Frailty phenotype and the role of levodopa challenge test in geriatric inpatients with mild parkinsonian signs

Effects of Blood Flow Restriction Resistance Training on Autonomic and Endothelial Function in Persons with Parkinson's Disease

Background

Autonomic dysfunction precedes endothelial dysfunction in Parkinson's disease (PD) and causes blood pressure and circulation abnormalities that are highly disruptive to one's quality of life. While exercise interventions have proven helpful for motor symptoms of PD, improving associated non-motor symptoms is limited. Low-intensity resistance training with blood flow restriction (LIRT-BFR) improves autonomic dysfunction in non-PD patients and high-intensity resistance training (HIRT) is recommended for motor symptom improvements for people with PD (PwPD).

Objective

To determine the effects of LIRT-BFR and HIRT on homocysteine and autonomic and endothelial function in PwPD and to determine the hemodynamic loads during LIRT-BFR and HIRT in PwPD using a novel exercise protocol.

Methods

Thirty-eight PwPD were assigned LIRT-BFR, HIRT or to a control (CNTRL) group. The LIRT-BFR and HIRT groups exercised three days per week for four weeks. The LIRT-BFR protocol used 60% limb occlusion pressure (LOP) and performed three sets of 20 repetitions at 20% of the one-repetition maximum (1RM). The HIRT group performed three sets of eight repetitions at 80% 1RM. The CNTRL group was asked to continue their normal daily routines.

Results

LIRT-BFR significantly improved orthostatic hypotension (p = 0.026), homocysteine levels (p < 0.001), peripheral circulation (p = 0.003), supine blood pressure (p = 0.028) and heart rate variability (p = 0.041); LIRT-BFR improved homocysteine levels (p < 0.018), peripheral circulation (p = 0.005), supine blood pressure (p = 0.007) and heart rate variability (p = 0.047) more than HIRT; and hemodynamic loads for LIRT-BFR and HIRT were similar.

Conclusions

LIRT-BFR may be more effective than HIRT for autonomic and endothelial function improvements in PwPD and hemodynamic loads may be lessened in LIRT-BFR protocols using single-joint exercises with intermittent blood flow restriction. Further research is needed to determine if non-motor symptoms improve over time and if results are sustainable.

Physical Frailty, Genetic Predisposition, and Incident Parkinson Disease

Importance

Cross-sectional evidence implicates high prevalent frailty in patients with Parkinson disease (PD), whereas the longitudinal association remains unknown.

Objectives

To examine the longitudinal association of the frailty phenotype with the development of PD and to explore the modification role of genetic risk of PD in such an association.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This prospective cohort study launched in 2006 to 2010 with a follow-up of 12 years. Data were analyzed from March 2022 to December 2022. The UK Biobank recruited over 500 000 middle-aged and older adults from 22 assessment centers across the United Kingdom. Participants who were younger than 40 years (n = 101), diagnosed with dementia or PD at baseline, and developed dementia, PD, or died within 2 years from baseline were excluded (n = 4050). Participants who had no genetic data or mismatch between genetic sex and reported gender (n = 15 350), were not of self-reported British White descent (n = 27 850), and had no data for frailty assessment (n = 100 450) or any covariates were also excluded (n = 39 706). The final analysis included 314 998 participants.

Exposures

The physical frailty was assessed by the Fried criteria's frailty phenotype through 5 domains, ie, weight loss, exhaustion, low physical activity, slow walking speed, and low grip strength. The polygenic risk score (PRS) for PD comprised 44 single-nucleotide variants.

Main Outcomes and Measures

New-onset PD was identified through the hospital admission electronic health records and death register.

Results

Among 314 998 participants (mean age, 56.1 years; 49.1% male), 1916 new-onset PD cases were documented. Compared with nonfrailty, the hazard ratio (HR) of incident PD in prefrailty and frailty was 1.26 (95% CI, 1.15-1.39) and 1.87 (95% CI, 1.53-2.28), respectively, and the absolute rate difference per 100 000 person-years was 1.6 (95% CI, 1.0-2.3) for prefrailty and 5.1 (95% CI, 2.9-7.3) for frailty. Exhaustion (HR, 1.41; 95% CI, 1.22-1.62), slow gait speed (HR, 1.32; 95% CI, 1.13-1.54), low grip strength (HR, 1.27; 95% CI, 1.13-1.43), and low physical activity (HR, 1.12; 95% CI, 1.00-1.25) were associated with incident PD. A significant interaction between frailty and PRS on PD was found and the highest hazard was observed in participants with frailty and high genetic risk.

Conclusions and Relevance

Physical prefrailty and frailty were associated with incident PD independent of sociodemographic factors, lifestyles, multiple morbidities, and genetic background. These findings may have implications for the assessment and management of frailty for PD prevention.

Immunogenicity of the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine in older residents of a long-term care facility: relation with age, frailty and prior infection status

Clinical and biological assessment of the COVID-19 vaccine efficacy in the frail population is of crucial importance. The study focuses on measuring the levels of anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibodies before and after BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccination among long-term care facility (LTCF) elderly residents. We conducted a prospective, single-center, observational study among LTCF residents. The study protocol was based on three blood sample acquisitions: first taken at baseline-5 days before the first dose of the vaccine, second-20 days after the first dose, and third-12 days after the second shot of the vaccine. The comparison was made for two cohorts: patients with and without prior COVID-19 infection. The data was collected from January to March 2021. A total number of 78 LTCF residents (55 women and 23 men) aged 62-104, 85.72 ± 7.59 years (mean ± SD), were enrolled in the study. All study participants were investigated for the presence of SARS-CoV-2 anti-spike (S) protein IgG, using a chemiluminescent immunoassay. Frailty was assessed with the Clinical Frailty Scale. Among elderly COVID-19 survivors in LTCF, a single dose of vaccine significantly increased anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibody levels. IgG concentration after a single and double dose was comparable, which may suggest that elderly COVID-19 survivors do not require a second dose of vaccine. For residents without a previous history of COVID-19, two doses are needed to achieve an effective serological response. The level of anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibodies after vaccination with BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 did not correlate with the frailty and age of the studied individuals.

The role of frailty in Parkinson's disease: a cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND

Frailty is an age-related state of increased risk for health-related adverse outcomes that reflects multisystem physiological changes and likely influences the clinical expression and disease progression of neurodegenerative disorders. The aim of the present study was to assess the potential relationship between frailty, as assessed by a frailty index (FI), and motor symptom severity, motor subtypes, and non-motor domains in Parkinson's disease (PD).

METHODS

We consecutively enrolled 150 PD patients. We administered an FI specifically designed for PD that included 50 age-related multidimensional biological deficits. Patients underwent a clinical assessment that evaluated motor and non-motor manifestations of PD. Using the FI score, we classified PD patients as relatively fit (FI ≤ 0.10), less fit (0.10 < FI ≤ 0.21), or frail (FI > 0.21). A linear regression model was designed to explore possible associations between frailty level and PD motor and non-motor manifestations.

RESULTS

Frail patients showed greater motor symptom severity and motor complications than fitter patients. A trend towards a higher prevalence of the postural instability/gait disorder subtype was also observed in frail versus relatively fit and less fit patients. The global burden of non-motor symptoms was higher in frail patients. Increased frailty was associated with more severe motor and non-motor symptoms, as well as with more pronounced cognitive deficits. These associations remained significant even when "traditional" predictors of PD severity (age, disease duration, and levodopa equivalent daily dose) were considered.

CONCLUSIONS

The present findings indicate that the FI is associated with both motor and non-motor features of PD.

Frailty and Prodromal Parkinson's Disease: Results From the HELIAD Study

BACKGROUND

To investigate the association between frailty, Parkinson's disease (PD), and the probability of prodromal Parkinson's disease (prodromal PD) in Greek community-dwelling older individuals.

METHODS

Parkinson's disease diagnosis was reached through standard clinical research procedures. Probability of prodromal PD was calculated according to the International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society's research criteria for PD-free participants. Frailty was evaluated according to definitions of the phenotypic and multidomain approach. Logistic and linear regression models were performed to investigate associations between frailty (predictor) and the probability of prodromal PD, either continuous or dichotomous (≥30% probability score), or PD (outcome).

RESULTS

Data from 1765 participants aged 65 and older were included in the present analysis. Parkinson's disease and prodromal PD prevalence were 1.9% and 3.0%, respectively. Compared to nonfrail participants, those who were frail, as identified with either the Fried frailty phenotype or Frailty Index had approximately 4 (odds ratio [OR] 4.09, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.54-10.89) and 12 times (OR 12.16, 95% CI 5.46-27.09) higher odds of having a PD diagnosis, respectively. Moreover, compared to the nonfrail, frail participants as identified with either the Fried frailty phenotype or Frailty Index had 2.8 (OR 2.83, 95% CI 1.09-7.37) and 8.3 times (OR 8.39, 95% CI 4.56-15.42) higher odds of having possible/probable prodromal PD, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Frailty status was associated with prodromal PD and PD, suggesting common characteristics or underlying mechanisms of these conditions. Although prospective studies are warranted, acknowledging the possible association of frailty, PD, and prodromal PD may improve their clinical management.

Gait Analysis of Old Individuals with Mild Parkinsonian Signs and Those Individuals' Gait Performance Benefits Little from Levodopa

Background and Purpose

Gait analysis and the effects of levodopa on the gait characteristics in Mild parkinsonian signs (MPS) are rarely published. The present research aimed to (1) analyze the gait characteristics in MPS; (2) explore the effects of levodopa on the gait performance of MPS.

Methods

We enrolled 22 inpatients with MPS and 20 healthy control subjects (HC) from Nanjing Brain Hospital. The Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale was used to evaluate motor symptoms. Acute levodopa challenge test was performed to explore the effects of levodopa on the gait performance of MPS. The instrumented stand and walk test was conducted for each participant and the JiBuEn gait analysis system was used to collect gait data.

Results

For spatiotemporal parameters: Compared with HC, the state before taking levodopa/benserazide in MPS group (meds-off) demonstrated a decrease in stride length (SL) (p≤0.001), an increase in SL variability (p≤0.001), and swing phase time variability (p=0.016). Compared with meds-off, the state after 1 hour of taking levodopa/benserazide in MPS group (meds-on) exhibited an increase in SL (p≤0.001), a decrease in SL variability (p≤0.001). For kinematic parameters: Compared with HC, meds-off demonstrated a decrease in heel strike angle (p=0.008), range of motion (ROM) of knee joint (p=0.011) and ROM of hip joint (p=0.007). Compared with meds-off, meds-on exhibited an increase in HS (p≤0.001). Bradykinesia and rigidity scores were significantly correlated with gait parameters.

Conclusion

Although the clinical symptoms of the MPS group are mild, their gait damage is obvious and they exhibited a decreased SL and joints movement, and a more variable gait pattern. Levodopa had little effect on the gait performance of those individuals.

Levodopa challenge test: indications, protocol, and guide

A drug challenge test in Parkinson's disease, such as the levodopa challenge test (LCT), is an easy and generally safe procedure, which has been used by clinicians for various indications. The results of the test have significant implications in the management of patients, from preoperative evaluation for deep brain stimulation to providing the basis for medication adjustments to address motor or non-motor fluctuations and dyskinesias. This paper reviews the different indications and protocols commonly used in an acute LCT. Potential complications of the procedure and an overview of levodopa responsiveness and unresponsiveness are also discussed.