Indications for kidney biopsy in idiopathic childhood nephrotic syndrome

To biopsy or not to biopsy a teenager with idiopathic nephrotic syndrome? Biopsy first

Kidney biopsy plays a crucial role in the diagnosis and management of several glomerular diseases. While it is generally considered a routine and safe procedure in children, it should be conducted with the primary objective of addressing the following question: do the prognosis and treatments vary based on the findings of kidney biopsy? In children presenting with idiopathic nephrotic syndrome (INS), guidelines suggest to consider kidney biopsy for individuals older than 12 years, primarily due to the possible increased incidence of different glomerulonephritis compared to younger patients, who predominantly manifest with minimal change disease. However, these guidelines also advocate for uniform therapeutic strategies, typically steroids, irrespective of the age or histological findings. Whether the age of more than 12 years may be a recommendation for performing kidney biopsy at presentation of INS is debatable. Instead, kidney biopsy could be reserved for steroid-resistant cases. On the other hand, when kidney biopsy is performed in INS, particularly in focal segmental glomerulosclerosis, histology may reveal additional lesions, that are strongly associated with a poorer response to treatment and worse clinical outcomes. Therefore, current guidelines on treatments of nephrotic syndrome may appear overly restrictive, despite the relevant findings provided by kidney biopsy. Therefore, in the present manuscript, which is part of a pro-con debate on the management of nephrotic syndrome in adolescents, we emphasize the potential role of performing a kidney biopsy before initiating corticosteroid treatment.

To biopsy or not to biopsy a teenager with typical idiopathic nephrotic syndrome? Start steroids first

It is well known that minimal change disease (MCD) and focal segmental glomerulosclerosis are the most common histopathology findings in children with idiopathic nephrotic syndrome. Moreover, several studies demonstrated that MCD is associated with high steroid-responsiveness and a low incidence of kidney failure, suggesting that routine kidney biopsy is not warranted. Over time, the indications for performing a kidney biopsy have become increasingly stringent, aiming to limit unnecessary invasive procedures in the paediatric population. The most recent guidelines state that a kidney biopsy is not usually necessary at disease onset. Still, it should be performed in case of atypical features suggestive of systemic diseases or glomerulonephritis and in case of steroid-resistance, to assess the different differential diagnoses, regardless of patient age. Moreover, it has been shown that the best prognostic marker in childhood nephrotic syndrome is response to treatment and that kidney histology is not accurate in predicting prognosis. Furthermore, a kidney biopsy is not necessary to predict the relapsing course. Notably, kidney biopsy is an invasive procedure and may lead to significant complications. Finally, novel non-invasive biomarkers have been validated or are in the process of being approved to guide differential diagnoses and thus limit the need for kidney biopsies in patients with typical nephrotic syndrome. In the following sections, we aim to explain why initiating steroid treatment as the initial approach in teenagers with typical nephrotic syndrome is a reasonable strategy. Additionally, we explore how kidney biopsy indications may be alleviated in this population.

Outcomes Using a Standardized Provincial Childhood Nephrotic Syndrome Clinical Pathway

Background

In 2013, the British Columbia (BC) Childhood Nephrotic Syndrome Clinical Pathway (CNSCP) was developed to standardize the care of children with nephrotic syndrome (NS). In BC, children access nephrology care at BC Children's Hospital (BCCH) and multiple regional clinics.

Objective

The primary objective was to compare induction therapy and clinical outcomes between BCCH and regional clinics since implementation of the CNSCP.

Design setting and patients

This was a retrospective cohort study of children with NS in BC.

Measurements and methods

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of children 1 to 17 years old with new-onset NS from 2013 to 2019 inclusive with minimum 12 months of follow-up. Children with non-minimal change disease, steroid resistance, incomplete induction therapy, or less than 6 months of pathway treatment within their first year post-diagnosis were excluded. Clinics were categorized as BCCH or regional (Surrey, Prince George, or Kelowna).

Results

Sixty-nine patients were included, with 52 (75%) at BCCH and 17 (25%) at regional clinics. There were no significant between-group differences in age, sex, or clinical characteristics at time of diagnosis. Comparing BCCH and regional clinics, there was no difference in induction prednisone exposure (median 3400, interquartile range [IQR] 3331-3585 mg/m2 vs 3492, IQR 3397-3644 mg/m2, P = .167), annualized relapse rate (median 3.3, IQR 1.1-5.3 vs 2.3, IQR 0.5-4.2, P = .575), or development of frequently relapsing courses (50% vs 62%, P = .475). There was a similar number of first-year clinic visits (4.2 ± 1.2 vs 4.0 ± 1.8, P = .655) and dietitian-reviewed food records (67% vs 47%, P = .135, BCCH vs regional). More children at BCCH had a recommended ophthalmology surveillance visit (87% vs 59%, P = .01, BCCH vs regional).

Limitations

Study limitations include small sample size and exclusion of children with complicated NS (ie, relapse during induction, steroid resistance).

Conclusion

Since we implemented the CNSCP, children with NS received comparable care and had similar outcomes at BCCH and regional clinics without significant practice variation.

Clinical Practice Guideline: Microhematuria in Children and Young Adults

BACKGROUND

Occult blood in the urine, or microhematuria, is a common finding (about 10%) in children and young adults. It is often of brief duration and therefore harmless. In persistent microhematuria, acanthocytes in the urine are a frequently unrecognized early marker of glomerular kidney disease. The purpose of this guideline is to promote the early detection of kidney disease in children and young adults with practical, evidence-based recommendations.

METHODS

A systematic search for pertinent publications up to January 2023 was conducted in Pubmed, the Cochrane Database, and Livivo. 474 publications were retrieved, summarized in terms of method and content, and classified by Oxford (2011) evidence level.

RESULTS

Approximately 1% of children and young adults have undiagnosed chronic kidney disease. Microhematuria is an early warning sign. A timely nephrological evaluation is indicated if microhematuria persists for 3 to 6 months, if ≥ 5% acanthocytes are detectable in the urine, and if there is also proteinuria, hypertension, or impaired renal function. Ultrasonography of the kidneys and urinary tract is the imaging method of choice; cystoscopy should be avoided. For patients with glomerular microhematuria, molecular genetic testing is recommended. Renal biopsy is recommended in case of florid glomerular diseases, after the determination of various laboratory param eters and clinical findings, including molecular genet ic testing especially in children.

CONCLUSION

In the absence of a guideline until now, findings have often been incorrectly assessed, leading either to an inadequate work-up or to excessive diagnostics. As a result, in approximately 30% of young patients, valuable opportunities for early treatment to protect the kidneys have been missed.

Pediatric glomerulopathy after COVID-19 vaccination: A case series and review of the literature

BACKGROUND

Cases of glomerulopathy after COVID-19 vaccination have been reported in the adult population, while only a few cases have been reported in children and adolescents. For better understanding of this association in pediatric population, we aimed to describe clinical course of patients with glomerulopathy within 60 days of COVID-19 vaccination who were under followed up in the pediatric nephrology department of National Taiwan University Children's Hospital.

METHODS

We reviewed the clinical characteristics, vaccine types, and outcomes of patients with newly diagnosed glomerular diseases or relapse of underlying glomerulopathy within 60 days after COVID-19 vaccination at our facility between January 2021 and July 2022.

RESULTS

Thirteen pediatric patients were found to have newly diagnosed glomerular diseases or relapse from their underlying glomerulopathy after receiving their first, second, or third COVID-19 vaccines in our facility. Of the five pediatric patients with newly diagnosed glomerulopathy after vaccination, thin basement membrane nephropathy, idiopathic nephrotic syndrome, and hematuria have been identified. Seven patients had relapse episodes of underlying nephrotic syndrome and one patient with underlying isolated microscopic hematuria developed subnephrotic proteinuria after COVID-19 vaccination. All patients experienced remission or improvement with either immunosuppressive or conservative treatment during the follow-up period.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the largest case series to date of pediatric glomerulopathy after COVID-19 vaccination. From our report, patients with either newly diagnosed or relapse of glomerulopathy after vaccination had good outcomes, and receiving vaccination to prevent COVID-19 infection or complications should be encouraged in pandemic era under close monitoring kidney manifestations.

Intrinsic Kidney Pathology in Children and Adolescents Following COVID-19 Vaccination: A Systematic Review

Global COVID-19 vaccination programs for children and adolescents have been developed with international clinical trial data confirming COVID-19 mRNA vaccine safety and efficacy for the pediatric population. The impact of COVID-19 vaccination in the kidneys is thought to be explained by a complex immune-mediated relationship between the two, although the pathophysiological mechanisms of how COVID-19 vaccination potentially induces kidney pathology are not presently well known. Whilst intrinsic kidney pathologies following COVID-19 vaccination have been reported in adults, such cases are only being recently reported with greater frequency in children and adolescents. Conforming to the PRISMA checklist, we conducted a systematic review of the current literature to provide an overview on the range of intrinsic kidney pathologies that have been reported following COVID-19 vaccination in children and adolescents. All English language research articles published on or before 30 June 2022 reporting new-onset or relapsed intrinsic kidney pathology in children or adolescents (≤18 years) following COVID-19 vaccination were selected for qualitative analysis. Out of 18 cases from the 13 published articles selected, there were 10 cases of IgA nephropathy (1 case of rapidly progressive glomerulonephritis requiring acute hemodialysis), 5 cases of minimal change disease (MCD), 1 case of concurrent MCD/tubulointerstitial nephritis (TIN) and 2 cases of TIN. There is no indication currently to avoid vaccination, unless specific circumstances exist, as the benefits of COVID-19 vaccination far outweigh its risks. Concluding the findings from our systematic review based on preliminary evidence, potential adverse effects to the kidney from COVID-19 vaccination affects a small number of children and adolescents among the many who have been vaccinated. There remains good reason at present to support vaccination of children and adolescents with a greater morbidity status, such as those living with preexisting chronic kidney disease. Close observation of all children and adolescents receiving COVID-19 vaccination is recommended, particularly in those with preceding intrinsic kidney pathology to identify risks of relapsed disease.

Intrinsic Kidney Pathology Following COVID-19 Infection in Children and Adolescents: A Systematic Review

Introduction: COVID-19 infections resulting in pathological kidney manifestations have frequently been reported in adults since the onset of the global COVID-19 pandemic in December 2019. Gradually, there have been an increased number of COVID-19-associated intrinsic kidney pathologies in children and adolescents reported as well. The pathophysiological mechanisms between COVID-19 and the onset of kidney pathology are not fully known in children; it remains a challenge to distinguish between intrinsic kidney pathologies that were caused directly by COVID-19 viral invasion, and cases which occurred as a result of multisystem inflammatory syndrome due to the infection. This challenge is made more difficult in children, due to the ethical limitations of performing kidney biopsies to reach a biopsy-proven diagnosis. Although previous systematic reviews have summarized the various pathological kidney manifestations that have occurred in adults following acute COVID-19 infection, such reviews have not yet been published for children and adolescents. We describe the results of a systematic review for intrinsic kidney pathology following COVID-19 infection in children and adolescents. Methods: A systematic literature search of published data up until 31 October was completed through the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Research articles reporting new-onset or relapsed intrinsic kidney pathology in children or adolescents (≤18 years) following acute COVID-19 infection were included for qualitative review. COVID-19 infection status was defined by a positive result from a RT-PCR, or nuclear antibody testing. Only full-text articles published in the English language were selected for review. Results: Twenty-nine cases from fifteen articles were included in the qualitative synthesis of this systematic review. Nephrotic syndrome, as an umbrella condition, appeared as the most frequently observed presentation (20 cases) with disease remission noted in all cases with steroid treatment. Other cases included numerous glomerulonephritides, such as acute necrotizing glomerulonephritis, MPO vasculitis and collapsing glomerulopathy, and thrombotic microangiopathies, such as aHUS. For patients with transplanted kidneys, T-cell-mediated rejection and mild tubular interstitial infiltration were noted following testing positive for COVID-19. There were no mortalities reported in any of the included cases, although two patients remained dialysis dependent at hospital discharge. Conclusion: This systematic review highlights the various intrinsic pathological kidney manifestations in children and adolescents as a result of acute COVID-19 infection. The clinical timeline and presentation of these cases support the mechanistic hypothesis between COVID-19 infection and the onset of intrinsic kidney pathologies within this context. The progressive introduction of vaccination programs for children and adolescents may hopefully reduce the severity of COVID-19-associated illnesses, and pathological kidney manifestations in this population.

Management of Steroid-Resistant Nephrotic Syndrome in Children

Nephrotic syndrome (NS) affects 115-169 children per 100,000, with rates varying by ethnicity and location. Immune dysregulation, systemic circulating substances, or hereditary structural abnormalities of the podocyte are considered to have a role in the etiology of idiopathic NS. Following daily therapy with corticosteroids, more than 85% of children and adolescents (often aged 1 to 12 years) with idiopathic nephrotic syndrome have full proteinuria remission. Patients with steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome (SRNS) do not demonstrate remission after four weeks of daily prednisolone therapy. The incidence of steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome in children varies between 35 and 92 percent. A third of SRNS patients have mutations in one of the important podocyte genes. An unidentified circulating factor is most likely to blame for the remaining instances of SRNS.

The aim of this article is to explore and review the genetic factors and management of steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome. An all language literature search was conducted on MEDLINE, COCHRANE, EMBASE, and Google Scholar till September 2021. The following search strings and Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) terms were used: “Steroid resistance”, “nephrotic syndrome”, “nephrosis” and “hypoalbuminemia”. We comprehensively reviewed the literature on the epidemiology, genetics, current treatment protocols, and management of steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome.

We found that for individuals with non-genetic SRNS, calcineurin inhibitors (cyclosporine and tacrolimus) constitute the current mainstay of treatment, with around 70% of patients achieving full or partial remission and an acceptable long-term prognosis. Patients with SRNS who do not react to calcineurin inhibitors or other immunosuppressive medications may have deterioration in kidney function and may develop end-stage renal failure. Nonspecific renal protective medicines, such as angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin 2 receptor blockers, and anti-lipid medications, slow the course of the illness. Recurrent focal segmental glomerulosclerosis in the allograft affects around a third of individuals who get a kidney transplant, and it frequently responds to a combination of plasma exchange, rituximab, and increased immunosuppression. Despite the fact that these results show a considerable improvement in outcome, further multicenter controlled studies are required to determine the optimum drugs and regimens to be used.

Steroid Sensitive Nephrotic Syndrome: Revised Guidelines

JUSTIFICATION

Steroid sensitive nephrotic syndrome (SSNS) is one of the most common chronic kidney diseases in children. These guidelines update the existing Indian Society of Pediatric Nephrology recommendations on its management.

OBJECTIVE

To frame revised guidelines on diagnosis, evaluation, management and supportive care of patients with the illness.

PROCESS

The guidelines combine evidence-based recommendations and expert opinion. Formulation of key questions was followed by review of literature and evaluation of evidence by experts in two face-to-face meetings.

RECOMMENDATIONS

The initial statements provide advice for evaluation at onset and follow up and indications for kidney biopsy. Subsequent statements provide recommendations for management of the first episode of illness and of disease relapses. Recommendations on the use of immunosuppressive strategies in patients with frequent relapses and steroid dependence are accompanied by suggestions for step-wise approach and plan of monitoring. Guidance is also provided regarding the management of common complications including edema, hypovolemia and serious infections. Advice on immunization and transition of care is given. The revised guideline is intended to improve the management and outcomes of patients with SSNS, and provide directions for future research.

Steroid Sensitive Nephrotic Syndrome: Revised Guidelines

Justification

Steroid sensitive nephrotic syndrome (SSNS) is one of the most common chronic kidney diseases in children. These guidelines update the existing Indian Society of Pediatric Nephrology recommendations on its management.

Objective

To frame revised guidelines on diagnosis, evaluation, management and supportive care of patients with the illness.

Process

The guidelines combine evidence-based recommendations and expert opinion. Formulation of key questions was followed by review of literature and evaluation of evidence by experts in two face-to-face meetings.

Recommendations

The initial statements provide advice for evaluation at onset and follow up and indications for kidney biopsy. Subsequent statements provide recommendations for management of the first episode of illness and of disease relapses. Recommendations on the use of immunosuppressive strategies in patients with frequent relapses and steroid dependence are accompanied by suggestions for step-wise approach and plan of monitoring. Guidance is also provided regarding the management of common complications including edema, hypovolemia and serious infections. Advice on immunization and transition of care is given. The revised guideline is intended to improve the management and outcomes of patients with SSNS, and provide directions for future research.

Podocin and uPAR are good biomarkers in cases of Focal and segmental glomerulosclerosis in pediatric renal biopsies

There are controversies whether Minimal Change Disease (MCD) and Focal and Segmental Glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) are distinct glomerular lesions or different manifestations within the same spectrum of diseases. The uPAR (urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor) and some slit diaphragm proteins may be altered in FSGS glomeruli and may function as biomarkers of the disease in renal biopsies. Thus, this study aims to evaluate the diagnostic potential of uPAR and glomerular proteins for differentiation between MCD and FSGS in renal pediatric biopsy. Renal biopsies from 50 children between 2 and 18 years old were selected, with diagnosis of MCD (n = 29) and FSGS (n = 21). Control group consisted of pediatric autopsies (n = 15) from patients younger than 18 years old, with no evidences of renal dysfunction. In situ expressions of WT1, nephrin, podocin and uPAR were evaluated by immunoperoxidase technique. Renal biopsy of patients with MCD and FSGS expressed fewer WT1 (p≤0.0001, F = 19.35) and nephrin (p<0.0001; H = 21.54) than patients in the control group. FSGS patients expressed fewer podocin than control (p<0.0359, H = 6.655). FSGS cases expressed more uPAR than each of control and MCD (p = 0.0019; H = 12.57) and there was a positive and significant correlation between nephrin and podocin (p = 0.0026, rS = 0.6502) in these cases. Podocin had sensitivity of 73.3% and specificity of 86.7% (p = 0.0068) and uPAR had sensitivity of 78.9% and specificity of 73.3% (p = 0.0040) for diagnosis of FSGS patients. The main limitation of the study is the limited number of cases due to the difficulty in performing biopsy in pediatric patients. Podocin and uPAR are good markers for FSGS and differentiate these cases from MCD, reinforcing the theory of distinct glomerular diseases. These findings suggest that podocin and uPAR can be used as biomarkers in the routine analysis of renal biopsies in cases of podocytopathies when the lesion (sclerosis) is not sampled.