Development and validation across trimester of the Prenatal Eating Behaviors Screening tool

Validation of the food craving acceptance and action questionnaire (FAAQ) in pregnancy

Food cravings are common during pregnancy and can trigger disordered eating behaviors, including binge and loss of control eating, which pose risks to maternal and fetal health. Assessing mechanisms underlying food cravings with theoretically informed and empirically validated measures is crucial for advancing research and clinical interventions that target cravings as predictors of disordered eating and its adverse sequelae during gestation. Pregnant individuals (n = 305) completed the ten-item Food Craving Acceptance and Action Questionnaire (FAAQ), a measure of acceptance of (factor 1) and willingness to experience cravings (factor 2), along with the Food Craving Questionnaire - Trait - reduced (FCQ-T-r), the Prenatal Eating Behaviors Screening Tool (PEBS), and Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale. Confirmatory factor analyses yielded poor fit for the original ten-item, two-factor structure of the FAAQ but excellent fit for the previously established seven-item, two-factor FAAQ-II (CFI = 0.96, RMSEA = 0.07, TLI = 0.94, with items 1, 3, and 6 removed). Internal consistency reliability was adequate for total (α = 0.68) and subscale scores (α = 0.76, 0.79). FAAQ-II scores correlated significantly with FCQ-T-r scores (r = -0.37 to -0.56, p < .001), supporting construct validity. FAAQ-II scores differentiated participants with versus without clinically significant disordered eating (PEBS ≥34, p < .001) and were significantly associated with pre-pregnancy body mass and mood symptoms. The FAAQ-II demonstrated robust psychometric properties in this sample, supporting its use in assessing acceptance of and willingness to experience food cravings during pregnancy.

Validation of the intolerance of uncertainty scale-12 in a sample of pregnant people

BACKGROUND

Intolerance of uncertainty (IU) has been proposed as a transdiagnostic mechanism driving anxiety, depression, and eating disorder symptoms. Pregnancy is a time of significant uncertainty, yet few studies have examined the measurement of IU and its impacts on pregnant people. The current study aimed to examine the psychometric performance of two versions of the Intolerance of Uncertainty Scale (IUS-27 and IUS-12) and their associations with psychopathologies common in pregnancy.

METHODS

This study is a secondary analysis of participants (n = 254) recruited for a larger study of a single-session intervention targeting disordered eating in pregnancy. We examined fit of participant baseline data with IUS-27 and IUS-12 factor structures using confirmatory factor analyses. We also assessed associations between IU and emotion dysregulation and depression and eating disorder symptoms, controlling for age, parity, and perceived social status.

RESULTS

The IUS-12 provided superior fit to the data (CFI = 0.95; TLI = 0.93; RMSEA = 0.09) compared to the IUS-27. The IUS-12 was significantly (all p < 0.05) correlated with measures of emotion dysregulation (r = 0.67), depression (r = 0.58), and eating disorders (r = 0.37). Inhibitory IU rather than prospective IU was generally significantly associated with greater psychopathology (ß range = 0.46 - 3.51, p's < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Results from this study provide initial support for the IUS-12 as a valid measure of IU in pregnant people and suggest that IU is strongly associated with measures of depression, emotion dysregulation, and eating disorder behaviors in this population. Severe psychological distress in pregnancy has been linked to complications in gestation and delivery and overall poor birth outcomes. Clinicians and doctors should consider using the IUS-12 as a general measure of psychological distress among pregnant patients.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The trial from which these data were drawn is registered at clinicaltrials.gov, NCT06129461 (registered on November 10, 2023).

Exploring the Relationship Between Eating Disorders and Reproductive Health, with a Focus on Fertility, Obstetric, and Fetal Outcomes: A Narrative Review

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Eating disorders can profoundly impact reproductive health in females, spanning from the onset of puberty through menopause. The impact is due to a variety of factors, including nutritional status, body fat percentage, and hormone regulation. Notably, fertility and pregnancy are particularly vulnerable to undernutrition and disordered eating. This narrative review provides a comprehensive summary and discussion of available literature from the past 5 years exploring the impact of eating disorders on fertility, obstetric outcomes, and fetal outcomes.

RECENT FINDINGS

Current literature demonstrates that EDs can have a negative impact on fertility, obstetric outcomes, and fetal outcomes. Primary research and systematic reviews support associations including increased use of assisted reproductive treatment for infertility, anemia and hyperemesis during pregnancy, and preterm delivery. Associated fetal outcomes include infant low birth weight, small for gestational age, and microcephaly. EDs, when unrecognized and left untreated, can negatively impact fertility, obstetric outcomes, and fetal outcomes. It is important for providers to be aware of these associations and implement screening to identify at-risk patients, as appropriate treatment can improve reproductive outcomes.

Pregnancy Eating Attitudes-Questionnaire (PEA-Q): Exploratory factor analysis and psychometric performance in a pregnant community sample with body mass index ≥ 25

Pregnancy is characterized by biopsychosocial changes that impact appetite, eating and weight. Understanding pregnant individuals' attitudes toward eating and weight can provide insight into prenatal health behavior. Accordingly, we developed and performed initial psychometric testing of a self-report measure, the Pregnancy Eating Attitudes-Questionnaire (PEA-Q), among individuals with pre-pregnancy BMI≥25. Pregnant participants with pre-pregnancy BMI≥25 (N = 213), who predominantly identified as racially minoritized (51% Black/African American) and lower income (66% ≤$30,000/year), enrolled in a longitudinal study. Participants completed 25 candidate PEA-Q items and eating- and weight-related measures. We conducted exploratory factor analysis to determine PEA-Q factor structure, calculated internal consistency coefficients of the extracted factors, and assessed convergent and discriminant validity. An 11-item, three-factor solution produced excellent model fit. Factors were interpreted as Permissive Eating and Weight Attitudes (e.g., "Pregnancy is a 'free pass' to eat any type of food that I want; " α = .82), Intentional Eating Changes (e.g., "I need to eat more food each day because I am pregnant; " α = .81), and Lack of Worry about Eating and Weight (e.g., "I am not concerned about eating too much now that I am pregnant; " α = .83). Each factor showed small-to-moderate correlations with measures of gestational weight gain and/or dietary intake and was not correlated with eating pathology measures, demonstrating adequate convergent and discriminant validity, respectively. This novel self-report measure seems to adequately capture pregnancy-related attitudes toward eating and weight among pregnant individuals with BMI≥25. Further testing is required to confirm these preliminary findings and determine generalizability.

Disordered eating instruments in the pregnancy cohort: a systematic review update

Pregnancy represents a crucial timepoint to screen for disordered eating due to the significant adverse impact on the woman and her infant. There has been an increased interest in disordered eating in pregnancy since the COVID-19 pandemic, which has disproportionately affected the mental health of pregnant women compared to the general population. This systematic review is an update to a previous review aiming to explore current psychometric evidence for any new pregnancy-specific instruments and other measures of disordered eating developed for non-pregnant populations. Systematic searches were conducted in PubMed, ProQuest, PsycInfo, CINAHL, Scopus, MEDLINE, and Embase from April 2019 to February 2024. A total of 20 citations met criteria for inclusion, with most studies of reasonable quality. Fourteen psychometric instruments were identified, including two new pregnancy-specific screening instruments. Overall, preliminary psychometric evidence for the PEBS, DEAPS, and EDE-PV was promising. There is an ongoing need for validation in different samples, study designs, settings, and administration methods are required. Similar to the original review on this topic, we did not find evidence to support a gold standard recommendation.

Management of eating disorders during pregnancy: A survey of Australian dietitians in clinical practice

BACKGROUND

Eating disorders (EDs) are estimated to affect 5.2%-7.5% of pregnant women, equating to 15,800-23,000 births in Australia annually. In pregnancy, an ED increases the risk of complications for both mother and child. Heightened motivation and increased utilisation of healthcare services during pregnancy present an opportunity to identify and commence ED treatment. Dietetic management of EDs differs from nutrition guidelines for pregnancy. This study aimed to assess current practice, confidence and training needs of dietitians to manage EDs in pregnancy.

METHODS

A cross-sectional survey of Australian dietitians with past year exposure to ED and/or antenatal fields was completed using Microsoft Forms between November 2022 and January 2023.

RESULTS

One hundred and seventeen responses were analysed. Confidence was less for assessment of a woman with an active ED in pregnancy than a pregnant woman with a history of an ED, pregnancy or an ED alone (p < 0.001). Greater than 5 years of experience as a dietitian, but without recent exposure to the patient population, was associated with increased confidence (p < 0.01). Almost half provided descriptions of treatments and interventions used to treat a pregnant woman with an ED, some of which conflict with ED or antenatal guidelines. Dietitians were more likely to weigh a person with an ED in pregnancy. Most respondents indicated further training (93%) and guidelines (98%) would be helpful.

CONCLUSION

This is the first investigation into the dietetic management of EDs in pregnancy, and it highlights a need for guidelines and training for dietitians.

A clinical trial protocol of a single-session self-guided acceptance-based online intervention targeting food cravings as predictors of disordered eating in pregnant people

BACKGROUND

Pregnancy is a time of heightened risk for disordered eating behaviors, which are linked to adverse health outcomes in gestation, delivery, and the postpartum. These adverse outcomes may be partially mediated by greater rates of deviation from recommended weight gain trajectories, especially in those who engage in binge and loss of control (LOC) eating. Food cravings are powerful and highly modifiable triggers of binge and LOC eating in non-pregnant populations with preliminary evidence linking cravings to disordered eating behaviors in pregnancy as well. Acceptance-based approaches have been shown to be feasible and effective in reducing the adverse impact of cravings on behavior.

PURPOSE

To test the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy of a single-session, self-guided, acceptance-based online workshop targeting food cravings as predictors of binge and LOC eating in pregnancy.

METHODS

We will conduct a pilot randomized controlled trial of a single-session, self-guided online acceptance-based workshop targeting food cravings in pregnancy. Pregnant individuals in the second trimester (n ≥ 74) endorsing current food cravings will be randomly assigned to the intervention or an untreated control group. The intervention group will participate in a one-hour workshop that imparts skills grounded in Acceptance and Commitment Therapy, including acceptance, defusion, and present-moment awareness. Both groups will complete comprehensive self-report assessments of primary outcomes and hypothesized mediators and moderators of intervention efficacy at baseline, one-month follow-up, and at full-term.

CONCLUSION

Results will inform integration of acceptance-based skills targeting food cravings into routine prenatal care to prevent adverse outcomes associated with disordered eating behaviors in pregnancy.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT06129461; registered on November 10, 2023.

"It is more isolating to patients if you aren't familiar with the resources": a pilot test of a clinician sensitivity training on eating disorders in pregnancy

It is more isolating to patients if you aren't familiar with the resources: A pilot test of a clinician sensitivity training on eating disorders in pregnancy.(IRB Number: 1909705198).Background Pregnant women with a history of eating disorders (EDs) or active EDs have greater maternal and child health complications. They are also unlikely to disclose their history with an ED to their clinician, few of which are confident in their knowledge to provide appropriate care for patients who present with EDs. This study's goal was to evaluate changes to knowledge, behavior, and attitudes for health professionals who were part of a sensitivity training (to provide information of and awareness, address potential clinician biases, and offer strategies for more patient-centered care with de-stigmatizing language) about eating disorders and pregnancy compared with those who received a reference document.Methods Our pilot study compared responses of health professionals before and after this sensitivity training (N = 54) with a group who were provided a clinician reference document about the same topic (N = 61).Results Mann-Whitney Wilcoxon tests showed significant differences between the sensitivity training and reference document groups, with the sensitivity training resulting in increases to participants' perception of ED's relevance to overall treatment (p = 0.018), comfort in providing resources (p < 0.0001), frequency of ability to introduce strategies (p = 0.001), and interest in additional strategies/recommendations in treating patients with eating disorders (p = 0.009). Thematic analysis of the open-ended responses indicated four major themes: Resources and support, Treatment, Additional training, and Clinician Strategies. Discussion Results indicated that the sensitivity training improved training outcomes compared to the reference document group. Qualitative responses from both groups indicated four themes that can help inform ED-centered care. This study provides context for future directions for continuing education courses as well as clinical training recommendations for treating pregnant patients with EDs.

Breastfeeding and pumping as maladaptive weight control behaviors

It is well recognized by the general public that breastfeeding expends calories. In our clinical practice, a number of postpartum women with a history of or a current eating disorder (ED) report using breastfeeding and/or pumping breast milk to influence their body shape and weight. This appears to be either a form of weight control behavior or, in some cases, a compensation for perceived overeating or binge eating. Breastfeeding and pumping have not generally been identified as maladaptive weight control behaviors, nor have they been a subject of research to date. We suggest that this practice should be investigated to determine how common it is, its potential role in maintaining EDs or contributing to relapse in the postpartum period, and to better understand other potential harms it may cause to both the mother and infant/child. PUBLIC SIGNIFICANCE: Breastfeeding and pumping may be used as maladaptive methods of weight control by women with EDs. This behavior is under-recognized in clinical practice and has received little research attention. We argue that maladaptive breastfeeding and pumping warrant further investigation, as the behaviors may play an important role in maintaining an ED or in contributing to relapse during the postpartum period and may also indirectly harm the infant/child.

Pregorexia: a systematic review and meta-analysis on the constructs of body image dissatisfaction and eating disturbances by gestational age in the peripartum

PURPOSE

Pregorexia is a phenomenon posited to occur in the peripartum, characterized by an attempt to counter pregnancy's physiological changes in body shape through reduced calorie intake or increased physical activity.

METHODS

In this pre-registered systematic review and meta-analysis, body image dissatisfaction and eating psychopathology in the peripartum according to gestational age were formally assessed. PubMed was searched up to May 2023. Selection criteria were represented by studies on body image concerns or eating psychopathology in the peripartum (up to 1 year after delivery). The population needed to include women from the general population or among patients with a history of (or current) eating disorder. For the meta-analysis, 17 studies were included: 10 for body image dissatisfaction (2625 individuals overall), 7 for eating behaviors (2551 individuals overall). The interplay between body image and the following themes was examined in depth: the adoption of breastfeeding, peripartum depression, sociocultural influences on body image, sexual disturbances, experiencing or reporting an altered food intake.

RESULTS

Progressive dissatisfaction with body image during pregnancy by gestational age was observed, stably elevated for at least 12 months postpartum. Eating psychopathology was observed as elevated only at 12 months in the postpartum, but not during pregnancy.

DISCUSSION

The current work offers normative values of body image satisfaction and eating psychopathology in the peripartum by gestational age. The relevance of current results was discussed, in order to inform both current clinical practice and future public policies.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level I-Evidence obtained from: systematic reviews and meta-analyses.