Insulin secretion improvement during steroid therapy for autoimmune pancreatitis according to the onset of diabetes mellitus

Autoimmune Pancreatitis: A Review

Autoimmune pancreatitis is a rare condition of pancreatic inflammation with two classic subtypes. The emergence of a third subtype, ICI-induced pancreatitis, highlights the need for knowledge of each type to ensure accurate diagnosis and treatment. Abbreviations: AIP-Autoimmune pancreatitis; AIP-1-Type 1 autoimmune pancreatitis, also known as lymphoplasmacytic sclerosing pancreatitis (LPSP); AIP-2-Type 2 autoimmune pancreatitis, also referred to as idiopathic duct-centric pancreatitis (IDCP); AIP-3-Type 3 autoimmune pancreatitis, also known as immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-induced autoimmune pancreatitis; IgG4-RD-Immunoglobulin G4-related disease.

The clinical outcomes and healthcare resource utilization in IgG4-related disease: a claims-based analysis of commercially insured adults in the United States

OBJECTIVES

IgG4-related disease (IgG4-RD) can affect nearly any organ and is often treated with glucocorticoids, which contribute to organ damage and toxicity. Comorbidities and healthcare utilization in IgG4-RD are poorly understood.

METHODS

We conducted a cohort study using claims data from a US managed care organization. Incident IgG4-RD cases were identified using a validated algorithm; general population comparators were matched by age, sex, race/ethnicity and index date. The frequency of 21 expert-defined clinical outcomes associated with IgG4-RD or its treatment and healthcare-associated visits and costs were assessed 12 months before and 36 months after the index date (date of earliest IgG4-RD-related claim).

RESULTS

There were 524 cases and 5240 comparators. Most cases received glucocorticoids prior to (64.0%) and after (85.1%) the index date. Nearly all outcomes, many being common glucocorticoid toxicities, occurred more frequently in cases vs comparators. During follow-up, the largest differences between cases and comparators were seen for gastroesophageal reflux disease (prevalence difference: +31.2%, P < 0.001), infections (+17.3%, P < 0.001), hypertension (+15.5%, P < 0.01) and diabetes mellitus (+15.0%, P < 0.001). The difference in malignancy increased during follow-up from +8.8% to +12.5% (P < 0.001). Some 17.4% of cases used pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy during follow-up. Over follow-up, cases were more often hospitalized (57.3% vs 17.2%, P < 0.01) and/or had an emergency room visit (72.0% vs 36.7%, P < 0.01); all costs were greater in cases than comparators.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with IgG4-RD are disproportionately affected by adverse outcomes, some of which may be preventable or modifiable with vigilant clinician monitoring. Glucocorticoid-sparing treatments may improve these outcomes.

Diabetes mellitus in patients with type 1 autoimmune pancreatitis at diagnosis and after corticosteroid therapy

BACKGROUND

A high prevalence of diabetes mellitus (DM) coexisting with autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) is observed. However, evidence on the circumstances under which corticosteroid therapy (CST) for AIP improves or worsens DM is scarce. This study aimed to demonstrate and identify predictors of DM control under the influence of CST.

METHODS

Patients diagnosed with type 1 AIP were enrolled from a prospectively maintained cohort and were classified into three groups according to the chronology in which AIP and DM were diagnosed: pre-existing DM (pDM), concurrent DM (cDM), and non-DM (nDM). The responses of DM to CST were assessed when corticosteroid was ceased or tapered to a maintenance dose and classified as 'improvement' and 'non-improvement' (including 'no change' and 'exacerbation').

RESULTS

Among 101 patients with type 1 AIP, 52 (51.5%) patients were complicated with DM at the time of AIP diagnosis, with 36 patients in the cDM group and 16 patients in the pDM group. The incidences of diffuse pancreatic swelling (72.2%) and pancreatic body/tail involvement (91.7%) were significantly higher in the cDM group than in both the pDM and nDM groups. Of the 52 patients with DM, CST was administered in 48 cases. Multivariate logistic analysis identified that elevated serum gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT) level at AIP diagnosis [odds ratio (OR) = 0.032, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.003-0.412, P = 0.008] and pancreatic atrophy after CST (OR = 0.027, 95% CI: 0.003-0.295, P = 0.003) were negatively associated with DM control improvement.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with diffuse pancreatic swelling and pancreatic body/tail involvement in pancreatitis tended to be complicated with cDM at AIP diagnosis. CST exerted a beneficial effect on the clinical course of DM in nearly half of the AIP patients complicated with DM at diagnosis, particularly in those without elevated serum GGT levels at diagnosis and who did not experience pancreatic atrophy after CST.

Recent advances in IgG4-related autoimmune pancreatitis

The incidence of IgG4-related autoimmune pancreatitis (IgG4-AIP) is high in Asia and other countries, and unnecessary treatment is often undertaken due to both missed diagnosis and misdiagnosis in clinical practice. Although IgG4-AIP has attracted increasing attention, the details of IgG4-AIP pathogenesis and systemic immune response, including its relationship to tumor pathogenesis, are still unclear. In recent years, research on serum immunological detection, pathological features, clinical manifestations, diagnosis and treatment measures for IgG4-AIP has gradually increased. It is of great importance to summarize and discuss the latest progress regarding IgG4-AIP disease.

Relapse and side effects of steroid therapy beyond 3 years in autoimmune pancreatitis: A multicenter retrospective study

BACKGROUND

The impact of extended steroid administration on patients with autoimmune pancreatitis after a 3-year maintenance period remains poorly understood. This study analyzed the advantage and disadvantage of continuing steroid therapy beyond 3 years.

METHODS

In this retrospective multicenter study across 17 institutions, patients who successfully completed 3 years of maintenance therapy without experiencing relapse were categorized into two groups: the maintenance therapy discontinuation group, who discontinued steroid therapy after the initial 3-year period, and maintenance therapy continuation group, who continued steroid therapy beyond 3 years. The cumulative relapse rate after 3 years of maintenance therapy was the primary outcome. Relapse predictors were compared using the Gray test for cumulative relapse incidence by specific factor.

RESULTS

Of 211 patients, 105 experienced no relapse during the 3-year maintenance therapy and were divided into two groups: 69 in the maintenance therapy discontinuation group and 36 in the maintenance therapy continuation group. The relapse rate was lower in the maintenance therapy continuation group than in the maintenance therapy discontinuation group (P = 0.035). Predictors of relapse after 3 years included cessation of maintenance therapy (hazard ratio [HR] = 3.76; 95 % confidence interval [CI] = 1.07-13.3, P = 0.040) and renal involvement (HR = 2.88; 95 % CI = 1.04-7.99, P = 0.042). The maintenance therapy continuation group showed a significantly higher prevalence of macrovascular complications, compared with the maintenance therapy discontinuation group (P = 0.005).

CONCLUSIONS

Cessation of steroid maintenance therapy and renal involvement were predictors of relapse after 3 years of maintenance therapy. However, the long-term use of steroids may increase the risk of macrovascular complications.

Long-term Outcomes after Steroid Pulse Therapy in Patients with Type 1 Autoimmune Pancreatitis

Objective Steroid pulse therapy is a regimen involving the intravenous administration of supra-pharmacological doses of corticosteroids in the short term. It is used to treat various inflammatory and autoimmune conditions. However, the strengths and limitations of steroid pulse therapy for induction of remission in type 1 autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) are unknown. Methods Depending on the steroid therapy regimen administered, the 104 patients with type 1 AIP included in this retrospective study were divided into three groups: conventional oral prednisolone (PSL) regimen (PSL group), intravenous methylprednisolone (IVMP) pulse followed by oral PSL regimen (Pulse+PSL group), and IVMP pulse-alone regimen (Pulse-alone group). We then examined the relapse rate and adverse events among the three groups. Results The Kaplan-Meier estimates of the relapse rate at 36 months after steroid therapy were 13.6% in the PSL group, 13.3% in the Pulse+PSL group, and 46.2% in the Pulse-alone group. The log-rank test revealed that the relapse-free survival in the Pulse-alone group was significantly shorter than that in the PSL (p=0.024) and Pulse+PSL groups (p=0.014). The exacerbation of glucose tolerance after steroid therapy was less frequently observed in the Pulse-alone group (0%) than in the PSL group (17%, p=0.050) and Pulse+PSL groups (26%, p=0.011). Conclusion Although treatment with IVMP pulse alone resulted in unsatisfactory relapse prevention outcomes compared with conventional steroid therapy, the IVMP pulse-alone regimen might be an alternative treatment strategy for type 1 AIP from the perspective of avoiding adverse events from steroids.

Impact of neoadjuvant therapy on gut microbiome in patients with resectable/borderline resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

/Objectives: Effects of chemotherapy on gut microbiota have been reported in various carcinomas. The current study aimed to evaluate the changes in the gut microbiota before and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in patients with resectable (R) and borderline resectable (BR) pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) and understand their clinical implications.

METHODS

Twenty patients diagnosed with R/BR-PDAC were included in this study. Stool samples were collected at two points, before and after NAC, for microbiota analysis using 16S ribosomal RNA (16S rRNA) gene sequences.

RESULTS

Of the 20 patients, 18 (90%) were treated with gemcitabine plus S-1 as NAC, and the remaining patients received gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel and a fluorouracil, leucovorin, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin combination. No significant differences were observed in the α- and β-diversity before and after NAC. Bacterial diversity was not associated with Evans classification (histological grade of tumor destruction by NAC) or postoperative complications. The relative abundance of Actinobacteria phylum after NAC was significantly lower than that before NAC (P = 0.02). At the genus level, the relative abundance of Bifidobacterium before NAC in patients with Evans grade 2 disease was significantly higher than that in patients with Evans grade 1 disease (P = 0.03). Patients with Evans grade 2 lost significantly more Bifidobacterium than patients with Evans grade 1 (P = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

The diversity of gut microbiota was neither decreased by NAC for R/BR-PDAC nor associated with postoperative complications. Lower incidence of Bifidobacterium genus before NAC may be associated with a lower pathological response to NAC.

Challenges for clinicians treating autoimmune pancreatitis: Current perspectives

Autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) is a rare disease clinically characterized by obstructive jaundice, unintentional weight loss, acute pancreatitis, focal pancreatic mass, and diabetes. AIP is classified into two subtypes - type 1 and type 2 - according to pathological findings, clinical features, and serology test results, but some cases may be defined as type not otherwise in the absence of pathological findings and inflammatory bowel disease. To address the differences in diagnostic criteria by country, standard diagnostic criteria for AIP were proposed in 2011 by an international consensus of expert opinions. Differential diagnosis of AIP from pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma is important but remains challenging for clinicians. Fortunately, all subtypes of AIP show dramatic response to steroid treatment. This review discusses the current perspectives on the diagnosis and management of AIP in clinical practice.

Factors affecting glycemic control in diabetes mellitus complicated by autoimmune pancreatitis

AIMS/INTRODUCTION

To investigate factors influencing glycemic control in diabetes mellitus complicated by autoimmune pancreatitis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective cohort study investigated 33 patients with diabetes mellitus complicated by autoimmune pancreatitis who had received steroid therapy at Toranomon Hospital between January 1, 2011, and December 31, 2020. The course of glycemic control at 12 months after starting steroids was classified into three groups: Improved, Unchanged, or Worsened. Factors affecting these groups were investigated. Furthermore, we created two scores: (1) time of diabetes mellitus onset and baseline body mass index; (2) time of diabetes mellitus onset and baseline C-peptide index. Diabetes mellitus occurring at the same time as autoimmune pancreatitis, body mass index ≥22 kg/m2 , and C-peptide index ≥1.1 were each worth 1 point. Scores were summed and totals of 0-2 were compared between groups.

RESULTS

Ten patients were in the Improved group, 10 were in the Unchanged group, and 13 were in the Worsened group. The baseline body mass index and baseline C-peptide index were lower in the Worsened group than in the Improved group (P < 0.05 each). In addition, the scores were lower in the Worsened group than in the other groups (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with a lower baseline body mass index and a decreased baseline C-peptide index may experience worse glycemic control on steroid therapy.

Exocrine and Endocrine Insufficiency in Autoimmune Pancreatitis: A Matter of Treatment or Time?

BACKGROUND

Autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) is a specific form of chronic pancreatitis with a high relapse rate after treatment. AIP patients are burdened with an increased risk of long-term sequelae such as exocrine and endocrine insufficiency. Our objective was to investigate if pharmacological treatment affects both endocrine and exocrine pancreatic function in patients with AIP.

METHODS

We included 59 patients with definite AIP in the final analysis. Screening for diabetes mellitus (DM) and pancreatic exocrine insufficiency (PEI) was performed at the time of AIP diagnosis and during follow-up.

RESULTS

There were 40 (67.8%) males and 19 (32.2%) females; median age at diagnosis was 65 years. Median follow-up after the diagnosis of AIP was 62 months. PEI prevalence at diagnosis was 72.7% and was 63.5% at follow-up. The cumulative incidence of DM was 17.9%, with a prevalence of DM at diagnosis of 32.8%. No strong association was found between pharmacological treatment and occurrence of PEI and DM. Univariate analysis identified potential risk factors for PEI (other organ involvement and biliary stenting) and for DM (overweight, blue-collar profession, smoking, weight loss or obstructive jaundice as presenting symptoms, imaging showing diffuse pancreatic enlargement, smoking). In a multivariate analysis, only obstructive jaundice was identified as a risk factor for DM both at diagnosis and during follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that the prevalence of endocrine and exocrine insufficiency in AIP is high at diagnosis with an additional risk of PEI and DM during follow-up despite pharmacological treatment.

Incidence of endocrine and exocrine insufficiency in patients with autoimmune pancreatitis at diagnosis and after treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) is a rare form of pancreatitis that may lead to endocrine and exocrine insufficiency if left untreated. AIP clinically responds to glucocorticoids (GCs) therapy, but multiple GCs courses are often required to maintain remission with detrimental effects on glycaemic control.

OBJECTIVE

In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we aimed to assess the rate of endocrine and of exocrine insufficiency at diagnosis and at follow up in patients with AIP as well as the impact of GC therapy on pancreatic function in the long-term.

METHODS

The MEDLINE, SCOPUS, and EMBASE databases were searched from inception to August 2021 to identify studies reporting data on endocrine and exocrine insufficiency in patients with AIP. Pooled events were calculated using a random-effect model and expressed in terms of pooled prevalence rates.

RESULTS

A total of 6522 AIP patients and sixty-two studies were included in the analysis. The pooled estimate rate for the overall prevalence of diabetes in AIP at baseline was 37% (95% CI 32-42, I2 96%). The pooled prevalence rate of exocrine insufficiency was 45% (95%CI 32.9-57.4; I2 97%). The pooled estimate rate of diabetes at follow-up was 44% (95%CI 26.1-62.4) in studies where GCs were given to 100% of patients and 42% (95%CI 30.6-52.9) in studies where GCs were given to less than 100% of patients.

CONCLUSION

A large proportion of patients with AIP displays concomitant exocrine and endocrine insufficiency at the time of diagnosis. The incidence of diabetes at the longest available follow up tends to increase in patients treated with GCs.

Steroid Therapy and Steroid Response in Autoimmune Pancreatitis

Autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP), a unique subtype of pancreatitis, is often accompanied by systemic inflammatory disorders. AIP is classified into two distinct subtypes on the basis of the histological subtype: immunoglobulin G4 (IgG4)-related lymphoplasmacytic sclerosing pancreatitis (type 1) and idiopathic duct-centric pancreatitis (type 2). Type 1 AIP is often accompanied by systemic lesions, biliary strictures, hepatic inflammatory pseudotumors, interstitial pneumonia and nephritis, dacryoadenitis, and sialadenitis. Type 2 AIP is associated with inflammatory bowel diseases in approximately 30% of cases. Standard therapy for AIP is oral corticosteroid administration. Steroid treatment is generally indicated for symptomatic cases and is exceptionally applied for cases with diagnostic difficulty (diagnostic steroid trial) after a negative workup for malignancy. More than 90% of patients respond to steroid treatment within 1 month, and most within 2 weeks. The steroid response can be confirmed on clinical images (computed tomography, ultrasonography, endoscopic ultrasonography, magnetic resonance imaging, and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography). Hence, the steroid response is included as an optional diagnostic item of AIP. Steroid treatment results in normalization of serological markers, including IgG4. Short- and long-term corticosteroid treatment may induce adverse events, including chronic glycometabolism, obesity, an immunocompromised status against infection, cataracts, glaucoma, osteoporosis, and myopathy. AIP is common in old age and is often associated with diabetes mellitus (33-78%). Thus, there is an argument for corticosteroid therapy in diabetes patients with no symptoms. With low-dose steroid treatment or treatment withdrawal, there is a high incidence of AIP recurrence (24-52%). Therefore, there is a need for long-term steroid maintenance therapy and/or steroid-sparing agents (immunomodulators and rituximab). Corticosteroids play a critical role in the diagnosis and treatment of AIP.