On the Failure Initiation in the Proximal Human Femur Under Simulated Sideways Fall

Human fall simulation testing method: where we are

Falls pose a significant threat to human health and safety. Accurately assessing the protective effectiveness of fall protection products can significantly reduce the occurrence of fall accidents. This paper systematically reviews the types and risk factors of human falls and then discusses the current research status and future prospects of various test methods for human fall protection. A literature search was conducted in databases such as Web of Science, Google Scholar, and Scopus. This study focuses on experimental methods for human fall testing, simulation model experiments, and finite element simulations, providing an outlook on future development trends. In the discussion of three different fall testing methods, research indicates that human fall simulation testing faces limitations such as ethical concerns and safety issues. Although simulation experiments allow for multiple tests in a short period, the complexity and accuracy of the models may affect the reliability of the results. By integrating more experimental data, optimizing the design of human models, and incorporating finite element simulation technology, the scope of testing applications can be expanded, thereby improving the effectiveness of protective product designs. In conclusion, future research on fall protection testing methods should aim to establish unified international standards, which will enhance consistency and repeatability in testing, facilitating better comparison and evaluation of the effectiveness of various protective measures. Furthermore, the integration of more experimental data with real-world scenarios, the optimization of human models and test environments, and the promotion of finite element simulation technology will be crucial in enhancing the precision of protective assessments.

A Controlled Variable Study of the Biomechanical Properties of the Proximal Femur before and after Cancellous Bone Removal

OBJECTIVE

The biomechanical characteristics of proximal femoral trabeculae are closely related to the occurrence and treatment of proximal femoral fractures. Therefore, it is of great significance to study its biomechanical effects of cancellous bone in the proximal femur. This study examines the biomechanical effects of the cancellous bone in the proximal femur using a controlled variable method, which provide a foundation for further research into the mechanical properties of the proximal femur.

METHODS

Seventeen proximal femoral specimens were selected to scan by quantitative computed tomography (QCT), and the gray values of nine regions were measure to evaluated bone mineral density (BMD) using Mimics software. Then, an intact femur was fixed simulating unilateral standing position. Vertical compression experiments were then performed again after removing cancellous bone in the femoral head, femoral neck, and intertrochanteric region, and data were recorded. According to the controlled variable method, the femoral head, femoral neck, and intertrochanteric trabeculae were sequentially removed based on the axial loading of the intact femur, and the displacement and strain changes of the femur samples under axial loading were recorded. Gom software was used to measure and record displacement and strain maps of the femoral surface.

RESULTS

There was a statistically significant difference in anteroposterior displacement of cancellous bone destruction in the proximal femur (p < 0.001). Proximal femoral bone mass explained 77.5% of the strength variation, in addition proximal femoral strength was mainly affected by bone mass at the level of the upper outer, lower inner, lower greater trochanter, and lesser trochanter of the femoral head. The normal stress conduction of the proximal femur was destroyed after removing cancellous bone, the stress was concentrated in the femoral head and lateral femoral neck, and the femoral head showed a tendency to subside after destroying cancellous bone.

CONCLUSION

The trabecular removal significantly altered the strain distribution and biomechanical strength of the proximal femur, demonstrating an important role in supporting and transforming bending moment under the vertical load. In addition, the strength of the proximal femur mainly depends on the bone density of the femoral head and intertrochanteric region.

Evaluation of bone healing process after intramedullary nailing for femoral shaft fracture by quantitative computed tomography-based finite element analysis

BACKGROUND

There is no proven method for quantitative evaluation of bone healing progress or decision to remove the nail after intramedullary nailing for femoral shaft fractures. Finite element analysis has become commonly utilized in bone analysis, but it may also be used to evaluate callus. The goal of this study was to use quantitative CT-based finite element analysis to assess the bone healing process and predict bone strength with the nail removed.

METHODS

Quantitative CT-based finite element analysis was conducted on CT images from patients who had intramedullary nailing after a femoral shaft fracture at 6, 12, and 15 months postoperatively. The failure risk of the callus was evaluated with maximal load throughout the gait cycle. The tensile failure ratio was calculated using the volume ratio of the callus element with a tensile failure risk ≥100%. A virtual model with the nail removed was built for bone strength study, and the strength was calculated using the displacement-load curve.

FINDINGS

The tensile failure ratio reduced with time, reaching 11.6%, 2.6%, and 0.5% at 6, 12, and 15 months postoperatively, respectively, consistent with bone healing inferred from imaging results. At 15 months, the bone strength at nail removal grew to 212, 2670, and 3385 N, surpassing the healthy side's 2766 N.

INTERPRETATION

Quantitative CT-based finite element analysis enables mechanical assessment during the bone healing process and is expected to be applied to the selection of revision surgery. It is also applicable to the nail removal decision.

Femoral strength and strains in sideways fall: Validation of finite element models against bilateral strain measurements

Low impact falls to the side are the main cause of hip fractures in elderly. Finite element (FE) models of the proximal femur may help in the assessment of patients at high risk for a hip fracture. However, extensive validation is essential before these models can be used in a clinical setting. This study aims to use strain measurements from bilateral digital image correlation to validate an FE model against ex vivo experimental data of proximal femora under a sideways fall loading condition. For twelve subjects, full-field strain measurements were available on the medial and lateral side of the femoral neck. In this study, subject-specific FE models were generated based on a consolidated procedure previously validated for stance loading. The material description included strain rate dependency and separate yield and fracture strain limits in tension and compression. FE predicted fracture force and experimentally measured peak forces showed a strong correlation (R² = 0.92). The FE simulations predicted the fracture initiation within 3 mm distance of the experimental fracture line for 8/12 subjects. The predicted and measured strains correlated well on both the medial side (R² = 0.87) and the lateral side (R² = 0.74). The lower correlation on the lateral side is attributed to the irregularity of the cortex and presence of vessel holes in this region. The combined validation against bilateral full-field strain measurements and peak forces has opened the door for a more elaborate qualitative and quantitative validation of FE models of femora under sideways fall loading.

Cortical bone mapping improves finite element strain prediction accuracy at the proximal femur

Despite evidence of the biomechanical role of cortical bone, current state of the art finite element models of the proximal femur built from clinical CT data lack a subject-specific representation of the bone cortex. Our main research hypothesis is that the subject-specific modelling of cortical bone layer from CT images, through a deconvolution procedure known as Cortical Bone Mapping (CBM, validated for cortical thickness and density estimates) can improve the accuracy of CT-based FE models of the proximal femur, currently limited by partial volume artefacts. Our secondary hypothesis is that a careful choice of cortical-specific density-elasticity relationship may improve model accuracy. We therefore: (i) implemented a procedure to include subject-specific CBM estimates of both cortical thickness and density in CT-based FE models. (ii) defined alternative models that included CBM estimates and featured a cortical-specific or an independently optimised density-elasticity relationship. (iii) tested our hypotheses in terms of elastic strain estimates and failure load and location prediction, by comparing with a published cohort of 14 femurs, where strain and strength in stance and fall loading configuration were experimentally measured, and estimated through reference FE models that did not explicitly model the cortical compartment. Our findings support the main hypothesis: an explicit modelling of the proximal femur cortical bone layer including CBM estimates of cortical bone thickness and density increased the FE strains prediction, mostly by reducing peak errors (average error reduced by 30%, maximum error and 95th percentile of error distribution halved) and especially when focusing on the femoral neck locations (all error metrics at least halved). We instead rejected the secondary hypothesis: changes in cortical density-elasticity relationship could not improve validation performances. From these improved baseline strain estimates, further work is needed to achieve accurate strength predictions, as models incorporating cortical thickness and density produced worse estimates of failure load and equivalent estimates of failure location when compared to reference models. In summary, we recommend including local estimates of cortical thickness and density in FE models to estimate bone strains in physiological conditions, and especially when designing exercise studies to promote bone strength.

Biomechanical Computed Tomography analysis (BCT) for clinical assessment of osteoporosis

The surgeon general of the USA defines osteoporosis as "a skeletal disorder characterized by compromised bone strength, predisposing to an increased risk of fracture." Measuring bone strength, Biomechanical Computed Tomography analysis (BCT), namely, finite element analysis of a patient's clinical-resolution computed tomography (CT) scan, is now available in the USA as a Medicare screening benefit for osteoporosis diagnostic testing. Helping to address under-diagnosis of osteoporosis, BCT can be applied "opportunistically" to most existing CT scans that include the spine or hip regions and were previously obtained for an unrelated medical indication. For the BCT test, no modifications are required to standard clinical CT imaging protocols. The analysis provides measurements of bone strength as well as a dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA)-equivalent bone mineral density (BMD) T-score at the hip and a volumetric BMD of trabecular bone at the spine. Based on both the bone strength and BMD measurements, a physician can identify osteoporosis and assess fracture risk (high, increased, not increased), without needing confirmation by DXA. To help introduce BCT to clinicians and health care professionals, we describe in this review the currently available clinical implementation of the test (VirtuOst), its application for managing patients, and the underlying supporting evidence; we also discuss its main limitations and how its results can be interpreted clinically. Together, this body of evidence supports BCT as an accurate and convenient diagnostic test for osteoporosis in both sexes, particularly when used opportunistically for patients already with CT. Biomechanical Computed Tomography analysis (BCT) uses a patient's CT scan to measure both bone strength and bone mineral density at the hip or spine. Performing at least as well as DXA for both diagnosing osteoporosis and assessing fracture risk, BCT is particularly well-suited to "opportunistic" use for the patient without a recent DXA who is undergoing or has previously undergone CT testing (including hip or spine regions) for an unrelated medical condition.

Numerical modelling of hip fracture patterns in human femur

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Hip fracture morphology is an important factor determining the ulterior surgical repair and treatment, because of the dependence of the treatment on fracture morphology. Although numerical modelling can be a valuable tool for fracture prediction, the simulation of femur fracture is not simple due to the complexity of bone architecture and the numerical techniques required for simulation of crack propagation. Numerical models assuming homogeneous fracture mechanical properties commonly fail in the prediction of fracture patterns. This paper focuses on the prediction of femur fracture based on the development of a finite element model able to simulate the generation of long crack paths.

METHODS

The finite element model developed in this work demonstrates the capability of predicting fracture patterns under stance loading configuration, allowing the distinction between the main fracture paths: intracapsular and extracapsular fractures. It is worth noting the prediction of different fracture patterns for the same loading conditions, as observed during experimental tests.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

The internal distribution of bone mineral density and femur geometry strongly influences the femur fracture morphology and fracture load. Experimental fracture paths have been analysed by means of micro-computed tomography allowing the comparison of predicted and experimental crack surfaces, confirming the good accuracy of the numerical model.

Biofidelic finite element models for accurately classifying hip fracture in a retrospective clinical study of elderly women from the AGES Reykjavik cohort

Clinical retrospective studies have only reported limited improvements in hip fracture classification accuracy using finite element (FE) models compared to conventional areal bone mineral density (aBMD) measurements. A possible explanation is that state-of-the-art quasi-static models do not estimate patient-specific loads. A novel FE modeling technique was developed to improve the biofidelity of simulated impact loading from sideways falling. This included surrogate models of the pelvis, lower extremities, and soft tissue that were morphed based on subject anthropometrics. Hip fracture prediction models based on aBMD and FE measurements were compared in a retrospective study of 254 elderly female subjects from the AGES-Reykjavik study. Subject fragility ratio (FR) was defined as the ratio between the ultimate forces of paired biofidelic models, one with linear elastic and the other with non-linear stress-strain relationships in the proximal femur. The expected end-point value (EEV) was defined as the FR weighted by the probability of one sideways fall over five years, based on self-reported fall frequency at baseline. The change in maximum volumetric strain (ΔMVS) on the surface of the femoral neck was calculated between time of ultimate femur force and 90% post-ultimate force in order to assess the extent of tensile tissue damage present in non-linear models. After age-adjusted logistic regression, the area under the receiver-operator curve (AUC) was highest for ΔMVS (0.72), followed by FR (0.71), aBMD (0.70), and EEV (0.67), however the differences between FEA and aBMD based prediction models were not deemed statistically significant. When subjects with no history of falling were excluded from the analysis, thus artificially assuming that falls were known a priori with no uncertainty, a statistically significant difference in AUC was detected between ΔMVS (0.85), and aBMD (0.74). Multivariable linear regression suggested that the variance in maximum elastic femur force was best explained by femoral head radius, pelvis width, and soft tissue thickness (R2 = 0.79; RMSE = 0.46 kN; p < 0.005). Weighting the hip fracture prediction models based on self-reported fall frequency did not improve the models' sensitivity, however excluding non-fallers lead to significant differences between aBMD and FE based models. These findings suggest that an accurate assessment of fall probability is necessary for accurately identifying individuals predisposed to hip fracture.

Biomechanics of Femoral Neck Fractures and Implications for Fixation

Fractures of the femoral neck can occur in young healthy individuals due to high loads occurring during motor vehicle accidents, impacts, or falls. Failure forces are lower if impacts occur sideways onto the greater trochanter as compared with vertical loading of the hip. Bone density, bone geometry, and thickness of cortical bone at the femoral neck contribute to its mechanical strength. Femoral neck fractures in young adults require accurate reduction and stable internal fixation. The available techniques for fracture fixation at the femoral neck (cannulated screws, hip screw systems, proximal femur plates, and cephallomedullary nails) are reviewed with respect to their competence to provide biomechanical stability. Mechanically unstable fractures require a load-bearing implant, such as hip screws, with antirotational screws or intramedullary nails. Subcapital or transcervical fracture patterns and noncomminuted fractures enable load sharing and can be securely fixed with cannulated screws or solitary hip screw systems without compromising fixation stability.

On the internal reaction forces, energy absorption, and fracture in the hip during simulated sideways fall impact

The majority of hip fractures have been reported to occur as a result of a fall with impact to the greater trochanter of the femur. Recently, we developed a novel cadaveric pendulum-based hip impact model and tested two cadaveric femur-pelvis constructs, embedded in a soft tissue surrogate. The outcome was a femoral neck fracture in a male specimen while a female specimen had no fracture. The aim of the present study was, first, to develop a methodology for constructing and assessing the accuracy of explicit Finite Element Models (FEMs) for simulation of sideways falls to the hip based on the experimental model. Second, to use the FEMs for quantifying the internal reaction forces and energy absorption in the hip during impact. Third, to assess the potential of the FEMs in terms of separating a femoral fracture endpoint from a non-fracture endpoint. Using a non-linear, strain rate dependent, and heterogeneous material mapping strategy for bone tissue in these models, we found the FEM-derived results to closely match the experimental test results in terms of impact forces and displacements of pelvic video markers up to the time of peak impact force with errors below 10%. We found the internal reaction forces in the femoral neck on the impact side to be approximately 35% lower than the impact force measured between soft tissue and ground for both specimens. In addition, we found the soft tissue to be the component that absorbed the largest part of the energy of the tissue types in the hip region. Finally, we found surface strain patterns derived from FEM results to match the fracture location and extent based on post testing x-rays of the specimens. This is the first study with quantitative data on the energy absorption in the pelvic region during a sideways fall.