The impact of medication therapy management in older oncology patients

Application of Structured Education Management in Standardized Treatment of Cancer Pain

In China, the drug treatment of many cancer pain patients is obviously affected by people's lack of knowledge and confidence, and cancer pain symptoms fail to be effectively controlled. This retrospective case-control study explored the effect of application of structured education management in standardized treatment of cancer pain. Eligible cancer pain patients from June 2022 to April 2023 were selected as the control group. The intervention group was selected from May 2023 to December 2023. Control group received analgesic treatment according to three-step analgesia method, the intervention group received structured cancer pain education intervention on the basis of the treatment for control group. The level of pain control disorders, total effective rate of pain relief and the frequency of pain outbreak, equivalent morphine consumption, and incidence of adverse events were compared between the two groups at enrollment and 2 weeks after. After treatment, the pain control disorder scores and NRS scores in the two groups were lower than that before treatment, and intervention group were lower than that in control group. The total effective rate of pain relief in intervention group was higher than that in control group. The total equivalent morphine dosage in the intervention group was lower than that in the control group. The incidence of constipation, nausea, vomiting, and fatigue in the intervention group was significantly lower than that in the control group, but there was no significant difference in the incidence of rash. Clinical pharmacist-led structured education can significantly improve therapeutic effect on cancer pain and reduce the adverse reactions.

Early Telephone-Based Frailty Screening With the Vulnerable Elders Survey in Adults Aged 75 Years and Older With Lung and Gynecological Cancer

BACKGROUND

The International Society of Geriatric Oncology recommends that all older people with cancer have a geriatric evaluation before beginning treatment.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the prevalence of frailty in people 75 years and older diagnosed with lung or gynecological cancer and evaluate the adaptation of standard therapeutic strategies based on frailty, following the implementation of telephone-based frailty screening with the Vulnerable Elders Survey (VES-13).

INTERVENTIONS/METHODS

We performed a retrospective observational study in 362 people screened by an advanced practice nurse before their first oncology appointment. We collected secondary data from electronic medical records. The main variables were degree of frailty (according to VES-13 and comprehensive geriatric assessment), type of cancer treatment (standard and prescribed), treatment completion, sociodemographic characteristics, and comorbidities.

RESULTS

The VES-13 detected 186 people (51.4%) at risk of health deterioration, and the comprehensive geriatric assessment confirmed some degree of frailty in 157 people (43.4%), with a κ coefficient of 0.84. People with more comorbidities, greater frailty, and more geriatric syndromes were more likely to need treatment readjustment ( P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Telephone-based frailty screening by an advanced practice nurse showed high applicability, with very good agreement between the proportion of people classified as frail before the initial visit and in the subsequent geriatric assessment.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

A protocol for establishing frailty risk through telephone screening by an advanced practice nurse facilitates the care process and helps clinicians adapt therapeutic decision-making to the needs of each patient and their family.

Comprehensive medication management (CMM): Application of a new pharmaceutical practice in onco-hematology

The integration of a large number of drugs, such as antineoplastic agents and cancer-related supportive care drugs, into the management of cancer patients exposes them to an increased number of drug-related problems (DRP). Clinical pharmacists contribute to drug management by actively intervening in detected DRP. The aim of this study is to assess the impact of the applying a clinical pharmacist-driven comprehensive medication management (CMM) service to onco-hematology patients. This prospective interventional study was carried out over six-month duration, specifically from November 06, 2022 to April 5, 2023 in the oncology and hematology departments of the EHU Oran. The adherence to treatment was evaluated using the 8-item Morisky Medication Adherence Scale (MMAS). Whereas data related to the patient's general condition and medication history was assessed using the Pharmaceutical Care Network Europe (PCNE) Classification for Drug-Related Problems V9.1. Among the 130 patients included in the study, a total of 879 DRP were identified, with a mean of 6.78 (±1.72) DRP/patient, half of which were related to efficacy (51%). Almost half of our sample (44.6%) did not adhere to their treatment. The most frequent cause of DRP, accounting for (19.9%) of the cases, was the inappropriate administration by a health professional. A total of 875 pharmaceuticals interventions (PI) were proposed, 67.2% of which were focused at the drug level. The PI acceptance rate was 94.1%. The integration of CMM services in onco-hematology played an important role in optimizing dosing regimen and treatment administration methods, as well as preventing iatropathology in the management of cancer patients.

Practicing and evaluating clinical pharmacy in oncology: Where are we now? A scoping review

BACKGROUND

Clinical pharmacy is a discipline structured around multiple activities whose objective is to secure patient care. Among all the specialties where it can be applied, oncology is a field of choice. More and more studies are being conducted on the impact of this activity, but their methodology and results seem at first sight very heterogeneous.

OBJECTIVE(S)

The objective of this literature review was to describe the clinical oncology pharmacy activities found in the literature, and analyze the methodology used and the outcomes measured by the authors for their evaluation.

METHODS

This literature review was based on the PRISMA-ScR criteria. The Embase, CINAHL, Google Scholar, and PsycINFO databases were searched. All studies reporting the evaluation of hospital-based clinical pharmacy activity in cancer patients were included based on a previously validated search equation. The search was conducted until the end of 2020. The quality of all studies was assessed using the MMAT.

RESULTS

Of the 2521 results of the initial query, 93 were selected for complete review. The main interventions implemented were pharmaceutical analysis as well as pharmaceutical interviews. The indicators assessed most often were the number of pharmaceutical interventions as well as treatment-related problems. The overall quality assessment score was 55%.

CONCLUSION

Clinical pharmacy activity in oncology still lacks robust studies, whether methodologically or of the measured indicator. Patient-centered impact indicators are still too rare. This area of research should focus on the homogenization of indicators and their relevance.

The role of oncology pharmacists and comprehensive medication reconciliation in informing treatment plans for older adults with cancer and downstream outcomes

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Proper medication management is an essential part of older adult cancer care. An aging population, an increase in anticancer treatment options, and high rates of comorbid conditions make navigating general medication reconciliation complicated. This review will highlight the recent literature describing the roles of the oncology pharmacist in caring for older adults with cancer.

RECENT FINDINGS

The body of literature highlighting oncology pharmacist roles in this population is mainly focused on polypharmacy and potentially inappropriate medication assessments, deprescribing nonessential therapies, drug-drug interaction reviews, and immunization optimization. Outcomes associated with oncology pharmacist interventions are still lacking as well as the development of benchmarks for appropriate pharmacy-based care in the older adult oncology population.

SUMMARY

Oncology pharmacist interventions in older adults with cancer have the potential to improve patient care. Future randomized studies in this area of practice are warranted in order to clearly define the optimal impact of oncology pharmacists.

Impact of pharmaceutical care interventions on multidisciplinary care of older patients with cancer: A systematic review

INTRODUCTION

Optimizing medication use is a major issue in older patients with cancer and pharmacists are increasingly involved in their multidisciplinary care. The implementation of pharmaceutical care interventions must be supported by impact evaluations to enable their development and funding. This systematic review aims to synthesize evidence on the impact of pharmaceutical care interventions in older patients with cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A comprehensive search was performed in the PubMed/Medline, Embase, and Web of Science databases, for articles reporting evaluations of pharmaceutical care interventions for patients with cancer aged 65 years or older.

RESULTS

Eleven studies met the selection criteria. Most pharmacists were part of multidisciplinary geriatric oncology teams. Whether in outpatient or inpatient settings, interventions had common components, including patient interview, medication reconciliation, and comprehensive medication review to assess drug-related problems (DRPs). DRPs were identified in 95% of patients with 1.7 to 3 DRPs on average. Pharmacist recommendations resulted in a 20-40% reduction in the total number of DRPs and a 20-25% decrease in the prevalence of DRP. Prevalence of potentially inappropriate or omitted medications and their subsequent deprescribing or addition varied greatly between studies, notably depending on detection tools used. Clinical impact was insufficiently evaluated. Only one study reported a reduction of anticancer treatment toxicities following a joint pharmaceutical and geriatric assessment. A single economic evaluation calculated a potential net benefit of $3,864.23 per patient resulting from the intervention.

DISCUSSION

These encouraging results must be confirmed by more robust evaluations to support the involvement of pharmacists in multidisciplinary care of older patients with cancer.

Influence of the implementation of a multidisciplinary consultation program on adherence to the first ever course of oral antineoplastic treatment in patients with cancer

PURPOSE

To evaluate adherence (as measured by the medication possession ratio) to the first ever course of oral antineoplasic treatment in cancer patients before and after the implementation of a multidisciplinary consultation program (involving an oncologist, a pharmacist, and a nurse) and to investigate the program's impact on adverse events and drug-related problems.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In a retrospective single-center study, we compared the medication possession ratio 2 months after treatment initiation in a control group (before multidisciplinary consultation program implementation) versus an interventional group (after multidisciplinary consultation program implementation).

RESULTS

Two months after oral antineoplasic treatment initiation, the mean ± standard deviation medication possession ratio did not differ significantly when comparing the interventional (multidisciplinary consultation program) group (n = 33; 0.99 ± 0.06) with the control group (n = 64; 0.94 ± 0.16) (p = 0.062). Patients in the multidisciplinary consultation program group had fewer adverse events in general (41, vs 109 in the control group; p = 0.048) and digestive adverse events in particular (6 vs 29, respectively; p = 0.007). A total of 53 and 40 drug-related problems were identified in the control and multidisciplinary consultation program groups, respectively (p = 0.074).

CONCLUSIONS

Implementation of an multidisciplinary consultation program was not associated with a significant difference in drug adherence (as assessed by the medication possession ratio), which was good before and after implementation. The multidisciplinary consultation program was associated with a lower incidence of adverse events.

International Society of Oncology Pharmacy Practitioners (ISOPP) position statement: Role of the oncology pharmacy team in cancer care

The Oncology Pharmacy Team (OPT), consisting of specialty-trained pharmacists and/or pharmacy technicians, is an integral component of the multidisciplinary healthcare team (MHT) involved with all aspects of cancer patient care. The OPT fosters quality patient care, safety, and local regulatory compliance. The International Society of Oncology Pharmacy Practitioners (ISOPP) developed this position statement to provide guidance on five key areas: 1) oncology pharmacy practice as a pharmacy specialty; 2) contributions to patient care; 3) oncology pharmacy practice management; 4) education and training; and 5) contributions to oncology research and quality initiatives to involve the OPT. This position statement advocates that: 1) the OPT be fully incorporated into the MHT to optimize patient care; 2) educational and healthcare institutions develop programs to continually educate OPT members; and 3) regulatory authorities develop certification programs to recognize the unique contributions of the OPT in cancer patient care.

Analysis of the interventions in antineoplastic therapy by a clinical pharmacy service at a tertiary hospital in Brazil

BACKGROUND

Medication errors are avoidable occurrences that can assume clinically significant dimensions and impose relevant costs to the health system, especially in the context of antineoplastic therapy.

OBJECTIVE

Assess the clinical significance and economic impacts of a clinical pharmaceutical service. This retrospective study consists of an analysis of pharmacy interventions and drug-related problems found in a review of electronic prescriptions referring to antineoplastic therapy of a public teaching tertiary hospital in Brazil.

METHOD

Retrospective descriptive study obtained from electronic records of drug-related problems and pharmaceutical interventions related to antineoplastic therapy for oncological and hematological diseases, obtained through the pharmacotherapy review service. The accepted interventions were analyzed for the financial impact generated, evaluating your direct costs. The perception of clinical significance of a random sample of interventions was ascertained by the experts' opinion, using the Delphi method.

RESULTS

The most frequent problem was a "lack of information to professionals" (25.06%), "problems as to the frequency and interval of doses" (22.90%), and "medication underdosing" (16.20%). Dose adjustment (31.50%) and clarifications (30.90%) were the most frequent pharmaceutical interventions. In the second round of Delphi, experts rated 77.77% of interventions as extremely significant and very significant. The main drugs reported in the interventions were cyclophosphamide, carboplatin, methotrexate, folinic acid, and monoclonal antibodies. The savings amounted to US$1,193,970.18 and involved mainly bortezomib, dactinomycin, and monoclonal antibodies.

CONCLUSION

Clinical pharmacy services contributed to the rational use of medicines presenting clinical significance and avoiding waste of financial resources.

Managing Polypharmacy in Older Adults with Cancer Across Different Healthcare Settings

The care of older patients with cancer is becoming increasingly complex. Common challenges for this population include management of comorbidities, safe transitions of care, and appropriate medication use. In particular, polypharmacy-generally defined as the regular use of five or more medications-and inappropriate medication use can lead to adverse effects and poor outcomes in older adults with cancer, including falls, hospital readmissions, cognitive impairment, poor adherence to essential medications, chemotherapy toxicity, and increased mortality. Managing polypharmacy across different cancer care settings is often challenging. Providers face barriers to safe and successful medication management that may include lack of time, absence of reimbursement, underappreciation of the scale of polypharmacy-related harm, lack of ownership of deprescribing efforts, and poor communication across care settings. Existing literature on managing inappropriate medication use and polypharmacy in older adults with cancer has often focused on ideal state settings in which resources are plentiful and time is purposefully allocated for medication interventions. This paper presents a narrative, rather than a systematic review, of studies published in the past decade that provided detailed information on medication management and polypharmacy across cancer care settings. This review aims to also summarize different healthcare provider roles in taking action against inappropriate medication use and polypharmacy in older adults with cancer.

[Securing the patient's care path receiving oral anticancer therapy: Experimentation around a pharmaceutical hospital-to-community liaison]

Due to the increasing prescription of oral anticancer therapies, the inpatient care pathway has shifted to an outpatient care pathway. This transformation requires an interdisciplinary coordination to provide a continuum of care and ensure therapeutic monitoring, as well as patient safety. To better support patients on oral anticancer therapies, a task group named "hospital-to-community pharmacist coordination" has been set up to create tools aiming at standardising the information exchanged between ambulatory and hospital pharmacists. A retrospective study examined the utilisation of the tools over a period of one year. The task group identified the expectations of all parties regarding the care pathways of patients undergoing oral chemotherapy, which lead to the creation of computerised exchange tools (integrated into the computerised patient's medical file). Over the course of this study, the cancer centre's pharmaceutical team contacted 425 ambulatory pharmacists regarding the prescription of oral chemotherapy to patients. Forty-two follow-ups from ambulatory pharmacists, gathering information on 34 patients, were submitted to the cancer centre pharmacists (7,7%). These first follow-ups allowed pharmaceutical responses regarding patient compliance, drug interaction and toxicities.

Interventions to reduce polypharmacy and optimize medication use in older adults with cancer

The use of polypharmacy and potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) is an increasingly common, concerning public health issue in older adults, and a concurrent cancer diagnosis only further escalates the prevalence and complexity. Polypharmacy and PIM use has been associated with negative patient outcomes, including falls, chemotherapy toxicities and other adverse events, postoperative complications, frailty, functional impairment, and shortened survival. Despite the recognition of the harms, the prevalence of polypharmacy and PIM use continues to rise due to a lack of standardized identification and intervention methods. Efforts to reduce the prevalence have included use of explicit PIM screening tools (e.g., Beers criteria), comprehensive medication reviews, and deprescribing algorithms. However, these efforts are not widespread and the research on the effectiveness of such interventions is limited. To better understand what is known, this paper summarized available studies evaluating the effect of interventions on reducing the burden of polypharmacy/PIMs and provided recommendations to guide further practice models to reduce the negative consequences associated with polypharmacy and PIM use. Furthermore, we aim to establish a framework for clinical practice and to highlight areas for future intervention-based research to improve outcomes for older adults with cancer.

Drug-related problems in head and neck cancer patients identified by repeated medication reviews on consecutive therapy cycles

BACKGROUND

Head and neck cancer (HNC) patients are particularly vulnerable to drug-related problems (DRPs) given the toxicity of concomitant chemoradiotherapy (CCRT).

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the number and type of potential DRPs (pDRPs) in HNC outpatients undergoing five consecutive cycles of CCRT.

METHODS

A single-centre, non-randomized, non-interventional, observational study was conducted at the Oncological Outpatient Clinic of the Center for Integrated Oncology at the University Hospital Bonn, Germany. Clinical pharmacists took a comprehensive medication history, documented laboratory data, assessed patients' symptom burden, and retrospectively performed medication reviews at study entry and on the first day of each therapy cycle without any clinical intervention.

RESULTS

In 26 patients, the mean number of pDRPs continuously increased during therapy course, from 4.8 (SD 2.7, range 2-12) at cycle 1 to 6.9 (SD 2.6, range 2-12) at cycle 5, with drug-drug interactions, adverse drug reactions, inappropriate durations of use, and inappropriate dosage intervals being the most common. Considering only new and recurrent pDRPs, the mean number was 4.3 (SD 2.3, range 2-9) at cycle 1 and lower in the further therapy course with an average of 1.3 (SD 1.7, range 0-7) at cycle 2 and 1.9 (SD 1.5, range 0-5) at cycle 5. The number of pDRPs was found to be associated with medication regimen complexity and health-related quality of life assessed in the first therapy cycle.

CONCLUSION

pDRPs frequently occurred in HNC outpatients demonstrating the need for pharmaceutical care. A methodological framework for repeated medication reviews was established, facilitating implementation into routine healthcare practice.

Interventions for older people having cancer treatment: A scoping review

OBJECTIVES

There is currently no overview of supportive interventions developed for older people having cancer treatment. The aims and objectives, methods, and outcomes of interest of existing supportive interventions have not been evaluated. To understand how health services might meet the needs of older people undergoing cancer treatment, a scoping review was undertaken to identify and characterise supportive interventions developed for this patient group.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This scoping review examined supportive interventions (services, programs, tools or policies) applied during diagnosis or treatment that address physical, psychological, social or spiritual needs of older patients. A systematic search of the following electronic databases was undertaken August-October 2017 (updated March 2019): AMED; CINAHL; EMBASE; Medline; PsychINFO.

RESULTS

Sixty-two papers met the inclusion criteria. The review established that existing interventions to support older people having treatment for cancer are diverse in aim, and the evaluation methodology and outcome measure selection vary considerably. The interventions rarely target complex issues such as multimorbidity, frailty, or the impact of other geriatric syndromes in addition to cancer.

CONCLUSION

We suggest that future research should focus on patient populations with complex needs, including addressing comorbidity and age-associated conditions such as dementia.

Impact of clinical pharmacy services in a hematology/oncology ward in Morocco

BACKGROUND

Clinical pharmacists are contributing to safe medication use by providing comprehensive management to patients and medical staff. The aim of this study is to document and evaluate the role of clinical pharmacy services in oncology department.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A prospective, descriptive, observational study was carried out from July 2018 through June 2019 at the Department of Medical Oncology at the National Institute of Oncology, Morocco. Medication reviews concerning hospitalized adult cancer patients were performed every day by the clinical pharmacist assigned to the department.

RESULTS

A total of 3542 prescriptions of 526 adult cancer patients were analyzed. The pharmacist identified 450 drug-related problems (12.7% of the prescriptions) primarily related to the analgesics (31.5%). Medication problems included mostly untreated indications (31.3%), overdosing (17.1%), drug-drug interactions (12.4%), underdosing (11.1%), administration omissions (6.7%), drug not indicated (6.0%), and contraindication (5.3%). Interventions (n = 450) led to drug additions (30.7%), drug dosing adjustments (27.1%), treatment discontinuations (20.0%), recall of the treatment (6.2%), replacement of a drug with another one (5.1%), administration optimization (4.0%), therapeutic drug monitoring (3.1%), alternate routes of administration (2.5%), and extension of treatment duration (1.3%). Most (98%) of the interventions were accepted and implemented by the medical staff-172 (38.2%) having a significant clinical impact on the patient, 88 (19.6%) as having a very significant clinical impact, and 71(15.8%) as having a potential vital impact.

CONCLUSION

This work highlights the positive clinical relevance of pharmacists' interventions in oncology and the importance of medicopharmaceutical collaboration to prevent medication error.

Optimising pharmacotherapy in older cancer patients with polypharmacy

OBJECTIVE

Polypharmacy is frequent among older cancer patients and increases the risk of potential drug-related problems (DRPs). DRPs are associated with adverse drug events, drug-drug interactions and hospitalisations. Since no standardised polypharmacy assessment methods for oncology patients exist, we aimed to develop one that can be integrated into routine care.

METHODS

Based on the Systematic Tool to Reduce Inappropriate Prescribing (STRIP), we developed OncoSTRIP, which includes a polypharmacy anamnesis, a concise geriatric assessment, a polypharmacy analysis taking life expectancy into account and an optimised treatment plan. Patients ≥65 years with ≥5 chronic drugs visiting our outpatient oncology clinic were eligible for the polypharmacy assessment.

RESULTS

OncoSTRIP was integrated into routine care of our older cancer patients. In 47 of 60 patients (78%), potential DRPs (n = 101) were found. In total, 85 optimisations were recommended, with an acceptance rate of 41%. It was possible to reduce the number of potential DRPs by 41% and the number of patients with at least one potential DRP by 30%. Mean time spent per patient was 71 min.

CONCLUSIONS

Polypharmacy assessment of older cancer patients identifies many pharmacotherapeutic optimisations. With OncoSTRIP, polypharmacy assessments can be integrated into routine care.

Demonstrating the value of the oncology pharmacist within the healthcare team

INTRODUCTION

Although many oncology pharmacists are embedded members within the healthcare team, data documenting their contributions to optimal patient outcomes are growing. The purpose of this paper is to demonstrate the value of the oncology pharmacist within the healthcare team and describe the knowledge, skills, and functions of the oncology pharmacist.

METHODS

A systematic literature review of articles that were published on PubMed between January 1951 and October 2018 was completed. Identified abstracts were reviewed and included if they focused on measuring the value or impact of the oncology pharmacist on provider/patient satisfaction, improvement of medication safety, improvement of quality/clinical care outcomes, economics, and intervention acceptance. Review articles, meta-analysis, and studies not evaluating oncology pharmacist activities were excluded. Studies were thematically coded into four themes (clinical care, patient education, informatics, and cost savings) by 10 oncology pharmacists.

RESULTS

Four-hundred twenty-two articles were identified, in which 66 articles met inclusion criteria for this review. The selected literature included 27 interventional and 38 descriptive studies. The value of the oncology pharmacist was demonstrated by published articles in four key themes: clinical care, patient education, informatics, and cost savings.

CONCLUSION

With an expected shortage of oncology physicians and the ongoing development of complex oncology therapies, the board-certified oncology pharmacist is well suited to serve as a physician extender alongside nurse practitioners and/or physician assistants as the medication expert on the oncology care team. The demonstrated value of the oncology pharmacist supports their role as frontline providers of patient care.

Patient engagement in first cycle comprehensive chemotherapy consultation pharmacist services and impact on patient activation

Background

Healthcare systems and policy makers worldwide are demonstrating interest in shared decision making, which requires patient activation. Patient activation can be measured using a validated tool called the patient activation measure-10. First cycle comprehensive chemotherapy consultation services (3CS) is provided by an oncology pharmacy team member during a patient encounter at the beginning of the patient's treatment for cancer.

Methods

This was a single center, prospective, non-randomized, observational clinical study in patients with cancer who required a new chemotherapy plan. A baseline patient activation measure-10 survey was administered and a pharmacy team member met with the patient to complete the first cycle 3CS encounter. Within two business days of that encounter, a second patient activation measure-10 survey was administered, and thus, patients served as their own control.

Results

Forty-nine patients who met the inclusion criteria were enrolled, of which 36 completed the study. Mean patient activation measure-10 scores measured at baseline and two business days after the 3CS encounter were significantly different (68.5 ± SD 14.7 vs. 75.0 ± SD 14.3, p = 0.001). This difference persisted when evaluated by gender (female: 70.0 ± SD 14.8 vs. 81.6 ± SD 10.5, p = 0.001; male: 66.1 ± SD 14.8 vs. 70.8 ± SD 14.7, p = 0.022).

Conclusion

This study demonstrates that cancer patients had significantly increased patient activation scores after engagement in a 3CS encounter provided by an oncology pharmacy team. Further studies are needed to verify these data in a larger population, different healthcare settings, and to evaluate for patients who have solid tumor malignancies.

Network analysis of drug-related problems in hospitalized patients with hematologic malignancies

PURPOSE

Network analysis was conducted to systematically analyze the relationship between causative drugs and types of drug-related problems (DRPs) in hospitalized patients with hematologic malignancies.

METHODS

A total of 1187 DRPs identified in hematology wards between 2013 and 2015 were analyzed. DRPs were classified into 11 sub-domains for problems and 35 sub-domains for causes according to Pharmaceutical Care Network Europe classification. Causative drugs were classified by Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical code. Network analytic tool was used to represent the relationship between drugs, causes, and problems. In-degree centrality (CD-in) was calculated to identify major causes of DRPs.

RESULTS

The following drugs accounted for more than 5% of DRP, including antibacterials (J01, 26.5%), drugs for acid-related disorders (A02, 11.5%), antiemetics (A04, 9.7%), antifungals (J02, 8.8%), and antineoplastic agents (L01, 7.0%). Inappropriate combinations (C1.3, CD-in of 161) of drugs for acid-related disorders, antifungals, and antineoplastic agents were major causes of DRPs and induced non-optimal effects of drug treatment (P1.2). Inappropriate dose adjustments (C3.6, CD-in of 151) of antibacterials lowered effects (P1.2) and increased side effects (P2.1). Missing necessary synergistic or preventive drugs, especially antiemetics, (C1.8, CD-in of 54) resulted in untreated indication (P1.4).

CONCLUSIONS

DRPs were mainly related to medications for supportive care. More attention should be paid to interactions of drugs used for acid-related disorders, dose adjustment of antibacterials, and omission of antiemetics in hospitalized patients with hematologic malignancy.

Prevalence and Risk of Polypharmacy Among Elderly Cancer Patients Receiving Chemotherapy in Ambulatory Oncology Setting

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This was a single center, retrospective cross-sectional study looking into the incidence and types of drug-related problems (DRPs) detected among elderly cancer patients receiving at least three long-term medications concurrent with IV chemotherapy, and the types of intervention taken to address these DRPs. This paper serves to elucidate the prevalence and risk of polypharmacy in our geriatric oncology population in an ambulatory care setting, to raise awareness on this growing issue and to encourage more resource allocation to address this healthcare phenomenon.

RECENT FINDINGS

DRP was detected in 77.6% of elderly cancer patients receiving at least three long-term medications concurrent with IV chemotherapy, with an average incidence of three DRPs per patient. Approximately half of DRPs were related to long-term medications. Forty percent of DRPs required interventions at the prescriber level. The use of five or more medications was shown to almost double the risk of DRP occurrence (OR 1.862, P = 0.039). Out of the eight predefined categories of DRPs, underprescribing was the most common (26.7%), followed by adverse drug reaction (25.0%) and drug non-adherence (16.2%). Polypharmacy leading to DRPs is a common occurrence in elderly cancer patients receiving outpatient IV chemotherapy. There should be systematic measures in place to identify patients who are at greater risk of inappropriate polypharmacy and DRPs, and hence more frequent drug therapy optimization and monitoring. The identification of DRPs is an important step to circumvent serious drug-related harm. Future healthcare interventions directed at reducing DRPs should aim to assess the clinical and economic impact of such interventions.

Prescribing errors intercepted by pharmacist intervention in care of patients hospitalised with breast and gynaecological cancer at a Brazilian teaching hospital

Oncologic inpatients often require multiple drug therapy. They may be at higher risk of experiencing prescribing errors, which pharmacist interventions may help to avoid. This study aimed to evaluate the types of prescribing errors, pharmaceutical interventions and differences in clinical significance, in prescriptions for hospitalised patients with breast and gynaecological cancer. A cross-sectional, prospective study was conducted at the oncology ward of a clinic specialised in breast and gynaecology cancer. A clinical pharmacist analysed prescriptions, identified errors, performed interventions and classified clinical significance. A total of 1,874 prescriptions of 248 patients were evaluated; 11.5% prescriptions were involved at least in one prescribing error, totalising 283 errors. The most common error was unsafe medication due to drug interaction (89[31.4%]). Drugs for the alimentary tract and metabolism, and nervous system were the most involved in errors with statistical association (p = .0246 and p = .0002 respectively). Of the 294 interventions, 73.5% were accepted. The clinical significance of prescribing errors and interventions were classified as significant and very significant respectively. The pharmacist interventions obtained a good acceptance rate and impact significantly, avoiding prescribing errors classified as significant.

Cardio-oncology in the older adult

Heart disease and cancer are the leading causes of death in older adults. Many first-line cancer treatments have the potential for cardiotoxicity. Age-related risk factors, pre-existing cardiac disease, and a high prevalence of comorbidities are reasons for increased cardiotoxicity in older adults. Concerns regarding cardiotoxicity may lead to frailty bias and undertreatment, resulting in suboptimal outcomes. There is an urgent need for geriatric-specific evidence and guidelines to help tailor care for this vulnerable group. A multi-disciplinary approach based on close collaboration between oncologists, cardiologists, and geriatricians, among other specialist clinicians is essential.

Drug-drug interactions and adverse drug reactions in polypharmacy among older adults: an integrative review

OBJECTIVE

to identify and summarize studies examining both drug-drug interactions (DDI) and adverse drug reactions (ADR) in older adults polymedicated.

METHODS

an integrative review of studies published from January 2008 to December 2013, according to inclusion and exclusion criteria, in MEDLINE and EMBASE electronic databases were performed.

RESULTS

forty-seven full-text studies including 14,624,492 older adults (≥ 60 years) were analyzed: 24 (51.1%) concerning ADR, 14 (29.8%) DDI, and 9 studies (19.1%) investigating both DDI and ADR. We found a variety of methodological designs. The reviewed studies reinforced that polypharmacy is a multifactorial process, and predictors and inappropriate prescribing are associated with negative health outcomes, as increasing the frequency and types of ADRs and DDIs involving different drug classes, moreover, some studies show the most successful interventions to optimize prescribing.

CONCLUSIONS

DDI and ADR among older adults continue to be a significant issue in the worldwide. The findings from the studies included in this integrative review, added to the previous reviews, can contribute to the improvement of advanced practices in geriatric nursing, to promote the safety of older patients in polypharmacy. However, more research is needed to elucidate gaps.

OBJETIVO

identificar e sintetizar estudos que examinam as interações medicamentosas (IM) e reações adversas a medicamentos (RAM) em idosos polimedicados.

MÉTODOS

revisão integrativa de estudos publicados de janeiro de 2008 a dezembro de 2013, de acordo com critérios de inclusão e exclusão, nas bases de dados eletrônicas MEDLINE e EMBASE.

RESULTADOS

foram analisados 47 estudos de texto completo, incluindo 14,624,492 idosos (≥ 60 anos): 24 (51,1%) sobre RAM, 14 (29,8%) sobre IM e 9 estudos (19,1%) que investigaram tanto IM como RAM. Encontramos uma variedade de desenhos metodológicos. Os estudos revisados reforçaram que a polifarmácia é um processo multifatorial, e os preditores e a prescrição inadequada estão associados a resultados negativos de saúde, como aumento da frequência e tipos de RAM e IM envolvendo diferentes classes de drogas, além disso, alguns estudos mostram as intervenções mais bem-sucedidas para otimizar a prescrição.

CONCLUSÕES

IM e RAM entre idosos continuam a ser um problema significativo no mundo todo. Os resultados dos estudos incluídos nesta revisão integrativa, adicionado às revisões anteriores, podem contribuir para a melhoria das práticas avançadas de enfermagem geriátrica, para promover a segurança dos pacientes idosos em polifarmácia. No entanto, são necessárias mais pesquisas para elucidar lacunas.

OBJETIVO

identificar y resumir los estudios que analizan tanto las interacciones medicamentosas (IM) como las reacciones adversas a medicamentos (RAM) en los adultos mayores polimedicados.

MÉTODOS

revisión integradora de estudios publicados entre enero de 2008 a diciembre de 2013, siguiendo criterios de inclusión y exclusión, en las bases de datos electrónicas MEDLINE y EMBASE.

RESULTADOS

cuarenta y siete estudios de texto completo incluidos fueron analizados incluyendo 14,624,492 adultos mayores (≥ 60 años), de ellos 24 (51,1%) en relación con RAM, 14 (29,9%) con IM y 9 estudios (19,1%) que investigaron tanto IM como RAM. Encontramos una gran variedad de diseños metodológicos. Los estudios revisados reforzaron el concepto que la polifarmacia es un proceso multifactorial, y los predictores y la prescripción inadecuada se asocian con resultados negativos para la salud tales como el aumento de la frecuencia y tipos de RAM y IM implicando diferentes clases de fármacos, además que algunos estudios muestran cuales son las intervenciones más exitosas para optimizar la prescripción.

CONCLUSIONES

IM y RAM siguen siendo un problema importante en el mundo entero entre los adultos mayores. Los resultados de los estudios incluidos en esta revisión integradora, sumado a las revisiones previas, pueden contribuir a la mejora de las prácticas avanzadas de enfermería geriátrica, para promover la seguridad de los pacientes de mayor edad en la polifarmacia. Sin embargo, se necesita más investigación para esclarecer los vacíos de conocimiento.

Pharmacists' roles in oncology pharmacy services: Results of a global survey

Background

Oncology pharmacists are capable of providing medication therapy management (MTM) because of their level of training, practice experiences, and responsibilities. Very little data exist about their current practice, including changing roles in the multidisciplinary team, overall impact, and effects in the education of patients and healthcare professionals.

Methods

A 70-item survey about oncology pharmacists' activities in oral chemotherapy programs, MTM, and collaborative practice agreements (CPAs) was deployed using a web survey tool (Qualtrics, Provo, UT, USA), targeting pharmacist members of American College of Clinical Pharmacy (ACCP) Hematology/Oncology Practice and Research Network (PRN). The objective of this study was to determine oncology pharmacists' activities in areas of oral chemotherapy programs, MTM, and CPAs. A cross-sectional survey was distributed to the ACCP Hematology/Oncology PRN membership. Investigational Review Board approval was obtained.

Results

Of the 795 members who were sent the survey, 81 members (10%) responded; 33 respondents (47%) are involved with an oral chemotherapy program; with 42% measuring outcomes of programs. Only six pharmacists (19%) have published or presented their data. A total of 28 (35%) respondents provide MTM services, with almost half (43%) of these MTM services being dictated by CPAs. A small fraction of these pharmacists (21.4%) reported conducting quality assurance evaluations of their MTM services and three pharmacists (10.7%) reported publishing their results. Those pharmacists practicing under CPAs ( n = 28) were surveyed as to activities included in their CPA. The most common activities included adjusting medication, ordering, interpreting, and monitoring lab tests, developing therapeutic plans and educating patients. Reimbursement for providing these services was uncommon: MTM (4%), oral chemotherapy program (6%), and CPA services (11%). Reported obstacles to reimbursement included lack of understanding, administrative assistance, or time with setting up reimbursement models within the institution.

Conclusion

Many oncology pharmacists are participating in oral chemotherapy programs, MTM, and/or CPAs and perceived barriers were identified. Increased efforts should be directed toward prospectively reporting and assessing the impact these services have on patient care.

The need for community pharmacists in oncology outpatient care: a systematic review

Background One-third of all deaths in Europe each year are attributable to cancer. Issues relating to cancer care, therefore, will continue to expand. To manage the increased challenges-including doctor shortages, an ageing population, and rural distribution of supplies-community pharmacists will likely be required to assume responsibility within oncology care. Aim of the review To assess the need for further investigation into quantity and utility of community pharmacists' interventions in assisting oncology outpatients. Methods Initial search terms for identifying relevant literature within the PubMed database were informed by four key questions. Study selection for the systematic review was performed based on inclusion and exclusion criteria, which were defined a priori using the PICO tool. Literature searches identified 2470 papers, for which titles and abstracts were reviewed. Of these, 220 papers were retained for detailed analysis. The full texts of these manuscripts were then screened by applying the inclusion criteria. The remaining 68 papers were included in the systematic review. Results Several models of pharmacists' interventions in inpatient, medium, and outpatient care have proven to be successful, have been consistently efficacious, and have positively influenced patient outcomes. Importantly, the quantity of scientific research, and thus of reported beneficial outcomes, in outpatient care is much lower than that conducted for inpatient and medium care. Conclusion Based on our findings, we suggest that further investigation of community pharmacists' interventions into oncology outpatient assistance is necessary, and that further research should be conducted to address this need.

A review of approaches for the management of specialty pharmaceuticals in the United States

With increased innovation and development of specialty pharmaceuticals, the US and global healthcare industries are looking to implement appropriate management strategies to control both utilization and costs. Specialty pharmaceuticals are high-cost medications that treat complex, chronic, rare, and difficult-to-manage conditions. These drugs require special drug handling, appropriate clinical outcomes monitoring, and effective cost controls. The primary scope of this article is to discuss various strategies being implemented for specialty pharmaceutical utilization and cost management and correlated outcomes in the USA; these outcomes include enhanced health insurance plan benefit designs with formulary modifications and greater patient cost burden. Additional methods to manage specialty pharmaceuticals include the use of specialty pharmacies for drug distribution, increased emphasis on coordination of care and evidence-based medicine, as well as healthcare reform and regulations. Healthcare spending, both in the US and globally, continues to increase, with a rising proportion of drug spend towards specialty pharmaceuticals. Continued specialty pharmaceutical innovation and introduction of biosimilar products will evolve the currently utilized management strategies for these drugs.

Impact of outpatient interventions made at an ambulatory cancer centre oncology pharmacy in Singapore

Objectives

To evaluate the clinical significance of interventions made by pharmacists in an oncology pharmacy in Singapore and their acceptance rate and to identify common drug-related problems and workflow-related interventions.

Methods

A two-month prospective intervention study was conducted at National Cancer Centre Singapore. During the study, pharmacists documented the reason for intervening and its related drug(s). Each intervention was evaluated for its clinical significance by an expert panel: two oncologists and a pharmacist using a five-point scale. The Kendall’s test of concordance and Cohen’s weighted kappa were employed for analysis of agreement among the respondents. Other variables were analysed using descriptive statistics.

Results

A total of 331 interventions were recorded: 147 cases were due to missing chemotherapy orders while 184 cases had potential drug-related problems. Among the 184 cases, 60 cases were related to clarification of orders, while the others had drug-related problems. The Kendall’s concordance coefficient was calculated to be 0.612 ( p < 0.001) while weighted kappa test results showed fair agreement across the evaluators. Acceptance rate of interventions was 93%. Most commonly documented drugs requiring interventions were carboplatin, trastuzumab and capecitabine.

Conclusions

About half of the documented interventions by pharmacists were evaluated as clinically ‘significant’ or ‘very significant’.