Healing of bisphosphonate-associated atypical femoral fractures in patients with osteoporosis: a comparison between treatment with and without teriparatide

Assessment of evidence for the off-label application of osteoanabolic drugs in fracture healing and spinal fusion

Osteoanabolic drugs are sometimes prescribed off-label for "fracture healing and spinal fusion." This study examines the scientific validity of such practices by analyzing existing clinical reports. The purported bone union-promoting effect of teriparatide in fracture cases has been refuted in clinical trials. While teriparatide shows efficacy in accelerating spinal fusion after surgery for patients with osteoporosis, there is no scientific justification for its off-label use in patients without osteoporosis. For osteoporosis patients, no clear evidence suggests that teriparatide is superior to antiresorptive drugs, making the rationale for switching from antiresorptive drugs to teriparatide weak. The efficacy in postoperative spinal fusion may primarily be attributed to systemic improvements in bone quality and quantity, enhancing the mechanical engagement of implants. The clinical evidence for the off-label use of romosozumab, another osteoanabolic drug, in fracture healing and spinal fusion is insufficient to support its efficacy. In conclusion, osteoanabolic drugs, like antiresorptive drugs, primarily have systemic functions in osteoporosis patients, with limited evidence supporting their role in promoting localized bone formation in fractures or spinal fusions.

Diagnosis and Management of Atypical Femoral Fractures and Medication-Related Osteonecrosis of the Jaw in Patients with Osteoporosis

Anti-osteoporosis treatments reduce fracture risk but maybe associated with rare adverse events with long-term use such as atypical femoral fractures (AFFs) and medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ). AFFs are rare but more likely with prolonged bisphosphonate use, whereas MRONJ incidence is higher in cancer patients on high-dose antiresorptive therapy. Following diagnosis, effective treatment options are available to manage both of these rare complications. An individualized treatment approach is advised with close monitoring.

Teriparatide Does not Have Beneficial Effects on Bone Healing in Complete Atypical Femur Fractures

Teriparatide is an anabolic drug sometimes administered to patients who have atypical femoral fracture (AFF). However, whether teriparatide has beneficial effects on bone healing remains uncertain. The present study aimed to analyze the association between teriparatide and bone healing in complete AFF. A total of 59 consecutive cases (58 patients) who underwent intramedullary nailing for complete AFF were categorized based on postoperative use of teriparatide into the non-teriparatide (non-TPTD, n = 34) and teriparatide groups (TPTD, n = 25). Time-to-bone union was evaluated and compared between the two groups. Additionally, multiple regression analysis was performed to evaluate factors affecting time-to-bone union. All participants were women, with a mean age of 77.6 years (range: 62-92). No significant difference in time-to-bone union was found between the non-TPTD and TPTD groups (5.5 months vs. 5.8 months, p = 0.359). Two patients in the non-TPTD group underwent reoperation (p = 0.503) due to failure caused by inadequate fixation, and both achieved bone healing after additional fixation with blocking screws. Multiple regression analysis revealed that the anterior gap of the fracture site postoperatively was a factor affecting time-to-bone union (p = 0.014). The beneficial effect of teriparatide on bone healing in complete AFF could not be confirmed. Additional randomized controlled trials are required. Nonetheless, appropriate techniques, including efforts to reduce the gap on the tensile side during the surgery, are important for reliable bone healing.

Does the Nonunion Rate of Atypical Femoral Fractures Differ According to Fracture Site?: A Meta-Analysis

Background

The nonunion rate for atypical femoral fractures (AFF) is known to be higher than that for typical fractures of the femur. We performed a meta-analysis to determine the incidence of nonunion necessitating reoperation following fixation for AFF and compare the rates according to the fracture site (subtrochanter or midshaft).

Methods

A total of 742 AFFs from 29 studies were included. A proportion meta-analysis utilizing a random-effects model was conducted to estimate the prevalence of nonunion. The outcomes were the incidence of reoperations that included osteosynthesis. To determine the association of nonunion with patient mean age or average duration of bisphosphonate use, meta-regression analysis was done.

Results

In proportion meta-analysis, the estimated pooled prevalence of nonunion was 7% (95% confidence interval [CI], 5%-10%) from all studies. There was a significant difference in nonunion rate between the 2 groups (I2 = 34.4%, p = 0.02); the estimated prevalence of nonunion was 15% (95% CI, 10%-20%) in subtrochanteric AFFs and 4% (95% CI, 2%-6%) in midshaft AFFs. From meta-regression analysis, significant correlations were identified between nonunion rate and patient mean age (coefficient: -0.0071, p = 0.010), but not in the average duration of bisphosphonate use (coefficient: -0.0024, p = 0.744).

Conclusions

A notable disparity existed in the nonunion rate among subtrochanteric AFFs and midshaft AFFs group. Therefore, it is critical for orthopedic surgeons to consider the complexity and challenges associated with AFF and to estimate the proper possibility of nonunion according to the fracture site.

Successful treatment of atypical femoral fracture with autogenous bone grafting in a patient on denosumab for bone metastasis from breast cancer: A case report

Atypical femoral fractures (AFFs) occur with minor trauma and are believed to be a potential complication of the prolonged use of antiresorptive agents, such as bisphosphonate and denosumab, for the treatment of bone metastasis. In comparison with typical femoral fractures, AFFs have a higher incidence of complications, including implant failure and delayed union or nonunion. This report describes the case of a 42-year-old woman who developed denosumab-associated AFF after denosumab therapy for bone metastasis from breast cancer. Surgical treatment with IMN was performed after open anatomical reduction. To reduce the risk of delayed union and nonunion, the autogenous bone graft obtained from the iliac crest was conducted. The radiograph taken 5 weeks after surgery showed callus formation. Full weight bearing was allowed 3 months after surgery. Six months postoperatively, radiographs and computed tomography images demonstrated bone union. Twelve months after surgery, the patient was able to walk easily without pain. For cancer patients with bone metastasis whose life expectancy may be limited, a decline in physical activity can be fatal. Consequently, it is crucial to avoid a decrease in activities of daily living brought about by delayed union or nonunion. In this regard, autogenous bone grafting is a viable and effective technique for the treatment of AFFs in patients with bone metastases.

Therapeutic strategy for atypical ulnar fracture in long use of bisphosphonate: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Atypical fractures are caused by the combined effects of severe suppression of bone metabolism (SSBT) due to long-term bisphosphonate therapy and chronic repetitive bone microdamage. Atypical ulnar fractures (AUFs) due to SSBT are rare, and there is no standard treatment strategy for such fractures. The relevant literature was reviewed, and the treatment strategy for AUF is discussed.

METHODS

A systematic review was conducted. All studies on ulnar fractures in individuals with a history of bisphosphonate use were included, and the data were extracted and analyzed from the perspective of the therapeutic strategy.

RESULTS

Forty limbs of 35 patients were included. As for the treatment of AUF, 31 limbs were treated surgically, and conservative treatment with casting was performed for 9 limbs. The bone fusion rate was 22/40 (55.0%), and non-union was seen in all patients treated conservatively. There was a significant difference in the bone fusion rate between patients with surgical treatment and those with conservative treatment. The bone fusion rate of patients with parathyroid hormone (PTH) and surgery was 82.3% (14/17 limbs); the bone fusion rate with PTH and bone graft was 69.2% (9/13 limbs). However, there were no significant differences in the fusion rate in the groups with or without PTH, with or without bone grafting, or the combination of the two treatments. There was also no significant difference in the bone fusion rate in the groups with or without low-intensity pulsed ultrasound (LIPUS) treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on the literature review, surgery is necessary to achieve bone union, but surgery alone is not adequate to achieve bony union. Bone grafting and the administration of PTH and LIPUS may promote early bone fusion, but the present study did not show significant advantages of these additional treatments for bone union.

Abaloparatide promotes bone repair of vertebral defects in ovariectomized rats by increasing bone formation

Osteoporotic vertebral fracture (OVF) is the most common type of osteoporotic fracture and is associated with immobility and mortality. Bone anabolic agents, such as abaloparatide (ABL), are usually administered to patients with OVF to prevent subsequent fractures. Although several studies have shown that bone anabolic agents promote healing of long bone fractures, there is little evidence of their healing effect on vertebral bone fractures. In the present study, we investigated the effect of ABL on vertebral bone defects using ovariectomized (OVX) rats with vertebral body drill-hole defects, an animal model of OVF. Eight-week-old female Sprague-Dawley rats were subjected to OVX, followed by the 32-36 days of bone depletion period, once-daily subcutaneous ABL was administered to OVX rats at a dose of 30 μg/kg for a maximum of 6 weeks from the day of the vertebral defect surgery. We found that ABL significantly increased bone mineral content and improved trabecular structural parameters at the vertebral defect site. Moreover, ABL significantly increased bone strength of the defected vertebrae. Bone histochemical analysis revealed formation of thick trabecular bone networks at the defect site after ABL administration, consistent with an improvement in trabecular structural parameters by ABL. ABL increased ALPase- and PHOSPHO1-positive osteoblastic cells and ALPase/PCNA double-positive cells, indicating enhanced preosteoblast proliferation as well as bone formation at the defect site. On the other hand, ABL did not affect the number of cathepsin K-positive osteoclasts per bone surface, suggesting that ABL did not promote excessive bone resorption. Our findings suggest that ABL is useful not only for preventing secondary vertebral fractures but also for promoting bone healing in OVF.

The effect of teriparatide on patients with atypical femur fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Bisphosphonates (BPs) are one of the most often used drugs to lower fracture risk in osteoporosis patients; nonetheless, BPs have been linked to atypical femoral fracture (AFF). Teriparatide (TPTD) is a parathyroid hormone analogue and anabolic drug that may accelerate fracture repair. TPTD has been considered as a possible treatment for AFF, particularly those caused by BP use. We evaluate the effect of TPTD on AFF in this systematic review and meta-analysis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A thorough search of: Web of Science, Scopus, PubMed, and Cochrane was conducted on August 2, 2023. Trials evaluating the effect of TPTD on the incidence of: complete bone healing, non-union, early and delayed bone union, progression of incomplete AFF to complete AFF, and time to bone union were included. Using Review Manager (RevMan) version 5.4, the risk ratio (RR) and mean difference (MD) with the corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI) were estimated for dichotomous and continuous outcomes, respectively. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used to assess the quality of studies.

RESULTS

Eight studies met the eligibility criteria and were included in our analysis. TPTD significantly increased the incidence of early bone union (RR = 1.45, 95% CI [1.13, 1.87], P = 0.004) and time to bone union (MD = -1.56, 95% CI [-2.86, -0.26], P = 0.02) compared to the control group. No significant differences were observed in terms of complete bone healing (RR = 1.09, 95% CI [0.99, 1.13], P = 0.12), non-union (RR = 0.48, 95% CI [0.22, 1.04], P = 0.06), and progression of incomplete AFF to complete AFF (RR = 0.27, 95% CI [0.04, 1.97], P = 0.19).

CONCLUSIONS

TPTD is an effective therapy for enhancing and hastening healing following AFF, particularly in postoperative settings. Future large randomized clinical trials are needed to confirm or dispute the results.

Osteoporosis: Molecular Pathology, Diagnostics, and Therapeutics

Osteoporosis is a major public health concern affecting millions of people worldwide and resulting in significant economic costs. The condition is characterized by changes in bone homeostasis, which lead to reduced bone mass, impaired bone quality, and an increased risk of fractures. The pathophysiology of osteoporosis is complex and multifactorial, involving imbalances in hormones, cytokines, and growth factors. Understanding the cellular and molecular mechanisms underlying osteoporosis is essential for appropriate diagnosis and management of the condition. This paper provides a comprehensive review of the normal cellular and molecular mechanisms of bone homeostasis, followed by an in-depth discussion of the proposed pathophysiology of osteoporosis through the osteoimmunological, gut microbiome, and cellular senescence models. Furthermore, the diagnostic tools used to assess osteoporosis, including bone mineral density measurements, biochemical markers of bone turnover, and diagnostic imaging modalities, are also discussed. Finally, both the current pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatment algorithms and management options for osteoporosis, including an exploration of the management of osteoporotic fragility fractures, are highlighted. This review reveals the need for further research to fully elucidate the molecular mechanisms underlying the condition and to develop more effective therapeutic strategies.

Effects of Teriparatide Treatment on Bone Mineral Density in Patients With Osteoporosis: A Short-Term Dose-Response Study

INTRODUCTION

Osteoporosis is a chronic bone disease that develops with a decrease in bone mineral density (BMD) along with bone mass. An essential measure in the prevention of osteoporosis is the achievement of normal peak bone mass. Teriparatide (TPTD) functions as an osteoanabolic agent, exerting a dual influence on bone remodeling by modulating both osteogenesis and osteoclastogenesis. Bone mass is determined by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) quantitative CT scan and has outstanding precision (within 1% to 2%) and has the ability to show the effectiveness of drug intervention.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the effectiveness of TPTD treatment on BMD in osteoporosis patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study is a retrospective, observational, multi-center study of 378 osteoporosis patients who were treated with 20 µg of subcutaneous TPTD every day for six months. DEXA scores of the hip joints of patients were measured both before and after TPTD treatment.

RESULTS

 The DEXA scores of the total population pre and post-treatment were -2.75+0.58 and -2.15+0.95 respectively, with a p-value of <0.001, which is statistically significant. In women the pre and post-treatment scores were -2.728+0.52 and -2.276+0.49, with a significant p-value of <0.001 whereas in males, the scores were -2.756+0.72 and -2.108+1.29 respectively, with a significant p-value of <0.05.

CONCLUSION

The six-month treatment with TPTD significantly improved DEXA scores in osteoporosis patients. DEXA score's precision and sensitivity in quantifying impact contribute to effective osteoporosis management, guiding treatment strategies for better outcomes in the Indian population. Further research is warranted to see the long-term effect of TPTD.

Should nails be locked dynamically or statically in atypical femoral fractures? - A radiological analysis of time to union and reoperations in 236 displaced fractures with 4 years average follow-up

INTRODUCTION

Atypical femoral fractures (AFFs) are associated with delayed union and higher reoperation rates. Axial dynamization of intramedullary nails is hypothesized to reduce time-to-union (TTU) and fixation failure as compared to static locking.

METHODS

Consecutive acutely displaced AFFs fixed with long intramedullary nails across five centres between 2006 and 2021 with a minimum postoperative follow-up of three months were retrospectively reviewed. The primary outcome was TTU, compared between AFFs treated with dynamically or statically locked intramedullary nails. Fracture union was defined as a modified Radiographic Union Score for Tibial fractures score of 13 or greater. Secondary outcomes involved revision surgery and treatment failure, defined as non-union beyond 18 months or revision internal fixation for mechanical reasons.

RESULTS

A total of 236 AFFs (127 dynamically locked and 109 statically locked) were analysed with good interobserver reliability of fracture union assessment (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.89; 95% CI = 0.82-0.98). AFFs treated with dynamized nails had significantly shorter median TTU (10.1 months; 95% CI = 9.24-10.96 vs 13.0 months; 95% CI = 10.60-15.40) (log-rank test, p = 0.019). Multivariate Cox regression revealed that dynamic locking was independently associated with greater likelihood of fracture union within 24 months (p = 0.009). Reoperations were less frequent in the dynamic locking group (18.9% vs 28.4%), although the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.084). Static locking was an independent risk factor for reoperation (p = 0.049), as were varus reduction and lack of teriparatide use within three months of surgery. Static locking also demonstrated a higher frequency of treatment failure (39.4% vs 22.8%, p = 0.006) and was an independent predictor of treatment failure in logistic regression (p = 0.018). Other factors associated with treatment failure included varus reduction and open reduction.

CONCLUSIONS

Dynamic locking of intramedullary nails in AFFs is associated with faster time to union, lower rate of non-union, and fewer treatment failures.

The effect of teriparatide on fracture healing after atypical femoral fracture: A systematic review and meta-analysis

This meta-analysis demonstrated that a greater prevalence of delayed union and nonunion and a longer time to fracture healing in the group that did not receive TPTD treatment after AFFs than in the group that received TPTD treatment.

PURPOSE

To date, there is no hard evidence for medical management after atypical femoral fracture (AFF), even though weak data indicate faster healing with teriparatide (TPTD). Herein, we aimed to investigate the effect of postfracture TPTD treatment on AFF healing using a pairwise meta-analysis focusing on delayed union, nonunion, and fracture healing time.

METHODS

A systematic search of the MEDLINE (PUBMED), Embase, and Cochrane Library databases was performed for studies investigating the effect of TPTD after AFF up to October 11, 2022. We compared the incidence of delayed union and nonunion and the time of fracture healing between the TPTD ( +) and TPTD (-) groups.

RESULTS

The 6 studies analyzed a total of 214 AFF patients, including 93 who received TPTD therapy after AFF and 121 who did not. The pooled analysis showed a significantly higher rate of delayed union in the TPTD (-) group than in the TPTD ( +) group (OR, 0.24; 95% CI, 0.11-0.52; P < 0.01; I² = 0%), and a higher nonunion rate was observed in the TPTD (-) group than in the TPTD ( +) group with low heterogeneity (OR, 0.21; 95% CI, 0.06-0.78; P = 0.02; I² = 0%). The TPTD (-) group required 1.69 months longer to achieve fracture union than the TPTD ( +) group, with statistical significance (MD =  - 1.69, 95% CI: - 2.44 to - 0.95, P < 0.01; I² = 13%). Subgroup analysis for patients with complete AFF showed that the TPTD (-) group had a higher rate of delayed union with low heterogeneity (OR, 0.22; 95% CI, 0.10-0.51; P < 0.01; I² = 0%), but there was no significant difference in the nonunion rate between TPTD ( +) and TPTD (-) groups (OR, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.06-2.21; P = 0.25; I² = 0%). Fracture healing took significantly longer in the TPTD (-) group (MD =  - 1.81, 95% CI: - 2.55 to - 1.08; P < 0.01; I² = 48%). The reoperation rate showed no significant difference between the two groups (OR, 0.29; 95% CI, 0.07-1.20; P = 0.09; I² = 0%).

CONCLUSIONS

The current meta-analysis supported the hypothesis that TPTD treatment following AFF might benefit fracture healing, lowering the rate of delayed union and nonunion and shortening the fracture healing time.

Is bisphosphonate use a risk factor for atypical periprosthetic/peri-implant fractures? - A metanalysis of retrospective cohort studies and systematic review of the current evidence

INTRODUCTION

Atypical periprosthetic/peri-implant fractures are not recognised in any widely used classification and therefore little focus is given to them. Multiple case reports and case series demonstrate these fractures exist and are related to bisphosphonate (BP) use.

HYPOTHESIS

Are patients taking long-term BPs at an increased risk of developing an atypical periprosthetic/peri-implant fracture? Is a particular BP drug causing an increased risk of fracture? Is there a correlation between the time of BP use and the incidence of fractures? Do vitamin D analogues or parathyroid hormones reduce the time to union?

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Systematic review of all available evidence on the existence of periprosthetic/peri-implant atypical fractures in patients taking long-term BPs and metanalysis of available retrospective cohort studies. Selected 1 systematic review, 7 retrospective cohort studies (5 used for metanalysis) and 32 case reports.

RESULTS

Metanalysis reported a risk ratio of 14.1, p=0.25, suggesting bisphosphonates are a risk factor in the development of periprosthetic/peri-implant atypical fractures. The secondary outcomes couldn't be reliably identified due to the small size of available studies and risk of significant bias.

DISCUSSION

Atypical periprosthetic/peri-implant fractures are an entity and seem to be associated with the use of bisphosphonates. The benefits of bisphosphonates use outweigh the risks, but clinicians should be aware of atypical fractures and actively search for them when patients on long-term bisphosphonates attend with non-specific pain close to the implant/prosthesis or reduced mobility.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II, Systematic review and metanalysis.

A brief review and clinical evidences of teriparatide therapy for atypical femoral fractures associated with long-term bisphosphonate treatment

The risk of bisphosphonate (BP)-associated atypical femur fracture (AFF) has markedly increased over recent decades due to suppression of bone turnover, accumulation of structural micro-damage and reduction of bone remodeling consequent to long-term BP treatment. These medications further delay bone union and result in challenging clinical management. Teriparatide (TPTD), a synthetic human parathyroid hormone, exhibits unique anabolic effects and can increase bone remodeling and improve bone microarchitecture, further promoting fracture healing and reducing the rate of bone non-union. In this study, we briefly define AFF as well as the effects of BPs on AFFs, detailed the role of TPTD in AFF management and the latest clinical therapeutic findings. We have confirmed that TPTD positively promotes the healing of AFFs by reducing the time to bone union and likelihood of non-union. Thus, teriparatide therapy could be considered as an alternative treatment for AFFs, however, further research is required for the establishment of effective clinical guidelines of TPTD use in the management of AFF.

Factors affecting healing and progression of conservatively treated incomplete atypical femoral fractures: retrospective observational study

INTRODUCTION

Incomplete atypical femoral fractures (iAFF) may occur with prolonged bisphosphonate usage. Factors influencing iAFF healing and progression are not well understood. This study of conservatively managed iAFF assessed factors influencing iAFF healing and progression including the effects of bisphosphonates and teriparatide use.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Single-center retrospective observational study of 69 consecutive patients with 78 radiographically confirmed iAFF from 2002 to 2017. Serial radiographs assessed for focal cortical thickening, dreaded black line (DBL) and complete fracture. Chief outcome measures were DBL healing and complete fracture.

RESULTS

DBL had a significant association (p < 0.05) with fracture progression by multivariable logistic regression (55.8% versus 25.7%, odds ratio [OR] 26.57 (95% CI 1.40-504.78)) and shorter fracture-free survival (mean 3.21 versus 6.27 years). Presence of symptoms was associated with shorter fracture-free survival (mean 2.68 versus 5.98 years). Discontinuing bisphosphonates had significant associations (p < 0.001) by multivariable logistic regression with decreased fracture rate (11.6% versus 92.0%; OR 0.00, 95% CI 0.00-0.08) and longer fracture-free survival (mean 7.52 versus 1.99 years). DBL healing occurred in 36.4%, only when bisphosphonates were discontinued. Age, sex, race, fracture site, glucocorticoid use, teriparatide supplementation and duration of bisphosphonate use showed no statistically significant effect although teriparatide use appeared to improve DBL healing (50% versus 17.9%, p = 0.188).

CONCLUSIONS

In conservatively managed iAFF, DBL healing occurred in 36.4% if bisphosphonates were discontinued. Bisphosphonates and DBL were significantly associated with fracture progression and together with symptoms with fracture survival.

Advancement in the Treatment of Osteoporosis and the Effects on Bone Healing

Osteoporosis (OP) is a major global health concern, with aging being one of the most important risk factors. Osteoarthritis (OA) is also an age-related disorder. Patients with OP and/or OA may be treated surgically for fractures or when their quality of life is impaired. Poor bone quality due to OP can seriously complicate the stability of a bone fixation construct and/or surgical fracture treatment. This review summarizes the current knowledge on the pathophysiology of normal and osteoporotic bone healing, the effect of a bone fracture on bone turnover markers, the diagnosis of a low bone mineral density (BMD) before surgical intervention, and the effect of available anti-osteoporosis treatment. Interventions that improve bone health may enhance the probability of favorable surgical outcomes. Fracture healing and the treatment of atypical femoral fractures are also discussed.

Management of Osteoporosis Medication after Osteoporotic Fracture

The aim of this study was to provide helpful information for use in selection of an appropriate medication after osteoporotic fractures through conduct of a literature review. In addition, a review of the recommendations of several societies for prevention of subsequent fractures was performed and the appropriate choice of medication for treatment of atypical femur fractures was examined. Clinical perspective was obtained and an updated search of literature was conducted across PubMed and MEDLINE and relevant articles were selected. The articles were selected manually according to relevance, and the references for identified articles and reviews were also evaluated for relevance. The following areas are reviewed: Commonly prescribed osteoporosis medications: BPs (bisphosphonates), denosumab, and SERMs (selective estrogen receptor modulators) in antiresorptive medications and recombinant human parathyroid hormone teriparatide, recently approved Romosuzumab in anabolic agents, clinical practice guidelines for the management of osteoporosis, osteoporotic fracture, and atypical femur fracture. Most medications for treatment of osteoporosis do not delay fracture healing and the positive effect of teriparatide on fracture healing has been confirmed. In cases where an osteoporotic fracture is diagnosed, risk assessment should be performed for selection of very high-risk patients in order to prevent subsequent fractures, and administration of anabolic agents is recommended.

Long-term consequences of osteoporosis therapy with denosumab

Denosumab (DMAb) is a human monoclonal antibody used as an antiresorptive drug in the treatment of osteoporosis. Approval at a dosage of 60 mg every 6 months was based on the results of the randomized, placebo-controlled trial (FREEDOM). The design of this 3-year study included an extension for up to 10 years. Those who were randomized to DMAb continued on drug, while those who were randomized to placebo transitioned to DMAb. The 10-year experience with DMAb provides data on efficacy of drug in terms of reduced fractures and continued increases in bone mineral density (BMD). The 10-year experience with denosumab also provides information about rare complications associated with the use of DMAb, such as osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ), and atypical femoral fractures (AFF). This experience provided new insights into the reversibility of effects upon discontinuation without follow-on therapy with another agent. This review focuses upon prolonged treatment with DMAb, with regard to beneficial effects on fracture reduction and safety. Additionally, its use in patients with impaired renal function, compare its results with those of bisphosphonates (BPs), the occurrence/frequency of complications, in addition to the use of different tools, from imaging techniques to histological findings, to evaluate its effects on bone tissue.

Snyder-Robinson syndrome: differential diagnosis of osteogenesis imperfecta

Snyder-Robinson syndrome is an extremely rare genetic disorder, caused by mutations of the spermine synthase gene. We report a novel case of Snyder-Robinson syndrome, caused by a de novo mutation and first misdiagnosed with osteogenesis imperfecta. Clinical features, course, and genetic analysis are presented. The patient was treated with bisphosphonates for a decade, until developing an atypical femoral fracture. Teriparatide was then administered for 2 years and then changed to denosumab every 6 months, improving his bone density mass and preventing further fractures.

Guideline No. 422g: Menopause and Osteoporosis

OBJECTIVE

Provide strategies for improving the care of perimenopausal and postmenopausal women based on the most recent published evidence.

TARGET POPULATION

Perimenopausal and postmenopausal women.

BENEFITS, HARMS, AND COSTS

Target population will benefit from the most recent published scientific evidence provided via the information from their health care provider. No harms or costs are involved with this information since women will have the opportunity to choose among the different therapeutic options for the management of the symptoms and morbidities associated with menopause, including the option to choose no treatment.

EVIDENCE

Databases consulted were PubMed, MEDLINE, and the Cochrane Library for the years 2002-2020, and MeSH search terms were specific for each topic developed through the 7 chapters.

VALIDATION METHODS

The authors rated the quality of evidence and strength of recommendations using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. See online Appendix A (Tables A1 for definitions and A2 for interpretations of strong and weak recommendations). INTENDED AUDIENCE: physicians, including gynaecologists, obstetricians, family physicians, internists, emergency medicine specialists; nurses, including registered nurses and nurse practitioners; pharmacists; medical trainees, including medical students, residents, fellows; and other providers of health care for the target population.

SUMMARY STATEMENTS

RECOMMENDATIONS.

Fracture Risk Following an Atypical Femoral Fracture

Atypical femoral fractures (AFFs) occurring during the course of osteoporosis treatment usually lead to discontinuation of anti-resorptive (AR) drugs. However, the risk of fracture after an AFF is unknown. We conducted a follow-up study of patients with AFF matched 1:3 for age and gender with patients with a peripheral major osteoporotic fracture (pMOF), in the setting of a fracture liaison service, to investigate the incidence of subsequent low-trauma fractures. Fifty-five patients with AFF (95% women, age [mean ± standard deviation] 75 ± 10 years, 89% exposed to AR drugs), followed for 6.2 ± 3.7 years, were compared to 165 matched controls with a pMOF (hip 85%) followed for 4.3 ± 2.6 years. During the follow-up, 38% of patients in the AFF group and 16% in the pMOF group received AR therapies. Continuation of AR drugs after an AFF was associated with contralateral AFF in 27% of subjects. The risks of new low-trauma, major osteoporotic and imminent (within 2 years) fractures, were similar between the two groups: incidence rate ratio (95% confidence interval [CI]) of subsequent fracture following AFF relative to pMOF, 1.30 (95% CI, 0.82-2.04), 1.28 (95% CI, 0.74-2.15), and 1.11 (95% CI, 0.54-2.15), respectively. Moreover, the risk of sustaining multiple fractures per participant was significantly increased among patients with AFF compared to pMOF (hazard ratio 1.48 [95% CI, 1.00-2.19]; p = 0.049). When taking mortality into account, the risk of subsequent fractures tended to be higher in the AFF group (sub-hazard ratio 1.42 [95% CI, 0.95-2.12]). In conclusion, patients who sustained an AFF are at high risk of subsequent fragility fractures, at least equal or even greater to the risk observed after a pMOF. However, continuation of AR drugs increases the risk of contralateral AFF. Therefore, optimal modalities for secondary fracture prevention after AFF require further evaluation. © 2021 The Authors. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR).

Mid-term outcomes after the surgical treatment of atypical femoral fractures : minimum three-year follow-up

AIMS

The incidence of atypical femoral fractures (AFFs) continues to increase. However, there are currently few long-term studies on the complications of AFFs and factors affecting them. Therefore, we attempted to investigate the outcomes, complications, and risk factors for complication through mid-term follow-up of more than three years.

METHODS

From January 2003 to January 2016, 305 patients who underwent surgery for AFFs at six hospitals were enrolled. After exclusion, a total of 147 patients were included with a mean age of 71.6 years (48 to 89) and 146 of whom were female. We retrospectively evaluated medical records, and reviewed radiographs to investigate the fracture site, femur bowing angle, presence of delayed union or nonunion, contralateral AFFs, and peri-implant fracture. A statistical analysis was performed to identify the significance of associated factors.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up period was 70.2 months (36 to 191). There were 146 AFFs (99.3%) in female patients and the mean age was 71.6 years (48 to 89). The AFFs were located in the subtrochanter and shaft in 52 cases (35.4%) and 95 (64.6%), respectively. The preoperative mean anterior/lateral femoral bowing angles were 10.5° (SD 5.7°)/6.1° (SD 6.2°). The postoperative mean anterior/lateral bowing values were changed by 8.7° (SD 5.4°)/4.6° (SD 5.9°). Bisphosphonates had been used contemporarily in 115 AFFs (78.2%) for a mean of 52.4 months (1 to 204; SD 45.5) preoperatively. Nailing was performed in 133 AFFs (90.5%), and union was obtained at a mean of 23.6 weeks (7 to 85). Delayed union occurred in 41 (27.9%), and nonunion occurred in 13 (8.8%). Contralateral AFF occurred in 79 patients (53.7%), and the use of a bisphosphonate significantly influenced the occurrence of contralateral AFFs (p = 0.019). Peri-implant fractures occurred in a total of 13 patients (8.8%), and a significant increase was observed in cases with plating (p = 0.021) and high grade of postoperative anterolateral bowing (p = 0.044).

CONCLUSION

The use of a bisphosphonate was found to be a risk factor for contralateral AFF, and high-grade postoperative anterolateral bowing and plate fixation significantly increased the occurrence of peri-implant fractures. Long-term follow-up studies on the bilaterality of AFFs and peri-implant fractures are warranted. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(11):1648-1655.

The effect of osteoporosis and its treatment on fracture healing a systematic review of animal and clinical studies

Introduction

Osteoporosis is characterised by low bone mass and micro-architectural deterioration of bone structure. Its treatment is directed at the processes of bone formation or resorption, that are of utmost importance in fracture healing. We provide a comprehensive review of the literature aiming to summarize and clarify the effects of osteoporosis and its treatment on fracture healing.

Material and methods

A literature search was conducted in PubMed and Embase (OVID version). In vivo animal and human studies on long bone fractures were included. A total of 93 articles were included for this review; 23 studies on the effect of osteoporosis (18 animal and 5 clinical studies) and 70 studies on the effect of osteoporosis treatment (41 animal, 26 clinical studies and 3 meta-analyses) on fracture healing.

Results

In animal fracture models osteoporosis was associated with decreased callus formation and bone growth, bone mineral density, biomechanical strength and delayed cellular and differentiation processes during fracture healing. Two large databases identified osteoporosis as a risk factor for non-union whereas three other studies did not. One of those three studies however found a prolonged healing time in patients with osteoporosis. Anti-osteoporosis medication showed inconsistent effects on fracture healing in both non-osteoporotic and osteoporotic animal models. Only the parathyroid hormone and anti-resorption medication were related to improved fracture healing and delayed remodelling respectively. Clinical studies performed in predominantly hip and distal radius fracture patients showed no effect of bisphosphonates on fracture healing. Parathyroid hormone reduced time to union in several clinical trials performed in mainly hip fracture patients, but this did not result in decreased delayed or non-union rates.

Conclusion

Evidence that substantiates the negative influence of osteoporosis on fracture healing is predominantly from animal studies and to a lesser extent from clinical studies, since convincing clinical evidence lacks. Bisphosphonates and parathyroid hormone may be used during fracture healing, since no clear negative effect has been shown. Parathyroid hormone might even decrease time to fracture union, without decreasing union rate.

•

Osteoporosis negatively influences fracture healing in animal models.

•

There is no convincing evidence for a similar effect in humans.

•

In animals, bisphosphonates delay bone remodelling

•

In animals, parathyroid hormone improves fracture healing

•

In humans, anti-osteoporotic drugs do not interfere with fracture healing.

Bilateral atypical fractures of the femur: Ten years AFTER ten years of bisphosphonate therapy

Background

Atypical femur fracture (AFF) is a clinically important complication of bisphosphonate (BP) use in the treatment of osteoporosis. The benefits of long-term BP therapy in preventing osteoporotic fractures have been shown to outweigh the risks of treatment. Discontinuation of BPs or "drug holidays" have been implemented as a strategy to reduce the risk of rare complications such as AFF.

Case report

We present the case of a 70-year-old postmenopausal woman who suffered bilateral AFF ten years after discontinuation of BP treatment. Management of this patient included fixation of the complete AFF with an intramedullary rod. A single dose of denosumab was administered prior to referral to endocrinology and seemed to contribute to callus formation. Denosumab was discontinued to prevent progression of the contralateral incomplete AFF. Teriparatide was indicated for the treatment of this patient's osteoporosis and also led to the resolution of the incomplete AFF.

Conclusion

Patients receiving long-term BP therapy should be periodically reevaluated in order to maximize the benefit and minimize the risk of treatment. Current research supports the implementation of drug holidays to decrease the risk of AFF; however, this case report confirms the need for continued monitoring after discontinuation of BP therapy. Additionally, our review of current literature highlights the need for more specific research regarding duration of BP treatment and drug holidays.

Clinical outcomes of using contralateral-side laterally bent intramedullary nails in atypical femur fractures with femoral bowing

INTRODUCTION

This study aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes of using contralateral-side laterally bent intramedullary nails (IMNs) in bowed atypical femur fractures (AFFs).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed bowed AFFs treated with contralateral-side laterally bent IMNs. In total, 20 patients with 25 cases of AFFs were included. Surgical outcomes including bone union time, complications, femoral bowing, and leg length discrepancy (LLD) were evaluated. We evaluated the surgical safety of performing contralateral-side intramedullary nailing with its intraoperative and postoperative complications and compared the LLD.

RESULTS

The average age was 76.8 years (range 67-86 years), and all of patients were female. There were 10 cases of complete AFFs and 15 cases of incomplete AFFs. Fourteen patients (70%) had a history of bisphosphonate (BP) use with an average of 74.5 months of its use. In the complete AFF cases, reduction of the fractures was tried to restore the patients' normal anatomical geometry. The average lateral gap was 0.6 mm (0-1 mm), and the average medial gap was 1.6 mm (1-3 mm). All cases achieved bone union without secondary intervention. There were no intraoperative fractures or postoperative complications. The average bone union time was 22.0 weeks and 9.2 weeks in complete and incomplete AFFs, respectively. The average preoperative femoral bowing seen in the coronal and sagittal planes was 10.1° and 16.1°, respectively, while the average postoperative bowing was 6.6° and 11.3°, respectively. The average change of angle was 3.5° in the coronal plane and 4.8° in the sagittal plane. The mean change of LLD was 5.7 mm.

CONCLUSION

The use of contralateral-side laterally bent IMNs in treating bowed femurs showed excellent clinical outcomes without complications. In severely bowed femurs, this technique can be safe and useful.

Differences in subtrochanteric and diaphyseal atypical femoral fractures in a super-aging prefectural area: YamaCAFe Study

INTRODUCTION

Atypical femoral fractures (AFFs) have been correlated with long-term use of bisphosphonates (BPs), glucocorticoids (GCs), and femoral geometry. We investigated the incidence and characteristics of subtrochanteric (ST) and diaphyseal (DP) AFFs in all institutes in a super-aging prefectural area.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed a blinded analysis of radiographic data in 87 patients with 98 AFFs in all institutes in Yamagata prefectural area from 2009 to 2014. Among the 98 AFFs, 57 AFFs comprising 11 ST fractures in 9 patients and 46 DP fractures in 41 patients with adequate medical records and X-rays were surveyed for time to bone healing and geometry.

RESULTS

Of the 87 patients, 67 received BPs/denosumab (77%) and 10 received GCs (11%). Surgery was performed in 94 AFFs. Among 4 AFFs with conservative therapy, 3 required additional surgery. In univariate regression analyses for ST group versus DP group, male-to-female ratio was 2/7 versus 1/40, mean age at fracture was 58.2 (37-75) versus 78 (60-89) years, rheumatic diseases affected 55.5% (5/9) versus 4.9% (2/41), femoral lateral bowing angle was 1.7 (0-6) versus 11.8 (0.8-24)°, GC usage was 67% (6/9) versus 4.9% (2/41), and bone healing time was 12.1 (6-20) versus 8.1 (3-38) months (p < 0.05). In multivariate analyses, higher male-to-female ratio, younger age, greater proportion affected by rheumatic diseases, and higher GC usage remained significant (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of AFFs in our prefectural area was 1.43 cases/100,000 persons/year. This study suggests that the onset of ST AFFs have greater correlation with the worse bone quality, vice versa, the onset of DP AFFs correlated with the bone geometry. The developmental mechanisms of AFFs may differ significantly between ST and DP fractures.

The Effect of Teriparatide on the Hip: A Literature Review

Teriparatide (TPTD) is a bone-forming agent used to treat postmenopausal osteoporosis. Since hip fractures are related to higher morbidity and mortality rates than other fractures, efficacious osteoporosis drugs for the hip are critical. We reviewed research articles reporting the efficacy of TPTD in terms of bone mineral density (BMD), fractures prevention, changes in the outer diameter, cortical thickness and porosity, post-operative periprosthetic BMD loss, and healing of typical and atypical fractures of the hip. Data meta-analyses indicated that TPTD not only increased the BMD of the proximal femur but also decreased the risk of hip fractures. Even though TPTD increases the cortical bone porosity of the proximal femur, the bone strength does not decrease as the majority of the porosity is located at the endocortex; further, it increases the outer diameter and thickens the cortical bone. TPTD stimulates bone remodeling and facilitates callus maturity and fracture healing. There have been many reports on improving the effect of TPTD on the healing of atypical fractures; therefore it is advisable to use TPTD considering the increase benefit compared to the risk.

Molecular enhancement of fracture healing - Is there a role for Bone Morphogenetic Protein-2, parathyroid hormone, statins, or sclerostin-antibodies?

Enhancement of fracture healing has been a hot topic over the last two decades. This narrative review article is aimed to provide an update on current clinical use and evidence on four clinically available agents in the treatment of fracture healing: bone morphogenetic proteins-2 (BMP-2), parathyroid hormone, statins and sclerostin-antibodies. After first promising results from animal and clinical studies in the early 2000s, BMP-2 was studied mainly in open tibia shaft fractures treated with intramedullary nailing. There are conflicting results from different randomized clinical trials (RCTs) regarding fracture healing time and complications compared to BMP-2 free control treatment in open tibia fractures, as BMP-2 could not show significant differences in patients treated with reamed nails compared to BMP-2 free control treatment with reamed nailing only. Given that fact, its official use was limited in Europe to open tibia shaft fractures treated with unreamed tibial nailing by the European Medical Agency (EMA). Another more recent RCT failed to show equivalence of BMP- 2 together with allograft versus autograft for the treatment of tibia fractures with critical size defects. Recombinant human parathyroid hormone has proven anabolic effects on bone metabolism and is commonly used in treatment of severe osteoporosis. Different animal trials suggested an enhancement effect in fracture healing by PTH. In several clinical trials, PTH seems to have a stimulative effect for lower limb fractures. Statins, commonly used in treatment of dyslipidemia, could also enhance fracture healing in animal trials, especially when they were applied locally at the fracture site. For statins, there is only one RCT that failed to show significant effects for the oral administration of statins in undisplaced distal radius fractures. The role of sclerostin in fracture healing has more and more been understood. Application of sclerostin antibodies has been shown to be beneficial for fracture healing in animal trials. However, no RCTs on the effect of sclerostin antibodies on fracture healing have been performed yet. In conclusion, the "magic bullet" for molecular enhancement of fracture healing has not been identified yet, at least not with its optimal dosage and delivery method.

Outcome of intramedullary nail for fixation of osteoporotic femoral shaft fractures in the elderly above 60

INTRODUCTION

Intramedullary nailing is an acceptable treatment option for femoral shaft fracture in young patients but not extensively studied in the elderly with osteoporotic fractures. Plate fixation for osteoporotic femoral shaft fractures have a high rate of complications and delayed healing time, and the most acceptable treatment is intramedullary nailing. This study evaluated the healing time and incidence of complications in osteoporotic femoral shaft fractures after intramedullary nailing.

PATIENTS &METHODS

This was a retrospective study that included 16 patients above 60 years old with osteoporotic femoral shaft fractures operated between January 2015 and December 2018. Patients with metastatic fractures or with atypical fractures were excluded. Thirteen patients had low-energy injuries such as a simple fall from standing height or lower and twisting injuries. The remaining 3 patients sustained high-energy-mechanism of injury. No patient received bisphosphonate except 2 patients received oral bisphosphonate for a period of 6 and 8 months, respectively.

RESULTS

Sixteen patients (12 females and 4 males) with mean age 69.5 ± 3.7 presented with femoral shaft fracture were operated with intramedullary nail, 10 patients were fixed with trochanteric entry nails with proximal neck screws, and 6 patients were fixed with piriformis entry nails. In 9 patients, closed reduction of fracture was achieved while 7 patients required open reduction, of which 5 fracture required cerclage wire addition. The mean bone healing time was 5.35±1.2 months. Intraoperative extension of femoral fractures during intramedullary nail insertion was observed in two cases that required open reduction and addition of cerclage wires around the fracture. The overall incidence of complications was 18.7%.

CONCLUSIONS

Intramedullary nailing for osteoporotic femoral shaft fracture is a good acceptable option in elderly patients with reasonable healing time with no major complications.

Evaluation and management of atypical femoral fractures: an update of current knowledge

Atypical femoral fractures are often attributed to the use of anti-resorptive medications such as bisphosphonates (BP). Whilst they have proven effects on fragility fracture prevention, clinical and laboratory evidence is evolving linking BP-related suppression of bone remodelling to the development of atypical stress-related sub-trochanteric fractures (Shane et al. in JBMR 29:1-23, 2014; Odvina et al. in JCEM 90:1294-301, 2005; Durchschlag et al. in JBMR 21(10):1581-1590, 2006; Donnelly et al. in JBMR 27:672-678, 2012; Mashiba et al. in Bone 28(5):524-531, 2001; Dell et al. in JBMR 27(12):2544-2550, 2012; Black et al. in Lancet 348:1535-1541, 1996; Black et al. in NEJM 356:1809-1822, 2007; Black et al. in JAMA 296:2927-2938, 2006; Schwartz et al. in JBMR 25:976-82, 2010). Injuries may present asymptomatically or with prodromal thigh pain and most can be successfully managed with cephalomedullary nailing and discontinuation of BP therapy. Such injuries exhibit a prolonged time to fracture union with high rates of non-union and metal-work failure when compared to typical subtrochanteric osteoporotic femoral fractures. Despite emerging literature on AFFs, their management continues to pose a challenge to the orthopaedic and extended multi-disciplinary team. The purpose of this review includes evaluation of the current evidence supporting the management of AFFs, clinical and radiological features associated with their presentation and a review of reported surgical strategies to treat and prevent these devastating injures.

Evaluation of factors affecting the occurrence of second atypical fracture after bone union of the first atypical fracture

PURPOSE

Teriparatide is sometimes used in the treatment of atypical femoral fracture (AFF). Even if bone union is achieved, orthopedic physicians must consider the risk of relapse. This study aimed to investigate the factors affecting AFF recurrence, and to determine the appropriate treatment for osteoporosis after bone union.

METHODS

One hundred thirty-one consecutive AFFs in 113 Japanese patients were included. Eleven patients had AFF in the unaffected limb (9 patients) after the first AFF or re-fracture at the original fracture site (2 patients) after bone union of the first AFF was confirmed. We divided all patients into two groups: the second fracture group (22 AFFs in 11 patients) and non-second fracture group (109 AFFs in 102 patients). We compared clinical information between the 2 groups and investigated the factors affecting AFF recurrence using the Student t-, Welch t-, and chi-square tests.

RESULTS

Although there was no significant difference in clinical characteristics between the 2 groups, multivariate analysis of factors associated with AFF recurrence identified short duration of treatment with teriparatide and active vitamin D₃ (p = 0.0408 and 0.0366, respectively) as risk factors. Even in the analysis excluding subtrochanteric AFF, short periods of teriparatide and active vitamin D₃ administration were observed as risk factors (p = 0.0484 and 0.0346, respectively).

CONCLUSION

The administration of teriparatide for as long as possible after occurrence first AFF and the use of active vitamin D₃ after completion of teriparatide therapy may be the most effective strategy to prevent the recurrence of AFF.

Effects of teriparatide on fusion rates in patients undergoing complex foot and ankle arthrodesis

BACKGROUND

Here, we determined whether teriparatide treatment would increase fusion rates after foot and ankle arthrodesis by comparing treatment results between patients with high-risk factors for nonunion who received teriparatide against those who did not.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 66 consecutive patients who underwent foot and ankle arthrodesis. The inclusion criterion was the presence of at least one of the following risk factors for nonunion after previous foot and ankle arthrodesis: deformity, bone defects, avascular necrosis, and nonunion. Sixteen patients were finally enrolled and divided into 2 groups: 8 patients received teriparatide treatment after fusion surgery (PTH group), and 8 patients did not (control group).

RESULTS

The fusion rate was significantly greater in the PTH group than in the control group (100% vs 50%). Four patients in the control group developed nonunion, 3 of whom underwent revision fusion; however, all patients received the teriparatide treatment after revision surgery and subsequently achieved union. No significant differences in demographics, fusion sites, and complication rates were found.

CONCLUSION

Though the sample size was small, the current study suggests that teriparatide administration may improve fusion rates in patients with high-risk factors for nonunion after foot and ankle arthrodesis.

Does Teriparatide Improve Fracture Union?: A Systematic Review

We conducted an updated review of the evidence of teriparatide (TPTD) for fracture healing for the following questions. (1) Does it decrease fracture healing time?; (2) Can it be an alternative treatment for nonunion?; (3) Does it aid the union of atypical femoral fracture (AFF)? We searched PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library including “Fracture” AND “nonunion” AND “Teriparatide”. In total, 57 publications met our inclusion criteria were summarized. This systemic review of the available literature revealed that TPTD works positively with regard to enhancing fracture healing time and union of AFF. There are also many case studies on the use of TPTD could be a potential new safe treatment for nonunion with no side effects. However, level 1 studies on the evidence of TPTD are still lacking so far. Over the last decade, a growing body of evidence has accumulated suggesting that TPTD can be an adjunct to enhance fracture healing or a therapeutic option to treat nonunion, but greater evidences from large volume prospective trials are needed.

AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGISTS/AMERICAN COLLEGE OF ENDOCRINOLOGY CLINICAL PRACTICE GUIDELINES FOR THE DIAGNOSIS AND TREATMENT OF POSTMENOPAUSAL OSTEOPOROSIS-2020 UPDATE

Objective: The development of these guidelines is sponsored by the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists (AACE) Board of Directors and American College of Endocrinology (ACE) Board of Trustees and adheres with published AACE protocols for the standardized production of clinical practice guidelines (CPGs). Methods: Recommendations are based on diligent reviews of the clinical evidence with transparent incorporation of subjective factors, according to established AACE/ACE guidelines for guidelines protocols. Results: The Executive Summary of this 2020 updated guideline contains 52 recommendations: 21 Grade A (40%), 24 Grade B (46%), 7 Grade C (14%), and no Grade D (0%). These detailed, evidence-based recommendations allow for nuance-based clinical decision-making that addresses multiple aspects of real-world care of patients. The evidence base presented in the subsequent Appendix provides relevant supporting information for the Executive Summary recommendations. This update contains 368 citations: 123 (33.5%) evidence level (EL) 1 (highest), 132 (36%) EL 2 (intermediate), 20 (5.5%) EL 3 (weak), and 93 (25%) EL 4 (lowest). New or updated topics in this CPG include: clarification of the diagnosis of osteoporosis, stratification of the patient according to high-risk and very-high-risk features, a new dual-action therapy option, and transitions from therapeutic options. Conclusion: This guideline is a practical tool for endocrinologists, physicians in general, regulatory bodies, health-related organizations, and interested laypersons regarding the diagnosis, evaluation, and treatment of post-menopausal osteoporosis. Abbreviations: 25(OH)D = 25-hydroxyvitamin D; AACE = American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists; ACE = American College of Endocrinology; AFF = atypical femoral fracture; ASBMR = American Society for Bone and Mineral Research; BEL = best evidence level; BMD = bone mineral density; BTM = bone turnover marker; CI = confidence interval; CPG = clinical practice guideline; CTX = C-terminal telopeptide type-I collagen; DXA = dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry; EL = evidence level; FDA = U.S. Food and Drug Administration; FRAX® = Fracture Risk Assessment Tool; GI = gastrointestinal; HORIZON = Health Outcomes and Reduced Incidence with Zoledronic acid ONce yearly Pivotal Fracture Trial (zoledronic acid and zoledronate are equivalent terms); ISCD = International Society for Clinical Densitometry; IU = international units; IV = intravenous; LSC = least significant change; NOF = National Osteoporosis Foundation; ONJ = osteonecrosis of the jaw; PINP = serum amino-terminal propeptide of type-I collagen; PTH = parathyroid hormone; R = recommendation; ROI = region of interest; RR = relative risk; SD = standard deviation; TBS = trabecular bone score; VFA = vertebral fracture assessment; WHO = World Health Organization.

The biology and treatment of acute long-bones diaphyseal fractures: Overview of the current options for bone healing enhancement

Diaphyseal fractures represent a complex biological entity that could often end into impaired bone-healing, with delayed union and non-union occurring up to 10% of cases. The role of the modern orthopaedic surgeon is to optimize the fracture healing environment, recognize and eliminate possible interfering factors, and choose the best suited surgical fixation technique. The impaired reparative process after surgical intervention can be modulated with different surgical techniques, such as dynamization or exchange nailing after failed intramedullary nailing. Moreover, the mechanical stability of a nail can be improved through augmentation plating, bone grafting or external fixation techniques with satisfactory results. According to the "diamond concept", local therapies, such as osteoconductive scaffolds, bone growth factors, and osteogenic cells can be successfully applied in "polytherapy" for the enhancement of delayed union and non-union of long bones diaphyseal fractures. Moreover, systemic anti-osteoporosis anabolic drugs, such as teriparatide, have been proposed as off-label treatment for bone healing enhancement both in fresh complex shaft fractures and impaired unions, especially for fragility fractures. The article aims to review the biological and mechanical principles of failed reparative osteogenesis of diaphyseal fractures after surgical treatment. Moreover, the evidence about the modern non-surgical and pharmacological options for bone healing enhancement will discussed.

Medical Management of Patients After Atypical Femur Fractures: a Systematic Review and Recommendations From the European Calcified Tissue Society

CONTEXT

Atypical femur fractures (AFFs) are serious adverse events associated with bisphosphonates and often show poor healing.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

We performed a systematic review to evaluate effects of teriparatide, raloxifene, and denosumab on healing and occurrence of AFF.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

We retrieved 910 references and reviewed 67 papers, including 31 case reports, 9 retrospective and 3 prospective studies on teriparatide. There were no RCTs. We pooled data on fracture union (n = 98 AFFs on teriparatide) and found that radiological healing occurred within 6 months of teriparatide in 13 of 30 (43%) conservatively managed incomplete AFFs, 9 of 10 (90%) incomplete AFFs with surgical intervention, and 44 of 58 (75%) complete AFFs. In 9 of 30 (30%) nonoperated incomplete AFFs, no union was achieved after 12 months and 4 (13%) fractures became complete on teriparatide. Eight patients had new AFFs during or after teriparatide. AFF on denosumab was reported in 22 patients, including 11 patients treated for bone metastases and 8 without bisphosphonate exposure. Denosumab after AFF was associated with recurrent incomplete AFFs in 1 patient and 2 patients of contralateral complete AFF. Eight patients had used raloxifene before AFF occurred, including 1 bisphosphonate-naïve patient.

CONCLUSIONS

There is no evidence-based indication in patients with AFF for teriparatide apart from reducing the risk of typical fragility fractures, although observational data suggest that teriparatide might result in faster healing of surgically treated AFFs. Awaiting further evidence, we formulate recommendations for treatment after an AFF based on expert opinion.

The Treatment of Acute Diaphyseal Long-bones Fractures with Orthobiologics and Pharmacological Interventions for Bone Healing Enhancement: A Systematic Review of Clinical Evidence

BACKGROUND

The healing of long bones diaphyseal fractures can be often impaired and eventually end into delayed union and non-union. A number of therapeutic strategies have been proposed in combination with surgical treatment in order to enhance the healing process, such as scaffolds, growth factors, cell therapies and systemic pharmacological treatments. Our aim was to investigate the current evidence of bone healing enhancement of acute long bone diaphyseal fractures.

METHODS

A systematic review was conducted by using Pubmed/MEDLINE; Embase and Ovid databases. The combination of the search terms "long-bones; diaphyseal fracture; bone healing; growth factors; cell therapies; scaffolds; graft; bone substitutes; orthobiologics; teriparatide".

RESULTS

The initial search resulted in 4156 articles of which 37 papers fulfilled the inclusion criteria and were the subject of this review. The studies included 1350 patients (837 males and 513 females) with a mean age of 65.3 years old.

CONCLUSIONS

General lack of high-quality studies exists on the use of adjuvant strategies for bone healing enhancement in acute shaft fractures. Strong evidence supports the use of bone grafts, while only moderate evidence demineralized bone matrix and synthetic ceramics. Conflicting results partially supported the use of growth factors and cell therapies in acute fractures. Teriparatide showed promising results, particularly for atypical femoral fractures and periprosthetic femoral fractures.

Nonunions of Bisphosphonate Fractures of the Femur: Presentation, Etiopathogenesis, Diagnosis, and Operative Treatment

Patients presenting with femoral fractures and long-term use of bisphosphonate treatment are at risk of developing a delayed union and/or nonunion as a result of the atypical metabolic activity prevailing at the fracture edges of the affected extremity. The treatment of these nonunions poses a serious challenge to orthopaedic surgeons worldwide and necessitates specialized techniques and materials to design a construct that will last a long period (greater than 6 months), while still allowing weight-bearing in this elderly population. Treatment options, timing of intervention, selection of implant, and the option of bone grafting are discussed to assist the clinician to make the right decisions in these complex clinical cases.

Effects of Intermittent Administration of Parathyroid Hormone and Parathyroid Hormone-Related Protein on Fracture Healing: A Narrative Review of Animal and Human Studies

Intermittent administration of parathyroid hormone (PTH) stimulates skeletal remodeling and is a potent anabolic agent in bone. PTH‐related protein (PTHrP) is anabolic acting on the same PTH1 receptor and is in therapeutic use for osteoporosis. The body of literature for PTH actions in fracture healing is emerging with promising yet not entirely consistent results. The objective of this review was to perform a literature analysis to extract up‐to‐date knowledge on the effects of intermittent PTH and PTHrP therapy in bone fracture healing. A literature search of the PubMed database was performed. Clinical case studies and articles related to “regeneration,” “implant,” and “distraction osteogenesis” were excluded. A narrative review was performed to deliberate the therapeutic potential of intermittent PTH administration on fracture healing. A smaller number of studies centered on the use of PTHrP or a PTHrP analog were also reviewed. Animal studies clearly show that intermittent PTH therapy promotes fracture healing and revealed the strong therapeutic potential of PTH. Human subject studies were fewer and not as consistent as the animal studies yet provide insight into the potential of intermittent PTH administration on fracture healing. Differences in outcomes for animal and human studies appear to be attributed partly to variable doses, fracture sites, age, remodeling patterns, and bone architectures, although other factors are involved. Future studies to examine the dose, timing, and duration of PTH administration will be necessary to further delineate the therapeutic potential of PTH for fracture healing in humans. © 2019 The Authors. JBMR Plus published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

A retrospective bicenter comparative study of surgical outcomes of atypical femoral fracture: Potential effect of teriparatide on fracture healing and callus formation

BACKGROUND

The main purpose of the present study was to assess the radiologic effect of teriparatide on fracture healing, including union rate, union time, and callus formation, by quantitative measurements using serial follow-up X-ray imaging examinations in patients with complete atypical femoral fractures (AFFs) treated using closed intramedullary nailing.

METHODS

From January 2010 to October 2017, 58 consecutive patients with complete AFF who were treated with intramedullary nailing at two institutions were enrolled. Patients were classified into two groups: those who received teriparatide therapy (group A) and those who did not (group B). Teriparatide (Forsteo®; Eli Lily Co., Indianapolis, IN, USA) at a once-daily 20 μg dose was prescribed as continuous treatment of osteoporosis or with the expectation of better bone healing. Surgical outcomes, including union rate, union time, modified radiologic union score (mRUS), and callus formation at 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively, were assessed to evaluate the effect of teriparatide on fracture healing. Quantitative measurement of callus formation was performed using the region of interest (ROI) tool in the picture archiving communication system (PACS).

RESULTS

Non-union was not observed in group A, whereas two patients had non-union in group B. Union time was 18.3 ± 4.8 (range, 12-28) weeks in group A and 23.6 ± 9.5 (range, 12-64) weeks in group B and was significantly shorter in group A than group B (p = 0.010). The average mRUSs during periods A (3-4 months postoperatively), B (6-8 months postoperatively), and C (12-14 months postoperatively) were 10.0, 13.9, and 15.9 in group A, and 8.7, 12.0, and 14.9 in group B, respectively. The average mRUSs during periods A and B were significantly different (p = 0.027 and 0.011, respectively). The medial, posterior, and total callus areas during periods A and B were also significantly greater in group A than in group B. No difference was observed in the union rate between the two groups (p = 0.492).

CONCLUSION

Teriparatide may improve callus formation and shorten union time in patients with complete diaphyseal AFF who underwent closed intramedullary nailing.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III retrospective comparative study.

Atypical femoral fracture associated with delayed union for which the cessation of alendronate and daily administration of teriparatide contributed to fracture healing: histopathological evidence of the enhancement in bone formation parameters

A female patient with systemic lupus erythematosus developed an atypical femoral fracture of the left femur after 5 years of glucocorticoid and alendronate therapy. We performed intramedullary nailing. However, 1 week later, we performed a revision surgery using a locking plate and an iliac bone graft because of displacement at the fracture site. At this stage, alendronate was discontinued and daily teriparatide was introduced and continued for 24 months. Twenty months after the revision surgery, a re-revision surgery was performed with an iliac bone graft because of breakage of the locking plate and fracture non-union. Fracture healing was eventually obtained 15 months after the re-revision surgery. Biopsies of the ilium before the treatment and 20 months after daily teriparatide treatment were evaluated. The histology revealed that proliferating osteoid and cuboidal osteoblasts were detected around the osteoid tissue after teriparatide treatment. Bone histomorphometry findings showed that bone volume parameters and osteoid parameters prominently increased with the teriparatide treatment, but not bone resorption parameters. Laboratory findings revealed the elevation of bone-specific alkaline phosphatase (24 U/L at 7 months) compared to its pre-teriparatide level (8.1 U/L) and increased bone mineral density of the hip (from -0.2 to 0.0 in T-score). These data indicated that the discontinuation of alendronate and initiation of teriparatide treatment activated bone-forming ability in our patient and may have contributed to fracture healing.

Antiresorptive-associated spontaneous fractures of both tibiae, followed by an atypical femur fracture during the sequential treatment with alendronate, denosumab then teriparatide

A 35-year-old man with juvenile idiopathic arthritis since childhood presented with bilateral atypical tibial fractures, followed by a later, single atypical fracture of the femur. The fractures were associated with 6 years of oral alendronate treatment immediately followed by subcutaneous denosumab therapy and later teriparatide therapy for osteoporosis. Atypical fractures are known to occur in the femur following bisphosphonate therapy; however, there are only a few documented cases of atypical fractures in the tibia. Our case highlights a rare but serious complication of a commonly prescribed antiresorptive agent. It also shows that teriparatide, while helpful in increasing bone mass, does not fully prevent the development of atypical fractures. Careful investigation should be considered in patients on long-term antiresorptive therapy presenting with bony tenderness to exclude an atypical fracture.

Two Cases of Periprosthetic Atypical Femoral Fractures in Patients on Long-Term Bisphosphonate Treatment

The current definition of atypical femoral fractures (AFFs) excludes periprosthetic fractures. However, a few cases of bisphosphonates (BPs) -associated periprosthetic atypical femoral fractures (PAFFs) have been reported in the literature. Here, we report two rare cases of PAFFs that fulfilled the major criteria for AFFs in patients with prolonged use of BPs. Both cases progressed to a complete fracture with minor trauma from an incomplete fracture at the distal tip of the well-fixed femoral stem. The femoral stem effect on lateral femoral cortical bone, together with the decreased bone elastic resistance induced by BPs, was considered the cause of onset. In each case, we performed open reduction and internal fixation using a locking plate with cable grip and postoperatively prescribed teriparatide and low-intensity pulsed ultrasound (LIPUS). Both cases had a good clinical course. However, as conservative treatment was not effective in these cases, treatment such as non-weight-bearing exercises during hospitalization or prophylactic surgery may be necessary. Further studies are needed to determine the optimal treatment strategy.

The Effects of Long-term Use of Nitrogen-containing Bisphosphonates on Fracture Healing

Nitrogen-containing bisphosphonates (N-BPs) are pharmaceutical agents that have been used for many years to treat osteoporosis, multiple myeloma, Paget's disease, metastatic bone disease, and a variety of other diseases in which bone mineral density is reduced. Given that N-BPs inhibit bone resorption, an important stage in the fracture healing process, they have been extensively studied in preclinical models for their activity. In animal models, treatment with N-BPs is associated with a larger callus formation in fracture area and delay in remodeling from primary woven bone to lamellar bone, but there is no delay in formation of the fracture callus. In humans, all existing evidence suggest that initiating treatment with N-BPs, after upper and lower limb fractures, does not appear to have a significant effect on fracture healing. Rarely, patients with long-term use of N-BPs may develop "atypical fractures" and delay in their healing. Therefore, this clinical condition is not fully understood and many questions remain unanswered. Similarly, there are few studies about the benefits of stopping a long-term treatment with them, if a fracture occurs. Although most studies support that chronic N-BP therapy may lead to fracture healing delay, this is not fully documented. On the other hand, there are studies that are in complete disagreement with them. All of the above suggest that there is a need for more detailed future research into larger patient populations and different types of fractures, with sufficient data on the type, dosage, route and duration of administration of N-BPs, and the control methods of fracture healing, in order to have a safe final conclusion on the effect of their long-term administration in this highly complex process.

Mechanisms Underlying Normal Fracture Healing and Risk Factors for Delayed Healing

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Substantial advances have been made in understanding the biological basis of fracture healing. Yet, it is unclear whether the presence of osteoporosis or prior or current osteoporosis therapy influences the healing process or is associated with impaired healing. This review discusses the normal process of fracture healing and the role of osteoporosis and patient-specific factors in relation to fracture repair.

RECENT FINDINGS

The definitive association of osteoporosis to impaired fracture healing remains inconclusive because of limited evidence addressing this point. eStudies testing anabolic agents in preclinical models of ovariectomized animals with induced fractures have produced mostly positive findings showing enhanced fracture repair. Prospective human clinical trials, although few in number and limited in design and to testing only one anabolic agent, have similarly yielded modestly favorable results. Interest is high for exploring currently available osteoporosis therapies for efficacy in fracture repair. Definitive data supporting their efficacy are essential in achieving approval for this indication.

The effects of teriparatide on acceleration of bone healing following atypical femoral fracture: comparison between daily and weekly administration

We compared the effectiveness of promoting bone healing between two teriparatide preparations for atypical femoral fracture (AFF). A total of 45 AFFs were included in this study, and we compared the duration of bone union. Teriparatide administered by daily injection enhanced bone union more than weekly administration in complete AFFs.

INTRODUCTION

The efficacy of teriparatide for atypical femoral fracture (AFF) has been recently reported. Although two different teriparatide preparations can be used to treat osteoporosis in Japan, daily or weekly injection, all previous reports on the effectiveness of teriparatide for AFF only examined daily injection formulations. Therefore, we compared the promotion of bone healing between the two teriparatide preparations for AFF.

METHODS

A total of 45 consecutive AFFs in 43 Japanese patients were included in this study. They received either a daily 20-μg teriparatide injection (daily group; n = 32) or a once-a-week 56.5-μg teriparatide injection (weekly group; n = 13). We compared the clinical background and duration of bone union between these two groups.

RESULTS

When all patents were included, the fracture healing time was not significantly different between the two groups. Only patients with complete AFFs had significantly fewer daily bisphosphonate or denosumab injections than the weekly group (P < 0.05). The fracture healing time in the daily group (6.1 ± 4.1 months) was significantly shorter than that in the weekly group (10.1 ± 4.2 months) (P < 0.05). Even if the influence of bisphosphonate or denosumab usage was excluded, a similar significant difference was observed in the fracture healing time (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference between the two groups among patients with incomplete AFFs.

CONCLUSIONS

Daily teriparatide injections enhance bone union more than weekly injections in complete AFF patients.

Subtrochanteric and diaphyseal femoral fractures in hypophosphatasia-not atypical at all

Risk for subtrochanteric and diaphyseal femoral fractures is considered increased in patients with hypophosphatasia (HPP). Evaluating a large cohort of HPP patients, we could for the first time quantify the prevalcence and identify both morphometric features as well as predisposing factors for this complication of severe HPP.

INTRODUCTION

Subtrochanteric and diaphyseal femoral fractures have been associated with both, long-term antiresorptive treatment and metabolic bone disorders, specifically Hypophosphatasia (HPP). Building on a cross-sectional evaluation of real-world data, this study reports risk factors, prevalence, treatment outcome and morphometric particularities for such fractures in HPP as compared to Atypical Femoral Fractures (AFF) in long-term antiresorptive treatment.

METHODS

For 15 out of 150 HPP patients identified with having experienced at least one such fracture, medical records were reviewed in detail, extracting medical history, genotype, lab assessments, bone mineral density (DXA), radiographic data on femoral geometry and clinical aspects of fracture etiology and healing.

RESULTS

Bilateral fractures were documented in 10 of these 15 patients, yielding a total of 25 fractures for evaluation. Disease-inherent risk factors included autosomal-recessive, childhood onset HPP, apparently low alkaline phosphatase (ALP) ≤ 20 U/l and substantially elevated pyridoxal 5'-phosphate (PLP) > 3 times upper limit of normal as well as high lumbar spine BMD. Fracture morphology met definition criteria for AFF in 88% of cases. Femoral geometry revealed additional risk factors previously described for AFF, including decreased femoral neck-shaft angle and increased femoral offset. Extrinsic risk factors include Hypovitaminosis D (80%) and pre-treatment with bisphosphonates (46,7%) and Proton-Pump Inhibitors (40%).

CONCLUSIONS

Increased risk for subtrochanteric and diaphyseal femoral fractures in HPP appears to result from both compromised bone metabolism as well as disease-associated bone deformities. In severe HPP, generous screening for such fractures seems advisable. Bisphosphonates and Hypovitaminosis D should be avoided. Healing is compromised and requires mindful consideration of both pharmacological and surgical options.