A combined subcision approach with either fractional CO2 laser (10,600 nm) or cross-linked hyaluronic acid versus subcision alone in atrophic post-acne scar treatment

A review on recent advances and challenges of microneedle technology for enhanced topical treatment of skin disorders

Microneedles are tiny, minimally invasive needles that are made to create microchannels over a subcutaneous layer of the skin. These micro-injuries encourage the secretion of growth factors and prompt collagen synthesis. The reasons for using microneedling therapy have increased significantly, leading to its widespread adoption in dermatology. This review article discussed recent advances and challenges of microneedle technology for enhanced topical treatment of skin disorders. It discussed the effective and safe use of microneedles for treating different types of skin conditions like acne, scars, alopecia, melasma, skin rejuvenation, and photo-damage. The drug delivery through the skin was enhanced and rare or permanent adverse effects were not mentioned, while temporary redness and post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation were frequently seen. Microneedling seems to be a generally reliable and secure treatment choice for various skin conditions. More extensive and randomized clinical trials were necessary to ensure their safety and efficacy across diverse populations, conditions, and treatment durations. This trial helps to identify optimal dosages, long-term outcomes, and any adverse effects that may not appear in smaller studies. They also enable comparisons with existing therapies, ensuring the technology's generalizability and value. Moreover, such trials are essential for regulatory approval and to determine which microneedle technologies work best for specific uses.

Treatment of acne scars using subcision combined with concentrated growth factors versus subcision monotherapy: a retrospective cohort study

Subcision is one of the most frequently used surgical options in improving acne scarring. Concentrated growth factors (CGF), with the potential to assist in the repair and regeneration of tissues, have been extended to the field of cosmetic plastic surgery. Here, we investigate the safety and efficacy of combining CGF (the latest generation of platelet concentrates) with subcision as a novel treatment method. Sixty patients with clinically diagnosed acne scars received either subcision combined with CGF (n = 24) or subcision monotherapy (n = 36). Clinical characteristics and treatment outcomes were documented through photographs, questionnaires, and medical records, with side effects recorded. Both groups showed significant scar improvements, but the combination therapy demonstrated superior outcomes in ECCA score reduction compared to subcision treatment alone. Patients in the combination therapy group reported higher satisfaction levels, and side effects were minimal, except for increased ecchymosis and pain levels which resolved within an acceptable recovery time range for the patients. This combination approach efficiently treats severe acne scars without significant safety risks.

PDO screw threads versus fractional CO2 laser, after subcision, for atrophic acne scar remodelling: a randomized group-based comparative study

Atrophic acne scars present a significant therapeutic challenge. While subcision with various adjunctive treatments, including fractional CO₂ lasers and polydioxanone (PDO) threads, has been employed for scar remodeling, comparative evidence on their efficacy remains limited. This study aims to compare the clinical efficacy and patient satisfaction between subcision with fractional CO₂ laser and subcision with PDO screw threads in managing atrophic acne scars. A randomized, controlled study was conducted on 40 patients with atrophic acne scars. Patients were assigned to two groups: Group A underwent subcision with PDO screw threads insertion, and Group B underwent subcision followed by fractional CO₂ laser resurfacing. Outcomes were assessed using the Goodman and Baron grading system, Antera 3D imaging, and patient satisfaction. Significant scar improvement was observed in both groups, with Group B demonstrating greater reduction in scar severity and depth (p = 0.022). While Group A showed faster recovery and lower downtime, Group B yielded higher patient satisfaction scores. Subcision combined with fractional CO₂ laser resulted in superior long-term scar improvement, although PDO threads provided quicker recovery. The choice of treatment may depend on patient preferences and scar characteristics.

Synthetic Dermal Fillers in Treating Acne Scars: A Comparative Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Acne is a common condition observed in adolescents and in most severe acne the scars develop. There are numerous treatment options for acne scars. However, no standardized guidelines have been established to guide physicians in the optimal treatment of acne scars.

AIMS

The objective of this systematic review is to evaluate the existing evidence on various fillers used for the treatment of acne scars and to compare their effectiveness with one another.

METHODS

The study was designed following PRISMA guidelines, and the information was retrieved in May 2024 using the PubMed database and ClinicalTrials.gov registry. The inclusion criteria were that studies involving patients of any age or gender with acne scars of any type treated with synthetic dermal fillers, and studies published in English. The exclusion criteria were studies with less than 10 participants and studies that did not use synthetic dermal fillers. To assess the risk of bias in the included studies, the Cochrane Collaboration's Risk of Bias tool was used for randomized controlled trials, and in observational studies, the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used.

RESULTS

Twenty-six studies were included with a total of 1121 participants. Fourteen studies evaluated HA on 372 subjects, five studies focused on PMMA on 305 subjects, four on CaHA on 392 subjects, two on PLLA on 42 subjects, and one on PCL on 10 subjects.

CONCLUSIONS

Most of the studies included in this review were of low quality, as indicated by their scores on quality assessments, lack of high-quality RCTs, and small sample sizes. Future research should focus on conducting randomized, controlled, split-face studies with an adequate number of participants and a detailed examination of different scar subtypes.

Prospective Clinical Trial Demonstrating the Efficacy of Hyaluronic Acid Filler for the Improvement of Atrophic Facial Scars up to 2 years

BACKGROUND

Hyaluronic acid (HA) filler longevity has been studied for wrinkles. However, its long-term use for treating atrophic facial scars has not yet been analyzed in long-term prospective studies.

OBJECTIVE

Analyze the safety and duration of a HA filler for the use in atrophic scars.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fifteen subjects received VYC-17.5L in atrophic scars on 1 randomized cheek and saline on the other, with 1 optional touch-up treatment and crossover after the short-term trial. Grading for this long-term extension was done on Day 720, using the Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) and the Quantitative Global Scarring Grading System.

RESULTS

On Day 720, a live blind evaluator rated the VYC-17.5L assigned side as having significant reduction in scar severity (-7.2 [t(22) = -6.01, p = .00009]) and number of scars (-8.8 [t(22) = -6.25, p = .00006]) as compared with baseline. There was no significant difference in the results from Day 120 to Day 720. Ninety-two percent (11/12) of subjects reported improvement (GAIS), were satisfied with the treatment, thought it looked natural, and had fewer side effects than expected. There were no persistent or late-onset side effects.

CONCLUSION

VYC-17.5L improved rolling atrophic facial scars, and the results were sustained throughout the 2-year trial without side effects.

Atrophic Postacne Scar Treatment: Narrative Review

Acne scarring is a frequent complication of acne. Scars negatively impact psychosocial and physical well-being. Optimal treatments significantly improve the appearance, quality of life, and self-esteem of people with scarring. A wide range of interventions have been proposed for acne scars. This narrative review aimed to focus on facial atrophic scarring interventions. The management of acne scarring includes various types of resurfacing (chemical peels, lasers, and dermabrasion); the use of injectable fillers; and surgical methods, such as needling, punch excision, punch elevation, or subcision. Since the scarred tissue has impaired regeneration abilities, the future implementation of stem or progenitor regenerative medical techniques is likely to add considerable value. There are limited randomized controlled trials that aimed to determine which treatment options should be considered the gold standard. Combining interventions would likely produce more benefit compared to the implementation of a single method.

Needle-Free Jet Injection of Poly-(Lactic Acid) for Atrophic Acne Scars: Literature Review and Report of Clinical Cases

Acne scars, particularly atrophic ones, present a persistent challenge in cosmetic medicine and surgery, requiring extended and multifaceted treatment approaches. Poly-(lactic acid) injectable fillers show promise in managing atrophic acne scars by stimulating collagen synthesis. However, the utilization of needle-free injectors for delivering poly-(lactic acid) into scars remains an area requiring further exploration. In this article, a summary of the latest advancements in needle-free jet injectors is provided, specifically highlighting the variations in jet-producing mechanisms. This summary emphasizes the differences in how these mechanisms operate, offering insights into the evolving technology behind needle-free injection systems. The literature review revealed documented cases focusing on treating atrophic acne scars using intralesional poly-(lactic acid) injections. The results of these clinical studies could be supported by separate in vitro and animal studies, elucidating the feasible pathways through which this treatment operates. However, there is limited information on the use of needle-free jet injectors for the intradermal delivery of poly-(lactic acid). Clinical cases of atrophic acne scar treatment are presented to explore this novel treatment concept, the needle-free delivery of poly-(lactic acid) using a jet pressure-based injector. The treatment demonstrated efficacy with minimal adverse effects, suggesting its potential for scar treatment. The clinical efficacy was supported by histological evidence obtained from cadaver skin, demonstrating an even distribution of injected particles in all layers of the dermis. In conclusion, we suggest that novel needle-free injectors offer advantages in precision and reduce patient discomfort, contributing to scar improvement and skin rejuvenation. Further comprehensive studies are warranted to substantiate these findings and ascertain the efficacy of this approach in scar treatment on a larger scale.

Evidence-based management of cutaneous scarring in dermatology part 2: atrophic acne scarring

Atrophic acne scars are the most common type of acne scars and are classified into three main types: icepick, boxcar, and rolling scars. Various procedures and techniques for atrophic acne scarring are discussed in detail, with stronger evidence-based support for lasers (non-fractional, fractional, ablative, and non-ablative), platelet-rich plasma as adjunctive treatment, chemical peels (glycolic acid, trichloroacetic acid, and Jessner's solution), dermal fillers such as hyaluronic acid, and microneedling, and lesser quality evidence for microdermabrasion, subcision, and lipoaspirate grafting. Further research is needed to optimize treatment protocols, assess the efficacy of monotherapies, and establish standardized guidelines for clinicians. This paper will provide a comprehensive review of the evidence-based management of atrophic acne scars, including currently commonly utilized therapies as well as more innovative treatment options.

Efficacy of fractional CO2 laser therapy combined with hyaluronic acid dressing for treating facial atrophic acne scars: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

The present work aimed to systematically identify the efficacy and safety of fractional carbon dioxide (CO2) laser plus hyaluronic acid (HA) dressing in dealing with facial atrophic acne scars. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) concerning fractional CO2 laser in combination with HA dressing for treating atrophic acne scars were screened in 8 electronic databases (containing PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Internet, Wanfang, Sinomed as well as VIP). Besides, for the purpose of evaluating the risk of bias of the enrolled RCTs, the Cochrane Collaboration tool was adopted. Statistical analysis was completed using Revman5.3 software and Stata 14.0 software. Meanwhile, the quality of evidence was assessed by the GRADE system. Finally, 6 studies involving 623 patients were enrolled. According to the findings in this study, compared with fractional CO2 laser alone, fractional CO2 laser therapy combined with HA dressing reduced the scores of ECCA (échelle d'évaluation clinique des cicatrices d'acné) grading scale (MD=-3.37,95% CI [-5.03, -1.70], P<0.0001), shortened the time of crust formation (MD=-0.42,95% CI [-0.80, -0.04], P=0.03) and the time of crust removal(MD=-1.31,95% CI [-1.67, -0.95], P<0.00001), enhanced patient satisfaction (RR=1.85, 95% CI [1.44, 2.38], P<0.00001). All the reported adverse events including hyperpigmentation, erythema, edema, mild itching, and slight burning pain were controllable. In addition, fractional CO2 laser combined with HA dressing therapy had a lower incidence of hyperpigmentation than fractional CO2 laser alone (RR=0.37, 95% CI [0.23, 0.61], P<0.0001). The level of evidence for outcomes was classified to be low to moderate. According to our findings, fractional CO2 laser combined with HA dressing is efficacious and safe option for facial atrophic acne scars. Nevertheless, more high-quality trials are required for further verification in the future.

Lipid Metabolism Reprogramming of Immune Cells in Acne: An Update

Acne vulgaris is one of the most widespread skin conditions and the main reason for visiting a dermatologist. Inflammatory response and abnormal infiltrations of immune cells are the main pathogenesis of acne. The increased lipid is the prerequisite for the acne, and the perturbation of lipid composition and content is consistent with the severity of acne. Furthermore, the increased lipid production not only contributes to the occurrence and development of acne, but also sensitizes the function of immune cells. The lipid metabolic dysfunction aggravates the severity of local tissue and provides pro-inflammatory-cytokine cues, which indicates the crucial roles of lipid metabolism on immune cells. Recent advances have demonstrated the lipid metabolism reprogramming of various immune cells in acne lesion. The abnormal lipid accumulation, lipolysis, and fatty acid oxidation lead to the activation and differentiation of immune cells, which promotes the pro-inflammatory cytokines production. Thus, this review discusses the emerging role of lipid metabolism reprogramming of immune cells in the progress of acne and aims to constitute food for others' projects involved in acne research.

Fractional carbon dioxide laser combined with subcision for the treatment of three subtypes of atrophic acne scars: a retrospective analysis

Fractional carbon dioxide (CO2) laser combined with subcision has been widely used for the clinical treatment, but the efficacy of the combined therapy on three types of atrophic acne scars remains unreported. This retrospective study analyzed the clinical data of 413 patients with atrophic acne scars, treated with fractional CO2 laser combined with subcision in the combined group and with fractional CO2 laser in the control group. The treatment efficacy was evaluated by the Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) and the Échelle d'évaluation clinique des cicatrices d'acné (ECCA). We reported adverse reactions such as erythema, lump, skin sensitivity, acne recurrence, and hyperpigmentation that occurred in both treatment groups. The treatment efficiency of the combined group was significantly higher than that of the control group (P < 0.001). Among the three subtypes of atrophic acne scars, the ECCA scores in the combined group of boxcar-type and rolling-type scars after treatment were lower than those in the control group (P = 0.041, P < 0.001, respectively), and no statistical difference in scores between the two groups for icepick-type scars was seen (P = 0.062). There was no statistical difference in adverse reactions between the two groups (P = 0.361). Fractional CO2 laser combined with subcision is more effective than fractional CO2 laser in the treatment of boxcar-type and rolling-type scars, but there is no significant difference in the treatment of icepick-type scars.