Consensus statement of the Italian society of colorectal surgery (SICCR): management and treatment of hemorrhoidal disease

Role of miR-143-3p in the Development of Hemorrhoids and Postoperative Wound Healing

BACKGROUND

Hemorrhoids refer to a common anorectal disorder that is usually associated with vascular proliferation. The present study investigated the role of miR-143-3p in the development of hemorrhoids and postoperative wound healing, aiming to provide novel ideas for the study of the pathogenesis of hemorrhoids and their clinical treatment.

METHODS

Hemorrhoid tissues and normal perianal tissues were collected from 42 patients who underwent hemorrhoid surgery. The expressions of miR-143-3p, vascular endothelial markers (CD31, vWF, and VEGFR2), and inflammatory factors (TNF-α, IL-1β, and IL-6) in these tissues were determined using RT-qPCR. The correlation of miR-143-3p with CD31, vWF, and VEGFR2 was analyzed using Pearson's method. The proliferation of HUVEC and HaCaT cells was detected using the CCK-8 assay. The migration of HUVEC and HaCaT cells was detected using Transwell assay. The apoptosis of HUVEC cells was detected using flow cytometry.

RESULTS

Reduced expression of miR-143-3p in hemorrhoid tissues was negatively correlated to the mRNA levels of CD31, vWF, and VEGFR2. The mRNA levels of CD31, vWF, and VEGFR2 in the HUVEC cells were reduced after miR-143-3p overexpression. Overexpression of miR-143-3p inhibited the proliferation and migration of HUVEC cells while promoting apoptosis in these cells. Upregulation of miR-143-3p decreased the mRNA levels of TNF-α, IL-1β, and IL-6 in HaCaT cells while promoting cell proliferation and migration in these cells.

CONCLUSIONS

Downregulation of miR-143-3p was noted in hemorrhoids, which could be linked to the regulation of angiogenesis. MiR-143-3p might have an anti-inflammatory role in postoperative wound healing.

Limitations of the Goligher classification in randomized trials for hemorrhoidal disease: a qualitative systematic review of selection criteria

BACKGROUND

The diverse range of therapeutic options for hemorrhoidal disease (HD) highlights the need for precise classification systems to guide treatment. Although the Goligher classification remains the most widely used, it has been criticized for its simplicity and limited ability to capture symptom severity or guide treatment decisions. This study aims to evaluate the patient selection criteria and classification systems employed in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) for HD.

METHODS

A systematic review was conducted following the 2020 PRISMA guidelines. A comprehensive search of databases identified randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing treatments for HD, focusing on classification systems used for patient enrollment. Eligible studies included adult patients and at least one arm involving surgical treatment.

RESULTS

Out of 6692 records, 162 studies met the inclusion criteria, with a median cohort size of 84 patients and 55.4% male. Most studies (86.4%) used the Goligher system, though the majority did not fully describe or cite the system. Only 13.6% of studies employed more recent alternative classification systems. The most common outcome measures across studies were postoperative pain (147 studies) and complications (133 studies). Recurrence rates were reported in 42% of studies, yet 70% of these did not provide adequate inclusion criteria or references to Goligher's classification.

CONCLUSIONS

The inconsistent application of the Goligher classification and the variability in patient selection criteria across RCTs highlight the need for more nuanced and standardized systems. Future research should focus on refining classification methods and incorporating patient-reported outcomes to improve the reliability and relevance of HD trials.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION

CRD42023387339.

The Complications of Hemorrhoidectomy From Patients' Perspective: A Qualitative Study

Background

Hemorrhoidectomy is a common general surgical procedure with numerous and intensive complications.

Objective

This study sought to investigate the complications of hemorrhoidectomy from the patients' perspective.

Methods

This qualitative study employed a phenomenological approach to explore the experiences of 27 patients with a history of hemorrhoidectomy. Convenience sampling was utilized initially, but purposive sampling was used as the investigation continued. All participants' statements were documented after obtaining informed consent and permission to record their experiences. Interviews were conducted until data saturation was achieved. The interview data was analyzed using content analysis, which involved the systematic extraction, interpretation, and reporting of the concepts and themes in the data.

Results

The study identified three main categories of complications: physical, psychological, and social. Additionally, 26 themes and 56 sub-themes were identified and defined under the main categories. Physical complications (PhCs) included nutritional problems, pain, sleep disturbances, physical weakness, bleeding, fecal incontinence, excretion problems, infection, fissures, anal prolapse, urinary retention, and disease recurrence. Psychological complications (PsCs) included fear, aversion, denial, isolation, depression, boredom, embarrassment, feeling defective, and dependency; Social complications (SCs) included secrecy, irritability, social withdrawal, and inability to perform social roles.

Conclusions

In addition to common PhCs such as pain and bleeding, patients with a history of hemorrhoidectomy face numerous PsCs and SCs that need to be communicated to the patient before deciding on this surgery. Furthermore, doctors should also consider special measures to manage these complications properly.

Assessment of long-term outcomes following Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy with Doppler transperineal ultrasound and endoscopy: a pilot study

PURPOSE

Hemorrhoidectomy remains the gold-standard treatment for advanced hemorrhoidal disease, but long-term outcomes vary depending on the surgical technique and assessment method. This study aims to show the long-term results achieved using a combination of transperineal ultrasound (TPUS) and endoscopy in patients who underwent Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy (MM).

METHODS

A consecutive series of MM patients treated between February 2020 and December 2023 were contacted and underwent a clinical proctological evaluation, a Doppler TPUS, and an endoscopic check of the anal canal. All investigations were performed using the ESAOTE MyLab XPRO80. TPUS anatomy, including Doppler views, was assessed on the axial, sagittal, and coronal planes. Outcome measures consisted of the description of Doppler TPUS modifications following MM, and their relationship with clinical and endoscopic findings.  RESULTS: Twenty-three patients were available for the analysis at 26 months of follow-up (range 14-48). Fifteen patients had a Doppler vascular pattern (65.2%), eight patients a scattered pattern (34.8%). No correlation was present between residual symptoms and the Doppler vascular pattern (p = 0.089). The vascular pattern was associated with endoscopic signs of recurrences (p = 0.003), and its absence was able to predict the lack of internal recurrences in all patients (100%).

CONCLUSION

Doppler TPUS could help in the long-term assessment of patients presenting residual symptoms after MM. If confirmed in larger future cohort studies, the 100% negative predictive value of the vascular pattern could be used to exclude internal recurrences during postoperative follow-up.

Clinical evidence and rationale of topical nifedipine and lidocaine ointment in the treatment of anal fissure and hemorrhoidal disease

INTRODUCTION

Anorectal conditions such as hemorrhoidal disease and anal fissure are frequently painful and debilitating. Pain after hemorrhoidectomy is also common and distressing. These conditions are at least initially managed conservatively. An ointment formulation containing the calcium channel blocker nifedipine and the local anesthetic lidocaine has an established role in the treatment of rectal conditions, particularly conditions associated with anal sphincter hypertonia such as hemorrhoidal disease and anal fissure. This review aimed to compile the evidence for the use of nifedipine 0.3% and lidocaine 1.5% ointment in treating these common but bothersome anorectal diseases.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

A comprehensive literature search was conducted, updated to 07 August 2024, using PubMed and MEDLINE databases to identify studies of lidocaine and nifedipine, alone or in combination, for the topical treatment of anal fissure or hemorrhoidal disease. Articles identified in the literature search were supplemented by ad hoc searches and supplemented by relevant literature known to the authors.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

Nifedipine 0.3% and lidocaine 1.5% ointment is effective in relieving pain and aiding the resolution of thrombosed hemorrhoids, reducing resting anal pressure and healing chronic anal fissures, and controlling pain after hemorrhoidectomy. The ointment was significantly better than controls consisting of topical lidocaine 1.5% alone or in combination with hydrocortisone acetate 1%.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the available literature on the topical application of nifedipine and lidocaine in anorectal diseases is limited, nifedipine 0.3% and lidocaine 1.5% ointment should be considered a valid treatment option for clinicians treating anorectal diseases. Further studies are warranted to confirm and extend the results reported.

Treatment of Hemorrhoidal Disease in Patients with Liver Cirrhosis: A Systematic Review

Introduction

The incidence of hemorrhoidal disease (HD) in cirrhotic patients is similar to that of general population, varying between 21% and 79%. Managing this clinical condition in these patients is challenging, due to the need to differentiate between bleeding originating from hemorrhoids or anorectal varices, and the unique hemostatic balance of each patient, which can lead to a decompensation of liver function and subsequently increase the anesthetic risk. To date, there are no systematic reviews specifically addressing this topic.

Methods

This was a systematic review following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Studies were retrieved from three electronic databases. Efficacy (symptomatic improvement, patient satisfaction, quality of life improvement, disease recurrence/need for surgery and/or hemorrhoidal prolapse reduction in anoscopy) and safety (reported adverse events) outcomes were evaluated. Data from each study were initially described individually, followed by a comparative analysis for procedures applied in multiple studies.

Results

Six studies were included - 1 randomized clinical trial (RCT), 2 prospective cohort studies, 1 retrospective cohort study, and 2 case series. The considered techniques encompassed rubber band ligation (RBL), injection sclerotherapy (IS) using 3 agents - aluminum potassium sulfate and tannic acid (ALTA), ethanolamine oleate 5% (EAO), or N-butyl-cyanoacrylate, hemorrhoidopexy, and emborrhoid technique. RBL showed great symptomatic improvement and patient satisfaction in 63% and 73% of patients, respectively, and in 90% was associated with one-grade prolapse reduction after only one session. The most frequently reported adverse events included pain (16%) and ulceration/fissure (1-17%). Concerning IS, symptomatic improvement was observed in all patients. Recurrence rates varied with the agent used (EAO: 13% at 12 months; N-butyl-cyanoacrylate: 40% at 12 months; ALTA: 18% at 5 years), and 86.7% of patients exhibited more than one-grade reduction after the initial session. The most frequent adverse event was pain (EAO: 63%; N-butyl-cyanoacrylate: 60%). Stapled hemorrhoidopexy resulted in symptomatic improvement in all patients, although associated with a recurrence rate of 25% within 4 months. With an emborrhoid technique, 80% of the patients showed clinical improvement at a 3-month follow-up, without significant adverse events, at the cost of a 40% recurrence rate.

Conclusions

All the treatment methods assessed in the included studies appear to be effective and safe in cirrhotic patients. This assumption challenges previous concerns regarding significant bleeding after office-based procedures like RBL in this population. Future research should prioritize RCT to thoroughly assess the management of HD in these patients, particularly addressing polidocanol foam sclerotherapy, a minimally invasive technique that has previously been shown to be more effective than RBL in the general population and in patients with bleeding disorders.

Perioperative Health Education for Patients With Daytime Anorectal Surgery: An Evidence-based Practice Change

PURPOSE

To develop and implement an evidence-based perioperative health education program for patients undergoing daytime anorectal surgery, and to enhance patients' knowledge scores pertaining to anorectal diseases.

DESIGN

An evidence-based quality improvement project.

METHODS

Adhering to the evidence-based practice model of the Joanna Briggs Institute, we developed 17 audit criteria grounded in the best available evidence. This evidence-based practice was subsequently applied to patients scheduled for daytime anorectal surgery between March 2023 and May 2024. The project progressed through three distinct phases: a baseline audit, implementation of practice changes, and a post evidence application audit. Specifically, we compared the execution rates of the audit criteria by the nursing staff, patients' scores on anorectal disease knowledge, patient satisfaction, and incidence of postoperative complications before and after implementation of the evidence-based practice.

FINDINGS

After implementation of the evidence-based practice, there was a statistically significant difference in the execution rates of audit indicators 1, 2, 5, 6, 8, and 10 to 17 (P < .05). After implementation, patients' average score on anorectal disease knowledge was 74.14 ± 14.40, higher than the average baseline audit phase score of 63.67 ± 12.31 (P = .004). Patients were likely to recommend the hospital's daytime anorectal surgery to others (P = .036). There were no statistically significant differences in patient satisfaction scores or complication incidence between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Current evidence suggests that the program may regulate nurse behavior, enhance patients' health knowledge, and improve patients' overall medical experience. Continuous quality supervision and audit should be further conducted in the future.

Acupuncture relieves postoperative pain of mixed hemorrhoids through the P2X7/ERK axis in dorsal root ganglion

Haemorrhoids are a common anorectal disease primarily treated through surgery, often leading to complications such as pain. The efficacy of acupuncture in relieving postoperative pain in mixed haemorrhoids has not been well-documented. This study included 90 patients undergoing haemorrhoid surgery and their Visual Analogue Score (VAS), inflammatory factor levels, Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD), and analgesic drug use were accessed. A rat incisional pain model was also constructed to monitor behavioral responses, with assessments including Sucrose Preference Test (SPT) and Open Field Test (OFT). The levels of ATP and proinflammatory cytokines in the dorsal root ganglion (DRG) were measured using luciferase assay and ELISA. We also examined P2×7 and ERK1/2 levels in DRG tissues of anal incisional pain rat model. In a Chronic Constriction Injury (CCI) rat model treated with BzATP, a potent agonist for P2×7 receptors, followed by acupuncture for 15 days, postoperative pain and behavioral responses were observed and assessed, alongside mechanistic studies of ATP and inflammatory factors in DRG tissues. Patients receiving acupuncture had significantly lower VAS scores, reduced levels of inflammatory factors, improved depression scores, and decreased analgesic drug use. In the animal model, acupuncture increased pain thresholds, improved behavioral responses, reduced ATP content and inflammatory factors, and modulated the P2×7/ERK axis. In the CCI model, BzATP increased P2×7 and ERK1/2 levels, pain sensitivity, and anxiety, which were mitigated by acupuncture. Our data suggest that acupuncture significantly alleviates postoperative pain following haemorrhoid surgery and modulates the pain response through the P2×7/ERK axis.

Sport practice and hemorrhoidal disease: results from a self-assessment questionnaire among athletes

BACKGROUND

Hemorrhoidal disease (HD) is a common proctologic disease. Dietary and lifestyle play a role in the genesis of the disease or in its progression to more severe forms, although the exact mechanism is still not fully understood. We performed a pilot observational cross-sectional analytical association study to evaluate the possible association between sport activities and HD.

METHODS

We included subjects aged 18 years old or more, competitive and non-competitive, practicing at least one sport activity, at least twice a week. Data were collected using an online questionnaire, developed on the Microsoft Teams communication platform.

RESULTS

Out of the 312 study participants, 34% reported HD. Among subjects who practiced cycling or horseback riding, 57% reported suffering from HD; among those practicing bodybuilding, 48% complained of HD. In the multivariate logistic regression analysis, age and bodybuilding practice showed a statistically significant association with HD.

CONCLUSIONS

Some sport activities could play a role in the onset or worsening of HD. Our results showed a positive association between cycling, horseback riding, bodybuilding, and HD occurrence. Given the numerous health benefits of physical activity, patients should be provided with correct information regarding the practice of sports in relation to their pathology.

Use of mesoglycan in the acute phase of hemorrhoidal disease (the CHORMES study): study protocol for a double-blind, randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Hemorrhoidal disease (HD) is associated with substantial economic burden and negative effects on health-related quality of life (HRQoL). The aCute HaemORrhoids treatment with MESoglycan (CHORMES) study aims to evaluate the effects of orally administered mesoglycan, a natural preparation of glycosaminoglycans with antithrombotic and profibrinolytic properties, as an acute treatment in patients with HD.

METHODS

CHORMES is a phase 2, double-blind, randomized controlled trial being conducted at two centers in Italy. Adults aged 18-75 years with Grade I-III HD according to Goligher classification or external thrombosed hemorrhoids, and a Hemorrhoidal Disease Symptom Score (HDSS) of ≥ 5, will be randomly allocated in a 1:1 ratio to mesoglycan or placebo and will be treated for 40 days (two capsules for the first 5 days and one capsule for the subsequent 35 days twice daily [after breakfast and dinner], equivalent to 200 mg in the first 5 days and 100 mg subsequently). Concomitant use of analgesics is permitted in both treatment groups. The trial aims to enroll 50 patients, with 25 patients in each treatment group. The primary objective of the trial is to evaluate the efficacy of mesoglycan in reducing symptoms of HD, assessed via change in HDSS from baseline (day 0) to day 40 in the intention-to-treat population. Secondary objectives include changes in HRQoL from baseline to day 40 using the Short Health Scale for Hemorrhoidal Disease, safety (adverse effects, physical assessments, vital signs and laboratory parameters in the safety population), fecal continence assessed using the Vaizey score, bleeding assessed using the Bleeding score, the amount and type of analgesic taken, and pain. Patient enrolment began on 11 December 2023, and trial completion is expected by December 2024.

DISCUSSION

The CHORMES trial will evaluate the efficacy and safety of mesoglycan, in addition to its impact on HRQoL, analgesic use and pain, in patients with HD. The results of the trial will assist clinicians in determining the most effective treatment for patients with HD.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT06101992. Prospectively registered on 26 October 2023 at https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT06101992 .

Shifting Paradigms in Hemorrhoid Management: The Emergence and Impact of Cap-Assisted Endoscopic Sclerotherapy

Hemorrhoidal disease (HD) is a prevalent proctological condition that has puzzled people since ancient times, and the most common symptom is painless bleeding. Traditional treatments include conservative treatment, nonsurgical office-based treatments, and surgery. Sclerotherapy is one of the oldest forms of nonoperative intervention and is widely used to treat internal hemorrhoids with the development of endoscopy technology. However, sclerotherapy is always accompanied by complications such as bleeding, pain, abscess, etc., when the sclerosant is injected into the wrong site. Cap-assisted endoscopic sclerotherapy (CAES), a new minimally invasive technology, was first time coined in 2015 for the treatment of hemorrhoidal disease. The left-posterior-right-anterior (LPRA) anus positioning method under endoscopy provides reliable methodological support for advancing hemorrhoidal treatment via endoscopy. The current trend is that treatment for HD has shifted from being performed predominantly by the Department of Proctology Surgery to being managed mostly by the Department of Gastroenterology. This review reviewed the shifting paradigms of sclerotherapy for HD and discussed the emerging development of CAES.

Does hemorrhoidal artery embolization really benefit patients with hemorrhoids?

This letter offers commentary on an article published in a recent issue of the World Journal of Gastroenterology. Hemorrhoidal artery embolization is a promising approach to severe hemorrhoidal bleeding treatment, but inappropriate patient selection and the use of different embolization procedures may affect the clinical efficacy and cause serious complications. In this article, the most appropriate candidate patients, embolization materials, embolization methods, and clinical evaluation methods are discussed to improve the safety and effectiveness of the procedure.

A Gender Perspective on Coloproctological Diseases: A Narrative Review on Female Disorders

Coloproctological diseases, including both benign and malignant conditions, are among the most common diagnoses in clinical practice. Several disorders affect both men and women, while others are unique to women, or women are at a greater risk of developing them. This is due to anatomical, biological, and social conditions and also due to females' exclusive capabilities of reproduction and pregnancy. In this context, the same proctological disease could differ between men and women, who can experience different perceptions of health and sickness. There is a raised awareness about the impact of different diseases in women and a growing need for a personalized approach to women's health. In this review, we aim to summarize the specific features of the main coloproctological diseases, specifically in the female population. This includes common complaints during pregnancy, conditions linked to vaginal delivery, functional consequences after colorectal resections, and conditions presenting a gender disposition.

An international observational study assessing conservative management in hemorrhoidal disease: results of CHORALIS (aCute HemORrhoidal disease evALuation International Study)

Aim: Real-world evidence on the management of hemorrhoidal disease (HD) is limited. This international study collected clinical practice data on the effectiveness of conservative treatments for acute HD on symptoms and quality of life (QoL), providing perspectives of treatment modalities from different continents. Patients & methods: The 4-week observational prospective CHORALIS study involved adult outpatients consulting for spontaneous complaints of hemorrhoids (graded using Goligher classification) and prescribed conservative treatments according to usual clinical practice. Assessments were: anal pain/discomfort (visual analog scale [VAS]), other signs/symptoms (patient questionnaire), Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) questionnaire and disease-specific QoL (HEMO-FISS-QoL questionnaire). Results: Of 3592 participants, 3505 were analyzed (58.4% male; age 40.5 ± 13.7 years; history of HD in 48.4%; 72.1% Goligher grade I and II). Pain and discomfort were the most common symptoms. Most treatments were venoactive drugs (VADs; 90.9%), particularly micronized purified flavonoid fraction (MPFF; 73.7%) and diosmin (14.6%). All VAD-based therapies improved signs/symptoms (number/intensity/frequency of pain, discomfort, bleeding, swelling, itching and soiling) and QoL. MPFF was associated with a significantly greater proportion of patients with no symptoms (48.8 vs diosmin 34.4%, p < 0.001), pain disappearance (69.7 vs diosmin 52.8%, p < 0.001), treatment impact at 1 week rated on PGI-C as 'very much better' (30.5 vs diosmin 17.9%, p < 0.001) and shorter times to improvement (mean ± SD 3.9 ± 1.5 days vs diosmin 4.2 ± 1.7 days). Conclusion: In this prospective real-world study of patients with acute HD, conservative therapies consisting mainly of VADs, including MPFF, improved the clinical signs and symptoms of disease, as well as QoL. This study evidence supports clinical advantages associated with VADs, mostly MPFF, for effectively managing acute HD.

Propensity-Score Matching Analysis for Laser Hemorrhoidoplasty Versus Circumferential Stapler Hemorrhoidectomy: One-Year Outcomes

BACKGROUND

Laser hemorrhoidectomy (LHP) is a minimally invasive procedure with less pain, short operative time and length of stay, and a low recurrent rate. This study aimed to analyze the surgical outcomes of the circumferential stapler hemorrhoidectomy (CSH, Longo operation) by propensity score-matching analysis, including perioperative outcomes and quality of life.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between March 2022 and March 2023, 216 patients underwent CSH and 198 LHP in Binh Dan Hospital, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam. Potential confounding factors for operative outcomes were adjusted by propensity score-matching analysis. The gender, age, Goligher classification, symptoms, Hemorrhoidal Disease Symptom Score (HDSS), and the number of hemorrhoidal columns were matching variables. After 1:1 propensity score-matching, 115 patients from each group were evaluated for perioperative outcomes and compared for a prospective study.

RESULTS

There was no difference in potential preoperative confounders such as gender, hemorrhoid classification, symptoms, and HDSS between the two groups after propensity score-matching. However, there was a difference in age (52 in the Longo group and 43 in the LHP group) and the number of columns (the LHP group had more). Postoperative outcomes such as operative time, blood loss, general complications, and postoperative interventions were less in the LHP group. However, Visual Analog Scale (VAS) (4 vs. 4), length of stay (1 day vs. 1 day), quality of life (both groups improved quality of life after the procedure), and recurrence rate (2 in the Longo group vs. 0 in the LHP group, p=0.5) had no difference between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Propensity-score matching analysis showed that the LHP procedure was superior to the Longo operation (CSH) in operative time, blood loss, general complications, and postoperative intervention. Other outcomes such as VAS, length of stay, quality of life, and recurrence rate have no difference.

Effectiveness of preoperative micronized purified flavonoid fraction treatment and sucralfate-based rectal ointment on hemorrhoidal disease: A case-matched analysis

BACKGROUND

Hemorrhoidal disease (HD) significantly impacts patients' quality of life. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of preoperative treatment with the micronized purified flavonoid fraction (MPFF) and a sucralfate-based rectal ointment in managing HD symptoms and reducing interventions.

METHODS

A prospective quasi-experimental study including consecutive cases and controls matched on the basis of sex was performed in a tertiary referral center. Cases received systemic and local therapy for HD, consisting of a rectal ointment containing 3% sucralfate and herbal extracts plus MPFF, in addition to conservative therapy, while controls received conservative therapy alone. The hemorrhoidal disease symptom score (HDSS), the Short Health Scale for HD (SHS-HD) score, and the Vaizey Incontinence Score were used to evaluate symptoms severity and their impact on quality of life and continence. Intervention requirements were assessed at baseline (T0) and after 60 days of treatment (T1).

RESULTS

Between January and December 2023, a total of 98 patients were assessed for eligibility. After exclusions, 56 patients were enrolled, with 28 in each group. Significant improvements were observed in HD symptom scores from T0 to T1: the intervention group showed a mean change in HDSS of -9 [95% confidence interval (CI) -10 to -8], and the control group showed no significant change (mean change of 0; 95% CI -1.5 to 0). At T1, a higher proportion of patients in the intervention group underwent less invasive interventions compared with controls (18% versus 11%). Age, treatment group, and baseline symptom severity significantly predicted post-treatment symptom scores.

CONCLUSIONS

In our study the preoperative treatment with MPFF and a sucralfate-based rectal ointment demonstrated clinical benefits in managing HD symptoms and reducing interventions. Further prospective trials are warranted to confirm and explore additional therapeutic strategies.

Topical metronidazole after haemorrhoidectomy to reduce postoperative pain: a systematic review

Excisional haemorrhoidectomy is the gold standard for operating haemorrhoids, but it is accompanied by a significant problem: postoperative pain. Several strategies have been adopted to minimize this condition. Oral metronidazole has been proven to reduce postoperative pain but with some complications. This systematic review was conducted to investigate the effects and general efficacy of topical metronidazole administration and to evaluate its potential superiority over the oral formula. A systematic review of the literature was carried out. Randomized controlled trials published until September 2023 on PubMed, Central, and Web of Science were considered. The primary outcome considered was postoperative pain, which was evaluated using visual analogue scores. The secondary outcomes were analgesic use, return to work, and complications. Six randomized controlled trials were included, with a total of 536 patients. Topical metronidazole was compared with placebo in two studies, with oral formula in three studies, and with placebo and oral administration in one study. Topical metronidazole was found to be effective for treating postoperative pain when compared to a placebo but had no significant advantage over the oral formula. No complications were reported in the studies. Topical and oral metronidazole are effective solutions for postoperative pain after excisional haemorrhoidectomy. No superiority was demonstrated based on the route of administration, and complications were marginal for both formulas. Further studies are required to determine the best metronidazole solution.

A Retrospective Study of Milligan-Morgan Versus LigaSure Hemorrhoidectomy in the Treatment of Symptomatic Hemorrhoids at an Institute in North India

Objective The present study aimed to assess and compare the surgical outcomes of hemorrhoidectomies performed using two different techniques: conventional Milligan-Morgan and another popular vessel sealing approach of LigaSure hemorrhoidectomy. Methods This retrospective study was conducted at our tertiary care hospital and involved patients who underwent either of the surgical procedures from June 2016 to March 2022. The patient demographics and data on the duration of operation, hospital stay, and postoperative recovery were collected and evaluated. Results Of the 91 cases reviewed, a total of 44 patients underwent Milligan-Morgan open hemorrhoidectomy and 47 had LigaSure hemorrhoidectomy. The mean operative time was significantly shorter for LigaSure hemorrhoidectomy (33.84 ±9.18 vs. 23.15 ±3.36 minutes for Milligan-Morgan and LigaSure, respectively, p<0.0001). Additionally, in comparison to Milligan-Morgan open hemorrhoidectomy, the LigaSure hemorrhoidectomy group exhibited a significant reduction in hospital stay (2.20 ±0.79 vs. 1.47 ±0.50 days), lower pain score [6.55 ±1.19 vs. 5.30 ±1.10 on the visual analog scale (VAS) on day one and 2.25 ±1.26 vs. 1.47 ±0.78 VAS on day seven], and faster return to normal activities (18.18 ±4.30 vs. 14.85 ±3.15 days). Conclusions When pitted against the traditional Milligan-Morgan method, the LigaSure approach to performing a hemorrhoidectomy is superior, owing to the shorter duration of operation, shorter hospital stays, lesser pain, and earlier return to normal activities. In light of these findings, surgeons may consider choosing this procedure to improve surgical outcomes and efficiency.

Efficacy and Safety of Snap Needles in the Treatment of Postoperative Hemorrhoidal Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Purpose

The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Snap Needles (SN) in the management of Postoperative Hemorrhoidal Pain (POHP).

Patients and Methods

A systematic search was conducted in various databases, including EMBASE, Web of Science, PubMed, WanFang database, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), China Biomedical Literature Database (CBM), and China Science and Technology Journal Database (VIP), spanning from their inception to August 2023, to identify relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on SN for POHP. The primary outcome measure was the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), while secondary outcomes encompassed the Total Effective Rate (TER), Wound Healing Time (WHT), Pain Relief Time (PRT), Pain Disappearance Time (PDT), and Adverse Events (AEs). The Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool was employed to assess the quality of individual studies. A meta-analysis was conducted using RevMan 5.4.1 software.

Results

The meta-analysis included 11 RCTs involving 1188 POHP patients, with an overall assessment of study quality ranging from very low to moderate. The findings revealed that the SN group exhibited significant improvements in treatment outcomes when compared to the control group (CG). These improvements were reflected in reduced VAS scores (mean difference [MD] = -1.10, 95% confidence interval [CI]: -1.31, -0.89, P < 0.05), shorter WHT (MD = -2.55, 95% CI: -3.02, -2.09, P < 0.05), quicker PRT (MD = -7.99, 95% CI: -8.48, -7.49, P < 0.05), fewer AEs (risk ratio [RR] = 0.38, 95% CI: 0.22, 0.67, P < 0.05), improved TER (RR = 1.18, 95% CI: 1.09, 1.27, P < 0.05), and faster PDT (MD = 19.24, 95% CI: 14.17, 24.31, P < 0.05).

Conclusion

The use of SN appears to yield favorable outcomes in the treatment of POHP, and is potentially an alternative therapy to western drug therapy.

Effectiveness and tolerability of rectal ointment and suppositories containing sucralfate for hemorrhoidal symptoms: a prospective, observational study

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

A high number of topical products are available for the treatment of hemorrhoidal symptoms. Sucralfate-based topical products constitute a new treatment alternative that act as a mechanical barrier to facilitate healing. The aim of this prospective, observational study was to determine patient- and physician-assessed effectiveness and tolerability of rectal ointment and suppositories containing sucralfate for the treatment of hemorrhoidal symptoms in routine clinical practice.

METHODS

Adult patients with diagnosed, mild-to-moderate, symptomatic non-bleeding hemorrhoids treated with rectal ointment or suppositories containing sucralfate were enrolled. Patients were administered treatment twice per day for at least 1 week until symptom resolution and/or for a maximum of 4 weeks. The primary endpoint was patient-assessed effectiveness on a modified Symptom Severity Score (mSSS, range 0 to 14). Physician-assessed effectiveness (9 symptoms, 0 to 5 Likert scale), hemorrhoid grade, and patient satisfaction were also determined.

RESULTS

Five investigators enrolled 60 patients; mean age was 48.4 ± 16.6 years and 72.4% were female. Pain or pressure sensitivity was reported as the most severe symptom by patients, and pressure sensitivity, discharge, soiling, and prolapse by physicians. Mean patient-assessed mSSS at baseline was 6.6 ± 1.9 and was significantly improved overall and in the ointment and suppository groups individually by -4.6 ± 2.0, -4.4 ± 1.8, and -4.8 ± 2.2, respectively (p < 0.0001). Investigator-assessed mean baseline symptom score was 18.1 ± 3.9 and improved by -7.1 ± 4.5, -6.9 ± 5.4, and -7.3 ± 3.5, respectively (p < 0.0001). Investigator-assessed symptoms of pressure sensitivity, swelling, and discharge were improved to the greatest extent. Hemorrhoid grade was improved in 38% of patients at the end of treatment. Compliance with treatment was 97.4% and patient satisfaction with application and onset of action was high (81.3% and 76.2%, respectively). Both the ointment and suppository were well tolerated.

CONCLUSIONS

The effectiveness of topical ointment or suppository containing sucralfate on patient- and investigator-assessed hemorrhoidal symptoms in real-life clinical practice was demonstrated. Patient satisfaction was high and treatments were well tolerated. Larger controlled trials are warranted to confirm the results.

Preoperative Blood Transfusion Requirements for Hemorrhoidal Severe Anemia: A Retrospective Study of 128 Patients

BACKGROUND Severe anemia caused by hemorrhoidal hematochezia is typically treated preoperatively with reference to severe anemia treatment strategies from other etiologies. This retrospective cohort study included 128 patients with hemorrhoidal severe anemia admitted to 3 hospitals from September 1, 2018, to August 1, 2023, and aimed to evaluate preoperative blood transfusion requirements. MATERIAL AND METHODS Of 5120 patients with hemorrhoids, 128 (2.25%; male/female: 72/56) experienced hemorrhoidal severe anemia, transfusion, and Milligan-Morgan surgery. Patients were categorized into 2 groups based on their preoperative hemoglobin (PHB) levels after transfusion: PHB ≥70 g/L as the liberal-transfusion group (LG), and PHB <70 as the restrictive-threshold group (RG). The general condition, bleeding duration, hemoglobin level on admission, transfusion volume, length of stay, immune transfusion reaction, surgical duration, and hospitalization cost were compared between the 2 groups. RESULTS Patients with severe anemia (age: 41.07±14.76) tended to be younger than those with common hemorrhoids (age: 49.431±15.59 years). The LG had a significantly higher transfusion volume (4.77±2.22 units), frequency of immune transfusion reactions (1.22±0.58), and hospitalization costs (16.69±3.31 thousand yuan) than the RG, which had a transfusion volume of 3.77±2.09 units, frequency of immune transfusion reactions of 0.44±0.51, and hospitalization costs of 15.00±3.06 thousand yuan. Surgical duration in the LG (25.69±14.71 min) was significantly lower than that of the RG (35.24±18.72 min). CONCLUSIONS Patients with hemorrhoids with severe anemia might require a lower preoperative transfusion threshold than the currently recognized threshold, with an undifferentiated treatment effect and additional benefits.

Haemorrhoidal disease in pregnancy: results from a self-assessment questionnaire administered by means of a social network

BACKGROUND

The anal symptoms occurring during pregnancy and post-partum, mainly related to Haemorrhoidal Disease (HD), have been reported with in a wide range of incidence in the literature. Although in many cases the course of the disease is mild and self-limiting, sometimes it is severe enough to affect quality of life.

METHODS

Our study has been conducted through a questionnaire administered via social media with the aim of obtaining epidemiologic data on the incidence of the symptoms of HD in an unselected population of pregnant women. In addition, we looked for the presence of those factors notoriously predisposing or associated to HD (constipation, straining on the toilet, low dietary fibres and fluid intake).

RESULTS

Out of 133 patients 51% reported symptoms of HD during pregnancy, mainly in the second and third trimester. Constipation, straining on the toilet, low dietary fibres and fluid intake were not significantly related to incidence of HD. Only a previous history of HD was correlated to onset of symptoms of HD in pregnancy and reached a statistical significance (odds ratio = 5.2, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Although with the limitations posed by the nature of our retrospective study via a self-assessment interview, our results suggest that the occurrence of HD in pregnancy seems not sustained by the classical risk factors observed in the general population. At the moment, specific therapeutic measures are lacking and treatment relies on empiric suggestions concerning diet, fluid intake, bowel care, local ointment. Further studies are needed in order to identify a targeted etiologic treatment.

Effect of lidocaine on postoperative analgesia of endoscopic rubber band ligation combined with injection sclerotherapy for treatment of internal hemorrhoids: A retrospective study (with video)

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS

Endoscopic minimally invasive treatment of internal hemorrhoids may cause postoperative pain. The aim of the study is to investigate the analgesic effect of lidocaine plus lauromacrogol on postoperative pain caused by endoscopic rubber band ligation (ERBL) combined with injection sclerotherapy (IS) for internal hemorrhoids treatment.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Clinical data of grade Ⅲ internal hemorrhoids patients who underwent ERBL combined with IS in department of Digestive Medicine, Shenzhen Hospital of Southern Medical University, were retrospectively analyzed. According to difference in the composition of sclerosing solution, the patients were divided into control group (lauromacrogol group, 46 patients) and study group (lidocaine plus lauromacrogol group, 20 patients). Postoperative pain (quantized by Visual Analogue Scale, VAS), pain relief time and postoperative adverse reactions were compared. The therapeutic effect was followed up 1 month after operation.

RESULTS

VAS of postoperative pain was 0.80 ± 0.42 points and pain relief time was 0.90 ± 0.56 days in the study group, while VAS of postoperative pain was 4.11 ± 1.37 points and pain relief time was 2.57 ± 0.83 days in the control group, there was statistical difference between them (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in the incidence of postoperative adverse reactions and follow-up therapeutic effect between the control group and the study group.

CONCLUSION

Lidocaine plus lauromacrogol is useful for pain alleviation on ERBL combined with IS for internal hemorrhoids treatment because of its convenient procedure, low adverse reaction incidence and good therapeutic effect, which is worthy of promotion.

Clinical evidence and rationale of mesoglycan to treat chronic venous disease and hemorrhoidal disease: a narrative review

Chronic venous disease (CVD) and hemorrhoidal disease (HD) are among the most common vascular diseases in the world, with CVD affecting 22-41% of the population in Europe and HD having a point prevalence of 11-39%. The burden is substantial in terms of the effect of symptoms on patients' health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and direct/indirect medical costs. Treatment begins with lifestyle changes, compression in CVD and topical therapies in HD, and escalates as needed through oral therapies first and eventually to surgery for severe disease. CVD and HD share etiological features and pathological changes affecting the structure and function of the tissue extracellular matrix. Mesoglycan, a natural glycosaminoglycan (GAG) preparation composed primarily of heparan sulfate and dermatan sulfate, has been demonstrated to positively impact the underlying causes of CVD and HD, regenerating the glycocalyx and restoring endothelial function, in addition to having antithrombotic, profibrinolytic, anti-inflammatory, antiedema and wound-healing effects. In clinical trials, oral mesoglycan reduced the severity of CVD signs and symptoms, improved HRQoL, and accelerated ulcer healing. In patients with HD, mesoglycan significantly reduced the severity of signs and symptoms and the risk of rectal bleeding. In patients undergoing excisional hemorrhoidectomy, adding mesoglycan to standard postoperative care reduced pain, improved HRQoL, reduced incidence of thrombosis, and facilitated an earlier return to normal activities/work, compared with standard postoperative care alone. The clinical effects of mesoglycan in patients with CVD or HD are consistent with the agent's known mechanisms of action.

Long-term results and quality of life after stapled hemorrhoidopexy vs Doppler-guided HAL-RAR: a propensity score matching analysis

AIM

The study aimed to evaluate and compare the short and long-term outcomes of doppler-guided (DG) hemorrhoidal artery ligation and rectoanal repair (HAL-RAR) using a wireless-doppler-guided probe and stapled hemorrhoidopexy (SH) for treatment of II-III hemorrhoids.

METHODS

This cohort study included patients who underwent HAL-RAR (n = 89) or SH (n = 174) for grade II-III hemorrhoids between January 2020 and December 2021. After propensity score matching at a 1:1 ratio, 76 patients for each group were analyzed. Short and long-term outcomes were collected. Pain was measured using a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at POD1, POD 10, 1 month, and 6 months after surgery. The enrolled patients completed the Hemorrhoidal Disease Symptom Score and Short Health ScaleHD quality of life (HDSS/SHS QoL) questionnaire preoperatively and during a regular follow-up visit at 24 months after surgery.

RESULTS

Groups exhibited comparable overall postoperative complication rates (23% HAL-RAR/ 21% SH; p = 0.295). Postoperative pain via VAS showed median scores of 4, 3, 1, 1 for HAL-RAR and 6, 4, 2, 1 for SH at POD1, POD10, 1 month, and 6 months, respectively (p =  < 0.001, 0.004, 0.025, 0.019). At a median follow-up of 12 months, the recurrence rate was 10.5% in the HAL-RAR group and 9.2% in the SH group (p = 0.785), respectively. At 24 months, 15.7% of HAL-RAR patients and 19.7% of SH patients remained symptomatic (p = 0.223). Median post-op QoL index was 1 (HAL-RAR) and 0.92 (SH), p = 0.036.

CONCLUSIONS

HAL-RAR is a safe and feasible technique in treating grade II-III hemorrhoids showing better outcomes in terms of postoperative pain and QoL.

SIGNIFICANCE

This paper adds a new perspective in comparing the HAL-RAR and SH, focusing the attention on the patients and not surgical techniques. A long and difficult follow-up was completed to fully understand the long-term results and the impact on the QoL of the patients who underwent these procedures.

Liposomal bupivacaine versus conventional anesthetic or placebo for hemorrhoidectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Liposome bupivacaine (LB) is a long-acting anesthetic to enhance postoperative analgesia. Studies evaluating the efficacy of the LB against an active comparator (bupivacaine or placebo) on acute postoperative pain control in hemorrhoidectomy procedures are few and heterogeneous. Therefore, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing LB's analgesic efficacy and side effects to conventional/placebo anesthetic in hemorrhoidectomy patients.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials investigating the use of LB after haemorrhoidectomy. We searched the literature published from the time of inception of the datasets to August 19, 2022. The electronic databases included English publications in Ovid MEDLINE In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations, Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid EMBASE, and Scopus.

RESULTS

A total of 338 patients who underwent a hemorrhoidectomy procedure enrolled in three randomized clinical trials were included. The overall mean age was 45.84 years (SD ± 11.43), and there was a male predominance (53.55% male). In total 194 patients (52.2%) received LB and 144 (47.8%) received either bupivacaine or placebo. Pain scores at 72 h in the LB (199, 266, and 300 mg) were significantly lower than in the bupivacaine HCl group (p = 0.002). Compared to the bupivacaine/placebo group, the time to first use of opioids in the LB group was significantly longer at LB 199 mg (11 h vs. 9 h), LB 266 mg (19 h vs. 9 h), and LB 300 mg (19 h vs. 8 h) (p < 0.05). Moreover, compared to the bupivacaine/epinephrine group, it was significantly lower in the LB 266 mg group (3.7 vs. 10.2 mg) and at LB 300 mg (13 vs. 33 mg) (p < 0.05). Finally, regarding adverse effects, the conventional anesthetic/placebo group reported more pain in bowel movement than LB groups (OR 2.60, 95% CI 1.31-5.16).

CONCLUSIONS

Comparing LB to conventional anesthetic/placebo anesthetic for hemorrhoidectomy, we found a statistically significant reduction in pain through 72 h, decreased opioid requirements, and delayed time to first opioid use. Moreover, the conventional anesthetic/placebo group reported more pain in bowel movement than LB groups.

Sclerotherapy for hemorrhoidal disease: systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of sclerotherapy methods for hemorrhoidal disease (HD) over the past 40 years.

METHODS

The review followed the 2020 Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. A comprehensive literature search was conducted, including studies reporting the use of sclerotherapy in patients with HD. Study eligibility criteria were defined, and data were extracted independently by the authors. Random-effects meta-analyses were performed to assess outcomes of interest.

RESULTS

Out of 1965 records identified, 44 studies met the inclusion criteria, involving 9729 patients. The majority of studies were conducted in Japan, followed by the UK, Italy, and Portugal. The median age of participants was 52 years, and the majority were male. The Goligher grade distribution indicated varying degrees of HD severity. Sclerotherapy was predominantly administered through anoscopy, with polidocanol being the most commonly used agent. The procedure was generally performed without pre-injection analgesia. The meta-analysis of 14 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) revealed that sclerotherapy was not inferior to control interventions in terms of success rate (risk ratio [RR] 1.00, 95% CI 0.71-1.41) and recurrence rate (RR 1.11, 95% CI 0.69-1.77), while resulting in fewer complications (RR 0.46, 95% CI 0.23-0.92).

CONCLUSIONS

This systematic review highlights the safety and efficacy of sclerotherapy for HD, which yields similar success rates and fewer complications compared to other conservative or surgical approaches. Further research is warranted to optimize sclerotherapy techniques and evaluate long-term outcomes.

REGISTRATION

PROSPERO 2023 CRD42023396910.

Translation and validation of Indonesian hemorrhoidal disease symptom score (HDSS) and short health scale hemorrhoidal disease (SHSHD)

Objectives

Hemorrhoidal disease, which affects nearly 40% of people, is characterized by pathological alterations and distal displacement of hemorrhoidal tissue. The short health scale (SHSHD) and the hemorrhoidal disease symptom score (HDSS) are two tools that can be utilized to assess the quality of life of hemorrhoidal patients. The present study aims to translate, modify, and validate the HDSS and SHSHD questionnaires in Indonesian.

Material and Methods

This cross-sectional study assessed the validity and reliability of the HDSS and SHSHD Indonesian adaptation instrument in hemorrhoidal patients from April 15, 2022, and April 1, 2023.

Results

There were 91 study subjects, 55 males and 36 females. The study showed that the subscale interpretations of the R-values and the full scale scored above 0.25, indicating weak to very strong correlations. These results mean that the HDSS and SHSHD questionnaires are valid for use. Based on the study's results, the R-value of each item, domain, and total score ≥0.8 (p <0.05) indicates that the HDSS and SHSHD instruments are reliable.

Conclusion

The Indonesian adaptation of the HDSS and SHSHD demonstrates validity and reliability as an assessment tool for measuring the healthrelated quality of life in Indonesian patients diagnosed with hemorrhoidal disease.

Comparison of the long-term efficacy and safety of multiple endoscopic rubber band ligations in a single session for varying grades of internal hemorrhoids

BACKGROUND

There is no consensus on the number of ligation bands for varying grades of internal hemorrhoids (IH) in a single session of endoscopic rubber band ligation (ERBL).

AIMS

The aims of this study were to investigate this issue.

METHODS

Patients with IH were treated with ERBL. The primary endpoint was no hemorrhoid symptoms 6 weeks after ERBL. The secondary endpoints were postoperative complications and recurrence.

RESULTS

One hundred twenty-three eligible patients met the inclusion criteria, and 3 patients were excluded. The average bands were 3.9 ± 1.1, and grade II hemorrhoids required significantly fewer bands than grade III hemorrhoids (3.45 ± 0.85 vs 4.35 ± 1.06, P = 0.000). 78.8% of patients achieved the primary endpoint. The efficacy of grade II hemorrhoids was higher than that of grade III hemorrhoids (87.8% vs 69.2%). The incidence of postoperative complications was not significantly correlated with the grade of hemorrhoids (P = 0.201) and the number of bands (P = 0.886). The median follow-up time was 14.3 ± 7.9 (1.3-30.9) months. The overall recurrence rate was 25.0%, with grade III significantly higher than grade I-II (32.8% vs 14.6%, P = 0.027). For grade III hemorrhoids, the recurrence rate was lower with more than 4 bands of ligation than with less than 4 bands (26.5% vs 53.3%).

CONCLUSIONS

The average ERBL treatment of IH requires nearly four bands, and grade II hemorrhoids require less banding than grade III hemorrhoids, while the efficacy was better. Increasing the number of bands improves the treatment efficacy for grade III IH, which could be a strategy to reduce the recurrence rate without increasing postoperative complications.

Prevalence, Characteristics, and Treatment of Hemorrhoids During Pregnancy: A Nationwide Population-Based Cohort Study in Taiwan

Background: Hemorrhoids, a gastrointestinal tract disorder, are common during pregnancy. However, large-scale epidemiological studies on hemorrhoids during pregnancy are limited. Therefore, this study used analyzed data from a nationwide population-based database to investigate the prevalence, characteristics, and treatment of hemorrhoids in Taiwan. Materials and Methods: This retrospective population-based study used data from the National Health Insurance Research Database and Taiwan Birth Certificate Application to collect the medical records of women who were pregnant at any time during 2009-2018. Hemorrhoids was defined by International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) (455. X) and International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-10-CM) (K64.X, O22.4X) with related treatment. Results: We enrolled 1,608,804 deliveries in 1,070,708 women. The proportion of hemorrhoids increased with age in both primipara and multipara women. Of the pregnant women, 31% received oral medication, and 93.2% used the topical ointment to treat their hemorrhoids. Few patients (1.8%) required procedure or surgery during pregnancy, and 41.4% of those patients underwent procedure or surgery in their first trimester. The cumulative incidence of hemorrhoids during pregnancy was significantly higher in women with a history of hemorrhoids and those with multifetal pregnancies. No significant difference in the incidence of hemorrhoids was observed between multiparous and primiparous women. Conclusion: Women with a history of hemorrhoids or those carrying multiple fetuses had an increased risk of hemorrhoids during pregnancy. The most commonly used treatment for hemorrhoids during pregnancy was topical ointments, with only a small proportion (1.8%) of patients requiring procedure or surgery.

Excisional Hemorrhoidectomy Versus Dearterialization With Mucopexy for the Treatment of Grade III Hemorrhoidal Disease: The EMODART3 Multicenter Study

BACKGROUND

Over the past few decades, several surgical approaches have been proposed to treat hemorrhoids.

OBJECTIVE

This multicenter study aimed to compare transanal hemorrhoidal artery ligation and conventional excisional hemorrhoidectomy for grade III hemorrhoidal disease.

DESIGN

Multicenter retrospective study.

SETTINGS

Any center belonging to the Italian Society of Colorectal Surgery in which at least 30 surgical procedures per year for hemorrhoidal disease were performed was able to join the study.

PATIENTS

Clinical data from patients with Goligher's grade III hemorrhoidal disease who underwent excisional hemorrhoidectomy or hemorrhoidal artery ligation were retrospectively analyzed after a 24-month follow-up period.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary aims were to evaluate the adoption of 2 different surgical techniques and to compare them in terms of symptoms, postoperative adverse events, and recurrences at a 24-month follow-up.

RESULTS

Data from 1681 patients were analyzed. The results of both groups were comparable in terms of postoperative clinical score by multiple regression analysis and matched case-control analysis. Patients who underwent excisional hemorrhoidectomy had a significantly higher risk of postoperative complication (adjusted OR = 1.58; p = 0.006). A secondary analysis highlighted that excisional hemorrhoidectomy performed with new devices and hemorrhoidal artery ligation reported a significantly lower risk for complications than excisional hemorrhoidectomy performed with traditional monopolar diathermy. At the 24-month follow-up assessment, recurrence was significantly higher in the hemorrhoidal artery ligation group (adjusted OR = 0.50; p = 0.001). A secondary analysis did not show a higher risk of recurrences based on the type of device.

LIMITATIONS

The retrospective design and the self-reported nature of data from different centers.

CONCLUSIONS

Hemorrhoidal artery ligation is an effective option for grade III hemorrhoidal disease; however, it is burdened by a high risk of recurrences. Excisional hemorrhoidectomy performed with newer devices is competitive in terms of postoperative complications.HEMORROIDECTOMÍA POR ESCISIÓN VERSUS DESARTERIALIZACIÓN CON MUCOPEXIA PARA EL TRATAMIENTO DE LA ENFERMEDAD HEMORROIDAL DE GRADO 3: EL ESTUDIO MULTICÉNTRICO EMODART3ANTECEDENTES:En las últimas décadas se han propuesto varios abordajes quirúrgicos para el tratamiento de las hemorroides.OBJETIVO:Este estudio multicéntrico tiene como objetivo comparar la ligadura de la arteria hemorroidal transanal y la hemorroidectomía por escisión convencional para la enfermedad hemorroidal de grado III.DISEÑO:Estudio retrospectivo multicéntrico.ÁMBITO:Cualquier centro perteneciente a la Sociedad Italiana de Cirugía Colorrectal en el que se realizaron al menos 30 procedimientos quirúrgicos por año para la enfermedad hemorroidal pudo participar en el estudio.PACIENTES:Los datos clínicos de pacientes con enfermedad hemorroidal de grado III de Goligher que se sometieron a hemorroidectomía por escisión o ligadura de arterias hemorroidales se analizaron retrospectivamente después de un período de seguimiento de 24 meses.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:Los objetivos primarios fueron evaluar la adopción de dos técnicas quirúrgicas diferentes y compararlas en términos de síntomas, eventos adversos posoperatorios y recurrencias a los 24 meses de seguimiento.RESULTADOS:Se analizaron datos de 1681 pacientes. Los 2 grupos resultaron ser comparables en términos de puntuación clínica posoperatoria mediante análisis de regresión múltiple y análisis de casos y controles emparejados. Los pacientes sometidos a hemorroidectomía excisional tuvieron un riesgo significativamente mayor de complicaciones posoperatorias (odds ratio ajustado = 1,58; p = 0,006). Un análisis secundario destacó que la hemorroidectomía por escisión realizada con nuevos dispositivos y la ligadura de la arteria hemorroidal informaron un riesgo significativamente menor de complicaciones que la hemorroidectomía por escisión realizada con diatermia monopolar tradicional. En la evaluación de seguimiento de 24 meses, la recurrencia fue significativamente mayor en el grupo de ligadura de la arteria hemorroidal (razón de probabilidad ajustada = 0,50; p = 0,001). Un análisis secundario no mostró un mayor riesgo de recurrencias según el tipo de dispositivo.LIMITACIONES:El diseño retrospectivo y el carácter autoinformado de los datos de diferentes centros.CONCLUSIÓN:HAL es una opción efectiva para la enfermedad hemorroidal grado III; sin embargo, se ve afectado por un alto riesgo de recurrencias. La hemorroidectomía por escisión realizada con dispositivos más nuevos es competitiva en términos de complicaciones posoperatorias. (Traducción-Dr Yolanda Colorado ).

Comparison of ointment-based agents after excisional procedures for hemorrhoidal disease: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

INTRODUCTION

Efficient postoperative pain control is important after hemorrhoidal surgery. Although several locally applied medications have been used, current evidence regarding the optimal strategy is still conflicting. This network meta-analysis assessed analgesic efficacy and safety of the various topical medications in patients submitted to excisional procedures for hemorrhoids.

METHODS

The present study followed the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions and the PRISMA guidelines. The last systematic literature screening was performed at 15 June 2023. Comparisons were based on a random effects multivariate network meta-analysis under a Bayesian framework.

RESULTS

Overall, 26 RCTs and 2132 patients were included. Regarding postoperative pain, EMLA cream (surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) 80.3%) had the highest ranking at 12-h endpoint, while aloe vera cream (SUCRA 82.36%) scored first at 24 h. Metronidazole ointments had the highest scores at 7 and 14 days postoperatively. Aloe vera had the best analgesic profile (24-h SUCRA 84.8% and 48-h SUCRA 80.6%) during defecation. Lidocaine (SUCRA 87.9%) displayed the best performance regarding overall morbidity rates.

CONCLUSIONS

Due to the inconclusive results and several study limitations, further RCTs are required.

Positive efficacy of Lactiplantibacillus plantarum MH-301 as a postoperative adjunct to endoscopic sclerotherapy for internal hemorrhoids: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

Background: Endoscopic sclerotherapy is a widely used minimally invasive procedure for internal hemorrhoids, yet postoperative symptoms remain a concern. The purpose of this study is to investigate the postoperative adjuvant efficacy of Lactiplantibacillus plantarum. Method: In this study, patients (≥18 years) with internal hemorrhoids that conformed to Goligher's classification of grade I-III received administration of L. plantarum MH-301 for 4 weeks following endoscopic sclerotherapy. The primary clinical endpoint in this study was the improvement rate, which was defined as the percentage of patients whose n-HDSS score decreased to 0 following the procedure. Stools were collected for high-throughput sequencing analysis post operation. Result: A total of 103 participants (51 in the LP group and 52 in the C group) were recruited, with 96 completing the entire trial (49 in the LP group and 47 in the C group). The primary clinical endpoint showed a higher improvement rate in the LP group (87.8% vs. 70.2%, P = 0.045). High-throughput sequencing analysis demonstrated that the LP group had a greater diversity of intestinal microbiota and a higher relative abundance of beneficial bacteria such as Bifidobacterium, Megamonas, and Lactobacillus. No significant difference in postoperative complications and adverse events was found. Conclusion: This paper concludes that the administration of L. plantarum MH-301 after endoscopic sclerotherapy can further increase the efficacy of the procedure and improve bowel movements. Regulation of intestinal microbiota may be the potential mechanism for the efficacy of L. plantarum MH-301.

Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy combined with non-doppler hemorrhoidal artery ligation for the treatment of grade III/IV hemorrhoids: a single centre retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy (MMH) is the most widely used surgical procedure because of its precise curative effect, but it has the disadvantages such as obvious postoperative pain and bleeding. To retrospectively evaluate the efficacy and safety of MMH combined with non-Doppler hemorrhoidal artery ligation (MMH + ND-HAL) for the treatment of grade III/IV hemorrhoids.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective analysis of 115 patients with grade III/IV hemorrhoids, 53 patients had received MMH + ND-HAL, and the remaining 62 patients received MMH. We collected and compared demographic and clinical characteristics of both groups, including intraoperative blood loss, postoperative visual analog scale (VAS) for pain, analgesic consumption, postoperative bleeding, perianal incision edema, urinary retention, anal stenosis, anal incontinence incidence, recurrence rate (prolapse or bleeding), and patient satisfaction.

RESULTS

The VAS pain score of the first postoperative defecation and at the postoperative 12 h, 1 day, 2 days, 3 days, and 7 days, as well as the total analgesic consumption within 7 days, for the MMH + ND-HAL group were lower than those for the MMH group (P < 0.05). The intraoperative blood loss, the incidence of postoperative bleeding, perianal incision edema, and urinary retention in the MMH + ND-HAL group was lower than that in the MMH group (P < 0.05). No anal stenosis or anal incontinence occurred in either group. At follow-up by telephone or outpatient 12 months after surgery, the recurrence rate (prolapse or bleeding) was lower in the MMH + ND-HAL group than in the MMH group (P < 0.05), and satisfaction was higher in the MMH + ND-HAL group than in the MMH group (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

MMH + ND-HAL was a satisfactory surgical modality for treating III/IV hemorrhoids.

Evaluation of Clinical Manifestations of Hemorrhoidal Disease, Carried Out Surgeries and Prolapsed Anorectal Tissues: Associations with ABO Blood Groups of Patients

Hemorrhoidal disease (HD) is a chronic multifactorial disease. Increased abdominal pressure, along with hyperperfusion, neovascularization, overexpression of inflammatory mediators, and dysbiosis, contributes to the development of HD. The deterioration of the anchoring connective tissue with reduced collagen content and altered collagen ratios, dilatation of blood vessels and thrombosis, muscle injury, and inflammation gradually lead to clinically manifesting prolapse and bleeding from hemorrhoids. The associations of the ABO blood types with a disease have been investigated for the upper gastrointestinal tract only. This study aimed to evaluate HD clinical manifestations, surgeries carried out, and the status of prolapsed anorectal tissues by exploring the associations with the patients' ABO blood groups. Clinical and various morphological methods, combined with extensive bioinformatics, were used. The blood type 0, grade III and IV HD individuals constituted the largest group in a moderately-sized cohort of equally represented males and females studied and submitted to surgical treatment of hemorrhoids. There were significantly more complaints reported by HD females compared to males (p = 0.0094). The Longo technique appeared mostly used, and there were proportionally more surgeries performed below the dentate line for HD individuals with blood type 0 compared to other blood type patients (24% vs. 11%). HD males were found to present with significantly more often inflamed rectal mucosa (p < 0.05). Loosening and weakening of collagenous components of the rectal wall combined with vascular dilation and hemorrhage was found to differ in 0 blood type HD individuals compared to other types. HD males were demonstrated to develop the ruptures of vascular beds significantly more often when compared to HD females (p = 0.0165). Furthermore, 0 blood type HD males were significantly more often affected by a disease manifested with tissue hemorrhage compared to the 0 blood type HD females (p = 0.0081). Collectively, the local status of chronically injured anorectal tissue should be considered when applying surgical techniques. Future studies could include patients with HD grades I and II to gain a comprehensive understanding of the disease progression, allowing for a comparison of tissue changes at different disease stages.

Topical Lidocaine or Lidocaine/Diltiazem Ointment Following Rubber Band Ligation of Hemorrhoids: A Prospective 3-Armed Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

Rubber band ligation of hemorrhoids causes less pain than excisional hemorrhoidectomy, but many patients still experience significant postprocedure discomfort.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to determine whether topical lidocaine, with or without diltiazem, is more effective than placebo for analgesia after hemorrhoid banding.

DESIGN

This is a prospective, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial. Patients were randomly assigned to 2% lidocaine, 2% lidocaine with 2% diltiazem, or a placebo ointment.

SETTINGS

This study was performed at 2 university public teaching hospitals and 2 private hospitals in Australia.

PATIENTS

Consecutive patients aged ≥18 years undergoing hemorrhoid banding were selected.

INTERVENTIONS

Topical ointments were applied postprocedure 3× daily for 5 days.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Visual analog pain score, opiate analgesia usage, and patient satisfaction were the main outcome measures.

RESULTS

Of 159 eligible patients, 99 were randomly assigned (33 in each group). Pain scores were reduced at 1 hour for the lidocaine (OR 4.15 [1.12-15.41]; p = 0.03) and lidocaine/diltiazem groups (OR 3.85 [1.05-14.11]; p = 0.04) compared with placebo. Patients in the lidocaine/diltiazem group had improved satisfaction (OR 3.82 [1.28-11.44]; p = 0.02) and were more likely to recommend the procedure to others (OR 9.33 [1.07-81.72]; p = 0.04). Patients in the lidocaine/diltiazem group required approximately 45% less total and in-hospital analgesia compared with the placebo. There was no difference in complications between any of the groups.

LIMITATIONS

A cost/benefit analysis was not performed. Analgesic efficacy appeared to be short term and the procedures were performed only in the hospital/nonambulatory setting.

CONCLUSIONS

Topical lidocaine reduced short-term analgesia use, whereas combination lidocaine/diltiazem was associated with both improved analgesia and patient satisfaction after hemorrhoid banding.

LIDOCANA TPICA O UNGENTO DE LIDOCANA/DILTIAZEM DESPUS DE LA LIGADURA HEMORROIDAL CON BANDA ELSTICA UN ENSAYO PROSPECTIVO CONTROLADO Y ALEATORIZADO DE TRES BRAZOS

ANTECEDENTES:La ligadura de hemorroides con banda elástica causa menos dolor que la hemorroidectomía escisional, pero muchos pacientes siguen experimentando molestias significativas tras el procedimiento.OBJETIVO:Este estudio tiene como objetivo determinar si la lidocaína tópica, con o sin diltiazem, es más eficaz que el placebo para la analgesia tras la ligadura hemorroidal.DISEÑO:Este es un ensayo prospectivo, aleatorizado, doble ciego, controlado con placebo. Los pacientes fueron aleatorizados para recibir lidocaína al 2 %, lidocaína al 2 % con diltiazem al 2 % o ungüento de placebo.AJUSTES:Este estudio se realizó en dos hospitales públicos con docencia universitaria y dos hospitales privados en Australia.PACIENTES:Se seleccionaron pacientes consecutivos de ≥18 años sometidos a ligadura para hemorroides.INTERVENCIONES:Se aplicaron ungüentos tópicos tras el procedimiento tres veces al día durante 5 días.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:La puntuación analógica visual del dolor, el uso de analgésicos opiáceos y la satisfacción del paciente fueron las principales medidas de resultado.RESULTADOS:De 159 pacientes elegibles, 99 fueron aleatorizados (33 en cada grupo). Las puntuaciones de dolor se redujeron a la hora para los grupos de lidocaína (OR 4,15 (1,12-15,41); p = 0,03) y lidocaína/diltiazem (OR 3,85 (1,05-14,11), p = 0,04) en comparación con el placebo.Los pacientes del grupo de lidocaína/diltiazem mejoraron su satisfacción (OR 3,82 (1,28-11,44), p = 0,02) y eran más propensos de recomendar el procedimiento a otros (OR 9,33 (1,07-81,72), p = 0,04). Los pacientes del grupo de lidocaína/diltiazem requirieron aproximadamente un 45 % menos de analgesia total e intrahospitalaria en comparación con el grupo de placebo. No hubo diferencia en las complicaciones entre ninguno de los grupos.LIMITACIONES:No se realizó un análisis de costo/beneficio. La eficacia analgésica pareció ser a corto plazo y los procedimientos solo se realizaron en el hospital/entorno no ambulatorio.CONCLUSIÓN:La lidocaína tópica mejora la analgesia a corto plazo, mientras que la combinación de lidocaína/diltiazem se asocia tanto con una mejor analgesia como con la satisfacción del paciente tras la colocación de bandas para hemorroides. (Traducción-Dr Osvaldo Gauto ).

Transanal Hemorrhoidal Dearterialization With Mucopexy Versus Vessel-Sealing Device Hemorrhoidectomy for Grade III to IV Hemorrhoids: Long-term Outcomes From the THDLIGA Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

Both transanal hemorrhoidal dearterialization and vessel-sealing device hemorrhoidectomy are safe for grade III to IV hemorrhoid treatment. Whether one of them is superior regarding long-term results remains unclear.

OBJECTIVE

To compare long-term results after transanal hemorrhoidal dearterialization and vessel-sealing device hemorrhoidectomy.

DESIGN

Multicenter randomized controlled trial.

SETTINGS

This study was conducted at 6 centers.

PATIENTS

Patients ≥18 years of age with grade III to IV hemorrhoids were included in the study.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients were randomly assigned to transanal hemorrhoidal dearterialization (n = 39) or vessel-sealing device hemorrhoidectomy (n = 41).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome was hemorrhoid symptom recurrence assessed by a specific questionnaire 2 years postoperatively. Secondary outcomes included long-term complications, reoperations, fecal continence, and patient satisfaction and quality of life.

RESULTS

Five of the 80 patients included in the study were lost to follow-up. Thirty-six patients randomly assigned to transanal hemorrhoidal dearterialization and 39 patients randomly assigned to vessel-sealing device hemorrhoidectomy were included in the long-term analysis. The differences between mean baseline and mean 2-year score in the 2 groups were similar (-11.0, SD 3.8 vs -12.5, SD 3.6; p = 0.080). Three patients in the transanal hemorrhoidal dearterialization group underwent supplementary procedures for hemorrhoid symptoms, compared with none in the vessel-sealing device hemorrhoidectomy group ( p = 0.106). Four patients in the vessel-sealing hemorrhoidectomy group and none in the transanal hemorrhoidal dearterialization group experienced chronic opened wound ( p = 0.116).

LIMITATIONS

Lack of stratification for hemorrhoid grade and power calculation based on the main outcome trial but not on the end point of this long-term study.

CONCLUSIONS

Transanal hemorrhoidal dearterialization with mucopexy is associated with hemorrhoid symptom recurrence similar to vessel-sealing device hemorrhoidectomy at 2 years. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B933 .

REGISTRATION

Clinicaltrials.gov ; ID: NCT02654249.

DESARTERIALIZACIN HEMORROIDAL TRANSANAL CON MUCOPEXIA VERSUS HEMORROIDECTOMA CON DISPOSITIVO DE SELLADO DE VASOS PARA HEMORROIDES DE GRADO IIIIV RESULTADOS A LARGO PLAZO DEL ENSAYO CLNICO ALEATORIZADO THDLIGARCT

ANTECEDENTES:Tanto la desarterialización hemorroidal transanal como la hemorroidectomía con dispositivo de sellado de vasos son seguras y bien toleradas para el tratamiento de las hemorroides de grado III-IV. La primera se asocia con una necesidad más breve de analgesia posoperatoria que la hemorroidectomía con dispositivo de sellado de vasos. No está claro si uno de ellos es superior con respecto a los resultados a largo plazo.OBJETIVO:El objetivo fue comparar los resultados a largo plazo después de la desarterialización hemorroidal transanal y la hemorroidectomía con dispositivo de sellado de vasos.DISEÑO:Se realizó un ensayo clínico aleatorizado multicéntrico.AJUSTE:Este estudio se realizó en 6 centros.PACIENTES:Se incluyeron en el estudio pacientes de ≥18 años con hemorroides de grado III-IV.INTERVENCIONES:Los pacientes fueron asignados al azar a desarterialización hemorroidal transanal (n = 39) o hemorroidectomía con dispositivo de sellado de vasos (n = 41).PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:El resultado primario fue la recurrencia de los síntomas de hemorroides evaluada mediante un cuestionario específico 2 años después de la operación. Los resultados secundarios incluyeron complicaciones a largo plazo, reoperaciones, continencia fecal, satisfacción del paciente y calidad de vida.RESULTADOS:Cinco de los 80 pacientes incluidos en el estudio se perdieron durante el seguimiento. En el análisis a largo plazo se incluyeron 36 pacientes aleatorizados a desarterialización hemorroidal transanal y 39 aleatorizados a hemorroidectomía con dispositivo de sellado de vasos. Las diferencias entre la puntuación inicial media y la puntuación media a los 2 años en los dos grupos fueron similares (-11,0, DE 3,8 frente a -12,5, DE 3,6; p = 0,080). Tres pacientes en el grupo de desarterialización hemorroidal transanal se sometieron a procedimientos complementarios por síntomas de hemorroides, en comparación con ninguno en el grupo de hemorroidectomía con dispositivo de sellado de vasos (p = 0,106). Cuatro pacientes en el grupo de hemorroidectomía con sellado de vasos y ninguno en el grupo de desarterialización hemorroidal transanal experimentaron herida abierta crónica (p = 0,116). No se encontraron diferencias en cuanto a continencia fecal (p = 0,657), satisfacción del paciente (p = 0,483) y calidad de vida.LIMITACIONES:No hay estratificación para el grado de hemorroides ni el cálculo del poder basado en el resultado principal del ensayo, pero no en el criterio de valoración de este estudio a largo plazo.CONCLUSIONES:La desarterialización hemorroidal transanal con mucopexia se asocia con una recurrencia de síntomas de hemorroides similar a la hemorroidectomía con dispositivo de sellado de vasos a los dos años. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B933 . (Traducción- Dr. Francisco M. Abarca-Rendon )REGISTRO DE PRUEBA:Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02654249).

Simple mucopexy and hemorrhoidal arterial ligation with and without Doppler guide: a randomized clinical trial for short-term outcome

PURPOSE

Hemorrhoids are the most common benign anorectal diseases. Mucopexy strengthens the anal canal mucosa, which can be performed alone or in combination with Doppler-guided hemorrhoidal artery ligation (DG-HAL). In this study, we compared the postoperative complications between simple mucopexy plus HAL with and without a Doppler guide.

METHODS

This study was performed as a single-blinded randomized clinical trial. Patients referred to a tertiary colorectal referral clinic with grades 3 and 4 hemorrhoids who were candidates for surgical intervention entered the study. Thirty-six patients were randomly divided into 2 groups. Group A including 18 patients underwent mucopexy and DG-HAL and the other 18 patients (group B) underwent standard mucopexy and HAL without a Doppler guide. Postoperative pain score and the duration of oral analgesic consumption were recorded. Additionally, postoperative symptoms and complications were recorded and compared between the 2 methods.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference between the 2 groups in terms of pain score and the duration of postoperative analgesic consumption as well as the incidence of postoperative complications. Besides, the primary grade of hemorrhoids was not significantly associated with recurrence, but there was a significant association between body mass index and Wexner score (WS) with recurrence. The mean WS of patients showed a significant decrease in both groups postoperatively. However, the rate of WS reduction was not remarkably different between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSION

Simple mucopexy with blind HAL (without Doppler guide) might be considered for the treatment of grades 3 and 4 hemorrhoids effectively.

Results of sclerotherapy and mucopexy with haemorrhoidal dearterialization in II and III degree haemorrhoids. A 4 years' single centre experience

Introduction

Haemorrhoidal disease (HD) affects a considerable portion of the adult population. The aim of this study is to confirm the safety and efficacy of the treatments and to report the long-term outcomes of Sclerotherapy (ST) and Mucopexy and Haemorrhoidal Dearterialization (MHD) performed over the last 4 years in a single tertiary centre. The secondary outcome is to evaluate the usefulness of both techniques and to demonstrate how those can be associated as a bridge to surgery.

Materials and methods

Patients affected by second-third-degree haemorrhoids and undergoing ST or non-Doppler guided MHD between 2018 and 2021 were enrolled. Safety and efficacy, recurrence rate, Haemorrhoid Severity Score (HSS) and pain resulting from both techniques were evaluated.

Results

Out of 259 patients, 150 underwent ST. Further, 122 (81.3%) patients were male and 28 (18.7%) were female. The mean age was 50.8 (range 34-68) years. Most of the patients (103, 68.6%) were affected by second-degree HD, while 47 (31.4%) were affected by third-degree HD. The overall success rate was 83.3%. The median pre-operative HSS score was 3 (IQR 0-4, p = 0.04) and at 2 year the median HSS was 0 (IQR 0-1, p = 0.03). No intraoperative complications and no drug-related side effects occurred. The mean follow-up for ST was 2 years (range 1-4; SD ±0.88). MHD was performed on 109 patients. In detail, 80 patients (73.4%) were male while 29 patients (26.6%) were female. The mean age in this group was 51.3 (range 31-69). Further, 72 patients (66.1%) were affected by third-degree HD and 37 (33.9%) by second-degree HD. The median HSS score was 9 (IQR 8-10, p = 0.001) preoperatively two years after treatment was 0 (IQR 0-1, p = 0.004). Major complications occurred in three patients (2.75%). The overall success rate was 93.5% (second degree 89.2% vs. third degree 95.8%). The mean follow-up for MHD was 2 years (range 1-4; SD ±0.68).

Conclusions

The results confirm the usefulness of those techniques, which can be considered safe and easily repeatable procedures, with a low recurrence rate after 2 years of median follow-up.

Evaluation of the Farsi-translated Hemorrhoidal Disease Symptom Score and Short Health Scale questionnaires in patients with hemorrhoid disease: A cross-sectional study

Background and Aims

The Hemorrhoidal Disease Symptom Score (HDSS) is a tool that is scored based on five main symptoms: pain, bleeding, itching, soiling, and prolapse. Furthermore, the Short Health Scale (SHS) is a measurement tool of subjective health and health-related quality of life. This study was performed to validate the Farsi-translated Hemorrhoidal Disease Symptom Score (HDSS), and Scale Short Health Scale adapted for hemorrhoidal disease (SHS-HD) as a measure of symptom severity in patients with hemorrhoid disease.

Methods

In this study, HDSS and SHS-HD were translated into Farsi. Participants with confirmed hemorrhoid disease completed the questionnaire. Subsequently, the questionnaire's discriminative validity, convergent validity, reliability, sensitivity, and specificity were evaluated.

Results

Data from 31 patients were analyzed (mean age 39.68; 71% male). The results of the analysis showed good internal consistency as Cronbach's α for HDSS and SHS were 0.994 and 0.995 respectively. Spearman's correlation coefficient for the test-retest comparison was 0.986 (p < 0.01). The responses demonstrated good convergent validity. Moreover, the comprehension and suitability of each question were rated as excellent (Pearson's correlation coefficient = 0.3).

Conclusions

Our findings revealed that the Farsi translation of the HDSS and SHS-HD can be a valuable tool for evaluating the symptom severity in patients with hemorrhoid disease.

Identification and Reporting of Anal Pathology during Routine Colonoscopies

The gold-standard procedure for anal canal examination is anoscopy. Nonetheless, patients are referred for a colonoscopy for many reasons, and a routine exam might provide an opportunity to diagnose anal pathologies, such as hemorrhoids, anal fissures, anal polyps, condylomas, and anal squamous cell carcinoma. It is important to know the main features of these conditions and relevant information to report in order to help guide patient treatment and follow-up.

Hemorrhoidal Artery Ligation for the Treatment of Grade II-III Hemorrhoids: Is it Worth the Use of Doppler Guide in Long-Term Follow-Up?: A Single-Center Cohort Study

Background

Hemorrhoidal artery ligation (HAL) may reduce postoperative pain and complications and shorten patients' recovery when compared to standard hemorrhoidectomy. It is unclear if the Doppler guide (DG) is useful in reducing recurrence risk.

Objective

To compare two groups of patients (treated with DG-HAL or HAL) in terms of recurrence risk and patients' satisfaction grade.

Methods

Between January 1, 2014 and January 31, 2021, 122 patients affected by grade II-III hemorrhoidal prolapse underwent DG-HAL or HAL at Chivasso Hospital, Italy. Mucopexy was routinely performed. After discharge, patients were subjected to 1-week, 1-, 3-, 6-, and 12-month clinical assessment. Thereafter, they were interviewed by telephone annually.

Results

Seventy-six (62.3%) DG-HAL and 46 (37.7%) HAL procedures were performed. Median surgical time was 30 (15-45) minutes for DG-HAL versus 25 (15-40) minutes for HAL (P = 0.005). No intraoperative complications occurred. Postoperative bleeding needing surgery occurred in 2 (1.6%) patients in the DG-HAL group. During a median follow-up of 46 months (6-86), we registered 18 (23.7%) recurrences in the DG-HAL group and 13 (28.3%) in the HAL one (P = 0.574). No cases of incontinence or anal stenosis occurred. No significant difference was observed between the two groups in terms of patients' satisfaction. At multivariate analysis, age ≥ 65 years resulted a protective factor for recurrence (odds ratio 0.31; 95% confidence interval 0.09-0.98; P = 0.047).

Conclusions

In our study, the use of DG did not reduce recurrence risk. Operative time was significantly increased in the DG-HAL group.

Analgesic effect of subcutaneous injection of different concentrations of methylene blue after hemorrhoidectomy: A retrospective study

Objective

Subcutaneous injection of methylene blue around the anus may help reduce postoperative pain. However, the concentration of methylene blue is still controversial. Therefore, Our study aims to investigate the efficacy and safety of different methylene blue injected concentrations subcutaneously in pain treatment after hemorrhoidectomy.

Methods

A total of 180 consecutive patients with grade III or IV hemorrhoids from March 2020 to December 2021 were reviewed. All patients underwent hemorrhoidectomy under spinal anesthesia and were divided into three groups. Group A received subcutaneous injection of 0.1% methylene blue after hemorrhoidectomy, group B received subcutaneous injection of 0.2% methylene blue, and Group C did not received subcutaneous injection of methylene blue. The primary outcome measures were the visual analog scale (VAS) pain score on postoperative days 1, 2, 3, 7, 14, and total analgesic consumption within 14 days. Secondary outcomes were complications after hemorrhoidectomy, including acute urinary retention, secondary bleeding, perianal incision edema, and perianal skin infection, and the Wexner scores used to assess the level of anal incontinence at one and three months after surgery.

Results

There was no significant difference among three groups in sex, age, course of the disease, hemorrhoid grade and the number of incisions, and there was no significant difference in the volume of methylene blue injected between group A and group B. The VAS pain score and total analgesics consumption within 14 days in group A and group B were significantly lower than those in group C, but the differences between group A and group B were not statistically significant. The Wexner scores of group B were significantly higher than those of group A and group C one month after the operation, but the differences between group A and group C were not statistically significant. In addition, the Wexner score among three groups decreased to zero at three months after operation. There was no significant difference in the incidence of other complications among three groups.

Conclusion

The perianal injection of 0.1% methylene blue and 0.2% methylene blue have a similar analgesic effect in pain treatment after hemorrhoidectomy, but 0.1% methylene blue has higher safety.

Open Hemorrhoidectomy With Ligasure™ Under Local or Spinal Anesthesia: A Comparative Study

BACKGROUND

There is increasing evidence that many anorectal surgical procedures may be performed under local anesthesia. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of local anesthesia in the outpatient clinic vs spinal anesthesia in the operating room for open hemorrhoidectomy.

METHODS

Sixty-two patients with grade III or IV hemorrhoids underwent open hemorrhoidectomy with LigaSure™ between 2018 and 2020. Of them, 32 procedures were performed in the operating room under spinal anesthesia with hyperbaric bupivacaine and other 30 procedures were undertaken in the outpatient clinic under local anesthesia with ropivacaine.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences regarding age, gender, American Society of Anesthesiologists class, and Goligher's grade in between groups. No significant differences were observed in postoperative pain score (P = .85), perioperative complications (P = .51), and reoperation rate (P = .96). No recurrences and no differences in patients' satisfaction degree (P = .76) were documented at long-term follow-up in both study groups.

DISCUSSION

Our results suggest that open hemorrhoidectomy with LigaSure™ performed in selected patients under local anesthesia in the outpatient clinic is a well-tolerated, safe, and effective procedure.