The role of surgical resection in the management of brain metastasis: a 17-year longitudinal study

Integrated analysis of molecular and clinical features associated with overall survival in melanoma patients with brain metastasis

Melanoma brain metastases (MBMs) are diagnosed in up to 60% of metastatic melanoma patients. Previous studies have identified clinical factors that correlate with overall survival (OS) after MBM diagnosis. However, molecular and immune features associated with OS are poorly understood. An improved understanding of the molecular and immune correlates of OS could provide insights into MBM patient outcomes and guide therapeutic development. Thus, we analyzed clinical features and outcomes of 74 melanoma patients who underwent surgical resection (via craniotomy) between 1991 and 2015 at our institution with RNA-seq data generated from their MBMs. The median post-operative OS was 8.6 months (range 0.6-146.9). On univariate analysis (UVA), the expression of multiple immune gene signatures was associated with improved OS, including IFN-γ Index, T cell-inflamed and the Expanded Immune Genes. The gene expression signatures of several immune cell types (i.e., T cells, CD8 T cells, cytotoxic lymphocytes, NK cells, monocytes) positively correlated with OS, whereas higher neutrophil gene expression correlated with shorter OS. UVA of clinical features identified low Karnofsky performance score (KPS), elevated serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), presence of extracranial metastases (ECMs), and uncontrolled (versus controlled) ECMs as clinical predictors of shorter survival. Multivariate analyses (MVA) were performed with significant clinical factors and all immune features without any redundant highly correlated variables in the model. After backward selection, multivariable coxPH model identified low KPS, low T cell signature, and low monocytic lineage signature as independent predictors of shorter survival. Finally, comparative analysis of MBMs from patients with MBMs only showed that these tumors were characterized by decreased oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS) and increased immune infiltration signature versus MBMs from patients with concurrent ECMs. Together these results support the clinical significance of specific immune features of MBMs and suggest their potential use as prognostic biomarkers.

Stereotactic radiosurgery versus whole-brain radiotherapy for intracranial metastases: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Brain metastasis has a negative influence on the morbidity and mortality of cancer patients. Conventionally, whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) was favored as the standard treatment for brain metastases. However, it has been linked to a significant decline in neuro-cognitive function and poor quality of life. Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has recently gained prominence as an alternative modality, considering that it provides targeted high-dose radiation while minimizing adverse effects. This study evaluates the efficacy and safety of SRS versus WBRT in patients with intracranial metastases.

Methods

According to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement, through July 2024, we searched PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science for articles comparing WBRT and SRS in patients with intracranial metastases. Outcomes included local and distant recurrence, leptomeningeal disease (LMD), and survival. We also used a random-effect model to perform a meta-analysis.

Results

The findings revealed no significant differences in local (risk ratio [RR] = 0.70, 95% confidence interval [CI] [0.46, 1.06]) or distant recurrence rates (RR = 0.83, 95% CI [0.54, 1.28], P = 0.41) between WBRT and SRS. However, SRS was associated with a greater risk of post-radiation LMD (hazard ratio [HR] = 3.09, 95% CI [1.47, 6.49], P = 0.003). Survival rates at 1 year (RR = 1.03, 95% CI [0.83, 1.29], P = 0.76) and 5 years (RR = 0.89, 95% CI [0.39, 2.04], P = 0.78) demonstrated no significant differences.

Conclusion

SRS and WBRT exhibited similar recurrence rates and overall survival (OS) at 1 and 5 years, with WBRT being more effective in managing post-radiation LMD. SRS patients, on the other hand, had longer OS when measured in months.

Preoperative mapping techniques for brain tumor surgery: a systematic review

Accurate preoperative mapping is crucial for maximizing tumor removal while minimizing damage to critical brain functions during brain tumor surgery. Navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation (nTMS), magnetoencephalography (MEG), and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) are established methods for assessing motor and language function. Following PRISMA guidelines, this systematic review analyzes the reliability, clinical utility, and accessibility of these techniques. A total of 128 studies (48 nTMS, 56 fMRI, 24 MEG) were identified from various databases. The analysis finds nTMS to be a safe, standardized method with high accuracy compared to direct cortical stimulation for preoperative motor mapping. Combining nTMS with tractography allows for preoperative assessment of short-term and long-term motor deficits, which may not be possible with fMRI. fMRI data interpretation requires careful consideration of co-activated, non-essential areas (potentially leading to false positives) and situations where neural activity and blood flow are uncoupled (potentially leading to false negatives). These limitations restrict fMRI's role in preoperative planning for both motor and language functions. While MEG offers high accuracy in motor mapping, its high cost and technical complexity contribute to the limited number of available studies. Studies comparing preoperative language mapping techniques with direct cortical stimulation show significant variability across all methods, highlighting the need for larger, multicenter studies for validation. Repetitive nTMS speech mapping offers valuable negative predictive value, allowing clinicians to evaluate whether a patient should undergo awake or asleep surgery. Language function monitoring heavily relies on the specific expertise and experience available at each center, making it challenging to establish general recommendations.

Role of microsurgical tumor burden reduction in patients with breast cancer brain metastases considering molecular subtypes: a two-center volumetric survival analysis

BACKGROUND

Advancements in metastatic breast cancer (BC) treatment have enhanced overall survival (OS), leading to increased rates of brain metastases (BM). This study analyzes the association between microsurgical tumor reduction and OS in patients with BCBM, considering tumor molecular subtypes and perioperative treatment approaches.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of surgically treated patients with BCBM from two tertiary brain tumor Swiss centers. The association of extent of resection (EOR), gross-total resection (GTR) achievement, and postoperative residual tumor volume (RV) with OS and intracranial progression-free survival (IC-PFS) was evaluated using Cox proportional hazard model.

RESULTS

101 patients were included in the final analysis, most patients (38%) exhibited HER2-/HR + BC molecular subtype, followed by HER2 + /HR + (25%), HER2-/HR- (21%), and HER2 + /HR- subtypes (13%). The majority received postoperative systemic treatment (75%) and radiotherapy (84%). Median OS and intracranial PFS were 22 and 8 months, respectively. The mean pre-surgery intracranial tumor volume was 26 cm3, reduced to 3 cm3 post-surgery. EOR, GTR achievement and RV were not significantly associated with OS or IC-PFS, but higher EOR and lower RV correlated with extended OS in patients without extracranial metastases. HER2-positive tumor status was associated with longer OS, extracranial metastases at BM diagnosis and symptomatic lesions with shorter OS and IC-PFS.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study found that BC molecular subtypes, extracranial disease status, and BM-related symptoms were associated with OS in surgically treated patients with BCBM. Additionally, while extensive resection to minimize residual tumor volume did not significantly affect OS across the entire cohort, it appeared beneficial for patients without extracranial metastases.

Comparative efficacy and safety of sodium fluorescein-guided surgery versus standard white light for resection of brain metastases: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Recent studies have investigated if the sodium fluorescein-guided (SFg) improves the extent of resection of BMs when compared to standard white light (sWL). Therefore, we aimed to assess the comparative efficacy and safety of SFg and sWL for resection of BMs.

METHODS

We searched Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases following Cochrane and PRISMA guidelines for studies reporting comparative data of SFg and WL resection of BMs. We pooled odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals under random effects and applied I² statistics and leave-one-out sensitivity analysis to assess heterogeneity. I² > 40% was considered significant for heterogeneity.

RESULTS

Five studies involving 816 patients were included, of whom 390 underwent BMs resection with SFg and 426 with sWL, and ages ranging between 26 and 86.2 years old. Analysis revealed a statistically significant higher likelihood of complete resection in the SFg group when compared to the sWL group (OR = 2.15, 95%CI: 1.18-3.92, p = 0.01; I² = 47%). Sensitivity analysis revealed a consistent result in all five scenarios, with low heterogeneity in two of the five scenarios. Three studies reported significant improvement in OS in the SFg group, and the qualitative assessment of complications and procedure-related mortality did not provide sufficient information for conclusions.

CONCLUSION

This systematic review and meta-analysis identified a higher likelihood of complete resection in the SFg group when compared to the standard sWL group. This study is the first to directly compare the impact of SFg and sWL on resection outcomes for BMs.

Enhancing outcomes: neurosurgical resection in brain metastasis patients with poor Karnofsky performance score - a comprehensive survival analysis

Background

A reduced Karnofsky performance score (KPS) often leads to the discontinuation of surgical and adjuvant therapy, owing to a lack of evidence of survival and quality of life benefits. This study aimed to examine the clinical and treatment outcomes of patients with KPS < 70 after neurosurgical resection and identify prognostic factors associated with better survival.

Methods

Patients with a preoperative KPS < 70 who underwent surgical resection for newly diagnosed brain metastases (BM) between 2007 and 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. The KPS, age, sex, tumor localization, cumulative tumor volume, number of lesions, extent of resection, prognostic assessment scores, adjuvant radiotherapy and systemic therapy, and presence of disease progression were analyzed. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to determine the factors associated with better survival. Survival > 3 months was considered favorable and ≤ 3 months as poor.

Results

A total of 140 patients were identified. Median overall survival was 5.6 months (range 0-58). There was no difference in the preoperative KPS between the groups of > 3 and ≤ 3 months (50; range, 20-60 vs. 50; range, 10-60, p = 0.077). There was a significant improvement in KPS after surgery in patients with a preoperative KPS of 20% (20 vs 40 ± 20, p = 0.048). In the other groups, no significant changes in KPS were observed. Adjuvant radiotherapy was associated with better survival (44 [84.6%] vs. 32 [36.4%]; hazard ratio [HR], 0.0363; confidence interval [CI], 0.197-0.670, p = 0.00199). Adjuvant chemotherapy and immunotherapy resulted in prolonged survival (24 [46.2%] vs. 12 [13.6%]; HR 0.474, CI 0.263-0.854, p = 0.013]. Systemic disease progression was associated with poor survival (36 [50%] vs. 71 [80.7%]; HR 5.975, CI 2.610-13.677, p < 0.001].

Conclusion

Neurosurgical resection is an appropriate treatment modality for patients with low KPS. Surgery may improve functional status and facilitate further tumor-specific treatment. Combined treatment with adjuvant radiotherapy and systemic therapy was associated with improved survival in this cohort of patients. Systemic tumor progression has been identified as an independent factor for a poor prognosis. There is almost no information regarding surgical and adjuvant treatment in patients with low KPS. Our paper provides novel data on clinical outcome and survival analysis of patients with BM who underwent surgical treatment.

Minimizing Intracranial Disease Before Stereotactic Radiation in Single or Solitary Brain Metastases

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) in multiple fractions (typically ≤5) can effectively treat a wide range of brain metastases, including those less suitable for single-fraction stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). Prior prospective studies on surgical resection with stereotactic radiation have focused exclusively on SRS, and retrospective studies have shown equivocal results regarding whether surgery is associated with improved outcomes compared with SRT alone. We compared resection with postoperative cavity SRT or SRS to SRT alone in patients with 1 brain metastasis, while including patients receiving SRS alone as an additional reference group.

METHODS

We studied 716 patients in a retrospective, single-institution cohort diagnosed with single or solitary brain metastases from 2007 to 2020. Patients receiving whole-brain radiotherapy were excluded. Cox proportional hazards models were constructed for overall survival and additional intracranial outcomes.

RESULTS

After adjustment for potential confounders, surgery with cavity SRT/SRS was associated with decreased all-cause mortality (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.39, 95% CI [0.27-0.57], P = 1.52 × 10 -6 ) compared with SRT alone, along with lower risk of neurological death attributable to intracranial tumor progression (HR: 0.46, 95% CI [0.22-0.94], P = 3.32 × 10 -2 ) and radiation necrosis (HR: 0.15, 95% CI [0.06-0.36], P = 3.28 × 10 -5 ). Surgery with cavity SRS was also associated with decreased all-cause mortality (HR: 0.52, 95% CI [0.35-0.78], P = 1.46 × 10 -3 ), neurological death (HR: 0.30, 95% CI [0.10-0.88], P = 2.88 × 10 -2 ), and radiation necrosis (HR: 0.14, 95% CI [0.03-0.74], P = 2.07 × 10 -2 ) compared with SRS alone. Surgery was associated with lower risk of all-cause mortality and neurological death in cardinality-matched subsets of the cohort. Among surgical patients, gross total resection was associated with extended overall survival (HR: 0.62, 95% CI [0.40-0.98], P = 4.02 × 10 -2 ) along with lower risk of neurological death (HR: 0.31, 95% CI [0.17-0.57], P = 1.84 × 10 -4 ) and local failure (HR: 0.34, 95% CI [0.16-0.75], P = 7.08 × 10 -3 ).

CONCLUSION

In patients with 1 brain metastasis, minimizing intracranial disease specifically before stereotactic radiation is associated with improved oncologic outcomes.

Narrative Review of Multidisciplinary Management of Central Nervous Involvement in Patients with HER2-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer: Focus on Elderly Patients

The tumor biology of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive breast cancer (BC) promotes the development of central nervous system (CNS) metastases, with 25% of patients with HER2-positive BC developing CNS metastases. Furthermore, the incidence of HER2-positive BC brain metastases has increased in the last decades, likely because of the improved survival with targeted therapies and better detection methods. Brain metastases are detrimental to quality of life and survival and represent a challenging clinical problem, particularly in elderly women, who comprise a substantial proportion of patients diagnosed with BC and often have comorbidities or an age-related decline in organ function. Treatment options for patients with BC brain metastases include surgical resection, whole-brain radiation therapy, stereotactic radiosurgery, chemotherapy, and targeted agents. Ideally, local and systemic treatment decisions should be made by a multidisciplinary team, with input from several specialties, based on an individualized prognostic classification. In elderly patients with BC, additional age-associated conditions, such as geriatric syndromes or comorbidities, and the physiologic changes associated with aging, may impact their ability to tolerate cancer therapy and should be considered in the treatment decision-making process. This review describes the treatment options for elderly patients with HER2-positive BC and brain metastases, focusing on the importance of multidisciplinary management, the different points of view from the distinct disciplines, and the role of oncogeriatric and palliative care in this vulnerable patient group.

Preoperative Prognostic Index for Patients with Brain Metastases-A Population-Based Multi-Centre Study

BACKGROUND

Brain metastases (BM) are common in cancer patients and are associated with high morbidity and mortality. Surgery is an option, but the optimal selection of patients for surgery is challenging and controversial. Current prognostication tools are not ideal for preoperative prognostication. By using a reference population (derivation data set) and two external populations (validation data set) of patients who underwent surgery for BM, we aimed to create and validate a preoperative prognostic index.

METHODS

The derivation data set consists of 590 patients who underwent surgery for BM (2011-2018) at Oslo University Hospital. We identified variables associated with survival and created a preoperative prognostic index with four prognostic groups, which was validated on patients who underwent surgery for BM at Karolinska University Hospital and St. Olavs University Hospital during the same time period. To reduce over-fitting, we adjusted the index in accordance with our findings.

RESULTS

438 patients were included in the validation data set. The preoperative prognostic index correctly divided patients into four true prognostic groups. The two prognostic groups with the poorest survival outcomes overlapped, and these were merged to create the adjusted preoperative prognostic index.

CONCLUSION

We created a prognostic index for patients with BM that predicts overall survival preoperatively. This index might be valuable in supporting informed choice when considering surgery for BM.

CrOssing fiber Modeling in the Peritumoral Area using dMRI (COMPARI)

Visualization of fiber tracts around the tumor is critical for neurosurgical planning and preservation of crucial structural connectivity during tumor resection. Biophysical modeling approaches estimate fiber tract orientations from differential water diffusivity information of diffusion MRI. However, the presence of edema and tumor infiltration presents a challenge to visualize crossing fiber tracts in the peritumoral region. Previous approaches proposed free water modeling to compensate for the effect of water diffusivity in edema, but those methods were limited in estimating complex crossing fiber tracts. We propose a new cascaded multi-compartment model to estimate tissue microstructure in the presence of edema and pathological contaminants in the area surrounding brain tumors. In our model (COMPARI), the isotropic components of diffusion signal, including free water and hindered water, were eliminated, and the fiber orientation distribution (FOD) of the remaining signal was estimated. In simulated data, COMPARI accurately recovered fiber orientations in the presence of extracellular water. In a dataset of 23 patients with highly edematous brain tumors, the amplitudes of FOD and anisotropic index distribution within the peritumoral region were higher with COMPARI than with a recently proposed multi-compartment constrained deconvolution model. In a selected patient with metastatic brain tumor, we demonstrated COMPARI's ability to effectively model and eliminate water from the peritumoral region. The white matter bundles reconstructed with our model were qualitatively improved compared to those of other models, and allowed the identification of crossing fibers. In conclusion, the removal of isotropic components as proposed with COMPARI improved the bio-physical modeling of dMRI in edema, thus providing information on crossing fibers, thereby enabling improved tractography in a highly edematous brain tumor. This model may improve surgical planning tools to help achieve maximal safe resection of brain tumors.

Efficacy of Stereotactic Radiosurgery as Single or Combined Therapy for Brain Metastasis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

To determine the efficacy of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) in treating patients with brain metastases (BMs), a network meta-analysis (NMA) of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and a direct comparison of cohort studies were performed. Relevant literature regarding the effectiveness of SRS alone and in combination with whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) and surgery was retrieved using systematic database searches up to April 2019. The patterns of overall survival (OS), one-year OS, progression-free survival (PFS), one-year local brain control (LBC), one-year distant brain control (DBC), neurological death (ND), and complication rate were analyzed. A total of 18 RCTs and 37 cohorts were included in the meta-analysis. Our data revealed that SRS carried a better OS than SRS+WBRT (p= 0.048) and WBRT (p= 0.041). Also, SRS+WBRT demonstrated a significantly improved PFS, LBC, and DBC compared to WBRT alone and SRS alone. Finally, SRS achieved the same LBC as high as surgery, but intracranial relapse occurred considerably more frequently in the absence of WBRT. However, there were not any significant differences in ND and toxicities between SRS and other groups. Therefore, SRS alone may be a better alternative since increased patient survival may outweigh the increased risk of brain tumor recurrence associated with it.

Fluorescence and Intraoperative Ultrasound as Surgical Adjuncts for Brain Metastases Resection: What Do We Know? A Systematic Review of the Literature

(1) Background: brain metastases (BMs) are the most common neoplasm of the central nervous system; despite the high incidence of this type of tumour, to date there is no universal consensus on the most effective treatment in patients with BMs, even if surgery still plays a primary role. Despite this, the adjunct systems that help to reach the GTR, which are well structured for other tumour forms such as ultrasound and fluorescence systems, are not yet well employed and standardised in surgical practice. The aim of this review is to provide a picture of the current state-of-art of the roles of iOUS and intraoperative fluorescence to better understand their potential roles as surgical tools. (2) Methods: to reach this goal, the PubMed database was searched using the following string as the keyword: (((Brain cerebral metastasis [MeSH Major Topic])OR (brain metastasis, [MeSH Major Topic])) AND ((5-ala, [MeSH Terms]) OR (Aminolevulinicacid [All fields]) OR (fluorescein, [MeSH Terms]) OR (contrast enhanced ultrasound [MeSH Terms])OR ((intraoperative ultrasound. [MeSH Terms]))) AND (english [Filter]) AND ((english [Filter]) AND (2010:2022 [pdat])) AND (english [Filter]). (3) Results: from our research, a total of 661 articles emerged; of these, 57 were selected. 21 of these included BMs generically as a secondary class for comparisons with gliomas, without going deeply into specific details. Therefore, for our purposes, 36 articles were considered. (4) Conclusions: with regard to BMs treatment and their surgical adjuncts, there is still much to be explored. This is mainly related to the heterogeneity of patients, the primary tumour histology and the extent of systemic disease; regardless, surgery plays a paramount role in obtaining a local disease control, and more standardised surgical protocols need to be made, with the aim of optimizing the use of the available surgical adjuncts and in order to increase the rate of GTR.

Multidisciplinary Management of Brain Metastasis from Breast Cancer

The management of patients with breast cancer and brain metastases (BMs) is exquisitely multidisciplinary. Patients presenting with a symptomatic BM may be offered neurosurgical resection, followed by radiation. Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is preferred over whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) in most patients presenting with a limited number of BMs, whereas WBRT with hippocampal-sparing and concomitant memantine is preferred for patients with multiple BMs. There is a growing role for systemic therapy, in some cases in lieu of local therapy, particularly in patients with HER2+ breast cancer.

Is intraoperative ultrasound more efficient than magnetic resonance in neurosurgical oncology? An exploratory cost-effectiveness analysis

Objective

Intraoperative imaging is a chief asset in neurosurgical oncology, it improves the extent of resection and postoperative outcomes. Imaging devices have evolved considerably, in particular ultrasound (iUS) and magnetic resonance (iMR). Although iUS is regarded as a more economically convenient and yet effective asset, no formal comparison between the efficiency of iUS and iMR in neurosurgical oncology has been performed.

Methods

A cost-effectiveness analysis comparing two single-center prospectively collected surgical cohorts, classified according to the intraoperative imaging used. iMR (2013-2016) and iUS (2021-2022) groups comprised low- and high-grade gliomas, with a maximal safe resection intention. Units of health gain were gross total resection and equal or increased Karnofsky performance status. Surgical and health costs were considered for analysis. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was calculated for the two intervention alternatives. The cost-utility graphic and the evolution of surgical duration with the gained experience were also analyzed.

Results

50 patients followed an iMR-assisted operation, while 17 underwent an iUS-guided surgery. Gross total resection was achieved in 70% with iMR and in 60% with iUS. Median postoperative Karnofsky was similar in both group (KPS 90). Health costs were € 3,220 higher with iMR, and so were surgical-related costs (€ 1,976 higher). The ICER was € 322 per complete resection obtained with iMR, and € 644 per KPS gained or maintained with iMR. When only surgical-related costs were analyzed, ICER was € 198 per complete resection with iMR and € 395 per KPS gained or maintained.

Conclusion

This is an unprecedented but preliminary cost-effectiveness analysis of the two most common intraoperative imaging devices in neurosurgical oncology. iMR, although being costlier and time-consuming, seems cost-effective in terms of complete resection rates and postoperative performance status. However, the differences between both techniques are small. Possibly, iMR and iUS are complementary aids during the resection: iUS real-time images assist while advancing towards the tumor limits, informing about the distance to relevant landmarks and correcting neuronavigation inaccuracy due to brain shift. Yet, at the end of resection, it is the iMR that reliably corroborates whether residual tumor remains.

Quality of Life and Cognitive Function Evaluations and Interventions for Patients with Brain Metastases in the Radiation Oncology Clinic

Simple Summary

Brain metastases (BMs) are the most common brain malignancy and are projected to increase in incidence over the coming decades. Historically, brain metastasis studies have focused on improving survival outcomes, but recently, the importance of evaluating health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and cognitive function has gained recognition. Although there is a myriad of validated HRQOL and cognitive assessments available in the radiation oncology clinic, there is an urgent need to identify tools tailored to patients with BMs and to adopt a uniform set of tests that measure HRQOL and cognition. This review presents various assessments for measuring HRQOL and cognitive function, current recommendations to improve standardization, and treatments known to preserve HRQOL and cognitive function.

Abstract

Brain metastases (BMs) account for a disproportionately high percentage of cancer morbidity and mortality. Historically, studies have focused on improving survival outcomes, and recent radiation oncology clinical trials have incorporated HRQOL and cognitive assessments. We are now equipped with a battery of assessments in the radiation oncology clinic, but there is a lack of consensus regarding how to incorporate them in modern clinical practice. Herein, we present validated assessments for BM patients, current recommendations for future clinical studies, and treatment advances that have improved HRQOL and cognitive outcomes for BM patients.

Preoperative neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (preNLR) for the assessment of tumor characteristics in lung adenocarcinoma patients with brain metastasis

•

A relationship between preoperative Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte ratio (preNLR) and brain metastasis characteristics such as tumor location and peritumoral brain edema is proposed.

•

The corresponding spearman correlations of peritumoral brain edema and preoperative NLR between different tumor location was performed.

•

A prognostic nomogram, that provide survival predictions for brain metastasis on lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) patients has been established.

Objectives

Brain metastases from lung adenocarcinoma cause significant patient mortality. This study aims to evaluate the role of preoperative Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte ratio (preNLR) in predicting the survival and prognosis of Lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) patients with brain metastasis (BM) and provide more references for predicting peritumoral edema.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed 125 LUAD-BM patients who had undergone surgical resection from December 2015 to December 2020. The clinical characteristic, demographic, MRI data, and preNLR within 24–48 h before craniotomy were collected. Patients were divided into two groups based on preNLR (high NLR and low NLR), with cutoff values determined by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. Association between preoperative NLR and clinical features was determined by using Pearson chi-squared tests. Uni- and multivariate analyzes were performed to compare the overall survival (OS) of clinical features.

Results

The patients were divided into NLR-low (64 patients) and NLR-high (61 patients) groups based on receiver operating characteristic analysis of NLR area. According to correlation analysis, a high preNLR (NLR≥2.8) is associated with the both supra- and infratentorial location involved (P = 0.017) and a greater incidence of severe peritumoral edema (P = 0.038). By multivariable analysis, age ≥ 65 years (P = 0.011), KPS < 70 (P = 0.043), elevated preNLR (P = 0.013), extracerebral metastases (P = 0.003), EGFR/ALK+ (P = 0.037), postoperative radiotherapy (P = 0.017) and targeted therapy (P = 0.007) were independent prognostic factors. OS nomogram was constructed based on cox model and model performance was examined (AUC = 0.935).

Conclusions

PreNLR may serve as a prognosis indicator in LUAD patients with brain metastasis, and high preNLR tends to be positively associate with multiple locations and severe peritumoral edema.

The Clinical Frailty Scale as useful tool in patients with brain metastases

PURPOSE

The Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) evaluates patients' level of frailty on a scale from 1 to 9 and is commonly used in geriatric medicine, intensive care and orthopedics. The aim of our study was to reveal whether the CFS allows a reliable prediction of overall survival (OS) in patients after surgical treatment of brain metastases (BM) compared to the Karnofsky Performance Score (KPS).

METHODS

Patients operated for BM were included. CFS and KPS were retrospectively assessed pre- and postoperatively and at follow-up 3-6 months after resection.

RESULTS

205 patients with a follow-up of 22.8 months (95% CI 18.4-27.1) were evaluated. CFS showed a median of 3 ("managing well"; IqR 2-4) at all 3 assessment-points. Median KPS was 80 preoperatively (IqR 80-90) and 90 postoperatively (IqR 80-100) as well as at follow-up after 3-6 months. CFS correlated with KPS both preoperatively (r = - 0.92; p < 0.001), postoperatively (r = - 0.85; p < 0.001) and at follow-up (r = - 0.93; p < 0.001). The CFS predicted the expected reduction of OS more reliably than the KPS at all 3 assessments. A one-point increase (worsening) of the preoperative CFS translated into a 30% additional hazard to decease (HR 1.30, 95% CI 1.15-1.46; p < 0.001). A one-point increase in postoperative and at follow-up CFS represents a 39% (HR 1.39, 95% CI 1.25-1.54; p < 0.001) and of 42% risk (HR 1.42, 95% CI 1.27-1.59; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The CFS is a feasible, simple and reliable scoring system in patients undergoing resection of brain metastasis. The CFS 3-6 months after surgery specifies the expected OS more accurately than the KPS.

Surgical Management of Brain Metastasis: Challenges and Nuances

Brain metastasis is the most common type of intracranial tumor. The contemporary management of brain metastasis is a challenging issue and traditionally has carried a poor prognosis as these lesions typically occur in the setting of advanced cancer. However, improvement in systemic therapy, advances in radiation techniques and multimodal therapy tailored to the individual patient, has given hope to this patient population. Surgical resection has a well-established role in the management of brain metastasis. Here we discuss the evolving role of surgery in the treatment of this diverse patient population.

Network analysis shows decreased ipsilesional structural connectivity in glioma patients

Gliomas that infiltrate networks and systems, such as the motor system, often lead to substantial functional impairment in multiple systems. Network-based statistics (NBS) allow to assess local network differences and graph theoretical analyses enable investigation of global and local network properties. Here, we used network measures to characterize glioma-related decreases in structural connectivity by comparing the ipsi- with the contralesional hemispheres of patients and correlated findings with neurological assessment. We found that lesion location resulted in differential impairment of both short and long connectivity patterns. Network analysis showed reduced global and local efficiency in the ipsilesional hemisphere compared to the contralesional hemispheric networks, which reflect the impairment of information transfer across different regions of a network.

Tumors and their location distinctly alter both local and global brain connectivity within the ipsilesional hemisphere of glioma patients.

Effect of 5-Aminolevulinic Acid and Sodium Fluorescein on the Extent of Resection in High-Grade Gliomas and Brain Metastasis

Surgery is essential in the treatment of high-grade gliomas (HGG) and gross total resection (GTR) is known to increase the overall survival and progression-free survival. Several studies have shown that fluorescence-guided surgery with 5-aminolevulinic acid (5-ALA) increases GTR considerably compared to white light surgery (65% vs. 36%). In recent years, sodium fluorescein (SF) has become an increasingly popular agent for fluorescence-guided surgery due to numerous utility benefits compared to 5-ALA, including lower cost, non-toxicity, easy administration during surgery and a wide indication range covering all contrast-enhancing lesions with disruption of the blood-brain barrier in the CNS. However, currently, SF is an off-label agent and the level of evidence for use in HGG surgery is inferior compared to 5-ALA. Here, we give an update and review the latest literature on fluorescence-guided surgery with 5-ALA and SF for brain tumors with emphasis on fluorescence-guided surgery in HGG and brain metastases. Further, we assess the advantages and disadvantages of both fluorophores and discuss their future perspectives.

Modern possibilities of neurosurgical treatment of brain metastases

Despite significant progress in neuroimaging and introduction of new combined treatments for solid tumors, brain metastases are still adverse factor for overall survival. Brain metastases are diagnosed in 8-10% of patients and associated with extremely poor prognosis. These lesions result focal and general cerebral symptoms. Literature review highlights the current principles of surgical treatment of metastatic brain lesions in patients with solid tumors.

Surgery for brain metastases-impact of the extent of resection

BACKGROUND

Surgical resection of brain metastases improves symptoms and survival in selected patients. The benefit of gross total resection is disputed, as most patients are believed to succumb from their non-CNS tumor burden. We investigated the association between overall survival and residual tumor after surgery for single brain metastases.

METHODS

We reviewed adults who underwent surgery for a single brain metastasis at a regional referral center (2011-2018). Gross total resection was defined as no visible residual tumor on cerebral MRI 12-48 h postoperatively.

RESULTS

We included 373 patients. The most common primary tumors were lung cancer (36%) and melanoma (24%). We identified gross total resection in 238 patients (64%). Median overall survival was 11.0 months, 8.0 (6.2-9.8) months for patients with subtotal resection and 13.0 (9.7-16.3) months for patients with gross total resection. In a multivariate regression analysis including preoperative prognostic factors, gross total resection was associated with longer overall survival (HR: 0.66, p = 0.003). Postoperative radiotherapy administered within 6 weeks did not significantly alter the hazard ratio estimates for grade of resection.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study suggests improved survival with gross total resection compared to subtotal resection. The importance of extent of resection in surgery for brain metastases should not be discarded.

Predicting the Extent of Resection of Motor-Eloquent Gliomas Based on TMS-Guided Fiber Tracking

Background: Surgical planning with nTMS-based tractography is proven to increase safety during surgery. A preoperative risk stratification model has been published based on the M1 infiltration, RMT ratio, and tumor to corticospinal tract distance (TTD). The correlation of TTD with corticospinal tract to resection cavity distance (TRD) and outcome is needed to further evaluate the validity of the model. Aim of the study: To use the postop MRI-derived resection cavity to measure how closely the resection cavity approximated the preoperatively calculated corticospinal tract (CST) and how this correlates with the risk model and the outcome. Methods: We included 183 patients who underwent nTMS-based DTI and surgical resection for presumed motor-eloquent gliomas. TTD, TRD, and motor outcome were recorded and tested for correlations. The intraoperative monitoring documentation was available for a subgroup of 48 patients, whose responses were correlated to TTD and TRD. Results: As expected, TTD and TRD showed a good correlation (Spearman’s ρ = 0.67, p < 0.001). Both the TTD and the TRD correlated significantly with the motor outcome at three months (Kendall’s Tau-b 0.24 for TTD, 0.31 for TRD, p < 0.001). Interestingly, the TTD and TRD correlated only slightly with residual tumor volume, and only after correction for outliers related to termination of resection due to intraoperative monitoring events or the proximity of other eloquent structures (TTD ρ = 0.32, p < 0.001; TRD ρ = 0.19, p = 0.01). This reflects the fact that intraoperative monitoring (IOM) phenomena do not always correlate with preoperative structural analysis, and that additional factors influence the intraoperative decision to abort resection, such as the adjacency of other vulnerable structures. The TTD was also significantly correlated with variations in motor evoked potential (MEP) responses (no/reversible decrease vs. irreversible decrease; p = 0.03). Conclusions: The TTD approximates the TRD well, confirming the best predictive parameter and giving strength to the nTMS-based risk stratification model. Our analysis of TRD supports the use of the nTMS-based TTD measurement to estimate the resection preoperatively, also confirming the 8 mm cutoff. Nevertheless, the TRD proved to have a slightly stronger correlation with the outcome as the surgeon’s experience, anatomofunctional knowledge, and MEP observations influence the expected EOR.

Surgical advances in the management of brain metastases

As the epidemiological and clinical burden of brain metastases continues to grow, advances in neurosurgical care are imperative. From standard magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) sequences to functional neuroimaging, preoperative workups for metastatic disease allow high-resolution detection of lesions and at-risk structures, facilitating safe and effective surgical planning. Minimally invasive neurosurgical approaches, including keyhole craniotomies and tubular retractors, optimize the preservation of normal parenchyma without compromising extent of resection. Supramarginal surgery has pushed the boundaries of achieving complete removal of metastases without recurrence, especially in eloquent regions when paired with intraoperative neuromonitoring. Brachytherapy has highlighted the potential of locally delivering therapeutic agents to the resection cavity with high rates of local control. Neuronavigation has become a cornerstone of operative workflow, while intraoperative ultrasound (iUS) and intraoperative brain mapping generate real-time renderings of the brain unaffected by brain shift. Endoscopes, exoscopes, and fluorescent-guided surgery enable increasingly high-definition visualizations of metastatic lesions that were previously difficult to achieve. Pushed forward by these multidisciplinary innovations, neurosurgery has never been a safer, more effective treatment for patients with brain metastases.

Resection of symptomatic non-small cell lung cancer brain metastasis in the setting of multiple brain metastases

OBJECTIVE

Current guidelines primarily suggest resection of brain metastases (BMs) in patients with limited lesions. With a growing number of highly effective local and systemic treatment options, this view may be challenged. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the role of metastasectomy, disregarding BM count, in a comprehensive treatment setting.

METHODS

In this monocentric retrospective analysis, the authors included patients who underwent resection for at least 1 BM and collected demographic, clinical, and tumor-associated parameters. Prognostic factors for local control and overall survival (OS) were analyzed with the log-rank test and Cox proportional hazards analysis.

RESULTS

The authors analyzed 216 patients. One hundred twenty-nine (59.7%) patients were diagnosed with a single/solitary BM, whereas 64 (29.6%) patients had 2-3 BMs and the remaining 23 (10.6%) had more than 3 BMs. With resection of symptomatic BMs, a significant improvement in Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS) was achieved (p < 0.001), thereby enabling adjuvant radiotherapy for 199 (92.1%) patients and systemic treatment for 119 (55.1%) patients. During follow-up, 83 (38.4%) patients experienced local recurrence. BM count did not significantly influence local control rates. By the time of analysis, 120 (55.6%) patients had died; the leading cause of death was systemic tumor progression. The mean (range) OS after surgery was 12.7 (0-88) months. In univariate analysis, the BM count did not influence OS (p = 0.844), but age < 65 years (p = 0.007), preoperative and postoperative KPS ≥ 70 (p = 0.002 and p = 0.005, respectively), systemic metastases other than BM (p = 0.004), adjuvant radiation therapy (p < 0.001), and adjuvant systemic treatment (p < 0.001) were prognostic factors. In regression analysis, the presence of extracranial metastases (HR 2.30, 95% CI 1.53-3.48, p < 0.001), adjuvant radiation therapy (HR 0.97, 95% CI 0.23-0.86, p = 0.016), and adjuvant systemic treatment (HR 0.37, 95% CI 0.25-0.55, p < 0.001) remained as independent factors for survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgery for symptomatic BM from non-small cell lung cancer may be indicated even for patients with multiple lesions in order to alleviate their neurological symptoms and to consequently facilitate further treatment.

Neurosurgical resection for locally recurrent brain metastasis

BACKGROUND

In patients with locally recurrent brain metastases (LRBMs), the role of (repeat) craniotomy is controversial. This study aimed to analyze long-term oncological outcomes in this heterogeneous population.

METHODS

Craniotomies for LRBM were identified from a tertiary neuro-oncological institution. First, we assessed overall survival (OS) and intracranial control (ICC) stratified by molecular profile, prognostic indices, and multimodality treatment. Second, we compared LRBMs to propensity score-matched patients who underwent craniotomy for newly diagnosed brain metastases (NDBM).

RESULTS

Across 180 patients, median survival after LRBM resection was 13.8 months and varied by molecular profile, with >24 months survival in ALK/EGFR+ lung adenocarcinoma and HER2+ breast cancer. Furthermore, 102 patients (56.7%) experienced intracranial recurrence; median time to recurrence was 5.6 months. Compared to NDBMs (n = 898), LRBM patients were younger, more likely to harbor a targetable mutation and less likely to receive adjuvant radiation (p < 0.05). After 1:3 propensity matching stratified by molecular profile, LRBM patients generally experienced shorter OS (hazard ratio 1.67 and 1.36 for patients with or without a mutation, p < 0.05) but similar ICC (hazard ratio 1.11 in both groups, p > 0.20) compared to NDBM patients with similar baseline. Results across specific molecular subgroups suggested comparable effect directions of varying sizes.

CONCLUSIONS

In our data, patients with LRBMs undergoing craniotomy comprised a subgroup of brain metastasis patients with relatively favorable clinical characteristics and good survival outcomes. Recurrent status predicted shorter OS but did not impact ICC. Craniotomy could be considered in selected, prognostically favorable patients.

The Management of Brain Metastases-Systematic Review of Neurosurgical Aspects

The multidisciplinary management of patients with brain metastases (BM) consists of surgical resection, different radiation treatment modalities, cytotoxic chemotherapy, and targeted molecular treatment. This review presents the current state of neurosurgical technology applied to achieve maximal resection with minimal morbidity as a treatment paradigm in patients with BM. In addition, we discuss the contribution of neurosurgical resection on functional outcome, advanced systemic treatment strategies, and enhanced understanding of the tumor biology.

The Debatable Benefit of Gross-Total Resection of Brain Metastases in a Comprehensive Treatment Setting

Simple Summary

In this monocentric retrospective analysis, the extent of resection of singular/solitary brain metastases has no impact on local recurrence and overall survival rates in patients receiving multidisciplinary adjuvant treatment. Since systemic disease progression is the leading cause of death, and an uncontrolled systemic disease status, along with adjuvant treatment, present independent predictors of overall survival, a comprehensive, multidisciplinary treatment concept is essential for patients with brain metastases.

Abstract

Background and Purpose: The value of gross-total surgical resection remains debatable in patients with brain metastases (BMs) as most patients succumb to systemic disease progression. In this study, we evaluated the impact of the extent of resection of singular/solitary BM on in-brain recurrence (iBR), focusing on local recurrence (LR) and overall survival (OS) in an interdisciplinary adjuvant treatment setting. Patients and Methods: In this monocentric retrospective analysis, we included patients receiving surgery of one BM and subsequent adjuvant treatment. A radiologist and a neurosurgeon determined in consensus the extent of resection based on magnetic resonance imaging. The OS was calculated using Kaplan–Meier estimates; prognostic factors for LR and OS were analysed by Log rank test and Cox proportional hazards. Results: We analyzed 197 patients. Gross-total resection was achieved in 123 (62.4%) patients. All patients were treated with adjuvant radiotherapy, and 130 (66.0%) received systemic treatment. Ninety-six (48.7%) patients showed iBR with an LR rate of 23.4%. LR was not significantly influenced by the extent of resection (p = 0.139) or any other parameter. The median OS after surgery was 18 (95%CI 12.5–23.5) months. In univariate analysis, the extent of resection did not influence OS (p = 0.6759), as opposed to adjuvant systemic treatment (p < 0.0001) and controlled systemic disease (p = 0.039). Systemic treatment and controlled disease status remained independent factors for OS (p < 0.0001 and p = 0.009, respectively). Conclusions: In this study, the extent of resection of BMs neither influenced the LR nor the OS of patients receiving interdisciplinary adjuvant treatment.

Navigated Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Motor Mapping Usefulness in the Surgical Management of Patients Affected by Brain Tumors in Eloquent Areas: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: The surgical strategy for brain glioma has changed, shifting from tumor debulking to a more careful tumor dissection with the aim of a gross-total resection, extended beyond the contrast-enhancement MRI, including the hyperintensity on FLAIR MR images and defined as supratotal resection. It is possible to pursue this goal thanks to the refinement of several technological tools for pre and intraoperative planning including intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IONM), cortico-subcortical mapping, functional MRI (fMRI), navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation (nTMS), intraoperative CT or MRI (iCT, iMR), and intraoperative contrast-enhanced ultrasound. This systematic review provides an overview of the state of the art techniques in the application of nTMS and nTMS-based DTI-FT during brain tumor surgery.

Materials and Methods: A systematic literature review was performed according to the PRISMA statement. The authors searched the PubMed and Scopus databases until July 2020 for published articles with the following Mesh terms: (Brain surgery OR surgery OR craniotomy) AND (brain mapping OR functional planning) AND (TMS OR transcranial magnetic stimulation OR rTMS OR repetitive transcranial stimulation). We only included studies regarding motor mapping in craniotomy for brain tumors, which reported data about CTS sparing.

Results: A total of 335 published studies were identified through the PubMed and Scopus databases. After a detailed examination of these studies, 325 were excluded from our review because of a lack of data object in this search. TMS reported an accuracy range of 0.4–14.8 mm between the APB hotspot (n1/4 8) in nTMS and DES from the DES spot; nTMS influenced the surgical indications in 34.3–68.5%.

Conclusion: We found that nTMS can be defined as a safe and non-invasive technique and in association with DES, fMRI, and IONM, improves brain mapping and the extent of resection favoring a better postoperative outcome.

[Brain metastases-Interdisciplinary approach towards a personalized treatment]

The incidence, treatment and prognosis of patients with brain metastases have substantially changed during the last decades. While the survival time after diagnosis of cerebral metastases was on average a maximum of 3-6 months only 10 years ago, the survival time could be significantly improved due to novel surgical, radiotherapeutic and systemic treatment modalities. Only a few years ago, the occurrence of brain metastases led to a withdrawal from systemic oncological treatment and the exclusion of drug therapy studies and to a purely palliatively oriented treatment in the sense of whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT) with or without surgery. The increasing availability of targeted and immunomodulatory drugs as well as adapted radio-oncological procedures enable increasingly more personalized treatment approaches. The aim of this review article is to demonstrate the progress and complexity of the treatment of brain metastases in the context of modern comprehensive interdisciplinary concepts.

Post-operative management of brain metastases: GRADE-based clinical practice recommendations on behalf of the Italian Association of Radiotherapy and Clinical Oncology (AIRO)

PURPOSE

To perform a systematic review of the current level of evidence on post-operative management following brain metastasectomy (namely: adjuvant stereotactic radiosurgery, whole brain radiotherapy or observation), and to propose a GRADE-based dedicated recommendation to inform Radiation Oncologists' clinical practice.

METHODS

A panel of expert Radiation Oncologists from the Italian Association of Radiotherapy and Clinical Oncology had defined the search question per the PICO methodology. Electronic databases were independently screened; the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses was adopted. The individual and pooled hazard ratios with 95% confidence intervals (CI), as well as the pooled risk ratio (RR) were calculated using a fixed- or random-effects model.

RESULTS

Eight full-texts were retrieved: six retrospective studies and two randomized clinical trials. Outcomes of benefit and damage were analyzed for SRS + observation (PICO A) and SRS + WBRT. SRS allowed for increased rates of local control when compared to both observation and WBRT, while evidence was less conclusive for distant brain control, leptomeningeal disease control and overall survival. In the SRS, the incidence of severe radionecrosis was higher as compared to WBRT, despite neurocognitive deterioration rates were lower. Overall, SRS seems to favorably compare with observation and whole brain RT, despite the level of evidence for the recommendation was low and very low, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Despite low level of evidence, the panel concluded that the risk/benefit ratio probably favors adjuvant SRS as compared to the observation and whole brain RT as adjuvant treatments following brain metastasectomy (5 votes/5 participants, 100% attendance).

Brain Metastases in Elderly Patients-The Role of Surgery in the Context of Systemic Treatment

In patients with brain metastases (BM), advanced age is considered a negative prognostic factor. To address the potential reasons for that, we assessed 807 patients who had undergone BM resection; 315 patients aged at least 65 years (group A) were compared with 492 younger patients (group B). We analyzed the impact of the pre- and postoperative Karnofsky performance status (KPS), postoperative treatment structure and post-treatment survival. BM resection significantly improved KPS scores in both groups (p = 0.0001). Median survival after BM resection differed significantly between the groups (A: 5.81 vs. B: 8.12 months; p = 0.0015). In both groups, patients who received postoperative systemic treatment showed significantly longer overall survival (p = 0.00001). However, elderly patients less frequently received systemic treatment (p = 0.0001) and the subgroup of elderly patients receiving such therapies had a significantly higher postsurgical KPS score (p = 0.0007). In all patients receiving systemic treatment, age was no longer a negative prognostic factor. Resection of BM improves the functional status of elderly patients, thus enhancing the likeliness to receive systemic treatment, which, in turn, leads to longer overall survival. In the context of such a treatment structure, age alone is no longer a prognostic factor for survival.

Bilateral occipital metastases: Visual deficits and management considerations

Background

Metastases to the bilateral occipital lobes pose a difficult clinical scenario due to risk of debilitating visual loss. We sought to characterize clinical outcomes following different treatment modalities to help guide management in this challenging situation.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed brain metastases patients treated at a single institution between 2008 and 2017 and assessed visual symptoms before and after treatment, the tumor and peritumoral edema volumes before treatment, and clinical outcomes including mortality.

Results

Eighteen patients with metastases affecting both occipital lobes were identified. Lung cancer represented the most common primary (n = 10). Visual deficits were present in 12 patients at the time of diagnosis of bilateral occipital metastases (67%). Patients received radiotherapy (n = 5) or combined surgical resection and radiotherapy (n = 13). Among symptomatic patients, two received radiation and 10 received combined surgery and radiation. Nine patients had improved visual symptoms after treatment with no new visual deficits reported as a result of treatment. Among asymptomatic patients, three were treated with radiation alone and three with resection and radiation. Three of these patients developed new visual symptoms following treatment, including one patient with Balint's syndrome.

Conclusion

Patients with symptomatic bilateral occipital lobe metastases may experience visual improvement following intervention, especially if symptoms stem from compression or edema. Those without visual symptoms are at risk of developing new visual deficits during treatment, which should be included in the decision-making process and when counseling patients. Visual deficits improved after surgery in the majority of patients, with no cases of immediate visual deterioration.

Surgical resection of symptomatic brain metastases improves the clinical status and facilitates further treatment

Background

Brain metastases (BM) frequently cause focal neurological deficits leading to a reduced Karnofsky performance score (KPS). Since KPS is routinely used to guide the choice of adjuvant therapy, we hypothesized that improving KPS by surgical resection may improve the chance for adjuvant treatment and ultimately result in better survival. We therefore analyzed the course of a large cohort undergoing resection of symptomatic brain metastases in the context of further treatment and clinical outcome.

Patients and methods

In a bi‐centric retrospective analysis we retrieved baseline, clinical, and treatment‐related parameters of patients operated on BM between 2010 and 2019. Survival was calculated using Kaplan‐Meier estimates; prognostic factors for survival were analyzed by Log‐rank test and Cox proportional hazards.

Results

We included 750 patients with a median age of 61 (19‐87) years. The functional status was significantly improved by surgical resection, with a median preoperative (KPS) of 80 (10‐100) increasing to 90 (0‐100) after surgery (P < .0001). Moreover, surgery improved the RTOG recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) class from III to I/II in 82 patients. Postoperative local radiotherapy and systemic treatment were associated with significantly longer survival (P < .0001 for each). Systemic treatment was provided significantly more frequently in patients with a fair postoperative clinical status (KPS ≥ 70; P < .0001). The postoperative clinical status, postoperative radiotherapy, systemic treatment, controlled systemic disease and < 4 BM were independent predictors for survival.

Conclusion

The resection of symptomatic BM may restore clinical status, so enhancing the likelihood of receiving adjuvant treatment, and therefore leading to improved overall survival.

The primary sites leading to brain metastases: Shifting trends at a tertiary care center

While the majority of brain metastases arise from lung cancer, breast cancer, or melanoma, new treatments and improved prognoses have altered the profile of primary cancers that metastasize to the brain. We sought to determine the proportion of brain metastases from less common primary sites and conduct trend analyses. We reviewed the charts of 3585 patients with brain metastases seen at our institution from 2008 to 2018. We determined the primary site for each of these patients, and the Mann-Kendall test was used to evaluate temporal trends in the yearly proportion of brain metastases originating from each primary cancer. The five most common primary sites were lung (43.0%), breast (19.9%), melanoma (8.2%), renal (5.0%), and colorectal (3.8%). The proportion of yearly brain metastases originating from breast cancer (p = 0.029) and melanoma (p = 0.013) decreased by 23.8% and 46.7%, respectively, from 2008 (0.21 breast, 0.15 melanoma) to 2018 (0.16 breast, 0.08 melanoma), while no change was found in the proportion of brain metastases from lung, renal, and colorectal cancers. Brain metastases arising from rare primary sites, defined as those comprising at most 2% of all brain metastases, increased by 34.4% (p = 0.005). Limited sample size prohibited trend analysis of other individual primary sites. We report a decrease over 11 years in the proportion of brain metastases originating from breast cancer and melanoma at our institution, and an increase in brain metastases from rare primary sites. Further work with larger, multi-center databases will enable additional evaluation of brain metastases from rare primary sites.

Survival benefit of lobectomy for glioblastoma: moving towards radical supramaximal resection

PURPOSE

Extent of resection remains a paramount prognostic factor for long-term outcomes for glioblastoma. As such, supramaximal resection or anatomic lobectomy have been offered for non-eloquent glioblastoma in an attempt to improve overall survival. Here, we conduct a propensity-matched analysis of patients with non-eloquent glioblastoma who underwent either lobectomy or gross total resection of lesion to investigate the efficacy of supramaximal resection of glioblastoma.

METHODS

Patients who underwent initial surgery for gross total resection or lobectomy for non-eloquent glioblastoma at our tertiary care referral center from 2010 to 2019 were included for this propensity-matched survival analysis. Propensity scores were generated with the following covariates: age, location, preoperative KPS, product of perpendicular maximal tumor diameters, and product of perpendicular FLAIR signal diameters. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) with generated propensity scores was used to compare progression-free survival and overall survival.

RESULTS

Sixty-nine patients were identified who underwent initial resection of glioblastoma for non-eloquent glioblastoma from 2010 to 2019 (GTR = 37, lobectomy = 32). Using IPTW, overall survival (30.7 vs. 14.1 months) and progression-free survival (17.2 vs. 8.1 months were significantly higher in the lobectomy cohort compared to the GTR group (p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in pre-op or post-op KPS or complication rates between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

Our propensity-matched study suggests that lobectomy for non-eloquent glioblastoma confers an added survival benefit compared to GTR alone. For patients with non-eloquent glioblastoma, a supramaximal resection by means of an anatomic lobectomy should be considered as a primary surgical treatment in select patients if feasible.

Label-free multiphoton imaging allows brain tumor recognition based on texture analysis-a study of 382 tumor patients

Background

Label-free multiphoton microscopy has been suggested for intraoperative recognition and delineation of brain tumors. For any future clinical application, appropriate approaches for image acquisition and analysis have to be developed. Moreover, an evaluation of the reliability of the approach, taking into account inter- and intrapatient variability, is needed.

Methods

Coherent anti-Stokes Raman scattering (CARS), two-photon excited fluorescence (TPEF), and second-harmonic generation were acquired on cryosections of brain tumors of 382 patients and 28 human nontumor brain samples. Texture parameters of those images were calculated and used as input for linear discriminant analysis.

Results

The combined analysis of texture parameters of the CARS and TPEF signal proved to be most suited for the discrimination of nontumor brain versus brain tumors (low- and high-grade astrocytoma, oligodendroglioma, glioblastoma, recurrent glioblastoma, brain metastases of lung, colon, renal, and breast cancer and of malignant melanoma) leading to a correct rate of 96% (sensitivity: 96%, specificity: 100%). To approximate the clinical setting, the results were validated on 42 fresh, unfixed tumor biopsies. 82% of the tumors and, most important, all of the nontumor samples were correctly recognized. An image resolution of 1 µm was sufficient to distinguish brain tumors and nontumor brain. Moreover, the vast majority of single fields of view of each patient’s sample were correctly classified with high probabilities, which is important for clinical translation.

Conclusion

Label-free multiphoton imaging might allow fast and accurate intraoperative delineation of primary and secondary brain tumors in combination with endoscopic systems.

Current approaches to the management of brain metastases

Brain metastases are a very common manifestation of cancer that have historically been approached as a single disease entity given the uniform association with poor clinical outcomes. Fortunately, our understanding of the biology and molecular underpinnings of brain metastases has greatly improved, resulting in more sophisticated prognostic models and multiple patient-related and disease-specific treatment paradigms. In addition, the therapeutic armamentarium has expanded from whole-brain radiotherapy and surgery to include stereotactic radiosurgery, targeted therapies and immunotherapies, which are often used sequentially or in combination. Advances in neuroimaging have provided additional opportunities to accurately screen for intracranial disease at initial cancer diagnosis, target intracranial lesions with precision during treatment and help differentiate the effects of treatment from disease progression by incorporating functional imaging. Given the numerous available treatment options for patients with brain metastases, a multidisciplinary approach is strongly recommended to personalize the treatment of each patient in an effort to improve the therapeutic ratio. Given the ongoing controversies regarding the optimal sequencing of the available and expanding treatment options for patients with brain metastases, enrolment in clinical trials is essential to advance our understanding of this complex and common disease. In this Review, we describe the key features of diagnosis, risk stratification and modern paradigms in the treatment and management of patients with brain metastases and provide speculation on future research directions.

Pseudo-continuous arterial spin labelling shows high diagnostic performance in the detection of postoperative residual lesion in hyper-vascularised adult brain tumours

OBJECTIVES

Our aim was to evaluate the contribution of pseudo-continuous arterial spin labelling (pCASL) in the detection of a postoperative residual lesion in adult brain tumours.

METHODS

Seventy-five patients were prospectively included. Following the results of preoperative DSC-PWI assessment, intra-axial lesions, including high-grade gliomas (n = 43) and certain metastases (n = 14), were classified as hyper-vascular (HV+ group, n = 57); other lesions, including low-grade gliomas and certain metastases, were classified as non-hyper-vascular (HV- group, n = 18). To confirm the absence/presence of a residual lesion or disease progression, postoperative MRI including pCASL sequence and follow-up-MRI were performed within 72 h and 1-6 months after the resection, respectively. Two raters evaluated the images. Mean and maximal ASL cerebral blood flow (CBF) values were measured in the perioperative region and normalised to the contralateral tissue. The pCASL-CBF maps and post-contrast T1WI were visually assessed for residual lesion. Quantitative data were analysed with unpaired Student t and Mann-Whitney U tests and the visual diagnostic performance with the McNemar test.

RESULTS

In the HV+ group, the mean normalised CBF was 1.97 ± 0.59 and 0.97 ± 0.29 (p < 0.0001, AUC = 0.964, cut-off = 1.27) for patients with or without residual tumours, respectively. The mean normalised CBF was not discriminative for assessing residual tumours in the HV- group (p = 0.454). Visual CBF evaluation allowed 92.98% patients belonging to the HV+ group to be correctly classified (sensitivity 93.02%, specificity 92.86%, p < 0.001). Visual evaluation was correlated with contrast enhancement evaluation and with the mean normalised CBF values (r = 0.505, p < 0.0001 and 0.838, p < 0.0001, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Qualitative and quantitative ASL evaluation shows high diagnostic performance in postoperative assessment of hyper-perfused tumours. In this case, postoperative pCASL may be useful, especially if contrast injection cannot be performed or when contrast enhancement is doubtful.

KEY POINTS

• Evaluation of postoperative residual lesion in the case of brain tumours is an imaging challenge. • This prospective monocentric study showed that increased normalised cerebral blood flow assessed by pseudo-continuous arterial spin labelling (pCASL) correlates well with the presence of a residual tumour in the case of hyper-vascular tumour diagnosed on preoperative MRI. • Qualitative and quantitative pCASL is an informative sequence for hyper-vascular residual tumour, especially if acquired more than 48 h after brain tumour surgery, when contrast enhancement can give ambiguous results due to blood-brain barrier disruption.

Outcome after surgery in supratentorial and infratentorial solitary brain metastasis

BACKGROUND

The aim of this retrospective study was to investigate and compare the outcome after surgery in patients with a supratentorial solitary metastasis (SSM) and an infratentorial solitary metastasis (ISM). A worse prognosis has been reported in ISM.

METHODS

Fifty-two patients with a newly diagnosed solitary brain metastasis on MRI were included to identify risk factors affecting the outcome. Key variables included tumor size, staging of the primary tumor, time span of presurgical work-up, and surgical technique. Outcome variables included postoperative complications, tumor recurrence, and mortality. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was applied.

RESULTS

Thirty patients with a SSM and 22 patients with an ISM underwent gross total resection. The tumor size did not have a statistical significant effect on survival. Presurgical work-up time was similar in SSM and ISM. Postoperative complications were more frequently encountered in ISM. Recurrence rate was comparable in SSM and ISM. Carcinomatous meningitis (CM) was more frequently seen in ISM, and CM was seen more often with the piecemeal resection technique. There was no statistical difference in overall survival between SSM and ISM.

CONCLUSIONS

This study identified factors that play a role in the outcome after surgery in patients with ISM and SSM on MRI. Postoperative complications seemed to be higher in ISM and CM was more often seen in ISM, but the worse prognosis in patients with ISM compared with SSM could not be confirmed.

Congress of Neurological Surgeons Systematic Review and Evidence-Based Guidelines on the Role of Surgery in the Management of Adults With Metastatic Brain Tumors

Please see the full-text version of this guideline https://www.cns.org/guidelines/guidelines-treatment-adults-metastatic-brain-tumors/chapter_2) for the target population of each recommendation listed below.  SURGERY FOR METASTATIC BRAIN TUMORS AT NEW DIAGNOSIS QUESTION: Should patients with newly diagnosed metastatic brain tumors undergo surgery, stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), or whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT)?

RECOMMENDATIONS

Level 1: Surgery + WBRT is recommended as first-line treatment in patients with single brain metastases with favorable performance status and limited extracranial disease to extend overall survival, median survival, and local control. Level 3: Surgery plus SRS is recommended to provide survival benefit in patients with metastatic brain tumors Level 3: Multimodal treatments including either surgery + WBRT + SRS boost or surgery + WBRT are recommended as alternatives to WBRT + SRS in terms of providing overall survival and local control benefits.  SURGERY AND RADIATION FOR METASTATIC BRAIN TUMORS QUESTION: Should patients with newly diagnosed metastatic brain tumors undergo surgical resection followed by WBRT, SRS, or another combination of these modalities?

RECOMMENDATIONS

Level 1: Surgery + WBRT is recommended as superior treatment to WBRT alone in patients with single brain metastases. Level 3: Surgery + SRS is recommended as an alternative to treatment with SRS alone to benefit overall survival. Level 3: It is recommended that SRS alone be considered equivalent to surgery + WBRT.  SURGERY FOR RECURRENT METASTATIC BRAIN TUMORS QUESTION: Should patients with recurrent metastatic brain tumors undergo surgical resection?

RECOMMENDATIONS

Level 3: Craniotomy is recommended as a treatment for intracranial recurrence after initial surgery or SRS.  SURGICAL TECHNIQUE AND RECURRENCE QUESTION A: Does the surgical technique (en bloc resection or piecemeal resection) affect recurrence?

RECOMMENDATION

Level 3: En bloc tumor resection, as opposed to piecemeal resection, is recommended to decrease the risk of postoperative leptomeningeal disease when resecting single brain metastases.

QUESTION B

Does the extent of surgical resection (gross total resection or subtotal resection) affect recurrence?

RECOMMENDATION

Level 3: Gross total resection is recommended over subtotal resection in recursive partitioning analysis class I patients to improve overall survival and prolong time to recurrence. The full guideline can be found at https://www.cns.org/guidelines/guidelines-treatment-adults-metastatic-brain-tumors/chapter_2.

Sodium fluorescein-guided brain tumor surgery under the YELLOW-560-nm surgical microscope filter in pediatric age group: feasibility and preliminary results

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the feasibility and safety of sodium fluorescein (Na-Fl)-guided surgery with the use of the PENTERO 900 surgical microscope (Carl Zeiss, Meditec, Oberkochen, Germany) equipped with the YELLOW-560-nm filter and low-dose Na-Fl (2 mg/kg) in pediatric brain tumor surgery.

METHODS

The study included 23 pediatric patients with various intracranial pathologies, who underwent Na-Fl-guided surgery between April 2015 and February 2018. Clinical features, surgical observations, extent of resection, and tumor histopathology were retrospectively analyzed. The use of YELLOW-560-nm filter was found "helpful" if the discrimination of the pinkish brain tissue and bright yellow stained tumor tissue was clear. Otherwise, it was described as "not helpful."

RESULTS

There were 11 female and 12 male patients with a mean age of 9.4 years. There were 7 brain stem/tectal plate gliomas, 6 supratentorial tumors, 4 intraventricular tumors, 2 pineal tumors, 2 infratentorial tumors, 1 clivus tumor, and 1 tumor with supra- and infratentorial extensions in the current series. Na-Fl was found helpful by means of the tumor demarcation in 20 instances (87%). In 11 of these 20 operations (55%), a total resection was achieved regardless of the tumor pathology. A subtotal resection was achieved in the remaining 9 patients (45%). No adverse events or side effects were encountered with regard to Na-Fl use.

CONCLUSION

Na-Fl guidance with the use of the YELLOW-560 filter is safe and effective during brain tumor surgery in pediatric age group.

Management of Intracranial Metastatic Disease With Laser Interstitial Thermal Therapy

Treatment approaches for metastatic brain tumors continue to evolve, with increasing recent emphasis on focal therapies whenever possible. MRI-guided Laser Interstitial Thermal Therapy (LITT) is a minimally invasive surgical option that has broadened the capability of the neurosurgeon in treating difficult-to-treat intracranial lesions. This technology uses image-guided delivery of laser to the target lesion to generate heat and thereby ablate pathological tissue and has expanded the neurosurgical armamentarium for surgical treatment of brain metastases. In this study, we describe the indications for LITT in the management of intracranial metastatic disease and report our institutional experience with LITT.

Application of fluorescein sodium in breast cancer brain-metastasis surgery

OBJECTIVE

Surgical resection serves an important role in the multidisciplinary treatment of cerebral metastases (CMs). Conventional white-light, microsurgical, and circumferential stripping of CMs is standard neurosurgical procedure, but is associated with a high recurrence rate. Based on this outcome, there is an urgent need for a new surgical strategy, such as fluorescence-guided resection, for CMs, in order to achieve total removal.

METHODS

A retrospective study was carried out in 38 patients clinically and pathologically diagnosed with breast cancer brain metastasis at three medical centers from May 2012 to June 2016. The study comprised group 1 (fluorescein-guided surgery) and group 2 (standard microsurgery). In group 1, 5 mg/kg of fluorescein sodium was injected intravenously after an allergy test and before general anesthesia for 17 patients. A yellow 560 filter was employed for microsurgical tumor resection. Group 2 consisted of 21 patients for whom fluorescein was not administered.

RESULTS

Surgical outcomes were assessed concerning the extent of resection and Karnofsky performance status. Gross total resection was achieved in these patients, with high fluorescence markedly enhancing tumor visibility. The extent of resection had a powerful influence on performance status. Overall survival after CM was 24.1 months in patients given fluorescein and was 22.8 months in the nonfluorescein group.

CONCLUSION

Fluorescein-guided surgery is a simple, safe, and practical method to resect breast cancer brain metastasis, and leads to a higher proportion of resection compared to common microsurgery. This offers a tremendous advantage when navigating a tiny tumor, and improves the quality of life of patients with CM.

Multiple brain metastases: a surgical series and neurosurgical perspective

Despite review papers claim for radical treatment of oligometastatic patients, only few surgical series have been published. In this study, we analyze results and actual role of surgical resection for the management of patients with multiple brain metastases. This retrospective study compares surgical results of two groups of patients consecutively treated in our Institute from January 2004 to June 2015. The first group comprises all 32 patients with multiple brain metastases with only 2-3 lesions who underwent surgical resection of all lesions; the second group comprises 30 patients with a single surgically treated brain mestastasis compatible with the first group (match-paired control series). Median survival was 14.6 months for patients with multiple brain metastases (range 1-28 months) and 17.4 months for patients with a single brain metastasis (range 4-38 months); the difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.2). Neurological condition improved in 59.4% of patients with multiple metastases, it remained unchanged in 37.5% and worsened in 3.1%. In our series, selected patients with only 2-3 lesions with well-controlled systemic disease, life expectancy of more than 3 months, Karnofsky's performance status > 60, and surgically accessible lesions, benefited from surgical treatment in terms of survival and quality of life, with reduction or disappearance of significant neurological deficits. The prognosis for these patients is similar to that of patients with a single metastasis. It seems that patients with breast cancer included in our series had the worst prognosis if compared to other histotypes.

The role of surgery for brain metastases from solid tumors

Surgery, stereotactic radiosurgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy including novel targeted therapy strategies and any combination thereof as well as supportive care are the key elements for treatment of brain metastases. Goals of microsurgery are to obtain tissue samples for histologic diagnosis (particularly in case of uncertainty about the unknown primary tumor but also in the context of future targeted therapies), to relieve burden from space-occupying effects, to improve local tumor control, and to prolong overall survival. Complete surgical resection improves local tumor control and may even affect overall survival. Stereotactic radiosurgery is an equal effective alternative for metastases up to 3 cm in diameter, especially in highly eloquent or deep seated location. Gross total resection (as defined by immediate postoperative MRI) does not necessarily have to be combined with whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT), at least for patients with good performance status and controlled systemic disease. Particularly in cases of incomplete resections, focal irradiation or radiosurgery of the resection cavity or tumor remnant rather than WBRT may be attempted.

Retrospective study of 229 surgically treated patients with brain metastases: Prognostic factors, outcome and comparison of recursive partitioning analysis and diagnosis-specific graded prognostic assessment

Background:

Metastases are the most frequent tumors in the brain. Most often used scoring systems to predict the outcome are the RPA (Recursive Partitioning Analysis) classification and the DS-GPA (Diagnosis-Specific Graded Prognostic Assessment) score. The goal of our study was to determine prognostic factors which influence outcome in patients who undergo surgery for brain metastases and to compare different outcome scores.

Methods:

Two hundred and twenty-nine patients who underwent surgery for brain metastases in our institution between January 2005 and December 2014 were included in the study. Patient data were evaluated retrospectively.

Results:

The mean survival time was 19.2 months (median survival time, MST: 8 months), for patients with a single metastasis (n = 149) 17.6 months (MST: 8 months), and for patients with multiple metastases (n = 80) 17.9 months (MST: 6 months). Significant influence on MST had age <65 years (9 vs. 5 months, P = 0.002), female sex (10 vs. 6 months, P < 0.001), RPA Class I and II (11 vs. 4 months, P < 0.001), Karnofsky score >70% (11 vs. 4 months, P < 0.001), and postoperative radiotherapy (8 vs. 5 months, P < 0.002). To evaluate the diagnostic power of DS-GPA and RPA score in respect of survival, two Cox regressions were modeled, where the RPA classification showed a better predictive power.

Conclusion:

Favorable factors for prolonged survival were KPS >70%, RPA Class I and II, age <65 years, female sex, a DS-GPA Score of 2.5–3 and 3.5–4, and adjuvant radiotherapy. The RPA Classification was more accurate in predicting the outcome than the DS-GPA score.

Neurosurgical management of brain metastases

Brain metastases present a significant public health issue, affecting more than 100,000 patients per year in the U.S. and result in significant morbidity. Brain metastases can occur in a variety of clinical situations ranging from multiple brain metastases with uncontrolled systemic disease to a solitary metastasis in the setting of controlled systemic disease. Additionally, advances in genomics have broadened the opportunities for targeted treatment options and potentially more durable systemic responses. As such, the treatment of brain metastases is now more tailored and multimodal, involving systemic, radiation, and surgical therapies, often in combination. This review discusses the historical and current role of neurosurgical techniques in the treatment of brain metastases.