Simplified treatment strategies to fluid therapy in diarrhea

Validity of the Adrogué-Madias Formula for the Management of Acute Dysnatremias in Critically Ill Children: A Prospective Multicenter Analysis

OBJECTIVE

Current conventional formulas do not predict the expected changes in serum sodium after administration of various fluids to correct serum sodium abnormalities. The Adrogué-Madias formula is currently the preferred and widely used fluid prescription for adult patients with dysnatremias, but its therapeutic efficacy has not been validated in pediatric patients.

METHODS

In this prospective study, we used the Adrogué-Madias formula for calculating the appropriate rate of various fluids administration to correct serum sodium abnormalities in 7 critically ill children with acute dysnatremias.

RESULTS

After administration of various intravenous fluids using the Adrogué-Madias formula, the anticipated as well as the achieved sodium concentrations were almost similar.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates that the use of the Adrogué-Madias quantitative formula allows to calculate the appropriate rate of administration of various fluids. The calculated fluid administration resulted in the subsequent actual laboratory values and clinical changes.

Recommendation document on rapid intravenous rehydration in acute gastroenteritis

INTRODUCTION

The efficacy and safety of the Rapid Intravenous Rehydration (RIR) guidelines in children affected by dehydration secondary to acute gastroenteritis is supported by current scientific evidence, but there is also great variability in its use in clinical practice.

OBJECTIVE

To prepare a document with evidence-based recommendations about RIR in paediatric population.

METHODS

The project was developed based on GRADE methodology, according to the following work schedule: Working Group training; creation of a catalogue of questions about research and definition of "relevant outcomes"; score and selection criteria for each item; bibliographic review; scientific evidence evaluation and synthesis (GRADE); review, discussion and creation of recommendations. 10 clinical questions and 15 relevant outcomes were created (7 about efficacy and 8 about security).

RESULTS

16 recommendations were set up, from which we can highlight as the main ones: 1) RIR is safe for children affected by mild-moderate dehydration secondary to acute gastroenteritis, unless expressly contraindicated or acute severe comorbidity (strong recommendation, moderate evidence). 2) Its use is recommended in this situation when oral rehydration has failed or due to contraindication (strong, high). 3) Isotonic fluids are recommended (strong, high), suggesting saline fluid as the first option (light, low), supplemented by glucose (2.5%) in those patients showing normoglycemia and ketosis (strong, moderate). 4) A rhythm of 20cc/kg/h is recommended (strong, high) during 1-4 h (strong, moderate).

CONCLUSIONS

This document establishes consensus recommendations, based on the available scientific evidence, which could contribute to the standardisation of the use of RIR in our setting.

[Recommendation document on rapid intravenous rehydration in acute gastroenteritis]

INTRODUCTION

The efficacy and safety of the rapid intravenous rehydration (RIR) guidelines in children affected by dehydration secondary to acute gastroenteritis is supported by current scientific evidence, but there is also great variability in its use in clinical practice.

OBJECTIVE

To prepare a document with evidence-based recommendations about RIR in paediatric population.

METHODS

The project was developed based on GRADE methodology, according to the following work schedule: Working Group training; creation of a catalogue of questions about research and definition of «relevant outcomes»; score and selection criteria for each item; bibliographic review; scientific evidence evaluation and synthesis (GRADE); review, discussion and creation of recommendations. 10 clinical questions and 15 relevant outcomes were created (7 about efficacy and 8 about security).

RESULTS

Sixteen recommendations were set up, from which we can highlight as the main ones: (1) RIR is safe for children affected by mild-moderate dehydration secondary to acute gastroenteritis, unless expressly contraindicated or acute severe comorbidity (strong recommendation and moderate evidence). (2) Its use is recommended in this situation when oral rehydration has failed or due to contraindication (strong and high). (3) Isotonic fluids are recommended (strong and high), suggesting saline fluid as the first option (light and low), supplemented by glucose (2.5%) in those patients showing normoglycemia and ketosis (strong and moderate). (4) A rhythm of 20 cc/kg/h is recommended (strong and high) during 1-4 h (strong and moderate).

CONCLUSIONS

This document establishes consensus recommendations, based on the available scientific evidence, which could contribute to the standardisation of the use of RIR in our setting.

Clinical Impact of Rapid Intravenous Rehydration With Dextrose Serum in Children With Acute Gastroenteritis

OBJECTIVES

We designed a study to compare rapid intravenous rehydration based on 0.9% normal saline (NS) or on NS + glucose 2.5% serum (SGS 2.5%) in patients with dehydration secondary to acute gastroenteritis. Our hypothesis is that the addition of glucose 2.5% serum (SGS 2.5%) to 0.9% saline solution could reduce the proportion of hospital admissions and return emergency visits in these patients. The secondary objective was to identify differences in the evolution of blood glucose and ketonemia between the groups.

METHODS

We designed a prospective randomized open-label clinical trial that was conducted in 2 tertiary hospitals over 9 months. Patients were randomized to receive SGS 2.5% or NS. Baseline clinical, analytical, and disease-related data were collected. Data were analyzed using SPSS.

RESULTS

The frequency of hospitalization in the SGS 2.5% group was 30.3% (n = 23) compared with 34.8% (n = 24) in the NS group, although the difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.59). The frequency of return visits to the emergency department was 17.8% (n = 8) in the NS group and 5.6% (n = 3) in the SGS 2.5% group (P = 0.091). Changes in glucose and ketone levels were more favorable in the SGS 2.5% group.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results enabled us to conclude that there were no significant differences in hospital admission or return visits to the emergency department between children with dehydration secondary to acute gastroenteritis.

Disidratazione acuta da gastroenterite nei lattanti

Il bambino sotto 1 anno e, soprattutto, di meno di 6 mesi è ad alto rischio di disidratazione, la cui causa principale è una gastroenterite acuta, soprattutto di origine virale. La gestione di una disidratazione da gastroenterite ha due componenti: la sua correzione e il rapido ripristino della normale perfusione tissutale e il mantenimento dei fabbisogni di acqua e di nutrienti, per limitare al massimo il deficit energetico. La valutazione della gravità della disidratazione è l’elemento chiave che guiderà la terapia. La perdita di peso, espressa in percentuale di peso corporeo prima dell’episodio di disidratazione, è il metodo di riferimento, ma è spesso difficile o impossibile da ottenere. Inoltre, i segni clinici, come l’alterazione dell’aspetto generale, l’allungamento del tempo di riempimento capillare, il riconoscimento di una plica cutanea persistente, gli occhi infossati, una secchezza delle mucose e la mancanza di lacrime, sono i principali elementi che permettono di valutare la gravità della disidratazione. Il trattamento si basa sulla rapida correzione del deficit del settore extracellulare. Un’espansione volemica di 20 ml/kg di una soluzione isotonica somministrata per via endovenosa o intraossea può essere necessaria nella fase iniziale nei casi più gravi (disidratazione > 10%). In tutti gli altri casi, la reidratazione per via orale per correggere il deficit di acqua in 4-6 ore è la tecnica di scelta, che si è dimostrata efficace, sicura e veloce. Essa utilizza delle soluzioni di reidratazione adattate che soddisfano criteri specifici. Il loro utilizzo precoce è la prevenzione più efficace delle forme gravi. L’allattamento al seno non deve essere interrotto e l’alimentazione artificiale deve essere ripresa da 4 a 6 ore dopo l’inizio della reidratazione. La vaccinazione contro i rotavirus prima dei 6 mesi è fortemente raccomandata.

Effects of Rapid Intravenous Rehydration in Children With Mild-to-Moderate Dehydration

BACKGROUND

New guidelines for "rapid or ultrarapid" intravenous rehydration are being developed in different emergency departments. These new guidelines propose a faster administration of fluids and electrolytes than in traditional protocols. However, there is still insufficient evidence to establish a standard protocol.

OBJECTIVE

Our objective was to determine the effects of an outpatient rapid intravenous rehydration regimen based on the administration of 0.9% saline + 2.5% dextrose, at a rate of 20 mL/kg per hour for 2 hours, in children with mild-to-moderate isonatremic dehydration resulting from acute gastroenteritis.

METHODS

We performed a 2-institution, prospective, observational, descriptive study. Eighty-three patients were included in the study. All patients underwent a first evaluation, including physical examination, laboratory tests, and assessment of clinical degree of dehydration. After this initial evaluation, all children received our intravenous rehydration regimen. A second evaluation including the same items as in the first one was made after in all the children.

RESULTS

Intravenous rehydration was successful in 69 patients (83.1%). It failed in 14 patients (16.8%), who required hospitalization because of persistent vomiting in 9 patients and poor general appearance in 5 patients. After intravenous rehydration, we observed a statistically significant decrease in the levels of ketonemia and uremia and in the Gorelick scale score. However, no significant changes were observed in sodium, chloride, potassium, and osmolarity values.

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that, in children with mild-to-moderate dehydration, the administration of 20 mL/kg per hour for 2 hours of 0.9% saline solution + 2.5% glucose improved clinical scores and may be used as an alternative and safe way for intravenous rehydration.

Pediatric rapid fluid resuscitation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Intravenous and enteral fluid resuscitation are frequently used therapies in the management of pediatric patients in emergency departments and critical care settings. Any state of intravascular fluid deficit, ranging from mild dehydration due to gastroenteritis to fulminant septic shock, requires careful assessment and early restoration of hemodynamic stability. Rapid fluid resuscitation has gained increased recognition since the most recent pediatric shock management guidelines. We sought to review the evidence for rapid fluid resuscitation and to outline its clinical indications, implementation, and potential associated risks.

RECENT FINDINGS

Rapid fluid resuscitation benefits pediatric patients with severe dehydration or signs of shock. Studies have proven the modality to be safe and efficacious and to reduce morbidity and mortality. Initial and frequent clinical assessments are key in reducing potential complications of overhydration or clinically significant electrolyte disturbances. Rapid enteral rehydration may be used in the uncomplicated, mildly to moderately dehydrated patient. Antiemetics may facilitate rehydration efforts by limiting further fluid losses.

SUMMARY

Rapid fluid resuscitation is most commonly used for children with moderate-to-severe dehydration, or for patients in shock to restore circulation. Concerns regarding potential for fluid overload and electrolyte disturbances and regarding the method of rehydration (i.e., enteral versus parenteral) raise some debate about the safety and efficacy of rapid fluid resuscitation in the pediatric patient. Recent studies show that early, aggressive fluid resuscitation of up to 60 ml/kg within 1-2 h may be necessary to replenish circulating intravascular fluid volume. Complications of severe electrolyte disturbances, cerebral edema, or uncontrolled hemorrhage are uncommon and can often be avoided with early clinical assessment and reassessments throughout the resuscitation. In the mildly to moderately dehydrated child, enteral fluid resuscitation with the aid of an antiemetic such as ondansetron can be as effective and efficient as intravenous fluid resuscitation.

Emergency department management of gastro-enteritis in Australia and New Zealand

OBJECTIVE

Comparison of clinical practice guideline (CPG) recommendations and reported physician management of gastro-enteritis at Paediatric Research in Emergency Departments International Collaborative (PREDICT) network sites as a baseline for further randomised controlled trials.

METHODS

Two part survey comprising: (i) review of CPGs from PREDICT sites for gastro-enteritis; and (ii) survey of senior emergency department physicians regarding the management of gastro-enteritis.

RESULTS

All 11 PREDICT sites participated. Nine CPGs were available with three sites using a common CPG. For moderate dehydration, eight CPGs advocated nasogastric (NG) rehydration in preference to intravenous (IV) rehydration. The IV route was reserved for severe dehydration or failed NG rehydration. In the second component of the survey, 78 of 83 (94%) physicians responded. In moderate dehydration, 82% of respondents used NG rehydration. In severe dehydration, 86% used IV fluids; 12% used NG and 3% an initial IV bolus followed by NG fluid. Serum electrolytes were measured universally with IV fluid use and by 22% using NG rehydration. The IV fluid bolus was with normal saline (86%). Fifty-four per cent used anti-emetics 'rarely' or 'sometimes'. The commonest agents were ondansetron (60%) and metoclopramide (29%).

CONCLUSIONS

CPG recommendations and physician practice for the management of gastro-enteritis were similar across PREDICT sites with a focus on NG for moderate dehydration and IV for severe dehydration. A variety of fluids and administration rates were used. Anti-emetics were used infrequently. The efficacy and safety of newer anti-emetics should be explored in collaborative studies. Collaborative development of new CPGs should be considered to simplify fluid regimens.

Enteral fluid therapy in large animals

Enteral fluids administered alone, or in conjunction with intravenous fluids, are reported to be useful for the treatment of dehydration and electrolyte loss associated with diarrhoea in a number of species, following exercise in horses and for feed impaction of the large intestine of horses. Enteral fluids are suitable for treatment of mild to moderately dehydrated patients with some intact intestinal epithelium and motile small intestine. In patients that will drink voluntarily or tolerate nasal intubation the use of enteral fluids may avoid the complications associated with intravenous fluid administration. However the labour costs associated with repeated nasal intubation in intensively managed patients requiring large volumes of fluids may make the use of enteral fluids less economical than intravenous fluid administration. Enteral fluid use alone is contraindicated in patients that are severely dehydrated and/or in hypovolaemic shock, however, if used in conjunction with intravenous fluids, the effects of villous atrophy and malnutrition may be ameliorated and the duration of hospitalisation shortened. There is a variety of commercially available enteral fluids available to veterinary practitioners. While the key components of these fluids are sodium, chloride and carbohydrates, the amounts of ions and other ingredients such as potassium, alkalising agents, amino acids and shortchain fatty acids may vary. The species of the animal, the underlying condition, and the constituents of the fluid, should influence the choice of an enteral fluid.