Ceramic/ceramic total hip arthroplasty

Comparison of Ceramic-on-Ceramic vs. Ceramic-on-Polyethylene for Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Meta-Analysis of 15 Randomized Trials

Objective: This meta-analysis aimed to compare ceramic-on-ceramic (COC) components and ceramic-on-polyethylene (COP) components during total hip arthroplasty (THA).

Settings: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing COC and COP during primary THA was conducted. Electronic searches were current to March 2021.

Participants: Trials were included for meta-analysis if they compared at least the bearing surfaces of COC and COP for patients undergoing primary THA and if they reported the outcomes of THA after a certain period of follow-up and only RCTs in English were included.

Primary and Secondary Outcome Measures: The primary endpoints consist of audible noise, prosthesis fracture, and revision. Secondary endpoints include dislocation, deep infection, osteolysis, and prosthesis loosening. Extracted data were statistically analyzed with the Stata11.0.

Results: A total of 15 RCTs containing 2,702 patients (2,813 hips) were included in this study. The audible noise [odds ratio (OR) = 5.919; 95% CI: 2.043, 17.146; p ≤ 0.001] and prosthesis fracture (OR = 35.768; 95% CI: 8.957, 142.836; p = 0.001) were significantly higher in the COC group. Hip function, revision rate, dislocation rate, deep infection rate, osteolysis rate, and prosthesis loosening rate were comparable between these two groups, while the wear rate was higher in the COP group.

Conclusion: This study indicated comparable outcomes of COC and COP bearing surfaces in primary THA; high-quality RCTs with a long-term follow-up are still urgently needed to provide more evidence on the optimal bearing surfaces in primary THA.

Outcomes of Ceramic Composite in Total Hip Replacement Bearings: A Single-Center Series

Despite the fact that total hip replacement is one of the most successful surgical procedures for treatment of a variety of end-stage hip diseases, the process of osteolysis and implant loosening remains a significant problem, especially in young and high-demand patients. More than 40 years ago, ceramic bearings were introduced due to their mechanical advantage in order to obtain a reduction in wear debris, and due to the conviction that it was possible to minimize friction and wear owing to their mechanical hardness, high chemical stability, surface lubrication by fluids and low friction coefficient. Together with excellent mechanical properties, ceramics have a biological inertness: eventual ceramic debris will lead to a reactive response with a high predominance of fibrocystic cells, rather than macrophagic cells, and absence of giant cells, which is ideal from a biological perspective. As a consequence, they will not trigger the granulomatous reaction necessary to induce periprosthetic osteolysis, and this clearly appears to be of great clinical relevance. In recent years, tribology in manufacturing ceramic components has progressed with significant improvements, owing to the development of the latest generation of ceramic composites that allow for an increased material density and reduced grain size. Currently, ceramic-on-ceramic bearings are considered the attractive counterparts of ceramic- or metal-on-polyethylene ones for patients with a long life expectancy. The aim of this paper is to report the results of total hip replacements performed with a ceramic-on-ceramic articulation made from a ceramic composite in a single center, focusing on its usefulness in specific preoperative diagnosis.

Biomaterial Properties of Femur Implant on Acetabulum Erosion: A Review

The hip is one in every of the various joint at intervals the body. The correct operating of this joint is essential. For the aim once the hip is injured whole, a substitution procedure of the entire joint ought to be done to reinstate its operating, that is known as absolute hip surgical process. It is finished with the assistance of inserts of various biomaterials, as an example, polymers, metals, and pottery. The primary issues with regard to the utilization of various biomaterials are the reaction of the body's instrument to wear trash. Throughout this audit, biomaterials that are developing is talked regarding aboard the wear and tear and tear conduct and instrument. To boot, the numerous properties of the biomaterials are talked regarding aboard the expected preferences and drawbacks of their utilization. Further, the blends of various biomaterials at intervals the articulating surfaces are cleft and so the problems regarding their utilization are assessed. This paper hopes to passes away an in depth review of the trauma fringe of bearing surfaces of hip prosthetic devices. Additionally, this paper can offer AN ordered blueprint of the materials nearby their favorable circumstances and detriments and besides the conceivable outcomes of use. Keywords: - Hip implant; Biomaterials; Wear mechanism; Bearing surfaces; Polymers

Global diversity in bearings in primary THA

Choice of articulating materials, head size and the design of the articulation will become decisive for the long-term performance of a total hip arthroplasty (THA) and especially in terms of risk for dislocation and wear-related problems. Here we account for common alternatives based on available studies and the evidence that can be derived from them.Metal or ceramic femoral heads articulating against a liner or cup made of highly cross-linked polyethylene and ceramic-on-ceramic articulations have about similar risk for complications leading to revision, whereas the performance of metal-on-metal articulations, especially with use of big heads, is inferior. The clinical significance of problems related to ceramic-on-ceramic articulations such as squeaking remains unclear. With use of current technology ceramic fractures are rare.Large femoral heads have the potential to increase the range of hip movement before impingement occurs and are therefore expected to reduce dislocation rates. On the other hand, issues related to bearing wear, corrosion at the taper-trunnion junction and groin pain may arise with larger heads and jeopardize the longevity of THA. Based on current knowledge, 32-mm heads seem to be optimal for metal-on-polyethylene bearings. Patients with ceramic-on-ceramic bearings may benefit from even larger heads such as 36 or 40 mm, but so far there are no long-term reports that confirm the safety of bearings larger than 36 mm.Assessment of lipped liners is difficult because randomized studies are lacking, but retrospective clinical studies and registry data seem to indicate that this liner modification will reduce the rate of dislocation or revision due to dislocation without clear evidence of clinically obvious problems due to neck-liner impingement.The majority of studies support the view that constrained liners and dual mobility cups (DMC) will reduce the risk of revision due to dislocation both in primary and revision THA, the latter gaining increasing popularity in some countries. Both these devices suffer from implant-specific problems, which seem to be more common for the constrained liner designs. The majority of studies of these implants suffer from various methodological problems, not least selection bias, which calls for randomized studies preferably in a multi-centre setting to obtain sufficient power. In the 2020s, the orthopaedic profession should place more effort on such studies, as has already been achieved within other medical specialties, to improve the level of evidence in the choice of articulation when performing one of the most common in-hospital surgical procedures in Europe. Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2020;5:763-775. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.5.200002.

Wear of composite ceramics in mixed-material combinations in total hip replacement under adverse edge loading conditions

Ceramic composites have performed very well under adverse edge loading conditions when used in like-on-like configurations, where the femoral head and acetabular cup are of the same material. The aim of this study was to determine the wear of pure alumina (Al2 O3 ), alumina toughened zirconia (ATZ) and zirconia toughened alumina (ZTA) when used in mixed bearing combinations, under edge loading conditions due to translational mal-positioning. The head-on-cup configurations of three ceramic materials were ATZ-on-ZTA, ZTA-on-ATZ, Al2 O3 -on-ATZ, ATZ-on-Al2 O3 , Al2 O3 -on-ZTA, and ZTA-on-Al2 O3 . They were tested on the Leeds II hip simulator under microseparation conditions. The bedding in and steady state wear rates of ATZ-on-ZTA were 1.16mm3 /million cycles and 0.18mm3 /million, respectively, and for ATZ-on-Al2 O3 were 0.66 mm3 /million cycles and 0.20 mm3 /million, respectively. The wear rates of the other bearing combinations under these adverse microseparation conditions, Al2 O3 -on-ATZ, Al2 O3 -on-ZTA, ZTA-on-ATZ and ZTA-on-Al2 O3 were very low with no clear bedding in and steady state phases, and with steady state wear rates lower than 0.11 mm3 /million. The mixed material combinations tested in this study have shown slightly higher wear rates when compared to ATZ in like-on-like configuration reported previously, but superior wear resistance when compared to alumina-on-alumina bearings tested previously under the same adverse microseparation conditions. © 2016 The Authors Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B: Applied Biomaterials Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res Part B: Appl Biomater, 105B: 1361-1368, 2017.

Long-Term Results of Third-Generation Ceramic-on-Ceramic Bearing Cementless Total Hip Arthroplasty in Young Patients

BACKGROUND

The results of third-generation of alumina-on-alumina ceramic bearing in a large number of patient cohorts are limited. The purpose of this study was to determine clinical and radiologic outcome, prevalence of osteolysis detected with radiographs and computerized tomographic scan, and survivorship of a cementless total hip arthroplasty using a third-generation of alumina-on-alumina ceramic bearing in a large number of active patients aged younger than 65 years.

METHODS

We reviewed the cases of 871 patients (1131 hips) who underwent a cementless total hip arthroplasty when they were aged 65 years or younger at the time of surgery. The most common diagnoses were osteonecrosis (53%) and osteoarthritis (20%). Harris hip score, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index, and University of California, Los Angeles activity scores were recorded. Radiographic and computerized tomographic evaluations were used to evaluate implant fixation and osteolysis. The mean follow-up interval was 18.8 years (range, 15-20 years).

RESULTS

At the time of final follow-up, the mean Harris hip score, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index score, and University of California, Los Angeles activity score were 90 points, 15 points, and 8 points, respectively. All the femoral stem and acetabular components were well-fixed at the time of final follow-up. No hip had aseptic loosening or osteolysis or fracture of ceramic material at the time of the final follow-up.

CONCLUSION

The current results with the use of the third-generation of alumina-on-alumina ceramic bearings in young patients suggest that cementless acetabular and femoral components provide outstanding long-term fixation and provide a high rate of survivorship without evidence of osteolysis.

Hip arthroplasty for treatment of advanced osteonecrosis: comprehensive review of implant options, outcomes and complications

Surgical treatment for late stage (post-collapse) osteonecrosis of the femoral head is controversial. In these situations, the outcome of joint preservation procedures is poor. There are several arthroplasty options for late-stage disease. The clinical outcomes of hemiarthroplasty and hemiresurfacing are unpredictable because of progressive acetabular cartilage degeneration. Total hip resurfacing may be associated with further vascular insult to the femoral head and early failure of the implant. Total hip replacement with metal-on-conventional polyethylene bearing surfaces has been the gold standard, but implant survivorship is limited in young active patients due to wear and osteolysis. Newer alternative bearing surfaces may have improved wear characteristics, but their durability must be confirmed in longer-term studies.

Predicting long-term wear performance of hard-on-hard bearing couples: effect of cup orientation

Wear is the major cause of implant failure, resulting in expensive revision surgeries of total hip arthroplasty. Therefore, understanding of wear mechanism and its progression is crucial to improve the physiological performance of implants. This paper presents a three-dimensional (3D) finite element (FE) wear modeling approach to estimate evolution of wear in hard-on-hard bearing components with the effect of cup abduction angle. Three bearing couples were considered, and they were PCD-on-PCD, Al2O3-on-Al2O3 and Si3N4-on-Si3N4, while the cup abduction angle varied from 35° to 70° with an increment of 5°. By adopting actual physiological hip gait loading and rotational movement for normal walking cycle in FE modeling, the contact pressure and the sliding distance were calculated to predict wear. A femoral head of 32 mm in diameter was considered, while a constant frictional contact at the inference between head and cup was used. During simulation, the geometry of cup surface was updated at a reasonable interval of gait cycles to consider the effect of wear. Wear was simulated for up to 20 million cycles which is an equivalent of 20 years of implant's life in human body. Simulation results showed that compared to other two bearing couples, the predicted linear and volumetric wear in PCD-on-PCD couple exhibited the least wear evolution for all cup angles considered. The increase in abduction angle from 35° to 70° decreases the volumetric wear by 28 % for all three bearing couples, due to the reduction in sliding distance. Steep cup angle, e.g., 70° for Al2O3 and Si3N4 bearing couples, encountered edge contact, which leads to more wear. Further, wear results were discussed and analyzed with respect to in vitro and/or clinical studies available in the literature to justify the efficacy of wear modeling.

History and systematic review of wear and osteolysis outcomes for first-generation highly crosslinked polyethylene

BACKGROUND

Highly crosslinked polyethylene (HXLPE) was introduced to reduce wear and osteolysis in total joint arthroplasty. While many studies report wear and osteolysis associated with HXLPE, analytical techniques, clinical study design and followup, HXLPE formulation and implant design characteristics, and patient populations differ substantially among investigations, complicating a unified perspective.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

Literature on first-generation HXLPE was summarized. We systematically reviewed the radiographic wear data and incidence of osteolysis for HXLPE in hip and knee arthroplasty.

METHODS

PubMed identified 391 studies; 28 met inclusion criteria for a weighted-averages analysis of two-dimensional femoral head penetration rates. To determine the incidence of osteolysis, we estimated a pooled odds ratio using a random-effects model.

RESULTS

Weighted-averages analyses of femoral head penetration rates in HXLPE liners and conventional UHMWPE liners resulted, respectively, in a mean two-dimensional linear penetration rate of 0.042 mm/year based on 28 studies (n=1503 hips) and 0.137 mm/year based on 18 studies (n=695 hips). The pooled odds ratio for the risk of osteolysis in HXLPE versus conventional liners was 0.13 (95% confidence interval, 0.06-0.27) among studies with minimum 5-year followup. We identified two clinical studies of HXLPE in TKA, preventing systematic analysis of outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

HXLPE liner studies consistently report lower femoral head penetration and an 87% lower risk of osteolysis. Reduction in femoral head penetration or osteolysis risk is not established for large-diameter (>32 mm) metallic femoral heads or ceramic femoral heads of any size. Few studies document the clinical performance of HXLPE in knees.

Primary cementless total hip arthroplasty with an alumina ceramic-on-ceramic bearing: results after a minimum of twenty years of follow-up

BACKGROUND

The biological problems related to wear debris after total hip arthroplasty have stimulated renewed interest in alternatives to metal-on-polyethylene bearing surfaces.

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated the clinical and radiographic results of 100 patients who had undergone a total of 109 primary total hip arthroplasties with a cementless alumina ceramic-on-ceramic prosthesis between January 1985 and December 1989. The mean age of the patients at the time of the index arthroplasty was forty-six years. Clinical evaluation was performed with use of the Charnley modification of the Merle d'Aubigné-Postel scale. Seventy-eight patients who had had a total of eighty-five arthroplasties were available for follow-up evaluation at an average of 20.8 years. The patients' average age at the time of the latest follow-up was 66.8 years.

RESULTS

Six hips (six acetabular cups and one femoral stem) in six patients underwent revision. Aseptic loosening of the cup combined with focal osteolysis was the cause of all six revisions. In one patient, the stem was also revised because of aseptic loosening. At the time of final follow-up, the result was excellent (according to the Merle d'Aubigné-Postel scale) in 68% of the hips, good in 19%, fair in 9%, and poor in 4%. The mean Merle d'Aubigné-Postel score improved from 7.9 points preoperatively to 16.9 points postoperatively (p < 0.001). The cumulative rate of survival of the prostheses was 84.4% at 20.8 years.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of these cementless ceramic-on-ceramic total hip arthroplasties continued to be satisfactory at a minimum of twenty years postoperatively. The improved design of contemporary prostheses and the new generation of ceramic-on-ceramic bearing surfaces may lead to even better long-term results.

Incomplete seating of a metal-backed alumina liner in ceramic-on-ceramic total hip arthroplasty

Metal-backed modular ceramic bearing systems using a recessed alumina liner in a titanium sleeve were developed to decrease ceramic chipping or fracture due to femoral neck impingement after total hip arthroplasty (THA). However, malseating of the metal-backed ceramic liner has recently been described. The goal of this study was to assess the prevalence, etiology, and clinical relevance of this event. Between 2005 and 2008, 51 consecutive patients (61 hips) underwent THA with a metal-backed alumina liner housed in a titanium shell. The metal-backed ceramic liner was aligned, seated, and impacted into the shell, and satisfaction in terms of liner stability and seating was confirmed intraoperatively. Postoperative assessment of seating was assessed with standard radiographs. Liner seating was classified as well seated, suspicious, or malseated. Seven liners (11.5%) were found to be malseated and 4 (6.5%) were considered suspicious. Radiographically, there was a gap between the liner and the shell located inferomedially in 4 patients and superolaterally in 3 patients. Two liners subsequently seated at 1 and 3 months postoperatively, respectively. No dislodgement, failures, or adverse events were identified. There were no revision surgeries. The significant percentage of malseated liners were potentially attributed to poor exposure, bony/soft tissue interposition, and surgeon learning curve.

Osteolysis in third-generation alumina ceramic-on-ceramic hip bearings with severe impingement and titanium metallosis

The most common cause of long-term failure of total hip arthroplasty is osteolysis and aseptic loosening secondary to wear debris. Combinations of hard materials such as ceramic-on-ceramic generate smaller volumes of particulate wear debris than traditional combinations such as metal-on-polyethylene. We describe 2 cases where osteolysis arose in hips with third-generation alumina ceramic-on-ceramic couplings. Periarticular tissue in both cases contained titanium wear debris due to impingement of the neck of the titanium femoral component against the rim of the titanium shell and ceramic debris from edge loading wear (stripe wear) of the ceramic. It is not clear whether the titanium debris, the ceramic debris, or both caused the osteolysis. These cases illustrate that the risk of osteolysis persists, even with third-generation alumina ceramics.

Alumina femoral head fracture in uncemented total hip arthroplasty with a ceramic sandwich cup

In total hip arthroplasty, insertion of a UHMWPE-coated ceramic sandwich liner dramatically reduces any risk related to the stiffness of the ceramic-ceramic coupling. We present a case of an alumina ceramic head fracture with a ceramic sandwich cup. The fracture occurred 16 months after the initial operation, without trauma. Impingement between the neck and posteroinferior portion of the liner rim had occurred. This was related to the traditional cross-legged sitting position of Koreans, which caused impingement between the neck and liner rim. Consequently, the taper became loose, and the resulting force bent the taper and fractured the head. We examined a peculiar case of ceramic femoral head fracture after implantation of an uncemented total hip arthroplasty with a ceramic sandwich cup and investigated the underlying cause.

Extensive intrapelvic granuloma formation caused by ceramic fragments after revision total hip arthroplasty

Ceramic debris embedded in a polyethylene liner was identified as the cause for rapid metal wear after revision total hip arthroplasty when a broken ceramic head was replaced by a metal head. Removal of an intrapelvic foreign body granuloma and rerevision hip arthroplasty had to be performed within 2 years after the first revision.

Zirconia femoral head fractures: a clinical and retrieval analysis

Zirconia femoral heads provide increased fracture strength, but 343 zirconia head failures have been documented since 2000. Retrieval analysis of 6 fractured heads, 4 suspect heads, 4 control zirconia heads, and 2 failed alumina heads was performed. Zirconia failures have been isolated to heads sintered in a "tunnel" furnace introduced in 1998. The monoclinic composition at the taper surface of fractured and nonfractured heads was significantly elevated (21% to 68%) compared to that of control zirconia heads (less than 5%). Electron microscopy identified circular fracture footprints unique to the zirconia heads produced in the tunnel furnace. Cobalt chrome heads were used in the urgent revision setting due to Morse taper damage. Partial capsulectomy was performed in an effort to reduce future third body wear. Monoclinic phase transformation following implantation remains a potential mechanism of ceramic head failure. We recommend that patients with recalled zirconia heads be advised of a potential fracture risk.