Pathological and clinical impact of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy using full-dose gemcitabine and concurrent radiation for resectable pancreatic cancer. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2013;20:197-205. [PMID: 22766692 DOI: 10.1007/s00534-012-0532-8]

An axon guidance-related microRNA panel identifies perivascular plexus local recurrence following curative surgery in patients with pancreatic cancer

BACKGROUND

Complete oncological local control is essential for a potential cure in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), but predicting local recurrence following curative surgery remains clinically challenging. In this study, we performed comprehensive biomarker discovery to identify an Axon guidance-related miRNA panel (AGMP) for risk-stratification of perivascular plexus recurrence (PPR) following curative surgery in patients with PDAC.

METHODS

To identify axon guidance-related microRNAs, we performed the pathway-miRNA interaction analysis using the miRPathDB2.0. Subsequently, the predictive performance of the miRNAs was trained and validated in three independent clinical surgically resected sample cohorts and one pretreatment blood sample cohort with different disease statuses [upfront surgery cohort: n = 162 (training: n = 103, internal validation: n = 59), neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NACRT) cohort: n = 217, arterial invasion cohort: n = 62, pretreatment blood sample cohort: n = 53].

RESULTS

The pathway-miRNA interaction analysis identified 13 miRNAs related to axon guidance pathway. Subsequently, we trained a 13-miRNA risk-prediction model, AGMP, which robustly distinguished PPR after surgery in the training cohort (AUC = 0.95). The AGMP was successfully validated in three independent cohorts (AUC: validation = 0.94, NACRT = 0.94, Arterial invasion = 0.90). Furthermore, we additionally validated the performance of AGMP in a pretreatment blood cohort, which again confirmed the robustness of risk-stratification for PPR (AUC = 0.86).

CONCLUSIONS

We developed a novel biomarker, AGMP that demonstrated remarkable predictive performance for PPR following curative surgery in patients with PDAC; highlighting the clinical importance of the nerve-cancer cross-talk and the hopefulness as a guidepost for designing future clinical and basic research to establish individualized treatment strategies.

Prognostic significance of creatine kinase in resected pancreatic cancer

BACKGROUND

Creatine kinase (CK) levels decrease with cancer progression and muscle wasting, but its association with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) remains unclear. The aim of this study was to investigate CK as a prognostic biomarker and surrogate marker for muscle mass in patients with PDAC.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of 476 patients with PDAC was conducted. CK levels were categorized into low and high groups using receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis.

RESULTS

Among the 476 patients, 200 (42.0%) and 276 (58.0%) were classified into the low and high CK groups, respectively. The low CK group had significantly poorer overall survival (p < .001) and recurrence-free survival (p < .001) compared to the high CK group. Multivariate analysis identified low CK as an independent poor prognostic factor (p < .001). The low CK group had significantly lower skeletal muscle index (p = .048) than the high CK group; however, the difference was slight and not significantly associated with sarcopenia. Additionally, combined risk assessment incorporating CK and resectability facilitated a more nuanced prognostic stratification.

CONCLUSIONS

CK served as a reliable prognostic marker independent from resectability but was less effective as a marker for sarcopenia in PDAC.

Clinical significance and therapeutic implication of CD200 in pancreatic cancer

BACKGROUND

CD200, a negative regulator of T cells as well as a marker for cancer stem cells, represents a significant prognostic factor and potential therapeutic target in certain cancers. However, its clinical significance remains unknown in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC).

METHODS

CD200 was assessed in 220 resected PDAC patients who underwent surgery with or without neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NACRT). We examined the clinicopathological outcomes associated with CD200 and further assessed its clinical implications regarding immunological and cancer stem cell properties.

RESULTS

NACRT was associated with higher CD200 expression (66.4 % vs. 32.2 %, P < 0.001) compared to upfront surgery. CD200 was identified as an independent poor prognostic factor in NACRT (hazard ratio 1.90, 95 % confidence interval 1.12-3.23, P = 0.016), but not in upfront surgery patients. Post-recurrence survival was significantly worse in CD200+ patients compared to CD200- patients in the NACRT group, but there was no significant difference observed in the upfront surgery group. CD200 expression was correlated with significantly lower levels of CD4+, CD8+, and CD45RO+ tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes. Furthermore, the correlation of CD200 with pancreatic cancer stem cell markers CD44/CD24/ESA was stronger in irradiated human pancreatic cancer cells.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data underscore novel roles for CD200 in immune evasion as well as therapy resistance in pancreatic cancer. CD200 may represent a novel poor prognostic predictive factor and potential therapeutic target for PDAC with NACRT.

Clinical impact of carbonic anhydrase 9 expression on neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

PDAC cells upregulate carbonic anhydrase 9 (CA9) expression in order to survive in hypoxic tumor environments, which plays a key role in tumor progression. However, the relationship between CA9 expression and preoperative treatment has not been clarified. We evaluated the clinical impact of CA9 expression on the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NACRT) in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC).

METHODS

We investigated CA9 expression in 273 surgical specimens and 20 serum samples obtained from patients with PDAC and evaluated their clinical outcomes. We analyzed the function of CA9 using human pancreatic cancer cell lines.

RESULTS

CA9 was positively expressed in 36.2 % of patients who underwent NACRT, which was significantly lower than those who underwent upfront surgery (US) (58.9 %, p < 0.001). Interestingly, patients who were CA9-positive in the US group had a significantly poorer prognosis than that of those in the NACRT group (median survival time [MST], 21.5 months vs. 49.2 months, p < 0.001), while there was no significant difference between patients who were CA9-negative in the US and NACRT groups (MST, 45.8 months vs. 46.3 months, p = 0.357). Moreover, serum CA9 levels tended to correlate positively with CA9 expression in cancer tissues. In-vitro experiments demonstrated that CA9 expression was reduced after treatments with radiation and chemoradiation therapy (RT/CRT), and that CA9 knockdown suppressed the impact of RT/CRT on cancer cell proliferation.

CONCLUSIONS

CA9 may act as a target molecule for RT/CRT, highlighting its clinical importance as a valuable biomarker for more stringent indications for NACRT.

Impact of pancreatic ductal occlusion on postoperative outcomes in pancreatic head cancer patients undergoing neoadjuvant therapy

BACKGROUND

Pancreatic ductal occlusion can accompany pancreatic head cancer, leading to pancreatic exocrine insufficiency (PEI) and adverse effects on nutritional status and postoperative outcomes. We investigated its impact on nutritional status, body composition, and postoperative outcomes in patients with pancreatic head cancer undergoing neoadjuvant therapy (NAT).

METHODS

We analyzed 136 patients with pancreatic head cancer who underwent NAT prior to intended pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) between 2015 and 2022. Nutritional and anthropometric indices (body mass index [BMI], albumin, prognostic nutritional index [PNI], Glasgow prognostic score, psoas muscle index, subcutaneous adipose tissue index [SATI], and visceral adipose tissue index) and postoperative outcomes were compared between the occlusion (n = 78) and non-occlusion (n = 58) groups, in which 61 and 44 patients, respectively, ultimately underwent PD.

RESULTS

The occlusion group showed significantly lower post-NAT BMI, PNI, and SATI (p = 0.011, 0.005, and 0.015, respectively) in the PD cohort. The occlusion group showed significantly larger main pancreatic duct, smaller pancreatic parenchyma, and greater duct-parenchymal ratio (p < 0.001), and these morphological parameters significantly correlating with post-NAT nutritional and anthropometric indices. Postoperative 3-year survival and recurrence-free survival (RFS) rates were significantly poorer (p = 0.004 and 0.013) with pancreatic ductal occlusion, also identified as an independent postoperative risk factor for overall survival (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.31, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.08-4.94, p = 0.030) and RFS (HR: 2.03, 95% CI 1.10-3.72, p = 0.023), in multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Pancreatic ductal occlusion may be linked to poorer postoperative outcomes due to PEI-related malnutrition.

Combination of carbohydrate antigen 19-9 level and tumor size after neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy may predict early recurrence of resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

Although the overall survival rate of patients with resectable pancreatic cancer has gradually improved, some patients relapse early and have a poor prognosis. This study aimed to identify the preoperative risk factors for early recurrence after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in patients with resectable pancreatic cancer.

METHODS

This study analyzed patients who underwent pancreatectomy after receiving neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for resectable pancreatic cancer between January 2009 and June 2021 and excluded those with borderline resectable and unresectable pancreatic cancers. Early recurrence was defined as recurrence within 6 months after surgery.

RESULTS

This study included 203 patients, of whom 22 experienced early recurrence. The median survival time of patients with early recurrence was 18.3 months, which was significantly worse than that of patients with late recurrence (44.0 months, p < 0.001) or no recurrence (not reached, p < 0.001). Logistic regression analysis revealed that a carbohydrate antigen 19-9 level of >100 units/mL and a T status of ≥T2 after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy were independent predictive risk factors for early recurrence. The median recurrence-free survival time of patients with two risk factors was 9.7 months and significantly worse than that of those with either risk factors (20.5 months, p = 0.024) and those with no risk factor (26.2 months, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

A combination of a high-level carbohydrate antigen 19-9 and a T status of ≥T2 after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy are predictors of early recurrence and may be helpful for selecting patients who require a stronger preoperative treatment.

Central pancreatectomy might be an acceptable surgical procedure for clinical T1 pancreatic body ductal adenocarcinoma: A multicenter retrospective analysis

BACKGROUND

Central pancreatectomy (CP) is accepted as a function-preserving procedure for benign tumors. However, the indication of CP for pancreatic cancers is limited. This multicenter study aimed to clarify the indications of CP for clinical T1 pancreatic body cancer.

METHODS

This multicenter study analyzed patients who underwent CP or distal pancreatectomy (DP) for clinical T1 pancreatic body cancer between 2013 and 2020 at three high-volume centers.

RESULTS

A total of 50 patients were enrolled: nine patients, who underwent CP, were classified into the CP group, while 38 patients, who underwent DP, served as controls. Three patients converted CP to DP during operation were excluded. Five patients in the CP group and 15 patients in the control group underwent preoperative treatment. The 5-year survival rate was 100% in the CP group, and 42% (p = .040) in the control group. Recurrence was found in three patients in the CP group. Importantly, insulin was not required after surgery in patients in the CP group.

CONCLUSION

The clinical outcomes of CP were comparable to or even better than that of conventional pancreatectomy. Our collaborative study suggests that CP may be an acceptable therapeutic option for selected patients with clinical T1 pancreatic body cancer.

Significance of multiple tumor markers measurements in conversion surgery for unresectable locally advanced pancreatic cancer

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to evaluate the significance of multiple tumor markers (TMs) measurements in determining the indications for conversion surgery (CS) in the management of unresectable locally advanced pancreatic cancer (UR-LAPC).

METHODS

A total of 103 patients with UR-LAPC, treated between 2008 and June 2021, were enrolled in this study. Three TMs, including carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9), carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), and Duke pancreatic monoclonal antigen type 2 (DUPAN-2), were measured.

RESULTS

Twenty-five patients (24%) underwent CS. The median preoperative treatment period was 9.5 months. The median survival time (MST) from the initial treatment for patients with CS was significantly longer than that for patients without surgery (34.6 vs. 18.9 months, P < 0.001). The number of elevated TMs before CS was one in five patients and two in five patients, while 15 patients had normal levels of all three TMs. Notably, the MST from the initial treatment for patients with all three preoperative normal TMs levels was favorable for 70.5 months. In contrast, patients with one or two preoperatively elevated TMs levels had a significantly worse prognosis (25.4 and 21.0 months, respectively, P < 0.001). Furthermore, the relapse-free survival of patients with three preoperative normal TMs levels was significantly longer than those with one or two elevated TMs levels (21.9 vs. 11.3 or 3.0 months, respectively, P < 0.001). Non-normal values of all TMs before CS were identified as independent poor prognostic factors.

CONCLUSIONS

Simultaneous measurement and assessment of the three TMs levels may help determine the surgical indications for UR-LAPC after systemic anticancer treatment.

Importance of triple tumor markers as biomarkers in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

Aim

There is an urgent need to establish biomarkers for the treatment of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). The aim of this study was to investigate the usefulness of the combined assessment of carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9), carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), and duke pancreatic monoclonal antigen type 2 (DUPAN-2) in PDAC.

Methods

We retrospectively investigated the impact of three tumor markers on overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS). Patients were classified into two groups: upfront surgery (US) and neoadjuvant chemoradiation (NACRT) groups.

Results

In total, 310 patients were evaluated. In the US group, patients who had all three elevated markers showed a significantly worse prognosis than the others (median: 16.4 months, P = .005). In the NACRT group, patients who had elevated CA 19-9 and CEA levels after NACRT had significantly worse prognosis than the others (median: 26.2 months, P < .001). The elevated DUPAN-2 levels before NACRT were associated with significantly worse prognosis than normal levels (median: 44.0 vs 59.2 months, P = .030). Patients who had elevated DUPAN-2 levels before NACRT with elevated CA 19-9 and CEA levels after NACRT showed extremely poor RFS (median: 5.9 months). Multivariate analysis revealed that a modified triple-positive tumor marker indicating elevated DUPAN-2 levels before NACRT and elevated CA19-9 and CEA levels after NACRT was an independent prognostic factor of OS (hazard ratio: 2.49, P = .007) and RFS (hazard ration: 2.47, P = .007).

Conclusions

The combined evaluation of three tumor markers may provide useful information for the treatment of patients with PDAC.

Negative prognostic impact of sarcopenia before and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for pancreatic cancer

OBJECTIVES

To elucidate the prognostic impact of sarcopenia before and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) for pancreatic cancer (PC).

METHODS

We retrospectively studied 75 consecutive PC patients who underwent neoadjuvant gemcitabine plus S-1 combination therapy followed by pancreatectomy between 2008 and 2016. According to the skeletal muscle volume index (SMI), the patients were divided into the muscle attenuation group (MAG) and normal group (NG) before or after NAC. Prognostic factors for overall survival (OS) were analyzed by Cox proportional hazards models.

RESULTS

The MAG showed significantly poorer OS than the NG before and after NAC. Pre-NAC, median OS was 20.0 months in the MAG versus 49.0 months in the NG (p = 0.006). Post-NAC, median OS was 21.3 months in the MAG versus 48.8 months in the NG (p = 0.014). Multivariate analysis, excluding muscle attenuation after NAC because of confounding factors and lower hazard ratio (2.08, 95% confidence interval: 1.14-3.78, p = 0.016) than that before NAC (2.14, 1.23-3.70, p = 0.007) by univariate analysis, revealed the following independent prognostic factors: muscle attenuation pre-NAC (2.25, 1.26-4.05, p = 0.007); borderline resectability (1.96, 1.04-3.69, p = 0.038); operative blood loss (2.60, 1.38-4.88, p = 0.003); and distant metastasis (3.31, 1.40-7.82, p = 0.006).

CONCLUSIONS

Sarcopenia before and after NAC for PC is suggested to be a poor prognostic factor, with a stronger impact before than after NAC.

Neoadjuvant therapy in resectable pancreatic cancer: A promising curative method to improve prognosis

Currently, 15 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have been designed to investigate whether neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) benefits patients with resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma (R-PA) compared to surgery alone. Five of them have acquired results so far; however, corresponding conclusions have not been obtained. We speculated that the reason for this phenomenon could be that some prognostic factors had proven to be adverse through upfront surgery curative patterns, but some of them were not regarded as independent baseline characteristics, which is important to obtaining comparability between the NAT and upfront surgery groups. This fact could cause bias and lead to the difference in the outcomes of RCTs. In this review, we collate data about risk factors (such as tumor size, resection margin, and lymph node status) influencing the prognoses of patients with R-PA from five RCTs and discuss the possible reasons for the varying outcomes.

Efficacy of Preoperative mFOLFIRINOX vs mFOLFIRINOX Plus Hypofractionated Radiotherapy for Borderline Resectable Adenocarcinoma of the Pancreas: The A021501 Phase 2 Randomized Clinical Trial

Importance

National guidelines endorse treatment with neoadjuvant therapy for borderline resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), but the optimal strategy remains unclear.

Objective

To compare treatment with neoadjuvant modified FOLFIRINOX (mFOLFIRINOX) with or without hypofractionated radiation therapy with historical data and establish standards for therapy in borderline resectable PDAC.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This prospective, multicenter, randomized phase 2 clinical trial conducted from February 2017 to January 2019 among member institutions of National Clinical Trials Network cooperative groups used standardized quality control measures and included 126 patients, of whom 70 (55.6%) were registered to arm 1 (systemic therapy; 54 randomized, 16 following closure of arm 2 at interim analysis) and 56 (44.4%) to arm 2 (systemic therapy and sequential hypofractionated radiotherapy; all randomized before closure). Data were analyzed by the Alliance Statistics and Data Management Center during September 2021.

Interventions

Arm 1: 8 treatment cycles of mFOLFIRINOX (oxaliplatin, 85 mg/m2; irinotecan, 180 mg/m2; leucovorin, 400 mg/m2; and infusional fluorouracil, 2400 mg/m2) over 46 hours, administered every 2 weeks. Arm 2: 7 treatment cycles of mFOLFIRINOX followed by stereotactic body radiotherapy (33-40 Gy in 5 fractions) or hypofractionated image-guided radiotherapy (25 Gy in 5 fractions). Patients without disease progression underwent pancreatectomy, which was followed by 4 cycles of treatment with postoperative FOLFOX6 (oxaliplatin, 85 mg/m2; leucovorin, 400 mg/m2; bolus fluorouracil, 400 mg/m2; and infusional fluorouracil, 2400 mg/m2 over 46 hours).

Main Outcomes and Measures

Each treatment arm's 18-month overall survival (OS) rate was compared with a historical control rate of 50%. A planned interim analysis mandated closure of either arm for which 11 or fewer of the first 30 accrued patients underwent margin-negative (R0) resection.

Results

Of 126 patients, 62 (49%) were women, and the median (range) age was 64 (37-83) years. Among the first 30 evaluable patients enrolled to each arm, 17 patients in arm 1 (57%) and 10 patients in arm 2 (33%) had undergone R0 resection, leading to closure of arm 2 but continuation to full enrollment in arm 1. The 18-month OS rate of evaluable patients was 66.7% (95% CI, 56.1%-79.4%) in arm 1 and 47.3% (95% CI 35.8%-62.5%) in arm 2. The median OS of evaluable patients in arm 1 and arm 2 was 29.8 (95% CI, 21.1-36.6) months and 17.1 (95% CI, 12.8-24.4) months, respectively.

Conclusions and Relevance

This randomized clinical trial found that treatment with neoadjuvant mFOLFIRINOX alone was associated with favorable OS in patients with borderline resectable PDAC compared with mFOLFIRINOX treatment plus hypofractionated radiotherapy; thus, mFOLFIRINOX represents a reference regimen in this setting.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02839343.

The effect of preoperative chemotherapy and chemoradiotherapy on pancreatic fistula and other surgical complications after pancreatic resection: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies

BACKGROUND

Preoperative chemo- or chemoradiotherapy is recommended for borderline-resectable pancreatic cancer. The aim of this study was to determine the impact of preoperative therapy on surgical complications in patients with resected pancreatic cancer.

METHODS

This systematic review and meta-analysis included studies reporting on the rate of surgical complications after preoperative chemo- or chemoradiotherapy versus immediate surgery in pancreatic cancer patients. The primary endpoint was the rate of grade B/C POPF. Pooled odds ratios were calculated using random-effects models.

RESULTS

Forty-one comparative studies including 25,389 patients were included. Vascular resections were more often performed after preoperative therapy (29.4% vs. 15.7%, p < 0.001). Preoperative therapy was associated with a lower rate of grade B/C POPF as compared to immediate surgery (pooled OR 0.47, 95%CI 0.38-0.58). This reduction was mostly obtained by preoperative chemoradiotherapy (OR 0.46, 95%CI 0.29-0.73), but not by preoperative chemotherapy alone (OR 0.83, 95%CI 0.59-1.16). No difference was demonstrated for major morbidity, mortality, postpancreatectomy haemorrhage, delayed gastric emptying and overall morbidity.

CONCLUSION

Preoperative chemo- and chemoradiotherapy in patients with pancreatic cancer appears to be safe with respect to POPF and other surgical complications as compared to immediate surgery. The reduced rate of POPF appears to be attributable to preoperative chemoradiation.

A gene expression signature for predicting response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

In patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), optimal treatment selection, including multimodality regimens such as neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NACRT), can be clinically transformative. Unfortunately, currently no predictive biomarkers are available that can guide the use of NACRT in PDAC patients. Accordingly, herein we developed a novel gene signature that can preoperatively predict NACRT-sensitivity in PDAC patients. Herein, we evaluated the performance of a 10-gene panel in 749 PDAC cases, which included two public datasets (The Cancer Genome Atlas and International Cancer Genome Consortium; n = 276), and three clinical specimen cohorts (n = 417), and a pre-NACRT endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) biopsy cohort (n = 56). The potential predictive performance of this signature was evaluated and compared to CA-19-9 levels and key clinicopathological factors. We first evaluated the prognostic potential of a 10-gene panel which significantly predicted overall survival in both public datasets (P < .01, P < .01), and two in-house patient cohorts (P < .01, P = .04). In the pre-NACRT EUS-FNA cohort, we established a radio-sensitivity gene panel (RSGP) which yielded highly robust (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.91; 95% CI: 0.81-0.97) for predicting response to gemcitabine-based NACRT. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that RSGP was an independent predictor for response to NACRT (OR = 2.70; 95% CI: 1.25-5.85), and this response-prediction was even more robust when CA-19-9 levels were included into the model. In conclusion, we have validated and developed a novel gene signature that is highly robust in predicting response to NACRT, even in preoperative settings, highlighting its clinical significance for optimizing and personalizing treatment strategies in PDAC patients.

Oncologic impact of preoperative prognostic nutritional index change in resected pancreatic cancer following neoadjuvant chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

Although several studies have focused on the oncologic impact of the preoperative prognostic nutritional index (PNI), there is no study correlating the preoperative PNI changes with the oncologic outcome of resected pancreatic cancer following neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC).

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 107 pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma patients who underwent NAC followed by surgical resection. ΔPNI was defined as post-NAC PNI subtracted from pre-NAC PNI. Patients were divided into high (≥-1.94, n = 54) and low ΔPNI groups (<-1.94, n = 53). Long-term oncologic outcomes, such as overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS), were compared. Univariate and multivariate analysis were used to identify independent prognostic factors.

RESULTS

The high ΔPNI group correlated with lower pre-NAC PNI (46.96 ± 4.68 vs. 51.77 ± 5.63, p < 0.001) and higher post-NAC PNI (50.05 ± 4.80 vs. 42.56 ± 7.44, p < 0.001) more than the low ΔPNI group. The high ΔPNI group was also associated with longer OS compared with the low ΔPNI group (mean OS: 63.97 months [95% CI: 49.95-77.99] vs. 41.16 months [95% CI: 27.66-54.66], p = 0.003); there was no significant difference in DFS (p > 0.05). Multivariate analysis revealed that low ΔPNI was an independent risk factor for OS (HR, 3.516; 95% CI, 1.885-6.558; p < 0.001), but not for DFS (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Low ΔPNI (<-1.94) was an independent risk factor for the overall survival of resected pancreatic cancer patients following NAC. In the preoperative setting, improving the PNI can better the long-term oncologic outcome of this condition.

A Qualitative Review of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Resectable Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma

The aim of this study was to evaluate outcomes of patients with resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC) who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The MEDLINE and PubMed databases were searched to identify relevant original articles investigating neoadjuvant therapy in resectable PDAC. Qualitative analyses were performed to investigate patient selection, disease stage, impact on perioperative outcomes, and cost-effectiveness. Forty-three studies met inclusion criteria for this review. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for upfront resectable PDAC is cost-effective, safe, may result in lower stage disease and has potential survival advantages. With proper patient selection, neoadjuvant chemotherapy is an appropriate approach for upfront resectable PDAC. Nevertheless, the risk for disease progression and losing a curative surgical window highlights the need for appropriate patient identification, further discovery of superior biomarkers or molecular profiles representative of positive treatment response, and additional prospective comparative study.

Significance of the inflammation-based prognostic score in recurrent pancreatic cancer

BACKGROUND

Although the prognosis of recurrent pancreatic cancer (RPC) is improving with the appearance of new anticancer drugs, prognostic indicators for RPC are still poorly understood. The aim of this study was to evaluate significance of the inflammation-based prognostic score, including modified Glasgow Prognostic Score (mGPS), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR), and Prognostic Nutritional Index (PNI), in patients with RPC.

METHODS

This study reviewed 263 patients of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma at our institution between 2006 and 2015. A receiver operating characteristics curve analysis was performed to determine the cut-off values. The prognostic significance of the inflammation-based prognostic scores were evaluated by a multivariate analysis.

RESULTS

172 patients (65.4%) who had recurrence was included in this study. The optimal PNI for predicting 1-year survival after recurrence was 40 with higher area under receiver operating characteristics curve value (0.704) in comparison with other inflammation-based prognostic scores. A univariate and multivariate analysis revealed that liver metastasis (P < 0.001) and PNI < 40 (P < 0.001) were independently associated with the survival time after recurrence. When each of the two predictors was counted as one point and the points were calculated for all cases, a good stratified survival curve was obtained, showing the shorter survival in the higher points: median survival times of 2, 1, and 0 points were 4.3, 11.1, and 21.2 months, respectively (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Inflammation-based prognostic scores, especially PNI is useful clinical biomarker for predicting the survival time after recurrence in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

Novel implications of combined arterial resection for locally advanced pancreatic cancer in the era of newer chemo-regimens

INTRODUCTION

In this study, we assessed the prognostic efficacy and feasibility of combined arterial resection (AR) for locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC), and aimed to identify significant prognostic factors for patients who underwent combined AR.

METHODS

Between 1981 and 2018, 733 consecutive patients who underwent pancreatic surgery for PC were identified. The 730 cases with detailed information were enrolled in the analysis.

RESULTS

Among 730 resected PC patients, 44 (6%) underwent AR including 21 hepatic (48%), 12 celiac (27%), five splenic (12%), four superior mesenteric (9%), and two other arteries (4%). The combined AR surgery showed significantly longer operative time (median, 608 vs 451 min, P < 0.0001), and the incidence of intraoperative blood transfusion was significantly higher in AR than surgery without AR (P = 0.0002), whereas there was no significant difference in the intraoperative blood loss (970 vs 1200 mL, P = 0.2) and occurrence of major complications (P = 0.5). In prognostic analysis of AR cases, multivariate Cox proportional hazard models revealed preoperative and postoperative therapy were the independent factors for both recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) (preoperative therapy: RFS, HR = 0.21, P = 0.007; OS, HR = 0.18, P = 0.01; postoperative therapy: RFS, HR = 0.31, P = 0.003; OS, HR = 0.19, P = 0.002).

CONCLUSION

This study showed the feasibility of combined AR for LAPC and robust association of pre- and postoperative therapy and survival after AR surgery. Preoperative therapy following combined AR surgery is potentially powerful strategy for LAPC.

Long-term outcome following neoadjuvant therapy for resectable and borderline resectable pancreatic cancer compared to upfront surgery: a meta-analysis of comparative studies by intention-to-treat analysis

The aim of the study was to evaluate the effect of neoadjuvant therapy on long-term survival in patients with resectable and borderline resectable pancreatic cancer. A meta-analysis was conducted using the reported randomized, controlled trials and retrospective studies using an intention-to-treat analysis to compare upfront surgery and neoadjuvant therapy in resectable or borderline resectable pancreatic cancer patients. Six comparative studies consisting of two randomized, controlled trials and four retrospective studies were included. The overall pooled hazard ratio was 0.66 (95% confidence interval: 0.50-0.87, P = 0.003), indicating that patients in the neoadjuvant group had better long-term survival than those in the upfront surgery group. However, considerable inter-study heterogeneity was observed (I² = 62%). This meta-analysis focusing on comparative studies analyzed by intention-to-treat analysis showed that neoadjuvant therapy for resectable and borderline resectable pancreatic cancer tends to improve patients' long-term outcomes. However, the evidence level remains too low for a firm conclusion. The well-designed, randomized, controlled trials now ongoing will provide the definite evidence needed in the future.

Primarily resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma - to operate or to refer the patient to an oncologist?

The aim of this work is to investigate the optimal therapeutic sequence of resectable pancreatic cancer - primary surgery with adjuvant therapy or neoadjuvant followed by resection. Application of the neoadjuvant approach in routine treatment of pancreatic cancer is rapidly growing every year, despite the lack of final results from randomized trials. Recent advancements in the adjuvant therapy, due to the more effective chemotherapy regimens, favor the upfront surgery strategy. On the other hand, theoretical background and metaanalyses favor the neoadjuvant strategy. Currently, primary resection with adjuvant chemotherapy remains the standard approach in resectable pancreatic cancer, but the first recommendations considering the neoadjuvant approach as an option seem to arise among the scientific societies with a global impact. Preliminary results of Prodige 24 study and PREOPANC-1 trial demonstrates that both options are worth further evaluation in clinical trials. Their results should soon provide more answers to this important clinical questions.

Nutritional support and therapy in pancreatic surgery: A position paper of the International Study Group on Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS)

BACKGROUND

The optimal nutritional therapy in the field of pancreatic surgery is still debated.

METHODS

An international panel of recognized pancreatic surgeons and pancreatologists decided that the topic of nutritional support was of importance in pancreatic surgery. Thus, they reviewed the best contemporary literature and worked to develop a position paper to provide evidence supporting the integration of appropriate nutritional support into the overall management of patients undergoing pancreatic resection. Strength of recommendation and quality of evidence were based on the approach of the grading of recommendations assessment, development and evaluation Working Group.

RESULTS

The measurement of nutritional status should be part of routine preoperative assessment because malnutrition is a recognized risk factor for surgery-related complications. In addition to patient's weight loss and body mass index, measurement of sarcopenia and sarcopenic obesity should be considered in the preoperative evaluation because they are strong predictors of poor short-term and long-term outcomes. The available data do not show any definitive nutritional advantages for one specific type of gastrointestinal reconstruction technique after pancreatoduodenectomy over the others. Postoperative early resumption of oral intake is safe and should be encouraged within enhanced recovery protocols, but in the case of severe postoperative complications or poor tolerance of oral food after the operation, supplementary artificial nutrition should be started at once. At present, there is not enough evidence to show the benefit of avoiding oral intake in clinically stable patients who are complicated by a clinically irrelevant postoperative pancreatic fistula (a so-called biochemical leak), while special caution should be given to feeding patients with clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula orally. When an artificial nutritional support is needed, enteral nutrition is preferred whenever possible over parenteral nutrition. After the operation, regardless of the type of pancreatic resection or technique of reconstruction, patients should be monitored carefully to assess for the presence of endocrine and exocrine pancreatic insufficiency. Although fecal elastase-1 is the most readily available clinical test for detection of pancreatic exocrine insufficiency, its sensitivity and specificity are low. Pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy should be initiated routinely after pancreatoduodenectomy and in patients with locally advanced disease and continued for at least 6 months after surgery, because untreated pancreatic exocrine insufficiency may result in severe nutritional derangement.

CONCLUSION

The importance of this position paper is the consensus reached on the topic. Concentrating on nutritional support and therapy is of utmost value in pancreatic surgery for both short- and long-term outcomes.

Risk Factors for Late-Onset Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage After Pancreatoduodenectomy for Pancreatic Cancer

BACKGROUND

Late-onset gastrointestinal hemorrhage after pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) occasionally occurs repeatedly or leads to a serious condition. This retrospective study aimed to clarify its frequency and pathogenesis.

METHODS

A total of 147 consecutive patients who underwent PD for pancreatic cancer between 2006 and 2014 were evaluated. Patients were divided into two groups according to the occurrence of late-onset gastrointestinal hemorrhage on postoperative day 100 or later. Furthermore, recurrence and portal vein (PV) hemodynamics were thoroughly reevaluated by computed tomography.

RESULTS

Eleven patients experienced late-onset gastrointestinal hemorrhage. The bleeding sites were gastrojejunostomy in four patients, choledochojejunostomy in two, transverse colic marginal vein in one, and unknown in four. The median occurrence time of late-onset gastrointestinal hemorrhage was 13.3 months after PD. PV occlusion (63.6 vs. 8.9%; p < 0.001), no patency of PV-splenic vein (SPV) confluence (54.5 vs. 12.7%; p = 0.002), and SPV ligation (36.4 vs. 9.6%; p = 0.025) were found to be significant risk factors for late-onset gastrointestinal hemorrhage. Among 11 patients who experienced late-onset gastrointestinal hemorrhage, 7 had PV occlusion and 6 had local recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data suggested for the first time that both oncologic and non-oncologic factors might contribute to late-onset gastrointestinal hemorrhage after PD for pancreatic cancer. Furthermore, PV occlusion, no PV-SPV patency, and SPV ligation were found to be significant risk factors for late-onset gastrointestinal hemorrhage. Therefore, to prevent late-onset gastrointestinal hemorrhage, we must consider various approaches to maintain the patency of the PV and SPV.

The maximum chemiluminescence intensity predicts severe neutropenia in gemcitabine-treated patients with pancreatic or biliary tract cancer

PURPOSE

To assess the predictive ability of the maximum chemiluminescence intensity (CI_max) for severe neutropenia (SN) during neoadjuvant chemo(radio)therapy [NAC(RT)] in patients with advanced pancreatic or biliary tract cancer.

METHODS

Clinicopathological variables and blood test data before NAC(RT) were evaluated in 64 patients with advanced pancreatic or biliary tract cancer who received gemcitabine plus tegafur/gimeracil/oteracil as NAC(RT).

RESULTS

Thirty-nine patients (60.9%) developed Grade 3-4 SN. The median time between commencing NAC(RT) and the onset of SN was 15 (range 10-36) days. SN occurred during the NAC period, not the RT period. The CI_max, neutrophil count, serum interleukin-6 level, C-reactive protein level, complement C3 titer, serum complement titer, and 50.0% hemolytic unit of complement before NAC(RT) were significantly lower in patients with SN than in those without SN (P < 0.05). Multivariate analysis confirmed the CI_max to be the sole independent predictor of SN (P < 0.05). The optimal threshold for the CI_max was 46,000 RLU/s. The sensitivity and specificity were 46.2% and 80.0%, respectively. Majority of the patients (81.8%) with a low CI_max before NAC(RT) experienced SN during NAC(RT).

CONCLUSIONS

CI_max before NAC(RT) predicts SN during NAC(RT) in patients with advanced pancreatic or biliary tract cancer.

Prognostic factors for actual long-term survival in the era of multidisciplinary treatment for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

PURPOSE

Recent advances in multidisciplinary treatments are improving the postoperative prognosis of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). However, the prognosis even after potentially curative resection remains poor. The aim of this study was to identify the clinical and pathological features of actual 5-year survivors under current circumstances.

METHODS

A total of 128 patients who underwent pancreatectomy for PDAC at our institution between January 2006 and December 2011 were retrospectively analyzed.

RESULTS

The actual 5-year overall survival rate for all patients was 30.9%, with a median survival time of 33.1 months. Of 128 patients, 25 (19.5%) survived for 5 years after surgery without disease recurrence. A univariate analysis showed that the pretreatment serum CA19-9 value, tumor depth, lymph node metastasis, and UICC stage at resection were significant predictive factors for the actual long-term survival. A multivariate analysis showed that a pretreatment serum CA19-9 value ≥ 110 U/mL was a significant unfavorable prognostic indicator. In addition, all subjects in the 5-year survival group completed adjuvant chemotherapy. The recurrence rate in the liver was significantly lower and that in the lung significantly higher in the long-term survival group than in the short-term survival group.

CONCLUSIONS

The factors contributing to the long-term survival of PDAC were the pretreatment CA19-9 value and the completion of adjuvant chemotherapy. To achieve the actual long-term survival and cure after pancreatectomy for pancreatic cancer, further treatment strategies enhancing the completion rate of adjuvant chemotherapy are required.

Contemporary Management of Localized Resectable Pancreatic Cancer

Pancreatic cancer is the third most common cause of cancer deaths in the United States. Surgical resection with negative margins still constitutes the cornerstone of potentially curative therapy, but is possible only in 15–20% of patients at the time of initial diagnosis. Accumulating evidence suggests that the neoadjuvant approach may improve R0 resection rate in localized resectable and borderline resectable diseases, and potentially downstage locally advanced disease to achieve surgical resection, though the impact on survival is to be determined. Despite advancements in the last decade in developing effective combinational chemo-radio therapeutic options, preoperative treatment strategies, and better peri-operative care, pancreatic cancer continues to carry a dismal prognosis in the majority. Prodigious efforts are currently being made in optimizing the neoadjuvant therapy with a better toxicity profile, developing novel agents, imaging techniques, and identification of biomarkers for the disease. Advancement in our understanding of the tumor microenvironment and molecular pathology is urgently needed to facilitate the development of novel targeted and immunotherapies for this setting. In this review, we detail the current literature on contemporary management of resectable, borderline resectable and locally advanced pancreatic cancer with a focus on future directions in the field.

Timing of Pancreatic Resection and Patient Outcomes: Is There a Difference?

Rates of long-term survival after treatment of pancreatic cancer remain low, in part because most patients are still treated with primary resection. This approach is often inadequate because of early local control failures, early manifestation of metastatic disease because of the unrecognized and untreated systemic component of this disease, and because half of patients never receive multimodal therapy. Preoperative therapy can be used to improve local control and treat the systemic nature of pancreatic cancer while also selecting for patients who benefit from a morbid operation. Preoperative therapy makes sense for most patients with this aggressive and deadly disease.

The Multidisciplinary Approach to Localized Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma

OPINION STATEMENT

Pancreatic adenocarcinoma 2030 (PCa) is predicted to be the second leading cause of cancer death in USA by 2030. To date, attempts at early detection have been unsuccessful. Therapies for resectable PCa include surgery followed by adjuvant chemotherapy with or without radiotherapy. Unfortunately, most patients with PCa present with advanced disease and thus only 20% of patients are potentially resectable upon presentation. Improved surgical techniques along with adjuvant combination chemotherapy have improved outcomes for patients with resectable disease. The optimal treatment approach for borderline resectable and locally advanced unresectable PCa has not yet been defined. Despite significant advances in the palliative treatment of PCa, long-term survival of early stage disease continues to be sobering. The key to improving outcomes for this largely fatal disease is to identify multidisciplinary therapeutic interventions including surgical, medical, and radiation techniques tailored to the patient and their disease characteristics. The neoadjuvant approach provides an in vivo platform to test novel treatment options to help us understand tumor biology and surrounding microenvironment, which may ultimately help us achieve the goal of improvement in long-term survival. While the neoadjuvant approach remains popular as a way to optimally select patients that might benefit most from surgery, randomized trials utilizing adjuvant and neoadjuvant novel therapies hold the key to truly personalizing the ideal treatment strategy for localized PCa.

Neoadjuvant treatment of pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 5520 patients

BACKGROUND

Recent years have seen standardization of the anatomic definitions of pancreatic adenocarcinoma, and increasing utilization of neoadjuvant therapy (NAT). The aim of the current review was to summarize the evidence for NAT in pancreatic adenocarcinoma since 2009, when consensus criteria for resectable (R), borderline resectable (BR), and locally advanced (LA) disease were endorsed.

METHODS

PubMed search was undertaken along with extensive backward search of the references of published articles to identify studies utilizing NAT for pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Abstracts from ASCO-GI 2014 and 2015 were also searched.

RESULTS

A total of 96 studies including 5520 patients were included in the final quantitative synthesis. Pooled estimates revealed 36% grade ≥ 3 toxicities, 5% biliary complications, 21% hospitalization rate and low mortality (0%, range 0-16%) during NAT. The majority of patients (59%) had stable disease. On an intention-to-treat basis, R0-resection rates varied from 63% among R patients to 23% among LA patients. R0 rates were > 80% among all patients who were resected after NAT. Among R and BR patients who underwent resection after NAT, median OS was 30 and 27.4 months, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The current study summarizes the recent literature for NAT in pancreatic adenocarcinoma and demonstrates improving outcomes after NAT compared to those historically associated with a surgery-first approach for pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

Neoadjuvant Therapy of Pancreatic Cancer: Definitions and Benefits

The standard treatment of resectable pancreatic cancer is surgery followed by adjuvant chemotherapy. Due to the complication rate of pancreatic surgery and the high rate of primary irresectability, neoadjuvant concepts are increasingly used for pancreatic cancer. Neoadjuvant therapy is better tolerated than adjuvant and might decrease the surgical complication rate from pancreatic surgery. In contrast to neoadjuvant chemoradiation, the nutritional status improves during neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Also, the survival of patients who develop postoperative complications after neoadjuvant therapy is comparable to those without complications whereas the survival of patients who underwent upfront surgery and then develop surgical complications is impaired. Moreover, large data base analyses suggest a down-sizing effect and improvement of overall survival by neoadjuvant therapy. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy appears to be equally efficient in converting irresectable in resectable disease and more efficient with regard to systemic tumor progression and overall survival compared to neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy. Despite these convincing findings from mostly small phase II trials, neoadjuvant therapy has not yet proven superiority over upfront surgery in randomized trials.

Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: Current and Evolving Therapies

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), which constitutes 90% of pancreatic cancers, is the fourth leading cause of cancer-related deaths in the world. Due to the broad heterogeneity of genetic mutations and dense stromal environment, PDAC belongs to one of the most chemoresistant cancers. Most of the available treatments are palliative, with the objective of relieving disease-related symptoms and prolonging survival. Currently, available therapeutic options are surgery, radiation, chemotherapy, immunotherapy, and use of targeted drugs. However, thus far, therapies targeting cancer-associated molecular pathways have not given satisfactory results; this is due in part to the rapid upregulation of compensatory alternative pathways as well as dense desmoplastic reaction. In this review, we summarize currently available therapies and clinical trials, directed towards a plethora of pathways and components dysregulated during PDAC carcinogenesis. Emerging trends towards targeted therapies as the most promising approach will also be discussed.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for pancreatic cancer: Effects on cancer tissue and novel perspectives

Chemotherapy for pancreatic cancer has diversified following the addition of more treatment regimens; however, in spite of this, pancreatic cancer remains a fatal disease. Preoperative (neoadjuvant) chemotherapy (NAC) or neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy (NACRT) has been developed and implemented. For patients with borderline resectable pancreatic cancer (BRPC) and locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC), a number of clinical trials have been conducted; NACRT was demonstrated to improve resectability, R0 resection rate, overall survival rate, disease-free survival rate and even an LAPC and BRPC survival advantage over NAC. However, from the knowledge obtained from resected specimens following preoperative treatment, residual pancreatic cancer tissues following NAC are rich in chemoresistant cancer stem-like cells and epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) markers. Conversely, metformin, angiotensin receptor blocker, statins and low-dose paclitaxel are well-known as drugs that inhibit EMT, which is associated with cancer stem cell-like characteristics. Although clinical effectiveness is unlikely to be achieved using one of these as an anticancer agent, it is reasonable to use these drugs for patients with comorbidities in the treatment of pancreatic cancer. Furthermore, gemcitabine (GEM) affects antitumor immunity by stimulating the expression of major histocompatibility complex class I-related chain A on the surface of cancer cells to enhance the cytotoxicity of natural killer cells. Considering EMT and antitumor immunity, there is a possibility that GEM and nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel therapy is the most suitable regimen for treating pancreatic cancer. However, even as preoperative treatment progresses, R0 resection is the most important factor for the long-term survival of pancreatic cancer patients.

The impact of neoadjuvant therapy on the histopathological features of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma - A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Due to increased rates of curative tumor resections exceeding 60% after FOLFIRINOX-treatment, neoadjuvant therapy/NTx is increasingly recognized as an effective therapy option for downstaging borderline or locally advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma/PDAC. Yet, the effects of NTx on the common histopathological features of PDAC have not been systematically analysed. Therefore, the aim of the current study was to assess the impact of NTx on relevant histopathological features of PDAC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Biomedical databases were systematically screened for predefined searching terms related to NTx and PDAC. The Preferred-Reporting-Items-for-Systematic-review-and-Meta-Analysis/PRISMA-guidelines were used to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis. Articles meeting the predefined criteria were analysed on relevance, and a meta-analysis was performed.

RESULTS

A total of 9031 studies could be identified that analysed the effect of NTx on PDAC. Only 35 studies presented comparative data on the histological features of neoadjuvantly treated vs. upfront resected PDAC patients. In meta-analyses, the beneficial effect of NTx was reflected by reduced tumor size (T1/2: RR 2.87, 95%-CI: 1.52-5.42, P=0.001, T3/4: RR 0.78, 95%-CI: 0.69-0.89, P=0.0002), lower N-Stage (N0: RR 2.14, 95%-CI: 1.85-2.46, P<0.00001, N1: RR 0.59, 95%-CI: 0.53-0.65, P<0.00001), higher R0-rates (R0: RR 1.13, 95%-CI: 1.08-1.18, P<0.00001, R1: RR 0.66, 95%-CI: 0.58-0.76, P<0.00001), less perineural invasion (Pn1: RR 0.78, 95%-CI: 0.73-0.83, P<0.00001), less lymphatic vessel invasion (RR: 0.50, 95%-CI: 0.36-0.70, P<0.0001) and fewer G3-tumors (RR 0.82, 95%-CI: 0.71-0.94, P=0.005).

CONCLUSIONS

NTx in PDAC seems to exert its beneficial effect in borderline or locally advanced PDAC over genuine tumor downstaging. Thus, although at least 40% of all NTx treated patients remain unresectable even with modern NTx regimes, neoadjuvantly treated PDAC showed not only increasing resectability rates especially after FOLFIRINOX, but even reach a lower tumor stage than primarily resected PDAC.

Preoperative predictors for early recurrence of resectable pancreatic cancer

Background

The first-line treatment for resectable pancreatic cancer (RPC) is surgical resection. However, our patients have often experienced early recurrence after curative resection for RPC, with desperately poor prognosis. Some reports indicated that minimally distant metastasis not detected at operation might cause early recurrence. The present study aimed to identify preoperative clinicopathological features of early recurrence after curative resection of RPC.

Methods

Ninety RPC patients who underwent curative resection between 2000 and 2014 at our institution were retrospectively analyzed.

Results

Of the 90 patients, 32 had recurrence within 1 year. Univariate analysis demonstrated that preoperative serum carbohydrate antigen (CA19-9) ≥529 U/mL (P = 0.0011), preoperative serum s-pancreas-1 antigen (SPan-1) ≥37 U/mL (P = 0.0038), and histological grades G2–G4 (P = 0.0158) were significantly associated with recurrence within 1 year after curative resection. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that preoperative serum CA19-9 ≥ 529 U/mL (P = 0.0477) and histological grade G2–G4 (P = 0.0129) were independent predictors of recurrence within 1 year. Recurrent cases within 1 year postoperatively had significantly more distant metastasis than cases with no recurrence within 1 year (P < 0.001).

Conclusions

Preoperative serum CA19-9 ≥ 529 U/mL and histological grades G2–G4 were independent predictive factors for recurrence within 1 year after pancreatectomy for RPC. Furthermore, recurrent cases within 1 year had more frequent distant metastasis than cases with no recurrence within 1 year. These results suggest that RPC patients with preoperative serum CA19-9 ≥ 529 U/mL should receive preoperative therapy rather than surgery.

Neoadjuvant therapy versus upfront surgery for resected pancreatic adenocarcinoma: A nationwide propensity score matched analysis

BACKGROUND

Neoadjuvant therapy is an emerging paradigm in pancreatic cancer care; however, its role for resectable disease remains controversial in the absence of conclusive randomized controlled trials. The purpose of the present study is to assess the impact of neoadjuvant therapy on survival in resected pancreatic cancer patients by clinical stage.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study using the National Cancer Data Base from 2004 to 2012 including nonmetastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma patients who underwent pancreatectomy and initiated chemotherapy. Propensity score matching within each stage was used to account for potential selection bias between patients undergoing neoadjuvant therapy and upfront surgery. Overall survival was compared by the Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

In the study, 1,541 and 7,159 patients received neoadjuvant therapy followed by surgery and upfront surgery succeeded by adjuvant therapy, respectively. In clinical stage III pancreatic cancer (n = 486), neoadjuvant therapy was associated with significant survival benefit after matching (median survival 22.9 vs 17.3 months; log-rank P < .0001) compared with conventional upfront surgery followed by adjuvant therapy; however, no survival difference was found between the 2 treatment sequences in patients with clinical stage I (n = 3,149; median survival, 26.2 vs 25.7 months; P = .4418) and II (n = 5,065; median survival, 23.5 vs 23.0 months; P = .7751) disease after matching.

CONCLUSION

The survival impact of neoadjuvant therapy is stage-dependent. Neoadjuvant therapy does not disadvantage survival compared with conventional upfront surgery followed by adjuvant therapy in any stage, and is associated with a significant survival advantage in stage III pancreatic cancer.

Inhibition of Eph receptor A4 by 2,5-dimethylpyrrolyl benzoic acid suppresses human pancreatic cancer growing orthotopically in nude mice

Ephrin receptor A4 (EphA4) is overexpressed in human pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC) and activate cell growth. Recent studies have identified small molecules that block EphA4. In this study, we investigated the correlation between EphA4 expression and the prognosis of patients with PDAC. We also examined the cytostatic efficacy of 2,5-dimethylpyrrolyl benzoic acid (compound 1), a small molecule that blocks EphA4, in PDAC cells. Overall survival of patients with EphA4 positivity was significantly shorter than that of patients with EphA4 negativity (P = 0.029). In addition, multivariate analysis revealed that EphA4 expression was an independent prognostic factor in PDAC patients (P = 0.039). Compound 1 showed a cytostatic efficacy in PDAC cells expressing EphA4 in vitro and in vivo. Our study indicated that compound 1 suppressed both EphA4 and Akt phosphorylations, and induced apoptosis in PDAC cells expressing EphA4. In conclusion,compound 1 has a high potential as a therapeutic agent for patients with PDAC.

Preoperative chemoradiotherapy does not compromise the feasibility of adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

PURPOSE

Preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) is a novel, emerging treatment strategy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), but it remains unclear whether post-surgery adjuvant chemotherapy is feasible following preoperative CRT. This retrospective study evaluates the feasibility of adjuvant therapy after preoperative CRT.

METHODS

The subjects of this study were 99 consecutive patients who underwent pancreatectomy for PDAC between January, 2007 and February, 2013 in our hospital. Sixty patients received preoperative CRT: as gemcitabine (GEM) and 40 Gy radiation in 28 (G-CRT group), and as GEM, S-1, and 50.4 Gy radiation in 32 (GS-CRT group). We also evaluated 39 patients who underwent surgery alone (SA group). We investigated adjuvant chemotherapy induction and completion rates and the frequency of adverse events rated ≥grade 3, based on Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (version 4.0) in all three groups.

RESULTS

In the G-CRT, GS-CRT, and SA groups, the induction rates were 78 % (22/28), 78 % (25/32), and 72 % (28/39), respectively; completion rates were 86 % (19/22), 88 % (22/25), and 82 % (23/28), respectively; and adverse event frequencies were 36 % (8/22), 28 % (7/25), and 43 % (12/28), respectively. No significant difference was found among the three groups.

CONCLUSION

Preoperative CRT was demonstrated to be safe and did not compromise the feasibility of adjuvant chemotherapy.

Neoadjuvant therapy versus upfront surgical strategies in resectable pancreatic cancer: A Markov decision analysis

BACKGROUND

Neoadjuvant therapy is gaining acceptance as a valid treatment option for borderline resectable pancreatic cancer; however, its value for clearly resectable pancreatic cancer remains controversial. The aim of this study was to use a Markov decision analysis model, in the absence of adequately powered randomized trials, to compare the life expectancy (LE) and quality-adjusted life expectancy (QALE) of neoadjuvant therapy to conventional upfront surgical strategies in resectable pancreatic cancer patients.

METHODS

A Markov decision model was created to compare two strategies: attempted pancreatic resection followed by adjuvant chemoradiotherapy and neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by restaging with, if appropriate, attempted pancreatic resection. Data obtained through a comprehensive systematic search in PUBMED of the literature from 2000 to 2015 were used to estimate the probabilities used in the model. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed.

RESULTS

Of the 786 potentially eligible studies identified, 22 studies met the inclusion criteria and were used to extract the probabilities used in the model. Base case analyses of the model showed a higher LE (32.2 vs. 26.7 months) and QALE (25.5 vs. 20.8 quality-adjusted life months) for patients in the neoadjuvant therapy arm compared to upfront surgery. Probabilistic sensitivity analyses for LE and QALE revealed that neoadjuvant therapy is favorable in 59% and 60% of the cases respectively.

CONCLUSION(S)

Although conceptual, these data suggest that neoadjuvant therapy offers substantial benefit in LE and QALE for resectable pancreatic cancer patients. These findings highlight the value of further prospective randomized trials comparing neoadjuvant therapy to conventional upfront surgical strategies.

Prognostic Significance of Muscle Attenuation in Pancreatic Cancer Patients Treated with Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy

BACKGROUND

Emerging evidences have gradually revealed the skeletal muscle attenuation (MA) was not only reflected the accumulation of lipids in skeletal muscle but also associated with physiological and pathological states. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of MA on the prognosis of pancreatic cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NACRT).

METHODS

Eighty-three patients with pancreatic cancer who received NACRT were enrolled. Patients were divided according to their Hounsfield units of the skeletal muscle at the third lumbar vertebra in CT. The lower quartile was defined as MA group and the remainder as control group.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in overall survival between pre-NACRT MA and control groups. In contrast, patients with post-NACRT MA had a significantly poorer prognosis than patients without. The patients in the post-NACRT MA group were significantly older than patients in the control group. There were no significant differences in most clinicopathological and perioperative factors between both groups. However, patients with post-NACRT MA had a longer hospital stay than patients without. Furthermore, the incompletion rate of the proposed adjuvant chemotherapy was significantly higher in the MA group than control. Importantly, multivariate analysis indicated that post-NACRT MA was an independent prognostic factor.

CONCLUSIONS

Muscle attenuation may have a significant impact in pancreatic cancer patients treated with multimodal therapy. Therefore, our data may provide new insights into perioperative patient care to improve the prognosis of resectable pancreatic cancer.

Efficacy of Neo-Adjuvant Chemoradiotherapy for Resectable Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma: A PRISMA-Compliant Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review

We have conducted a meta-analysis and systematic review to determine the overall survival, mortality rate, and complete resection rate of neo-adjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) compared with pancreaticoduodenectomy alone in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Whether neo-adjuvant CRT is beneficial in the treatment of resectable pancreatic cancer or not, it is still a controversial issue. Medline and Cochrane were searched with relevant terms. Eight studies with a total of 833 participants were selected. The meta-analysis was performed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. The analysis revealed neo-adjuvant group may have a benefit in the overall survival, as compared with the resection group, although it did not reach statistical significance (pooled hazard ratio = 0.87, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.75-1.00, P = 0.051). We found no difference in the in-hospital mortality rate (pooled odds ratio [OR] = 1.27, 95% CI = 0.35-4.58, P = 0.710). The complete resection rate was significantly higher in the neo-adjuvant group than in the resection group (pooled OR = 2.39, 95% CI = 1.21-4.74, P = 0.012). This meta-analysis found that there was no significant difference in the overall survival between patients treated with neo-adjuvant CRT or pancreaticduodenectomy.

Borderline resectable pancreatic cancer

Surgery followed by adjuvant chemotherapy remains the only treatment option for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) with the chance of long-term survival. If a radical tumor resection is possible, 5-year survival rates of 20-25% can be achieved. Pancreatic surgery has significantly changed during the past years and resection approaches have been extended beyond standard procedures, including vascular and multivisceral resections. Consequently, borderline resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (BR-PDAC), which has recently been defined by the International Study Group for Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS), has become a controversial issue with regard to its management in terms of upfront resection vs. neoadjuvant treatment and sequential resection. Preoperative diagnostic accuracy to define resectability of PDAC is a keypoint in this context as well as the surgical and interdisciplinary expertise to perform advanced pancreatic surgery and manage complications. The present mini-review summarizes the current state of definition, management and outcome of BR-PDAC. Furthermore, the topic of ongoing and future studies on neoadjuvant treatment which is closely related to borderline resectability in PDAC is discussed.

The role of neoadjuvant therapy in pancreatic cancer: a review

Controversy remains regarding neoadjuvant approaches in the treatment of pancreatic cancer. Neoadjuvant therapy has several potential advantages over adjuvant therapy including earlier delivery of systemic treatment, in vivo assessment of response, increased resectability rate in borderline resectable patients and increased margin-negative resection rate. At present, there are no randomized data favoring neoadjuvant over adjuvant therapy and multiple neoadjuvant approaches are under investigation. Combination chemotherapy regimens including 5-fluorouracil, irinotecan and oxaliplatin, gemcitabine with or without abraxane, or docetaxel and capecitabine have been used in the neoadjuvant setting. Radiation and chemoradiation have also been incorporated into neoadjuvant strategies, and delivery of alternative fractionation regimens is being explored. This review provides an overview of neoadjuvant therapies for pancreatic cancer.

Proposed preoperative risk factors for early recurrence in patients with resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma after surgical resection: A multi-center retrospective study

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE

Although surgical resection remains the only chance for cure in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), postoperative early recurrence (ER) is frequently encountered. The purpose of this study is to determine the preoperative predictive factors for ER after upfront surgical resection.

METHODS

Between 2001 and 2012, 968 patients who underwent upfront surgery with R0 or R1 resection for PDAC at seven high-volume centers in Japan were retrospectively reviewed. ER was defined as relapse within 6 months after surgery. Study analysis stratified by resectable (R) and borderline resectable (BR) PDACs was conducted according to the National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines.

RESULTS

ER occurred in 239 patients (25%) with a median survival time (MST) of 8.8 months. Modified Glasgow prognostic score = 2 (odds ratio (OR) 2.06, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.05-3.95; P = 0.044), preoperative CA19-9 ≥300 U/ml (OR 1.94, 1.29-2.90; P = 0.003), and tumor size ≥30 mm (OR 1.72, 1.16-2.56; P = 0.006), were identified as preoperative independent predictive risk factors for ER in patients with R-PDAC. In the R-PDAC patients, MST was 35.5, 26.3, and 15.9 months in patients with 0, 1 and ≥2 risk factors, respectively. There were significant differences in overall survival between the three groups (P < 0.001). No preoperative risk factors were identified in BR-PDAC patients with a high rate of ER (39%).

CONCLUSIONS

There is a high-risk subset for ER even in patients with R-PDAC and a simple risk scoring system is useful for prediction of ER.

Potential risk of residual cancer cells in the surgical treatment of initially unresectable pancreatic carcinoma after chemoradiotherapy

Background

With development of chemoradiotherapy for pancreatic carcinoma, borderline resectable or initially unresectable cases sometimes become operable after long-term intensive chemoradiotherapy. However, there is no established strategy for adjuvant surgery with respect to whether the surgical resection should be extensive or downsized accordingly with diminished disease areas following response to chemoradiotherapy.

Methods

The clinical and pathological aspects of 18 patients with initially unresectable pancreatic cancer who underwent adjuvant surgery after chemo(radio)therapy in our department from 2007 were evaluated.

Results

Overall survival from initial treatment was much better for patients with R0 resection than for patients with R1/2 resection. In two of three patients who had complete improvement of plexus (PL) invasion after chemo(radio)therapy, there had still remained pathological plexus invasion. It was shown that tumors did not shrink continuously from the tumor front, but parts remained discontinuously at the distal portion in the process of tumor regression by chemo(radio)therapy.

Conclusions

In adjuvant surgery for patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer, the potential risk of residual cancer in the regression area following chemoradiotherapy should be considered. Achieving R0 resection will lead to an improved prognosis, and it is necessary to consider how well the extent of resection is after a favorable response to chemoradiotherapy.

Novel directions in neoadjuvant therapy for pancreas adenocarcinoma

Surgical resection of pancreatic carcinoma has long represented the only viable option for a potential cure of pancreas cancer. The use of adjuvant chemotherapy post-resection has been established in treating micro metastases and prolonging disease-free survival. However, studies of neoadjuvant therapy have not come to any definitive conclusion regarding the overall efficacy of such treatment, despite the theoretical benefits. In this review, we examine the historical precedent as well as the current state of affairs regarding neoadjuvant therapy in resectable and borderline resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma. In addition, we review the definitions for resectable and borderline resectable disease and highlight key areas of clinical investigation in the field and summarize the major ongoing neoadjuvant studies focused on resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma.