Genetic panel screening in patients with clinically unclassified systemic autoinflammatory diseases

Endoscopic characterization of gastrointestinal manifestations in children with undifferentiated recurrent fever

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS

Systemic autoinflammatory diseases are characterized by recurrent or chronic inflammation, and monogenic forms are increasingly defined. However, a group of patients without genetic diagnosis is called the syndrome of undifferentiated recurrent fever (SURF). This study analyzed the clinical and endoscopic features of patients with SURF presenting with gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between 2019 and 2022, GI endoscopy were performed in patients with SURF who presented with GI symptoms. Clinical, genetic, laboratory, and endoscopy findings were analyzed.

RESULTS

Fifteen patients were included in the study, eight (53.3 %) were girls. The mean age was 10.5 ± 5.80 years, and the median age at symptom onset was 4 (0.3-16) years. All patients experienced fever and abdominal pain. Thirteen patients (86.7 %) experienced diarrhea, 11 (73.3 %) reported myalgia, and 10 (66.7 %) had joint involvement. Lymphoid follicles in the terminal ileum mucosa were detected in 10 patients (66.7 %), and nodular lymphoid hyperplasia in the terminal ileum was the histopathological finding in 12 patients (80 %).

CONCLUSIONS

The current study found that patients with SURF experiencing gastrointestinal symptoms have excessive lymph node formation in the terminal ileal mucosa due to an exaggerated inflammatory response. This may be the cause of their GI symptoms.

TNFRSF11A variants contribute to systemic autoinflammatory diseases: A case series of 12 patients

BACKGROUND

Limited evidence suggests that variants in TNFRSF11A gene, encoding RANK, may contribute to systemic autoinflammatory disease (SAID).

AIM/METHODS

To estimate the prevalence of TNFRSF11A variants in a cohort of patients with SAIDs screened for 26 related genes and describe the disease phenotypic expression.

RESULTS

A total of 12 out of 167 patients, 7 males, aged (median) 38 years at disease onset, yielded at least one TNFRSF11A rare variant. All patients carried a coexisting variant in at least one other SAID-related gene, most frequently MEFV (6 patients), but also TNFRSF1A, NOD2, NLRP3, NLRP7, MVK, IL36RN, RBCK1, PLCG2 and PSMB8. SAID episodes lasting (median) 9 days manifested with high grade fever (91%), myalgias (75%), malaise (67%), serositis (58%), arthralgias/arthritis (58%), gastrointestinal involvement (33%), and rash (25%), and responded to corticosteroids. The most common initial clinical diagnosis was TNF-associated periodic fever syndrome (TRAPS), which was, however, confirmed, in only one patient. The emergence of MEFV variations supported the diagnosis of atypical Familial Mediterranean Fever in two cases, whereas the diagnosis of Yao syndrome was speculated in two patients with NOD2 variants. The presence of atypical disease and the inability of defining diagnosis in the remaining 7 patients, supported the possible involvement of TNFRSF11A variants in the phenotypic expression of SAIDs.

CONCLUSION

TNFRSF11A variants, occurring in 7% of SAID patients always in combination with other SAID-related gene variants, contribute to the development of an autoinflammatory syndrome resembling to TRAPS. Additional studies to confirm novel pathogenic SAID pathways are clearly warranted.

Disease phenotypes in adult patients with suspected undifferentiated autoinflammatory diseases and PFAPA syndrome: Clinical and therapeutic implications

BACKGROUND

Undifferentiated autoinflammatory diseases are characterized by recurrent or persistent fever, usually combined with other inflammatory manifestations, and negative or inconclusive genetic studies for monogenic autoinflammatory disorders.

AIMS

To define and characterize disease phenotypes in adult patients diagnosed in an adult reference center with undifferentiated autoinflammatory diseases, and to analyze the efficacy of the drugs used in order to provide practical diagnostic and therapeutic recommendations.

METHODS

Retrospective study (2015-2022) of patients with undifferentiated autoinflammatory diseases among all patients visited in our reference center. Demographic, clinical, laboratory features and detailed therapeutic information was collected.

RESULTS

Of the 334 patients with a suspected autoinflammatory disease, 134 (40%) patients (61% women) were initially diagnosed with undifferentiated autoinflammatory diseases. Mean age at disease onset and at diagnosis was 28.7 and 37.7 years, respectively. In 90 (67.2%) patients, symptoms started during adulthood. Forty-four (32.8%) patients met diagnostic/classification criteria for adult periodic fever with aphthous stomatitis, pharyngitis and cervical adenitis (PFAPA) syndrome. In the remaining patients, four additional phenotypes were differentiated according to the predominant manifestations: a) Predominantly fever phenotype (n = 18; 13.4%); b) Predominantly abdominal/pleuritic pain phenotype (n = 9; 6.7%); c) Predominantly pericarditis phenotype (n = 18; 13.4%), and d) Complex syndrome phenotype (n = 45; 33.6%). Prednisone (mainly on demand), colchicine and anakinra were the drugs commonly used. Overall, complete responses were achieved with prednisone in 41.3%, colchicine in 40.2%, and anakinra in 58.3% of patients in whom they were used. By phenotypes, prednisone on demand was more effective in adult PFAPA syndrome and colchicine in patients with the abdominal/pleuritic pain pattern and PFAPA syndrome. Patients with complex syndrome achieved complete responses with prednisone (21.9%), colchicine (25.7%) and anakinra (44.4%), and were the group more often requiring additional immunosuppressive drugs.

CONCLUSIONS

The analysis of the largest single-center series of adult patients with undifferentiated autoinflammatory diseases identified and characterized different disease phenotypes and their therapeutic approaches. This study is expected to contribute to increase the awareness of physicians for an early identification of these conditions, and to provide the best known therapeutic options.

Unravelling the clinical heterogeneity of undefined recurrent fever over time in the European registries on Autoinflammation

BACKGROUND

Systemic autoinflammatory disorders (SAIDs) represent a growing spectrum of diseases characterized by dysregulation of the innate immune system. The most common pediatric autoinflammatory fever syndrome, Periodic Fever, Aphthous Stomatitis, Pharyngitis, Adenitis (PFAPA), has well defined clinical diagnostic criteria, but there is a subset of patients who do not meet these criteria and are classified as undefined autoinflammatory diseases (uAID). This project, endorsed by PRES, supported by the EMERGE fellowship program, aimed to analyze the evolution of symptoms in recurrent fevers without molecular diagnosis in the context of undifferentiated AIDs, focusing on PFAPA and syndrome of undifferentiated recurrent fever (SURF), using data from European AID registries.

METHODS

Data of patients with PFAPA, SURF and uSAID were collected from 3 registries including detailed epidemiological, demographic and clinical data, results of the genetic testing and additional laboratory investigations with retrospective application of the modified Marshall and PRINTO/Eurofever classification criteria on the cohort of PFAPA patients and preliminary SURF criteria on uSAID/SURF patients.

RESULTS

Clinical presentation of PFAPA is variable and some patients did not fit the conventional PFAPA criteria and exhibit different symptoms. Some patients did not meet the criteria for either PFAPA or SURF, highlighting the heterogeneity within these groups. The study also explored potential overlaps between PFAPA and SURF/uAID, revealing that some patients exhibited symptoms characteristic of both conditions, emphasizing the need for more precise classification criteria.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with recurrent fevers without molecular diagnoses represent a clinically heterogeneous group. Improved classification criteria are needed for both PFAPA and SURF/uAID to accurately identify and manage these patients, ultimately improving clinical outcomes.

The expanding clinical spectrum of autoinflammatory diseases with NOD2 variants: a case series and literature review

Objective

To assess the impact conferred by NOD2 variants on the clinical spectrum of patients with systemic autoinflammatory diseases (SAIDs) in Greece.

Methods

Consecutive patients (n=167) with confirmed SAIDs who underwent screening by next generation sequencing (NGS) targeting 26 SAID-associated genes, and carried at least one NOD2 gene variant, were retrospectively studied. The demographic, clinical and laboratory parameters were recorded.

Results

In total, 24 rare NOD2 variants in 23/167 patients (14%) were detected. Notably, 18 patients had at least one co-existing variant in 13 genes other than NOD2. Nine patients had juvenile- and 14 adult-onset disease. All patients presented with symptoms potentially induced by the NOD2 variants. In particular, the candidate clinical diagnosis was Yao syndrome (YAOS) in 12 patients (7% of the whole SAID cohort). The clinical spectrum of patients with YAOS (mean episode duration 8 days) was fever (n=12/12), articular symptoms (n=8), gastrointestinal symptoms (n=7; abdominal pain/bloating in 7; diarrhea in 4; oral ulcers in 3), serositis (n=7), and rash (n=5), while the inflammatory markers were elevated in all but one patient. Most of these patients showed a poor response to nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (n=7/9), colchicine (n=6/8) and/or anti-TNF treatment (n=3/4), while a complete response was observed in 6/10 patients receiving steroids and 3/5 on anti-IL1 treatment. Another 8 patients were diagnosed with either FMF (n=6) or PFAPA syndrome (n=2) presenting with prominent diarrhea (n=7), oral ulcers (n=2), periorbital swelling and sicca-like symptoms (n=1), or maculopapular rash (n=1). One patient had a clinically undefined SAID, albeit characterized by oral ulcers and diarrhea. Finally, one patient presented with chronic relapsing urticaria with periorbital edema and inflammatory markers, and another one had a Crohn-like syndrome with good response to anti-IL-1 but refractory to anti-TNF treatment.

Conclusion

NOD2 variants were detected in 1 out of 7 SAID patients and seem to have an impact on disease phenotype and treatment response. Further studies should validate combined molecular and clinical data to better understand these distinct nosological entities.

The assessment of autoinflammatory disease classification criteria (Eurofever/PRINTO) in a real-life cohort

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study was to determine the sensitivity and specificity rates of Eurofever/PRINTO autoinflammatory recurrent fever classification criteria with real-life data in patients with an autoinflammatory disease.

METHODS

A total of 119 patients were included in the study. Based on clinical symptoms, they were divided into four subgroups: cryopyrin-associated periodic syndromes (CAPS), TNF receptor-associated periodic syndrome (TRAPS), mevalonate kinase deficiency (MKD), and syndrome of undifferentiated recurrent fever (SURF) using the Eurofever/PRINTO clinical classification criteria. In the last step, the patients were re-evaluated in the light of genetic results and their final diagnosis was reached.

RESULTS

A total of 119 patients, including 37 CAPS, 13 TRAPS, 8 MKD, 39 SURF, 14 NLRP12-related autoinflammatory disease (NLRP12-AID), and 8 familial Mediterranean fever (FMF) patients were evaluated in the study. While the sensitivity of the new clinical Eurofever/PRINTO criteria was 48% for CAPS, 77% for TRAPS, 87.5%for MKD, and the specificity of the clinical criteria was 86% for CAPS, 85% for TRAPS, and 60% for MKD. The sensitivity of the new mixed (genetic plus clinical variables) Eurofever/PRINTO criteria was 27% for CAPS, 61% forTRAPS, 85% for MKD, and the specificity of the mixed criteria for each group was 100%.

CONCLUSION

We found the sensitivity of the Eurofever/PRINTO classification criteria to be low as genotypic changes between populations cause phenotypic differences. For this reason, we think that patient-based evaluation is correct rather than standard classification criteria in real life. Key-points • In systemic autoinflammatory diseases, common variants in the populations may alter the phenotype, and making it difficult to classify some patients with the current classification criteria. • In populations with common genetic variants, the classification criteria should be modified according to the clinical phenotype.

Systematic genetic analysis of pediatric patients with autoinflammatory diseases

Monogenic autoinflammatory diseases (AID) encompass a growing group of inborn errors of the innate immune system causing unprovoked or exaggerated systemic inflammation. Diagnosis of monogenic AID requires an accurate description of the patients' phenotype, and the identification of highly penetrant genetic variants in single genes is pivotal. We performed whole exome sequencing (WES) of 125 pediatric patients with suspected monogenic AID in a routine genetic diagnostic setting. Datasets were analyzed in a step-wise approach to identify the most feasible diagnostic strategy. First, we analyzed a virtual gene panel including 13 genes associated with known AID and, if no genetic diagnosis was established, we then analyzed a virtual panel including 542 genes published by the International Union of Immunological Societies associated including all known inborn error of immunity (IEI). Subsequently, WES data was analyzed without pre-filtering for known AID/IEI genes. Analyzing 13 genes yielded a definite diagnosis in 16.0% (n = 20). The diagnostic yield was increased by analyzing 542 genes to 20.8% (n = 26). Importantly, expanding the analysis to WES data did not increase the diagnostic yield in our cohort, neither in single WES analysis, nor in trio-WES analysis. The study highlights that the cost- and time-saving analysis of virtual gene panels is sufficient to rapidly confirm the differential diagnosis in pediatric patients with AID. WES data or trio-WES data analysis as a first-tier diagnostic analysis in patients with suspected monogenic AID is of limited benefit.

Efficacy of anakinra treatment in pediatric rheumatic diseases: Our single-center experience

Objectives

This study aims to present our experience on anakinra, a recombinant interleukin-1 (IL-1) receptor antagonist, and efficacy results in pediatric rheumatic diseases in our clinic.

Patients and methods

Between July 1^st, 2016 and July 1^st, 2020, a total of 33 pediatric patients (18 males, 15 females; mean age: 6±3.4 years; range 4 to 13 years) with pediatric rheumatic diseases who were treated with anakinra were retrospectively analyzed. The patients with over one-month treatment period and followed for at least one year were included. Demographic and clinical findings, outcomes, adverse events, prior and/or additional treatments were collected at baseline, at 3 and 12 months of therapy.

Results

There were 33 patients with different pediatric rheumatic diseases (11 with systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis [sJIA] complicated by macrophage activation syndrome [MAS], six with hyperimmunoglobulin-D syndrome, five with cryopyrin-associated periodic syndrome, five with familial Mediterranean fever, four with idiopathic recurrent pericarditis, one with NLRP12-associated periodic fever syndrome and one with unclassified systemic autoinflammatory disease), in the study group. The complete response was observed 69.7% of patients, partial response in 24.2%, and no response in 6.1% at three months of treatment. Inactive disease status was achieved in 45.5% of the patients with remission-on medication and 18.2% of the patients with remission-off medication at the end of a year. Anakinra was switched to other biological treatments in 51.5% of patients (n=17). Biological switch to canakinumab and tocilizumab were observed in 70.6% and 29.4% of these patients. Except for local reactions (n=2), no adverse events were observed in any of the patients.

Conclusion

Anakinra appears to be a promising treatment alternative owing to its rapid effect as a result of its short half-life in autoinflammatory conditions. While short-term therapy seems to be sufficient for the sJIA complicated by MAS, the patients with systemic autoinflammatory diseases maintenance a more anakinra-dependent course.

Genotyping of familial Mediterranean fever gene (MEFV)-Single nucleotide polymorphism-Comparison of Nanopore with conventional Sanger sequencing

Background

Through continuous innovation and improvement, Nanopore sequencing has become a powerful technology. Because of its fast processing time, low cost, and ability to generate long reads, this sequencing technique would be particularly suitable for clinical diagnostics. However, its raw data accuracy is inferior in contrast to other sequencing technologies. This constraint still results in limited use of Nanopore sequencing in the field of clinical diagnostics and requires further validation and IVD certification.

Methods

We evaluated the performance of latest Nanopore sequencing in combination with a dedicated data-analysis pipeline for single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) genotyping of the familial Mediterranean fever gene (MEFV) by amplicon sequencing of 47 clinical samples. Mutations in MEFV are associated with Mediterranean fever, a hereditary periodic fever syndrome. Conventional Sanger sequencing, which is commonly applied in clinical genetic diagnostics, was used as a reference method.

Results

Nanopore sequencing enabled the sequencing of 10 target regions within MEFV with high read depth (median read depth 7565x) in all samples and identified a total of 435 SNPs in the whole sample collective, of which 29 were unique. Comparison of both sequencing workflows showed a near perfect agreement with no false negative calls. Precision, Recall, and F1-Score of the Nanopore sequencing workflow were > 0.99, respectively.

Conclusions

These results demonstrated the great potential of current Nanopore sequencing for application in clinical diagnostics, at least for SNP genotyping by amplicon sequencing. Other more complex applications, especially structural variant identification, require further in-depth clinical validation.

Comparison of the clinical diagnostic criteria and the results of the next-generation sequence gene panel in patients with monogenic systemic autoinflammatory diseases

INTRODUCTION/OBJECTIVES

The clinicians initially prefer to define patients with the systemic autoinflammatory disease (SAID)'s based on recommended clinical classification criteria; then, they confirm the diagnosis with genetic testing. We aimed to compare the initial phenotypic diagnoses of the patients who were followed up with the preliminary diagnosis of a monogenic SAID, and the genotypic results obtained from the next-generation sequence (NGS) panel.

METHOD

Seventy-one patients with the preliminary diagnosis of cryopyrin-associated periodic fever syndrome (CAPS), mevalonate kinase deficiency (MKD), or tumor necrosis factor-alpha receptor-associated periodic fever syndrome (TRAPS) were included in the study. The demographic data, clinical findings, laboratory results, and treatments were recorded. All patients were examined by NGS panel analysis including 16 genes. The genetic results were compared with the initial Federici score to determine whether they were compatible with each other.

RESULTS

Thirty patients were initially classified as MKD, 22 as CAPS, and 19 as TRAPS. The frequency of clinical manifestations was urticarial rash 57.7%, diarrhea 49.2%, abdominal pain 47.8%, arthralgia 45%, oral aphthae 43.6%, myalgia 32.3%, tonsillitis 28.1%, and conjunctivitis 25.3%, respectively. After NGS gene panel screening, 13 patients were diagnosed with CAPS, 8 with MKD, 7 with familial Mediterranean fever, 5 with TRAPS, and 2 with NLRP12-associated periodic syndrome. The remaining 36 patients were genetically identified as undefined SAID since they were not classified as one of the defined SAIDs after the result of the NGS panel.

CONCLUSIONS

We have demonstrated that clinical diagnostic criteria may not always be sufficient to establish the correct diagnosis. There is still low accordance between clinical diagnoses and molecular analyses. In the case of a patient with a preliminary diagnosis of a monogenic SAID with the negative result of target gene analysis, other autoinflammatory diseases should also be kept in mind in the differential diagnosis. Key Points • Monogenic autoinflammatory diseases can present with different clinical manifestations. • The clinical diagnostic criteria may not always be sufficient to reach the correct diagnosis in autoinflammatory diseases. • In the case of a patient with a preliminary diagnosis of a monogenic SAID with the negative result of target gene analysis, other autoinflammatory diseases should be kept in mind in the differential diagnosis.

Syndrome of Undifferentiated Recurrent Fever (SURF): An Emerging Group of Autoinflammatory Recurrent Fevers

Syndrome of undifferentiated recurrent fever (SURF) is a heterogeneous group of autoinflammatory diseases (AID) characterized by self-limiting episodes of systemic inflammation without a confirmed molecular diagnosis, not fulfilling the criteria for periodic fever, aphthous stomatitis, pharyngitis and adenopathy (PFAPA) syndrome. In this review, we focused on the studies enrolling patients suspected of AID and genotyped them with next generation sequencing technologies in order to describe the clinical manifestations and treatment response of published cohorts of patients with SURF. We also propose a preliminary set of indications for the clinical suspicion of SURF that could help in everyday clinical practice.