Expansive open-door laminoplasty versus laminectomy and instrumented fusion for cases with cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament and straight lordosis

Comparison of Anterior Controllable Antedisplacement and Fusion Versus Laminoplasty in the Treatment of Multisegment Ossification of Cervical Posterior Longitudinal Ligament: A Meta-Analysis of Clinical

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to provide a comprehensive summary of the existing literature and conduct a systematic evaluation of the clinical outcomes associated with anterior controllable antedisplacement and fusion (ACAF) and posterior laminoplasty (LP) for the treatment of multisegment ossification of the cervical posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL).

METHODS

We conducted an electronic search of databases, including PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and CNKI, from the inception of the initial database to March 2023. We analyzed various parameters, including demographic data, operation time, intraoperative blood loss, cervical curvature, Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scores, Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores, and postoperative complications. Two independent reviewers screened the literature, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias in the included studies. Meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.4 software.

RESULTS

Our evaluation encompassed 7 studies involving a total of 467 patients. The patient cohort was divided into 2 groups: Group A (ACAF) comprised 226 patients, while Group B (LP) comprised 241 patients. Overall, our statistical analysis revealed significant differences between the 2 groups (P < 0.05) in terms of intraoperative blood loss, operative time, JOA score, JOA score improvement rate, postoperative VAS score, postoperative cervical curvature, and the incidence of certain postoperative complications (C5 nerve root paralysis, dysphagia, and axial symptoms). However, there was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of postoperative cerebrospinal fluid leakage and postoperative total complications between the 2 groups (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The findings of this study suggest that, in the treatment of multilevel cervical OPLL, ACAF yields superior outcomes compared to LP. Specifically, ACAF improves postoperative neurologic function, reduces postoperative pain, lowers intraoperative blood loss, improves postoperative cervical curvature, and decreases the incidence of C5 nerve root paralysis and postoperative axial symptoms. Nonetheless, ACAF is associated with longer operative times and a higher incidence of postoperative dysphagia, though the overall incidence of postoperative complications is similar. It is important to note that these conclusions should be interpreted cautiously due to the limited sample size and the variable quality of the included studies. Further research involving larger, high-quality studies is warranted to validate these findings.

Comparison of radiological and clinical outcomes of cervical laminoplasty versus lateral mass screw fixation in patients with ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament

PURPOSE

This study aimed to compare cervical sagittal parameters and clinical outcomes between patients undergoing cervical laminoplasty(CL) and those undergoing lateral mass screw fixation(LMS).

METHODS

We retrospectively studied 67 patients with multilevel ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) of the cervical spine who underwent lateral mass screw fixation (LMS = 36) and cervical laminoplasty (CL = 31). We analyzed cervical sagittal parameters (C2-7 sagittal vertical axis (C2-7 SVA), C0-2 Cobb angle, C2-7 Cobb angle, C7 slope (C7s), T1 slope (T1s), and spino-cranial angle (SCA)) and clinical outcomes (visual analog scale [VAS], neck disability index [NDI], Japanese Orthopaedic Association [JOA] scores, recovery rate (RR), and minimum clinically significant difference [MCID]). The cervical sagittal parameters at the last follow-up were analyzed by binary logistic regression. Finally, we analyzed the correlation between the cervical sagittal parameters and each clinical outcome at the last follow-up after surgery in both groups.

RESULTS

At the follow-up after posterior decompression in both groups, the mean values of C2-C7 SVA, C7s, and T1s in the LMS group were more significant than those in the CL group (P ≤ 0.05). Compared with the preoperative period, C2-C7 SVA, T1s, and SCA gradually increased, and the C2-C7 Cobb angle gradually decreased after surgery (P < 0.05). The improvement in the JOA score and the recovery rate was similar between the two groups, while the improvement in the VAS-N score and NDI score was more significant in the CL group (P = 0.001; P = 0.043). More patients reached MCID in the CL group than in the LMS group (P = 0.036). Binary logistic regression analysis showed that SCA was independently associated with whether patients reached MCID at NDI postoperatively. SCA was positively correlated with cervical NDI and negatively correlated with cervical JOA score at postoperative follow-up in both groups (P < 0.05); C2-7 Cobb angle was negatively correlated with cervical JOA score at postoperative follow-up (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

CL may be superior to LMS in treating cervical spondylotic myelopathy caused by OPLL. In addition, smaller cervical SCA after posterior decompression may suggest better postoperative outcomes.

Current Concepts of Cervical Spine Alignment, Sagittal Deformity, and Cervical Spine Surgery

There are not many reports on cervical spine alignment, and only a few analyze ideal surgical approaches and optimal amounts of correction needed for the various types of deformity. We comprehensively reviewed the present literature on cervical spinal deformities (with or without myelopathy) and their surgical management to provide a framework for surgical planning. A general assessment of the parameters actually in use and correlations between cervical and thoracolumbar spine alignment are provided. We also analyzed posterior, anterior, and combined cervical surgical approaches and indications for the associated techniques of laminoplasty, laminectomy and fusion, and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. Finally, on the basis of the NDI, SF-36, VAS, and mJOA questionnaires, we fully evaluated the outcomes and measures of postoperative health-related quality of life. We found the need for additional prospective studies to further enhance our understanding of the importance of cervical alignment when assessing and treating cervical deformities with or without myelopathy. Future studies need to focus on correlations between cervical alignment parameters, disability scores, and myelopathy outcomes. Through this comprehensive literature review, we offer guidance on practical and important points of surgical technique, cervical alignment, and goals surgeons can meet to improve symptoms in all patients.

The clinical efficacy of laminectomy fusion fixation and posterior single open-door laminoplasty in the treatment of multilevel cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL): a retrospective study

BACKGROUND

To compared the clinical efficacy of two surgical methods, posterior laminectomy fusion fixation, and posterior single open-door laminoplasty, in treating multilevel cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL).

METHODS

The study retrospectively included 102 patients treated between December 2016 and December 2020. The patients were included into an observation group (56 cases) treated with total laminectomy and lateral screw fixation, and a control group (46 cases) treated with single open-door laminoplasty.

RESULTS

After 24 months, both groups showed significant improvement in Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scores and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scores, indicating better clinical symptoms and functional recovery. There was no significant difference in preoperative JOA and VAS scores between the two groups (P > 0.05). At 24 months after surgery, there was no significant difference in JOA and VAS scores between the two groups (P > 0.05). However, the observation group had a significantly higher cervical curvature index (CCI) and lower range of motion (ROM) of the cervical spine compared to the control group (P < 0.05). The CCI in control group was lower than before surgery, while the CCI in observation group was higher than before surgery, and CCI in the control group was considerably lower than that in the observation group (P < 0.05). The complication rate was lower in the control group, with fewer cases of axial symptoms, fifth cervical nerve root palsy, and overall complications. The overall complication rate was 25.0% (14/56) in the observation group and 10.8% (5/46) in the control group (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Both posterior laminectomy fusion fixation and posterior single open-door laminoplasty yield positive outcomes in improving clinical neurological function, cervical curvature, range of motion of the cervical spine, and cervical sagittal balance. Although open-door laminoplasty is less effective than total laminectomy in maintaining CCI and sagittal balance, it excels in preserving cervical range of motion, less surgical trauma and complications. Thus, open-door laminoplasty may be a suitable first-choice treatment for multi-segmental cervical OPLL, especially for patients with lordotic cervical spine physiological curvature.

Reoperation rate and risk factors of reoperation for ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL): a systematic review and meta-analysis

Revision surgery for OPLL is undesirable for both patients and physicians. However, the risk factors for reoperation are not clear. Thus, we sought to review the existing literature and determine the factors associated with higher reoperation rates in patients with OPLL. A search was performed using Pubmed, Embase, Web of Sciences, and Ovid to include studies regarding the risk factors of reoperation for OPLL. RoBANS (Risk of Bias Assessment tool for Nonrandomized Studies) was used for risk of bias analysis. Heterogeneity of studies and publication bias was assessed, and sensitivity analysis was performed. Statistical analysis was performed with a p-value < 0.05 using SPSS software (version 23). Twenty studies with 129 reoperated and 2,793 non-reoperated patients were included. The pooled reoperation rate was 5% (95% CI: 4% to 7). The most common cause of reoperation was residual OPLL or OPLL progression (n = 51, 39.53%). An increased risk of additional surgery was found with pre-operative cervical or thoracic angle (Standardized mean difference = -0.44; 95% CI: -0.69 to -0.19; p = 0.0061), post-operative CSF leak (Odds ratio, OR = 4.97; 95% CI: 2.48 to 9.96; p = 0.0005), and graft and/or hardware failure (OR = 192.09; 95% CI: 6.68 to 5521.69; p = 0.0101). Apart from the factors identified in our study, the association of other variables with the risk of second surgery could not be ruled out, owing to the complexity of the relationship and significant bias in the current literature.

K-line in patients with cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: relationship with change in sagittal cervical curvature and laminoplasty outcomes

INTRODUCTION

To analyze how K-line is related to change in sagittal cervical curvature and laminoplasty outcomes in patients with cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study retrospectively analyzed 81 patients with OPLL who had undergone posterior cervical single-door laminoplasty and arch plate fixation between June 2011 and June 2017. Fifty-five were K-line positive (K[+]) and 26 were K-line negative (K[-]). Clinical and radiological results were compared between the groups. Patients were followed up for at least 2 years.

RESULTS

Before the operation, Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score, visual analogue scale (VAS) score, neck disability index (NDI), and short-form-36 (SF-36) quality of life score did not differ significantly between the groups. Neurological function was improved in both groups after the procedure. At last follow-up, JOA score, VAS score, NDI, SF-36 score, and JOA score improvement rate differed significantly between the groups. Before the operation, at the 3-month and final follow-ups, C2-7 Cobb angle, T1 slope, and C2-7 SVA differed significantly between the groups. The changes were more marked in the K(-) group than in the K(+) group. The incidence of cervical kyphosis differed significantly between the groups (P < 0.05), as well as between patients with lordosis < 7° and those with lordosis ≥ 7°.

CONCLUSIONS

K-line negativity and lordosis < 7° may predict kyphosis after laminoplasty in patients with OPLL. The cervical curvature in patients with OPLL tends towards kyphosis and anteversion after laminoplasty, which contributes to the reduced clinical effect of the procedure.

Instrumented fusion versus instrumented non-fusion following expansive open-door laminoplasty for multilevel cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament

PURPOSE

To compare the outcomes of expansive open-door laminoplasty with instrumented fusion (ELIF) and expansive open-door laminoplasty with instrumented non-fusion (ELINF) for multilevel cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL).

METHODS

Patients who underwent ELIF or ELINF due to multilevel cervical OPLL from June 2013 to June 2019 were identified. Clinical and radiological outcomes were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

A total of 78 patients were enrolled in this study with a minimum follow-up of 24 months, including 42 patients in the ELIF group and 36 patients in the ELINF group. At the final follow-up, sagittal vertical axis (SVA) and C2-C7 Cobb angle in the ELIF group were significantly better than those in the ELINF group, and cervical range of movement (ROM) in the ELIF group decreased significantly than that in the ELINF group. The incidence of OPLL progression at the final follow-up was 4.76% (2/42) in the ELIF group and 27.78% (10/36) in the ELINF group. Postoperative Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score, neck disability index (NDI), and visual analog scale (VAS) score improved significantly in each group, but JOA score and recovery rate (RR) in the ELIF group were significantly better than those in the ELINF group at the final follow-up. When K-line was positive, the difference in the final JOA score between the two groups was not significant, but the RR in the ELIF group was significantly better than that in the ELINF group. When K-line was negative, the final JOA score and RR in the ELIF group were significant higher than those in the ELINF group.

CONCLUSIONS

ELIF and ELINF were two effective surgical procedures for treating multilevel cervical OPLL. However, ELIF was superior to ELINF due to better postoperative JOA score and RR, significant improvement of C2-C7 Cobb angle and maintenance of SVA, and suppressant effect on OPLL progression, especially for patients with K-line ( - ) OPLL.

Bridging the cervicothoracic junction during posterior cervical laminectomy and fusion for the treatment of multilevel cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: a retrospective case series

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to investigate the surgical efficacy of crossing the cervicothoracic junction during posterior cervical laminectomy and fusion for the treatment of multilevel cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL).

METHODS

From October 2009 to October 2017, 46 consecutive patients with multilevel cervical OPLL underwent posterior cervical laminectomy and crossing the cervicothoracic junction fusion were obtained in the study. Their medical records were retrospectively collected. Cervical lordosis and cervical sagittal balance were used to assess radiographic outcomes. Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA), axial symptom, C5 root palsy, blood loss, and operation time were used to assess clinical outcomes. The mean follow-up period was 20.7 ± 8.3 months.

RESULTS

The operation time was 205.2 ± 39.8 min and the intraoperative blood loss was 352.2 ± 143.7 ml. Analysis of the final follow-up data showed significant differences in JOA score (P < 0.01), C2-C7 lordosis angle (P < 0.01), and C2-C7 SVA (P < 0.01). CT confirmed that grafted bone was completely fused in all patients and progression of OPLL was observed in two patients (4.3%) at final follow-up. No adjacent segment disease (ASD) or instrument failure occurred in any patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Cervical laminectomy and crossing the cervicothoracic junction fusion are effective and safe methods to treat multilevel cervical OPLL. Randomized controlled studies compared constructs ending at cervical vertebrae or thoracic vertebrae are needed to confirm these results.

Comparison of Laminoplasty vs. Laminectomy for Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVES

Laminoplasty (LP) and laminectomy (LC) with or without fusion are recommended as treatment procedures for cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM). The purpose of this study is to conduct a meta-analysis to analyze the results of CSM patients undergoing LP or LC surgery.

METHODS

We systematically and comprehensively searched Web of Science, Cochrane Library, PubMed, EMBASE, OVID, VIP database, Google Scholar, Chinese Bio-medicine Literature database, and China Scientific Journal Full-text database to July 2021 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational case series that compared LP and LC in patients with CSM. The main endpoints were the surgical process, radiographic outcomes, clinical outcomes, and surgical complications.

RESULTS

A total of 19 were included the inclusion criteria in this meta-analysis (n = 4,348 patients). There was no significant difference in range of motion (ROM), sagittal vertical axis (SVA), Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA), Cobb angle, visual analog scale (VAS), cervical curvature index (CCI), Nurick score, Neck Dysfunction Index (NDI), and complications. LP was found to be superior than LC in terms of complications of C5 radiculopathy and surperficial infection.

CONCLUSION

Our results indicate that LP can achieve better results in C5 radiculopathy and superficial infection in surgical treatment of CSM compared with LC. Further high-quality research is warranted to further verify our findings.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

PRISMA: CRD42018107070.

Laminectomy with instrumented fusion vs. laminoplasty in the surgical treatment of cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: A multicenter retrospective study

Laminectomy with instrumented fusion (LF) has demonstrated better prevention of ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) growth compared to laminoplasty (LP). There remains uncertainty, however, as to which surgical approach is more beneficial with respect to clinical outcomes and complications. We retrospectively reviewed 273 cervical OPLL patients of more than 3 levels, from the two institutions' databases, who underwent LF or LP between January 1998 and January 2016. Each 273 patient (85 with LF, 188 with LP) was assessed for postoperative neurologic and radiologic outcomes, complications and reoperations. The mean length of follow-up was 40.11 months. There were baseline differences between cohorts. Overall, postoperative JOA recovery rate at last follow up was significantly better in the LP group with similar improvement in visual analog neck score. Postoperative C2-7 Cobb angle was decreased compared to baseline for both LF and LP cohorts, but there was no significant difference between groups. Complications occurred in 19 (22.35%) LF patients, and 11 (5.85%) LP patients, with higher incidence of C5 palsy and instrumentation failure in the LF group. Four LF patients (4.71%) and five LP patients (2.66%) underwent reoperation during the follow up period.

The Effect of Laminectomy with Instrumented Fusion Carried into the Thoracic Spine on the Sagittal Imbalance in Patients with Multilevel Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament

OBJECTIVE

To determine if there is a difference in either the cervical alignment or the clinical outcomes in cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) patients who underwent laminectomy with instrumented fusion (LIF) ending at C₆ , C₇ , or proximal thoracic spine for the treatment of multilevel OPLL, and to find out the appropriate distal fusion level.

METHODS

This was a single-center retrospective study. In total, 36 patients with cervical OPLL who underwent three or more level LIF in our institution between January 2015 and January 2017 were enrolled. They were divided into three groups according to their distal ends: C₆ (nine females and 11 males, 60.45 ± 9.68 years old), C₇ (four females and six males, 61.60 ± 10.29 years old), and T-group (two females and four males, 64.33 ± 8.12 years old). Radiographic (compression level, classification of OPLL, occupying rate, C_2-7 cobb angle, C_2-7 sagittal vertical axis, and fusion level) and clinical outcomes (NDI score, operative time, and blood loss) were compared. Predictors of postoperative sagittal imbalance were also identified according to if the postoperative C_2-7 SVA was greater than 40 mm. The sensitivity and specificity of preoperative parameters predicting postoperative cervical stability were evaluated via the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.

RESULTS

All patients were followed up at least 1 year. The blood loss in T group was significantly more than C₆ or C₇ group. The length of fusion level became significantly longer when the caudal level extended to the thoracic spine. The age, preoperative SVA, and NDI score at follow-up were significantly greater in the imbalance group. At the final follow-up, the cervical lordosis tended to be straight and the C_2-7 SVA tended to be greater when the caudal level of fusion was extended to upper thoracic segment. Further ROC curve analysis suggested that patients' age had a sensitivity of 75.00%, specificity of 79.17% for cervical stability, and the AUC was 0.844 (P < 0.01), with the cutoff value for age being 66.5 years old. For preoperative SVA, the sensitivity was 58.30%, and specificity was 91.70%, with the AUC of 0.778 (P < 0.01). The cutoff value for preoperative SVA was 30.4 mm.

CONCLUSION

Although posterior fusion terminating in the thoracic spine was not superior to the cervical spine for patients with multilevel OPLL, for elderly patients (>67 years) with great preoperative SVA (>30 mm), terminating at C₆ was recommended to limit the invasion of cervical extensor muscles, provided the decompression was adequate.

Comparison of Interventions for Cervical Ossification of Posterior Longitudinal Ligament: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVE

To summarize the literature and systematically evaluate outcomes for ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament interventions including anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion (ACCF), anterior controllable antedisplacement and fusion (ACAF), laminoplasty (LP), and laminectomy with fusion (LF).

METHODS

We searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library from January 1990 to March 2021. Patient demographic data, Japanese Orthopaedic Association score, cervical lordosis and overall complications were analyzed.

RESULTS

We evaluated 30 studies involving 2038 patients. Patients undergoing ACCF had improved Japanese Orthopaedic Association scores compared with patients undergoing LP (weighted mean difference [WMD] 1.17, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.49-1.85) and LF (WMD 1.21, 95% CI 0.17-2.24). Patients with ACAF had better cervical lordosis compared with patients with ACCF (WMD 7.00, 95% CI 0.72-13.27), LP (WMD 10.27, 95% CI 4.64-15.90), and LF (WMD 8.98, 95% CI 2.48-15.47). Additionally, ACAF (odds ratio 0.24, 95% CI 0.07-0.84) and LP (odds ratio 0.50, 95% CI 0.28-0.90) had a lower incidence of complications compared with ACCF.

CONCLUSIONS

Japanese Orthopaedic Association score outcomes indicated that ACCF was superior to LP and LF. ACAF had the largest cervical lordosis among all procedures. ACCF showed a higher incidence of overall complications compared with ACAF and LP.

Does surgical treatment increase the progression of spinal cord injury in patients with ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament of cervical spine? A systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study is to explore if the surgical treatment will accelerate the progression of spinal cord injury (SCI) in patients with cervical Ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) and if surgery will have better curative effect than conservative treatment.

METHODS

An extensive search of literature was implemented in PubMed, EMBASE, and other online databases. The quality of the included articles was evaluated according to the Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale, as recommended by the Cochrane manual, and meta-analysis was performed using the review manage5.3 software.

RESULTS

No obvious statistical difference was observed in the rate of SCI progression (P > 0.05, OR 1.15 [0.66, 2.00]), cervical range of motion, (P > 0.05, weighted mean difference (WMD) 4.52 [-5.75, 14.79]), and Japanese Orthopedic Association scores before surgery (P > 0.05, WMD -2.78 [-7.87, 2.32]) between the surgical group and conservative treatment group. However the surgical group illustrated obviously higher neurofunctional recovery rate (P < 0.05, OR 6.07 [1.55, 23.78]) and postoperative JOA score of the surgery group (P < 0.05, WMD -0.77 [-1.21, -0.33]) than conservative group.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on this meta-analysis, there is not enough evidence to indicate that surgery will accelerate the progress of SCI with OPLL. However, the superiority of surgical efficacy can be observed over conservative treatment in terms of relieving neurological symptoms.

Laminoplasty versus laminectomy with fusion for treatment of multilevel cervical compressive myelopathy: an updated meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) and ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) are debilitating degenerative diseases. If conservative treatment is ineffective, surgical options for multilevel CSM and OPLL include laminoplasty (LP) and laminectomy with fusion (LF). In this updated meta-analysis, we aimed to compare the clinical outcomes and complications of both approaches.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, the Cochrane Library and Embase datasets from their inception to 31 March 2020, to identify all eligible studies comparing LP versus LF for multilevel CSM and OPLL. Data were extracted according to predefined endpoints. We summarised data by the random-effects or fixed-effect models, as necessary.

RESULTS

Of 533 eligible studies, 16 were identified, which included 638 patients who underwent LP and 671 patients who underwent LF. No significant differences were observed between preoperative and postoperative scores of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (p=1.0 and 0.20, respectively); Visual Analogue Scale (p=0.24 and 0.89, respectively); sagittal vertical axis ((p=0.16 and 0.87, respectively); Nurick Scale (p=0.59 and 0.17, respectively); and range of motion (p=0.67 and 0.63, respectively). However, total complications were higher for LF compared with LP (p=0.006). A significantly higher incidence of C5 palsy was observed in the LF group (p=0.004). The postoperative Neck Disability Index (NDI) was also higher in the LF group (p<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Although LP and LF shared similar clinical improvement, LP had fewer complications, a lower incidence of C5 palsy, and better NDI scores and recovery outcomes than LF. Randomised studies are warranted to validate these findings.

One-stage posterior laminectomy with instrumented fusion and foraminotomy for cervical ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament with radiculopathy pain

OBJECTIVE

To explore the clinical efficacy of posterior LFF for cervical OPLL with radicular pain of upper limbs METHODS: Between January 2014 and January 2018, 48 OPLL patients with radicular pain symptoms of upper limbs who underwent a one-stage posterior laminectomy and instrumented fusion with/without foraminotomy were reviewed retrospectively and divided into two groups: LF group (laminectomy with instrumented fusion without foraminotomy) and LFF group (laminectomy with instrumented fusion and foraminotomy). Clinical data were assessed and compared between the two groups. The radicular pain of upper limbs and neck was measured using the visual analog scale (VAS). The neurological function was evaluated with the American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) scale. Changes of sagittal alignment were investigated by postoperative plain x-ray or computed tomography (CT). Moreover, the decompression of the spinal cord was evaluated based on postoperative MRI.

RESULTS

All the 48 patients were followed up for 24-42 months with an average follow-up time of 31.1±5.3 months. A total of 56 cervical intervertebral foramens were enlarged in 48 patients, including 40 cases (83.3%) with 1 intervertebral foramen enlargement and 8 cases (16.7%) with 2 intervertebral foramen enlargements. There were no significant differences in intraoperative blood loss, postoperative drainage amount, Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scores, JOA recovery rates, VAS scores for neck pain, and ASIA grade between two groups. The mean operative time was shorter in the LF group compared with the LFF group. The VAS score for arm pain was significantly lower while the surgical duration was longer in group B. No statistical difference was observed between the two groups in terms of C2-C7 SVA, cervical lordosis, focal angulation at the foraminotomy segment, and local spinal cord angle. Compared with the LF group, there was no segmental kyphosis or instability where the additional posterior foraminotomy was performed in the LFF group.

CONCLUSIONS

One-stage posterior LFF can achieve satisfied clinical efficacy in improving neurological function and relieving the radicular pain of the upper limbs for OPLL patients with radiculopathy symptoms.

Comparison of the surgeries for the ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament-related cervical spondylosis: A PRISMA-compliant network meta-analysis and literature review

OBJECTIVE

We designed and performed a network meta-analysis to compare the clinical outcomes among the 5 surgeries-anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion (ACCF), anterior controllable antedisplacement fusion (ACAF), laminoplasty (LP), laminectomy (LC), and posterior decompression with instrumented fusion (PDF)-for patients with cervical spondylosis related to the ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL).

METHODS

Databases, including PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Google Scholar, and Web of Science (firstly available-2019) were selected for literature search. We performed a network meta-analysis with the included studies. A Newcastle-Ottawa scale was employed to assess the study quality of the included studies.

RESULTS

Total 23 studies with 1516 patients were included in our analysis. We found that ACCF achieved the most improvement in the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Scores and excellent and good recovery rate, ACAF achieved the best improvement of the improvement rate and lordosis. LP got the best operative time and blood loss.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggested that both anterior (ACCF and ACAF) and posterior (LP, LC, and PDF) procedures have their strengths and weaknesses. Clinicians need to select the most appropriate surgery with a comprehensive consideration of the clinical condition of each patient with OPLL-related cervical spondylosis.

Anterior Controllable Antedisplacement and Fusion (ACAF) vs Posterior Laminoplasty for Multilevel Severe Cervical Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament: Retrospective Study Based on a Two-Year Follow-up

Objectives

To compare the clinical outcomes of anterior controllable antedisplacement fusion (ACAF), a new surgical technique, with laminoplasty for the treatment of multilevel severe cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) based on a 2‐year follow‐up.

Methods

Clinical data of 53 patients (21 by ACAF and 32 by laminoplasty) who have accepted surgery for treatment of cervical myelopathy caused by multilevel severe OPLL (occupying rate ≥ 50%) from March 2015 to March 2017 were retrospectively reviewed and compared between ACAF group and laminoplasty group. Operative time, blood loss, and complications of the two groups were recorded. Radiographic parameters were evaluated pre‐ and postoperatively: cervical lordosis on X‐ray, space available for the cord (SAC) and the occupying ratio (OR) on computed tomography (CT), and the anteroposterior (AP) diameter of the spinal cord at the narrowest level and the spinal cord curvature on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scoring was used to evaluate neurologic recovery. Statistical analysis was conducted to analyze the differences between two groups. The Mann–Whitney U test and chi square test were used to compare categorical variables. unpaired t test was used to compare continuous data.

Results

All patients were followed up for at least 24 months. The operative time was longer in ACAF group (286.5 vs 178.2 min, P < 0.05). The blood loss showed no significant difference (291.6 vs 318.3 mL, P > 0.05). Less complications were observed in ACAF group than in laminoplasty group (one case [4.7%] of C5 palsy and one case [4.7%] of cerebrospinal fluid [CSF] leakage in ACAF group; four cases [12.5%] of C5 palsy, two cases [6.3%] of CSF leakage, and four cases [12.5%] of axial symptoms in laminoplasty group). The mean JOA score at last follow‐up (14.6 vs 12.8, P < 0.05) and the improvement rate (IR) (63.8% vs 47.8%, P < 0.05) in ACAF group were superior to those in laminoplasty group significantly. The postoperative OR (16.7% vs 40.9%, P < 0.05), SAC (150.8 vs 110.5 mm², P < 0.05), AP spinal cord diameter (5.5 vs 4.2 mm, P < 0.05), and cervical lordosis (12.7° vs 4.7°, P < 0.05) were improved more considerably in ACAF group, with significant differences between two groups. Notably, the spinal cord on MRI showed a better curvature in ACAF group.

Conclusions

This study showed that ACAF is considered superior to laminoplasty for the treatment of multilevel severe OPLL as anterior direct decompression and better curvature of the spinal cord led to satisfactory neurologic outcomes and low complication rate.

Comparative Effectiveness and Safety of Anterior Cervical Corpectomy with Fusion, Laminoplasty, and Laminectomy and Instrumented Fusion for Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

To evaluate the comparative effectiveness and safety of anterior cervical corpectomy with fusion (ACCF), laminoplasty (LP), and laminectomy and instrumented fusion (LF) in the treatment of ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL).

METHODS

Embase, Pubmed, and Cochrane library were searched from their date of inception to June 13, 2020. Relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies comparing different procedures among ACCF, LP, and LF were identified, data were extracted to perform a network meta-analysis (NMA). The outcomes were the Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score and complications.

RESULTS

We deemed 14 trials eligible, including 877 patients. In NMA, ACCF showed a significant improvement of JOA score compared with LP [MD= -0.89, 95% CI (-1.73, -0.18)], but no significant difference was found when compared LF with ACCF or LP. No significant differences in complications were found when compared LF with LP or ACCF, while ACCF showed significantly higher in complications than LP [OR = 1.99, 95% CI (1.10, 3.35)]. The surface under the cumulative ranking curves (SUCRA) showed that the rank of JOA score improvement is as follows: ACCF (82.5%), LF (79.5%), and LP (2.3%). And the rank of complication rate is as follows: LF (65.8%), ACCF (68.4%), and LP (2.1%).

LIMITATION

The biggest limitation was that none of the included studies were RCTs.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the higher probability of complications than LP, ACCF was the more recommended procedure for its highest ranking spectrums of JOA score improvement to treat the OPLL.

A modified cutting line in the single-door cervical laminoplasty via a computed tomography-based morphological study of the subaxial cervical spine

OBJECTIVE

To modify the conventional methods of grooving and direction during the single-door cervical laminoplasty (SDCL) in the subaxial cervical spine.

METHODS

The distance between the left and the right lamina-lateral mass junction at the upper, middle, and lower levels of each segment (DLL-U, DLL-M, DLL-L), angle between the posterior edge of the vertebral body and the lamina (AVL) and thickness of lamina (TL) were measured in the transverse plane. The parameters of preoperative computed tomography scans of 200 patients who had undergone SDCL were measured. The patients were divided into male and female groups and developmental canal stenosis (DCS) and non-DCS (NDCS) groups.

RESULTS

DLL-M gradually increased from the cranial to the caudal except for C7, and DLL-L > DLL-M > DLL-U in each vertebra. AVL increased from C3 to C7, TL decreased from C3 to C5 and increased from C5 to C7, with both parameters showing no significant differences between the left and right sides. AVL of the DCS group was less than that of the NDCS group (P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

In the SDCL, the ideal surgical trough should be several discontinuous lines sloping from top to bottom, rather than a straight line. The abduction angle during drilling should gradually increase from C3 to C7 in the SDCL averaging 40 degrees. This method mentioned above improves the efficiency of the operation with less blood loss as an extended cut into the lateral mass is avoided.

Comparison of Anterior Controllable Antedisplacement and Fusion With Posterior Laminoplasty in the Treatment of Multilevel Cervical Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament: A Prospective, Randomized, and Control Study With at Least 1-Year Follow Up

STUDY DESIGN

A prospective, randomized, controlled study.

OBJECTIVE

To compare anterior controllable antidisplacement and fusion (ACAF) with laminoplasty in the treatment of multilevel ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL), and evaluate the efficacy and safety of this procedure.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

The optimal approach for the treatment of OPLL still remains controversial. Both anterior and posterior approaches have their advantages and disadvantages.

METHODS

Between September 2016 and April 2018, a total of 80 patients with multilevel OPLL were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to ACAF group and laminoplasty group. All patients were followed up at least 1 year. Clinical and radiological results were compared between ACAF group and laminoplasty group.

RESULTS

ACAF took a longer operation time. C5 palsy and axial pain occurred more commonly in laminoplasty group, whereas dysphagia and hoarseness appeared easily in ACAF group. At 1-year follow-up, the final Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score and recovery rate were significant higher in ACAF group than those in laminoplasty group, when occupying rate (OR) was not less than 60%, or K-line was negative. ACAF was also good at preservation of cervical lordosis and sagittal balance, but range of movement of cervical spine in both groups decreased significantly.

CONCLUSION

Generally speaking, ACAF is a safe and effective alternative for multilevel OPLL. Compared with laminoplasty, ACAF is more effective in the cases when OR is not less than 60%, or K-line is negative.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

2.

Posterior decompression and fusion versus laminoplasty for cervical ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Both posterior decompression and fusion (PDF) and laminoplasty (LAMP) have been used to treat cervical myelopathy due to multilevel ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL). However, considerable controversy exists over the choice of the two surgical strategies. Thus, the aim of this study is to compare clinical outcomes of PDF and LAMP for treatment of cervical myelopathy due to multilevel OPLL. We searched PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials database to identify relevant clinical studies compared with clinical outcomes of PDF and LAMP for cervical OPLL. The primary outcomes including Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score and recovery rate of JOA were evaluated, and the secondary outcomes involving visual analogue scale (VAS), cervical curvature, OPLL progression rate, complication rate, reoperation rate and surgical trauma were also evaluated using Stata software. A total of nine studies were included in the current study, involving 324 patients. The current study suggests that compared with LAMP, PDF achieves a lower OPLL progression rate, better postoperative cervical curvature and similar neurological improvement in the treatment of multilevel cervical OPLL. However, PDF has a higher complication rate, more surgical trauma and higher postoperative VAS than LAMP.

Analysis of the reciprocal changes in upper cervical profile and the risk factors for increasing cervical sagittal vertical axis after laminoplasty for ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament of the cervical spine

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to elucidate the reciprocal changes in the upper cervical profile and the risk factors for increasing cervical sagittal vertical axis (cSVA) after laminoplasty for ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) of the cervical spine.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This retrospective study included thirty-nine consecutive patients (30 men and 9 women) with cervical OPLL who underwent cervical laminoplasty. We recorded the operative time, blood loss, Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score recovery rate. Radiological measurements were performed to analyze the following parameters: pre and 1- year postoperative chin-brow vertical angle (CBVA), McGregor's slope (McGS), occiput to C2 Cobb angle (O-C2 angle), C2-C7 Cobb angle (C2-C7 angle), T1-slope (T1S), C2-C7 sagittal vertical axis (cSVA) and calculated the change (Δ). Patients were divided into two groups according to ΔcSVA: positive (ΔcSVA ≥ 0) and negative (ΔcSVA < 0).

RESULTS

Postoperative O-C2 angle (P = 0.028), ΔO-C2 angle (P = 0.019), ΔC2-C7 angle (P = 0.030) and T1S (P = 0.009) diff ;ered between the two groups. ΔcSVA showed a positive correlation with ΔO-C2 (R = 0.365, P = 0.022) and T1S (R = 0.472, P = 0.002). ΔO-C2 showed a positive correlation with T1S (R = 0.478, P = 0.002) and a negative correlation with ΔC2-C7 (R=-0.443, P = 0.005). ΔC2-C7 showed a negative correlation with T1S (R=-0.415, P = 0.009). Stepwise multiple linear regression analysis showed that ΔcSVA increased by 0.757 mm for each T1 slope and increased by 0.905 mm for each ΔMcGS.

CONCLUSION

Increasing the lordosis in the O-C2 segment compensates for the loss of lordosis in the C2-C7 segment after cervical laminoplasty. Higher T1S is a risk factor for increasing cSVA after laminoplasty for OPLL of the cervical spine.

Anterior selective stabilization combined with laminoplasty for cervical myelopathy due to massive ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: report of early outcomes in 14 patients

OBJECTIVE

Surgical management of massive ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) is challenging. To reduce surgical complications, the authors have performed anterior selective stabilization combined with laminoplasty (antSS+LP) for massive OPLL since 2012. This study aimed to elucidate the short-term outcome of the antSS+LP procedure.

METHODS

The authors' analysis was based on data from 14 patients who underwent antSS+LP for cervical myelopathy caused by massive OPLL and were followed up for at least 2 years after surgery (mean follow-up duration 3.3 years). Clinical outcome was evaluated preoperatively, at 6 months and 1 year postoperatively, and at the final follow-up using the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scoring system for cervical myelopathy and the recovery rate of the JOA score. The following radiographic parameters were measured preoperatively, immediately after surgery, at 1 year after surgery, and at the final follow-up: the C2-7 angle, measured on lateral plain radiographs, and the segmental lordosis angle (SLA), measured on sagittal CT scans. The correlation between radiographic parameters and clinical outcomes was evaluated.

RESULTS

The mean JOA score increased from 10.4 before surgery to 13.6 and 13.8 at 6 months and 1 year after surgery, respectively; at the final follow-up the mean score was 13.4. This postoperative recovery was significant (p = 0.004) and was maintained until the final follow-up. No patient required revision surgery due to postoperative neurological deterioration. However, the C2-7 angle gradually deteriorated postoperatively. Similarly, the SLA was significantly increased immediately after surgery, but the improvement was not maintained. The recovery rate at the final follow-up correlated positively with the change in C2-7 angle (r = 0.60, p = 0.03) and the change in SLA (r = 0.72, p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

AntSS+LP is safe and effective and may be an alternative to anterior decompression and fusion for the treatment of patients with massive OPLL. No postoperative neurological complications or significant postoperative exacerbation of neck pain were observed in our case series. Not only reducing intervertebral motion and decompressing the canal at the maximal compression level but also acquiring segmental lordosis at the maximal compression level are crucial factors for achieving successful outcomes of antSS+LP.

Extensor muscle-preserving laminectomy in treating multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy compared with laminoplasty

Background

Laminectomy and laminoplasty are popularly used in posterior cervical spine surgery but still have involved complications. We aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of microscope-assisted extensor muscle-preserving laminectomy (MA-EMPL) and open-door laminoplasty (ODLP) in treating multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy (MCSM).

Methods

A prospective study was designed to enroll twenty patients with MCSM underwent MA-EMPL, and recruit twenty-four patients with MCSM received ODLP (control). Radiographic measurements, outcome indicators including Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score and visual analogue score (VAS) were used to evaluate technical effectiveness. Surgical complications were documented to assess technical safety.

Results

Postoperative cervical curvature index and range of neck motion (ROM) were not significantly changed except ROM in ODLP group. Postoperative JOA score and VAS in both groups showed improvements at final follow-up. There was no statistical difference in postoperative neurological recovery rates between two groups (67.6%±17.8% vs. 70.15%±19.6%, P=0.632). However, VAS was significantly lower at postoperative 1 month in MA-EMPL group compared with ODLP group (P<0.001). The incidences of C5 palsy were 0 vs. 16.7% between MA-EMPL group and ODLP group. There was no axial symptom occurred in MA-EMPL group while six patients in ODLP group (0 vs. 25%, P=0.049). In addition, the mean blood loss and hospital stay were lesser in MA-EMPL group compared with ODLP group (P<0.001, P=0.002, respectively).

Conclusions

MA-EMPL is an effective, safe and minimally invasive method in treatment of MCSM. Compared with ODLP, MA-EMPL has advantage to decrease intraoperative blood loss, hospital stay, postoperative VAS and axial symptom, as well as preserve postoperative ROM.

Clinical Investigation of the Association of Opening Size with Sagittal Canal Diameter Based on Single-Door Cervical Laminoplasty

Background

Many clinical studies have assessed the association of laminoplasty opening size (LOS) with sagittal canal diameter (SCD) based on single-door cervical laminoplasty (SDCL). Nevertheless, the “worn-off” lamina extracted in SDCL was neglected in these reports. We aimed to develop a simple mathematical model to analyze the relationship between the effective LOS and SCD, taking into consideration the worn-off lamina.

Material/Methods

A total of 106 patients treated by SDCL at our hospital were included in this study. Pre-operative and post-operative SCDs were assessed using a picture archiving and communication system (PACS) based on computed tomography scans. Mini-plate sizes as well as drill bit diameters were recorded in detail in order to determine the effective LOS for each vertebral lamina involved.

Results

SCD in all patients was increased significantly after SDCL (P<0.01). A linear correlation was found between effective LOS and the post-operative SCD increment from C3 to C7 (R²>0.933, P<0.001). The 12 mm mini-plate was most often used in SDCL, accounting for 64.45% of all cases, whereas 10 mm and 16 mm mini-plates were the least used, accounting for 3.85% and 3.00%, respectively.

Conclusions

There is a strong linear correlation between effective LOS and the post-operative SCD increment. The SCD was increased by about 0.5 mm per mm increase in effective LOS. Thus, post-operative SCD could be precisely calculated and predicted, enabling the selection of optimal mini-plate prior to SDCL.

Does Extension Dysfunction Affect Postoperative Loss of Cervical Lordosis in Patients Who Undergo Laminoplasty?

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective study.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate whether loss of cervical lordosis (LCL) after laminoplasty can be predicted from specific preoperative dynamic radiograph measurements.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Recent studies have focused on the correlation between LCL after laminoplasty and T1 slope. These studies explain this correlation through the injury of the posterior neck muscular-ligament complex (PMLC); however, this muscle injury model could not explain the less kyphotic change in high T1s patients, as reported in some studies as controversy. We have focused on the PMLC constriction reservoir which was represented by extension function (EF).

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 50 consecutive patients who underwent open-door laminoplasty (>1-year follow-up). EF is defined as extension C2-7 Cobb angle (CA) minus neutral C2-7 CA (Ext CA - CA). LCL is defined as follow-up CA minus preoperative CA (CA [FU] - CA [PRE]), and significant kyphotic change was defined as LCL smaller than -10°.

RESULTS

The distribution of LCL was -3.70 ± 7.98 and the significant kyphotic change occurred in 20% of the patients (10/50). EF, C2-7 sagittal vertical axis (PRE), and C2 slope (PRE) were found to be risk factors for LCL by multiple linear regression analysis. The receiver operating characteristic curve analysis revealed that EF could predict the significant kyphotic change well than previously known risk factors. The cutoff value of EF was 14°. No significant kyphotic change occurred at EF greater than or equal to 14°. Upon limiting the number of patients with preoperative straight curvature (n = 28), there is also no significant kyphotic change occurred in any patient whose EF was greater than or equal to 14°.

CONCLUSION

In our study sample, we found that there is no relation between T1 slope and LCL. We have identified a new factor, EF, that could predict LCL after laminoplasty. No significant kyphotic changes after laminoplasty occurred particularly when the EF was greater than or equal to 14°.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3.

Postoperative Progression of Cervical Ossification of Posterior Longitudinal Ligament: A Systematic Review

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to provide a systematic and comprehensive review of the existing literature regrading postoperative ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) progression.

METHODS

Using the PRISMA guidelines, we conducted an exhaustive review of electronic databases. Potential articles were screened and related information was extracted and analyzed. Twenty-four articles with low-quality evidence were included in the review. The findings of the literature review were divided into several groups: the relationship of surgery to OPLL progression; incidence and risk factors; timing and process of OPLL progression; the effect of additional instrumentation on progression; and neurologic deterioration related with progression.

RESULTS

There was no definitive conclusion for whether surgery could accelerate OPLL progression compared with the natural course. The incidence of postoperative OPLL progression was reported from 3.3% to 74.5%. Younger age, involvement of multiple levels and mixed or continuous types are recognized as risk factors. OPLL could progress transversely and longitudinally and progression in length appeared more significant than progression in thickness. Although radiologic OPLL progression was observed significantly more frequently after laminoplasty than after fusion surgery, whether additional instrumented fusion could suppress progression needs further research. Radiographic progression of OPLL did not positively correspond with neurologic deterioration.

CONCLUSIONS

The lack of high-level evidence makes it difficult to draw definite conclusions and further research and long-term follow-up clinical studies are needed to better understand postoperative OPLL progression.

Influence of the Ratio of C2–C7 Cobb Angle to T1 Slope on Cervical Alignment After Laminoplasty

PURPOSE

To assess the relationship between the ratio of C2-C7 Cobb angle to T1 slope (CL/T1S) and cervical alignment changes after laminoplasty.

METHODS

78 consecutive patients with cervical myelopathy who underwent laminoplasty were enrolled. All patients with preoperative and follow-up cervical spine lateral x-ray images available for review were recruited in this study. Imaging data included C2-C7 Cobb angle, T1 slope, and cervical sagittal vertical axis (cSVA). All patients were classified into low-ratio group (bottom 25% of CL/T1S), fair-ratio group (middle 50% of CL/T1S), and high ratio group (top 25% of CL/T1S) according to CL/T1S ratio. The recovery rate was calculated based on the Japanese Orthopedic Association score.

RESULTS

The preoperative C2-C7 Cobb angle had significant correlations with the T1 slope (r = 0.528). Kyphotic alignment changes in the group with a high ratio of CL/T1S was greater than that of the other 2 groups (P < 0.001). The incidence of postoperative kyphosis in the group with a low ratio of CL/T1S was higher than that of the other 2 groups (P < 0.001). There was no postoperative kyphosis in the fair-ratio group. The surgical outcome in the low-ratio CL/T1S group and the high-ratio CL/T1S group was poorer than that in the fair-ratio CL/T1S group (P = 0.005).

CONCLUSIONS

The cervical alignment was kept well in the mid-range CL/T1S ratio group after laminoplasty. Patients with a high CL/T1S ratio were more likely to present with kyphotic alignment changes. Patients with a low CL/T1S ratio were more likely to have postoperative kyphosis.

Radiological Characteristics and Clinical Outcome of Ossification of Posterior Longitudinal Ligament Involving C2 After Posterior Laminoplasty and Instrumented Fusion Surgery

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective study.

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the radiological characteristics and surgical outcome of cervical ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) involving C2 level.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

The study and report focused on the OPLL involving C2 level are rare. Therefore, the radiological characteristics and surgical outcome remain unclear.

METHODS

The records of the patients with OPLL involving C2 level who underwent posterior surgery from July 2006 through October 2015 were retrospectively reviewed. The types, longitudinal and transverse extent, occupation ratio, K-line classification of OPLL, and high-intensity zone of spine cord on magnetic resonance imaging were analyzed to evaluate the radiological characteristics. All the cases received posterior open-door laminoplasty and instrumented fusion surgery. The Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score and recovery rate (RR) were used to evaluate neurological function after surgery.

RESULTS

A total of 45 patients with OPLL involving C2 level were enrolled in the study. Their radiological data were carefully analyzed. The mixed (73.3%) and continuous type (24.5%) were observed. The mean number of involved segments was 5.1. The narrowest spinal canal mostly located in the level of C3-C4 and mean occupying ratio was 65.3%. Thirty-two patients were followed up for at least 2 years and the mean follow-up time was 46.2 months. The mean JOA score was 10.3 preoperatively and 15.2 at the final follow-up and the mean RR was 70.7%. The K-line (+) and (-) subgroups showed similar preoperative JOA score and RR. The high-intensity zone (+) subgroup showed lower preoperative JOA score but equal RR with (-) subgroup.

CONCLUSION

When OPLL involve C2 level, it often presented different radiological characteristics. The posterior open-door laminoplasty and instrumented fusion surgery could achieve favorable clinical outcomes. Further researches and long-term clinical follow-up are needed to better appreciate the OPLL involving C2 level.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4.

Clinical and radiologic outcomes of bone grafted and non-bone grafted double-door laminoplasty, the modified Kirita-Miyazaki method, for treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy: Five-year follow-up

PURPOSE

To clarify whether there is any difference in mid-term clinical and radiologic outcomes between bone-grafted laminoplasty (BG LAMP) and non-bone-grafted laminoplasty (non-BG LAMP) when used to treat cervical spondylotic myelopathy.

BACKGROUND

Conventional BG LAMP includes bone grafting at the lamina hinge site to prevent closure of the lamina postoperatively, but it often results in segmental fusion and sometimes causes loss of cervical mobility and lordotic alignment. Non-BG LAMP can now be performed to address this problem and preserve mobility postoperatively. However, there have been no studies comparing BG LAMP and non-BG LAMP to date.

METHODS

Forty-one patients who underwent BG LAMP (n = 24) or non-BG LAMP (n = 17) and had 5 years of follow-up were enrolled in the study. Neurological status was assessed preoperatively and postoperatively using the Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) scoring system. The Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) was used to assess neck pain after surgery at the final visit. Radiographic parameters were evaluated at 1, 3, and 5 years after surgery. Postoperative segmental fusion was defined as the level at which the segmental flexion-extension range of motion was <1°.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in JOA score or recovery rate between the groups. NRS score was significantly lower in the BG group, indicating less neck pain (P < .01). The lordotic angle and range of motion at C2-C7 were significantly decreased in the BG group (P < .05). The segmental fusion was evident from 1 year postoperatively in both groups, but the fusion rate was significantly higher in the BG group (P < .05).

CONCLUSIONS

Neurologic outcomes were similar between the two groups, whereas axial symptom was lower in the BG group than in the non-BG group.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Ⅳ.

Ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament in the cervical spine: a review

Ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) is a rare pathologic process of lamellar bone deposition that can result in spinal cord compression. While multiple genetic and environmental factors have been related to the development of OPLL, the pathophysiology remains poorly understood. Asymptomatic patients may be managed conservatively and patients with radiculopathy or myelopathy should be considered for surgical decompression. Multiple studies have demonstrated the morphology and size of the OPLL as well as the cervical alignment have significant implications for the appropriate surgical approach and technique. In this review, we aim to address all the available literature on the etiology, history, presentation, and management of OPLL in an effort to better understand OPLL and give our recommendations for the treatment of patients presenting with OPLL.

Comparison of laminoplasty versus laminectomy and fusion in the treatment of multilevel cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Laminoplasty (LP) and laminectomy with fusion (LF) were recognized as two reliable and effective way in treating multilevel cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL). However, there was no clear conclusion on which method is better. A meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate the clinical results between LP and LF in the treatment of multilevel cervical OPLL.

METHODS

An extensive search of literature was performed in PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane library, CNKI (Chinese database), and WANFANG (Chinese database). The following outcomes were extracted: the Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) scores, visual analog scale (VAS), cervical lordosis, cervical range of motion (ROM), complications, blood loss, and operation time. Data analysis was conducted with RevMan 5.3.

RESULTS

A total of 11 studies were included in the final analysis. The results indicated that no significant differences between LP and LF group in terms of preoperative JOA scores (P = .58), postoperative JOA scores (P = .60), JOA scores improvement rate (P = 0.64), preoperative VAS (P = .34), postoperative VAS (P=.20), preoperative range of motion (ROM) (P = .10), postoperative ROM (P = .18), preoperative cervical lordosis (P = .56), C5 palsy (P = .16), and axial pain (P = .21). LF group showed larger postoperative cervical lordosis than LP group [standardized mean difference (SMD) = 1.13 (2.03, 0.24), P = .01]. However, LP group showed lower operation time [mean difference (MD) = 19.42 (26.87, 11.97), P < .001] and blood loss [MD = 94.78 (179.05, 10.51), P = .03] than LF group.

CONCLUSION

Both LP and LF can achieve clinical improvement in the treatment of multilevel cervical OPLL. LF was superior to LP in maintaining cervical lordosis. However, LP showed lower surgical trauma than LF. Kyphosis line (K-line) may be a good criterion in the selection of posterior surgery. LP was performed for the patients with K-line (+) and LF for K-line (-).

A retrospective imaging study of surgical outcomes and range of motion in patients with cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament

PURPOSE

The K line was introduced in a previous study, but did not include the cervical range of motion (ROM) as a parameter for evaluating surgical outcomes for patients with cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL), and few reports have used both the K line and X-ray evaluations of the cervical ROM to describe the surgical outcomes in such patients.

METHODS

Double-door C2-C7 or C3-C7 laminoplasty was performed in 100 patients with cervical OPLL who were classified according to the K line [86 patients, K line (+) and 14 patients, K line (-)]. Preoperative and 1-year postoperative Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) scores were used to evaluate recovery rates. Preoperative and postoperative C2-C7 lordotic angles were measured using the Cobb method. In addition, preoperative and postoperative sagittal alignments in flexion and extension were studied, and the flexion values were calculated by subtracting the preoperative and postoperative flexion ROM from extension ROM.

RESULTS

The mean JOA scores recovery rate were 57.3% in the K line (+) and 37.7% in the K line (-) groups (p < 0.05), and the respective corresponding mean postoperative C2-C7 lordotic angles were 9.1° and -3.4° (p < 0.001). In the K line (+) group, the JOA score recovery rate for a postoperative flexion value >0 was significantly lower than that for a postoperative flexion value ≤0 (p < 0.01), and the mean JOA score recovery rate worsened with an increased signal intensity on 1-year postoperative magnetic resonance imaging.

CONCLUSIONS

K line (+) patients exhibited sufficient neurological improvement after laminoplasty. However, even patients in this group had a low JOA score recovery rate if the postoperative flexion value was >0 and the 1-year postoperative increased signal intensity grade was 2 or 3.