Improving hepatitis B vaccination rates for advanced chronic kidney disease patients: a quality improvement initiative

Hepatitis B vaccination status among patients with end-stage kidney disease on haemodialysis in Ethiopia: a multi-center cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND

Chronic kidney disease patients, especially those on hemodialysis, are at increased risk of developing hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection. Guidelines suggest that all patients with chronic kidney disease patients should be vaccinated against HBV, but these guidelines are sub-optimally implemented. Notably, there is a lack of studies in Ethiopia examining the hepatitis B vaccination status among patients with end-stage renal disease.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the vaccination status of hepatitis B and associated factors among people with end-stage renal disease who were on hemodialysis.

METHODS

A multi-center cross-sectional observational study was conducted in six randomly selected dialysis centers in Ethiopia, from May 2023 to September 2023. Logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate factors associated with vaccination status. A person is considered to be vaccinated against hepatitis B if he/ she has taken at least one dose of HBV. Vaccination status was determined by patient's recall and verification from medical record.

RESULTS

Only 16% of patients with end-stage renal disease on hemodialysis were vaccinated against hepatitis B virus (16.6%; with CI = 12.18, 21.83), of which 30% had received one dose, 57.5% had two doses, 12.5% had three doses, and only five had a booster dose. Post-secondary education (AOR = 5.47; 95% CI = 1.41, 21.2; P < 0.014) and dialysis for more than three years (AOR = 19.75; 95% CI = 4.06, 96.1; P < 0.001) were significant factors associated with having received hepatitis B vaccination.

CONCLUSION

Only a small minority of Ethiopian hemodialysis patients have received hepatitis B vaccination. The level of education of patients and the duration of time on dialysis were significant associated factors that affected the vaccination status of patients with end-stage renal disease. So, strong intervention is needed according to the identified factors to raise the vaccination status of patients.

How nurses contribute to the elimination of hepatitis B? A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

With approximately one-third of the global population exhibiting serological evidence of exposure, the hepatitis B virus remains a serious public health threat. Elimination of hepatitis B faces enormous challenges, from prevention to diagnosis, treatment, and long-term monitoring. Nurses are pivotal in optimising the hepatitis B care continuum; however, their contributions have been neglected.

OBJECTIVE

To identify the role of nurses in the elimination of hepatitis B and to synthesise the effectiveness of interventions with nursing roles in approaching the elimination target.

DESIGN

A systematic review and meta-analysis.

SETTING(S)

Thirteen databases (EMBASE, MEDLINE via OvidSP, Ovid Emcare, Ovid Nursing Database, British Nursing Index, APA PsycINFO, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, CINAHL, Scopus, Web of Science Core Collection, China National Knowledge Internet, SinoMed, and Wanfang Data) were searched from their inception to 6 December 2022.

METHODS

Interventional studies examining the contribution of nursing roles towards elimination targets were included. Content analysis was used to extract and map the nursing roles based on the nursing interventions classification system. Random-effects meta-analyses were conducted to examine the effectiveness of the intervention in improving hepatitis B screening, detection, and vaccination rates.

RESULTS

The synthesis from 16 studies identified 13 nursing roles that primarily involved (1) health education and counselling for informed patient decision-making regarding hepatitis B prevention, vaccination, screening, and disease monitoring; (2) case management and health promotion to advocate elimination services at multiple levels and enable equitable access among marginalised communities; and (3) running specialist clinics to lead advanced practices in prescribing and carrying diagnostic tests, formulating evidence-based individualised care plans, and coordinating care throughout the disease process. Interventions with these roles achieved pooled hepatitis B screening and detection rates of 64 % (95 % confidence interval [CI] = 0.44, 0.84) and 2 % (95 % CI = 0.00, 0.05), respectively, increased the odds of hepatitis B virus vaccination by 2.61 times (95 % CI = 1.60, 4.28), improved immunity rate, and enhanced patient adherence to antiviral treatment and monitoring of liver comorbidities. However, their effects on hepatitis B virus DNA-negative conversion rates and hepatocellular carcinoma incidence were not significant.

CONCLUSIONS

Nurses play multifaceted roles in advocating hepatitis B screening and vaccination, initiating outreach efforts in marginalised communities, and leading advanced practices that effectively contribute to the elimination of hepatitis B. Policymakers should consider how nurses may help the achievement of the elimination target.

REGISTRATION

PROSPERO (CRD42022380719) registered on December 12, 2022.

TWEETABLE ABSTRACT

Nurses raised awareness, initiated outreach efforts, addressed inequalities, and led advanced practices-effectively contributing to eliminating hepatitis B.

Enhancing Hepatitis A and B Vaccinations Through Electronic Clinical Decision Support Systems and Staff Education in a Correctional Facility

BACKGROUND

Despite the prevalence and risks for hepatitis A virus (HAV) and hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection and the availability of safe and effective vaccines, HAV/HBV vaccinations are disproportionately low in jails. This quality improvement project evaluated the effectiveness of clinical decision support systems: electronic standing orders to nurses, clinical alerts to nurses and healthcare providers, and secondarily staff education in enhancing HAV and HBV vaccination and knowledge of hepatitis infection.

METHODS

We distributed a validated self-report hepatitis knowledge questionnaire (α = 0.7-0.8) before and after an educational presentation to nurses, nurse practitioners, and physicians ( N = 26) at a Northeastern state jail and then embedded electronic clinical alerts and standing orders in the electronic medical record. The questionnaire assessed pre- and posteducation knowledge scores. The number of vaccine status screenings and vaccinations was retrieved from the electronic medical record 3 months pre- and post-implementation. Descriptive statistics and the Wilcoxon signed-ranks test were used for data analysis.

RESULTS

Twenty-one participants completed the pretest, 18 attended the educational intervention, and 15 completed the posttest. Vaccine status screening increased by 97.5%, and HAV and HBV vaccinations increased by 8.7%. Knowledge scores improved significantly post-intervention ( p = 0.04), with an effect size of r = 0.67).

DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION

Using the Donabedian quality of care model, we showed that quality initiatives are feasible in a jail setting. Implementing a clinical decision support system and education improved the vaccination rate, which may decrease HAV/HBV incidence in the jail and prevent community spread.

Improving hepatitis B screening and vaccination rates in a veterans affairs resident-based primary care clinic

INTRODUCTION

In 2022, the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) updated its recommendation regarding hepatitis B vaccination and advised vaccination for all adults aged 19-59 regardless of risk factors and those 60 years and older with risk factors. Adults 60 years and older without known risk factors may also be vaccinated. Our project aimed to spread awareness of the updated hepatitis B virus (HBV) vaccination guideline and improve HBV vaccination rates among veterans in a resident-based primary care clinic.

METHODS

Preintervention data were collected from October to December 2021 and post intervention data were collected from March to May 2022; patients seen in the clinic during these months were included. Patients were considered immune against HBV if they had positive anti-hepatitis B surface antigen and susceptible to infection if the hepatitis B panel was negative. Interventions included educating each resident group regarding current guidelines via multifaceted modalities. In addition, a reminder for checking hepatitis B status was embedded in the veterans affairs (VA) electronic medical record.

RESULTS

In the preintervention period from October to December 2021, a total of 1242 veterans were seen. 532 veterans had previous screening for hepatitis B immunity in the chart with 378 veterans negative for hepatitis B surface antibody. Of those 378 veterans, only 35 were vaccinated against hepatitis B during the time period studied. In the postintervention period, 1174 veterans were seen and 559 had prior hepatitis B immunity screening with 430 veterans negative for hepatitis B surface antibody. Of the 430 veterans with no immunity against HBV, 123 received hepatitis B vaccination during the time period studied, which is an increase of greater than 20% in the number of veterans vaccinated.

DISCUSSION

Our data suggest that HBV vaccination rate was suboptimal among the veteran population. A low-cost intervention could be beneficial in integrating new vaccination guidelines in the VA standard of care. Increased awareness of the updated HBV vaccination guideline would likely help to achieve the goal of full vaccination among the veteran population.