Non-anti-TNF biologic agents are associated with slower worsening of interstitial lung disease secondary to rheumatoid arthritis

Korean Guidelines for Diagnosis and Management of Interstitial Lung Diseases: Connective Tissue Disease Associated Interstitial Lung Disease

Connective tissue disease (CTD), comprising a range of autoimmune disorders, is often accompanied by lung involvement, which can lead to life-threatening complications. The primary types of CTDs that manifest as interstitial lung disease (ILD) include rheumatoid arthritis, systemic sclerosis, Sjögren's syndrome, mixed CTD, idiopathic inflammatory myopathies, and systemic lupus erythematosus. CTD-ILD presents a significant challenge in clinical diagnosis and management due to its heterogeneous nature and variable prognosis. Early diagnosis through clinical, serological, and radiographic assessments is crucial for distinguishing CTD-ILD from idiopathic forms and for implementing appropriate therapeutic strategies. Hence, we have reviewed the multiple clinical manifestations and diagnostic approaches for each type of CTD-ILD, acknowledging the diversity and complexity of the disease. The importance of a multidisciplinary approach in optimizing the management of CTD-ILD is emphasized by recent therapeutic advancements, which include immunosuppressive agents, antifibrotic therapies, and newer biological agents targeting specific pathways involved in the pathogenesis. Therapeutic strategies should be customized according to the type of CTD, the extent of lung involvement, and the presence of extrapulmonary manifestations. Additionally, we aimed to provide clinical guidance, including therapeutic recommendations, for the effective management of CTD-ILD, based on patient, intervention, comparison, outcome (PICO) analysis.

Immunosuppressive Therapy for Usual Interstitial Pneumonia in Autoimmune Rheumatic Diseases: A Review

Usual Interstitial Pneumonia (UIP) is the most severe radiological/histological pattern of Interstitial Lung Disease (ILD). It is typical of Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis (IPF), but is also frequently described in Autoimmune Rheumatic Diseases (ARDs), sharing with IPF common risk factors, genetic backgrounds, and in some cases, disease progression and prognosis. Following the results of the PANTHER study, immunosuppressive drugs are now not recommended for the treatment of IPF; however, their use for the treatment of UIP secondary to ARDs is still under debate. The aim of this review is to summarize existing knowledge on the clinical presentation of autoimmune UIP and its treatment with immunosuppressive drugs. We searched PubMed for English language clinical trials and studies on treatment of ARDs-ILD, looking for specific treatments of UIP-ARDs. The available clinical trials rarely stratify patients by ILD pattern, and clinical studies generally lack a comparison with a placebo group. In Systemic Sclerosis, UIP patients showed a non-significant trend of worsening under immunosuppression. On the contrary, in Interstitial Pneumonia with Autoimmune Features and, above all, Rheumatoid Arthritis, immunosuppressive treatment produced promising results in the management of UIP patients. In conclusion, the current evidence about the immunosuppressive treatment of UIP-ARDs is limited and conflicting. There is an urgent need to adequately assess this topic with specific clinical trials, as has already been performed for IPF. The possibility should be considered that different ARDs can respond differently to immunosuppression. Finally, a wider use of histological samples could produce valuable information from a diagnostic, therapeutic, and research point of view.

Impact of csDMARDs vs. b/tsDMARDs on the Prognosis of Rheumatoid Arthritis-Associated Interstitial Lung Disease: A Multicenter, Retrospective Study

Background/Objectives: Rheumatoid arthritis-associated interstitial lung disease (RA-ILD) significantly affects disease prognosis and patient survival. The impact of conventional synthetic DMARDs (csDMARDs) and biologic/targeted synthetic DMARDs (b/tsDMARDs) on RA-ILD prognoses remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate the effects of csDMARDs and b/tsDMARDs on RA-ILD progression and prognosis based on pulmonary function tests (PFTs), high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT), and symptom changes. Methods: This multicenter, retrospective, observational study included patients with RA-ILD at 13 referral hospitals in South Korea. The participants were categorized into csDMARD-only and b/tsDMARD-exposed groups. RA-ILD prognosis was assessed over a 24-month follow-up period using serial PFTs (the forced vital capacity [FVC] and diffusing capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide [DLCO]), HRCT findings, and clinical symptom changes. Kaplan-Meier survival analyses and Cox proportional hazards models were used to compare disease progression risk while adjusting for baseline lung function, RA disease activity, and glucocorticoid use. Results: Among 127 eligible patients, 22 (17.3%) were exposed to b/tsDMARDs, predominantly abatacept and tocilizumab. During a mean follow-up of 2.8 years, 65 (51.2%) patients experienced RA-ILD progression. A higher baseline Disease Activity Score-28 with erythrocyte sedimentation rate (DAS28-ESR) (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR]: 1.344, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.136-1.590, p = 0.001) and initially prescribed prednisone dose (aHR: 1.078, 95% CI: 1.011-1.151, p = 0.023) were significant prognostic factors for ILD progression. No statistically significant difference in progression risk was observed between the csDMARD-only and b/tsDMARD-exposed groups (aHR: 0.937, p = 0.851). Conclusions: The RA-ILD prognosis was more strongly influenced by disease activity, rather than the type of DMARD used. These findings emphasize the importance of maintaining low RA disease activity to improve RA-ILD prognosis.

Advanced therapies in US veterans with rheumatoid arthritis-associated interstitial lung disease: a retrospective, active-comparator, new-user, cohort study

BACKGROUND

Uncertainty exists regarding patient outcomes when using TNF inhibitors versus other biological and targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) in rheumatoid arthritis-associated interstitial lung disease (ILD). We compared survival and respiratory hospitalisation outcomes following initiation of TNF-inhibitor or non-TNF inhibitor biological or targeted synthetic DMARDs for treatment of rheumatoid arthritis-associated ILD.

METHODS

We did a retrospective, active-comparator, new-user, observational cohort study with propensity score matching following the target trial emulation framework using US Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) electronic and administrative health records. VA health-care enrollees with rheumatoid arthritis-associated ILD and no previous receipt of ILD-directed therapies (eg, antifibrotics) who initiated a TNF inhibitor or non-TNF inhibitor between Jan 1, 2006, and Dec 31, 2018, were included. Propensity score matching was performed using demographics, health-care use, health behaviours, comorbidity burden, rheumatoid arthritis-related severity factors, and ILD-related severity factors, including baseline forced vital capacity. Study outcomes were respiratory hospitalisation, all-cause mortality, and respiratory-related death over follow-up of up to 3 years, from VA, Medicare, and National Death Index data. People with lived experience of rheumatoid arthritis-associated ILD were not involved in the design or conduct of this study.

FINDINGS

Of 1047 patients with rheumatoid arthritis-associated-ILD who initiated biological or targeted synthetic DMARDs, we matched 237 patients who had initiated TNF inhibitors and 237 who had initiated non-TNF inhibitors (mean age 68 years [SD 9]); 434 (92%) of 474 were male and 40 (8%) were female. Death and respiratory hospitalisation did not significantly differ between groups (adjusted hazard ratio 1·21 [95% CI 0·92-1·58]). Respiratory hospitalisation (1·27 [0·91-1·76]), all-cause mortality (1·15 [0·83-1·60]), and respiratory mortality (1·38 [0·79-2·42]) did not differ between groups. Secondary, sensitivity, and subgroup analyses supported the primary findings.

INTERPRETATION

In US veterans with rheumatoid arthritis-associated ILD, no difference in outcomes were seen between those who started TNF inhibitors compared to those starting non-TNF biological or targeted synthetic DMARDs. These data do not support systematic avoidance of TNF inhibitors in all people with rheumatoid arthritis-associated ILD. Comparative efficacy trials in patients with rheumatoid arthritis-associated ILD are needed given the potential for residual confounding and selection bias in observational studies.

FUNDING

US Department of Veterans Affairs.

Rheumatoid Factor: Diagnostic and Prognostic Performance and Therapeutic Implications in Rheumatoid Arthritis

Rheumatoid factor (RF) is the first autoantibody identified in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) which targets the fragment crystallizable (Fc) region of immunoglobulin (Ig) G. Although IgM isotype is predominant, other Ig isotypes, including IgG and IgA, also exist. While RF is not specific to RA, it remains a valuable serological test for diagnosing the disease, as evidenced by its inclusion in the 2010 classification criteria for RA based on elevated serum RF levels. RF is also associated with RA severity, including joint damage and extra-articular manifestations, serving as a poor prognostic factor and aiding in the identification of difficult-to-treat RA. Recent studies have demonstrated that high serum RF levels are associated with a reduced response to tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors. In contrast, anti-TNF antibodies lacking the Fc portion have shown stable efficacy in RA patients regardless of baseline RF levels. These findings reaffirm the clinical significance of RF measurement, 80 years after its initial discovery. This review explores the diagnostic and prognostic significance of RF and its impact on treatment selection in RA management.

Nintedanib and its combination with immunosuppressives in connective tissue disease-related interstitial lung diseases

BACKGROUND

Nintedanib reduces the decline of pulmonary function in patients with advancing lung fibrosis.

AIM

To assess the characteristics of the patients with connective tissue diseases (CTDs) related to interstitial lung disease (ILD) under nintedanib treatment.

METHODS

The CTD-related ILD patients under nintedanib treatment who were followed up between 2020 and 2023 were included in the study. The clinical data of the patients before and after nintedanib were evaluated retrospectively.

RESULTS

There were 36 patients (19 female) with a mean age of 65.2 ± 8.5 years who were treated with nintedanib. The median duration for nintedanib treatment was 19 months. The most common CTD was Sjogren's syndrome (36.1%), followed by systemic sclerosis (27.8%), rheumatoid arthritis (25%), undifferentiated CTD (8.3%), and inflammatory myositis (2.8%). Fifteen (41.7%) patients had impaired pulmonary function tests (FVC < 70 ml and/or DLco < 80 ml), and 23 (63.9%) patients had ≥ 20% involvement of parenchyma in high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) before nintedanib. According to HRCT findings, 25 (69.4%) patients had the usual interstitial pneumonia pattern. All patients had 300 mg/day of nintedanib and received at least one immunosuppressive treatment during the study period. The mean %predicted value of FVC was 82.8 ± 17.6, and DLco was 65.3 ± 19.2 before nintedanib treatment. Following the 6-month follow-up, FVC showed an increase to 92.3 ± 15.8 (with an R correlation coefficient of 0.54, p = 0.025), and 22 (61.1%) patients exhibited either stabilization or regression of findings on HRCT.

CONCLUSIONS

Nintedanib emerges as a promising therapeutic agent compatible with immunosuppressives for treating progressive lung fibrosis in patients with CTD-related ILD.

Rheumatoid Arthritis-Associated Interstitial Lung Disease (RA-ILD): Update on Prevalence, Risk Factors, Pathogenesis, and Therapy

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Rheumatoid arthritis is frequently complicated by interstitial lung disease (RA-ILD), an underappreciated contributor to excess morbidity and mortality. The true prevalence of RA-ILD is difficult to define given the variability in diagnostic criteria used. The lack of standardized screening methods, an incomplete understanding of disease pathogenesis, and dearth of validated biomarkers have limited the development of controlled clinical trials for this disease.

RECENT FINDINGS

Numerous studies have focused on clinical, radiographic, genetic, molecular, and/or serologic markers of disease severity as well as risk of disease progression. In addition to defining valuable clinical biomarkers, these studies have provided insights regarding the pathogenesis of RA-ILD and potential therapeutic targets. Additional studies involving immunomodulatory and/or anti-fibrotic agents have assessed new therapeutic options for different stages of RA-ILD. RA-ILD continues to be a major contributor to the increased morbidity and mortality associated with RA. Advancements in our understanding of disease pathogenesis at a molecular level are necessary to drive the development of more targeted therapy.

Clinical Course of Interstitial Lung Disease in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis

Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is a frequent manifestation of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) that is associated with high mortality. RA-ILD may initially be asymptomatic, and lung function may be markedly impaired by the time it is diagnosed. The course of RA-ILD is highly variable, with some patients experiencing no discernable progression or a slow decline, whereas others experience more rapid deterioration. Some patients develop progressive pulmonary fibrosis, which is associated with high mortality. Although risk factors for the progression of RA-ILD have been identified, including older age, worse lung function, and a usual interstitial pneumonia pattern on high-resolution computed tomography, it is not possible to predict the course of RA-ILD in an individual patient. The association between RA disease activity and progression of RA-ILD remains unclear. Regular monitoring is important to enable the prompt identification of progression and early intervention to preserve lung function. The management of RA-ILD requires a multidisciplinary and individualized approach, taking account of the severity and progression of articular and lung disease, risk factors for the progression of RA-ILD, and the patient's preferences, and may include immunosuppression, antifibrotic therapy, and supportive care.

The Therapeutic Efficacy of Abatacept for Rheumatoid Arthritis-Associated Interstitial Lung Disease: Insights from a 12-Month Trial Using Semi-Quantitative Chest High-Resolution Computed Tomography Imaging

Background: Rheumatoid arthritis-associated interstitial lung disease (RA-ILD) is a major complication of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), but effective treatment remains an unmet need in its management. Our aim was to evaluate the therapeutic efficacy of abatacept for RA-ILD. Methods: This observational retrospective study included patients with RA-ILD treated with abatacept between 2012 and 2021. Indices of RA disease activity and interstitial lung disease (Disease Activity Score in 28 joints using C-reactive Protein [DAS28-CRP], Simplified Disease Activity Index [SDAI], Clinical Disease Activity Index [CDAI], serum Krebs von den Lungen-6 levels, % forced vital capacity [%FVC], and semi-quantified chest high-resolution computed tomography scores) were evaluated before and 1 year after the start of abatacept administration. Results: Overall, 38 patients were included. DAS28-CRP, SDAI, and CDAI were significantly improved (all with p < 0.0001). Total ground-glass opacity scores were decreased in both patients with usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP)-like patterns and with non-UIP-like patterns (p = 0.008 and <0.002, respectively). Total fibrosis scores were also decreased in the UIP-like pattern group (p < 0.042). The %FVC remained stable. Conclusions: Abatacept significantly improves RA disease activity and reduces pulmonary inflammation in patients with RA-ILD.

Effect of abatacept versus conventional synthetic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs on rheumatoid arthritis-associated interstitial lung disease

BACKGROUND/AIMS

To compare the effects of abatacept and conventional synthetic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (csDMARDs) on the progression and development of rheumatoid arthritis-associated interstitial lung disease (RA-ILD).

METHODS

This multi-center retrospective study included RA patients receiving abatacept or csDMARDs who underwent at least two pulmonary function tests and/or chest high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT). We compared the following outcomes between the groups: progression of RA-ILD, development of new ILD in RA patients without ILD at baseline, 28-joint Disease Activity Score with the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (DAS28-ESR), and safety. Longitudinal changes were compared between the groups by using a generalized estimating equation.

RESULTS

The study included 123 patients who were treated with abatacept (n = 59) or csDMARDs (n = 64). Nineteen (32.2%) and 38 (59.4%) patients treated with abatacept and csDMARDs, respectively, presented with RA-ILD at baseline. Newly developed ILD occurred in one patient receiving triple csDMARDs for 32 months. Among patients with RA-ILD at baseline, ILD progressed in 21.1% of cases treated with abatacept and 34.2% of cases treated with csDMARDs during a median 21-month follow-up. Longitudinal changes in forced vital capacity and diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide were comparable between the two groups. However, the abatacept group showed a more significant decrease in DAS28-ESR and glucocorticoid doses than csDMARDs group during the follow-up. The safety of both regimens was comparable.

CONCLUSION

Abatacept and csDMARDs showed comparable effects on the development and stabilization of RA-ILD. Nevertheless, compared to csDMARDs, abatacept demonstrated a significant improvement in disease activity and led to reduced glucocorticoid use.

Biologics or Janus Kinase Inhibitors in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients Who are Insufficient Responders to Conventional Anti-Rheumatic Drugs

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic immune-mediated inflammatory disease which can induce progressive disability if not properly treated early. Over the last 20 years, the improvement of knowledge on the pathogenesis of the disease has made available several drugs targeting key elements of the pathogenetic process, which now represent the preferred treatment option after the failure of first-line therapy with conventional drugs such as methotrexate (MTX). To this category of targeted drugs belong anti-cytokine or cell-targeted biological agents and more recently also Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKis). In the absence to date of specific biomarkers to guide the therapeutic choice in the context of true precision medicine, the choice of the first targeted drug after MTX failure is guided by treatment cost (especially after the marketing of biosimilar products) and by the clinical characteristics of the patient (age, sex, comorbidities and compliance) and the disease (presence or absence of autoantibodies and systemic or extra-articular manifestations), which may influence the efficacy and safety profile of the available products. This viewpoint focuses on the decision-making process underlying the personalized approach to RA therapy and will analyse the evidence in the literature supporting the choice of individual products and in particular the differential choice between biological drugs and JAKis.

Rational approach to the prescription of anti-rheumatic drugs in rheumatoid arthritis: a product leaflet-based strategy in Italy

The treatment of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) has dramatically changed in the past 30 years. Currently, numerous conventional, biologic, and targeted synthetic DMARDs have been licensed and used following recommendations provided by international and national scientific societies. However, the availability of biosimilars and the increasing necessity of savings impacted on the local/national prescription of these drugs. The information provided by data sheet of every single drug is a decisive factor on the choice of a certain treatment merged with the patient's profile. Thus, our purpose was to construct a rational algorithm for the treatment strategy in RA according to costs and the product leaflet of the biologic and targeted-synthetic DMARDs currently licensed in Italy. We used the most recent available recommendations and then we performed a review of the literature considering all the factors that are known to influence drug safety/effectiveness. All these factors were considered in the context of the data sheets of currently available originators and biosimilars.

Safety of Tocilizumab on Rheumatoid Arthritis in Patients with Interstitial Lung Disease

Purpose

The prognosis of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) with interstitial lung disease (ILD) is particularly poor. Although drugs that do not contribute to the progression of ILD should be used in RA treatment, none have been established. This study evaluated the safety of tocilizumab in terms of ILD activity.

Patients and Methods

This study prospectively enrolled all 55 patients with RA complicated by ILD who were treated with tocilizumab at Dokkyo Medical University Saitama Medical Center from April 2014 to June 2022. The outcome measures were MMP-3 and KL-6 as biomarkers of RA and ILD activity, respectively, and the relationship between them was analyzed.

Results

Both MMP-3 and KL-6 were significantly improved at 6 months of treatment (P < 0.001 and P < 0.05, respectively), and a weak correlation between MMP-3 and KL-6 was observed (R2 = 0.086, P = 0.087). The group with increased MMP-3 due to RA progression had significantly higher KL-6 at 6 months compared with the group with RA improvement (P < 0.05). Also, the group with ILD progression on computed tomography had significantly higher MMP-3 compared with the groups with improvement or no change of ILD (P < 0.05 and P < 0.01, respectively). The mortality rate was 0% at 6 months, 2.0% at 1 year, 16.7% at 2 years, and 32.4% at 3 years, and mortality from acute exacerbation of ILD due to respiratory infection increased over time.

Conclusion

RA activity and ILD activity were found to be related at 6 months of treatment. Tocilizumab does not seem to affect the mechanism of ILD progression, as most patients showed improvement in both MMP-3 and KL-6 with tocilizumab within 6 months, when this drug would be expected to affect the lungs directly. However, respiratory infection exacerbated ILD from 1 year after the start of treatment. As immunosuppressive drugs, including tocilizumab, have a risk of respiratory infection, it is important to identify early signs of infection.

Rituximab for rheumatoid arthritis-related interstitial lung disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Objectives

This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed at summarizing the evidence of efficacy and safety of rituximab in rheumatoid arthritis-related interstitial lung disease (RA-ILD).

Materials and methods

PubMed and Embase databases were searched until June 22, 2022, to identify studies on RA-ILD treated with rituximab, confined to predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed on the included studies to assess the overall stabilization or improvement in ILD, changes in percent-predicted (%-predicted) forced vital capacity (FVC), and %-predicted diffusion capacity of lungs for carbon monoxide (DLCO) following rituximab therapy.

Results

A total of 15 studies (4 prospective and 11 retrospective studies) were included, with a total of 314 patients. There were 105 (60.7%) females out of 173 subjects for whom sex details were available from seven studies. The overall pooled proportion of patients with stabilization or improvement in ILD was 0.88 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.76-0.96, p=0.02]. Rituximab improved FVC from baseline by 7.50% (95% CI: 1.35-13.65; p=0.02, fixed effect). Similarly, rituximab improved DLCO by 6.39% (95% CI: 1.366-14.43; p=0.12, random-effect). Two retrospective studies reported reduced mortality with rituximab therapy compared to tumor necrosis factor-alpha inhibitors.

Conclusion

Treatment with rituximab in RA-ILD was associated with a significant improvement in %-predicted FVC, as well as stabilization or improvement in ILD after one year of treatment.

Rate of severe and fatal infections in a cohort of patients with interstitial lung disease associated with rheumatoid arthritis: a multicenter prospective study

Objective

To describe severe infection, foci of infection, microorganisms, associated factors, and impact on mortality in patients with rheumatoid arthritis-associated interstitial lung disease (RA-ILD).

Patients and methods

The study was based on a multicenter prospective cohort of patients with RA-ILD followed up from 2015 to 2023. The main outcome measures were incident severe infection and fatal infection. We evaluated infectious foci, etiologic agents, vaccination status, variables associated with lung function, and clinical-therapeutic variables in RA. The incidence rate (IR) for infection and mortality was calculated per 100 person-years, and 3 multivariate models were constructed to explore factors associated with infection.

Results

We followed up 148 patients with RA-ILD for a median 56.7 months (699.3 person-years). During this period, 142 patients (96%) had at least 1 infection. A total of 368 infectious episodes were recorded, with an IR of 52.6 per 100 person-years. Of the 48 patients who died, 65% did so from infection. Respiratory infections were the most common first infection (74%), infection overall (74%), and fatal infection (80%) and were caused mostly by SARS CoV-2, Streptococcus pneumoniae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and influenza A virus. The factors associated with an increased risk of infection and death in patients with RA-ILD were age, inflammatory activity, and therapy with corticosteroids and immunosuppressants.

Conclusion

Patients with RA-ILD have a high risk of serious infection, especially respiratory infection. Infection develops early, is recurrent, and is frequently fatal. The presence of associated factors such as advanced age, joint inflammation, and treatment highlight the importance of integrated and preventive medical care.

Does a window of opportunity for rheumatoid arthritis-associated interstitial lung disease exist?

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is an autoimmune disease characterized by chronic inflammatory synovitis, eventually leading to joint destruction. Remarkable advancements in the emergence of molecular targeted therapies and the treatment strategy based on treat-to-target have made it possible for patients to lead their daily lives without disabilities. Specifically, early diagnosis and appropriate treatment without missing a 'window of opportunity' are crucial for improving joint outcomes. On the other hand, interstitial lung disease (ILD) is an extra-articular complication of RA and has an impact on life prognosis. Importantly, it has become evident that achieving remission of arthritis is critical not only for joint outcomes but also to prevent the irreversible progression of pulmonary fibrosis in RA-ILD. Therefore, a 'window of opportunity' may exist not only for joints but also for RA-ILD. However, within RA-ILD, there are cases that progress from an NSIP pattern or airway involvement to a UIP pattern, while there are cases without progression, suggesting that their disease behavior may be diverse. Thus, accumulating evidence is necessary to accurately determine the disease behavior of RA-ILD. This review provides an overview of clinical and radiological features and treatment strategies for RA-ILD, incorporating the latest findings.

Abatacept in usual and in non-specific interstitial pneumonia associated with rheumatoid arthritis

OBJECTIVE

To compare the effectiveness of abatacept (ABA) in Rheumatoid Arthritis-associated Interstitial Lung Disease (RA-ILD) according to the radiological patterns of usual (UIP) or non-specific interstitial pneumonia (NSIP).

METHODS

From an observational longitudinal multicentre study of 263 RA-ILD patients treated with ABA, those with UIP or NSIP were selected. Lung function, chest high resolution computerised tomography (HRCT) and dyspnoea were recorded and compared in both groups from baseline to the end of follow-up (progression definitions: improvement or worsening >10% of FVC or DLCO, changes in HRCT extension and 1-point change in the mMRC scale, respectively). Differences between final and baseline visits were calculated as the average difference (95% CI) through mixed effects models regression.

RESULTS

We studied 190 patients with UIP (n=106) and NSIP (n=84). General features were similar in both groups except for older age, positive rheumatoid factor, and previous sulfasalazine therapy, which were more frequent in patients with UIP. ILD duration up to ABA initiation was relatively short: median 16 [4-50] and 11 [2-36] months (p=0.36) in UIP and NSIP, respectively. Mean baseline FVC and DLCO were 82% and 63% in UIP and 89% and 65% in NSIP, respectively. Both parameters remained stable during 24 months with ABA. HRCT lesions and dyspnoea improved/stabilized in 73.1% and 90.5% and 72.9% and 94.6% of UIP and NSIP patterns, respectively.

CONCLUSION

ABA seems equally effective in stabilizing dyspnoea, lung function and radiological impairment in both UIP and NSIP patterns of RA-ILD. Early administration of ABA may prevent RA-ILD progression, regardless of the radiological pattern.

Janus Kinase Inhibitors in Rheumatoid Arthritis: An Update on the Efficacy and Safety of Tofacitinib, Baricitinib and Upadacitinib

Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKis) are the most recent new drug class to arrive to the market for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) treatment. While they have proven to be a very effective treatment option, there remains significant concern regarding the risk of cardiovascular events, thrombosis and malignancy, particularly given the findings of the post-marketing ORAL Surveillance study and FDA black box warnings. This article reviews the key findings of the most impactful cohort of studies and registry data since ORAL Surveillance. It also evaluates the role of JAKis in practice and offers guidance on risk stratifying patients and determining their suitability for a JAKi.

The additional treatment value of immunoglobulin for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis complicated with interstitial lung disease: A propensity score-matched pilot study

OBJECTIVE

To explore the additional treatment value of intravenous immunoglobulin injections for treating interstitial lung disease (ILD) caused by rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

METHODS

This pilot study included patients with RA-ILD. The RA-ILD patients were grouped by treatment agents: traditional agents (disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs, [D]MARDs] and glucocorticoids) and traditional agents plus immunoglobulin. A propensity matching score (PSM) was performed to balance the bias of baseline characteristics. The treatment efficacy and safety indicators were analyzed and compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

In total, 134 patients were included in this study. After PSM, 80 patients were finally included, with 40 in each group. The immunoglobulin group consisted of 12 men and 28 women with a mean age of 51.5 ± 8.4 years (22-75 years). The control group included 13 men and 27 women, with a mean age of 50.6 ± 8.2 years (25-74 years). The chronic obstructive pulmonary disease assessment test score in the immunoglobulin group was statistically lower after treatment than in the control group (19.1 ± 3.3 vs. 17.7 ± 3.4, p = .03). The 6-min walking distance (364.4 ± 54.3 vs. 332.3 ± 55.1, p = .04) and forced vital capacity (78.8 ± 12.6 vs. 66.6 ± 11.2, p = .05) were statistically higher in the immunoglobulin group. The high-resolution computed tomography score and erythrocyte sedimentation rate were both statistically lower in the immunoglobulin group (both p < .05). The adverse event rate did not differ between the two groups (p = .61).

CONCLUSION

The additional use of immunoglobulin intravenous injection is effective for the treatment of RA-ILD with no additional adverse effects.

Inflammatory Biomarkers in the Diagnosis and Prognosis of Rheumatoid Arthritis-Associated Interstitial Lung Disease

This study aimed to identify inflammatory factors and soluble cytokines that act as biomarkers in the diagnosis and prognosis of rheumatoid arthritis-associated interstitial lung disease (RA-ILD). We performed a nested prospective observational case-control study of patients with RA-ILD matched by sex, age, and time since the diagnosis of RA. All participants underwent pulmonary function testing and high-resolution computed tomography. ILD was defined according to the criteria of the American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society; the progression of lung disease was defined as the worsening of FVC > 10% or DLCO > 15%. Inflammation-related variables included the inflammatory activity measured using the DAS28-ESR and a multiplex cytokine assay. Two Cox regression models were run to identify factors associated with ILD and the progression of ILD. The study population comprised 70 patients: 35 patients with RA-ILD (cases) and 35 RA patients without ILD (controls). A greater percentage of cases had higher DAS28-ESR (p = 0.032) and HAQ values (p = 0.003). The variables associated with RA-ILD in the Cox regression analysis were disease activity (DAS28) (HR [95% CI], 2.47 [1.17-5.22]; p = 0.017) and high levels of ACPA (HR [95% CI], 2.90 [1.24-6.78]; p = 0.014), IL-18 in pg/mL (HR [95% CI], 1.06 [1.00-1.12]; p = 0.044), MCP-1/CCL2 in pg/mL (HR [95% CI], 1.03 [1.00-1.06]; p = 0.049), and SDF-1 in pg/mL (HR [95% CI], 1.00 [1.00-1.00]; p = 0.010). The only variable associated with the progression of ILD was IL-18 in pg/mL (HR [95% CI], 1.25 [1.07-1.46]; p = 0.004). Our data support that the inflammatory activity was higher in patients with RA-ILD than RA patients without ILD. Some cytokines were associated with both diagnosis and poorer prognosis in patients with RA-ILD.

Unmet needs and perspectives in rheumatoid arthritis-associated interstitial lung disease: A critical review

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic systemic autoimmune disease characterized by synovitis as the most common clinical manifestation, and interstitial lung disease (RA-ILD) represents one of the most common and potentially severe extra-articular features. Our current understanding of the mechanisms and predictors of RA-ILD is limited despite the demonstration that an early identification of progressive fibrosing forms is crucial to provide timely treatment with antifibrotic therapies. While high resolution computed tomography is the gold standard technique for the diagnosis and follow-up of RA-ILD, it has been hypothesized that serum biomarkers (including novel and rare autoantibodies), new imaging techniques such as ultrasound of the lung, or the application of innovative radiologic algorithms may help towards predicting and detecting early forms of diseases. Further, while new treatments are becoming available for idiopathic and connective tissue disease-associated forms of lung fibrosis, the treatment of RA-ILD remains anecdotal and largely unexplored. We are convinced that a better understanding of the mechanisms connecting RA with ILD in a subgroup of patients as well as the creation of adequate diagnostic pathways will be mandatory steps for a more effective management of this clinically challenging entity.

Incidence of Interstitial Lung Disease in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis Treated With Biologic and Targeted Synthetic Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs

IMPORTANCE

Current data are lacking regarding the risk of biologic and targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (b/tsDMARD) use on the development of interstitial lung disease (ILD) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

OBJECTIVE

To determine the risk of developing ILD in patients with RA undergoing treatment with different b/tsDMARDs.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

Retrospective cohort study using claims data from the Optum Clinformatics Data Mart between December 2003 and December 2019. Adult patients with RA, 1 year or more of continuous enrollment, treatment with a b/tsDMARD of interest, and without preexisting ILD were included. Data were analyzed from October 2021 to April 2022.

EXPOSURES

New administration of adalimumab, abatacept, rituximab, tocilizumab, or tofacitinib.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Crude incidence rates (IRs) for the development of ILD were calculated. The risk of ILD across different b/tsDMARDs was compared using Cox-regression models. A sensitivity analysis using a prevalent new-user cohort design compared patients treated with tofacitinib and adalimumab.

RESULTS

A total of 28 559 patients with RA (mean [SD] age 55.6 [13.7] years; 22 158 female [78%]) were treated with adalimumab (13 326 patients), abatacept (5676 patients), rituximab (5444 patients), tocilizumab (2548 patients), or tofacitinib (1565 patients). Crude IRs per 1000 person-years for ILD were 3.43 (95% CI 2.85-4.09) for adalimumab, 4.46 (95% CI 3.44-5.70) for abatacept, 6.15 (95% CI 4.76-7.84) for rituximab, 5.05 (95% CI 3.47-7.12) for tocilizumab, and 1.47 (95% CI 0.54-3.27) for tofacitinib. After multiple adjustments, compared with patients treated with adalimumab, patients treated with tofacitinib had a lower risk of ILD (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 0.31; 95% CI, 0.12-0.78; P = .009). In a prevalent new-user cohort analysis, patients treated with tofacitinib had 68% reduced risk of ILD compared with adalimumab (aHR 0.32; 95% CI 0.13-0.82; P < .001). In an adjusted model, there was a 69% reduced risk of ILD in patients treated with tofacitinib compared with patients treated with adalimumab.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In this retrospective cohort of patients with RA, patients treated with tofacitinib had the lowest incidence of ILD compared with patients treated with all bDMARDs evaluated, and patients treated with tofacitinib had a reduced risk of ILD compared with patients treated with adalimumab after adjusting for important covariates. Additional prospective studies are needed to better understand the role tofacitinib may play in preventing ILD in patients with RA. These results, while significant, should be interpreted with caution given the fairly small sample size of the tofacitinib group.

Retention Rate and Safety of Biologic and Targeted Synthetic DMARDs in Patients with RA-Associated Interstitial Lung Disease: A KOBIO Registry Study

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to evaluate the long-term retention and safety of biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) and targeted synthetic DMARDs (tsDMARDs) and identify the factors associated with drug withdrawal in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) with interstitial lung disease (ILD) enrolled in the Korean College of Rheumatology Biologics and Targeted Therapy registry.

METHODS

We investigated adults with RA (n = 2266) administered with bDMARDs or tsDMARDs between 2012 and 2021. Propensity score matching (1:3) was performed between patients with RA with ILD (RA-ILD) and without ILD (RA-no ILD). The Kaplan-Meier method was used to analyse drug survival and a logistic regression model to identify withdrawal-related factors in RA-ILD.

RESULTS

One hundred and fifty-nine patients with RA-ILD were matched with 477 patients with RA-no ILD. The 5-year drug retention rate was lower in RA-ILD than in RA-no ILD (log-rank p = 0.020), and both the ILD and no-ILD groups had statistical differences of drug retention rate among agents (log-rank p = 0.019 and 0.020, respectively). In the RA-ILD group, Janus kinase inhibitors had the highest drug retention rate (64.3%), and tumour necrosis factor-α inhibitors showed the lowest retention rate (30.6%). Approximately 58.5% and 48.4% of the patients with RA-ILD and RA-no ILD, respectively, withdrew from their regimen, and the main cause of withdrawal in RA-ILD was adverse events, followed by inefficacy. In the logistic regression analysis, current smoking had a negative effect on drug retention (odds ratio [OR]: 9.938, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.550-38.733; p < 0.001), while concomitant corticosteroid use had a protective effect against withdrawal (OR: 0.284, 95% CI: 0.008-0.917; p = 0.035) in RA-ILD.

CONCLUSION

The patients with RA-ILD had lower bDMARD and tsDMARD retention rates than those with RA-no ILD. In the RA-ILD group, current smoking and concomitant corticosteroid use were associated factors affecting drug withdrawal.

Diffuse lung involvement in rheumatoid arthritis: a respiratory physician's perspective

ABSTRACT

The lungs are one of the most common extra-articular organs involved in rheumatoid arthritis (RA), which is reported to occur in up to 60% to 80% of RA patients. Respiratory complications are the second leading cause of death due to RA. Although there is a wide spectrum of RA-associated respiratory diseases, interstitial lung disease is the most common manifestation and it impacts the prognosis of RA. There has been progress in understanding the management and progression of rheumatoid arthritis-associated interstitial lung disease (RA-ILD) and RA-associated respiratory diseases recently, for example, opportunistic pulmonary infectious diseases and toxicity from RA therapies. From a chest physicians' perspective, we will update the diagnosis and treatment of RA-associated ILD, methotrexate-associated lung disease, and the complication of Pneumocystis jiroveci pneumonia in RA in this review.

Analysis of comorbidity in rheumatoid arthritis-associated interstitial lung disease: a nested case-cohort study

OBJECTIVES

To describe comorbid conditions in patients with rheumatoid arthritis-associated interstitial lung disease (RA-ILD) and to analyze factors associated with multimorbidity.

METHODS

Nested case-cohort study of 2 prospective cohorts: one with RA-ILD (cases) and another with RA but not ILD (controls). The cohorts were matched for age, sex, and time since diagnosis. Multimorbidity was defined as the co-occurrence of 2 or more chronic diseases, in addition to RA and ILD. We evaluated the comorbid conditions included in the Charlson Comorbidity Index, cardiovascular risk factors, neuropsychiatric conditions, and other frequent conditions in RA. We also recorded clinical-laboratory variables, inflammatory activity according to the 28-joint Disease Activity Score, C-reactive protein (CRP), physical function, and pulmonary function. We performed 2 multivariate analyses to identify factors associated with multimorbidity in RA and RA-ILD.

RESULTS

The final study population comprised 110 cases and 104 controls. Multimorbidity was more frequent among cases than controls (80 [72.7] vs 60 [57.7]; p = 0.021). In both groups, multimorbidity was associated with ILD (OR [95% CI] 1.92 [1.03-3.59]; p = 0.039), age (OR [95% CI] 1.05 [1.01-1.08]; p = 0.004), CRP (OR [95% CI] 1.16 [1.05-1.29]; p = 0.003), and erosions (OR [95% CI] 1.05 [1.01-1.08]; p = 0.004); in the cases, it was associated with CRP (OR [95% CI] 1.17 [1.01-1.35]; p = 0.027), anti-citrullinated peptide antibody (OR [95% CI] 1.23 [1.14-13.02]; p = 0.049), and forced vital capacity (OR [95% CI] 0.79 [0.96-0.99]; p = 0.036).

CONCLUSION

In patients with RA, multimorbidity was associated with ILD, systemic inflammation, and advanced age.

Factors associated with selection of targeted therapy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis

OBJECTIVE

Deciding which drug to choose for targeted therapy is an important step in sequential treatment for rheumatoid arthritis (RA). This study aimed to identify factors for selecting Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKis) rather than biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) in patients with RA in real-world practice.

METHODS

We selected RA patients starting JAKis or bDMARDs from single-center prospective cohorts in Korea. Patients were divided into JAKi, tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitor, and non-TNF inhibitor groups. We performed multinomial logistic regression analyses to identify factors associated with selecting JAKis.

RESULTS

145, 205, and 89 patients were included in the JAKi, TNF inhibitor, and non-TNF inhibitor groups. In multinomial regression analysis, the JAKi group was older than the TNF inhibitor group (OR 1.03, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.01-1.05) but younger than the non-TNF inhibitor group (OR 0.97, CI 0.95-1.00). The JAKi group was less likely to have chronic pulmonary diseases compared with the TNF inhibitor group (OR 0.07, CI 0.01-0.56) or the non-TNF inhibitor group (OR 0.06, CI 0.01-0.50). Higher disease activity assessed by physician (OR 1.80, CI 1.51-2.38) and previous tacrolimus use (OR 2.05, CI 1.20-3.51) were factors suggesting selection of JAKis than TNF inhibitors.

CONCLUSION

Age, pulmonary comorbidities, previous tacrolimus use, and high disease activity assessed by physician were factors influencing the selection of JAKis for RA patients in Korea.

Scleroderma specific autoantibodies in rheumatoid arthritis and Sjögren's syndrome patients with interstitial lung disease: Prevalence and associations

Systemic sclerosis (SSc) has been classically linked to interstitial lung disease (ILD) development, often in association with specific SSc autoantibodies. In the present report, we aimed to estimate the prevalence of SSc autoantibodies in 60 seropositive RA and 41 primary SS patients complicated or not by ILD. SSc autoantibodies were determined in patients' sera by a commercial immunoblot assay. RA ILD patients displayed higher frequency of SSc-specific antibodies at strong titers compared to RA-with no lung involvement (25% vs 3.1%, p = 0.01)[OR 95% CI:10.9 (1.2-94.5)], with no differences detected between primary SS groups. These data indicate that many seropositive RA ILD patients probably represent an overlap RA/SSc entity, requiring tailored diagnostic and therapeutic approach.

SER-SEPAR recommendations for the management of rheumatoid arthritis-related interstitial lung disease. Part 2: Treatment

OBJECTIVE

To develop multidisciplinary recommendations to improve the management of rheumatoid arthritis-related interstitial lung disease (RA-ILD).

METHODS

Clinical research questions relevant to the objective of the document were identified by a panel of rheumatologists and pneumologists selected based on their experience in the field. Systematic reviews of the available evidence were conducted, and evidence was graded according to the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN) criteria. Specific recommendations were made.

RESULTS

Six PICO questions were selected, three of which analysed the safety and effectiveness of glucocorticoids, classical synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) and other immunosuppressants, biological agents, targeted synthetic DMARDs, and antifibrotic therapies in the treatment of this complication. A total of 12 recommendations were formulated based on the evidence found and/or expert consensus.

CONCLUSIONS

We present the first official SER-SEPAR document with specific recommendations for RA-ILD management developed to resolve some common clinical questions, reduce clinical healthcare variability, and facilitate decision-making for patients.

Safety and Effectiveness of Abatacept in a Prospective Cohort of Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis–Associated Interstitial Lung Disease

Objective: To prospectively evaluate the safety and efficacy profile of abatacept in patients with rheumatoid arthritis–associated interstitial lung disease (RA-ILD). Methods: We performed a prospective observational multicenter study of a cohort of patients with RA-ILD treated with abatacept between 2015 and 2021. Patients were evaluated using high-resolution computed tomography and pulmonary function tests at initiation, 12 months, and the end of follow-up. The effectiveness of abatacept was evaluated based on whether ILD improved, stabilized, progressed, or was fatal. We also evaluated factors such as infection, hospitalization, and inflammatory activity using the 28-joint Disease Activity Score with the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (DAS28-ESR). Cox regression analysis was performed to identify factors associated with progression of lung disease. Results: The study population comprised 57 patients with RA-ILD treated with abatacept for a median (IQR) of 27.3 (12.2–42.8) months. Lung disease had progressed before starting abatacept in 45.6% of patients. At the end of follow-up, lung disease had improved or stabilized in 41 patients (71.9%) and worsened in 13 (22.8%); 3 patients (5.3%) died. No significant decreases were observed in forced vital capacity (FVC) or in the diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (DLCO).The factors associated with progression of RA-ILD were baseline DAS28-ESR (OR [95% CI], 2.52 [1.03–3.12]; p = 0.041), FVC (OR [95% CI], 0.82 [0.70–0.96]; p = 0.019), and DLCO (OR [95% CI], 0.83 [0.72–0.96]; p = 0.018). Only 10.5% of patients experienced severe adverse effects. Conclusion: Pulmonary function and joint inflammation stabilized in 71% of patients with RA-ILD treated with abatacept. Abatacept had a favorable safety profile.

Treatment approach to connective tissue disease-associated interstitial lung disease

Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is a common manifestation in connective tissue diseases (CTD), such as rheumatoid arthritis (RA), systemic sclerosis (SSc), and inflammatory myositis (IM). ILD is associated with significant morbidity and mortality in nearly all CTD highlighting the critical need for effective treatment strategies in this patient population. In this review, we will summarize the approach to treatment when there is concern for CTD-ILD and highlight recent advancements in therapeutics within various forms of CTD-ILD.

Predictors of progression in rheumatoid arthritis-associated interstitial lung disease: A single-center retrospective study from China

AIM

Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is a common extra-articular manifestation of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and is associated with high mortality, especially in progressive ILD. We aimed to identify predictors of disease progression in the early stages of ILD in a large sample of patients with RA.

METHOD

The medical records of 201 RA-ILD patients were retrospectively analyzed. According to changes in their pulmonary function tests, patients were divided into progressive disease and stable disease groups. Data were collected on clinical characteristics, laboratory findings, chest high-resolution computed tomography, and therapeutic agents. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify predictors of ILD progression.

RESULTS

During a median follow up of 38 months, 105 (52.5%) patients were diagnosed with progressive ILD. These patients were mostly male, past or present smokers (P = 0.028, P = 0.021, respectively). Higher Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index score and higher Disease Activity Score in 28 joints with erythrocyte sedimentation rate (DAS28-ESR) were observed in the ILD progression group (P = 0.003, P < 0.001, respectively). There were no significant differences in baseline respiratory symptoms, pulmonary function, or laboratory features. Multivariate analysis indicated that high DAS28-ESR, definite usual interstitial pneumonia pattern, fibrosis score, and less use of cyclophosphamide were independent risk factors for RA-ILD progression. Fifteen (7.46%) patients died during the follow up, and the most frequent cause of death was lung infection.

CONCLUSION

Our results suggested that high disease activity, definite usual interstitial pneumonia pattern, fibrosis score, and less use of cyclophosphamide at the onset of ILD may indicate the progression of ILD in RA patients.

Recent Advances in Basic and Clinical Aspects of Rheumatoid Arthritis-associated Interstitial Lung Diseases

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a common autoimmune disease that mainly affects the joints and systemic organs, such as the skin, eyes, heart, gastrointestinal tract, and lungs. In particular, among various pulmonary involvements, interstitial lung disease (ILD) is closely related to the selection of anti-rheumatic drugs and the long-term prognosis of patients with RA. Although the exact pathogenesis of RA-ILD is not well defined, several mechanistic pathways, similar to those of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, have been elucidated recently. Conversely, RA-related autoantibodies, including anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibody, are detectable in circulation and in the lungs, even in the absence of articular symptoms. RA-ILD can also predate years before the occurrence of joint symptoms. This evidence supports the fact that local dysregulated mucosal immunity in the lung causes systemic autoimmunity, resulting in clinically evident polyarthritis of RA. Because the early diagnosis of RA-ILD is important, imaging tests, such as computed tomography and pulmonary function tests, are being used for early diagnosis, but there is no clear guideline for the early diagnosis of RA-ILD and selection of optimal disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs for the treatment of patients with RA with ILD. In addition, the efficacy of nintedanib, a new anti-fibrotic agent, for RA-ILD treatment, has been investigated recently. This review collectively discusses the basic and clinical aspects, such as pathogenesis, animal models, diagnosis, and treatment, of RA-ILD.

Efficacy and Safety of Rituximab in Autoimmune Disease-Associated Interstitial Lung Disease: A Prospective Cohort Study

OBJECTIVES

To analyze the efficacy and safety of rituximab (RTX) in connective tissue disease associated with interstitial lung disease (CTD-ILD).

METHODS

We performed a multicenter, prospective, observational study of patients with CTD-ILD receiving rituximab between 2015 and 2020. The patients were assessed using high-resolution computed tomography and pulmonary function tests at baseline, at 12 months, and at the end of follow-up. The main outcome measure at the end of follow-up was forced vital capacity (FVC) > 10% or diffusing capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide (DLCO) > 15% and radiological progression or death. We recorded clinical characteristics, time to initiation of RTX, concomitant treatment, infections, and hospitalization. A Cox regression analysis was performed to identify factors associated with worsening ILD.

RESULTS

We included 37 patients with CTD-ILD treated with RTX for a median (IQR) of 38.2 (17.7-69.0) months. At the end of the follow-up, disease had improved or stabilized in 23 patients (62.1%) and worsened in seven (18.9%); seven patients (18.9%) died. No significant decline was observed in median FVC (72.2 vs. 70.8; p = 0.530) or DLCO (55.9 vs. 52.2; p = 0.100). The multivariate analysis showed the independent predictors for worsening of CTD-ILD to be baseline DLCO (OR (95% CI), 0.904 (0.8-0.9); p = 0.015), time to initiation of RTX (1.01 (1.001-1.02); p = 0.029), and mycophenolate (0.202 (0.04-0.8); p = 0.034). Only 28 of the 37 patients (75.6%) were still undergoing treatment with RTX: two patients (5.4%) stopped treatment due to adverse events and seven patients (18.9%) died owing to progression of ILD and superinfection.

CONCLUSION

Lung function improved or stabilized in more than half of patients with CTD-ILD treated with RTX. Early treatment and combination with mycophenolate could reduce the risk of progression of ILD.

Pathogenesis, clinical features, and treatment strategy for rheumatoid arthritis-associated interstitial lung disease

Rheumatoid arthritis is an autoimmune disease that primarily affects the joints. The emergence of highly effective anti-rheumatic drugs such as biologic agents and janus kinase inhibitors has dramatically improved the management of the disease by preventing irreversible joint destruction and disability. This disease can manifest the serious extra-articular involvements including interstitial lung disease, which has the significant impact on the patients' morbidity and mortality. However, treatment strategy specific for rheumatoid arthritis-associated interstitial lung disease (RA-ILD) has not been yet established. Therefore, understanding the pathogenesis and clinical features of RA-ILD is critical to provide the better management and improve the prognosis of the patients. Accumulation of evidence suggest that it is essentially important to achieve remission or at least low disease activity of arthritis to prevent new emergence, progression, or acute exacerbation of RA-ILD. RA-ILD patients frequently show high titers of autoantibodies including rheumatoid factor and anti-CCP antibody, and the excessive formation of tertiary lymphoid organs is found in the local affected lungs, indicating the adaptive immune response as a key pathogenic inducer. In this regard, non-TNF inhibitors targeting adaptive immune responses such as abatacept and rituximab were reported to be promising for the stabilization and improvement of RA-ILD. Nintedanib, an anti-fibrotic agent, was shown to be effective for reducing the decline of forced vital capacity in RA-ILD. In this review, we summarized the current evidence in the pathogenesis, clinical features, and treatments for RA-ILD and provide future prospects.

Protective effect of methotrexate on lung function and mortality in rheumatoid arthritis–related interstitial lung disease: a retrospective cohort study

Background:

Studies on the risk and protective factors for lung function decline and mortality in rheumatoid arthritis–related interstitial lung disease (RA-ILD) are limited.

Objectives:

We aimed to investigate clinical factors and medication uses associated with lung function decline and mortality in RA-ILD.

Methods:

This retrospective cohort study examined the medical records of patients with RA-ILD who visited Severance Hospital between January 2006 and December 2019. We selected 170 patients with RA-ILD who had undergone at least one spirometry test and chest computed tomography scan. An absolute decline of ⩾10% in the functional vital capacity (FVC) was defined as significant decline in pulmonary function. Data for analysis were retrieved from electronic medical records.

Results:

Ninety patients (52.9%) were female; the mean age was 64.0 ± 10.2 years. Multivariate logistic regression showed that a high erythrocyte sediment rate level at baseline [odds ratio (OR) = 3.056; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.183–7.890] and methotrexate (MTX) use (OR = 0.269; 95% CI = 0.094–0.769) were risk and protective factors for lung function decline, respectively. Multivariate Cox regression analysis indicated that age ⩾65 years (OR = 2.723; 95% CI = 1.142–6.491), radiologic pattern of usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP) or probable UIP (OR = 3.948; 95% CI = 1.522–10.242), baseline functional vital capacity (FVC) % predicted (OR = 0.971; 95% CI = 0.948–0.994), and MTX use (OR = 0.284; 95% CI = 0.091–0.880) were predictive of mortality.

Conclusion:

We identified risk and protective factors for lung function decline and mortality in patients with RA-ILD. MTX use was associated with favorable outcome in terms of both lung function and mortality in our cohort.

Characteristics and Predictors of Progression Interstitial Lung Disease in Rheumatoid Arthritis Compared with Other Autoimmune Disease: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Objectives: To describe the characteristics and progression of interstitial lung disease in patients with associated systemic autoimmune disease (ILD-SAI) and to identify factors associated with progression and mortality. Patients and methods: We performed a multicenter, retrospective, observational study of patients with ILD-SAI followed between 2015 and 2020. We collected clinical data and performed pulmonary function testing and high-resolution computed tomography at diagnosis and at the final visit. The main outcome measure at the end of follow-up was forced vital capacity (FVC) >10% or diffusing capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide >15% and radiological progression or death. Cox regression analysis was performed to identify factors associated with worsening of ILD. Results: We included 204 patients with ILD-SAI: 123 (60.3%) had rheumatoid arthritis (RA), 58 had (28.4%) systemic sclerosis, and 23 (11.3%) had inflammatory myopathy. After a median (IQR) period of 56 (29.8–93.3) months, lung disease had stabilized in 98 patients (48%), improved in 33 (16.1%), and worsened in 44 (21.5%). A total of 29 patients (14.2%) died. Progression and hospitalization were more frequent in patients with RA (p = 0.010). The multivariate analysis showed the independent predictors for worsening of ILD-SAI to be RA (HR, 1.9 [95% CI, 1.3–2.7]), usual interstitial pneumonia pattern (HR, 1.7 [95% CI, 1.0–2.9]), FVC (%) (HR, 2.3 [95% CI, 1.4–3.9]), and smoking (HR, 2.7 [95%CI, 1.6–4.7]). Conclusion: Disease stabilizes or improves after a median of 5 years in more than half of patients with ILD-SAI, although more than one-third die. Data on subgroups and risk factors could help us to predict poorer outcomes.

Efficacy and safety of abatacept in interstitial lung disease of rheumatoid arthritis: A systematic literature review

BACKGROUND

Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is a serious complication that represents the second leading cause of death in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Treatment of RA-ILD remains controversial. The absence of randomized clinical trials and specific ACR or EULAR therapeutic guidelines makes it difficult to establish solid therapeutic recommendations on this issue. In this scenario, real-world data is especially valuable.

OBJECTIVE

To review the literature evidence on the efficacy and safety of abatacept (ABA) for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) with associated interstitial lung disease (ILD), given its clinical relevance and the lack of consensus on its therapeutic management.

METHODS

PUBMED and EMBASE were searched from the date of approval of ABA to the end of 2020 using a combination of RA, ILD and ABA terms following PRISMA guidelines. Identified studies were evaluated by two independent investigators.

RESULTS

Nine original studies (1 case series and 8 observational studies) were selected for inclusion in the systematic review. No randomized trial or meta-analysis were identified. The mean age of patients ranged from 61.2 to 75 years and the mean RA duration varied from 7.4 to 18 years. Subcutaneous ABA (74.5%-91%) predominated in combination with conventional synthetic DMARDs (csDMARDs) (58%-75%), and it was used as first-line biologic agent in 22.8%-64.9% of the patients. The mean course of ILD ranged from 1 to 6.7 years, being usual and nonspecific interstitial pneumonia the most frequent patterns. Improvement or stabilization of ILD imaging (76.6%-92.7%) and FVC or DLCO (>85%) was described after a mean follow-up of 17.4-47.8 months, regardless of the pattern of lung involvement, being more remarkable in patients with shorter evolution of ILD. ABA led to significantly lower ILD worsening rates than TNF inhibitors (TNFi) and was associated with a 90% reduction in the relative risk of deterioration of ILD at 24 months of follow-up compared to TNFi and csDMARDs. Combination with methotrexate may have a corticoid-sparing effect. No unexpected adverse events were identified.

CONCLUSIONS

Current evidence suggests that ABA may be a plausible alternative to treat RA patients with ILD. It would be highly desirable to develop prospective randomized controlled studies to confirm these findings.

Predictors of Progression and Mortality in Patients with Prevalent Rheumatoid Arthritis and Interstitial Lung Disease: A Prospective Cohort Study

OBJECTIVES

To describe a prospective cohort of patients with rheumatoid arthritis associated with interstitial lung disease (RA-ILD) and identify risk factors associated with disease progression and mortality in this cohort.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We performed a multicenter, prospective, observational study of patients with RA-ILD receiving disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) between 2015 and 2020. The patients were assessed using high-resolution computed tomography and pulmonary function tests at baseline and at 60 months. The main endpoint was "Progression to ILD at the end of follow-up" in terms of the following outcomes: (1) improvement (i.e., improvement in forced vital capacity (FVC) ≥10% or diffusing capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide (DLCO) ≥15% and absence of radiological progression); (2) nonprogression (stabilization or improvement in FVC ≤10% or diffusing capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide (DLCO) <15% and absence of radiological progression); (3) progression (worsening of FVC >10% or DLCO >15% and radiological progression); or (4) death. We recorded demographic and clinical characteristics, lung function, and the incidence of adverse events. A Cox regression analysis was performed to identify factors associated with the worsening of ILD.

RESULTS

After 60 months, lung disease had stabilized in 66 patients (56.9%), improved in 9 (7.8%), and worsened in 23 (19.8%). Eighteen patients (15.5%) died, with a mean survival of 71.8 (1.9) months after diagnosis of ILD. The Cox multivariate analysis revealed the independent predictors of worsening of RA-ILD to be usual interstitial pneumonia (hazard ratio (HR), 2.6 (95%CI, 1.0-6.7)), FVC <80% (HR, 3.8 (95%CI, 1.5-6.7)), anticitrullinated protein antibody titers (HR, 2.8 (95%CI, 1.1-6.8)), smoking (HR, 2.5 (95%CI, 1.1-6.2)), and treatment with abatacept, tocilizumab, or rituximab (HR, 0.4 (95%CI, 0.2-0.8)). During follow-up, 79 patients (68%) experienced an adverse event, mostly infection (61%). Infection was fatal in 10/18 patients (55.5%) during follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Lung function is stable in most patients with RA-ILD receiving treatment with disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs), although one-third worsened or died. Identifying factors associated with worsening in RA-ILD is important for clinical management.