Evaluation of RAPID(®) 5 Access software for examination of capsule endoscopies and reading of the capsule by an endoscopy nurse

New Generation Express View: An Artificial Intelligence Software Effectively Reduces Capsule Endoscopy Reading Times

BACKGROUND: Reading capsule endoscopy (CE) is time-consuming. The Express View (EV) (IntroMedic, Seoul, Korea) software was designed to shorten CE video reading. Our primary aim was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of EV in detecting significant small-bowel (SB) lesions. We also compared the reading times with EV mode and standard reading (SR). METHODS: 126 patients with suspected SB bleeding and/or suspected neoplasia were prospectively enrolled and underwent SB CE (MiroCam®1200, IntroMedic, Seoul, Korea). CE evaluation was performed in standard and EV mode. In case of discrepancies between SR and EV readings, a consensus was reached after reviewing the video segments and the findings were re-classified. RESULTS: The completion rate of SB CE in our cohort was 86.5% and no retention occurred. The per-patient analysis of sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and diagnostic accuracy of EV compared to SR were 86%, 86%, 90%, 81%, and 86%, respectively, before consensus. After consensus, they increased to 97%, 100%, 100%, 96%, and 98%, respectively. The median reading time with SR and EV was 71 min (range 26−340) and 13 min (range 3−85), respectively (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The new-generation EV shows high diagnostic accuracy and significantly reduces CE reading times.

Follow-up outcomes in patients with negative initial colon capsule endoscopy findings

BACKGROUND

Colon capsule endoscopy (CCE), which became clinically applicable in 2006, is a simple and noninvasive procedure to evaluate colonic diseases; the accuracy of second-generation CCE, introduced in 2009, has dramatically improved. Currently, CCE is used as an alternative method for colorectal cancer screening, as well as for evaluating the mucosal lesions of inflammatory bowel disease, in cases where performing colonoscopy (CS) is difficult. However, the outcomes of CCE are uncertain.

AIM

To investigate the outcomes of Japanese patients with negative findings (no polyps or colorectal cancer) on initial CCE.

METHODS

This retrospective, single-center study was conducted at the Endoscopic Center at Aishinkai Nakae Hospital. This study included patients who underwent continuous CCE between November 2013 and August 2019, that exhibited no evidence of polyps or colorectal cancer at the initial CCE, and could be followed up using either the fecal immunochemical test (FIT), CS, or CCE. The observational period, follow-up method, presence or absence of polyps and colorectal cancer, pathological diagnosis, and number of colorectal cancer deaths were evaluated.

RESULTS

Thirty-one patients (mean age, 60.4 ± 15.6 years; range, 28–84 years; 14 men and 17 women) were enrolled in this study. The reasons for performing the first CCE were screening in 12, a positive FIT in six, lower abdominal pain in nine, diarrhea in two, and anemia in two patients. The mean total water volume at the time of examination was 3460 ± 602 mL (2250–4800 mL), and a total CS was performed in 28 patients (90%). The degree of cleanliness was excellent in 15 patients and good in 16, and no poor cases were observed. No adverse events, such as retention or capsule aspiration, were observed in any of the patients. The mean follow-up period was 3.1 ± 1.5 years (range, 0.3–5.5 years). Follow-up included FIT in nine, CS in 20, and CCE in four patients (including duplicate patients). The FIT was positive in two patients, while CS revealed five polyp lesions (three in the ascending colon, one in the transverse colon, and one in the descending colon), with sizes ranging between 2 mm and 8 mm. Histopathological findings revealed a hyperplastic polyp in one patient, and adenoma with low grade dysplasia in four patients; colorectal cancers were not recognized. In the follow-up example by CCE, polyps and colorectal cancer could not be recognized. During the follow-up period, there were no deaths due to colorectal cancer in any of the patients.

CONCLUSION

We determined the outcomes in patients with negative initial CCE findings.

A Current and Newly Proposed Artificial Intelligence Algorithm for Reading Small Bowel Capsule Endoscopy

Small bowel capsule endoscopy (SBCE) is one of the most useful methods for diagnosing small bowel mucosal lesions. However, it takes a long time to interpret the capsule images. To solve this problem, artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms for SBCE readings are being actively studied. In this article, we analyzed several studies that applied AI algorithms to SBCE readings, such as automatic lesion detection, automatic classification of bowel cleanliness, and automatic compartmentalization of small bowels. In addition to automatic lesion detection using AI algorithms, a new direction of AI algorithms related to shorter reading times and improved lesion detection accuracy should be considered. Therefore, it is necessary to develop an integrated AI algorithm composed of algorithms with various functions in order to be used in clinical practice.

Evaluation of Performance in Colon Capsule Endoscopy Reading by Endoscopy Nurses

BACKGROUND

Although there are papers reporting on the accuracy of colon capsule endoscopy (CCE) compared with colonoscopy (CS), there are few reports on the detection rates of significant lesions by endoscopy nurses. We previously reported no significant difference in the detection rates for small bowel capsule endoscopy (SBCE) images among two well-trained physicians and one expert nurse.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the reading time and detection rate of the significant lesions of CCE images among novice and trained expert endoscopy nurses and novice physicians.

METHODS

CCE videos of 20 consecutive patients who performed both CCE and CS with clinically significant localized lesions were selected. Two trained expert endoscopy nurses, untrained two novice physicians, and novice three endoscopy nurses reviewed CCE videos. The detection rate of the lesions and reading time were compared among the three groups and were evaluated by comparison between the first and the second 10 videos.

RESULTS

The median reading time was the shortest (19 min) in the trained expert endoscopy nurses and the longest (45 min) in the novice nurses. The number of thumbnails tended to be more in the trained expert endoscopy nurses in the first 10-video reading. Although the detection rates of small polyps (<5 mm) were significantly lower (46.5%, p=0.025) in the novice nurses compared to the others, they were improved (35.2% to 63.5%, p=0.015) in the second 10 videos. The detection rates of tumor lesions by either one of two trained expert endoscopy nurses were higher compared to those by each novice physician.

CONCLUSIONS

The trained expert endoscopy nurses for CCE reading can reduce physician's time and improve the diagnostic yield.

Artificial intelligence and deep learning for small bowel capsule endoscopy

Capsule endoscopy is ideally suited to artificial intelligence-based interpretation given its reliance on pattern recognition in still images. Time saving viewing modes and lesion detection features currently available rely on machine learning algorithms, a form of artificial intelligence. Current software necessitates close human supervision given poor sensitivity relative to an expert reader. However, with the advent of deep learning, artificial intelligence is becoming increasingly reliable and will be increasingly relied upon. We review the major advances in artificial intelligence for capsule endoscopy in recent publications and briefly review artificial intelligence development for historical understanding. Importantly, recent advancements in artificial intelligence have not yet been incorporated into practice and it is immature to judge the potential of this technology based on current platforms. Remaining regulatory and standardization hurdles are being overcome and artificial intelligence-based clinical applications are likely to proliferate rapidly.

Use of rapid reading software to reduce capsule endoscopy reading times while maintaining accuracy

BACKGROUNDS AND AIMS

A typical capsule endoscopy (CE) case generates tens of thousands of images, with abnormalities often confined to a just few frames. Omni Mode is a novel EndoCapsule software algorithm (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan) that proposes to intelligently remove duplicate images while maintaining accuracy in lesion detection.

METHODS

This prospective multicenter study took place across 9 European centers. Consecutive, unselected CE cases were read conventionally in normal mode, with every captured frame reviewed. Cases were subsequently anonymized and randomly allocated to another center where they were read using Omni Mode. Detected lesions and reading times were recorded, with findings compared between both viewing modes. The clinical significance of lesions was described according to the P classification (P0, P1, and P2). Where a discrepancy in lesion detection in either mode was found, expert blinded review at a consensus meeting was undertaken.

RESULTS

The patient population undergoing CE had a mean age of 49.5 years (range, 18-91), with the investigation of anemia or GI bleeding accounting for 71.8% of cases. The average small-bowel transit time was 4 hours, 26 minutes. The mean reading time in normal mode was 42.5 minutes. The use of Omni Mode was significantly faster (P < .0001), with an average time saving of 24.6 minutes (95% confidence interval, 22.8-26.9). The 2127 lesions were identified and classified according to the P classification as P0 (1234), P1 (656), and P2 (237). Lesions were identified using both reading modes in 40% (n = 936), and 1186 lesions were identified by either normal or Omni Mode alone. Normal mode interpretation was associated with 647 lesions being missed, giving an accuracy of .70. Omni Mode interpretation led to 539 lesions being missed, with an accuracy of .75. There was no significant difference in clinical conclusions made between either reading mode.

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows that CE reading times can be reduced by an average of 40%, without any reduction in clinical accuracy.

Evaluation of the sensitivity of the Express View function in the Mirocam® capsule endoscopy software

Background: A new computer algorithm called Express-View has recently been introduced by Mirocam, but data concerning its application and efficacy are scarce.Objective: To evaluate the lesion detection rate, per-patient sensitivity and the diagnostic accuracy using Express-View.Methods: All patients who performed CE between January 2018 and June 2019, whose indication was obscure gastrointestinal bleeding (OGIB) and with findings on CE, were included. Lesions identified in conventional reading were selected and considered as reference.Results: Eighty-nine patients were included, 50.6% male, with a mean age of 68.4 years-old (±12.3). The Express-View mode detected 85.5% of lesions previously detected by conventional reading (524 out of 613). There were 89 missed lesions, mainly erosions or ulcers (44.9%) and angioectasias (38.2%). The lesion detection rate was found to be lower in the jejunum and ileum compared to extra-small bowel locations and duodenum (p = .04). Although Express-View had a per-patient sensitivity for all lesions of 56.2% and a per-patient sensitivity for all clinically significant lesions of 83.1%, it achieved a diagnostic accuracy of 91%.Conclusions: The per-patient sensitivity for all lesions was shown to be below expectations, although the lesion detection rate, the per-patient sensitivity for all clinically significant lesions, and the diagnostic accuracy were shown to be higher.

What defines quality in small bowel capsule endoscopy

Small bowel capsule endoscopy is considered a first-line diagnostic tool for the investigation of small bowel diseases. Gastroenterological and endoscopic societies have proposed and established measures known as quality indicators, quality measures or performance measures for the majority of endoscopic procedures, in order to ensure competence, healthcare quality and define areas requiring improvement. However, there is a paucity of publications describing small bowel capsule endoscopy quality indicators. Hereby, we attempt to identify and describe a number of pre-procedure, intra-procedure and post-procedure quality indicators, regarding process measures in small bowel capsule endoscopy, after a comprehensive review of the literature.

Does the PillCam SB3 capsule endoscopy system improve image reading efficiency irrespective of experience? A pilot study

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS

 The aim of this study was tp compare the diagnostic efficiency of the PillCam SB3 capsule endoscopy (CE) system with the older system, PillCam SB2, taking into consideration the experience of the image reader.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

 Small intestinal CE was conducted on 64 patients around May 2014 when the SB3 was introduced in our hospital. Data obtained from 20 patients (SB2: 10 and SB3: 10) based on transit time were assessed by junior (experience: 20 images), intermediate (> 50), and expert readers (> 600).

RESULTS

 Reading time with the CE down to the end of the small intestine was shorter in the SB3 group for each reader (SB2 vs. SB3: junior, 40.2 ± 10.1 vs. 23.7 ± 6.7 [ P  = 0.0009]; intermediate, 21.4 ± 4.9 vs. 10.3 ± 2.9 [ P  = 0.0003]; expert, 23.2 ± 5.6 vs. 11.1 ± 2.9 min [ P  = 0.0002]). Interpretation agreement rates between the findings by junior and intermediate readers and those by the expert reader were 84.6 % and 92.3 %, respectively. For the junior reader, rates of agreement using the SB2 and SB3 systems with those by the expert reader were 85.7 % and 83.3 %, respectively; no significant difference was noted between the two systems. Similarly, for the intermediate reader, the respective agreement rates using the SB2 and SB3 systems were 85.7 % and 100 %, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

 The PillCam SB3 reduces the time burden on readers irrespective of their experience.

Systematic review and meta-analysis of the performance of nurses in small bowel capsule endoscopy reading

INTRODUCTION

Increasing demands on healthcare systems mean that nurses are taking on more roles as physician extenders. Capsule endoscopy (CE) is a laborious procedure where specialist nurses could reduce physician workload and rationalise resource utilisation. The aim of this review and meta-analysis is to consolidate data on nurses' performance in small bowel CE (SBCE).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was conducted for randomised controlled trials and comparative studies on nurses in SBCE reading compared to physicians. We examined the performance of nurses compared to SBCE-trained physicians.

RESULTS

Sixteen relevant studies were identified, with 820 SBCE examinations involving 20 nurses. 11/16 studies reported the numbers of SBCE findings detected. Overall, the pooled proportion of all findings reported by physicians and nurses was 86%. Studies involving nurses with endoscopic experience showed a summative detection rate of 89%. 7/16 studies reported the number of videos where there was agreement between the nurse and physicians for overall findings/diagnosis. The overall proportion of videos with agreement was 68%. In studies where nurses had endoscopy experience, the proportion of videos with agreement was 71%.

CONCLUSION

Our meta-analysis supports a more active role for nurses in SBCE reading. We suggest nurses can function as independent CE readers in general, given adequate training and formal credentialing.

Evaluation of performance of the Omni mode for detecting video capsule endoscopy images: A multicenter randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS

Olympus recently developed a new algorithm called Omni mode that discards redundant video capsule endoscopy (VCE) images. The current study aimed to demonstrate the non-inferiority of the Omni mode in terms of true positives (TPs) and the superiority of the Omni mode with regard to reading time against a control (ordinary ES-10 system).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This multicenter prospective study included 40 patients with various small bowel diseases. VCE images were evaluated by 7 readers and 3 judging committee members. Two randomly allocated readers assessed the VCE images obtained using the 2 modalities for each patient. The order of the modalities was switched between the 2 readers and the interval between readings by the same reader was 2 weeks. The judging committee predefined clinically relevant lesions as major lesions and irrelevant lesions as minor lesions. The number of TPs for major and minor lesions and the reading times were compared between the modalities. The predefined non-inferiority margin for the TP ratio of the Omni mode compared with the control was 0.9.

RESULTS

The estimated TP ratios and 95 % confidence intervals for total, major, and minor lesions were 0.87 (0.80 - 0.95), 0.93 (0.83 - 1.04), and 0.83 (0.74 - 0.94), respectively. Although non-inferiority was not demonstrated, the rate of detection of major lesions was not significantly different between the modalities. The reading time was significantly lower when using the Omni mode than when using the control.

CONCLUSIONS

The Omni mode may be only appropriate for the assessment of major lesions.

A critical analysis of the effect of view mode and frame rate on reading time and lesion detection during capsule endoscopy

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Factors influencing reading time and detection of lesions include the view mode (VM) and frame rate (FR) applied during reading of small bowel capsule endoscopy images. The aims of this study were to examine the impact of VM and FR on reading time and lesion detection using a standardized, single-type lesion model.

METHODS

A selected video clip containing a known number of positive images (n = 60) of small bowel angioectasias was read using nine different combinations of VM and FR (VM1, VM2, and VM4 × FR10, FR15, and FR25) in randomized order by six capsule endoscopists. Readers were asked to count all positive images of angioectasias (maximum number of positive images, MPIs) seen during reading. The main outcome measurements were effect of VM and FR on reading time and lesion detection.

RESULTS

Mean MPIs for all VM2 and VM4 were 36 (60 %) and 38 (64 %). They were significantly higher than VM1 of 24 (40 %) (P = 0.011, 0.008). A statistical difference was found when the total MPIs at FR10 were compared to FR15 (P = 0.008) and to FR25 (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Both VM and FR significantly influence lesion detection during capsule endoscopy reading.

Optimizing lesion detection in small-bowel capsule endoscopy: from present problems to future solutions

This review presents issues pertaining to lesion detection in small-bowel capsule endoscopy (SBCE). The use of prokinetics, chromoendoscopy, diagnostic yield indicators, localization issues and the use of 3D reconstruction are presented. The authors also review the current status (and future expectations) in automatic lesion detection software development. Automatic lesion detection and reporting, and development of an accurate lesion localization system are the main software challenges of our time. The 'smart', selective and judicious use (before as well as during SBCE) of prokinetics in combination with other modalities (such as real time and/or purge) improves the completion rate of SBCE. The tracking of the capsule within the body is important for the localization of abnormal findings and planning of further therapeutic interventions. Currently, localization is based on transit time. Recently proposed software and hardware solutions are proposed herein. Moreover, the feasibility of software-based 3D representation (attempt for 3D reconstruction) is examined.

The evaluation of the OMOM capsule endoscopy with similar pictures elimination mode

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

The reading of capsule endoscopy (CE) is time-consuming. Thus, several time-saving features have been added to the CE software by different CE companies. However, the similar pictures elimination mode in the OMOM capsule endoscopy software has not been evaluated yet. Our aim is to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of the similar pictures elimination mode.

METHODS

We retrospectively studied 200 consecutive capsule endoscopy procedures in Nanfang Hospital between April 2012 and July 2012, among which 52 cases were excluded for poor bowel preparation, failure to reach the colon or data missing. All images of the small-bowel were re-evaluated with four different reading modes (conventional mode and three levels of similar pictures elimination mode) by four experienced endoscopists. Then, the reading time, the number of detected lesions, κ value, sensitivity and specificity were compared between 4 methods.

RESULTS

The mean reading time with levels I to III, respectively, was significantly shorter than with conventional mode (P<0.001, conventional mode 33.25min, level I 24.90min, level II 20.54min, level III 14.96min). The sensitivity between conventional mode and level I were similar (93.8% vs. 87.7%, P=0.073), while the sensitivity of levels II and III was significantly lower than conventional mode (77.8% vs. 93.8%, 70% vs. 93.8%, respectively). The specificity between all 4 modes were similar (100% for conventional mode, 98.5% for levels I to III).

CONCLUSIONS

Level I reading mode was as efficient as the conventional mode and less time-consuming. Its sensitivity and specificity were similar compared with the conventional mode.

Continuing challenges in the diagnosis and management of obscure gastrointestinal bleeding

The diagnosis and management of obscure gastrointestinal bleeding (OGIB) have changed dramatically since the introduction of video capsule endoscopy (VCE) followed by deep enteroscopy and other imaging technologies in the last decade. Significant advances have been made, yet there remains room for improvement in our diagnostic yield and treatment capabilities for recurrent OGIB. In this review, we will summarize the latest technologies for the diagnosis of OGIB, limitations of VCE, technological enhancement in VCE, and different management options for OGIB.

A rapid and accurate method to detect active small bowel gastrointestinal bleeding on video capsule endoscopy

BACKGROUND

Video capsule endoscopy (VCE) is indicated to evaluate for suspected small bowel bleeding, but "standard view" (SV) evaluation is time-consuming. Rapid Reader 6.0 software (Given Imaging, Duluth GA) contains two computer algorithmic systems: (1) "Quickview" (QV) which automatically skips similar images and (2) a pixel analysis program that identifies suspected blood (SBI). Combining the two modalities (QV + SBI) may provide a faster modality to assess for active small bowel bleeding.

AIMS

This study was designed to assess the accuracy of QV + SBI for small bowel bleeding compared to SV findings.

METHODS

This is a retrospective, case-control study at a single tertiary care referral hospital including all patients with VCE performed for suspected small bowel bleeding from 4/2007 to 3/2011. All studies were previously read using SV by one of two experienced faculty (CS, DR). The primary outcome was diagnostic accuracy of QV + SBI in assessing for active small bowel bleeding compared to SV.

RESULTS

A total of 116 VCE were included, 28 with active small bowel bleeding identified by original SV. Using QV + SBI, all 28 VCEs with active small bowel bleeding were identified. The sensitivity of QV + SBI to detect active bleeding was 100%, while the specificity was 93-94%. The mean time to identify landmarks and read the entire study was 3 min 20 s.

CONCLUSIONS

The QV + SBI reading format of VCE is an efficient, highly sensitive modality to assess for potential small bowel bleeding.

High sensitivity of quick view capsule endoscopy for detection of small bowel Crohn's disease

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Capsule endoscopy (CE) has a high sensitivity for diagnosing small bowel Crohn's disease, but video analysis is time-consuming. The quick view (qv) function is an effective tool to reduce time consumption. The aim of this study was to determine the rate of missed small bowel ulcerations with qv-CE compared with standard view and the diagnostic accuracy of qv-CE in suspected Crohn's disease.

METHODS

This study consisted of two parts: (i) 12 small bowel segments with Crohn's disease of varying severity were selected for a detailed analysis of the number and type of lesions visualized with CE and qv-CE, and (ii) a blinded study of the diagnostic accuracy of qv-CE including 40 patients with suspected Crohn's disease. Ileocolonoscopy and CE served as gold standard.

RESULTS

Part 1: CE visualized 171 ulcerations compared with 102 detected with qv-CE (miss rate 40%, P = 0.02). Part 2: qv-CE identified 15 of 16 patients with small bowel Crohn's disease corresponding to a 94% sensitivity, and overall, 39 out of 40 patients were classified correct (diagnostic accuracy 98%). Qv-CE was false negative in one patient because of a leap of 3 min and 20 s in the terminal ileum. Reading times varied from 5 to 18 min (median 10).

CONCLUSION

Despite a significant number of missed lesions, qv-CE is a safe and time-reducing method for diagnosing small bowel Crohn's disease. To avoid false negative cases, we recommend viewing the terminal ileum in standard view.

Small-bowel capsule endoscopy: a ten-point contemporary review

The introduction of capsule endoscopy (CE) in clinical practice increased the interest for the study of the small-bowel. Consequently, in about 10 years, an impressive quantity of literature on indications, diagnostic yield (DY), safety profile and technical evolution of CE has been published as well as several reviews. At present time, there are 5 small-bowel capsule enteroscopy (SBCE) models in the worldwide market. Head-to-head trials have showed in the great majority of studies comparable results in terms of DY, image quality and completion rate. CE meta-analyses formed the basis of national/international guidelines; these guidelines place CE in a prime position for the diagnostic work-up of patients with obscure gastrointestinal bleeding, known and/or suspected Crohn's disease and possible small-bowel neoplasia. A 2-L polyethylene glycol-based purge, administered the day before the procedure, is the most widely practiced preparation regimen. Whether this regimen can be further improved (i.e., by further decreasing its volume, changing the timing of administration, coupling it with prokinetics and/or other factors) or if it can really affect the DY, is still under discussion. Faecal calprotectin has been used in SBCE studies in two settings: in patients taking non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, to evaluate the type and extent of mucosal damage and, more importantly from a clinical point of view, in patients with known or suspected Crohn's disease for assessment of inflammation activity. Although there is still a lot of debate around the exact reasons of SBCE poor performance in various small-bowel segments, it is worth to remember that the capsule progress is non-steerable, hence more rapid in the proximal than in lower segments of the small-bowel. Capsule aspiration, a relatively unexpected complication, has been reported with increasing frequency. This is probably related with the increase in the mean age of patients undergoing CE. CE video review is a time-consuming procedure. Therefore, several attempts have been made to develop technical software features, in order to make CE video analysis easier and shorter (without jeopardizing its accuracy). Suspected Blood Indicator, QuickView and Fujinon Intelligent Chromo Endoscopy are some of the software tools that have been checked in various clinical studies to date.

Evaluation of four time-saving methods of reading capsule endoscopy videos

OBJECTIVE

Review of wireless capsule endoscopy recordings is time consuming. The aim of this study was to evaluate four time-saving methods offered with Rapid Software.

METHODS

A total of 100 wireless capsule endoscopy videos with abnormal findings were evaluated using five different ways of viewing: (a) manual mode at a speed of 10 frames per second (fps), (b) manual mode at a speed of 20 fps, (c) manual mode with a simultaneous display of two images at a speed of 20 fps, (d) automatic mode at a speed of 10 fps, and (e) quickview mode at a speed of 3 fps. Then, we calculated the concordance of abnormal findings between each one of the four time-saving methods using method A.

RESULTS

The mean reading time with time-saving methods was significantly shorter than with method A (method A: 59.8 min, method B: 30 min, method C: 30.2 min, method D: 32.2 min, method E: 16.3 min). The agreement in finding abnormal lesions between method A and the four evaluated methods was excellent and almost perfect (κ>0.8), except for quickview in recognizing polyps. Diagnostic miss rate was 1% for method D, 2% for B and C, and 12% for E. No tumors and cases of celiac or Crohn's disease were lost by all four methods.

CONCLUSION

We conclude that manual mode/20 fps, the simultaneous projection of two images/20 fps, and automatic mode/10 fps have minimal diagnostic miss rates and can safely replace slower modes in clinical practice. The quickview mode is a safe diagnostic tool only when larger or diffuse lesions are suspected, such as Crohn's or celiac disease.

Analysis of small-bowel capsule endoscopy reading by using Quickview mode: training assistants for reading may produce a high diagnostic yield and save time for physicians

GOAL

The aim was to investigate the clinical utility of RAPID Access 6.5 Quickview software and to evaluate whether preview of the capsule endoscopy video by a trained nurse could detect significant lesions accurately compared with endoscopists.

BACKGROUND

As reading capsule endoscopy is time consuming, one possible cost-effective strategy could be the use of trained nonphysicians or newly available software to preread and identify potentially important capsule images.

STUDY

The 100 capsule images of a variety of significant lesions from 87 patients were investigated. The minimum percentages for settings of sensitivity that could pick up the selected images and the detection rate for significant lesions by a well-trained nurse, two endoscopists with limited experience in reading, and one well-trained physician were examined.

RESULTS

The frequency of the selected lesions picked up by Quickview mode using percentages for sensitivity settings of 5%, 15%, 25%, and 35% were 61%, 74%, 93%, and 98%, respectively. The percentages for sensitivity significantly correlated (r=0.78, P<0.001) with the reading time. The detection rate by the nurse or the well-trained physician was significantly higher than that by the physician with limited capsule experience (87% and 84.1% vs. 62.7%; P<0.01). The clinical use of Quickview at 25% did not significantly improve the detection rate.

CONCLUSIONS

Quickview mode can reduce reading time but has an unacceptably miss rate for potentially important lesions. Use of a trained nonphysician assistant can reduce physician's time and improve diagnostic yield.

QuickView in small-bowel capsule endoscopy is useful in certain clinical settings, but QuickView with Blue Mode is of no additional benefit

BACKGROUND

Analysis of small-bowel capsule endoscopy (SBCE) is time-consuming. QuickView (QV) has been added to the RAPID software to reduce the reading times. However, its validity is still under intense review. Recently, we have shown that Blue Mode (BM) provides improvements in images for most lesion categories.

AIM

To assess the validity of QuickView with white light (QVWL) and QuickView with Blue Mode (QVBM) reading, in a group of patients who underwent SBCE in our centre, by comparing it with the standard video sequence review (used as reference) by experienced SBCE readers.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study; all SBCE (August 2008-November 2011), performed with PillCam SB, with complete small-bowel visualization were included. A clinician with previous SBCE experience, unaware of the SBCE reports, reviewed prospectively the video streams on RAPID platform using QVWL and QVBM. All SBCE had been reported previously using the standard mode; these reports were considered as the reference. There were 106 cases of obscure gastrointestinal bleeding (OGIB), 81 cases of known or suspected Crohn's disease (CD) and 10 cases of polyposis syndromes.

RESULTS

The mean small-bowel evaluation was 475 (± 270) s and 450 (± 156) s for QVWL and QVBM, respectively. In the OGIB (n=106; 21 overt/85 occult), with QVWL, 54 [P0 (28), P1 (18), P2 (8)] lesions were detected, 63 [P0 (48), P1 (13), P2 (2)] with QVBM, as compared with 98 [P0 (67), P1 (23), P2 (8)] by standard (reference) reporting. For P1+P2 lesions, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value for QVWL (as compared with reference reporting) were 92.3, 96.3, 96 and 92.8%, respectively. For QVBM, the above values were 91, 96, 96.2 and 90.6%, respectively. Eighty-one (n=81) patients underwent SBCE for small-bowel evaluation on the basis of a clinical history of suspected or known CD. With QVWL, 71 mucosal ulcers were detected, 68 with QVBM, as compared with 155 mucosal ulcers with reference reading. Finally, in the polyposis category with QVWL and QVBM, four polypoid lesions were detected compared with seven with standard (reference) review.

CONCLUSION

QV can be used confidently in OGIB in an urgent inpatient setting and in outpatients with occult OGIB or suspected CD. Furthermore, BM does not confer any additional advantage in the QV setting. Standard review settings should be used in all other cases.

Efficacy of new playback functions at reducing small-bowel wireless capsule endoscopy reading times

INTRODUCTION

Interpretation of video capsule data is time-consuming. Olympus capsule endoscopy (CE) software systems are equipped with auto-speed-adjusted and express-selected playback modes and overview function in an effort to reduce reading times. The clinical efficacy of these new playback features is unknown. Our objective was to evaluate the diagnostic yield and reading times of these new playback features.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study involving two experienced CE readers who analysed the CE procedures using either overview with express-selected or overview with auto-speed-adjusted modes. All CE videos were read blinded using Olympus Endocapsule software at 15 frames per second. The findings were then compared with those obtained when the CE procedures were read with conventional methods.

RESULTS

Seventy patients (36 male, 34 female) with a mean age of 51 ± 22 years were included in the study. Clinically significant findings were found for 40/70 (57%) patients. Use of overview function alone resulted in recognition of 32/40 (80%) clinically significant findings; when overview function was combined with express-selected or auto-speed-adjusted methods 39/40 (97.5%) clinically significant findings were recognised. The average reading time for overview with auto-speed-adjusted mode (34 ± 10 min) was significantly (p = 0.001) more than for overview with express-selected mode (19 ± 5 min).

CONCLUSIONS

The reading time for overview with express-selected mode was significantly lower than for overview with auto-speed-adjusted mode, with few unrecognised clinically significant lesions. These new playback systems can efficaciously reduce reading times of CE but need further evaluation in prospective multicentre studies.

Detection of lesions during capsule endoscopy: physician performance is disappointing

OBJECTIVES

Limited data guide capsule endoscopists on how to view the many images collected in each capsule. The objective of this study was to compare the detection rates of clinically significant findings in different capsule endoscopy reading modes and speeds.

METHODS

Seventeen capsule endoscopists with experience from 23 to > 1,000 total capsule procedures read 24 clips, 18 of which were abnormal. Clips were read in two different reading modes utilizing two speeds, including SingleView at 15 at frames per second (f.p.s.), SingleView 25 f.p.s., QuadView 20 f.p.s., and QuadView 30 f.p.s. The main outcome measurements were pathology detection rates correlated with reading mode, lesion type, reader experience, and timing order.

RESULTS

SingleView 15, QuadView 20, and QuadView 30 had no significant difference in overall detection rate (45, 47, and 43%, respectively). SingleView 25 had a 26% detection rate, which was significantly lower than SingleView 15 (P = 0.04) and QuadView 20 (P = 0.002). The detection rates of angioectasias, ulcers/erosions, masses/polyps, and blood were 69, 38, 46, and 17%, respectively. Reader experience and timing of interpretation did not significantly impact detection rate.

LIMITATIONS

Pathology was present on a few frames. Limited modes and speeds were assessed. Lesion types were not confirmed with surgical or deep enteroscopic methods. A relatively small number of readers provided interpretations.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, the detection rates in this study are lower than previously reported and not influenced by increasing experience. Detection rates are significantly higher when reading in SingleView 15 and QuadView 20 compared with reading in SingleView 25. Increasing viewing speed from QuadView 20 to QuadView 30 appears to have no significant effect on detection. Quality control measures to compare and improve lesion detection rates need further study.

Capsule endoscopy: comparison of two different reading modes

PURPOSE

Capsule endoscopy (CE) is a very useful tool for the evaluation of the small intestine, but it is time consuming. The aim of this study was to compare evaluation times and detection rates in two different reading modes (single view at a speed of 10 frames per second (fps) and four images simultaneously, i.e., quadview mode at a speed of 20 fps) to find the optimum setting mode for evaluation of CE videos.

METHODS

CE videos of 70 patients performed for different indications (obscure bleeding, n = 50; suspected Crohn's disease, n = 10; and suspected or complicated celiac disease, n = 10) were reviewed by investigators A and B in the two different reading modes.

RESULTS

The mean evaluation time using single view at 10 fps was 22 min (SD ± 9.1 min) and 11.9 min (SD ± 4.8 min) using quadview mode at 20 fps. The detection rates of angiodysplasias, erosions, small ulcers, and small polyps were only discreetly lower using the quadview mode at 20 fps. In Crohn's disease and celiac disease, the essential aspects of inflamed or atrophic mucosa segments were equally detected in both reading modes. In one case of complicated celiac disease with severe erosive jejunitis, a lymphoma-suspect lesion was overlooked in the quadview mode at 20 fps.

CONCLUSIONS

It is often possible to read CE videos in quadview mode at a higher speed with even so a high diagnostic yield in a shortened evaluation time.