Preliminary outcomes after vertebral body tethering (VBT) for lumbar curves and subanalysis of a 1- versus 2-tether construct

Outcomes and complications of vertebral body tethering by patient gender

PURPOSE

Non-fusion surgical options for pediatric scoliosis management such as vertebral body tethering (VBT) offer an alternative to spinal fusion. With this study, we aim to evaluate the postoperative outcomes in boys versus girls who have undergone VBT. Our hypothesis is that girls and boys will have similar outcomes by 2-year follow-up.

METHODS

This study employed a review of retrospective data for patients who underwent VBT at 10 sites between 2011 and 2020. Patients were stratified based on gender. All patients had preoperative and 2-year follow-up and were evaluated for curve correction, complications, surgery metrics, and patient reported outcomes.

RESULTS

328 patients were included in this study: 277 girls and 51 boys. Mean age at surgery was 12.2 years for girls and 13.4 years for boys. Mean preoperative curve magnitude and curve flexibility was similar between both groups. Compared to girls, boys were older, heavier and taller at the time of surgery; BMI was not different between the groups. Skeletal maturity was not different preoperatively or at 2 years. There were no significant differences for mean operative time, mean estimated blood loss, or levels instrumented. Postoperative stay was longer in the girls averaging 4.5 days compared to 3.9 days for the boys (p = 0.026). There were no statistically significant differences between boys and girls for the curve magnitude at final follow-up (28° vs 25° thoracic, 21° both groups lumbar) or percent correction (45% vs 38% thoracic, 38% vs 31% lumbar) at 2-year follow-up. Overall, 98 girls (35%) experienced medical or surgical complications compared to 18 boys (39%) (p = 0.599). Boys experienced higher rates of tether breakage at latest follow-up (33% vs. 17%, p = 0.008) and more loss of correction > 10° (10% vs. 3%, p = 0.03). Rates of reoperation were 15.9% in the girls and 15.7% in the boys (p = 0.972).

CONCLUSION

Our study found that boys on average had higher body weight than girls and also higher rates of tether cord breakage and loss of correction. Despite these differences, curve correction, modulation, and reoperation rates were similar in both groups. Further work is needed to determine the relative impact of patient gender and weight on incidence of tether breakage.

Which Lenke type curve is most appropriate for vertebral body tethering in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis?

PURPOSE

Clinical trials have studied the effects of curve magnitude and flexibility, age, and skeletal immaturity on the outcomes of VBT. No studies have assessed the effect of Lenke curve type on the outcomes of VBT. This study compares outcomes in patients who underwent VBT with Lenke type 1, 3, 5, and 6 curves.

METHODS

Single center retrospective review of patients undergoing mini-open thoracoscopic-assisted two row vertebral body tethering (2RVBT) for the correction of AIS with a minimum 2-year follow-up were included. Patients were grouped by Lenke type, which yielded 4 groups; types 1, 3, 5, or 6. Analysis included preoperative demographic parameters, as well as radiographic and clinical outcome measures.

RESULTS

156 2RVBT (Lenke 1, N = 61; Lenke 3, N = 35; Lenke 5, N = 37; Lenke 6, N = 23) patients met inclusion criteria. The mean preoperative apex Cobb angle in the Lenke type 1, 3, 5, and 6 groups were 50.2 ± 9.1, 50.5 ± 10.1, 45.0 ± 8.6, and 49.0 ± 10.8, respectively. This corrected to 21.2 ± 10.2, 19.2 ± 8.5, 13.6 ± 7.2, 18.5 ± 8.3 in Lenke type 1, 3, 5, and 6 groups, respectively, demonstrating that Lenke type 5 saw greatest correction following 2RVBT. With regards to revision recommendation following tether breakage, Lenke type 3 curves were most frequently indicated for fusion, whereas Lenke type 1 curves were most frequently not indicated for revision surgery.

CONCLUSION

Lenke type 5 curves are the most amenable to correction via 2RVBT, as evident by their lower post-operative apex Cobb angles and lowest rate of recommendation for revision to posterior spinal fusion.

Analysis of the Biomechanical Effects of Vertebral Body Tethering With Apical Fusion

STUDY DESIGN

Biomechanical study by using a multibody simulation approach.

OBJECTIVE

Objectification of spinal biomechanics after vertebral body tethering with and without apical fusion.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Vertebral body tethering, a motion-preserving surgical technique for correction of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis, is increasingly being used for thoracolumbar curves. However, tether breakage remains a common problem with breakage rates up to 60% for TL curves. Therefore, surgeons have begun to adapt their surgical technique by fusing the apex. The short-term clinical studies show a significant reduction of the tether breakage rate to 10%, but little is known about the biomechanical reasons. Therefore, this study analyzes the intervertebral compression and tether force in a tethered spine without apical fusion and in a tethered spine with apical fusion between L1/2.

METHODS

A multibody simulation approach was chosen to analyze the biomechanical effects of two surgical techniques during different physiological movements. The tether and intervertebral compression forces in the different instrumented segments are once analyzed for a T10 to L3 tethered spine and once for a T10 to L3 tethered with additional L1/2 fusion using an intervertebral cage.

RESULTS

VBT with apical fusion reduces the prevailing tether forces not only at the fused level by nearly 861 N but also at the adjacent spinal segments by around 100 N. However, a significant increase in intervertebral compression force of ~706 N can be observed, especially at the adjacent spinal segments.

CONCLUSION

L1/2 fusion in a tethered spine reduces tether forces in adjacent segments and thus might decrease the rate of tether breakage. However, fusion results in increased intervertebral compression forces by up to 31% compared with an unfused spine. Long-term clinical studies are needed to further analyze and evaluate the biomechanical consequences.

The Fate of The Broken Tether: How Do Curves Treated With Vertebral Body Tethering Behave After Tether Breakage?

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective, multicenter.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to assess curve progression and occurrence of revision surgery following tether breakage after vertebral body tethering (VBT).

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Tether breakage after VBT is common with rates up to 50% reported. In these cases, it remains unknown whether the curve will progress or remain stable.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Adolescent and juvenile idiopathic scoliosis patients in a multicenter registry with ≥2-year-follow-up after VBT were reviewed. Broken tethers were listed as postoperative complications and identified by increased screw divergence of >5 degrees on serial radiographs. Revision procedures and curve magnitude at subsequent visits were recorded.

RESULTS

Of 186 patients who qualified for inclusion, 84 (45.2%) patients with tether breakage were identified with a mean age at VBT of 12.4±1.4 years and mean curve magnitude at index procedure of 51.8±8.1 degrees. Tether breakage occurred at a mean of 30.3±11.8 months and mean curve of 33.9±13.2 degrees. Twelve patients (12/84, 14.5%) underwent 13 revision procedures after tether breakage, including six tether revisions and seven conversions to fusion. All tether revisions occurred within 5 months of breakage identification. No patients with curves <35 degrees after breakage underwent revision. Revision rate was greatest in skeletally immature (Risser 0-3) patients with curves ≥35 degrees at time of breakage (Risser 0-3: 9/17, 53% vs. Risser 4-5: 3/23, 13%, P =0.01). Curves increased by 3.1 and 3.7 degrees in the first and second year, respectively. By 2 years, 15/30 (50%) progressed >5 degrees and 8/30 (26.7%) progressed >10 degrees. Overall, 66.7% (40/60) reached a curve magnitude >35 degrees at their latest follow-up, and 14/60 (23.3%) reached a curve magnitude >45 degrees. Skeletal maturity did not affect curve progression after tether breakage ( P >0.26), but time to rupture did ( P =0.048).

CONCLUSIONS

While skeletal immaturity and curve magnitude were not independently associated with curve progression, skeletally immature patients with curves ≥35 degrees at time of rupture are most likely to undergo additional surgery. Most patients can expect progression at least 5 degrees in the first 2 years after tether breakage, though longer term behavior remains unknown.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Where does the tether break in vertebral body tethering cases? Clinical insights from revision cases after tether breakage

PURPOSE

To evaluate the sites where the tether breaks in vertebral body tethering (VBT) cases.

METHODS

Intraoperative evaluation of broken tethers in patients who had anterior revision.

INCLUSION CRITERIA

anterior revision of VBT cases with explantation of the full implant and photo documentation. Eight patients met the inclusion criteria. The primary variable of interest was the location of tether breakage in relation to the vertebral curve and the tether-screw interface. Another variable of interest was to evaluate the difference in breakage rates between anterior and posterior tethers in double tether cases.

RESULTS

Sixty tethers bridging the intervertebral disc within this cohort of eight patients were found. Seven implants were removed from thoracolumbar curves and one implant from a thoracic curve. We identified 32 tether breakages. Double tethers were used in six patients. In these six cases, 15 breakages were found in the posterior tether and 13 in the anterior tether. Four cases (50%) exhibited breakages at the apex, eight cases (100%) at the lowest instrumented vertebra (LIV), and five cases (63%) at the uppermost-instrumented vertebra (UIV). Five tether breakages (in three cases with double tether) were observed at the screw sites, while the remaining 27 exhibited cord breakages near the intervertebral discs. In double tether systems, statistical analysis did not reveal any significant difference in breakage rates between anterior and posterior tethers.

CONCLUSIONS

In VBT cases, the tether breaks mostly at the level of the intervertebral disc, adjacent to the lowest instrumented vertebra.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV (Case series with no comparison group).

Associations of overweight status with spinal curve correction and complications in patients undergoing vertebral body tethering: a multicenter retrospective review

PURPOSE

Our purpose was to determine associations between body mass index (BMI) category and outcomes of vertebral body tethering (VBT), a non-fusion treatment for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) and juvenile idiopathic scoliosis (JIS).

METHODS

Using a multicenter database, we identified patients with AIS or JIS who underwent VBT from 2012 to 2018 and had minimum 2-year follow-up (median, 3.0 [interquartile range 2.2, 3.8]). BMI percentiles were used to classify patients as overweight (≥ 85th percentile) or non-overweight (< 85th percentile). Univariate and multivariate regressions assessed associations between complication rates and curve correction between groups, controlling for sex, triradiate cartilage closure, and preoperative curve magnitude.

RESULTS

Of 271 patients, 48 (18%) were overweight. Complication rates did not differ between groups. Factors associated with less correction from preoperative to first postoperative-erect imaging were overweight (β = - 10, p < 0.001), male sex (β = - 8.8 p < 0.01), closed triradiate cartilage (β = 6.0, p = 0.01), and smaller preoperative curve (β = 0.3, p < 0.01). Factors associated with a larger curve at latest follow-up were overweight (β = 4.0, p = 0.02) and larger preoperative curve (β = 0.5, p < 0.001), but tether breakage did not differ between groups (p = 0.31).

CONCLUSION

In patients who were overweight, VBT was associated with less curve correction at first erect imaging and larger final curve. However, complications and curve correction during the modulation phase were not different from those of non-overweight patients. These findings suggest that surgeons should expect less correction with VBT in patients who are overweight but similar correction over time.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic, Level III.

Vertebral Body Tethering for Thoracolumbar Curvatures in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: Radiographic and Clinical Outcomes at 2-6-Year Follow-Up

Background: The gold standard treatment for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) is posterior spinal fusion (PSF). However, long-term consequences of PSF can include reduced spinal flexibility, back pain, and intervertebral disc degeneration. Vertebral body tethering (VBT) is a non-fusion alternative that preserves motion. We investigated the outcomes of VBT for the treatment of thoracolumbar (TL) major AIS in the largest single-surgeon series with a minimum 2-year follow-up (FU). Methods: We performed a retrospective single-center review. Inclusion criteria were AIS, Lenke 5/6 curvature, and skeletally immature Variables were compared using Student's t-tests, Wilcoxon rank sum tests, Chi-square, and Fisher's exact tests. Results: A total of 37 consecutive patients, age 14.1 ± 1.6 years, 86.5% F, 35.9 ± 11.5-month FU, were examined. Overall, 27 patients (73%) had Lenke 5 and 10 (27%) had Lenke 6 curvatures. Instrumentation of the TL curve alone was performed in 59.5%, and thoracic (T) and TL in 40.5% of patients. Overall, 45.9% of patients had two tethers placed in the TL spine; no patients had double tethers placed at the main thoracic curves. The TL (51 ± 8° to 20 ± 11°; p < 0.0001) and T (37 ± 13° to 17 ± 10°; p < 0.0001) curvatures improved from baseline to the latest FU. Overall, 89% of patients achieved major Cobb < 35°; the three patients who did not experienced at least one cord breakage or required PSF. T5-T12 kyphosis increased (p = 0.0401) and lumbar lordosis was maintained (p = 0.9236). Both the TL inclinometer (16 ± 4º to 4 ± 2°; p < 0.0001) and T (6 ± 4° to 4 ± 3°; p = 0.0036) measurements improved. There was a 49% tether breakage rate as follows: 60% for single-cord TL constructs and 35% for double cords (p = 0.0991). There was an 8.1% re-operation rate as follows: one conversion to T PSF and revision of the TL tether; one release of the T tether and revision of the TL tether; one screw revision for radiculopathy. One patient was re-admitted for poor pain control. Conclusions: Patients with TL major curvature treated with VBT experienced a high rate of clinically successful outcomes with maintenance of lumbar lordosis and relatively low complication rates at the latest FU.

The efficacy of anterior vertebral body tethering in lenke type 6 curves for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis

PURPOSE

Spinal fusion is the standard treatment for severe forms of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). However, with the lowest instrumented vertebra that is usually located at L3 or L4, patients are prone to develop adjacent segment degeneration in the long term. Vertebral body tethering (VBT) as motion preserving technique has become an alternative for select patients with AIS. Several studies have presented the outcome after thoracic VBT but no study has analyzed the outcome after VBT for Lenke type 6 curves.

METHODS

This is a retrospective single center data analysis of patients who have had bilateral VBT for Lenke type 6 curves and a minimum follow up of 24 months. Radiographic analysis was performed on several time points. Suspected tether breakages were additionally analyzed with respect to location and time at occurrence.

RESULTS

25 patients were included. Immediate thoracic curve correction was 55.4% and 71.7% for TL/L curves. Loss of correction was higher for TL/L curves and resulted in a correction rate of 48.3% for thoracic curves and 48.9% for TL/L curves at 24 months post-operatively. 22 patients were suspected to have at least one segment with a tether breakage. Three patients required a re-VBT but no patient received posterior spinal fusion.

CONCLUSION

Bilateral VBT for Lenke type 6 curves is feasible and shows a significant curve correction for thoracic and TL/L curves at a minimum of 24 months post-operatively. Tether breakage rate and loss of correction remain an unfavorable observation that needs to be improved in the future.

Early-term outcome of apical fusion with vertebral body tethering for thoracolumbar curves in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a preliminary study

INTRODUCTION

Vertebral body tethering (VBT) has become an alternative option for select patients with idiopathic scoliosis. However, studies have shown a high number of tether breakages, specifically after thoracolumbar (TL) VBT, that can have a negative impact on the outcome, when the breakage occurs within the first year after surgery. In order to overcome this problem, we have started to apply an apical fusion (AF) in combination with TL VBT for select patients. This study aims to analyze the outcome after AF plus VBT.

METHODS

This is a retrospective single surgeon's data analysis. All patients were included who have had TL VBT after January 2022 and a follow-up of 12 months. Patients were grouped based on whether they only had VBT or VBT + AF.

RESULTS

Twenty-five patients were analyzed (15 VBT, 10 VBT + AF). Both groups showed a significant curve correction for thoracic and TL curves. Minor loss of correction was observed in both groups. A significant difference was seen regarding early tether breakages, which were found in 60% of VBT patients and 10% of VBT + AF patients.

CONCLUSION

The preliminary data shows a significant reduction of early tether breakages when TL VBT is applied in combination with AF.

Double major curvature treated with vertebral body tethering of both curves: how do outcomes compare to posterior spinal fusion?

PURPOSE

Vertebral body tethering (VBT) is a non-fusion alternative to posterior spinal fusion (PSF). There have been few reports on VBT of two curvatures. We aim to compare the radiographic outcomes between VBT and PSF in patients with double curvatures in which both curves were instrumented.

METHODS

29 AIS patients matched by Lenke, age (± 2 years), triradiate cartilage closure status, major Cobb angle (± 8°), and T5-T12 kyphosis (± 10°). Variables were compared using Wilcoxon rank-sum tests, Student's t tests, and chi-Square. Clinical success was defined as major curve < 35°.

RESULTS

Group baseline demographics were similar. Major thoracic (T) curve types had significantly better major (VBT 51.5 ± 7.9° to 31.6 ± 12.0° [40%] vs. PSF 54.3 ± 7.4° to 17.4 ± 6.5° [68%]; p = 0.0002) and secondary curve correction in the PSF group. 71% of major T VBT patients were clinically successful versus 100% of PSF. Major thoracolumbar (TL) curve types experienced comparable major (VBT 52.3 ± 7.0° to 18.3 ± 11.4° (65%) vs. PSF 53.0 ± 5.2° to 23.8 ± 10.9° (56%); p = 0.2397) and secondary curve correction. 92% of major TL VBT patients were clinically successful versus 75% in the PSF group. There was no difference in T5-12 kyphosis or lumbar lordosis between groups for any curve type. There were 4 patients (13.8%) with major complications in the VBT group compared to 0 (0%) in the PSF.

CONCLUSION

Patients with double major AIS who underwent VBT with major T curve types had less correction than PSF; however, those with major TL curves experienced similar radiographic outcomes regardless of procedure. Complications were greater for VBT.

A New Look at Vertebral Body Tethering (VBT): Through the Modified Clavien-Dindo-Sink (mCDS) Classification

INTRODUCTION

Anterior vertebral body tethering (AVBT) is increasingly popular as an option for surgical treatment of idiopathic scoliosis (IS). While the technology remains new, it is important for families and patients to be able to compare it to the current standard of care, posterior spinal fusion (PSF). The purpose of this study is to describe the complication rate of AVBT in IS using the mCDS and to compare it to the recently reported complication rate of PSF in IS.

METHODS

A multicenter pediatric spine deformity database was queried for all idiopathic scoliosis patients who underwent vertebral body tethering. There were 171 patients with a minimum 9-month follow-up included in this study. Complications were retrospectively graded by 2 attending pediatric spine surgeons using the mCDS classification system.

RESULTS

Data from 171 patients with idiopathic scoliosis was available for analysis, with 156/171 (91%) of patients being female and an average age of 12.2 years old at surgery. There were 156 thoracic tethers (1 with an LIV below L2), 5 lumbar tethers, 9 staged double tethers, and only 1 patient with same-day double tether. Fifty-five (55) (32%) patients experienced a total of 69 complications. The most common complication type for VBT by mCDS was Grade IIIb, encompassing 29/69 (42%) of complications. The second most frequent complication grade was Grade I at 23/69 (33%). Thirty-four (34) out of 69 (49%) of the VBT complications reported required either procedural/surgical intervention or admission to the ICU.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first study to directly compare the complication profile of VBT to PSF using the mCDS. Forty-nine percent (49%) of the VBT complications reported were at least Grade III, while only 7% of complications in the control PSF cohort from the literature were Grade III or higher. The mCDS complication classification brings light to the early learning experience of a new technique compared to the widely accepted standard of PSF for IS.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III - Retrospective comparative study.

Incidence of Tether Breakage in Anterior Vertebral Body Tethering

BACKGROUND

Thoracic anterior vertebral body tethering (TAVBT) is an emerging treatment for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Tether breakage is a known complication of TAVBT with incompletely known incidence. We aim to define the incidence of tether breakage in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis who undergo TAVBT. The incidence of tether breakage in TAVBT is hypothesized to be high and increase with time postoperatively.

METHODS

All patients with right-sided, thoracic curves who underwent TAVBT with at least 2 and up to 3 years of radiographic follow-up were included. Tether breakage between 2 vertebrae was defined a priori as any increase in adjacent screw angle >5 degrees from the minimum over the follow-up period. The presence and timing of tether breakage were noted for each patient. A Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was performed to calculate expected tether breakage up to 36 months. χ 2 analysis was performed to examine the relationship between tether breakage and reoperations. Independent t test was used to compare the average final Cobb angle between cohorts.

RESULTS

In total, 208 patients from 10 centers were included in our review. Radiographically identified tether breakage occurred in 75 patients (36%). The initial break occurred at or beyond 24 months in 66 patients (88%). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis estimated the cumulative rate of expected tether breakage to be 19% at 24 months, increasing to 50% at 36 months. Twenty-one patients (28%) with a radiographically identified tether breakage went on to require reoperation, with 9 patients (12%) requiring conversion to posterior spinal fusion. Patients with a radiographically identified tether breakage went on to require conversion to posterior spinal fusion more often than those patients without identified tether breakage (12% vs. 2%; P =0.004). The average major coronal curve angle at final follow-up was significantly larger for patients with radiographically identified tether breakage than for those without tether breakage (31 deg±12 deg vs. 26 deg±12 deg; P =0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of tether breakage in TAVBT is high, and it is expected to occur in 50% of patients by 36 months postoperatively.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV.

Evidence-based Indications for Vertebral Body Tethering in Spine Deformity

Posterior spinal fusion has long been established as an effective treatment for the surgical management of spine deformity. However, interest in nonfusion options continues to grow. Vertebral body tethering is a nonfusion alternative that allows for the preservation of growth and flexibility of the spine. The purpose of this investigation is to provide a practical and relevant review of the literature on the current evidence-based indications for vertebral body tethering. Early results and short-term outcomes show promise for the first generation of this technology. At this time, patients should expect less predictable deformity correction and higher revision rates. Long-term studies are necessary to establish the durability of early results. In addition, further studies should aim to refine preoperative evaluation and patient selection as well as defining the benefits of motion preservation and its long-term effects on spine health to ensure optimal patient outcomes.

Automated measurements of interscrew angles in vertebral body tethering patients with deep learning

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Vertebral body tethering is the most popular nonfusion treatment for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. The effect of the tether cord on the spine can be segmentally assessed by comparing the angle between two adjacent screws (interscrew angle) over time. Tether breakage has historically been assessed radiographically by a change in adjacent interscrew angle by greater than 5° between two sets of imaging. A threshold for growth modulation has not yet been established in the literature. These angle measurements are time consuming and prone to interobserver variability.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to develop an automated deep learning algorithm for measuring the interscrew angle following VBT surgery.

STUDY DESIGN/SETTING

Single institution analysis of medical images.

PATIENT SAMPLE

We analyzed 229 standing or bending AP or PA radiographs from 100 patients who had undergone VBT at our institution.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Physiologic Measures: An image processing algorithm was used to measure interscrew angles.

METHODS

A total of 229 standing or bending AP or PA radiographs from 100 VBT patients with vertebral body tethers were identified. Vertebral body screws were segmented by hand for all images and interscrew angles measured manually for 60 of the included images. A U-Net deep learning model was developed to automatically segment the vertebral body screws. Screw label maps were used to develop and tune an image processing algorithm which measures interscrew angles. Finally, the completed model and algorithm pipeline was tested on a 30-image test set. Dice score and absolute error were used to measure performance.

RESULTS

Inter- and Intra-rater reliability for manual angle measurements were assessed with ICC and were both 0.99. The segmentation model Dice score against manually segmented ground truth across the 30-image test set was 0.96. The average interscrew angle absolute error between the algorithm and manually measured ground truth was 0.66° and ranged from 0° to 2.67° in non-overlapping screws (N=206). The primary modes of failure for the model were overlapping screws on a right thoracic/left lumbar construct with two screws in one vertebra and overexposed images. An algorithm step which determines whether an overlapping screw was present correctly identified all overlapping screws, with no false positives.

CONCLUSION

We developed and validated an algorithm which measures interscrew angles for radiographs of vertebral body tether patients with an accuracy of within 1° for the majority of interscrew angles. The algorithm can process five images per second on a standard computer, leading to substantial time savings. This algorithm may be used for rapid processing of large radiographic databases of tether patients and could enable more rigorous definitions of growth modulation and cord breakage to be established.

Bilateral vertebral body tethering: identifying key factors associated with successful outcomes

PURPOSE

The treatment of operative double major pediatric spinal deformities (e.g., Lenke 3 or 6) with bilateral vertebral body tethering (VBT) can be significantly more challenging when compared to other deformity patterns (e.g., Lenke 1) or treatment with a posterior spinal fusion. We aimed to identify preoperative and perioperative characteristics that were associated with successful postoperative outcomes in patients treated with both a thoracic and thoracolumbar (e.g., bilateral) tether.

METHODS

We retrospectively assessed radiographic and clinical data from patients enrolled in a large multi-center study who had a minimum postoperative follow-up of two years. Standard radiographic parameters were extracted from standing spine and left hand-wrist radiographs at various timepoints. We classified patients based on their preoperative deformity pattern (Primary Thoracic [TP] vs. Primary Thoracolumbar [TLP]) and assessed: (1) deformity balance, (2) tilt of the transitional vertebra, and (3) postoperative success.

RESULTS

We analyzed data from thirty-six patients (TP: 19 and TLP: 17). We observed no relationship between deformity balance at first erect and postoperative success (p = 0.354). Patients with a horizontal transitional vertebra at first erect were significantly (p = 0.001) more likely to exhibit a successful outcome when compared to those who exhibited a tilted transitional vertebra (83% vs. 62%). Patients who had TLP were also more likely to exhibit a successful outcome when compared to patients who exhibited TP (76% vs. 50%).

CONCLUSION

These data indicate that double major deformities can be successfully treated with VBT, particularly for those who exhibit TLP.

Posterior Vertebral Body Tethering: A Preliminary Study of a New Technique to Correct Lenke 5C Lumbar Curves in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis

Vertebral body tethering has been approved for adolescent scoliosis correction. The usual approach is anterior, which is relatively easy for the thoracic spine, but becomes much more challenging for the lumbar curves, with a higher rate of complications. The purpose of this study was to describe and evaluate the first results of a new posterior vertebral body tethering (PVBT) technique using pedicle screws through a posterolateral Wiltse approach. Twenty-two patients with 5C idiopathic scoliosis (Lenke classification) were included in this retrospective study, with a follow up of 2 years after surgery. The lumbar and thoracic curves were measured pre-operatively (POS), at first standing (FS) and at 2 years (2Y). Complications were also analysed. A significant improvement of 30.7° was observed for lumbar curve magnitude between POS and 2Y. Both the thoracic kyphosis and the lumbar lordosis remained stable. Thirteen complications were noted: three led to posterior arthrodesis, three needed a revision with a good outcome, and the seven others (overcorrections, screw breakage or pull-out) achieved a good result. PVBT seems an effective technique for the management of type 5 C adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. The complication rate seems high but is probably secondary to the learning curve of this new technic as it concerns only the first half of the patients.

Radiographic and perioperative outcomes following anterior thoracic vertebral body tethering and posterior lumbar spine tethering: a pilot series

BACKGROUND AND CONTEXT

 In patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) of main thoracic and lumbar spine regions, combined anterior thoracic vertebral body tethering and posterior lumbar spine tethering (ATVBT/PLST) is a novel non-fusion treatment option for growth modulation and conservation of motion.

METHODS

 Fourteen patients with AIS who underwent ATVBT/PLST with at least 2-year follow-up were included. Primary outcomes included quality of life as assessed by SRS-22 instruments, radiographic analysis, and revision operations. We secondarily reported perioperative metrics and post-operative opiate morphine equivalents (OME). Clinical success was defined as patients who achieved skeletal maturity with ≤ 30° curve magnitude of both their main thoracic and thoracolumbar/lumbar curves and who did not undergo posterior spine instrumentation and fusion (PSIF).

RESULTS

Patients had a mean age of 11.6 years (range 10-14 years), majority were girls (92%), and mean follow-up was 3.0 years (range 2-4.8 years). All patients were skeletally immature with a Risser ≤ 2. Included curves were Lenke 1C, 3C, or 6C. Mean preoperative curve magnitudes were 53° ± 8° (range 45°-65°) main thoracic and 49° ± 9° (range 40°-62°) thoracolumbar/lumbar curves. At most recent follow-up, patients had a mean main thoracic curve of 29° ± 8° (range 15°-40°) and a mean thoracolumbar/lumbar curve of 20° ± 15° (range 4°-35°). 50% required a revision operation. Cable breakage occurred in 43%, which did not always require revision. One patient progressed to thoracic fusion, but no patient underwent lumbar fusion. Patients had a mean SRS-22 outcome score of 4.2 ± 0.4.

CONCLUSIONS

ATVBT/PLST is a potential alternative to spine fusion for select immature patients with AIS at a minimum 2-year follow-up. ATVBT/PLST potentially offers motion conservation at the cost of a higher revision rate. Further study and reporting of results are necessary to refine indications and techniques, which in turn will improve outcomes of this procedure.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV-Case series without comparative group.

Biomechanical modeling and assessment of lumbar vertebral body tethering configurations

PURPOSE

Vertebral body tethering (VBT) is a fusionless spinal growth modulation technique, which shows promise for pediatric idiopathic scoliosis (IS) curve correction. This technique, mainly used for thoracic curves, is increasingly being used to treat lumbar curves in order to preserve spine flexibility. It remains necessary to adequately define the cord tension to be applied during the operation and the instrumented levels to biomechanically predict correction over time for the lumbar spine.

METHODS

Twelve pediatric patients with lumbar IS, treated with lumbar-only or lumbar and thoracic VBT, were selected for this study. Three independent variables were tested alternately using a patient-specific finite element model (FEM), which includes an algorithm modeling vertebra growth and spine curve changes due to growth modulation for 24 months post-operatively according to the Hueter-Volkmann principle. Parameters included cable tensioning (150N/250N), upper instrumented level (actual UIV, UIV-1) and lower instrumented level (actual LIV, LIV + 1). Each FEM was personalized using 3D radiographic reconstruction and flexibility supine radiographs.

RESULT

An increase in cord tension (from 150 to 250N) had significant effects on main thoracic and thoraco-lumbar/lumbar Cobb angles, as well as on lumbar lordosis, after surgery (supplementary average correction of 3° and 8°, and increase of 1.4°, respectively) and after 24 months (4°, 10° and 1.1°) (p < 0.05). Adding a level to the actual UIV or LIV did not improve correction.

CONCLUSION

This parametric study showed that cord tension is the most important biomechanical parameter on the simulated immediate and 2-year increase in lumbar curve correction. Our preliminary model suggests that it is not advantageous to add additional instrumented levels.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

This computational study uses a retrospective validation cohort (level of evidence 3).

Outcomes of vertebral body tethering in the lumbar spine

PURPOSE

The use of vertebral body tethering (VBT) for the treatment of main thoracic deformities in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients is becoming increasingly more common, but limited data exist on its safety and efficacy in thoracolumbar deformities. We aimed to evaluate the postoperative outcomes of patients with thoracolumbar (TL) deformities that were treated with VBT.

METHODS

We assessed clinical and radiographic data from twenty-eight consecutive patients that were surgically managed with VBT, all of whom exhibited a TL deformity with at least two years (mean: 44.7 ± 14.5 months) of postoperative follow-up. Standard radiographic parameters were extracted from left hand wrist and standing posterior-anterior and lateral spine radiographs at various timepoints. Outcome variables were assessed based on preoperative Lenke Classification and included: deformity measures, complications, surgical revisions, and postoperative success.

RESULTS

The mean age at the time of instrumentation was 13.4 ± 1.3 years, with an average preoperative Sanders Stage of 4.6 ± 1.4. A significant reduction in preoperative deformities was observed at most postoperative timepoints. A perioperative complication was observed in three patients and surgical revision was required in another four patients. A suspected broken tether was observed in sixteen patients, most of which occurred at the apex of the lumbar deformity. Only one patient required surgical revision due to a suspected broken tether. We observed an overall success rate of 57%, regardless of Lenke Classification.

CONCLUSIONS

These data indicate that VBT can successfully correct TL deformity patterns in 57% of patients without an increase in the rate of perioperative complications, suspected broken tethers, or surgical revisions.

Biomechanics of the tether breakage: tensile behaviour of a single-unit vertebral body tethering construct

PURPOSE

Tether breakage was reported as the most common complication of vertebral body tethering. However, as the literature suggests the physiological loads do not have the potential to cause the failure of the tether. Currently, the biomechanical reason behind the tether breakage is unknown. The current study aims to elucidate the effects of the tension forces on the failure mechanisms of the VBT and provide mechanical justification for how it can be identified radiographically.

METHODS

Tensile tests (20%/min strain rate) were performed on single-unit VBT samples. Failure modes and mechanical characteristics were reported.

RESULTS

The failure took place prematurely due to the slippage of the tether at the screw-tether junction where the tether is damaged significantly by the locking cap. Slippage was initiated at 10-13% tensile strain level where the tensile stress and tension force were 50.4 ± 1.5 MPa and 582.2 ± 30.8 N, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The failure occurs because of high-stress concentrations generated within the locking region which damages the tether surface and leads to the slippage of the tether. We observed that the loads leading to failure are within the physiological limits and may indicate the high likelihood of the tether breakage. The failure mode observed in our study is shown to be the dominant failure mode, and a design improvement on the gripping mechanism is suggested to avoid failure at the screw-tether junction. We observed that the tether elongates 10-13% prior to the breakage, which can be employed as a diagnostic criterion to screen for tether breakages radiographically.

Thoracoscopic Anterior Vertebral Body Tethering in Lenke Type-1 Right Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis

Background

Vertebral body tethering (VBT) is indicated for skeletally immature patients with progressive adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) who have failed or are intolerant of bracing and who have a major coronal curve of 40° to 65°. The vertebral body must be structurally and dimensionally adequate to accommodate screw fixation, as determined radiographically. The best indication for VBT is a flexible single major thoracic curve with nonstructural compensating lumbar and proximal thoracic curves (Lenke 1A or 1B). VBT allows for progressive correction of the deformity without spinal fusion by utilizing a minimally invasive fluoroscopic technique.

Description

The procedure for a right thoracic curve is performed with use of a right thoracoscopic approach with the patient in the left lateral decubitus position. The thoracoscope is introduced through a portal at the apex of the curvature in the posterior axillary line. Instrument portals are created lateral to each vertebral body in the mid-axillary line. Screws are inserted into each vertebral body under biplanar fluoroscopic control and with intraoperative neuromonitoring. An electroconductivity probing device, while not mandatory, is routinely utilized at our practice. The tether is attached to the most proximal screw of the construct, and then reduction is obtained sequentially by tensioning the tether from one vertebral screw to the next.

Alternatives

Bracing is the gold-standard treatment for progressive AIS involving the immature spine. The most commonly utilized surgical treatment is posterior spinal fusion (PSF), which should be considered when the major coronal curve exceeds 45°.

Rationale

PSF has proven to be a dependable technique to correct scoliotic deformities. It has a low complication rate and good long-term outcomes. However, concerns exist regarding the stiffness conferred by PSF and the long-term effects of adjacent segment disease. Thus, interest had developed in non-fusion solutions for AIS correction. VBT utilizes the Hueter-Volkmann principle to guide growth and correct deformity. Compressive forces applied to the convexity of the deformity by a polyethylene tether allow the patient's growth to realign the spine. Intraoperative correction triggers growth modulation, and most of the modulation seems to occur during the first 12 months postoperatively. The best results have been seen with a short Lenke type-1A curve in a patient with closed triradiate cartilage, a Risser 3 or lower (ideally Risser 0) iliac apophysis, and a flexible curve characterized by a 50% reduction of the major coronal curve angle on side-bending radiographs.

Expected Outcomes

In 57 immature patients with a Lenke type-1A or 1B curve (i.e., a 30° to 65° preoperative Cobb angle), Samdani et al.3 found a main thoracic Cobb angle reduction from 40° ± 7° preoperatively to 19° ± 13° at 2 years after VBT. In the sagittal plane, the T5-T12 kyphosis measured 15° ± 10° preoperatively, 17° ± 10° postoperatively, and 20° ± 13° at 2 years. No major neurologic or pulmonary complications occurred. A total of 7 (12.3%) of the 57 patients underwent surgical revision, including 5 for overcorrection and 2 to span additional vertebrae. In a study of 21 skeletally mature patients, Pehlivanoglu et al.4 found that the Cobb angle was reduced from 48° preoperatively to 16° on the first-erect postoperative radiograph and finally to 10° at the latest follow-up (mean, 27.4 months). The 2 main complications of VBT reported in the literature are overcorrection and tether breakage. Both may require revision, which explains the higher rate of revision observed for VBT compared with PSF.

Important Tips

Good patient selection is important. VBT is most appropriate in cases of a flexible Lenke type-1A or 1B curve in an immature child before Risser stage 3 and after triradiate cartilage closure.Always monitor and control screw positioning in both anteroposterior and lateral planes fluoroscopically.The screws should be placed parallel to the vertebral end plates or, even better, be angled inferiorly for the upper vertebrae and angled superiorly for the lower vertebrae to decrease the risk of pull-out when tensioning the device and during growth modulation. Less tension on the uppermost and lowermost instrumented vertebrae than at the apex, as controlled by the tensioning device, can also help to limit pull-out.

Acronyms and Abbreviations

VBT = vertebral body tetheringAIS = adolescent idiopathic scoliosisIONM = intraoperative neuromonitoringPSF = posterior spinal fusionUIV = upper instrumented vertebraLIV = lower instrumented vertebraAP = anteroposteriorK-wire = Kirschner wire.

Inter-screw index as a novel diagnostic indicator of tether breakage

PURPOSE

Tether breakage is the most common complication of Vertebral Body Tethering (VBT) occurring in up to 52% of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (AIS) patients and risks continued progression and revision. Radiographical diagnosis of tether breakage is commonly defined by a 5° increase in inter-screw angle and associates breakage with loss of correction. However, the sensitivity of this method was 56% only, suggesting that tethers can break without an increase in angulation, which was supported by other studies. To our knowledge, current literature lacks a method merely focusing on the diagnosis of tether breakage radiographically that does not associate the breakages with loss of correction.

METHODS

This was a retrospective review of prospectively collected data of AIS patients who underwent VBT. The "inter-screw index" is defined as the percentage increase in inter-screw distance since post-op, with ≥ 13% increase defined as tether breakage as suggested by our mechanical tests. CTs were reviewed to identify the breakages and compared with inter-screw angle and inter-screw index.

RESULTS

94 segments from 13 CTs were reviewed, and 15 tether breakages were identified. Use of inter-screw index correctly identified 14 breakages (93%), whereas ≥ 5° increase in inter-screw angle only identified 12 breakages (80%).

CONCLUSION

Use of inter-screw index is proven to be more sensitive than inter-screw angle in identifying tether breakages. Therefore, we propose the use of inter-screw index to diagnose tether breakages radiographically. Tether breakages were not necessarily accompanied by a loss of segmental correction leading to an increase in inter-screw angle, especially after skeletal maturity.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level 3.

Anterior Vertebral Body Tethering for Skeletally Immature Patients with AIS: Indication for Spinal Fusion at Skeletal Maturity Is Not Obviated in 60% of Cases

The role of anterior vertebral body tethering (aVBT) in obviating the need for spinal fusion in patients with AIS remains unclear, and a large amount of variation exists in the data among different studies. The present study aims to investigate and analyze what factors have a potential influence on aVBT outcome. Skeletally immature patients with AIS who underwent aVBT for scoliosis correction were followed up until skeletal maturity. The mean age at the time of surgery was 13.4 ± 1.1, and the mean follow-up time was 2.5 ± 0.5 years. The Cobb angle of the main curve was 46.6 ± 9° at the time of surgery and was significantly corrected to 17.7 ± 10.4° (p < 0.001) immediately postoperatively. A significant loss of correction was observed during the latest follow-up (Cobb angle 33.8 ± 18.7°; p < 0.001). An indication for spinal fusion at skeletal maturity was not obviated in 60% of the patients. The factors identified as having an influence on the outcome were preoperative bone age and the magnitude of the major curve. Patients with advanced bone age and larger curves were more likely to reach an indication for spinal fusion at skeletal maturity. In conclusion, no general recommendation for aVBT can be made for AIS patients. The method can be discussed as a treatment option in skeletally very immature preadolescent patients (Sanders Stadium ≤ 2) with a moderate Cobb angle (≤50°) who failed previous brace therapy.

Radiographic outcome after vertebral body tethering of the lumbar spine

INTRODUCTION

Multiple studies have analyzed the outcome after thoracic Vertebral Body Tethering (VBT). The results seem reproducible with most studies reporting coronal correction rates around 50% and a tether breakage rate near 20% at two years follow-up. There is a paucity of data on lumbar VBT, and no study has yet analyzed the radiographic outcome after lumbar VBT in a double tether technique at two years follow-up, which was the aim of this study.

METHODS

This is a retrospective, single surgeons' data analysis of all consecutive immature patients who have had VBT of the lumbar spine (to L3 or L4) between January 2019 and September 2020. Primary interest focused on coronal curve correction at two years post-operatively. Suspected tether breakages were analyzed separately and defined as an angular change of more than 5° between two adjacent screws.

RESULTS

Forty-one patients were eligible for this study and 35 (85%) had complete two-year follow-up data. Average age at surgery was 14.3 years. All patients had a Sanders stage of 7 or below. Average curve correction for thoracolumbar/lumbar curves at two years follow-up was 50%. 90% of patients had at least one level with a suspected tether breakage. No patient required a revision surgery within two years from surgery but two patients were surgically revised after two years.

CONCLUSION

VBT in the lumbar spine resulted in 50% coronal curve correction two years post-operatively despite a tether breakage in 90% of patients.

Vertebral body tethering: An alternative to posterior spinal fusion in idiopathic scoliosis?

INTRODUCTION

Skeletally immature patient with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) whose curves continue to progress despite bracing should be treated surgically. Vertebral body tethering (VBT) is a non-fusion, compression-based, growth preserving alternative to posterior spinal fusion (PSF) based on the concept of 'growth modulation' to prevent possible functional complications secondary to fusion while correcting scoliotic deformity. This review aims to shed light on the indications of VBT, short- and medium-term outcomes, describe the surgical technique and associated complications, and to compare its efficacy to that of PSF.

METHODS

A review of peer-reviewed literature on VBT as a surgical technique, its indications, outcomes, complications, and comparison with other surgical interventions to correct AIS was conducted in December 2022.

RESULTS

Indications remain controversial and mainly include stage of skeletal maturity based on radiographic markers, curve location, magnitude and flexibility, and presence of secondary curve. Assessment of VBT clinical success should not be restricted to improvement in radiographic parameters but should include functional results and patient-centered outcomes, improved body image and pain, and durability of outcomes. In contrast to fusion, VBT seems to be associated with preserved spinal growth, shorter recovery, potentially better functional outcomes, less motion loss but possibly less curve correction.

DISCUSSION

Yet still, with VBT there exists a risk of overcorrection, construct breakage or failure of procedure which require revision and at times conversion to PSF. Patient and family preferences must be accounted for acknowledging gaps in knowledge, attributes and drawbacks of each intervention.

An investigation of range of motion preservation in fusionless anterior double screw and cord constructs for scoliosis correction

PURPOSE

To evaluate the motion-preserving properties of vertebral body tethering with varying cord/screw constructs and cord thicknesses in cadaveric thoracolumbar spines.

METHODS

In vitro flexibility tests were performed on six fresh-frozen human cadaveric spines (T1-L5) (2 M, 4F) with a median age of 63 (59-to-80). An ± 8 Nm load was applied to determine range of motion (ROM) in flexion-extension (FE), lateral bending (LB), and axial rotation (AR) in the thoracic and lumbar spine. Specimens were tested with screws (T5-L4) and without cords. Single (4.0 mm and 5.0 mm) and double (4.0 mm) cord constructs were sequentially tensioned to 100 N and tested: (1) Single 4.0 mm and (2) 5.0 mm cords (T5-T12); (3) Double 4.0 mm cords (T5-12); (4) Single 4.0 mm and (5) 5.0 mm cord (T12-L4); (6) Double 4.0 mm cords (T12-L4).

RESULTS

In the thoracic spine (T5-T12), 4.0-5.0 mm single-cord constructs showed slight reductions in FE and 27-33% reductions in LB compared to intact, while double-cord constructs showed reductions of 24% and 40%, respectively. In the lumbar spine (T12-L4), double-cord constructs had greater reductions in FE (24%), LB (74%), and AR (25%) compared to intact, while single-cord constructs exhibited reductions of 2-4%, 68-69%, and 19-20%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The present biomechanical study found similar motion for 4.0-5.0 mm single-cord constructs and the least motion for double-cord constructs in the thoracic and lumbar spine suggesting that larger diameter 5.0 mm cords may be a more promising motion-preserving option, due to their increased durability compared to smaller cords. Future clinical studies are necessary to determine the impact of these findings on patient outcomes.

The different applications of Vertebral Body Tethering - Narrative review and clinical experience

Background

Vertebral body tethering (VBT) has been originally developed as a growth modulation technique for the surgical management of skeletally immature patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). Given the positive results obtained in this setting, the use of VBT is gradually expanding to other patient categories, such as those with no or limited remaining growth or with non-idiopathic scoliosis. Aim of this manuscript is to offer an overview over the current applications of VBT, along with imaging and comments derived from the clinical experience. The work was based on a literature search conducted in January 2023 on Pubmed, Scopus and Web of Science databases. Following keywords were used for the search: vertebral body tethering, adolescent idiopathic scoliosis, early onset scoliosis, neuromuscular scoliosis, syndromic scoliosis.

Results

Three patient categories in which VBT has been applied have been highlighted: VBT for growth modulation in AIS, VBT as anterior scoliosis correction in AIS and VBT for non-idiopathic curves or early-onset scoliosis.

Conclusion

While growth modulation in AIS still represents the most widespread use of VBT, the use of this technique has yielded positive results in different settings as well, such as scoliosis correction in AIS or temporary or definitive curve management in non-AIS curves. While long-term results are lacking, patient selection seems to play a central role to reduce the complication rate and ensure predictable and stable results.

Minimum 3-year experience with vertebral body tethering for treating scoliosis: A systematic review and single-arm meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Over the past 12 years, vertebral body tethering (VBT) has been gradually promoted for treating scoliosis, but there are few published studies, with only short-term follow-up. This study aimed to systematically review VBT efficacy and safety for treating scoliosis.

METHODS

PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were searched for studies on VBT treatment of scoliosis published up to November 2021. Two researchers independently screened the literature, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias in included studies. Data on clinical efficacy, unplanned reoperations, and complications were extracted. The meta-analysis was performed with R 4.1.0.

RESULTS

Twenty-six studies involving 1045 patients were included in the meta-analysis. The correction rate of major curve immediately post-operation was 46.6% ± 13.8% (16%-69%) and that at final follow-up was 53.2% ± 17.9% (16%-79%). The single-arm meta-analysis results of all included studies showed that VBT was effective in general. The overall clinical success rate was 73.02% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 68.31%-78.05%). The pooled overall unplanned reoperation rate was 8.66% (95% CI: 5.53%-13.31%). The overall incidence rate of complications was 36.8% (95% CI: 23.9%-49.7%). The subgroup analysis based on follow-up time indicated that patients with follow-up time >36 months had increased clinical success rate, unplanned reoperation rate, and incidence rate of complications compared with those with <36 months' follow-up time. The preliminary results showed that after 36 months of follow-up, only 7.17% (95% CI: 4.81%-10.55%) of patients required posterior spinal fusion (PSF) surgery and nearly 93% of patients avoided spinal fusion surgeries.

CONCLUSIONS

The current evidence from at least 3-year follow-up in different countries indicates that VBT is an effective surgical approach for treating scoliosis, with 73.88% of patients achieving clinical success. Nevertheless, about one in seven patients (15.8%) required unplanned reoperations, but only 7.17% required PSF. About half (52.17%) of the patients experienced complications. Due to the limitation of the study number and quality, our conclusion may be biased and requires verification by further studies with longer follow-up times.

The preliminary outcomes of vertebral body tethering in treating adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a systematic review

PURPOSE

VBT is a novel alternative to spinal fusion surgery to treat skeletally immature AIS and was approved to correct idiopathic scoliosis in August 2019 by US Federal Drug Administration (FDA). To systemically review the preliminary outcomes of vertebral body tethering (VBT) in treating adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

METHODS

The electronic databases PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science were queried up to January 2022 for articles regarding VBT. Basic characteristics of patients, changes of radiographic parameters in coronal and sagittal planes, and clinical outcomes of surgical treatment of VBT including complication and revision rates were summarized.

RESULTS

Twenty five studies met the inclusion criteria. Most studies (23/25) included patients with only skeletal immaturity. The average % correction of the main/tethered curve at final follow-up, and % correction of thoracic kyphosis at final follow-up were reported to be 15.6-106.5% and - 31.8 to 20.0%, respectively. The most common complications for VBT were tether breakage (n = 145;21.3%), pulmonary complications (n = 49; 6.9%), and overcorrection (n = 30; 4.2%). The revision rate was 13.1%.

CONCLUSION

VBT could effectively and safely correct spinal deformity in skeletally immature patients with AIS and preserve the motion and growth of the spine. However, VBT has a relatively high complication and revision rates. Therefore, surgeons should cautiously consider VBT for treating AIS. Future research efforts are needed to lower the complication and revision rates. Whatever, VBT is still in its infancy and may have a promising future as a non-fusion solution for AIS.

The timing of tether breakage influences clinical results after VBT

INTRODUCTION

Tether breakage is a frequent mechanical complications after vertebral body tethering (VBT), but not all patients with a breakage show loss of correction. The reason of this clinical finding has not yet been clarified. We hypothesized that the integrity of the tether is relevant only in the early stages after VBT, when it drives growth modulation and tissue remodelling. After these mechanisms have taken place, the tether loses its function and a breakage will not alter the new shape of the spine. Thus, tether breakage would have a greater clinical relevance when occurring shortly after surgery.

METHODS

All consecutive patients who underwent VBT and had a min. 2-year follow-up were included. The difference in curve magnitude between the 1st standing x-ray and the last follow-up was calculated (ΔCobb). For each curve, the presence and timing of tether breakage were recorded. The curves were grouped according to if and when the breakage was observed (no breakage, breakage at 0-6 months, 6-12 months, > 12 months). The ΔCobb was compared among these groups with the analysis of variance (ANOVA).

RESULTS

Data from 152 curves were available: 68 with no breakage, 12 with a breakage at 0-6 months, 37 at 6-12 months and 35 > 12 months. The ANOVA found significant difference in the ΔCobb among the groups (Sum of square 2553.59; degree of freedom 3; mean of square 851.1; Fisher test 13.8; P < 0.0001). Patients with no breakage or breakage at > 12 months had similar ΔCobb (mean 4.8° and 7.8°, respectively, P = 0.3), smaller than the 0-6 or 6-12 groups (15.8° and 13.8°, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Tether breakage leads to a consistent loss of correction when occurring within the first 12 months, while it has limited clinical relevance when occurring later on.

Anterior vertebral body tethering for idiopathic scoliosis: how well does the tether hold up?

PURPOSE

Durability of outcomes following vertebral body tethering (VBT) is a concern and may be impacted by tether breakage (TB), which has been unstudied in a large cohort. We characterized TB rates and their impact on clinical outcomes in the largest single-surgeon series to date.

METHODS

Inclusion criteria were VBT patients with AIS, major Cobb angle ≤ 75°, and minimum 2-year follow-up (FU). TBs were identified on 1- and 2-year FU X-rays. TB rates between single-cord and double-cord tethers were evaluated using two-proportion z test. Curve correction rates and SRS-22 scores between patients with and without TB at 2 years were evaluated using Mann-Whitney U test.

RESULTS

69 patients were included. By 2-year FU, 18 (27%) had experienced TB. TB primarily occurred in major (70%) versus minor curves and thoracolumbar tethers (75%) versus thoracic. TB rates between thoracolumbar single (32%) and double-cord tethers (30%) were not significantly different (p = 0.88). Mean major curve correction at 2-year FU was lower (p = 0.02) in patients with major curve TB (48° to 24°, 50%) versus those without (53°-21°, 60%). 2 patients (3%) required reoperation, 1 due to foraminal encroachment from a screw tip and 1 for curve progression with TB.

CONCLUSION

TB rate was 27% at 2 years following VBT. Broken major curve tethers are associated with minor loss of correction that may not be clinically significant. TB rates are higher for thoracolumbar curvatures and double cords may not be protective against TB. Further study of long-term TB rates is imperative.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Vertebral Body Tethering in 49 Adolescent Patients after Peak Height Velocity for the Treatment of Idiopathic Scoliosis: 2-5 Year Follow-Up

Vertebral Body Tethering (VBT) is a non-fusion surgical treatment for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (AIS) that elicits correction via growth modulation in skeletally immature patients. VBT after peak height velocity is controversial and is the subject of this study. A retrospective review of Risser 3−5 AIS patients treated with VBT, and min. 2-year FU was performed. Pre to post-op changes in clinical outcomes were compared using Student’s t-test or the Mann-Whitney test. A total of 49 patients met criteria, age 15.0 ± 1.9 years, FU 32.5 ± 9.1 months. For thoracic (T) major curvatures, T curvature improved from 51.1 ± 6.9° to 27.2° ± 8.1° (p < 0.01) and TL from 37.2° ± 10.7° to 19.2° ± 6.8° (p < 0.01). For thoracolumbar (TL) major curvatures, T improved from 37.2° ± 10.7° to 18.8° ± 9.4° (p < 0.01) and TL from 49.0° ± 6.4° to 20.1° ± 8.5° (p < 0.01). Major curve inclinometer measurements and SRS-22 domains, except activity, improved significantly (p ≤ 0.05). At the latest FU, one (2%) patient required fusion of the T curve and revision of the TL tether due to curve progression in the previously uninstrumented T curve and tether breakage (TB) in the TL. Twenty (41%) patients experienced TB. VBT in AIS patients with limited remaining skeletal growth resulted in satisfactory clinical outcomes at the latest FU.

Vertebral Body Tethering: Indications, Surgical Technique, and a Systematic Review of Published Results

Vertebral body tethering (VBT) represents a new surgical technique to correct idiopathic scoliosis using an anterior approach, spinal instrumentation with vertebral body screws, and a cable compressing the convexity of the curve. According to the Hueter-Volkmann principle, compression reduces and distraction increases growth on the growth plates. VBT was designed to modulate spinal growth of vertebral bodies and hence, the term ‘growth modulation’ has also been used. This review describes the indications and surgical technique of VBT. Further, a systematic review of published studies was conducted to critically evaluate the results and complications of this technique. In a total of 23 included studies on 843 patients, the preoperative main thoracic curve corrected from 49 to 23 degrees in a minimum 2 year follow-up. The complication rate of VBT was 18%. The results showed that 15% of VBT patients required reoperations for pulmonary or tether-related issues (10%) and less than 5% required conversion to spinal fusion. While the reported median-term results of VBT appear promising, long-term results of this technique are currently lacking.

Analysis of the risk factors for early tether breakage following vertebral body tethering in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis

INTRODUCTION

Tether breakage is a common mechanical complication after VBT. When this occurs shortly after surgery, patients may be at higher risk for loss of correction. Aim of this study was to analyze demographic and radiographic parameters that may potentially be risk factors for early tether breakage, as no data are yet available on this topic.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All skeletally immature patients who underwent VBT and for whom a 1-year follow-up was available were included in the study. Demographic, intraoperative and coronal and sagittal parameters from the preoperative and 1st standing X-rays were collected. Patients were divided in two groups according to the presence or absence of a breakage and the outcomes of interest were compared.

RESULTS

Data from 105 patients were available (age 14.2 ± 1.5, 153 curves). Lumbar curves showed a higher risk of breakage than thoracic ones (71% vs. 29%, P < 0.0001). Overall, preoperative risk factors were a high curve magnitude (MD, mean difference - 4.1°, P = 0.03) and a limited flexibility (MD 8.9%, P = 0.006); postoperative risk factors were a large residual curve (MD - 6.4°, P = 0.0005) and a limited correction (MD 8.4%, P = 0.0005). The same risk factors were identified in thoracic curves, while in lumbar instrumentation only a higher preoperative Cobb angle represented a risk factor for breakage. Age and skeletal maturity did not represent risk factors.

CONCLUSION

The main preoperative risk factors for early tether breakage after VBT are a high curve magnitude and a limited flexibility. A limited curve correction also represents a risk factor for this complication.

Difference between radiographically suspected and intraoperatively confirmed tether breakages after vertebral body tethering for idiopathic scoliosis

PURPOSE

Vertebral body tethering (VBT) has shown promising results but also a high tether breakage rate, which has been reported in up to 48% of patients. Tether breakages can lead to loss of correction, and the most used definition for tether breakage is a loss of segmental correction of > 5°. However, there may also be some breakages that do not have a negative influence on curve correction. Analyzing the real breakage rate was the aim of this study.

METHODS

All patients who underwent anterior revision surgery after VBT were included in this retrospective study. Real (intraoperatively confirmed) tether breakages were compared to preoperatively suspected tether breakages. The definition for a suspected tether breakage was an angular change of more than 5° between an early and the latest radiograph.

RESULTS

Ten patients who received 11 revision surgeries with a total of 15 revised curves were analyzed. Of the 80 analyzed segments, 36 were found to have a breakage. Of these 36 segments, 20 were suspected to be broken preoperatively. Sixteen breakages were not identified on preoperative radiographs (44%). One suspected broken tether was intraoperatively found to be intact.

CONCLUSION

By using the > 5° rule, only 56% of the tether breakages could be diagnosed. On the other hand, many tether breakages will not result in a loss of correction.