Nonexposure laparoscopic and endoscopic cooperative surgery (closed laparoscopic and endoscopic cooperative surgery) for gastric submucosal tumor

Clinical outcomes and cost-effectiveness analysis of robotic and endoscopic cooperative surgery for treating gastric submucosal tumors: a longitudinal nested cohort study

BACKGROUND

Robotic and endoscopic cooperative surgery (RECS) is an emerging and promising therapeutic approach for treating gastric submucosal tumors (GSMTs). However, the efficacy of RECS has not been well established, and its high medical costs significantly limit its application.

METHODS

This nested cohort study examined patients with GSMTs managed with different surgical techniques. A total of 314 consecutive patients were enrolled in this study, including 61 patients treated with RECS, 196 patients treated laparoscopically, and 57 patients treated with open surgery. To mitigate confounding bias, 1:1:1 propensity score matching (PSM) was utilized. The perioperative outcomes, postoperative gastrointestinal symptoms, long-term outcomes, and cost-effectiveness among the three groups were compared.

RESULTS

After PSM, 51 patients were included in each group. Compared with the laparoscopic and open surgical groups, the RECS group presented significantly lower intraoperative bleeding volumes, times to first flatus, times to liquid intake, and postoperative hospital stay. The severity of gastrointestinal symptoms in the RECS group was notably better than that in the laparoscopic and open groups 3, 6, and 12 months postsurgery. Regarding long-term outcomes, there were no differences in overall or relapse-free survival among the three groups. The total hospitalization cost was significantly greater in the RECS group, primarily due to surgical cost differences. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratios per quality-adjusted life year for the RECS group relative to the laparoscopic and open groups were 18,244 and 56,914 Chinese yuan (CNY), respectively. Analysis of the cost-effectiveness acceptability curves indicated that across all willingness-to-pay thresholds, the probability that RECS was cost-effective exceeded 90%.

CONCLUSIONS

RECS is a safe and effective method for treating GSMTs, offering faster postoperative recovery and fewer gastrointestinal symptoms than laparoscopic and open surgeries. Despite the increased costs associated with the introduction of RECS technology, it remains a cost-effective option.

Sealed endoscopic full-thickness resection with sentinel node navigation for early gastric cancer without endoscopic submucosal dissection indication

Background and study aims

Laparoscopic and endoscopic cooperative surgery (LECS) is a beneficial procedure that enables minimal resection of the gastric wall because the tumor can be located endoscopically. However, it is not indicated for epithelial tumors because of risk of peritoneal dissemination. Therefore, we devised a new LECS technique, known as sealed endoscopic full-thickness resection (sealed EFTR), in which the serosa was sealed with a silicone sheet to prevent escape of gastric contents and tumor cells. The aims of this study were to evaluate the safety and feasibility of a newly developed procedure and to observe its long-term outcomes, including absence of local recurrence and peritoneal dissemination.

Patients and methods

Approval was obtained from the Ethics Review Committee of the Japan Consortium for Advanced Surgical Endoscopy Study Group. Between December 2011 and July 2021, at Kanazawa Medical University Hospital, 16 patients with cT1 gastric cancer were enrolled in this study. Sealed EFTR was performed in patients diagnosed with negative lymph node metastasis via intraoperative sentinel node biopsy.

Results

Among the 16 enrolled patients, 12 (75%) had negative sentinel node metastases, 11 of whom underwent sealed EFTR. Except for two patients who died from other causes, no instances of metastasis or recurrence were observed during the mean follow-up period of 6.5 years (range, 2-11).

Conclusions

This study suggests that appropriate case selection for sentinel lymph node biopsy could allow for oncologically safe and individualized minimally invasive surgery for early gastric cancer that is ineligible for endoscopic submucosal dissection.

Advancements in Endoscopic Treatment for Gastric Subepithelial Tumors

Peroral flexible endoscopy is a minimally invasive technique that enables the local resection of gastric subepithelial tumors (SETs) with malignant potential. Resection techniques are mainly chosen on the basis of the lesion size. Minute SETs less than 1 cm should be managed through a watch and wait strategy, with the exception of histologically diagnosed superficial lesions, which require endoscopic mucosal resection or endoscopic submucosal dissection. For 1- to 3-cm small SETs, endoscopic enucleation techniques, such as endoscopic submucosal excavation, submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection, and peroral endoscopic tumor resection, can be used. However, endoscopic full-thickness resection is preferred for histologically complete removal with negative surgical margins. When endoscopic full-thickness resection is considered technically difficult, laparoscopic and endoscopic cooperative surgery (LECS) is a safe and dependable alternative. Moderate-sized SETs (3 to 5 cm) require surgical intervention because the lesions must be removed transabdominally. LECS is a less invasive surgical procedure as it reduces the resection area; however, some LECS techniques that require transoral tumor retrieval are not available. Endoscopic intervention for lesions larger than 5 cm should be used with caution for research purposes. With advancements in endoscopic diagnosis, the indications for endoscopic treatment for SETs are expected to improve, thereby enhancing patients' quality of life.

The maximum transverse diameter: an effective indicator for predicting peroral en bloc retrieval rate of mesenchymal tumors after endoscopic resection

BACKGROUND

Gastrointestinal mesenchymal tumors (GIMTs) are being increasingly resected under endoscopy. Large GIMTs cannot be completely retrieved through the mouth, but the cut-off diameter of peroral en bloc retrieval (PEBR) for GIMTs completely resected is still unknown. This study aimed to investigate the ability of maximum transverse diameter (MTD) to predict the PEBR rate of GIMTs after endoscopic resection (ER).

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed all patients who underwent ER for upper GIMTs from January 2009 to August 2023. The MTD was measured according to the maximum transverse diameter of specimen immediately retrieved after ER. For the PEBR rate, the independent predictors and optimal cut-off value of MTD were determined by logistic regression analysis and the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. The potential significance of preoperative CT for the evaluation of MTD was also clarified.

RESULTS

A total of 2032 patients were diagnosed with upper GIMTs after en bloc resection under endoscopy. The overall PEBR rate was 98.72% (2006/2032). The PEBR rate was 100% for 1943 GIMTs with MTD < 2.5 cm, 85.71% (60/70) for GIMTs with 2.5 cm but ≤ 3.0 cm, and 15.79% (3/19) for GIMTs with MTD > 3.0 cm, and these rates were significantly different (P < 0.01). In terms of the PEBR rate of GIMTs, the ROC curve revealed that the optimal cut-off MTD value was 3.0 cm, and logistic regression analysis revealed that MTD > 3.0 cm was an independent predictive factor (OR 71.07, 95% CI 9.14-552.43; P < 0.001). The MTD of CT was related to that of the resected specimen (r = 0.7149, P < 0.01), and CT underestimated the mean MTD of upper GIMTs by 0.17 cm (95% CI 0.09-0.24, P < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

MTD is an effective indicator for predicting the PEBR rate of GIMTs after ER. Resected specimens with MTD > 3.0 cm could not be routinely retrieved en bloc. Preoperative CT is suitable for evaluating the MTD of GIMTs, but underestimates the mean MTD of upper GIMTs by 0.17 cm.

Outcomes of laparoscopic and endoscopic cooperative surgery for gastric submucosal tumors: A retrospective multicenter study at 21 Japanese institutions

AIM

We conducted a multicenter study on classical laparoscopic and endoscopic cooperative surgery (LECS) and LECS-related procedures to retrospectively clarify the safety, problems, and mid-term outcomes of these methods after their coverage by the national health insurance.

METHODS

A total of 201 patients who underwent classical LECS/LECS-related procedures for gastric submucosal tumors (G-SMTs) in 21 institutions affiliated with the Laparoscopy Endoscopy Cooperative Surgery Study Group from April 2014 to March 2016 were included. Data was retrospectively obtained from the patients' charts.

RESULTS

The most common surgical procedure was classical LECS (155 patients, 77.1%), non-exposed endoscopic wall inversion surgery (22 patients, 11.4%), a combination of laparoscopic and endoscopic approaches to neoplasia with non-exposure technique (16 patients, 8%), and closed LECS (two patients, 1%). Only six (3%) patients underwent LECS with gastrostomy. The mean operative time and blood loss were 188.4 (70-462) minutes and 23.3 (0-793) g, respectively. Ten (5%) patients developed postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo classification grade II or higher). Two patients needed reoperation due to postoperative bleeding or anastomotic leakage. All tumors were resected with negative margins. A total of 127 (63.2%) patients underwent follow-up observations for over 36 months, one of whom had a recurrence of peritoneal dissemination and one had poor oral intake.

CONCLUSION

Classical LECS and LECS-related procedures for G-SMTs have favorable short/mid-term outcomes.

Long‑term survival prognosis of function‑preserving curative gastrectomy for early gastric cancer

Segmental gastrectomy, mini-distal gastrectomy and local resection of the stomach are function-preserving curative gastrectomies (FPGs), which are used to treat gastric cancer in specialized centers. These surgical options are less invasive and can alleviate postgastrectomy symptoms more than standard gastrectomy; however, their association with prognosis remains to be fully elucidated. The present study aimed to compare the survival prognosis of patients diagnosed as node-negative by sentinel node biopsy (SNB) treated via FPG with reduced lymph node dissection with that of patients who underwent guideline gastrectomy (GL). This retrospective study was conducted between April 1999 and March 2016. The inclusion criteria were a diagnosis of gastric cancer type 0, of ≤5 cm, located in L or M areas, and pT1N0. Patients who underwent distal gastrectomy and pylorus-preserving gastrectomy were included as controls in the GL group. Among the 146 and 300 patients in the FPG and GL groups, respectively, only 1 patient in the GL group experienced recurrence. The overall survival (OS) of the FPG group was 96.6% at 5 years and 92.5% at 10 years, which was significantly higher than that of the GL group (P<0.05). In addition, the cumulative incidence of non-cancer-related deaths, especially pulmonary diseases, was lower in the FPG group than that in the GL group (P<0.05). Notably, the OS and non-cancer death rate in the FPG group remained significantly better after propensity score-matching analysis. In conclusion, for early gastric cancer located in M or L areas, patients treated via FPG guided by SNB have a better prognosis and fewer deaths caused by respiratory disease than those treated via GL. The present clinical trial was registered under the following trial registration numbers: UMIN000010154 (2013/3/4), UMIN000023828 (2016/8/29), jRCTs041180006 (2018/10/9).

'The parachute method': A novel technique for laparoscopic tumour handling

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES

Although laparoscopic surgery for submucosal tumours (SMTs) may require multiple support threads, the traction direction of a single thread is only one option and cannot be freely changed. To solve this problem, we introduced a novel innovative technique for tumour handling, named 'the parachute method'.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

Prior to suturing, the surrounding vessel was treated when the tumour was located near the lesser or greater curvature. A monofilament thread was ligated in the serous muscle layer along the peritumoural markings with approximately five stitches in a row, with moderate deflection. Next, the other monofilament thread was passed through the deflection and ligated; this resembled a parachute shape that could be pulled in any direction over the entire circumference with uniform tension.

RESULTS

We performed this procedure in three patients with extramural growth-type gastrointestinal stromal tumours of approximately 2-3 cm. The median suturing time was 10 minutes. Laparoscopic local resection of the stomach was safely performed, and the patients were discharged without any complications.

CONCLUSION

In this study, we demonstrate a novel, simple, inexpensive, useful and reasonable technique for handling SMTs, named 'the parachute method'. We believe that this technique will have additional applications in cooperative surgery with endoscopy.

Perforation-free removal of gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors: Endoscopic inversion and strangulation of muscle layer and resection (EISMR)

Endoscopic resection for GIST has become more widespread in recent years because it is less invasive than surgery. However, when endoscopic resection is performed, a full-layer resection of the gastric wall is often necessary, and extensive suturing is required if perforation occurs, which is a technically challenging procedure. Recently, we reported a new method called endoscopic inversion and strangulation of the muscle layer and resection (EISMR), which consists of endoscopically inverting the muscle layer into the gastric lumen and strangulating the muscle layer with a detachable snare, followed by resection. The study comprised five consecutive patients with gastric GIST ≤50 mm in diameter who underwent EISMR procedures. The main outcomes of the study were en bloc resection rate, R0 resection rate, procedure time, and complications. The results showed that all five patients successfully underwent complete resection without perforation, and the en bloc resection and R0 resection rates were 100%. The median procedure time was 93 min (range, 58-120 min), and there were no major complications. We concluded that EISMR would be a safe and effective technique for endoscopic resection of gastric GISTs and may be an alternative to surgery or endoscopic submucosal dissection.

Non-exposed endoscopic wall-inversion surgery with one-step nucleic acid amplification for early gastrointestinal tumors: Personal experience and literature review

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic and endoscopic cooperative surgery is a safe, organ-sparing surgery that achieves full-thickness resection with adequate margins. Recent studies have demonstrated the safety and efficacy of these procedures. However, these techniques are limited by the exposure of the tumor and mucosa to the peritoneal cavity, which could lead to viable cancer cell seeding and the spillage of gastric juice or enteric liquids into the peritoneal cavity. Non-exposed endoscopic wall-inversion surgery (NEWS) is highly accurate in determining the resection margins to prevent intraperitoneal contamination because the tumor is inverted into the visceral lumen instead of the peritoneal cavity. Accurate intraoperative assessment of the nodal status could allow stratification of the extent of resection. One-step nucleic acid amplification (OSNA) can provide a rapid method of evaluating nodal tissue, whilst near-infrared laparoscopy together with indocyanine green can identify relevant nodal tissue intraoperatively.

AIM

To determine the safety and feasibility of NEWS in early gastric and colon cancers and of adding rapid intraoperative lymph node (LN) assessment with OSNA.

METHODS

The patient-based experiential portion of our investigations was conducted at the General and Oncological Surgery Unit of the St. Giuseppe Moscati Hospital (Avellino, Italy). Patients with early-stage gastric or colon cancer (diagnosed via endoscopy, endoscopic ultrasound, and computed tomography) were included. All lesions were treated by NEWS procedure with intraoperative OSNA assay between January 2022 and October 2022. LNs were examined intraoperatively with OSNA and postoperatively with conventional histology. We analyzed patient demographics, lesion features, histopathological diagnoses, R0 resection (negative margins) status, adverse events, and follow-up results. Data were collected prospectively and analyzed retrospectively.

RESULTS

A total of 10 patients (5 males and 5 females) with an average age of 70.4 ± 4.5 years (range: 62-78 years) were enrolled in this study. Five patients were diagnosed with gastric cancer. The remaining 5 patients were diagnosed with early-stage colon cancer. The mean tumor diameter was 23.8 ± 11.6 mm (range: 15-36 mm). The NEWS procedure was successful in all cases. The mean procedure time was 111.5 ± 10.7 min (range: 80-145 min). The OSNA assay revealed no LN metastases in any patients. Histologically complete resection (R0) was achieved in 9 patients (90.0%). There was no recurrence during the follow-up period.

CONCLUSION

NEWS combined with sentinel LN biopsy and OSNA assay is an effective and safe technique for the removal of selected early gastric and colon cancers in which it is not possible to adopt conventional endoscopic resection techniques. This procedure allows clinicians to acquire additional information on the LN status intraoperatively.

Lap-Endo cooperative surgery (LECS) in gastric GIST: updates and future advances

BACKGROUND

With advancements in the field of laparoscopic and endoscopic techniques leading to improved patient outcomes, open resection has become increasingly outdated for the treatment of gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GIST). This is further superseded with the advent of laparoscopic and endoscopic cooperative surgery (LECS), an amalgamation of the two techniques to further improve results garnered while overcoming prior limitations each had individually.

METHODS

The electronic databases MEDLINE, Embase and PubMed were reviewed up to August 2021, using terms relating to LECS and gastric GIST. Relevant in-article references not returned in the searches were also considered.

RESULTS

Advancements in the field of laparoscopic and endoscopic techniques has led to improved patient outcomes, making open resection a thing of the past for gastric GIST. This has become even more apparent with the advent of LECS, coupling two cutting edge techniques to further improve results garnered while overcoming prior limitations each had individually. LECS has gained much favour by reducing surgical margins due to endoscopic visualisation without being limited to smaller tumours, allowing for better anatomical and functional preservation of prior anatomy. Furthermore, hybrid approaches have improved perioperative outcomes, with reduction in procedure time, post-procedure hospital stay and lesser complications. Additionally, subtypes of LECS such as inverted LECS, closed LECS, non-exposed endoscopic wall-inversion surgery (NEWS) and laparoscopy-assisted endoscopic full-thickness resection (LAEFR) have been developed that allows the abdominal cavity to not be exposed to tumour cells and gastric contents by extracting the lesion transorally.

CONCLUSIONS

LECS and its subtypes being a combination of two advanced techniques shows a synergistic effect that is promising. However, despite all these advantages of enhanced safety and certainty, there remains areas that require further improvement.

Pure endoscopic resection versus laparoscopic assisted procedure for upper gastrointestinal stromal tumors: Perspective from a surgical endoscopist

Management of upper gastrointestinal (UGI) tract gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) has evolved significantly over the past two decades. For GIST size smaller than 5 cm, laparoscopic resection has become the current standard. To avoid postoperative gastric deformity and preserve gastric function, laparoscopic endoscopic cooperative surgery (LECS) was developed and various modifications have been reported and utilized successfully. Pure endoscopic resection techniques have also been reported at a similar period of time, which further push the boundary of incisionless surgery in managing these lesions. Both tunneling and nontunneling exposed type endoscopic full thickness resection are well described procedures for resection of small UGI GIST. In this review, a summary of these procedures is provided, and the pros and cons of each technique from the perspective of a surgical endoscopist are discussed in detail. LECS and endoscopic resection are complementary to each other. The choice of technique should be tailored to the location, morphology, and size of the target lesions, taking into account the experience of the laparoscopic surgeons and endoscopists.

Advances of endoscopic and surgical management in gastrointestinal stromal tumors

As one of the most common mesenchymal malignancies in the digestive system, gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) occur throughout the alimentary tract with diversified oncological characteristics. With the advent of the tyrosine kinase inhibitor era, the treatment regimens of patients with GISTs have been revolutionized and GISTs have become the paradigm of multidisciplinary therapy. However, surgery resection remains recognized as the potentially curative management for the radical resection and provided with favorable oncological outcomes. The existing available surgery algorithms in clinical practice primarily incorporate open procedure, and endoscopic and laparoscopic surgery together with combined operation techniques. The performance of various surgery methods often refers to the consideration of risk evaluation of recurrence and metastases; the degree of disease progression; size, location, and growth pattern of tumor; general conditions of selected patients; and indications and safety profile of various techniques. In the present review, we summarize the fundamental principle of surgery of GISTs based on risk assessment as well as tumor size, location, and degree of progress with an emphasis on the indications, strengths, and limitations of current surgery techniques.

Laparoscopic and endoscopic cooperative surgery for early gastric cancer: Perspective for actual practice

Early gastric cancer (EGC) has a desirable prognosis compared with advanced gastric cancer (AGC). The surgical concept of EGC has altered from simply emphasizing radical resection to both radical resection and functional preservation. As the mainstream surgical methods for EGC, both endoscopic resection and laparoscopic resection have certain inherent limitations, while the advent of laparoscopic and endoscopic cooperative surgery (LECS) has overcome these limitations to a considerable extent. LECS not only expands the surgical indications for endoscopic resection, but greatly improves the quality of life (QOL) in EGC patients. This minireview elaborates on the research status of LECS for EGC, from the conception and development of LECS, to the tentative application of LECS in animal experiments, then to case reports and retrospective clinical studies. Finally, the challenges and prospects of LECS in the field of EGC are prospected and expounded, hoping to provide some references for relevant researchers. With the in-depth understanding of minimally invasive technology, LECS remains a promising option in the management of EGC. Carrying out more related multicenter prospective clinical researches is the top priority of promoting the development of this field in the future.

Safety, efficacy, and selection strategy of laparoscopic local gastrectomy for gastrointestinal stromal tumors in the esophagogastric junction

Objective

To investigate the safety, efficacy, and selection strategy of laparoscopic local gastrectomy for stromal tumors in the esophagogastric junction.

Methods

Thirty-eight patients with mesenchymal tumors in the esophagogastric junction were retrospectively enrolled from April 2018 to July 2021 in which the upper edge of the tumor is less than 2 cm from the Z-line or has invaded the Z-line <1/2 circumference. Surgical outcomes, complications, recover, and postoperative gastroesophageal reflux of both groups were compared.

Results

27 patients underwent wedge resection, and 11 underwent resection by opening all of the layers of the stomach wall. Operative time (90.0 vs. 181.8 min, respectively, P = 0.001) was shorter for the WR group vs. RASW. Blood loss (20 vs. 50 ml, respectively, P = 0.012) was less for the WR group vs. RASW. Recovery of the RASW group was slower in terms of time to pass gas (2 vs. 3 days, P = 0.034), time to oral intake (2 vs. 4 days, P = 0.007), time to semi-liquid food intake (4 vs. 8 days, P = 0.003), and postoperative hospitalization (5 vs. 8 days, P = 0.001) vs. WR. In terms of short-term complications (≤30 days), no significant between-group differences were observed. Cardia stenosis did not occur in either group. In the WR group, one patient experienced mild reflux at 6 months and recovered 1 year after surgery. In the RASW group, one patient experienced severe gastroesophageal reflux at 6 months and 1 year after surgery, which was not entirely relieved by taking antacids. No other patients have gastroesophageal reflux.

Conclusion

Laparoscopic local gastrectomy is safe and feasible for mesenchymal tumors in the esophagogastric junction in which the upper edge of the tumor is less than 2 cm from the Z-line or has invaded the Z-line <1/2 circumference, and has achieved an excellent short-term effect. The choice of surgery is based on the relationship between the tumor and the position of the cardia.

Laparoscopic and endoscopic cooperative surgery for full-thickness resection and sentinel node dissection for early gastric cancer

The endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) technique has become the gold standard for submucosal tumors that have negligible risk of lymph node metastasis (LNM), due to its minimal invasiveness and ability to improve quality of life. However, this technique is limited in stage T1 cancers that have a low risk of LNM. Endoscopic full thickness resection can be achieved with laparoscopic endoscopic cooperative surgery (LECS), which combines laparoscopic gastric wall resection and ESD. In LECS, the surgical margins from the tumor are clearly achieved while performing organ-preserving surgery. To overcome the limitation of classical LECS, namely the opening of the gastric wall during the procedure, which increases the risk of peritoneal tumor seeding, non-exposed endoscopic wall-inversion surgery was developed. With this full-thickness resection technique, contact between the intra-abdominal space and the intragastric space was eliminated.

A scoring system to predict surgical difficulty in minimally invasive surgery for gastric submucosal tumors

BACKGROUND

Various minimally invasive surgery (MIS) procedures are used for gastric submucosal tumors (SMTs), and their technical difficulties vary. Preoperative understanding of difficulties is crucial; however, objective indicators are lacking.

METHODS

Gastric SMTs requiring MIS (n = 36) were retrospectively analyzed. Preoperative factors were evaluated using a multivariate linear regression analysis. A scoring system was then constructed, and its feasibility was evaluated.

RESULTS

Three factors were identified and scored based on the weighted contribution for predicting surgical time: tumor location (cardia, score of "2"; posterior wall of fundus, "1"); tumor size (greater than 4 cm, "1"); and tumor growth appearance (intraluminal, "1"). The summed scores could stratify the surgical time stepwise in each score, and patients who scored higher than 3 had larger intraoperative blood loss and a longer hospital stay.

CONCLUSION

Our scoring system predicted surgical difficulties and may, therefore, be useful in selecting appropriate surgical approaches for gastric SMTs.

Current treatment strategies and future perspectives for gastrointestinal stromal tumors

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are mesenchymal tumors that originate from the gastrointestinal tract, mostly from the stomach. GISTs are derived from the myenteric interstitial cells of Cajal and are caused by several mutations in the c-kit and platelet-derived growth factor receptor genes. Clinically, GISTs are detected by endoscopic and imaging findings and are diagnosed by immunostaining. Surgery is the first line of treatment, and if the tumor is relatively small, minimally invasive surgery such as laparoscopy is performed. In recent years, neoadjuvant therapy has been administered to patients with GISTs that are suspected of having a large size or infiltration to other organs. Postoperative adjuvant imatinib is the standard therapy for high-risk GISTs. It is important to assess the risk of recurrence after GIST resection. However, the effect of tyrosine kinase inhibitor use will vary by the mutation of c-kit genes and the site of mutation. Furthermore, information regarding gene mutation is indispensable when considering the treatment policy for recurrent GISTs. This article reviews the clinicopathological characteristics of GISTs along with the minimally invasive and multidisciplinary treatment options available for these tumors. The future perspectives for diagnostic and treatment approaches for these tumors have also been discussed.

Clinical outcomes of laparoscopic and endoscopic cooperative surgery for gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumor

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic and endoscopic cooperative surgery (LECS) is a well-recognized surgical procedure for gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST). In this report, we describe the clinical outcomes of LECS procedures for gastric GIST in our institution.

METHODS

We performed LECS procedures, including classical LECS, inverted LECS, closed LECS, and combination of laparoscopic and endoscopic approaches to neoplasia with non-exposure technique (CLEAN-NET), in 40 gastric intraluminal and intramural type GIST patients, whose tumors were ≤ 50 mm in diameter, between September 2012 and December 2020. The patient background, surgical outcomes, postoperative morbidity and mortality, as well as the tumors' clinicopathological characteristics were analyzed retrospectively.

RESULTS

Pathological findings showed that most patients had a low or very low risk of tumor recurrence, while one patient had a high risk according to the modified-Fletcher's classification. The median length of postoperative hospital stay was 7 days. Only one patient had severe postoperative grade III complications according to the Clavien-Dindo (C-D) classification, after closed LECS, but was treated successfully with endoscopic hemostasis for postoperative hemorrhage. The remaining patients treated with LECS did not have severe complications. During the follow-up period (median, 31 months), all patients were disease-free, with no tumor recurrence or metastases.

CONCLUSION

LECS is a safe surgical procedure for gastric intraluminal and intramural type GIST ≤ 50 mm in diameter, with good clinical outcomes.

Minimally Invasive Approach to Gastric GISTs: Analysis of a Multicenter Robotic and Laparoscopic Experience with Literature Review

Background: Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are most frequently located in the stomach. In the setting of a multidisciplinary approach, surgery represents the best therapeutic option, consisting mainly in a wedge gastric resection. (1) Materials and methods: Between January 2010 to September 2020, 105 patients with a primary gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GISTs) located in the stomach, underwent surgery at three surgical units. (2) Results: A multi-institutional analysis of minimally invasive series including 81 cases (36 laparoscopic and 45 robotic) from 3 referral centers was performed. Males were 35 (43.2%), the average age was 66.64 years old. ASA score ≥3 was 6 (13.3%) in the RS and 4 (11.1%) in the LS and the average tumor size was 4.4 cm. Most of the procedures were wedge resections (N = 76; 93.8%) and the main operative time was 151 min in the RS and 97 min in the LS. Conversion was necessary in five cases (6.2%). (3) Conclusions: Minimal invasive approaches for gastric GISTs performed in selected patients and experienced centers are safe. A robotic approach represents a useful option, especially for GISTs that are more than 5 cm, even located in unfavorable places.

Single-Incision Laparoscopic Intragastric Surgery for Gastric Submucosal Tumors Located Near the Esophagogastric Junction

Background: Laparoscopic local resection of the stomach for gastric submucosal tumors (SMTs) is widely accepted by surgeons. For SMTs located near the esophagogastric junction (EGJ), simple laparoscopic wedge resection is rarely performed owing to concerns of causing cardia deformities or stenosis. Single-incision laparoscopic intragastric surgery (sLIGS) has been used to treat SMTs located near the EGJ in carefully selected cases. Methods: We modified sLIGS using a subxiphoid incision. Thirteen consecutive patients with intraluminal or intramural growth type gastric SMTs located near the EGJ underwent sLIGS at our institution from July 2018 to April 2020. Results: Thirteen operations were successfully performed using sLIGS, including eight full-thickness resections and five submucosal resections. There were no conversions to an open procedure and all tumors were confirmed to have negative margins on pathology. The mean operation time was 100 ± 10 minutes (range, 85-160 minutes). The mean blood loss was 50 ± 10 mL (range, 50-100 mL). The mean length of postoperative hospital stay was 7 ± 1.5 days (6-10 days). One patient was found to have oozing of blood confirmed by gastroscopy postoperatively and recovered after stopping antiplatelet therapy. Ten cases were gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST), two cases were leiomyoma, and one case was neuroendocrine neoplasm. Of the 10 GISTs, 9 were classified as low risk; 1 showed medium risk and the patient received adjuvant imatinib therapy. There were no tumor recurrences during a mean follow-up of 14 ± 4 months (range, 5-25 months). Conclusions: This modified sLIGS for the treatment of the gastric SMTs located near the EGJ is simple and safe. This can be used as an alternative treatment for gastric SMTs near the EGJ.

Current Status and Prospects of Endoscopic Resection Technique for Colorectal Tumors

Currently, endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a well-established and common treatment for intramucosal colorectal cancer in Japan. However, colorectal ESD is technically more difficult to perform than esophageal and gastric ESD, and some lesions, such as fibrotic lesions, are difficult to dissect by endoscopy. Several techniques, such as the pocket-creation method and laparoscopically assisted endoscopic polypectomy, have been utilized for challenging targets. In recent years, endoscopic full-thickness resection (EFTR) using full-thickness resection devices have mainly been performed in Western countries. We have used laparoscopy and endoscopy cooperative surgery for colorectal tumors (LECS-CR) since 2011 for the challenging treatment of colorectal ESD. Improvements in ESD techniques have resulted in an increase in the literature on EFTR, and LECS-CR may be considered an effective endoscopic technique for colorectal ESD in the future.

Current status of the diagnosis and treatment of gastrointestinal schwannoma

Gastrointestinal schwannoma is a rare, slow-growing and benign tumor that mostly originates in the Auerbach myenteric nerve plexus in the gastrointestinal tract. The clinical manifestations may be associated with the location, size, differentiation type, and degree of malignancy of the tumor. Endoscopy, ultrasound and imaging examinations serve an important auxiliary role in the clinical identification, diagnosis and differential diagnosis of lesions; assessment of risk; and preparation for surgery. S-100 positivity is a hallmark of schwannoma. CD34, CD117, discovered on GIST-1, P53, ALK, β-catenin, smooth muscle actin and Desmin negativity are helpful for the identification of other gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Surgical removal of the tumor is the main treatment for schwannoma. Benign gastrointestinal schwannoma has a good prognosis without recurrence and metastasis; malignant transformation is extremely rare and has a poor prognosis.

Laparoscopic Limited Resection for Duodenal Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic surgery may be a suitable treatment for gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) in terms of oncological feasibility and being minimally invasive. Case series of laparoscopic resection for duodenal GISTs have not been reported in detail, so in this report, the detail of laparoscopic surgeries for duodenal GISTs is summarized.

METHODS

This is a single-center retrospective case series of six consecutive patients with duodenal GISTs who underwent laparoscopic limited resection of the duodenum between 2003 and 2019.

RESULTS

Tumors were located within the first portion in three patients, the second portion in two patients, and the third portion in one patient. Median tumor size was 25 mm. Four patients underwent a laparoscopic and endoscopic full-thickness resection with primary closure, one patient underwent a laparoscopic wedge resection, and one patient underwent a laparoscopic segmental duodenectomy with Roux-en-Y gastrojejunostomy. Median blood loss was minimal (10 ml) with median operative time of 2 h, and there were no conversions to open surgery. There were no intraoperative or postoperative complications. All patients underwent curative resection with negative surgical margins, and none had recurrence of their duodenal GISTs. All patients were alive at the end of the follow-up period of 54 months.

CONCLUSION

Laparoscopic limited resection is a feasible, safe, and ideal treatment procedure for duodenal GISTs in terms of short- and long-term surgical outcomes.

Closed laparoscopic and endoscopic cooperative surgery for early gastric cancer with difficulty in endoscopic submucosal dissection: a report of three cases

Background

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is increasingly applied for early gastric cancer. ESD is a less invasive procedure and could be a radical treatment. However, in some cases, ESD cannot be completed owing to patient or technical factors. In such cases, which could have the potential for curative resection with ESD, standard gastrectomy is excessively invasive. Through closed laparoscopic and endoscopic cooperative surgery (LECS), gastric tumor can be precisely resected without exposing tumor cells to the abdominal cavity. Compared with standard gastrectomy, closed LECS is less invasive for the treatment of early gastric cancer.

Case presentation

We performed closed LECS for three cases of early gastric cancer after failed ESD. In all three cases, ESD was interrupted owing to technical and patient factors, including perforation, respiratory failure, and carbon dioxide narcosis. All three cases successfully underwent closed LECS with complete tumor resection and showed an uneventful postoperative course. All three patients remain alive and have experienced no complications or recurrence, with a median follow up of 30 (14–30) months.

Conclusions

Closed LECS is less invasive and useful procedure for the treatment of early gastric cancer, particularly in cases with difficulty in ESD.

Laparoscopic and endoscopic cooperative surgery for gastric cancer mimicking a submucosal tumor

Abstract

Background

Gastric cancer that mimics a submucosal tumor (SMT) is infrequently encountered in routine clinical settings, and histopathological analysis is often negative for malignant cells. In such cases, excisional biopsy of the entire tumor may be necessary to make a definitive pathological diagnosis, and laparoscopic and endoscopic cooperative surgery (LECS) is a viable method of excisional biopsy.

Case presentation

An 80-year-old male patient diagnosed with stomach wall irregularities at routine medical check-up was referred to our facility, and consequent endoscopic examination detected a 20-mm protruded lesion in the greater curvature at the middle third of the stomach. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) showed a thick, low echoic lesion with an irregular margin in the second layer of the gastric wall. Further, a nodular part of the lesion had infiltrated into the submucosa, with an appearance similar to that of linitis plastica of the stomach. The lesion was highly suspected to be a gastric carcinoma with submucosal invasion. However, mucosal-incision-assisted biopsy revealed no malignant cells. Computed tomography (CT) identified no metastatic lymph nodes. Therefore, an excisional biopsy using LECS was performed, and to avoid peritoneal dissemination, we used a modified version, namely, combination of laparoscopic and endoscopic approaches to neoplasia with non-exposure technique (CLEAN-NET). The procedure ended without any complications, and post-operative course was uneventful. As histopathology returned a diagnosis of adenocarcinoma pT4a, we performed radical gastrectomy and D2 lymphadenectomy. Post-operative course was unremarkable and the patient underwent follow-up examinations without adjuvant chemotherapy because of old age.

Conclusions

Local resection using LECS for gastric tumors with a high suspicion of malignancy is useful and feasible. LECS could be used in similar cases.

Nonexposed wall-inversion surgery as a novel local resection method for neoplasms in the gastrointestinal tract

Nonexposed wall-inversion surgery was invented for the treatment of node-negative gastrointestinal tumors that are difficult to be resected using the endoluminal approach alone. The advantages of this surgery include 1. full-thickness resection procedure of gastrointestinal wall with minimum necessary tumor-negative margins and 2. less risk of bacterial contamination and tumor seeding into the abdominal cavity. We conducted a PubMed search to select relevant articles published until the end of October 2019 for pooled case analyses using the keyword "nonexposed wall-inversion surgery," Based on our search, we enrolled the data of 88 gastric lesions and 1 duodenal lesion retrieved from 7 case report articles and 4 original articles of clinical cases. The gastric lesions consisted of 59 gastrointestinal stromal tumors, 7 ectopic pancreases, 5 leiomyomas, 3 early gastric cancers, and 14 others, with a mean maximal tumor diameter of 25.0 mm. In 5 lesions (5.7%), intraoperative perforation was performed, and 2 lesions (2.3%) were retrieved by the transabdominal route. All 4 major postoperative complications (4.5%) were managed without resurgical interventions. The duodenal case, neuroendocrine tumor, measuring 13 mm in size, was curatively resected without complications. Nonexposed wall-inversion surgery appears to be an acceptable treatment for node-negative gastric and duodenal tumors; however, further accumulation of cases is necessary to confirm the feasibility.

A Rare Case of Gastric Schwannoma: A Case Report and Literature Review

In general, schwannoma is a benign and slow-glowing neoplasm that rarely occurs in the gastrointestinal tract as a submucosal tumor (SMT), with the most common site being the stomach. As gastric schwannoma (GS) is a rare tumor, there is limited data in the literature about its clinical features. The diagnosis of schwannoma can only be made by pathological examination with positive staining for S-100 protein. It is necessary to obtain an accurate diagnosis to introduce optimal treatment options preoperatively. However, a precise diagnosis of GS is difficult, even with modern imaging techniques. On the other hand, a complete resection with a negative surgical margin (R0) of GS is considered the best treatment, with an excellent prognosis. We present a case of a 66-year-old female patient who underwent laparoscopic-assisted wedge gastrectomy for gastric SMT, pathologically diagnosed as GS, with positive staining for S-100 protein and negative for c-kit and CD34. At 12-month follow-up after surgery, there was no recurrence or metastasis of GS. Our treatment is appropriate and effective in case of GS exceeding 50 mm.

History and future perspectives in Japanese guidelines for endoscopic resection of early gastric cancer

Japanese guidelines for gastric cancer treatment were first published in 2001 for the purpose of showing the appropriate indication for each treatment method, thereby reducing differences in the therapeutic approach among institutions, and so on. With the accumulation of evidence and the development and prevalence of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), the criteria for the indication and curability of endoscopic resection (ER) for early gastric cancer (EGC) have expanded. However, several problems still remain. Although a risk-scoring system (eCura system) for predicting lymph node metastasis (LNM) may help treatment decision in patients who do not meet the curative criteria for ER of EGC, which is referred to as eCura C-2 in the latest guidelines, additional gastrectomy with lymphadenectomy may be excessive for many patients, even those at high risk for LNM. Less-invasive function-preserving surgery, such as non-exposed endoscopic wall-inversion surgery with laparoscopic sentinel node sampling, may overcome this problem. In addition, further less-invasive treatment, such as ER with chemotherapy, should be established for patients who prefer not to undergo additional gastrectomy.

Sentinel lymph node detection for gastric cancer: Promise or pitfall?

At present, optimal surgery for gastric cancer is still under debate, especially the extent of lymph node dissection. Gastrectomy with D1/D2 lymphadenectomy is standard treatment for resectable advanced gastric cancer. However, in early gastric cancer without lymph node metastasis, gastrectomy with D1/D2 lymphadenectomy may not be unnecessary, which could increases morbidity and mortality and reduces the quality of life (QOL). Therefore, the concept of sentinel lymph node could be applied in gastric cancer. But due to the complexity of gastric lymphatic drainage, there are still many issues under debate, such as suitable tracers, the method of mapping and collecting and the oncologic safety of sentinel node navigation surgery (SNNS). In addition, skip metastasis and unreliability of intraoperative pathological diagnosis are two main reasons for false negative cases. In this review, we summarize the current status and controversy of sentinel lymph node detection in gastric cancer, attempting to help with practical application. Further, we hold opinion that we should be cautious about performing sentinel lymph node detection in gastric cancer before an accurate and effective method occurs.

Laparoscopic and Endoscopic Cooperative Dissection for Small Gastric Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor without Causing Injury to the Mucosa

Objective

To investigate the feasibility of laparoscopic and endoscopic cooperative dissection (LECD) for small gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) without causing injury to the mucosa, compared with ESD surgery which is widely used now.

Methods

A total of 25 patients with small gastric GISTs who underwent LECD and 20 patients with small gastric GISTs who underwent ESD between October 2014 and June 2016 were included in this study. All patients underwent curative resection for pathologically diagnosed small gastric GISTs. Patients' clinical data were retrospectively analyzed.

Results

In LECD group, the operation was successfully performed in all patients. However, in the ESD group, three patients were transferred to laparoscopic surgery due to intraoperative massive bleeding or intraoperative perforation. No additional targeted chemotherapy drugs for interstitial tumors were prescribed in two groups. There was no difference in the complete tumor capsule rate (100% vs. 90%, p = 0.11), operation time (80.76 ± 13.86 ml vs. 84.05 ± 15.33 ml, p = 0.45), major intraoperative bleeding (0 vs. 5%, p = 0.26), postoperative bleeding (0 vs. 10%, p = 0.11), and postoperative infection (0 vs. 10%, p = 0.11) between the two groups. Compared to ESD (endoscopic submucosal dissection), LECS patients had shorter postoperative indwelling gastric tube (1.04 ± 0.98 d vs. 2.85 ± 0.24 d, p < 0.01), earlier postoperative eating (1.96 ± 0.98 d vs. 3.50 ± 1.15 d, p < 0.01), shorter average postoperative hospital stay (3.44 ± 1.00 d vs. 7.85 ± 1.18 d, p < 0.01), smaller perforation rate (0 vs. 25%, p < 0.05), and fewer surgical supplies. No recurrence or metastasis cases were found between the two groups during the follow-up period, and there were no cases of death due to gastric GISTs.

Conclusion

LECD is a novel surgery for small gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors that leads to satisfactory short-term outcomes and meets the idea of minimally invasive surgery and rapid recovery; compared with ESD, LECD surgery has some advantages in clinical practice. However, further follow-up is needed to confirm.

Clinical feasibility and safety of third space robotic and endoscopic cooperative surgery for gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors dissection : A new surgical technique for treating gastric GISTs

Background

Surgical management of gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) has evolved towards minimal invasiveness. Laparoscopic wedge resection and laparoscopic and endoscopic cooperative surgery had been considered as standard surgical treatments for gastric GISTs > 2 cm. However, stomach deformation and the full-thickness gastric defect caused by these procedures may increase the risk of morbidity. To address these problems, we developed a novel technique, third space robotic and endoscopic cooperative surgery (TS-RECS), which could dissect the tumor entirely while preserving the intact mucosal layer. Here we performed a prospective evaluation of the feasibility and safety of TS-RECS.

Methods

Patients with gastric GISTs were recruited between April 2018 and April 2019. During the operation, the gastric GIST was located by endoscopic view firstly and the submucosal injection was performed. The tumor was then dissected through robotic surgery. Clinicopathological characteristics, operative data, adverse events, and follow-ups were prospectively collected and analyzed.

Results

A total of 20 patients with gastric GISTs received TS-RECS. The mean tumor size was 33.0 ± 7.3 mm. R0 resection was achieved in all patients with a median operation time of 115 min and a median blood loss of 20 ml. The integrity of mucosal layer was maintained in 95% (19/20) of the patients. All patients started oral diet on postoperative day 1 or 2, staying in the hospital for a median of 6 days after surgery. There were no major adverse events. Local or distant recurrences were not observed during a median follow-up period of 10 months.

Conclusions

Our study suggests that TS-RECS appears to be a feasible and safe technique which could be an alternative method for resecting gastric GISTs > 2 cm.

Clinical Trials

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03804762.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1007/s00464-019-07223-w) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Gastric schwannoma with high accumulation on fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography resected by non-exposed endoscopic wall-inversion surgery

Gastric schwannoma is a relatively rare tumor arising from Auerbach plexus in the muscle layer of the gastric wall, and constitutes 0.1% to 0.2% of all gastric tumors and 5% of benign non-epithelium-related gastric tumors. We report the case of a 49-year-old woman in whom upper gastrointestinal endoscopy revealed an approximately 2-cm submucosal tumor on the anterior wall of the fornix of the stomach. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography revealed a homogeneously enhanced lesion (~ 17 mm) in the upper third of the stomach as well as a lesion (~ 25 mm) on the left kidney that was strongly enhanced in the early phase. An ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography scan revealed high accumulation that is characteristic of gastric tumors. The possibility of malignancy was not completely excluded, and the gastric tumor was resected by non-exposed endoscopic wall-inversion surgery. The patient was discharged with a good prognosis 5 days after surgery. In conclusion, non-exposed endoscopic wall-inversion surgery is a minimally invasive and effective method for resecting small gastric submucosal tumors (diameters < 3 cm) for which preoperative diagnosis is difficult.

Laparoscopic endoscopic cooperative surgery (LECS) for the gastrointestinal tract: Updated indications

Laparoscopic and endoscopic cooperative surgery (LECS) is a procedure combining laparoscopic gastric resection with endoscopic submucosal dissection for local resection of gastric tumors with appropriate, minimal surgical resection margins. The LECS concept was initially developed from the classical LECS procedure for gastric submucosal tumor resection. Many researchers reported that classical LECS was a safe and feasible technique for resection of gastric submucosal tumors, regardless of tumor location, including the esophagogastric junction. Recently, LECS was approved for insurance coverage by Japan's National Health Insurance plan and widely applied for gastric submucosal tumor resection. However, the limitations of classical LECS are the risk of abdominal infection, scattering of tumor cells in the abdominal cavity, and tumor cell seeding in the peritoneum. The development of modified LECS procedures, such as inverted-LECS, non-exposed endoscopic wall-inversion surgery, a combination of laparoscopic and endoscopic approaches to neoplasia with a non-exposure technique, and closed-LECS, has almost resolved these drawbacks. This has led to a recent increase in the indication of modified LECS to include patients with gastric epithelial neoplasms. The LECS concept is also beginning to be applied to tumor excision in other organs, such as the duodenum, colon and rectum. Further evolution of LECS procedures is expected in the future. Sentinel lymph node mapping could also be combined with LECS, resulting in a portion of early gastric cancers being treated by LECS with sentinel node mapping.

An innovative laparoscopic and endoscopic technique in an animal model: combined gastric full-thickness tumor resection

Background and study aims  The combination of endoscopy with laparoscopy for full-thickness gastric resection has received much attention. The advantage in using it is removak of the target lesion without resection of excessive normal tissue. The technique could prevent deformed scars, particularly at the cardia and in the prepyloric area. The aim of this protocol was to evaluate a new combined operation for full-thickness resection of the gastric wall. Materials and methods  Gastric subepithelial lesions in multiple topographic locations of the stomach were simulated in seven live pigs. Full-thickness gastric resection was undertaken and after assessment of the outcome, the animals were euthanized. The primary endpoint was accomplishment of the procedure following all steps in the new technique, in various gastric locations. The secondary endpoints were duration of the procedure, quality of specimen margins, and complications. Results  Resections were successful, complete, and complication-free, ensuring a safe surgical margin of healthy tissue. The procedure was completed in 50 minutes. No mucosal perforation or gas escape occurred. Conclusions  The combined technique was safe, effective and minimally invasive. No expensive materials were used. Lesion exposure, gastric content leakage, incomplete resection, and excessive normal tissue elimination were avoided. Human trials of this technique may be warranted.

Laparoscopic and endoscopic cooperative surgery for gastric tumors: Perspective for actual practice and oncological benefits

Laparoscopic and endoscopic cooperative surgery (LECS) is a surgical technique that combines laparoscopic partial gastrectomy and endoscopic submucosal dissection. LECS requires close collaboration between skilled laparoscopic surgeons and experienced endoscopists. For successful LECS, experience alone is not sufficient. Instead, familiarity with the characteristics of both laparoscopic surgery and endoscopic intervention is necessary to overcome various technical problems. LECS was developed mainly as a treatment for gastric submucosal tumors without epithelial lesions, including gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs). Local gastric wall dissection without lymphadenectomy is adequate for the treatment of gastric GISTs. Compared with conventional simple wedge resection with a linear stapler, LECS can provide both optimal surgical margins and oncological benefit that result in functional preservation of the residual stomach. As technical characteristics, however, classic LECS involves intentional opening of the gastric wall, resulting in a risk of tumor dissemination with contamination by gastric juice. Therefore, several modified LECS techniques have been developed to avoid even subtle tumor exposure. Furthermore, LECS for early gastric cancer has been attempted according to the concept of sentinel lymph node dissection. LECS is a prospective treatment for GISTs and might become a future therapeutic option even for early gastric cancer. Interventional endoscopists and laparoscopic surgeons collaboratively explore curative resection. Simultaneous intraluminal approach with endoscopy allows surgeons to optimizes the resection area. LECS, not simple wedge resection, achieves minimally invasive treatment and allows for oncologically precise resection. We herein present detailed tips and pitfalls of LECS and discuss various technical considerations.

Laparoscopic Endoscopic Cooperative Surgery for Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors

With the development of laparoscopy and digestive endoscopy, multiple laparoscopic and endoscopic cooperative surgeries (LECSs) for gastrointestinal stromal tumors have recently been developed. Classic LECS has been confirmed as a feasible and safe treatment procedure for gastrointestinal stromal tumors with regard to both short-term surgical and long-term oncological outcomes; however, classic LECS has the potential risk of gastric contents or tumor cells spilling into the abdominal cavity because the gastric wall has to be opened during the procedure. Various modified LECS techniques have aimed at further minimizing invasiveness, such as the full-thickness resection method using the nonexposure technique (combination of laparoscopic and endoscopic approaches to neoplasia with a nonexposure technique), nonexposed endoscopic wall-inversion surgery, and closed LECS. This review describes and summarizes the current LECS for gastrointestinal tumor.

Comparison between endoscopic and laparoscopic removal of gastric submucosal tumor

BACKGROUND AND AIM

A retrospective study was conducted to compare two resection methods, namely, endoscopic resection (ER) procedures (endoscopic submucosal dissection [ESD], endoscopic muscularis dissection [EMD], and endoscopic full-thickness resection [EFTR]) and laparoscopic resections (LR) (laparoscopic endoscopic cooperative surgery [LECS] and laparoscopic wedge resection).

METHODS

Seventy-three patients who underwent ER (N = 33: ESD, N = 4; EMD, N = 15; EFTR, N = 14) or LR (N = 39: LECS, N = 16; wedge resection, N = 23) for gastric submucosal tumor (G-SMT) smaller than 50 mm were included in this study. Patient/tumor characteristics and intra/postoperative factors were compared between the ER and LR groups.

RESULTS

The ER group had a significantly higher percentage of intraluminal growing type of tumor (100% vs 41%) and smaller tumor size (23 vs 33 mm) than the LR group. The ER group had a significantly shorter operative time (93 vs 145 min) and less blood loss (13 vs 30 mL) than the LR group. In the ER group, three patients who had tumors located on the anterior wall of the stomach required laparoscopic closure after EFTR because of difficulty in endoscopic closure of the gastric-wall defect. Postoperative complication rates and duration of postoperative hospital stays did not differ between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

ER may be technically feasible, safe, less invasive, and oncologically appropriate options for selected patients with the intraluminal growing type of G-SMT smaller than 30 mm. EFTR may be more reasonable alternatives to LR in selected patients with a small G-SMT located on the lesser curvature side.

Endoscopic resection of gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are the most common mesenchymal tumors in the gastrointestinal tract, and about 60% of them are found in the stomach. With the widespread application of endoscopy and endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS), more and more gastric GISTs are being found in an early stage (with a relative small diameter and no metastasis), giving the chance of complete resection. Endoscopic resection such as endoscopic band ligation (EBL), endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), endoscopic submucosal excavation (ESE), endoscopic full-thickness resection (EFTR) and submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection (STER), is a minimally invasive method compared with the conventional surgical approaches (open or laparoscopic), and has been demonstrated to be safe and effective for treating gastric GISTs. This review summarizes the recent advances on endoscopic resection of gastric GISTs, aiming to provide a rational management strategy for gastric GISTs.

A gastric glomus tumor resected using non-exposed endoscopic wall-inversion surgery

Gastric glomus tumors are extremely rare, constituting approximately 1% of gastric mesenchymal tumors. We report the case of a 45-year-old female patient in whom upper gastrointestinal endoscopy revealed a 3-cm submucosal tumor with a bridging fold in the posterior wall of the antrum of the stomach. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography revealed the tumor to be hypervascular in the arterial phase and exhibit continuous enhancement in the post-venous phase. Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging showed that the tumor was hypervascular in the early phase and persistently enhanced in the late phase. Endoscopic ultrasonography revealed a mosaic echo pattern. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy was performed. Immunohistochemical examination revealed that the tumor was positive for α-smooth muscle actin and synaptophysin, but negative for CD56, chromogranin A and C-kit. Furthermore, 1-2% of the tumor cell nuclei were Ki-67-positive. Thus, the preoperative diagnosis was a benign glomus tumor. The patient then underwent non-exposed endoscopic wall-inversion surgery (NEWS), and the tumor was completely resected. In conclusion, NEWS is an effective method for the treatment of gastric glomus tumors.

Laparoscopic resection for gastrointestinal stromal tumors in esophagogastric junction (EGJ): how to protect the EGJ

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic surgery for gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) is now widely performed. However, laparoscopic resection of GIST in the esophagogastric junction (EGJ) is technically difficult and rarely reported. Herein, we introduce four fashions of laparoscopic resection for EGJ-GIST.

METHODS

A retrospective review of 42 consecutive patients with EGJ-GIST who underwent attempted laparoscopic surgery was conducted. EGJ-GIST was defined as GIST with an upper border of less than 5 cm from the esophagogastric line. Four fashions of laparoscopic resection were performed: fashion A, laparoscopic wedge resection using linear stapler; fashion B, laparoscopic complete resection by opening the stomach wall and closing with suture or linear stapler; fashion C, laparoscopic mucosa-preserving resection; and fashion D, laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy with pyloroplasty and gastric plication. Clinicopathologic characteristics, operative course, and short-term and long-term outcomes were analyzed.

RESULTS

All procedures were completed successfully without operative complications. In 24 of 42 (57.1%) patients, tumors were located in the fundus or greater curvature. Out of those, 70.8% (17/24) received fashion A and 29.2% (7/24) received fashion B. Tumors in 16 of 42 (38.1%) patients were located in the lesser curvature. Of those, 81.3% (13/16) underwent fashion B and 18.7% (3/16) underwent fashion D. One tumor in the anterior stomach wall and one in the posterior wall received fashion C. The mean operative time was 103.8 ± 22.1 min and the mean estimated blood loss was 22.4 ± 13.5 ml. The mean time to flatus was 40.3 ± 12.9 h and the time to fluid intake was 43.2 ± 14.3 h. The mean hospital stay was 4.8 ± 2.1 days.

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic surgery for EGJ-GIST is safe and feasible. The selection of various laparoscopic resection fashions should be chosen based on tumor location and the surgeon's experience.

Laparoscopic endoscopic cooperative surgery (LECS) for the upper gastrointestinal tract

We developed the laparoscopic and endoscopic cooperative surgery (LECS) technique, which combines endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) and laparoscopic gastric resection to resect gastric submucosal tumors (SMTs). Many researchers have reported LECS to be a feasible technique for gastric submucosal tumor resection regardless of tumor location, including the esophagogastric junction (EGJ). Recently, the Japanese National Health Insurance system approved LECS for insurance coverage, and it is now widely applied for gastric submucosal tumor resection. Initially, we applied LECS to gastric SMTs without ulcerative lesions due to concern about the possibility of tumor cells seeding into the peritoneal cavity, in a procedure termed "classical LECS". To expand the indication of LECS for gastric epithelial neoplasms, modified LECS procedures such as inverted LECS, non-exposed endoscopic wall-inversion surgery (NEWS), combination of laparoscopic and endoscopic approaches to neoplasia with non-exposure technique (CLEAN-NET), and closed laparoscopic and endoscopic cooperative surgery (closed-LECS) have been developed and applied to patients with gastric epithelial neoplasms. As a future perspective of LECS, we plan to combine the modified LECS procedure and sentinel node (SN) navigation surgery (SNNS) for clinical (c)Stage IA gastric cancer resection. This strategy could be a minimally invasive surgical technique for cStage IA early gastric cancer.

Laparoscopic and endoscopic cooperative surgery for gastrointestinal tumor

With technological progress of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) in the last decade, several laparoscopic and endoscopic cooperative surgeries (LECS) for gastrointestinal tumor have recently been developed. LECS is definitely favorable to the minimization of surgical margin, which leads to functional and anatomical preservation of gastrointestinal tract. LECS for gastrointestinal tumor is mainly sorted by two categories: exposure procedures and non-exposure procedures between endoluminal and extraluminal spaces. Exposure procedures have the potential risk of gastric contents or tumor cells spilling out over the abdominal cavity, because the stomach wall has to be perforated intentionally during the procedure. In order to avoid the potential these risks, non-exposure procedures have been developed. Currently, the LECS concept has rapidly permeated for treatment of gastrointestinal tumor due to its certainty and safety, although there is still room for improvement to lessen its technical difficulty. This review describes the current LECS for gastrointestinal tumor based on the several articles.