The prognostic value of the prognostic nutritional index and inflammation-based markers in obstructive colorectal cancer

Cholinesterase as a predictor of skeletal muscle loss after gastrectomy for gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

Cholinesterase is a classical nutritional and inflammatory marker. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the value of cholinesterase as a predictive marker for postoperative skeletal muscle loss after gastrectomy for gastric cancer.

METHODS

The study comprised 68 patients who had undergone gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Skeletal muscle mass was evaluated using skeletal mass index, and major skeletal muscle loss was defined as less than or equal to the median change rate (1-year postoperative/preoperative) of skeletal mass index in all patients. We explored the relationship between postoperative major skeletal muscle loss and disease-free survival and overall survival. Then we investigated the relationship between change rate of skeletal muscle index and serum cholinesterase levels after gastrectomy.

RESULTS

The median value of change rate of skeletal mass index was 0.93. Postoperative major skeletal muscle loss was significantly associated with disease-free survival after gastrectomy (P = 0.003). Although major skeletal muscle loss had worse overall survival, it was not significant (P = 0.058). The change rate of skeletal mass index and cholinesterase had a stronger positive correlation compared with other nutritional indices according to Spearman's rank correlation coefficient (r = 0.438, P ≤ 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Evaluation of serum cholinesterase levels may be valuable for predicting postoperative skeletal muscle loss after gastrectomy, suggesting the importance of cholinesterase in postoperative nutritional management of patients with gastric cancer.

Prognostic Value of Systemic Inflammatory Response in Lymph Node-Negative Colorectal Cancer

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to investigate the prognostic value of systematic inflammatory response in patients with lymph node-negative colorectal cancer.

METHODS

We retrospectively investigated 245 patients with lymph node-negative colorectal cancer who underwent curative resection and evaluated the prognostic impact of systematic inflammatory response, which was represented by neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), prognostic nutritional index (PNI), and C-reactive protein-to-albumin ratio (CAR). Then, the prognostic significance of the systematic inflammatory response on survival was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method in patients selected by propensity score matching (PSM) analysis.

RESULTS

In the multivariate analysis, CAR ≥ .081 (P = .004) was independent predictors of disease-free survival, while American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status ≥3 (P = .049) and CAR ≥ .081 (P < .001) were independent predictors of overall survival. By PSM analysis, PSM-high-CAR was significantly associated with worse disease-free survival (P = .043) and overall survival (P = .041) in patients with lymph node-negative colorectal cancer.

CONCLUSIONS

C-reactive protein-to-albumin ratio may be a significant indicator of poor long-term outcomes in patients with lymph node-negative colorectal cancer.

Effect of the lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio on the prognosis of patients with obstructive colorectal cancer with a colonic stent: a retrospective multicenter study in Japan

PURPOSE

The prognostic value of the lymphocyte-to-monocyte (LMR) ratio has been reported for various cancers, including colorectal cancer (CRC). The insertion of colonic stents is considered effective for patients with surgically indicated obstructive CRC, but their LMR can vary depending on factors such as inflammation associated with stent dilation and improvement of obstructive colitis. However, the usefulness of the LMR in patients with obstructive CRC and colonic stents and the optimal timing for its measurement remain unclear. We conducted this study to investigate the relationship between the pre-stent LMR and the mid-term prognosis of patients with obstructive CRC and stents as a bridge to surgery (BTS).

METHODS

The subjects of this retrospective multicenter study were 175 patients with pathological stage 2 or 3 CRC. Patients were divided into a low pre-stent LMR group (n = 87) and a high pre-stent LMR group (n = 83).

RESULTS

Only 3-year relapse-free survival differed significantly between the low and high pre-stent LMR groups (39.9% vs. 63.6%, respectively; p = 0.015). The pre-stent LMR represented a prognostic factor for relapse-free survival in multivariate analyses (hazard ratio 2.052, 95% confidence interval 1.242-3.389; p = 0.005), but not for overall survival.

CONCLUSIONS

A low pre-stent LMR is a prognostic factor for postoperative recurrence in patients with obstructive CRC and a colonic stent as a BTS.

Correlation of gasdermin B staining patterns with prognosis, progression, and immune response in colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Pyroptosis is a type of programmed cell death mediated by the gasdermin family. Gasdermin B (GSDMB), as a member of gasdermin family, can promote the occurrence of cell pyroptosis. However, the correlations of the GSDMB expression in colorectal cancer with clinicopathological predictors, immune microenvironment, and prognosis are unclear.

METHODS

Specimens from 267 colorectal cancer cases were analyzed by immunohistochemistry to determine GSDMB expression, CD3+, CD4+, and CD8+ T lymphocytes, CD20+ B lymphocytes, CD68+ macrophages, and S100A8+ immune cells. GSDMB expression in cancer cells was scored in the membrane, cytoplasm, and nucleus respectively. GSDMB+ immune cell density was calculated. Univariate and multivariate survival analyses were performed. The association of GSDMB expression with other clinicopathological variables and immune cells were also analyzed. Double immunofluorescence was used to identify the nature of GSDMB+ immune cells. Cytotoxicity assays and sensitivity assays were performed to detect the sensitivity of cells to 5-fluorouracil.

RESULTS

Multivariate survival analysis showed that cytoplasmic GSDMB expression was an independent favorable prognostic indicator. Patients with positive cytoplasmic or nuclear GSDMB expression would benefit from 5-fluorouracil based chemotherapy. The assays in vitro showed that high GSDMB expression enhanced the sensitivity of colorectal cancer cells to 5-fluorouracil. Patients with positive membranous or nuclear GSDMB expression had more abundant S100A8+ immune cells in the tumor invasive front. Positive nuclear GSDMB expression indicated more CD68+ macrophages in the tumor microenvironment. Moreover, GSDMB+ immune cell density in the stroma was associated with a higher neutrophil percentage but a lower lymphocyte counts and monocyte percentage in peripheral blood. Furthermore, the results of double immunofluorescence showed that GSDMB co-expressed with CD68 or S100A8 in stroma cells.

CONCLUSION

The GSDMB staining patterns are linked to its role in cancer progression, the immune microenvironment, systemic inflammatory response, chemotherapeutic efficacy, and prognosis. Colorectal cancer cells with high GSDMB expression are more sensitive to 5-fluorouracil. However, GSDMB expression in immune cells has different effects on cancer progression from that in cancer cells.

Modified Naples prognostic score for evaluating the prognosis of patients with obstructive colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Inflammatory, immune, and nutritional status are key factors in obstructive colorectal cancer (OCRC). This study aims to investigate the value of modified Naples prognostic score (M-NPS) in evaluating OCRC prognosis.

METHODS

A total of 196 OCRC patients were retrospectively analyzed to construct M-NPS based on serum albumin (ALB), total cholesterol (CHOL), neutrophil:lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and lymphocyte:monocyte ratio (LMR), and then they were divided into three groups. The Kaplan-Meier (KM) method and Cox proportional hazard regression analysis were performed for overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) of OCRC patients.

RESULTS

Patients with high M-NPS had worse OS and DFS (P = 0.0001, P = 0.0011). Multivariate COX analysis showed that M-NPS was an independent prognostic factor for OCRC patients. Patients in the M-NPS 2 group had significantly worse OS (hazard ratio [HR] = 4.930 (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 2.217-10.964), P < 0.001) and DFS (HR = 3.508 (95% CI, 1.691-7.277), P < 0.001) than those in the 0 group.

CONCLUSION

M-NPS was an independent prognostic factor for OCRC patients; it might provide a potential reference for immunonutritional intervention in patients with obstruction.

Prognostic significance of osteosarcopenia in older adults with colorectal cancer

Aim

Osteopenia and sarcopenia, features of the aging process, are recognized as major health problems in an aging society. This study investigated the prognostic impact of osteosarcopenia, the coexistence of osteopenia and sarcopenia, in older adults undergoing curative resection for colorectal cancer.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed data of older adults aged 65-98 y who had undergone curative resection for colorectal cancer. Osteopenia was evaluated by bone mineral density measurement in the midvertebral core of the 11th thoracic vertebra on preoperative computed tomography images. Sarcopenia was evaluated by measuring the skeletal muscle cross-sectional area at the third lumbar vertebra level. Osteosarcopenia was defined as the coexistence of osteopenia and sarcopenia. We explored the relationship of preoperative osteosarcopenia with the disease-free and overall survival after curative resection.

Results

Among the 325 patients included, those with osteosarcopenia had significantly lower overall survival rates than those with osteopenia or sarcopenia alone (P < 0.01). In the multivariate analysis, male sex (P = 0.045), C-reactive protein-to-albumin ratio (P < 0.01), osteosarcopenia (P < 0.01), pathological T4 stage (P = 0.023), and pathological N1/N2 stage (P < 0.01) were independent predictors of disease-free survival, while age (P < 0.01), male sex (P = 0.049), C-reactive protein-to-albumin ratio (P < 0.01), osteosarcopenia (P < 0.01), pathological T4 stage (P = 0.036), pathological N1/N2 stage (P < 0.01), and carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (P = 0.041) were independent predictors of overall survival.

Conclusion

Osteosarcopenia was a strong predictor of poor outcomes in older adults undergoing curative resection for colorectal cancer, suggesting an important role of osteosarcopenia in an aging society.

Association of a newly developed Cancer Cachexia Score with survival in Stage I-III colorectal cancer

PURPOSE

Cancer cachexia, a complex multifactorial syndrome associated with sarcopenia, negatively affects the quality of life and survival in patients with several cancers. We aimed to develop a new score for cachexia assessment and evaluate its effectiveness in the classification of patients undergoing radical resection for colorectal cancer.

METHODS

This study included 396 patients who underwent radical resection for Stage I-III colorectal cancer. To develop the Cancer Cachexia Score (CCS), we analyzed predictive factors of cachexia status related to the development of sarcopenia and incorporated significant factors into the score. We then evaluated the relationship between CCS and survival after radical resection for colorectal cancer.

RESULTS

As body mass index (P < 0.001), prognostic nutritional index (P = 0.005), and tumor volume (P < 0.001) were significantly associated with the development of sarcopenia, these factors were included in CCS. Using CCS, 221 (56%), 98 (25%), and 77 (19%) patients were diagnosed with mild, moderate, and severe cancer cachexia, respectively. In multivariate analysis, severe CCS (P < 0.001), N stage 1-2 (P < 0.001), and occurrence of postoperative complications (P = 0.007) were independent predictors of disease-free survival. Age ≥ 65 years (P = 0.009), severe CCS (P < 0.001), and N stage 1-2 (P < 0.001) were independent predictors of overall survival.

CONCLUSIONS

CCS may be a useful prognostic factor for predicting poor survival after radical resection in patients with Stage I-III colorectal cancer.

A decreased preoperative platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio, systemic immune-inflammation index, and pan-immune-inflammation value are associated with the poorer survival of patients with a stent inserted as a bridge to curative surgery for obstructive colorectal cancer

PURPOSE

Inflammation is one of the hallmarks of cancer, and inflammation-based markers that are calculated easily from laboratory results have shown predictive abilities. We investigated the prognostic values of the preoperative platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), systemic immune-inflammation index (SII), and pan-immune-inflammation value (PIV) in patients with non-metastatic obstructive colorectal cancer (OCRC) and a self-expandable metallic stent inserted as a bridge to curative surgery.

METHODS

The subjects of this retrospective study were 86 patients with pathological stage I to III OCRC. We examined the associations of these biomarkers with short- and long-term outcomes.

RESULTS

Multivariate analyses revealed that a preoperative PLR < 149, SII < 597, and PIV < 209 were independently associated with poorer relapse-free survival (RFS) (P = 0.007, P < 0.001, and P = 0.002, respectively) and that a PIV < 209 was independently associated with poorer cancer-specific survival (P = 0.030). A platelet count < 240 was significantly associated with worse RFS, whereas the lymphocyte count was not. Pre-stenting PLR < 221 was an independent poor prognostic factor for RFS (P = 0.045).

CONCLUSION

This study showed that decreased preoperative PLR, SII, PIV, and pre-stenting PLR were associated with poorer RFS, contrary to the findings of most previous studies. Our results suggest that platelets and obstruction contributed primarily to the opposite relationships, which might provide new insight into the possible pathophysiology of platelet-tumor interactions generated in the OCRC environment.

Combined preoperative prognostic nutritional index and D-dimer score predicts outcome in colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

The prognostic nutritional index (PNI) and D-dimer (DD) levels represent useful prognostic indicators in colorectal cancer (CRC); however, a combination of these indicators, namely, the PNI and DD score (PDS) was less addressed.

METHODS

A retrospective study with 183 patients after curative surgery was conducted. Patients were divided into 3 subgroups: PDS 0, decreased PNI and increased DD levels; PDS 1, decreased or increased PNI and DD levels; PDS 2, increased PNI and decreased DD levels. The differences in disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were compared among these subgroups, and risk factors for outcome were determined.

RESULTS

A total of 56, 65 and 62 patients were assigned to the PDS 0, 1 and 2 subgroups, respectively. PDS was significant in predicting both the DFS (area under the curve (AUC) = 0.68, P < 0.001) and OS (AUC = 0.74, P < 0.001). PDS 0 patients were more likely to be associated with old age (P = 0.032), laparotomy (P < 0.001), elevated CEA (P = 0.001), T₃ + T₄ (P = 0.001) and advanced TNM stage (P = 0.031). PDS 0 patients had significantly inferior DFS (log rank = 18.35, P < 0.001) and OS (log rank = 28.34, P < 0.001) than PDS 1 or 2 patients. PDS was identified as an independent risk factor for both DFS (PDS 1: HR = 0.54, 95% CI: 0.30-1.00, P = 0.049; PDS 2: HR = 0.40, 95% CI: 0.20-0.79, P = 0.009) and OS (PDS 1: HR = 0.44, 95% CI: 0.22-0.88, P = 0.020; PDS 2: HR = 0.17, 95% CI: 0.06-0.45, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The PDS is a useful prognostic indicator for CRC patients after curative surgery, and PDS 0 patients have inferior survival. Additional future studies are needed to validate these findings.

Utility and safety of the self-expandable metallic colonic stent in Japanese patients who received systemic chemotherapy or palliative treatment for obstructive primary advanced colorectal cancer: A retrospective single-center medical chart evaluation

Background and Aim

The present study aimed to compare the utility and safety of the colonic self-expandable metallic stent between patients with obstructive primary colorectal cancer who underwent chemotherapy or palliative treatment care and patients bridging for surgery.

Methods

The cases of 71 patients with colonic obstructive stenosis and in-dwelling stents who were hospitalized between May 2012 and April 2020 at Karatsu Red Cross Hospital were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were classified into three groups: bridging for curative surgery (group I), receiving systemic chemotherapy (group II-A), and receiving only palliative treatment (group II-B). Technical and clinical success rates and complication rates after stenting were evaluated.

Results

No significant differences were observed in the technical (procedure) success rates (group I: 100%; group II, 97.6% [II-A: 100%; II-B: 95.8%]). The total clinical success rate was 85.9% (61/71) and did not vary significantly among the groups (group I: 82.8%; group II 88.0% [II-A: 83.3%; II-B: 91.6%]). No significant differences were observed in the early complication rates between groups I and II and in the late complication rates between groups II-A and II-B. Nutrition status, general condition, tumor staging, and 1-year survival were poorer in group II than in group I.

Conclusion

The findings show that colonic stenting for malignant obstruction was performed successfully and safely both in patients who received systemic chemotherapy or palliative therapy and in patients bridging for curative surgery, regardless of risk status for malnutrition, poor general condition, cancer stage progression, and short survival.

Predictive value of prognostic nutritional index on infection after radical gastrectomy: a retrospective study

BACKGROUND

The prognostic nutritional index (PNI) is a useful tool to evaluate nutritional status, which is associated with postoperative complications and prognosis of patients with cancer. Recent studies have shown that PNI has important predictive value for postoperative infection in cancer patients. However, the role and clinical value of PNI in infection after radical gastrectomy remains unclear. This study investigated the relationship between PNI and infection after radical surgery for gastric cancer (GC), focusing on the predictive value of PNI.

METHODS

A total of 1,111 patients with primary gastric cancer who underwent radical surgery in our hospital from December 2010 to December 2020 were included in this retrospective study. The demographic and clinicopathological data of all patients were acquired through hospital information system (HIS). Preoperative serum albumin (ALB) level and peripheral blood lymphocyte count were obtained for PNI calculation. We selected 812 patients by propensity score matching to reduce biases due to the different distributions of co-variables among the comparable groups. The factors influencing postoperative infection in the matched patients were explored using univariate and multivariate analyses.

RESULTS

Baseline characteristics significantly differed among patients with different PNI scores. After one-to-one matching, the clinicopathological data of the 2 groups were comparable, and 812 patients were included for further analysis. Among these patients, 101 developed infections, with an infection rate of 12.4%, which were mainly caused by gram-negative bacteria. The incidence of infection was significantly higher in the low PNI group than in the high PNI group. Univariate and multivariate analyses identified body mass index (BMI) ≥25 kg/m2 [odds ratio (OR) =2.314, P=0.004], diabetes mellitus (OR =1.827, P=0.042), PNI score <45 (OR =2.138, P=0.037), combined multi-organ resection (OR =2.946, P<0.001), operation time ≥240 minutes (OR =2.744, P=0.023), and perioperative blood transfusion (OR =2.595, P=0.025) as risk factors for infection after radical surgery for GC.

CONCLUSIONS

Infection is the most common complication after radical gastrectomy for GC, and a low preoperative PNI score is a risk factor for postoperative infection.

The impact of low serum cholinesterase levels on survival in patients with colorectal cancer

PURPOSE

Nutritional and inflammatory status have been associated with postoperative recurrence and poor survival in patients with colorectal cancer. The aim of the present study is to investigate the relationship between serum cholinesterase levels and postoperative outcomes among patients who underwent curative resection for colorectal cancer.

METHODS

The study comprised 174 patients who had undergone curative resection for colorectal cancer. We explored the relationship between preoperative serum cholinesterase levels and disease-free survival and overall survival after curative resection. Then patients were divided into the high-cholinesterase group (n = 102) and the low-cholinesterase group (n = 72) to analyze their clinicopathological variables including other nutritional markers and systemic inflammatory responses.

RESULTS

In multivariate analysis, lymph node metastasis (P = 0.011) and serum cholinesterase levels (P < 0.01) were independent predictors of disease-free survival, while lymph node metastasis (P = 0.013), serum cholinesterase levels (P < 0.01), and carbohydrate antigen19-9 (P = 0.022) were independent predictors of overall survival. In the low-cholinesterase group, neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio, (P = 0.021), C-reactive protein to albumin ratio (P < 0.01), and distant metastasis (P < 0.01) were higher, and prognostic nutritional index (P < 0.01) was lower compared with the high-cholinesterase group.

CONCLUSION

Preoperative low serum cholinesterase levels can be a prognostic factor for postoperative recurrence and poor prognosis in patients after curative resection for colorectal cancer, suggesting an important role of cholinesterase in the assessment of nutritional and inflammatory status in cancer patients.

Application Value of Combined Detection of NLR, PNI, D-Dimer, CD3+ T Lymphocytes, and CEA in Colorectal Cancer Screening

Objective

To investigate the application value of combined detection of neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), prognostic nutrition index (PNI), D-dimer (D-D), CD3⁺ T lymphocytes (CD3⁺ T), and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) in colorectal cancer screening.

Methods

The study cohort comprised 187 colorectal cancer patients and 100 mixed hemorrhoids patients as controls from January 2019 to August 2021 at the Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University. Comparing the levels of NLR, PNI, D-D, CD3⁺ T, and CEA between the two groups of subjects, drawing receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve evaluates the efficacy of single and combined detection for colorectal cancer screening.

Results

Compared with the control group, the levels of NLR, D-D, and CEA in the colorectal cancer group were significantly increased, while the levels of PNI and CD3⁺ T were significantly decreased (P < 0.05). ROC curve analysis showed that the combined detection of NLR, PNI, D-D, CD3⁺ T, and CEA for colorectal cancer screening had an AUC^ROC of 0.943, a sensitivity of 84.49%, a specificity of 91.00%, and a Youden index of 0.75, and its screening efficacy was significantly superior to that of a single detection (P < 0.001).

Conclusion

The combined detection of NLR, PNI, D-D, CD3⁺ T, and CEA has a high clinical application value for colorectal cancer and can provide a reference for early screening and auxiliary diagnosis of colorectal cancer.

Gustave Roussy Immune Score as a Novel Prognostic Scoring System for Colorectal Cancer Patients: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis

Aim

The Gustave Roussy Immune Score (GRIm-Score) was originally designed to select cancer patients for immunotherapy, and later was reported to be a novel prognostic scoring system in lung cancer and esophageal cancer. This study was aimed to determine the prognostic role and predictive performance of GRIm-Score in colorectal cancer (CRC) CRC patients.

Methods

We conducted a single-institution study of 1,579 adult CRC patients receiving surgical removal, and those patients were divided into low GRIm-Score group (scores 0, 1) and high GRIm-Score group (scores 2, 3). Propensity score matching (PSM) was executed to balance the potential confounding factors between the two groups. Survival and time-dependent receiver operating characteristic (Td-ROC) analyses were applied to depict the prognostic role and predictive significance of GRIm-Score in CRC patients.

Results

There were 200 cases CRC patients in high GRIm-Score group and 1,379 cases in low GRIm-Score group. CRC patients with high GRIm-Score correspond with higher level of CEA, CA125, and inflammatory indexes, such as NLR, PLR, SII, PNI, and ALRI. Correlation analysis exhibited that GRIm-Score correlated well with the established inflammatory indexes. Survival analysis revealed that CRC patients in high GRIm-Score group showed worse overall survival (OS, P <0.0001) and disease-free survival (DFS, P <0.0001) compared with those in low GRIm-Score group. Results from multivariate Cox regression implicated that high GRIm-Score was not only a potent prognostic index for unfavorable OS (HR = 1.622, 95%CI: 1.118–2.355, P = 0.0109), but also a potent risk factor for worse DFS (HR = 1.743, 95%CI: 1.188–2.558, P = 0.0045). Td-ROC analysis demonstrated that GRIm-Score exhibited the superior discriminatory power in the prediction of OS and DFS when compared to SII, PNI, and ALRI. Such strong associations between high levels of preoperative GRIm-Score and unfavorable survival outcomes remained robust after PSM analysis.

Conclusion

GRIm-Score, a novel inflammatory and nutritional risk scoring system, is a potent prognostic index in CRC patients receiving surgical removal. GRIm-Score can be used as an effective and simplified risk stratification tool for postoperative survival prediction of CRC patients.

Inflammation-Immunity-Nutrition Score: A Novel Prognostic Score for Patients with Resectable Colorectal Cancer

Purpose

This study was designed to investigate the prognostic value of the combination of high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, lymphocyte, and albumin in patients with resectable colorectal cancer.

Patients and Methods

Seven-hundred-and-nineteen patients who underwent colorectal cancer resection in Hubei Cancer Hospital were included. Inflammation-Immunity-Nutrition score (0–6) was constructed based on preoperative high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, lymphocyte, and albumin. Time-dependent receiver operating characteristic curve, decision curve, Kaplan-Meier survival curve, Cox regression, and C-index were conducted to detect the prognostic values of inflammation-immunity-nutrition score. The prognostic values of inflammation-immunity-nutrition score in different subgroups by sex, location of tumor, pathologic stage, and KRAS mutation were also explored. The prognostic performance of inflammation-immunity-nutrition score was further compared with that of other traditional prognostic indicators.

Results

The median follow-up time was 40 months. High inflammation-immunity-nutrition score (>2 scores) presented worse survival, with the adjusted hazard ratios (95% confidence intervals) of 3.106 (2.202–4.380) for overall survival and 2.105 (1.604–2.764) for disease-free survival. Besides, the associations of high inflammation-immunity-nutrition score with overall survival were even stronger in cases with wild type KRAS, with the adjusted hazard ratios (95% confidence intervals) of 4.018 (2.355–6.854). Considering the AUCs, C-indices, and hazard ratios estimates, inflammation-immunity-nutrition score presented better prognostic performance than high-sensitivity modified Glasgow prognostic score, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein to albumin ratio, prognostic nutrition index, carcinoembryonic antigen, and carbohydrate antigen 19-9 for overall survival.

Conclusion

Inflammation-immunity-nutrition score might serve as a powerful prognostic score in patients with colorectal cancer for overall survival, particularly in patients with wild type KRAS.

Selecting Patients for Palliative Procedures in Oncology

Surgical palliation in oncology can be defined as "procedures employed with non-curative intent with the primary goal of improving symptoms caused by an advanced malignancy," and is an important aspect of the end-of-life care of patients with incurable malignancies. Palliative interventions may provide great benefit, but they also carry high risk for morbidity and mortality, which may be minimized with careful patient selection. This can be done by consideration of the patient and his or her indication for the given intervention via open communication, as well as prediction of benefits and risks to define the therapeutic index of the operation or procedure.

Systemic Inflammatory Biomarkers as Surrogate Markers for Stage in Colon Cancer

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to investigate whether the systemic inflammatory parameters currently in use in staging the disease can be used as biomarker tests operated colon cancer patients. Neutrophil, lymphocyte, monocyte, platelet, neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR), lymphocyte/monocyte ratio (LMR), platelet/lymphocyte ratio (PLR), neutrophil/monocyte ratio (NMR), CRP, albumin, lymphocyte/CRP ratio, CRP/albumin ratio, and neutrophil/albumin ratio as systemic inflammatory biomarkers and prognostic nutritional index (PNI) were evaluated.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 592 patients. Patients with colon cancer in the cohort were divided into 2 subgroups: Tumor, nodes, metastases (TNM) stage 0, TNM stage 1, and TNM stage 2; early stage (n: 332) and TNM stage 3 and TNM stage 4; late stage (n: 260) colon cancer patients.

RESULTS

LDH (P < .001), NLR (P < .001), PLR (P < .05), CRP/albumin (P < .01), and neutrophil/albumin (P < .01) were significantly higher, while monocyte count (P < .05) and PNI (P < .01) were found to be significantly lower in late stage colon cancer patients than in early stage colon cancer patients. Moderate negative correlation was found between the PNI and the neutrophil/albumin ratio in late stage colon cancer patients (r: -.568, P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Our data suggest that high serum LDH, NLR, PLR, CRP/albumin, and neutrophil/albumin may be useful predictive markers for advanced stage in colon cancer. According to the receiver operating characteristic analysis results, CRP/albumin ratio can be used to discriminate early from late stage. Preoperative low monocyte count and PNI are associated with postoperative staging patients with colon cancer.

The Controlling Nutritional Status (CONUT) Score as a prognostic factor for obstructive colorectal cancer patients received stenting as a bridge to curative surgery

PURPOSE

The Controlling Nutritional Status (CONUT) Score, originally developed as a nutritional screening tool, is a cumulative score calculated from the serum albumin level, total cholesterol level, and total lymphocyte count. Previous studies have demonstrated that the score has significant prognostic value in various malignancies. We investigated the relationship between the CONUT score and long-term survival in obstructive colorectal cancer (OCRC) patients who underwent self-expandable metallic colonic stent placement and subsequently received curative surgery.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 57 pathological stage II and III OCRC patients between 2013 and 2019. The associations between the preoperative CONUT score and clinicopathological factors and patient survival were evaluated.

RESULTS

A receiver operating characteristic curve analysis revealed that the optimal cut-off value for the CONUT score was 7. A CONUT score of ≥ 7 was significantly associated with elevated CA19-9 level (p = 0.03). Multivariate analyses revealed that a CONUT score of ≥ 7 was independently associated with cancer-specific survival (hazard ratio [HR] = 10.2, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.2-85.9, p = 0.03) and disease-free survival (HR = 7.1, 95% CI 2.3-21.7, p = 0.0006).

CONCLUSION

The results demonstrated that the CONUT score was a potent prognostic indicator. Evaluating the CONUT score might result in more precise patient assessment and tailored treatment.

A higher platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio is prevalent in the presence of circulating tumor microemboli and is a potential prognostic factor for non-metastatic colon cancer

•

A high platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR; >124) before curative surgical resection was found to be associated with reduced disease-free survival (DFS) in non-metastatic colon cancer patients.

•

A high PLR was predominant among patients with circulating tumor microemboli (CTM).

•

This prospective study revealed a mechanism of interaction between circulating tumor cells (CTCs) and other blood components, and implicated platelets in CTC survival.

•

The present findings support the use of blood biomarkers to better identify and follow high-risk colon cancer patients.

Colorectal cancer is a common and often deadly cancer. Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) have been implicated as a potentially valuable prognosis factor. The detection of circulating tumor microemboli (CTM) and of simple blood component parameters that reflect inflammatory status, such as the platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), may provide information about tumor progression. The aim of this study was to explore the importance of CTCs, CTM, PLR, and NLR prospectively in non-metastatic colon cancer progression. CTCs were enriched using ISET^Ⓡ (Isolation by SizE of Tumor cells) and identified by immunocytochemical exclusion of leukocytes. We evaluated CTCs and blood cell parameters in a cohort of 69 stage I–III colon cancer patients (52.2% men; median age, 61 years; age range, 19–87 years) at a baseline timepoint prior to resection surgery. The median of CTC levels at baseline was 20 cells/8 mL (0–94) and higher levels were associated with CTM presence (p = 0.02). CTM were found in 18 (26.1%) patients. Of 18 stage I patients, 33.3% had CTM and of 51 stages II or III patients, 13.7% had CTM (p = 0.08). Patients with a high PLR (>124) were mostly (75.6%) diagnosed with high-risk stages II/III cancer (stages I/low-risk II, 24.4%; p = 0.014). All 8 patients that had disease recurrence during follow-up had a high PLR (p = 0.02 vs. low PLR). NLR was not significantly associated with disease stage or recurrence. The present results indicate that CTCs and PLR analyses may be clinically useful for colon cancer management and risk stratification.