Hip-spine relations and sagittal balance clinical consequences

Phase-specific changes in hip joint loading during gait following sacroiliac joint fusion: Findings from a finite element analysis

BACKGROUND

Low back pain affects over 80 % of adults, with sacroiliac joint dysfunction accounting for 15-30 % of these cases. Sacroiliac fusion is a surgical procedure for refractory joint pain. While the biomechanics of the joint and its fusion relative to the spinal column are well-known, the hip-spine relationship post-fusion remains unclear. Understanding the biomechanical state following fusion can enhance patient recovery and optimize surgical outcomes. This study uses finite element analysis to assess hip joint biomechanics following sacroiliac joint fusion.

METHODS

CTs of a 55-year-old male were used to create a biomechanical model, validated against a cadaveric study. Three triangular titanium alloy implants were placed across the sacroiliac joint in a unilateral and bilateral configuration. The model, loaded with pelvis and hip joint kinematics during a gait cycle, calculated joint reaction forces, contact stress and area on the hip joint across various gait phases.

FINDINGS

Hip joint contact stresses varied with fixation configurations and gait phases. Unilateral right fusion reduced joint reaction forces by 2 % but increased contact stress by 3.7 %. Bilateral fusion increased joint reaction forces by 6.7 % and contact stress by 3.25 %, with higher stress during foot flat and heel off phases compared to unilateral fixation.

INTERPRETATION

Fusion alters hip loading patterns during specific gait phases, with bilateral fusion producing the highest stresses during foot flat and heel off. These findings may suggest the need for fusion-specific rehabilitation protocols and warrants further investigation of long-term joint health outcomes.

Impact of Supine, Standing, and Sitting Postures on Acetabular Component Orientation in Total Hip Arthroplasty

INTRODUCTION

Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is a highly effective surgical procedure aimed at relieving pain and restoring function in patients with severe hip joint disorders, such as osteoarthritis, osteonecrosis, and developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH). The primary goals of THA are to alleviate pain, improve joint function, and enhance the quality of life by providing a stable and well-functioning hip joint. Accurate orientation of the acetabular component is critical for the success of THA, ensuring optimal joint mechanics, reducing the risk of complications such as dislocation and wear, and enhancing implant longevity. Postural changes significantly influence the orientation and stability of the acetabular component. Traditional supine evaluations may not accurately reflect the functional alignment during daily activities, necessitating more dynamic assessment methods.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study was conducted at a tertiary care hospital in Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India, from March 2018 to October 2019. It was a prospective study involving 27 patients who underwent primary THA. Exclusion criteria included bilateral or revision THA, a history of spine or hip surgery, neurological or musculoskeletal disorders, or lower limb deformities. Computed tomography scans were performed in supine, simulated standing, and sitting postures. Pre-operative and post-operative evaluations included standing and sitting lateral lumbosacral spine radiographs. Measurements at the spinopelvic junction evaluated spinal balance and pelvic compensation. The anatomical acetabular anteversion (AAA) was determined in supine, standing, and sitting positions using CT scans.

RESULTS

The study included 27 patients aged 19 to 66 (mean age 37). Most patients (17, 63%) were between 21-40 years old. Osteoarthritis was the most common indication for THA (15, 55.6%), followed by osteonecrosis (six, 22.2%), DDH (four, 14.8%), and post-traumatic arthritis (two, 7.4%). Spinopelvic mobility assessment showed 15 (55.6%) participants with normal mobility, eight (29.6%) who were hypermobile, three (11.1%) stiff, and one (3.7%) who were severely stiff. Significant variability in acetabular component orientation was observed across postures: mean supine AAA was 11.04° (SD 14.44°), standing AAA was 13.07° (SD 14.38°), and sitting AAA was 30.93° (SD 14.28°). The mean difference between sitting and standing AAA was 17.85° (SD 11.83°). Statistical analysis revealed significant differences in acetabular component orientation across different postures (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

This study highlights the critical need for dynamic and individualised approaches in THA. The findings underscore the importance of dynamic pre-operative assessments, including standing and sitting radiographs, to optimise component placement. Clinical recommendations include tailoring surgical techniques based on individual spinopelvic mobility, utilising advanced intraoperative tools for precise placement, and developing customised post-operative rehabilitation programs.

Spinopelvic Motion Evaluation in Patients Undergoing Total Hip Arthroplasty and Patient-Specific Target for Acetabular Cup Placement

Background/Objectives: Instability is a major reason for revision after total hip arthroplasty (THA), and acetabular cup placement in the "traditional" safe zone does not protect against dislocations. Spinopelvic mobility may play a role in impingement and dislocation after THA. Personalized acetabular cup placement that incorporates spinopelvic mobility is currently lacking in the literature. Methods: The spinopelvic motion of 116 patients was evaluated during preoperative planning. All patients underwent radiological assessments with an anteroposterior pelvis radiograph in the standing and supine positions and a lateral view of the lumbar spine and pelvis in the standing and sitting positions. The pelvic incidence, pelvic tilt, sacral slope, standing anterior pelvic plane tilt, sitting anterior pelvic plane tilt, and lumbar lordosis angle were measured, and the degree of pelvic motion from standing to sitting was calculated. The development of the patient-specific target for the acetabular cup was based on the mean mobility of the whole group and the specific posture of each patient. Results: The average pelvic incidence was 51.0 ± 13.1 degrees, the sacral slope was 35.0 ± 10.3 degrees, the pelvic tilt was 16.0 ± 13.3 degrees, the standing anterior pelvic plane tilt was 3.4 ± 12 degrees backward, and the degree of lumbar lordosis was 39.5 ± 11.3 degrees. The mean spinopelvic mobility was 27.3 ± 13.4 degrees. The measurements had good to excellent interobserver and intraobserver reliability. On the basis of these measurements, we developed a novel algorithm for a patient-specific target for acetabular cup placement. Conclusions: the evaluation of spinopelvic mobility has good to excellent interobserver and intraobserver reliability and can be used for personalized acetabular cup placement.

Change in standing acetabular orientation 2 years postoperatively after surgical correction of adult spinal deformity

INTRODUCTION

Although sagittal alignment is known to influence pelvic position, few studies accurately identify the relationship between sagittal alignment and acetabular orientation. We hypothesized that postoperative PT should be correlated with acetabular change in native hips after surgical correction of adult spinal deformity. The objective of this study was therefore to describe the correlation between the change in pelvic tilt and the change in acetabular orientation two years after surgical correction of adult spinal deformity.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

Based on a retrospective study of a prospective mono center database, 127 acetabuli out of sixty-nine patients were analyzed preoperatively and at two years postoperatively of surgical management of sagittal imbalance by posterior arthrodesis extended to the pelvis. The analysis was based on bi-planar EOS radiographs with 3D reconstructions of the pelvis and spine using SterEOS 3D software. The following specific parameters were analyzed: sacral slope, pelvic tilt, lumbar lordosis, SVA, acetabulum tilt (AT), anteversion (AA) (orientation of the acetabulum in the axial plane), abduction (AAbd) (orientation of the acetabulum in the frontal plane), inclination (AI) (orientation of the acetabulum in the sagittal plane), and anterior acetabulum coverage (ACA). A Pearson correlation was performed between the pre-and postoperative change in acetabular parameters (right and left) and pelvic parameters. Linear regressions were performed to identify the most relevant pelvic and spinal parameters. A subgroup analysis was performed to identify a difference between distal sacral and distal ilium fixations.

RESULTS

All measured acetabular parameters were significantly different two years after surgery. Changes in AT (p = 0.03), AI (p = 0.03) and ACA (p = 0.05) were significantly greater in the ilium fixation group. Postoperative PT reduction was strongly correlated with the decrease of AT and AA ( = 0.61 and = 0.57, p < 0.001), it was also correlated with the increase of AI and ACA and the decrease of AAbd. The entire cohort linear regression analysis revealed that a 1 ° decrease in PT resulted in a 0.4 ° decrease in AA and a 0.6 ° decrease in AT (R2 = 0.45 and = 0.38).

CONCLUSION

Our study highlights the significant influence of the change in sagittal alignment on acetabular orientation in standing position. This correlation explains the increased risk of anterior hip impingement, the change in acetabular load distribution that might lead to early hip osteoarthritis, and the overall change in the subjects' gait pattern.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Patient-Specific Acetabular Safe Zones in Total Hip Arthroplasty: External Validation of a Quantitative Approach to Preoperatively Templating Spinopelvic Parameters

Background

Spinopelvic mechanics are critical in total hip arthroplasty; however, there is no established consensus for adjusting acetabular component positioning based on spinopelvic parameters. This study aimed to (1) validate a recently developed Patient-Specific acetabular safe-zone calculator that factors in spinopelvic parameters and (2) compare differences with hip-spine classification targets.

Methods

A total of 3750 patients underwent primary total hip arthroplasty across 3 academic referral centers, with 33 (0.88%) requiring revision for instability. Spinopelvic parameters were measured before initial total hip arthroplasty, and acetabular component position was measured following the index and revision procedures. Most operations employed either computer navigation or robotic assistance (94%). Surgical approaches included both anterior and posterior techniques. Utilizing our recently developed patient-specific safe-zone calculator, theoretical intraoperative positions were calculated and compared to true component positions before and after revision.

Results

Among 33 patients who underwent revision, none dislocated at an average follow-up of 5.1 years. In the external validation cohort, the average absolute differences between the patient-specific safe-zone and the median hip-spine classification recommendation were 3.8° ± 2.1° inclination and 5.0° ± 3.2° version. For the pooled cohort, the absolute differences between the patient-specific safe-zone targets and the prerevision component positions were 7.9° ± 5.1° inclination and 11.4° ± 6.9° version. After revision, the mean absolute differences decreased to 3.6° ± 3.1° inclination and 5.8° ± 3.5° version (P < .001).

Conclusions

A patient-specific approach improved acetabular component positioning accuracy within 6° of version and 4° of inclination of stable, revised hips. Patient-specific safe zones provide quantitative targets for nuanced spinopelvic preoperative planning that may mitigate risk of instability and may indicate use of assisted technologies.

Hip joint stress distribution changes depending on three-dimensional pelvic orientation: Finite-element analysis

BACKGROUND

Pelvis experiences changes in its orientation due to the alignment of the hip joint and spine, and its orientation might affect both joints. Pelvic tilt on the sagittal plane has been widely discussed; however, the pelvis is oriented also on the coronal and horizontal planes. This study aimed to examine how stress distribution on intact hip joint changes under the three-dimensional pelvic orientation.

METHODS

Computed tomography data of five patients with unilateral pelvic girdle were analyzed. Thirteen models were evaluated by the MECHANICAL FINDER: neutral position at 0°; 10° and 20° anterior and posterior pelvic tilt; 10° and 20° pelvic hike and drop; 10° and 20° pelvic forward and backward rotation. Stress assessment was performed in four parts of the acetabulum: anterosuperior, posterosuperior, posteroinferior, and central parts.

RESULTS

Compared with the neutral position, the mean value of the equivalent stress and maximum principal stress in the anterosuperior part significantly increased by 1.51 times and 1.57 times at 20° posterior tilt, respectively. The maximum principal stress in the anterosuperior part significantly increased by 1.44 times at 20° hike. A significant increase of 1.45 times was found in the maximum principal stress in the anterosuperior part at 20° forward rotation.

CONCLUSIONS

Local stress accumulated in the anterosuperior acetabulum at the posterior pelvic tilt, pelvic hike, and pelvic forward rotation, which might lead to hip overload. The effect of posterior pelvic tilt appears to be greater for the hip joint than at the pelvic hike or forward rotation.

The Sacroiliac Joint Fusion Patient Population and Its Prevalence of Total Hip Arthroplasty

INTRODUCTION

The prevalence of sacroiliac joint (SIJ) pathology generating lower back pain is increasing, often requiring SI joint fusion in refractory cases. Similarly, total hip arthroplasty (THA) is an increasing procedure in the older growing population. Prior SIJ fusion in patients undergoing THA has increased hip dislocation. This study aims to determine the prevalence of preexisting THA in SIJ fusion patients at our institution.

METHODS

After institutional review board approval, we completed a retrospective review of consecutive SIJ fusion cases performed by fellowship-trained orthopaedic spine surgeons between October 2019 and June 2022. The senior surgeon reviewed pelvis radiographs to determine whether a THA was present. Patient demographics, surgical history, SIJ fusion date, and laterality information from study participants' medical records were collected and analyzed.

RESULTS

We screened 157 consecutive cases and excluded 45 not meeting the inclusion criteria. One hundred twelve radiographs were reviewed, with seven additional patients excluded. The final analysis consisted of 105 patients (33M:72F). The mean age was 50.4 ± 13.8 years, and the mean body mass index was 29.1 ± 6.1 kg/m 2 . SIJ fusion laterality included 51 right (48.6%), 44 left (41.9%), and 10 bilateral (9.5%). One patient (0.95%) had a preexisting right THA, and two patients (1.9%) underwent ipsilateral THA after SIJ fusion.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrated a low prevalence (0.95%) of preexisting THA in SIJ fusion patients at our institution, similar to the THA prevalence of the total US population. Additional research is needed to determine the outcomes of patients with preexisting THA undergoing SIJ fusion.

How Does Radiographic Acetabular Morphology Change Between the Supine and Standing Positions in Asymptomatic Volunteers?

BACKGROUND

The radiographic appearance of the acetabulum differs between the supine and standing positions in patients with hip conditions. The pelvis undergoes a change in tilt when transitioning between positions, resulting in variations in version and acetabular coverage. However, the extent of these variations in well-functioning volunteers without compensatory patterns caused by pain is unknown.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

We performed this study to (1) quantify differences in radiographic acetabular measurements when transitioning between supine and standing among asymptomatic, well-functioning volunteers; (2) assess differences in pelvic tilt between positions; and (3) test whether individual anatomic parameters are associated with the change in tilt.

METHODS

This was a prospective, single-center study performed at an academic referral center. One hundred volunteers (students, staff, and patients with upper limb injuries) with well-functioning hips (Oxford hip score ≥ 45) were invited to participate. A total of 45% (45) of them were female, their mean age was 37 ± 14 years, and their mean BMI was 25 ± 2 kg/m 2 . Supine and standing AP pelvic radiographs were analyzed to determine numerous acetabular parameters including the lateral center-edge angle (LCEA), acetabular index (AI), anterior wall index (AWI), posterior wall index (PWI), crossover sign (COS), crossover ratio (COR), posterior wall sign (PWS), ischial spine sign (ISS), and femoroepiphyseal acetabular roof index (FEAR), as well as pelvic parameters including the sacrofemoral-pubic angle (SFP). Spinopelvic parameters were measured from lateral standing spinopelvic radiographs. Radiographic measurements were performed by one hip preservation research fellow and a fellowship-trained staff surgeon. Differences in parameters were determined, and correlations between postural differences and morphological parameters were tested. Clinically important differences were defined as a difference greater than 3° for acetabular angle measurements and 0.03 for acetabular ratio measurements, based on previous studies.

RESULTS

Lateral coverage angles did not show a clinically important difference between positions. AWI decreased when standing (0.47 ± 0.13 versus 0.41 ± 0.14; p < 0.001), whereas acetabular retroversion signs were more pronounced when supine (COS: 34% [34 of 100], PWS: 68% [68 of 100], and ISS: 34% [34 of 100] versus COS: 19% [19 of 100], PWS: 38% [38 of 100], and ISS: 14% [14 of 100]; all p values < 0.05). Pelvic tilt increased by a mean of 4° ± 4° when standing, but the range of change was from -15° to 7°. The change in AWI (ρ = 0.47; p < 0.001), PWI (ρ = -0.45; p < 0.001), and COR (ρ = 0.52; p < 0.001) between positions correlated with ΔSFP. Volunteers with spinal imbalance (pelvic incidence lumbar lordosis > 10°) demonstrated greater change in pelvic tilt (ΔSFP) (-7° ± 3° versus -4° ± 4°; p = 0.02) and a greater reduction in AWI (by 10%). These volunteers demonstrated reduced standing lumbar lordosis angles (45° ± 11° versus 61° ± 10°; p = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Acetabular version increases from supine to standing because of an increase in pelvic tilt. The change in pelvic tilt between positions exhibited substantial variability. Individuals with reduced lumbar lordosis for a given pelvic incidence value demonstrated greater pelvic mobility. No features on supine radiographs were associated with the change in tilt.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Performing standing radiographs in addition to supine views can help identify aberrant physiologic patterns in patients with diagnostic dilemmas and might thus help with management. Normative data of pelvic tilt change can help clinicians identify patients who demonstrate excessive change in tilt that contributes to abnormal hip pathomechanics.

Adapted Training to Boost Upper Body Sensorimotor Control and Daily Living Functionality in Visually Impaired Baseball Players

Background and Objectives: Vision significantly contributes to postural control, balance, coordination, and body kinematics, thus deeply influencing everyday functionality. Sight-impaired subjects often show upper body anatomofunctional and kinetic chain alterations negatively impacting daily living efficiency and autonomy. The present study aimed to investigate and train, for the first time, upper body sensorimotor control in an Italian blind baseball team to boost global and segmental functionality while contemporarily prevent injuries. Materials and Methods: The whole team underwent a validated test battery using both quantitative traditional tools, such as goniometric active range of motion and muscular/functional tests, and an innovative biofeedback-based device, a Libra proprioceptive board. Consequently, a 6-week adapted training protocol was designed and leaded to improve sensorimotor control and, hence, counteract disability-related deficits and sport-specific overuse syndromes. Results: Statistically significant improvements were observed in all the investigated parameters. Noteworthy, an overall boost of global and segmental stability was detected through an orthostatic dynamic balance enhancement during the Y Balance test (p = 0.01) and trunk multiplanar control improvement on the Libra board (p = 0.01). Concurrently, the comparison of baseline vs. post-intervention outcomes revealed a consistent increase in upper body mobility (p < 0.05 for all the assessed districts), core recruitment (p = 0.01 for all the administered functional tests), and proprioceptive postural control (p = 0.01 for the Libra board validated test). Conclusions: Our findings suggest that a tailored sensorimotor training, conceived and led by an adapted physical activity kinesiologist, may effectively improve upper body functional prerequisites and global proprioceptive control, thus potentially promoting autonomy, quality of life, and physical activity/sport practice adherence in visually impaired individuals.

Hip Osteoarthritis in Patients Undergoing Surgery for Severe Adult Spinal Deformity: Prevalence and Impact on Spine Surgery Outcomes

BACKGROUND

Hip osteoarthritis (OA) is common in patients with adult spinal deformity (ASD). Limited data exist on the prevalence of hip OA in patients with ASD, or on its impact on baseline and postoperative alignment and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). Therefore, this paper will assess the prevalence and impact of hip OA on alignment and PROMs.

METHODS

Patients with ASD who underwent L1-pelvis or longer fusions were included. Two independent reviewers graded hip OA with the Kellgren-Lawrence (KL) classification and stratified it by severity into non-severe (KL grade 1 or 2) and severe (KL grade 3 or 4). Radiographic parameters and PROMs were compared among 3 patient groups: Hip-Spine (hip KL grade 3 or 4 bilaterally), Unilateral (UL)-Hip (hip KL grade 3 or 4 unilaterally), or Spine (hip KL grade 1 or 2 bilaterally).

RESULTS

Of 520 patients with ASD who met inclusion criteria for an OA prevalence analysis, 34% (177 of 520) had severe bilateral hip OA and unilateral or bilateral hip arthroplasty had been performed in 8.7% (45 of 520). A subset of 165 patients had all data components and were examined: 68 Hip-Spine, 32 UL-Hip, and 65 Spine. Hip-Spine patients were older (67.9 ± 9.5 years, versus 59.6 ± 10.1 years for Spine and 65.8 ± 7.5 years for UL-Hip; p < 0.001) and had a higher frailty index (4.3 ± 2.6, versus 2.7 ± 2.0 for UL-Hip and 2.9 ± 2.0 for Spine; p < 0.001). At 1 year, the groups had similar lumbar lordosis, yet the Hip-Spine patients had a worse sagittal vertebral axis (SVA) measurement (45.9 ± 45.5 mm, versus 25.1 ± 37.1 mm for UL-Hip and 19.0 ± 39.3 mm for Spine; p = 0.001). Hip-Spine patients also had worse Veterans RAND-12 Physical Component Summary scores at baseline (25.7 ± 9.3, versus 28.7 ± 9.8 for UL-Hip and 31.3 ± 10.5 for Spine; p = 0.005) and 1 year postoperatively (34.5 ± 11.4, versus 40.3 ± 10.4 for UL-Hip and 40.1 ± 10.9 for Spine; p = 0.006).

CONCLUSIONS

This study of operatively treated ASD revealed that 1 in 3 patients had severe hip OA bilaterally. Such patients with severe bilateral hip OA had worse baseline SVA and PROMs that persisted 1 year following ASD surgery, despite correction of lordosis.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Impact of Hip and Knee Osteoarthritis on Full Body Sagittal Alignment and Compensation for Sagittal Spinal Deformity

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective review of prospectively collected data.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the effect of lower extremity osteoarthritis on sagittal alignment and compensatory mechanisms in adult spinal deformity (ASD).

BACKGROUND

Spine, hip, and knee pathologies often overlap in ASD patients. Limited data exists on how lower extremity osteoarthritis impacts sagittal alignment and compensatory mechanisms in ASD.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In total, 527 preoperative ASD patients with full body radiographs were included. Patients were grouped by Kellgren-Lawrence grade of bilateral hips and knees and stratified by quartile of T1-Pelvic Angle (T1PA) severity into low-, mid-, high-, and severe-T1PA. Full-body alignment and compensation were compared across quartiles. Regression analysis examined the incremental impact of hip and knee osteoarthritis severity on compensation.

RESULTS

The mean T1PA for low-, mid-, high-, and severe-T1PA groups was 7.3°, 19.5°, 27.8°, and 41.6°, respectively. Mid-T1PA patients with severe hip osteoarthritis had an increased sagittal vertical axis and global sagittal alignment ( P <0.001). Increasing hip osteoarthritis severity resulted in decreased pelvic tilt ( P =0.001) and sacrofemoral angle ( P <0.001), but increased knee flexion ( P =0.012). Regression analysis revealed that with increasing T1PA, pelvic tilt correlated inversely with hip osteoarthritis and positively with knee osteoarthritis ( r2 =0.812). Hip osteoarthritis decreased compensation through sacrofemoral angle (β-coefficient=-0.206). Knee and hip osteoarthritis contributed to greater knee flexion (β-coefficients=0.215, 0.101; respectively). For pelvic shift, only hip osteoarthritis significantly contributed to the model (β-coefficient=0.100).

CONCLUSIONS

For the same magnitude of spinal deformity, increased hip osteoarthritis severity was associated with worse truncal and full body alignment with posterior translation of the pelvis. Patients with severe hip and knee osteoarthritis exhibited decreased hip extension and pelvic tilt but increased knee flexion. This examines sagittal alignment and compensation in ASD patients with hip and knee arthritis and may help delineate whether hip and knee flexion is due to spinal deformity compensation or lower extremity osteoarthritis.

Does spinopelvic alignment affect femoral head cartilage and the proximal femoral physis in slipped capital femoral epiphysis? A finite element analysis

BACKGROUND

Slipped capital femoral epiphysis is a prevalent pediatric hip disorder. Recent studies suggest the spine's sagittal profile may influence the proximal femoral growth plate's slippage, an aspect not extensively explored. This study utilizes finite element analysis to investigate how various spinopelvic alignments affect shear stress and growth plate slip.

METHODS

A finite element model was developed from CT scans of a healthy adult male lumbar spine, pelvis, and femurs. The model was subjected to various sagittal alignments through reorientation. Simulations of two-leg stance, one-leg stance, walking heel strike, ascending stairs heel strike, and descending stairs heel strike were conducted. Parameters measured included hip joint contact area, stress, and maximum growth plate Tresca (shear) stress.

FINDINGS

Posterior pelvic tilt cases indicated larger shear stresses compared to the anterior pelvic tilt variants except in two leg stance. Two leg stance resulted in decreases in the posterior tilted pelvi variants hip contact and growth plate Tresca stress compared to anterior tilted pelvi, however a combination of posterior pelvic tilt and high pelvic incidence indicated larger shear stresses on the growth plate. One leg stance and heal strike resulted in higher shear stress on the growth plate in posterior pelvic tilt variants compared to anterior pelvic tilt, with a combination of posterior pelvic tilt and high pelvic incidence resulting in the largest shear.

INTERPRETATION

Our findings suggest that posterior pelvic tilt and high pelvic incidence may lead to increased shear stress at the growth plate. Activities performed in patients with these alignments may predispose to biomechanical loading that shears the growth plate, potentially leading to slip.

Challenges in Total Hip Arthroplasty with Prior Spinal Arthrodesis: A Comprehensive Review of Biomechanics, Complications, and Surgical Strategies

Total hip arthroplasty (THA) has revolutionized patients' lives with hip osteoarthritis. However, the increasing prevalence of THA in individuals with prior lumbar arthrodesis (LA) poses unique challenges. This review delves into the biomechanical alterations, complications, and surgical strategies specific to this patient subset, highlighting the need for tailored preoperative assessments and planning. Due to altered pelvic and spinal biomechanics, patients with LA undergoing THA face a higher risk of dislocation and revision. The complex interplay between spinal and hip biomechanics underscores the need for meticulous preoperative planning. Comprehensive clinical examination and radiographic evaluation are vital for understanding patient-specific challenges. Various radiographic techniques, including computed tomography (CT)/X-ray matching and standing/seated studies, provide insights into postural changes affecting pelvic and spinal alignment. Complications following THA in patients with LA highlight the necessity for personalized surgical strategies. Careful consideration of implant selection, the surgical approach, and component positioning are essential to prevent complications. In summary, THA in patients with prior LA demands individualized preoperative assessments and planning. This approach is crucial to optimize outcomes and mitigate the heightened risks of complications, underlining the importance of tailored surgical strategies.

Functional assessment of component positioning in patients with groin pain after total hip arthroplasty as a tool to guide management

BACKGROUND

Persisting groin pain post total hip arthroplasty (THA) is a common and complex issue that can be difficult to diagnose and manage. Acetabular component positioning is often implicated.

AIMS AND METHODS

We used a previously well described and validated functional positioning protocol to determine if functional acetabular malpositioning was a factor in groin pain post THA and hence to determine if acetabular revision would be indicated. We compared patient-specific functional acetabular positioning to traditional CT evaluation of cup position and assessment of anterior cup overhang.

RESULTS

39 patients with groin pain post-THA were investigated. Functional acetabular malpositioning was diagnosed in 31% (12/39). Revision THA was performed in those 12 patients, resulting in resolution of functional malpositioning (100%), with an overall accuracy of 5.6° (range 1-12), and resolution of groin pain in 67% (8/12). 33% (4/12) of the revised implants had functional positioning located outside the traditional "40/20 zone". Comparison with CT indicated that 40% (4/10) of implants with anterior overhang were well positioned, however only 50% (6/12) of functionally malpositioned implants had CT evidence of anterior cup prominence. Of the 8/12 revision patients who had resolution of their groin pain, only 1 had cup prominence.

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests that the utilisation of a patient specific functional positioning algorithm in the analysis of persistent groin pain following THA can assist in identifying the underlying cause of pain and help to guide treatment. For a functionally malpositioned acetabulum, revision surgery offers a potential resolution of groin pain.

Knee flexion compensation in postoperative adult spinal deformity patients: implications for sagittal balance and clinical outcomes

PURPOSE

To determine whether maintaining good sagittal balance with significant knee flexion (KF) constitutes a suboptimal outcome after adult spinal deformity (ASD) correction.

METHODS

This single-center, single-surgeon retrospective study, assessed ASD patients who underwent posterior spinal fusion between 2014 and 2020. Inclusion criteria included meeting at least one of the following: PI-LL ≥ 25°, T1PA ≥ 20°, or CrSVA-H ≥ 2 cm. Those with lower-extremity contractures were excluded. Patients were classified into four groups based on their 6-week postoperative cranio-hip balance and KF angle, and followed for at least 2 years: Malaligned with Knee Flexion (MKF+) (CrSVA-H > 20 mm + KFA > 10), Malaligned without Knee Flexion (MKF-) (CrSVA-H > 20 mm + KFA < 10), Aligned without Knee Flexion (AKF-) (CrSVA-H < 20 mm + KFA < 10), and Aligned with Knee Flexion (AKF+) (CrSVA-H < 20 mm + KFA > 10). The primary outcomes of this study included one and two year reoperation rates. Secondy outcomes included clinical and patient reported outcomes.

RESULTS

263 patients (mean age 60.0 ± 0.9 years, 74.5% female, and mean Edmonton Frailty Score 3.3 ± 0.2) were included. 60.8% (160/263 patients) exhibited good sagittal alignment at 6-week postop without KF. Significant differences were observed in 1-year (p = 0.0482) and 2-year reoperation rates (p = 0.0374) across sub-cohorts, with the lowest and highest rates in the AKF- cohort (5%, n = 8) and MKF + cohort (16.7%, n = 4), respectively. Multivariable Cox regression demonstrated the AKF- cohort exhibited significantly better reoperation outcomes compared to other groups: AKF + (HR: 5.24, p = 0.025), MKF + (HR: 31.7, p < 0.0001), and MKF- (HR: 11.8, p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

Our findings demonstrate that patients relying on knee flexion compensation in the early postoperative period have inferior outcomes compared to those achieving sagittal balance without knee flexion. When compared to malaligned patients, those with CrSVA-H < 20 mm and KFA > 10 degrees experience fewer early reoperations but similar delayed reoperation rates. This insight emphasizes the importance of considering knee compensation perioperatively when managing sagittal imbalance in clinical practice.

The Effect of Pelvic Incidence on Outcomes After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement and Acetabular Labral Tears

BACKGROUND

In the setting of femoroacetabular impingement (FAI), decompression osteoplasties reconcile deleterious loading patterns caused by cam and pincer lesions. However, native variations of spinopelvic sagittal alignment may continue to perpetuate detrimental effects on the labrum, chondrolabral junction, and articular cartilage after hip arthroscopy.

PURPOSE

To evaluate the effect of pelvic incidence (PI) on postoperative outcomes after hip arthroscopy for acetabular labral tears in the setting of FAI.

STUDY DESIGN

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

METHODS

A retrospective query of prospectively collected data identified patients ≥18 years of age who underwent primary hip arthroscopy for FAI and acetabular labral tears between February 2014 and January 2022, with 3-, 6-, 12-, and 24-month follow-ups. Measurements for PI, pelvic tilt (PT), sacral slope (SS), and acetabular version were obtained via advanced diagnostic imaging. Patients were stratified into low-PI (<45°), moderate-PI (45°≤ PI ≤ 60°), and high-PI (>60°) cohorts. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), clinically meaningful outcomes (ie, minimal clinically important difference, Patient Acceptable Symptom State, substantial clinical benefit, and maximal outcome improvement), visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores, and patient satisfaction were compared across cohorts.

RESULTS

A total of 74 patients met eligibility criteria and were stratified into low-PI (n = 28), moderate-PI (n = 31), and high-PI (n = 15) cohorts. Correspondingly, patients with high PI displayed significantly greater values for PT (P = .001), SS (P < .001), acetabular version (P < .001), and acetabular inclination (P = .049). By the 12- and 24-month follow-ups, the high-PI cohort was found to have significantly inferior PROMs, VAS pain scores, rates of clinically meaningful outcome achievement, and satisfaction relative to patients with moderate and/or low PI. No significant differences were found between cohorts regarding rates of revision arthroscopy, subsequent spine surgery, or conversion to total hip arthroplasty.

CONCLUSION

After hip arthroscopy, patients with a high PI (>60°) exhibited inferior PROMs, rates of achieving clinically meaningful thresholds, and satisfaction at 12 and 24 months relative to patients with low or moderate PI. Conversely, the outcomes of patients with low PI (<45°) were found to match the trajectory of those with a neutral spinopelvic alignment (45°≤ PI ≤ 60°). These findings highlight the importance of analyzing spinopelvic parameters preoperatively to prognosticate outcomes before hip arthroscopy for acetabular labral tears and FAI.

Excessive posterior pelvic tilt from preoperative supine to postoperative standing after total hip arthroplasty

Aims

Excessive posterior pelvic tilt (PT) may increase the risk of anterior instability after total hip arthroplasty (THA). The aim of this study was to investigate the changes in PT occurring from the preoperative supine to postoperative standing position following THA, and identify factors associated with significant changes in PT.

Methods

Supine PT was measured on preoperative CT scans and standing PT was measured on preoperative and one-year postoperative standing lateral radiographs in 933 patients who underwent primary THA. Negative values indicate posterior PT. Patients with > 13° of posterior PT from preoperative supine to postoperative standing (ΔPT ≤ -13°) radiographs, which corresponds to approximately a 10° increase in functional anteversion of the acetabular component, were compared with patients with less change (ΔPT > -13°). Logistic regression analysis was used to assess preoperative demographic and spinopelvic parameters predictive of PT changes of ≤ -13°. The area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) determined the diagnostic accuracy of the predictive factors.

Results

PT changed from a mean of 3.8° (SD 6.0°)) preoperatively to -3.5° (SD 6.9°) postoperatively, a mean change of -7.4 (SD 4.5°; p < 0.001). A total of 95 patients (10.2%) had ≤ -13° change in PT from preoperative supine to postoperative standing. The strongest predictive preoperative factors of large changes in PT (≤ -13°) from preoperative supine to postoperative standing were a large posterior change in PT from supine to standing, increased supine PT, and decreased standing PT (p < 0.001). Flexed-seated PT (p = 0.006) and female sex (p = 0.045) were weaker significant predictive factors. When including all predictive factors, the accuracy of the AUC prediction was 84.9%, with 83.5% sensitivity and 71.2% specificity.

Conclusion

A total of 10% of patients had > 13° of posterior PT postoperatively compared with their supine pelvic position, resulting in an increased functional anteversion of > 10°. The strongest predictive factors of changes in postoperative PT were the preoperative supine-to-standing differences, the anterior supine PT, and the posterior standing PT. Surgeons who introduce the acetabular component with the patient supine using an anterior approach should be aware of the potentially large increase in functional anteversion occurring in these patients.

Development and validation of a practical solution for detecting motion artefacts in the EOS X-ray system

The EOS™2D/3D system is a low-dose, 3D imaging system that utilizes two perpendicular X-ray beams to create simultaneous frontal and lateral images of the body. This is a useful modality to assess spinal pathologies. However, due to the slow imaging acquisition time up to 25 s, motion artifacts (MA) frequently occur. These artifacts may not be distinguishable from pathological findings, such as scoliosis, and may impair the diagnostic process. The aim of this study was to design a method to detect MA in EOS X-ray. We retrospectively analyzed EOS imaging from 40 patients wearing a radiopaque reference device during imaging. We drew a straight vertical line along the reference device. We measured deviations from it to quantify MA, presenting these findings through descriptive statistics. For a subset of patients with high MA, acquisitions were repeated after giving specific instructions to stand still. For these patients, we compared MA between the two acquisitions. In our study, a substantial proportion of patients exhibited MA ≥ 1 mm, with 80% in frontal projections and 87.9% in lateral projections. In the subjects who received a second acquisition, MA was significantly lower in the second images. Our method allows for a precise detection of MA on EOS images through a simple, yet reliable solution. Our method may improve the reliability of spine measurements, and reduce the risk of wrong diagnosis due to low imaging quality.

EOS® is reliable to evaluate spinopelvic parameters: a validation study

BACKGROUND

Sagittal and coronal standing radiographs have been the standard imaging for assessing spinal alignment. However, their disadvantages include distortion at the image edges and low interobserver reliability in some parameters. EOS® is a low-dose biplanar digital radiographic imaging system that can avoid distortion by obtaining high-definition images.

METHODS

This study aimed to evaluate spinopelvic parameters in conventional lateral C1S1 upright radiographs and EOS® images and compare them. Patients with non-deformity changes were subjected to routine clinical examinations. Plain AP and lateral X-ray radiographs were obtained along the entire spine length. Patients were also referred for full-length EOS® of the spine. Thoracic Kyphosis (TK), Lumbar Lordosis (LL), Pelvic Tilt (PT), Sacral Slope (SS), Pelvic Incidence (PI), and Sagittal Vertical Axis (SVA) were measured in the two studies by an orthopedic surgeon and a radiologist using PACS software. Also, the orthopedic surgeon evaluated the studies again after two weeks. Intra- and inter-observer reliability was then assessed using the interclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Also, the coefficient of variation was used to assess intra- and inter-observer reliability. Bland-Altman plots were drawn for each parameter.

RESULTS

The mean age was 48.2 ± 6.6 years. Among the 50 patients, 30 (60%) were female. The mean ICC for TK, LL, PT, SS, PI, and SVA in EOS® images are 0.95, 0.95, 0.92, 0.90, 0.94, and 0.98, respectively, and in C1S1 radiography images, it was 0.92, 0.87, 0.94, 0.88, 0.93, and 0.98, respectively which shows good to excellent results. The coefficient of variation for intraobserver reliability was relatively low (< 18.6%), while it showed higher percentages in evaluating interobserver reliability (< 54.5%). Also, the Bland-Altman plot showed good agreement for each parameter.

CONCLUSION

Spinopelvic parameters, e.g., TK, LL, SS, PI, and SS, in EOS® are reliable and comparable to those in conventional lateral upright C1S1 radiographs.

Superior outcomes of total hip arthroplasty without prior lumbar arthrodesis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

The number of patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA) surgery after previous lumbar arthrodesis (LA) is rising. Literature suggests that LA may significantly impact pelvic biomechanics and potentially compromise the success of prosthetic hip replacement. This study aims to evaluate complication rates, dislocation rates, and revision rates in patients with prior LA undergoing THA surgery compared to those undergoing THA surgery without prior LA.

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. A PICOS template was developed to ensure a structured approach. The search for relevant studies was performed across five databases, including Pubmed, Scopus, Embase, Medline, and Cochrane. The selected articles were evaluated based on the Levels of Evidence (LoE) criteria. The Coleman Methodology Score (mCMS) was employed to analyze the retrospective studies. This systematic review and meta-analysis were registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO). For the outcomes that allowed for a meta-analysis performed using R software, a p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

The final analysis included seventeen studies comprising a total of 3,139,164 cases of THA. Among these cases, 3,081,137 underwent THA surgery alone, while 58,027 patients underwent THA with a previous LA. The study investigated various factors, including dislocation rates, revision rates, and complication, as well as the surgical approach and type of implant used, for both the THA-only group and the group of patients who underwent THA with prior LA. The analysis revealed a statistically significant difference (p < 0.05) for all variables studied, favoring the group of patients who underwent THA alone without prior LA.

CONCLUSIONS

This systematic review and meta-analysis demonstrated a statistically significant superiority in all analyzed outcomes for patients who underwent THA-only without prior LA. Specifically, patients with isolated THA implants experienced significantly lower incidences of THA dislocation, wound complications, periprosthetic joint infection, revision, and mechanical complications.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV.

Kinematic Analysis of Pelvic and Lower Limb Joints during Stand-to-sit Movement in Individuals with Chronic Low Back Pain: A cross-sectional study

Objectives

It is crucial to investigate the daily functions commonly utilized by individuals with low back pain (LBP) due to their implications for recurrence and chronicity. Stand-to-sit (StTS) task is one of the more repetitive functions in human daily life. This study aims to evaluate pelvic and lower limb joint kinematics during the StTS task in individuals with Non-Specific Chronic Low Back Pain (NSCLBP) compared to a healthy control group.

Methods

Pelvic and lower limb joint kinematic data in all three planes were recorded from 20 individuals with LBP and 20 healthy individuals using a Qualisys motion capture system during the StTS task. A Functional Data Analysis statistical approach was employed to compare the kinematic data between the two groups.

Results

In the initial phase of the movement, we observed a greater anterior pelvic tilt (P=0.028) and an altered pelvic frontal plane motion pattern (P=0.029) in the LBP compared to the healthy group. The only significant differences between the lower limb joint kinematics of the two groups were a less hip external rotation position (P=0.025) and a more knee adduction pattern (P=0.002) on the right side in the LBP subjects compared to the healthy group.

Conclusion

Considering a few differences noted between the two groups across various joints and planes evaluated, it appears that the kinematic pattern of the lower limbs does not significantly differ between the NSCLBP and healthy groups during the StTS task in most comparisons. However, distinct kinematic patterns have been observed in the pelvic region, particularly in the sagittal and frontal planes, between the two groups.

Hip-Spine Relationship between Sagittal Balance of the Lumbo-Pelvi-Femoral Complex and Hip Extension Capacity: An EOS Evaluation in a Healthy Caucasian Population

STUDY DESIGN

A prospective study of healthy volunteers.

OBJECTIVES

The influence of the sagittal alignment of the spine and its influence on the extension reserve have been reported in the literature. However, specific analysis of the intrinsic coxofemoral and extrinsic pelvic component in subjects without any spinal or hip pathologies remains poorly reported. The aim of this study was to categorize the hip extension capacity, or extension reserve (ER), in relation to spinal sagittal alignment whilst standing, in a young healthy population. We hypothesized that the global extension reserve (GER) of the hip joint was influenced by the sagittal spinopelvic alignment.

METHODS

We evaluated the ER of 120 healthy Caucasian volunteers (56 females (46.7%), 74 males (53.3%); mean age 25.6 years), using low dose radiographs from an EOS® X-ray imaging system in 2 functional positions; neutral standing position and in a forward lunge position. The GER is defined as the sum of the intrinsic (hip) extension reserve (IER) and the extrinsic (pelvic) extension reserve (EER). Cases were grouped into 4 sagittal alignment subtypes according to the Roussouly classification, and analyzed.

RESULTS

Global extension reserve values were not significantly different between the 4 Roussouly subtypes (P = .094), nor between patients with a sacral slope (SS) <35° (types 1/2) and ≥ 35° (type 3/4) (P = .837). Statistically significant differences were seen between IER in each subtype (P = .015), and EER (P = .006). No difference in ER was seen between subtypes regarding pelvic incidence (PI).

CONCLUSION

An inverse relationship was found between IER and EER among Roussouly subtypes. The range of motion of the pelvis and the hip joint was higher in patients with a greater sacral slope.

The influence of the sacral slope on pelvic kinematics and clinical manifestations in femoroacetabular impingement

INTRODUCTION

The radiological study of the sagittal alignment of the spine in static and dynamic positions has allowed a better understanding of the clinical results of total hip prostheses. According to the Roussouly classification, the sacral slope in a standing position characterizes the patient with a stiff spine (less than 35̊) or a flexible spine (greater than 35̊). The objectives of this study were to compare, in a population of patients operated on for femoroacetabular impingement (FAI), firstly, the kinematics of the lumbar-pelvic-femoral complex and secondly, the clinical presentation depending on whether the spine is stiff or flexible.

HYPOTHESIS

Patients with stiff spines (SS<35̊) were "hip users" and had less ability to compensate for their hip pathology.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

This prospective and comparative multicenter study was conducted with patients operated on arthroscopically for FAI between 2020 and 2021. All patients included received preoperative EOS imaging of the lower limbs and spine, in standing and seated positions. The following parameters were measured: pelvic tilt (PT), pelvic incidence (PI), lumbar lordosis (LL), and sacral slope (SS), as well as dynamic parameters (intrinsic mobility of the hip: delta standing/sitting femoral sacral angle, and of the pelvis: delta standing/sitting sacral slope). The functional result was evaluated at 1 year.

RESULTS

In the stiff spine group, 62 patients were included versus 138 in the flexible spine group. The mean follow-up was 15.1±3.3 months (9.2-24.3). Nineteen patients were lost to follow-up and there were 2 revisions for iterative arthroscopy. Intrinsic pelvic mobility and intrinsic hip mobility were 16̊±13.5 (-12; 44) and 44.5̊±28.5 (-9; 99) respectively in the stiff spine group. In the flexible spine group, these same measurements were 22̊±11.5 (-30; 45) and 29.7̊±22.7 (-33; 82) respectively. In the stiff spine group, the symptoms occurred at a significantly younger age: 28.3 years±9.5 (18-51) versus 31 years±8 (18-54) (p=0.017).

DISCUSSION

The sacral slope is a determining factor in the kinematics of impingement and the appearance of symptoms. The sacral slope helps define the concept of a "hip user" in symptomatic FAI.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Radiological signs of femoroacetabular impingement are linked to pelvic version in asymptomatic subjects

INTRODUCTION

With the recent interest in hip-spine relationship, the link between femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) and the lumbar-pelvic-femoral complex (LPFC) appears decisive. The objectives of this study were (1) to compare the pelvic version, as well as (2) all the parameters of the LPFC between two populations of healthy subjects, comparing those with radiological signs of FAI to those without and finally, (3) to evaluate the LPFC parameters according to the type of FAI.

HYPOTHESIS

Asymptomatic subjects with radiological signs of FAI had superior pelvic anteversion.

MATERIALS AND METHOD

This retrospective study was based on a prospective cohort of 118 voluntary asymptomatic patients including 62 men (52.5%) with a mean age of 25.6 years±4.4 (19-39). The following parameters: pelvic version (PV), pelvic incidence (PI), lumbar lordosis (LL), sacral slope (SS), hip flexion, intrinsic (IER) and extrinsic (EER) extension reserve were measured using EOS imaging™ in the reference standing position and the lunge position. The radiological signs of FAI (cam, pincer, mixed) were identified on these acquisitions then separated into 2 groups. The first was the group presenting with one or more images of FAI (FAI+) and the second group with no images of FAI (FAI-).

RESULTS

There were 143 hips in the FAI+ group compared to 93 hips in the FAI- group. There were 36.4% cams and 45% pincers. With an average of 9.08°±7.81 (-11.0; 27.0) versus 12.33°±8.94 (-5.0; 55.0), the PV was significantly lower (p=0.022) in the FAI+ group compared to the FAI- group. A post-hoc power analysis on the primary outcome (PV) confirmed sufficient power (1-β=0.809). Compared to the FAI- group, the cam group presented a significantly lower IER and EER (respectively p=0.014 and p=0.047). The comparative analysis between the FAI- and pincer groups found a significant difference in PI (p=0.001), PV (p<0.001), IER (p=0.017) and hip flexion (p<0.001), SS in lunge position (p=0.031) and EER (p=0.039).

CONCLUSION

Asymptomatic subjects with radiographic signs of FAI present with weak pelvic version when standing. This pelvic hyper-anteversion is mainly found in the event of a radiological pincer sign.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III, retrospective comparative study.

Increased dislocation rates following total hip arthroplasty in patients with ankylosing spondylitis

BACKGROUND

Patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS) experience abnormal spinopelvic motion due to chronic inflammation of the axial skeleton, predisposing them to impingement and dislocation. The purpose of this study was to evaluate total hip arthroplasty (THA) dislocation rates in AS patients and evaluate the effects of age and gender on dislocation risk.

METHODS

Patients who underwent primary THA from 2005 to 2014 were identified using the PearlDiver database. AS patients were compared to age- and gender-matched controls without AS. Patients with a history of spine pathology or spine surgery were excluded. Univariate analyses were performed based on age and sex to evaluate dislocation rates at 90 days, 6 months, 1 year, and 5 years postoperatively.

RESULTS

A total of 2792 THA patients (59.6% male) with AS were identified and compared to an age- and gender-matched control group of 5582 THA patients (59.5% male) without AS or known spine pathology. At final follow-up, there were 96 dislocations (3.4%) in the AS group and 138 (2.5%) dislocations in the control group (OR 1.40; 95% CI, 1.08-1.83; p = 0.0118). AS patients ⩾70 years old had higher dislocation rates at all time points (OR range, 1.75-2.09; p < 0.05) compared to controls. At 5-year follow-up, dislocation-free survivorship was 95.7% (95% CI, 94.5-96.9%) for AS patients ⩾70 years old compared to 97.3% (95% CI, 96.6-98.0%) for patients ⩾70 years old without AS.

CONCLUSIONS

Older AS patients have higher dislocation rates following THA. This effect is likely related to decreased spinopelvic motion in the sagittal plane, predisposing patients to impinge and dislocate.

The Sacro-femoral-pubic Angle Is Unreliable to Estimate Pelvic Tilt: A Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The accurate measurement of pelvic tilt is critical in hip and spine surgery. A sagittal pelvic radiograph is most often used to measure pelvic tilt, but this radiograph is not always routinely obtained and does not always allow the measurement of pelvic tilt because of problems with image quality or patient characteristics (such as high BMI or the presence of a spinal deformity). Although a number of recent studies have explored the correlation between pelvic tilt and the sacro-femoral-pubic angle using AP radiographs (SFP method), which aimed to estimate pelvic tilt without a sagittal radiograph, disagreement remains about whether the SFP method is sufficiently valid and reproducible for clinical use.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

The purpose of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the correlation between SFP and pelvic tilt in the following groups: (1) overall cohort, (2) male and female cohort, and (3) skeletally mature and immature cohorts (young and adult groups, defined as patients older or younger than 20 years). Additionally, we assessed (4) the errors of SFP-estimated pelvic tilt angles and determined (5) measurement reproducibility using the intraclass correlation coefficient.

METHODS

This meta-analysis was reported in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines and registered in PROSPERO (record ID: CRD42022315673). PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and Web of Science were screened in July 2022. The following keywords were used: sacral femoral pubic, sacro femoral pubic, or SFP. The exclusion criteria were nonresearch articles such as commentaries or letters and studies that only investigated relative pelvic tilt rather than absolute pelvic tilt. Although the included studies had different patient recruitment strategies, study quality-wise, they all used an adequate amount of radiographs for landmark annotation and applied a correlation analysis for the relationship between the SFP angle and pelvic tilt. Thus, no risk of bias was found. Participant differences were mitigated via subgroup and sensitivity analyses to remove outliers. Publication bias was assessed using the p value of a two-tailed Egger regression test for the asymmetry of funnel plots, as well as the Duval and Tweedie trim and fill method for potential missing publications to impute true correlations. The extracted correlation coefficients r were pooled using the Fisher Z transformation with a significance level of 0.05. Nine studies were included in the meta-analysis, totaling 1247 patients. Four studies were used in the sex-controlled subgroup analysis (312 male and 460 female patients), and all nine studies were included in the age-controlled subgroup analysis (627 adults and 620 young patients). Moreover, a sex-controlled subgroup analysis was conducted in two studies with only young cohorts (190 young male patients and 220 young female patients).

RESULTS

The overall pooled correlation coefficient between SFP and pelvic tilt was 0.61, with high interstudy heterogeneity (I 2 = 76%); a correlation coefficient of 0.61 is too low for most clinical applications. The subgroup analysis showed that the female group had a higher correlation coefficient than the male group did (0.72 versus 0.65; p = 0.03), and the adult group had a higher correlation coefficient than the young group (0.70 versus 0.56; p < 0.01). Three studies reported erroneous information about the measured pelvic tilt and calculated pelvic tilt from the SFP angle. The mean absolute error was 4.6° ± 4.5°; in one study, 78% of patients (39 of 50) were within 5° of error, and in another study, the median absolute error was 5.8º, with the highest error at 28.8° (50 female Asian patients). The intrarater intraclass correlation coefficients ranged between 0.87 and 0.97 for the SFP angle and between 0.89 and 0.92 for the pelvic tilt angle, and the interrater intraclass correlation coefficients ranged between 0.84 and 1.00 for the SFP angle and 0.76 and 0.98 for the pelvic tilt angle. However, large confidence intervals were identified, suggesting considerable uncertainty in measurement at the individual radiograph level.

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis of the best-available evidence on this topic found the SFP method to be unreliable to extrapolate sagittal pelvic tilt in any patient group, and it was especially unreliable in the young male group (defined as patients younger than age 20 years). Correlation coefficients generally were too low for clinical use, but we remind readers that even a high correlation coefficient does not alone justify clinical application of a metric such as this, unless further subgroup analyses find low error and low heterogeneity, which was not the case here. Further ethnicity-segregated subgroup analyses with age, sex, and diagnosis controls could be useful in the future to determine whether there are some subgroups in which the SFP method is useful.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, diagnostic study.

Outcomes of Hip Arthroscopy in the Setting of Concomitant Symptomatic Lumbosacral Spine Pathology: A Matched Control Study With Minimum 24-Month Follow-up

BACKGROUND

The overlapping biomechanical relationship between the lumbosacral spine and pelvis poses unique challenges to patients with concomitant pathologies limiting spinopelvic range of motion.

PURPOSE

To assess the influence of concomitant, symptomatic lumbosacral spine pathology on patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) after hip arthroscopy for the treatment of femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) and symptomatic labral tears.

STUDY DESIGN

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

METHODS

A retrospective query of prospectively collected data identified patients aged ≥18 years with a minimum 24-month follow-up who underwent hip arthroscopy by a single surgeon for the treatment of symptomatic labral tears secondary to FAI. Patients were stratified into cohorts based on the presence (hip-spine [HS]) or absence (matched control [MC]) of symptomatic lumbosacral spine pathology. Inclusion within the HS cohort required confirmation of lower back pain/symptoms on preoperative surveys plus a diagnosis of lumbosacral spine pathology verified by radiology reports and correlating clinical documentation. Patients with previous spine surgery were excluded. PROMs were compared between groups, along with rates of achieving minimal clinically important difference (MCID) thresholds, Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) thresholds, revision arthroscopy, and conversion to total hip arthroplasty (THA).

RESULTS

A total of 70 patients with lumbosacral pathology were coarsened exact matched to 87 control patients without spinal pathology. The HS cohort had preoperative baseline scores that were significantly worse for nearly all PROMs. Follow-ups at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months displayed similar trends, with the HS cohort demonstrating significantly worse scores for most collected outcomes. However, at every time point, HS and MC patients exhibited similar magnitudes of improvement across all PROM and pain metrics. Furthermore, while significantly fewer HS patients achieved PASS for nearly all PROMs at 12- and 24-month follow-ups, MCID thresholds were reached at similar or greater rates across all PROMs relative to the MC cohort. Finally, there were no significant differences in rates of revision or THA between cohorts at maximum available follow-up.

CONCLUSION

After hip arthroscopy to address labral tears in the setting of FAI, patients with symptomatic lumbosacral pathologies and no history of spine surgery were found to exhibit inferior pre- and postoperative PROMs but achieved statistically similar clinical benefit and rates of PROM improvement through 24-month follow-up compared with the MC cohort with isolated hip disease. These findings aid in providing a realistic recovery timeline and evidence that coexisting hip and spine disorders are not a contraindication for arthroscopic hip preservation surgery.

Effect of the type of brace on head to pelvis sagittal alignment of adolescents with Scheuermann's kyphosis

The aim of this study was to determine the effects of the Milwaukee brace and thoracolumbosacral orthosis (TLSO) on head to pelvis sagittal alignment in adolescents with Scheuermann's kyphosis (SK). A total of 52 adolescents with SK who were under brace treatment were studied. They underwent biplanar radiography of the head to pelvis (EOS Imaging, Paris, France) before and 6 months after the beginning of bracing. We measured T1 slope, neck tilt (NT), cervical sagittal vertical axis (cSVA), thoracic inlet angle (TIA), C0-C2 lordosis, C2-C7 lordosis, thoracic kyphosis (TK), lumbar lordosis (LL), pelvic incidence (PI), pelvic tilt (PT), sacral slope (SS), sagittal vertical axis (SVA) and T1 spinopelvic inclination (T1SPi). There were no significant differences in baseline values of TIA, PT, SS, PI, SVA, TK, cSVA, NT and T1 slope between the two groups (p > 0.05). There were significant differences between the baseline and final measurements of T1 slope, cSVA, TK, LL, T1SPi and TIA in both groups (p < 0.05). The results imply that brace treatment can significantly affect head to pelvis sagittal parameters of adolescents with SK. However, there are no significant differences in the values of head to pelvis sagittal parameters when comparing short-term effect of TLSO and the Milwaukee brace.

Current Concepts in Diagnosis and Management of Patients Undergoing Total Hip Replacement with Concurrent Disorders of Spinopelvic Anatomy: A Narrative Review

Despite the high success rate of primary total hip replacement (THR), a significant early revision rate remains, which is largely attributed to instability and dislocations. Despite the implants being placed according to the safe zone philosophy of Lewinnek, occurrence of THR dislocation is not an uncommon complication. Large diagnostic and computational model studies have shown variability in patients' mobility based on the individual anatomic and functional relationship of the hip-pelvis-spine complex. The absolute and relative position of hip replacement components changes throughout motion of the patient's body. In the case of spinopelvic pathology such as spine stiffness, the system reaches abnormal positional states, as shown with computerized models. The clinical result of such pathologic hip positioning is edge loading, implant impingement, or even joint dislocation. To prevent such complications, surgeons must change the dogma of single correct implant positioning and take into account patients' individualized anatomy and function. It is essential to broaden the standard diagnostics and their anatomical interpretation, and correct the pre-operative surgical planning. The need for correct and personalized implant placement pushes forward the development and adaptation of novel technologies in THR, such as robotics. In this current concepts narrative review, we simplify the spinopelvic biomechanics and pathoanatomy, the relevant anatomical terminology, and the diagnosis and management algorithms most commonly used today.

The Outcome of Hip Arthroscopy in the Setting of Lumbar Spine Disease Is Beneficial, Yet Limited: A Systematic Review of Existing Evidence

PURPOSE

To compare hip arthroscopy outcomes in femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) patients with concurrent symptomatic lumbar spine disease to the outcomes of arthroscopic FAI patients without spine disease.

METHODS

A systematic review was performed according to PRISMA guidelines via PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, and Google Scholar databases. Studies were valid for inclusion if they had an average follow-up ≥12 months and compared patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in hip arthroscopy patients with and without concurrent spinal disease. Data collected included study characteristics, patient demographics, follow-up intervals, surgical indications, spinal pathology, PROMs, and reoperation rates.

RESULTS

Twelve studies were included in this systematic review. 3,107 patients who underwent hip arthroscopy were evaluated: 1,056 with coexisting lumbar spine disease (spine cohort) and 2,051 control subjects without spine disease (control cohort). The average follow-up period was 24 months. Across included studies, there were 35 instances wherein postoperative PROM scores reported by each cohort were compared. In all 35 instances, the spine cohort reported inferior postoperative PROM scores with the difference being significant (P < .05) on 23 PROMs. Collectively, 23 cases were available contrasting the proportion of each cohort to achieve the minimal clinically important difference (MCID). In 22 (95.65%) of these cases, the spine cohort achieved the MCID at a lower rate than the control cohort. There were 14 PROMs, wherein intragroup analyses were reported that compared the preoperative and postoperative score reported by the spine cohort. On all 14 PROMs, the spine cohort reported significant (P < .05) improvement after arthroscopic intervention.

CONCLUSION

FAI patients with coexisting lumbar spine pathology experience significant improvement from baseline state after arthroscopic intervention. However, the postoperative outcomes reported are inferior, and the improvement from arthroscopy was limited when compared to surgical control subjects with FAI and normal spinal anatomy.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV: systematic review of Level II, III, and IV studies.

Correlations Analysis of Different Pelvic Tilt Definitions: A Preliminary Study

Background: Pelvic tilt (PT) is described as the pelvic orientation along the transverse axis, yet 4 PT definitions were established based on radiographic landmarks: anterior pelvic plane (PTa), the center of femoral heads to sacral plate (PTm), pelvic outlet (PTh), and sacral slope (SS). These landmarks quantify a similar concept, yet understanding of their relationships is lacking, and their differences are sometimes ignored. Purpose: This study aimed to examine the correlations and differences of PT definitions for education and research purposes. Methods: This study reviewed 105 sagittal pelvic radiographs of patients (68 men and 37 women) awaiting hip surgery at a single clinic. Hip hardware and spine pathologies were examined for subgroup analysis. Two observers annotated 4 PTs in a gender-dependent manner and repeated it after 6 months. The linear regression model and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) were applied with a 95% confidence interval. Results: The SS showed no correlation to the other 3 PT definitions, except for females in the hip hardware subgroup (n = 17). PTm demonstrated very strong linear correlation to PTh (r > 0.9) under the linear model PTm = 0.951 × PTh - 68.284. Conclusion: The PTm and PTh can be calculated from each other under a simple linear regression equation, which enables comparisons between them. SS presented poor correlations to the other PT parameters, except for the female subgroup with hip implant that required further analysis; PTa-related comparisons showed high anatomical variations between patients.

Does Individualization of Cup Position Affect Prosthetic or Bone Impingement Following THA?

INTRODUCTION

Spinopelvic (SP) mobility patterns during postural changes affect three-dimensional acetabular component position, the incidence of prosthetic impingement, and total hip arthroplasty (THA) instability. Surgeons have commonly placed the acetabular component in a similar "safe zone" for most patients. Our purpose was to determine the incidence of bone and prosthetic impingement with various cup orientations and determine if a preoperative SP analysis with individualized cup orientation lessens impingement.

METHODS

A preoperative SP evaluation of 78 THA subjects was performed. Data was analyzed using a software program to determine the prevalence of prosthetic and bone impingement with a patient individualized cup orientation versus six commonly selected cup orientations. Impingement was correlated with known SP risk factors for dislocation.

RESULTS

Prosthetic impingement was least with the individualized choice of cup position (9%) vs. preselected cup positions (18 to 61%). The presence of bone impingement (33%) was similar in all groups and not affected by cup position. Factors associated with impingement in flexion were age, lumbar flexion, pelvic tilt (stand to flexed seated), and functional femoral stem anteversion. Risk factors in extension included standing pelvic tilt, standing SP tilt, lumbar flexion, pelvic rotation (supine to stand and stand to flexed seated), and functional femoral stem anteversion.

CONCLUSION

Prosthetic impingement is reduced with individualized cup positioning based on SP mobility patterns. Bone impingement occurred in one-third of patients and is a noteworthy consideration in preoperative THA planning. Known SP risk factors for THA instability correlated with the It dependspresence of prosthetic impingement in both flexion and extension.

Sacral Slope Change From Standing to Relaxed-Seated Grossly Overpredicts the Presence of a Stiff Spine

BACKGROUND

Several authors propose that a change in sacral slope of ≤10° between the standing and relaxed-seated positions (ΔSS_{standing→relaxed-seated}) identifies a patient with a stiff lumbar spine and has suggested the use of dual-mobility bearings for such patients undergoing a total hip arthroplasty (THA). The aim of this study was to assess how accurately ΔSS_{standing→relaxed-seated} can identify patients with a stiff spine.

METHODS

A prospective, multicentre, consecutive cohort series of 312 patients had standing, relaxed-seated, and flexed-seated lateral radiographs prior to THA. ΔSS_{standing→relaxed-seated} was determined by the change in sacral slope between the standing and relaxed-seated positions. Lumbar flexion (LF) was defined as the difference in lumbar lordotic angle between standing and flexed-seated. LF ≤20° was considered a stiff spine. The predictive value of ΔSS_{standing→relaxed-seated} for characterizing a stiff spine was assessed.

RESULTS

A weak correlation between ΔSS_{standing→relaxed-seated} and LF was identified (r² = 0.13). Eighty six patients (28%) had ΔSS_{standing→relaxed-seated} ≤10° and 19 patients (6%) had a stiff spine. Of the 86 patients with ΔSS_{standing→relaxed-seated} ≤10°, 13 had a stiff spine. The positive predictive value of ΔSS_{standing→relaxed-seated} ≤10° for identifying a stiff spine was 15%.

CONCLUSION

In this cohort, ΔSS_{standing→relaxed-seated} ≤10° was not correlated with a stiff spine. Using this simplified approach could lead to a 7-fold overprediction of patients with a stiff lumbar spine and abnormal spinopelvic mobility, unnecessary use of dual-mobility bearings, and incorrect component alignment targets. Referring to patients with ΔSS_{standing→relaxed-seated} ≤10° as being stiff is misleading. The flexed-seated position should be used to effectively assess a patient's spine mobility prior to THA.

T1 pelvic angle is associated with rapid progression of hip arthrosis

PURPOSE

To evaluate the association between global spinal malalignment and rapid progression of hip arthrosis.

METHODS

This was a retrospective, case-control study including 90 patients, contributing 90 hips, who underwent hemi- or total hip arthroplasty at our institution. For analysis, hips were classified into a rapid progression group, defined as ≥ 2 mm destruction of the femoral head or loss of the hip joint space within a 12-month period (n = 30), and a non-rapid progression group, defined by no observable hip disease progression over a period more than 12 months (n = 60). Logistic regression analysis identified factors that predicted rapid progression, with a receiver operating characteristic curve analysis used to confirm factors.

RESULTS

Significant between-group differences were identified for the following parameters: pelvic tilt (P = 0.002, PT), sagittal vertical axis (P = 0.002, SVA), and T1 pelvic angle (P < 0.001, TPA). On multiple logistic regression, PT (P = 0.002), SVA (P = 0.002), and TPA (P < 0.001) were predictive of a rapid progression on hip arthrosis, with the area under the curve being greater for TPA than PT (P = 0.035).

CONCLUSION

Global spinal alignment is associated with rapid progression of hip arthrosis. TPA could assist in identifying patients at risk for rapid progression of hip arthrosis, allowing for time management.

[Preoperative MR imaging for hip dysplasia : Assessment of associated deformities and intraarticular pathologies]

BACKGROUND

Developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) is a known reason for hip pain for adolescents and young adults. Preoperative imaging is increasingly recognized as an important factor due to the recent advances in MR imaging.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this article is to give an overview of preoperative imaging for DDH. The acetabular version and morphology, associated femoral deformities (cam deformity, valgus and femoral antetorsion) and intraarticular pathologies (labrum and cartilage damage) and cartilage mapping are described.

METHODS

After an initial evaluation with AP radiographs, CT or MRI represent the methods of choice for the preoperative evaluation of the acetabular morphology and cam deformity, and for the measurement of femoral torsion. Different measurement techniques and normal values should be considered, especially for patients with increased femoral antetorsion because this could lead to misinterpretation and misdiagnosis. MRI allows analysis of labrum hypertrophy and subtle signs for hip instability. 3D MRI for cartilage mapping allows quantification of biochemical cartilage degeneration and yields great potential for surgical decision-making. 3D-CT and, increasingly, 3D MRI of the hip to generate 3D pelvic bone models and subsequent 3D impingement simulation can help to detect posterior extraarticular ischiofemoral impingement.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Acetabular morphology can be divided in anterior, lateral and posterior hip dysplasia. Combined osseous deformities are common, such as hip dysplasia combined with cam deformity (86%). Valgus deformities were reported in 44%. Combined hip dysplasia and increased femoral antetorsion can occur in 52%. Posterior extraarticular ischiofemoral impingement between the lesser trochanter and the ischial tuberosity can occur in patients with increased femoral antetorsion. Typically, labrum damage and hypertrophy, cartilage damage, subchondral cysts can occur in hip dysplasia. Hypertrophy of the muscle iliocapsularis is a sign for hip instability. Acetabular morphology and femoral deformities (cam deformity and femoral anteversion) should be evaluated before surgical therapy for patients with hip dysplasia, considering the different measurement techniques and normal values of femoral antetorsion.

Dislocation Rates of Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty in Patients With Prior Lumbar Spine Fusion and Lumbar Degenerative Disk Disease With and Without Utilization of Dual Mobility Cups: An American Joint Replacement Registry Study

INTRODUCTION

Patients undergoing primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) with a previous history of lumbar spine fusion (LSF) are at increased risk of dislocation. The purpose of this study was to compare the 90-day and 1-year dislocation rates of patients with LSF or lumbar degenerative disk disease who underwent primary THA with and without dual mobility (DM) constructs.

METHODS

An American Joint Replacement Registry data set of patients aged 65 years and older undergoing primary THA with minimum 1-year follow-up with a history of prior LSF or a diagnosis of lumbar degenerative disk disease was created. DM status was identified, and dislocation and all-cause revision at 90 days and 1 year were assessed.

RESULTS

A total of 15,572 patients met study criteria. The overall dislocation rates for the non-DM and DM groups were 1.17% and 0.68%, respectively, at 90 days, and 1.68% and 0.91%, respectively, at 1 year ( P = 0.005). The odds of 90-day (OR = 0.578, [ P = 0.0328]) and 1-year (OR = 0.534, [ P = 0.0044]) dislocation were significantly less with DM constructs, compared with non-DM constructs. No statistically significant difference was observed in revision rates between groups.

DISCUSSION

This large registry-based study identified a reduced risk of dislocation in patients at risk for spinal stiffness when a DM compared with non-DM construct was used in primary THA at 90-day and 1-year follow-up intervals. Our data support the use of DM constructs in high-risk patients with stiff spines and altered spinopelvic mobility as a promising option to mitigate the risk of postoperative hip instability after primary THA.

LEVELS OF EVIDENCE

Level III. Therapeutic retrospective cohort.

Failure of a Highly Cross-Linked Polyethylene Liner After Spine Fusion

A 73-year-old woman, 11 years after total hip arthroplasty and 2 years after a multilevel lumbar spine fusion, presented with a 2-month history of anterior hip and gluteal pain. She was diagnosed with an acetabular liner fracture that occurred through the high wall, likely related to repetitive impingement on the neck of the femoral implant, as notable burnishing was observed on the explanted femoral head. The acetabulum was successfully revised to a dual-mobility articulation. Spinal fusion after total hip arthroplasty can alter the acetabular implant position and was seen in our patient whose previously functional high-walled liner failed. Surgeons may consider alternative techniques, including a change in acetabular implant's anteversion to mitigate the need for a high-walled liner or the use of a dual-mobility bearing.

Association of age and spinopelvic function in patients receiving a total hip arthroplasty

Restricted spinopelvic mobility received attention as a contributing factor for total hip arthroplasty (THA) instability. However, it is still unknown, how the spinopelvic function is influenced by age. In identifying the patients at highest risk for altered spinopelvic mechanics the study aimed to determine the association of age on the individual segments of the spinopelvic complex and global spinal sagittal alignment in patients undergoing THA. 197 patients were included in the prospective observational study conducting biplanar stereoradiography (EOS) in standing and sitting position pre-and postoperatively. Two independent investigators assessed C7-sagittal vertical axis (C7-SVA), cervical lordosis (CL), thoracic kyphosis (TK), lumbar lordosis (LL), pelvic incidence (PI), sacral slope (SS), anterior plane pelvic tilt (APPT), and pelvic femoral angle (PFA). Key segments of the spinopelvic complex are defined as lumbar flexibility (∆ LL = LL_standing - LL_sitting), pelvic mobility (∆ SS = SS_standing - SS_sitting) and hip motion (∆ PFA = PFA_standing - PFA_sitting). Pelvic mobility was further defined based on ∆ SS = SS_standing - SS_sitting as stiff (∆ SS < 10°), normal (∆ SS ≥ 10°-30°) and hypermobile (∆ SS > 30°). The patient collective was classified into three groups: (1) < 60 years (n = 56), (2) ≥ 60-79 years (n = 112) and (3) ≥ 80 years (n = 29). Lumbar flexibility (∆ LL) was decreased with increasing age between all groups (36.1° vs. 23.1° vs. 17.2°/p₁₊₂ < 0.000, p₂₊₃ = 0.020, p₁₊₃ < 0.000) postoperatively. Pelvic mobility (∆ SS) was decreased in the groups 2 and 3 compared to group 1 (21.0° and 17.9° vs. 27.8°/p₁₊₂ < 0.000, p₂₊₃ = 0.371, p₁₊₃ = 0.001). Pelvic retroversion in standing position (APPT) was higher in group 2 and 3 compared to group 1 (1.9° and - 0.5° vs 6.9°/p₁₊₂ < 0.000, p₂₊₃ = 0.330, p₁₊₃ < 0.000). Global sagittal spinal balance (C7-SVA) showed more imbalance in groups 2 and 3 compared to group 1 (60.4 mm and 71.2 mm vs. 34.5 mm/p₁₊₂ < 0.000, p₂₊₃ = 0.376, p₁₊₃ < 0.000) postoperatively. The preoperative proportion of patients with stiff pelvic mobility in group 1 was distinctly lower than in group 3 (23.2% vs. 35.7%) and declined in group 1 to 1.8% compared to 20.7% in group 3 after THA. Changes after THA were reported for groups 1 and 2 representing spinopelvic complex key parameter lumbar flexibility (∆ LL), pelvic mobility (∆ SS) and hip motion (∆ PFA), but not for group 3. This is the first study to present age-adjusted normative values for spinopelvic mobility. The subgroups with increased age were identified as risk cohort for altered spinopelvic mechanics and enhanced sagittal spinal imbalance and limited capacity for improvement of mobility after THA. This valuable information serves to focus in the preoperative screening on the THA candidates with the highest risk for abnormal spinopelvic function.

Complications following total hip arthroplasty and hemiarthroplasty for femoral neck fractures in patients with a history of lumbar spinal fusion

INTRODUCTION

The purpose of this study was to examine whether previous lumbar spinal fusion (LSF) was an independent risk factor for complications in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA) or hemiarthroplasty for displaced femoral neck fractures.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

An administrative database was queried from 2010 to Q2 of 2019 to analyze and compare complications in patients undergoing either THA or hemiarthroplasty for femoral neck fracture with a history of LSF versus no history of LSF. Joint complications including periprosthetic fracture, prosthetic joint infection (PJI), prosthetic joint dislocation (PJD), aseptic loosening, and prosthetic revision were examined at 90 days and 1 year post-operatively.

RESULTS

In the THA cohort, patients with prior LSF had significantly higher likelihood of aseptic loosening at 90 days and 1 year post-operatively in comparison to those without prior LSF (90-day: OR 2.22; 1-year: OR 1.95). Patients in the hemiarthroplasty cohort with prior LSF had significantly higher likelihood of PJI (90-day: OR 2.18; 1-year: OR 2.37), aseptic loosening (90-day: OR 3.42; 1-year: OR 4.68), and prosthetic revision (90-day: OR 2.27; 1-year: OR 2.25) in both the 90-day and 1-year postoperative period in comparison to those without prior LSF. Additionally, for the same cohort, periprosthetic fracture (1-year: OR 2.32) and PJD (1-year: OR 2.31) were significantly higher at 1-year postoperative.

CONCLUSION

Presence of LSF was found to be an independent risk factor for increased joint complications in patients undergoing either a THA or hemiarthroplasty for displaced femoral neck fractures.

Influence of kinematics of the lumbopelvic complex in hip arthroplasty dislocation: from assessment to recommendations

INTRODUCTION

In total hip arthroplasty (THA), misplacement of the implant can provide instability. Adequate orientation of the acetabular cup is a challenge due to variations in inter-individual anatomy and kinematics of the pelvis in everyday life. The aim of this study was to characterize the kinematic factors influencing the risk of dislocation in order to give recommendations for optimal placement of the cup. We hypothesized that the lack of pelvic adaptation would influence the risk of prosthetic instability and motivate adapted.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Eighty patients with primary unilateral THA were included in a matched case-control study. Seventy-four patients were divided into two groups: group 1 (G1) consisting of patients with postoperative THA dislocation (37 patients) and group 2 (G2), without episodes of dislocation within two years postoperatively (37 patients). In both groups, spino-pelvic parameters and cup orientation were measured in standing and sitting positions with EOS^® X-ray imaging and compared to each other between 12 and 24 months post-operatively.

RESULTS

No significant difference between the two groups was found for static parameters. In a sitting position, a lack of pelvic retroversion with a significant lower variation in sacral slope was observed in group 1 (8.0° ± 9.3 for G1 versus 14.7° ± 6.2 for G2, p < 0.01). Twenty-two (59%) patients with THA instability had sacral slope variations of less than 10° versus eight (21% of patients) with stable THA (p < 0.01). Cup orientation in the Lewinnek safe zone was not significantly different (59% vs 67%, p = 0.62), and the spino-pelvic parameters and cup orientation measured did not change between the standing and sitting positions. However, only 14 (37%) cups in G1 were in the functional safe zone versus 24 (67%) in G2 (p = 0.03).

CONCLUSION

Static parameters of the sagittal spinopelvic balance have a low predictive value for prosthetic instability. Dynamic analysis is essential. Kinematic parameters must be taken into account in determining the ideal position of the cup or stem. Stiffness with locked standing or sitting pelvis must be integrated in order to determine a personalized safe zone.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III (matched case-control study).

Evaluating Outcomes of Spinopelvic Fixation for Patients Undergoing Long Segment Thoracolumbar Fusion with a Prior Total Hip Arthroplasty

INTRODUCTION

Understanding the relationship between spinal fusion and its effects on relative spinopelvic alignment in patients with prior total hip arthroplasty (THA) is critical. However, limited data exist on the effects of long spinal fusions on hip alignment in patients with a prior THA. Our objective was to compare clinical outcomes and changes in hip alignment between patients undergoing long fusion to the sacrum versus to the pelvis in the setting of prior THA.

METHODS

Patients with a prior THA who underwent elective thoracolumbar spinal fusion starting at L2 or above were retrospectively identified. Patients were placed into one of two groups: fusion to the sacrum or pelvis. Preoperative, six-month postoperative, one-year postoperative, and delta spinopelvic and acetabular measurements were measured from standing lumbar radiographs.

RESULTS

A total of 112 patients (55 sacral fusions, 57 pelvic fusions) were included. Patients who underwent fusion to the pelvis experienced longer length of stay (LOS) (8.31 vs. 4.21, P < 0.001) and less frequent home discharges (30.8% vs. 61.9%, P = 0.010), but fewer spinal revisions (12.3% vs. 30.9%, P = 0.030). No difference was observed in hip dislocation rates (3.51% vs. 1.82%, P = 1.000) or hip revisions (5.26% vs. 3.64%, P = 1.000) based on fusion construct. Fusion to the sacrum alone was an independent predictor of an increased spine revision rate (odds ratio: 3.56, P = 0.023). Patients in the pelvic fusion group had lower baseline lumbar lordosis (LL) (29.2 vs. 42.9, P < 0.001), six-month postoperative LL (38.7 vs. 47.3, P = 0.038), and greater 1-year ∆ pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis (-7.98 vs. 0.21, P = 0.032).

CONCLUSION

Patients with prior THA undergoing long fusion to the pelvis experienced longer LOS, more surgical complications, and lower rate of spinal revisions. Patients with instrumentation to the pelvis had lower LL preoperatively with greater changes in LL and pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis postoperatively. No differences were observed in acetabular positioning, hip dislocations, or THA revision rates between groups.

Spinopelvic Parameters Do Not Influence Outcomes Following Primary Hip Arthroscopy for the Treatment of Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome

Purpose

To evaluate the influence of spinopelvic parameters on short-term postoperative patient-reported outcomes (PROs) following primary hip arthroscopy for the treatment of femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS).

Methods

Patients undergoing primary hip arthroscopy between January 2012 and December 2015 were retrospectively reviewed. Hip Outcome Score - Activities of Daily Living, Hip Outcome Score - Sports-Specific Subscale, modified Harris Hip Score, International Hip Outcome Tool-12, and visual analog scale pain were recorded preoperatively and at final follow-up. Lumbar lordosis (LL), pelvic tilt (PT), sacral slope, and pelvic incidence (PI) were measured on lateral radiographs in standing position. Patients were split into subgroups for individual analyses based on previous literature cutoffs: |PI-LL|> or <10°, PT> or <20°, and PI <40°, 40° < PI < 65°, and PI >65°. PROs and rate of achievement of patient acceptable symptom state (PASS) were compared between subgroups at final follow-up.

Results

Sixty-one patients who underwent unilateral hip arthroscopy were included in the analysis, and 66% of patients were female. Mean patient age was 37.6 ± 11.3 years, whereas mean body mass index was 25.0 ± 5.7. Mean follow-up time was 27.6 ± 9.0 months. No significant difference in preoperative nor postoperative PROs were appreciated in patients with spinopelvic mismatch (|PI-LL| >10°) versus those without, whereas patients with mismatch achieved PASS according to the modified Harris Hip Score (P = .037) and International Hip Outcome Tool-12 (P = .030) at greater rates. When we compared patients with a PT ≥20° versus PT <20°, no significant differences in postoperative PROs were present. When we compared patients in the following pelvic incidence groups: PI <40°, 40° < PI <65°, and PI >65°, no significant differences in 2-year PROs or rates of PASS achievement for any PRO were appreciated (P > .05 for all).

Conclusions

In this study, spinopelvic parameters and traditional measures of sagittal imbalance did not influence PROs in patients undergoing primary hip arthroscopy for FAIS. Patients with sagittal imbalance (|PI-LL|> 10° or PT >20°) achieved a greater rate of PASS.

Level of Evidence

IV; Prognostic case series.

The Functional Mechanics of the Acetabular Component in Total Hip Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Total hip arthroplasty functional safe zones match postural hip changes to dynamic positioning of the acetabular component. We studied integrating the Anteinclination (AI) cup angle into the spinopelvic environment, defining normative values for all parameters and calculating adjustments to AI for each degree of altered standing pelvic position and postural mobility from these values. A sagittal geometric model was employed to determine these values using established spinopelvic parameter angles.

METHODS

Theoretical normative Pelvic Incidence (PI) specific values were calculated using a triangular construct employing a linear equation describing the functional relationship between the pelvic parameters at a mobility producing an isosceles solution for normative acetabular angles. Individual optimal AI cup values for altered Sacral Slope (SS)/pelvic tilt (sPT) and mobility (dSS) were calculated using specific ratios of angular change between parameters correcting from these normative values.

RESULTS

A PI:SS:sPT ratio of angular change of 3:2:1 at dSS = 25° mobility creates an isosceles condition solving for PI specific theoretical normative values for all construct parameters. Individualized tilt correction applies to each posture a +0.25° AI alteration for each +1° sPT increase from this architectural value. Mobility correction applies a +0.5° standing AI and -0.5° sitting AI alteration for each -1° dSS < 25°, the opposite for each +1° dSS > 25°. The Sacroacetabular angle/Pelvic acetabular angle (SAA/PAA) index describes the underlying spinopelvic environment the cup functions within.

CONCLUSION

This model quantitatively integrates an implanted acetabular component into the host spinopelvic environment. Theoretical normative and individual optimal cup orientations are passively determined by these conditions of standing pelvic position and mobility.

Spinopelvic Hypermobility Corrects After Staged Bilateral Total Hip Arthroplasty

Background: Spinopelvic hypermobility may be secondary to a stiff osteoarthritic hip with a compliant spine. Purpose: We sought to determine if spinopelvic hypermobility resolves after total hip arthroplasty (THA) and when it resolves in patients with bilateral hip osteoarthritis (OA) undergoing staged bilateral THA. We also sought to analyze the change in spinopelvic parameters before and after the second THA. Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of 2047 THAs that were performed by 2 fellowship-trained arthroplasty surgeons from 2014 to 2018. Patients with preoperative spinopelvic hypermobility undergoing staged bilateral THA were identified. Radiographic spinopelvic parameters, including sacral slope (SS), pelvic incidence (PI), lumbar lordosis (LL), PI-LL mismatch, anterior pelvic plane tilt (APPt), and spinopelvic tilt (SPT), were measured on preoperative, 6-week postoperative, and 1-year postoperative lateral standing and sitting radiographs. Bilateral hip OA was graded using Kellgren-Lawrence criteria. Results: We identified 42 patients with preoperative spinopelvic hypermobility who underwent staged bilateral THA. Mean time (standard deviation) between surgeries was 9.4 months (±10.0). After the first THA, spinopelvic hypermobility resolved in 29% of the patients. After the second THA, it resolved in 67% at 6 weeks, increasing to 98% at 1 year postoperatively. Conclusion: Spinopelvic hypermobility resolves after staged bilateral THA in 98% of the patients, occurring most often only after the second THA. Less than one-third of the patients had resolution after the first THA, suggesting that contralateral hip OA continues to drive hip-driven spinopelvic motion. Acetabular component position targets based on functional pelvic position should incorporate these changes in spinopelvic motion with the understanding that resolution of hypermobility usually occurs after the second THA.

Does Total Hip Arthroplasty Affect Spinopelvic and Spinal Alignment?: A Prospective Observational Investigation

STUDY DESIGN

A prospective observational study, level of evidence 3.

OBJECTIVES

The study with patients undergoing unilateral total hip arthroplasty (THA) aimed to evaluate the following hypotheses: (1) the spinal sagittal and coronal alignment alters due to THA, (2) the spinopelvic parameter changes after THA, (3) the spinopelvic alignment differs between sagittal balanced and imbalanced patients.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Surgical correction of spinal sagittal misalignment affects the spinopelvic alignment and pelvic tilt. It is not yet known to what extent THA affects spinopelvic, spinal sagittal, and coronal alignment.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 153 patients undergoing THA were assessed with biplanar stereoradiography in standing position preoperatively and postoperatively. Two independent investigators examined C7-sagittal vertical axis (C7-SVA), pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis (PI-LL) mismatch, lumbar lordosis (LL), C7-central sacral vertical line, pelvic oblique angle lumbosacral, intra-pelvic oblique angle, pelvic incidence (PI), sacral slope (SS), pelvic tilt (PT), anterior plane pelvic tilt (APPT), and pelvic femoral angle (PFA). An analysis of the sagittal misaligned subgroups of C7-SVA and PI-LL on the influence of the spinopelvic alignment was performed.

RESULTS

A significant difference in spinopelvic parameters was detected in the preoperative to postoperative comparison (SS, PT, APPT, and PFA; P <0.000) ( d =-0.394; d =0.609; d =-0.481; d =0.431). The coronal alignment and pelvic obliquity revealed no significant differences. The misaligned groups (C7-SVA; PI-LL) demonstrated significant increases in PI and PT and decreased in LL compared with the groups with normal sagittal alignment. Preoperatively, 66/153 (C7-SVA) and 46/153 (PI-LL) of the THA patients presented sagittal misalignment, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The results suggest an effect of THA on sagittal spinal and spinopelvic alignment, with a significant reduction of PT postoperatively and no effect on coronal alignment. Particularly striking are the significant differences in the misaligned groups, which may be classified as risk population and potentially can contribute biomechanically to a higher risk of posterior impingement and anterior THA dislocation. The substantial proportion of sagittal misaligned patients in the THA collective illustrates the crucial need for interdisciplinary collaboration.

Imaging in Hip Arthroplasty Management-Part 1: Templating: Past, Present and Future

Hip arthroplasty is a frequently used procedure with high success rates. Its main indications are primary or secondary advanced osteoarthritis, due to acute fracture, osteonecrosis of the femoral head, and hip dysplasia. The goals of HA are to reduce pain and restore normal hip biomechanics, allowing a return to the patient’s normal activities. To reach those goals, the size of implants must suit, and their positioning must meet, quality criteria, which can be determined by preoperative imaging. Moreover, mechanical complications can be influenced by implant size and position, and could be avoided by precise preoperative templating. Templating used to rely on standard radiographs, but recently the use of EOS^® imaging and CT has been growing, given the 3D approach provided by these methods. However, there is no consensus on the optimal imaging work-up, which may have an impact on the outcomes of the procedure. This article reviews the current principles of templating, the various imaging techniques used for it, as well as their advantages and drawbacks, and their expected results.

Current Evidence for Spinopelvic Characteristics Influencing Total Hip Arthroplasty Dislocation Risk

BACKGROUND

Decreased pelvic mobility and pelvic retroversion may result from spinal degeneration and lead to changes in the orientation of the acetabular implant after total hip arthroplasty (THA). While multiple patient and surgery-related factors contribute to THA dislocations, there is increasing evidence that sagittal spinopelvic dynamics are relevant for THA stability. The aim of this systematic review was to assess the relationship between previously described sagittal spinopelvic characteristics and implant dislocations after primary THA.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search in the PubMed and Embase databases was conducted for studies reporting on spinopelvic morphology, alignment, pathology, or surgery and THA dislocations. Risk of bias was assessed using the MINORS criteria. Because of high heterogeneity in study methodology, a synthesis of best evidence was performed. Odds ratios (ORs), relative risks (RRs), and effect sizes (g) were calculated.

RESULTS

Fifteen studies (1,007,900 THAs) with quality scores of 15 to 23 out of 24 were included. Nine different spinopelvic alignment parameters (8 studies, g = 0.14 to 2.02), spinal pathology (2 studies, OR = 1.9 to 29.2), and previous spinal fusion surgery (8 studies, OR = 1.59 to 23.7, RR = 3.0) were found to be related to THA dislocation. Conflicting results were found for another sagittal pelvic morphology parameter, pelvic incidence.

CONCLUSIONS

Several sagittal spinopelvic patient characteristics were found to be related to THA dislocation, and the associated risks were greater than for other patient and surgery-related factors. Future research is needed to determine which of those characteristics and parameters should be taken into account in patients undergoing primary THA.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Effect of Coronal and Sagittal Spinal Malalignment on Spinopelvic Mobility in Patients Undergoing Total Hip Replacement: A Prospective Observational Study

STUDY DESIGN

This was a prospective observational study.

OBJECTIVE

This investigation aimed (1) to determine the impact of sagittal spinal alignment with C7-sagittal vertical axis (SVA), pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis (PI-LL) mismatch and Roussouly classification on individual segments of spinopelvic mobility represented by lumbar flexibility [∆lumbar lordosis (LL)], pelvic mobility [∆pelvic tilt (PT)], and hip motion [∆pelvic femoral angle (PFA)] and (2) to assess the influence of coronal spinal balance on the spinopelvic complex in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA) preoperatively and postoperatively.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Restricted spinopelvic mobility gained attention as a contributing factor for THA instability. However, it remains unclear what influence the coronal and sagittal spinal alignment has on spinopelvic mobility.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 197 THA patients were included in the investigation conducting biplanar stereoradiography in standing and sitting position preoperatively and postoperatively. Two independent investigators assessed C7-SVA (≤50 mm balanced, >50 mm imbalanced), PI-LL (≤10 degrees balanced, >10 degrees imbalanced), refounded Roussouly classification, coronal spinal balance with C7-central sacral vertical line, LL, pelvic incidence (PI), PT, PFA. Individual segments of spinopelvic mobility based on the change from standing to sitting were defined as ∆LL, ∆PT, and ∆PFA. Unpaired t test or Welch t test for comparison between groups of 2 was applied. Analysis of variance and post hoc analysis according to Bonferroni or Games-Howell was used to determine differences between groups of >2. The Spearman rank correlation coefficient was used to determine the interrater reliability of the radiographic measurements.

RESULTS

Significant differences were demonstrated for ∆LL (SVA balanced/imbalanced: 24.7 degrees/19.1 degrees, P =0.001; PI-LL balanced/imbalanced: 24.4 degrees/16.4 degrees, P <0.000), PT (SVA balanced/imbalanced: 12.5 degrees/15.2 degrees, P =0.029; PI-LL balanced/imbalanced: 10.8 degrees/20.5 degrees, P <0.000), PI (SVA balanced/imbalanced: 52.9 degrees/56.9 degrees, P =0.001; PI-LL balanced/imbalanced: 52.1 degrees/61.0 degrees, P <0.000), LL (SVA balanced/imbalanced: 54.8 degrees/47.8 degrees, P =0.029; PI-LL balanced/imbalanced: 55.3 degrees/42.6 degrees, P <0.000). The coronal spinal balance (central sacral vertical line) indicated no significant differences regarding spinopelvic mobility between positive, neutral, or negative balanced groups. Significant differences with decreased pelvic mobility (∆PT) and lumbar flexibility (∆LL) in low-grade PI types 1 and 2 compared with high-grade PI type 4 according to the Roussouly classification were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first study to investigate spinal sagittal alignment using 3 different classifications in association to the spinopelvic complex in THA patients preoperatively and postoperatively. The significantly altered spinopelvic mechanics with decreased lumbar flexibility and increased pelvic retroversion in sagittal imbalanced patients clearly indicate the need for a separate consideration of the global spinal sagittal alignment. Our findings emphasize the importance of risk stratification for THA candidates in terms of sagittal imbalance attempting to mitigate the THA instability risk with accurate preoperative planning.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

The Effect of Hip Offset and Spinopelvic Abnormalities on the Risk of Dislocation Following Total Hip Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Previous studies have demonstrated that patients with abnormal spinopelvic motion are at increased risk of dislocation. However, little is known about the effect of hip offset on dislocation risk following total hip arthroplasty (THA) in patients with abnormal spinopelvic motion. The purpose of this study is to investigate the prevalence of under-restored hip offset and spinopelvic abnormalities in a series of THA patients treated for recurrent instability.

METHODS

This is a retrospective review of consecutive patients treated for hip instability following primary THA (THA+I) from 2012 to 2020. Patient demographics, surgical variables, and radiographic parameters were recorded. THA+I patients were compared to an age-matched and gender-matched control THA population without hip instability (THA). Univariate analyses were performed to compare differences between groups.

RESULTS

Thirty-three THA+I patients (44 hips) were compared to 44 THA patients (44 hips). THA+I patients had a higher prevalence of spinopelvic pathology (odds ratio [OR] 7.80, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.59-23.50, P < .001). The majority of acetabular components were placed within the Lewinnek safe zone (86.4% THA+I vs 72.7% THA; P = .119). THA+I patients were at greater risk of markedly under-restored hip offset (Δoffset ≤ 3 mm; OR 6.34, 95% CI 2.20-18.30, P = .001) and small (<32 mm) femoral head diameter (OR 4.38, 95% CI 1.53-12.53, P = .006) compared to THA patients.

CONCLUSION

Lumbar degenerative disease and under-restoration of hip offset were present in a high proportion of patients with hip instability. Although multiple factors may contribute to THA instability, these data suggest that restoration of offset is essential, particularly in patients with spinopelvic pathology, and may be more important than historically described acetabular targets.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.