Endoscopic resection of esophageal and gastric submucosal tumors from the muscularis propria layer: submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection versus endoscopic submucosal excavation: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Advancements in Endoscopic Treatment for Gastric Subepithelial Tumors

Peroral flexible endoscopy is a minimally invasive technique that enables the local resection of gastric subepithelial tumors (SETs) with malignant potential. Resection techniques are mainly chosen on the basis of the lesion size. Minute SETs less than 1 cm should be managed through a watch and wait strategy, with the exception of histologically diagnosed superficial lesions, which require endoscopic mucosal resection or endoscopic submucosal dissection. For 1- to 3-cm small SETs, endoscopic enucleation techniques, such as endoscopic submucosal excavation, submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection, and peroral endoscopic tumor resection, can be used. However, endoscopic full-thickness resection is preferred for histologically complete removal with negative surgical margins. When endoscopic full-thickness resection is considered technically difficult, laparoscopic and endoscopic cooperative surgery (LECS) is a safe and dependable alternative. Moderate-sized SETs (3 to 5 cm) require surgical intervention because the lesions must be removed transabdominally. LECS is a less invasive surgical procedure as it reduces the resection area; however, some LECS techniques that require transoral tumor retrieval are not available. Endoscopic intervention for lesions larger than 5 cm should be used with caution for research purposes. With advancements in endoscopic diagnosis, the indications for endoscopic treatment for SETs are expected to improve, thereby enhancing patients' quality of life.

Minimally invasive treatment strategies for submucosal tumors of the upper gastrointestinal tract: Advances in innovative endoscopy-based therapies

The increasing detection of submucosal tumors (SMTs) in the upper gastrointestinal tract (UGI) is due to the increased clinical use of endoscopy and imaging technology. Some of these SMTs have malignant potential and may cause clinical symptoms. Thus, it is recommended in clinical guidelines to consider resection of these SMTs. Endoscopic techniques have become widely used in the diagnosis and treatment of SMT in the UGI as compared with traditional surgery due to their advantages of minimally invasive, quick recovery, and economical cost. Recently, new endoscopic techniques and instruments have been continuously implemented, leading to revolutionary innovation in endoscopic treatments. However, the safety and efficacy of these innovative techniques remain unclear. Therefore, we have comprehensively summarized the various techniques used in the treatment of UGI tumors in recent years, evaluated the indications and effects of each technique, and compared their benefits and disadvantages. We hope that this review will provide a more comprehensive reference for clinical and endoscopic practitioners, and help them develop more individualized treatment plans for different patients. This will ultimately expand the patient population that can benefit from these innovative technologies.

Endoscopic resection of gastrointestinal stromal tumors

Surgical resection is regarded as the main modality for the treatment of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs). With the advancement of endoscopic techniques and the introduction of super minimally invasive surgery (SMIS), endoscopic resection has been an alternative option to surgery. Recently, various endoscopic resection techniques have been used for the treatment of GISTs, including endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), endoscopic submucosal excavation (ESE), endoscopic full-thickness resection (EFR), submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection (STER), and laparoscopic and endoscopic cooperative surgery (LECS). Studies on the safety and efficacy of the endoscopic treatment of GISTs have emerged in recent years. Endoscopic resection techniques have demonstrated to be effective and safe for the treatment of GISTs. However, there is currently no consensus on the optimal follow-up strategy and the appropriate cut-off value of tumor size for endoscopic resection. In this review we discussed the indications, preoperative preparation, procedures, efficacy, safety, postoperative evaluation, follow-up, and perspectives of endoscopic resection modalities for GISTs.

Ligation-assisted endoscopic submucosal resection following unroofing technique for small esophageal subepithelial lesions originating from the muscularis propria

BACKGROUND

The majority of esophageal subepithelial lesions originating from the muscularis propria (SEL-MPs) are benign in nature, although a subset may exhibit malignant characteristics. Conventional endoscopic resection techniques are time-consuming and lack efficacy for small SEL-MPs.

AIM

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of ligation-assisted endoscopic submucosal resection (ESMR-L) following unroofing technique for small esophageal SEL-MPs.

METHODS

From January 2021 to September 2023, 17 patients diagnosed with esophageal SEL-MPs underwent ESMR-L following unroofing technique at the endoscopy center of Shenzhen People's Hospital. Details of clinicopathological characteristics and clinical outcomes were collected and analyzed.

RESULTS

The mean age of the patients was 50.12 ± 12.65 years. The mean size of the tumors was 7.47 ± 2.83 mm and all cases achieved en bloc resection successfully. The average operation time was 12.2 minutes without any complications. Histopathology identified 2 Lesions (11.8%) as gastrointestinal stromal tumors at very low risk, 12 Lesions (70.6%) as leiomyoma and 3 Lesions (17.6%) as smooth muscle proliferation. No recurrence was found during the mean follow-up duration of 14.18 ± 9.62 months.

CONCLUSION

ESMR-L following roofing technique is an effective and safe technique for management of esophageal SEL-MPs smaller than 20 mm, but it cannot ensure en bloc resection and may require further treatment.

Endoscopic submucosal excavation of a rectal submucosal tumor assisted by a curvilinear echoendoscope

A 62-year-old woman undergoing screening colonoscopy was found to have a submucosal protrusion in the mid-rectum. Evaluation with a curvilinear echoendoscope revealed it to be a 1.8×1.1cm, hypoechoic mass originating from muscularis propria (MP) . Endoscopic submucosal excavation (ESE) was attempted, but despite adequate dissection of the submucosa, the mass remained poorly defined appearing as a slight elevation in the background of flat muscle. Repeat visualization of the lesion status post submucosal dissection was performed with the curvilinear echoendoscope. A biopsy forceps was introduced as a movable landmark which could be visualized on both synchronized endosonographic and optical views, so as to clearly identify the margin of the lesion . Incision of the MP overlying the identified margin allowed for precise exposure of the mass, which was further excavated and finally resected.

Orthodontic rubber band traction to facilitate endoscopic resection of gastric submucosal tumor

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS

Endoscopic submucosal excavation (ESE) and endoscopic full-thickness resection (EFTR) are common endoscopic minimally invasive methods for treatment of gastric submucosal tumors (SMTs). However, it is sometimes difficult to expose the tumor optimally. This study aimed to explore the safety and effectiveness of tumor traction using orthodontic rubber band (ORB) combined with clips to assist ESE and EFTR of gastric SMTs.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The data of patients with gastric SMTs who underwent ESE or EFR at the Endoscopy Center of the 900th Hospital of PLA from January 2021 to May 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. Baseline characteristics and clinical outcomes, including operation time and postoperative adverse events, were compared between patients receiving ORB-ESE/EFTR and conventional ESE/EFTR.

RESULTS

A total of 52 patients were enrolled: 16 patients who underwent ORB-ESE /EFTR and 36 patients who underwent conventional ESE/EFTR. Median procedure time was significantly shorter in the ORB-ESE/EFTR group than in the conventional ESE/EFTR group (32 [IQR, 23.8, 38.0] minutes vs. 39.0 [IQR, 34.6-67.3] minutes, P = 0.002). Baseline characteristics, en bloc resection rate, incidence of postoperative adverse events, and postoperative pathology results were comparable between the two groups (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Use of ORB with clips-assisted traction during ESE/EFTR of gastric SMT can shorten the surgical time. Further large prospective studies are needed to confirm the findings of this study.

Efficacy and Safety of Endoscopic Resection for Gastric Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors Originating from the Muscularis Propria

BACKGROUND

The role of endoscopic resection (ER) in gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) has not been fully elucidated.

AIMS

The purpose of this work was to evaluate the clinical effectiveness and safety of ER in patients with GISTs originating from the muscularis propria (MP).

METHODS

A total of 233 consecutive patients with gastric GISTs originating from the MP layer, who underwent ER between February 2012 and May 2023, were included in this study. Clinical characteristics, tumor features, and outcomes were recorded and compared between patients who underwent en bloc resection and piecemeal resection.

RESULTS

Among the 233 patients, the median size of GISTs was 12 mm (range 5-60 mm). Risk assessment categorized 190 patients as very low risk, 26 as low risk, 10 as moderate risk, and 7 as high risk. The procedures performed included endoscopic submucosal excavation (127 cases), endoscopic full-thickness resection (103 cases), and submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection (3 cases). The complete and R0 resection rate was 93.1%. Complications occurred in 4.7% of cases (perioperative perforations 1.7%, perioperative bleeding 1.3%, both 0.9%), resulting in conversion to surgery in 1.3% of cases. Risk factors associated with piecemeal resection were tumor size [odds ratio (OR) 0.402, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.207-0.783; P = 0.007] and shape (OR 0.045, 95% CI 0.009-0.235; P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

ER is proven to be an effective and reasonably safe approach for gastric GISTs originating from the MP. Notably, larger tumor size and irregular shape are identified as risk factors for piecemeal resection during ER procedures.

Present situation of minimally invasive surgical treatment for early gastric cancer

Minimally invasive surgery is a kind of surgical operation, which is performed by using professional surgical instruments and equipment to inactivate, resect, repair or reconstruct the pathological changes, deformities and wounds in human body through micro-trauma or micro-approach, in order to achieve the goal of treatment, its surgical effect is equivalent to the traditional open surgery, while avoiding the morbidity of conventional surgical wounds. In addition, it also has the advantages of less trauma, less blood loss during operation, less psychological burden and quick recovery on patients, and these minimally invasive techniques provide unique value for the examination and treatment of gastric cancer patients. Surgical minimally invasive surgical techniques have developed rapidly and offer numerous options for the treatment of early gastric cancer (EGC): endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR), underwater EMR (UEMR), endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), endoscopic full-thickness resection (EFTR), endoscopic submucosal excavation (ESE), submucosal tunnel endoscopic resection), laparoscopic and endoscopic cooperative surgery (LECS); Among them, EMR, EFTR and LECS technologies have a wide range of applications and different modifications have been derived from their respective surgical operations, such as band-assisted EMR (BA-EMR), conventional EMR (CEMR), over-the-scope clip-assisted EFTR, no-touch EFTR, the inverted LECS, closed LECS, and so on. These new and improved minimally invasive surgeries are more precise, specific and effective in treating different types of EGC.

Submucosal endoscopy: the present and future

Submucosal endoscopy or third-space endoscopy utilizes the potential space between the mucosal and muscularis layers of the gastrointestinal tract to execute therapeutic interventions for various diseases. Over the last decade, endoscopic access to the submucosal space has revolutionized the field of therapeutic endoscopy. Submucosal endoscopy was originally used to perform endoscopic myotomy in patients with achalasia cardia, and its use has grown exponentially since. Currently, submucosal endoscopy is widely used to resect subepithelial tumors and to manage refractory gastroparesis and Zenker's diverticulum. While the utility of submucosal endoscopy has stood the test of time in esophageal motility disorders and subepithelial tumors, its durability remains to be established in conditions such as Zenker's diverticulum and refractory gastroparesis. Other emerging indications for submucosal endoscopy include esophageal epiphrenic diverticulum, Hirschsprung's disease, and esophageal strictures not amenable to conventional endoscopic treatment. The potential of submucosal endoscopy to provide easy and safe access to the mediastinum and peritoneal spaces may open doors to novel indications and rejuvenate the interest of endoscopists in natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery in the future. This review focuses on the current spectrum, recent updates, and future direction of submucosal endoscopy in the gastrointestinal tract.

Endoscopic ultrasonography is useful for predicting perforation in the endoscopic resection of gastric submucosal tumors originating from the muscularis propria: a retrospective case-control study

PURPOSE

Models for predicting perforation during endoscopic resection (ER) of gastric submucosal tumors (SMTs) originating from the muscularis propria (MP) are rare. Therefore, this study was conducted to determine important parameters in endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) images to predict perforation and to build predictive models.

METHODS

Consecutive patients with gastric SMTs originating from the MP who received ER from May 1, 2013 to January 15, 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. They were classified into case and control groups based on the presence of perforation. Logistic multivariate analysis was used to identify potential variables and build predictive models (models 1 and 2: with and without information on tumor pathology, respectively).

RESULTS

In total, 199 EUS procedures (194 patients) were finally chosen, with 99 procedures in the case group and 100 in the control group. The ratio of the inner distance to the outer distance (I/O ratio) was significantly larger in the case group than in the control group (median ratio, 2.20 vs. 1.53; P<0.001). Multivariate analysis showed that age (odds ratio [OR], 1.036 in model 1; OR, 1.046 in model 2), the I/O ratio (OR, 2.731 in model 1; OR, 2.372 in model 2), and the pathology of the tumors (OR, 10.977 for gastrointestinal stromal tumors; OR, 15.051 for others in model 1) were risk factors for perforation. The two models to predict perforation had areas under the curve of 0.836 (model 1) and 0.755 (model 2).

CONCLUSION

EUS was useful in predicting perforation in ER for gastric SMTs originating from the MP. Two predictive models were developed.

Risk stratification in patients with upper gastrointestinal submucosal tumors undergoing submucosal tunnel endoscopic resection

Background

A substantial heterogeneity exists in patients with upper gastrointestinal submucosal tumors (SMTs). This study aimed to identify predictors of long procedure time (≥60 min), occurrence of procedure-related complications, and long hospital stay (≥6 days) in patients with SMTs undergoing submucosal tunnel endoscopic resection (STER) and stratify risk based on the predictors.

Methods

Sixty-six consecutive patients with upper gastrointestinal SMTs undergoing STER between January 2013 and December 2018 were retrospectively included. Binary logistic regression models were developed to identify predictors of outcomes. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were constructed to evaluate the discrimination of tumor size.

Results

Complete resection and en bloc resection of tumor were achieved in 66 (100%) and 64 patients (97%), respectively. Twenty-seven patients (41%) had a long procedure time, 10 (15%) developed STER-related complications, and 17 (26%) had a long hospital stay. On multivariable analysis, tumor size was an independent predictor of long procedure time (OR 1.37, 95% CI 1.13-1.67; p = 0.001), occurrence of complications (OR 1.06, 95% CI 1.01-1.10; p = 0.012), and long hospital stay (OR 1.05, 95% CI 1.01-1.09; p = 0.035). ROC curves identified a tumor of size 25 mm as the best cutoff; those who had a tumor above this value had a 76-fold risk of long procedure time, 8.56-fold risk of occurrence of complications, and 6.35-fold risk of long hospital stay.

Conclusion

Patients with a tumor size ≥25 mm had longer procedure time, higher risk of STER-related complications, and longer hospital stay; therefore, they should be classified as a high-risk group.

Efficacy and safety of esophageal submucosal tumors treated with internal traction method-assisted submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection: a single-center, single-blind, randomized controlled study

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Submucosal tunnel endoscopic resection (STER) is an effective technique for treating esophageal submucosal tumors, but the efficacy and safety of treating esophageal submucosal tumors with internal traction method-assisted STER have not been determined. The objectives of this study were to assess the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of internal traction method-assisted STER for the removal of esophageal submucosal tumors.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Eighty patients who underwent STER for esophageal submucosal tumors were included in the study. They were randomized and assigned to the two groups. The dual-knife method was used for STER. Forty patients underwent conventional STER (control group) and 40 underwent internal traction method-assisted STER in which self-made rubber band traction with clips was used (study group). In the study group, one end of the self-made rubber band was fixed on the surface of esophageal submucosal tumors with a clip, and the other end of the self-made rubber band was set on the anal side of the contralateral esophageal wall with a clip.

RESULTS

STER was successful in all cases. Lesion features and demographics were similar between the two groups. In addition, broad exposure of the submucosal tissue was obtained by applying tension to the self-made rubber band traction with clips. The en bloc resection rate and complete resection rate were both 100% in the study group. However, the en bloc resection rate and complete resection rate were 85.0% and 100%, respectively, in the control group. Complications, such as perforation and pneumomediastinum, were significantly reduced in the study group, and there was a significant difference in the number of occurrences of bleeding, operation duration, fasting time, and patient length of stay between the study group and control group (P < 0.05). During the mean 13.7 month follow-up, there were no patients with esophageal fistula, recurrence, or distant metastasis in either group.

CONCLUSIONS

This original study showed that esophageal submucosal tumors could be effectively and safely treated with internal traction method-assisted STER, and this technique might be superior to conventional STER due to its fewer complications, shorter operation duration, and shorter inpatient length of stay.

Gastric submucosal mass lesions

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Gastric submucosal mass lesions are a collection of tumours that arise in the stomach and are deep to the mucosal layer. Distinct from gastric epithelial carcinomas, these tumours are generally more indolent. They are often found incidentally on upper endoscopy. Most often they present as smooth protuberant masses covered by normal intact gastric mucosa. The majority are asymptomatic. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) is frequently employed to further characterize the lesions. EUS can be diagnostic of some lesions, such as lipomas, and can be used to guide fine needle aspiration to diagnose others. Adding to the traditional management approaches of observation and surgical resection, numerous new and emerging endoscopic therapies are now being used to resect these gastric tumours.

RECENT FINDINGS

This review focuses on evolving strategies in the diagnosis and management of submucosal mass lesions. Although surgical intervention was once the lone option for intervention, there are an increasing number of endoscopic therapies. There have also been advancements in neoadjuvant therapies and in distinguishing the malignant potential of submucosal mass lesions.

SUMMARY

Gastric submucosal lesions are common. EUS is frequently indicated in the evaluation and diagnosis. For tumours for which observation is not recommended, novel endoscopic therapies may offer less invasive management options.

Endoscopic resection of large subepithelial esophageal lesions via submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection and endoscopic submucosal dissection: a single-center, retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes between submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection (STER) and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for large subepithelial esophageal lesions (SELs) and analyze risk factors for perforation and piecemeal resection.

METHODS

The clinicopathological features and outcomes of endoscopic treatment of 56 patients with SELs with diameters ≥30 mm, diagnosed between June 2017 and December 2020, were reviewed in this retrospective cohort study. Patients were divided into two groups (ESD group and STER group).

RESULTS

The complete resection rates of the STER and ESD groups were 88.1% and 78.6%, respectively (p = .398). The operation time of STER was longer than ESD (p = .03), while the hospital stay of STER was shorter than ESD (p = .02). The rate of major adverse events associated with ESD was considerably higher than STER group (p = .035). The extraluminal growth pattern was a risk factor for piecemeal resection, and ESD was an independent risk factor for perforation. Regarding tumors with extraluminal growth patterns, the ESD group's perforation rate was significantly higher than the STER group (p = .009). There were no recurrence or metastases found during a mean follow-up of 24.4 months.

CONCLUSION

The STER technique has advantages of shorter hospital stays and fewer major adverse events than ESD. The extraluminal growth pattern seems to be a risk factor for piecemeal resection in both ESD and STER. STER appears to be a preferable choice for large SELs with extraluminal growth patterns.