Measuring quality of life in patients with abdominal wall hernias: a systematic review of available tools

Evaluation of medium to long-term patient satisfaction following open midline incisional hernia repair

PURPOSE

Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are increasingly recognised as one of the most important metrics for assessment of outcomes after abdominal wall hernia repair. The study aim was to evaluate patient satisfaction using 4 different PROMS following open repair of midline incisional hernias.

METHODS

Patients with no recurrence or significant surgical site infection (SSI) after midline incisional hernia retromuscular mesh repair and concurrent abdominoplasty were invited to complete four PROMs: the Carolinas Comfort Scale (CCS, range 0-115), Brehaut decision regret scale (BDRS, range 20-100), Abdominoplasty questionnaire (Q-PROM, range 7-28) and Patient Scar Assessment Scale (PSAS; range 6-60).

RESULTS

50 out of 72 responses were received and analysed. The mean age of respondents was 60.6 years. The mean time to assess PROMs responses was 41.4 (range, 12.0-83.9) months after the date of surgery. The mean CCS score was 11.36 (no or mild mesh-related post-operative symptoms), the mean PSAS score was 17.36 (the scar looked or felt moderately different to normal skin), the mean abdominoplasty score was 20.51 (patients were very satisfied with their post-operative body contour) and the mean BDRS score was 28.4 (patients either had no or minimal regret). Overall, there was 78% global satisfaction rate across the 4 PROMS.

CONCLUSION

The majority of patients had self-reported satisfactory outcomes and quality of life in the medium to long term, however despite no hernia recurrence or SSI a proportion remained dissatisfied and regretted their surgical decision. Embedding PROMs into follow-up regimes improves understanding of post-operative outcomes and should be considered at least as important as traditional outcome measures for hernia repair.

Interim analysis of single - centre randomised controlled trial on incisional hernia repair with vs without synthetic mesh fixation

INTRODUCTION

In a prospective randomised trial, we aimed to compare incisional hernia repair with mesh fixation versus incisional hernia repair without mesh fixation.

METHODS

The study was performed from June 2018 to August 2024 at a single centre in Vilnius, Lithuania. Fifty-seven patients with incisional abdominal wall hernia were randomly included into two groups: group one-"sublay" hernia repair with mesh fixation and the second - without mesh fixation. The duration of surgery, hospital stay, pain levels, quality of life and rate of complications were compared.

RESULTS

Of the 38 women and 19 men who were included in the study, 30 were with mesh fixation and 27 without mesh fixation. The median patient's body mass index was 31.57 ± 5.96 (19.5-49.6). The most common hernia width was W2 according to the European Hernia Society (EHS) classification. A significant difference between the groups was found in duration of surgery - 108.00 ± 47.35 (40-235) minutes in the mesh fixation group vs. 75.74 ± 30.25 (35-150)-without the mesh fixation group (p < 0.05). A higher pain level was observed on the 10th postoperative day-3.03 ± 2.54 in the mesh fixation group versus 1.67 ± 2.22 in the group without the mesh fixation group (p < 0.05). A statistically significant difference was also observed in seroma rate after 6 months (16.6% versus 0%, p < 0.05). There have been no hernia recurrences in either group so far.

CONCLUSIONS

No mesh fixation on "sublay" hernia repair does not worsen the patient's postoperative condition. It does not increase postoperative pain, worsen the quality of life, or increase the risk of postoperative complications. On the 10th postoperative day, the non-fixed mesh group had less postoperative pain, however, later the pain was equal. A lower number of seromas was also observed in this group after 6 months. However, the operative time in the group without mesh fixation was significantly shorter.

Does quality of life improve after complex incisional hernia repair? A systematic review

INTRODUCTION

Health-related quality of life (QoL) is an essential patient-reported outcome in abdominal wall surgery. The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate short term outcome of QoL after complex incisional hernia repair (IHR), focusing on open surgery.

METHODS

A multi-database systematic search was performed on patients treated for complex IHR. Studies evaluating the outcome in terms of QoL using validated questionnaires, at least three months postoperatively, were included. The methodology was graded, and patients' operative and outcome details were extracted.

RESULTS

Seven studies were included, encompassing 729 patients, all of whom underwent an open approach. A significant increase in QoL was found in all types of questionnaires (Short Form-36 (SF-36), Carolinas Comfort Scale, Hernia Related QoL, and Numeric Rating Scale). SF-36 was used most frequently. A pooled standardized mean difference (SMD) of 0.70 (95% CI: 0.08-1.47 p < 0.00001) was yielded, indicating a moderate to large effect of the intervention compared to preoperative scores.

CONCLUSION

A limited number of studies have included QoL measurement after incisional hernia repair. In all studies, a significant increase was seen in QoL postoperatively. This review highlights the substantial benefits of open surgery in improving QoL, while emphasizing the need for further research to standardize outcome measurement and explore long-term results.

Anatomical Study of Abdominal Wall Muscle Innervation to Optimize Retroperitoneal Vascular Approach

INTRODUCTION

Different surgical approaches are used in aortic surgery. Retroperitoneal approaches can result in abdominal wall weakness and flank bulging. These approaches often require dissection of the anterolateral or anteromedial muscles of the abdominal wall. During dissection, the underlying nerves are at great risk of injury, which induces significant complications in abdominal wall muscles. Few studies have been conducted to minimize the risk of injury to these nerves.

OBJECTIVES

This study aims to describe the trajectory of abdominal muscle motor nerves and their relationship to ribs and other anatomical landmarks. The secondary objective is to optimize surgical approaches by preserving the nerves.

METHOD

We conducted 12 dissections on fresh cadavers. Nerve trajectories, the communication between the intercostal nerves (9th-10th-11th) and the subcostal nerve (12th), and the distance from the nerve to the estimated projection point of intersection with the abdominal midline, umbilicus, and iliac crest were recorded.

RESULTS

Our dissections identified the 12th subcostal nerve as the largest nerve. The 11th intercostal nerve exhibits more accessory branches than other nerves. Multiple communications and branches were observed between the 10th and 11th intercostal nerves and between the 11th and 12th nerves in the region from the anterior axillary line (AAL) to the mid-clavicular line. The estimated projection point of intersection with the midline was 7.92 ± 1.24 cm supraumbilical for the ninth intercostal nerve, 3.92 ± 1.18 cm supraumbilical for the 10th, 1.08 ± 1.52 cm at the umbilical level for the 11th, and -3.33 ± 0.83 cm infraumbilical for the subcostal nerve. The distance between the iliac crest and the iliohypogastric nerve (IHN) in the lateral jackknife position was 2.54 ± 0.65 cm. The 11th nerve had an angle in relation to the rib between -45° and -10° (average: -24.6°), and the 12th nerve had a similar angle between -30° and 0° (average: -18.3°). For the 11th nerve, the distance was between 0 and 5.5 cm (average: 2.92 cm); for the 12th nerve, it was between 0 and 3.0 cm (average: 1.71 cm).

CONCLUSIONS

To preserve the 11th nerve, the optimal approach is a straight incision starting from the upper edge of the 11th rib toward the midline, 4 cm above the umbilicus; for the 12th nerve, the optimal approach is a straight incision starting from the upper edge of the 12th rib toward the midline, 1 cm below the umbilicus; for the IHN, the optimal approach is an incision close to the iliac crest at a distance <1.5 cm. The estimated projection point of intersection between the nerve directions toward the midline can indicate the anatomical trajectory of nerves. A nerve projection toward the midline can provide valuable information about the anatomical location of a nerve. This study has utility in optimizing surgical approaches. A clinical study can confirm these anatomical results.

Quality of life and abdominal wall functionality after abdominal wall reconstruction: A prospective single center follow-up study

BACKGROUND

Fascial breakdown with the occurrence of an incisional hernia (IH) is an important and challenging complication of any laparotomy. For a long time, the success of the abdominal wall reconstruction (AWR) was measured only from the surgeon's perspective by defining outcome measures such as wound morbidity and recurrence. The understanding that complete recovery is difficult to assess without considering patients has shifted the paradigm of optimal outcomes to Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMS) and Quality of Life (QoL), which are pivotal to evaluate the success and efficacy of AWR.

METHODS

We conducted a prospective follow-up study of 91 patients undergoing mesh-augmented abdominal wall reconstruction for primary or recurrent incisional hernia between January 2021 and December 2023. Demographic data, comorbidities, and hernia characteristics were recorded. All patients were evaluated preoperatively by a native abdomino-pelvic CT scan to assess the characteristics of hernia (length, width, surface, and volume of the incisional hernia sac and of peritoneal cavity), the presence of mesh (if previously inserted), and abdominal wall muscles status. All intervention were performed by the same surgical team according to the techniques described by Rives - Stoppa (RS), Ramirez (ACS), and Novitsky (PCS). Abdominal wall function was assessed using trunk raising (TR) and double leg lowering (DLL) measurements performed preoperatively, 1 month, 6 months, and 1 year postoperatively. At the same time, pre- and post-operative quality of life was analysed using the EQ-5D score.

RESULTS

Mean age of 59.42 ± 12.28 years and a male/female ratio of 35/56 were recorded, most of them being obese. There were 36 (42%) patients with defects larger than 10 cm. The distribution of the type of surgical intervention was: RS 35 patients, ACS 13 patients, and PCS 43 patients. The mean value of combined score for the preoperative abdominal wall functionality was 4.41 ± 1.67 (2-8) while the mean value of preoperative EQ-5D index was 0.652 ± 0.026 (-0.32-1.00). QoL was poor and very poor for 48% (44) of the patients who recorded index values less than 0.56 (50% percentile). Preoperative EQ-5D index was highly correlated with Combined AWF score (r = 0.620; p < 0.0001) and the correlation was specific (AUC = 0.799; p < 0.0001; asymptotic 95%CI = 0.711-0.923). At 12 months, the AWF score increased to 8.13 ± 2.58 (1-10) and the QoL total score to 0.979 ± 0.007 (0.71-1). Good and very good total scores for QoL were recorded for 47 patients (84%) compared to 33 (36%) in the preoperative evaluation (χ2 with Yates continuity correction for two degrees of liberty = 46.04; p < 0.00001).

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that patients can expect to see a significant overall improvement in all five components of QoL measured with the help of Eq. 5D questionnaire. This improvement is dependent by hernia size, and some individual patient's factors (diabetes, cardiovascular diseases, and age over 60 years).

Quality of life following Shouldice Repair: a prospective cohort study among inguinal hernia patients

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to evaluate quality of life from the preoperative time to six months after surgery of patients who underwent a Shouldice Repair for primary inguinal hernia.

METHODS

After ethical approval, consent was obtained, and data collected from surveys and chart review. The study population was composed of male and female patients aged 16-90 years of age, who had a Shouldice Repair of a primary unilateral inguinal hernia. The EQ-5D-3L, a questionnaire applied to hernia surgery in Canada, was used to determine quality of life at the preoperative and 1 week, 1- and 6-month postoperative time. Data analysis included descriptive statistics, as well as inferential analysis.

RESULTS

From January 2023 to February 2024, 532 participants met the criteria, completed and returned the preoperative survey, and underwent primary inguinal hernia repair. The participants were mostly male (94%) with an average age of 62.18 years and BMI of 24.93 kg/m2. The EQ-5D-3L health index scores and EQ-VAS health status at preoperative were 0.83 ± 0.13 and 79.5 ± 12.59. At the 1-month postoperative time, health index scores and health status had significantly increased from preoperative (score:0.91 ± 0.12, p = .001; status 83.56 ± 12.93, p = .001), and continued to significantly increase from baseline at the 6-month postoperative time (score:0.95 ± 0.10, p = .001; status:85.25 ± 12.17, p < .001).

CONCLUSION

Quality of life, as measured by the ED-5D-3L health index score, significantly improved for patients that underwent a Shouldice Repair for an inguinal hernia.

"What really matters to the patients?": assessing the impact of wound healing on the quality of life in patients undergoing incisional hernia repair

PURPOSE

We aim to evaluate the impact of surgical wound complications in the first 30 postoperative days after incisional hernia repair on the long-term quality of life of patients. In addition, the impact of the surgical technique and preoperative comorbidities on the quality of life of patients will also be evaluated.

METHOD

Prospective cohort study, which evaluates 115 patients who underwent incisional hernioplasty between 2019 and 2020, using the onlay and retromuscular techniques. These patients were initially assessed with regard to surgical wound outcomes in the first 30 postoperative days (surgical site infection (SSI) or surgical site occurrence (SSO)), and then, assessed after three years, through a specific quality of life questionnaire, the Hernia Related Quality of Life Survey (HerQLes).

RESULTS

After some patients were lost to follow-up during the study period, due to death, difficulty in contact, refusal to respond to the questionnaire, eighty patients were evaluated. Of these, 11 patients (13.8%) had SSI in the first 30 postoperative days and 37 (46.3%) had some type of SSO. The impact of both SSI and SSO on quality of life indices was not identified. When analyzing others variables, we observed that the Body Mass Index (BMI) had a significant impact on the patients' quality of life. Likewise, hernia size and mesh size were identified as variables related to a worse quality of life outcome. No difference was observed regarding the surgical techniques used.

CONCLUSION

In the present study, no relationship was identified between surgical wound outcomes (SSO and SSI) and worse quality of life results using the HerQLes score. We observed that both BMI and the size of meshes and hernias showed an inversely proportional relationship with quality of life indices. However, more studies evaluating preoperative quality of life indices and comparing them with postoperative indices should be carried out to evaluate these correlations.

Outcomes of Robotic Transabdominal Retromuscular Repair: 3-Year Follow-up

Background

Our study addresses the gap in ventral hernia repair literature, regarding the long-term effectiveness of robotic transabdominal retrorectus umbilical prosthetic repair (r-TARUP) for primary and incisional ventral hernias. This study aimed to report the 3-year recurrence rates and overall patient outcomes including quality of life.

Method

A retrospective review of prospective collected data analyzed 101 elective r-TARUP patients from August 2018 to January 2022. Data collected included demographics, hernia sizes, mesh types, postoperative outcomes and the European Hernia Society Quality of Life questionnaire (EuraHS-QoL) before and after surgery.

Results

The average age of the group of patients was 53, having a mean body mass index (BMI) of 32 kg/m, with 54% incisional and 46% primary hernias, with mean length and width of 4.4 cm and 6.1 cm, utilizing synthetic 58% and bioabsorbable 42% mesh types. The majority were classified as Centers of Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) class I wounds. Postoperative complications included seroma (2%), hematoma (3%), which required surgical intervention, with no significant correlation to mesh type. A strong positive correlation was found between Transversus Abdominis Release (TAR) and increased length of hospital stay (correlation coefficient: 0.731, p < 0.001). Preoperative quality of life assessments demonstrated statistically significant improvements when compared to postoperative assessments at 3 years, with a mean (±SD) of 61.61 ± 5.29 vs. 13.84 ± 2.6 (p < 0.001). Mean follow up of 34.4 months with no hernia recurrence at 1 year and 3 recurrence at the 2-3 years follow up (3.2%).

Conclusion

The r-TARUP technique has proven to be safe and effective for repairing primary and incisional ventral hernias, with a low recurrence rate during this follow up period with a noticeable improvement in quality of life (QoL).

QUALITY OF LIFE USING EURAHS-QoL SCORES AFTER SURGICAL TREATMENT OF INGUINAL HERNIA: LAPAROSCOPIC TRANSABDOMINAL PREPERITONEAL (TAPP) AND LICHTENSTEIN TECHNIQUES

BACKGROUND

Results on quality of life after inguinal hernia surgery, such as esthetics, postoperative pain, period of absence from activities, and recurrence are a relevant topic since inguinal hernia affects 27% of men and 3% of women at some point in their lives, and should guide health policies to allocate resources more efficiently.

AIMS

To evaluate the quality of life in the late postoperative period of inguinal herniorrhaphy regarding recurrence, pain, esthetics, and restriction in activities, comparing the minimally invasive techniques - the transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) and the conventional Lichtenstein.

METHODS

A cross-sectional observational clinical study was conducted with the EuraHS-QoL questionnaire validated and translated into Portuguese, applied to patients after an average of 65 months postoperatively. Forty-five patients were assessed, 28 undergoing Lichtenstein and 17 undergoing TAPP. All were males aged between 18 and 87 years with a primary unilateral inguinal hernia. Recurrent or bilateral hernias, other concomitant abdominal wall hernias, patients who chose not to participate or who were not found, and female patients were excluded from the study.

RESULTS

Regarding the domains pain, restriction, and esthetics, there was no difference between the two groups when examining quality of life. Neither group presented recurrence in the studied period.

CONCLUSIONS

Both TAPP and Lichtenstein techniques presented similar results concerning quality of life when compared in the long-term.

Quantifying postoperative recovery using wearable activity monitors following abdominal wall surgery: The AbTech trial

PURPOSE

This work aimed to investigate the validity of wearable activity monitors (WAMs) as an objective tool to measure the return toward normal functional mobility following abdominal wall surgery. This was achieved by quantifying and comparing pre- and postoperative physical activity (PA).

METHODS

A multicenter, prospective, observational cohort study was designed. Patients undergoing abdominal wall surgery were assessed for eligibility and consent for study participation was obtained. Participants were asked to wear a WAM (AX3, Axivity) on the wrist of their dominant hand at least 48 hours pre-operatively, for up to 2 weeks postop, and again after 6 months postop for 48 hours.

RESULTS

A cohort of 20 patients were recruited in this validation study with a mean age of 47.3 ± 13.0 years. Postoperation, the percentage median PA (±IQR) dropped to 32.6% (20.1), whereas on day 14, PA had reached 64.6% (22.7) of the preoperative value providing construct validity. Activity levels at >6 months postop increased by 16.4% on an average when compared to baseline preoperative PA (p = 0.046).

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates that WAMs are valid markers of postoperative recovery following abdominal wall surgery. This was achieved by quantifying the reduction in PA postoperation, which has not been previously shown. In addition, this study suggests that abdominal wall surgery may improve the patient's quality of life via increased functional mobility at 6 months postop. In the future, this technology could be used to identify the patient and surgical factors that are predictors of outcome following abdominal wall surgery.

The top 100 most-cited papers in incisional hernia: a bibliometric analysis from 2003 to 2023

PURPOSE

Incisional hernia (IH) is one of the most common complications after abdominal surgeries and may bring great suffering to patients. This study aims to evaluate the global trends in IH research from 2003 to 2023 and visualize the frontiers using bibliometric analysis.

METHODS

The literature search was conducted on the Web of Science for IH studies published from 2003 to 2023 and sorted by citation frequency. The top 100 most-cited articles were analyzed by the annual publication number, prolific countries and institutions, influential author and journal, and the number of citations through descriptive statistics and visualization.

RESULTS

The top paper was cited 1075 times and the median number of citations was 146. All studies were published between 2003 and 2019 and the most prolific year was 2003 with 14 articles. Jeekel J and Rosen M were regarded as the most productive authors with ten articles each and acquired 2738 and 2391 citations, respectively. The top three institutions with the most productive articles were Erasmus Mc, Carolinas Med Ctr, and Univ Utah, while the top three countries were the United States, Netherlands and Germany. The most frequent keyword was "incisional hernia" with 55 occurrences, followed by "mesh repair", "randomized controlled trial", and "polypropylene".

CONCLUSION

The 100 most-cited papers related to IH were published predominantly by USA and European countries, with randomized controlled trial (RCT) and observational study designs, addressing topics related to risk factors, complications, mesh repair, and mesh components.

A Scoping Review of Quality-of-Life Assessments Employed in Abdominal Wall Reconstruction

INTRODUCTION

Surgeons use several quality-of-life instruments to track outcomes following abdominal wall reconstruction (AWR); however, there is no universally agreed upon instrument. We review the instruments used in AWR and report their utilization trends within the literature.

METHODS

This scoping review was reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis extension for Scoping Reviews guidelines using the PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Cochrane databases. All published articles in the English language that employed a quality-of-life assessment for abdominal wall hernia repair were included. Studies which focused solely on aesthetic abdominoplasty, autologous breast reconstruction, rectus diastasis, pediatric patients, inguinal hernia, or femoral hernias were excluded.

RESULTS

Six hernia-specific tools and six generic health tools were identified. The Hernia-Related Quality-of-Life Survey and Carolinas Comfort Scale are the most common hernia-specific tools, while the Short-Form 36 (SF-36) is the most common generic health tool. Notably, the SF-36 is also the most widely used tool for AWR outcomes overall. Each tool captures a unique set of patient outcomes which ranges from abdominal wall functionality to mental health.

CONCLUSIONS

The outcomes of AWR have been widely studied with several different assessments proposed and used over the past few decades. These instruments allow for patient assessment of pain, quality of life, functional status, and mental health. Commonly used tools include the Hernia-Related Quality-of-Life Survey, Carolinas Comfort Scale, and SF-36. Due to the large heterogeneity of available instruments, future work may seek to determine or develop a standardized instrument for characterizing AWR outcomes.

Novel insights into patient's thoughts about their body image in abdominal wall hernia

BACKGROUND

Abdominal wall hernias (AWH) are frequently large and deforming. Despite this, little is known about how AWH impact upon body image. This study is the first study to qualitatively examine patients' subjective lived experiences of how AWH affects their body image.

METHODS

Fifteen patients were interviewed from a purposive sample of AWH patients awaiting surgery until no new narrative themes emerged. Interviews explored patient thoughts and experiences of AWH and body image. Data were examined using interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA).

RESULTS

Two key themes pertaining to body image were identified: "Changes to perceptions of self" and "Fears concerning other's perceptions of them". Both themes were often interrelated and displayed detrimental effects AWH had on patients' body image.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings illustrate that AWH detrimentally affected patients' body image. This aspect of patient care can be treated and managed through better pre-operative information, including on body image as part of a holistic needs assessment (HNA), and ensuring the results are addressed in a patient care package. These development suggestions may positively affect the AWH patient's experience and outcomes in terms of Quality of Life (QoL) by preparing patients better for realistic results regarding what can be achieved in terms of form, function thus making a more holistic recovery from surgery.

Retrospective study of an incisional hernia after laparoscopic colectomy for colorectal cancer

PURPOSE

This study aimed to examine the incidence of incisional hernia (IH) in elective laparoscopic colorectal surgery (LC) using regulated computed tomography (CT) images at intervals every 6 months.

METHODS

We retrospectively examined the diagnosis of IH in patients who underwent LC for colorectal cancer at Kansai Medical University Hospital from January 2014 to August 2018. The diagnosis of IH was defined as loss of continuity of the fascia in the axial CT images.

RESULTS

470 patients were included in the analysis. IH was diagnosed in 47 cases at 1 year after LC. The IH size was 7.8 cm2 [1.3-55.6]. In total, 38 patients with IH underwent CT examination 6 months after LC, and 37 were already diagnosed with IH. The IH size was 4.1 cm2 [0-58.9]. The IH size increased in 17 cases between 6 months and 1 year postoperatively, and in 1 case, a new IH occurred. 47%(18/38) of them continued to grow until 1 year after LC. A multivariate analysis was performed on the risk of IH occurrence. SSI was most significantly associated with IH occurrence (OR:5.28 [2.14-13.05], p = 0.0003).

CONCLUSION

IH occurred in 10% and 7.9% at 1 year and 6 months after LC. By examining CT images taken for the postoperative surveillance of colorectal cancer, we were able to investigate the occurrence of IH in detail.

Short-Term Outcomes and Quality-of-Life Assessment Following Rives-Stoppa and Transversus Abdominis Release Procedures of Open Ventral Hernia Repair

INTRODUCTION

Ventral hernia is one of the common surgical conditions that can significantly impact a patient's quality of life (QoL). Open ventral hernia repair using the Rives-Stoppa (RS) and Transversus Abdominis Release (TAR) procedures has gained recognition for its effectiveness in achieving hernia repair and reducing the risk of further recurrence. However, limited research has been performed to explore the short-term outcomes and QoL assessment following these two surgical techniques. The aim of this study was to know the result after RS and TAR methods of hernia repair in terms of short-term recurrences, pain, postoperative complications, and QoL.

METHODS

This was a prospective, interventional study, which included 30 patients fulfilling the inclusion criteria. The study group was subjected to posterior component separation (PCS)-TAR and RS repair as per surgical indication (RS if defect size 4-10cm; PCS-TAR if defect size >10cm and

RESULTS

Not a single recurrence was observed till POD 180 in either of the repair methods. The mean operative time for RS repair was 170.47 ± 15.08 minutes while for TAR repair was 188.8 ± 22.04 (p-value= 0.013). Surgical site infection (SSI) was reported in 14.28% of RS repair cases and 11.11% of TAR repair cases. Seroma formation was observed in 9.5% of RS repair cases. RS repair has less mean CCS score than TAR. The one-way ANOVA showed f-ratio=421.43 and p-value=0.00001 for RS repair while f-ratio= 298.05 and p-value=0 .00001 for TAR repair at POD seven, POD 30, and POD 90. Both RS and TAR repair markedly reduced mean scores in all three domains on POD 90.

CONCLUSION

Both RS and TAR had no recurrence in a short period of six months. The intraoperative time taken in TAR was less than in earlier studies. QoL improved postoperatively in both the repairs with RS repair having better QoL than TAR repair.

Collapse

Key Words

• carolina comfort scale
• quality of life
• recurrence
• rives-stoppa
• tar
• ventral hernia

Collapse

MESH Headings Collapse

Grants Collapse

Affiliation(s)

Rajiv Kumar General Surgery, Indira Gandhi Institute of Medical Sciences, Patna, IND
Prem Prakash General Surgery, Indira Gandhi Institute of Medical Sciences, Patna, IND
Seema R Sinha Biochemistry, Indira Gandhi Institute of Medical Sciences, Patna, IND
Nadeem Ahmad General Surgery, Indira Gandhi Institute of Medical Sciences, Patna, IND
Kanchan S Baitha General Surgery, Indira Gandhi Institute of Medical Sciences, Patna, IND

Collapse

Collaborators Collapse

Quality of Life With a Hernia-A Novel Patient Led Study

Introduction: Abdominal wall hernia surgery aims to relieve symptoms and to improve quality of life (QoL). The aim of this novel patient led research, was to help surgeons understand how hernias impact on patients' wellbeing. Methods: A questionnaire was developed by patient advocates. It was promoted through social media to gather anonymous feedback from patients. Results: 264 questionnaires were completed. The majority of the respondents were female (78.4%, n = 207), from English speaking countries (85.2%, n = 225), and had either parastomal hernias (36.0%, n = 95) or incisional hernias (28.0%, n = 74). Respondents described how their hernia affected sexual intimacy, either due to the dislike of their physical appearance, pain or the practicalities of their hernia getting in the way. They reported that their hernia restricted them from engaging in certain exercise activities, and a significant proportion also reported an impact on their diet. Conclusion: This study has identified that in addition to functional problems, living with a hernia can affect mental health as well as social and physical relationships. Existing hernia QoL tools are limited in the outcomes that they measure. Without a comprehensive hernia specific QoL tool, it remains difficult for a surgeon to accurately assess the impact that different treatment modalities may have on patients.

Abdominal wall hernia and mental health: patients lived experiences and implications for patient care

BACKGROUND

Abdominal wall hernia (AWH) affects mental health and mental health questions are frequently included within Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMS) for this patient population. However, these questions have not been informed by the subjective lived experiences of mental health in AWH patients. This study is the first to qualitatively examine how AWH affects patients' mental health.

METHODS

Fifteen patients were interviewed from a purposive sample of AWH patients until no new themes emerged. Interviews explored patient thoughts and experiences of AWH and mental health. Data were examined using Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis (IPA).

RESULTS

Three key themes pertaining to mental health were identified: "psychological and emotional distress", "identity disruption" and "coping mechanisms and support systems".

CONCLUSION

Our findings illustrate that AWH is a pathology that can have a significant detrimental impact on people's mental health. This impact has implications for patient care and can be treated and managed through better psychological support. This support may positively affect AWH patient's experience and outcomes in terms of quality of life. This paper provides recommendations for improved AWH patient care in regard to mental health.

ONE-STAGE PROSTATECTOMY ACCOMPANIED BY HERNIOPLASTY TO IMPROVE QUALITY-OF-LIFE OUTCOMES OF PATIENTS WITH COMBINED SURGICAL PATHOLOGIES

OBJECTIVE

The aim: To evaluate whether simultaneous inguinal hernioplasty during prostatectomy confers benefits on quality-of-life outcomes.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Materials and methods: 152 patients with prostatic adenoma were observed. The general group included 32 (21%) patients with prostatic adenoma and hernia inguinalis, who underwent one-stage prostatectomy accompanied with hernioplasty. 120 (79%) persons of comparison group underwent a prostatectomy only. The average age of the comparison group was 68.0±7.0 years, the general group - 67.1±6.9 years; the average prostate volume was 94.4±42.3 cm3 and 91.2±32.6 cm3 respectively. Hernia inguinalis was in 32 patients of the general group, in 4 of them - on both sides (36 cases totally).

RESULTS

Results: The average time of retropubic prostatectomy in both groups was the same, and simultaneous hernioplasty took 35.0±17.4 minutes. The frequency of early and late bleeding after prostatectomies in the general group was 6.25% (2 cases) and 7.5% (9 cases) in the comparison group. No deaths were noted in two groups. The quality-of-life outcomes after the one-stage prostatectomy accompanied with hernioplasty in 6 and 12 months were statistically better than before these operations.

CONCLUSION

Conclusions: Performing one-stage prostatectomy accompanied with hernioplasty does not worsen the immediate and long-term results of operation, instead it helps to eliminate two diseases at the same time from one surgical approach.

Transversus abdominis release (TAR) procedure: a retrospective analysis of an abdominal wall reconstruction group

Complex abdominal wall defects are important conditions with high morbidity, leading to impairment of patients' physical condition and quality of life. In the last decade, the abdominal wall reconstruction paradigm has changed due to the formation of experienced and excellence groups, improving clinical outcomes after surgery. Therefore, our study shows the perspective and outcomes of an abdominal wall reconstruction group (AWRG) in Colombia, focused on the transverse abdominis release (TAR) procedure. A retrospective review of a prospectively collected database was conducted. All the patients older than 18 years old that underwent TAR procedures between January 2014-December 2020 were included. Analysis and description of postoperative outcomes (recurrence, surgical site infection (SSI), seroma, hematoma, and re-intervention) were performed. 47 patients underwent TAR procedure. 62% of patients were male. Mean age was 55 ± 13.4 years. Mean BMI was 27.8 ± 4.5 kg/m². Abdominal wall defects were classified with EHS ventral Hernia classification having a W3 hernia in 72% of all defects (Mean gap size of 11.49 cm ± 4.03 cm). Mean CeDAR preoperative risk score was 20.5% ± 14.5%. Preoperative use of BOTOX Therapy (OR 1.0 P 0.00 95% CI 0.3-1.1) or pneumoperitoneum (OR 0.7 P 0.04 95% CI 0.3-0.89) are slightly associated with postoperative hematoma. In terms of hernia relapse, we have 12% of cases; all of them over a year after the surgery. TAR procedure for complex abdominal wall defects under specific clinical conditions including emergency scenarios is viable. Specialized and experienced groups show better postoperative outcomes; further studies are needed to confirm our results.

The Abdominal Hernia-Q: a critical analysis of the components that impact quality-of-life

PURPOSE

Ventral hernias (VH) are a common surgical problem associated with significant morbidity. While assessment tools have examined quality-of-life (QoL), the relative change in specific domains of hernia-related QoL measures from pre- to post-operative period has yet to be comprehensively examined. Using the Abdominal Hernia-Q (AHQ), this study aims to assess the impact of ventral hernia repair (VHR) on key components of QoL.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review was conducted of patients undergoing VHR between September 2017 and September 2019 who had completed at least one pre- and post-operative AHQ. Post-operative intervals were created to capture AHQ responses around standard follow-up visits (< 1.5 months, 1.5-4.5 months, 4.5-11 months, and 11 + months) and scores were statistically analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 136 patients were included, with an average age of 54.8 years at the time of VHR. Compared to the pre-operative period, the appearance score increased significantly (p < 0.05). The physical domain score increased from < 1.5 month to the 1.5-4.5 month period (p = 0.03) and remained significantly higher in later time period. The appearance score decreased from the 1.5-4.5 month to 4.5-11 month period (p = 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

VHR leads to a sustained multi-dimensional increase in hernia-specific QoL measures during the post-operative course driven by early positive changes in appearance and sustained physical functioning. The initial increase in QoL is mainly driven by an improvement in appearance, while the sustained increase may be due to restored physical function.

Health-related quality of life in abdominal wall hernia: let's ask patients what matters to them?

INTRODUCTION

Quality of Life (QoL) is an important consideration in patients with abdominal wall hernia (AWH). What matters to patients and their everyday experience living with AWH may depend on a variety of personal, psychological, social and environmental factors. At present, no study has addressed what is important to this particular group of patients by asking the patients themselves. This study aims to determine QoL from the patient's perspective by examining the lived experience in this patient population.

METHODS

We interviewed 15 patients with AWH until thematic saturation. The patients were purposively sampled from AWH clinic between February 2020 and June 2020 using topic guides and interview schedules. Verbatim interview transcripts were coded and analysed using NVivo12 software and Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis (IPA). We adhered to consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ).

RESULTS

Fifteen participants (8 men and 7 women) of age range 36-85 years, median 65 years, covering all Ventral Hernia Working Group (VHWG) grades. Five superordinate themes were identified each with several subordinate themes, as follows: (1) body image (subthemes-'changes to perceptions of self' and 'fears concerning perceptions of others'). (2) Mental health (subthemes-'emotional responses', 'disruptions to previously solid aspects of identity', 'developing coping strategies'). (3) Symptoms (subthemes-'managing pain', 'freedom of movement', 'restriction and adaptation of function'). (4) Interpersonal relationships (subthemes-'difficulties socially connecting' and 'changes in sexual relations'). (5) Employment (subthemes-'financial pressure', 'return to work issues' and 'costs to family').

CONCLUSION

This is the first phenomenological qualitative study in the field of AWH and presents a rich account of what is important to these patients in terms of QoL. Developed from the patients' own words, the themes are interrelated and should shape our understanding of patients with AWH. This study provides qualitative examples of each theme. This study has identified new themes (body image, interpersonal relationships and employment) that are not incorporated in existing AWH-specific QoL instruments. This is important for surgeons because the study suggests that we are currently not capturing all data relevant to QoL in this specific patient group with current tools. The wider impact of this would be to help counsel patients and support them more holistically through the disease process and it's management. Further research is needed to generate a standardised AWH QoL instrument which incorporates bio-psycho-emotional-social themes important to patients, as identified by patients.

Quality of life following two different techniques of an open ventral hernia repair for large hernias: a prospective randomized study

Background

We compare the health-related quality of life (QoL) of patients with incision hernias before and after surgery with two different techniques.

Methods

In this prospective randomized study, the study population consisted of all patients who underwent the first surgical incisional hernias repair during the 1-year study period. Patients who met the criteria for inclusion in the study were randomized into two groups: the first group consisted of patients operated by an open Rives sublay technique, and the second group included patients operated by a segregation component technique. The change in the quality of life before and 6 months after surgery was assessed using two general (Short form of SF-36 questionnaires and European Quality of Life Questionnaire—EQ-5D-3L), and three specific hernia questionnaires (Hernia Related Quality of Life Survey-HerQles, Eura HS Quality of Life Scale—EuraHS QoL, and Carolinas Comfort Scale—CCS).

Results

A total of 93 patients were included in the study. Patients operated on by the Rives technique had a better role physical score before surgery, according to the SF-36 tool, although this was not found after surgery. The postoperative QoL measured with each scale of all questionnaires was significantly better after surgery. Comparing two groups of patients after surgery, only the pain domain of the EuraHS Qol questionnaire was worse in patients operated by a segregation component technique.

Conclusion

Both techniques improve the quality of life after surgery. Generic QoL questionnaires showed no difference in the quality of life compared to repair technique but specific hernia-related questionnaires showed differences.

Fascial defect closure versus bridged repair in laparoscopic ventral hernia mesh repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

PURPOSE

Several studies have examined effectiveness of primary fascial defect closure (FDC) versus bridged repair (no-FDC) during laparoscopic ventral hernia mesh repair (LVHMR). The purpose of this study was to systematically review and meta-analyse randomized controlled trials (RCTs) which compared safety and effectiveness of two techniques.

METHODS

Systematic literature searches (EMBASE, MEDLINE, PubMed, and CINAHL) were conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines using predefined terms. RCTs comparing FDC and no-FDC in LVHMR were identified and retrieved. Primary outcomes were risk of recurrence and risk of major complications analyzed as a single composite outcome. Secondary outcomes were risks of seroma formation, clinical or radiologically confirmed eventration, incidence of readmission to hospital, postoperative changes in quality of life (QoL), and postoperative pain. Random effects modeling to summarize statistics were performed. The risk of bias was assessed using Cohrane's Risk of Bias tool 2.

RESULTS

Three RCTs that enrolled total of 259 patients were included. There was clinical heterogeneity present between studies related to patients' characteristics, hernia characteristics, and operative techniques. There was no difference found in primary outcomes, risks of seroma formation, eventration, and chronic pain. There is conflicting evidence on how both techniques affect postoperative QoL or early postoperative pain.

CONCLUSIONS

Both techniques were detected to have equal safety profile and do not differ in risk of recurrence, seroma formation, risks of clinical or radiological eventration. Giving uncertainty and clinical equipoise, another RCT examining FDC vs no-FDC laparoscopic mesh repair separately for primary and secondary hernias using narrow inclusion criteria for hernia size on well-defined population would be ethical and pragmatic.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION

CRD42021274581.

Prevalence and risk factors of abdominal hernia among Saudi population

Objective:

Studies assessing prevalence and risk factors of abdominal hernia are scarce in Saudi Arabia, that is why this study aimed to find out the prevalence and risk factors of abdominal hernia among the Saudi Population in 2020.

Methods:

A cross-sectional study was done on 500 participants. A pre-designed questionnaire included three sections: Section A consisted of sociodemographic, Section B had items for three dimensions: pain at the site of the hernia or the hernia repair, restriction of activities, cosmetic discomfort; Section C included medical history and other associated risk factors of hernia.

Results:

The prevalence of abdominal hernia in our study was found to be 38.8%. The participants in 18-25 years had less prevalence (21.2%). participants with BMI >25 (Overweight and Obese) had higher prevalence than others. The mean EuraHS-QoL score in participants who had abdominal hernia was significantly higher than patients who didn't have AH. Age >40 years, male gender, BMI >25, congenital anomalies, history of abdominal surgery, history of abdominal trauma, family history, grand multipara, chronic cough, chronic bronchitis, and smoking were potential predictive factors of AH.

Conclusion:

Abdominal hernia is a common problem in Saudi Arabia. Abdominal hernias are more common in men than women, there is an obvious relationship between obesity, history of abdominal surgery, history of abdominal trauma, family history and hernias. Early diagnosis, easily accessible health facilities and health education are important to prevent complications and improve quality of life.

Perioperative optimization in complex abdominal wall hernias: Delphi consensus statement

BACKGROUND

The incidence of incisional hernia after major abdominal surgery via a midline laparotomy is 20-41 per cent with short-term follow-up, and over 50 per cent in those surviving an abdominal catastrophe. Abdominal wall reconstruction (AWR) requires complex operations, often involving mesh resection, management of scarred skin, fistula takedown, component separation or flap reconstruction. Patients tend to have more complex conditions, with multiple co-morbidities predisposing them to a vicious cycle of complications and, subsequently, hernia recurrence. Currently there appears to be variance in perioperative practice and minimal guidance globally. The aim of this Delphi consensus was to provide a clear benchmark of care for the preoperative assessment and perioperative optimization of patients undergoing AWR.

METHODS

The Delphi method was used to achieve consensus from invited experts in the field of AWR. Thirty-two hernia surgeons from recognized hernia societies globally took part. The process included two rounds of anonymous web-based voting with response analysis and formal feedback, concluding with a live round of voting followed by discussion at an international conference. Consensus for a strong recommendation was achieved with 80 per cent agreement, and a weak recommendation with 75 per cent agreement.

RESULTS

Consensus was obtained on 52 statements including surgical assessment, preoperative assessment, perioperative optimization, multidisciplinary team and decision-making, and quality-of-life assessment. Forty-six achieved over 80 per cent agreement; 14 statements achieved over 95 per cent agreement.

CONCLUSION

Clear consensus recommendations from a global group of experts in the AWR field are presented in this study. These should be used as a baseline for surgeons and centres managing abdominal wall hernias and performing complex AWR.

Patient-reported outcomes after incisional hernia repair

Purpose

Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are pivotal to evaluate the efficacy of surgical management. Debate persists on the optimal surgical technique to repair incisional hernias. Assessment of PROs can guide the selection of the best management of patients with incisional hernias. The objective of this cohort study was to present the PROs after incisional hernia repair at long term follow-up.

Methods

Patients with a history of incisional hernia repair were seen at the out-patient clinic to collect PROs. Patients were asked about the preoperative indication for repair and postoperative symptoms, such as pain, feelings of discomfort, and bulging of the abdominal wall. Additionally, degree of satisfaction was asked and Carolina Comfort Scales were completed.

Results

Two hundred and ten patients after incisional hernia repair were included with a median follow-up of 3.2 years. The main indication for incisional hernia repair was the presence of a bulge (60%). Other main reasons for repair were pain (19%) or discomfort (5%). One hundred and thirty-two patients (63%) reported that the overall status of their abdominal wall had improved after the operation. Postoperative symptoms were reported by 133 patients (63%), such as feelings of discomfort, pain and bulging. Twenty percent of patients reported that the overall status of their abdominal wall was the same, and 17% reported a worse status, compared to before the operation. Ten percent of the patients would not opt for operation in hindsight.

Conclusion

This study showed that a majority of the patients after incisional hernia repair still report pain or symptoms such as feelings of discomfort, pain, and bulging of the abdominal wall 3 years after surgery. Embedding patients’ expectations and PROs in the preoperative counseling discussion is needed to improve decision-making in incisional hernia surgery.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10029-021-02477-7.