1
|
Buclin CP, von Arx M, Jolidon V, Sandoval JL, Buholzer-Mercier F, Daverio JE, van der Linden BW, Wanner P, Guessous I, Courvoisier DS, Cullati S. Linguistic difference in the effect of organized programs on socioeconomic inequalities in breast cancer screening: ecological study in Switzerland. Eur J Cancer Prev 2025; 34:221-230. [PMID: 39150692 PMCID: PMC11949226 DOI: 10.1097/cej.0000000000000914] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2024] [Accepted: 07/18/2024] [Indexed: 08/17/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The objective of this study is to examine how the effect of organized mammography screening programs on breast cancer screening participation differ between socioeconomic strata and how this relationship may be modified by the context of linguistic differences. Switzerland, marked by its diverse linguistic landscape, reflects cultural variations alongside differences in public health strategies. The goal of this study was to assess potential socioeconomic differences in regional mammography screening programs effectiveness to improve breast cancer screening participation. METHODS Data on 14 173 women in the regionally adapted breast cancer screening age range was drawn from five cross-sectional waves of the nationally representative Swiss Health Interview Survey (1997-2017). Socioeconomic indicators included education, household income, and employment status. Poisson regression was used to estimate the adjusted prevalence ratios of up-to-date (last 2 years) mammography uptake. Inequality was assessed using relative index of inequality and the slope index of inequality. RESULTS Organized screening programs were generally effective and increased up-to-date mammography uptake by close to 20 percentage points in both regions. While in the Latin cantons, screening programs had no impact on socioeconomic inequalities in screening, it reduced inequalities for women with lower education in the German cantons. This modification effect of screening programs was not seen for income and employment-related inequalities and did not differ across linguistic regions. CONCLUSIONS Public health agencies should consider the different cultural reception of programs as addressing these differences could help ensure that breast cancer screening initiatives are not only effective, but also culturally equitable across different socioeconomic groups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Martina von Arx
- Institute of Sociological Research, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Vladimir Jolidon
- Institute of Sociological Research, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
- School of International Business and Marketing, University of Economics, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
| | - José Luis Sandoval
- Division of Primary Care, Department of Health and Community Medicine, Geneva University Hospitals and Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva
- Division of Oncology, Department of Oncology, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva
| | - Fabienne Buholzer-Mercier
- Department of Community Health, Population Health Laboratory (#PopHealthLab), University of Fribourg, Fribourg
| | - Justine E. Daverio
- Institute of Sociological Research, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
- Quality of care division, Medical directorate, Geneva University Hospitals
| | | | - Philippe Wanner
- Institute of Demography and Socioeconomics, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Idris Guessous
- Division of Primary Care, Department of Health and Community Medicine, Geneva University Hospitals and Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva
| | | | - Stéphane Cullati
- Department of Community Health, Population Health Laboratory (#PopHealthLab), University of Fribourg, Fribourg
- Quality of care division, Medical directorate, Geneva University Hospitals
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Guthmuller S, Carrieri V, Wübker A. Effects of organized screening programs on breast cancer screening, incidence, and mortality in Europe. JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS 2023; 92:102803. [PMID: 37688931 DOI: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2023.102803] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/18/2022] [Revised: 08/16/2023] [Accepted: 08/18/2023] [Indexed: 09/11/2023]
Abstract
We link data on regional Organized Screening Programs (OSPs) throughout Europe with survey data and population-based cancer registries to estimate effects of OSPs on breast cancer screening (mammography), incidence, and mortality. Identification is from regional variation in the existence and timing of OSPs, and in their age-eligibility criteria. We estimate that OSPs, on average, increase mammography by 25 percentage points, increase breast cancer incidence by 16% five years after the OSPs implementation, and reduce breast cancer mortality by about 10% ten years after.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sophie Guthmuller
- Health Economics and Policy group, Department of Socioeconomics, Vienna University of Economics and Business, Welthandelsplatz 1, Building D4 1020 Vienna, Austria; RWI-Leibniz Institute for Economic Research, Hohenzollernstr. 1-3 45128 Essen, Germany; European Commission, Joint Research Centre, Ispra, VA, Italy.
| | - Vincenzo Carrieri
- RWI-Leibniz Institute for Economic Research, Hohenzollernstr. 1-3 45128 Essen, Germany; Department of Political and Social Sciences, University of Calabria 87036, Rende, Italy; Forschungsinstitut zur Zukunft der Arbeit (IZA), Schaumburg-Lippe-Straße 5-9 53113 Bonn, Germany
| | - Ansgar Wübker
- RWI-Leibniz Institute for Economic Research, Hohenzollernstr. 1-3 45128 Essen, Germany; Hochschule Harz, Friedrichstraße 57-59 38855 Wernigerode, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Jolidon V, De Prez V, Bracke P, Bell A, Burton-Jeangros C, Cullati S. Revisiting the Effects of Organized Mammography Programs on Inequalities in Breast Screening Uptake: A Multilevel Analysis of Nationwide Data From 1997 to 2017. Front Public Health 2022; 10:812776. [PMID: 35198524 PMCID: PMC8858931 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.812776] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2021] [Accepted: 01/13/2022] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
This study revisits the effects of mammography screening programs on inequalities in breast screening uptake in Switzerland. The progressive introduction of regional mammography programs by 12 out of the 26 Swiss cantons (regions) since 1999 offers an opportunity to perform an ecological quasi-experimental study. We examine absolute income and marital status inequalities in mammography uptake, and whether the cantons' implementation of mammography programs moderate these inequalities, as previous research has devoted little attention to this. We use five waves of the Swiss Health Interview Survey covering the 1997-2017 period and comprising data on 14,267 women aged 50-70. Both up-to-date and ever-screening outcomes are analyzed with multilevel models which assess the mammography programs' within-canton effect. Findings show that higher income women and married women (compared to unmarried women) had significantly higher mammography uptake probabilities. Mammography programs did not moderate absolute income differences in up-to-date screening; however, they were associated with smaller absolute income differences in ever-screening uptake. Mammography programs related to higher screening uptake for married women, more than for unmarried women. In conclusion, we showed absolute income inequalities in mammography uptake which were not revealed by previous studies using relative inequality measures. Mammography programs may have contributed to reducing income inequalities in ever-screening, yet this was not observed for up-to-date screening. This study has implication for preventive health interventions-e.g., cancer screening promotion should pay attention to women's marital status since screening programs may widen the screening gap between married and unmarried women.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vladimir Jolidon
- Institute of Sociological Research, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | | | - Piet Bracke
- Department of Sociology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Andrew Bell
- Sheffield Methods Institute, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom
| | | | - Stéphane Cullati
- Institute of Sociological Research, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
- Population Health Laboratory, University of Fribourg, Fribourg, Switzerland
- Department of Readaptation and Geriatrics, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Eibich P, Goldzahl L. Does retirement affect secondary preventive care use? Evidence from breast cancer screening. ECONOMICS AND HUMAN BIOLOGY 2021; 43:101061. [PMID: 34555616 PMCID: PMC8683749 DOI: 10.1016/j.ehb.2021.101061] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2021] [Revised: 08/31/2021] [Accepted: 08/31/2021] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
This paper examines the causal impact of retirement on preventive care use by focusing on breast cancer screening. It contributes to a better understanding of the puzzling results in the literature reporting mixed effects on health care consumption at retirement. We use five waves of data from the Eurobarometer surveys conducted between 1996 and 2006, covering 25 different European countries. We address the endogeneity of retirement by using age thresholds for pension eligibility as instrumental variables in a bivariate probit model. We find that retirement reduces mammography use and other secondary preventive care use. Our results suggest that health status, income, and knowledge on cancer prevention and treatment contribute little to our understanding of the effects of retirement. Instead, our evidence suggests important effect heterogeneity based on the generosity of the social health insurance system and organized screening programs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter Eibich
- Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Konrad-Zuse-Str. 1, 18057 Rostock, Germany; Health Economics Research Centre, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, UK.
| | - Léontine Goldzahl
- EDHEC Business School, 24 Avenue Gustave Delory, CS 50411, 59057 Roubaix Cedex 1, France.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Bähler C, Brüngger B, Ulyte A, Schwenkglenks M, von Wyl V, Dressel H, Gruebner O, Wei W, Blozik E. Temporal trends and regional disparities in cancer screening utilization: an observational Swiss claims-based study. BMC Public Health 2021; 21:23. [PMID: 33402140 PMCID: PMC7786957 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-020-10079-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/18/2020] [Accepted: 12/16/2020] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Background We examined colorectal, breast, and prostate cancer screening utilization in eligible populations within three data cross-sections, and identified factors potentially modifying cancer screening utilization in Swiss adults. Methods The study is based on health insurance claims data of the Helsana Group. The Helsana Group is one of the largest health insurers in Switzerland, insuring approximately 15% of the entire Swiss population across all regions and age groups. We assessed proportions of the eligible populations receiving colonoscopy/fecal occult blood testing (FOBT), mammography, or prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing in the years 2014, 2016, and 2018, and calculated average marginal effects of individual, temporal, regional, insurance-, supply-, and system-related variables on testing utilization using logistic regression. Results Overall, 8.3% of the eligible population received colonoscopy/FOBT in 2014, 8.9% in 2016, and 9.2% in 2018. In these years, 20.9, 21.2, and 20.4% of the eligible female population received mammography, and 30.5, 31.1, and 31.8% of the eligible male population had PSA testing. Adjusted testing utilization varied little between 2014 and 2018; there was an increasing trend of 0.8% (0.6–1.0%) for colonoscopy/FOBT and of 0.5% (0.2–0.8%) for PSA testing, while mammography use decreased by 1.5% (1.2–1.7%). Generally, testing utilization was higher in French-speaking and Italian-speaking compared to German-speaking region for all screening types. Cantonal programs for breast cancer screening were associated with an increase of 7.1% in mammography utilization. In contrast, a high density of relevant specialist physicians showed null or even negative associations with screening utilization. Conclusions Variation in cancer screening utilization was modest over time, but considerable between regions. Regional variation was highest for mammography use where recommendations are debated most controversially, and the implementation of programs differed the most. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12889-020-10079-8.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caroline Bähler
- Department of Health Sciences, Helsana Group, Zürichstrasse 130, 8600, Dübendorf, Switzerland. .,Department of Epidemiology, Epidemiology, Biostatistics & Prevention Institute, University of Zurich, Hirschengraben 84, 8001, Zurich, Switzerland.
| | - Beat Brüngger
- Department of Health Sciences, Helsana Group, Zürichstrasse 130, 8600, Dübendorf, Switzerland.,Department of Epidemiology, Epidemiology, Biostatistics & Prevention Institute, University of Zurich, Hirschengraben 84, 8001, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Agne Ulyte
- Department of Epidemiology, Epidemiology, Biostatistics & Prevention Institute, University of Zurich, Hirschengraben 84, 8001, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Matthias Schwenkglenks
- Department of Epidemiology, Epidemiology, Biostatistics & Prevention Institute, University of Zurich, Hirschengraben 84, 8001, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Viktor von Wyl
- Department of Epidemiology, Epidemiology, Biostatistics & Prevention Institute, University of Zurich, Hirschengraben 84, 8001, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Holger Dressel
- Division of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Department of Epidemiology, Epidemiology, Biostatistics & Prevention Institute, University of Zurich and University Hospital Zurich, Hirschengraben 84, 8001, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Oliver Gruebner
- Department of Epidemiology, Epidemiology, Biostatistics & Prevention Institute, University of Zurich, Hirschengraben 84, 8001, Zurich, Switzerland.,Department of Geography, University of Zurich, Winterthurerstrasse 190, 8057, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Wenjia Wei
- Department of Epidemiology, Epidemiology, Biostatistics & Prevention Institute, University of Zurich, Hirschengraben 84, 8001, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Eva Blozik
- Department of Health Sciences, Helsana Group, Zürichstrasse 130, 8600, Dübendorf, Switzerland.,Institute of Primary Care, University of Zurich and University Hospital Zurich, Pestalozzistrasse 24, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Eibich P, Goldzahl L. Health information provision, health knowledge and health behaviours: Evidence from breast cancer screening. Soc Sci Med 2020; 265:113505. [PMID: 33218891 PMCID: PMC7768188 DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113505] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Revised: 11/02/2020] [Accepted: 11/04/2020] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
Many public health interventions aim to provide individuals with health information on the consequences of behaviours such as smoking, alcohol consumption or preventive care use, with the intention of changing health behaviour through better health knowledge. This paper examines whether the provision of health information in organised breast cancer screening programs affects mammography utilisation via changes in health knowledge. We use unique data on 10,610 European women from the Eurobarometer survey collected in 1997/1998, and we exploit variation in the availability and coverage of organised breast cancer screening programs for causal identification in a difference-in-differences design. We find that health information provision improves health knowledge. Yet, these changes in health knowledge had little to no effects on mammography utilisation in the overall population. Our findings imply that health information provision contributes little to health behaviour change. Although screening programs are effective at increasing preventive care use, their effect can be attributed almost entirely to factors other than health knowledge. We estimate a difference-in-differences model and conduct a mediation analysis. We exploit variation in screening program existence and eligibility ages in Europe. Screening program eligibility improves health knowledge about breast cancer. Changes in health knowledge contribute little to screening program uptake. Health information provision has a stronger impact on less educated women.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter Eibich
- Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Konrad-Zuse-Str. 1, 18057, Rostock, Germany; Health Economics Research Centre, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, UK.
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Harper S. A Future for Observational Epidemiology: Clarity, Credibility, Transparency. Am J Epidemiol 2019; 188:840-845. [PMID: 30877294 DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwy280] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/12/2018] [Revised: 12/17/2018] [Accepted: 12/18/2018] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Observational studies are ambiguous, difficult, and necessary for epidemiology. Presently, there are concerns that the evidence produced by most observational studies in epidemiology is not credible and contributes to research waste. I argue that observational epidemiology could be improved by focusing greater attention on 1) defining questions that make clear whether the inferential goal is descriptive or causal; 2) greater utilization of quantitative bias analysis and alternative research designs that aim to decrease the strength of assumptions needed to estimate causal effects; and 3) promoting, experimenting with, and perhaps institutionalizing both reproducible research standards and replication studies to evaluate the fragility of study findings in epidemiology. Greater clarity, credibility, and transparency in observational epidemiology will help to provide reliable evidence that can serve as a basis for making decisions about clinical or population-health interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sam Harper
- Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics & Occupational Health, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec
- Institute for Health and Social Policy, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Buchmueller TC, Goldzahl L. The effect of organized breast cancer screening on mammography use: Evidence from France. HEALTH ECONOMICS 2018; 27:1963-1980. [PMID: 30084221 DOI: 10.1002/hec.3813] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2017] [Revised: 05/07/2018] [Accepted: 07/01/2018] [Indexed: 06/08/2023]
Abstract
In 2004, France introduced a national program of organized breast cancer screening. The national program built on preexisting local programs in some, but not all, départements. Using data from multiple waves of a nationally representative biennial survey of the French population, we estimate the effect of organized screening on the percentage of women obtaining a mammogram. The analysis uses difference-in-differences methods to exploit the fact that the program was targeted at women in a specific age group: 50 to 74 years old. We find that organized screening significantly raised mammography rates among women in the target age range. Just above the lower age threshold, the percentage of women reporting that they had a mammogram in the past 2 years increased by over 10 percentage points after the national program went into effect. Mammography rates increased even more among women in their 60s. Estimated effects are particularly large for women with less education and lower incomes, suggesting that France's organized screening program has reduced socioeconomic disparities in access to mammography.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas C Buchmueller
- Ross School of Business, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
- NBER, Cambridge, Massachusetts
| | - Léontine Goldzahl
- Manchester Centre for Health Economics, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
- EDHEC Business School, Roubaix, France
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Cullati S, von Arx M, Courvoisier DS, Sandoval JL, Manor O, Burton-Jeangros C, Bouchardy C, Guessous I. Organised population-based programmes and change in socioeconomic inequalities in mammography screening: A 1992-2012 nationwide quasi-experimental study. Prev Med 2018; 116:19-26. [PMID: 30145347 DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2018.08.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2018] [Revised: 07/25/2018] [Accepted: 08/21/2018] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
Organised mammography screening programmes may reduce socioeconomic inequalities in breast cancer screening, but evidence is contradictory. Switzerland has no national organised mammography screening programme, but regional programmes were progressively introduced since 1999, giving the opportunity to conduct a nationwide quasi-experimental study. We examined the evolution of socioeconomic inequalities in mammography screening in Switzerland and if exposure to regional organised programmes reduced socioeconomic inequalities. Data of 10,927 women aged 50 to 70 years old were collected from the Swiss Health Interview Survey, a nationally representative cross-sectional survey repeated 5 times (1992-2012). Socioeconomic characteristics were assessed using education, income, employment status, and occupational class. Adjusted prevalence ratios of up-to-date mammography screening were estimated with Poisson regressions and weighted for sampling strategy and non-participation bias. In the absence of organised screening programmes (1992-1997), prevalence of mammography screening increased by 23% and was associated with tertiary education and working part time. During the period of progressive introduction of regionally organised programmes (2002-2012), prevalence of mammography screening increased by 19% every 5 years and was associated with exposure to regional programmes and with independent/artisan occupations. Tertiary education and working part time were no longer associated. Exposure to organised programmes did not modify socioeconomic inequalities except for employment status: not employed women benefitted more from organised programmes compared to women working full time. In conclusion, socioeconomic inequalities in mammography screening decreased over time but organised programmes did not greatly modify them, except women not employed whose prevalence passed employed women.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stéphane Cullati
- Unit of Population Epidemiology, Department of Community Medicine, Primary Care and Emergency Medicine, Geneva University Hospitals, Switzerland; Swiss NCCR "LIVES - Overcoming Vulnerability: Life Course Perspectives", University of Geneva, Switzerland; Department of General Internal Medicine, Rehabilitation and Geriatrics, University of Geneva, Switzerland; Institute of Demography and Socioeconomics, University of Geneva, Switzerland.
| | - Martina von Arx
- Institute of Demography and Socioeconomics, University of Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Delphine S Courvoisier
- Department of General Internal Medicine, Rehabilitation and Geriatrics, University of Geneva, Switzerland
| | - José Luis Sandoval
- Unit of Population Epidemiology, Department of Community Medicine, Primary Care and Emergency Medicine, Geneva University Hospitals, Switzerland; Department of General Internal Medicine, Rehabilitation and Geriatrics, University of Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Orly Manor
- School of Public Health and Community Medicine, Hebrew University-Hadassah, Israel
| | - Claudine Burton-Jeangros
- Swiss NCCR "LIVES - Overcoming Vulnerability: Life Course Perspectives", University of Geneva, Switzerland; Institute of Demography and Socioeconomics, University of Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Christine Bouchardy
- Geneva Cancer Registry, Global Health Institute, University of Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Idris Guessous
- Unit of Population Epidemiology, Department of Community Medicine, Primary Care and Emergency Medicine, Geneva University Hospitals, Switzerland; Department of Ambulatory Care and Community Medicine, University of Lausanne, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|