An enhanced risk-group stratification system for more practical prognostication of clinically malignant gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Int J Clin Oncol. 2007;12:369-374. [PMID: 17929119 DOI: 10.1007/s10147-007-0705-7]

Clinical importance of tumor rupture in gastrointestinal stromal tumor

Risk factors of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) include tumor size, location, mitosis, and tumor rupture. Although the first three are commonly recognized as independent prognostic factors, tumor rupture is not a consistent finding. Indeed, tumor rupture may be subjectively diagnosed and is rarely observed. Moreover, the criteria used for diagnosis differ among oncologists, which may result in inconsistent outcomes. Based on these conditions, a universal definition of tumor rupture was proposed in 2019 and consists of six scenarios: tumor fracture, blood-stained ascites, gastrointestinal perforation at the tumor site, histologically proven invasion, piecemeal resection, and open incisional biopsy. Although the definition is considered appropriate for selection of GISTs with worse prognostic outcomes, each scenario lacks a high level of evidence and there is yet no consensus for some, including histological invasion and incisional biopsy. It may be, however, important to have common criteria for clinical decision-making, which may facilitate reliability, external validity, and comparability of clinical studies in rare GISTs. After the definition, several retrospective reports indicated that even with adjuvant therapy, tumor rupture was associated with high recurrence rates and poor prognostic outcomes. The prognosis of patients with ruptured GISTs is improved by 5-year adjuvant therapy compared with 3-year therapy. Nevertheless, the universal definition requires further evidence, and prospective clinical studies based on the definition are warranted.

English version of Japanese Clinical Practice Guidelines 2022 for gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) issued by the Japan Society of Clinical Oncology

The Japan Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guidelines 2022 for gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) have been published in accordance with the Minds Manual for Guideline Development 2014 and 2017. A specialized team independent of the working group for the revision performed a systematic review. Since GIST is a rare type of tumor, clinical evidence is not sufficient to answer several clinical and background questions. Thus, in these guidelines, we considered that consensus among the experts who manage GIST, the balance between benefits and harms, patients' wishes, medical economic perspective, etc. are important considerations in addition to the evidence. Although guidelines for the treatment of GIST have also been published by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) and the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO), there are some differences between the treatments proposed in those guidelines and the treatments in the present guidelines because of the differences in health insurance systems among countries.

The impact of contour maps on estimating the risk of gastrointestinal stromal tumor recurrence: indications for adjuvant therapy: an analysis of the Kinki GIST registry

INTRODUCTION

Contour maps enable risk classification of GIST recurrence in individual patients within 10 postoperative years. Although contour maps have been referred to in Japanese guidelines, their usefulness and role in determining indications for adjuvant therapy is still unclear in Japanese patients. The aims of this study are to investigate the validity of contour maps in Japanese patients with GIST and explore the new strategy for adjuvant therapy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 1426 Japanese GIST patients who were registered to the registry by the Kinki GIST Study Group between 2003 and 2012 were analyzed. Patients who had R0 surgery without perioperative therapy were included in this study. The accuracy of contour maps was validated.

RESULTS

Overall, 994 patients have concluded this study. Using contour maps, we validated the patients. The 5-year recurrence-free survival rates of patients within the GIST classification groups of 0-10%, 10-20%, 20-40%, 40-60%, 60-80%, 80-90%, and 90-100% were 98.1%, 96.6%, 92.3%, 48.0%, 37.3%, 41.0% and 42.4%, respectively. We confirmed that this classification by contour maps was well reflected recurrence prediction. Further, in the high-risk group stratified by the modified National Institutes of Health consensus criteria (m-NIHC), the 10-year RFS rate was remarkably changed at a cutoff of 40% (0-40% group vs. 40-100% group: 88.7% vs. 50.3%, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Contour maps are effective in predicting individual recurrence rates. And it may be useful for the decision of individual strategy for high-risk patients combined with m-NIHC.

Imaging of abdominopelvic oncologic emergencies

With advancements in cancer treatment, the survival rates for many malignancies have increased. However, both the primary tumors and the treatments themselves can give rise to various complications. Acute symptoms in oncology patients require prompt attention. Abdominopelvic oncologic emergencies can be classified into four distinct categories: vascular, bowel, hepatopancreatobiliary, and bone-related complications. Radiologists need to be familiar with these complications to ensure timely diagnosis, which ultimately enhances patient outcomes.

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors of the upper GI tract: population-based analysis of epidemiology, treatment and outcome based on data from the German Clinical Cancer Registry Group

BACKGROUND

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) are rare mesenchymal tumors. They are most frequently located in the stomach but are also found in the esophagus and the gastroesophageal junction (GEJ). Information regarding the prognostic factors associated with upper gastrointestinal GIST is still scarse.

METHODS

In this study, datasets provided by the German Clinical Cancer Registry Group, including a total of 93,069 patients with malignant tumors in the upper GI tract (C15, C16) between 2000 and 2016 were analyzed to investigate clinical outcomes of GIST in the entire upper GI tract.

RESULTS

We identified 1361 patients with GIST of the upper GI tract. Tumors were located in the esophagus in 37(2.7%) patients, at the GEJ in 70 (5.1%) patients, and in the stomach in 1254 (91.2%) patients. The incidence of GIST increased over time, reaching 5% of all UGI tumors in 2015. The median age was 69 years. The incidence of GIST was similar between males and females (53% vs 47%, respectively). However, the proportion of GIST in female patients increased continuously with advancing age, ranging from 34.7% (41-50 years) to 71.4% (91-100 years). Male patients were twice as likely to develop tumors in the esophagus and GEJ compared to females (3.4% vs. 1.9% and 6.7% vs. 3.4%, respectively). The median overall survival of upper gastrointestinal GIST was 129 months. The 1-year, 5-year, and 10-year OS was 93%, 79%, and 52% respectively. Nevertheless, tumors located in the esophagus and GEJ were associated with shorter OS compared to gastric GIST (130 vs. 111 months, p = 0.001). The incidence of documented distant metastasis increased with more proximal location of GIST (gastric vs. GEJ vs. esophagus: 13% vs. 16% vs. 27%) at presentation.

CONCLUSION

GIST of the esophagus and GEJ are rare soft tissue sarcomas with increasing incidence in Germany. They are characterized by worse survival outcomes and increased risk of metastasis compared to gastric GIST.

A rare rectal gastrointestinal stromal tumor with indolent biological behavior: A case study

The overall incidence of rectal gastrointestinal stromal tumor (RGIST) has risen, but it remains a rare disease. Furthermore, tumor rupture is associated with poor prognosis. The present study reported a rare case of RGIST with indolent biological behavior. The biological behavior of this RGIST was analyzed and its malignant potential was evaluated using a guideline-based risk stratification assessment. The patient was diagnosed with a rectal tumor at the Third Affiliated Hospital of Qiqihar Medical University (Qiqihar, China) in April 2020 and a partial resection biopsy was then performed. This resection counts as a rupture. The biopsy confirmed RGIST and the patient refused further examination and treatment due to economic concerns. However, the patient survives with no tumor progression and metastasis until now, May 2022. In conclusion, based on the present case, tumor rupture in indolent RGIST is not necessarily associated with poor outcome.

Angiogenesis in gastrointestinal stromal tumors: From bench to bedside

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are rare neoplasms with an estimated incidence from 0.78 to 1-1.5 patients per 100000. They most commonly occur in the elderly during the eighth decade of life affecting predominantly the stomach, but also the small intestine, the omentum, mesentery and rectosigmoid. The available treatments for GIST are associated with a significant rate of recurrent disease and adverse events. Thorough understanding of GIST's pathophysiology and translation of this knowledge into novel regimens or drug repurposing is essential to counter this challenge. The present review summarizes the existing evidence about the role of angiogenesis in GIST's development and progression and discusses its clinical underpinnings.

The analysis of prognostic factors of primary small intestinal gastrointestinal stromal tumors with R0 resection: A single-center retrospective study

OBJECTIVE

We aim to assess factors that affect overall survival in patients with primary small intestinal gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) who had undergone R0 resection.

METHOD

A retrospective analysis reviewed the data of 82 consecutive confirmed GIST patients at a single medical center in China from January 2012 to June 2020. The survival curve was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and independent prognostic factors were confirmed using the Cox regression model.

RESULTS

A total of 82 patients were included in the study: 42 men and 40 women, the mean age was 59 years old (23-83 years old). Tumors were commonly found in the jejunum (46.3%), ileum (20.7%), and duodenum (32.9%). The median tumor size was 6.0 cm (range: 1.0-15.0 cm). The number of mitoses per one 50 high-power field was used to define the mitotic rates. In our present study, 56 patients presented a mitotic rate ≤5 (68.3%) and 26 patients showed a rate >5 (31.7%) at the time of diagnosis. All patients accepted tumor resection without lymph node resection. The positivity rate was 97.6% for CD117, 96.3% for delay of germination 1, 65.9% for CD34, 6.1% for S-100, and 59.8% for smooth muscle actin using immunohistochemistry. Tumor size, tumor rupture, Ki67 index, mitotic index, and postoperative imatinib were independent prognostic factors for small intestinal GISTs.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, larger tumor size, high Ki67 index, high mitotic index, the occurrence of tumor rupture, and use of imatinib were independent unfavorable prognostic indicators.

Clinicopathological Features and Outcomes of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumours in Oman: A multi-centre study

Objectives

This study aimed to report the clinicopathological features, management and long-term outcomes of patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GISTs) in Oman.

Methods

This retrospective study was conducted on patients treated for GIST between January 2003 and December 2017 at three tertiary referral centres in Muscat, Oman. All patients with confirmed histopathological diagnoses of GIST and followed-up at the centres during this period were included. Relevant information was retrieved from hospital records until April 2019.

Results

A total of 44 patients were included in the study. The median age was 55.5 years and 56.8% were female. The most common primary site of disease was the stomach (63.6%) followed by the jejunum/ileum (18.2%). Two patients (4.5%) had c-Kit-negative, discovered on GIST-1-positive disease. A total of 24 patients (54.5%) presented with localised disease and eight (33.3%) were classified as being at high risk of relapse. Patients with metastatic disease received imatinib in a palliative setting, whereas those with completely resected disease in the intermediate and high-risk groups were treated with adjuvant imatinib. Of the six patients (13.6%) with progressive metastatic disease, of which four had mutations on exon 11 and one on exon 9, while one had wild-type disease. Overall, rates of progression-free survival and overall survival (OS) at 100 months were 77.4% and 80.4%, respectively. Rates of OS for patients with localised and metastatic disease were 89.9% and 80.2%, respectively.

Conclusion

The presenting features and outcomes of patients with GISTs in Oman were comparable to those reported in the regional and international literature.

Curative intent treatment of late presented extragastrointestinal stromal tumor: two identical case reports with literature review

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) occurring outside the gastrointestinal tract are known as extragastrointestinal stromal tumors (EGIST). They share some common histopathologic and molecular characteristics. This report describes two female patients who were suspected of having a mesenteric GIST, but opted for surveillance rather than definitive treatment. Upon reassessment, both patients demonstrated increased tumor mass with no evidence of distant metastasis. The intraoperative findings confirmed the conclusion of clinical and imaging studies performed preoperatively and radical excisions were performed. Histopathological examination (spindle cell neoplasm) and immunohistochemistry (CD117) confirmed EGIST. Both patients underwent Imatinib therapy following surgery with no evidence of disease recurrence or metastasis upon follow up. Although sharing histologic features with GIST, EGIST frequently demonstrates distinct characteristics that facilitate the proper diagnosis and management of EGIST. Since it is a rare and aggressive disease with a poor outcome, early detection and curative surgical resection remains the mainstay of treatment.

Gastrointestinal stromal tumours

Gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GIST) have an incidence of ~1.2 per 10⁵ individuals per year in most countries. Around 80% of GIST have varying molecular changes, predominantly mutually exclusive activating KIT or PDGFRA mutations, but other, rare subtypes also exist. Localized GIST are curable, and surgery is their standard treatment. Risk factors for relapse are tumour size, mitotic index, non-gastric site and tumour rupture. Patients with GIST with KIT or PDGFRA mutations sensitive to the tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) imatinib that are at high risk of relapse have improved survival with adjuvant imatinib treatment. In advanced disease, median overall survival has improved from 18 months to >70 months since the introduction of TKIs. The role of surgery in the advanced setting remains unclear. Resistance to TKIs arise mainly from subclonal selection of cells with resistance mutations in KIT or PDGFRA when they are the primary drivers. Advanced resistant GIST respond to second-line sunitinib and third-line regorafenib, as well as to the new broad-spectrum TKI ripretinib. Rare molecular forms of GIST with alterations involving NF1, SDH genes, BRAF or NTRK genes generally show primary resistance to standard TKIs, but some respond to specific inhibitors of the activated genes. Despite major advances, many questions in both advanced and localized disease remain unanswered.

Prognostic Factors for Primary Localized Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors After Radical Resection: Shandong Gastrointestinal Surgery Study Group, Study 1201

BACKGROUND

Most previous risk-prediction models for gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) were based on Western populations. In the current study, we collected data from 23 hospitals in Shandong Province, China, and used the data to examine prognostic factors in Chinese patients and establish a new recurrence-free survival (RFS) prediction model.

METHODS

Records were analyzed for 5285 GIST patients. Independent prognostic factors were identified using Cox models. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was used to compare a novel RFS prediction model with current risk-prediction models.

RESULTS

Overall, 4216 patients met the inclusion criteria and 3363 completed follow-up. One-, 3-, and 5-year RFS was 94.6% (95% confidence interval [CI] 93.8-95.4), 85.9% (95% CI 84.7-87.1), and 78.8% (95% CI 77.0-80.6), respectively. Sex, tumor location, size, mitotic count, and rupture were independent prognostic factors. A new prognostic index (PI) was developed: PI = 0.000 (if female) + 0.270 (if male) + 0.000 (if gastric GIST) + 0.350 (if non-gastric GIST) + 0.000 (if no tumor rupture) + 1.259 (if tumor rupture) + 0.000 (tumor mitotic count < 6 per 50 high-power fields [HPFs]) + 1.442 (tumor mitotic count between 6 and 10 per 50 HPFs) + 2.026 (tumor mitotic count > 10 per 50 HPFs) + 0.096 × tumor size (cm). Model-predicted 1-, 3-, and 5-year RFS was S(12, X) = 0.9926exp(PI), S(36, X) = 0.9739exp(PI) and S(60, X) = 0.9471exp(PI), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Sex, tumor location, size, mitotic count, and rupture were independently prognostic for GIST recurrence. Our RFS prediction model is effective for Chinese GIST patients.

Cyclophosphamide, Fluorouracil and subcutaneous Interleukin-2 in the treatment of advanced GIST: A Case Report

A male 68 years hold patient was admitted to surgical ward for hemorrhagic shock. After CT scan detection of 6x5 cm neoformation of first jejunal loop, he was submitted to segmental resection and pathological diagnosis was gastrointestinal stromal tumor. The patient was defined as high-risk according to Takahashi criteria, but refused Imatinib adjuvant therapy. After 15 months of disease-free interval, he developed bilobar liver metastases. After treatment with Imatinib 400 mg he reported G3 hepatotoxicity resolved with temporary suspension, he continue low dose with stable disease. After liver progression, he resumed Imatinib full dose with disease stabilization for 9 months. After liver progression, second line Sunitinib 37,5 mg/day was started for four months with stable disease. After further liver and lymph node mediastinal progression he was treated for four months with Regorafenib with disease stabilization. Patient developed slow but inexorable progression of liver disease with severe abdominal pain resistant to opioid and was treated with authorized compassionate program comprising Cyclophosphamide 300 mg/sqm and Fluorouracil 500 mg/sqm on day 1 intravenously followed by Interleukin-2 4.5 MUI subcutaneously on days 3–6 and 17–20 every four weeks. After three cycles the patients obtained a relevant subjective improvement with partial response on mediastinal lymph node and liver stabilization. A substantial increase on neutrophil, lymphocytes, monocytes, platelets, T regulator cells count, and a decrease on platelets/lymphocytes, CD8/T regulator cells ratio, CD8, NK count and C-reactive protein value were observed after treatment compared to basal value. The toxicity was mild represented by fever G1, flue-like-syndrome G1 during the treatment. After four cycle of chemo-immunotherapy, the patient demonstrated progression of disease and died five months after treatment. Noteworthy is the temporal disease control with significant symptomatic improvement achieved for the first time with this chemo-immunotherapeutic combination in a patient with very advanced pretreated GIST.

The prognostic value of gastrointestinal bleeding in gastrointestinal stromal tumor: A propensity score matching analysis

Background and objectives

Whether gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding indicates gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) rupture and impacts prognosis is unclear. We examined the prognostic value of GI bleeding in GIST.

Methods

Primary GIST patients with (GB group) or without (NGB group) initial symptoms of GI bleeding were retrospectively studied. Propensity score matching (PSM) was conducted to reduce confounders.

Results

Eight hundred patients were enrolled. Male gender [odds ratio (OR) = 1.517, P = 0.011], tumors in the small intestine (OR = 2.539, P < 0.001), and tumor size 5‐10 cm (OR = 2.298, P = 0.004) increased the odds of GI bleeding; age >60 years decreased the odds (OR = 0.683, P = 0.031). After PSM, 444 patients were included (222 in each group). Relapse‐free survival (RFS) (P = 0.001) and overall survival (OS) (P = 0.002) were both superior in the GB group. In subgroup analysis, the GB group achieved a superior RFS (P = 0.005) and OS (P = 0.007) in patients with small intestine GIST, but not stomach or colorectal GIST.

Conclusions

GIST patients with age <60, male gender, tumors located in the small intestine, and tumors 5‐10 cm in size had a higher risk of GI bleeding. GIST patients with GI bleeding had a superior RFS and OS. This difference was statistically significant only in small intestine GIST.

New frontiers in the medical management of gastrointestinal stromal tumours

The tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) imatinib has radically changed the natural history of KIT-driven gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GISTs). Approved second-line and third-line medical therapies are represented by the TKIs sunitinib and regorafenib, respectively. While imatinib remains the cardinal drug for patients with GISTs, novel therapies are being developed and clinically tested to overcome the mechanisms of resistance after treatments with the approved TKI, or to treat subsets of GISTs driven by rarer molecular events. Here, we review the therapy of GISTs, with a particular focus on the newest drugs in advanced phases of clinical testing that might soon change the current therapeutic algorithm.

The assessment of different risk classification systems for gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs): the analytic results from the SEER database

BACKGROUND

Although various risk classification systems for GISTs have been proposed, the optimum one remains uncertain. In the present study, we compared the prognostic stratification of different risk classification systems for GIST patients.

METHODS

We reviewed those patients who were pathologically diagnosed with GISTs in the SEER database between 2009 and 2014. All patients were classified into different risk groups according to the NIH criteria, AFIP criteria and AJCC staging system, respectively. The prognostic differences between different risk groups were compared and clinicopathologic features were analyzed.

RESULTS

The prognosis of small intestinal GISTs was not significantly different from that of gastric GISTs. For gastric GIST patients, there was no significant prognostic difference between very low risk and low risk group according to the NIH and AFIP criteria. However, the prognostic stratification for two groups could be improved by the AJCC staging system. For small intestinal GIST patients, the prognostic difference between low risk and intermediate risk group was not stratified properly by the NIH and AFIP criteria. However, the prognostic difference between two groups could reach statistical significance according to the AJCC staging system. Unlike gastric GISTs, tumor size was not identified as an independent factor influencing the prognosis of small intestinal GISTs.

CONCLUSIONS

The AJCC staging system could provide a better prognostic stratification for GIST patients compared with the NIH and AFIP criteria, regardless of gastric or small intestinal tumor. However, primary tumor location and tumor size may be reconsidered and revised in the risk classification system.

Defining Tumor Rupture in Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor

Tumor rupture is an important risk factor predictive of recurrence after macroscopically complete resection of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs), and an indication for defined interval or even lifelong adjuvant therapy with imatinib according to guidelines. However, there is no consensus or universally accepted definition of the term ‘tumor rupture’, and, consequently, its incidence varies greatly across reported series. Without predefined criteria, the clinical significance of rupture has also been difficult to assess on multivariate analysis of retrospective data. We reviewed the relevant literature and international guidelines, and, based on the Oslo criteria, proposed the following six definitions for ‘tumor rupture’: (1) tumor fracture or spillage; (2) blood-stained ascites; (3) gastrointestinal perforation at the tumor site; (4) microscopic infiltration of an adjacent organ; (5) intralesional dissection or piecemeal resection; or (6) incisional biopsy. Not all minor defects of tumor integrity should not be classified as rupture, i.e. mucosal defects or spillage contained within the gastrointestinal lumen, microscopic tumor penetration of the peritoneum or iatrogenic damage only to the peritoneal lining, uncomplicated transperitoneal needle biopsy, and R1 resection. This broad definition identifies GIST patients at particularly high risk of recurrence in population-based cohorts; however, its applicability in other sarcomas has not been investigated. As the proposed definition of tumor rupture in GIST has limited evidence based on the small number of patients with rupture in each retrospective study, we recommend validating the proposed definition of tumor rupture in GIST in prospective studies and considering it in clinical practice.

Tumor rupture of gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors during endoscopic resection: a risk factor for peritoneal metastasis?

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS

 Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are the most common mesenchymal tumors in the gastrointestinal tract. Up to the present time, complete surgical excision has been the standard treatment for primary GISTs greater than 2 cm. It is well known that tumor rupture during surgery is an independent risk factor for peritoneal metastasis; however, it is not known whether the risk of peritoneal metastasis increases in cases where the tumor is ruptured during endoscopic resection.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

 A total of 195 patients treated for GIST between January 2014 and December 2016 in our hospital were enrolled in this study. They were divided into two groups according to whether the tumor was ruptured during endoscopic resection. The rate of peritoneal metastasis in patients in the two groups who also suffered perforation was investigated from the follow-up results.

RESULTS

 Approximately 55.4 % of all patients were female and the average age of the study group was 59.0 ± 10.3 years. Of the 195 patients, the tumors in 27 were ruptured and the remaining 168 patients underwent en bloc resection. There was no statistically significant difference in gender or age between the two groups. The median tumor size (maximum diameter) in all patients was 1.5 cm (0.3 - 5.0 cm): 2.5 cm (0.8 - 5.0 cm) and 1.4 cm (0.3 - 4.0 cm) in the tumor rupture group and en bloc resection group, respectively ( P  < 0.001). Most of the tumors were located in the gastric fundus. At a median follow-up of 18.7 ± 10.2 months, neither tumor recurrence (liver metastasis, peritoneal metastasis, local recurrence) nor mortality related to GISTs were detected.

CONCLUSIONS

 Tumor rupture during endoscopic resection of gastric GISTs may not be a risk factor for peritoneal metastasis.

Clinicopathological Features and Prognosis of Primary GISTs with Tumor Rupture in the Real World

Background

Patients with ruptured gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) are recommended for imatinib adjuvant therapy; however, their clinicopathological features and prognosis in the era of imatinib are unknown.

Patients and Methods

The study cohort included 665 patients with histologically proven primary GISTs who underwent R0 or R1 surgery between 2003 and 2007; the validation cohort included 182 patients between 2000 and 2014. The definitions of tumor rupture in the study included perforation at tumor site, tumor fracture, piecemeal resection including open biopsy, and macroscopic injuries to the pseudocapsule.

Results

Tumor rupture occurred in 21 (3.2%) of 665 and 5 (2.9%) of 182 patients in the study and validation cohort, respectively. Ruptured GISTs were more symptomatic, were larger in size, and had higher mitotic count than nonruptured GISTs but were not associated with tumor location or laparoscopic surgery. GISTs with intraoperative rupture had clinicopathological features and prognostic outcomes similar to those with preoperative rupture. Recurrence rates were higher and median recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were shorter with ruptured than nonruptured GIST. Tumor rupture was one of the independent prognostic factors for RFS, but not OS, according to multivariate analysis.

Conclusions

Ruptured GISTs were symptomatic larger tumors with high mitotic activity, frequent relapse, and shorter RFS. Tumor rupture was an independent prognostic factor for RFS, but not for OS, in the era of imatinib.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1245/s10434-018-6505-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Systematic review of current prognostication systems for primary gastrointestinal stromal tumors

BACKGROUND

The advent of tyrosine kinase inhibitors as adjuvant therapy has revolutionized the management of GIST and emphasized the need for accurate prognostication systems. Numerous prognostication systems have been proposed for GIST but at present it remains unknown which system is superior. The present systematic review aims to summarize current prognostication systems for primary treatment-naive GIST.

METHODS

A literature review of the Pubmed and Embase databases was performed to identify all published articles in English, from the 1st January 2002 to 28th Feb 2017, reporting on clinical prognostication systems of GIST.

RESULTS

Twenty-three articles on GIST prognostication systems were included. These systems were classified as categorical systems, which stratify patients into risk groups, or continuous systems, which provide an individualized form of risk assessment. There were 16 categorical systems in total. There were 4 modifications of the National Institute of Health (NIH) system, 2 modifications of Armed Forces Institute of Pathology (AFIP) criteria and 3 modifications of Joensuu (modified NIH) criteria. Of the 7 continuous systems, there were 3 prognostic nomograms, 3 mathematical models and 1 prognostic heat/contour maps. Tumor size, location and mitotic count remain the main variables used in these systems.

CONCLUSION

Numerous prognostication systems have been proposed for the risk stratification of GISTs. The most widely used systems today are the NIH, Joensuu modified NIH, AFIP and the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center nomogram. More validation and comparison studies are required to determine the optimal prognostication system for GIST.

Asian consensus guidelines for gastrointestinal stromal tumor: what is the same and what is different from global guidelines

There are some disparities between the clinical practice and profiles of cancer in Asia and those in Europe & North America. In Asia, surgical oncologists still have a major role in the multidisciplinary therapy of gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST), whereas medical oncologists hold this status in the West. Although the incidence of clinical GIST is considered similar between the two areas, small gastric GISTs are more frequently treated by surgery in East Asia compared with Europe & North America. The diagnosis and treatment of small submucosal tumors (SMTs), including GIST, is important in Asian clinical practice guidelines for GIST. Most items of Asian and Western GIST guidelines are very similar. There are slight differences between the two guidelines in the degree of recommendation, which may come from disparities of clinical practice and available medicines. Importantly, most clinical evidence in the GIST guidelines has been established by clinical trials conducted in Western countries, and the number of clinical trials is still limited in Asia, suggesting that Asian GIST patients may have limited access to investigational drugs after standard therapy. Finally, both Asian and Western GIST guidelines are well-harmonized in some parts, and their contents may reflect the medical circumstances of each region.

Endoscopic versus laparoscopic resection of gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors: a multicenter study

Despite endoscopic resection has been performed to treat gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GISTs). However, the safety and long-term outcomes remains controversial. This study aims to compare the safety and surgical outcomes of endoscopic versus laparoscopic resection of gastric GISTs. A total of 335 patients that were pathologically confirmed with gastric GISTs (tumor size ≤ 3.5 cm) were surgically treated with endoscopic resection (endoscopic group) or laparoscopic resection (laparoscopic group) in three institutions from March 1, 2011 to October 1 2014. These demographics, tumor characteristics, and outcomes were retrospectively analyzed for identification of outcomes and feasibility of endoscopic or laparoscopic resection. Of 335 patients, 262 and 73 patients underwent endoscopic and laparoscopic resection, respectively. The average tumor size was 1.33±0.78 cm in the endoscopic group and 1.97±0.93 cm in the laparoscopic group. The average operating time was 62.40±36.94 min in the endoscopic group and 112.81±55.69 cm in the laparoscopic group. Days of realimentation was 2.76±1.67 in the endoscopic group and 4.89±2.03 in the laparoscopic group. The average cost was $ 3246.01±1017.61 in the endoscopic group and $ 4884.81±1339.51 in the laparoscopic group. There was no postoperative mortality. Endoscopic resection for gastric GISTs is safe and feasible in tumors ≤ 3.5 cm. Because endoscopic resection showed good results with lower operating time, realimentation days, length of hospital stay and mean total cost, it is a minimally invasive and safe alternative approach which can achieve fast recovery and satisfactory outcomes for appropriately selected patients with gastric GISTs.

Gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GISTs): an insight into clinical practice with review of literature

BACKGROUND

Gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GISTs) are rare mesenchymal tumours of the gastrointestinal tract. We retrospectively reviewed the clinical management of all patients with GIST presenting to a regional multidisciplinary upper gastrointestinal cancer group in the north of England.

METHODS

Clinical, pathological, immunohistochemical treatment strategies, follow-up and outcome data on all patients with GIST between 2007 and 2012 were reviewed. Tumours were categorised by risk according to the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and AFIP models.

RESULTS

36 (85.7%) of 42 tumours were located in the stomach, 5 (11.9%) in the small intestine and 1 (2.4%) in the oesophagus. Median age of patients was 68 (range 43-91) years. 24 patients (57.1%) were female. Tumour size ranged from 1.0  to 12.7 cm with mean size of 5.46 cm. Metastasis was present in 19 (45.2%) patients at diagnosis with distant metastases in 12 patients. Liver was the most common site of metastases. Histology and immunohistochemical analysis was available in 32 (76.2%) patients. Most common histology was spindle cell morphology 17/32 (53.1%) followed by epithelioid 9/32 (28.1%) and mixed morphology 5/32 (15.6%). The positive rate for KIT protein (CD117) was 90.6%, while that for CD34 was 75.0%. 12/25 (48.0%) and 8/23 (34.8%) patients were categorised as high risk as per NIH and AFIP risk scores, respectively. 23/42 (54.8%) patients underwent surgical resection, after which 5/23 (21.7%) had adjuvant imatinib therapy. Imatinib was given as primary therapy in 14/42 (33.3%) patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgery alone may not be a curative treatment for GISTs. Targeted therapy with imatinib may play an important role in the treatment of GISTs. Further risk categorisation models may be needed to evaluate GIST behaviour and prognosis.

Comparison of Different Risk Classification Systems in 558 Patients with Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors after R0-Resection

Background: Due to adjuvant treatment concepts for patients with R0-resected gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST), a reproducible and reliable risk classification system proved of utmost importance for optimal treatment of patients and prediction of prognosis. The aim of this study was to reevaluate the impact of five widely-applied and well-established GIST risk classification systems (i.e., scores by Fletcher, Miettinen, Huang, Joensuu, and TNM classification) on a series of 558 GIST patients with long-term follow-up after R0 resection. Methods: Tumor size, mitotic count and site were used in variable combination to predict high- and low risk patients by the use of the five risk classification models. For survival analyses disease-specific survival, disease-free survival and overall-survival were investigated. Patients with initial metastatic disease or incompletely resectable tumors were excluded. Results: All GIST classification models distinguished well between patients with high-risk and low-risk tumors and none of the five risk systems was superior to predict patient outcome. The models showed significant heterogeneity. There was no significant difference between the different risk-groups regarding overall-survival. Subdivision of GIST patients with very low- and low-risk appeared to be negligible. Conclusions: Currently applied GIST risk classification systems are comparable to predict high- or low-risk patients with initial non-metastatic and completely resected GIST. However, the heterogeneity of the high-risk group and the absence of differences in overall survival indicate the need for more precise tumor- and patient-related criteria for better stratification of GIST and identification of patients who would benefit best from adjuvant tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy.

Primary gastrointestinal stromal tumour of the ileum pre-operatively diagnosed as an abdominal abscess

The present case report described the acute presentation, diagnosis and management of a primary gastrointestinal stromal tumour (GIST) of the ileum. A male patient (age, 51 years) was admitted to Maggiore Hospital (Parma, Italy) due to presenting with fever, dysuria and lower abdominal pain. Ultrasonography and computed tomography showed a 7,5×5,5-cm pelvic mass containing air and purulent fluid indicative of an intraperitoneal abscess. The patient was subjected to diagnostic laparoscopy, which revealed a huge, soft cystic mass arising from the small bowel. The procedure was then converted to an open exploration through a midline incision. Ileal resection including a Meckel's diverticulum was performed. Macroscopic examination revealed that the cystic mass was filled with a large amount of pus, probably due to communication between the tumour mass and the small bowel lumen. In fact, the surgical specimen showed enteric leakage from the ileal mucosal ulcer into the tumour mass. Histopathology and immunohistochemistry of the abscess wall identified a spindle-cell mesenchymal-type, c-KIT-positive neoplasm. The post-operative course was uneventful and adjuvant imatinib mesylate was administered for 1 year. Follow-up by computed tomography demonstrated no tumour recurrence at 72 months after surgery.

Surgical Treatment of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors Located in the Stomach in the Imatinib Era

BACKGROUND

Imatinib has changed the treatment of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs). Preoperative imatinib treatment can be administered to patients with locally advanced disease to reduce the risk of incomplete resection, tumor spill, and lessen the extent of resection. In metastatic GIST, surgery follows imatinib in responding patients with resectable disease. In this study, the outcome of surgically treated patients with a gastric GIST with and without preoperative imatinib was investigated.

METHODS

Patients surgically treated for a gastric GIST at our institute between 1999 and 2011 were included. Patient data were retrieved from a prospectively maintained database.

RESULTS

A consecutive series of 47 patients was identified: 17 patients were treated with primary surgery (group 1) and 30 patients received imatinib before surgery (group 2). Preoperative imatinib led to a 33% reduction in tumor size. All patients in group 1 and 23 patients (77%) in group 2 had a complete resection (R0) without tumor spill. At a median follow-up of 30 months, 4 patients in group 2 had died of GIST. In these 4 patients, either the resection had been irradical or tumor spill had occurred, and 3 of them had radiologic progressive disease at the time of surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

In this surgical series of gastric GIST patients, preoperative imatinib led to a major reduction in tumor size. Irradical resection, tumor spill, and progressive disease at the time of surgery were associated with poor prognosis.

Surgical strategy for the gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) larger than 5 cm: laparoscopic surgery is feasible, safe, and oncologically acceptable

BACKGROUND

The efficacy and feasibility of laparoscopic surgery (LAP) for gastric GISTs >5 cm has not been adequately assessed. Here we investigated the clinical outcomes of these patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Twenty-seven consecutive patients who underwent resection for gastric GISTs >5 cm were enrolled in this retrospective study. We assessed the tumor characteristics, surgical outcomes, tumor recurrence, and patient survival in the open surgery (OPEN) group and in the LAP group.

RESULTS

The tumor size in the OPEN group was larger than that in the LAP group, but there were no differences in the mitotic count. There were no differences in operative complications. Finally, there were no differences in the disease-free and no patients in the LAP group died.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with gastric GISTs >5 cm, LAP can be performed with outcomes equivalent to those of OPEN if patient selection and intraoperative judgment are appropriate.

Definition and clinical significance of tumour rupture in gastrointestinal stromal tumours of the small intestine

BACKGROUND

Tumour rupture is a risk factor for recurrence of gastrointestinal stromal tumour (GIST). In this study, patterns of recurrence after potential tumour seeding were investigated, and a new definition of tumour rupture, based on major and minor defects of tumour integrity, is proposed.

METHODS

Patients undergoing surgery for non-metastatic small intestinal GIST from 2000 to 2012 were included in the study. Tumour spillage, tumour fracture or piecemeal resection, bowel perforation at the tumour site, blood-tinged ascites, microscopic tumour infiltration into an adjacent organ, and surgical biopsy were defined as major defects of tumour integrity. Peritoneal tumour penetration, iatrogenic peritoneal laceration and microscopically involved margins were defined as minor defects.

RESULTS

Seventy-two patients were identified. Median follow-up was 58 (range 7-122) months. Radical surgery was performed in 71 patients. A major defect was recorded in 20 patients, and a minor defect in 21. The 5-year recurrence rate was 64, 29 and 31 per cent in patients with major, minor and no defect respectively (P = 0·001). The hazard ratio (HR) for major defect versus no defect was 3·55 (95 per cent c.i. 1·51 to 8·35). Peritoneal recurrence rates for major, minor and no defect were 52, 25 and 19 per cent respectively (P = 0·002), and the HR for major defect versus no defect was 4·98 (1·69 to 14·68). On multivariable analysis, mitotic index, major defect of tumour integrity, tumour size and age were independently associated with risk of recurrence.

CONCLUSION

Recurrence rates were increased after major, but not minor tumour ruptures.

Re-appraisal of risk classifications for primary gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) after complete resection: indications for adjuvant therapy

BACKGROUND

A substantial number of localized gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) patients have recurrences even after complete resection. The risk of recurrence after complete resection should be estimated when considering adjuvant therapy. In this study, we evaluated prognostic factors of GIST recurrence and compared several reported risk-stratification schemes for defining risk of recurrence to guide the use of adjuvant therapy using data from a large Japanese GIST population.

METHODS

We analyzed clinicopathological data collected retrospectively and prospectively from 712 GISTs with complete resection from 1980-2010. We evaluated possible prognostic factors and compared the National Institutes of Health consensus criteria, the Armed Forces Institute of Pathology criteria, Joensuu's modified NIH classification (J-NIHC), the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system (AJCCS), and the Japanese modified NIH criteria for prediction of tumor recurrence in adjuvant settings.

RESULTS

Univariate analysis suggested that the following factors were prognostic: tumor size, mitotic count, site, clinically malignant features of rupture and/or invasion, and gender. In multivariate analysis, size >5 cm, mitotic count >5/50 HPF, non-gastric location, and the presence of rupture and/or macroscopic invasion were independent adverse prognostic factors. When adjuvant therapy is considered for patients with high-risk GIST, the J-NIHC was the most sensitive classification system, while the AJCCS appeared to be the most accurate for predicting recurrence.

CONCLUSION

Tumor size, mitotic count, tumor site, and clinical features of rupture and/or invasion were important prognostic factors for GIST recurrence. Joensuu's classification appeared to best identify candidates for adjuvant therapy.

Practical aspects of risk assessment in gastrointestinal stromal tumors

INTRODUCTION

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are mesenchymal tumors of the gastrointestinal tract, which are characterized in the majority of cases by activating mutations in KIT and platelet-derived growth factor receptor alpha (PDGFRA). The introduction of tyrosine kinase inhibitors has revolutionized the management of patients with metastatic GIST. However, complete surgical resection remains the mainstay of management for those with localized disease. Recently, three large trials have confirmed the benefit of adjuvant imatinib therapy in patients who were at high risk of recurrence following complete resection. In this setting, it is critical that oncologists understand the various GIST risk assessment criteria and be able to apply these methods to accurately assess the risk of recurrence and the need for adjuvant imatinib therapy.

PURPOSE

The aim of this review is to outline the risk stratification systems currently available to oncologists who are treating patients with GIST, so they can be optimally applied for clinical decision-making.

Cyclin-Dependent Kinase Activity Correlates with the Prognosis of Patients Who Have Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors

BACKGROUND

The estimation of recurrence risk remains a critical issue in relation to gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) treated with adjuvant therapy. The accuracy of the commonly used risk stratifications is not always adequate.

METHODS

For this study, data were prospectively collected from 68 patients with GISTs who underwent R0 surgery between 2004 and 2009. The results from this analysis cohort were evaluated using the data obtained from an additional 40 patients in the validation cohort. Cyclin-dependent kinase 1 (CDK1)- and CDK2-specific activities were measured using a non-RI kinase assay system.

RESULTS

The specific activities of CDK1 and CDK2, but not their expression, significantly correlated with recurrence. The specific activities of both CDK1 and CDK2 were independently correlated with mitosis and significantly correlated with recurrence-free survival (RFS). In the multivariate analysis, CDK2-specific activity (P = 0.0006), tumor size (P = 0.0347), and KIT deletion mutations (P = 0.0006) were significantly correlated with RFS in the analysis cohort. In the validation cohort, CDK2-specific activity (P = 0.0368) was identified as an independent prognostic factor for tumor recurrences with tumor location (P = 0.0442).

CONCLUSION

The results suggest that the specific activities of CDK1 and CDK2 may reflect the proliferative activity of GISTs and that CDK2-specific activity is a good prognostic factor predicting recurrence after macroscopic complete resection of GISTs.

KIT and PDGFRA mutations and the risk of GI stromal tumor recurrence

PURPOSE

Mutated KIT and platelet-derived growth factor alpha gene (PDGFRA) drive GI stromal tumor (GIST) oncogenesis, but the clinical significance of their single mutations is known incompletely.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We identified 11 population-based series of patients with GIST through a literature search and pooled individual data from 3,067 patients treated with macroscopically complete tumor excision. Mutation analysis was done from 1,505 tumors. We analyzed associations between KIT and PDGFRA mutations and recurrence-free survival (RFS) in the subsets in which patients were treated with surgery alone.

RESULTS

We identified 301 different single mutations in KIT and 33 in PDGFRA. Patients with PDGFRA mutations had more favorable RFS than those with KIT mutations (hazard ratio, 0.34; P = .004). Only one of the 35 GISTs with KIT exon 11 duplication mutations recurred. Patients with deletions of only one codon of KIT exon 11 had better RFS than those with another deletion type, and some KIT exon 11 substitution mutations (Trp557Arg, Val559Ala, and Leu576Pro) were also associated with favorable RFS. Patients with an identical mutation had greatly variable outcomes depending on the standard prognostic factors, notably, mitotic count. Commonly used risk stratification schemes tended to overestimate the risk for recurrence in subgroups with prognostically favorable mutations.

CONCLUSION

GISTs with an identical KIT or PDGFRA mutation may have widely varying risks for recurrence. Most of the patients with PDGFRA mutations and those with KIT exon 11 duplication mutation or deletion of one codon have favorable RFS with surgery alone and are usually not candidates for adjuvant therapy.

Gastrointestinal stromal tumours: correlation of modified NIH risk stratification with diffusion-weighted MR imaging as an imaging biomarker

PURPOSE

To evaluate the correlation of risk grade of gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GISTs) based on modified National Institutes of Health (NIH) criteria with conventional magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and diffusion-weighted (DW) imaging.

METHODS

We included 22 patients with histopathologically proven GISTs in the stomach or small bowel who underwent pre-operative gadoxetic acid-enhanced MR imaging and DW imaging. We retrospectively assessed correlations between morphologic findings, qualitative (signal intensity, consensus from two observers) and quantitative (degree of dynamic enhancement using signal intensity of tumour/muscle ratio and apparent diffusion coefficient [ADC]) values, and the modified NIH criteria for risk stratification. Spearman partial correlation analysis was used to control for tumour size as a confounding factor. The optimal cut-off level of ADC values for intermediate or high risk GISTs was analyzed using a receiver operating characteristic analysis.

RESULTS

Except tumour size and necrosis, conventional MR imaging findings, including the degree of dynamic enhancement, were not significantly different according to the modified NIH criteria (p>0.05). Tumour ADC values were negatively correlated with the modified NIH criteria, before and after adjustment of tumour size (ρ=-0.754; p<0.001 and ρ=-0.513; p=0.017, respectively). The optimal cut-off value for the determination of intermediate or high-risk GISTs was 1.279 × 10(-3)mm(2)/s (100% sensitivity, 69.2% specificity, 81.8% accuracy).

CONCLUSION

Except tumour size and necrosis, conventional MR imaging findings did not correlate with the risk grade. However, the ADC value can be used as an imaging biomarker to assess the risk grade of GISTs, regardless of tumour size.

Clinical presentation, management and outcomes of gastrointestinal stromal tumors

INTRODUCTION

The present study investigated the incidence, management and outcome of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors (GIST) in Qatar.

METHODS

A retrospective review of all GIST patients admitted between 1995 and 2012 was conducted. Patients' demographics, clinical presentation, tumor characteristics, radiological, pathological and immunohistochemical findings, surgical procedures, recurrence and mortality were recorded.

RESULTS

A total of 48 GIST patients were identified. Stomach (56%) and small intestine (27%) were the most common sites of tumor. The majority of cases (n = 27) had tumor size >5 cm, 31 cases had primary and 15 cases had locally advanced tumor. Patients were stratified as high, intermediate, and low risk (43.8%, 18.8% and 37.5%, respectively). Almost all the cases were surgically managed and 94% were completely resectable. Robotic partial resection was performed in 4 cases and 5 cases underwent laparoscopic resection. Chemotherapy was initiated in half of patients. During follow up (average 37.5 months), 33 patients showed complete recovery, 7 had recurrent or metastatic disease and 2 died due to liver metastasis.

CONCLUSION

The incidence of GIST in Qatar is apparently low. Surgical resection is the preferred choice of treatment; however, robotic and laparoscopic resections are feasible and safe approaches in some cases.

The changing face of GIST: implications for pathologists

Gastrointestinal stromal tumour (GIST) is now recognised as the most common primary mesenchymal tumour of the gut. A number of different parameters have been identified to aid prediction of clinical behaviour, but prognostication for an individual remains difficult. The pathologist plays a crucial role in guiding management of these tumours, but is faced with a number of challenges in so doing. This review describes the variable pathological features that may be encountered, and examines some of the issues in the pathology reporting of GIST and attempts to provide some guidance in factors that should be addressed in a comprehensive pathology report.

New fronts in the adjuvant treatment of GIST

PURPOSE

To review the prognostic factors and stratification systems used to determine the need for adjuvant therapy in the treatment of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST), and to review recent clinical advances in investigation of the efficacy and safety of adjuvant imatinib mesylate treatment.

METHODS

Recent data from clinical trials of various durations of adjuvant imatinib in GIST are reviewed, with emphasis on key results from the Phase III American College of Surgeons Oncology Group (ACOSOG) Z9001 trial and the Scandinavian Sarcoma Group XVIII/Arbeitsgemeinschaft Internistische Onkologie (SSGXVIII/AIO) trial.

RESULTS

Complete surgical resection remains the standard of treatment for localized GISTs; however, disease recurrence occurs in up to 50 % of patients who undergo complete resection. The ACOSOG Z9001 trial established that 1 year of adjuvant imatinib reduces the risk of recurrence in patients with resected GIST. The SSGXVIII/AIO trial further demonstrated that 3-year adjuvant imatinib improves both recurrence-free survival and overall survival compared with 1-year therapy in patients at high risk of recurrence after surgery. Considering risk factors associated with tumor recurrence is essential for identifying the patients who are most likely to benefit from adjuvant imatinib.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the optimal duration of adjuvant therapy remains to be determined, results from these pivotal trials provide firm evidence that adjuvant imatinib improves recurrence-free survival and improved overall survival of patients in the SSGXVIII/AIO trial. Ongoing studies may shed further light on the benefits and harms of adjuvant therapy, as well as the most appropriate patient candidates for adjuvant imatinib treatment.

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors: risk assessment and adjuvant therapy

Adjuvant imatinib prolongs recurrence-free survival and probably overall survival of patients who have undergone surgery for gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST). Estimation of the risk of recurrence with a prognostication tool and tumor mutation analysis is essential before imatinib initiation, because approximately 60% of patients with GIST with operable tumor are cured by surgery alone and some mutated tyrosine kinases are insensitive to imatinib. Adjuvant imatinib is usually administered for 3 years at the dose of 400 mg once daily. Early detection of tumors that recur despite adjuvant therapy with longitudinal imaging of the abdomen is likely beneficial.

[Case of primary retroperitoneal GIST (gastrointestinal stromal tumor) with rapid progression]

A 69-year-old man complaining of left abdominal pain was referred from a private clinic for retroperitoneal masses that were discovered on abdominal ultrasound in November 2010. CT scan showed retroperitoneal masses, located above the left kidney, measuring 10 cm. Para-aortic lymph nodes were swelling. We performed open biopsy to make the diagnosis in December 2010. The diagnosis was primary retroperitoneal GIST (gastrointestinal stromal tumor). We started imatinib 400 mg/day according to the Japan GIST guideline in January 2011. However the tumor pogressed rapidly, after 1 month the patient died.

Clinical significance of surgery for gastric submucosal tumours with size enlargement during watchful waiting period

BACKGROUND

The true impact of surgery for small, asymptomatic and biopsy-negative gastric submucosal tumours (SMTs) with size enlargement during 'watchful waiting' period has not been fully understood.

METHODS

From 2005 to 2012, 100 patients with gastric SMTs underwent surgery. Twenty-three of them with size enlargement during observation period were enrolled in the retrospective analysis. Data included clinicopathologic findings, genetic findings, operative outcomes and prognoses.

RESULTS

All patients (13 males, 10 females), with median age of 54 (41-71), had their lesions detected by routine health check-up (n=21) or incidentally (2). The tumours were 1.8 (0.5-4.0)cm in size at their initial detection, and enlarged up to 3.2 (2.0-7.0)cm at the operation during 63.0 (14.6-233.7) months. As surgical procedure, laparoscopic partial gastrectomy accounted for the majority (78.3%). Histologic examination revealed gastrointestinal stromal tumour (GIST) (21) and schwannoma (2). Although 16 out of 21 GISTs were categorised into 'Very low' (1), and 'Low' (13) risk according to Fletcher's classification, 'Intermediate' (5) and 'High' (2) risk were identified in the series. No recurrences/metastases were noted in 23.2 (0.9-87) months of postoperative follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Our study revealed the existence of high mitotic GISTs in asymptomatic, small gastric SMTs with size enlargement, and laparoscopic surgery was safely applied to majority of those cases. Prompt surgical intervention should therefore be considered for those lesions.

Gastrointestinal stromal tumor--background, pathology, treatment

Gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) represents the most common mesechymal tumor of the gastrointestinal tract. Discovery of the relationship between unregulated KIT kinase and GIST transformation has led to diagnostic and therapeutic targeting. Imatinib is the recommended first-line treatment of metastatic GIST. In addition, the combination of surgery and imatinib for primary GIST is indicated in the adjuvant setting of high-risk patients and there may be benefit for this combination in the neoadjuvant setting. The success of molecular targeted therapy in GIST represents an important and exciting advance in solid tumor oncology.

Clinical outcomes of gastrointestinal stromal tumor in southern Thailand

AIM

To review a single institutional experience in clinical management of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) and analyze for factors determining treatment outcome.

METHODS

Clinicopathological data of patients with a diagnosis of GIST who were treated at our institute during November 2004 to September 2009 were retrospectively reviewed.

RESULTS

Ninety-nine cases were included in the analysis. Primary tumor sites were at the stomach in and small bowel in 44% and 33%, respectively. Thirty-one cases already had metastasis at presentation and the most common metastatic site was the liver. Sixty-four cases (65%) were in the high-risk category. Surgical treatment was performed in 77 cases (78%), 3 of whom received upfront targeted therapy. Complete resection was achieved in 56 cases (73% of operative cases) and of whom 27 developed local recurrence or distant metastasis at a median duration of 2 years. Imatinib was given as a primary therapy in unresectable cases (25 cases) and as an adjuvant in cases with residual tumor (21 cases). Targeted therapy gave partial response in 7 cases (15%), stable disease in 27 cases (57%) and progressive disease in 13 cases (28%). Four-year overall survival was 74% (95% CI: 61%-83%). Univariate survival analysis found that low-risk tumor, gastric site, complete resection and response to imatinib were associated with better survival.

CONCLUSION

The overall outcomes of GIST can be predicted by risk-categorization. Surgery alone may not be a curative treatment for GIST. Response to targeted therapy is a crucial survival determinant in these patients.

Gastrointestinal stromal tumor

Gastrointestinal stromal tumor has received a lot of attention over the last 10 years due to its unique biologic behavior, clinicopathological features, molecular mechanisms, and treatment implications. GIST is the most common mesenchymal neoplasm in the gastrointestinal tract and has emerged from a poorly understood and treatment resistant neoplasm to a well-defined tumor entity since the discovery of particular molecular abnormalities, KIT and PDGFRA gene mutations. The understanding of GIST biology at the molecular level promised the development of novel treatment modalities. Diagnosis of GIST depends on the integrity of histology, immunohistochemistry and molecular analysis. The risk assessment of the tumor behavior relies heavily on pathological evaluation and significantly impacts clinical management. In this review, historic review, epidemiology, pathogenesis and genetics, diagnosis, role of molecular analysis, prognostic factor and treatment strategies have been discussed.

Presentation and management of gastrointestinal stromal tumors of the duodenum: a multi-institutional analysis

BACKGROUND

Duodenal gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are a small subset of GISTs, and their management is poorly defined. We evaluated surgical management and outcomes of patients with duodenal GISTs treated with pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) versus local resection (LR) and defined factors associated with prognosis.

METHODS

Between January 1994 and January 2011, 96 patients with duodenal GISTs were identified from five major surgical centers. Perioperative and long-term outcomes were compared based on surgical approach (PD vs LR).

RESULTS

A total of 58 patients (60.4%) underwent LR, while 38 (39.6%) underwent PD. Patients presented with gross bleeding (n = 25; 26.0%), pain (n = 23; 24.0%), occult bleeding (n = 19; 19.8%), or obstruction (n = 3; 3.1%). GIST lesions were located in first (n = 8, 8.4%), second (n = 47; 49%), or third/fourth (n = 41; 42.7%) portion of duodenum. Most patients (n = 86; 89.6%) had negative surgical margins (R0) (PD, 92.1 vs LR, 87.9%) (P = 0.34). Median length of stay was longer for PD (11 days) versus LR (7 days) (P = 0.001). PD also had more complications (PD, 57.9 vs LR, 29.3%) (P = 0.005). The 1-, 2-, and 3-year actuarial recurrence-free survival was 94.2, 82.3, and 67.3%, respectively. Factors associated with a worse recurrence-free survival included tumor size [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.09], mitotic count >10 mitosis/50 HPF (HR = 6.89), AJCC stage III disease (HR = 4.85), and NIH high risk classification (HR = 4.31) (all P < 0.05). The 1-, 3-, and 5-year actuarial survival was 98.3, 87.4, and 82.0%, respectively. PD versus LR was not associated with overall survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Recurrence of duodenal GIST is dependent on tumor biology rather than surgical approach. PD was associated with longer hospital stays and higher risk of perioperative complications. When feasible, LR is appropriate for duodenal GIST and PD should be reserved for lesions not amenable to LR.

Pathology of gastrointestinal stromal tumors

Gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) is a well recognized and relatively well understood soft tissue tumor. Early events in GIST development are activating mutations in KIT or PDGFRA, which occur in most GISTs and encode for mutated tyrosine receptor kinases that are therapeutic targets for tyrosine kinase inhibitors, including imatinib and sunitinib. A small minority of GISTs possessing neither KIT nor PDGFRA mutations may have germline mutations in SDH, suggesting a potential role of SDH in the pathogenesis. Immunohistochemical detection of KIT, and more recently DOG1, has proven to be reliable and useful in the diagnosis of GISTs. Because current and future therapies depend on pathologists, it is important that they recognize KIT-negative GISTs, GISTs in specific clinical contexts, GISTs with unusual morphology, and GISTs after treatment. This review focuses on recent developments in the understanding of the biology, immunohistochemical diagnosis, the role of molecular analysis, and risk assessment of GISTs.

Endoscopic muscularis dissection for upper gastrointestinal subepithelial tumors originating from the muscularis propria

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Based on our experience with endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) and new endoscopic techniques for endoscopic closure of iatrogenic upper gastrointestinal (upper-GI) perforations, we developed methods to remove upper-GI subepithelial tumors (SETs) originating from the muscularis propria by endoscopic muscularis dissection (EMD). The aim of this study is to evaluate the clinical feasibility and safety of EMD.

METHODS

31 patients with upper-GI SETs originating from the muscularis propria were treated by EMD. The EMD differed from ESD in (1) precutting the overlying mucosa above the lesion by using snare or longitudinal incision instead of circumferential incision, (2) dissecting the complete tumors away from submucosal and muscularis propria tissue by electrical dissection combined with blunt dissection, and (3) closing the wound with clips. Perforations occurring during dissection were closed by endoscopic methods.

RESULTS

30 of 31 tumors were resected completely (96.8 %). One esophageal lesion was resected partially because of severe adhesions with surrounding tissue. Mean resected tumor size was 22.1 mm × 15.5 mm, and mean operation time was 76.8 min (range 15-330 min). Histological diagnosis was gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) in 16 lesions [6 esophageal, 3 cardial, 7 gastric; 6 very low risk and 10 low risk according to the National Institutes of Health (NIH) risk classification] and leiomyoma in 15 lesions (8 esophageal, 4 cardial, 3 gastric). No patient developed delayed hemorrhage. Perforation occurred in four patients (12.9 %), all of which were managed successfully by endoscopic techniques. The mean follow-up time was 17.7 months (range 7-35 months). Follow-up found no tumor recurrence in any patient.

CONCLUSIONS

In this early experience, EMD appears to be a feasible and minimally invasive treatment for some patients with upper-GI SETs originating from the muscularis propria. Although there is a higher risk of perforation than with ESD, this will improve with extended practice, and perforations have become manageable endoscopically.

Adjuvant treatment of GIST: patient selection and treatment strategies

Tyrosine kinase inhibitors that target the key molecular drivers of gastrointestinal stromal tumour (GIST) are effective treatments of advanced-stage GIST. Yet, most of these patients succumb to the disease. Approximately 60% of patients with GIST are cured by surgery, and these individuals can be identified by risk stratification schemes based on tumour size, mitosis count and site, and assessment of rupture. Two large randomized trials have evaluated imatinib as adjuvant treatment for operable, KIT-positive GIST; adjuvant imatinib substantially improved time to recurrence. One of these trials reported that 3 years of adjuvant imatinib improves overall survival of patients who have a high estimated risk for recurrence of GIST compared with 1 year of imatinib. The optimal adjuvant strategy remains unknown and some patients might benefit from longer than 3 years of imatinib treatment. However, a strategy that involves GIST risk assessment following surgery using a validated scheme, administration of adjuvant imatinib for 3 years, patient monitoring during and after completion of imatinib to detect recurrence early, and reinstitution of imatinib if GIST recurs is a reasonable choice for care of patients with high-risk GIST.

Recurrence Risk after Resection of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors: Size is Not All that Matters… the Consequences of Tumor Rupture

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are mesenchymal tumors that most commonly have activating mutations in KIT. Recurrence after complete resection remains a significant problem, and the ability to identify patients at high risk for recurrence would allow for selective use of adjuvant therapies such as imatinib in patients who may garner the most benefit. Initial staging systems stratified recurrence risk by tumor size and mitotic index, whereas subsequent staging systems also included tumor location. However, other clinical factors may influence prognosis and the risk for tumor recurrence after surgery. The purpose of this article is to highlight tumor rupture as an additional risk factor that should be considered when assessing for recurrence risk. Tumor rupture is associated with decreased survival and increased recurrence rates, but it is not universally included in current staging systems. Patients with ruptured GISTs may not meet the risk criteria elaborated in some current staging systems, yet these patients are at high risk for tumor recurrence and may benefit from adjuvant imatinib therapy. A fundamental understanding of all the risk factors for tumor recurrence, including tumor rupture, and appropriate consideration for adjuvant therapy through a multidisciplinary approach are requisite for the maximal prevention of disease recurrence.

Risk of recurrence of gastrointestinal stromal tumour after surgery: an analysis of pooled population-based cohorts

BACKGROUND

The risk of recurrence of gastrointestinal stromal tumour (GIST) after surgery needs to be estimated when considering adjuvant systemic therapy. We assessed prognostic factors of patients with operable GIST, to compare widely used risk-stratification schemes and to develop a new method for risk estimation.

METHODS

Population-based cohorts of patients diagnosed with operable GIST, who were not given adjuvant therapy, were identified from the literature. Data from ten series and 2560 patients were pooled. Risk of tumour recurrence was stratified using the National Institute of Health (NIH) consensus criteria, the modified consensus criteria, and the Armed Forces Institute of Pathology (AFIP) criteria. Prognostic factors were examined using proportional hazards and non-linear models. The results were validated in an independent centre-based cohort consisting of 920 patients with GIST.

FINDINGS

Estimated 15-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) after surgery was 59·9% (95% CI 56·2-63·6); few recurrences occurred after the first 10 years of follow-up. Large tumour size, high mitosis count, non-gastric location, presence of rupture, and male sex were independent adverse prognostic factors. In receiver operating characteristics curve analysis of 10-year RFS, the NIH consensus criteria, modified consensus criteria, and AFIP criteria resulted in an area under the curve (AUC) of 0·79 (95% CI 0·76-0·81), 0·78 (0·75-0·80), and 0·82 (0·80-0·85), respectively. The modified consensus criteria identified a single high-risk group. Since tumour size and mitosis count had a non-linear association with the risk of GIST recurrence, novel prognostic contour maps were generated using non-linear modelling of tumour size and mitosis count, and taking into account tumour site and rupture. The non-linear model accurately predicted the risk of recurrence (AUC 0·88, 0·86-0·90).

INTERPRETATION

The risk-stratification schemes assessed identify patients who are likely to be cured by surgery alone. Although the modified NIH classification is the best criteria to identify a single high-risk group for consideration of adjuvant therapy, the prognostic contour maps resulting from non-linear modelling are appropriate for estimation of individualised outcomes.

FUNDING

Academy of Finland, Cancer Society of Finland, Sigrid Juselius Foundation and Helsinki University Research Funds.