Young colorectal carcinoma patients do not have a poorer prognosis: a comparative review of 2,426 cases

Prognosis of early-onset versus late-onset sporadic colorectal cancer: Systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

In the last years, a dramatic increase in colorectal cancer (CRC) diagnoses in early-onset (EO) patients has been observed. The prognosis of EO-CRC compared to late-onset (LO) patients is still unclear. This meta-analysis aims to clarify whether there is any difference in the prognosis between the two groups.

METHODS

A systematic review was conducted on EMBASE-Medline, Pubmed and Cochrane Library in March 2024 to identify studies comparing overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), disease-free survival (DFS), local recurrence (LR) and distant recurrence (DR) risk outcomes between EO-CRC (<50 years old) and LO-CRC (>50 years old) with at least 50 patients per group and one year of follow-up. The risk of bias was assessed with the ROBINS-E tool. Data from stage prevalence and survival were extracted and meta-analysed. Meta-regression was used to identify impacting effect modifiers. The PROSPERO registration number was CRD42024573264.

RESULTS

Twenty-six studies were identified; 1,062,037 patients (13.4% EO-CRC and 86.6% LO-CRC) were included in the stage prevalence and 567,689 in the prognostic meta-analysis. Overall, 60% of the EO-CRC and 49% of the LO-CRC were diagnosed with an advanced stage (III-IV) of disease (RR 1.26, 95%CI 1.19-1.35, I2=87%). EO-CRC had a better OS than LO-CRC (HR 0.89, 95%CI 0.81-0.99, I2=89%) but equal CSS (HR 0.94, 95%CI 0.83-1.06, I2=82%), DFS (HR 1.05 95%CI 0.94-1.16, I2=76%), LR (HR 1.41, 95%CI 0.62-3.18, I2=49%) and DR (HR 1.51, 95%CI 0.79-2.89) risk. Meta-regression analysis identified a worse DFS in the EO-CRC rectal cancer subgroup (HR 1.14, 95%CI 1.00-1.30, I2=0%).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the high heterogeneity of existing studies, EO-CRC patients are diagnosed with significantly more advanced stages than LO-CRC, although this is not reflected in any difference in cancer-related survival. There is an urgent need for increased vigilance in the early detection of CRC in young patients.

Rectal Cancer in Young Adults: A Single Center Experience

Purpose: Individuals below the age of 40 make up only 3%-11% of colorectal cancer (CRC) cases. In this study, we aimed to review clinicopathological characteristics of rectal cancer in young adults. Methods: Rectal adenocancer patients aged ≤40 were included in this study from Antalya Training and Research Hospital. A single-arm descriptive study was designed. Results: There were 85 patients in the final analyses (n = 85). The median age was 37 (19-40). Mucinous adenocarcinoma and signet-cell carcinoma rates were 11.8% for each. Twenty patients (24.4%) had high-grade cancer. Fourteen patients (16.5%) had CRC history in a first-degree relative. None of the patients were diagnosed through a screening test. Of the 85 patients, 41 (48.2%) were stage 3 and 23 (27.1%) were stage 4 at the time of diagnosis. Thirty-four (54.8%) of the 62 nonmetastatic patients had neoadjuvant and 27 (43.5%) had adjuvant treatment because of having an upfront surgery before presentation. In the nonmetastatic population, the 5-year disease-free survival rate was 69.7 ± 6.5%. De-novo metastatic underwent chemotherapy, and biological agents were administered when feasible. KRAS mutation rate was 56.5% among metastatic patients. The median progression-free survival for the first-line treatment was 11.2 months (5.7-16.6), and the median overall survival was 22.3 months (15.4-29.1). Conclusion: We demonstrated that rectal cancer is usually diagnosed at late stages in young individuals which is compatible with the previous reports. Low cancer awareness in young patients and their caregivers and adverse histological features were advocated as the reason for the diagnostic delay. However, future studies may elucidate the reason behind the common diagnosis at advanced stages.

Clinicopathologic Characteristics Influencing Overall Survival of Patients With Early- Versus Average-Onset Colorectal Cancer at a Tertiary Care Center in Indonesia

PURPOSE

There has been a global increase in early-onset colorectal cancer (EOCRC), yet there has been very limited exploration of its impact in Indonesia. This study aimed to determine the clinicopathologic characteristics and the overall survival (OS) of EOCRC compared with those of average-onset colorectal cancer (AOCRC).

METHODS

Medical records were retrospectively reviewed from all patients presenting with colorectal cancer (CRC) at Dr Sardjito General Hospital (Yogyakarta, Indonesia) between 2016 and 2019. Sociodemographic, clinicopathologic, and treatment variables were extracted. t Tests were used to compare characteristics of EOCRC and AOCRC patient groups. The Cox proportional hazards regression model was used to analyze age and other potential prognostic factors.

RESULTS

The total population (N = 1,276) comprised EOCRC (n = 149; 11.7%) and AOCRC (n = 1,127; 88.3%) patients. EOCRC patients were more likely to have a higher education level, be single, have out-of-pocket insurance, be underweight, and have signet ring histology (all P values <.05), compared with AOCRC patients. EOCRC and AOCRC groups had a comparable estimated 5-year OS of 34.2% and 36.9%, respectively. In multivariable analyses, performance status (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group), hemoglobin level, cancer stage, and treatment intention were independent prognostic factors for OS (all P values <.05).

CONCLUSION

To our knowledge, this first major study of EOCRC in Indonesia highlights its role in the overall burden of CRC and its connection with social determinants of health. Patients with EOCRC are more commonly underweight and generally have a higher proportion of signet ring histology than AOCRC, yet OS in both groups is similar. Future research is required to identify risk factors to inform the content and focus of public health education activities, alongside delineating the biology and causes of early and average onset of the disease.

Correlation between mismatch repair statuses and the prognosis of stage I-IV colorectal cancer

Background

The role of microsatellite instability (MSI) and prognosis for stage II-III colorectal cancer (CRC) has been described, but the role of MSI in stage I and IV CRC is controversial.

Methods

A total of 2,540 CRC patients were collected from Huzhou Central Hospital, China, from January 2006 to 2016, and 783 cases were excluded. This retrospective study illustrates the correlation between MMR status and prognosis for 1,757 CRC patients as well as the correlation between MSI and prognosis for CRC patients. Two groups were classified as MSI-H and MSI-L&MSS. If the expression of one or more mismatch repair (MMR) proteins was negative, it was considered as microsatellite instability high expression (MSI-H), whereas positive expression was considered as microsatellite instability low expression and microsatellite stability (MSI-L&MSS), as assessed by correlation analyses. Overall and disease-free survival were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Univariable and multivariable analyses were conducted using Cox regression.

Results

Preoperative serum S-CEA, positive lymph, tumor size, pathologic tumor (Pt) status, node (N) stage, differentiation, chemotherapy, and the 8th Edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC-8) were significantly correlated with MSI (P=0.028, 0.037, 0.019, 0.007, 0.002, <0.001, <0.001, and <0.001, respectively), whereas tumor location was not associated with MSI. Univariable and multivariable analyses showed that MSI was an independent factor for CRC. The 5-year overall survival (OS) and 5-year disease-free survival (DFS, P<0.001) rates differed significantly between the two groups in stages II, III, and IV, whereas stage I did not show a significant difference (P>0.05).

Conclusion

MSI-H was associated with a good prognosis for stages II to IV, whereas stage I did not show any significant correlation. Moreover, MSI expression was an independent prognostic factor.

Comparison of the short- and long-term prognosis of early-onset colorectal cancer compared with later-onset colorectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background and Aims

The annual incidence of early-onset colorectal cancer (EOCRC) is increasing at an alarming rate. The prognosis of EOCRC remains controversial, and whether the early onset is a risk factor for colorectal cancer remains unclear.

Methods

We searched four electronic bibliographic databases from database inception to April 25, 2022 for studies that included both early- and later-onset patients and performed a prognostic analysis. Random-effects models were used to summarize the prognostic information extracted by the investigators, including overall survival (OS), cancer-special survival (CSS), and disease-free survival (DFS). Network meta-analysis (NMA) was used to compare patients' long-term prognoses in different age subgroups.

Results

After 694 reports were screened, 13 studies were included in the final analysis, with a total of 448,781 CRC cases. In the meta-analysis of the 5-year OS, EOCRC had a better prognosis compared to LOCRC (hazard ratio [HR] 0.87, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.74-0.99; relative risk [RR] 0.83, 95% CI, 0.78-0.89). No difference in prognosis was found between the two groups in terms of 5-year CSS (RR 0.99, 95% CI, 0.93-1.05), 5-year DFS (RR 0.90, 95% CI, 0.74-1.09), and short-term OS. In the NMA, patients aged <30 years had the worst outcome (surface under the cumulative ranking curve [SUCRA], 15.8%) in 5-year OS; consistent results were observed in the analysis of 5-year CSS (<30 years, SUCRA 4.5%), but the difference was not statistically significant.

Conclusion

Although patients with early-onset CRC had better OS than those with later-onset CRC, there was no difference in the CSS. Meanwhile, the trend for survival was worse in younger patients, especially in those ages 18-29 years. Thus, more attention should be paid to early diagnosis and treatment of EOCRC.

Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis Registration

The systematic review and Meta-analysis protocol was registered with PROSPERO (registration number CRD42022334697).

Colorectal Cancer in the Young: Research in Early Age Colorectal Cancer Trends (REACCT) Collaborative

Background: The incidence of colorectal cancer (CRC) is increasing in the young (under 50). Defining the clinicopathological features and cancer-specific outcomes of patients with early-onset CRC is important to optimize screening and treatment strategies. This study evaluated disease-specific features and oncological outcomes of patients with early-onset CRC. Methods: Anonymized data from an international collaboration were analyzed. The inclusion criteria for this study were patients aged <50 years with stage I-III disease surgically resected with curative intent. Overall and disease-free survival were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Results: A total of 3378 patients were included, with a median age of 43 (18-49) and a slight male preponderance (54.3%). One-third had a family history of colorectal cancer. Almost all (>95%) of patients were symptomatic at diagnosis. The majority (70.1%) of tumors were distal to the descending colon. Approximately 40% were node positive. Microsatellite instability was demonstrated in one in five patients, representing 10% of rectal and 27% of colon cancers. A defined inherited syndrome was diagnosed in one-third of those with microsatellite instability. Rectal cancer displayed a worse prognosis stage for stage. Five-year disease-free survival for stage I, II, and III colon cancer was 96%, 91%, and 68%, respectively. The equivalent rates for rectal cancer were 91%, 81%, and 62%. Conclusions and relevance: The majority of EOCRC would be captured with flexible sigmoidoscopy. Extending screening to young adults and public health education initiatives are potential interventions to improve survivorship.

A Retrospective Multicenter Study of the Clinicopathological Characteristics and Prognosis of Young Adult Patients with Colorectal Cancer: Effects of Chemotherapy on Prognosis

BACKGROUND

The objective of this study was to evaluate clinicopathologic features of young patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) and to compare their prognosis with those of older patients Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients who underwent surgery for stage 0-III CRC at four university-affiliated hospitals between January 2011 and December 2020. The patients were divided into two groups, the young adult group (≤45 years) and the older group (>45 years).

RESULTS

Of 1992 patients, 93 (4.6%) were young adults and 1899 (95.3%) were older patients. Young patients showed more symptoms (p = 0.014) and more poorly or undifferentiated adenocarcinoma (p = 0.047) than older patients. The young adult patients were more likely to receive adjuvant chemotherapy (p < 0.001) and multidrug agents (p = 0.029), and less likely to cease chemotherapy (p = 0.037). The five-year RFS (recurrence-free survival) rate was better in the young adults than in the older patients (p = 0.009). In the multivariable analysis, young age was a significant prognostic factor for better RFS (p = 0.015).

CONCLUSIONS

Young patients with CRC had more symptoms, aggressive histological features than older patients. They received more multidrug agents and discontinued chemotherapy less often, resulting in better prognosis.

A Retrospective Study of the Prognostic Patterns in Colorectal Cancer Patients

Introduction  Colorectal cancer (CRC) management has advanced globally, leading to a steady decline in mortality rates. However, recent studies have shown that the prognosis of CRC varies based on the anatomical site of the primary tumor, histopathological grading, and type of mutation. With an increase in the incidence of CRC globally and in Bahrain, there is a need for a recent descriptive study to improve overall management. This study aims to investigate the anatomical, histopathological, and molecular prognostic factors in CRC patients presenting to the Salmaniya Medical Complex (SMC). Methods  The study was conducted retrospectively using ISEHA electronic database over two years (January 2019 to December 2020). A total of 101 patients with primary CRC registered in the General Surgery Department were included in this study. The sample size was further stratified and analyzed using descriptive statistics based on the available data of measured outcomes. Results  Anatomical data showed that 65% of CRC patients had a tumor on the left side of the colon, 27.7% on the right side, and 7% in the transverse colon. Overall, 16.8% of all patients had rectal involvement. Histopathological data showed that 86% of the patients had a low-grade CRC adenocarcinoma. The most diagnosed tumor stage was pT3N0M0 (22.8%). In addition, there were ten metastatic cases (10 to the liver, of which three had concomitant lung involvement and two had concurrent brain metastases). The average tumor diameter was 46.2 mm, where 63% ranged between 30 mm to 69 mm. Most mutations involved the TP53 (27.7%) and the KRAS (29%) genes.  Conclusion  The study found that majority of CRC patients at SMC in Bahrain had relatively good overall anatomical, tumor staging and grading prognostic factors but somewhat poorer molecular prognostics.

Reduced expression of alanyl aminopeptidase is a robust biomarker of non-familial adenomatous polyposis and non-hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer syndrome early-onset colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Early-onset colorectal cancer (EOCRC) has been increasing in incidence worldwide but its genomic pathogenesis is mostly undetermined. This study aimed to identify robust EOCRC-specific gene expression patterns in non-familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) and non-hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer syndrome (HNPCC) EOCRC.

METHOD

We first performed gene expression profiling analysis using RNA sequencing of discovery cohort comprised of 49 EOCRC (age <50) and 50 late-onset colorectal cancer (LOCRC) (age >70) specimens. To obtain robust gene expression data from this analysis, we validated differentially expressed genes (DEGs) through TCGA cohort (EOCRC:59 samples, LOCRC:229 samples) and our validation cohort (EOCRC:72 samples, LOCRC:43 samples) using real-time RT-PCR. After the validation of DEGs, we validated the selected gene at protein levels using Western blotting. To identify whether genomic methylation regulates the expression of a particular gene, we selected methylation sites using The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) datasets and validated them by pyrosequencing in our validation cohort.

RESULTS

The EOCRC patients included in this study had significantly more prominent family history of cancer than the LOCRC patients (23 [46.9%] vs. 13 [26%], p = 0.050). Alanyl aminopeptidase (ANPEP) was significantly downregulated in the EOCRC tissues (FC = 1.78, p = 0.0007) and was also commonly downregulated in the TCGA cohort (FC = -1.08, p = 0.0021). Moreover, the ANPEP mRNA and protein expression levels were significantly downregulated in the EOCRC tissues of our validation cohort (p = 0.037 and 0.027). In comparisons of the normal and tumor tissues in public datasets, the ANPEP level was significantly lower in the tumor tissue in the TCGA dataset (p < 2.2 × 10^-16 ) and GSE196006 dataset (p = 0.0005). Furthermore, the ANPEP expression level did not show a decreasing tendency at a young age in the normal colon tissue of the GTEx dataset. Lastly, the hypermethylation of cg26222247 in ANPEP was identified to be weakly associated with reduced ANPEP expression in our EOCRC cohort.

CONCLUSION

The reduced expression of ANPEP was identified as a novel biomarker of non-FAP and non-HNPCC EOCRC.

Early Onset Colorectal Cancer in Arabs, Are We Dealing with a Distinct Disease?

Early-onset colorectal cancer (EOCRC) incidence is increasing worldwide. Efforts are directed to understand the biological and clinical signatures of EOCRC compared to late-onset colorectal cancer (LOCRC). EOCRC is thought to present differently across different ethnic groups and geographical regions. This study was an attempt to contribute with data from the Arab world toward the understanding of the clinicopathological parameters of EOCRC compared to LOCRC. Data from 254 CRC patients diagnosed at Sultan Qaboos University Hospital from the period 2015-2020 were studied. About 32.6% of all diagnosed CRC patients are below 50 years old, with no differences in gender distribution between EOCRC and LOCRC (p-value 0.417). Rectal involvement and tumor laterality were comparable among the two groups. Adenocarcinoma accounts for 83.3% and 94.2% of EOCRC and LOCRC, respectively. More mucinous and signet ring adenocarcinoma (8.3% each) were reported in EOCRC than LOCRC (2.9% and 2.2%, respectively). MLH1 and PMS2 loss are more common among LOCRC, but MSH6 loss is more frequent in EOCRC. The overall survival of EOCRC and LOCRC was comparable (median survival 64.88 and 67.24 months, respectively). This study showed comparable clinicopathological parameters between EOCRC and LOCRC from Arabs, which adds to the bigger picture of understand the disease.

Early onset colorectal cancer: Challenges across the cancer care continuum

Early Onset Colorectal cancer (EOCRC) incidence is increasing at an alarming pace. An increase of 90% in colon cancer and 124% in rectal cancer is expected by 2030. Patients with EOCRC are not receiving additional attention compared to older patients despite having a unique molecular pattern, majority of cases are sporadic, and related short- and long-term treatment and disease complications. The current management and screening guidelines have been constructed from studies on late onset CRC. Plethora of studies are ongoing to understand this disease entity in order to construct a tailored prevention, detection and management plans. While waiting for a better understanding of the disease, efforts should be directed toward improving the quality of care across the cancer continuum. Here we aim to address the challenges faced by EOCRC patients across the cancer continuum. This will facilitate directing future efforts and research toward construction of a personalized and precise guidelines.

•

Studies showed that Ealy onset colorectal cancer is caused by an accumulative risk exposure.

•

Indirect cost of premature death and reduced productivity due to EOCRC exceeds direct costs.

•

Patients, system and physicians related diagnosis delays should be improved.

•

Young cancer patients have unique survivorship concerns different from old patients.

The Characterization and Outcomes of Colorectal Malignancy in Patients ≤40 Years of Age: A Single-Center Experience

BACKGROUND

Implementation of screening modalities has led to a decreased incidence of colorectal malignancies. Unfortunately, overall incidence has remained unchanged as cases have increased in patients below the suggested screening age. Therefore, we evaluated characteristics and oncological outcomes of malignancies in patients ≤40 years of age.

METHODS

Single-center retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data of malignancies in patients ≤40 years evaluated in our institution between 2010 and 2016. Basic descriptors for demographic, clinical, histologic, and genetic data were collected. Disease-free survival (DFS) and 5-year overall survival (OS) were compared for patients between 30-40 years and <30 years.

RESULTS

Fifty-six patients ≤40 years were identified, 44 of whom (96.5%) had adenocarcinomas. Most common malignancy location was the rectum (64.3%). Despite aggressive tumor characteristics such as moderate/poor differentiation (88.6%), lymphovascular invasion (26.8%), perineural invasion (21.4%), and advanced tumor stage T3/T4 (60.7%), OS rate was 94.6%. Both age groups had similar oncologic characteristics. There was a trend toward worse OS (2/11 and 1/45, P = .06) but not for DFS (7/11 and 15/43, P = .18) in patients <30 years of age compared to 30-40 years. There were no differences in OS (3/44 vs 0/88, P = .44) or DFS (17/42 vs 3/8, P = .80) between sporadic vs non-sporadic malignancies, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients ≤40 years of age with malignancy have advanced tumor stages and aggressive tumor characteristics at diagnosis. Although there is higher OS risk for patients <30 compared to those aged 30-40 years, no differences were found for DFS between these two groups.

Clinicopathologic characteristics of early-onset colorectal cancer

Purpose

The aim of this study was to analysis of the clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis of colorectal cancer (CRC) under the age of 50 years.

Methods

Between January 2009 and December 2018, 1,126 primary CRC patients were included from National Health Insurance Service Ilsan Hospital. The patients were divided into group 1 (n=111, ≤50 years) and group 2 (n=1,015, >50 years). The clinicopathologic features and prognostic outcomes were compared. In addition, to analyze whether there were any differences of those characteristics in 3 groups, patients aged under 50 years were divided into their 20s, 30s, and 40s.

Results

Group 1 had a slightly higher distribution in the left colon and rectum, lower T stage I and higher T stage IV rate, and a significantly higher distribution in stage N2 than group 2 (30.6%:16.3%, P<0.001). Poor histological differentiation of tumors was significantly high in group 1 (P=0.003). The 5-year survival rate for those in their 30s (69.2%) and 40s (91.6%) was higher than those in their 20s who died immediately after surgery (P<0.001). The 5-year disease-free survival rate was also confirmed to be meaningful for each age group, with 0% in their 20s, 53.8% in their 30s, 79.2% in their 40s (P<0.001).

Conclusion

Although the age was not an independent prognostic factor for overall survival in this study, the early onset group of CRCs is more advanced at the time of diagnosis and has a more aggressive histologic type.

The Role of Diet and Lifestyle in Early-Onset Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review

Simple Summary

This systematic review sifted through the exogenous dietary and lifestyle risk factors associated with early-onset colorectal cancer, going through the putative involvement of these exogenous risk factors in epigenetic and microbiota modifications. Given the burden of early-onset colorectal cancer and its globally increasing trend with scant literature on its pathogenesis, we believe it would be of benefit to highlight the importance of further systematic and large studies. Indeed, dietary and lifestyle modification could complement colorectal screening for early-onset colorectal cancer prevention.

Abstract

The incidence of early-onset colorectal cancer, defined as colorectal cancer occurring in young adults under the age of 50, is increasing globally. Knowledge of the etiological factors in young adults is far from complete. Questionable eoCRCs’ exogenous factors are represented by processed meat, sugary drinks, alcohol, Western dietary pattern, overweight and obesity, physical inactivity, and smoking, though with heterogeneous results. Therefore, we performed a systematic review to summarize the current evidence on the role of diet and lifestyle as eoCRC risk factors. We systematically searched PubMed, Scopus, and EMBASE up to July 2021, for original studies evaluating diet, alcohol, physical activity, BMI, and smoking in eoCRC and included twenty-six studies. Indeed, the exogenous factors could represent modifiable key factors, whose recognition could establish areas of future interventions through public health strategies for eoCRC primary prevention. Additionally, we discussed the role of additional non-modifiable risk factors, and of epigenetic regulation and microbiota as mediators of the eoCRC triggered by diet and lifestyle.

Predictors of Lymph Node Metastasis in T1 Colorectal Cancer in Young Patients: Results from a National Cancer Registry

The objective of this study is to fill the knowledge gap by examining predictors of lymph node metastasis (LNM) in young patients, less than 45 years, using a national cancer registry. Methods: Patients diagnosed with T1 colorectal cancer were identified in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results registry. In total, 692 patients with T1 colorectal cancer were identified. Most tumors occurred in white race (77.7%), between 40 and 44 years of age (49.4%), with grade III tumor differentiation (59.8%) and 1 to 1.9 cm size (32.2%), and were left-sided tumors (61.1%). The overall rate of LNM was 22.5% (n = 149). LNM was associated with tumor grade IV (undifferentiated) (odds ratio (OR) 2.94, CI: 1.06-8.12; p = 0.038), and increasing tumor size (1 cm-1.9 cm: OR 2.92, CI: 1.71-4.97, p < 0.001; 2.0 cm-2.9 cm: OR 2.00, CI: 1.05-3.77, p = 0.034; and ≥3.0 cm: OR 2.68, CI: 1.43-5.01, p = 0.002). Five-year cancer-specific survival for patients with LNM was 91% and for patients without LNM this was 98%. Adjusted cox proportion models showed that LNM was associated with a four times higher rate of mortality (hazard ratio (HR) 4.43, CI: 1.27-15.52, p = 0.020). In this population-based analysis of patients with T1 colorectal cancer, tumor size and grade were significant predictors of LNM.

Outcomes of young patients diagnosed with locally advanced rectal cancer

BACKGROUND

The incidence of rectal cancer is higher in the older population. In developed nations, there has been a rise in incidence in young onset colorectal cancer (CRC). We examined the outcomes of locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) in younger patients (yRC) compared with older patients, using a retrospective audit.

METHODS

All cases of LARC referred to two tertiary referral cancer centres in Western Sydney were examined. Patient demographics, presenting symptoms, treatment, relapse free survival (RFS), overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS) were obtained. Under 50 years old was used as the cut-off age for defining yRC.

RESULTS

All 145 consecutive patients were treated for LARC, including 28 in the yRC and 117 in the older patient group. Median follow-up was 54 months. yRC were more likely to complete neoadjuvant therapy (100% vs. 86%; P=0.032) and to undergo more extensive surgical procedures (24% vs. 2%, P<0.0001). yRC were more likely to have microsatellite high (MSI) tumours (30% vs. 4.7%; P=0.003). yRC demonstrated significantly poorer RFS compared with the standard group (HR 2.79; median RFS 4.67 vs. 16.02 months; P=0.023). In the relapsed setting, yRC had poorer PFS compared with the standard group (median PFS 2.66 vs. 9.70, P=0.006, HR 3.04). A difference in OS was also seen between the two groups, with yRC demonstrating poorer OS (median OS 40.46 vs. 58.26 months, HR 3.48, P=0.036).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients under 50 years with LARC are more likely to have MSI tumours with a more aggressive disease course and poorer RFS, PFS and OS. Initiatives to improve early detection of these patients may improve outcomes. Further research is necessary to understand this disease and optimise its treatment.

Preventive intraperitoneal hyperthermic perfusion chemotherapy for patients with T4 stage colon adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) has been shown to be an effective treatment for peritoneal tumors; whether preventive HIPEC after radical resection for T4 stage colon adenocarcinoma could decrease peritoneal recurrence remains unknown. The aim of the present study was to compare peritoneal recurrence and short-term survival in patients with T4 stage colon adenocarcinoma undergoing HIPEC plus adjuvant chemotherapy or adjuvant chemotherapy alone following surgery.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed T4 stage colon adenocarcinoma patients who had radical tumor resection at our institution between January 2014 and January 2019. Clinical data were extracted from the database at our institution, and patient survival and long-term complications were assessed through repeated outpatient examinations and telephone interviews.

RESULTS

A total of 352 patients were included in this study; 157 patients received postoperative HIPEC plus adjuvant chemotherapy (HIPEC group), 195 patients received adjuvant chemotherapy alone (conventional chemotherapy group). Forty-one (26.1%) patients in the HIPEC group had a peritoneal recurrence and the peritoneum was the first site of tumor recurrence in 6 (14.6%) of them. However, 73 (37.4%) patients experienced peritoneal recurrence in the conventional group, and the peritoneum was the first site of tumor recurrence in 25 (34.2%) (p = 0.019). Disease-free survival in the HIPEC group at 1 and 3 years was 93.3% and 61.1%, respectively, versus 89.3% and 51.7% in the conventional chemotherapy group (p = 0.038). Overall survival in the HIPEC group at 1 and 3 years was 100.0% and 82.7%, respectively, versus 100.0% and 76.9% in the conventional chemotherapy group (p = 0.420). The two groups did not differ with respect to severe complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Preventive HIPEC after radical surgery may decrease peritoneal recurrence and promote disease-free survival for T4 stage colon adenocarcinoma. Large-scale randomized controlled studies are needed to confirm the results of our study.

Early-onset colorectal cancer: initial clues and current views

Over the past several decades, the incidence of early-onset colorectal cancer (EOCRC; in patients <50 years old) has increased at an alarming rate. Although robust and scientifically rigorous epidemiological studies have sifted out environmental elements linked to EOCRC, our knowledge of the causes and mechanisms of this disease is far from complete. Here, we highlight potential risk factors and putative mechanisms that drive EOCRC and suggest likely areas for fruitful research. In addition, we identify inconsistencies in the evidence implicating a strong effect of increased adiposity and suggest that certain behaviours (such as diet and stress) might place nonobese and otherwise healthy people at risk of this disease. Key risk factors are reviewed, including the global westernization of diets (usually involving a high intake of red and processed meats, high-fructose corn syrup and unhealthy cooking methods), stress, antibiotics, synthetic food dyes, monosodium glutamate, titanium dioxide, and physical inactivity and/or sedentary behaviour. The gut microbiota is probably at the crossroads of these risk factors and EOCRC. The time course of the disease and the fact that relevant exposures probably occur in childhood raise important methodological issues that are also discussed.

Nomogram predicting cancer-specific mortality in early-onset rectal cancer: a competing risk analysis

BACKGROUND

The incidence of rectal cancer has meaningfully increased in young patients. However, quantitative evaluation for the competing data of early-onset rectal cancer is lacking. So, we performed a competing risk analysis to calculate the cumulative incidence of death for patients with early-onset rectal cancer and developed a nomogram to predict the probability of cancer-specific mortality for these patients.

METHODS

We abstracted data of patients with early-onset rectal cancer between 2004 and 2016 by using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program database. The cumulative incidence function was used to calculate the crude cancer-specific mortality of early-onset rectal cancer. Fine and Gray's proportional sub-distribution hazard model was adopted to explore the risk factors of cancer-specific death. Then, we establish a nomogram to predict their 3-, 5-, and 10-year probabilities.

RESULTS

We identified 9917 patients with early-onset rectal cancer, and they were randomly divided into training (n = 6941) and validation (n = 2976) cohorts. In the training cohort, the 3-, 5-, and 10-year cumulative incidences of cancer-specific death after diagnosis for early-onset rectal cancer were 11.4%, 19.9%, and 28.8%, respectively. Fine and Gray's model showed that sex, race, marital status, histology, T stage, N stage, M stage, examined lymph nodes, and pretreatment carcinoembryonic antigen were independently associated with cancer-specific mortality. Such factors were selected to develop a prognostic nomogram.

CONCLUSION

The competing risk nomogram has an ideal performance for predictive cancer-specific mortality in early-onset rectal cancer.

Age and Lymph Node Positivity in Patients With Colon and Rectal Cancer in the US Military Health System

BACKGROUND

Young age may be associated with an increased risk of lymph node involvement at diagnosis of colorectal cancer. Accessibility to care, which is related to cancer detection, tumor stage, and therefore lymph node positivity, may vary by age and thus influence research results.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to investigate whether young patients had an increased risk of lymph node-positive colon and rectal cancers in the Department of Defense Military Health System, which provides universal health care to its beneficiaries.

DESIGN

This was a retrospective, cross-sectional study.

SETTINGS

Patients were identified from the US Department of Defense Automated Central Tumor Registry.

PATIENTS

Included patients were diagnosed with histologically confirmed primary stage I to III colon and rectal adenocarcinomas between 1989 and 2013, had surgery and ≥1 lymph node examined, and did not receive preoperative radiotherapy. Logistic regression was used to examine the relationships between age at diagnosis (18-49, 50-59, 60-69, and ≥70 y) and lymph node positivity overall and stratified by tumor T stage and number of lymph nodes examined.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Lymph node positivity of colon and rectal cancers was measured.

RESULTS

The youngest patients (aged 18-49 y) were more likely to have lymph node-positive colon and rectal cancers compared with those who were aged ≥70 years after adjustment for potential confounders (OR = 2.04 and 95% CI, 1.63-2.56 for colon cancer; OR = 1.73 and 95% CI, 1.11-2.70 for rectal cancer). A similar tendency was shown in most colon and rectal cancer subgroups stratified by tumor T stage and number of lymph nodes examined.

LIMITATIONS

This study was limited by its small sample size for certain subgroup analyses. No information on comorbidities, BMI, or other indicators of health status was available.

CONCLUSIONS

In a universal healthcare system, young age was associated with increased lymph node positivity of colon and rectal cancers, suggesting that factors other than access to care may play a role in this association. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B90. EDAD Y POSITIVIDAD DE GANGLIOS LINFÁTICOS EN PACIENTES CON CÁNCER DEL COLON Y EL RECTO EN EL SISTEMA DE SALUD MILITAR DE EE UU: La edad temprana puede estar asociada con un mayor riesgo de compromiso de los ganglios linfáticos en el momento del diagnóstico de cáncer colorrectal. La accesibilidad a la atención medica, que está relacionada con la detección del cáncer, el estadio del tumor y, por lo tanto, la positividad de los ganglios linfáticos, puede variar según la edad y, por lo tanto, influir en los resultados de la investigación.Investigar si los pacientes jóvenes tenían un mayor riesgo de cáncer del colon y el recto con ganglios linfáticos positivos en el Sistema de Salud Militar del Departamento de Defensa, que brinda atención médica universal a sus beneficiarios.Estudio transversal retrospectivo.Se identificaron pacientes del Registro Automático Central de Tumores del Departamento de Defensa de los Estados Unidos.Fueron diagnosticados con adenocarcinomas del colon y el recto en estadio I-III confirmados histológicamente entre 1989-2013, se les realizó una cirugía y se examinaron ≥ 1 ganglio linfático, y no recibieron radioterapia preoperatoria. La regresión logística se utilizó para examinar las relaciones entre la edad al momento del diagnóstico (18-49, 50-59, 60-69 y ≥70 años) y la positividad de los ganglios linfáticos en general y fue estratificada por el estadio T tumoral y el número de ganglios linfáticos examinados.Positividad de ganglios linfáticos de cáncer del colon y el recto.Los pacientes más jóvenes (18-49 años) tenían más probabilidades de tener cáncer del colon y el recto con ganglios linfáticos positivos en comparación con aquellos que tenían 70 años o más después del ajuste por posibles factores de confusión (odds ratio: 2.04, intervalo de confianza del 95%: 1.63 -2.56 para el cáncer de colon; odds ratio: 1.73, intervalo de confianza del 95%: 1.11-2.70 para el cáncer de recto). Se mostró una tendencia similar en la mayoría de los subgrupos de cáncer del colon y el recto estratificados por el estadio T tumoral y el número de ganglios linfáticos examinados.Tamaño de muestra pequeño para ciertos análisis de subgrupos. No hay información sobre comorbilidades, índice de masa corporal u otros indicadores del estado de salud.En un sistema de salud universal, la edad joven se asoció con un aumento de la positividad de los ganglios linfáticos del cáncer del colon y el recto, lo que sugiere que otros factores además del acceso a la atención medica pueden desempeñar un papel en esta asociación. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B90.

The association of age with the clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis of colorectal cancer: a UK single-centre retrospective study

INTRODUCTION

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is uncommon in patients under the age of 40 years and its association with poor histological features and survival is uncertain. This study aimed to evaluate age-related differences in clinicopathological features and prognosis in patients diagnosed with CRC.

METHOD

A single-centre retrospective review of all patients diagnosed with CRC between 2004 and 2013 was performed. Patients were stratified into three age groups: (1) 18-40 years, (2) 41-60 years and (3)> 60 years. Clinicopathological characteristics and outcomes were compared between the three groups.

RESULTS

A total of 1328 patients were included, of whom 57.2% were men. There were 28 (2.1%) patients in group 1, 287 (21.6%) in group 2 and 1013 (76.3%) in group 3. Group 1 had the highest proportion of rectal tumours (57.1% in group 1, 50.2% in group 2 and 31.9% in group 3; P < 0.001). Tumour histology and disease stage were comparable between the groups. Group 1 had significantly worse disease-free survival (DFS) than the two older groups (44%, 78% and 77%, respectively; P = 0.022). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that age was not an independent prognostic factor whereas Stage III disease [hazard ratio (HR) 4.42; 95% CI 2.81-6.94; P < 0.001] and neoadjuvant chemotherapy (HR 1.65; 95% CI 1.06-2.58; P = 0.026) were associated with increased risk of recurrence.

CONCLUSION

Patients under the age of 40 are more likely to present with rectal cancer and have comparable histological features than the older groups. Despite higher rates of adjuvant and neoadjuvant treatment, the young group were found to have worse DFS.

Young-Onset Early Colorectal Cancer Had Similar Relative Survival to but Better Overall Survival Than Conventional Early Colorectal Cancer: A Large Population-Based Study

Background: There existed limited evidence about prognosis of young-onset early colorectal cancer (ECRC). In the present study, we aimed to compare prognosis between patients with young-onset ECRCs and patients with conventional ECRCs.

Method: Patients with surgically resected, histologically diagnosed ECRCs were retrieved from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Young-onset ECRC was defined as ECRC occurring in patients aged <50 years. Five-years relative survival was calculated at the time of diagnosed year and linear regression was performed to analyze the association between 5-years relative survival and age. The multivariate Cox regression, multivariate competing risk model, and propensity score matching (PSM) and univariate analysis weighted by the inverse probability of treatment weight (IPTW) were used to compare overall survival (OS) between young-onset ECRCs and conventional ECRCs.

Results: A total of 51,197 ECRCs were retrieved from SEER database, including 4,634 young-onset ECRCs and 46,563 conventional ECRCs. Five-years relative survival was found to be moderately associated with different age groups (R = −0.725, P = 0.0034). Patients with young-onset ECRCs (96.7%) had similar 5-years relative survival compared with conventional ECRCs (96.3%). However, multivariate Cox regression [HR (hazard ratio), 0.18; 95% CI: 0.16–0.20; P < 0.001] showed better OS in young-onset ECRCs. After PSM, we still found favored prognosis for young-onset ECRCs under univariate Cox regression (HR, 0.18; 95% CI: 0.16–0.21; P < 0.001). Similar results could also be found in the univariate Cox regression weighted by IPTW (HR, 0.17; 95% CI: 0.17–0.18; P < 0.001).

Conclusions: Patients with young-onset ECRCs had similar relative survival but better OS compared with conventional ECRCs.

Inverse Association of Age with Risk of Lymph Node Metastasis in Superficial Colorectal Cancer: A Large Population-Based Study

BACKGROUND

Superficial colorectal cancer (SCRC) is defined as colorectal cancer (CRC) confined to the mucosa or submucosa. Endoscopic resection (ER) is widely used to resect differentiated SCRC from patients without lymph node metastasis (LNM). However, it is unclear whether ER is suitable for use with patients with differentiated early-onset SCRC because early-onset CRC is more aggressive. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the association between age of CRC onset and LNM.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrieved data for patients with surgically resected differentiated-type SCRCs from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Rate of LNM was compared among patients aged 18-39, 40-49, 50-59, 60-69, and ≥70 years. The association between age and LNM was further examined using multivariate logistic regression.

RESULTS

We retrieved 34,506 records of differentiated SCRCs from the SEER database, including 667 patients aged 18-39 years, 2,385 aged 40-49, 8,075 aged 50-59 years, 9,577 aged 60-69 years, and 13,802 aged ≥70 years. Rates of LNM were 15.74%, 14.13%, 10.67%, 8.07%, and 6.76% for patients aged 18-39, 40-49, 50-59, 60-69, and ≥70 years, respectively. We found an inverse correlation between age at diagnosis and risk of LNM from the univariate analysis (p < .001). Compared with patients aged 18-39, the odds ratios with 95% confidence interval (CI) for patients aged 40-49, 50-59, 60-69, and ≥70 years were 0.90 (0.71-1.15, p = .376), 0.69 (0.56-0.87, p = .001), 0.54 (0.43-0.68, p < .001), and 0.47 (0.38-0.60, p < .001), respectively.

CONCLUSION

In differentiated SCRCs, younger age at diagnosis was associated with higher risk of LNM.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Endoscopic resection (ER) is widely used to resect differentiated superficial colorectal cancer (SCRC) without lymph node metastasis (LNM). However, no study has ever investigated risk of LNM of early-onset SCRC compared with average onset SCRC to explore whether ER is suitable for early-onset SCRC. To the authors' knowledge, this population-based study is the first study to find inverse correlation between age at diagnosis and risk of LNM in differentiated SCRCs. This finding indicates that ER may not be suitable for young patients with differentiated SCRC. Because the 30-day operative mortality after surgery is higher but the risk of LNM is lower in older patients compared with younger patients, ER for differentiated SCRCs may be advantageous over surgery for older patients.

Analysis of factors potentially predicting prognosis of colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Accurate assessment of the prognosis after colorectal cancer surgery is of great significance in patients with colorectal cancer. However, there is no systematic analysis of factors affecting the prognosis of colorectal cancer currently.

AIM

To systematically analyze the influence of clinical data and serological and histological indicators on the prognosis of patients with colorectal cancer, and to explore the indicators that can accurately assess the prognosis of patients with colorectal cancer.

METHODS

A total of 374 patients with colorectal cancer were enrolled. The clinical data, tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) stage, and Dukes stage were recorded. All patients received examinations including carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), carbohydrate antigen 199, C-reactive protein, albumin, D-dimer, and fibrinogen as well as routine blood tests one week before surgery. The tumor location, size, depth of invasion, lymph node metastasis, and distant metastasis were recorded during surgery. The pathological tissue typing and expression of proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) and p53 were observed. All patients were followed for 3 years, and patients with endpoint events were defined as a poor prognosis group, and the remaining patients were defined as a good prognosis group. The differences in clinical data, serology, and histology were analyzed between the two groups. Multivariate COX regression was used to analyze the independent influencing factors for the prognosis of colorectal cancer. The receiver operating characteristic curve was used to evaluate the predictive value of each of the independent influencing factors and their combination for the prognosis of colorectal cancer.

RESULTS

The follow-up outcomes showed that 81 patients were in the good prognosis group and 274 patients in the poor prognosis group. The TNM stage, PCNA, Glasgow prognostic score (GPS), neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), C-reactive protein/albumin ratio (CAR), D-dimer, and CEA were independent influencing factors for the prognosis of colorectal cancer (P = 0.000). NLR had the highest predictive power for colorectal cancer prognosis [area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) = 0.925], followed by D-dimer (AUC = 0.879) and GPS (AUC = 0.872). The accuracy of the combination of all indicators in predicting the prognosis of colorectal cancer was the highest (AUC = 0.973), which was significantly higher than that of any of the indicators alone (P < 0.05). The sensitivity and specificity of the combination were 92.59% and 90.51%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The independent influence factors for the prognosis of colorectal cancer include TNM stage, PCNA, GPS, NLR, CAR, D-dimer, and CEA. The combined assessment of the independent factors is the most accurate predictor of the prognosis after colorectal cancer surgery.

Clinicopathological features and survival of colorectal cancer patients younger than 50 years: a retrospective comparative study

BACKGROUND

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a disease of old age, but its incidence has been rising among younger population compared to older ones. Nevertheless, there is a controversy over survival of younger patients compared to the older ones. Therefore, in the current study, we investigated the clinicopathological features and survival of the younger (< 50 years) versus older (≥ 50 years) CRC patients.

RESULTS

The younger and older groups consisted of 39.4% and 60.6% of patients, respectively. Both age groups were comparable regarding the symptom presentation and duration, and pre-operative carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA). The younger patients were diagnosed with a higher proportion of poorly differentiated (14.7% vs. 8.3%; p < 0.001) and more advanced tumors (53.2% vs. 45.9%; p = 0.266). The rectum tumor site was significantly more common among the younger patients (p = 0.021). The overall survival (OS) (p = 0.278), the cancer-specific survival (CSS) (p = 0.233), and the disease-free survival (DFS) (p = 0.497) did not differ significantly between the two groups. Based on Cox regression model, elevated pre-operative CEA level (HR = 1.41; 95%CI of 1.01-1.97), advanced tumor stage (6.06; 95%CI of 3.03-12.15), and poorly differentiated tumor (HR = 1.69; 95%CI of 1.05-2.71) were associated with decreased survival.

CONCLUSIONS

The younger patients did not have poor prognosis compared to the older ones despite having an advanced tumor stage and a poor tumor differentiation.

Differences in biological behaviors between young and elderly patients with colorectal cancer

Background

We investigated the differences in biological behaviors of sporadic colorectal cancer (CRC) between young and elderly patients. CRC is a common cancer, with a mean age at onset of > 65 years. However, recent reports indicate increasing rates in younger populations. The biological behaviors of sporadic CRC in elderly patients could differ from those in young patients.

Methods

Between September 2007 and August 2012, we selected 723 CRC patients from our institution. The patients were divided into Group Y (n = 127, aged ≤50 years) and Group O (n = 596, aged >50 years). The clinicopathologic and oncologic outcomes in the two groups were compared.

Results

Group Y tumors were characterized by higher incidences of mucin production (13.4% vs. 6.7%; P = 0.017), high microsatellite instability (MSI-H) (19.8% vs. 5.2%; P < 0.001), and N2 stage (32.3% vs. 22.1%; P = 0.020) than those in Group O. The recurrence rates were similar in both groups (14.9% vs. 17.3%; P = 0.665). The 5-year overall survival and disease-free survival did not differ. Multivariate analysis indicated that cellular differentiation and pathologic stage were significant prognostic factors for 5-year overall survival.

Conclusion

Although age was not a prognostic factor for overall survival and young patients did not show a worse prognosis, there were differences in mucin production, MSI-H, and N2 stage between the two groups. Further studies are needed to clarify the clinical and biological characteristics of CRC, improve its treatment strategies, and promote better outcomes in young patients.

Disparities in survival for right-sided vs. left-sided colon cancers in young patients: a study based on the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database (1990-2014)

Purpose

To investigate whether young patients exhibit different characteristics and survival according to tumor location and stage using data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database.

Patients and methods

Young patients (20–49 years old) with stage I–III colon cancers were identified from the SEER program from 1990 to 2014. Kaplan–Meier survival analysis and Cox proportional hazards regression were used to analyze the data. Subset analyses were also done among different age and stage subgroups.

Results

Of 8197 patients, 3709 (45.2%) had right-sided colon cancers (RCCs). Patients with RCCs were more likely to be male, to be younger, and to have more poorly differentiated and more advanced tumors. The Kaplan–Meier survival curves and univariate survival models revealed that left-sided colon cancers (LCCs) had lower mortality for all stages combined and stage III, but higher mortality for stage II, compared with right-sided tumors. However, multivariate Cox regression models showed no significant survival differences by location for all patients (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 0.95; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.86–1.05; P=0.34) or for stage I (adjusted HR, 1.47; 95% CI, 0.82–2.63; P=0.20). Stage II left-sided cancers had higher mortality (adjusted HR, 1.24; 95% CI, 1.00–1.54; P=0.048), whereas stage III left-sided cancers had lower mortality (adjusted HR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.77–0.97; P=0.01). For 20- to 39-year-old patients, a significant difference was only found in stage II disease, with a higher mortality for left-sided tumors (adjusted HR, 1.82; 95% CI, 1.12–2.97; P=0.02). However, for 40- to 49-year-old patients, a significant difference was only found in stage III disease, with a lower mortality for left-sided tumors (adjusted HR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.72–0.95; P=0.008).

Conclusion

In patients younger than 50 years, there were no significant differences in mortality between RCCs and LCCs for all stages combined after adjusting for multiple clinicopathological features. However, RCCs had lower mortality in stage II (especially in 20- to 39-year-old patients) and higher mortality in stage III (especially in 40- to 49-year-old patients).

Early onset sporadic colorectal cancer: Worrisome trends and oncogenic features

Early onset colorectal cancers, defined as arising before 50 years of age, are a growing health hazard in western and eastern countries alike. The incidence of colon and rectal cancers in young individuals is projected to increase by as much as 90% and 140%, respectively, by 2030. Although several known cancer risk factors (e.g. smoking, alcohol, dietary habits) have been investigated, there is no single compelling explanation for this epidemiological trend. While some early onset colorectal cancers have been associated with germline mutations in cancer predisposition genes, genetic syndromes are implicated in only a fraction of these cancers (20%) and do not explain the rising incidence. Colorectal neoplasms develop through microsatellite instability or chromosomal instability pathways, with most of the early onset colorectal cancers exhibiting microsatellite stable phenotypes. Genome-wide hypomethylation is a feature of a subgroup of early onset cancers, which appears to be correlated with chromosomal instability and poor prognosis.

Mucinous Histology Signifies Poor Oncologic Outcome in Young Patients With Colorectal Cancer

BACKGROUND

The incidence of colorectal cancer in the young (under age 40) is increasing, and this population has worse oncologic outcomes. Mucinous histology is a potential prognostic factor in colorectal cancer, but has not been evaluated specifically in young patients.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of the study was to determine factors associated with poor outcome in young patients with colorectal cancer (≤40 years) and to determine relationships between mucinous histology and oncologic outcomes in this population.

DESIGN

This is a retrospective study.

SETTING

Patients from a single-institution tertiary care center were studied.

PATIENTS

A total of 224 patients with colorectal cancer under 40 years of age diagnosed between 1990 and 2010 were included (mean age, 34.7 years; 51.3% female). 34 patients (15.2%) had mucinous histology.

INTERVENTIONS(S)

There were no interventions.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Oncologic outcomes were analyzed according to the presence of mucinous histology.

RESULTS

The mucinous and nonmucin colorectal cancer study populations were statistically similar in age, sex, tumor location, pathological stage, differentiation, and adjuvant chemotherapy use. Five-year disease-free survival was 29.1% versus 71.3% (p < 0.0001) and 5-year overall survival was 54.7% versus 80.3% (p < 0.0001) for mucinous and nonmucinous patients, respectively. Mucinous colorectal cancers recurred earlier at a median time of 36.4 months versus 94.2 months for nonmucin colorectal cancers (p < 0.001). On multivariate analysis, pathological stage (stage II HR, 3.61; 95% CI, 1.37-9.50; stage III HR, 5.27; 95% CI, 2.12-12.33), positive margins (HR, 1.95; 95% CI, 1.12-3.23), angiolymphatic invasion (HR, 2.15; 95% CI, 1.26-3.97), and mucinous histology (HR, 2.36; 95% CI, 1.44-3.96) were independently associated with worse disease-free and overall survival.

LIMITATIONS

This is a retrospective study without genetic information.

CONCLUSIONS

Mucinous histology is a negative prognostic factor in young patients with colorectal cancer. This is associated with early and high recurrence rates, despite use of standard neoadjuvant and adjuvant regimens. Physicians need to be aware of this association and potentially explore novel treatment options. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/A575.

High NUCB2 expression level is associated with metastasis and may promote tumor progression in colorectal cancer

Nucleobindin 2 (NUCB2) is mainly expressed in the hypothalamic nuclei and has a proven role in energy homeostasis. It has also been recently reported to have a key role in tumor progression. However, the clinical significance of NUCB2 in colorectal cancer (CRC) remains unknown. In the present study, the level of NUCB2 mRNA was quantified by reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) in 34 paired fresh tissues from patients with CRC. RT-qPCR was followed by immunohistochemical (IHC) staining of NUCB2 protein in tissue microarrays of 251 samples to evaluate the clinical significance of NUCB2 in CRC. The RT-qPCR indicated an upregulation of NUCB2 mRNA in CRC tissues compared with normal tissues (P=0.027). IHC staining indicated a positive association between elevated NUCB2 expression and lymph node metastasis or tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) stage. Patients with CRC and lymph node metastasis demonstrated a higher expression of NUCB2 (49.5%, 50/101) compared with those without lymph node metastasis (36.7%, 55/150; P=0.043). Furthermore, NUCB2 expression was also higher in patients with CRC and TNM stage III–IV compared with those with TNM stage I–II (50.9% vs. 35.0%; P=0.011). However, Kaplan-Meier analysis indicated no significant association between NUCB2 expression and disease-free survival of patients. Additionally, multivariate analysis did not identify the upregulation of NUCB2 as an independent prognostic predictor in patients with CRC (P=0.755). In conclusion, the present study demonstrated that upregulation of NUCB2 is significantly associated with CRC metastasis, indicating that NUCB2 may be a cancer-associated oncogene associated with the aggressive progression of CRC.

Poorer prognosis in young female patients with non-metastatic colorectal cancer: a hospital-based analysis of 5,047 patients in China

Purpose

To investigate the association of age and sex on survival in non-metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) patients and to identify groups at high risk for poor outcomes.

Materials and methods

We performed a retrospective analysis of 5,047 non-metastatic CRC patients from 2008 to 2013. Data regarding age at diagnosis; gender; tumor site; tumor stage; differentiation; lymphatic, neural or vascular invasion; and survival outcomes were collected. Patients were stratified into 10-year age groups (≤35, 36-45, 46-55, 56-65, 66-75, >75) and then further analyzed in three age groups (≤35, 36-75, >75). Disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were evaluated using univariate and multivariate Cox regression models.

Results

Of the 5,047 eligible patients, 41.3% were female. The tumor stages were balanced between the genders. In the female patients, the tumor stages were similarly distributed among the different age groups, while younger male patients were diagnosed with more advanced disease (P<0.001 for trend). When stratified into three age groups, young females experienced significantly poorer survival than young males (DFS: hazard ratio [HR]=1.85 [1.04-3.30], OS: HR=2.65 [1.11-6.34]). After adjusting for tumor stage, site, differentiated grade and lymphatic or vascular invasion status, females ≤35 and >75 had shorter DFS than patients between 36 and 75 years old (HR=1.57 [1.03-2.38] and HR=1.51 [1.11-2.05, respectively]), while there was no difference in DFS between females ≤35 and those >75. For male patients, older age was associated with poorer OS after the same adjustment.

Conclusion

Young female CRC patients (≤35 years old) had the poorest DFS and quite poor OS compared to the other age groups. This emphasizes the need for health care providers to have a heightened awareness and to conduct further research when caring for young female CRC patients.

Is Colonoscopy Indicated in Young Patients with Hematochezia

Background/Aims

While colonoscopy is indicated in patients >50 years old presenting with hematochezia, its role in those ≤50 remains debatable. This study aims to evaluate the role of colonoscopy in patients presenting with hematochezia who are ≤50 years old.

Methods

A retrospective review of all patients aged ≤50 years who underwent colonoscopy for hematochezia in 2012 was conducted. Patient demographics, endoscopic details, and histological results were analyzed. Patients were stratified by age to compare differences in outcome.

Results

A total of 361 patients with a median age of 44 (range, 18-50) years were reviewed. Hemorrhoid (n = 183, 69.6%) was the most common etiology. Seventy-two neoplastic polyps were identified in 48 (13.3%) patients. There was a significantly larger proportion of patients aged 41-50 years who had neoplastic polyps compared to those aged ≤40 (18.8 vs. 3.8%, p ≤ 0.001); 43.8% (n = 28) of the neoplastic polyps found in those aged 41-50 were proximal to the splenic flexure. The only 2 (0.5%) patients with malignancy were aged 41-50 years.

Conclusion

Performing colonoscopy in patients presenting with hematochezia should be strongly considered for those aged 41-50 years in view of the significant likelihood of underlying neoplastic polyps compared to those aged ≤40 years.

Colorectal cancer in the young: a possible role for immune surveillance?

BACKGROUND

Younger patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) generally have better survival in spite of worse clinical and pathological features.

METHODS

Twenty-six patients under 50 years operated for primary CRC were enrolled and matched 1:2:2 according to stage, tumor site and gender with 52 patients from 50 to 70 years and 52 patients over 70 years old.

RESULTS

Patients under 50 years had a significantly longer overall, cancer specific and disease free survival (p = .001, p = .007 and p = .05, respectively). However, they had more frequently lymphovascular invasion (p = .006) and they more frequently developed metachronous CRC at follow-up (p = .03). Nevertheless, preoperative lymphocytes blood count/white blood count (LBC/WBC) ratio inversely correlated with age at operation (rho = -.21, p = .04) and it predicted CRC recurrence with an accuracy of 70%, p < .001 (threshold value LBC/WBC = 0.21%) and better overall, cancer specific and disease free survival (p < .0001 for all). At multivariate analysis, stage and LBC/WBC ratio resulted independent predictors of disease free survival (p = .0001 and p = .01, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients under 50 years had a significantly longer survival with a higher LBC/WBC ratio. These results could suggest a possible role of immunosurveillance in neoplastic control.

Comparison of Colonoscopy Surveillance Outcomes Between Young and Older Colorectal Cancer Patients

BACKGROUND

Young-onset colorectal cancer is uncommon, but the incidence is increasing. Despite several guidelines for colonoscopic surveillance following colorectal cancer resection, there is little consistency regarding the timing and age-adjusted strategies of surveillance colonoscopy after surgery of young-onset colorectal cancer. The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of surveillance colonoscopy between sporadic colorectal cancer patients with young and older age after curative resection.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 569 colorectal cancer patients who underwent curative resection between January 2006 and December 2010. The primary outcome was comparison of the development of metachronous advanced neoplasia during surveillance colonoscopy between young and older colorectal cancer patients.

RESULTS

There were 95 patients in the young age group and 474 patients in the older age group. The mean time interval from surgery to the development of metachronous advanced neoplasia was 99.2 ± 3.7 months in the young age group and 84.4 ± 2.5 months in the old age group (P = 0.03). In the multivariate analysis, age (OR, 3.56; P = 0.04) and family history of colorectal cancer (OR, 2.66; P = 0.008) were associated with the development of metachronous advanced neoplasia. None of the young patients without both family history of colorectal cancer and high-risk findings at index colonoscopy showed advanced neoplasia during the follow-up period.

CONCLUSIONS

Age and family history of colorectal cancer are independent risk factors for the occurrence of advanced neoplasia after curative colorectal cancer resection, suggesting age-adjusted strategies of surveillance colonoscopy.

Poor prognosis of young patients with colorectal cancer: a retrospective study

PURPOSE

The present study aimed to explore the survival outcomes of patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) aged 35 years and younger.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study included a total of 995 patients with CRC treated between January 2003 and September 2011. The patients were assorted into the young (aged 18-35 years) and older (aged 36-75 years) groups. The clinical characteristics and survival outcomes of the patients in the young group were compared with those of the patients in the older group for evaluation.

RESULTS

Compared with the older group, a significantly higher number of patients in the young group had right-sided colon cancer (30.9 vs. 19.6%, P = 0.026), high histologic grade tumor (14.7 vs. 6.4%, P = 0.021), and stage III disease (50.0 vs. 35.5%, P = 0.016). In stage III disease, compared with the older group, the patients in the young group had worse survival outcome in terms of 5-year overall survival (OS, P = 0.007), cancer-specific survival (CSS, P = 0.010), and disease-free survival (DFS, P = 0.039). Multivariate analysis revealed that age ≤35 years was an independent risk factor in terms of 5-year OS (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.68; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.12-2.54; P = 0.012), CSS (HR = 1.74; 95% CI: 1.15-2.65; P = 0.009), and DFS (HR = 1.58; 95% CI: 1.06-2.35; P = 0.024).

CONCLUSIONS

The young patients with CRC aged 35 years and younger had worse prognosis compared with older patients, especially for stage III disease.

Early Recurrence After Hepatectomy for Colorectal Liver Metastases: What Optimal Definition and What Predictive Factors?

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to determine the optimal definition and elucidate the predictive factors of early recurrence after surgery for colorectal liver metastases (CRLM).

METHODS

Among 987 patients who underwent curative surgery for CRLM from 1990 to 2012, 846 with a minimum follow-up period of 24 months were eligible for this study. The minimum p value approach of survival after initial recurrence was used to determine the optimal cutoff for the definition of early recurrence. The predictive factors of early recurrence and prognostic factors of survival were analyzed.

RESULTS

For 667 patients (79%) who developed recurrence, the optimal cutoff point of early recurrence was determined to be 8 months after surgery. The impact of early recurrence on survival was demonstrated mainly in patients who received preoperative chemotherapy. Among the 691 patients who received preoperative chemotherapy, recurrence was observed in 562 (81%), and survival in patients with early recurrence was significantly worse than in those with late recurrence (5-year survival 18.5% vs. 53.4%, p < .0001). Multivariate logistic analysis identified age ≤57 years (p = .0022), >1 chemotherapy line (p = .03), disease progression during last-line chemotherapy (p = .024), >3 tumors (p = .0014), and carbohydrate antigen 19-9 >60 U/mL (p = .0003) as independent predictors of early recurrence. Salvage surgery for recurrence significantly improved survival, even in patients with early recurrence.

CONCLUSION

The optimal cutoff point of early recurrence was determined to be 8 months. The preoperative prediction of early recurrence is possible and crucial for designing effective perioperative chemotherapy regimens.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

In this study, the optimal cutoff point of early recurrence was determined to be 8 months after surgery based on the minimum p value approach, and its prognostic impact was demonstrated mainly in patients who received preoperative chemotherapy. Five factors, including age, number of preoperative chemotherapy lines, response to last-line chemotherapy, number of tumors, and carbohydrate antigen 19-9 concentrations, were identified as predictors of early recurrence. Salvage surgery for recurrence significantly improved survival, even in patients with early recurrence. For better selection of patients who could truly benefit from surgery and should also receive strong postoperative chemotherapy, the accurate preoperative prediction of early recurrence is crucial.

Increasing Incidence of Colorectal Cancer, Starting at a Younger Age for Rectal Compared to Colon Cancer in Brunei Darussalam

BACKGROUND

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the most common gastrointestinal malignancy and is a significant cause of mortality. Its incidence is generally increasing in Asia. Reports from the West have indicated that the incidence of rectal cancer is increasing in the younger population. This study assessed the time trend of CRC in Brunei Darussalam specifically assessing the different age groups at which the incidences start to increase.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The National Cancer registry was reviewed (1991 to 2014). The age standardized rate (ASR) and the age specific incidence rates (ASIRs) for three time periods (1991-1998), (1999-2006) and (2007-2014) were calculated.

RESULTS

The mean age of diagnosis was 59.3±14.6 years old, incidences being slightly higher amongst men (57.6%) and Malays (67.1%). The most common tumor type was adenocarcinoma (96.4%). Rectal cancers accounted for 35.2% (n=372/1,056) of all cancers of the large bowel; more men were affected than women. The proportion of rectal cancer was also high among the indigenous group. In the three time periods, the ASR for CRC increased from 16 per 100,000 (1991-1998) to 19.6 per 100,000 (1999-2006) and 24.3 per 100,000 (2007-2014). The ASIRs for CRC increased markedly between the time periods 1998-2006 and 2007-2014, beginning in the 40-44 years age group. For rectal cancers, the ASIRs started to increase in the 25-29 age group onward whereas for colon cancers, the increase was observed at a later age, starting from the 45-49 age group.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study showed an increase in the incidence of CRC including in the younger age groups. The increase was seen earlier in rectal cancer compared to colon cancer. These data mirror the trends reported from the West.

Clinical and molecular features of young-onset colorectal cancer

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the leading causes of cancer related mortality worldwide. Although young-onset CRC raises the possibility of a hereditary component, hereditary CRC syndromes only explain a minority of young-onset CRC cases. There is evidence to suggest that young-onset CRC have a different molecular profile than late-onset CRC. While the pathogenesis of young-onset CRC is well characterized in individuals with an inherited CRC syndrome, knowledge regarding the molecular features of sporadic young-onset CRC is limited. Understanding the molecular mechanisms of young-onset CRC can help us tailor specific screening and management strategies. While the incidence of late-onset CRC has been decreasing, mainly attributed to an increase in CRC screening, the incidence of young-onset CRC is increasing. Differences in the molecular biology of these tumors and low suspicion of CRC in young symptomatic individuals, may be possible explanations. Currently there is no evidence that supports that screening of average risk individuals less than 50 years of age will translate into early detection or increased survival. However, increasing understanding of the underlying molecular mechanisms of young-onset CRC could help us tailor specific screening and management strategies. The purpose of this review is to evaluate the current knowledge about young-onset CRC, its clinicopathologic features, and the newly recognized molecular alterations involved in tumor progression.

Effect of Age on Survival Outcome in Operated and Non-Operated Patients with Colon Cancer: A Population-Based Study

Objective

To know the effect of age on survival outcome in operated and non-operated patients with colon cancer.

Methods

From the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database, we identified 123,356 patients with colon cancer who were diagnosed between 1996 and 2005, grouped them as older or younger than 40 years and analyzed their 5-year cancer-specific survival (CSS) data, along with some risk factors, using Kaplan–Meier methods and multivariable Cox regression models.

Results

The younger group had significantly higher pathological grades (P<0.001), more mucinous and signet-ring histology (P<0.001), advanced AJCC stage (P<0.001), and were more likely to undergo surgery (P<0.001). For surgically treated patients, age did not significantly affect 5-year CSS (younger: 66.7%; older: 67.3%; P = 0.86). Further analysis showed that age was an independent prognostic factor in stage I–IV disease (stage I: P = 0.001; P<0.001 for stages II–IV, in both uni- and multivariate analyses), but not for patients with unknown disease stage (P = 0.52). For non-surgically treated patients, age significantly affected 5-year CSS (younger: 16.2%; older: 12.9%; P<0.001) in univariate analysis; and was an independent prognostic factor (P<0.001) in multivariate analysis.

Conclusion

The CSS rate for younger CC patients was at least as high as for older patients, although they presented with higher proportions of unfavorable factors and more advanced disease.

Clinicopathological characteristics of young patients with sporadic colorectal cancer

PURPOSE

To evaluate the clinicopathological features of and prognosis associated with sporadic colorectal cancer (CRC) in Japanese patients younger than 40 years old.

METHODS

The subjects of this study were patients with sporadic stage 0-III CRC, who underwent curative resection between 2004 and 2012 at the Cancer Institute Hospital. Clinicopathological characteristics and survival were compared between the young (<40 years; n = 81) and older groups (≥40 years; n = 2257).

RESULTS

The median age was 36 years in the young group and 64 years in the older group. Young patients had a lower incidence of right-sided colon cancer (14 vs 28 %) and a higher incidence of rectal cancer (47 vs 32 %; P < 0.0001). The number of retrieved lymph nodes was significantly higher in the young group than in the older group (P = 0.0049). The young patients had similar overall survival and relapse-free survival to their older counterparts, except for overall survival in stage II patients (P = 0.0229). However, multivariate analysis indicated that age was not an independent prognostic factor for overall survival in patients with stage II CRC.

CONCLUSIONS

Young Japanese patients with sporadic CRC have unique characteristics such as a high incidence of rectal cancer and similar pathological features; however, they appear to have comparable survival to older patients.

Clinicopathological Features and Survival Outcomes of Colorectal Cancer in Young Versus Elderly: A Population-Based Cohort Study of SEER 9 Registries Data (1988-2011)

The incidence of colorectal cancer (CRC) in young adults is rising. We aimed to analyze the clinicopathological characteristics and survival outcomes of young versus elderly CRC patients. All patients diagnosed with CRC in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program data (1988-2011) from the United States were evaluated. They were divided into 3 groups by age at diagnosis: group 1 (20-40 years old), group 2 (41-50 years old), and group 3 (>50 years old). The clinicopathological characteristics and CRC-specific survival (CRC-SS) were evaluated and compared among the 3 groups. A total of 279,623 CRC patients were included: 6700 (2.4%) in group 1, 19,385 (6.9%) in group 2, and 253,538 (90.7%) in group 3. Young CRC patients had more tumors located in rectum, fewer cases with multiple tumors, later stage, more mucinous carcinoma and signet ring-cell carcinoma, more poor differentiated tumors, and more lymph nodes (no. ≥12) examined. The 5-year CRC-SS rates of patients in groups 1, 2, and 3 were 65.1%, 67.1%, and 62.8%, respectively (group 1 vs group 2, P = 0.001; group 1 vs group 3, P < 0.001; group 2 vs group 3, P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis revealed older (>50 years old) age was an independent predictor of poor prognosis (hazard ratio, 1.545; 95% confidence interval, 1.456-1.639; P < 0.001). Young CRC patients had later stage presentation and more aggressive pathological features, but better survival. CRC patients aged 41 to 50 years had best CRC-SS in contrast to patients in another 2 age groups.

Early-onset colorectal cancer: a separate subset of colorectal cancer

Colorectal cancer (CRC) has a great impact on the world population. With increasing frequency, CRC is described according to the presenting phenotype, based on its molecular characteristics. Classification of CRC tumors according to their genetic and/or epigenetic alterations is not only important for establishing the molecular bases of the disease, but also for predicting patient outcomes and developing more individualized treatments. Early-onset CRC is a heterogeneous disease, with a strong familial component, although the disease is sporadic in an important proportion of cases. Different molecular alterations appear to contribute to the apparent heterogeneity of the early-onset population and subgroups can be distinguished with distinct histopathologic and familial characteristics. Moreover, compared with late-onset CRC, there are characteristics that suggest that early-onset CRC may have a different molecular basis. The purpose of this review was to analyze the current state of knowledge about early-onset CRC with respect to clinicopathologic, familial and molecular features. Together, these features make it increasingly clear that this subset of CRC may be a separate disease, although it has much in common with late-onset CRC.

Young patients (≤ 35 years old) with colorectal cancer have worse outcomes due to more advanced disease: a 30-year retrospective review

An appropriate cutoff of age and the impact of age on colorectal cancer outcomes remain unclear and need to be explored, particularly in China.In total, 2460 colorectal cancer patients were studied retrospectively. All patients were divided into 6 groups according to their ages at the time of diagnosis: ≤ 30, 31 to 35, 36 to 40, 41 to 45, 46 to 50, and ≥ 50 years. A suitable cutoff age for defining young adult colorectal cancer was explored according to the distribution of survival in each group. Clinical characteristics and prognosis between the young adult group and the older group were then compared.According to the survival curves for each group, 35 years old was considered a suitable cutoff age for defining young adult colorectal cancer. There were 140 (5.7%) and 2320 (94.3%) cases in the young adult and older groups, respectively. The proportion of stage III-IV tumors was significantly higher in the young adult group (69.3%) than in the older group (46.4%) (P  =  0.000). The univariate analysis showed that the 5-year overall survival (OS) rate and the 10-year OS rate in the young adult group were 48.9% and 38.6%, respectively, whereas in the older group, they were 63.6% and 56.9%, respectively. The young adult group had a worse prognosis (P  =  0.000). The multivariate analysis showed that age was not an independent prognostic factor (relative risk 0.787, P  =  0.062). After adjusting for tumor stage, the hazard proportion of death in the young adult group increased by 27.6%, but this difference was not significant (P  =  0.053). Stratified analyses showed that the young adults with stage IV tumors had a worse survival rate (P  =  0.046).Patients ≤ 35 years who were diagnosed with colorectal cancer had a worse prognosis because of a higher proportion of advanced stage tumors. When stage-to-stage analysis was performed, it was found that young adult colorectal cancer patients had a worse outcome only if they had stage IV tumors.

Segmental versus extended resection for sporadic colorectal cancer in young patients

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Guidelines on the management of colon cancer state that extensive colectomy should be "considered" for patients of young age (<50). This study aimed to compare the risk of metachronous cancer, overall recurrence and mortality between segmental and extended colon resections in patients under the age of 50 with sporadic CRC.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective review of patients age <50 undergoing surgery for CRC from 1991 to 2009. Patients were divided into two groups based on extent of resection: segmental versus extended. The primary outcomes analyzed were metachronous tumors, disease recurrence, and overall survival.

RESULTS

Two hundred seventy one patients underwent segmental resection and 30 underwent extended resection. 3.3% in the segmental resection group developed metachronous CRC versus 0% in the extended resection group (P = 0.61). There was no significant difference in the risk of recurrence or mortality for those who underwent a segmental resection compared to those with an extended resection. In a regression model, type of surgery was not an independent risk factor for recurrence or mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Extended colectomy for sporadic CRC in patients younger than 50 does not improve disease-free or overall survival. Further study to determine if segmental resection is appropriate oncologic treatment is warranted.

Clinical characteristics and prognosis of young patients with colorectal cancer in Eastern China

AIM: To explore the clinical characteristics and prognosis of young patients with colorectal cancer patients in Eastern China.

METHODS: A total of 1335 patients with colorectal cancer treated from December 1985 to December 2005 at the Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine were studied retrospectively. The patients were divided into two groups, a younger group (aged ≤ 30 years) and an older group (aged > 30 years), and comparison was made in the clinical characteristics and prognosis between the two groups. Chi-square test was used for data analysis of all categorical variables, and overall survival (OS) was calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method. A multivariate analysis was performed using the Cox model.

RESULTS: There were 42 (3.1%) and 1293 (96.9%) cases in the younger group and older group, respectively. Univariate analysis showed that the 5- and 10-year OS in the younger group were 33.9% and 26.1%, respectively, and those in the older group were 60.1% and 52.2%, respectively. Younger group had poor survival (χ² = 14.146, P = 0.000). Multivariate analysis revealed that age was not a dependent factor for prognosis (OR = 0.866, 95%CI: 0.592-1.269, P = 0.461). Stratified analysis indicated that in stage III and IV disease, the 5- and 10-year OS were 24.6% and 14.8% in the younger group, and 40.4% and 33.3% in the older group, respectively, with a significant difference between the two groups (χ² = 5.101, P = 0.024). In the subgroup of radical surgery, the 5- and 10-year OS were 44.3% and 34.2% in the younger group, and 69.6% and 60.5% in the older group, with a difference being significant between the two groups (χ² = 7.830, P = 0.005).

CONCLUSION: Compared with older patients, the younger patients have lower survival, especially in the subgroups of stage III and IV disease and radical surgery.