Incretin-based therapy and risk of cholangiocarcinoma: a nested case-control study in a population of subjects with type 2 diabetes

Real-world evidence on the association of novel antidiabetic medication use with cancer risk and protective effects: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

Background

Novel antidiabetic medications (SGLT-2 inhibitors, DPP-4 inhibitors, and GLP-1 agonists) are commonly used worldwide; however, the available research lacks definitive conclusions on their protective effects or potential risks on cancer.

Objectives

Compared to other antidiabetics, our systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA) aims to use real-world studies to assess the potential cancer risks or protective effects of these novel antidiabetics.

Methods

We comprehensively searched PubMed, CINAHL, and Web of Science from their inception until November 30, 2023. We included observational studies examining at least one novel antidiabetics in the systematic review. The novel antidiabetics include sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT-2i), dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP-4i), and glucagon-like peptide-1 agonists (GLP-1a).

Design

We focused on cohort studies that provided data on cancer incidence and sample size in the NMA. Using NetMetaXL®, the random effects model with informative priors was used in the NMA to estimate the pooled odds ratio (OR) with 95% credible intervals (CrI).

Results

The systematic review included 62 studies, of which 22 met the inclusion criteria for the NMA. SGLT-2i users had lower overall cancer risk compared to sulfonylureas (OR: 0.54; 95% CrI: 0.40-0.74, low certainty), GLP-1a (OR: 0.70; 95% CrI: 0.53-0.92, low certainty), and DPP-4i users (OR: 0.72; 95% CrI: 0.57-0.92, very low certainty). DPP-4i users also had a lower cancer risk than sulfonylureas users (OR: 0.76; 95% CrI: 0.60-0.96, low certainty). No other statistically significant ORs were found in other direct comparisons.

Conclusion

SGLT-2i users have a lower risk of developing cancers than sulfonylureas, GLP-1a, and DPP-4i users. These results may improve patient safety by guiding future clinical practice and medication choices. Future studies should investigate the mechanisms behind these observed associations.

Trial registration

This NMA was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42023469941).

Association between incretin-based drugs and risk of cholangiocarcinoma among patients with type 2 diabetes: A large population-based matched cohort study

AIM

To examine the association between the use of incretin-based drugs [glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs), dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP-4Is)] and the risk of cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) in the United States.

METHODS

This large population-based, retrospective cohort study using the TriNetX datasets included adult patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) who were new users of GLP-1RAs, DPP-4Is, or other second- or third-line antidiabetic drugs between 2010 and 2021. The primary outcome was the incidence of CCA.

RESULTS

A total of 3,816,071 patients were included (mean age, 61.4 years, female, 49.3 %). A 51 % and 23 % risk reduction in CCA after 1 year of exposure to GLP-1RAs (hazard ratio 0.49; 95 % CI 0.40-0.60) and DPP4Is (0.77, 95 % CI 0.67-0.90), respectively compared to new second-or third-line users. Results were consistent at 3, 5, and 7 years of follow-up (0.66, 0.71, and 0.72 for GLP-1RAs and 0.84, 0.87, and 0.85 for DPP-4Is, respectively). Compared to new metformin users, GLP-1RA users were associated with a 42 % lower risk of developing CCA, whereas DPP-4I group was not associated with an increased risk.

CONCLUSIONS

GLP-1RAs and DPP-4Is were not associated with a significantly increased risk of CCA. GLP-1RAs even showed a reduced risk of CCA development. They can be considered as safe and effective treatment options for patients with T2DM at risk of CCA.

Glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonist: A potential game changer for cholangiocarcinoma

Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor (GLP-1R) agonist, a subgroup of incretin-based anti-diabetic therapies, is an emerging medication with benefits in reducing blood glucose and weight and increasing cardiovascular protection. Contrarily, concerns have been raised about GLP-1R agonists increasing the risk of particular cancers. Recently, several epidemiological studies reported contradictory findings of incretin-based therapy on the risk modification for cholangiocarcinoma (CCA). The first cohort study demonstrated that incretin-based therapy was associated with an increased risk of CCA. Later studies, however, showed a null effect of incretin-based therapy on CCA risk for dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor nor GLP-1R agonist. Mechanistically, glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor is multifunctional, including promoting cell growth. High GLP-1R expressions were associated with progressive phenotypes of CCA cells in vitro. Unexpectedly, the GLP-1R agonist showed anti-tumor effects on CCA cells in vitro and in vivo with unclear mechanisms. Our recent report also showed that GLP-1R agonists suppressed the expression of GLP-1R in CCA cells in vitro and in vivo, leading to the inhibition of CCA tumor growth. This editorial reviews recent evidence, discusses the potential effects of GLP-1R agonists in CCA patients, and proposes underlying mechanisms that would benefit from further basic and clinical investigation.

Liraglutide exhibits potential anti-tumor effects on the progression of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, in vitro and in vivo

Glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor (GLP-1R) agonist is an emerging anti-diabetic medication whose effects on the risk and progression of cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) are controversial. This study aimed to elucidate the roles of GLP-1R and its agonists on intrahepatic CCA (iCCA) progression. Expressions of GLP-1R in iCCA tissues investigated by immunohistochemistry showed that GLP-1R expressions were significantly associated with poor histological grading (P = 0.027). iCCA cell lines, KKU-055 and KKU-213A, were treated with exendin-4 and liraglutide, GLP-1R agonists, and their effects on proliferation and migration were assessed. Exendin-4 and liraglutide did not affect CCA cell proliferation in vitro, but liraglutide significantly suppressed the migration of CCA cells, partly by inhibiting epithelial-mesenchymal transition. In contrast, liraglutide significantly reduced CCA tumor volumes and weights in xenografted mice (P = 0.046). GLP-1R appeared downregulated when CCA cells were treated with liraglutide in vitro and in vivo. In addition, liraglutide treatment significantly suppressed Akt and STAT3 signaling in CCA cells, by reducing their phosphorylation levels. These results suggested that liraglutide potentially slows down CCA progression, and further clinical investigation would benefit the treatment of CCA with diabetes mellitus.

The role of insulin and incretin-based drugs in biliary tract cancer: epidemiological and experimental evidence

Insulin and incretin-based drugs are important antidiabetic agents with complex effects on cell growth and metabolism. Emerging evidence shows that insulin and incretin-based drugs are associated with altered risk of biliary tract cancer (BTC). Observational study reveals that insulin is associated with an increased risk of extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ECC), but not intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) or gallbladder cancer (GBC). This type-specific effect can be partly explained by the cell of origin and heterogeneous genome landscape of the three subtypes of BTC. Similar to insulin, incretin-based drugs also exhibit very interesting contradictions and inconsistencies in response to different cancer phenotypes, including BTC. Both epidemiological and experimental evidence suggests that incretin-based drugs can be a promoter of some cancers and an inhibitor of others. It is now more apparent that this type of drugs has a broader range of physiological effects on the body, including regulation of endoplasmic reticulum stress, autophagy, metabolic reprogramming, and gene expression. In particular, dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP-4i) have a more complex effect on cancer due to the multi-functional nature of DPP-4. DPP-4 exerts both catalytic and non-enzymatic functions to regulate metabolic homeostasis, immune reaction, cell migration, and proliferation. In this review, we collate the epidemiological and experimental evidence regarding the effect of these two classes of drugs on BTC to provide valuable information.

Association of Diabetes Mellitus and Cholangiocarcinoma: Update of Evidence and the Effects of Antidiabetic Medication

Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a risk factor for cancer in many organs and associated with an increased risk of cholangiocarcinoma (CCA). The molecular linkage between these diseases has been demonstrated in preclinical studies, which have highlighted the role of hyperinsulinemia and hyperglycemia in the carcinogenesis and progression of CCA. Recent studies on the emerging role of antidiabetic medication in the development and progression of CCA showed a subclass of antidiabetic drug with a therapeutic effect on CCA. Although associations between CCA, insulin analogues and sulfonylureas are unclear, incretin-based therapy is likely associated with an increased risk for CCA, and may lead to CCA progression, as demonstrated by in vitro and in vivo experiments. In contrast, biguanides, especially metformin, exert an opposite effect, associated with a reduced risk of CCA and inhibited in vitro and in vivo CCA progression. The association between incretin-based therapy and the risk of CCA needs further clarification, as metformin is being studied in an ongoing clinical trial. Understanding the association between DM and CCA is critical for preventing the development of CCA in patients with DM, and for establishing the appropriateness of antidiabetic medication to treat CCA. Determining how metformin affects CCA can lead to repurposing this safe and well-known drug for improving CCA treatment, regardless of the diabetes status of patients.

Regenerative medicine of pancreatic islets

The pancreas became one of the first objects of regenerative medicine, since other possibilities of dealing with the pancreatic endocrine insufficiency were clearly exhausted. The number of people living with diabetes mellitus is currently approaching half a billion, hence the crucial relevance of new methods to stimulate regeneration of the insulin-secreting β-cells of the islets of Langerhans. Natural restrictions on the islet regeneration are very tight; nevertheless, the islets are capable of physiological regeneration via β-cell self-replication, direct differentiation of multipotent progenitor cells and spontaneous α- to β- or δ- to β-cell conversion (trans-differentiation). The existing preclinical models of β-cell dysfunction or ablation (induced surgically, chemically or genetically) have significantly expanded our understanding of reparative regeneration of the islets and possible ways of its stimulation. The ultimate goal, sufficient level of functional activity of β-cells or their substitutes can be achieved by two prospective broad strategies: β-cell replacement and β-cell regeneration. The "regeneration" strategy aims to maintain a preserved population of β-cells through in situ exposure to biologically active substances that improve β-cell survival, replication and insulin secretion, or to evoke the intrinsic adaptive mechanisms triggering the spontaneous non-β- to β-cell conversion. The "replacement" strategy implies transplantation of β-cells (as non-disintegrated pancreatic material or isolated donor islets) or β-like cells obtained ex vivo from progenitors or mature somatic cells (for example, hepatocytes or α-cells) under the action of small-molecule inducers or by genetic modification. We believe that the huge volume of experimental and clinical studies will finally allow a safe and effective solution to a seemingly simple goal-restoration of the functionally active β-cells, the innermost hope of millions of people globally.