Single anastomosis sleeve ileal (SASI) bypass versus sleeve gastrectomy: a case-matched multicenter study

Laparoscopic Single Anastomosis Sleeve Ileal Bypass Versus Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass as Single Stage Procedure for Management of Patients with Class V Obesity (BMI ≥ 60 kg/m2): Short-Term Follow-Up

BACKGROUND

Individuals with clinically severe obesity and a BMI ≥ 60 kg/m2 (class V obesity) have a higher incidence of both obesity-related comorbidities and anticipated operative difficulty, with a subsequent higher risk of perioperative morbidity and mortality and a longer hospital stay. In patients with class V obesity, the definitive bariatric procedure is still a matter of debate. This study compared surgical procedures (SASI vs. RYGB) in people with class V obesity. The primary objective was to compare weight loss after both procedures over a 1-year follow-up. Secondary outcomes included the evaluation of the incidence of the operative time (skin-to-skin), postoperative complications, duration of hospital stay, rate of conversion to the open technique, and quality of life, as well as amelioration of obesity-related comorbidities.

METHODS

From January 2019 to December 2022, the data of 73 consecutive patients with class V obesity was collected, who underwent either standard RYGB (n = 40) or SASI (n = 33) at the General Surgery Department of Alexandria University Hospital and some non-governmental hospitals.

RESULTS

There was no statistically significant difference between both groups as regards mean age (p = 0.012), sex (p = 0.250), preoperative BMI (p = 0.754), or preoperative incidence of obesity-related co-morbidities. The SASI procedure showed a statistically shorter operative time (p < 0.001). There was no significant difference between the two groups as regards the incidence of postoperative surgical complications, either early cmplications (21.1% and 20% in both SASI and RYGB, respectively, p = 0.770) or late (beyond 30 days) complications (15.2% and 15% in SASI and RYGB, respectively, p = 1.000), with neither conversion nor intra-operative mortality in both groups. However, the SASI group showed a significant shorter postoperative hospital stay (p < 0.001). During the follow-up period, both operations demonstrated a significant overall resolution of pre-operative obesity-related comorbidities, a significant increase in postprandial 6 weeks postoperative GLP-1 with statistically more rise in the SASI group in the postprandial GLP-1 compared to the RYGB group (p < 0.001). There was no mortalities in both group during the follow up duration.

CONCLUSION

In patients with class V obesity, the SASI procedure had a statistically shorter operative time (skin-to-skin) and a shorter hospital stay compared to RYGB. Both procedures resulted in satisfactory weight loss, as well as comparable improvements in obesity-related comorbidities.

Sleeve gastrectomy plus single anastomosis sleeve ileal bipartition versus sleeve gastrectomy alone: The role of bipartition

BACKGROUND

Sleeve gastrectomy (SG) with single anastomosis sleeve ileal bipartition (SASI) is a novel procedure for increasing the anti-metabolic efficacy of SG in severely people with obesity.

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to compare 1-year results between SASI and SG, thereby assessing the role of bipartition.

SETTING

The study was conducted at the Medical University hospital.

METHODS

Between November 2021 and December 2022, 39 patients received an SG + SASI surgery, a total of 35 patients completed 1-year follow-up after the surgery. They were matched with a group of 70 patients with SG that were equal in age, sex, and body mass index (BMI). Operative risk, weight loss, and remission of comorbidities were evaluated after 12 months.

RESULTS

The operation time of the SASI group was significantly longer than the SG group (140.3 ± 22.8 vs. 114.9 ± 21.6 min; p < .001). At 12 months after surgery, the SASI group had better weight loss (total weight loss: 37.0% vs. 29.7%; p = .001) and achieved a lower BMI than SG (23.4 ± 2.6 kg/m2 vs. 24.6 ± 2.9 kg/m2; p = .046). Reduction of A1C and remission of T2D was greater in the SASI group. The SASI group had a higher reduction in uric acid, low-density lipoprotein, total cholesterol, and triglyceride levels after operation than the SG group. However, the SG group is superior to the SASI group in mean corpuscular volume, calcium, and iron levels.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, adding an ileum bipartition to SG increases the weight loss, glycemic, and blood lipid control of SG only.

Long-Term Follow-Up After Bariatric Surgery: Key to Successful Outcomes in Obesity Management

Background/Objectives: Bariatric surgery (BS) is considered one of the most effective interventions for the treatment of obesity. To achieve optimal long-term results, continuous follow-up (FU) within a multidisciplinary treatment team is essential to ensure patient compliance and maximize the benefits of BS. However, many patients find it difficult to maintain regular FU, which can affect the quality of care and lead to postoperative complications. This review aims to highlight factors that may hinder compliance with FU after BS, examine potential causes and consequences of inadequate FU, and identify strategies to improve patient participation in long-term FU. Methods: The literature search was conducted between October 2023 and June 2024 in Medline (PubMed) and the Cochrane Library datasets. Studies were selected for their relevance to adherence to FU, multidisciplinary approaches, and long-term bariatric outcomes. Results: The pre- and postoperative period is critical for educating patients and healthcare team members about the importance of FU, addressing potential barriers (e.g., logistical, psychological, and social challenges), and highlighting the risk of relapse to obesity after surgery. The lack of a standardized FU protocol leads to differences between medical centers, further impacting patient adherence. Conclusions: Tailored and regularly updated strategies are essential to address individual patient needs and improve adherence to FU. Further research is needed to identify the specific factors that influence variability in long-term BS outcomes, highlighting the need for a patient-centered approach to obesity treatment.

Efficacy of single anastomosis sleeve-ileal bypass in weight control and resolution of type 2 diabetes mellitus - a retrospective cohort study

Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is a chronic metabolic disorder exacerbated by obesity. Single Anastomosis Sleeve-Ileal Bypass (SASI) has emerged as a promising metabolic bariatric procedure that combines sleeve gastrectomy and ileal bypass, facilitating substantial weight loss and T2DM remission through restrictive and malabsorptive mechanisms. This study aims to evaluate the effects of SASI on T2DM remission, weight loss, and safety in one year follow-up. A retrospective cohort study analyzed 31 patients with obesity and T2DM who underwent SASI. Data collected included demographic characteristics, preoperative and postoperative BMI, HbA1c levels, and bariatric outcomes, including %TWL and T2DM changes. The mean age was 45 years, with a mean preoperative BMI of 40.7 kg/m². One year postoperatively, the mean %EWL was 85.6% and %TWL was 31.7%. T2DM remission was achieved in 24 (77.4%) patients, improvement in 4 (12.9%), and no change in 3 (9.7%). Hypertension improved in 21 (87.5%) patients, with 12 (50%) achieving remission. Significant reductions in BMI and HbA1c levels were observed (p < 0.001). Responders (R) and non-responders (NR) groups showed significant differences in postoperative BMI and %EWL (p = 0.007, p = 0.023). One patient experienced a Clavien-Dindo Grade III complication; no deaths occurred. SASI is an effective and safe procedure for treating T2DM, resulting in significant weight loss and metabolic improvements over a one-year follow-up. SASI seems to be a favorable option for T2DM management in metabolic bariatric surgery.

Comparison of the Effectiveness of Single Anastomosis Sleeve Ileal Bypass and Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass in Obese Patients with Type 2 Diabetes

INTRODUCTION

The rapid increase in obesity and related problems has heightened the importance of obesity and metabolic surgery, resulting in a continuing search for the ideal surgical method. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB), which is the gold standard method, and the relatively newer method of single anastomosis sleeve ileal (SASI) bypass.

METHODS

The medical records of patients who underwent RYGB and SASI bypass were reviewed and compared regarding excess weight loss (EWL) and HgA1c, fasting glucose, serum iron, ferritin, hemoglobin (Hgb), and vitamin B12 levels.

RESULTS

The body mass index was significantly lower (p = 0.003), and the %EWL was significantly higher (p = 0.023) at 6 months postoperative in patients who underwent SASI bypass. Both groups had similar results at the other follow-up visits. The mean HgA1c levels at the 6- and 12-month follow-up visits were significantly lower in SASI patients (p = 0.037 and p = 0.012, respectively). At the 24-month follow-up, no difference was detected in HgA1c levels between the groups (p = 0.476). In patients who underwent RYGB, ferritin (p < 0.001), plasma iron (p = 0.001), and Hgb levels (p = 0.001) were significantly lower at 12, 24, and 12 months postoperatively, respectively.

CONCLUSION

SASI bypass is effective and comparable to RYGB in terms of EWL and metabolic control and has the advantage of not producing excluded segments and reducing nutritional deficiencies.

Novel Surgical Interventions for the Treatment of Obesity

Metabolic and bariatric surgery is widely recognized as the most effective and durable treatment for the disease of obesity and its associated comorbidities. In recent years, the field has seen significant advancements, introducing numerous innovative surgical options. This review aims to comprehensively examine these emerging surgical techniques, which have recently received endorsement from the American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery (ASMBS). Additionally, we will explore new technologies and methodologies supported by the latest scientific evidence. Our analysis will include a critical evaluation of the efficacy, safety, and long-term outcomes of these novel approaches, providing a detailed update on the current state of metabolic and bariatric surgery, highlighting key developments and their potential implications for clinical practice.

Pharmacotherapy as an Augmentation to Bariatric Surgery for Obesity

A global obesity pandemic is one of the most significant health threats worldwide owing to its close association with numerous comorbidities such as type 2 diabetes mellitus, arterial hypertension, dyslipidemia, heart failure, cancer and many others. Obesity and its comorbidities lead to a higher rate of cardiovascular complications, heart failure and increased cardiovascular and overall mortality. Bariatric surgery is at present the most potent therapy for obesity, inducing a significant weight loss in the majority of patients. In the long-term, a substantial proportion of patients after bariatric surgery experience a gradual weight regain that may, in some, reach up to a presurgical body weight. As a result, anti-obesity pharmacotherapy may be needed in some patients after bariatric surgery to prevent the weight regain or to further potentiate weight loss. This article provides an overview of the use of anti-obesity medications as an augmentation to bariatric surgery for obesity. Despite relatively limited published data, it can be concluded that anti-obesity medication can serve as an effective adjunct therapy to bariatric surgery to help boost post-bariatric weight loss or prevent weight regain.

Efficiency and safety of single anastomosis sleeve ileal (SASI) bypass in the treatment of obesity and associated comorbidities: a systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

The Single Anastomosis Sleeve Ileal (SASI) bypass is a new bariatric surgery corresponding to an adaptation of the Santoro approach, consisting of a sleeve gastrectomy (SG) followed by loop gastroileostomy. Therefore, we aimed to systematically assess all the current literature on SASI bypass in terms of safety, weight loss, improvement in associated comorbidities, and complications.

METHODS

Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta- Analyses (PRISMA) recommendations, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis by searching three databases (PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science). We performed a meta-analysis of risk ratios and mean differences to compare surgical approaches for excessive weight loss, improvement/remission in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), hypertension (HT), dyslipidemia (DL), obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), and complications. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I2 statistic.

RESULTS

Eighteen studies were included in the qualitative analysis and four in the quantitative analysis, comparing SASI bypass with SG and One-Anastomosis Gastric Bypass (OAGB). A comparison between Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass (RYGB) and SASI bypass could not be performed. Compared to SG, the SASI bypass was associated with improved weight loss (MD = 11.32; 95% confidence interval (95%CI) [7.89;14.76]; p < 0.0001), and improvement or remission in T2DM (RR = 1.35; 95%CI [1.07;1.69]; p = 0.011), DL (RR = 1.41; 95%CI [1.00;1.99]; p = 0.048) and OSA (RR = 1.50; 95%CI [1.01;2.22]; p = 0.042). No statistically significant differences in any of the assessed outcomes were observed when compared with OAGB. When compared to both SG and OAGB, the complication rate of SASI was similar.

CONCLUSION

Although studies with longer follow-up periods are needed, this systematic review and meta-analysis showed that SASI bypass has a significant effect on weight loss and metabolic variables. Variations in outcomes between studies reinforce the need for standardization.

Sleeve gastrectomy with duodenoileal bipartition using linear magnets: feasibility and safety at 1-year follow-up

BACKGROUND

Single-anastomosis metabolic/bariatric surgery procedures may lessen the incidence of anastomotic complications. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility and safety of performing side-to-side duodenoileal (DI) bipartition using magnetic compression anastomosis (MCA). In addition, preliminary efficacy, quality of life (QoL), and distribution of food through the DI bipartition were evaluated.

METHODS

Patients with a body mass index (BMI) of ≥35.0 to 50.0 kg/m2 underwent side-to-side DI bipartition with the magnet anastomosis system (MS) with sleeve gastrectomy (SG). By endoscopic positioning, a distal magnet (250 cm proximal to the ileocecal valve) and a proximal magnet (first part of the duodenum) were aligned with laparoscopic assistance to inaugurate MCA. An isotopic study assessed transit through the bipartition.

RESULTS

Between March 14, 2022 to June 1, 2022, 10 patients (BMI of 44.2 ± 1.3 kg/m2) underwent side-to-side MS DI. In 9 of 10 patients, an SG was performed concurrently. The median operative time was 161.0 minutes (IQR, 108.0-236.0), and the median hospital stay was 3 days (IQR, 2-40). Paired magnets were expelled at a median of 43 days (IQR, 21-87). There was no device-related serious advanced event within 1 year. All anastomoses were patent with satisfactory diameters after magnet expulsion and at 1 year. Respective BMI, BMI reduction, and total weight loss were 28.9 ± 1.8 kg/m2, 15.2 ± 1.8 kg/m2, and 34.2% ± 4.1%, respectively. Of note, 70.0% of patients reported that they were very satisfied. The isotopic study found a median of 19.0% of the meal transited through the ileal loop.

CONCLUSION

Side-to-side MCA DI bipartition with SG in adults with class II to III obesity was feasible, safe, and efficient with good QoL at 1-year follow-up. Moreover, 19% of ingested food passed directly into the ileum.

Laparoscopic single anastomosis sleeve ileal bypass in the surgical management of morbid obesity: A single‐centre experience

Background

Single anastomosis sleeve ileal (SASI) bypass is a recently developed two‐step bariatric operation that involves a sleeve gastrectomy followed by a side‐to‐side sleeve‐ileal anastomosis. While the primary outcomes are promising, more evidence is required before SASI can be considered a standard bariatric procedure.

Objective

This study aims to evaluate short‐term outcomes of SASI bypass regarding safety, efficacy and complications.

Methods

This retrospective study involved the analysis of 75 patients who underwent SASI between January 2019 and January 2022. The study examined patients’ characteristics, comorbidities, surgical technique, operative details, post‐operative weight loss and complications.

Results

Of the 88 patients who underwent SASI, 13 were excluded, leaving 75 participants for analysis. The mean age was 36.9 ± 8.3 years, and the mean body mass index was 49.23 ± 5.5 kg/m2. Among the participants, 19 patients (25.3%) had diabetes and 8 patients (10.6%) had hypertension. The mean operative time was 78.42 ± 13.18 min. The mean excess weight loss percentage was 25.53 ± 3.63, 43.33 ± 8.78, 63.51 ± 10.85, 82.11 ± 11.42 and 88.95 ± 8.69 at 1, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months, respectively. The diabetic remission rate was 100%, and the hypertension remission rate was 75%. Post‐operative complications were observed in 12 patients (16%), with most being minor. Notably, two patients underwent SASI reversal to sleeve gastrectomy due to excessive weight loss, and one patient experienced weight regain in the second post‐operative year.

Conclusion

SASI bypass emerges as a straightforward and highly effective bariatric procedure, with an acceptable complication rate. It is easy to perform and revise, offering not only excellent and sustained weight loss outcomes during short‐term follow‐up but also the resolution or improvement of obesity‐associated comorbidities.

The Alarming Rate of Malnutrition after Single Anastomosis Sleeve Ileal Bypass. A single Centre Experience

BACKGROUND

Single anastomosis sleeve ileal (SASI) bypass is a modification of sleeve gastrectomy with transit bipartition (SG + TB). This study aims to assess the safety and efficacy of SASI as a primary metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS).

METHODS

This is a retrospective case series of 30 patients who underwent SASI bypass from January to December 2021. All patients completed at least 12 months of follow-up.

RESULTS

Among the 30 patients, 93.3% were women, the mean age was 37.4 years, and the mean body mass index (BMI) was 45.6 kg/m2. The percentage of total body weight loss (TWL%) was 42.7%, the percent excess body weight loss (EWL%) was 92.7%, and the mean BMI at 12 months went from 45.6(35.2-58.4) to 25.8 kg/m2 (19.2-33.4). The obesity-associated complications remission rate was 87.5% for type 2 diabetes (T2D), 71.4% for hypertension (HTN) and 100% for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). Thirteen patients (43.3%) had diarrhea, 7 (23.3%) had hypoalbuminemia, defined as serum albumin < 3 g/dl, and 6 (20%) underwent reversal of their index SASI. As for other nutritional issues, iron deficiency anemia was present in 21 patients (70%), while 19 patients (63.3%) had vitamin D, and 2(6.6%) had vitamin B12 deficiency.

CONCLUSION

Despite good short-term weight loss and improvement of obesity-associated complications, SASI is accompanied by high alarming malnutrition, even in short-term follow-up. Novel MBS should be judged for their long-term effects and compared to well-tested standard operations before they are used in routine clinical practice.

Analysis of the efficacy of sleeve gastrectomy, one-anastomosis gastric bypass, and single-anastomosis sleeve ileal bypass in the treatment of metabolic syndrome

The objective of this study was to evaluate and compare the effectiveness of three different types of bariatric surgeries, namely, sleeve gastrectomy (SG), one-anastomotic gastric bypass (OAGB), and single anastomosis sleeve ileal (SASI) bypass, in the treatment of metabolic syndrome (MS). The optimal approach for managing MS remains uncertain, and thus this study aimed to provide a recent analysis of the efficacy of these surgical procedures. This retrospective study evaluated data of individuals who underwent SG, OAGB, and SASI bypass. The primary outcome measures included weight, body mass index (BMI), glucolipid metabolic index, and the occurrence of treatment-related complications within 6 to 12 months post-surgery. A total of 324 patients were included in this study. Of these, 264 patients underwent SG, 30 underwent OAGB, and 30 underwent SASI bypass. A significant decrease in weight was observed at the 6-month and 12-month marks following all three surgical procedures. Of these, patients who underwent SASI bypass exhibited the greatest reduction in weight and BMI post-surgery. Furthermore, the SASI bypass was associated with a significantly higher percentage of total weight loss (%TWL) and excess body mass index loss (%EBMIL) compared to SG and OAGB. Patients who underwent OAGB and SASI bypass demonstrated notable improvements in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Patients who underwent SASI bypass and OAGB experienced greater postoperative comfort and reported fewer complaints of discomfort compared to the other procedure. Based on the retrospective analysis of the data, SASI bypass was associated with greater reductions in weight and BMI, higher percentages of %TWL and %EBMIL, and better improvement in T2DM compared to SG and OAGB. Therefore, both SASI bypass and OAGB were found to be more effective than SG in the treatment of MS.

One Anastomosis Transit Bipartition (OATB): Rational and Mid-term Outcomes

BACKGROUND

The "One-anastomosis transit bipartition" (OATB) is a promising emerging technique in the metabolic syndrome treatment.

OBJECTIVE

To demonstrate the results achieved with OATB in the first 5 years after surgery.

METHOD

Cross-sectional, retrospective study, with individuals undergoing primary OATB. Individuals included in the study were: ≥ 18 years, BMI ≥ 35 kg/m2; and excluded smoking habits, drug dependence, inflammatory bowel diseases. The data analyzed demographic, anthropometric, surgical, clinical, and nutritional.

RESULTS

Sixty eight participants, 75% women, average age 45.5 years and BMI 41 kg/m2. Associated diseases: osteoarthritis (52.9%), hypertension (48.5%) and type 2 diabetes mellitus-T2DM (39.7%). All underwent laparoscopy, without conversions. Average operative time is 122.6 ± 31.7 min, and hospital stay is 2.2 ± 0.8 days. The common channel length 27 and 41 patients with 250 cm and 300 cm respectively. We registered no intraoperative complications, 2 (2.9%) early complications, and 14 (20.6%) late complications. In the first 6 months, 94.7% (250 cm) and 88.9% (300 cm) of the patients no longer used medication for T2DM, with no statistical difference between the two groups. The incidence of nutritional disorders at any time during follow-up: hypovitaminosis D (14.7%), folate hypovitaminosis (14.7%), elevated PTH (7.4%), hypoproteinemia (5.9%) and anemia (5.9%). We found no statistically significant difference between 250 and 300 cm common channel groups.

CONCLUSION

We conclude that OATB is a safe and effective technique, demonstrating good control of T2DM and metabolic syndrome. There is a requirement to treat previous nutritional deficits. We need more long-term evidence and comparison to other surgical techniques.

Effect of SASI procedure (Single Anastomosis Sleeve Ileal) on the symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease in bariatric patients - a review of the literature

The problem of gastroesophageal reflux disease among bariatric patients is constantly growing. While bariatric surgery is the most effective method of treating obesity and related diseases, not all surgical procedures lead to improvement or resolution of gastroesophageal reflux disease. The search for the "ideal" surgical procedure for this group of patients is ongoing. The relatively recently introduced SASI procedure seems to have a beneficial effect on GERD symptoms and may be an alternative anti-reflux procedure in obese patients. The presented paper is a review of the latest literature on the impact of SASI procedure on the symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Outcomes of single anastomosis duodeno ileal bypass and single anastomosis stomach ileal bypass for type II diabetes: a systematic review

INTRODUCTION

Bariatric surgery has demonstrated long-term effectiveness in inducing weight loss and improving metabolic parameters for obesity. Single anastomosis duodeno-ileal (SADI) bypass and single anastomosis sleeve-ileal (SASI) bypass have both emerged as new promising bariatric procedures. In this paper, we review the existing literature and compare the outcomes of SADI and SASI bypass procedures in regard to weight loss, complication rate, and improvement of type II diabetes (T2DM). This has not yet been done in the preexisting literature.

AREAS COVERED

We conducted a systematic literature search of electronic databases focusing on weight loss outcomes, rate of complications and remission, or improvement of T2DM and other obesity-related comorbidities. Seventeen studies on SADI and nine studies on SASI were included. Both are similar in terms of surgical technique and have demonstrated fewer complications when compared to other bariatric procedures. Mean preoperative BMI was similar in both study groups: 46.4 kg/m2 in SADI and 48.8 kg/m2 in SASI. Mean %EWL at 12 months in the SADI group was 74.1% compared to 77.4% in the SASI group. Preoperative severity of T2DM appeared to be higher in the SASI patient group, with a higher preoperative HbA1c and fasting blood glucose levels. T2DM resolution was achieved in a significant proportion of both SADI and SASI patient populations (78.5% in SADI and 89.0% in SASI). Complication rates were comparable for both procedures.

EXPERT OPINION

Both SADI and SASI are effective in inducing weight loss at 12 months, with a low rate of major complications and mortality. From the studies included in this review, the SASI procedure had a higher impact on T2DM resolution compared to SADI.

[Anastomotic techniques in minimally invasive bariatric surgery]

BACKGROUND

Recommendations for the use of specific anastomotic techniques are not available in laparoscopic bariatric surgery. Recommendation criteria should consider the rate of insufficiency, bleeding, tendency to stricture or ulceration as well as the impact on weight loss or dumping.

OBJECTIVE

This article gives a review of the available evidence on the anastomotic techniques of typical surgical procedures in laparoscopic bariatric surgery.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The current literature was reviewed and is discussed regarding anastomotic techniques for Roux-en‑Y gastric bypass (RYGB), one-anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB), single anastomosis sleeve ileal (SASI) bypass and biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch (BPD-DS).

RESULTS

Few comparative studies exist, except for the RYGB. In RYGB gastrojejunostomy, a complete manual suture was shown to be equivalent to a mechanical anastomosis. In addition, the linear staple suture showed slight advantages over the circular stapler in terms of wound infections and bleeding. The anastomosis technique of the OAGB and SASI can be performed entirely with a linear stapler or with suture closure of the anterior wall defect. There seems to be an advantage of manual anastomosis in BPD-DS.

CONCLUSION

Due to the lack of evidence, no recommendations can be made. Only in RYGB was there an advantage of the linear stapler technique with hand closure of the stapler defect compared to the linear stapler. In principle, prospective, randomized studies should be strived for.

Comparison of Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy and Single Anastomosis Sleeve Ileal Bypass in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Remission Using International Criteria

Introduction: Single anastomosis sleeve ileal (SASI) bypass procedure is recommended in the treatment of patients with obesity, who have comorbidities such as type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Meanwhile, laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) has become the most preferred contemporary bariatric procedure. Research comparing these two techniques are scarce in the literature. In this study, we aimed to compare LSG and SASI procedures in terms of weight loss and diabetes remission. Materials and Methods: Thirty patients, who underwent LSG and 31 patients, who underwent SASI, with a body mass index (BMI) of 35 and above, and under unsuccessful medical treatment, in terms of T2DM, were included in the study. Patients' demographic data were recorded. Oral antidiabetic drugs and insulin use, HbA1c and fasting blood glucose values, and BMI values were recorded preoperatively, at thd sixth month and at first year. According to these data, patients were compared in terms of primarily diabetes remission and secondarily weight loss. Results: At the sixth month and first year, the mean excess weight loss (EWL) values of the SASI group were 55.2% ± 12.45% and 71.67% ± 15.75%, respectively, while EWL values of the LSG group were 57.41% ± 16.22% and 69.73% ± 16.65%, respectively (P > .05). T2DM evaluations revealed that in the SASI group, 25 (80.65%) patients at the sixth month and 26 (83.87%) patients at the first year had either clinical improvement or remission, whereas 23 (76.67%) patients at the sixth month and 26 (86,67%) patients at the first year in the LSG group had the same outcomes (P > .05). Conclusion: The short-term comparison of LSG and SASI procedures revealed similar results in terms of weight loss and T2DM remission. Hence, LSG can be considered as the first-step treatment of morbid obesity accompanied by T2DM, since it is a simpler surgical procedure.

Safety and Efficacy of Single Anastomosis Sleeve Ileal (SASI) Bypass Surgery on Obese Patients with Type II Diabetes Mellitus during a One-Year Follow-up Period: A Single Center Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

We aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of single anastomosis sleeve ileal (SASI) bypass surgery on obese patients with type II diabetes mellitus during a one-year follow-up period.

METHODS

We included patients with a body mass index (BMI) more than 35 kg/m2 and at least one-year history of type II diabetes mellitus. We excluded patients aged under 25 or above 66 years, those who were not candidates for surgery, needed another bariatric surgery, and those not willing to participate in the study. All the patients were visited in the outpatient office on the 10th and 45th days as well as the 3rd month of the post-operative period until the end of the first year.

RESULTS

in this study, we investigated 14 male (23.0%) and 47 female (77.0%) morbidly obese patients with type II diabetes mellitus who underwent SASI bypass. The mean excess weight loss (%EWL) was 60.99±15.69 and the mean total weight loss (%TWL) was 30.39±6.52 at the end of the one-year follow up. Finally, 44 patients (72.1%) had a complete and 15 patients (24.6%) had partial remission of type II diabetes mellitus. Of note, severe complications were recorded in two patients (3.2%). Paired t test analysis demonstrated a significant decrease for fasting plasma sugar (FBS) after one-year follow-up in comparison with FBS before surgery (P<0.0001). Furthermore, this difference was observed in HbA1c (P<0.0001).

CONCLUSION

SASI bypass is an effective method for weight loss and controlling type II diabetes mellitus.

Unpredictable Malnutrition and Short-Term Outcomes after Single Anastomosis Sleeve Ileal (SASI) Bypass in Obese Patients

Objectives

The aim of this study is to present the clinical outcomes of SASI bypass as a treatment alternative for patients with morbid obesity.

Methods

This study was a prospective follow-up of morbidly obese patients who underwent SASI bypass at Helwan University Hospital between March 1, 2019, and March 2020. The surgical procedure involved sleeve gastrectomy, followed by the anastomosis of the ileum, which was brought and hand-sewn 4 cm length side to side with the antrum, at a distance of 250 cm from the ileocecal valve. The data collected for the study included the resolution of comorbidities, incidence of gallstones, and one-year morbidity.

Results

The mean age of the studied patients (n = 30) was 44.13 ± 8.9 years. The mean BMI of the studied patients was 47.3 ± 7.6 kg/ht2. All patients were morbidly obese for an average of 24 years. Postoperatively, 48% of the patients (n = 13) developed gallstones (GS), and the formation of GS was significantly higher in patients with longer durations of obesity (P = 0.009) and rapid weight loss. There was a significant decrease in the incidence of GS after 12 months postoperatively (P < 0.05). 63% of the patients (n = 19) had malnutrition, and 15 cases required revision due to the fear of further weight loss. Revision and malnutrition were significantly higher among male patients than female patients and among patients with longer durations of obesity (P ≤ 0.001).

Conclusion

The SASI bypass may be an effective bariatric and metabolic surgery that can achieve satisfactory weight loss and improvement in medical comorbidities. However, our study highlights the potential risks of severe malnutrition and unpredictable weight loss; patient selection and duration of obesity may play a role in mitigating these risks.

Mid-term outcomes after single anastomosis sleeve ileal (SASI) bypass in treatment of morbid obesity

BACKGROUND

According to several short-term studies, single-anastomosis sleeve ileal (SASI) bypass offers similar weight loss to Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass (RYGB) with fewer complication and better comorbidity reduction/resolution. Long-term data on this operation is lacking in the literature. The purpose of this study was to analyze the outcomes of SASI bypass up to 4 years.

METHODS

This study is a retrospective cohort analysis of 366 patients with morbid obesity who underwent primary SASI bypass from January 2018 to February 2022.

RESULTS

The mean age and preoperative body mass index (BMI) were 41 years (range 22-71 years) and 43.9 ± 6.5 kg/m², respectively. Follow-up was available for 229 patients at 1-year (89%), 112 patients at 2-year (75%), 61 patients at 3-year (75%), and 35 patients at 4-year (71%). The intraoperative, short-term, and long-term complication rates were 0%, 2.5%, 4.6%, respectively. After 4 years, mean percentage excess weight loss (%EWL) was 93.3% and total weight loss (%TWL) was 41.2%. Remission of comorbidities was 93% for type 2 diabetes mellitus, 73% for hypertension, 83% for hyperlipidemia, 79% for sleep apnea, and 25% for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Biliary gastritis and ulcers are seldom. Eight patients developed de novo GERD symptoms requiring proton pump inhibitor treatment. None of the patients in our study had hypoalbuminemia or malabsorption that did not respond to increased protein intake and vitamin or mineral supplementation.

CONCLUSION

SASI bypass appears to be safe, and one of the most effective bariatric procedures regarding weight loss and obesity related comorbidities. The double-outlet created in this procedure seemingly minimizes nutritional complications.

From Our One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass (OAGB) Experience to Establishing Single Anastomosis Sleeve Ileal (SASI) Bypass Procedure: A Single-Center Report

BACKGROUND

Bariatric surgery has been proven to be the most effective treatment for obesity with or without metabolic syndrome. One anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) is a well-established bariatric procedure developed over the past 20 years with excellent outcomes. Single anastomosis sleeve ileal (SASI) bypass is introduced as a novel bariatric and metabolic procedure. There is some similarity between these two operations. This study aimed to present our SASI procedure based on the past experience of the OAGB in our center.

METHOD

Thirty patients with obesity underwent SASI surgery from March 2021 to June 2022. Herein, we demonstrated our techniques step by step and key points of techniques learned from our experience with OAGB (shown in the video) with satisfying surgical outcomes. The clinical characteristics, peri-operative variables, and short-term outcomes were reviewed.

RESULTS

There was no case of conversion to open surgery. The mean operative time, volume of blood loss, and hospital stay were 135.2 ± 39.2 min, 16.5 ± 6.2 mL, and 3.6 ± 0.8 days, respectively. There is no postoperative leakage, bleeding, or mortality. The percentage of total weight loss and excess weight loss at 6 months were 31.2 ± 6.5 and 75.3 ± 14.9, respectively. Improvement in type 2 diabetes (11/11, 100%), hypertension (14/26, 53.8%), dyslipidemia (16/21, 76.2%), and obstructive sleep apnea (9/11, 81.8%) were observed at 6 months after surgery.

CONCLUSION

Our experience showed that our proposed SASI technique is feasible and may help surgeons perform this promising bariatric procedure without encountering many obstacles.

Optimal Length of Biliopancreatic Limb in Single Anastomosis Sleeve Gastrointestinal Bypass for Treatment of Severe Obesity: Efficacy and Concerns

PURPOSE

The present study aimed to compare two newly introduced procedures, single anastomosis sleeve jejunal (SASJ) with ileal (SASI) bypass in terms of weight loss, remission of obesity-associated medical problems, complications, and nutritional status.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study was carried out with 162 patients who underwent single anastomosis sleeve gastrointestinal bypass from October 2017 to September 2021, either single anastomosis sleeve jejunal bypass (SASJ) or single anastomosis sleeve ileal bypass (SASI). The main outcome measures were weight loss and improvement in obesity-associated medical problems, nutritional status, and complications at 12 months post-surgery.

RESULTS

At 12 months, both groups showed significant weight loss and remission in obesity-associated medical problems. There were significant differences in body mass index (BMI), total weight loss (TWL), and excess weight loss (EWL) between SASI and SASJ bypass (P < 0.05). Improvements in associated medical problems after the two procedures were similar except for hypertension. The reversal surgery rate of the SASI group was significantly higher than that of the SASJ group (5.5% vs. 0.0%, p = 0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

SASJ and SASI bypass achieved satisfactory weight loss and improvement in obesity-associated medical problems that were comparable between the two groups. SASI bypass was followed by a significant difference in the rate of reversal surgery at 1 year due to a short common channel, which was not observed after SASJ bypass.

Laparoscopic Single Anastomosis Sleeve Ileal Bypass with Follow-up of Weight Loss and Metabolic Impact

Background: Bariatric surgery has been an effective safe management for severe obesity. The newly developed single-anastomosis sleeve ileal (SASI) bypass has shown efficacy as a functional as well as mechanical restrictive bariatric procedure, with a neuroendocrine modulation effect. SASI bypass is still an investigational procedure, hence, more evidence is needed till it is declared as a standard bariatric procedure by the IFSO. Aim of the study: The current work aimed to describe our experience regarding the technical steps, the efficacy and the short-term outcome of SASI bypass procedure in patients with severe obesity. Patients and methods: Forty seven patients with severe obesity underwent SASI bypass procedure. They were followed till 1 year postoperatively. The weight loss, comorbidities and laboratory changes were assessed. Results: Patients evaluation at the 1-year postoperative follow up revealed a mean %TWL of 37.55 ± 6.17 and a mean %EBWL of 76.21 ± 9.8. The remission rates of T2DM, hyperlipidemia and hypertension were 85.7%, 94.7% and 89.66%, respectively, with statistically high significant differences between the preoperative and 1-year postoperative comorbidities rate. Stepwise regression analysis demonstrated that only the preoperative HbA1C remained in the model predicting the %TWL, and the preoperative BMI was the remaining factor in the model predicting the %EBWL in the study patients. Conclusion: The present study adds a new evidence to the promising outcome of the newly introduced SASI bypass procedure. After one year, the study patients showed excellent weight loss and comorbidities remission together with acceptable major complication rates.

Short-term Results of Transit Bipartition to Promote Weight Loss After Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy

Objective

To evaluate (1) the efficacy of transit bipartition (TB) as revisional bariatric surgery (RBS) after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG); (2) the impact of the length of the common channel (CC) on weight loss.

Background

LSG in combination with TB has been shown to be highly efficacious for treating morbid obesity. The role of TB as RBS to address the problem of primary failure or weight recidivism after LSG is less well defined.

Methods

Observational study of outcomes in 100 morbidly obese patients who received a TB following LSG. Follow-up examinations (FE) were performed at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months. Variables analyzed included BMI, percent excess weight loss (%EWL), total body weight loss (%TBWL), effect on obesity-related conditions and complications.

Results

The mean BMI before LSG was 49.9 ± 8.5 kg/m2. A nadir of 32.7 ± 6.1 kg/m2 was reached 22.1 ± 16.9 months after LSG (%EWL 70.0 ± 14.5). The time interval between LSG and TB was 52.2 ± 26.6 months at which the BMI had increased to 37.6 ± 7.1 kg/m2 and %EWL decreased to 49.4 ± 19.7. Following TB, the BMI decreased continuously to 31.4 ± 5.7 kg/m2 after 12 months with a parallel increase in %EWL to 74.7 ± 20.3 and %TWL reaching 36.3 ± 10.5. Weight loss was significantly higher for CC length of 250 versus 300 cm after 12 months (BMI 29.4 ± 5.3/33 ± 5.3 kg/m2, P = 0.002; %EWL 79.8 ± 26.6/70.4 ± 17; P = 0.009). Improvement of comorbidities was observed in a high proportion of patients. Major early complications occurred in 3% of the patients.

Conclusion

TB is an effective second-step procedure to address insufficient weight loss or weight recidivism after LSG. CC length of 250 versus 300 cm had a significant impact. While most improvements of obesity-related comorbidities are likely linked to weight loss, amelioration of GERD is largely mediated by accelerated gastric emptying. Major complications were observed in 3% of patients and managed without fatalities.

Combined Nissen Fundoplication and Single Anastomosis Sleeve Ileal Bypass (N-SASI) as a Practical Modality of Bariatric Surgery (Video Report)

Sleeve gastrectomy is one of the most common bariatric procedures because of its simplicity and effectiveness. Gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD) symptoms and weight regain after SG are common issues. Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) is currently the most promising approach to achieve satisfying weight loss and GERD remission; however, remnant gastric cancer is still a major concern for patients. We present a video case that individualized procedure of Nissen fundoplication, and SASI bypass (N-SASI) was designed and applied to the patient with class III obesity and severe GERD. This is a 37-year-old man with obesity (BMI: 41.8 kg/m², categorized as class III obesity) and associated disease of stage 1 hypertension, hyperlipidemia, obstructive sleep apnea syndrome, and non-alcoholic steatohepatitis as well as severe symptoms of GERD. Esophageal-gastro-duodenal scope revealed GERD grade C, hiatal hernia, and duodenal ulcer. He refused RYGB recommended initially due to serious concern about remnant gastric cancer. We therefore performed Nissen fundoplication for his GERD symptoms and adapted SASI bypass instead of RYGB as the individualized bariatric surgery to achieve the optimal surgical outcome. The postoperative course was smooth, and the patient was discharged on postoperative day 8.

Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass with Long Biliopancreatic Limb Compared to Single Anastomosis Sleeve Ileal (SASI) Bypass in Treatment of Morbid Obesity

PURPOSE

Bariatric surgery is the most effective treatment of morbid obesity. Bariatric procedures employ different mechanisms of action to induce weight loss. The present study aimed to compare single-anastomosis sleeve ileal (SASI) bypass and roux-en-Y gastric bypass RYGB with long biliopancreatic limb (BPL) in terms of weight loss, remission of comorbidities, complications, and nutritional status.

METHODS

This was a single-center cohort study on patients with morbid obesity who underwent RYGB with long BPL of 150 cm or SASI bypass. The main outcome measures were weight loss and improvement in comorbidities at 12 months, nutritional status, and complications.

RESULTS

The present study included 92 patients (59.8% females) of a mean age of 38.4 years and mean BMI of 42 kg/m2. RYGB and SASI bypass were followed by a significant decrease in body mass index at 12 months and were comparable in terms of excess and total weight loss. Improvement in comorbidities after the two procedures was similar. The serum albumin levels showed a significant decline after RYGB, but not after SASI bypass. The postoperative serum iron levels were higher after SASI bypass than after RYGB. There was no significant difference in regard to complication rates (13% vs 4.3%, p = 0.27).

CONCLUSIONS

RYGB with long BPL and SASI bypass achieved satisfactory weight loss and improvement in comorbidities that were comparable among the two groups. Long BPL RYGB was followed by a significant decrease in serum albumin and iron levels at one year, which was not observed after SASI bypass.

Systematic review of the outcome of single-anastomosis sleeve ileal (SASI) bypass in treatment of morbid obesity with proportion meta-analysis of improvement in diabetes mellitus

BACKGROUND

Single-anastomosis sleeve ileal (SASI) bypass has emerged as a promising bariatric and metabolic procedure. We aimed to review the current literature on the outcome of SASI procedure in terms of weight loss, improvement in comorbidities, and complications.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic literature search, querying electronic databases and Google Scholar, for studies that reported the outcome of the SASI bypass. The main outcome measures of the review were change in body mass index (BMI), % of excess weight loss (%EWL), improvement in comorbidities, and complications after SASI bypass.

RESULTS

This systematic review comprised ten studies including 941 patients with a median BMI of 45.6 kg/m2. The median %EWL at 6 months was 59.4% and significantly (p = 0.04) increased to 90.1% at 12 months. The weighted mean rate of improvement in diabetes mellitus was 99.1 (95%CI: 98.2-99.9, I2 = 0). The crude percentages of patients with improvement in hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and gastroesophageal reflux disease were 51%, 76.6%, and 92%, respectively. The median operation time was 111.3, ranging between 75 and 148.4 min. Complications were recorded in 116 (12.3%) patients. Longer common limb was associated with less %EWL at 6 months and less complications whereas larger anastomosis size was associated with higher weight loss and greater improvement in hypertension.

CONCLUSIONS

SASI bypass was associated with good short-term outcomes in regard to weight loss and improvement in comorbidities, namely diabetes mellitus with an acceptably low complication rate.

Short-term Outcome of Single-Anastomosis Plication Ileal Bypass (SAPI) in Treatment of Morbid Obesity

PURPOSE

This prospective study aimed to report the short-term outcome of the single-anastomosis plication ileal (SAPI) bypass in the treatment of morbid obesity.

METHODS

Adult patients with morbid obesity who underwent SAPI procedure were recruited to this prospective study. SAPI procedure involved plication of the greater curvature of the stomach in two rows then performing a stapled side-to-side anastomosis between an ileal loop and the gastric antrum. Body mass index (BMI), percentage excess weight loss (%EWL), percentage total weight loss (%TWL), and improvement in comorbidities were recorded at 6 and 12 months postoperatively.

RESULTS

The present study included 56 patients (48 female) of a mean age of 37.3 years. There was a significant decrease in BMI at 6 months (37.2 ± 9.3) and 12 months (31.5 ± 7.8) as compared with the baseline BMI (47.9 ± 5.7). The %EWL at 12 months was 72.5 ± 16.2, significantly higher than its value at 6 months (50.1 ± 15.6). The %TWL at 12 months was 36.4 ± 6.4, significantly higher than its value at 6 months (24.9 ± 6.3). All patients with DM showed remission or improvement in their diabetic state. Improvement in hyperlipidemia and hypertension was recorded in 81.8% and 77.8% of patients, respectively. Postoperative complications were recorded in five (8.9%) patients.

CONCLUSION

SAPI procedure achieved significant reduction in body weight and BMI, significant %EWL, and satisfactory improvement in comorbidities at 12 months after surgery. Longer follow-up of patients is needed to reach more solid conclusions on the efficacy and safety of this new technique.

Variation in Small Bowel Length and Its Influence on the Outcomes of Sleeve Gastrectomy

PURPOSE

Small bowel length is drawing attention in the development of gastrointestinal bariatric/metabolic surgery, but the importance of the length of the small bowel in bariatric/metabolic is not clear. The present study was conducted to investigate variations in small bowel length and their clinical significance in patients undergoing laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Small bowel length was measured in 620 patients diagnosed with obesity who underwent LSG between March 2014 and August 2018. Prospectively obtained demographic and clinical data were investigated, focusing on the association between small bowel length and weight loss.

RESULTS

Small bowel length varied widely among patients (mean 739.8 + 115.7 cm, range 380-1050 cm). Linear regression analysis revealed a significant association between small bowel length and body height, body weight, waist circumference, and serum levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, hemoglobin, C-peptide, glycated hemoglobin (A1C), and gamma-glutamyl transferase (r-GT). Multivariate analysis confirmed that body height and serum A1C% levels independently predicted small bowel length in bariatric patients, strongly with body height (p < 0.001) but weakly with A1C%(p = 0.021). One-year follow-up rate was 75.3% (467/620), and small bowel length did not influence weight loss or the reduction of obesity related cardiovascular risk factors after LSG.

CONCLUSION

In this study, small bowel length varied widely among bariatric patients and was strongly associated with body height and weakly with serum A1C levels. Small bowel length has no significant role in weight loss or the resolution of cardiovascular risk factors after LSG.