, and perfusion is assessed with indocyanine green fluorescence imaging. An intracorporeal, isoperistaltic, side-to-side anastomosis is performed using the 45-mm robotic stapler. The common enterotomy is sewn closed in two layers. Pathology showed T3N0 adenocarcinoma with all negative margins.

CONCLUSION

Extended right hemicolectomy with complete mesocolic excision and D3 lymph node dissection is facilitated by a robotic approach, which improves visualization and instrument dexterity.

[Lymphadenectomy in oncological visceral surgery-Part 2 : Cancer of the upper and lower intestinal tract]

In cancers of the upper and lower intestinal tract the risk of lymphatic metastases depends on the histological results, tumor grading, and depth of tumor infiltration (T-stage). Pretherapeutic staging is of particular importance for determining the surgical strategy (local excision vs. en bloc resection with regional lymphadenectomy) as well as for evaluating the necessity of neoadjuvant therapy. While the first part on "Lymphadenectomy in oncological visceral surgery" focused on hepatobiliary and pancreatic cancer, this second part contains an overview of anatomical conditions of lymphatic drainage of the esophagus, stomach, duodenum, small intestine, colon, rectum and anus. Based on this, the principles and techniques of lymphadenectomy for cancer in these organs and the requirements on systematic regional lymphadenectomy in the actual TNM classification (8th edition) are discussed.

Laparoscopic surgery in patients diagnosed with clinical N2 colon cancer

PURPOSE

The benefits of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer have been well established. Several randomized controlled trials have demonstrated similar oncological outcomes between laparoscopic and open surgery for colon cancer. However, whether or not laparoscopic surgery is acceptable in patients with clinical N2 colon cancer is unclear. Therefore, the present study aimed to evaluate the safety and oncological outcomes of laparoscopic surgery for clinical N2 colon cancer.

METHODS

This retrospective study assessed a prospective database and identified 262 consecutive patients with clinical N2 colon cancer who underwent either laparoscopic or open primary resection between 2000 and 2016. After propensity-score matching, 162 patients were analyzed. The primary outcome of interest was the 3-year recurrence-free survival rate, and the secondary outcome of interest was the postoperative complication rate.

RESULTS

The 3-year recurrence-free survival rate did not differ markedly between the laparoscopic and open surgery groups (77.4% vs. 76.5%, p = 0.620). In addition, the incidence of postoperative complications did not differ markedly between the laparoscopic and open surgery groups (16.6% vs. 24.0%, p = 0.317).

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that laparoscopic surgery is safe and effective for clinical N2 colon cancer. Laparoscopic resection can be considered in patients diagnosed with clinical N2 colon cancer.

Initial experience of laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with complete mesocolic excision in Singapore: a case series

INTRODUCTION

Laparoscopic colorectal surgery is increasingly performed worldwide due to its multiple advantages over traditional open surgery. In the surgical treatment of right-sided colonic tumours, the latest technique is laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with complete mesocolic excision (lapCME), which aims to lower the rate of local recurrence and maximise survival as compared to standard laparoscopic right hemicolectomy (lapS).

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective analysis of our initial experience with lapCME in Singapore General Hospital between 2012 and 2015. All procedures were performed by a single surgeon.

RESULTS

Nine patients underwent lapCME and 16 patients underwent lapS. Indication for lapCME was cancer in the right colon. None of the patients required conversion to open surgery, and all were discharged well. The number of lymph nodes resected in the lapCME group was significantly greater than in the lapS group (29 ± 15 vs. 19 ± 6; p = 0.02) during the study period, and the mean operation time was significantly longer for lapCME (237 ± 50 minutes vs. 156 ± 46 minutes; p = 0.0005). There were no statistically significant differences in terms of demographics, tumour stage, time taken for bowel to open postoperatively, time taken for patient to resume a solid diet postoperatively and length of hospital stay. Two patients who underwent lapS were re-admitted for intra-abdominal collections - one patient required radiology-guided drainage, while the other patient was managed conservatively.

CONCLUSION

Our initial experience with lapCME confirms the feasibility and safety of the procedure.

Preoperative anatomical road mapping reduces variability of operating time, estimated blood loss, and lymph node yield in right colectomy with extended D3 mesenterectomy for cancer

OBJECTIVE

To assess the impact of individual patient anatomy on operating time, estimated blood loss (EBL), and lymph node yield in right colectomy with extended D3 mesenterectomy, where surgeons have access to a preoperative 3-D reconstruction of the vascular anatomy of patients before surgery. Data on the impact of individual patient vascular anatomy when surgeons have an anatomical road map as a guide at surgery is still missing in the literature.

METHOD

Consecutive patients enrolled in an ongoing trial were classified into 4 groups and 2 subgroups using a 3-D vascular anatomy reconstruction derived from the staging CT. Outcome measures are operating time, EBL, vascular events, and D3 volume lymph node yield. SPSS was used for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

One hundred seventy-six (77 men) patients included. Mean operating time was 200 ± 50 min. Type 4b required significantly longer operating time (mean, 219 ± 59) compared to type 3 (mean, 188 ± 43) (p = 0.004). Vascular events occurred most often in anatomy type 4b (20.0%) and 3 (19.2%). No difference in EBL and lymph node yield was found (p = 0.102 and p = 0.803, respectively).

CONCLUSION

The use of a roadmap at surgery seems to even differences in operating time, EBL, and lymph node yield, independent of the complexity of the individual patient's central mesenteric vascular anatomy. The incidents of vascular events requiring hemostasis do not cause differences in EBL between the anatomy groups, suggesting that preoperative awareness of the anatomy is beneficial at surgery.

The Toldt fascia: A historic review and surgical implications in complete mesocolic excision for colon cancer

To clarify the anatomic concept of Toldt fascia, based on the literature review and the surgical anatomic dissection using laparoscopic or robotic approach. We undertook review of the historic literature and surgical videos from 250 patients with colorectal cancer operated on laparoscopically or robotically to discuss the surgical implications of Toldt fascia in complete mesocolic excision for colon cancer. Toldt fascia, sandwiched by the overlying mesothelial layer of the mesocolon and underlying mesothelial layer of the retroperitoneum, comprised loose fibrous tissues with minute vessels inside, and was contiguous from the ileocecal mesentery radix to the upper rectum. Surgical dissection plane is readily developed within the Toldt fascia; however, any attempt to dissect along the interface between Toldt fascia and the overlying mesocolon or underlying retroperitoneum failed. Within the anatomic territory of kidney, Toldt fascia fused with Gerota fascia, and then extended in all directions: upward to the dosal surface of the duodenum, liver and pancreas; medially to fuse with the adventitia layer of the abdominal aorta; laterally, it tapered at the area below the reflection of visceral and parietal peritoneum; and downward, it became a thin membranous structure covering the gonadal vessels, ureters and retroperitoneal structures and ended at the upper rectum, where it met the junction of endopelvic fascia and proper fascia of the rectum. The present study demonstrated that Toldt fascia is a natural embryonic dissection plane for the precise conduction of complete mesocolic excision for colon cancer.

Laparoscopic right hemicolectomy oriented by superior mesenteric artery for right colon cancer: efficacy evaluation with a match-controlled analysis

Background

Laparoscopic right hemicolectomy (LRC) with a principle of D3 lymphadenectomy seems to be appropriate in treatment of right-sided colon cancer (RCC). This study aimed to evaluate clinical efficacy of superior mesenteric artery (SMA)-guided LRC (SLRC) for RCC patients.

Patients and methods

Data for RCC patients with radical resection were retrieved from our database and electronic medical records (January 2010 to December 2014). Patients undergoing SLRC procedure were compared with those undergoing conventional laparoscopic right hemi-colectomy (CLRC), with a match ratio of 1:2 for group balance. Perioperative and long-term outcomes were compared between two groups.

Results

In sum, 102 matched patients were selected, with a median follow-up of 32 (range, 3–68) months. The mean operative time was significantly reduced in the SLRC group compared to the CLRC group (206.9 vs 240.0 minutes, P=0.007), with increased incidence of postoperative complications observed (14.7% vs 8.8%, P=0.499). Average length of stay after surgery (7.4 vs 8.0 days), estimated blood loss (85.3 vs 105.4 mL), number of harvested (28.4 vs 28.2) and positive (0.6 vs 0.9) lymph nodes, and overall costs ($4826.9 vs $4874.6) were comparable between two groups (P>0.05). The 3-year disease-free survival rate (89.4% vs 92.1%, P=0.840) and overall survival rate (93.0% vs 83.1%, P=0.273) were similar in both groups. Older age (≥65 years, P=0.049) and advanced tumor stage (≥II, P=0.009) were independent risk factors of recurrence.

Conclusion

The perioperative and oncologic outcomes of SLRC were not superior, but comparable to CLRC. SMA-guided dissection was a feasible surgical approach in treatment of RCC.

Right colectomy: a New York state of mind

Although mortality rates attributable to colon cancer have significantly improved over the past decades, it is still one of the leading causes of death in the USA. As newer technology and surgical techniques and concepts are being introduced, substantial confusion and dissenting opinions have come into fray as well. Naturally, different practice patterns emerged in Asia, Western Europe as well as in the USA. In this special article, we focus on the right colon and examine the unique challenges and oddities of practicing academic colorectal surgery in the New York metropolitan area.

Long-term outcomes of laparoscopic versus open D3 dissection for stage II/III colon cancer: Results of propensity score analyses

BACKGROUND

Non-inferiority of the laparoscopic approach for stage II/III colon cancer has not been clearly established. This study aimed to evaluate the long-term outcomes of laparoscopic versus open D3 surgery.

METHODS

Subjects were 1230 consecutive patients with stage II/III colon cancer, who were referred to the National Cancer Center Hospital from 2004 to 2013. Open surgery was performed in 821 (67%) patients, and laparoscopic surgery was performed in 409 (33%). Propensity score analyses with overall survival as the primary endpoint were performed in three different propensity score methods.

RESULTS

Regression adjustment using the propensity score as a linear predictor in the model showed similar overall survival between laparoscopic and open surgeries [hazard ratio (HR), 0.98 (95% CI [0.64-1.46]; p = 0.916)]. Stratification analysis of the entire cohort revealed that, among five strata, only the highest stratum (clinical T2/T3, clinical N0/N1, tumor size <6 cm, and body mass index (BMI) < 28) had an HR of <1 (0.37). In the other four strata, open surgery was favored as reflected by HRs of >1 (1.13-1.26). The propensity score-matched cohort (365 matched pairs), from which patients with advanced disease and high BMI were excluded, yielded an HR of 0.93 (95% CI [0.57-1.52]; p = 0.772).

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic surgery appeared to be a safe and reasonable option for patients with stage II/III colon cancer in general. Patients with high BMI, clinical N2 and T4 disease, and tumor size ≥6 cm might require prudent selection of surgical approach.

Laparoscopic complete mesocolic excision via mesofascial separation for left-sided colon cancer

PURPOSE

To evaluate the safety and feasibility of laparoscopic complete mesocolic excision (CME) via mesofascial separation for left-sided colon cancer.

METHODS

We evaluated prospectively collected data on 65 consecutive patients with stage I-III left-sided colon cancer, who underwent laparoscopic CME between October 2011 and September 2016. After the exclusion of 5 patients who had T4b or other active tumors, 60 patients were the subjects of this analysis. The completeness of CME, preservation of the hypogastric nerve, operative data, pathological findings, complications, and length of hospital stay were assessed.

RESULTS

CME completeness was graded as the mesocolic and intramesocolic plane in 54 and 6 patients, respectively. The hypogastric nerve was preserved in all patients. A total of 17, 12, 28, and 3 patients had T1, T2, T3, and T4a tumors, respectively. The mean number of lymph nodes retrieved was 16.2, and lymph node metastasis was identified in 22 patients. The mean operative time and intraoperative blood loss were 283 min and 38 ml, respectively. One patient had an intraoperative complication and six patients had postoperative complications. The hospital stay was 12 days.

CONCLUSION

Laparoscopic CME via mesofascial separation is a safe and feasible procedure for left-sided colon cancer.

Survival Benefit of Japanese Extended Lymphadenectomy for Clinically Node-Negative and Node-Positive Colorectal Cancers

BACKGROUND

The impact of extended lymphadenectomy for colorectal cancer is still not sufficiently clear.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the survival benefit of extended lymphadenectomy compared with nonextended lymphadenectomy for clinically node-negative and node-positive colorectal cancers.

DESIGN

The present study was a retrospective cohort study that used prospectively collected data and a propensity score matching method.

SETTINGS

The present study was conducted at a single specialized colorectal surgery department.

PATIENTS

Of the 1314 patients who underwent radical resection with nonextended or extended lymphadenectomy between 1988 and 2007, we included 711 and 603 patients in the cN0 and cN1/2 series. Propensity score matching was applied, and 141 and 63 pairs were extracted from the cN0 and cN1/2 series.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Disease-free survival, cancer-specific survival, and overall survival of the 2 groups were calculated and compared.

RESULTS

In the cN0 series, no differences were observed in the long-term outcomes between the nonextended and extended groups. In the cN1/2 series, the disease-free survival, cancer-specific survival and overall survival were significantly higher (log rank, p = 0.04, p = 0.02, and p = 0.01, respectively), and the frequency of local recurrence was significantly lower (p = 0.04) in the extended group.

LIMITATIONS

The present study was limited by its nonrandomized retrospective design.

CONCLUSIONS

Extended lymphadenectomy demonstrated a good inhibitory effect on the local recurrence rate and led to improved disease-free survival, cancer-specific survival, and overall survival of patients in the cN1/2 series. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/A517.