Twenty-four-hour ambulatory blood pressure profiles in pediatric patients after renal transplantation

Isolated nocturnal hypertension in pediatric kidney transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

Isolated nocturnal hypertension (INH) is defined as nighttime hypertension in the setting of normal daytime blood pressure (BP), diagnosed by ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM).

METHODS AND RESULTS

Hypertension affects 60%-80% of pediatric kidney transplant recipients, and INH is the most common type of ambulatory hypertension. INH is associated with an increased prevalence of hypertension-mediated target organ damage such as left ventricular hypertrophy in adults and in pediatric kidney transplant recipients.

CONCLUSION

Ambulatory BP monitoring should be performed annually in all pediatric kidney transplant recipients to diagnose hypertension phenotypes that are not detectable by office BP such as masked hypertension, white-coat hypertension, or INH. Isolated nocturnal hypertension in pediatric transplant patients requires study as a treatment target.

Management of Hypertensive Crises in Children: A Review of the Recent Literature

Hypertensive emergency is a life-threatening condition associated with severe hypertension and organ damage, such as neurological, renal or cardiac dysfunction. The most recent guidelines on pediatric hypertension, the 2016 European guidelines and the 2017 American guidelines, provide recommendations on the management of hypertensive emergencies, however in pediatric age robust literature is lacking and the available evidence often derives from studies conducted in adults. We reviewed PubMed and Cochrane Library from January 2017 to July 2021, using the following search terms: "hypertension" AND "treatment" AND ("emergency" OR "urgency") to identify the studies. Five studies were analyzed, according to our including criteria. According to the articles reviewed in this work, beta-blockers seem to be safe and effective in hypertensive crises, more than sodium nitroprusside, although limited data are available. Indeed, calcium-channel blockers seem to be effective and safe, in particular the use of clevidipine during the neonatal age, although limited studies are available. However, further studies should be warranted to define a univocal approach to pediatric hypertensive emergencies.

Restoration of nocturnal blood pressure dip and reduction of nocturnal blood pressure with evening anti-hypertensive medication administration in pediatric kidney transplant recipients: A pilot randomized clinical trial

Non-dipping and nocturnal hypertension are commonly found during ABPM in pediatric kidney transplant recipients. These entities are independently associated with increased cardiovascular disease risk in adults. Kidney transplant recipients aged 5-21 years with eGFR > 30 mL/min/1.73 m² and ABPM demonstrating non-dipping status and normal daytime BP were randomized to intervention (short acting BP medication added in the evening) or control (no medication change) in this pilot, randomized, open-label, blinded end-point clinical trial. ABPM, echocardiography, and PWV were performed at baseline, 3 months, and 6 months. The trial included 17 intervention and 16 control participants. Conversion to dipper status occurred in 53.3% vs 7.7% (P = .01) at 6 months for intervention and controls, respectively. Systolic dip was greater in the intervention group compared to controls (10.9 ± 4.5 vs 4.2 ± 4.6, P = .001), and average systolic nighttime BP was significantly lower in the intervention group (106 ± 8.3 vs 114.9 ± 9.5 mm Hg, P = .01) at 6 months. There were no significant differences in LVMI, PWV, or eGFR between groups. Within-group changes in the intervention group demonstrated improvements in non-dippers, dipping, systolic nighttime BP and nighttime BP load. Restoration of nocturnal dip and improvement in nocturnal BP were observed in the population following chronotherapy. Future studies are needed with larger sample sizes over a longer period of time to delineate the long-term effect of improved nocturnal dip on target organ damage.

2016 European Society of Hypertension guidelines for the management of high blood pressure in children and adolescents

Increasing prevalence of hypertension (HTN) in children and adolescents has become a significant public health issue driving a considerable amount of research. Aspects discussed in this document include advances in the definition of HTN in 16 year or older, clinical significance of isolated systolic HTN in youth, the importance of out of office and central blood pressure measurement, new risk factors for HTN, methods to assess vascular phenotypes, clustering of cardiovascular risk factors and treatment strategies among others. The recommendations of the present document synthesize a considerable amount of scientific data and clinical experience and represent the best clinical wisdom upon which physicians, nurses and families should base their decisions. In addition, as they call attention to the burden of HTN in children and adolescents, and its contribution to the current epidemic of cardiovascular disease, these guidelines should encourage public policy makers to develop a global effort to improve identification and treatment of high blood pressure among children and adolescents.

Hypertension in chronic kidney disease: role of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring

Children with chronic kidney disease have a markedly increased risk of cardiovascular morbidity and children with end stage renal disease have an estimated 30 times greater risk of cardiovascular mortality than the general pediatric population. In adults, the link between hypertension and cardiovascular disease is well-documented but that association has not been so readily apparent in children with chronic kidney disease. This may be in part because the early changes in blood pressure that occur in these patients do not necessarily manifest with changes in casual blood pressure measurements. Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring, with its ability to gather multiple readings both during the normal activities of the day and the night, is felt to be a more veritable measure of blood pressure. Its use in children has been hampered by limited data on normative values and difficulties in blood pressure classification, while its use in adults is ever expanding. However, with an increasing number of studies in children with chronic kidney disease, ambulatory blood pressure has revealed a greater prevalence of abnormal findings in this population and has been shown to better predict cardiovascular risk than current standards. Two large multi-center studies in Europe and North America have revealed even greater utility of ambulatory blood pressure measures in this population. It is hoped that continued use of ambulatory monitoring in children will help overcome some of its perceived limitations while also validating its use in those at high risk of cardiovascular morbidity.

Blood pressure profiles 5 to 10 years after transplant in pediatric solid organ recipients

Arterial hypertension is a major risk factor for cardiovascular disease after solid organ transplantation, emphasizing the need for blood pressure (BP) monitoring. The authors studied 24-hour ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM) parameters (index, load, dipping) and their predictive value with regard to hypertension as well as correlations with graft function and metabolic parameters such as obesity and dyslipidemias. The ABPM profiles of 111 renal, 29 heart, and 13 liver transplant recipients were retrospectively analyzed 5 to 10 years after transplant (median 5.1 years). The BP profiles among the different transplant groups were similar. The BP index and load were abnormal especially at nighttime and the nocturnal BP dipping was often blunted (in 49% to 83% of the patients). The BP variables were found to be equally valued when assessing hypertension. BP load of 50% instead of 25% seems to be a more adequate cutoff value. The BP variables correlated poorly with the metabolic parameters and kidney function. Antihypertensive medication did not notably change the ABPM profile in renal transplant recipients. Hypertension, including nocturnal hypertension, is present in children receiving solid organ transplant, underlining the importance of use of ABPM in the follow-up of these patients.

Post-transplant hypertension in pediatric kidney transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

The aim of the study was to investigate the prevalence of post-transplant hypertension (HT) and to assess the blood pressure (BP) of transplanted children with possible risk factors.

METHODS

Office and ambulatory blood pressure measurements were performed for each patient.

RESULTS

Twenty-nine patients were included in the study, including 13 patients with newly diagnosed untreated HT according to the results of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM). Fourteen patients were on antihypertensive medication, but only in five of these patients was the HT under control; nine patients receiving antihypertensive drugs had uncontrolled HT. Of the 29 patients, two had normotension without any antihypertensive drug(s). Standard deviation scores (SDS) of the nocturnal diastolic BP of the ABPM were positively correlated with the prednisolone dosage per kilogram (p = 0.013, r = 0.45) and negatively correlated with the time period after transplantation (p = 0.024, r = -0.41). Similarly, the SDS of the 24-h diastolic BP was positively correlated with the prednisolone dosage per kilogram (p = 0.006, r = 0.50) and negatively correlated with the time period after transplantation (p = 0.016, r = -0.44). Patients with alternate-day steroid treatment had lower nocturnal systolic (p = 0.016), nocturnal diastolic (p = 0.001) and 24-h diastolic (p = 0.008) SDS when compared to those receiving daily steroid medication.

CONCLUSION

The prevalence of HT among children after renal transplantation was high among our patient cohort, and steroids had direct impact on nocturnal and diastolic BP.

Hypertension in the teenager

Over the last two decades, essential hypertension has become common in adolescents, yet remains under-diagnosed in absence of symptoms. Diagnosis is based on normative percentiles that factor in age, sex and height. Evaluation is more similar to adult essential hypertension than childhood secondary hypertension. Modifiable risk factors such as obesity, sodium consumption and low exercise should be addressed first. Many anti-hypertensive medications now have specific regulatory approval for children. Sports participation need not be limited in mild or well-controlled cases. Primary care physicians play an important role in reduction of cardiovascular mortality by early detection and referral when needed.

Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in pediatric renal transplantation

Hypertension is a common and serious complication after renal transplantation. It is an important risk factor for graft loss and adverse cardiovascular outcomes. Blood pressure (BP) in transplanted children should be measured not only by clinic BP (cBP) measurement, but also by ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM), because ABPM has distinct advantages over cBP, specifically the ability to reveal nocturnal, masked or white-coat hypertension. These types of hypertension are common in transplanted children (nocturnal hypertension 36-71 %, masked hypertension 24-45 %). It may also reveal uncontrolled hypertension in treated children, thereby improving control of hypertension. Regular use of ABPM and ABPM-guided therapy of hypertension may help to decrease cardiovascular and renal target organ damage in transplanted children. Therefore, ABPM should be routinely performed in all transplanted children at least once a year, regardless of the values of cBP.

Systemic arterial hypertension in children following renal transplantation: prevalence and risk factors

BACKGROUND

Control of blood pressure (BP) following renal transplantation may improve allograft and patient survival. Our aims were (i) to describe the distribution of BP and the prevalence of systolic and/or diastolic hypertension in children over the first 5 years following renal transplantation and (ii) to evaluate clinical risk factors and centre-specific factors associated with hypertension in this population.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective case note review of all current paediatric kidney transplant patients in the UK, with data collected at 6 months, 1, 2 and 5 years following transplantation in subjects with hypertension (systolic and/or diastolic BP > 95th > ) and non-hypertensive subjects BP ≤ 95th > .

RESULTS

In total, 27.3% (117/428), 27.6% (118/428), 26.0% (95/365) and 25.6% (50/195) of the patients were hypertensive (systolic and/or diastolic BP > 95th > ) at 6 months, 1, 2 and 5 years following transplantation, respectively. A total of 58.4% of the patients at 6 months, 52.8% at 1 year, 48.2% at 2 years and 48.2% at 5 years were receiving anti-hypertensive therapy, of whom 31.6-36.6% remained hypertensive. When subjects were identified as being hypertensive, on anti-hypertensive medication or had untreated hypertension (systolic and/or diastolic BP > 95th > ), 66.4, 61.0, 56.4 and 55.9% of patients were hypertensive at 6 months, 1, 2 and 5 years, respectively. In a multivariate model, odds ratios for systolic hypertension were 4.16 (deceased versus living donor), 2.65 (lowest versus highest quartile of height z-score) and 2.07 (if on anti-hypertensive; yes versus no). There was significant variation in prevalent rates of hypertension between centres (P < 0.0001) that remained significant (P = 0.003) after adjustment for all the factors in the multivariate model.

CONCLUSIONS

Control of BP after kidney transplantation remains sub-optimal in paediatric centres in the UK. Just over 25% of patients remain hypertensive 5 years following transplantation. Significant differences between centres remain unexplained and may reflect differences in assessment and management of hypertension.

Chronic peritoneal dialysis in children with special needs or social disadvantage or both: contraindications are not always contraindications

OBJECTIVE

Our aim in the present study was to identify outcomes in children with special needs or social disadvantage, or both, receiving chronic peritoneal dialysis (CPD) treatment in a pediatric dialysis unit.

METHODS

Among 110 children started on CPD in our unit during the period between November 1995 and November 2008, we identified 13 patients (8 girls, 5 boys) with major physical, mental, or psychosocial problems. Age at CPD initiation in the group with disability ranged from 4.0 years to 16.5 years (median: 7.5 years). Under lying diseases were vesicoureteral reflux (4 patients), neuropathic bladder and vesicoureteral reflux (3 patients), chronic pyelonephritis (3 patients), amyloidosis (2 patients), and Alport syndrome (1 patient). Challenges encountered were adverse family or social circumstances (4 patients), cerebral palsy (3 patients), Down syndrome (1 patient), rectovesical fistula in conjunction with ectopic anus and previous multiple abdominal surgery (1 patient), blindness and deafness (1 patient), ventriculoperitoneal shunt (1 patient), colostomy and malnutrition (1 patient), and mental retardation and blindness (1 patient). All catheters were implanted percutaneously.

RESULTS

Median duration of dialysis was 18 months (range: 6 - 124 months). The frequency of peritonitis was not different between children with and without disability (p > 0.05). In children with disability compared with children without disability, the frequencies of catheter-related infections (1 episode/79.3 patient-months vs 1 episode/32.4 patient-months) and of catheter-related non-infectious complications (1 episode/238 patient-months vs 1 episode/115.7 patient-months) were lower (p < 0.05). Chronic peritoneal dialysis was terminated in 5 children (for renal transplantation in 3, switch to hemodialysis in 1, death in 1).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that, with appropriate family support and an experienced multidisciplinary team, CPD can be effectively performed in children with special needs or social disadvantage, or both.

Importance of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in adolescent hypertension

There has been a steady increase in the prevalence of adolescent hypertension in recent years. In order to prevent target organ damages, it is important to determine the group of hypertensive adolescents. If repeatedly elevated blood pressure values are observed, with special emphasis on white coat hypertension, which is particularly frequent at this age, ambulatory blood pressure monitoring is highly recommended before pharmacological treatment is started. In addition, performing ambulatory blood pressure monitoring is recommended with target organ damage, resistance to therapy, and suspicion of secondary hypertension. The results of the widely available, simple-to-use device are easy to reproduce.

Cardiorespiratory fitness is a marker of cardiovascular health in renal transplanted children

Children with renal transplants (TX) are at increased risk of cardiovascular (CV) disease. Study objectives were to assess the level of cardiorespiratory fitness (CR fitness) and daily physical activity (PA) in renal TX children and adolescents in relation to traditional cardiovascular risk factors. Laboratory testing included assessment of CR fitness by treadmill exercise testing (VO(2peak)), 24-h ambulatory blood-pressure (ABPM) measurement, oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT), anthropometrics and measurement of lipid levels. PA was self-reported by questionnaire. Twenty-two TX patients with a median (range) age 14.5 (9-18) years were tested. Median V0(2peak) was 66% (36-97) of the expected values compared with controls. Nineteen (86%) children reported <60 min of daily moderate to vigorous physical activity (MVPA). Sixteen (73%) were hypertensive and 8 (34%) were overweight or obese. Four children fulfilled the criteria for a metabolic syndrome. Children with at least 2 of the 3 metabolic risk factors (hypertension, overweight, and glucose intolerance, n=7) achieved significantly lower VO(2peak) compared with those with one or none of these factors (median V0(2peak) 45% and 73% of the expected values respectively, p=0.003). Renal TX children and adolescents have severely impaired CR fitness and PA. Reduced CR fitness was associated with the clustering of CV risk factors. Routine counseling for increased PA is strongly recommended.

Masked hypertension and hidden uncontrolled hypertension after renal transplantation

Arterial hypertension is a risk factor affecting graft function in pediatric kidney transplants. Recent pediatric studies reported a high prevalence of hypertension, especially nocturnal hypertension in this population. Data regarding the prevalence of masked hypertension in pediatric patients with kidney transplants are still scarce. The aim of this cross-sectional study was to assess the prevalence of masked and hidden uncontrolled hypertension after renal transplantation. A total of 41 patients (25 males) with stable functioning renal graft were included in the study. Their median age was 14.5 years with the median interval since transplantation of 2.5 years (range 0.3 to 20.6). Spacelabs 90207 was used to measure ambulatory blood pressure (BP) during a 24-h period. Ambulatory hypertension was defined as mean systolic and/or diastolic BP index at day-time or nighttime >or=1. Masked hypertension was defined as normal office BP but daytime ambulatory hypertension in patients without antihypertensive medications. Hidden uncontrolled hypertension was defined as daytime ambulatory hypertension undetected by office BP measurements in treated patients. Antihypertensive medications were prescribed to 58%. Prevalence of nocturnal hypertension was 68%. On the basis of combination of office and ABPM masked hypertension and hidden uncontrolled hypertension was detected in 24% and 21% of the study population, respectively. Regular use of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in transplanted patients enables detection of masked and hidden uncontrolled hypertension.

[Importance of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in adolescent hypertension]

The prevalence of adolescent hypertension is increasing. The national epidemiological study found 2.5% prevalence, while it is 4.5% according to the newest international survey. Repeated casual blood pressure measurements, but not ambulatory blood pressure monitoring is needed for the diagnosis of adolescent hypertension on the basis of the presently available European guideline. At the last decade growing evidence came into light for ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in adolescence. These data show better correlation with end-organ damages than casual measurements. In patients with hypertension diagnosed based on repeated casual blood pressure measurements, 24-hour monitoring showed normal blood pressure in 21-47%, so this is the rate of white coat hypertension. Masked hypertension can also be diagnosed with the help of this method, which has a prevalence of 7-11%. We can also get useful data for secondary forms of hypertension. Until the appearance of the new European guidelines, more frequent use of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring is affordable. The confirmation of the diagnosis based on elevated casual blood pressure data is important. Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring is suggested in cases suspicious for white coat or masked hypertension, in cases of target organ damages or therapy resistant hypertension. Before administration of pharmaceutical therapy in adolescence hypertension - according to author's opinion - ambulatory blood pressure monitoring is absolutely necessary.

Hypertension after renal transplantation

Hypertension is a common and serious complication after renal transplantation. It is an important risk factor for graft loss and morbidity and mortality of transplanted children. The etiology of posttransplant hypertension is multifactorial: native kidneys, immunosuppressive therapy, renal-graft artery stenosis, and chronic allograft nephropathy are the most common causes. Blood pressure (BP) in transplanted children should be measured not only by casual BP (CBP) measurement but also regularly by ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM). The prevalence of posttransplant hypertension ranges between 60% and 90% depending on the method of BP measurement and definition. Left ventricular hypertrophy is a frequent type of end-organ damage in hypertensive children after transplantation (50-80%). All classes of antihypertensive drugs can be used in the treatment of posttransplant hypertension. Hypertension control in transplanted children is poor; only 20-50% of treated children reach normal BP. The reason for this poor control seems to be inadequate antihypertensive therapy, which can be improved by increasing the number of antihypertensive drugs. Improved hypertension control leads to improved long-term graft and patient survival in adults. In children, there is a great potential for antihypertensive treatment that could also result in improved graft and patient survival.

Blood pressure control in hypertensive pediatric renal transplants: role of repeated ABPM following transplantation

BACKGROUND

Hypertension in pediatric renal transplants is a widespread condition associated with high mortality risk in early adult life. Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) was found to be superior to office blood pressure (BP) in identifying true hypertensive and responders to treatment. The aim of this study was to investigate the role of repeated ABPM, performed at yearly intervals following transplantation, in the assessment and decision-making processes of post-transplant hypertension.

METHODS

Thirty-seven recipients (23 males; aged 10.5 +/- 4.3 years) who were followed for 4.3 +/- 2.2 years (range 2-9) after transplantation were eligible for analysis. The mean follow-up time between the baseline (1 year post-transplantation) and the most recent ABPM examination was 3.3 +/- 2.2 years (range 1-8).

RESULTS

Throughout the follow-up period, antihypertensive therapy was either started or intensified in 27 recipients. These interventions were decided based on ABPM results obtained on 40 of 44 occasions. At last follow-up, 24 of 29 treated hypertensive recipients displayed controlled BP. This figure was significantly higher compared to our historical hypertensive control recipients in whom ABPM was applied for the first time in treatment at 6 +/- 3.3 years (range 2-15) after transplantation, while therapeutic decisions were driven by office BP measurements (95 % confidence interval (95% CI) for the difference between proportions (80.6-32 %) 36-60 %, P = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study shows that, in a population with high risk for hypertension, repeated ABPM may significantly help to improve BP control.

Blood pressure abnormalities in children with chronic kidney disease

OBJECTIVES

Disturbances of blood pressure (BP) rhythms have been demonstrated in patients with various degrees of renal impairment. The purpose of this study was to determine the prevalence of BP abnormalities in children with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and evaluate possible factors associated with nocturnal BP abnormalities.

METHODS

42 children between 2 and 19 years of age with CKD stages 2-5 completed 24-h ambulatory BP monitoring.

RESULTS

The percentage of patients with daytime hypertension was less than 10% but rates were higher at nighttime where 14% had systolic and 24% diastolic hypertension. A similar percentage of patients had a BP load >50%. BP abnormalities that were not evident in clinic BP readings were identified in 49% of the participants. The nocturnal BP dipping percentage tended to decrease as the estimated glomerular filtration rate decreased. Proteinuria was significantly associated with nocturnal BP nondipping.

CONCLUSION

24-h ambulatory BP monitoring may provide additional insight into hypertension in pediatric patients as early as CKD stage 2. Several BP abnormalities were identified that were not evident in casual BP measurements including nocturnal hypertension, elevated BP load, and nocturnal BP nondipping.

Therapeutic strategies to slow chronic kidney disease progression

Childhood chronic kidney disease commonly progresses toward end-stage renal failure, largely independent of the underlying disorder, once a critical impairment of renal function has occurred. Hypertension and proteinuria are the most important independent risk factors for renal disease progression. Therefore, current therapeutic strategies to prevent progression aim at controlling blood pressure and reducing urinary protein excretion. Renin-angiotensin-system (RAS) antagonists preserve kidney function not only by lowering blood pressure but also by their antiproteinuric, antifibrotic, and anti-inflammatory properties. Intensified blood pressure control, probably aiming for a target blood pressure below the 75th percentile, may exert additional renoprotective effects. Other factors contributing in a multifactorial manner to renal disease progression include dyslipidemia, anemia, and disorders of mineral metabolism. Measures to preserve renal function should therefore also comprise the maintenance of hemoglobin, serum lipid, and calcium-phosphorus ion product levels in the normal range.

Improved control of hypertension in children after renal transplantation: results of a two-yr interventional trial

Hypertension is a frequent complication in children after renal transplantation and the control of post-transplant hypertension is unsatisfactorily low. The aim of this prospective interventional study was to improve the control of hypertension in children after renal transplantation. Thirty-six children fulfilled the inclusion criteria (> or =6 months after transplantation and no acute rejection in the last three months). BP was measured using ABPM. Hypertension was defined as mean ambulatory BP > or =95th-centile for healthy children and/or using antihypertensive drugs. The study intervention consisted of using intensified antihypertensive drug therapy - in children with uncontrolled hypertension (i.e., mean ambulatory BP was > or =95th centile in treated children), antihypertensive therapy was intensified by adding new antihypertensive drugs to reach goal BP <95th centile. ABPM was repeated after 12 and 24 months. Daytime BP did not change significantly after 12 or 24 months. Night-time BP decreased from 1.57 +/- 1.33 to 0.88 +/- 0.84 SDS for systolic and from 1.10 +/- 1.51 to 0.35 +/- 1.18 SDS for diastolic BP after 24 months (p < 0.05). The number of antihypertensive drugs increased from 2.1 +/- 0.9 to 2.7 +/- 0.8 drugs per patient (p < 0.05), this was especially seen with the use of ACE-inhibitors (increase from 19% to 40% of children, p < 0.05). In conclusion, this interventional trial demonstrated that, in children after renal transplantation, the control of hypertension, especially at night-time, can be improved by increasing the number of antihypertensive drugs, especially ACE-inhibitors.

ABPM vs office blood pressure to define blood pressure control in treated hypertensive paediatric renal transplant recipients

While 24-h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) is an established tool for monitoring antihypertensive therapy in adults, data in children are scarce. We retrospectively analysed whether office blood pressure (BP) is reliable for the diagnosis of BP control in 26 treated hypertensive paediatric renal transplants. Controlled office BP was defined as the mean of three replicate systolic and diastolic BP recordings less than or equal to the 95th age-, sex- and height-matched percentile on the three-outpatient visits closest to ABPM. Controlled ABPM was defined as systolic and diastolic daytime BP < or =95th distribution adjusted height- and sex-related percentile of the adapted ABPM reference. Eight recipients (30%) with controlled office BP were in fact categorized as having non-controlled BP by ABPM criteria. Overall, when office BP and ABPM were compared using the Bland and Altman method, the 95% limits of agreement between office and daytime values ranged from -12.6 to 34.1 mmHg for systolic and -23.9 to 31.7 mmHg for diastolic BP, and the mean difference was 10.7 and 3.9 mmHg respectively. Office readings miss a substantial number of recipients who are hypertensive by ABPM criteria. Undertreatment of hypertension could be avoided if ABPM is applied as an adjunct to office readings.

Predominance of nocturnal hypertension in pediatric renal allograft recipients

Hypertension is common in children with end-stage renal disease who have undergone renal transplantation. We performed ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) in renal allograft recipients who were on stable maintenance immunosuppressive medications and were more than six months post-transplant. Echocardiographic measurement of left ventricular mass index (LVMI) was obtained at the time of ABPM. Twenty-nine children with a mean age of 14.8 yr (8-18 yr) were evaluated 4.3 yr (0.6-12.8 yr) after deceased donor (n = 13) or living donor (n = 16) transplantation. BP levels were higher during sleep compared with when awake using the 95th percentile to standardize mean BP for each period: mean BP was expressed as a standard deviation score (SDS) for each time period, awake vs. sleep: systolic (s) BP SDS were 0.43 +/- 1.3 vs. 1.29 +/- 1.2 (p < 0.001) and diastolic (d) BP SDS were 0.04 +/- 1.3 vs. 1.34 +/- 1.2 (p < 0.001). Significant differences between awake and sleep BP were also confirmed using the mean BP for each period expressed as a BPI. Hypertension (HTN) during sleep was more common than awake HTN. Based upon BPI, 21% had sHTN when awake compared with 48% during sleep and 7% had dHTN when awake compared with 41% during sleep (p < 0.05). Based upon mean BP load, 38% had sHTN when awake compared with 55% during sleep and 21% demonstrated dHTN when awake compared with 52% during sleep (p < 0.05). Left ventricular mass (LVM) was abnormally increased in six of 17 children (35%); LVM was not correlated with BP. Children prescribed angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin II receptor blockers (ACEi/ARB) had significantly lower systolic BP compared with those on calcium channel blocking agents (CCB). Mean sSDS was -0.11 +/- 1.1 in those children on ACEi/ARB compared with 1.6 +/- 1.2 in those on CCB (p = 0.02): sSDS during sleep was significantly lower in the ACEi/ARB group compared with CCB (0.70 +/- 1.1 vs. 2.0 +/- 1.1, p = 0.04). Isolated nocturnal HTN is more common than daytime HTN among clinically stable pediatric renal allograft recipients. Detection and treatment of nocturnal HTN in pediatric allograft recipients could potentially affect graft survival.

The choice of threshold limits for pediatric ambulatory blood pressure monitoring influences clinical decisions

OBJECTIVES

Hypertension in children may be defined by blood pressure elevated above the 95th percentile according to sex and age. Population data for ambulatory blood pressure provide different age-related and sex-related threshold limits to office-derived data. We sought to determine whether, when using ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in a clinical setting, changing 95th percentile threshold limit sets from office-derived to ambulatory blood pressure-derived would lead to different diagnostic decisions.

METHODS

Three nephrologists who were blinded as to patient identity and limit setting method reported on 42 ambulatory blood pressure records from a mixed group of patients aged 5-18 years by using both office-derived threshold limits for the 95th centile of blood pressure and ambulatory blood pressure-derived limits. Decisions regarding the presence or absence of hypertension were compared for each patient according to the limit set.

RESULTS

Thirty-five (83%) patients were considered to be hypertensive when office-derived threshold limits were used and 20% (P=0.005) fewer records were reported as showing hypertension when ambulatory blood pressure-derived threshold limits were used. When ambulatory blood pressure limits were applied, there were fewer records with an awake systolic blood pressure load >50% (P=0.004) and the average awake systolic blood pressure load was significantly lower (P<0.001).

CONCLUSION

Ambulatory blood pressure normative data tend to provide higher blood pressure limits for age and sex. Consequently, when ambulatory blood pressure data are used to set threshold limits, clinical decisions based on ambulatory blood pressure may be different than when office limits are used. These findings demonstrate the importance of using the most appropriate limit sets to analyze ambulatory blood pressure and when interpreting ambulatory blood pressure-based research.

Control of hypertension in children after renal transplantation

The aim of this cross-sectional single-center study was to investigate the efficacy of hypertension control in children who underwent transplantation using ambulatory blood pressure (BP) monitoring, and to determine the risk factors associated with poor control of hypertension. Thirty-six children fulfilled the inclusion criteria. The mean age was 13.9+/-4.4 yr; the mean time after renal transplantation was 2.7+/-2.4 yr (0.5-10.1). Hypertension was defined as a mean ambulatory BP > or =95th centile for healthy children and/or requiring antihypertensive drugs. Hypertension was regarded as controlled if the mean ambulatory BP was <95th centile in children already on antihypertensive drugs, or uncontrolled if the mean ambulatory BP was > or =95th centile in treated children. Hypertension was present in 89% of children. Seventeen children (47%) had controlled hypertension, and 14 (39%) had uncontrolled hypertension. One child (3%) had untreated hypertension, and only four children (11%) showed normal BP without antihypertensive drugs. The efficacy of hypertensive control was 55% (17 of 31 children on antihypertensive drugs had a BP<95th centile), i.e. 45% of treated children still had hypertension. Children with uncontrolled hypertension had significantly higher cyclosporine doses (6.1 vs. 4.3 mg/kg/day, p=0.01) and tacrolimus levels (9.2 vs. 6.1 microg/L, p<0.05), and there was a tendency toward use of lower number of antihypertensive drugs (2.0 vs. 1.5 drugs/patient, p=0.06) and lower use of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors (7 vs. 35%, p=0.09) and diuretics (29 vs. 59%, p=0.14) than in children with controlled hypertension. In conclusion, nearly 90% of our children after renal transplantation are hypertensive and the control of hypertension is unsatisfactorily low. The control of hypertension could be improved by increasing the number of prescribed antihypertensive drugs, especially ACE inhibitors, and diuretics, or by using higher doses of currently used antihypertensives.

Assessing cardiovascular risk in children with chronic kidney disease. B-type natriuretic peptide: a potential new marker

Elevated plasma B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) level is a hallmark of altered left ventricular (LV) structure and function. Measurement of circulating BNP has proved to be a sensitive and specific diagnostic test for congestive heart failure (CHF) and coronary syndrome in adults. Further, BNP levels constitute a strong predictive marker for future cardiovascular (CV) events. In high CV risk populations, such as adults with hypertension or chronic kidney disease (CKD), increased BNP predicts CV morbidity and mortality in symptomatic or asymptomatic patients. However, caution is needed in interpreting plasma BNP levels, as they increase with both age and decreased renal function. Despite increasing evidence of the value of BNP in the medical literature in adults, data in children are limited to those with congenital heart disease. It is appropriate to analyze the potential application of this tool in children with CKD, a well-known factor for CV disease.

Hypertension and ace gene insertion/deletion polymorphism in pediatric renal transplant patients

The objective of the present study was to define the risk factors for hypertension and to analyze the influence of insertion/deletion (I/D) polymorphism of the angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) on hypertension in pediatric renal transplant recipients. Twenty-six pediatric renal transplant recipients with stable renal function and treated with the same immunosuppression protocol were included in the study. Their mean age was 12.5 +/- 3.3 yr and mean time after transplantation was 38.5 +/- 39.8 month. Twenty-four hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) was performed by SpaceLabs (90207) device. The I/D polymorphism of the ACE was determined by PCR and ACE serum level was analyzed by colorimetric method. Hypertension was present in 15 patients (57.7%) by causal blood pressure measurements and 19 patients (73.1%) by ABPM. Twenty-two patients (84.6%) were found to be non-dipper and eight of them had reverse dipping. Only time after transplantation (38 +/- 31 vs. 79 +/-49 month, p = 0.016) and cyclosporin A trough plasma levels (206 +/-78 vs. 119 +/- 83 ng/mL, p = 0.020) influenced the presence of hypertension by multiple logistic regression analysis. The distribution of genotypes were II = 2 (7.7%), ID = 8 (30.8%), DD = 16 (61.5%). There was no effect of ACE gene I/D polymorphism or serum ACE levels on hypertension prevalence and circadian variability of blood pressures. Hypertension was related to the time after transplantation and cyclosporin A levels. The ACE gene I/D polymorphism and serum ACE levels did not influence the blood pressure values or circadian variability of blood pressure among pediatric renal transplant patients.

Reduced nocturnal blood pressure dip and sustained nighttime hypertension are specific markers of secondary hypertension

OBJECTIVE

To investigate with the use of ambulatory blood pressure (BP) monitoring whether nocturnal BP dip and nighttime BP values are different in children with untreated primary and secondary hypertension.

STUDY DESIGN

Ambulatory BP monitoring studies from 145 children with untreated hypertension were retrospectively analyzed. Forty-five children had primary hypertension and 100 children had secondary hypertension.

RESULTS

Children with secondary hypertension had lower nocturnal BP dip for systolic and diastolic BP in comparison to children with primary hypertension (8% +/- 5% vs 14% +/- 4% for systolic and 14% +/- 7% vs 22% +/- 5% for diastolic BP, P < .0001 for both). Eleven percent of children with primary hypertension were classified as nondipper (BP dip <10%) for systolic BP and no child for diastolic BP; on the contrary, in children with secondary hypertension, 65% were nondippers for systolic and 21% for diastolic BP. Nocturnal systolic and diastolic BP loads were significantly greater in children with secondary hypertension than in those with primary hypertension.

CONCLUSIONS

Reduced nocturnal BP dip and sustained nighttime BP elevation are specific markers of secondary hypertension in children with untreated hypertension. Children with blunted nocturnal BP dip or sustained nighttime hypertension should be thoroughly investigated searching for the underlying cause of hypertension.

Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in children after renal transplantation

Arterial hypertension is a common complication in children after renal transplantation and the control of hypertension is often difficult. This retrospective investigates the prevalence and rate of control of hypertension using ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) in 45 children (mean age 14.1 +/- 4.3 years, mean time after renal transplantation 2.2 +/- 2.7 years), all on cyclosporine or tacrolimus, azathioprine or mycophenolate mofetil plus daily steroids. The overall prevalence of hypertension was 82%. None of the transplanted children had normal blood pressure without antihypertensive therapy (ie, spontaneous normotension). Twenty percent of children had untreated hypertension, 18% had controlled hypertension, and 62% had uncontrolled hypertension. Prevalence of the nondipping phenomenon was 53%. The mean number of antihypertensive drugs (without diuretic monotherapy) in treated patients was 1.9 drugs per patient. The prevalence of arterial hypertension in children after renal transplantation is high and the control of hypertension is often unsatisfactorily low.

Pathomechanisms and the diagnosis of arterial hypertension in pediatric renal allograft recipients

Arterial hypertension is common in pediatric renal allograft recipients. While the causes are multifactorial, including chronic graft rejection, immunosuppressive therapy, and renal vascular disorders, the effect of hypertension on renal allograft function is detrimental. As in adults, if not treated early and aggressively, hypertension may lead to cardiovascular damage and graft failure. Pathophysiological changes in the arteries and kidney af-ter renal transplantation and the impact of receptor regulation have not been studied extensively in children. For identifying children with hypertension following renal transplantation casual blood pressure measurements do not accurately reflect average arterial blood pressure and circadian blood pressure rhythm. Ambulatory 24-h blood pressure monitoring should regularly be applied in trans-plant patients. The purpose of this review is to analyze pathophysiological aspects of risk factors for arterial hypertension and underline the importance of regular blood pressure monitoring and early therapeutic intervention.

Twenty-four-hour ambulatory blood pressure profiles in liver transplant recipients

Twenty-four-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) has proven to have better reproducibility than office blood pressure (BP) and is increasingly used for the study of hypertension in children and adolescents. The aim of our study was to assess 24-h BP profiles and to compare the results of office BP measurements with ABPM in stable liver transplant recipients transplanted before the age of 18 yr. ABPM was performed in 29 patients (nine males, 20 females), aged 3.9-24.8 yr (median 10.8 yr). The investigation was conducted 1.1-11.5 yr (median 5.1 yr) following transplantation. ABPM confirmed hypertension in one out of three office hypertensive patients. Seven patients (24%), whose office BP recordings were within the normotensive range, were reclassified as hypertensive. Non-dippers (n = 17), arbitrarily defined as patients with less than 10% nocturnal fall in BP, were similarly distributed among patients with ambulatory normotension and ambulatory hypertension (chi(2), p = 0.79). In addition, non-dippers showed a negative correlation between 24-h total urinary albumin excretion and both systolic and diastolic nocturnal decline in BP (Rho = -0.48, p < 0.05 and Rho = -0.86, p < 0.01, respectively). Our study found office BP readings to be poorly representative of 24-h BP profile. Larger studies are needed to confirm our observations as well as to determine whether routine BP measurements in the follow-up of paediatric liver transplant recipients should be based solely on office BP.

Is ABPM clinically useful after pediatric solid organ transplantation?

When ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) is performed in populations with a high risk for secondary hypertension, such as solid organ transplant recipients, hypertension or abnormalities in circadian blood pressure variability are often discovered even in patients with normal office blood pressure (BP). To discuss whether ABPM should be routinely assessed in pediatric solid organ recipients, the available information on pathological findings, association of ABPM abnormalities with outcome parameters, and treatment options is reviewed. ABPM is a useful tool to optimize therapy in the large proportion of transplant recipients with confirmed hypertension. Whether the use of ABPM on a routine basis should be recommended for pediatric transplantation patients without office hypertension remains to be determined.

Measurement and treatment of elevated blood pressure in the pediatric patient with chronic kidney disease

Hypertension, as in adults, is a frequent complication found in children with chronic kidney disease (CKD). Indeed, hypertension has now become one of the most prevalent chronic diseases of childhood. The most recent data available (2003) indicate that at least 38% of children with CKD in the United States are receiving antihypertensive therapy. Only recently has it been shown in children that hypertension, traditionally considered a marker for disease severity in children, is additionally a significant and independent risk factor for accelerated deterioration of kidney function and progression of CKD and a significant risk factor for cardiovascular disease. The following review outlines the differences and similarities of childhood versus adult hypertension with respect to measurement, diagnosis, treatment, and consequence in CKD. The definition of hypertension changes continually as a child grows with or without CKD. Despite numerous guidelines, the diagnosis of childhood hypertension continues to be based on epidemiologic data rather than evidence. For children, the current definition includes 2 categories: high normal, which is blood pressure (BP) between the 90th and 95th percentile, and hypertensive, which is BP above the 95th percentile. The evaluation of all hypertensive children should include a complete assessment of end-organ damage, including eyes, cardiovascular system (including blood vessels), kidneys, and nervous system. For children with CKD and end-stage renal disease (ESRD), a high percentage have left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH). The finding of end-organ damage or comorbidity (CKD, diabetes) in any child is an absolute indication for immediate pharmacologic therapy, whereas the presence of hypertension above the 95th percentile in children without CKD warrants initial intervention such as life style modification. The guidelines for measurement of BP in children with CKD are similar to those in children without CKD and include casual BP measurement, self-measured BP, and ambulatory BP monitoring. The recommendation for BP measurement in children is, when permitted, by auscultative method with a well-calibrated mercury manometer. Most casual BP measurements are performed with an automated oscillometric device whose validation has not been confirmed in children with CKD. The ambulatory BP monitor (ABPM) has 2 advantages: it significantly correlates with the presence of end-organ damage, and it identifies abnormal BP patterns that are frequently present in CKD patients, such as hypertension during the sleep period. An abnormal ABPM pattern can also be predictive of the development of end-organ damage. Treatment of hypertension in children, with and without CKD, is based on 3 factors: degree of BP elevation, the presence of cardiovascular risk factors, and the presence of end-organ damage. Additionally, the initial antihypertensive agent may be selected on available and age-appropriate formulations (eg, suspension and dosage selection). A physician treating a hypertensive child with CKD faces multiple challenges. They include selecting the convenience of available automated devices and the ABPM versus traditional auscultatory techniques upon which all normative standards have been based. Current research initiatives propose to develop pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamics properties of antihypertensive medications and to study the effect of early intervention on end-organ damage.

Insights from ambulatory blood pressure monitoring: diagnosis of hypertension and diurnal blood pressure in renal transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

Accurate diagnosis of hypertension is essential in chronic kidney disease patients, as it is linked to increased left ventricular mass, stroke, cardiovascular mortality and morbidity, and progression to end-stage renal disease. Elevated blood pressure (BP) detected by ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM) has been shown to be predictive of worse outcome in chronic kidney disease patients. Another predictor of worse outcome is diurnal BP variation, measured also by ABPM. In this study, the authors examined the relationship (concordance or discordance) between blood pressure measured by ABPM compared with daytime office BP, and also explored the predictors of diurnal variation in renal transplant recipients.

METHODS

All the patients who underwent renal transplantation and follow-up at the authors' institution from January 1998 to January 2003 were involved in this study (n=177) in addition to another randomly selected 64 patients that underwent transplantation before 1998. All patients had their ABPM performed according to previously described protocols at least 2 weeks after discharge from the hospital, dialysis-independent and with a functioning renal allograft.

RESULTS

The authors found a positive correlation between systolic BP (SBP) diurnal variation and age (r =0.263, P <0.0001), glomerular filtration rate (GFR) (r =-0.229, P <0.0001), cyclosporine trough (r =0.171, P =0.047), and ABPM-to-transplant interval (r =-0.133, P =0.039). After fitting a regression model, the authors found that only GFR (P <0.0001) and age (P =0.001) were independent predictors of SBP diurnal variation (r =0.357). Concordance rate between casual BP and ABPM was 80%, and by using casual BP, only 15% of hypertensive renal transplant patients would be erroneously diagnosed as normotensive.

CONCLUSIONS

The authors found that SBP diurnal variation is predicted independently by age and GFR, although it does correlate with cyclosporine trough and ABPM-to-transplant interval. In addition, the authors showed that ABPM is a more sensitive method for diagnosing hypertension than is sole reliance on office BP in renal transplant recipients.

Systolic blood pressure diurnal variation is not a predictor of renal target organ damage in kidney transplant recipients

Elevated blood pressure and diurnal blood pressure variation detected by ambulatory blood pressure monitoring has been shown to be predictive of worse outcome in end-stage renal disease patients in small studies. What has been lacking is a large study to determine whether these ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM)-derived variables are predictors of worse outcome in renal transplant recipients. All the patients that underwent renal transplantation and follow up at this institution from January 1998 till October 2002 were involved in this study (n=177). All patients were followed up for at least 48 weeks. Last creatinine correlated positively with duration of dialysis (p=0.035, r=0.158), kidney-donor age (p<0.0001, r=0.377), early kidney function (p<0.0001, r=0.610, r=0.683), 24-h systolic blood pressure (SBP) load (p=0.002, r=0.228), and ABPM-derived pulse pressure (p<0.0001, r=0.269). However neither office blood pressure nor SBP diurnal variation were predictors of kidney outcome. Regression analysis showed that early kidney function was the only independent predictor of transplant outcome (p<0.0001). Systolic blood pressure diurnal variation, though an important predictor of target organ damage in chronic kidney disease patients, was not a predictor of renal transplant function in renal transplant recipients. Only early kidney function was an independent predictor of later serum creatinine.

Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in renal transplantation: should ABPM be routinely performed in renal transplant patients?

In renal transplant recipients, hypertension is common and associated with increased cardiovascular and allograft rejection risks. Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring is required for its accurate diagnosis and adequate treatment, as it clearly offers several advantages over office or casual blood pressure measurements. First, it correlates better with target-organ damage and with cardiovascular mortality. Second, ambulatory blood pressure monitoring can eliminate "white coat" hypertension. Most important is the identification of nocturnal hypertension, an independent cardiovascular risk factor. A circadian nondipping pattern is often found in renal transplant recipients, most probably resulting from cyclosporine A and persistent fluid overload in the early posttransplant phase (approximately 70% prevalence), but reflecting an underlying renal (parenchymal or vascular) allograft disease when persistent (approximately 25% prevalence) beyond the first year posttransplant.

Analysis of blood pressure in children and adolescents reporting siesta during ambulatory blood pressure monitoring

BACKGROUND

In adults, a siesta yields a blood pressure profile similar to that seen in nocturnal sleep. It is therefore stressed that siestas should not be included in daytime blood pressure measurement.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate blood pressure profiles in pediatric and adolescent patients who reported a siesta during 24 h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM).

METHODS

Patients' diaries of actual sleep times were used to determine the periods of sleep (night-time and siesta) and daytime wakefulness. Ambulatory systolic and/or diastolic daytime and/or night-time hypertension was determined by comparing patients' measurements with normal values taken from published standards for healthy children and adolescents. Data obtained from 12 patients with ambulatory normotension and 12 patients with ambulatory hypertension, who were referred for an evaluation of hypertension or management of known hypertension, were analysed separately.

RESULTS

Mean systolic (SBP) and diastolic (DBP) blood pressure values during the daytime awake period were significantly higher than the mean values for the period of daytime, including the siesta, both in patients with ambulatory normotension and in those with ambulatory hypertension (P<0.001 and P<0.01 for SBP and DBP, and P<0.001 and P<0.001 for SBP and DBP, respectively). The percentage night-time falls in SBP and DBP were 12.9+/-0.5 and 19.1+/-1.4 in patients with ambulatory normotension, and 7.1+/-1.5 and 12.9+/-2.2 in patients with ambulatory hypertension. These values were significantly higher when the siesta was excluded from the analysis in both groups (13.9+/-0.5% and 20.7+/-1.5%, P<0.001 and P<0.01 for SBP and DBP in patients with ambulatory normotension; 8+/-1.6% and 14.8+/-2.4%, P<0.001 and P<0.001 for SBP and DBP in patients with ambulatory hypertension, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

By ignoring the effect of the siesta, both the calculation of daytime blood pressure values and the analysis of day-night variability in children and adolescents undergoing ABPM may be erroneously interpreted.

Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in pediatric renal transplantation

Over last two decades ABPM has evolved from a research device to an established and valuable clinical tool for BP evaluation. More than 10 yrs ago ABPM was introduced to pediatrics and since that time, its importance has been increasing in the management of hypertension in children and adolescents. This review summarizes the information gathered from the studies of ABPM in adult and pediatric patients with renal transplants. We will review the importance of hypertension in this patient subset, discuss the advantage of ABPM over CBP and focus on specific abnormalities and clinical significance of ABPM in renal transplant recipients.

Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in children and adolescents

With recent technological advances, 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure (BP) monitoring (ABPM) has become a useful tool for the evaluation, diagnosis, and management of hypertensive children. It provides a more accurate representation of an individual's BP rather than intermittent casual or office BP measurements. Hence, ABPM is being used more often to assess the BP of children. In this comprehensive review, we provide the reader with the available literature on ABPM, discuss the advantages and limitations of ABPM, and the interpretation of ABPM data. The role of ABPM in various clinical conditions and hypertension research in children is presented.

Differentiation between primary and secondary hypertension in children using ambulatory blood pressure monitoring

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) can help differentiate children with secondary hypertension from those with primary hypertension.

METHODS

Ninety-seven ABPM studies obtained from 85 children followed in a pediatric hypertension clinic were analyzed. Forty studies were performed in patients with primary hypertension, and 57 studies were performed in patients with secondary hypertension. Mean patient age was 13.8 +/- 3.5 [mean +/- standard deviation] years, range 4 to 19.7 years; patients with secondary hypertension were younger and had lower body mass index than patients with primary hypertension.

RESULTS

Daytime diastolic and nocturnal systolic blood pressure (BP) loads, defined as the percentage of readings greater than a threshold value, were significantly greater in patients with secondary hypertension compared with patients with primary hypertension. A daytime diastolic BP load of > or =25% and/or a nocturnal systolic BP load of > or =50% was highly specific for secondary hypertension.

CONCLUSIONS

Secondary hypertension in childhood is characterized by daytime diastolic BP elevation and nocturnal systolic BP elevation. This pattern of hypertension on ABPM may be a clue to underlying renal or other organ system pathology in children being evaluated for suspected hypertension and could help to identify children who require more detailed evaluation to determine the cause of their hypertension.

Relevance for chronopharmacology in practical medicine

Nearly all functions of the body, including those influencing pharmacokinetic parameters, such as drug absorption and distribution, drug metabolism, and renal elimination display significant daily variations. Also, the onset and symptoms of diseases such as asthma attacks, coronary infarction, angina pectoris, stroke, and ventricular tachycardia are circadian-phase dependent. Asthma attacks predominantly occur around 4 o'clock at night. Blood pressure and heart rate in normotensives and essential (primary) hypertensive patients display highest values during daytime followed by a nightly drop and an early morning rise. In about 70% of forms of secondary hypertension, however, this rhythmic pattern is abolished or even reversed exhibiting nightly peaks in blood pressure. Similar findings were obtained in children. This form of hypertension is accompanied by increased end organ damages. These observations call for a circadian time-specified drug treatment. In nocturnal asthma unequal dosing of antiasthmatic drugs with a higher/single evening dose is recommended. In secondary hypertension not only the elevated blood pressure must be reduced but the disturbed blood pressure profile should be normalized, too, possibly best achieved by evening dosing. Pharmacokinetics may also not be constant within 24 hours of a day as shown for cardiovascular active drugs, antiasthmatics, anticancer drugs, psychotropics, analgesics and local anesthetics, antibiotics to mention but a few. Far more drugs were shown to display significant daily variations in their effects even after chronic application or constant infusion. Because circadian rhythms undergo maturation with development, drug therapy in children can/may also be modified by circadian time of drug dosing as shown for anticancer drugs. In conclusion, there is clear evidence that the dose/concentration-response relationship of drugs can be significantly dependent on the time of day. Thus, circadian time has to be taken into account as an important variable influencing a drug's pharmacokinetics and/or its effects or side effects.

Abnormal 24-hour blood pressure patterns in children after renal transplantation

Hypertension after renal transplantation occurs commonly and is associated with decreased allograft survival. Hypertension is usually diagnosed by casual blood pressure (BP) measurements in the outpatient clinic that may not reflect the overall 24-hour BP pattern. To better describe the pattern of BP in children after renal transplantation, 24-hour ambulatory BP monitoring (APBM) was performed in 42 patients with stable renal function. BP was measured every 20 minutes during the daytime and every 30 minutes at night. Mean patient age was 12.8 +/- 5.2 years, and mean time after transplantation was 34 +/- 36 months. Seventy-six percent of the patients were administered antihypertensive medications. Twenty-four-hour mean systolic BP (SBP) was 127 +/- 11 mm Hg, and diastolic BP (DBP) was 80 +/- 11 mm Hg. Mean 24-hour BP load values (percentage of BP readings > 95th percentile based on Task Force criteria) were 59% for SBP and 50% for DBP, which were significantly elevated compared with healthy children (P < 0.001). An attenuated decline in sleep BP (nondipping) was found in 78% of the patients for SBP and 50% for DBP. Sleep BP exceeded awake BP in 24% of the patients for SBP and 17% for DBP. Boys had a greater SBP load (66% versus 45%; P = 0.03) and DBP load (57% versus 38%; P = 0.04) than girls. These results confirm in children the high prevalence of hypertension by ABPM criteria after renal transplantation and show attenuation of normal sleep BP decreases. These BP disturbances may shorten renal allograft survival and predispose children to long-term hypertensive end-organ damage.