Partial fundoplication for gastroesophageal reflux

Clinical Outcomes of a Laparoscopic Total vs a 270° Posterior Partial Fundoplication in Chronic Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Importance

The efficacy of fundoplication operations in the management of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) has been documented. However, few prospective, controlled series report long-term (>10 years) efficacy and postfundoplication concerns, particularly when comparing various types of fundoplication.

Objective

To compare long-term (>15 years) results regarding mechanical complications, reflux control, and quality of life between patients undergoing posterior partial fundoplication (PF) or total fundoplication (TF) (270° vs 360°) in surgical treatment for GERD.

Design, Setting, and Participants

A double-blind randomized clinical trial was performed at a single center (Ersta Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden) from November 19, 2001, to January 24, 2006. A total of 456 patients were recruited and randomized. Data for this analysis were collected from August 1, 2019, to January 31, 2021.

Interventions

Laparoscopic 270° posterior PF vs 360° TF.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The main outcome was dysphagia scores for solid and liquid food items after more than 15 years. Generic (36-Item Short-Form Health Survey) and disease-specific (Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale) quality of life and proton pump inhibitor consumption were also assessed.

Results

Among 407 available patients, relevant data were obtained from 310 (response rate, 76%; mean [SD] age, 66 [11.2] years; 184 [59%] men). A total of 159 were allocated to a PF and 151 to a TF. The mean (SD) follow-up time was 16 (1.3) years. At 15 years after surgery, mean (SD) dysphagia scores were low for both liquids (PF, 1.2 [0.5]; TF, 1.2 [0.5]; P = .58) and solids (PF, 1.3 [0.6]; TF, 1.3 [0.5]; P = .97), without statistically significant differences between the groups. Reflux symptoms were equally well controlled by the 2 types of fundoplications as were the improvements of quality-of-life scores.

Conclusions and Relevance

The long-term findings of this randomized clinical trial indicate that PF and TF are equally effective for controlling GERD and quality of life in the long term. Although PF was superior in the first years after surgery in terms of less dysphagia recorded, this difference did not prevail when assessed a decade later.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04182178.

Robotic Fundoplication for Large Paraesophageal Hiatal Hernias

Purpose:

Laparoscopic fundoplication is now a cornerstone in the treatment of gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD) with sliding hernia. The best outcomes are achieved in those patients who have some response to medical treatment compared to those who do not. Robotic fundoplication is considered a novel approach in treating GERD with large paraesophageal hiatal hernias. Our goal was to examine the feasibility of this technique.

Methods:

Seventy patients (23 males and 47 females) with mean age 64 y old (22–92), preoperatively diagnosed with a large paraesophageal hiatal hernia, were treated with a robotic approach. Biosynthetic tissue absorbable mesh was applied for hiatal closure reinforcement. Fifty-eight patients underwent total fundoplication, 11 patients had partial fundoplication, and one patient had a Collis-Nissen fundoplication for acquired short esophagus.

Results:

All procedures were completed robotically, without laparoscopic or open conversion. Mean operative time was 223 min (180–360). Mean length of stay was 38 h (24–96). Median follow-up was 29 mo (7–51). Moderate postoperative dysphagia was noted in eight patients, all of which resolved after 3 mo without esophageal dilation. No mesh-related complications were detected. There were six hernia recurrences. Four patients were treated with redo-robotic fundoplication, and two were treated medically.

Conclusions:

The success of robotic fundoplication depends on adhering to a few important technical principles. In our experience, the robotic surgical treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease with large paraesophageal hernias may afford the surgeon increased dexterity and is feasible with comparable outcomes compared with traditional laparoscopic approaches.

Paraesophageal Hernia and Reflux Prevention: Is One Fundoplication Better than the Other?

BACKGROUND

The management of paraesophageal hernia (PEH) is one of the most debated in surgery. Trends regarding indications, approach (open, laparoscopic, thoracoscopic), sac excision, mesh placement, and routine performance of fundoplication have changed over time. Today, most surgeons tend to perform a laparoscopic PEH repair that entails the excision of the sac, liberal use of a mesh to buttress the hiatus, and the addition of an anti-reflux procedure. Nevertheless, very little has been written on which type of fundoplication should be performed in these patients. Therefore, the goal of our study was to provide an evidence-based overview of which type of fundoplication should be performed during a PEH repair and the role of preoperative function tests in the decision-making METHODS: We searched the MEDLINE, Cochran, PubMed, Google Scholar, and Embase databases for papers published between 1996 and 2016 pertaining to the surgical treatment of PEH. We hand-searched the bibliographies of included studies and we excluded all reviews and case reports. We selected clinical studies and technical reports. We only considered papers stating rationales for the type of fundoplication performed.

RESULTS

Our search yielded 24 articles: 17 clinical studies and 7 technical reports. In five of the clinical studies, a fundoplication was added only to patients with reflux symptoms. In all clinical studies, the most performed procedure was a total fundoplication (Nissen or Nissen-Rossetti), whereas a partial fundoplication (Toupet more frequently than Dor) or no fundoplication was reserved to those with impaired esophageal motility. All seven technical reports recommended a tailored approach and suggested adding a partial fundoplication (mainly Toupet) when the manometric findings showed esophageal dismotility.

CONCLUSION

The argument of whether or not a fundoplication should be added to a PEH repair in patients without evidence of reflux still persists. However, this review highlights that, when a fundoplication is performed, a tailored approach based on preoperative function tests is almost always preferred.

A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials to Compare Long-Term Outcomes of Nissen and Toupet Fundoplication for Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease

Aim

In recent years, several studies with large sample sizes and recent follow-up data have been published comparing outcomes between laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication and laparoscopic Toupet fundoplication. It is now timely to be re-evaluated and synthesized long-term efficacy and adverse events of both total and partial posterior fundoplication.

Materials and Methods

Electronic searches for RCTs comparing the outcome after laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication and laparoscopic Toupet fundoplication were performed in the databases of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Center Register of Controlled Trials. The data of evaluation in positive and adverse results of laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication and laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication were extracted and compared using meta-analysis.

Results

13 RCTs were ultimately identified involving 814 (52.05%) and 750 (47.95%) patients who underwent laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication and laparoscopic Toupet fundoplication, respectively. The operative time, perioperative complications, postoperative satisfaction, recurrence, and the rates of medication adoption or re-operation due to recurrence were not significantly different between two groups. The two types of fundoplication both reinforced the anti-reflux barrier and elevated the lower esophageal sphincter pressure. However, rates of adverse results involving dysphasia, gas-bloat syndrome, inability to belch and re-operation due to severe dysphasia were significantly higher after LNF. In the subgroup analysis of wrap length≤2cm, laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication was associated with a significantly higher incidence of postoperative dysphagia. However, in the subgroup wrap length>2cm, the difference was not statistically significant.

Conclusion

Laparoscopic Toupet fundoplication might be the better surgery approach for gastroesophageal reflux disease with a lower rate of postoperative adverse results and equal effectiveness as Laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication.

Laparoscopic fundoplication: Nissen versus Toupet two-year outcome of a prospective randomized study of 200 patients regarding preoperative esophageal motility

OBJECTIVE

To determine the influence of preoperative esophageal motility on clinical and objective outcome of the Toupet or Nissen fundoplication and to evaluate the success rate of these procedures. Nissen fundoplication (360 degrees ) is the standard operation in the surgical management of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). In order to avoid postoperative dysphagia it has been proposed to tailor antireflux surgery according to pre-existing esophageal motility. Postoperative dysphagia is thought to occur more commonly in patients with esophageal dysmotility and it has been recommended to use the Toupet procedure (270 degrees ) in these patients. We performed a randomized trial to evaluate this tailored concept and to compare the two operative techniques concerning reflux control and complication rate (dysphagia).

METHODS

200 patients with GERD were included in a prospective, randomized study. After preoperative examinations (clinical interview, endoscopy, 24-hour pH-metry and esophageal manometry) 100 patients underwent either a laparoscopic Nissen procedure (50 with and 50 without motility disorders), or Toupet (50 with and 50 without motility disorders). Postoperative follow-up after two years included clinical interview, endoscopy, 24-hour pH-metry, and esophageal manometry.

RESULTS

After two years 85% (Nissen) and 85% (Toupet) of patients were satisfied with the operative result. Dysphagia was more frequent following a Nissen fundoplication compared to Toupet (19 vs. 8, p < 0.05) and did not correlate with preoperative motility. Concerning reflux control the Toupet proved to be as good as the Nissen procedure.

CONCLUSION

Tailoring antireflux surgery according to the esophageal motility is not indicated, as motility disorders are not correlated with postoperative dysphagia. The Toupet procedure is the better operation as it has a lower rate of dysphagia and is as good as the Nissen fundoplication in controlling reflux.

[Conventional and minimally invasive surgical methods for gastroesophageal reflux]

The introduction of minimally invasive techniques has had great influence on the indication and surgical therapy for gastroesophageal reflux disease. This analysis is an overview of the current evidence-based status and a critical reprisal of open and laparoscopic antireflux surgery.

RESULTS

The analysis of randomized trials showed an advantage for patients after laparoscopy for total and partial fundoplication because of reduced morbidity, shorter postoperative hospitalization due to faster recovery, and significantly fewer scar and wound problems. The functional results of open and laparoscopic techniques were similar. Five-year follow-up results for the latter showed effective reflux control in at least 85% of patients. Randomized trials regarding technical variations did not show an advantage for division of the short gastric vessel. A bougie for the cardia calibration can prevent postoperative dysphagia after fundoplication.

Nissen or partial posterior fundoplication: which antireflux procedure has a lower rate of side effects?

INTRODUCTION

In patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) it is still controversial as to which type of antireflux procedure-the Nissen or the partial posterior fundoplication-offers the lower rate of side effects in the long term.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In this follow-up study the Nissen fundoplication was performed only in GERD patients with normal oesophageal peristalsis. The partial posterior fundoplication was preserved for patients with weak peristalsis. Only patients with effective postoperative control of GERD were included in the study. The study groups consisted of 77 patients who underwent the Nissen fundoplication and 132 patients who underwent partial posterior fundoplication. Clinical assessment of side effects was performed after a median of 52 months following surgery. Manometric assessment of the lower esophageal sphincter (LES) and of esophageal peristalsis was achieved 6 months after surgery.

RESULTS

Side effects such as dysphagia, bloating, inability to belch and vomit, epigastric pain and early satiety were significantly more common after the Nissen fundoplication than after partial posterior fundoplication. Improvement of the antireflux barrier was equal in both groups; however, LES relaxation was incomplete following the Nissen fundoplication but normal after partial posterior fundoplication. Partial posterior fundoplication resulted in improved oesophageal peristalsis, whereas the Nissen fundoplication caused slight impairment of peristalsis.

CONCLUSIONS

Partial posterior fundoplication is a more physiological antireflux procedure than the Nissen fundoplication, and, therefore, this operation has now become our preferred technique for all GERD patients.

Updated guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease

Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) were published in 1995 and updated in 1999. These and other guidelines undergo periodic review. Advances continue to be made in the area of GERD, leading us to review and revise previous guideline statements. GERD is defined as symptoms or mucosal damage produced by the abnormal reflux of gastric contents into the esophagus. These guidelines were developed under the auspices of the American College of Gastroenterology and its Practice Parameters Committee, and approved by the Board of Trustees. Diagnostic guidelines address empiric therapy and the use of endoscopy, ambulatory reflux monitoring, and esophageal manometry in GERD. Treatment guidelines address the role of lifestyle changes, patient directed (OTC) therapy, acid suppression, promotility therapy, maintenance therapy, antireflux surgery, and endoscopic therapy in GERD. Finally, there is a discussion of the rare patient with refractory GERD and a list of areas in need of additional study.

Medical or surgical therapy for erosive reflux esophagitis: cost-utility analysis using a Markov model

OBJECTIVE

To compare the cost and utility of healing and maintenance regimens of omeprazole and laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication (LNF) in the framework of the Canadian medical system.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

Medical therapy with proton pump inhibitors for endoscopically proven reflux esophagitis is a safe and effective treatment option. Of late, the surgical treatment of choice for this disease has become LNF.

METHODS

The authors' base case was a 45-year-old man with erosive reflux esophagitis refractory to H2-blockers. A cost-utility analysis was performed comparing the two strategies. A two-stage Markov model (healing and maintenance phases) was used to estimate costs and utilities with a time horizon of 5 years. Discounted direct costs were estimated from the perspective of a provincial health ministry, and discounted quality-of-life estimates were derived from the medical literature. Sensitivity analyses were performed to test the robustness of the model to the authors' assumptions and to determine thresholds. A Monte Carlo simulation of 10,000 patients was used to estimate variances and 95% interpercentile ranges.

RESULTS

For the 5-year period studied, LNF was less expensive than omeprazole (3519.89 dollars vs. 5464.87 dollars per patient) and became the more cost-effective option at 3.3 years of follow-up. The authors found that 20 mg/day omeprazole would have to cost less than 38.60 dollars per month before medical therapy became cost effective; conversely, the cost of LNF would have to be more than 5,273.70 dollars or the length of stay more than 4.2 days for medical therapy to be cost effective. Estimates of quality-adjusted life-years did not differ significantly between the two treatment options, and the incremental cost for medical therapy was 129,665 dollars per quality-adjusted life-years gained.

CONCLUSIONS

For patients with severe esophagitis, LNF is a cost-effective alternative to long-term maintenance therapy with proton pump inhibitors.

Nissen vs Toupet laparoscopic fundoplication

BACKGROUND

Nissen fundoplication (360 degrees ) is the standard operation for the surgical management of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). To avoid postoperative dysphagia, it has been proposed that antireflux surgery be tailored according to the degree of preexisting esophageal motility. Postoperative dysphagia is thought to occur more commonly in patients with esophageal dysmotility and the Toupet procedure (270 degrees ) has been recommended for these patients. We performed a randomized trial to evaluate this tailored concept and to compare the two operative techniques in terms of reflux control and complication rate (dysphagia). Our objective was to determine the impact of preoperative esophageal motility on the clinical and objective outcome, following Toupet vs Nissen fundoplication and to evaluate the success rate of these procedures.

METHODS

From May 1999 until May 2000, 200 patients with GERD were included in a prospective randomized study. After preoperative examinations (clinical interview, endoscopy, 24-h pH study and esophageal manometry), 100 patients underwent either a laparoscopic Nissen (50 with and 50 without motility disorders), or a Toupet procedure (50 with and 50 without motility disorders). Postoperative follow-up after 4 months included clinical interview, endoscopy, 24-h pH study and esophageal manometry.

RESULTS

Interviews showed that 88% (Nissen) and 90% (Toupet) of the patients, respectively, were satisfied with the operative result. Dysphagia was more frequent following a Nissen fundoplication than after a Toupet (30 vs 11, p <0.001) and did not correlate with preoperative motility. In terms of reflux control, the Toupet proved to be as effective as the Nissen procedure.

CONCLUSION

Tailoring antireflux surgery to esophageal motility is not indicated, since motility disorders are not correlated with postoperative dysphagia. The Toupet procedure is the better operation because it has a lower rate of dysphagia and is as effective as the Nissen fundoplication in controlling reflux.

Heartburn is More Likely to Recur after Toupet Fundoplication than Nissen Fundoplication

Toupet (270°) fundoplication is commonly recommended for patients with gastroesophageal reflux (GER) and esophageal dysmotility. However, Toupet fundoplication may be less effective at protecting against reflux than Nissen (360°) fundoplication. We therefore compared the effectiveness and durability of both types of fundoplication as a function of preoperative esophageal motility. From January 1992 through January 1998, 669 patients with GER underwent laparoscopic fundoplication (78 Toupet, 591 Nissen). Patients scored heartburn, regurgitation, and dysphagia preoperatively, and at 6 weeks and 1 year postoperatively, using a 0 (“none”) to 3 (“severe”) scale. We compared symptom scores (Wilcoxon rank sum test) and redo fundoplication rates (Fisher exact test) in Toupet and Nissen patients. We also performed subgroup analyses on 81 patients with impaired esophageal motility (mean peristaltic amplitude, <30 mm Hg or peristalsis <70% of wet swallows) and 588 patients with normal esophageal motility. Toupet and Nissen patients reported similar preoperative heartburn, regurgitation, and dysphagia. At 6 weeks after operation, heartburn and regurgitation were similarly improved in both groups, but dysphagia was more prevalent among Nissen patients. After 1 year, heartburn and regurgitation were re-emerging in Toupet patients, and dysphagia was again similar between groups. Patients with impaired motility who have Nissen fundoplication are no more likely to suffer persistent dysphagia than their counterparts who have Toupet fundoplication. In addition, patients with normal motility are more likely to develop symptom recurrence after Toupet fundoplication than Nissen fundoplication, with no distinction in dysphagia rates. We conclude that since Toupet patients suffer more heartburn recurrence than Nissen patients, with similar dysphagia, selective use of Toupet fundoplication requires further study.

Advances in minimally invasive esophageal surgery

Advances in minimally invasive techniques have substantially expanded the role of surgery in the treatment of esophageal disease. In many cases this expansion has made more effective treatment available to a larger number of patients. Gastroesophageal reflux disease, paraesophageal hernias, and achalasia are now routinely treated laparoscopically, and laparoscopy is beginning to be used for total esophagectomy as well. The introduction of this technology has created new controversies and revitalized existing ones in the surgical treatment of esophageal disease. The indications, techniques, and outcomes of videoendoscopic approaches to the esophagus, as well as the controversies surrounding them, are discussed in this review.

Prospective randomized double-blind trial between laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication and anterior partial fundoplication

BACKGROUND

In the operative management of gastro-oesophageal reflux, a balance must be achieved between adequate control of reflux and excessive dysphagia. The ideal technique is not known. A randomized study was performed to determine whether laparoscopic anterior fundoplication is associated with a lower incidence of postoperative dysphagia than laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication, while achieving equivalent control of reflux.

METHODS

Patients presenting for laparoscopic antireflux surgery were randomized to undergo either a Nissen fundoplication (n = 53) or an anterior 180 degrees hemifundoplication (n = 54). Patients were blinded to which procedure had been performed, and follow-up was obtained by a blinded independent investigator. Standardized clinical grading systems were used to assess dysphagia, heartburn and patient satisfaction 1, 3 and 6 months after operation. Objective measurement of lower oesophageal sphincter pressure, oesophageal emptying time, distal oesophageal acid exposure and endoscopic healing of oesophagitis was also performed.

RESULTS

Operating time was similar for the two procedures (58 min for the Nissen procedure versus 60 min for anterior fundoplication). Resting and residual lower oesophageal sphincter pressures were lower following anterior fundoplication (29 versus 18 mmHg, and 13 versus 6 mmHg), and oesophageal emptying times were faster (92 versus 116 s). Acid exposure times and ability to heal oesophagitis were similar. At 3 months' follow-up clinical outcomes were similar for the two procedures. At 6 months, however, patients who had undergone anterior fundoplication experienced significantly less dysphagia for solid food and were more likely to be satisfied with the clinical outcome.

CONCLUSION

Laparoscopic anterior fundoplication achieved equivalent control of reflux, more physiological postoperative manometry parameters, and an improved clinical outcome at 6 months. Continued follow-up remains necessary to confirm the long-term efficacy of the partial fundoplication procedure.

Results of laparoscopic antireflux surgery for dysphagia and gastroesophageal reflux disease

BACKGROUND

Little attention has been paid to nonobstructive dysphagia (dysphagia in the absence of an esophageal stricture) in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). The objectives of this study were to assess (a) the incidence of nonobstructive dysphagia in patients with GERD; and (b) the effects of laparoscopic fundoplication on nonobstructive dysphagia.

METHODS

Esophageal manometry and pH monitoring identified 666 patients with GERD. Two hundred and eight patients (31 %) without esophageal strictures complained of dysphagia in addition to heartburn and regurgitation. Forty-nine (24%) of these patients underwent laparoscopic fundoplication. Esophageal function tests were repeated postoperatively in 12 patients (25%). Main outcome measures were effects of laparoscopic fundoplication on symptoms and esophageal motor function.

RESULTS

Dysphagia resolved postoperatively in 44 patients (90%), and improved in 2 patients (4%). Postoperative esophageal manometry showed a significant increase in the length and pressure of the lower esophageal sphincter, without changes in its ability to relax in response to swallowing.

CONCLUSIONS

About one third of GERD patients without strictures experienced dysphagia; and dysphagia resolved in about 90% of such patients following a laparoscopic fundoplication.

Antireflux surgery in the laparoscopic era

BACKGROUND

The recent development of laparoscopic techniques for fundoplication has created renewed interest in surgery for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease, leading to reports of large clinical series from many centres. However, controversy remains about technical aspects of laparoscopic antireflux surgery, with no consensus yet reached about a standard operative technique. It is important, therefore, to reassess critically the results of laparoscopic surgery for reflux disease, so that its current status can be determined.

METHODS

Published outcome studies for laparoscopic antireflux surgery, as well as selected studies from the era of open antireflux surgery, were reviewed to assess outcomes.

RESULTS

The results of case series for laparoscopic antireflux surgery with short- and medium-term follow-up, as well as the early results of randomized trials, confirm that this approach reduces the early overall morbidity of surgery for reflux disease. However, certain complications may be more common, for instance paraoesophageal hiatus herniation, pneumothorax and oesophageal perforation, requiring surgeons to use specific strategies which can help to avoid these problems. Published studies and trials do not support the routine or selective application of a posterior partial fundoplication technique or routine division of the short gastric vessels during Nissen fundoplication.

CONCLUSION

At present, a short loose Nissen fundoplication performed laparoscopically, with or without division of the short gastric vessels, is an appropriate surgical approach for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. However, long-term outcomes following laparoscopic antireflux surgery will not be available for some years, and must be awaited before the final status of the various laparoscopic techniques can be confirmed.

Advances in laparoscopic surgery

After a brief account of the origins of laparoscopy and of its development into an interventional technique thanks to technical improvement, the author gives a dynamic state of the art in laparoscopic surgery, beginning with a description of his original classification method for laparoscopic procedures according to their level of use. Before tackling the highly controversial issue of laparoscopic surgery for cancer, he reviews in detail the various operations successfully performed by laparoscopy for the treatment of nonmalignant abdominal disorders and acute syndromes, all the while checking their results against those obtained with their open counterparts. As the various procedures are described, the interest of the laparoscopic approach becomes clearly visible, based on the excellent view of the operative field that allows diagnostic accuracy, thus avoiding unnecessary operations, and precise dissection with minimal damage. However, the laparoscopic approach is highly dependent on the surgeon's proficiency, itself depending on experience and therefore on the frequency of occurrence of the disorder, and on the progress in and availability of adequate equipments. The last chapter looks into the future of this ever-expanding approach and defines two great trends in its evolution, one accessible to the individual surgeon, the gradual adaptation of open procedures into laparoscopic ones, the other at the institutional level, in view of the huge financial support involved if high technologies are to be systematically integrated in this new surgery. What will the future be like?