Adalimumab decreases aortic stiffness independently of its effect in disease activity in patients with rheumatoid arthritis

Vascular effects of biologic and targeted synthetic antirheumatic drugs approved for rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) increases the risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD), with inflammation playing a key role. Biologic and targeted synthetic drugs used to treat RA can induce systemic immunomodulation and may have pleiotropic effects on vascular function, making it crucial to investigate their impact on CVD risk in RA patients.

METHODS

A systematic review of the literature was conducted to investigate the impact of biologic and targeted synthetic treatments approved for RA on various cardiovascular markers, including endothelial function, arterial stiffness, and subclinical atherosclerosis. Our analysis included a search of the MedLine (via PubMed) and Web of Science databases using a pre-determined search strategy. We conducted a narrative synthesis of the included studies due to heterogeneity in study design and outcome measures.

RESULTS

From an initial pool of 647 records, we excluded 327 studies based on their titles and abstracts, and we selected 182 studies for final examination. Ultimately, 58 articles met our inclusion criteria and were included in our systematic review. Our analysis of these studies revealed a positive effect of biologic and targeted synthetic therapies on vascular dysfunction associated with RA. However, the impact of these treatments on subclinical atherosclerosis was inconsistent.

CONCLUSION

Overall, our systematic review provides important insights into the potential cardiovascular benefits of biologic and targeted synthetic treatments for RA by a still unknown mechanism. These findings can inform clinical practice and contribute to our understanding of their possible effects on early vascular pathology. Key Points • Great heterogeneity of methods are used to evaluate the endothelial function and arterial stiffness in patients with RA on biologic and targeted synthetic antirheumatic drugs. • Most studies have shown a considerable improvement in endothelial function and arterial stiffness with TNFi, despite some studies reporting only transient or no improvement. • Anakinra and tocilizumab may have a beneficial effect on vascular function and endothelial injury, as indicated by increased FMD, coronary flow reserve, and reduced levels of biomarkers of endothelial function, while the overall impact of JAKi and rituximab remains inconclusive based on the reviewed studies. • To fully comprehend the distinctions between biologic therapies, more long-term, well-designed clinical trials are necessary using a homogeneous methodology.

Effect of TNF inhibitors on arterial stiffness and intima media thickness in rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Controlling inflammation with tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients is hypothesized to reduce their cardiovascular risk. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis on the effects of TNF inhibitors on arterial stiffness and carotid intima media thickness (IMT) in RA. MEDLINE, EMBASE, clinicaltrials.gov , and WHO Clinical Trials Registry were searched up to September 2021 for randomized controlled trials, prospective cohort studies, and nonrandomized clinical trials evaluating the effects of TNF inhibitors on pulse wave velocity (PWV), augmentation index (AIx), and IMT in RA. A meta-analysis was performed to assess changes of these measures after therapy during different follow-up periods. Risk of bias assessment was performed using an adjusted Downs and Black checklist (INPLASY: 2022-1-0131). Thirty studies were identified from 1436 records, of which 23 were included in the meta-analysis. PWV and AIx showed a decrease after treatment (PWV: mean difference (MD) -0.51 m/s (95% CI: -0.96, -0.06), p=0.027; AIx: MD -0.57% (95% CI: -2.11, 0.96), p=0.463, sensitivity analysis AIx: MD -1.21% (95% CI: -2.60, 0.19), p=0.089). For IMT, there was a slight increase in the first months of follow-up, but this disappeared on the long-term (overall timepoints MD -0.01 mm (95% CI: -0.04, 0.02), p=0.615). Heterogeneity was high in the overall analyses and subgroups with long follow-up periods (≥12 months). The included studies showed mixed results of the effects of TNF inhibitors on the surrogate markers. The pooled results suggest that PWV and AIx decrease over time, while IMT remains stable. This indicates a favorable effect of TNF inhibitors on the cardiovascular disease risk, all the more since these markers also increase with age.

Inflammatory Mediators in Atherosclerotic Vascular Remodeling

Atherosclerotic vascular disease remains the most common cause of ischemia, myocardial infarction, and stroke. Vascular function is determined by structural and functional properties of the arterial vessel wall, which consists of three layers, namely the adventitia, media, and intima. Key cells in shaping the vascular wall architecture and warranting proper vessel function are vascular smooth muscle cells in the arterial media and endothelial cells lining the intima. Pathological alterations of this vessel wall architecture called vascular remodeling can lead to insufficient vascular function and subsequent ischemia and organ damage. One major pathomechanism driving this detrimental vascular remodeling is atherosclerosis, which is initiated by endothelial dysfunction allowing the accumulation of intimal lipids and leukocytes. Inflammatory mediators such as cytokines, chemokines, and modified lipids further drive vascular remodeling ultimately leading to thrombus formation and/or vessel occlusion which can cause major cardiovascular events. Although it is clear that vascular wall remodeling is an elementary mechanism of atherosclerotic vascular disease, the diverse underlying pathomechanisms and its consequences are still insufficiently understood.

Arterial stiffness, the hidden face of cardiovascular risk in autoimmune and chronic inflammatory rheumatic diseases

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Cardiovascular diseases (CVD) are the leading causes of death in chronic inflammatory rheumatic diseases and are not solely explained by the increased prevalence of cardiovascular (CV) risk factors in this population. Arterial stiffness, assessed primarily by pulse wave velocity (PWV) and more indirectly by augmentation index (AIx), is a surrogate marker of CVD that should be considered. The objective of this review was to investigate the relationship between arterial stiffness and chronic inflammatory and/or autoimmune diseases.

METHODS

We performed a systemic literature review of articles published in Medline from January 2012 to April 2020 restricted to English languages and to human adults. We selected relevant articles about the relationship between arterial stiffness and rheumatoid arthritis, systemic lupus erythematosus, psoriasis, Sjogren's syndrome and ankylosing spondylitis. For each selected article, data on PWV and AIx were extracted and factors that may have an impact on arterial stiffness were identified.

RESULTS

A total of 214 references were identified through database searching and 82 of them were retained for analysis. Arterial stiffness is increased in chronic inflammatory and autoimmune diseases. Traditional CV risk factors such as hypertension and dyslipidemia accentuate this relationship. Current data are insufficient to determine whether disease activity significantly influences arterial stiffness, whereas disease duration seems rather critical. TNF-alpha inhibitors and cardiorespiratory fitness tend to decrease arterial stiffness. Finally, increased arterial stiffness leads to diastolic dysfunction, which is the main mechanism of heart failure in chronic inflammatory rheumatic diseases.

CONCLUSION

CV risk assessment in chronic inflammatory and autoimmune diseases should also rely on PWV and AIx.

Effect of Biologics on Cardiovascular Inflammation: Mechanistic Insights and Risk Reduction

It is increasingly recognized that atherosclerosis and consequently cardiovascular disease (CVD) are closely linked with inflammatory processes. The latter is in the center of the pathogenic mechanism underlying autoimmune rheumatic diseases (ARD). It follows then, that optimal control of inflammation in ARDs may lead to a decrease of the accompanied CVD risk. Major trials (eg, CANTOS, CIRT), aimed at examining the possible benefits of immunomodulatory treatments in CVD, demonstrated conflicting results. On the other hand, substantial evidence is accumulating about the possible beneficial effects of biologic disease modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) in patients with ARDs, particularly those with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). It seems that bDMARDs (some more than others) alter the lipid profile in RA patients but do not adversely affect, in most cases, the TC/HDL ratio. Favorable effects are noted for arterial stiffness and endothelial function. This is reflected in the lower risk for CVD events, seen in observational studies of RA patients treated with bDMARDs. It should be stressed that more data exist for the TNF-inhibitors than for other bDMARDs, such as tocilizumab, abatacept and rituximab. As regards the spondyloarthropathies (SpA), data are less robust. For TNF-inhibitors, effects appear to be on par with those seen in RA but no conclusions can be drawn for newer biologic drugs used in SpA (eg, IL-17 blockers). Finally, there is accumulating evidence for a beneficial effect of immunosuppressive treatment in cardiac inflammation and function in several ARDs. Introduction of newer therapeutic options in clinical practice seem to have a positive impact on CVD in the setting of ARD. This is probably due to better control of inflammation, but direct improvement in vascular pathology is also a valid hypothesis. Most data are derived from observational studies and, therefore, randomized controlled trials are needed to assess the possible favorable effect of bDMARDs on CVD outcomes.

Biologics and atherosclerotic cardiovascular risk in rheumatoid arthritis: a review of evidence and mechanistic insights

Introduction: Cardiovascular disease is a leading comorbidity in rheumatoid arthritis. Timely introduction of biologic therapies in a treat-to-target approach has optimized disease-related outcomes and attenuated accrual of comorbidities, including cardiovascular risk.Areas covered: A literature search in MEDLINE (via PubMed) was performed between January 2009 and November 2020. This manuscript explores recent developments in atherosclerotic cardiovascular risk in RA compared with non-RA individuals; it synopsizes differences in vascular function and inflammation, prevalence, burden, vulnerability, and progression of atherosclerotic plaque and their underlying cellular and molecular mechanisms. Finally, it reviews the recent literature on cardioprotective benefits of biologics and draws mechanistic links with inhibition of new plaque formation, stabilization of high-risk lesions and improvement in endothelial function, arterial stiffness, lipid metabolism, and traditional cardiac risk factors.Expert opinion: Increasing evidence points to a solid cardioprotective influence of earlier, longer, and ongoing use of biologic treatments in RA. Nevertheless, the precise mechanistic effects of plaque progression and remodeling, vascular stiffness, endothelial dysfunction, lipid metabolism, and traditional cardiac risk factors are less rigorously characterized.

Do anti-tumour necrosis factor-α biologics affect subclinical measures of atherosclerosis and arteriosclerosis? A systematic review

AIMS

Inflammatory cytokines, particularly tumour necrosis factor-α (TNFα), are thought to promote arterial disease through a variety of mechanisms leading to arteriosclerosis and atherosclerosis. We reviewed the existing evidence of the effect of anti-TNFα treatment on arteriosclerosis and atherosclerosis in chronic inflammatory disease.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review of studies examining effects of monoclonal antibodies against TNFα on subclinical measures of arteriosclerosis (arterial pulse wave velocity) and atherosclerosis (endothelial function measured by flow-mediated dilation or forearm blood flow responses to endothelium-dependent agonists, and common carotid intima-media thickness).

RESULTS

We identified 60 studies (of 854 potential studies identified using a systematic search) in which effects of anti-TNFα biologics on these measures were assessed in patients receiving anti-TNFα therapy for a clinical indication (usually an inflammatory disease such as an inflammatory arthritis, psoriasis or inflammatory bowel disease). Of these, only 6 were randomised clinical controlled trials. Whilst many observational studies and noncontrolled studies reported positive findings, positive finding were reported in only 1 of 6 randomised clinical controlled trials.

CONCLUSIONS

There is no strong evidence for an effect of anti-TNFα biologics on the subclinical measures of arteriosclerosis or atherosclerosis examined in this review. This does not exclude a positive effect of TNFα biologics on clinical outcomes through alternate pathways including those induced by remission of the primary inflammatory disease.

Atherosclerosis in Rheumatoid Arthritis: Promoters and Opponents

Substantial epidemiological data identified cardiovascular (CV) diseases as a main cause of mortality in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). In light of this, RA patients may benefit from additional CV risk screening and more intensive prevention strategies. Nevertheless, current algorithms for CV risk stratification still remain tailored on general population and are burdened by a significant underestimation of CV risk in RA patients. Acute CV events in patients with RA are largely related to an accelerated atherosclerosis. As pathophysiological features of atherosclerosis overlap those occurring in the inflamed RA synovium, the understanding of those common pathways represents an urgent need and a leading challenge for CV prevention in patients with RA. Genetic background, metabolic status, gut microbiome, and systemic inflammation have been also suggested as additional key pro-atherosclerotic factors. The aim of this narrative review is to update the current knowledge about pathophysiology of atherogenesis in RA patients and potential anti-atherosclerotic effects of disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs.

Aortic wall stiffness as a side-effect of anti-cancer medication

Introduction: Malignancies and cardiovascular disease are the two leading causes of mortality worldwide. There is a growing concern that anti-cancer drugs may lead to increased cardiovascular morbidity among cancer survivors. This may be the result of direct effects of the cancer treatment on heart function, or due to an indirect acceleration of atherosclerosis.Areas covered: We searched two bibliographic databases [PubMed, Scopus] and one full-text database (Google Scholar) for publications on chemotherapy and arterial stiffness since 1970. Anthracyclines, alkylating agents and tyrosine kinase inhibitors seem to affect arterial elastic properties. These effects can be non-reversible and may appear after treatment termination. Monoclonal antibodies may induce either a temporary increase or no change on arterial stiffness of patients with malignancies. Anti-microtubule agents and antimetabolites have not been extensively studied so far.Expert opinion: This literature review suggests that certain anticancer medications may impair arterial stiffness, and that assessment of arterial elastic properties before and after initiation of anti-neoplasmatic therapy may be clinically useful in order to develop protective strategies against chemotherapy-induced vascular effects. Further research is warranted to confirm the effects of anti-cancer agents on arterial stiffness, as well as their potential clinical implications. Future research lies in finding new targeted biomarkers identifying arterial stiffness such as micro RNAs while imaging techniques could also be implemented in assessment of vascular toxicity.

Repurposing existing drugs for cardiovascular risk management: a focus on methotrexate

About 20% of patients with a history of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease will experience further cardiovascular events despite maximal pharmacological treatment with cardioprotective drugs. This highlights the presence of residual cardiovascular risk in a significant proportion of patients and the need for novel, more effective therapies. These therapies should ideally target different pathophysiological pathways involved in the onset and the progression of atherosclerosis, particularly the inflammatory and immune pathways. Methotrexate is a first-line disease-modifying antirheumatic drug that is widely used for the management of autoimmune and chronic inflammatory disorders. There is some in vitro and in vivo evidence that methotrexate might exert a unique combination of anti-inflammatory, blood pressure lowering, and vasculoprotective effects. Pending the results of large prospective studies investigating surrogate end-points as well as morbidity and mortality, repurposing methotrexate for cardiovascular risk management might represent a cost-effective strategy with immediate public health benefits. This review discusses the current challenges in the management of cardiovascular disease; the available evidence on the effects of methotrexate on inflammation, blood pressure, and surrogate markers of arterial function; suggestions for future research directions; and practical considerations with the use of methotrexate in this context.

ACCORDING TO THE MATERIALS OF THE 2015/2016 NEW EUROPEAN LEAGUE AGAINST RHEUMATISM (EULAR) GUIDELINES FOR REDUCING CARDIOVASCULAR RISK IN PATIENTS WITH INFLAMMATORY ARTHRITIS: GENERAL CHARACTERIZATION AND DISCUSSION PROBLEMS

According to the materials of the 2015/2016 new European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) guidelines for reducing cardiovascular risk in patients with inflammatory arthritis. The authors identify three main principles of prevention of cardiovascular diseases in rheumatoid arthritis and other chronic inflammatory arthritis and provide a general characterization of the guidelines, by reviewing the discussion problems.

The effect of TNF-a antagonists on aortic stiffness and wave reflections: a meta-analysis

Patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) have higher aortic stiffness and cardiovascular risk. Tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-a) antagonists reduce inflammation in RA and are indicated for the treatment of patients with severe active rheumatoid disease. However, it is debatable if they have favorable effects on cardiovascular health. The present meta-analysis evaluates the effect of TNF-a antagonists on aortic stiffness and wave reflections, predictors of cardiovascular events and mortality, in RA patients. A search of PubMed, Cohrane, and Embase databases was conducted to identify studies into the effect of TNF-a antagonists on aortic stiffness in RA patients. Aortic stiffness and wave reflections were assessed by aortic (carotid-femoral [cf]) pulse wave velocity (PWV) and augmentation index (AIx), respectively. cfPWV significantly improved following TNF-a antagonist treatment (mean change: -0.53 m/s, 95% CI: -0.833 to -0.218, p = 0.001), independently of age and clinical response to treatment. A more prominent reduction in cfPWV was associated with etanercept/adalimumab (mean difference: -0.62 m/s, 95% CI: -0.968 to -0.272 m/s, p < 0.001) versus infliximab (mean difference: -0.193 m/s, 95% CI: -0.847 to 0.462 m/s, p = 0.564). TNF-a antagonist treatment induced a significant improvement in AIx (mean change: -1.48%, 95% CI: -2.89 to -0.078%, p = 0.039), but this reduction was influenced by age and clinical response to treatment. The balance of evidence suggests that TNF-a antagonists may have a beneficial effect on aortic stiffness and, therefore, on cardiovascular risk. However, larger, longitudinal studies are warranted to confirm such findings.

Practical Management of Cardiovascular Comorbidities in Rheumatoid Arthritis

Cardiovascular (CV) comorbidities are a frequent extra-articular manifestation of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Cardiovascular disease (CVD) with accelerated atherosclerosis is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with RA. Subclinical CVD may be present since the early phase of RA. Not only traditional but also non-traditional CV risk factors are involved in the pathogenesis of RA-related CVD. Due to the lack of specifically designed randomized clinical trials, it is still unclear which tools to use to perform CV risk assessment, how to interpret the results and which interventions are appropriate in RA patients both to prevent and to manage CVD. Based on the available evidence, we propose a practical approach.

Cardiovascular Risk Factors and Disease Characteristics Are Consistently Associated with Arterial Function in Rheumatoid Arthritis

Objective.

Arterial properties influence cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk. We identified potential determinants of arterial function in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

Methods.

Relationships of traditional cardiovascular risk factors and RA characteristics with arterial stiffness (pulse wave velocity), wave reflection (augmentation index, reflected wave pressure, and reflection magnitude), and pressure pulsatility (central systolic and pulse pressure, peripheral pulse pressure, pulse pressure amplification, and forward wave pressure) were identified in multivariable backward regression models among 177 patients without established CVD (118 white, 32 Asian, 22 black, 5 mixed ancestry).

Results.

Recorded characteristics explained 37% (pulse wave velocity) to 71% (reflected wave pressure) of the variability in arterial function. These factors were particularly associated with wave reflection and pressure pulsatility: RA duration (p = 0.04), rheumatoid factor status (p = 0.01 to 0.03), leukocyte counts (p = 0.02 to 0.05), and total cholesterol (p < 0.01 to 0.03). Body mass index (p < 0.01 to 0.02) and insulin resistance (p < 0.01 to 0.01) were related to reduced wave reflection and peripheral pulse pressure. Exercise (p = 0.02) and alcohol consumption (p < 0.01) were associated with increased pulse pressure amplification and decreased peripheral pulse pressure, respectively. Tumor necrosis factor-α inhibition (p < 0.01) was related to reduced pulse wave velocity, and tetracycline use (p = 0.02) to decreased peripheral pulse pressure.

Conclusion.

Traditional cardiovascular risk factors and disease characteristics are consistently associated with vascular hemodynamic alterations in RA. The relative effect of arterial stiffness, wave reflection, and pressure pulsatility on CVD risk in RA needs further study.

EULAR recommendations for cardiovascular disease risk management in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and other forms of inflammatory joint disorders: 2015/2016 update

Patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and other inflammatory joint disorders (IJD) have increased cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk compared with the general population. In 2009, the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) taskforce recommended screening, identification of CVD risk factors and CVD risk management largely based on expert opinion. In view of substantial new evidence, an update was conducted with the aim of producing CVD risk management recommendations for patients with IJD that now incorporates an increasing evidence base. A multidisciplinary steering committee (representing 13 European countries) comprised 26 members including patient representatives, rheumatologists, cardiologists, internists, epidemiologists, a health professional and fellows. Systematic literature searches were performed and evidence was categorised according to standard guidelines. The evidence was discussed and summarised by the experts in the course of a consensus finding and voting process. Three overarching principles were defined. First, there is a higher risk for CVD in patients with RA, and this may also apply to ankylosing spondylitis and psoriatic arthritis. Second, the rheumatologist is responsible for CVD risk management in patients with IJD. Third, the use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and corticosteroids should be in accordance with treatment-specific recommendations from EULAR and Assessment of Spondyloarthritis International Society. Ten recommendations were defined, of which one is new and six were changed compared with the 2009 recommendations. Each designated an appropriate evidence support level. The present update extends on the evidence that CVD risk in the whole spectrum of IJD is increased. This underscores the need for CVD risk management in these patients. These recommendations are defined to provide assistance in CVD risk management in IJD, based on expert opinion and scientific evidence.

The count of tender rather than swollen joints correlates with aortic stiffness in patients with rheumatoid arthritis

BACKGROUND

Patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) are at a higher cardiovascular (CV) risk in comparison to the general population. CV risk associates closely with aortic stiffness. Aim of this exploration was therefore to evaluate aortic stiffness in patients with RA and to examine its association with various RA associated parameters as well as with traditional CV risk factors.

METHODS

Measurements of carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (cfPWV) were analyzed retrospectively in 38 RA patients and 25 controls. We investigated the statistical difference between cfPWV values in the two groups. Furthermore, we analyzed the associations of cfPWV with laboratory and clinical RA parameters including Disease Activity Score 28 and its components, rheumatoid factor, cyclic citrullinated peptide antibodies, antinuclear antibodies and RA duration. Finally, we explored the relationship of cfPWV with traditional CV risk factors in the RA group.

RESULTS

cfPWV was not significantly higher in RA patients in comparison to controls in an adjusted statistical model for confounding factors [-0.587 95 % CI (-1.38 to 0.201), p = 0.144]. Among RA patients there was a statistically significant correlation of cfPWV with age (rho = 0.544, p = 0.001) and the count of tender joints [0.051 95 % CI (0.008-0.207), p = 0.034]. Finally, C-reactive protein associated only marginally with cfPWV [0.105 95 % CI (-0.410 to 0.003), p = 0.053].

CONCLUSIONS

In RA patients the number of tender, rather than swollen joints correlates with stiffness of the aorta, as measured through cfPWV. Therefore, RA associated joint pain might play a role in the development of aortic stiffness and thus increase CV risk.

Targeting inflammation in the prevention of cardiovascular disease in patients with inflammatory arthritis

Patients with inflammatory arthritis have increased risk of cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) compared with the general population. Subclinical carotid atherosclerosis and increased arterial stiffness are also common in these patients, which may serve as surrogate end points for cardiovascular (CV) events in clinical trials. Although exact mechanisms are still unclear, persistent systemic inflammation in patients with inflammatory arthritis may contribute to the development of CVD. Dysregulated innate immunity pathways in these patients may also play a role in accelerating atherosclerosis. During the last decade, effective suppression of inflammation by biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs has improved the disease outcome dramatically in patients with inflammatory arthritis. Growing evidence suggests that antitumor necrosis factor (TNF) therapy may prevent CVD in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Nonetheless, data on non-TNF biologics are limited. Whether anti-TNF therapy may prevent CVD in patients with spondyloarthritis also remained unclear. In this review, we summarized the effect of both anti-TNF and non-TNF biologics on the CV system, including traditional CVD risk factors, endothelial function, arterial stiffness, subclinical atherosclerosis, and clinical CVD in patients with inflammatory arthritis.

Rheumatoid arthritis is sufficient to cause atheromatosis but not arterial stiffness or hypertrophy in the absence of classical cardiovascular risk factors

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) associates with increased cardiovascular disease (CVD) mortality thought to be due to accelerated arterial disease. Different components of arterial disease, namely, atheromatosis, arteriosclerosis, and arterial wall hypertrophy, are differentially affected by classical CVD risk factors, which are highly prevalent in these patients. We hypothesized that RA disease per se may also differentially affect these components. Of 267 consecutive RA patients, we selected specifically those who were free of established CVD and CVD risk factors (18 %); of them, 41 patients (36 women, 49 ± 13 years) could be matched effectively 1:1 for age and gender to healthy controls. Atheromatosis was assessed by the presence of carotid and/or femoral artery plaques, arteriosclerosis by pulse wave velocity and local wall elasticity, and arterial hypertrophy by intima-media thickness and cross-sectional area. More patients had atheromatic plaques than controls (29 vs. 12 %, p = 0.039), and multiarterial atheromatosis was more prevalent in RA (22 vs. 2 %, p = 0.026). Accelerated atheromatosis was not associated with rheumatoid factor, or anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide (CCP) autoantibody status. Plaque burden in patients with less than 5 years disease duration (aged 41 ± 13 years) was comparable to their matched controls. In contrast, all indices of arterial stiffness and hypertrophy were similar between controls and RA patients, even in those with long-standing disease. RA per se is sufficient to cause atheromatosis in the absence of classical CVD risk factors, but has minimal, if any, effect on arteriosclerosis and arterial wall hypertrophy.