Analysis of the clinical features of recurrent acute pancreatitis in China

Application of a Machine Learning Predictive Model for Recurrent Acute Pancreatitis

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Acute pancreatitis is the main cause of hospitalization for pancreatic disease. Some patients tend to have recurrent episodes after experiencing an episode of acute pancreatitis. This study aimed to construct predictive models for recurrent acute pancreatitis (RAP).

METHODS

A total of 531 patients who were hospitalized for the first episode of acute pancreatitis at the Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University from January 2018 to December 2019 were enrolled in the study. We confirmed whether the patients had a second episode until December 31, 2021, through an electronic medical record system and telephone or WeChat follow-up. Clinical and follow-up data of patients were collected and randomly allocated to the training and test sets at a ratio of 7:3. The training set was used to select the best model, and the selected model was tested with the test set. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curves, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, accuracy, decision curve, and calibration plots were used to assess the efficacy of the models. Shapley additive explanation values were used to explain the model.

RESULTS

Considering multiple indices, XGBoost was the best model. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curves, accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of the XGBoost model in the test set were 0.779, 0.763, 0.883, 0.647, 0.341, and 0.922, respectively. According to the Shapley additive explanation values, drinking, smoking, higher levels of triglyceride, and the occurrence of ANC are associated with RAP.

CONCLUSION

The XGBoost model shows good performance in predicting RAP, which may help identify high-risk patients.

The Pancreas and Known Factors of Acute Pancreatitis

Pancreatitis is regarded by clinicians as one of the most complicated and clinically challenging of all disorders affecting the abdomen. It is classified on the basis of clinical, morphological, and histological criteria. Causes of acute pancreatitis can easily be identified in 75–85% of patients. The main causes of acute, recurrent acute, and chronic pancreatitis are gallstone migration and alcohol abuse. Other causes are uncommon, controversial, or unexplained. For instance, cofactors of all forms of pancreatitis are pancreas divisum and hypertriglyceridemia. Another factor that should be considered is a complication of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography acute pancreatitis. The aim of this study is to present the known risk factors for acute pancreatitis, beginning with an account of the morphology, physiology, and development of the pancreas.

Diagnosis and Treatment of Acute Pancreatitis

The pancreas is a glandular organ that is responsible for the proper functioning of the digestive and endocrine systems, and therefore, it affects the condition of the entire body. Consequently, it is important to effectively diagnose and treat diseases of this organ. According to clinicians, pancreatitis—a common disease affecting the pancreas—is one of the most complicated and demanding diseases of the abdomen. The classification of pancreatitis is based on clinical, morphologic, and histologic criteria. Medical doctors distinguish, inter alia, acute pancreatitis (AP), the most common causes of which are gallstone migration and alcohol abuse. Effective diagnostic methods and the correct assessment of the severity of acute pancreatitis determine the selection of an appropriate treatment strategy and the prediction of the clinical course of the disease, thus preventing life-threatening complications and organ dysfunction or failure. This review collects and organizes recommendations and guidelines for the management of patients suffering from acute pancreatitis.

Triglyceride to HDL-C ratio is associated with plasma D-dimer levels in different types of pancreatitis

This study aims to evaluate levels of D-dimer and serum lipid in different types of pancreatitis, and the relationship between D-dimer and dyslipidemia, especially triglyceride to HDL-C ratio (TG/HDL-C) in different types of pancreatitis. We analyzed the D-dimer and dyslipidemia levels in acute pancreatitis (AP), recurrent acute pancreatitis (RAP) and chronic pancreatitis (CP). A single-centered retrospective study was conducted on 1013 patients diagnosed with AP, RAP or CP. Only patients hospitalized within 24 h of onset were included, and 204 patients were enrolled in pancreatitis groups. 68 normal persons without pancreatitis, malignant diseases, pregnancy, or organ failure, who had health check-ups, were enrolled in the control group. Blood samples were taken within 24 h of admission. The relevant information on epidemiology and etiology was collected. D-dimer and serum lipid levels in different types of pancreatitis were analyzed. Furthermore, the area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUC) was used to estimate the validity of the predictor and to define optimal cut-off points for prediction. We found that D-dimer and TG/HDL-C ratio could distinguish mild AP (MAP) and non-MAP in AP and RAP patients. The D-dimer level was related to TG/HDL-C ratio and severity of pancreatitis, with the coefficient correlation of 0.379 and 0.427(p < 0.05), respectively. TG/HDL-C was related to D-dimer in different types of pancreatitis. Logistic regression analysis was conducted in the parameters at admission like alcohol abuse, dyslipidemia and coagulation disturbance in distinguishing AP and RAP groups from the control group, and the parameter like diabetes in RAP and CP groups significantly increased compared with that of the control group. The value of D-dimer level and TG/HDL-C ratio in predicting the severity of AP and RAP was confirmed but there was no significant difference between CP group and the control group. The D-dimer level was related to dyslipidemia and TG/HDL-C ratio.

Different clinical characteristics between recurrent and non-recurrent acute pancreatitis: A retrospective cohort study from a tertiary hospital

BACKGROUND

Acute pancreatitis (AP) is a common digestive disorder with different clinical outcomes, some of which develop into recurrent acute pancreatitis (RAP). This study aimed to explore the differences between AP and RAP.

METHODS

All patients with AP admitted to Changsha Central Hospital between January 2015 and December 2020 were included. Characteristics between RAP and non-RAP groups were compared. Independent factors associated with RAP were identified by multivariate logistic regression analyses.

RESULTS

This was a retrospective study. A total of 1567 patients, including 262 patients in the RAP group and 1305 patients in the non-RAP group, were enrolled. Compared to the non-RAP group, results indicated that the RAP group was younger (P < 0.001), had a male predominance (P < 0.001), and had higher incidences of diabetes (P < 0.001) and hypertriglyceridemia (HTG) (P < 0.001). Lower incidences of cholelithiasis (P < 0.001) and acute liver injury (P < 0.001) were also noted in the RAP group. Scores of Ranson, BISAP, SOFA, and APACHE II were significantly higher in the non-RAP group (P < 0.001 for all). Three independent factors associated with RAP, including male gender (P = 0.006), diabetes (P < 0.001), and HTG (P < 0.001), were identified by multivariate logistic regression.

CONCLUSION

Compared to the non-RAP, the incidence of cholelithiasis and acute liver injury was lower in RAP. Three independent factors associated with RAP, namely male, diabetes, and HTG, were identified.

Risk Factors for Recurrent Pancreatitis After First Episode of Acute Pancreatitis

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Recurrent acute biliary pancreatitis - A frequent and preventable condition potentially associated with morbidity and mortality

Recurrent acute biliary pancreatitis (RABP) is a common condition associated with an increase in hospital admissions, morbidity, mortality, and healthcare costs. This editorial will attempt to discuss the issue's current status as well as actions for its prevention.

The role of the BISAP score in predicting acute pancreatitis severity according to the revised Atlanta classification: a single tertiary care unit experience from Turkey

BACKGROUND/AIMS

In this study, we examine the utility of Bedside Index of Severity in Acute Pancreatitis (BISAP), which is an increasingly more commonly used simple and practical novel scoring system for predicting the prognosis and severity of the disease at presentation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Consecutive patients diagnosed with AP between January 2013 and December 2020 were evaluated retrospectively. The AP severity was assessed using the revised Atlanta classification (RAC). BISAP score, demographic characteristics, pancreatitis etiology, pancreatitis history, duration of hospital stay, and mortality rates of the patients were recorded.

RESULTS

A total of 1000 adult patients were included, of whom 589 (58.9%) were female and 411 (41.1%) were male. The mean age in female and male patients was 62.15 ± 17.79 and 58.1 ± 16.33 years, respectively (p >0.05). The most common etiological factor was biliary AP (55.8%), followed by idiopathic AP (23%). Based on RAC, 389 (38.9%), 418 (41.8%), and 193 (19.3%) patients had mild, moderate, and severe AP. Of the 1000 patients, 42 (4.2%) died. Significant predictors of mortality included advanced age (>65 y) (p=0.003), hypertension (p=0.007), and ischemic heart disease (p=0.001). A BISAP score of ≥3 had a sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value (NPV) of 79.79%, 91.57%, 69.37%, and 94.99%, respectively, for determining SAP patients according to RAC.

CONCLUSION

BISAP is an effective scoring system with a high NPV in predicting the severity of AP in the early course of the disease in a Turkish population.

Evidence for diagnosis of early chronic pancreatitis after three episodes of acute pancreatitis: a cross-sectional multicentre international study with experimental animal model

Chronic pancreatitis (CP) is an end-stage disease with no specific therapy; therefore, an early diagnosis is of crucial importance. In this study, data from 1315 and 318 patients were analysed from acute pancreatitis (AP) and CP registries, respectively. The population from the AP registry was divided into AP (n = 983), recurrent AP (RAP, n = 270) and CP (n = 62) groups. The prevalence of CP in combination with AP, RAP2, RAP3, RAP4 and RAP5 + was 0%, 1%, 16%, 50% and 47%, respectively, suggesting that three or more episodes of AP is a strong risk factor for CP. Laboratory, imaging and clinical biomarkers highlighted that patients with RAP3 + do not show a significant difference between RAPs and CP. Data from CP registries showed 98% of patients had at least one AP and the average number of episodes was four. We mimicked the human RAPs in a mouse model and found that three or more episodes of AP cause early chronic-like morphological changes in the pancreas. We concluded that three or more attacks of AP with no morphological changes to the pancreas could be considered as early CP (ECP).The new diagnostic criteria for ECP allow the majority of CP patients to be diagnosed earlier. They can be used in hospitals with no additional costs in healthcare.

Suboptimal management of hypertriglyceridemia in the outpatient setting is associated with the recurrent pancreatitis: A retrospective cohort study

Hyperlipemia is a well-established etiology of acute pancreatitis. However, few data are available in the medical literature about the management of triglyceride levels in the outpatient setting in patients with hypertriglyceridemic acute pancreatitis (HTG-AP). We evaluated the blood triglyceride levels and followed the triglyceride management of patients with HTG-AP.This retrospective study enrolled patients with HTG-AP from January 2013 to March 2019 in the Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical of University. By reviewing the hospitalization records and the follow-up data, the clinical features, blood triglyceride levels, use of lipid-lowering medications and rate of blood triglyceride levels monitoring after hospital discharge were analyzed.A total of 133 patients (46 women, 87 men; median age at presentation 37.4 years) diagnosed with HTG-AP were enrolled in the study. Thirty-two patients (24.1%) presented with recurrent acute pancreatitis (RAP). Patients who had RAP were younger and had higher blood triglyceride levels than those with a single attack (P < .05). No difference in serum amylase levels, hospitalization duration or mortality rate were observed between non-recurrent acute pancreatitis and RAP patients. Lipid monitoring was only observed in 12.8% of patients and 10 patients (7.5%) took medications to control their blood triglyceride levels after hospital discharge. The follow-up of triglyceride levels in the outpatient setting were higher in RAP patients than in patients with non-recurrent acute pancreatitis (P < .05). Among the patients who measured their triglyceride levels after discharge, 83.3% of patients with RAP had at least 1 follow-up triglyceride level that was higher than 500 mg/dL, while no patients had an HTG-AP attack with a triglyceride level higher than 500 mg/dL.Triglyceride levels after hospital discharge higher than 500 mg/dL may be associated with an increased risk of relapse of clinical acute pancreatitis events. Inappropriate management for triglyceride control in the outpatient setting may be associated with an increased risk of relapse of clinical HTG-AP events.

Progression to recurrent acute pancreatitis after a first attack of acute pancreatitis in adults

PURPOSE

Patients with a first attack of acute pancreatitis (AP) can develop recurrent acute pancreatitis (RAP). Hence, this study aimed to investigate the clinical features of the disease and the risk factors for RAP.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective study of 522 patients from Jan 1 to Dec 31, 2006. All patients with AP were followed for 36 months. The primary end point was the rate of RAP. The secondary end points were the risk factors that were evaluated by Cox regression analysis. The cumulative risk of RAP was assessed using Kaplan-Meier analysis.

RESULTS

56 of the 522 patients (10.7%) developed RAP. Among those RAP patients, 37 (7.1%) experienced one relapse, 10 (1.9%) experienced two relapses, and 9 (1.7%) experienced three or more relapses. Univariate analysis indicated that age (p = 0.016), male sex, etiology of AP (p = 0.001), local complications (p = 0.001) and Length of stay (LOS) (p = 0.007) were associated with RAP. Multivariate analysis with the Cox proportional hazards model showed that male sex (HR = 2.486, 95% CI, 0.169-0.960, p = 0.04), HTG-associated etiology (HR = 5.690, 95% CI, 2.138-15.146, p = 0.001), alcohol-associated etiology (HR = 5.867, 95% CI, 1.446-23.803, p = 0.013) and current local complications at index admission (HR = 8.917, 95% CI, 3.650-21.789, p = 0.001) were significant independent risk factors for RAP.

CONCLUSIONS

A first attack of AP led to RAP in 10.7% of patients within 3 years. Male sex was significantly associated with RAP. The etiologies of alcohol and HTG and local complications were the strongest risk factors for recurrent disease. Patients with these characteristics should be given special attention and followed-up closely.

The Lived Experience of Inpatients With Acute Recurrent Pancreatitis: A Qualitative Research Study From West China

The incidence of acute pancreatitis (AP) has increased year by year. Approximately 20%-30% of these patients will have further subsequent attacks, described as acute recurrent pancreatitis (ARP). Patients who are repeatedly admitted to hospitals suffer significant psychological problems and mental hardships. In the current study, we aimed to illuminate the lived experience of inpatients with ARP from Chongqing, China. A purposive sample of 13 ARP patients was recruited from the First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University. Semistructured and in-depth qualitative interviews were adopted in this phenomenological research. Data were analyzed by Colaizzi's Method of descriptive phenomenology and feedback on early findings from the participants. All interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed with the permission of the participants. Five themes presented in the study: anxiety and fear, lack of related knowledge, inevitability and helplessness, guilt and shame, hope, and perseverance. Overall, the ARP inpatients showed complexed experience, both active and positive. They also performed poor compliance during their hospitalization but wished for professional knowledge. Nurses should pay attention to their psychological changes to take effective interventions for them.

Risk factors of recurrent pancreatitis after first acute pancreatitis attack: a retrospective cohort study

Background and aims: Few studies have been conducted in Asia on the recurrence of acute pancreatitis (AP). This study was designed to investigate characteristics of the disease to predict recurrence.Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 617 patients that experienced a first AP attack between January 2009 and December 2014. Based on reviews of clinical and follow-up data, we attempted to identify risk factors of recurrence using Cox regression analysis.Results: During a median follow-up of 3.2 years (range 3-72 months), 100(16.2%) of the 617 study subjects experienced one or more episodes of recurrent acute pancreatitis (RAP). Of these 100 patients, 75(75%) experienced one relapse, 12(12%) two relapses, and 13(13%) three or more relapses. The etiologies of RAP were an alcohol (48%), gallstone (31%), idiopathic (14%), and others (7%). Univariate analysis showed that an age of <60 years, male gender, smoking, an alcohol-associated etiology, and a local complication at index admission were significant risk factors of RAP. Cox regression analysis showed that an age of <60 years (HR = 1.602, 95% CI: 1.029-2.493), male gender (HR = 1.927, 95% CI: 1.127-3.295), and the presence of a local complication (HR = 3.334, 95% CI: 2.211-5.026) were significant risk factors of RAP development.Conclusion: A local complication at index admission was found to be the strongest risk factor of RAP, and a male gender and an age of <60 years were significantly associated with RAP. Special attention and close follow-up should be afforded to patients with a local complication at index admission or male patients <60 years old.

Recurrent Acute Pancreatitis: Current Concepts in the Diagnosis and Management

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

There have been significant developments in the diagnosis, clinical approach, and management of patients with recurrent acute pancreatitis (RAP) in the last decade. This review systematically summarizes our current understanding of RAP.

NEW FINDINGS

Gallstones and alcohol are common causes of RAP. Non-alcohol non-biliary RAP (nAnB RAP) is a difficult group of patients after excluding these two causes because extensive workup is required to elucidate the etiology. Idiopathic RAP is diagnosed after excluding all the known causes and recurrence is noted to be higher in such patients. Patients with non-biliary RAP are prone to develop chronic pancreatitis (CP) suggesting a continuum from acute to recurrent to chronic pancreatitis. Often, patients destined to develop CP present at an earlier stage with RAP. Endoscopic ultrasound and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) are the investigations of choice to detect microlithiasis, choledocholithiasis, ductal abnormalities, peri-ampullary malignancies, and early changes of chronic pancreatitis. The role of pancreas divisum, sphincter of Oddi dysfunction, and anomalous pancreatobiliary union in causing RAP is controversial. Genetic testing may be advisable in younger patients.

CONCLUSION

With a focused approach and appropriate investigations, the etiology of RAP can be identified in a significant proportion of patients. Therapeutic options are limited and future research is needed to improve understanding of the disease.

Differences between the outcome of recurrent acute pancreatitis and acute pancreatitis

Background and aim

Overall, a handful of studies are available on the outcomes of recurrent acute pancreatitis (RAP), in comparison to the first episode of acute pancreatitis (AP). We aimed to provide a more complete and updated picture of RAP and how it is different from the initial episode of AP.

Methods

Consecutive patients admitted with an episode of AP over 8 years were divided into two groups on the basis of prior episodes: AP and RAP. Primary outcome measures were for surgical necrosectomy and mortality.

Results

Of the 724 patients (age 39.22 ± 13.25 years, 68% male) with an episode of pancreatitis, 632 (87.3%) had presented with a first episode (AP) and 92 (12.7%) with at least one prior episode (RAP). The incidence of severe pancreatitis was significantly less in RAP patients (10.9%) in comparison to AP patients (48.6%). The requirement of surgical intervention and mortality were less in patients with RAP (1.1 and 2.2%, respectively) compared to patients with AP (9.3 and 18%, respectively). The mean number of episodes per RAP patients was 2.97 ± 1.66 (range 2–10), and 64.1% had only two episodes. Regarding the etiology of RAP patients, biliary etiology (32.6%) and alcohol (30.4%) were the two most frequent factors, and no etiology could be identified in 19.6%.

Conclusion

Patients with RAP had milder disease course and lesser mortality when compared to the initial episode of AP. Appropriate evaluation and dealing with etiological factors at the initial episode of AP can prevent a majority of RAP.

Rate of recurrence in Indian patients presenting with acute pancreatitis and identification of chronicity on follow up: Possible risk factors for progression

BACKGROUND

To study the profile and long-term outcome of Indian patients presenting with acute pancreatitis and the possible risk factors for progression.

METHODS

Consecutive patients with acute or recurrent acute pancreatitis seen in our department during July 2013 to December 2014 were included. Details of past episodes were collected and patients were followed up till March 2015.

RESULTS

In the 97 patients included (mean age 47.2 [SD 16.9] years; 74 men), gallstones (37 [38.1%]) and alcohol (19 [19.6%]) were the major identified etiologies; the idiopathic (31 [32%]) group constituted a third of patients. Recurrences were more common with idiopathic etiology (14 patients out of 30 had recurrences [46.7%]) as compared to alcoholic (5 out of 19 [26.3%]) and biliary (4 out of 37 [10.8%]) pancreatitis and with mild index episode. Following the episode of acute pancreatitis, identification of chronic pancreatitis was more common with alcoholic (6 out of 18 [33%]) and idiopathic (9 out of 30 [30%]) etiology as compared to other etiologies. Longer duration of follow up, but not number of recurrent episodes, was associated with identification of chronicity in patients presenting as acute pancreatitis.

CONCLUSIONS

Out of 97 patients with acute pancreatitis, 27 (27.8%) developed recurrences with risk factors being idiopathic etiology and mild index episode. Eighteen of 97 (18.6%) patients had evidence of chronic pancreatitis on follow up, risk factors being the alcoholic and idiopathic varieties, and longer duration of follow up.

Epidemiology of Recurrent Acute and Chronic Pancreatitis: Similarities and Differences

Emerging data in the past few years suggest that acute, recurrent acute (RAP), and chronic pancreatitis (CP) represent a disease continuum. This review discusses the similarities and differences in the epidemiology of RAP and CP. RAP is a high-risk group, comprised of individuals at varying risk of progression. The premise is that RAP is an intermediary stage in the pathogenesis of CP, and a subset of RAP patients during their natural course transition to CP. Although many clinical factors have been identified, accurately predicting the probability of disease course in individual patients remains difficult. Future studies should focus on providing more precise estimates of the risk of disease transition in a cohort of patients, quantification of clinical events during the natural course of disease, and discovery of biomarkers of the different stages of the disease continuum. Availability of clinically relevant endpoints and linked biomarkers will allow more accurate prediction of the natural course of disease over intermediate- or long-term-based characteristics of an individual patient. These endpoints will also provide objective measures for use in clinical trials of interventions that aim to alter the natural course of disease.

Continuing episodes of pain in recurrent acute pancreatitis: Prospective follow up on a standardised protocol with drugs and pancreatic endotherapy

AIM

To assess the outcomes of drug therapy (DT) followed by pancreatic endotherapy for continuing painful episodes in recurrent acute pancreatitis.

METHODS

DT comprised of pancreatic enzymes and anti-oxidants failing which, endotherapy (ET; pancreatic sphincterotomy and stent placement) was done. The frequency of pain, its visual analogue score (VAS), quality of life (QoL), serum C peptide and faecal elastase were compared between baseline and after 1 year of follow up in all patients and in the two subgroups on DT and ET. Response was defined as at least 50% reduction in the severity of pain to below a score of 5.

RESULTS

Of the thirty nine patients analysed, 21 (53.9%) responded to DT and 18 (46.1%) underwent ET. The VAS for pain (7.0 ± 2.0 vs 1.3 ± 2.5, P < 0.001) and the number of days with pain per month decreased [1.0 (1.0, 2.0) vs 1.0 (0.0, 1.0), P < 0.001], and the QoL scores [55.0 (44.0, 66.0) vs 38.0 (32.00, 51.00), P < 0.01] improved significantly during follow up. Similar significant improvements were seen in patients in the subgroups of DT and ET except for QoL in ET. The serum C-peptide (P = 0.001) and FE (P < 0.001) levels improved significantly in the entire group and in the two subgroups of patients except for the C peptide levels in patients on DT.

CONCLUSION

A standardised protocol of DT, followed by ET decreased the intensity and frequency of pain in recurrent acute pancreatitis, enhanced QoL and improved pancreatic function.

Decreased Severity in Recurrent Versus Initial Episodes of Acute Pancreatitis

OBJECTIVES

The comparative outcomes of initial versus recurrent acute pancreatitis (AP) have not been clearly established.

AIM

The aim was to compare the clinical outcomes of those with an initial episode of AP to those with recurrent AP stratified by the number of prior episodes.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study included consecutive patients with AP admitted to the Cleveland Clinic between 2008 and 2011. The odds of severe AP, multisystem organ failure, ICU admission, new local complications, elevated blood urea nitrogen and bedside index for severity in acute pancreatitis score, systemic inflammatory response syndrome, and mortality were compared using univariable and multivariable logistic regression.

RESULTS

Two hundred and ninety two patients were included, of which 213 (72%) were admitted on their initial AP episode. Mortality in patients experiencing first episode was 4.7%, compared to 0% in patients with recurrent attack of pancreatitis (P = 0.047). Prior episodes of AP were found to be protective against multisystem organ failure (odds ratio, 0.14 for each prior episode; confidence interval, 0.01-0.76) and intensive care unit admission (0.24, confidence interval, 0.06-0.91), adjusting for potential confounding factors such as transfer status and obesity.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients presenting with recurrent AP may be at decreased risk of a clinically severe course and incur decreased mortality.

Etiology, clinical features and management of acute recurrent pancreatitis

OBJECTIVE

To study the etiology and clinical features of acute recurrent pancreatitis (ARP) and to determine its optimal management and outcomes.

METHODS

ARP cases among acute pancreatitis patients who were admitted to the West China Hospital, Sichuan University from January 2008 to December 2012 were retrospectively collected. Their etiology, clinical features, treatments and outcomes were analyzed.

RESULTS

Of all pancreatitis patients, 8.9% were classified as ARP. The proportions of mild and severe diseases were 85.7% and 14.3%, respectively. The common etiological factors were biliogenic (31.0%), alcohol (26.2%), hyperlipidemia (21.4%) and pancreaticobiliary malformation (15.4%). At first 46 cases were cryptogenic and among them 36 were subsequently confirmed by endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). Among the hyperlipidemic ARP patients, 72.2% failed to routinely monitor and control serum lipids. ERCP was performed in 88 cases, and 48 also required an endoscopic sphincterotomy or calculus removal. Twenty-two patients underwent cholangiopancreatic duct stent placement, and pancreatic necrosectomy was performed on eight severe cases. The overall outcomes indicate that 8.3% of the cases progressed to chronic pancreatitis and 33.3% of the cases receiving etiological treatment were recurrence-free. There were no deaths in this study.

CONCLUSIONS

The etiological factors of ARP are similar to those of acute pancreatitis at the first attack. The management of ARP should be fully considered based on etiological investigation.

Etiology of recurrent acute pancreatitis, with special emphasis on pancreaticobiliary malformation

PURPOSE

This study was aimed to investigate etiology and clinical profiles of recurrent acute pancreatitis (RAP), particularly from the morphology of the pancreaticobiliary duct system.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Pancreaticobiliary morphology was examined in 230 of 381 patients with acute pancreatitis (AP) using endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. We analyzed factors associated with RAP including the pancreaticobiliary duct system.

RESULTS

RAP was diagnosed in 74 patients (19%). Major etiologies of RAP were alcoholic (38%), idiopathic (26%) and pancreaticobiliary malformation (22%). Patients with alcoholic RAP were significantly younger (47.2±11.6 years) than those with gallstone RAP (67.3±16.8; p<0.05). RAP with pancreaticobiliary malformation (male-to-female ratio: 1:4.3; p<0.01) and gallstone RAP (1:1.7; p<0.05) occurred predominantly in females in comparison with alcoholic RAP (1:0.2). Recurrence rate was 80% for AP with pancreaticobiliary malformation, significantly higher than for the others (p<0.01). Pancreas divisum was suspected as the etiology of mild RAP in 7 patients. Four RAP patients with pancreas divisum underwent endoscopic minor papilla sphincterotomy and improved. Pancreaticobiliary maljunction with biliary dilatation (choledochal cyst) was suspected as the etiology of mild RAP in 3 patients. The 3 RAP patients with choledochal cyst underwent prophylactic flow diversion surgery with complete resection of the dilated common bile duct, and achieved improvement. High confluence of pancreaticobiliary ducts was suspected as the etiology of mild RAP in 6 patients.

CONCLUSION

Pancreaticobiliary malformation is one of the major causes of RAP. As some of them benefit from endoscopic or surgical treatment, morphology of the pancreaticobiliary duct system should be examined where possible in RAP patients.

Contrasts and comparisons between childhood and adult onset acute pancreatitis

Acute pancreatitis (AP) in children is an increasingly recognised clinical entity notably different from the adults with respect to incidence, aetiology, severity and outcome. Yet our current understanding and approach to the management of paediatric pancreatitis is based almost entirely on adult studies. Acute recurrent pancreatitis (ARP) in children is more likely associated with various genetic factors, some of which have been relatively well characterised and others are in an evolving phase. The aim of this review is to summarise current knowledge, highlight any recent advances and contrast the paediatric and adult forms of this condition.

Recurrent acute pancreatitis: clinical profile and an approach to diagnosis

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Though recurrent acute pancreatitis is often seen in clinical practice, there are few comprehensive articles on this entity. The aim of this study therefore was to assess the etiological and clinical profile as well as diagnostic yield of non-invasive and invasive tests in this group of patients.

METHODS

All patients with recurrent acute pancreatitis seen from 2002 to 2007 were included in the study, retrospectively. Clinical information, investigation, and treatment data were collected for all patients by a standardized review of medical charts. Diagnostic tests were grouped into level one (non-invasive) and level two (invasive) tests and their yield was assessed. Comparison was made between the group with known etiology and idiopathic group to look for significant differences.

RESULTS

A total of 188 patients with recurrent acute pancreatitis were seen during the study period. Common etiological factors were biliary disease (37%), pancreas divisum (8.5%) and alcohol (6.4%). Multiple etiologies were seen in 7% of cases, and no cause was found in 32.4%. The diagnostic yield of level-one investigation (non-invasive) was 29.3%. Level-two tests (invasive) identified presumptive etiologies in 38.3% of cases. Complications developed in 12.2% and there was no mortality. Clinical features and complications were similar in the idiopathic group and those with known etiology.

CONCLUSIONS

Etiological diagnosis was obtained in 67.6% of patients after comprehensive diagnostic work up. Diagnosis in the majority of patients could only be reached after invasive tests (bile crystal analysis, EUS, ERCP). Early diagnosis and etiology-based therapy is the key to optimum patient outcome.

Rational diagnosis and therapy for recurrent acute pancreatitis: a clinical analysis of 84 cases

AIM: To investigate the characteristics of etiology, clinical features and endoscopic manifestations and prevention methods of recurrent acute pancreatitis.

METHODS: The clinical data of 84 patients with recurrent acute pancreatitis (recurrence group) and 67 patients with incipient acute pancreatitis (control group) at our hospital from September 2001 to December 2007 were retrospectively analyzed; the results of imaging changes and endoscopy therapy were reviewed as well.

RESULTS: Incidence rate of biliary tract diseases was significantly higher in relapse group than in the control group (60.7% vs 38.8%, P < 0.01). Radiation pain, jaundice, intestinal obstruction were increased in the relapse group than in the control group, but there was no marked difference. Crude echo (38.3%), pancreatic duct dilation (21.3%), cholecystitis, the common bile duct stone were also significantly higher in relapse group than in control group. ERCP showed that stones and common bile duct dilation were significantly higher in relapse group than in control group (35.8% vs 11.6%, 32.1% vs9.3%, P < 0.05). Of 84 RAP cases, 20 underwent surgical treatment, 48 conservative treatment, and 16 endoscopy therapy. Three died in each surgery group and conservative treatment group, and none in endoscopy therapy group.

CONCLUSION: Recurrent acute pancreatitis often results from biliary tract diseases including cholelithiasis, chronic cholecystitis, inappropriate eating habit and alcohol use. Rational diagnosis and therapy is important measure to prevent relapse. Endoscopy therapy for RAP is safe, minimally invasive and effective, and is recommended for wide use.