Multicentre evaluation of a commercial test for the rapid diagnosis of Clostridium difficile-mediated antibiotic-associated diarrhoea

A prospective study of two isothermal amplification assays compared with real-time PCR, CCNA and toxigenic culture for the diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection

Background

New molecular methods of detecting Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) provide the routine lab with a sensitive random access method to produce results that are available in a shorter time than traditional methods.

Methods

In this prospective study a total of 989 stool specimens were tested over a period of 16 months in parallel using two isothermal amplification assays, AmpliVue® (Quidel) and Illumigene® (Meridian) and the results compared to those from toxigenic culture. In addition all specimens were tested using a cytotoxic cell neutralisation assay (CCNA) and three different Real-time PCR targeting a C. difficile-specific 16S rDNA sequence or the toxin genes tcdA, tcdB/tcdB027 or cdtB.

Results

AmpliVue® was positive in 242 (24.5 %) and Illumigene® in 228 (23.1 %) specimens. 167 (16.9 %) specimens were positive in toxigenic culture. Real-time-tcdA and -tcdB PCR was positive in 211 (21.3 %) specimens, Real-time-cdtB PCR was positive in 101 (10.2 %) specimens and C. difficile-PCR (16S rDNA) in 267 (27.0 %) specimens.

Conclusions

The respective sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value compared to toxigenic culture were 91, 89, 62 and 98 % for AmpliVue® and 91, 91, 67 and 98 % for Illumigene®.

Rapid and simple method for detecting the toxin B gene of Clostridium difficile in stool specimens by loop-mediated isothermal amplification

We applied the loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) assay to the detection of the toxin B gene (tcdB) of Clostridium difficile for identification of toxin B (TcdB)-positive C. difficile strains and detection of tcdB in stool specimens. tcdB was detected in all toxin A (TcdA)-positive, TcdB-positive (A(+)B(+)) and TcdA-negative, TcdB-positive (A(-)B(+)) C. difficile strains but not from TcdA-negative, TcdB-negative strains. Of the 74 stool specimens examined, A(+)B(+) or A(-)B(+) C. difficile was recovered from 39 specimens, of which 38 specimens were LAMP positive and one was negative. Amplification was obtained in 10 specimens that were culture negative, indicating that LAMP is highly sensitive. The LAMP assay was applied to detection of tcdB in DNA extracted by a simple boiling method from 47 of those 74 specimens, which were cultured overnight in cooked-meat medium (CMM). Twenty-two of 24 culture-positive specimens were positive for LAMP on DNA from the culture in CMM. Four specimens were culture negative but positive by LAMP on DNA from CMM cultures. The LAMP assay is a reliable tool for identification of TcdB-positive C. difficile as well as for direct detection of tcdB in stool specimens with high sensitivity. Detection of tcdB by LAMP from overnight cultures in CMM could be an alternative method of diagnostic testing at clinical laboratories without special apparatus.

Immunological detection and cytotoxic properties of toxins from toxin A-positive, toxin B-positive Clostridium difficile variants

Clostridium difficile is a major nosocomial pathogen and a causative agent of antibiotic-associated diarrhoea and pseudomembranous colitis. PCR analysis of the toxin A and B genes of this bacterium has revealed 20 variant types (toxinotypes I-XX), many of which can cause human disease. Strains comprising the 15 toxin A-positive, toxin B-positive toxinotypes are not usually differentiated from non-variant strains by routine laboratories that do not utilize PCR tests. Consequently, the toxins from these variant strains have not been investigated thoroughly. The present studies revealed that toxin A-positive (A+B+) strains representing 12 variant toxinotypes all express considerably lower levels of toxin A and are less cytotoxic in vitro than non-variant strain VPI 10463. Truncated forms of toxin A were detected by immunoblotting in toxinotype VI and VII strains and these toxins were differentiated from each other and from toxin A of the non-variant strain. A further novel finding was the ability of toxin A-positive (A+B+) strains of toxinotypes IX, XIV and XV to exhibit an alternative Clostridium sordellii-like cytopathic effect on Vero cells, characterized by marked cell clumping. A rapid and simple method for toxin A removal from culture filtrates was developed. This enabled confirmation that the abnormal cytotoxicity observed for these strains is due to an altered toxin B, as has been found in toxin A-negative (A-B+) strains. These findings indicate the potential for differentiation of certain toxin A-positive (A+B+) toxinotypes without the need for PCR techniques.

Reducing delays in the diagnosis and treatment of Clostridium difficile diarrhoea

BACKGROUND

The diagnosis of Clostridium difficile diarrhoea is often delayed.

AIM

To assess and reduce delays in diagnosis and treatment.

DESIGN

Two-part study: retrospective audit then prospective observational.

METHODS

The retrospective study audited cases positive for C. difficile culture or toxin A between June 2000 and January 2001. Cases were reviewed regarding demographic characteristics and the timing from onset of symptoms to testing and treatment (n = 27). In the prospective study, efforts were made to increase the awareness of medical staff about C. difficile diarrhoea, and testing for C. difficile toxin A assay was substituted for stool culture and external toxin analysis. Data were prospectively analysed for demographic characteristics and time from onset of symptoms to testing and treatment (n = 24).

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in age (76 vs. 78 years), male to female ratio (1:2 vs. 1:4), reason for admission, specialty responsible, or mortality rate (40% vs. 37%) during the presenting admission. Preceding antibiotic use, the combination of antibiotics used and subsequent treatment also did not differ between groups. The time from onset of diarrhoea to sampling was reduced from 4.7 days (range 3-30) to 0.8 days (range 0-5; p </= 0.05). The time from sampling to treatment was reduced from 7.7 days (5-34) to 2.8 days (2-9; p </= 0.05).

DISCUSSION

The combination of increased awareness of C. difficile diarrhoea and the change to in-house toxin testing significantly reduced the time from onset of symptoms to sampling and treatment.

Identification and screening for antimicrobial activity against Clostridium difficile of Bifidobacterium and Lactobacillus species isolated from healthy infant faeces

The antimicrobial activity against Clostridium difficile of 109 lactic acid bacteria (LAB) isolated from 32 healthy Korean infants was measured. The ability to show similar activity against Escherichia coli O157:H7 and Staphylococcus aureus was also looked for. Twelve of the 109 LAB showed activity against C. difficile and 19 strains were active against E. coli O157:H7, but none against S. aureus. Four strains had antimicrobial activity against both C. difficile and E. coli O157:H7. Of the 12 strains that had activity against C. difficile, four strains were excluded as Streptococcus species, while the other eight were identified using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assays using group-specific primers designed from the nucleotide sequences of the 16S rDNA and internal transcribed spacer (ITS) regions of the Bifidobacterium and Lactobacillus species. Based on the sequencing results, the eight strains screened were identified as Bifidobacterium infantis and Lactobacillus salivarius.

Evaluation of the Clearview Clostridium difficile Toxin A Test and various selective culture media in comparison with the cytotoxin assay for the diagnosis of Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhoea

AIM

Clostridium difficile is the major pathogen associated with nosocomial diarrhoea. We evaluated the performances of a commercially available toxin A enzyme immunoassay (EIA; Clearview C. difficile Toxin A Test), culture and tissue culture cytotoxin assay in the diagnosis of C. difficile-associated diarrhoea.

METHODS

Comparative test performance was determined from data obtained from 166 faecal samples. The initial analysis compared the performance of toxin A EIA and culture with that of cytotoxin assay, this being defined as a 'laboratory gold standard'. A second analysis compared the individual performance of the toxin A EIA, culture and cytotoxin assay using a combined clinical and laboratory diagnostic assessment as a 'clinical gold standard'. In a parallel, study three selective culture media were compared.

RESULTS

From the initial analysis, the sensitivity and specificity of the methods were, respectively, 84.6 and 65.4% for the toxin A EIA, and 38.5 and 93.5% for culture. From the second analysis, the sensitivity and specificity of the methods were, respectively, 100 and 67.5% for the toxin A EIA, 63.6 and 96.7% for culture and 72.7 and 98.0% for cytotoxin assay. Media containing d-cycloserine 250mg/L and cefoxitin 8mg/L performed best, growing 88.2% of the isolates.

CONCLUSION

The toxin A EIA we evaluated had poor specificity in the diagnosis of C. difficile-associated diarrhoea. We conclude that in our laboratory the combination of culture and cytotoxin assay is a preferred approach to the diagnosis of C. difficile-associated diarrhoea.

Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea: current strategies for diagnosis and therapy

Clostridium difficile, a spore-forming toxigenic bacterium, is one of the most common causes of infectious diarrhea and colitis in the United States. Most patients with C. difficile infection have recently received antimicrobial therapy--usually clindamycin, cephalosporins, or the extended-spectrum penicillins. Clinical presentation varies from asymptomatic colonization to mild diarrhea to severe colitis. The mainstay of diagnosis is detection of C. difficile toxin A, toxin B, or both with a cytotoxin test or enzyme immunoassay of the stool of patients who have received antibiotic therapy and have features of C. difficile-associated diarrhea. Enzyme immunoassays that detect both toxins are preferred because of their higher diagnostic accuracy. If the first assay is negative and C. difficile-associated diarrhea is strongly suspected, a second assay may be performed. Ten days of oral metronidazole is the preferred therapy for most initial infections. Vancomycin is considered second-line therapy because of its cost and potential to select for vancomycin resistance. About 20% to 25% of patients experience reinfection or relapse after initial therapy and require retreatment. The disease can best be prevented by limiting the use of broad-spectrum antibiotics and adhering to control techniques.

Detection of toxin production in Clostridium difficile strains by three different methods

OBJECTIVE

To compare two immunoassays for detection of toxins produced in vitro by isolates of Clostridium difficile with the standard tissue culture assay, to help in the diagnosis of C. difficile-associated diarrhoea.

METHODS

Toxin production was investigated in 42 strains of C. difficile of various serotypes, ribotypes and S-protein types. These included strains from our laboratory collection, strains freshly isolated from stool specimens of patients suspected of suffering from C. difficile-associated disease or of carrying it asymptomatically, and one reference strain (NCTC 11223). Toxin was assayed by (i) a rapid slide immunoassay (C. difficile toxin A test, Clearview, Oxoid), (ii) an enzyme-linked microplate immunoassay (C. difficile toxin A/B test, Techlab), and (iii) a tissue culture assay. The rapid slide assay and the enzyme immunoassay were performed according to the manufacturers' recommendations. The tissue culture assay was performed using Vero cells.

RESULTS

Thirty of the 42 strains (71%) were shown to be positive for toxin A by the slide immunoassay and 34 of the strains (81%) were found to be toxin A/B producers by the enzyme immunoassay. The same 34 strains that were positive in the enzyme immunoassay also produced toxin B (cytotoxin) in the tissue culture assay. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values for the rapid slide immunoassay method were calculated to be 88.2%, 100.0%, 100.0% and 66.7%, respectively, when compared to tissue culture assay results as the reference method. These values for the enzyme immunoassay method were all 100.0%. In this study eight strains were found to be non-toxin-producing by all methods. It is possible that there were four strains that only produced toxin B (A- B+), and were missed by the rapid A-only assay.

CONCLUSIONS

We can recommend the use of the Techlab A + B enzyme immunoassay for the detection of toxin production by C. difficile strains because of its high sensitivity and specificity, its ease of use, and its capability of detecting both A- and B-type toxins.

Laboratory diagnosis of Clostridium difficile disease

The laboratory diagnosis of Clostridium difficile-associated disease (CDAD) is based on culture and toxin detection in fecal specimens. Culture is performed on a commercially available selective media. C. difficile colony morphology is typical when viewed under a dissecting microscope. Definitive identification is best obtained by gas liquid chromatography. Culture is very sensitive but, when used alone without toxin testing, it leads to low specificity and misdiagnosis of CDAD when high rates of asymptomatic carriage exist. Toxin detection by a tissue culture cytotoxin assay followed by neutralisation with specific antiserum is often considered the standard. However, this approach lacks sensitivity and has not detected up to 30% of patients with confirmed CDAD. Multiple enzyme immunoassays (EIAs) have been introduced by various manufacturers for the detection of toxin A alone or for both toxins A and B. Some of these are designed to give results in less than 1 h. Comparative studies of EIA kits reported that the sensitivity and specificity are slightly lower than cytotoxin assays. Toxigenic culture tests C. difficile isolates for toxin production: colonies isolated on selective media are tested for in-vitro toxin production either by a cytotoxicity assay or by direct EIA. It has higher sensitivity than the cytotoxicity assay and equivalent specificity. In the routine laboratory, culture and toxin detection should be performed on every specimen and, in culture-positive and fecal toxin-negative cases, toxigenic cultures should be performed on isolated colonies.

Performance of two rapid, single-use immunoassays for the detection of Clostridium difficile toxin A

Two rapid, single-use immunoassays for C. difficile toxin A, the Clearview C. DIFF A (Wampole Laboratories, Cranbury, N.J.) and the ImmunoCard Toxin A assays (Meridian Diagnostics Inc., Cincinnati, Ohio) were compared to the cytotoxin assay for their ability to detect C. difficile toxin in fecal specimens. A total of 537 specimens were tested and 47 (8.8%) were positive by the cytotoxin assay. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of the toxin A assays were as follows: 70.2% (95% CI, 57.1 to 83.3), 98.8% (95% CI, 97.8 to 99.8), 84.6% (95% CI, 73.3 to 95.9), and 97.2% (95% CI, 95.7 to 98.6) respectively for the Clearview assay; and 74.5% (95% CI, 62.0 to 86.9), 99.0% (95% CI, 98.1 to 99.9), 87.5% (95% CI, 77.3 to 97.8), and 97.6% (95% CI, 96.2 to 98.9) respectively for the ImmunoCard assay. Both toxin A assays are less sensitive than the cytotoxin assay, however, these assays offer a rapid and easy-to-perform test that may be used in conjunction with the cytotoxin assay for laboratory confirmation of C. difficile-associated disease.