Feasibility of immediate breast reconstruction for locally advanced breast cancer

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy impact on outcomes in immediate breast reconstruction with latissimus dorsi flap and silicone implant

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCH) has demonstrated efficacy in downsizing tumors and facilitating less extensive surgery. However, immediate breast reconstruction (IBR) after NCH has raised concerns regarding higher complication rates. This study evaluates the impact of NCH on outcomes following IBR with a latissimus dorsi flap and implant (LDI) after mastectomy.

METHODS

Cases from a prospective maintained database were reviewed, and patients classified according to whether or not they received NCH. Risk factors and major and minor complications in both groups were then analyzed.

RESULTS

Among the 196 patients who underwent 198 IBR procedures, 38.4% received NCH and 66.1% did not. The overall complication rate was 46.7% in the non-NCH group and 53.3% in the NCH group (p =  0.650). The presence of comorbidities increased the likelihood of any complication (odds ratio [OR]: 3.46; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.38-8.66; p = 0.008) as well as major complications (OR: 3.35; 95% CI: 1.03-10.95; p = 0.045). Although patients in the NCH group experienced more major complications (10.5% vs. 4.9%; p = 0.134) and early loss of breast reconstruction (3.9% vs. 0.8%; p = 0.128), these findings were not statistically significant.

CONCLUSION

This study found no statistically significant association between NCH and higher risk of complications or loss of IBR with LDI after mastectomy.

Oncologic Safety of One-Stage Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction in Breast Cancer Patients With Positive Sentinel Lymph Nodes: A Single-Center Retrospective Study Using Propensity Score Matching

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the oncologic safety of one-stage implant-based breast reconstruction (OIBR) following mastectomy in breast cancer patients with positive sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs).

METHODS

We collected clinical and pathological data from breast cancer patients with positive SLNs who underwent OIBR or not after mastectomy between January 2015 and December 2018. A total of 194 patients were included, with 130 patients undergoing mastectomy alone (MA) and 64 patients receiving OIBR after mastectomy. The clinical and pathological features, as well as the postoperative oncologic outcomes, of the 2 groups were retrospectively analyzed. Propensity score matching (PSM) was employed to mitigate the effects of data bias and confounding factors.

RESULTS

The median follow-up time was 66 months for the OIBR group and 64 months for the MA group after PSM. The majority of reconstructive surgeries use an approach of prosthetic implantation (52.0%). This is followed by prosthetic implantation combined with a latissimus dorsi (LD) flap (32.0%), and acellular dermal matrix (ADM)-assisted implant placement (16.0%). During the follow-up period, a local recurrence was observed in 1 case, regional recurrence in 3 cases, and distant metastasis leading to death in 3 cases among the OIBR group patients. No significant difference was found between the OIBR and MA groups in disease-free survival (DFS) (P = .66), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) (P = .91), locoregional recurrence-free survival (LRRFS) (P = .44), and overall survival (OS) (P = .57).

CONCLUSION

OIBR is a safe option for breast cancer patients with positive SLNs and does not negatively impact cancer recurrence or overall survival.

Mastectomies for breast cancer: Comparison between peri-operative morbidity after simple mastectomy or after immediate breast reconstruction in a unicentric serie of 210 patients

BACKGROUND

In breast cancer surgery, IBR (immediate breast reconstruction) is widely proposed to patients without indications of adjuvant treatments and without risk factors of surgical complications. New INCa's guidelines (2022) allow the expansion of IBR indications.

OBJECTIVE

A retrospective, unicentric and safety study: post-operative complication rate after IBR in comparison with simple mastectomy (SM, reference treatment).

MATERIEL AND METHOD

This retrospective study has included all major patients who have received mastectomy for breast cancer between 2016 and 2020 before application of new guidelines, in Hôpital de la Croix-Rousse, Lyon (France). They were distributed in two groups according to their surgery : IBR and SM. Usual risk factors of post-operative complications were collected (tabacco, obesity…). The primary endpoint was the occurrence of an early post-operative complication (within 3 months after surgery). Two secondary analysis focused on the impact of preoperative risk factors on complications, and the proportion of patients eligibled for an IBR among SM based on new INCA's guidelines.

RESULTS

The study included 185 mastectomies: 153 SM, 32 mastectomies IBR.  IBR's patients presented less risk factors, and few indications of adjuvant treatments. The rate of major complications was identical in the two groups (14 % in SM group, 12 % in IBR group), and there were more minor complications in the SM group than in the IBR group (p 0,01). According to our study, the raw proportion of initially possible IBR was 68 % (36 % of breast reconstruction in this study).

CONCLUSION

This analyse approve IBR in selected patients. In this context, INCa's guidelines (2022) can generalize IBR's proposal to patients. However, the analysis of pre-operative risk factors stay essential in medical care.

Does the Type of Reconstruction Matter? A Propensity Score Analysis of Immediate Postmastectomy Implant and Flap Reconstruction

BACKGROUND

No randomized controlled trials have compared implant and flap reconstruction. Recently, worse longitudinal outcomes have been suggested for flap reconstruction. The authors compared long-term oncologic outcomes of postmastectomy breast reconstruction using propensity score matching.

METHODS

A retrospective study of postmastectomy reconstruction was achieved using the Weill Cornell Breast Cancer Registry between 1998 and 2019. Patients were matched using propensity scores based on demographic, clinical, and surgical characteristics. Kaplan-Meier estimates, Cox-regression models, and restricted mean survival times (RMST) were used to evaluate patient outcomes.

RESULTS

Before matching, 1395 implant and 586 flap patients were analyzed. No difference in overall survival and recurrence were observed. Multivariable models showed decreased survival for Medicare/Medicaid [hazard ratio (HR), 3.09; 95% CI, 1.63 to 5.87; P < 0.001], pathologic stage II (HR, 2.98; 95% CI, 1.12 to 7.90; P = 0.028), stage III (HR, 4.88; 95% CI, 1.54 to 15.5; P = 0.007), 11 to 20 lymph nodes positive (HR, 3.66; 95% CI, 1.31 to 10.2; P = 0.013), more than 20 lymph nodes positive (HR, 6.41; 95% CI, 1.49 to 27.6; P = 0.013). RMST at 10 years after flap reconstruction showed 2 months of decreased survival time compared with implants (9.56 versus 9.74 years; 95% CI, -0.339 to -0.024; P = 0.024). After matching, 563 implant and 563 flap patients were compared. Reconstruction was not associated with overall survival and recurrence. RMST between implant and flap reconstruction showed no difference in each 5-year interval over 20 years.

CONCLUSION

Postmastectomy breast reconstruction was not associated with a difference in long-term oncologic outcomes over a 20-year period.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, III.

Does Immediate Breast Reconstruction Lead to a Delay in Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer? A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review

Timely delivery of adjuvant chemotherapy is crucial. With an increasing frequency of immediate breast reconstructions (IBR) following mastectomy (MAS), concerns have arisen regarding its complication rates and effects on time to chemotherapy. The aim was to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine if there is a prolonged time to chemotherapy (TTC) after IBR and MAS. Electronic databases, reference lists and relevant articles were searched systematically. Eligibility criteria included women receiving adjuvant chemotherapy who underwent either MAS only or MAS and IBR. Random-effects models were used in the analysis. A total of 29 studies were included in qualitative analysis, comprising of 156,000 patients (IBR: 57,159; MAS: 98,841). But 23 studies had sufficient data to be included in the meta-analysis. Sixteen papers concluded there was no difference in TTC compared to MAS. There was a difference of 3.50 days between TTC in IBR versus MAS (95% CI [0.42, 6.57], P value = .0256; IBR = 43.56 days, MAS = 40.38 days). The rate of patients being delayed past 90 days was not significantly higher in IBR (OR = 1.34, 95% CI [0.76, 2.38], P = .310). IBR patients were more likely to have complications compared to the MAS group (OR = 2.04, 95% CI [1.04-4.01], P < .01). We concluded that there is a statistically significant longer time to chemotherapy following IBR of 3.50 days, yet there is no difference in delays past 90 days. Therefore, the longer TTC in IBR is unlikely to be of any clinical significance.

Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Patients Who Have Clinical T4 Breast Cancer Treated via Mastectomy with and Without Reconstruction

BACKGROUND

Patients with clinical T4M0 breast cancer are recommended to undergo neoadjuvant chemotherapy, modified radical mastectomy, and postmastectomy radiotherapy. This study determined whether BREAST-Q scores differ by decision to pursue reconstruction or timing of reconstruction.

METHODS

This retrospective, single-institutional study analyzed cT4 breast cancer patients from 2014 to 2021 without evidence of distant metastatic disease undergoing mastectomy with or without reconstruction. As routine care, BREAST-Q was administered preoperatively, then 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years postoperatively. Satisfaction and quality-of-life domains were compared between mastectomy with no reconstruction (NR), immediate reconstruction (IR), and delayed reconstruction (DR) groups.

RESULTS

Of the 144 patients eligible for this study, 71 (49%) had NR, 36 (25%) had DR, and 37 (26%) had IR. The patients undergoing reconstruction were younger and more likely to elect contralateral prophylactic mastectomy. Timing of reconstruction was not associated with significant differences in satisfaction with breasts (SATBR) at any time point. For the patients who had DR, breast satisfaction increased over time after reconstructive surgery. Physical well-being of the chest (PWB-CHEST) did not significantly differ among IR, DR, and NR at any time point. The patients who underwent DR experienced improvement in PWB-CHEST scores from preoperative scores. The patients with IR and NR experienced PWB-CHEST decline over time. Psychosocial well-being (PSWB) did not differ significantly across time or by subgroup.

CONCLUSIONS

The patients with T4 breast cancer who elected reconstruction did not differ in patient-reported outcomes based on timing of reconstruction. In the DR cohort, SATBR significantly improved after reconstructive surgery. These data can help inform breast reconstructive decision-making for patients facing the choice among DR, IR, and NR.

Delay in the initiation of adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with breast cancer with mastectomy with or without immediate breast reconstruction

Background

Patients with breast cancer undergoing mastectomy should be offered the option of immediate breast reconstruction (IBR). The aim of this retrospective study was to assess whether there is a delay in the initiation of adjuvant chemotherapy in patients undergoing mastectomy with or without IBR.

Method

The study included patients aged 70 years or younger with clinically node-negative breast cancer who underwent unilateral mastectomy with IBR (IBR group) or mastectomy alone (no-IBR group) followed by adjuvant chemotherapy at the Helsinki University Hospital between January 2012 to July 2018.

Results

A total of 645 patients were included; 186 in the IBR group and 459 in the no-IBR group. Sixty-six (35.5 per cent) patients in the IBR group and 102 (22.2 per cent) patients in the no-IBR group received their first chemotherapy cycle later than 6 weeks after surgery (P &lt; 0.001). The respective numbers for later than 8 weeks were 17 (9.1 per cent) and 14 (3.1 per cent) (P = 0.001). Among all 645 patients, postoperative complications were a significant risk factor for a delay in the initiation of chemotherapy. Sixty-seven (39.9 per cent) patients with and 101 (21.2 per cent) patients without complications had a delay in chemotherapy (P &lt; 0.001). The delay in chemotherapy was due to complications in 39 (59.1 per cent) in the IBR group and in 28 (27.5 per cent) in the no-IBR group (P &lt; 0.001).

Conclusion

Patients undergoing mastectomy alone were more likely to receive adjuvant chemotherapy within 6 weeks after surgery compared with the IBR patients. IBR significantly increased the risk of postoperative complications in comparison with mastectomy alone. The complications, in turn, were a significant risk factor for delay in adjuvant chemotherapy.

Immediate breast reconstruction in locally advanced breast cancer: is it safe?

PURPOSE

Immediate breast reconstruction (IBR) following mastectomy remains controversial for locally advanced breast cancer over concerns regarding recurrence and complications which may delay adjuvant therapies. This study aimed to compare the oncologic outcomes and surgical safety of IBR following mastectomy with mastectomy alone (MA) for locally advanced breast cancer.

METHODS

All patients treated at the Providence Breast Center between 2012 and 2017 for biopsy-proven locally advanced breast cancer, AJCC (8th edition) clinical stages (IIB-IIIC), were included. Primary outcomes were overall survival (OS), disease-specific survival (DSS), and disease-free survival (DFS). Secondary outcomes included recurrence rate, adjuvant therapy use, and reoperation.

RESULTS

267 patients (112 IBR, 155 MA) were included. On average, IBR patients were younger (48.82 years vs 61.42 years, P < 0.001). Median study follow-up was 50.7 months. OS was higher among IBR patients (86.6% vs 73.5%, P < 0.05). However, no significant differences were found in DSS (87.5% vs 84.5%, P = 0.34), DFS (79.5% vs 78.7%, P = 0.55), local recurrence (0% vs 1.9%, P = 0.194), adjuvant therapy use (95.5% vs 91.6%, P = 0.155), or reoperation (1.8% vs 1.3%, P = 0.559).

CONCLUSION

IBR is a safe option for patients with locally advanced breast cancer and does not negatively impact survival, cancer recurrence rates, and use of adjuvant therapy.

Extensive Microsurgical Reconstruction of Chest Wall Defects for Locally Advanced Breast Cancer: A 10-Year Single-Unit Experience

BACKGROUND

Despite improvements in the early detection of breast cancer, locally advanced breast cancer (LABC) involving the chest wall exists in developing countries. Surgical resection remains a controversial management option. This study aims to demonstrate the value of chest wall reconstructive techniques for large LABC defects and report long-term outcomes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We report a 10-years single-unit experience in the reconstruction of large defects (>300 cm). From 2007 to 2017, all LABC cases managed with large surgical resection with immediate microsurgical chest wall reconstruction were included in this study. Herein, we present the demographics, comorbidities, clinicopathological LABC characteristics, surgical techniques (free flap choice, recipient vessels), and outcomes (survival, complication, cosmesis, and patient satisfaction).

RESULTS

Of the 104 LABC cases, free deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flap was performed in 41 (39.4%) cases, free anterolateral thigh flap in 5 (4.8%), free deep inferior epigastric artery perforator combined with pedicled transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous (TRAM) flap in 23 (22.1%), free muscle-sparing transverse rectus abdominis muscle flap in 30 (28.9%), and free transverse upper gracilis flap in 5 (4.8%). Complications were low. Over a median follow-up of 49.5 months, the 3-year local recurrence rate and distant metastasis-free survival were 13.9% and 84.9%, respectively. In addition, the 3-year disease-free survival and overall survival were 84.2% and 92.0%, respectively. The rate of excellent and good ratings by the esthetic assessment panel was 83.0%, and the patient satisfaction rate was 90.0%.

CONCLUSION

Wide resection and microvascular free tissue transfer is oncologically safe in LABC with huge tumors and provides versatile solutions for the reconstruction of extensive chest wall defects. With favorable long-term survival and cosmetic outcomes, surgical resection of LABC combined with flap reconstruction may offer a practical approach in difficult and complicated cases.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

In this retrospective review, it was demonstrated that wide resection followed by distinct chest wall reconstructive free flaps transfer is oncologically safe in LABC with huge tumors and provides useful solutions for the reconstruction of extensive chest wall defects.

Quality-of-Life and Surgical Outcomes for Breast Cancer Patients Treated with Therapeutic Reduction Mammoplasty Versus Mastectomy with Immediate Reconstruction

BACKGROUND

Therapeutic reduction mammoplasty (TRM) is a safe and effective surgical technique that has oncologic outcomes comparable with those achieved by mastectomy. This study aimed to compare surgical and patient-reported outcomes between breast cancer patients treated with TRM and those who had mastectomy with immediate reconstruction (MIR).

METHODS

A 4-year, single-institution, retrospective cohort study analyzed breast cancer patients undergoing TRM and MIR. Patient characteristics and perioperative data were collected from electronic records. Patient-reported outcome data were collected via BREAST-Q questionnaires preoperatively, then 3 months and 12 months postoperatively. A subgroup analysis was performed on locally advanced breast cancer (LABC) patients for TRM and MIR.

RESULTS

The study included 249 breast reconstructions, of which 77 (31%) were TRM and 172 (69%) were MIR. The mean follow-up time was 2.4 ± 1.2 years. Compared with MIR, TRM had significantly lower major complication rates (9% vs 21%; p = 0.02) and fewer revisionary surgeries (5% vs 37%; p < 0.0001). At 1 year postoperatively, TRM had a significantly greater change in satisfaction with breasts, (+ 27.7 vs + 4.6; p < 0.01) and sexual well-being (+ 20.0 vs - 5.5; p = 0.02) than MIR.

CONCLUSION

For select breast cancer patients, TRM continues to be a safe and effective alternative to mastectomy. The current study demonstrated that TRM patients had fewer major complications and revisionary surgeries, as well as better patient-reported outcomes than MIR.

Oncologic outcomes after immediate breast reconstruction following mastectomy: comparison of implant and flap using propensity score matching

Background

Although immediate breast reconstruction has been reported to be oncologically safe, no affirmative study comparing the two reconstruction methods exists. We investigated breast cancer recurrence rates in two breast reconstruction types; implant reconstruction and autologous flap reconstruction.

Methods

A retrospective cohort study was performed on propensity score-matched (for age, stage, estrogen receptor status) patients who underwent IBR after mastectomy at Seoul National University Hospital between 2010 and 2014. The main outcomes determined were locoregional recurrence-free interval (LRRFI) and disease-free interval (DFI).

Results

We analyzed 496 patients among 731 patients following propensity score matching (Median age 43, 247 implant reconstruction and 249 flap reconstruction). During median follow-up of 58.2 months, DFI was not different between the two groups at each tumor stage. However, flap reconstruction showed inferior DFI compared to implant reconstruction in patients with high histologic grade (p = 0.012), and with high Ki-67 (p = 0.028). Flap reconstruction was related to short DFI in multivariate analysis in aggressive tumor subsets. Short DFI after flap reconstruction in aggressive tumor cell phenotype was most evident in hormone positive/Her-2 negative cancer (p = 0.008). LRRFI, on the other hand, did not show difference according to reconstruction method regardless of tumor cell aggressiveness.

Conclusion

Although there is no difference in cancer recurrence according to reconstruction method in general, flap-based reconstruction showed higher systemic recurrence associated with histologically aggressive tumors.

Using KISS Flaps in a Chest Wall Reconstruction After Mastectomy for Locally Advanced Breast Cancer: A New Technique

This study described a technique for the reconstruction of large lateral thoracic defects after local advanced breast cancer resection that allows for complete cover of the defect and primary closure of the donor site. The authors performed reconstruction using the newly designed KISS flap in 2 women for coverage of their large skin defect (15 × 13 cm each) following mastectomies with extensive tissue resection. The KISS flap consisting of 2 skin islands (marked Flap A and Flap B; 15 × 6 cm each) was designed and transferred to the thoracic defect through the subcutaneous tunnel, and based on the same vessel. The flap covered properly without causing excessive tension and allowed primary closure of chest wound and donor defect. The security it brings is comparable with that of classical radical mastectomy, and its success rate is similar to that of single skin flap transplantation. Compared with the conventional pedicled latissimus-dorsi-musculocutaneous flap, we believe that the donor zone tension decreases, wherein the KISS flaps can reduce the incidence of incision dehiscence and nonhealing complications to some extent. The study reported good results from this technique and discussed the techniques that referenced previous reports.

Use of Preoperative Radiation Therapy in Early-stage and Locally Advanced Breast Cancer

Purpose

There is growing interest in delivering radiation preoperatively (preopRT) rather than postoperatively (postopRT) for breast cancer. Using the National Cancer Database, we evaluated the use and outcomes of preopRT in breast cancer.

Methods

We identified adult females diagnosed with non-metastatic breast cancer treated with definitive surgery and radiation between 2004 and 2014. Logistic regression models evaluated factors associated with use of preopRT in early-stage (clinical T1-3/N0-1) and locally advanced (clinical T4/N2-3) disease. Rates of breast-conserving surgery, breast reconstruction, positive surgical margins, and 30-day surgical readmissions were compared between patients receiving preopRT and postopRT.

Results

Of 373,595 patients who met our inclusion criteria, 1,245 (0.3%) patients received preopRT. Patients receiving preopRT were more likely to be of lower socioeconomic status and have tumors with higher T stage. Younger age and N1 (vs N0) disease predicted for use of preopRT in early-stage disease, while older age and N0 disease predicted for use of preopRT in the locally advanced setting. PreopRT patients were less likely to undergo breast-conserving surgery and more likely to have positive surgical margins. Rates of unplanned readmissions within 30 days of surgery were similar among patients treated with preopRT and postopRT.

Conclusions

PreopRT is a new treatment strategy for patients with breast cancer with different clinical and sociodemographic drivers of its use in the early-stage and locally advanced settings. We await the results of clinical trials studying the efficacy of this approach.

Immediate Implant Reconstruction Is Associated With a Reduced Risk of Lymphedema Compared to Mastectomy Alone: A Prospective Cohort Study

OBJECTIVE

We sought to determine the risk of lymphedema associated with immediate breast reconstruction compared to mastectomy alone.

BACKGROUND

Immediate breast reconstruction is increasingly performed at the time of mastectomy. Few studies have examined whether breast reconstruction impacts development of lymphedema.

METHODS

A total of 616 patients with breast cancer who underwent 891 mastectomies between 2005 and 2013 were prospectively screened for lymphedema at our institution, with 22.2 months' median follow-up. Mastectomies were categorized as immediate implant, immediate autologous, or no reconstruction. Arm measurements were performed preoperatively and during postoperative follow-up using a Perometer. Lymphedema was defined as 10% or more arm volume increase compared to preoperative. Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses were performed to determine lymphedema rates and risk factors.

RESULTS

Of 891 mastectomies, 65% (580/891) had immediate implant, 11% (101/891) immediate autologous, and 24% (210/891) no reconstruction. The two-year cumulative incidence of lymphedema was as follows: 4.08% [95% confidence interval (CI): 2.59-6.41%] implant, 9.89% (95% CI: 4.98-19.1%) autologous, and 26.7% (95% CI: 20.4-34.4%) no reconstruction. By multivariate analysis, immediate implant [hazards ratio (HR): 0.352, P < 0.0001] but not autologous (HR: 0.706, P = 0.2151) reconstruction was associated with a significantly reduced risk of lymphedema compared to no reconstruction. Axillary lymph node dissection (P < 0.0001), higher body mass index (P < 0.0001), and greater number of nodes dissected (P = 0.0324) were associated with increased lymphedema risk.

CONCLUSIONS

This prospective study suggests that in patients for whom implant-based reconstruction is available, immediate implant reconstruction does not increase the risk of lymphedema compared to mastectomy alone.

Oncologic reconstruction: General principles and techniques

Halsted's principle of radical mastectomy influenced cancer treatment for decades. Randomized controlled trials resulted in a paradigm shift to less radical surgery and the use of adjuvant therapies. Oncologic reconstruction performed by plastic surgeons has evolved, ranging from skin grafts and local flaps for smaller defects to pedicled flaps and free flaps for larger and more complex defects. Immediate reconstruction facilitates resection is oncologically safe and contributes to meaningful improvements in quality of life. J. Surg. Oncol. 2016;113:852-864. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Inflammatory breast cancer: A decade of experience

Inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) is an aggressive and rare form of breast cancer. At present, there are no established diagnostic, radiological, pathological or molecular diagnostic criteria for this entity. The aim of this study was to examine the patterns of presentation, treatment and outcomes of IBC in this institution over the course of a decade. This is a retrospective observational study using data from the Royal Perth Hospital from January 2001 to December 2010. Our results identified 57 women with IBC, representing 1.9% of all new breast cancer presentations. Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 (HER2)-positive and triple negative tumors were overrepresented (41% and 18%, respectively). Forty-four (77%) patients had early disease at diagnosis, of whom 35 underwent surgery and 16 are relapse-free. All six patients achieving complete pathological response were relapse-free in contrast to 11 (38%) with lesser responses at a median follow-up of 59 months. Median survival in 13 patients with metastatic disease at diagnosis was 21.7 months, with two patients still in remission. Clearly, this small but important group continues to offer management challenges and warrants ongoing study, including better molecular and pathological profiling of tumors to allow improved diagnostic clarity and more effective targeted therapy.

Locally Advanced Breast Cancer: Autologous Versus Implant-based Reconstruction

Recent papers and guidelines agree that patients with locally advanced breast cancer (LABC) should be offered breast reconstruction. Yet, the type of reconstruction in this group of patients is still a point of controversy.

METHODS

One hundred fourteen patients, treated for LABC from 2007 to 2013, were divided into 3 groups based on the reconstructive option: no reconstruction (NR), implant-based/expander-based reconstruction (IBR), and autologous tissue reconstruction (ATR). We analyzed demographics and compared delay in adjuvant therapy, length of hospitalization, surgical complications, failure of reconstruction, local recurrence, and disease-free survival.

RESULTS

Twenty-six patients had NR, 38 had IBR, and 50 had ATR. No significant difference was found in the percentage of patients who had their adjuvant treatment delayed [16% (NR) vs 22% (IBR) vs 14% (ATR)]. Mean length of hospitalization for the NR, IBR, and ATR groups was 2.7, 6, and 7.5 days, respectively. Complication rates requiring readmission were 36% (NR), 42% (IBR), and 32% (ATR). In the IBR group, 37% of implants were removed because of complications. Failure of reconstruction was 37% and 0% for the IBR and ATR groups, respectively. Local recurrence rates in the NR and Reconstruction (groups IBR and ATR combined) groups were 7% and 2%, respectively. Mean survival times in patients were 18 (NR), 10.3 (IBR), and 12.2 (ATR) months.

CONCLUSIONS

No significant difference was found in the hospital stay length, adjuvant treatment delay, and complication rates between IBR and ATR. High rates of failed reconstruction suggest that the use of implants should be considered very carefully in patients with LABC.

The effect of immediate breast reconstruction on the timing of adjuvant chemotherapy: a systematic review

Adjuvant chemotherapy is often needed to achieve adequate breast cancer control. The increasing popularity of immediate breast reconstruction (IBR) raises concerns that this procedure may delay the time to adjuvant chemotherapy (TTC), which may negatively impact oncological outcome. The current systematic review aims to investigate this effect. During October 2014, a systematic search for clinical studies was performed in six databases with keywords related to breast reconstruction and chemotherapy. Eligible studies met the following inclusion criteria: (1) research population consisted of women receiving therapeutic mastectomy, (2) comparison of IBR with mastectomy only groups, (3) TTC was clearly presented and mentioned as outcome measure, and (4) original studies only (e.g., cohort study, randomized controlled trial, case-control). Fourteen studies were included, representing 5270 patients who had received adjuvant chemotherapy, of whom 1942 had undergone IBR and 3328 mastectomy only. One study found a significantly shorter mean TTC of 12.6 days after IBR, four studies found a significant delay after IBR averaging 6.6-16.8 days, seven studies found no significant difference in TTC between IBR and mastectomy only, and two studies did not perform statistical analyses for comparison. In studies that measured TTC from surgery, mean TTC varied from 29 to 61 days for IBR and from 21 to 60 days for mastectomy only. This systematic review of the current literature showed that IBR does not necessarily delay the start of adjuvant chemotherapy to a clinically relevant extent, suggesting that in general IBR is a valid option for non-metastatic breast cancer patients.

Using local flaps in a chest wall reconstruction after mastectomy for locally advanced breast cancer

BACKGROUND

Surgical ablation for locally advanced breast cancer results in large chest wall defects, which can then be managed with local flaps or skin grafts. The purpose of this article is to evaluate the outcomes of three types of local skin flaps.

METHODS

Among 25 local flaps in 24 patients, 6 were bilateral advancement (BA) flaps, 9 were thoracoabdominal (TA) flaps, and 10 were thoracoepigastric (TE) flaps. Clinical outcomes were compared including complications, the need for a secondary surgical intervention, and the timing of adjuvant therapy.

RESULTS

The mean defect size was 436.2 cm(2). Two patients with TA flaps and 6 patients with TE flaps developed distal flap necrosis, and skin grafts were needed to treat 2 patients with TE flaps. Radiation was administered to the BA, TA, and TE patients after average postoperative durations of 28, 30, or 41 days, respectively. The incidence of flap necrosis tended to be higher in TE patients, which lead to significant delays in adjuvant radiation therapy (P=0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

Three types of local skin flaps can be used to treat large chest wall defects after the excision of locally advanced breast cancer. Each flap has its own merits and demerits, and selecting flaps should be based on strict indications based on the dimensions and locations of the defects.

Immediate transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous flap reconstruction is associated with improved cancer-specific survival in locally advanced breast cancer

BACKGROUND

This study of stage III (locally advanced) breast cancer patients evaluated the survival improvement conferred by immediate breast reconstruction by transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous (TRAM) flap reconstruction after modified radical mastectomy (MRM) in comparison with MRM alone.

METHODS

This retrospective study analyzed data for all women who had received TRAM immediately after unilateral modified radical mastectomy for locally advanced breast cancer at a single institution from January 2002 to December 2009. The analysis included 192 patients divided into 2 groups: patients who had received MRM immediately followed by TRAM flap reconstruction (MRM-TRAM group, n=52) and patients who had received MRM alone (MRM group, n=140). Data collection included demographic characteristics, underlying comorbidities, and cancer characteristics. Postoperative adjuvant therapies, oncologic outcomes, and survival were compared between the 2 groups. Kaplan-Meier plots, univariate log-rank test, multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression models, and t-test were used to evaluate potential predictors of cancer recurrence and patient survival.

RESULTS

In comparison with the MRM group, significant differences in the MRM-TRAM group included a younger mean age, a better overall health status, and a higher education level (all P<0.001). Severity of breast cancer disease did not significantly differ in terms of cancer characteristics. Additionally, there were no significant differences in local recurrence (P=0.326) and distant metastasis (P=0.338). Immediate breast reconstruction was not associated with delays in detection of local recurrence and initiation of adjuvant therapiesThe 5-year breast cancer-specific survival rate was significantly higher in the MRM-TRAM group (84.6%) compared with the MRM group (61.2%) (P=0.003). Multivariate analysis showed that TRAM flap reconstruction is an independent predictor of survival in breast cancer patients. The MRM-TRAM group had a significantly lower hazard of death (HR, 0.235; 95% CI, 0.070-0.788; P=0.019) compared with the MRM group.

CONCLUSIONS

Immediate TRAM flap reconstruction is oncologically safe and is unassociated with delayed adjuvant therapies or delayed detection of local recurrence. Patients with locally advanced breast cancer can be considered appropriate candidates for TRAM flap reconstruction because the procedure is an independent predictor of breast cancer survival and is associated with a 76.5% decrease (HR, 0.235) in the risk of cancer death.

Management of locally advanced breast cancer-perspectives and future directions

Locally advanced breast cancer (LABC) constitutes a heterogeneous entity that includes advanced-stage primary tumours, cancers with extensive nodal involvement and inflammatory breast carcinomas. Although the definition of LABC can be broadened to include some large operable breast tumours, we use this term to strictly refer to inoperable cancers that are included in the above-mentioned categories. The prognosis of such tumours is often unfavourable; despite aggressive treatment, many patients eventually develop distant metastases and die from the disease. Advances in systemic therapy, including radiation treatment, surgical techniques and the development of new targeted agents have significantly improved clinical outcomes for patients with this disease. Notwithstanding these advances, LABC remains an important clinical problem, particularly in developing countries and those without widely adapted breast cancer awareness programmes. The optimal management of LABC requires a multidisciplinary approach, a well-coordinated treatment schedule and close cooperation between medical, surgical and radiation oncologists. In this Review, we discuss the current state of the art and possible future treatment strategies for patients with LABC.

Surgical considerations in locally advanced breast cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The definition of locally advanced breast cancer (LABC) includes patients with large tumors, extensive regional lymph node involvement, or direct involvement of the skin or underlying chest wall. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery has become the standard of care and a valuable strategy in the multimodality management of LABC. Variations in practice exist and the purpose of this article is to explore the surgical considerations in the management of LABC.

RECENT FINDINGS

There exist various diagnostic and treatment considerations in LABC patients that help guiding clinicians in the optimal management of LABC. The evolving concepts of breast conservation, immediate breast reconstruction and optimal management of the axilla are addressed.

SUMMARY

LABC represents a heterogenous cohort of patients for whom a multidisciplinary care team is critical. A more detailed understanding of the surgical considerations will facilitate the optimal diagnostic evaluation and management of these patients.

Oncological safety of immediate rectus abdominis myocutaneous breast reconstruction in patients with locally advanced disease (stage IIb and III)

BACKGROUND

The management of locally advanced (Stage IIb and III) breast cancer is challenging. It often includes multimodal treatment with systemic therapy and/or radiation therapy and surgery. Immediate breast reconstruction has not traditionally been performed in these patients. We review the results of immediate rectus abdominis musculo-cutaneous (TRAM/VRAM) flap in 60 patients treated for Stage IIb and III breast cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data were collected prospectively on 60 patients diagnosed with Stage IIb (32 patients) and Stage III (28 patients) breast cancer between May 2008 and May 2012. All patients had mastectomy and immediate rectus abdominis myocutaneous reconstruction (TRAM in 40 patients and VRAM in 20 patients). All patients received primary systemic therapy, and all patients received postoperative radiotherapy to the operative site.

RESULTS

Mean age was 40.13 (range 28-53) years, mean hospital stay was 8.86 days and mean follow-up for the group was 28 months. Neither of them developed local disease recurrence in the operative site till the last follow-up. Eight (13.3%) patients had some delay in chemo-radiation therapy due to flap-related complications. Flap-related complications were present in eight patients (partial flap failure in four and superficial skin necrosis in four). There was no adverse effect of chemo-radiation therapy on reconstructed breast.

CONCLUSION

Immediate TRAM/VRAM breast reconstruction for locally advanced breast cancer is not associated with a significant delay in adjuvant therapy or an increased risk of local relapse. Radiation therapy can be delivered to the reconstructed breast when indicated without difficulty. Breast reconstruction facilitates surgical resection of locally advanced breast cancer with primary closure and should be considered if the patient desires immediate breast reconstruction.

The integrated evaluation of the results of oncoplastic surgery for locally advanced breast cancer

The optimal surgical management of locally advanced breast cancer (LABC) remains undefined. The aim of the study was to obtain long-term results of oncoplastic surgery in terms of overall survival, loco-regional recurrence, and quality of life in case of LABC. Prospective cohort study enrolled 60 patients with stage III breast cancer. Forty-two (70%) patients received neo-adjuvant chemotherapy, 28 patients were considered suitable for surgery as initial treatment option. Type II oncoplastic surgery was performed for all patients: hemimastectomy and breast reconstruction with latissimus dorsi flap - for 29 (48.3%), lumpectomy - 31 (51.7%), and reconstruction with subaxillary flap for four (6.7%), with bilateral reduction mammoplasty - 14 (23.3%) and with J-plastic - 13 (21.7%) patients. Adjuvant chemotherapy and hormonal therapy followed surgery for all, except one, patients. Sequential radiotherapy was administered for all patients. The mean period of follow-up was 86 months. Postoperative morbidity rate was 5%. Local-regional recurrence was detected in six (10%) patients. After reoperation no local relapse was diagnosed. However, three of these patients had systemic dissemination of the disease. Distant metastasis was detected in 23 (38.3%) patients. Distant metastasis-free survival at 5 years was 61.7%. Fourteen patients died (23.3%). A total of 87.2% of the patients had good and excellent esthetic outcome. Oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery can be proposed for selected patients with LABC with acceptable complication, local recurrence rate, and good esthetic results.

Oncoplastic surgery in the treatment of breast cancer

Advances in reconstructive breast surgery with new materials and techniques now allow us to offer our patients the best possible cosmetic results without the risks associated with oncological control of the disease. These advances, in both oncological and plastic surgery, have led to a new specialisation, namely oncoplastic breast surgery, which enables us to undertake large resections and, with advance planning, to prevent subsequent deformities. This is particularly important when more than 30% of the breast volume is removed, as it allows us to obtain precise information for conservative surgery according to the site of the lesion, and also allows us to set the boundary between conservative surgery and mastectomy.Given the existence of new alloplastic materials and new reconstructive techniques, it is essential for our patients that surgeons involved in breast cancer treatment are trained in both the oncological as well as the reconstructive and aesthetic fields, to enable them to provide the best loco-regional treatment with the best cosmetic results.

Skin-reducing Mastectomy with Primary Implant Reconstruction

Background: We present a series of skin-sparing mastectomies (SSMs) with skin reduction and immediate breast reconstruction to treat large and ptotic breasts. The technique combines oncological mastectomy with immediate subpectoral implant placement as a single-step procedure. Methods: Data was collected from a prospective database from February 2009 to April 2011. A total of 24 patients with macromastia or pronounced ptosis fulfilled the criteria for skin-saving mastectomy. All operations were carried out as a single-step procedure with adaptation of the contralateral breast by reduction mastopexy. Results: A total of 27 SSMs were performed in 24 patients. The mean implant volume was 265 cm³. Immediate reconstruction of the nipple-areola complex was done in 22 patients. The cosmetic and functional results were assessed in all patients 6 months postoperatively; mean follow-up time was 13 months. Mean patient age was 49 years. The cosmetic result was assessed as "very good" or "good" by 22 patients; 2 patients graded the result as "unsatisfactory". There was one local recurrence. Conclusion: Our results support the use of this technique as a safe oncoplastic procedure which is well tolerated by patients.

Inflammatory breast cancer: what we know and what we need to learn

PURPOSE

We review the current status of multidisciplinary care for patients with inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) and discuss what further research is needed to advance the care of patients with this disease.

DESIGN

We performed a comprehensive review of the English-language literature on IBC through computerized literature searches.

RESULTS

Significant advances in imaging, including digital mammography, high-resolution ultrasonography with Doppler capabilities, magnetic resonance imaging, and positron emission tomography-computed tomography, have improved the diagnosis and staging of IBC. There are currently no established molecular criteria for distinguishing IBC from noninflammatory breast cancer. Such criteria would be helpful for the diagnosis and development of novel targeted therapies. Combinations of neoadjuvant systemic chemotherapy, surgery, and radiation therapy have led to an improved prognosis; however, the overall 5-year survival rate for patients with IBC remains very low (∼30%). Sentinel lymph node biopsy and skin-sparing mastectomy are not recommended for patients with IBC.

CONCLUSION

Optimal management of IBC requires close coordination among medical, surgical, and radiation oncologists, as well as radiologists and pathologists. There is a need to identify molecular changes that define the pathogenesis of IBC to enable eradication of IBC with the use of IBC-specific targeted therapies.

Local breast cancer recurrence after mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction for invasive cancer: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The main priorities in the surgical treatment of patients with breast cancer are to achieve cure, local control and prevent recurrence. It is increasingly important to address quality of life and self-image with women undergoing surgical intervention for breast cancer. There is a lack of consensus as to the oncologic safety of immediate breast reconstruction (IBR). The purpose of this paper is to systematically review the literature and compare the frequency of recurrence in patients with and without IBR following mastectomy for breast cancer.

METHODS

Two independent investigators searched PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane database using predefined search terms. After application of inclusion and exclusion criteria, 10 articles remained. Each article was assessed for quality. Relevant data was collected including recurrence rates, cancer stage, type of mastectomy and reconstruction, adjuvant treatments, and duration of follow-up.

RESULTS

Inter-rater reliability was good at 74% (95% CI: 0, 93%). There was no evidence of study heterogeneity (p for Q-statistic=0.34 and I(2)=12%). The OR ratio for recurrence of breast cancer for mastectomy with IBR as compared to mastectomy alone was 0.98 (95% CI: 0.62, 1.54).

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis demonstrated no evidence for increased frequency of local breast cancer recurrence with IBR compared with mastectomy alone.

The impact of skin-sparing mastectomy with immediate reconstruction in patients with Stage III breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and postmastectomy radiation

PURPOSE

The safety and efficacy of skin-sparing mastectomy (SSM) with immediate reconstruction (IR) in patients with locally advanced breast cancer are unclear. The purpose of this study is to compare the outcomes of women with noninflammatory Stage III SSM with IR vs. non-SSM-treated women who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy and adjuvant radiation therapy (XRT).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Between October 1997 and March 2010, 100 consecutive patients (40 SSM with IR vs. 60 non-SSM) with Stage III breast cancer received anthracycline- and/or taxane-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy, mastectomy, and adjuvant XRT. Clinical stage (SSM with IR vs. for non-SSM) was IIIA (75% vs. 67%), IIIB (8% vs. 18%), and IIIC (8% vs. 8%). Tumors greater than 5 cm were found in 74% vs. 69%; 97% of patients in both groups were clinically node positive; and 8% vs. 18% had T4b disease.

RESULTS

The time from initial biopsy to XRT was prolonged for SSM-IR patients (274 vs. 254 days, p = 0.04), and there was a trend toward XRT delay of more than 8 weeks (52% vs. 31%, p = 0.07) after surgery. The rate of complications requiring surgical intervention was higher in the SSM-IR group (37.5% vs. 5%, p < 0.001). The 2-year actuarial locoregional control, breast cancer-specific survival, and overall survival rates for SSM with IR vs. non-SSM were 94.7% vs. 97.4%, 91.5% vs. 86.3%, and 87.4% vs. 84.8%, respectively (p = not significant).

CONCLUSIONS

In our small study with limited follow-up, SSM with IR prolonged overall cancer treatment time and trended toward delaying XRT but did not impair oncologic outcomes. Complication rates were significantly higher in this group. Longer follow-up is needed.

Immediate free flap reconstruction for advanced-stage breast cancer: is it safe?

BACKGROUND

Numerous studies have demonstrated that immediate breast reconstruction following mastectomy is associated with improvements in quality of life and body image. However, immediate breast reconstruction for advanced-stage breast cancer remains controversial. This study evaluates its safety in patients with advanced-stage breast cancer.

METHODS

Over a 10-year period, patients diagnosed with stage IIB or greater breast cancer treated with mastectomy followed by immediate breast reconstruction were identified and analyzed. Complication rates and reconstructive aesthetics were determined.

RESULTS

One hundred seventy patients were identified who underwent 157 unilateral and 13 bilateral reconstructions (183 flaps) predominantly by means of free transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous flaps (n = 162). The average age was 47 years and the average hospital stay was 5.1 days. There were 15 major complications (8.8 percent), but adjuvant postoperative therapy was delayed in only eight patients (4.7 percent), with the maximum delay lasting 3 weeks in one patient. Although some degree of flap shrinkage was noted in 30 percent of patients treated with postoperative radiotherapy, only 10 percent of patients experienced severe breast distortion. Importantly, the overall cosmetic outcome in patients who underwent postoperative irradiation was comparable to that of those who did not.

CONCLUSIONS

The authors have shown that immediate breast reconstruction in the setting of advanced-stage breast cancer is safe and well tolerated by patients, and is not associated with significant delays in adjuvant therapy. These findings make a strong argument for immediate reconstruction regardless of cancer stage. The authors found the changes caused by radiation to the reconstructed breast to be less significant than previously reported and readily addressed to complete an ultimate reconstruction that is aesthetically acceptable to both surgeon and patient.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, IV.(Figure is included in full-text article.).

Immediate locally advanced breast cancer and chest wall reconstruction: surgical planning and reconstruction strategies with extended V-Y latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flap

BACKGROUND

Surgical resection in locally advanced breast cancer produces large defects that may not be suitable for primary closure. Immediate reconstruction is controversial and presents a complicated scenario for breast surgeons and plastic surgeons.

METHODS

In this study, a different design was planned for the latissimus dorsi musculocutaneous flap with primary closure in V-Y for the correction of major lesions in the anterior chest wall. Twenty-five patients underwent immediate locally advanced breast cancer reconstruction with a V-Y latissimus dorsi musculocutaneous flap. This flap was raised from adjacent tissue located on the lateral and posterior thoracic region and presented a triangular shape whose base was the lateral aspect of the mastectomy wound. The technique was indicated in patients with large thoracic wounds.

RESULTS

Mean follow-up time was 16 months. Closure was obtained in the donor and recipient sites without the use of skin grafts or other more major procedures. Complications occurred in nine patients (36 percent), including dorsal wound dehiscence in five patients and seroma in three. All cases except one were treated by a conservative approach with a good result. No total flap loss was reported. All patients achieved a satisfactory thoracic reconstruction and adequate wound care.

CONCLUSIONS

The V-Y latissimus dorsi musculocutaneous flap is a reliable technique for immediate locally advanced breast cancer reconstruction. The technique is advantageous because the V-Y design allows primary closure of the chest wound and donor defect. Success depends on patient selection, coordinated planning with the breast cancer surgeon, and careful intraoperative management.

Immediate versus delayed reconstruction following surgery for breast cancer

BACKGROUND

Breast cancer is the most prevalent cancer in women and has a lifetime incidence of one in nine in the UK. Curative treatment requires surgery, and may involve adjuvant and neo-adjuvant therapy. In many women, post-mastectomy breast reconstruction is essential to restore body image and improve quality of life. Timing of reconstruction may be immediately at the time of mastectomy or delayed until after surgery. Outcomes such as psychosocial morbidity, aesthetics and complications rates may differ between the two approaches.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of immediate versus delayed reconstruction following surgery for breast cancer.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Breast Cancer Group (CBCG) Specialised Register on 22 July 2010, MEDLINE from July 2008 to 26 August 2010, EMBASE from 2008 to 26 August 2010 and the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) on 26 August 2010.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing immediate breast reconstruction versus delayed or no reconstruction in women in any age group and stage of breast cancer. We considered any recognised methods of reconstruction to one or both breasts undertaken at the same time as mastectomy or at any time following mastectomy.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently screened papers, extracted trial details and assessed the risk of bias in the one eligible study.

MAIN RESULTS

We included only one RCT that involved that involved 64 women.We judged this study as being at a high risk of bias. Post-operative morbidity and mortality were not addressed, and secondary outcomes of patient cosmetic evaluations and psychosocial well-being post-reconstruction were inadequately reported. Based on limited data there was some, albeit unreliable, evidence that immediate reconstruction compared with delayed or no reconstruction, reduced psychiatric morbidity reported three months post-operatively.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The current level of evidence for the effectiveness of immediate versus delayed reconstruction following surgery for breast cancer was based on a single RCT with methodological flaws and a high risk of bias, which does not allow confident decision-making about choice between these surgical options. Until high quality evidence is available, clinicians may wish to consider the recommendations of relevant guidelines and protocols. Although the limitations and ethical constraints of conducting RCTs in this field are recognised, adequately powered controlled trials with a focus on clinical and psychological outcomes are still required. Given the paucity of RCTs in this subject, in future versions of this review we will look at study designs other than RCTs specifically good quality cohort and case-controlstudies.

Immediate reconstruction with implants in women with invasive breast cancer does not affect oncological safety in a matched cohort study

Physicians are still concerned about the oncological safety regarding immediate breast reconstruction (IBR) in breast cancer patients. This study aimed to evaluate possible differences between local, regional, and distant recurrences between women having implant-based reconstruction versus women operated with mastectomy alone. Secondary aims were to evaluate time to oncological treatment as well as disease-free and breast-cancer-specific survival. In a retrospective cohort designed study, 300 reconstructed patients with invasive breast cancer were matched with 300 patients from the population-based Regional Breast Cancer Register of the Stockholm-Gotland health-care region operated with mastectomy alone. They were matched for age, tumor size, nodal stage, and year of operation. Also included were patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and postoperative radiotherapy. The median follow-up for both the groups was 11.5 years (range 2-20). There were no significant differences in the local recurrence rate, 8.2% in the IBR group and 9.0% in the control group or in the regional recurrence rate, 8.2% versus 9.7%. Distant metastases occurred more frequently in the control group (27.1%) when compared to the IBR group (20.3%). There were no significant differences in time to treatment or in complications rate. Breast cancer mortality was 17% for the IBR group and 23% in the control group during follow-up. This long-term follow-up survey with a well-matched control group demonstrates that IBR with implants is safe to offer patients with invasive breast cancer without any negative effect on the oncological safety.

Early Complications after Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy and Immediate Breast Reconstruction with Silicone Prosthesis: Results of 214 Procedures

Background and Aims:

Breast reconstruction with silicone prosthesis following nipple-sparing mastectomy has become widely accepted as a reconstruction option in women requiring mastectomy for cancer. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the incidence and some factors influencing early local complications in patients undergoing NSM with immediate implant reconstruction.

Material and Methods:

Prospective study was performed on a consecutive series of 214 breast reconstructions in 205 patients. All complications during the six weeks after surgery were recorded. 42 prostheses were implanted after neoadjuvant chemotherapy, 27 patients previously had radiotherapy due to breast conserving surgery and in all other cases surgery was the primary treatment for cancer.

Results:

The overall six-week complication rate was 16% (35) and included: major skin flap necrosis (4%, 9 procedures), minor skin necrosis (3%, 7), major infection (2%, 5), minor infection (3%, 7), prolonged seroma formation (3%, 6), haematoma (1%, 2) and epidermolysis (1%, 2). In 6% (12) reconstruction procedures explantation of prosthesis was done. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy were not associated with higher rate of complications.

Conclusion:

Nipple-sparing mastectomy with immediate implant reconstruction has acceptable morbidity rate in the hand of experienced oncoplastic surgeon and therefore should be considered as treatment option to women requiring mastectomy.

Oncological safety of skin sparing mastectomy followed by immediate reconstruction for locally advanced breast cancer

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Skin sparing mastectomy (SSM) has been demonstrated as an oncologically safe procedure for early breast cancer in several studies. But few studies concerned the safety of SSM for patients with locally advanced breast cancer; therefore, its safety for these patients is less clear. The purpose of this study is to examine the oncological safety of SSM followed by immediate reconstruction for locally advanced breast cancer.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 897 breast cancer patients who underwent mastectomy for stage IIB (T3N0)-III between 1996 and 2005. Of 897, 87 underwent SSM (n = 73) or nipple sparing mastectomy (NSM, n = 14). We compared the local recurrence (LR) rate, disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) for SSM group with conventional mastectomy group.

RESULTS

The 5-year DFS and OS of SSM group were not worse than those of CM group for all stages. LR rate was 3.0% (2/67) for IIB, 2.8% (1/36) for IIIA, 4.5% (1/22) for IIIC, and 5.0% (1/20) for T3 in SSM group. There was no difference in LR rates between SSM group and CM group for all stages.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study demonstrates that SSM followed by immediate reconstruction is oncologically safe for locally advanced breast cancer.

Autologous tissue immediate breast reconstruction: desired but oncologically safe?

BACKGROUND

There has been a dramatic increase in the incidence of immediate breast reconstruction after mastectomy for breast cancer over the past few decades and autologous tissue flaps are being used with increasing frequency. Concern has been expressed that these complex procedures may lead to a delay in the delivery of adjuvant therapy, which in turn may adversely affect recurrence and survival rates. Several publications have looked into the effect of immediate reconstruction on the timing of delivery of adjuvant therapy, but all types of immediate breast reconstruction (IBR) tend to be examined as a homogenous group.

AIM

The aim of this review was to search current literature and look specifically at the effect of autologous tissue reconstructions on adjuvant therapy, and identify possible causes of delay.

DISCUSSION

From the data analysed, it appears that there may be a delay in the delivery of adjuvant therapy associated with autologous tissue IBR, especially transverse rectus abdominis muscle (TRAM) flaps. The studies available, however, examine small numbers of patients, which makes proving statistical significance difficult. Moreover, there also appears to be no consensus on what constitutes a delay in the delivery of adjuvant therapy. From 3% to 72% of autologous tissue IBR patients seem to receive their adjuvant treatment with a delay, according to the guidelines of the respective centres. Moreover, the period of time until chemotherapy appears generally increased from 13% to 36% compared with mastectomy alone patients. The most common reasons for delay are wound and flap complications.

CONCLUSION

At the moment, despite the increasing popularity of autologous IBR, these procedures have not proved their oncological safety. Further studies looking at the effect of IBR, especially TRAM flap reconstruction, are needed.