Anti-factor H antibody associated hemolytic uremic syndrome following SARS-CoV-2 infection

Abbreviated protocol of plasma exchanges for patients with anti-factor H associated hemolytic uremic syndrome

BACKGROUND

Plasma exchanges (PEX) and immunosuppression are the cornerstone of management of anti-factor H (FH) antibody-associated atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome (aHUS), particularly if access to eculizumab is limited. The duration of therapy with PEX for anti-FH aHUS is empirical.

METHODS

We compared the efficacy of abbreviated PEX protocol (10-12 sessions) in a prospective cohort of patients diagnosed with anti-FH aHUS (2020-2022), to standard PEX protocol (20-22 sessions) in a historical cohort (2016-2019; n = 65). Efficacy was defined as 70% decline in anti-FH titers or fall to ≤ 1300 AU/ml at 4 weeks. Patients in both cohorts received similar immunosuppression with oral prednisolone, IV cyclophosphamide (5 doses) and mycophenolate mofetil. Outcomes included efficacy, rates of hematological remission and adverse kidney outcomes at 1, 3 and 6 months.

RESULTS

Of 23 patients, 8.2 ± 2.1 years old enrolled prospectively, two were excluded for significant protocol deviation. PEX was abbreviated in 18/21 (86%) patients to 11.5 ± 3.3 sessions. Abbreviation failed for lack of hematological remission by day 14 (n = 2) and persistent neurological manifestations (n = 1). All patients in whom PEX was abbreviated achieved > 70% reduction in anti-FH titers at day 28. The percentage fall in anti-FH titers was similar for the abbreviated vs. standard PEX protocols at 1, 3 and 6 months. At last follow-up, at median 50 months and 25 months for standard and abbreviated cohorts, the estimated GFR was similar at 104.8 ± 29.1 vs. 93.7 ± 53.4, respectively (P = 0.42).

CONCLUSION

Abbreviation of the duration of PEX is feasible and efficacious in reducing anti-FH titers. Short-term outcomes were comparable in patients managed by abbreviated and standard PEX protocols.

Anti-factor B antibodies in atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome

BACKGROUND

The etiology of atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome (aHUS) is unknown in 30-40% of patients. Anti-factor B (FB) antibodies are reported in C3 glomerulopathy (C3G) and immune-complex membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis (IC-MPGN), though not in aHUS.

METHODS

We screened patients < 18-year-old from cohorts of aHUS and C3G/idiopathic IC-MPGN. Anti-FB IgG antibodies were measured by ELISA and confirmed by Western blot. Normative levels were based on antibody levels in 103 healthy blood donors.

RESULTS

Prevalence of anti-FB antibodies was 9.7% (95% CI 6.1-14.5%; n = 21) in 216 patients with aHUS, including 11.5% (95% CI 6.4-18.5%; n = 14) in anti-FH associated aHUS and 11.8% (95% CI 4.4-23.9%; n = 6) in patients without a definitive genetic or autoimmune etiology. Patients with significant genetic variants did not show anti-FB antibodies. In patients with concomitant anti-FB and anti-FH antibodies, median anti-FH titers were higher (11,312 AU/mL vs. 4920 AU/mL; P = 0.04). Anti-FB antibody titer correlated with disease severity (hemoglobin and platelets; P < 0.05), declined following plasma exchange and increased during relapse. While 4/64 patients with C3G (6.3%) and 1/17 with IC-MPGN showed anti-FB antibodies, titers were higher in aHUS (544.8 AU/mL vs. 1028.8 AU/mL; P = 0.003).

CONCLUSION

Anti-FB antibodies are present in 6-10% of patients with aHUS and C3G/IC-MPGN, with higher titers in the former. The diagnostic and therapeutic implication of anti-FB antibodies in aHUS needs confirmation and further studies. The study shows propensity for autoantibody generation and co-existence of multiple risk factors for aHUS in Indian children.

Immune responses and safety of COVID-19 vaccination in atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome patients in Taiwan

Atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome is a rare, life-threatening disorder which can be triggered by COVID 19 infection and COVID 19 vaccination then induce multiple organ failure. Our study is the first to evaluate immune responses to COVID-19 vaccination and safety in a cohort of patients in a local single-center study in Taiwan.. Results indicate that vaccines effectively shield aHUS patients from severe COVID-19 complications without significant safety concerns. A double booster dose for the third vaccine is essential for optimal efficacy. Anti-complement therapy did not influence vaccination effectiveness. Transplant aHUS patients had the lowest immune response titers, indicating a need for additional vaccine doses. Compared to healthcare workers, aHUS patients had poor T-cell responses. We noted a superior trend with mixed-type COVID-19 vaccinations in aHUS patients, while fixed-type mRNA demonstrated better results in healthcare workers. Our findings endorse COVID-19 vaccination as a potent strategy to safeguard aHUS patients from severe complications, emphasizing the importance of vigilant monitoring pre- and post-vaccination.

Complement and COVID-19: Three years on, what we know, what we don't know, and what we ought to know

The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) virus was identified in China in 2019 as the causative agent of COVID-19, and quickly spread throughout the world, causing over 7 million deaths, of which 2 million occurred prior to the introduction of the first vaccine. In the following discussion, while recognising that complement is just one of many players in COVID-19, we focus on the relationship between complement and COVID-19 disease, with limited digression into directly-related areas such as the relationship between complement, kinin release, and coagulation. Prior to the 2019 COVID-19 outbreak, an important role for complement in coronavirus diseases had been established. Subsequently, multiple investigations of patients with COVID-19 confirmed that complement dysregulation is likely to be a major driver of disease pathology, in some, if not all, patients. These data fuelled evaluation of many complement-directed therapeutic agents in small patient cohorts, with claims of significant beneficial effect. As yet, these early results have not been reflected in larger clinical trials, posing questions such as who to treat, appropriate time to treat, duration of treatment, and optimal target for treatment. While significant control of the pandemic has been achieved through a global scientific and medical effort to comprehend the etiology of the disease, through extensive SARS-CoV-2 testing and quarantine measures, through vaccine development, and through improved therapy, possibly aided by attenuation of the dominant strains, it is not yet over. In this review, we summarise complement-relevant literature, emphasise its main conclusions, and formulate a hypothesis for complement involvement in COVID-19. Based on this we make suggestions as to how any future outbreak might be better managed in order to minimise impact on patients.

Pitfalls of Thrombotic Microangiopathies in Children: Two Case Reports and Literature Review

Thrombotic microangiopathy can present itself in the form of several clinical entities, representing a real challenge for diagnosis and treatment in pediatric practice. Our article aims to explore the evolution of two rare cases of pediatric thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP) and atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome (aHUS) with extremely similar clinical pictures, which, coincidentally, presented at approximately the same time in our hospital. These cases and our literature review demonstrate the multiple facets of thrombotic microangiopathy, which can produce various determinations and salient manifestations even among the pediatric population. TTP and aHUS may represent genuine diagnostic pitfalls through the overlap of their clinical and biological findings, although they develop through fundamentally different mechanisms that require different therapeutic approaches. As a novelty, we underline that COVID-19 infection cannot be excluded as potential trigger for TTP and aHUS in our patients and we predict that other reports of such an association will follow, raising a complex question of COVID-19's implication in the occurrence and evolution of thrombotic microangiopathies. On this matter, we conducted literature research that resulted in 15 cases of COVID-19 pediatric infections associated with either TTP or aHUS. Taking into consideration the morbidity associated with TTP and aHUS, an elaborate differential diagnosis and prompt intervention are of the essence.

Hemolytic uremic syndrome in the setting of COVID-19 successfully treated with complement inhibition therapy: An instructive case report of a previously healthy toddler and review of literature

INTRODUCTION

As the global pandemic continues, new complications of COVID-19 in pediatric population have turned up, one of them being hemolytic uremic syndrome (HUS), a complement-mediated thrombotic microangiopathy (CM-TMA) characterized by triad of thrombocytopenia, microangiopathic hemolytic anemia and acute kidney injury (AKI). With both multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C) and HUS sharing complement dysregulation as one of the key factors, the aim of this case report is to highlight differences between these two conditions and also emphasize the importance of complement blockade as a treatment modality.

CASE REPORT

We describe a 21-month-old toddler who initially presented with fever and confirmed COVID-19. His condition quickly deteriorated and he developed oliguria, accompanied with diarrhea, vomiting and oral intake intolerance. HUS was suspected, supported with compelling laboratory findings, including decreased platelets count and C3 levels, elevated LDH, urea, serum creatinine and sC5b-9 and presence of schistocytes in peripheral blood, negative fecal Shiga toxin and normal ADAMTS13 metalloprotease activity. The patient was given C5 complement blocker Ravulizumab and started to display rapid improvement.

CONCLUSION

Although reports of HUS in the setting of COVID-19 continue to pour in, the questions of exact mechanism and similarities to MIS-C remain. Our case for the first time accentuates the use of complement blockade as a valuable treatment option in this scenario. We sincerely believe that reporting on HUS as a complication of COVID-19 in children will give rise to improved diagnosis and treatment, as well as better understanding of both of these intricating diseases.

Anti-factor H antibody and its role in atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome

Atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome (aHUS) an important form of a thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA) that can frequently lead to acute kidney injury (AKI). An important subset of aHUS is the anti-factor H associated aHUS. This variant of aHUS can occur due to deletion of the complement factor H genes, CFHR1 and CFHR3, along with the presence of anti-factor H antibodies. However, it is a point of interest to note that not all patients with anti-factor H associated aHUS have a CFHR1/R3 deletion. Factor-H has a vital role in the regulation of the complement system, specifically the alternate pathway. Therefore, dysregulation of the complement system can lead to inflammatory or autoimmune diseases. Patients with this disease respond well to treatment with plasma exchange therapy along with Eculizumab and immunosuppressant therapy. Anti-factor H antibody associated aHUS has a certain genetic predilection therefore there is focus on further advancements in the diagnosis and management of this disease. In this article we discuss the baseline characteristics of patients with anti-factor H associated aHUS, their triggers, various treatment modalities and future perspectives.

COVID-19 microthrombosis: unusually large VWF multimers are a platform for activation of the alternative complement pathway under cytokine storm

ADAMTS13, a metalloproteinase, specifically cleaves unusually large multimers of von Willebrand factor (VWF), newly released from vascular endothelial cells. The ratio of ADAMTS13 activity to VWF antigen (ADAMTS13/VWF) and indicators of the alternative complement pathway (C3a and sC5b-9) are both related to the severity of COVID-19. The ADAMTS13/VWF ratio is generally moderately decreased (0.18–0.35) in patients with severe COVID-19. When these patients experience cytokine storms, both interleukin-8 and TNFα stimulate VWF release from vascular endothelial cells, while interleukin-6 inhibits both production of ADAMTS13 and its interaction with VWF, resulting in localized severe deficiency of ADAMTS13 activity. Platelet factor 4 and thrombospondin-1, both released upon platelet activation, bind to the VWF-A2 domain and enhance the blockade of ADAMTS13 function. Thus, the released unusually-large VWF multimers remain associated with the vascular endothelial cell surface, via anchoring with syndecan-1 in the glycocalyx. Unfolding of the VWF-A2 domain, which has high sequence homology with complement factor B, allows the domain to bind to activated complement C3b, providing a platform for complement activation of the alternative pathway. The resultant C3a and C5a generate tissue factor-rich neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs), which induce the mixed immunothrombosis, fibrin clots and platelet aggregates typically seen in patients with severe COVID-19.

Case report: Diarrhea-associated hemolytic uremic syndrome in the Era of COVID-19

Over the past two years, a growing number of SARS-CoV-2 infection-associated clinical pediatric phenotypes have been identified, including a hemolytic uremic syndrome (HUS) form of thrombotic microangiopathy. Oregon's high prevalence of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) infections gives it a unique perspective to discuss the impact of COVID-19 and HUS. We seek to highlight SARS-CoV-2 as a potential new infectious etiology of severe diarrhea-associated HUS, based on two cases from Portland, Oregon, occurring in non-COVID-19 immunized children. The first case is a previously healthy ten-year-old who presented with SARS-CoV-2 infection and bloody diarrhea after an appendectomy, followed by full-blown oligo-anuric HUS. Second is a previously healthy six-year-old who presented with short-lived bloody diarrhea, rapidly evolving to HUS, and who tested positive for COVID-19 via polymerase chain reaction and STEC toxins one and two. These two cases highlight two main points. First, SARS-CoV-2 must be included in the differential diagnosis of diarrhea-associated HUS, either as the sole agent or concurrent with a STEC infection. Second, when managing STEC gastroenteritis the recommendation has been to maintain excellent hydration as a strategy to prevent the progression to oligo-anuric acute kidney injury and HUS. This strategy may need to be re-evaluated in a patient with SARS-CoV-2 infection or co-infection.