1
|
You W, Pilehvari A, Shi R, Cohn W, Sheffield C, Chow PI, Krukowski BA, Anderson R. A multi-dimensional assessment of financial hardship of cancer patients using existing health system data. Cancer Med 2023; 12:22263-22277. [PMID: 37987094 PMCID: PMC10757134 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.6731] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2023] [Revised: 10/19/2023] [Accepted: 11/07/2023] [Indexed: 11/22/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Existing financial hardship screening does not capture the multifaceted and dynamic nature of the problem. The use of existing health system data is a promising way to enable scalable and sustainable financial hardship screening. METHODS We used existing data from 303 adult patients with cancer at the University of Virginia Comprehensive Cancer Center (2016-2018). All received distress screening and had a valid financial assistance screening based solely on household size-adjusted income. We constructed a composite index that integrates multiple existing health system data (Epic, distress screening, and cancer registry) to assess comprehensive financial hardship (e.g., material conditions, psychological responses, and coping behaviors). We examined differences of at-risk patients identified by our composite index and by existing single-dimension criterion. Dynamics of financial hardship over time, by age, and cancer type, were examined by fractional probit models. RESULTS At-risk patients identified by the composite index were generally younger, better educated, and had a higher annual household income, though they had lower health insurance coverage. Identified periods to intervene for most patients are before formal diagnosis, 2 years, and 6 years after diagnosis. Within 2 years of diagnosis and more than 4 years after diagnosis appear critical for subgroups of patients who may suffer from financial hardship disparities. CONCLUSION Existing health system data provides opportunities to systematically measure and track financial hardship in a systematic, scalable and sustainable way. We find that the dimensions of financial hardship can exhibit different patterns over time and across patient subgroups, which can guide targeted interventions. The scalability of the algorithm is limited by existing data availability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wen You
- University of Virginia Comprehensive Cancer CenterCharlottesvilleVirginiaUSA
| | - Asal Pilehvari
- University of Virginia Comprehensive Cancer CenterCharlottesvilleVirginiaUSA
| | - Ruoding Shi
- University of Virginia Comprehensive Cancer CenterCharlottesvilleVirginiaUSA
| | - Wendy Cohn
- University of Virginia Comprehensive Cancer CenterCharlottesvilleVirginiaUSA
| | - Christina Sheffield
- University of Virginia Comprehensive Cancer CenterCharlottesvilleVirginiaUSA
| | - Philip I‐Fon Chow
- University of Virginia Comprehensive Cancer CenterCharlottesvilleVirginiaUSA
| | | | - Roger Anderson
- University of Virginia Comprehensive Cancer CenterCharlottesvilleVirginiaUSA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Teteh DK, Ferrell B, Okunowo O, Downie A, Erhunmwunsee L, Montgomery SB, Raz D, Kittles R, Kim JY, Sun V. Social determinants of health and lung cancer surgery: a qualitative study. Front Public Health 2023; 11:1285419. [PMID: 38026333 PMCID: PMC10644827 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1285419] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2023] [Accepted: 10/05/2023] [Indexed: 12/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction Social determinants of health (SDOH) are non-clinical factors that may affect the outcomes of cancer patients. The purpose of this study was to describe the influence of SDOH factors on quality of life (QOL)-related outcomes for lung cancer surgery patients. Methods Thirteen patients enrolled in a randomized trial of a dyadic self-management intervention were invited and agreed to participate in semi-structured key informant interviews at study completion (3 months post-discharge). A conventional content analysis approach was used to identify codes and themes that were derived from the interviews. Independent investigators coded the qualitative data, which were subsequently confirmed by a second group of independent investigators. Themes were finalized, and discrepancies were reviewed and resolved. Results Six themes, each with several subthemes, emerged. Overall, most participants were knowledgeable about the concept of SDOH and perceived that provider awareness of SDOH information was important for the delivery of comprehensive care in surgery. Some participants described financial challenges during treatment that were exacerbated by their cancer diagnosis and resulted in stress and poor QOL. The perceived impact of education varied and included its importance in navigating the healthcare system, decision-making on health behaviors, and more economic mobility opportunities. Some participants experienced barriers to accessing healthcare due to insurance coverage, travel burden, and the fear of losing quality insurance coverage due to retirement. Neighborhood and built environment factors such as safety, air quality, access to green space, and other environmental factors were perceived as important to QOL. Social support through families/friends and spiritual/religious communities was perceived as important to postoperative recovery. Discussion Among lung cancer surgery patients, SDOH factors can impact QOL and the patient's survivorship journey. Importantly, SDOH should be assessed routinely to identify patients with unmet needs across the five domains. SDOH-driven interventions are needed to address these unmet needs and to improve the QOL and quality of care for lung cancer surgery patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dede K. Teteh
- Department of Health Sciences, Crean College of Health and Behavioral Sciences, Chapman University, Orange, CA, United States
- Division of Nursing Research and Education, Department of Population Sciences, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, CA, United States
| | - Betty Ferrell
- Division of Nursing Research and Education, Department of Population Sciences, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, CA, United States
| | - Oluwatimilehin Okunowo
- Division of Biostatistics, Department of Computational and Quantitative Medicine, Beckman Research Institute of City of Hope, Duarte, CA, United States
| | - Aidea Downie
- School of Public Health, Brown University, Providence, RI, United States
| | - Loretta Erhunmwunsee
- Department of Surgery, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, CA, United States
| | | | - Dan Raz
- Department of Surgery, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, CA, United States
| | - Rick Kittles
- Department of Community Health and Preventive Medicine, Morehouse School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, United States
| | - Jae Y. Kim
- Department of Surgery, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, CA, United States
| | - Virginia Sun
- Division of Nursing Research and Education, Department of Population Sciences, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, CA, United States
- Department of Surgery, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, CA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Yamauchi K, Nakashima M, Nakao M. Time-Related Characteristics of Medical and Psychosocial Decisions in Japanese Women with Breast Cancer: Results of a Web-Based Open-Ended Response. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2023; 24:3381-3387. [PMID: 37898841 PMCID: PMC10770686 DOI: 10.31557/apjcp.2023.24.10.3381] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2023] [Accepted: 10/07/2023] [Indexed: 10/30/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study aimed to articulate chronological characteristics of decisions made by Japanese women with breast cancer (BC) since their diagnosis. METHODS Open-ended questions were asked using an Internet-based cross-sectional survey method. Qualitative content analysis was performed on 1,158 free descriptive responses obtained from 549 participants, which were categorized according to the content of decisions. Furthermore, 994 text data from 433 respondents to the quantitative questions were categorized according to the decisions' timing and examined in relation to medical and sociodemographic factors. RESULTS Whereas more than 60% of medical decisions, except chemotherapy, were made before initial treatment, approximately more than one-third of sociopsychological decisions were made only after the initial treatment. In decisions regarding medical care, only surgical decisions showed an association between timing and the participants' decision-making style. Meanwhile, in decisions regarding sociopsychological matters, socioeconomic status at the time of diagnosis, such as marital and employment status, along with the perceived importance of what was to be determined, were associated with the timing of decision-making related to employment, attitudes toward life with BC, family matters and financial affairs. CONCLUSION Women make various decisions depending on the amount of time since the diagnosis of BC. Generally, medical decisions are made prior to initial treatment, while these temporal characteristics are not observed for decisions relating to sociopsychological matters. Furthermore, socioeconomic status influences the timing of decision-making regarding sociopsychological matters. This finding can illustrate the manner in which to go through life with BC, and thus, help women who are unexpectedly diagnosed with BC to be more prepared.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Keiko Yamauchi
- Department of Public Health, School of Medicine, Kurume University, Fukuoka, Japan.
| | - Mitsuyo Nakashima
- Department of Nursing, School of Medicine, Fukuoka University, Fukuoka, Japan.
| | - Motoyuki Nakao
- Department of Public Health, School of Medicine, Kurume University, Fukuoka, Japan.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Mudaranthakam DP, Nollen N, Wick J, Hughes D, Welch D, Calhoun E. Evaluating Work Impairment as a Source of Financial Toxicity in Cancer Healthcare and Negative Impacts on Health Status. CANCER RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS 2023; 3:1166-1172. [PMID: 37415746 PMCID: PMC10321355 DOI: 10.1158/2767-9764.crc-23-0038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2023] [Revised: 04/17/2023] [Accepted: 06/06/2023] [Indexed: 07/08/2023]
Abstract
How the socioeconomic factors intersect for a particular patient can determine their susceptibility to financial toxicity, what costs they will encounter during treatment, the type and quality of their care, and the potential work impairments they face. The primary goal of this study was to evaluate financial factors leading to worsening health outcomes by the cancer subtype. A logistic model predicting worsening health outcomes while assessing the most influential economic factors was constructed by the University of Michigan Health and Retirement Study. A forward stepwise regression procedure was implemented to identify the social risk factors that impact health status. Stepwise regression was done on data subsets based on the cancer types of lung, breast, prostate, and colon cancer to determine whether significant predictors of worsening health status were different or the same across cancer types. Independent covariate analysis was also conducted to cross-validate our model. On the basis of the model fit statistics, the two-factor model has the best fit, that is, the lowest AIC among potential models of 3270.56, percent concordance of 64.7, and a C-statistics of 0.65. The two-factor model used work impairment and out-of-pocket costs, significantly contributing to worsening health outcomes. Covariate analysis demonstrated that younger patients with cancer experienced more financial burdens leading to worsening health outcomes than elderly patients aged 65 years and above. Work impairment and high out-of-pocket costs were significantly associated with worsening health outcomes among cancer patients. Matching the participants who need the most financial help with appropriate resources is essential to mitigate the financial burden. Significance Among patients with cancer, work impairment and out-of-pocket are the two primary factors contributing to adverse health outcomes. Women, African American or other races, the Hispanic population, and younger individuals have encountered higher work impairment and out-of-pocket costs due to cancer than their counterparts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dinesh Pal Mudaranthakam
- Department of Biostatistics & Data Science, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas
- Department of Population Health, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas
- University of Kansas Comprehensive Cancer Center, Kansas City, Kansas
| | - Nicole Nollen
- Department of Population Health, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas
- University of Kansas Comprehensive Cancer Center, Kansas City, Kansas
| | - Jo Wick
- Department of Population Health, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas
- University of Kansas Comprehensive Cancer Center, Kansas City, Kansas
| | - Dorothy Hughes
- Department of Population Health, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas
| | - Danny Welch
- University of Kansas Comprehensive Cancer Center, Kansas City, Kansas
| | - Elizabeth Calhoun
- Department of Population Health, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas
- Population Health Sciences, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Kc M, Oral E, Rung AL, Trapido E, Rozek LS, Fontham ETH, Bensen JT, Farnan L, Steck SE, Song L, Mohler JL, Khan S, Vohra S, Peters ES. Prostate cancer aggressiveness and financial toxicity among prostate cancer patients. Prostate 2023; 83:44-55. [PMID: 36063402 PMCID: PMC10087487 DOI: 10.1002/pros.24434] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2022] [Revised: 06/13/2022] [Accepted: 08/25/2022] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Financial toxicity (FT) is a growing concern among cancer survivors that adversely affects the quality of life and survival. Individuals diagnosed with aggressive cancers are often at a greater risk of experiencing FT. The objectives of this study were to estimate FT among prostate cancer (PCa) survivors after 10-15 years of diagnosis, assess the relationship between PCa aggressiveness at diagnosis and FT, and examine whether current cancer treatment status mediates the relationship between PCa aggressiveness and FT. METHODS PCa patients enrolled in the North Carolina-Louisiana Prostate Cancer Project (PCaP) were recontacted for long-term follow-up. The prevalence of FT in the PCaP cohort was estimated. FT was estimated using the COmprehensive Score for Financial Toxicity, a validated measure of FT. The direct effect of PCa aggressiveness and an indirect effect through current cancer treatment on FT was examined using causal mediation analysis. RESULTS More than one-third of PCa patients reported experiencing FT. PCa aggressiveness was significantly independently associated with high FT; high aggressive PCa at diagnosis had more than twice the risk of experiencing FT than those with low or intermediate aggressive PCa (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 2.13, 95% CI = 1.14-3.96). The proportion of the effect of PCa aggressiveness on FT, mediated by treatment status, was 10%, however, the adjusted odds ratio did not indicate significant evidence of mediation by treatment status (aOR = 1.05, 95% CI = 0.95-1.20). CONCLUSIONS Aggressive PCa was associated with high FT. Future studies should collect more information about the characteristics of men with high FT and identify additional risk factors of FT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Madhav Kc
- Cancer Outcomes, Public Policy, and Effectiveness Research (COPPER) Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
- Epidemiology Program, School of Public Health, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center-New Orleans, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA
| | - Evrim Oral
- Biostatistics Program, School of Public Health, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center-New Orleans, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA
| | - Ariane L Rung
- Epidemiology Program, School of Public Health, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center-New Orleans, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA
| | - Edward Trapido
- Epidemiology Program, School of Public Health, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center-New Orleans, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA
| | - Laura S Rozek
- Department of Environmental Health Sciences, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Elizabeth T H Fontham
- Epidemiology Program, School of Public Health, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center-New Orleans, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA
| | - Jeannette T Bensen
- Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Laura Farnan
- Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Susan E Steck
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina, USA
| | - Lixin Song
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
- School of Nursing, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - James L Mohler
- Department of Urology, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, New York, USA
| | - Saira Khan
- Epidemiology Program, College of Health Sciences, University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware, USA
| | - Sanah Vohra
- Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Edward S Peters
- Epidemiology Program, School of Public Health, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center-New Orleans, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA
- Department of Epidemiology, College of Public Health, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
von Kutzleben M, Galuska JC, Hein A, Griesinger F, Ansmann L. Needs of Lung Cancer Patients Receiving Immunotherapy and Acceptance of Digital and Sensor-Based Scenarios for Monitoring Symptoms at Home—A Qualitative-Explorative Study. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2022; 19:ijerph19159265. [PMID: 35954619 PMCID: PMC9368591 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19159265] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2022] [Revised: 07/14/2022] [Accepted: 07/26/2022] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
Background: The development of immunotherapy in the treatment for lung cancer has changed the outlook for both patients and health care practitioners. However, reporting and management of side effects are crucial to ensure effectiveness and safety of treatment. The aim of this study was to learn about the subjective experiences of patients with lung cancer receiving immunotherapy and to explore their potential acceptance of digital and sensor-based systems for monitoring treatment-related symptoms at home. Methods: A qualitative-explorative interview study with patients with lung cancer (n = 21) applying qualitative content analysis. Results: Participants had trouble to classify and differentiate between symptoms they experienced and it seemed challenging to assess whether symptoms are serious enough to be reported and to figure out the right time to report symptoms to health care practitioners. We identified four basic needs: (1) the need to be informed, (2) the need for a trustful relationship, (3) the need to be taken seriously, and (4) the need for needs-oriented treatment concepts. The idea of digital and sensor-based monitoring initially provoked rejection, but participants expressed more differentiated attitudes during the interviews, which could be integrated into a preliminary model to explain the acceptance of digital and sensor-based monitoring scenarios. Conclusions: Supporting lung cancer patients and their health care providers in communicating about treatment-related symptoms is important. Technology-based monitoring systems are considered to be potentially beneficial. However, in view of the many unfulfilled information needs and the unsatisfactory reporting of symptoms, it must be critically questioned what these systems can and should compensate for, and where the limits of such monitoring lie.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Milena von Kutzleben
- Division for Organizational Health Services Research, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Carl von Ossietzky University of Oldenburg, Ammerlaender Heerstr, 140, 26129 Oldenburg, Germany; (J.C.G.); (L.A.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +49-441-798-4540
| | - Jan Christoph Galuska
- Division for Organizational Health Services Research, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Carl von Ossietzky University of Oldenburg, Ammerlaender Heerstr, 140, 26129 Oldenburg, Germany; (J.C.G.); (L.A.)
| | - Andreas Hein
- Division for Assistance Systems and Medical Technology, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Carl von Ossietzky University of Oldenburg, Ammerlaender Heerstr, 140, 26129 Oldenburg, Germany;
| | - Frank Griesinger
- Department of Hematology and Oncology at the Pius-Hospital Oldenburg, Georgstraße, University Department Internal Medicine-Oncology, 12, 26121 Oldenburg, Germany;
| | - Lena Ansmann
- Division for Organizational Health Services Research, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Carl von Ossietzky University of Oldenburg, Ammerlaender Heerstr, 140, 26129 Oldenburg, Germany; (J.C.G.); (L.A.)
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Henrikson NB, Anderson ML, Dickerson J, Ewing JJ, Garcia R, Keast E, King DA, Lewis C, Locher B, McMullen C, Norris CM, Petrik AF, Ramaprasan A, Rivelli JS, Schneider JL, Shulman L, Tuzzio L, Banegas MP. The Cancer Financial Experience (CAFÉ) study: randomized controlled trial of a financial navigation intervention to address cancer-related financial hardship. Trials 2022; 23:402. [PMID: 35562781 PMCID: PMC9099299 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-022-06344-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2022] [Accepted: 04/23/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is an urgent need for evidence on how interventions can prevent or mitigate cancer-related financial hardship. Our objectives are to compare self-reported financial hardship, quality of life, and health services use between patients receiving a financial navigation intervention versus a comparison group at 12 months follow-up, and to assess patient-level factors associated with dose received of a financial navigation intervention. METHODS The Cancer Financial Experience (CAFÉ) study is a multi-site randomized controlled trial (RCT) with individual-level randomization. Participants will be offered either brief (one financial navigation cycle, Arm 2) or extended (three financial navigation cycles, Arm 3) financial navigation. The intervention period for both Arms 2 and 3 is 6 months. The comparison group (Arm 1) will receive enhanced usual care. The setting for the CAFÉ study is the medical oncology and radiation oncology clinics at two integrated health systems in the Pacific Northwest. Inclusion criteria includes age 18 or older with a recent cancer diagnosis and visit to a study clinic as identified through administrative data. Outcomes will be assessed at 12-month follow-up. Primary outcomes are self-reported financial distress and health-related quality of life. Secondary outcomes are delayed or foregone care; receipt of medical financial assistance; and account delinquency. A mixed methods exploratory analysis will investigate factors associated with total intervention dose received. DISCUSSION The CAFÉ study will provide much-needed early trial evidence on the impact of financial navigation in reducing cancer-related financial hardship. It is theory-informed, clinic-based, aligned with patient preferences, and has been developed following preliminary qualitative studies and stakeholder input. By design, it will provide prospective evidence on the potential benefits of financial navigation on patient-relevant cancer outcomes. The CAFÉ trial's strengths include its broad inclusion criteria, its equity-focused sampling plan, its novel intervention developed in partnership with clinical and operations stakeholders, and mixed methods secondary analyses related to intervention dose offered and dose received. The resulting analytic dataset will allow for rich mixed methods analysis and provide critical information related to implementation of the intervention should it prove effective. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05018000 . August 23, 2021.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nora B Henrikson
- Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA, USA.
| | - Melissa L Anderson
- Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - John Dickerson
- Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, Portland, OR, USA
| | - John J Ewing
- Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Robin Garcia
- Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Erin Keast
- Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Deborah A King
- Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Cara Lewis
- Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Blake Locher
- Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Carmit McMullen
- Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Consuelo M Norris
- Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Amanda F Petrik
- Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Arvind Ramaprasan
- Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA, USA
| | | | | | - Lisa Shulman
- Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Leah Tuzzio
- Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Matthew P Banegas
- Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, Portland, OR, USA
- University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Modi ND, Abuhelwa AY, Badaoui S, Shaw E, Shankaran K, McKinnon RA, Rowland A, Sorich MJ, Hopkins AM. Prediction of severe neutropenia and diarrhoea in breast cancer patients treated with abemaciclib. Breast 2021; 58:57-62. [PMID: 33906086 PMCID: PMC8099659 DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2021.04.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2021] [Revised: 03/22/2021] [Accepted: 04/08/2021] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Neutropenia and diarrhoea are common and potentially serious adverse events associated with abemaciclib in advanced breast cancer (ABC), and the risk factors have been minimally explored. The study aimed to develop clinical prediction tools that allow personalized predictions of neutropenia and diarrhoea following abemaciclib initiation. Materials and methods Data was pooled from MONARCH 1, 2 and 3 trials investigating abemaciclib. Cox proportional hazard analysis was used to assess the association between pre-treatment clinicopathological data and grade ≥3 diarrhoea and neutropenia occurring within the first 365 days of abemaciclib use. Results Older age was associated with increased risk of grade ≥3 diarrhoea [HR [95%CI] for age > 70: 1.72 [1.14–2.58]; P = 0.009]. A clinical prediction tool for abemaciclib induced grade ≥3 neutropenia was optimally defined by race, ECOGPS and white blood cell count. Large discrimination between subgroups was observed; the highest risk subgroup had a 64% probability of grade ≥3 neutropenia within the first 365 days of abemaciclib (150 mg twice daily) + fulvestrant/NSAI, compared to 5% for the lowest risk subgroup. Conclusion The study identified advanced age as significantly associated with an increased risk of abemaciclib induced grade ≥ 3 diarrhoea. A clinical prediction tool, defined by race, ECOGPS and pre-treatment white blood cell count, was able to discriminate subgroups with significantly different risks of grade ≥3 neutropenia following abemaciclib initiation. The tool may enable improved interpretation of personalized risks and the risk-benefit ratio of abemaciclib. Neutropenia and diarrhoea are common adverse effects of abemaciclib. Higher age was associated with abemaciclib induced diarrhoea. White blood cell count, Race, and performance status were linked with neutropenia. A prediction tool was developed to provide personalized risks of neutropenia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natansh D Modi
- College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Ahmad Y Abuhelwa
- College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Sarah Badaoui
- College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Emily Shaw
- College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Kiran Shankaran
- College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Ross A McKinnon
- College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Andrew Rowland
- College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Michael J Sorich
- College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Ashley M Hopkins
- College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Personalized Prechemotherapy Education Reduces Peri-Chemotherapy Anxiety in Colorectal Cancer Patients. DISEASE MARKERS 2021; 2021:6662938. [PMID: 34007345 PMCID: PMC8110412 DOI: 10.1155/2021/6662938] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/29/2020] [Revised: 02/26/2021] [Accepted: 03/06/2021] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
Objective To evaluate the effect of personalized prechemotherapy education in the reduction of peri-chemotherapy anxiety in patients with colorectal cancer. Methods Patients admitted to the Department of Oncology with a diagnosis of stage III or IV colorectal cancer and scheduled for initial chemotherapy from January 1, 2017, to June 30, 2019, were retrieved. Patients in the educated group completed the GAD-7 form to evaluate their anxiety level at admission and 14 days after personalized prechemotherapy education, the educator team of which included both physician and nurse staff. Patients in the control group only completed GAD-7 forms at admission and 14 days thereafter without personalized education. Results Three hundred and sixty-four patients were enrolled for analysis, including 127 patients who received personalized prechemotherapy education and 237 patients who did not receive education. There were no significant differences in age, gender, education level, or pretreatment GAD-7 scores between the two groups, but significantly lower posttreatment GAD-7 score, and fewer medium to severe posttreatment anxiety patients in the educated group. Conclusion Personalized prechemotherapy education involving physician for medical treatment and nursing staff for peri-treatment care, in contrast to traditional brief discussion with physicians during clinic visits and unified informed consent before treatments, may reduce peri-chemotherapy anxiety more efficiently.
Collapse
|
10
|
Richardson DR, Oakes AH, Crossnohere NL, Rathsmill G, Reinhart C, O'Donoghue B, Bridges JFP. Prioritizing the worries of AML patients: Quantifying patient experience using best-worst scaling. Psychooncology 2021; 30:1104-1111. [PMID: 33544421 DOI: 10.1002/pon.5652] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2021] [Accepted: 02/01/2021] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
CONTEXT Although patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) experience significant toxicities and poor outcomes, few studies have quantified patients' experience. METHODS A community-centered approach was used to develop an AML-specific best-worst scaling (BWS) instrument involving 13 items in four domains (psychological, physical, decision-making, and treatment delivery) to quantify patient worry. A survey of patients and caregivers was conducted using the instrument. Data were analyzed using conditional logistic regression. RESULTS The survey was completed by 832 patients and 237 caregivers. Patients were predominantly white (88%), married/partnered (72%), and in remission (95%). The median age was 55 years (range: 19-87). Median time since diagnosis was 8 years (range: 1-40). Patients worried most about "the possibility of dying from AML" (BWS score = 15.5, confidence interval [CI] [14.2-16.7]) and "long-term side effects of treatments" (14.0, CI [12.9-15.2]). Patients found these items more than twice as worrisome as all items within the domains of care delivery and decision-making. Patients were least worried about "communicating openly with doctors" (2.50, CI [1.97-3.04]) and "having access to the best medical care" (3.90, CI [3.28-4.61]). Caregiver reports were highly correlated to patients' (Spearman's ρ = 0.89) though noted significantly more worry about the possibility of dying and spending time in the hospital. CONCLUSION This large convenience sample demonstrates that AML patients have two principal worries: dying from their disease and suffering long-term side effects from treatment. To better foster patient-centered care, therapeutic decision-making and drug development should reflect the importance of both potential outcomes. Further work should explore interventions to address these worries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel R Richardson
- UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Division of Hematology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Allison H Oakes
- Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion, Crescenz VA Medical Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.,Penn Medicine Nudge Unit, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Norah L Crossnohere
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.,Department of Health Behavior and Society, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Gary Rathsmill
- Leukemia & Lymphoma Society, White Plains, New York, USA
| | - Crystal Reinhart
- Center for Prevention Research and Development, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, Illinois, USA
| | | | - John F P Bridges
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.,Department of Health Behavior and Society, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Tangka FKL, Subramanian S, Jones M, Edwards P, Flanigan T, Kaganova Y, Smith KW, Thomas CC, Hawkins NA, Rodriguez J, Fairley T, Guy GP. Insurance Coverage, Employment Status, and Financial Well-Being of Young Women Diagnosed with Breast Cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2020; 29:616-624. [PMID: 32132129 PMCID: PMC7909848 DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.epi-19-0352] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2019] [Revised: 10/04/2019] [Accepted: 01/03/2020] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The economic cost of breast cancer is a major personal and public health problem in the United States. This study aims to evaluate the insurance, employment, and financial experiences of young female breast cancer survivors and to assess factors associated with financial decline. METHODS We recruited 830 women under 40 years of age diagnosed with breast cancer between January 2013 and December 2014. The study population was identified through California, Florida, Georgia, and North Carolina population-based cancer registries. The cross-sectional survey was fielded in 2017 and included questions on demographics, insurance, employment, out-of-pocket costs, and financial well-being. We present descriptive statistics and multivariate analysis to assess factors associated with financial decline. RESULTS Although 92.5% of the respondents were continuously insured over the past 12 months, 9.5% paid a "higher price than expected" for coverage. Common concerns among the 73.4% of respondents who were employed at diagnosis included increased paid (55.1%) or unpaid (47.3%) time off, suffering job performance (23.2%), and staying at (30.2%) or avoiding changing (23.5%) jobs for health insurance purposes. Overall, 47.0% experienced financial decline due to treatment-related costs. Patients with some college education, multiple comorbidities, late stage diagnoses, and self-funded insurance were most vulnerable. CONCLUSIONS The breast cancer diagnosis created financial hardship for half the respondents and led to myriad challenges in maintaining employment. Employment decisions were heavily influenced by the need to maintain health insurance coverage. IMPACT This study finds that a breast cancer diagnosis in young women can result in employment disruption and financial decline.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Florence K L Tangka
- Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Cheryll C Thomas
- Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Nikki A Hawkins
- Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Juan Rodriguez
- Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Temeika Fairley
- Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Gery P Guy
- Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Aminaie N, Mirlashari J, Lehto RH, Lashkari M, Negarandeh R. Iranian Cancer Patients Perceptions of Barriers to Participation in Decision-Making: Potential Impact on Patient-Centered Care. Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs 2019; 6:372-380. [PMID: 31572757 PMCID: PMC6696813 DOI: 10.4103/apjon.apjon_11_19] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective: The purpose of this study was to explore perceptions about barriers to decision-making in Iranian patients with cancer about their care. Methods: Utilizing a qualitative approach, semi-structured interviews were conducted with 15 cancer patients. Results: Data analysis revealed four central categories reflecting patient perceptions about barriers that included medical dominance (uninformed decision-making, perceived inability to disagree secondary to despair, and patient objectification), healthcare system mistrust (physician, nurse, and medical center facility and equipment), healthcare system characteristics (services and facilities’ limitations, poor communication, healthcare setting compulsion), and cultural barriers (feeling unfamiliar, insecurity in an unfamiliar environment, language barriers, limited attention to religious beliefs). Conclusions: Barriers may impact the perceived ability of Iranian patients’ with cancer ability to participate in decision-making regarding their care. Such barriers contain the potential to disrupt patient-centered care. Perceptions about barriers articulated by patients are modifiable. While some Iranian healthcare systems may have problematic challenges, targeted allocation of resources and education of healthcare providers convey strong possibilities to enhance patient-centered care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Naism Aminaie
- Department of Medical Surgical Nursing, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Jila Mirlashari
- Department of Pediatric and Neonatal Intensive Care Nursing, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.,Obstetric and Gynecology Department, University of British Colombia, Canada
| | - Rebecca H Lehto
- College of Nursing, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA
| | - Marzieh Lashkari
- Radiation Oncology Research Center, Cancer Institute, Tehran University of Medical Science, Tehran, Iran
| | - Reza Negarandeh
- Nursing and Midwifery Care Research Center, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Smith GL, Lopez-Olivo MA, Advani PG, Ning MS, Geng Y, Giordano SH, Volk RJ. Financial Burdens of Cancer Treatment: A Systematic Review of Risk Factors and Outcomes. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2019; 17:1184-1192. [PMID: 31590147 PMCID: PMC7370695 DOI: 10.6004/jnccn.2019.7305] [Citation(s) in RCA: 187] [Impact Index Per Article: 37.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2018] [Accepted: 03/29/2019] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients with cancer experience financial toxicity from the costs of treatment, as well as material and psychologic stress related to this burden. A synthesized understanding of predictors and outcomes of the financial burdens associated with cancer care is needed to underpin strategic responses in oncology care. This study systematically reviewed risk factors and outcomes associated with financial burdens related to cancer treatment. METHODS MEDLINE, Embase, PubMed, PsychINFO, and the Cochrane Library were searched from study inception through June 2018, and reference lists were scanned from studies of patient-level predictors and outcomes of financial burdens in US patients with cancer (aged ≥18 years). Two reviewers conducted screening, abstraction, and quality assessment. Variables associated with financial burdens were synthesized. When possible, pooled estimates of associations were calculated using random-effects models. RESULTS A total of 74 observational studies of financial burdens in 598,751 patients with cancer were identified, among which 49% of patients reported material or psychologic financial burdens (95% CI, 41%-56%). Socioeconomic predictors of worse financial burdens with treatment were lack of health insurance, lower income, unemployment, and younger age at cancer diagnosis. Compared with patients with health insurance, those who were uninsured demonstrated twice the odds of financial burdens (pooled odds ratio [OR], 2.09; 95% CI, 1.33-3.30). Financial burdens were most severe early in cancer treatment, did not differ by disease site, and were associated with worse health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and nearly twice the odds of cancer medication nonadherence (pooled OR, 1.70; 95% CI, 1.13-2.56). Only a single study demonstrated an association with increased mortality. Studies assessing the comparative effectiveness of interventions to mitigate financial burdens in patients with cancer were lacking. CONCLUSIONS Evidence showed that financial burdens are common, disproportionately impacting younger and socioeconomically disadvantaged patients with cancer, across disease sites, and are associated with worse treatment adherence and HRQoL. Available evidence helped identify vulnerable patients needing oncology provider engagement and response, but evidence is critically needed on the effectiveness of interventions designed to mitigate financial burden and impact.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Grace L. Smith
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
- Department of Health Services Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Maria A. Lopez-Olivo
- Department of General Internal Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Pragati G. Advani
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Matthew S. Ning
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Yimin Geng
- Research Medical Library, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Sharon H. Giordano
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
- Department of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Robert J. Volk
- Department of Health Services Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Yamauchi K, Nakao M, Nakashima M. Correlates of regret with treatment decision-making among Japanese women with breast cancer: results of an internet-based cross-sectional survey. BMC WOMENS HEALTH 2019; 19:86. [PMID: 31266493 PMCID: PMC6607591 DOI: 10.1186/s12905-019-0783-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2019] [Accepted: 06/14/2019] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
Background Satisfaction with medical decisions among patients with cancer is associated not only with the results of decisions they make but also with how they make those decisions. To elucidate the decision-making process among Japanese women with breast cancer, we explored the correlates of regret with patients’ treatment decision-making. Methods An Internet-based cross-sectional survey was utilized. Japanese women (N = 467) who self-reported that they had been diagnosed with stage 0II breast cancer participated. Data regarding their decisional role (active, collaborative, or passive) in treatment decision-making, their most regrettable experience regarding their decision-making, the importance of various factors related to decision-making at the time, and clinical and sociodemographic factors were obtained. A forced-entry logistic regression analysis was performed on the likelihood that patients would have some regrets regarding the decision-making process. Results About half the women expressed some regret (51.4%). Women who had a mastectomy were significantly more likely to have regret than women who had breast conserving surgery. Correlates of regret differed by surgical type. For women who had a mastectomy, those who were aged ≥50 years when diagnosed, or who made their decisions collaboratively with their doctors were significantly less likely to have regret with the decision-making. For women who had breast conserving surgery, those who worked on a contract or part-time basis or whose decision-making roles matched their preferred role were significantly less likely to have regret. Among women who reported some regret, 23.8% expressed that their most regrettable experience concerned gathering information, while 21.3% regretted not consulting with others. For women who were diagnosed at a younger age, the influence on their sex life and pregnancy and childbirth was more important when making their treatment decisions than for women diagnosed an older age. Conclusions Approximately half of the Japanese women with breast cancer in this study reported some regret in the treatment decision-making process. Effective participation in decision-making differed by surgical types. Additionally, women who are diagnosed with breast cancer at a relatively younger age, as compared to those who are older, may need additional information and support regarding their sex life and fertility after cancer treatment. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s12905-019-0783-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Keiko Yamauchi
- Department of Public Health, School of Medicine, Kurume University, 67 Asahimachi, Kurume, Fukuoka, 830-0011, Japan.
| | - Motoyuki Nakao
- Department of Public Health, School of Medicine, Kurume University, 67 Asahimachi, Kurume, Fukuoka, 830-0011, Japan
| | - Mitsuyo Nakashima
- Department of Nursing, School of Medicine, Fukuoka University, Fukuoka, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Witte J, Mehlis K, Surmann B, Lingnau R, Damm O, Greiner W, Winkler EC. Methods for measuring financial toxicity after cancer diagnosis and treatment: a systematic review and its implications. Ann Oncol 2019; 30:1061-1070. [PMID: 31046080 PMCID: PMC6637374 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdz140] [Citation(s) in RCA: 129] [Impact Index Per Article: 25.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Patients experiencing financial distress as a side-effect of cancer are not only reported in the United States, but also in third-party payer healthcare systems in Europe. Since validated survey instruments are a prerequisite for robust and comparable results, we aimed to compile and classify available instruments to enable both a better understanding of the underlying construct of financial toxicity and to facilitate further studies that are adjustable to various healthcare systems. We did a systematic literature search on studies that provide data on perceived cancer-related financial distress experienced by adult patients using PubMed, CINAHL and Web of Science databases up to 2018. We analyzed all detected instruments, items domains and questions with regard to their wording, scales and the domains of financial distress covered. Among 3298 records screened, 41 publications based on 40 studies matched our inclusion criteria. Based on the analysis of 352 different questions we identified 6 relevant subdomains that represent perceptions of and reactions to experienced financial distress: (i) active financial spending, (ii) use of passive financial resources, (iii) psychosocial responses, (iv) support seeking, (v) coping with care or (vi) coping with ones' lifestyle. We found an inconsistent coverage and use of these domains that makes it difficult to compare and quantify the prevalence of financial distress. Moreover, some existing instruments do not reflect relevant domains for patients in third-party payer systems. There is neither a consistent understanding of the construct of financial burden nor do available instruments cover all relevant aspects of a patients' distress perception. We encourage using the identified six domains to further develop survey instruments and adjust them to different health systems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Witte
- Department of Health Economics and Health Care Management, School of Public Health, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld
| | - K Mehlis
- Department of Medical Oncology, Programme for Ethics and Patient Oriented Care, National Center for Tumor Diseases, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - B Surmann
- Department of Health Economics and Health Care Management, School of Public Health, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld
| | - R Lingnau
- Department of Health Economics and Health Care Management, School of Public Health, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld
| | - O Damm
- Department of Health Economics and Health Care Management, School of Public Health, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld
| | - W Greiner
- Department of Health Economics and Health Care Management, School of Public Health, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld
| | - E C Winkler
- Department of Medical Oncology, Programme for Ethics and Patient Oriented Care, National Center for Tumor Diseases, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Pisu M, Schoenberger YM, Herbey I, Brown-Galvan A, Liang MI, Riggs K, Meneses K. Perspectives on Conversations About Costs of Cancer Care of Breast Cancer Survivors and Cancer Center Staff: A Qualitative Study. Ann Intern Med 2019; 170:S54-S61. [PMID: 31060056 DOI: 10.7326/m18-2117] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite recommendations to discuss the cost of care (CoC) with patients with cancer, little formal guidance is available on how to conduct these sensitive conversations in ways that are acceptable to both patients and providers. OBJECTIVE To explore the perspectives of patients and medical and nonmedical cancer center staff on CoC conversations. DESIGN In individual interviews, participants were asked to discuss the content of, timing of, and ideal person to hold CoC conversations. Interviews were transcribed verbatim. Content was analyzed to identify emerging essential elements. SETTING Division of Preventive Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham. PARTICIPANTS 42 women aged 60 to 79 years with a history of breast cancer and 20 cancer center staff (6 physicians, 4 nurses, 5 patient navigators, 3 social workers, and 2 billing specialists). RESULTS Both patients and providers identified reassurance and action as essential elements of CoC conversations. Participants expressed the importance of reassurance that recommended medical care would not be affected by affordability challenges. Action was intended as discussions on ways to help patients cover treatment-related costs, such as discussion of payment plans or linkage to financial resources. Optimal timing for CoC conversations was felt to be after an initial consult visit but before treatment started. The person to hold these conversations should be compassionate, helpful, and knowledgeable of the patient's specific situation (for example, treatment plan, insurance coverage) and of the resources available to attain the patient's goals of care. LIMITATION Interviews were limited to older breast cancer survivors and staff at 1 institution. CONCLUSION Conversations about CoC extend beyond discussing costs and must be sensitive to the vulnerability experienced by patients. These findings can guide training of personnel involved in CoC conversations. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE Robert Wood Johnson Foundation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Pisu
- Division of Preventive Medicine and Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Alabama at Birmingham (M.P., Y.S.)
| | - Yu-Mei Schoenberger
- Division of Preventive Medicine and Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Alabama at Birmingham (M.P., Y.S.)
| | - Ivan Herbey
- Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham (I.H.)
| | - Aquila Brown-Galvan
- Division of Preventive Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham (A.B., K.R.)
| | - Margaret I Liang
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology and Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Alabama at Birmingham (M.I.L.)
| | - Kevin Riggs
- Division of Preventive Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham (A.B., K.R.)
| | - Karen Meneses
- School of Nursing and Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Alabama at Birmingham (K.M.)
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Hastert TA, Kyko JM, Reed AR, Harper FWK, Beebe-Dimmer JL, Baird TE, Schwartz AG. Financial Hardship and Quality of Life among African American and White Cancer Survivors: The Role of Limiting Care Due to Cost. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2019; 28:1202-1211. [PMID: 31061097 DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.epi-18-1336] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2018] [Revised: 03/08/2019] [Accepted: 04/30/2019] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Financial hardship is common among cancer survivors and is associated with both limiting care due to cost and with poor health-related quality of life (HRQOL). This study estimates the association between limiting care due to cost and HRQOL in a diverse population of cancer survivors and tests whether limiting care mediates the association between financial hardship and HRQOL. METHODS We used data from 988 participants (579 African American, 409 white) in the Detroit Research on Cancer Survivors (ROCS) pilot, a hospital-based cohort of breast, colorectal, lung, and prostate cancer survivors. We assessed associations between financial hardship, limiting care, and HRQOL [measured by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G)] using linear regression and mediation analysis controlling for demographic, socioeconomic, and cancer-related variables. RESULTS FACT-G scores were 4.2 [95% confidence interval (CI), 2.0-6.4] points lower among survivors who reported financial hardship compared with those who did not in adjusted models. Limiting care due to cost was associated with a -7.8 (95% CI, -5.1 to -10.5) point difference in FACT-G scores. Limiting care due to cost explained 40.5% (95% CI, 25.5%-92.7%) of the association between financial hardship and HRQOL overall, and 50.5% (95% CI, 29.1%-188.1%) of the association for African American survivors. CONCLUSIONS Financial hardship and limiting care due to cost are both associated with lower HRQOL among diverse cancer survivors, and this association is partially explained by limiting care due to cost. IMPACT Actions to ensure patients with cancer can access appropriate care could lessen the impact of financial hardship on HRQOL.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Theresa A Hastert
- Department of Oncology, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, Michigan.
- Population Studies and Disparities Research Program, Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, Michigan
| | - Jaclyn M Kyko
- Department of Oncology, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, Michigan
- Population Studies and Disparities Research Program, Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, Michigan
- Department of Family Medicine & Public Health Sciences, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, Michigan
| | - Amanda R Reed
- Department of Oncology, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, Michigan
- Population Studies and Disparities Research Program, Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, Michigan
| | - Felicity W K Harper
- Department of Oncology, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, Michigan
- Population Studies and Disparities Research Program, Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, Michigan
| | - Jennifer L Beebe-Dimmer
- Department of Oncology, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, Michigan
- Population Studies and Disparities Research Program, Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, Michigan
| | - Tara E Baird
- Department of Oncology, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, Michigan
- Population Studies and Disparities Research Program, Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, Michigan
| | - Ann G Schwartz
- Department of Oncology, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, Michigan
- Population Studies and Disparities Research Program, Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, Michigan
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Pisu M, Henrikson NB, Banegas MP, Yabroff KR. Costs of cancer along the care continuum: What we can expect based on recent literature. Cancer 2018; 124:4181-4191. [PMID: 30475400 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.31643] [Citation(s) in RCA: 56] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2018] [Revised: 05/09/2018] [Accepted: 06/04/2018] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cancer costs should be discussed by patients and providers, but information is not readily available. Results from recently published studies (in the last 5 years) on direct and indirect cancer costs may help guide these discussions. METHODS The authors reviewed studies published between 2013 and 2017 that reported direct health care costs and indirect (productivity losses) costs. The annual mean total and net costs of cancer were summarized for all payers and for survivors only by age (ages 18-64 and ≥65 years), by phase of care (initial [ie, 12 months from diagnosis], continuing, and end-of-life [ie, 12 months before death]), or for recently diagnosed (within 1-2 years of diagnosis) and longer term survivors. RESULTS For all payers combined, costs for cancers like breast, prostate, colorectal, and lung cancers were $20,000 to $100,000 in the initial phase, $1000 to $30,000 annually in the continuing phase, and ≥$60,000 in the end-of-life phase. Annual out-of-pocket costs to recently diagnosed survivors were >$1000 for medical care and time costs, approximately $2000 for productivity losses, and from $2500 to >$4000 for employment disability, depending on age. For longer term survivors, the cost of medical care was approximately $1500 for older survivors and $747 for younger survivors, time costs were $831 to $955 for older survivors and $459 to $630 for younger survivors, and productivity losses were approximately $800. Disability among long-term survivors was similar to that among short-term survivors. Limitations of the reviewed studies included older data and under-representation of higher cost cancers. CONCLUSIONS Frequently updated cost information for all cancer types is needed to guide discussions of anticipated short-term and long-term cancer-related costs with survivors. Cancer 2018;000:000-000. © 2018 American Cancer Society.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Pisu
- Division of Preventive Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama.,University of Alabama at Birmingham Comprehensive Cancer Center, Birmingham, Alabama
| | - Nora B Henrikson
- Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, Washington
| | | | - K Robin Yabroff
- Department of Intramural Research, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, Georgia
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Duberstein PR, Chen M, Chapman BP, Hoerger M, Saeed F, Guancial E, Mack JW. Fatalism and educational disparities in beliefs about the curability of advanced cancer. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING 2018; 101:113-118. [PMID: 28716485 PMCID: PMC5732080 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2017.07.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2016] [Revised: 07/05/2017] [Accepted: 07/08/2017] [Indexed: 06/07/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Understanding socioeconomic disparities in the care of patients with incurable cancer is a high priority. We hypothesized that patients without a high school education are more likely to believe that they could be cured and we explored the role of fatalism. METHODS We studied 977 patients with advanced, incurable cancer. Two logistic regression analyses were conducted. Model One examined the effect of education on beliefs about curability. Model Two added fatalism. RESULTS The significant association between having less than a high school education and the belief that advanced cancer can be cured (OR=2.55; 95% CI: 1.09-5.96) in Model One was attenuated by 39% and rendered nonsignificant in Model Two. Fatalism was associated with the belief that advanced cancer can be cured. Whites were less likely to believe they could be cured than Blacks and Asians/Pacific Islanders. Beliefs about curability were not associated with income or insurance status. CONCLUSIONS People who do not complete high school are more likely to believe that their advanced cancer is curable, in part because they are more likely to hold fatalistic worldviews. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS Interventions to help oncologists care for patients with fatalistic beliefs could mitigate socioeconomic disparities in end-of-life care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul R Duberstein
- Departments of Psychiatry, Medicine, and Family Medicine, University of Rochester Medical Center, 300 Crittenden Blvd., Rochester, NY, 14642, USA.
| | - Michael Chen
- Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Rochester Medical Center, 300 Crittenden Blvd., Rochester, NY, 14642, USA.
| | - Benjamin P Chapman
- Departments of Psychiatry and Public Health Sciences, University of Rochester Medical Center, 300 Crittenden Blvd., Rochester, NY, 14642, USA.
| | - Michael Hoerger
- Departments of Psychiatry, Medicine, and Psychology, Tulane University, 2007 Percival Stern Hall, New Orleans, LA, 70118, USA.
| | - Fahad Saeed
- Department of Medicine, Divisions of Nephrology and Palliative Care, University of Rochester Medical Center, 601 Elmwood Ave., Rochester, NY, 14642, USA.
| | - Elizabeth Guancial
- Department of Medicine and Wilmot Cancer Institute, University of Rochester Medical Center, 601 Elmwood Ave., Rochester, NY, 14642, USA.
| | - Jennifer W Mack
- Department of Pediatric Oncology and Division of Population Sciences, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Ave., Boston, MA, 02215, USA; 25 Shattuck Street, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Patient-centered decision making requires cancer patients be actively involved and feel sufficiently informed about their care, but patients' preferences for information are often unrecognized or unmet by their oncologist, particularly for more distressing topics. This study examined cancer patients' preferences for information about three care-related topics: (1) diagnostic information, (2) treatment costs, and (3) prognosis. We tested whether factors known to influence information preferences (psychological distress, control preferences, and financial distress) were differently associated with information preferences for each topic. METHODS Cancer patients (N = 176) receiving ongoing treatment completed a questionnaire that assessed their out-of-pocket treatment costs, psychological distress, preferences for control over their medical decisions, and the amount of information they desired and received from their oncologists about the three topics. RESULTS Patients' preferences were less often met for treatment cost information than for the other topics, p < 0.001, with half wanting more cost information than they received. One-third of patients also wanted more prognostic information than they received. Patients' preferences for diagnostic information did not differ as a function of financial burden, distress, or control preferences, ps > 0.05. Preferences for cost information were greater among patients who preferred more control over their medical decisions, p = 0.016. Patients' preferences for prognostic information were greater among those desiring more control and with lower distress, ps < 0.05. Financial burden was not associated with information preferences. CONCLUSION Appreciating the variability in information preferences across topics and patients may aid efforts to meet patients' information needs and improve outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erin M Ellis
- a Behavioral Research Program , National Cancer Institute , Rockville , Maryland , USA
| | - Ashley Varner
- b DeCesaris Cancer Institute, Anne Arundel Medical Center , Annapolis , Maryland , USA
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Pisu M, Kenzik KM, Rim SH, Funkhouser EM, Bevis KS, Alvarez RD, Cantuaria G, Rocconi RP, Martin MY. Values and worries of ovarian cancer patients. Gynecol Oncol 2017; 147:433-438. [PMID: 28888542 PMCID: PMC5835401 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2017.08.028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2017] [Revised: 08/24/2017] [Accepted: 08/27/2017] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Older women with ovarian cancer (OC) are less likely to receive guideline concordant treatment. Differences in values and worries about treatment may explain why. METHODS Women with OC in 2013-2015 were surveyed about values and worries at the time of initial treatment. Existing values (11 item, e.g., maintaining quality of life) and worries (12 items, e.g., treatment side effects) scales were adapted based on OC literature. Responses were very/somewhat/a little/not at all important or worried. Principal Component Analyses (PCA) identified groups of values and worries that best explained scales' variation. We examined proportions reporting very/somewhat important/worried on ≥1 item in each component by age (older ≥65years, younger <65years). RESULTS Of 170 respondents, 42.3% were older. PCA components for values were: functional well-being (3 survey items, proportion of variance explained [PoVE] 26.3%), length of life and sexual functioning (3 items, PoVE 20.1%), attitudes (3 items, PoVE 14.2%), and not becoming a burden (2 items, PoVE 13.7%). PCA components for worries were: economic (4 items, PoVE 27.2%), uncertainty (6 items, PoVE 26.0%), and family impact (2 items, PoVE 16.3%). Older women were less likely to indicate very/somewhat worried to ≥1 item in the economic (51.4% vs 72.4%, p=0.006), uncertainty (80.6% vs. 98.0%, p=0.001), and family impact component (55.6% vs. 70.4%, p=0.03). No other age differences were found. CONCLUSIONS While worry during OC treatment decision-making may differ across age groups, values do not. Research should assess how differences in worry might affect OC medical decision-making for older and younger women.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Pisu
- Division of Preventive Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States; Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States.
| | - Kelly M Kenzik
- Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States; Institute for Cancer Outcomes and Survivorship and Division of Hematology Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States
| | - Sun Hee Rim
- Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, United States
| | - Ellen M Funkhouser
- Division of Preventive Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States; Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States
| | - Kerri S Bevis
- Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States; Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States
| | - Ronald D Alvarez
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, United States
| | - Guilherme Cantuaria
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Northside Hospital, Atlanta, GA, United States
| | - Rodney P Rocconi
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Mitchell Cancer Institute, University of South Alabama, Mobile, AL, United States
| | - Michelle Y Martin
- Center for Innovation in Health Equity Research (CIHER), Department of Preventive Medicine, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN, United States
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Evans R, Taylor S, Janes S, Halligan S, Morton A, Navani N, Oliver A, Rockall A, Teague J, Miles A. Patient experience and perceived acceptability of whole-body magnetic resonance imaging for staging colorectal and lung cancer compared with current staging scans: a qualitative study. BMJ Open 2017; 7:e016391. [PMID: 28882915 PMCID: PMC5588966 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016391] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2017] [Revised: 06/02/2017] [Accepted: 06/07/2017] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To describe the experience and acceptability of whole-body magnetic resonance imaging (WB-MRI) staging compared with standard scans among patients with highly suspected or known colorectal or lung cancer. DESIGN Qualitative study using one-to-one interviews with thematic analysis. SETTING Patients recruited from 10 hospitals in London, East and South East England between March 2013 and July 2014. PARTICIPANTS 51 patients (31 male, age range 40-89 years), with varying levels of social deprivation, were recruited consecutively from two parallel clinical trials comparing the diagnostic accuracy and cost-effectiveness of WB-MRI with standard scans for staging colorectal and lung cancer ('Streamline-C' and 'Streamline-L'). WB-MRI was offered as an additional scan as part of the trials. RESULTS In general WB-MRI presented a greater challenge than standard scans, although all but four patients completed the WB-MRI. Key challenges were enclosed space, noise and scan duration; reduced patient tolerance was associated with claustrophobia, pulmonary symptoms and existing comorbidities. Coping strategies facilitated scan tolerance and were grouped into (1) those intended to help with physical and emotional challenges, and (2) those focused on motivation to complete the scan, for example focusing on health benefit. Our study suggests that good staff communication could reduce anxiety and boost coping strategies. CONCLUSIONS Although WB-MRI was perceived as more challenging than standard scans, it was sufficiently acceptable and tolerated by most patients to potentially replace them if appropriate. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER ISRCTN43958015 and ISRCTN50436483.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ruth Evans
- Department of Psychological Sciences, Birkbeck University of London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Stuart Taylor
- Division of Medicine, Centre for Medical Imaging, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Sam Janes
- Division of Medicine, Lungs for Living Research Centre, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Steve Halligan
- Division of Medicine, Centre for Medical Imaging, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Alison Morton
- C/O National Cancer Research Institute, London, United Kingdom
| | - Neal Navani
- Division of Medicine, Lungs for Living Research Centre, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Alf Oliver
- C/O National Cancer Research Institute, London, United Kingdom
| | - Andrea Rockall
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College, London, United Kingdom
- Department of Radiology, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Jonathan Teague
- Cancer Research UK & UCL Clinical Trials Centre, London, United Kingdom
| | - Anne Miles
- Department of Psychological Sciences, Birkbeck University of London, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Jiang Y, Sereika SM, Bender CM, Brufsky AM, Rosenzweig MQ. Beliefs in Chemotherapy and Knowledge of Cancer and Treatment Among African American Women With Newly Diagnosed Breast Cancer. Oncol Nurs Forum 2017; 43:180-9. [PMID: 26906129 DOI: 10.1188/16.onf.180-189] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE/OBJECTIVES To examine beliefs regarding the necessity of chemotherapy and knowledge of breast cancer and its treatment in African American women with newly diagnosed breast cancer, and to explore factors associated with women's beliefs and knowledge.
. DESIGN Descriptive, cross-sectional study.
. SETTING Six urban cancer centers in Western Pennsylvania and Eastern Ohio.
. SAMPLE 101 African American women with newly diagnosed breast cancer.
. METHODS Secondary analysis using baseline data collected from participants in a randomized, controlled trial at their first medical oncology visit before the first cycle of chemotherapy.
. MAIN RESEARCH VARIABLES Belief in chemotherapy, knowledge of cancer and recommended treatment, self-efficacy, healthcare system distrust, interpersonal processes of care, symptom distress, and quality of life.
. FINDINGS African American women endorsed the necessity of chemotherapy. Most women did not know their tumor size, hormone receptors, specific therapy, or why chemotherapy was recommended to them. Women who perceived better interpersonal communication with physicians, less self-efficacy, or were less involved in their own treatment decision making held stronger beliefs about the necessity of chemotherapy. Women without financial difficulty or having stronger social functioning had more knowledge of their cancer and recommended chemotherapy.
. CONCLUSIONS African American women with newly diagnosed breast cancer generally agreed with the necessity of chemotherapy. Knowledge of breast cancer, treatment, and risk reduction through adjuvant therapy was limited.
. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING Oncology nurses could help advocate for tailored educational programs to support informed decision making regarding chemotherapy acceptance for African American women.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yun Jiang
- University of Michigan School of Nursing in Ann Arbor
| | - Susan M Sereika
- Associate professors School of Nursing, University of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
24
|
Altice CK, Banegas MP, Tucker-Seeley RD, Yabroff KR. Financial Hardships Experienced by Cancer Survivors: A Systematic Review. J Natl Cancer Inst 2016; 109:djw205. [PMID: 27754926 DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djw205] [Citation(s) in RCA: 488] [Impact Index Per Article: 61.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2016] [Accepted: 08/05/2016] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
Background With rising cancer care costs, including high-priced cancer drugs, financial hardship is increasingly documented among cancer survivors in the United States; research findings have not been synthesized. Methods We conducted a systematic review of articles published between 1990 and 2015 describing the financial hardship experienced by cancer survivors using PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and CINAHL databases. We categorized measures of financial hardship into: material conditions (eg, out-of-pocket costs, productivity loss, medical debt, or bankruptcy), psychological responses (eg, distress or worry), and coping behaviors (eg, skipped medications). We abstracted findings and conducted a qualitative synthesis. Results Among 676 studies identified, 45 met the inclusion criteria and were incorporated in the review. The majority of the studies (82%, n = 37) reported financial hardship as a material condition measure; others reported psychological (7%, n = 3) and behavioral measures (16%, n = 7). Financial hardship measures were heterogeneous within each broad category, and the prevalence of financial hardship varied by the measure used and population studied. Mean annual productivity loss ranged from $380 to $8236, 12% to 62% of survivors reported being in debt because of their treatment, 47% to 49% of survivors reported experiencing some form of financial distress, and 4% to 45% of survivors did not adhere to recommended prescription medication because of cost. Conclusions Financial hardship is common among cancer survivors, although we found substantial heterogeneity in its prevalence. Our findings highlight the need for consistent use of definitions, terms, and measures to determine the best intervention targets and inform intervention development in order to prevent and minimize the impact of financial hardship experienced by cancer survivors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cheryl K Altice
- Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD, USA
| | | | - Reginald D Tucker-Seeley
- Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.,Center for Community Based Research, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - K Robin Yabroff
- Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Mack JW, Cronin A, Fasciano K, Block SD, Keating NL. Cancer treatment decision-making among young adults with lung and colorectal cancer: a comparison with adults in middle age. Psychooncology 2016; 25:1085-91. [PMID: 26335435 PMCID: PMC4775442 DOI: 10.1002/pon.3949] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2014] [Revised: 06/10/2015] [Accepted: 08/05/2015] [Indexed: 01/24/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Our aim is to understand experiences with treatment decision-making among young adults with cancer. METHODS We studied patients with lung cancer or colorectal cancer in the Cancer Care Outcomes Research and Surveillance Consortium, a prospective cohort study. We identified 148 young adult patients aged 21-40 years who completed baseline interview questions about cancer treatment decision-making; each was propensity score matched to three middle adult patients aged 41-60 years, for a cohort of 592 patients. Patients were asked about decision-making preferences, family involvement in decision-making, and worries about treatment. An ordinal logistic regression model evaluated factors associated with more treatment worries. RESULTS Young and middle-aged adults reported similar decision-making preferences (p = 0.80) and roles relative to physicians (p = 0.36). Although family involvement was similar in the age groups (p = 0.21), young adults were more likely to have dependent children in the home (60% younger versus 28% middle-aged adults, p < 0.001). Young adults reported more worries about time away from family (p = 0.002), and, in unadjusted analyses, more cancer treatment-related worries (mean number of responses of 'somewhat' or 'very' worried 2.5 for younger versus 2.2 for middle-aged adults, p = 0.02.) However, in adjusted analyses, worries were associated with the presence of dependent children in the home (odds ratio [OR] 1.55, 95% CI = 1.07-2.24, p = 0.02), rather than age. CONCLUSIONS Young adults involve doctors and family members in decisions at rates similar to middle-aged adults but experience more worries about time away from family. Patients with dependent children are especially likely to experience worries. Treatment decision-making strategies should be based on individual preferences and needs rather than age alone. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer W Mack
- Department of Pediatric Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
- Division of Population Sciences, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Angel Cronin
- Division of Population Sciences, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Karen Fasciano
- Department of Psychosocial Oncology and Palliative Care, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Psychiatry, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Susan D Block
- Department of Psychosocial Oncology and Palliative Care, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Psychiatry, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Nancy L Keating
- Department of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Division of General Internal Medicine and Primary Care, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Ng DLC, Leong YC, Gan GG. Quality of life amongst lymphoma survivors in a developing country. Support Care Cancer 2016; 24:5015-5023. [PMID: 27460016 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-016-3364-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2016] [Accepted: 07/18/2016] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The survival for patients with lymphoma has improved over the past decades with the introduction of novel agents. Quality of life of these survivors is now being studied with focus on minimising the late effects of chemotherapy and improving psychosocial support. This study aims to determine the prevalence of anxiety and depression of lymphoma survivors and to investigate the possible association between these disorders and quality of life. METHODS Patients with previous diagnosis of lymphoma who remained in remission were recruited from a major hospital in Malaysia. Quality of life of these patients was measured using European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ C30). Anxiety and depression symptoms were assessed using Hospital Anxiety and Depression scale (HADS). RESULTS A total of 156 patients participated in this study. Eighteen percent (18 %) of patients had symptoms of anxiety, and 10 % had symptoms of depression. Patients who had higher depression scores were older, of lower education level and had more than one comorbidity illness. Patients with anxiety were associated with lower overall quality of life (QOL) score, lower emotional and cognitive functioning and complained more of fatigue and insomnia (p < 0.05). Patients who had depression were associated with lower physical functioning and complained more of insomnia (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION It is important for the treating physicians to ensure follow-up of lymphoma survivors for any psychological disorders in order early counseling and support can be provided. This may improve patients' quality of life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Diana L C Ng
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universiti Malaysia Sarawak, Kota Samarahan, Malaysia
| | - Y C Leong
- Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - Gin Gin Gan
- Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Yabroff KR, Dowling EC, Guy GP, Banegas MP, Davidoff A, Han X, Virgo KS, McNeel TS, Chawla N, Blanch-Hartigan D, Kent EE, Li C, Rodriguez JL, de Moor JS, Zheng Z, Jemal A, Ekwueme DU. Financial Hardship Associated With Cancer in the United States: Findings From a Population-Based Sample of Adult Cancer Survivors. J Clin Oncol 2015; 34:259-67. [PMID: 26644532 DOI: 10.1200/jco.2015.62.0468] [Citation(s) in RCA: 362] [Impact Index Per Article: 40.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To estimate the prevalence of financial hardship associated with cancer in the United States and identify characteristics of cancer survivors associated with financial hardship. METHODS We identified 1,202 adult cancer survivors diagnosed or treated at ≥ 18 years of age from the 2011 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey Experiences With Cancer questionnaire. Material financial hardship was measured by ever (1) borrowing money or going into debt, (2) filing for bankruptcy, (3) being unable to cover one's share of medical care costs, or (4) making other financial sacrifices because of cancer, its treatment, and lasting effects of treatment. Psychological financial hardship was measured as ever worrying about paying large medical bills. We examined factors associated with any material or psychological financial hardship using separate multivariable logistic regression models stratified by age group (18 to 64 and ≥ 65 years). RESULTS Material financial hardship was more common in cancer survivors age 18 to 64 years than in those ≥ 65 years of age (28.4% v 13.8%; P < .001), as was psychological financial hardship (31.9% v 14.7%, P < .001). In adjusted analyses, cancer survivors age 18 to 64 years who were younger, female, nonwhite, and treated more recently and who had changed employment because of cancer were significantly more likely to report any material financial hardship. Cancer survivors who were uninsured, had lower family income, and were treated more recently were more likely to report psychological financial hardship. Among cancer survivors ≥ 65 years of age, those who were younger were more likely to report any financial hardship. CONCLUSION Cancer survivors, especially the working-age population, commonly experience material and psychological financial hardship.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K Robin Yabroff
- K. Robin Yabroff, Matthew P. Banegas, Neetu Chawla, Danielle Blanch-Hartigan, Erin E. Kent, and Janet S. de Moor, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda; Timothy S. McNeel, Information Management Services, Calverton, MD; Emily C. Dowling, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston; Danielle Blanch-Hartigan, Bentley University, Waltham, MA; Gery P. Guy Jr, Chunyu Li, Juan L. Rodriguez, and Donatus U. Ekwueme, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; Xuesong Han, Zhiyuan Zheng, and Ahmedin Jemal, American Cancer Society; Katherine S. Virgo, Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Amy Davidoff, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT; and Neetu Chawla, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA.
| | - Emily C Dowling
- K. Robin Yabroff, Matthew P. Banegas, Neetu Chawla, Danielle Blanch-Hartigan, Erin E. Kent, and Janet S. de Moor, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda; Timothy S. McNeel, Information Management Services, Calverton, MD; Emily C. Dowling, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston; Danielle Blanch-Hartigan, Bentley University, Waltham, MA; Gery P. Guy Jr, Chunyu Li, Juan L. Rodriguez, and Donatus U. Ekwueme, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; Xuesong Han, Zhiyuan Zheng, and Ahmedin Jemal, American Cancer Society; Katherine S. Virgo, Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Amy Davidoff, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT; and Neetu Chawla, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA
| | - Gery P Guy
- K. Robin Yabroff, Matthew P. Banegas, Neetu Chawla, Danielle Blanch-Hartigan, Erin E. Kent, and Janet S. de Moor, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda; Timothy S. McNeel, Information Management Services, Calverton, MD; Emily C. Dowling, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston; Danielle Blanch-Hartigan, Bentley University, Waltham, MA; Gery P. Guy Jr, Chunyu Li, Juan L. Rodriguez, and Donatus U. Ekwueme, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; Xuesong Han, Zhiyuan Zheng, and Ahmedin Jemal, American Cancer Society; Katherine S. Virgo, Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Amy Davidoff, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT; and Neetu Chawla, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA
| | - Matthew P Banegas
- K. Robin Yabroff, Matthew P. Banegas, Neetu Chawla, Danielle Blanch-Hartigan, Erin E. Kent, and Janet S. de Moor, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda; Timothy S. McNeel, Information Management Services, Calverton, MD; Emily C. Dowling, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston; Danielle Blanch-Hartigan, Bentley University, Waltham, MA; Gery P. Guy Jr, Chunyu Li, Juan L. Rodriguez, and Donatus U. Ekwueme, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; Xuesong Han, Zhiyuan Zheng, and Ahmedin Jemal, American Cancer Society; Katherine S. Virgo, Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Amy Davidoff, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT; and Neetu Chawla, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA
| | - Amy Davidoff
- K. Robin Yabroff, Matthew P. Banegas, Neetu Chawla, Danielle Blanch-Hartigan, Erin E. Kent, and Janet S. de Moor, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda; Timothy S. McNeel, Information Management Services, Calverton, MD; Emily C. Dowling, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston; Danielle Blanch-Hartigan, Bentley University, Waltham, MA; Gery P. Guy Jr, Chunyu Li, Juan L. Rodriguez, and Donatus U. Ekwueme, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; Xuesong Han, Zhiyuan Zheng, and Ahmedin Jemal, American Cancer Society; Katherine S. Virgo, Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Amy Davidoff, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT; and Neetu Chawla, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA
| | - Xuesong Han
- K. Robin Yabroff, Matthew P. Banegas, Neetu Chawla, Danielle Blanch-Hartigan, Erin E. Kent, and Janet S. de Moor, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda; Timothy S. McNeel, Information Management Services, Calverton, MD; Emily C. Dowling, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston; Danielle Blanch-Hartigan, Bentley University, Waltham, MA; Gery P. Guy Jr, Chunyu Li, Juan L. Rodriguez, and Donatus U. Ekwueme, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; Xuesong Han, Zhiyuan Zheng, and Ahmedin Jemal, American Cancer Society; Katherine S. Virgo, Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Amy Davidoff, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT; and Neetu Chawla, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA
| | - Katherine S Virgo
- K. Robin Yabroff, Matthew P. Banegas, Neetu Chawla, Danielle Blanch-Hartigan, Erin E. Kent, and Janet S. de Moor, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda; Timothy S. McNeel, Information Management Services, Calverton, MD; Emily C. Dowling, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston; Danielle Blanch-Hartigan, Bentley University, Waltham, MA; Gery P. Guy Jr, Chunyu Li, Juan L. Rodriguez, and Donatus U. Ekwueme, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; Xuesong Han, Zhiyuan Zheng, and Ahmedin Jemal, American Cancer Society; Katherine S. Virgo, Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Amy Davidoff, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT; and Neetu Chawla, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA
| | - Timothy S McNeel
- K. Robin Yabroff, Matthew P. Banegas, Neetu Chawla, Danielle Blanch-Hartigan, Erin E. Kent, and Janet S. de Moor, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda; Timothy S. McNeel, Information Management Services, Calverton, MD; Emily C. Dowling, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston; Danielle Blanch-Hartigan, Bentley University, Waltham, MA; Gery P. Guy Jr, Chunyu Li, Juan L. Rodriguez, and Donatus U. Ekwueme, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; Xuesong Han, Zhiyuan Zheng, and Ahmedin Jemal, American Cancer Society; Katherine S. Virgo, Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Amy Davidoff, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT; and Neetu Chawla, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA
| | - Neetu Chawla
- K. Robin Yabroff, Matthew P. Banegas, Neetu Chawla, Danielle Blanch-Hartigan, Erin E. Kent, and Janet S. de Moor, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda; Timothy S. McNeel, Information Management Services, Calverton, MD; Emily C. Dowling, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston; Danielle Blanch-Hartigan, Bentley University, Waltham, MA; Gery P. Guy Jr, Chunyu Li, Juan L. Rodriguez, and Donatus U. Ekwueme, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; Xuesong Han, Zhiyuan Zheng, and Ahmedin Jemal, American Cancer Society; Katherine S. Virgo, Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Amy Davidoff, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT; and Neetu Chawla, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA
| | - Danielle Blanch-Hartigan
- K. Robin Yabroff, Matthew P. Banegas, Neetu Chawla, Danielle Blanch-Hartigan, Erin E. Kent, and Janet S. de Moor, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda; Timothy S. McNeel, Information Management Services, Calverton, MD; Emily C. Dowling, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston; Danielle Blanch-Hartigan, Bentley University, Waltham, MA; Gery P. Guy Jr, Chunyu Li, Juan L. Rodriguez, and Donatus U. Ekwueme, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; Xuesong Han, Zhiyuan Zheng, and Ahmedin Jemal, American Cancer Society; Katherine S. Virgo, Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Amy Davidoff, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT; and Neetu Chawla, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA
| | - Erin E Kent
- K. Robin Yabroff, Matthew P. Banegas, Neetu Chawla, Danielle Blanch-Hartigan, Erin E. Kent, and Janet S. de Moor, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda; Timothy S. McNeel, Information Management Services, Calverton, MD; Emily C. Dowling, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston; Danielle Blanch-Hartigan, Bentley University, Waltham, MA; Gery P. Guy Jr, Chunyu Li, Juan L. Rodriguez, and Donatus U. Ekwueme, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; Xuesong Han, Zhiyuan Zheng, and Ahmedin Jemal, American Cancer Society; Katherine S. Virgo, Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Amy Davidoff, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT; and Neetu Chawla, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA
| | - Chunyu Li
- K. Robin Yabroff, Matthew P. Banegas, Neetu Chawla, Danielle Blanch-Hartigan, Erin E. Kent, and Janet S. de Moor, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda; Timothy S. McNeel, Information Management Services, Calverton, MD; Emily C. Dowling, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston; Danielle Blanch-Hartigan, Bentley University, Waltham, MA; Gery P. Guy Jr, Chunyu Li, Juan L. Rodriguez, and Donatus U. Ekwueme, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; Xuesong Han, Zhiyuan Zheng, and Ahmedin Jemal, American Cancer Society; Katherine S. Virgo, Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Amy Davidoff, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT; and Neetu Chawla, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA
| | - Juan L Rodriguez
- K. Robin Yabroff, Matthew P. Banegas, Neetu Chawla, Danielle Blanch-Hartigan, Erin E. Kent, and Janet S. de Moor, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda; Timothy S. McNeel, Information Management Services, Calverton, MD; Emily C. Dowling, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston; Danielle Blanch-Hartigan, Bentley University, Waltham, MA; Gery P. Guy Jr, Chunyu Li, Juan L. Rodriguez, and Donatus U. Ekwueme, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; Xuesong Han, Zhiyuan Zheng, and Ahmedin Jemal, American Cancer Society; Katherine S. Virgo, Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Amy Davidoff, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT; and Neetu Chawla, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA
| | - Janet S de Moor
- K. Robin Yabroff, Matthew P. Banegas, Neetu Chawla, Danielle Blanch-Hartigan, Erin E. Kent, and Janet S. de Moor, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda; Timothy S. McNeel, Information Management Services, Calverton, MD; Emily C. Dowling, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston; Danielle Blanch-Hartigan, Bentley University, Waltham, MA; Gery P. Guy Jr, Chunyu Li, Juan L. Rodriguez, and Donatus U. Ekwueme, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; Xuesong Han, Zhiyuan Zheng, and Ahmedin Jemal, American Cancer Society; Katherine S. Virgo, Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Amy Davidoff, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT; and Neetu Chawla, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA
| | - Zhiyuan Zheng
- K. Robin Yabroff, Matthew P. Banegas, Neetu Chawla, Danielle Blanch-Hartigan, Erin E. Kent, and Janet S. de Moor, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda; Timothy S. McNeel, Information Management Services, Calverton, MD; Emily C. Dowling, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston; Danielle Blanch-Hartigan, Bentley University, Waltham, MA; Gery P. Guy Jr, Chunyu Li, Juan L. Rodriguez, and Donatus U. Ekwueme, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; Xuesong Han, Zhiyuan Zheng, and Ahmedin Jemal, American Cancer Society; Katherine S. Virgo, Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Amy Davidoff, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT; and Neetu Chawla, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA
| | - Ahmedin Jemal
- K. Robin Yabroff, Matthew P. Banegas, Neetu Chawla, Danielle Blanch-Hartigan, Erin E. Kent, and Janet S. de Moor, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda; Timothy S. McNeel, Information Management Services, Calverton, MD; Emily C. Dowling, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston; Danielle Blanch-Hartigan, Bentley University, Waltham, MA; Gery P. Guy Jr, Chunyu Li, Juan L. Rodriguez, and Donatus U. Ekwueme, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; Xuesong Han, Zhiyuan Zheng, and Ahmedin Jemal, American Cancer Society; Katherine S. Virgo, Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Amy Davidoff, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT; and Neetu Chawla, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA
| | - Donatus U Ekwueme
- K. Robin Yabroff, Matthew P. Banegas, Neetu Chawla, Danielle Blanch-Hartigan, Erin E. Kent, and Janet S. de Moor, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda; Timothy S. McNeel, Information Management Services, Calverton, MD; Emily C. Dowling, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston; Danielle Blanch-Hartigan, Bentley University, Waltham, MA; Gery P. Guy Jr, Chunyu Li, Juan L. Rodriguez, and Donatus U. Ekwueme, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; Xuesong Han, Zhiyuan Zheng, and Ahmedin Jemal, American Cancer Society; Katherine S. Virgo, Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Amy Davidoff, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT; and Neetu Chawla, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Mosher CE, Winger JG, Given BA, Helft PR, O'Neil BH. Mental health outcomes during colorectal cancer survivorship: a review of the literature. Psychooncology 2015; 25:1261-1270. [PMID: 26315692 DOI: 10.1002/pon.3954] [Citation(s) in RCA: 74] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2014] [Revised: 06/24/2015] [Accepted: 08/05/2015] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This article reviews literature on adults' mental health outcomes during acute and long-term colorectal cancer (CRC) survivorship. METHODS We identified articles that included at least one measure of psychological symptoms or mental quality of life or well-being through a search of databases (CINAHL, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, and PsycARTICLES). Articles were published between January 2004 and April 2015. RESULTS A significant proportion of CRC survivors experience clinically meaningful levels of anxiety and depressive symptoms or reduced mental well-being across the trajectory of the illness. Demographic, medical, and psychosocial predictors of mental health outcomes were identified. However, few studies were theory-driven, and gaps remain in our understanding of risk and protective factors with respect to mental health outcomes, especially during long-term CRC survivorship. CONCLUSIONS Theory-driven longitudinal research with larger samples is required to identify subgroups of CRC survivors with different trajectories of psychological adjustment. Such research would assess adjustment as a function of internal resources (e.g., personality and coping) and external resources (e.g., finances and social support) to inform future interventions for CRC survivors. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Catherine E Mosher
- Department of Psychology, Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
| | - Joseph G Winger
- Department of Psychology, Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Barbara A Given
- College of Nursing, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA
| | - Paul R Helft
- Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Bert H O'Neil
- Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Pisu M, Kenzik KM, Oster RA, Drentea P, Ashing KT, Fouad M, Martin MY. Economic hardship of minority and non-minority cancer survivors 1 year after diagnosis: another long-term effect of cancer? Cancer 2015; 121:1257-64. [PMID: 25564986 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.29206] [Citation(s) in RCA: 71] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2014] [Revised: 10/27/2014] [Accepted: 11/17/2014] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Current literature suggests that racial/ethnic minority survivors may be more likely than whites to experience economic hardship after a cancer diagnosis; however, little is known about such hardship. METHODS Patients with lung cancer (LC) and colorectal cancer (CRC) participating in the Cancer Care Outcomes Research and Surveillance (CanCORS) Consortium were surveyed approximately 4 months (baseline) and 12 months (follow-up) after diagnosis. Economic hardship at follow-up was present if participants 1) indicated difficulty living on household income; and/or 2) for the following 2 months, anticipated experiencing hardships (inadequate housing, food, or medical attention) or reducing living standards to the bare necessities of life. The authors tested whether African Americans (AAs) and Hispanics were more likely than whites to experience economic hardship controlling for sex, age, education, marital status, cancer stage, treatment, and economic status at baseline (income, prescription drug coverage). RESULTS Of 3432 survivors (39.7% with LC, 60.3% with CRC), 14% were AA, 7% were Hispanic, and 79% were white. AAs and Hispanics had lower education and income than whites. Approximately 68% of AAs, 58% of Hispanics, and 44.5% of whites reported economic hardship. In LC survivors, the Hispanic-white disparity was not significant in unadjusted or adjusted analyses, and the AA-white disparity was explained by baseline economic status. In CRC survivors, the Hispanic-white disparity was explained by baseline economic status, and the AA-white disparity was not explained by the variables that were included in the model. CONCLUSIONS Economic hardship was evident in almost 1 in 2 cancer survivors 1 year after diagnosis, especially AAs. Research should evaluate and address risk factors and their impact on survival and survivorship outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Pisu
- Division of Preventive Medicine and Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
30
|
Blum T, Schönfeld N. The lung cancer patient, the pneumologist and palliative care: a developing alliance. Eur Respir J 2014; 45:211-26. [DOI: 10.1183/09031936.00072514] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
Considerable evidence is now available on the value of palliative care for lung cancer patients in all stages and at all times during the course of the disease. However, pneumologists and their institutions seem to be widely in arrears with the implementation of palliative care concepts and the development of integrated structures.This review focuses on the available evidence and experience of various frequently unmet needs of lung cancer patients, especially psychological, social, spiritual and cultural ones. A PubMed search for evidence on these aspects of palliative care as well as on barriers to the implementation, on outcome parameters and effectiveness, and on structure and process quality was performed with a special focus on lung cancer patients.As a consequence, this review particularly draws pneumologists’ attention to improving their skills in communication with the patients, their relatives and among themselves, and to establish team structures with more far-reaching competences and continuity than existing multilateral cooperations and conferences can provide. Ideally, any process of structural and procedural improvement should be accompanied by scientific evaluation and measures for quality optimisation.
Collapse
|
31
|
Iihara N, Nishio T, Goda T, Anzai H, Kagawa M, Houchi H, Kirino Y. Effect of endurance for adverse drug reactions on the preference for aggressive treatments in cancer patients. Support Care Cancer 2014; 23:1091-7. [PMID: 25294657 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-014-2439-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2014] [Accepted: 09/09/2014] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Cancer patients receiving chemotherapy will sometimes conceal their discomfort, but an excessive endurance for adverse drug reactions (ADRs) can lead to a poorer prognosis. The aim of this study was to clarify the association between ADR endurance and a preference of cancer patients for aggressive treatments. METHODS A cross-sectional study was undertaken of inpatients under 75 years of age receiving injectable systemic chemotherapy or oral chronic medications at hospitals in Japan. Subjects were asked to respond to a validated questionnaire to assess the extent of their ADR endurance and whether they would choose a novel, more aggressive therapy if their life expectancy was estimated at 2 years. RESULTS Study participants were separated into the chemotherapy group (n = 36) and the non-chemotherapy group (n = 78). In the chemotherapy group, patients who had moderate ADR endurance scores were more likely to choose the new therapy (0-33, 34-67, and 68-100 points: 0.0, 54.5, and 27.3 %; χ (2) test, p = 0.15). Additionally, every patient on long-term chemotherapy (≥3 years) had high ADR endurance scores but did not choose the new, riskier treatment. In the non-chemotherapy group, the proportion of those choosing the new therapy was linearly associated with higher ADR endurance scores (25.9, 38.2, and 64.7 %; p = 0.04). CONCLUSION Cancer patients may prefer aggressive therapies, even when self-estimations of ADR endurance are not very high, especially if they have been receiving chemotherapy for a short period of time. These patients should be observed with great caution.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Naomi Iihara
- Kagawa School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Tokushima Bunri University, 1314-1 Shido, Sanuki, Kagawa, 769-2193, Japan,
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|