Immunobiological properties of influenza A (H7N9) hemagglutinin and neuraminidase proteins

Anti-neuraminidase immunity in the combat against influenza

INTRODUCTION

Anti-neuraminidase (NA) immunity correlates with the protection against influenza virus infection in both human and animal models. The aim of this review is to better understand the mechanism of anti-NA immunity, and also to evaluate the approaches on developing NA-based influenza vaccines or enhancing immune responses against NA for current influenza vaccines.

AREAS COVERED

In this review, the structure of influenza neuraminidase, the contribution of anti-NA immunity to protection, as well as the efforts and challenges of targeting the immune responses to NA were discussed. We also listed some of the newly discovered anti-NA monoclonal antibodies and discussed their contribution in therapeutic as well as the antigen design of a broadly protective NA vaccine.

EXPERT OPINION

Targeting the immune response to both HA and NA may be critical for achieving the optimal protection since there are different mechanisms of HA and NA elicited protective immunity. Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) that target the conserved protective lateral face or catalytic sites are effective therapeutics. The epitope discovery using monoclonal antibodies may benefit NA-based vaccine elicited broadly reactive antibody responses. Therefore, the potential for a vaccine that elicits cross-reactive antibodies against neuraminidase is a high priority for next-generation influenza vaccines.

Recombinant H7 hemagglutinin expressed in glycoengineered Pichia pastoris forms nanoparticles that protect mice from challenge with H7N9 influenza virus

Cases of H7N9 human infection caused by an avian-origin H7N9 virus emerged in eastern China in 2013, leading to the urgent requirement of developing an effective vaccine to reduce its pandemic potential. In this report, the full-length recombinant H7 protein (rH7) of A/Hangzhou/1/2013 (H7N9) virus was expressed by a glycoengineered Pichia pastoris system. The rH7 protein underwent complex glycosylation modifications and polymerized to nanoparticles of 30-50 nm in diameter. Recombinant H7 (1.9 µg) elicited a > 1:40 hemagglutination inhibition titer, and 3.75 µg rH7 protected 100% of the mice in the mice challenge model with 10-fold 50% lethal dose of the A/Shanghai/2/2013 (H7N9) rat lung-adapted strain. In conclusion, rH7 produced by the glycoengineered P. pastoris can be used for vaccination against the H7N9 virus, and provides an effective platform for the rapid production of future influenza vaccines.

Kinetics, Longevity, and Cross-Reactivity of Antineuraminidase Antibody after Natural Infection with Influenza A Viruses

The kinetics, longevity, and breadth of antibodies to influenza virus neuraminidase (NA) in archival, sequential serum/plasma samples from influenza A virus (IAV) H5N1 infection survivors and from patients infected with the 2009 pandemic IAV (H1N1) virus were determined using an enzyme-linked lectin-based assay. The reverse-genetics-derived H4N1 viruses harboring a hemagglutinin (HA) segment from A/duck/Shan Tou/461/2000 (H4N9) and an NA segment derived from either IAV H5N1 clade 1, IAV H5N1 clade 2.3.4, the 2009 pandemic IAV (H1N1) (H1N1pdm), or A/Puerto Rico/8/1934 (H1N1) virus were used as the test antigens. These serum/plasma samples were also investigated by microneutralization (MN) and/or hemagglutination inhibition (HI) assays. Neuraminidase-inhibiting (NI) antibodies against N1 NA of both homologous and heterologous viruses were observed in H5N1 survivors and H1N1pdm patients. H5N1 survivors who were never exposed to H1N1pdm virus developed NI antibodies to H1N1pdm NA. Seroconversion of NI antibodies was observed in 65% of the H1N1pdm patients at day 7 after disease onset, but an increase in titer was not observed in serum samples obtained late in infection. On the other hand, an increase in seroconversion rate with the HI assay was observed in the follow-up series of sera obtained on days 7, 14, 28, and 90 after infection. The study also showed that NI antibodies are broadly reactive, while MN and HI antibodies are more strain specific.