Gamma knife surgery for brain metastases: indications for and limitations of a local treatment protocol

Outcomes of single brain metastasis treated with gamma knife stereotaxic radiosurgery(GKSR). Our experience on 103 cases

Background

Brain metastases (BM) occur in the natural course of malignant tumors in 18-40% of cases. Their management has changed considerably over the past decade thanks to the advent of Gamma knife Stereotactic Radiosurgery (GKSR).

Objective

We report our experience on Single Brain metastasis treated with (GKSR).

Methods

Patients treated by Gamma Knife stereotaxic radiosurgery (GKSR) in our institution between 2009 and 2021 for Single BM were recorded retrospectively.

Results

A total of 103 patients (n = 52; 50.5% females) were included, with a mean age of 56.33 ± 11.33. Breast (n = 39, 37.9%) and lung (n = 36, 35%) were the common original location for the primary tumors. GKSR alone without prior surgery, radiotherapy, or chemotherapy was achieved in 81.5% (n = 84). Thirteen patients (15.1%) progressed in BM volume while finding the appearance of de novo BM in 5 (5.8%) patients. The median percentage of tumor control after radiosurgery treatment was 70% (IQR: 65-78) and only 26.2% (n = 27) of patients had > 80% tumor control and stability over the median follow-up time of 5 (95% CI, 4-6) months. We found only two cases of radionecrosis (1.9%). The median survival time was 5.21 (IQR, 3-8) months. Retreatment, recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) class, and tumor stability influenced the overall survival of BM respectively (Hazard Ratio adjust (HRa)= 5.610,p = 0.045; HRa= 6.133,p = 0.031; HRa= 22.463, p = 0.036).

Conclusion

Stereotaxic Radiosurgery provides good results in terms of Overall survival with fewer neurocognitive disorders.RPA class and tumor control (stability) influenced the overall survival of single BM.

Metastatic Neoplasm Volume Kinetics Following Two-Staged Stereotactic Radiosurgery

INTRODUCTION

Multisession staged stereotactic radiosurgery (2-SSRS) represents an alternative approach for management of large brain metastases (LBMs), with potential advantages over fractionated SRS. We investigated the clinical efficacy and safety of 2-SSRS in patients with LBMs.

METHODS

LBMs patients treated with 2-SSRS between 2014-2020 were evaluated. Demographic, clinical, and radiologic information was obtained. Volumetric measurements at first SSRS, second SSRS, and follow-up imaging studies were obtained. Characteristics that might predict response to 2-SSRS were evaluated through Fischer-exact or Mann-Whitney U test.

RESULTS

Twenty-four patients with 26 LBMs were included in the study. Median marginal doses for first and second SSRS were 15 Gy (14-18 Gy) and 15 Gy (12-16 Gy), respectively. Median tumor volumes at first SSRS, second SSRS, and 3-month follow-up were 8.1 cm³ (1.5-28.5 cm³), 3.3 cm³ (0.8-26.1 cm³), and 2.2 cm³ (0.2-10.1 cm³), respectively. Overall, 24/26 lesions (92%) demonstrated early local control following the first SSRS with 17 lesions (71%) demonstrating a decrease of >30% in the T1 post-contrast MRI volume before the second SSRS and 3 lesions (12%) remaining stable. Eventually, four lesions showed disease progression after 2-SSRS. The median time to local progression was not reached and the median time to intracranial progression was 9.1 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study supports the effectiveness and safety of 2-SSRS as a treatment modality for patients with large, symptomatic brain metastases, especially in poor surgical candidates. The local failure rate and low occurrence of adverse effects are comparable to other staged radiosurgery studies.

Application of atomic force microscope in diagnosis of single cancer cells

Changes in mechanical properties of cells are closely related to a variety of diseases. As an advanced technology on the micro/nano scale, atomic force microscopy is the most suitable tool for information acquisition of living cells in human body fluids. AFMs are able to measure and characterize the mechanical properties of cells which can be used as effective markers to distinguish between different cell types and cells in different states (benign or cancerous). Therefore, they can be employed to obtain additional information to that obtained via the traditional biochemistry methods for better identifying and diagnosing cancer cells for humans, proposing better treatment methods and prognosis, and unravelling the pathogenesis of the disease. In this report, we review the use of AFMs in cancerous tissues, organs, and cancer cells cultured in vitro to obtain cellular mechanical properties, demonstrate and summarize the results of AFMs in cancer biology, and look forward to possible future applications and the direction of development.

Clinical Outcomes of Upfront Stereotactic Radiosurgery Alone for Patients With 5 to 15 Brain Metastases

BACKGROUND

The role of primary stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for patients with >4 brain metastases (BM) remains controversial.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the outcomes of patients treated with upfront SRS alone for 1, 2 to 4, and 5 to 15 BM and assess for predictors of clinical outcomes in the 5 to 15 BM group.

METHODS

A total of 478 patients treated with upfront SRS were stratified by number of lesions: 220 had 1 BM, 190 had 2 to 4 BM, and 68 patients had 5 to 15 BM. Overall survival and whole brain radiotherapy-free survival were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. The cumulative incidences of local failure and distant brain failure (DBF) were estimated using competing risks methodology. Clinicopathologic and dosimetric parameters were evaluated as predictors of survival and DBF in patients with 5 to 15 BM using Cox proportional hazards.

RESULTS

Median overall survival was 8.0, 6.3, and 4.7 mo for patients with 1, 2 to 4, and 5 to 15 BM, respectively (P = .14). One-year DBF was 27%, 44%, and 40%, respectively (P = .01). Salvage SRS and whole brain radiotherapy rates did not differ. Progressive extracranial disease and gastrointestinal primary were associated with poor survival while RCC primary was associated with increased risk of DBF. No evaluated dose-volume parameters predicted for death, neurologic death or toxicity.

CONCLUSION

SRS for 5 to 15 BM is well tolerated without evidence of an associated increase in toxicity, treatment failure, or salvage therapy. Further prospective, randomized studies are warranted to clarify the role of SRS for these patients.

Comparison of two-stage Gamma Knife radiosurgery outcomes for large brain metastases among primary cancers

PURPOSE

Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is typically considered for patients who cannot undergo surgical resection for large (> 10 cm³) brain metastases (BMs). Staged SRS requires adaptive planning during each stage of the irradiation period for improved tumor control and reduced radiation damage. However, there has been no study on the tumor reduction rates of this method. We evaluated the outcomes of two-stage SRS across multiple primary cancer types.

METHODS

We analyzed 178 patients with 182 large BMs initially treated with two-stage SRS. The primary cancers included breast (BC), non-small cell lung (NSCLC), and gastrointestinal tract cancers (GIC). We analyzed the overall survival (OS), neurological death, systemic death (SD), tumor progression (TP), tumor recurrence (TR), radiation necrosis (RN), and the tumor reduction rate during both stages.

RESULTS

The median survival time after the first Gamma Knife surgery (GKS) procedure was 6.6 months. Compared with patients with BC and NSCLC, patients with GIC had shorter OS and a higher incidence of SD. Compared with patients with NSCLC and GIC, patients with BC had significantly higher tumor reduction rates in both sessions. TP rates were similar among primary cancer types. There was no association of the tumor reduction rate with tumor control. The overall cumulative incidence of RN was 4.2%; further, the RN rates were similar among primary cancer types.

CONCLUSIONS

Two-stage SRS should be considered for BC and NSCLC if surgical resection is not indicated. For BMs from GIC, staged SRS should be carefully considered and adapted to each unique case given its lower tumor reduction rate and shorter OS.

Two-staged stereotactic radiosurgery for the treatment of large brain metastases: Single institution experience and review of literature

Introduction: Two-staged stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has been shown as an effective treatment for brain metastases that are too large for single fraction SRS. Methods: Patients with large brain metastases (>4 cm³) treated with two-staged SRS from January 2017 to December 2019 at our institution were retrospectively identified. Results: There were 23 brain metastases treated. The normal brain volume receiving equivalent 12Gy-in-single-fraction was defined as V_12E. The V_12E for original single-fraction GKS plan (mean of 41.4 cm³, range 5.6-146.1 cm³) was significantly higher compared to that of the second stage (mean of 23.7 cm³, range 2.8-92.7 cm³). The median tumor volume measured at the second stage (4.30 cm³) was reduced by an average of 52.2% compared to the first stage (9.58 cm³). Three patients (27.3%) showed local tumor progression in 4 tumors (20%). The median time to progression was 152 days. Conclusions: Two-staged SRS is an effective treatment technique for large brain metastasis that results in significant reduction of tumor volume at the second stage SRS. Optimal treatment dose has not yet been defined.

Single-Session versus Multisession Gamma Knife Radiosurgery for Large Brain Metastases from Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Retrospective Analysis

PURPOSE

To evaluate the efficacy of Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKS) in patients with large brain metastases by comparing single-session radiosurgery (S-GKS) and multisession radiosurgery (M-GKS), we retrospectively analyzed the clinical outcomes of patients who underwent GKS for brain metastases from non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between January 2010 and December 2016, 66 patients with 74 lesions ≥10 cm3 from large brain metastases from only NSCLC were included. Fifty-five patients with 60 lesions were treated with S-GKS; 11 patients with 14 lesions were treated with M-GKS. Median doses were 16 Gy (range, 11-18 Gy) for the S-GKS group and 8 Gy (range, 7-10 Gy) in three fractions for the M-GKS group.

RESULTS

With a mean follow-up period of 13.1 months (range, 1.3-76.4 months), the median survival duration was 21.1 months for all patients. Median tumor volume was 14.3 cm3 (range, 10.0-58.3 cm3). The local control rate was 77.0% and the progression-free survival rate was 73.6% at the last follow-up. There were no significant between-group differences in terms of local control rate (p = 0.10). Compared with S-GKS, M-GKS did not differ significantly in radiation-induced complications (38.1 vs. 45.4%, p =0.83). While 8 patients who underwent S-GKS experienced major complications of grade ≥3, no toxicity was observed in patients treated with M-GKS.

CONCLUSIONS

M-GKS may be an effective alternative for large brain metastases from NSCLC. Specifically, severe radiation-induced toxicity (≥grade 3) did not occur in M-GKS for large-volume metastases. Although the long-term effects and results from larger samples remain unclear, M-GKS may be a suitable palliative treatment for preserving neurological function.

Local tumor progression treated with Gamma Knife radiosurgery: differences between patients with 2-4 versus 5-10 brain metastases based on an update of a multi-institutional prospective observational study (JLGK0901)

OBJECTIVE

The Japanese Leksell Gamma Knife (JLGK)0901 study proved the efficacy of Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS) in patients with 5-10 brain metastases (BMs) as compared to those with 2-4, showing noninferiority in overall survival and other secondary endpoints. However, the difference in local tumor progression between patients with 2-4 and those with 5-10 BMs has not been sufficiently examined for this data set. Thus, the authors reappraised this issue, employing the updated JLGK0901 data set with detailed observation via enhanced MRI. They applied sophisticated statistical methods to analyze the data.

METHODS

This was a prospective observational study of 1194 patients harboring 1-10 BMs treated with GKRS alone. Patients were categorized into groups A (single BM, 455 cases), B (2-4 BMs, 531 cases), and C (5-10 BMs, 208 cases). Local tumor progression was defined as a 20% increase in the maximum diameter of the enhanced lesion as compared to its smallest documented maximum diameter on enhanced MRI. The authors compared cumulative incidence differences determined by competing risk analysis and also conducted propensity score matching.

RESULTS

Local tumor progression was observed in 212 patients (17.8% overall, groups A/B/C: 93/89/30 patients). Cumulative incidences of local tumor progression in groups A, B, and C were 15.2%, 10.6%, and 8.7% at 1 year after GKRS; 20.1%, 16.9%, and 13.5% at 3 years; and 21.4%, 17.4%, and not available at 5 years, respectively. There were no significant differences in local tumor progression between groups B and C. Local tumor progression was classified as tumor recurrence in 139 patients (groups A/B/C: 68/53/18 patients), radiation necrosis in 67 (24/31/12), and mixed/undetermined lesions in 6 (1/5/0). There were no significant differences in tumor recurrence or radiation necrosis between groups B and C. Multivariate analysis using the Fine-Gray proportional hazards model revealed age < 65 years, neurological symptoms, tumor volume ≥ 1 cm3, and prescription dose < 22 Gy to be significant poor prognostic factors for local tumor progression. In the subset of 558 case-matched patients (186 in each group), there were no significant differences between groups B and C in local tumor progression, nor in tumor recurrence or radiation necrosis.

CONCLUSIONS

Local tumor progression incidences did not differ between groups B and C. This study proved that tumor progression after GKRS without whole-brain radiation therapy for patients with 5-10 BMs was satisfactorily treated with the doses prescribed according to the JLGK0901 study protocol and that results were not inferior to those in patients with a single or 2-4 BMs.Clinical trial registration no.: UMIN000001812 (umin.ac.jp).

Evaluation of new lesions and symptoms after gamma knife radiosurgery for brain metastases: a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Symptomatic new lesions that appear after gamma knife radiosurgery (GKRS) for brain metastases have not been thoroughly described.

METHODS

Among 238 patients who underwent a single session of GKRS without whole-brain radiotherapy or surgery for brain metastases between 2009 and 2014, a total of 165 (69.3%) patients underwent follow-up magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Their electrical health records were reviewed retrospectively. The median age was 68 years, and 62.4% patients were men. The median number of brain metastases was 2. The most frequent primary organ site was the lung (71.5%). Then, we evaluated predictors for the symptoms of new lesions.

RESULTS

New lesions and leptomeningeal dissemination were observed in 101 (61.2%) and 23 (14.2%) patients, respectively. The median number of new lesions was 2; moreover, 20 of 101 patients (19.8%) with new lesions had tumours with the largest diameters of > 1 cm. Among 101 patients with new lesions, 13 were symptomatic (12.9%). Patients with larger new lesions (> 1 cm of the largest diameter) experienced symptoms more frequently (odds ratio 7.6, P < 0.01). Symptoms resolved after salvage GKRS in seven of 11 patients who abided by the recommended follow-up MRI schedule. No significant risk factors were found for symptoms of new lesions.

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of symptomatic new lesions that appeared after GKRS was low, and more than half of the patients showed improvements in their symptoms after salvage GKRS. However, careful MRI-based assessments and salvage GKRS are critical for the quality of life.

Robustness of the neurological prognostic score in brain metastasis patients treated with Gamma Knife radiosurgery

OBJECTIVE

The neurological prognostic score (NPS) was recently proposed as a means for predicting neurological outcomes, such as the preservation of neurological function and the prevention of neurological death, in brain metastasis patients treated with Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS). NPS consists of 2 groups: Group A patients were expected to have better neurological outcomes, and Group B patients were expected to have poorer outcomes. NPS robustness was tested in various situations.

METHODS

In total, 3040 patients with brain metastases that were treated with GKRS were analyzed. The cumulative incidence of the loss of neurological function independence (i.e., neurological deterioration) was estimated using competing risk analysis, and NPS was compared between Groups A and B by employing Gray's model. NPS was tested to determine if it can be applied to 5 cancer categories—non–small cell lung cancer, small cell lung cancer, gastrointestinal tract cancer, breast cancer, and other cancers—as well as if it can be incorporated into the 5 major grading systems: recursive partitioning analysis (RPA), score index for stereotactic radiosurgery (SIR), basic score for brain metastases (BSBM), graded prognostic assessment (GPA), and modified-RPA (M-RPA).

RESULTS

There were 2263 patients in NPS Group A and 777 patients in Group B. Neurological deterioration was observed in 586 patients (19.2%). The cumulative incidences of neurological deterioration were 9.5% versus 21.0%, 14.1% versus 25.4%, and 17.6% versus 27.8% in NPS Groups A and B at 1, 2, and 5 years, respectively. Significant differences were detected between the NPS groups in all cancer categories. There were significant differences between NPS Groups A and B for all classes in terms of the BSBM, GPA, and M-RPA systems, but the differences failed to reach statistical significance in terms of RPA Class I and SIR Class 0 to 3.

CONCLUSIONS

The NPS was verified as being highly applicable to all cancer categories and almost all classes for the 5 grading systems in terms of neurological function independence. This NPS system appears to be quite robust in various situations for brain metastasis patients treated with GKRS.

Impact of 2-staged stereotactic radiosurgery for treatment of brain metastases ≥ 2 cm

OBJECTIVE Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is the primary modality for treating brain metastases. However, effective radiosurgical control of brain metastases ≥ 2 cm in maximum diameter remains challenging and is associated with suboptimal local control (LC) rates of 37%-62% and an increased risk of treatment-related toxicity. To enhance LC while limiting adverse effects (AEs) of radiation in these patients, a dose-dense treatment regimen using 2-staged SRS (2-SSRS) was used. The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of this treatment strategy. METHODS Fifty-four patients (with 63 brain metastases ≥ 2 cm) treated with 2-SSRS were evaluated as part of an institutional review board-approved retrospective review. Volumetric measurements at first-stage stereotactic radiosurgery (first SSRS) and second-stage SRS (second SSRS) treatments and on follow-up imaging studies were determined. In addition to patient demographic data and tumor characteristics, the study evaluated 3 primary outcomes: 1) response at first follow-up MRI, 2) time to local progression (TTP), and 3) overall survival (OS) with 2-SSRS. Response was analyzed using methods for binary data, TTP was analyzed using competing-risks methods to account for patients who died without disease progression, and OS was analyzed using conventional time-to-event methods. When needed, analyses accounted for multiple lesions in the same patient. RESULTS Among 54 patients, 46 (85%) had 1 brain metastasis treated with 2-SSRS, 7 patients (13%) had 2 brain metastases concurrently treated with 2-SSRS, and 1 patient underwent 2-SSRS for 3 concurrent brain metastases ≥ 2 cm. The median age was 63 years (range 23-83 years), 23 patients (43%) had non-small cell lung cancer, and 14 patients (26%) had radioresistant tumors (renal or melanoma). The median doses at first and second SSRS were 15 Gy (range 12-18 Gy) and 15 Gy (range 12-15 Gy), respectively. The median duration between stages was 34 days, and median tumor volumes at the first and second SSRS were 10.5 cm³ (range 2.4-31.3 cm³) and 7.0 cm³ (range 1.0-29.7 cm³). Three-month follow-up imaging results were available for 43 lesions; the median volume was 4.0 cm³ (range 0.1-23.1 cm³). The median change in volume compared with baseline was a decrease of 54.9% (range -98.2% to 66.1%; p < 0.001). Overall, 9 lesions (14.3%) demonstrated local progression, with a median of 5.2 months (range 1.3-7.4 months), and 7 (11.1%) demonstrated AEs (6.4% Grade 1 and 2 toxicity; 4.8% Grade 3). The estimated cumulative incidence of local progression at 6 months was 12% ± 4%, corresponding to an LC rate of 88%. Shorter TTP was associated with greater tumor volume at baseline (p = 0.01) and smaller absolute (p = 0.006) and relative (p = 0.05) decreases in tumor volume from baseline to second SSRS. Estimated OS rates at 6 and 12 months were 65% ± 7% and 49% ± 8%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS 2-SSRS is an effective treatment modality that resulted in significant reduction of brain metastases ≥ 2 cm, with excellent 3-month (95%) and 6-month (88%) LC rates and an overall AE rate of 11%. Prospective studies with larger cohorts and longer follow-up are necessary to assess the durability and toxicities of 2-SSRS.

Quality of Life following Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Single and Multiple Brain Metastases

BACKGROUND: Given the neurological morbidity and poor prognosis associated with brain metastases, it is critical to deliver appropriate therapy while remaining mindful of patient quality of life (QOL). For many patients, stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) effectively controls intracranial disease, but QOL outcomes have not been characterized.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of number of brain metastases upon QOL preservation following SRS.

METHODS: The EuroQol 5 Dimensions questionnaire (EQ-5D) and Patient Health Questionnaire 9 instruments were prospectively collected from a cohort of patients undergoing SRS for brain metastasis between 2008 and 2015. These instruments served as measures of overall QOL and depression. QOL deterioration exceeding the minimum clinically important difference was considered failure. Freedom from 12-month EQ-5D index failure was the primary outcome.

RESULTS: One hundred and twenty-two SRS treatments (67 patients, 421 lesions) were eligible for inclusion. Intracranial failure (local or distant) occurred following 61% of treatments. Among 421 lesions, 8% progressed locally. Median follow-up was 12 months.

All subscores of the EQ-5D instrument expectantly worsened at last follow-up; however, the magnitude of this difference (0.079) did not exceed the EQ-5D index minimum clinically important difference (mean 0.752 vs 0.673, P &lt; .01). Twelve-month EQ-5D index QOL preservation was 79%. Patients with more than 3 brain metastases had a greater rate of EQ-5D index deterioration (hazard ratio 4.14, P &lt; .01) than those with a single metastasis.

CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with brain metastasis, QOL preservation must remain paramount as multimodality therapy continues to improve. In the present investigation, 12-month QOL preservation was 79%. However, patients with more than 3 brain metastases were at significantly greater risk for QOL decline.

Intensity-Modulated Radiosurgery for Patients with Brain Metastases: A Mature Outcomes Analysis

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of patients with brain metastases treated by tomotherapeutic Intensity-modulated Radiosurgery (IMRS). Using retrospective chart review, we analyzed the outcomes of 78 patients (age 33–83 years, median 57 years) who underwent 111 sessions of IMRS (1 to 7 sessions per patient, median 1) for brain metastases (1 to 4 targets per IMRS session, median 1) treated between 2000 and 2005 using a serial tomotherapeutic intensity-modulated radiotherapy treatment (IMRT) planning and delivery system (Peacock, Nomos Corp., Cranberry Township, PA). Treatment planning was performed using an inverse treatment planning optimization algorithm that was optimized for IMRS. A median prescription dose of 15 Gy in combination with WBI, and median 20 Gy for IMRS alone was delivered using 2–4 couch angles over 4–24 rotational arcs. Overall survival was calculated using Kaplan-Meier analysis. To determine the effects of prognostic variables on survival, univariate and multivariate analyses using proportional hazards were performed to assess the effects of age, tumor size, the combination with whole brain irradiation, presence of multiple brain metastases, and presence of extracranial disease. The median overall survival was 6.5 months (95% CI, 5.5–7.9). One- and two-year survival rates were 24% and 10%. In multivariate analyses, age greater than 60 years was the only statistically significant variable that affected survival (hazard rate 1.29, p=0.049). We conclude that tomotherapeutic IMRS is safe and effective to treat patients with brain metastases.

A new grading system focusing on neurological outcomes for brain metastases treated with stereotactic radiosurgery: the modified Basic Score for Brain Metastases

Object

The Basic Score for Brain Metastases (BSBM) proposed by Lorenzoni and colleagues is one of the best grading systems for predicting survival periods after stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for brain metastases. However, it includes no brain factors and cannot predict neurological outcomes, such as preservation of neurological function and prevention of neurological death. Herein, the authors propose a modified BSBM, adding 4 brain factors to the original BSBM, enabling prediction of neurological outcomes, as well as of overall survival, in patients undergoing SRS.

Methods

To serve as neurological prognostic scores (NPSs), the authors scored 4 significant brain factors for both preservation of neurological function (qualitative survival) and prevention of neurological death (neurological survival) as 0 or 1 as described in the following: > 10 brain tumors = 0 or ≤ 10 = 1, total tumor volume > 15 cm3 = 0 or ≤ 15 cm3 = 1, MRI findings of localized meningeal dissemination (yes = 0 or no = 1), and neurological symptoms (yes = 0 or no = 1). According to the sum of NPSs, patients were classified into 2 subgroups: Subgroup A with a total NPS of 3 or 4 and Subgroup B with an NPS of 0, 1, or 2. The authors defined the modified BSBM according to the NPS subgroup classification applied to the original BSBM groups. The validity of this modified BSBM in 2838 consecutive patients with brain metastases treated with SRS was verified.

Results

Patients included 1868 with cancer of the lung (including 1604 with non–small cell lung cancer), 355 of the gastrointestinal tract, 305 of the breast, 176 of the urogenital tract, and 134 with other cancers. Subgroup A had 2089 patients and Subgroup B 749. Median overall survival times were 2.6 months in BSBM 0 (382 patients), 5.7 in BSBM 1 (1143), 11.4 in BSBM 2 (1011) and 21.7 in BSBM 3 (302), and pairwise differences between the BSBM groups were statistically significant (all p < 0.0001). One-year qualitative survival rates were 64.6% (modified BSBM 0A, 204 patients), 45.0% (0B, 178), 82.5% (1A, 825), 63.3% (1B, 318), 86.4% (2A, 792), 73.7% (2B, 219), 91.4% (3A, 268), and 73.5% (3B, 34). One-year neurological survival rates were 82.6% (0A), 52.4% (0B), 90.5% (1A), 78.1% (1B), 91.1% (2A), 83.2% (2B), 93.9% (3A), and 76.3% (3B), where A and B identify the subgroup. Statistically significant differences in both qualitative and neurological survivals between Subgroups A and B were detected in all BSBM groups.

Conclusions

The authors' new index, the modified BSBM, was found to be excellent for predicting neurological outcomes, independently of life expectancy, in SRS-treated patients with brain metastases.

A simple and efficient methodology to improve geometric accuracy in gamma knife radiation surgery: implementation in multiple brain metastases

PURPOSE

To propose, verify, and implement a simple and efficient methodology for the improvement of total geometric accuracy in multiple brain metastases gamma knife (GK) radiation surgery.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

The proposed methodology exploits the directional dependence of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-related spatial distortions stemming from background field inhomogeneities, also known as sequence-dependent distortions, with respect to the read-gradient polarity during MRI acquisition. First, an extra MRI pulse sequence is acquired with the same imaging parameters as those used for routine patient imaging, aside from a reversal in the read-gradient polarity. Then, "average" image data are compounded from data acquired from the 2 MRI sequences and are used for treatment planning purposes. The method was applied and verified in a polymer gel phantom irradiated with multiple shots in an extended region of the GK stereotactic space. Its clinical impact in dose delivery accuracy was assessed in 15 patients with a total of 96 relatively small (<2 cm) metastases treated with GK radiation surgery.

RESULTS

Phantom study results showed that use of average MR images eliminates the effect of sequence-dependent distortions, leading to a total spatial uncertainty of less than 0.3 mm, attributed mainly to gradient nonlinearities. In brain metastases patients, non-eliminated sequence-dependent distortions lead to target localization uncertainties of up to 1.3 mm (mean: 0.51 ± 0.37 mm) with respect to the corresponding target locations in the "average" MRI series. Due to these uncertainties, a considerable underdosage (5%-32% of the prescription dose) was found in 33% of the studied targets.

CONCLUSIONS

The proposed methodology is simple and straightforward in its implementation. Regarding multiple brain metastases applications, the suggested approach may substantially improve total GK dose delivery accuracy in smaller, outlying targets.

Long-term outcome of gamma knife radiosurgery for metastatic brain tumors originating from lung cancer

Background:

Gamma knife radiosurgery (GKRS) has emerged as an important treatment option for metastasis brain tumors (MBTs). However, the long-term outcome of GKRS on MBTs originating from lung carcinoma is not well understood. The treatment of MBTs derived from lung cancer with GKRS at our institution is reviewed.

Methods:

We performed a retrospective review (2000-2013) of 173 patients with MBTs from lung cancer who received GKRS. Out of 173 patients, 38 patients had recurrent tumors after microsurgical resection and whole brain radiotherapy (WBT).

Results:

GKRS in MBTs metastasized from lung carcinoma showed significant variations in tumor growth control (decreased in 79 [45.7%] patients, arrested growth in 54 [31.2%] patients, and increased tumor size in 40 [23.1%] patients). The median survival in the study population was 14 months. Overall survival after 3 years was 25%, whereas progression-free survival after 3 years was 45%. The predictive factors for improving survival in the patients with MBTs were recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) class I (P = 0.005), absence of hydrocephalus (P = 0.001), Karnofsky performance scale (KPS) >70 (P = 0.007), age ≤65 (P = 0.041), tumor size ≤3 cm (P = 0.023), controlled primary tumor (P = 0.049), and single number of MBTS (P = 0.044).

Conclusion:

Long-term follow-up revealed that GKRS offers a high rate of tumor control and good overall survival period in both new and recurrent patients with MBTs originating from lung carcinoma. Thus, GKRS is an effective treatment option for new patients with MBTs from lung cancer, as well as an adjuvant therapy in patients with recurrent MBTs derived from lung cancer.

Long term outcome of Gamma Knife radiosurgery for metastatic brain tumors

Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS; Elekta AB, Stockholm, Sweden) has emerged as an important treatment option for metastatic brain tumors (MBT). However, the long term outcome of GKRS on MBT is not well understood. We reviewed the treatment of MBT with GKRS at our institution. We performed a retrospective review (2000-2013) of 298 patients with MBT who received GKRS. The study population was monitored clinically and radiographically after GKRS treatment. Survival benefits and predictive factors of the outcome were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier test and Cox regression model, respectively. GKRS in MBT showed significant variation in tumor growth control (decreased in 135 [45%] patients, arrested growth in 91 [37%] patients and increased tumor size in 72 [24%] patients). The median survival in the study population was 17 months. Overall and progression free survival after 3 years were 25% and 45%, respectively. The predictive factors for improving survival in the patients with MBT were recursive partitioning analysis class I (p<0.0001), absence of hydrocephalus (p<0.0001), Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) >80 (p=0.007) and absence of recurrent MBT (p=0.01). Forty (12%), 15 (4.3%) and two (0.6%) patients required GKRS, resection and whole brain radiation, respectively, after initial GKRS due to tumor progression and worsening of signs and symptoms. Our findings revealed that GKRS offers a high rate of tumor control and good survival benefits in both new and recurrent patients with MBT. Thus, GKRS is an effective treatment option for new patients with MBT, as well as an adjuvant therapy in patients with recurrent MBT.

Stereotactic radiotherapy for large solitary brain metastases

PURPOSE

To assess effectiveness and toxicity levels of stereotactic radiation therapy without whole brain radiation therapy in patients with solitary brain metastases larger than 3cm.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between June 2007 and March 2009, 12 patients received fractionated stereotactic radiation therapy and 24 patients underwent stereotactic radiosurgery. For the fractionated stereotactic radiation therapy group, 3×7.7Gy were delivered to the planning target volume (PTV); median volume and diameter were 29.4 cm(3) and 4.4cm, respectively. For the stereotactic radiosurgery group, 14Gy were delivered to the PTV; median volume and diameter were 15.6 cm(3) and 3.7cm, respectively.

RESULTS

Median follow-up was 218 days. For the fractionated stereotactic radiation therapy group, local control rates were 100% at 360 days and 64% at 720 days; for the stereotactic radiosurgery group, rates were 58% at 360 days and 48% at 720 days (P=0.06). Median survival time was 504 days for the fractionated stereotactic radiation therapy group and 164 days for the stereotactic radiosurgery group (P=0.049). Two cases of grade 2 toxicity were observed in the fractionated stereotactic radiation therapy group, and 6 cases of grade 1-2 toxicity, in the stereotactic radiosurgery group.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides data to support that fractionated stereotactic radiation therapy without whole brain radiation therapy with a margin dose of 3 fractions of 7.7Gy for treatment of solitary large brain metastases is efficient and well-tolerated. Because of the significant improvement in overall survival, this schedule should be assessed in a randomized trial.

Stereotactic radiosurgery for brain metastases

The authors discuss the results of Gamma Knife (Elekta AB, Stockholm, Sweden) radiosurgery (GKS) for brain metastases based on their retrospective review of 2645 cases. All patients were treated according to the same protocol, with the tumors being irradiated with GKS without up-front whole-brain radiation therapy at the initial treatment. New distant lesions, detected by gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) performed every 2 to 3 months, were treated primarily with GKS. New distant lesions are generally well controlled with GKS salvage treatment. However, careful observation with enhanced MRI and appropriate salvage treatments are needed to prevent neurologic death and maintain activities of daily life.

Stereotactic radiosurgery in the treatment of brain metastases: the current evidence

Chemotherapy has made substantial progress in the therapy of systemic cancer, but the pharmacological efficacy is insufficient in the treatment of brain metastases. Fractionated whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) has been a standard treatment of brain metastases, but provides limited local tumor control and often unsatisfactory clinical results. Stereotactic radiosurgery using Gamma Knife, Linac or Cyberknife has overcome several of these limitations, which has influenced recent treatment recommendations. This present review summarizes the current literature of single session radiosurgery concerning survival and quality of life, specific responses, tumor volumes and numbers, about potential treatment combinations and radioresistant metastases. Gamma Knife and Linac based radiosurgery provide consistent results with a reproducible local tumor control in both single and multiple brain metastases. Ideally minimum doses of ≥18Gy are applied. Reported local control rates were 90-94% for breast cancer metastases and 81-98% for brain metastases of lung cancer. Local tumor control rates after radiosurgery of otherwise radioresistant brain metastases were 73-90% for melanoma and 83-96% for renal cell cancer. Currently, there is a tendency to treat a larger number of brain metastases in a single radiosurgical session, since numerous studies document high local tumor control after radiosurgical treatment of >3 brain metastases. New remote brain metastases are reported in 33-42% after WBRT and in 39-52% after radiosurgery, but while WBRT is generally applied only once, radiosurgery can be used repeatedly for remote recurrences or new metastases after WBRT. Larger metastases (>8-10cc) should be removed surgically, but for smaller metastases Gamma Knife radiosurgery appears to be equally effective as surgical tumor resection (level I evidence). Radiosurgery avoids the impairments in cognition and quality of life that can be a consequence of WBRT (level I evidence). High local efficacy, preservation of cerebral functions, short hospitalization and the option to continue a systemic chemotherapy are factors in favor of a minimally invasive approach with stereotactic radiosurgery.

Efficacy and limitations of salvage gamma knife radiosurgery for brain metastases of small-cell lung cancer after whole-brain radiotherapy

BACKGROUND

The efficacy and limitations of salvage gamma knife surgery (GKS) have not been thoroughly described. This study evaluated the efficacy of GKS for treating brain metastases associated with small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) after whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) as the first-line radiation therapy.

METHODS

Forty-four patients with recurrent or new SCLC-associated brain metastases underwent GKS after receiving WBRT (median age, 62 years; median duration between WBRT and first GKS, 8.8 months). The median Karnofsky performance status (KPS) score was 100 (range, 40-100), and the median number of brain metastases at the first GKS was five. Ten patients who partially or completely responded to chemotherapy received prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) for limited disease.

RESULTS

The median prescribed dose and number of lesions treated with the initial GKS were 20.0 Gy and 3.5, respectively, and the tumor control rate was 95.8 % (median follow-up period, 4.0 months). The 6-month new lesion-free survival, functional preservation rates, and overall survival were 50.0 %, 94.7 %, and 5.8 months, respectively. Neurological death occurred in 17.9 % of cases. The poor prognostic factors for new lesion-free survival time and functional preservation were >5 brain metastases and carcinomatous meningitis, respectively. Poor prognostic factors for survival time were KPS <70, >10 brain metastases, diameter of the largest tumor >20 mm, and carcinomatous meningitis. Median overall survival time from brain metastasis diagnosis was 16.9 months.

CONCLUSIONS

GKS may be an effective option for controlling SCLC-associated brain metastases after WBRT and for preventing neurological death in patients without carcinomatous meningitis.

Prognostic factors for patients in postoperative brain metastases from surgically resected non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Postoperative recurrence in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) reduces the life expectancy of patients. In this retrospective study, we investigated the prognostic factors in patients with postoperative brain metastases from surgical resected non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective chart review of patients who had undergone resection for NSCLC between April 2004 and February 2009 and found 65 had experienced postoperative brain metastases by March 2010. We reviewed these patients for clinicopathological information, treatments and responses to treatment, and overall survival.

RESULTS

The 5-year survival rate after the diagnosis of brain metastases was 15.4 %. Significantly favorable prognostic factors for patients after a diagnosis of brain metastases included female gender, adenocarcinoma, a small number (1-3) of brain metastases, no extracranial metastasis at the diagnosis of brain metastases, radiation treatment (whole-brain radiation and/or stereotactic irradiation), and local treatment [stereotactic irradiation and/or surgical operation (craniotomy)]. Furthermore, in patients with only brain metastases as the postoperative initial recurrence, the favorable positive prognostic factors included a small number (1-3) of brain metastases, adjuvant chemotherapy, chemotherapy (including adjuvant and other chemotherapy and excluding epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors), and local treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study found that the foregoing clinical characteristics in postoperative brain metastases and the administration of treatment contributed to patient life expectancy.

A prospective pilot study of two-session Gamma Knife surgery for large metastatic brain tumors

The purpose of this prospective study is to evaluate the efficacy and limitations of two-session Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKS) alone for large metastatic brain tumors. Inclusion criteria were as follows: (i) patients with large metastatic brain tumors (volume >15 cm(3) in the supratentorial region or >10 cm(3) in the infratentorial region), and (ii) tumors not causing clinical signs of impending cerebral herniation. Twenty-eight lesions in 27 consecutive patients (18 men and 9 women, age range 32 to 88 years, median age 65 years) were included in this study. The radiosurgical protocol was as follows: 20-30 Gy given in two fractions 3-4 weeks apart. The local tumor control rate and the overall survival rate were calculated by using the Kaplan-Meier method. Median tumor volumes were 17.8 cm(3) at first GKS and 9.7 cm(3) at second GKS. Median follow-up time was 8.9 months. The local control rate was 85 % at 6 months and 61 % at 12 months. The overall survival rate after GKS was 63 % at 6 months and 45 % at 12 months. The 1-year rate of prevention of neurological death was maintained at 78 %. Mean Karnofsky performance status (KPS) improved from 61 [95 % confidence interval (CI), 57-71] at first GKS to 80 (95 % CI, 74-85) at second GKS; the best follow-up mean KPS was 85 (95 % CI, 78-91) (p < 0.001). Local tumor recurrence necessitated craniotomy in two patients and repeat GKS in three patients. Seventeen patients died, and the causes of death were as follows: 3 from local progression, 2 from meningeal carcinomatosis, and 12 from progression of the primary tumor. Delayed symptomatic perilesional edema developed in one patient and eventually resolved with conservative treatment. Two-session GKS for large brain metastases appears to be an effective treatment in terms of both local tumor control and neurological palliation with minimal treatment-related morbidity. These data suggest that two-session GKS could be used as an alternative to surgical resection of large tumors in patients with significant comorbidity and/or at an advanced age. The optimum regimen for dose and fraction schedule remains to be established.

Radiosurgery for large brain metastases

PURPOSE

To determine the efficacy and safety of radiosurgery in patients with large brain metastases treated with radiosurgery.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Eighty patients with large brain metastases (>14 cm(3)) were treated with radiosurgery between 1998 and 2009. The mean age was 59 ± 11 years, and 49 (61.3%) were men. Neurologic symptoms were identified in 77 patients (96.3%), and 30 (37.5%) exhibited a dependent functional status. The primary disease was under control in 36 patients (45.0%), and 44 (55.0%) had a single lesion. The mean tumor volume was 22.4 ± 8.8 cm(3), and the mean marginal dose prescribed was 13.8 ± 2.2 Gy.

RESULTS

The median survival time from radiosurgery was 7.9 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 5.343-10.46), and the 1-year survival rate was 39.2%. Functional improvement within 1-4 months or the maintenance of the initial independent status was observed in 48 (60.0%) and 20 (25.0%) patients after radiosurgery, respectively. Control of the primary disease, a marginal dose of ≥11 Gy, and a tumor volume ≥26 cm(3) were significantly associated with overall survival (hazard ratio, 0.479; p = .018; 95% CI, 0.261-0.880; hazard ratio, 0.350; p = .004; 95% CI, 0.171-0.718; hazard ratio, 2.307; p = .006; 95% CI, 1.274-4.180, respectively). Unacceptable radiation-related toxicities (Radiation Toxicity Oncology Group central nervous system toxicity Grade 3, 4, and 5 in 7, 6, and 2 patients, respectively) developed in 15 patients (18.8%).

CONCLUSION

Radiosurgery seems to have a comparable efficacy with surgery for large brain metastases. However, the rate of radiation-related toxicities after radiosurgery should be considered when deciding on a treatment modality.

Hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy for oligometastases in the brain: a single-institution experience

The treatment of brain metastases is changing. Many different radiotherapy options are now available and under clinical evaluation. As part of this effort, we retrospectively evaluated the efficacy and toxicity of hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (HSRT) in patients with up to three brain metastases. Sixty-five patients with 81 lesions were treated with hypofractionated radiotherapy. Median dose was 24 Gy in three fractions. Median follow-up was 24.6 months. Actuarial tumour control was 75 and 45% at 9 months and 24 months after treatment, respectively. Median survival time was 7.5 months, and 32% of the patients died from brain tumour progression. Actuarial overall survival was 75% at 3 months and 25% at 12 months. Recursive partitioning analysis class was the only significant prognostic factor. Neoadjuvant whole-brain radiotherapy (in 29 patients) had no impact on survival or local control. Neurological status improved in 42 patients (65%). Adverse events were rare and usually mild. This experience suggests HSRT should be considered as an alternative approach in the treatment of one to three metastatic lesions in selected patients.

Gamma Knife surgery for brain metastases from colorectal cancer. Clinical article

OBJECT

The outcomes after Gamma Knife surgery (GKS) were retrospectively analyzed in patients with brain metastases from radioresistant primary colorectal cancer to evaluate the efficacy of GKS and the prognostic factors for local tumor control and overall survival.

METHODS

The authors reviewed the medical records of 152 patients with 616 tumors. The group included 102 men and 50 women aged 35-85 years (mean age 64.4 years), who underwent GKS for metastatic brain tumors from colorectal cancer between April 1992 and September 2008 at Yokohama Rosai Hospital.

RESULTS

The mean prescription dose to the tumor margin was 18.5 Gy (range 8-30 Gy). The mean tumor volume at GKS was 2.0 cm(3) (range 0.004-10.0 cm(3)). The primary tumors were located in the colon in 88 patients and the rectum in 64. The median interval between the diagnosis of primary lesions and the diagnosis of brain metastases was 27 months (range 0-180 months). The median neuroradiological follow-up period after GKS was 3 months (mean 6.4 months, range 1-93 months). The local tumor growth control rate, based on MR imaging, was 91.2%. The significant factors for unfavorable local tumor growth control, based on multivariate analysis, were larger tumor volume (p = 0.001) and lower margin dose (p = 0.016). The median overall survival time was 6 months. Lower Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS) score (p = 0.026) and the presence of extracranial metastases (p = 0.004) at first GKS were significantly correlated with poor overall survival period in multivariate analysis. The cause of death was systemic disease in 112 patients and neurological disease in 13 patients. Leptomeningeal carcinomatosis was significantly correlated with a shorter duration of neurological survival in multivariate analysis (p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Gamma Knife surgery is effective for suppression of local tumor growth in patients with brain metastases from radioresistant colorectal primary cancer. Therefore, clinical and radiological screening of intracranial metastases for patients with lower KPS scores and/or the presence of extracranial metastases as well as follow-up examinations after GKS for brain metastases should be performed periodically in patients with colorectal cancer, because the neurological prognosis is improved by initial and repeat GKS for newly diagnosed or recurrent tumors leading to a prolonged high-quality survival period.

Gamma knife surgery for 1-10 brain metastases without prophylactic whole-brain radiation therapy: analysis of cases meeting the Japanese prospective multi-institute study (JLGK0901) inclusion criteria

We evaluated the results of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) alone using gamma knife (GK) for selected patients with 1-10 brain metastases without prophylactic whole-brain radiation therapy (WBRT) among JLGK0901-eligible cases. Seven hundred seventy-eight consecutive cases meeting the following JLGK0901 study inclusion criteria were analyzed: (1) newly diagnosed brain metastases, (2) 1-10 brain lesions, (3) less than 10 cm(3) volume of the largest tumor, (4) less than 15 cm(3) total tumor volume, (5) no magnetic resonance (MR) findings of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) dissemination, and (6) no impaired activity of daily living [<70 Karnofsky Performance Score (KPS)] due to extracranial disease. At initial treatment, all lesions were irradiated with SRS without upfront WBRT. Thereafter, enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was applied every 2-3 months, and new distant lesions were appropriately retreated with SRS or WBRT. We divided patients according to tumor number: single lesion for group A (280 cases), 2 for group B (135), 3-4 for group C (148), 5-6 for group D (93), and 7-10 for group E (122). Differences among groups were compared in terms of overall, neurological, qualitative, and new-lesion-free survival (NLFS). Median age was 65 years (range 26-92 years). There were 505 men and 273 women. The primary organ was lung in 579 patients, gastrointestinal tract in 79, breast in 48, urinary tract in 34, and others/unknown in 38. Mean survival time was 0.72 years (0.83 years for 1, 0.69 years for 2, 0.69 years for 3-4, 0.59 years for 5-6, and 0.62 years for 7-10 metastases). On multivariate analysis, significant poor prognostic factors for overall survival (OS) were active systemic disease, poor (<70) initial KPS, and male gender. Neurological survival and qualitative survival at 1 year were 92.7% and 88.2%, respectively. NLFS at 6 months and 1 year were 69.8% and 43.8%, respectively. There were statistically significant differences in new lesion emergence between groups A and B and between groups B and C. SRS using GK provides excellent results in selected patients with 1-10 brain lesions, without prophylactic WBRT. This study revealed that brain lesion number has no effect on any of the four types of survivals, which is anticipated to be confirmed by the JLGK0901 study.

Strategy of surgery and radiation therapy for brain metastases

Cancer patients with brain metastases have poor prognoses and their median survival time is about 1 year. Surgery with whole-brain radiation therapy (WBRT) has been used in the treatment of single brain metastasis measuring 3 cm or more. Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) including the use of the Gamma knife and Cyberknife is widely used for the treatment of small and multiple brain metastases; however, recent clinical studies have revealed that SRS + WBRT is superior to WBRT or SRS alone in terms of survival time and local tumor control rates. Here, surgical indications and the strategy of surgery and radiation therapy are discussed, based on many clinical trials of treatments for brain metastases. To improve the survival rate and quality of life for these cancer patients with brain metastases, it is necessary to choose the most suitable mode of surgery and radiotherapy with the close cooperation of physicians, surgeons, radiologists, and neurosurgeons, based on accumulated evidence.

Three-staged stereotactic radiotherapy without whole brain irradiation for large metastatic brain tumors

PURPOSE

To evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of staged stereotactic radiotherapy with a 2-week interfraction interval for unresectable brain metastases more than 10 cm(3) in volume.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Subjects included 43 patients (24 men and 19 women), ranging in age from 41 to 84 years, who had large brain metastases (> 10 cc in volume). Primary tumors were in the colon in 14 patients, lung in 12, breast in 11, and other in 6. The peripheral dose was 10 Gy in three fractions. The interval between fractions was 2 weeks. The mean tumor volume before treatment was 17.6 +/- 6.3 cm(3) (mean +/- SD). Mean follow-up interval was 7.8 months. The local tumor control rate, as well as overall, neurological, and qualitative survivals, were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

At the time of the second and third fractions, mean tumor volumes were 14.3 +/- 6.5 (18.8% reduction) and 10.6 +/- 6.1 cm(3) (39.8% reduction), respectively, showing significant reductions. The median overall survival period was 8.8 months. Neurological and qualitative survivals at 12 months were 81.8% and 76.2%, respectively. Local tumor control rates were 89.8% and 75.9% at 6 and 12 months, respectively. Tumor recurrence-free and symptomatic edema-free rates at 12 months were 80.7% and 84.4%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The 2-week interval allowed significant reduction of the treatment volume. Our results suggest staged stereotactic radiotherapy using our protocol to be a possible alternative for treating large brain metastases.

Gamma Knife surgery for metastatic brain tumors

Object

The authors compared results of Gamma Knife surgery (GKS) for brain metastases obtained at 2 institutions in Japan.

Methods

They analyzed a consecutive series of 2390 patients with brain metastases who underwent GKS from 1998 through 2005 in 2 institutes (1181 patients in Chiba; 1209 in Mito). In the 2 facilities, 1 neurosurgeon each was responsible for diagnosis, patient selection, GKS procedures, and follow-up (T.S. in Chiba, M.Y. in Mito). Even if tumor numbers exceeded 4, all visible lesions were irradiated with a total skull integral dose (TSID) of ≤ 10–12 J. No prophylactic whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) was applied. If new distant lesions were detected, salvage GKS was appropriately performed.

Results

The distributions of patient and treatment factors did not differ between institutes. The most common primary tumors were lung cancer (1572 patients), followed by gastrointestinal tract (316), breast (211), kidney (113), and other cancers (159). The median survival periods were 7.7 months in Chiba and 7.0 months in Mito (p = 0.0635). The significant poor prognostic factors for overall survival were active extracranial disease status, male sex, and low initial Karnofsky Performance Scale score on multivariate analysis (all p < 0.0001). The neurological survival rates at 1 year were 86.6% in Chiba and 84.2% in Mito (p = 0.3310).

Conclusions

This 2-institute study demonstrated no significant institutional differences in any of the treatment result items. Gamma Knife surgery for brain metastases without prophylactic WBRT prevents neurological death and allows a patient to maintain good brain condition. However, there is 1 important patient selection criterion: regardless of how many tumors there are, all lesions can be irradiated with a TSID of ≤12 J.

Trastuzumab prolongs overall survival in patients with brain metastases from Her2 positive breast cancer

BACKGROUND

Brain metastases are frequently encountered in Her2 positive advanced breast cancer. It is still not clear, if trastuzumab treatment should be continued following their diagnosis. In this analysis we evaluated if trastuzumab was able to influence time to in-brain progression (TTP) and overall survival (OS). For this reason, we compared patients who continued on trastuzumab with a historical control group.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Seventeen Her2 positive patients receiving whole brain radiotherapy for brain metastases and continuing on trastuzumab were identified. As historical control group, thirty-six patients treated before 2002 were identified from a breast cancer database. We performed a multivariate analysis (Cox regression) to explore which factors were potentially able to significantly influence TTP and OS.

RESULTS

Median TTP was 6 months, range 1-33+ months. Median OS was 7 months, range 1-38 months. Seventeen patients received trastuzumab after WBRT. Factors associated with prolonged TTP were KPS (p = 0.001), and intensified local treatment (p = 0.004). A trend towards longer TTP was observed in patients treated with trastuzumab (p = 0.068). OS was significantly influenced by KPS (p < 0.001), and continued antibody therapy (p = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Two parameters were significantly associated with prolonged OS: KPS and trastuzumab. While there was a trend towards prolonged TTP in patients with trastuzumab treatment after WBRT, this did not reach statistical significance. It appears therefore reasonable to suggest continuation of antibody therapy in patients with good performance status despite disease spreading to the brain. Concerning activity of trastuzumab in brain metastases themselves, no final conclusion is possible.

Gamma Knife surgery for metastatic brain tumors without prophylactic whole-brain radiotherapy: results in 1000 consecutive cases

Object

The authors analyzed the effectiveness of Gamma Knife surgery (GKS) for metastatic brain tumors without adjuvant prophylactic whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT). Salvage GKS was performed as the sole treatment for new distant lesions.

Methods

Among 1127 patients in whom new brain metastases had been diagnosed, 97 who met one or more of the following three criteria were excluded from the study: any surgically inaccessible huge (≥ 35 mm) lesion; tumor number and size requiring an internal skull dose exceeding 10 J; or symptomatic carcinomatous meningitis. Thus, 1030 consecutive patients formed the basis for this study. Huge tumors were totally removed, whereas smaller lesions were treated with GKS. No adjuvant WBRT was given prior to GKS, and new distant lesions were appropriately retreated with GKS. Overall, neurological and new lesion–free survival curves were calculated and the prognostic values of covariates were obtained. In total, 1853 separate GKS sessions were required to treat 10,163 lesions.The patients' median overall survival period was 8.6 months. Neurological survival and new lesion–free rates at 1 year were 89.1 and 49.3%, respectively. In a multivariate analysis, the significant factors for poor prognosis were the development of more than four new brain metastases and active extracranial disease.

Conclusions

In meeting the goal of preventing neurological death and maintaining activities of daily living for patients with brain metastases, GKS alone provides excellent palliation without prophylactic WBRT. New distant lesions were quite well controlled with GKS salvage treatment alone.

Intensified local treatment and systemic therapy significantly increase survival in patients with brain metastases from advanced breast cancer - a retrospective analysis

BACKGROUND

Brain metastases have evolved from a rare to a frequently encountered event in advanced breast cancer due to advances in palliative systemic treatment.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

All Patients treated at our centre from 1994 to 2004 with WBRT for brain metastases from breast cancer were included. We performed a multivariate analysis (Cox regression) to explore which factors are able to influence significantly cerebral time to progression (TTP) and overall survival (metastatic sites [visceral versus non-visceral], Karnofsky performance score [KPS], age, intensified local treatment [boost irradiation, neuro-surgical resection] further systemic treatment).

RESULTS

Overall 174 patients, median age 51 years, range 27-76 years, were included. Median TTP was 3 months (m), range 1-33+ m. Median overall survival was 7 m, range 1-44 m. Factors significantly influencing TTP were KPS (p = 0.002), intensified local treatment (p < 0.001), and palliative systemic treatment (p = 0.001). Factors significantly influencing survival were intensified local treatment (p = 0.004), metastatic sites (p = 0.008), KPS (p = 0.006), and palliative systemic treatment (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

As shown by the significant influence of metastatic sites, some patients die from their advanced systemic tumour situation before they would die from cerebral progression. In other individuals however, intensified local treatment and systemic treatment appear to influence cerebral time to progression and overall survival.