Variability in hormone and growth factor receptor expression in primary versus recurrent, metastatic, and post-neoadjuvant breast carcinoma

Retesting of oestrogen receptor, progesterone receptor and HER2 status of invasive carcinoma of the breast after neoadjuvant chemotherapy

AIMS

There is no consensus on whether oestrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) status should be assessed after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. This study assessed the frequency of changes in ER, PR and HER2 status after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Of 353 patients who had neoadjuvant chemotherapy and anti-HER2 treatment, receptors were assessed in 185 residual carcinomas. Eight per cent of carcinomas that were ER-negative in the core biopsy were ER-positive in the excision compared with 1.5% of controls. All were HER2-positive in the core biopsy and 23% were HER2-negative in the excision compared with 0% of controls. Controls were cases tested in the core biopsy and subsequent surgical resection with no neoadjuvant treatment. Of 589 patients who had neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone, receptors were assessed in 495 residual carcinomas. Six per cent of carcinomas that were ER-negative in the core biopsy were ER-positive in the excision (mainly ER-low positive) compared with 1.5% of controls. All were HER2-negative in the core biopsy and 6% were HER2-positive in the excision (mainly immunohistochemistry score 2+ and HER2 gene amplified) compared with 2% of controls.

CONCLUSIONS

Negative to positive changes in receptor status after neoadjuvant chemotherapy are infrequent and the positive result in the excision is often weakly positive. These results imply that repeat assessment after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and surgery could influence the subsequent treatment in a small proportion of patients.

Preclinical research progress in HER2-targeted small-molecule probes for breast cancer

Breast cancer is a malignant tumor that has the highest morbidity and mortality in women worldwide. Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) is a key driver of breast cancer development. Therefore, accurate assessment of HER2 expression in cancer patients and timely initiation or termination of anti-HER2 treatment are crucial for the prognosis of breast cancer patients. The emergence of radiolabeled molecular probes targeting HER2 makes this assessment possible. This article describes different types of small-molecule probes that target HER2 and are used in current preclinical applications and summarizes their advantages and disadvantages.

A dedicated structured data set for reporting of invasive carcinoma of the breast in the setting of neoadjuvant therapy: recommendations from the International Collaboration on Cancer Reporting (ICCR)

AIMS

The International Collaboration on Cancer Reporting (ICCR), a global alliance of major (inter-)national pathology and cancer organisations, is an initiative aimed at providing a unified international approach to reporting cancer. ICCR recently published new data sets for the reporting of invasive breast carcinoma, surgically removed lymph nodes for breast tumours and ductal carcinoma in situ, variants of lobular carcinoma in situ and low-grade lesions. The data set in this paper addresses the neoadjuvant setting. The aim is to promote high-quality, standardised reporting of tumour response and residual disease after neoadjuvant treatment that can be used for subsequent management decisions for each patient.

METHODS

The ICCR convened expert panels of breast pathologists with a representative surgeon and oncologist to critically review and discuss current evidence. Feedback from the international public consultation was critical in the development of this data set.

RESULTS

The expert panel concluded that a dedicated data set was required for reporting of breast specimens post-neoadjuvant therapy with inclusion of data elements specific to the neoadjuvant setting as core or non-core elements. This data set proposes a practical approach for handling and reporting breast resection specimens following neoadjuvant therapy. The comments for each data element clarify terminology, discuss available evidence and highlight areas with limited evidence that need further study. This data set overlaps with, and should be used in conjunction with, the data sets for the reporting of invasive breast carcinoma and surgically removed lymph nodes from patients with breast tumours, as appropriate. Key issues specific to the neoadjuvant setting are included in this paper. The entire data set is freely available on the ICCR website.

CONCLUSIONS

High-quality, standardised reporting of tumour response and residual disease after neoadjuvant treatment are critical for subsequent management decisions for each patient.

A new era in cancer treatment: harnessing ZIF-8 nanoparticles for PD-1 inhibitor delivery

This review delves into the potential of zeolitic imidazolate framework-8 (ZIF-8) nanoparticles in augmenting the efficacy of cancer immunotherapy, with a special focus on the delivery of programmed cell death receptor 1 (PD-1) inhibitors. The multifunctional nature of ZIF-8 nanoparticles as drug carriers is emphasized, with their ability to encapsulate a range of therapeutic agents, including PD-1 inhibitors, and facilitate their targeted delivery to tumor locations. By manipulating the pore size and surface characteristics of ZIF-8 nanoparticles, controlled drug release can be realized. The strategic use of ZIF-8 nanoparticles to deliver PD-1 inhibitors presents a precise and targeted modality for cancer treatment, reducing off-target impacts and enhancing therapeutic effectiveness. This combined strategy addresses the existing challenges and constraints of current immunotherapy techniques, with the ultimate goal of enhancing patient outcomes in cancer therapy.

HER2 categorical changes after neoadjuvant chemotherapy: A study of 192 matched breast cancers with the inclusion of HER2-Low category

Understanding the changes of HER2 expression after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in breast cancer (BC) is more important than ever, since it may allow more patients to access the effective therapeutic drugs targeting HER2-low BC. 192 matched pre- and post-NAC BCs were analyzed. HER2 immunohistochemistry (IHC) was re-evaluated with consensus according to the current ASCO/CAP guidelines. Tumors were categorized into HER2-0 (IHC0+), HER2-low (IHC1+ or IHC2+/ISH-) and HER2-positive (IHC3+ or IHC2+/ISH+) subgroups. 55 (28.6 %) patients achieved pathologic complete response (pCR). HER2-low BC accounted for 75/192 (39.1 %) baseline tumors, and 48/133 (36.1 %) residual tumors. In the non-pCR cohort, 53 (39.9 %) patients had HER2 categorical change after NAC, most commonly converting from HER2-low to HER2-0 (20.3 %, n = 27). Among patients with residual tumor, 25.6 % (11/43) of patients with baseline HER2-0 expression experienced a categorical change to HER2-low after NAC, significantly higher (p < 0.05) in the hormone receptor (HR) positive (9/23, 39.1 %) compared to the HR negative tumors (10 %, 2/20). Exploratory analysis failed to reveal a statistically significant difference in disease free survival and overall survival in non-pCR patients with or without HER2 change. Our results suggest that a substantial number of patients may experience HER2 categorical change after NAC, supporting re-testing of HER2 status in post-NAC residual tumors. Retesting HER2 status may be particularly important for evaluating post-NAC HER2-low status, in order to better assess which patients will more likely benefit from therapeutic drugs targeting HER2-low BC.

The Lucerne Toolbox 2 to optimise axillary management for early breast cancer: a multidisciplinary expert consensus

Clinical axillary lymph node management in early breast cancer has evolved from being merely an aspect of surgical management and now includes the entire multidisciplinary team. The second edition of the "Lucerne Toolbox", a multidisciplinary consortium of European cancer societies and patient representatives, addresses the challenges of clinical axillary lymph node management, from diagnosis to local therapy of the axilla. Five working packages were developed, following the patients' journey and addressing specific clinical scenarios. Panellists voted on 72 statements, reaching consensus (agreement of 75% or more) in 52.8%, majority (51%-74% agreement) in 43.1%, and no decision in 4.2%. Based on the votes, targeted imaging and standardized pathology of lymph nodes should be a prerequisite to planning local and systemic therapy, axillary lymph node dissection can be replaced by sentinel lymph node biopsy ( ± targeted approaches) in a majority of scenarios; and positive patient outcomes should be driven by both low recurrence risks and low rates of lymphoedema.

A New Landscape of Testing and Therapeutics in Metastatic Breast Cancer

Predictive biomarker testing on metastatic breast cancer is essential for determining patient eligibility for targeted therapeutics. The National Comprehensive Cancer Network currently recommends assessment of specific biomarkers on metastatic tumor subtypes, including hormone receptors, HER2, and BRCA1/2 mutations, on all newly metastatic breast cancers subtypes; programmed death-ligand 1 on metastatic triple-negative carcinomas; and PIK3CA mutation status on estrogen receptor-positive carcinomas. In select circumstances mismatch repair protein deficiency and/or microsatellite insufficiency, tumor mutation burden, and NTRK translocation status are also testing options. Novel biomarker testing, such as detecting PIK3CA mutations in circulating tumor DNA, is expanding in this rapidly evolving arena.

Receptor Status after Neoadjuvant Therapy of Breast Cancer: Significance and Implications

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) is now established in routine management of early breast cancer. Alterations in oestrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) following NACT are reported, with wide variation in results across series. In larger series, changes in ER status are identified in 5-23%, whilst changes in PR status are more frequent (14.5-67%). HER2 status changes less frequently with loss being more common than gain, and higher rates of change with immunohistochemistry are observed compared to in situ hybridization and following HER2-targeted therapy compared with chemotherapy alone. Triple negative is the most stable molecular subtype with combined ER, and HER2-positive cancers show the highest rate of change. Neoadjuvant endocrine therapy is used less commonly than NACT, and whilst loss of ER is rare, changes in PR status can occur in up to 40% of cases. There is relatively little published data on the impact of change in receptor status on survival outcomes. In patients whose tumours become ER or HER2 positive post-NACT, endocrine or anti-HER2 therapy can be initiated, although evidence from clinical trials is lacking. Most guidelines do not currently recommend routine retesting; however it should be considered in some circumstances.

Clinical Evaluation of Nuclear Imaging Agents in Breast Cancer

Precision medicine is the customization of therapy for specific groups of patients using genetic or molecular profiling. Noninvasive imaging is one strategy for molecular profiling and is the focus of this review. The combination of imaging and therapy for precision medicine gave rise to the field of theranostics. In breast cancer, the detection and quantification of therapeutic targets can help assess their heterogeneity, especially in metastatic disease, and may help guide clinical decisions for targeted treatments. Positron emission tomography (PET) or single-photon emission tomography (SPECT) imaging has the potential to play an important role in the molecular profiling of therapeutic targets in vivo for the selection of patients who are likely to respond to corresponding targeted therapy. In this review, we discuss the state-of-the-art nuclear imaging agents in clinical research for breast cancer. We reviewed 17 clinical studies on PET or SPECT agents that target 10 different receptors in breast cancer. We also discuss the limitations of the study designs and of the imaging agents in these studies. Finally, we offer our perspective on which imaging agents have the highest potential to be used in clinical practice in the future.

A New Landscape of Testing and Therapeutics in Metastatic Breast Cancer

Predictive biomarker testing on metastatic breast cancer is essential for determining patient eligibility for targeted therapeutics. The National Comprehensive Cancer Network currently recommends assessment of specific biomarkers on metastatic tumor subtypes, including hormone receptors, HER2, and BRCA1/2 mutations, on all newly metastatic breast cancers subtypes; programmed death-ligand 1 on metastatic triple-negative carcinomas; and PIK3CA mutation status on estrogen receptor-positive carcinomas. In select circumstances mismatch repair protein deficiency and/or microsatellite insufficiency, tumor mutation burden, and NTRK translocation status are also testing options. Novel biomarker testing, such as detecting PIK3CA mutations in circulating tumor DNA, is expanding in this rapidly evolving arena.

Biomarker dynamics and prognosis in breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy

Breast cancer is a biologically diverse disease with treatment modalities selected based on tumor stage and tumor biology. Distinct intrinsic subtypes and surrogate biomarker profiles play a major role for therapeutic decisions. Response rates to systemic and local treatments as well as the interaction with epidemiological risk factors have been validated in clinical trials and translational studies. This retrospective study addresses the question how biomarker profiles and treatment modalities in the neoadjuvant chemotherapy setting have changed during the past 15 years and what prognostic impact these changes implicate. 342 female breast cancer stage I-IV patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy between 2003 and 2017 were analyzed. Overall survival (OS) was correlated with preoperative clinical stage, postoperative pathological stage, treatment modalities and tumor biology before and after chemotherapy. Two subgroups were separated using an arbitrary cut-off year at 2009/2010, due to 2010 when platinum containing regimens were first administered. Median follow-up was 54 months. 57 (17%) patients died; recurrences occurred in 103 of 342 (30%) patients. Nodal stage and intrinsic subtypes (pre- and postoperative) significantly correlated with OS (p < 0.001). Preoperative histological grading lacked prognostic power. When comparing the patient characteristics of the subgroups, we found significant difference in the following characteristics: cT, ypT, ypN, pCR and chemotherapy regimens (p < 0.001). There was no difference in OS when comparing the two subgroups. Pathological complete response (pCR) rates had a significant impact on OS and disease-free survival (DFS) in HER2+ and triple negative subtypes (p = 0.03). In multivariate analysis, high proliferation index (> 30%), clinical metastatic stage and pathological tumor stage had prognostic impact on OS (p < 0.001, p = 0.0001, p = 0.002). Clinico-pathological factors and distinct therapy regiments especially in triple negative and HER2+ subtypes have prognostic impact on pCR, OS and DFS after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Pathologic evaluation of specimens after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer: Current recommendations and challenges

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy is increasingly used to optimize breast conservation surgery and is becoming a standard of care in a subset of breast cancer patients. An accurate pathologic assessment is crucial in guiding clinical decisions and subsequent management and prognosis. This review aims to summarize the most current literature, recommendations, and challenges in the pathologic evaluation of breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Included are the most current definitions of the different types of tumor response, the underlying factors that can affect tumor response, how to assess lymph nodes, margins, and tumor markers post-neoadjuvant chemotherapy, as well as the different classification systems a pathologist can use to assess residual disease. In this era of de-escalation of surgical treatment, studies on imaging techniques to assess residual disease and avoid surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy have also been done. However, at least for now, surgical treatment remains the preferred practice. As such, pathologists play an increasingly critical role in standardizing assessment of residual disease post-neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and in optimizing the knowledge gained by this approach to breast cancer therapy.

Role and evaluation of pathologic response in early breast cancer specimens after neoadjuvant therapy: consensus statement

Pathologic evaluation of early breast cancer after neoadjuvant therapy is essential to provide prognostic information based on tumor response to treatment (pathologic complete response [pCR] or non-pCR) and to inform therapy decisions after surgery. To harmonize the pathologist’s handling of surgical specimens after neoadjuvant therapy, a panel of experts in breast cancer convened to developed a consensus on six main topics: (1) definition of pCR, (2) required clinical information, (3) gross examination and sampling, (4) microscopic examination, (5) evaluation of lymph node status, and (6) staging of residual breast tumor. The resulting consensus statements reported in this document highlight the role of an accurate evaluation of tumor response and define the minimum requirements to standardize the assessment of breast cancer specimens after neoadjuvant therapy.

Impact of immunohistochemical profile changes following neoadjuvant therapy in the treatment of breast cancer

Introduction

Currently, the indication for neoadjuvant chemotherapy is increasing in the treatment of breast cancer. Variability in the expression of biomarkers following neoadjuvant treatment has been observed, which could be accompanied by changes in the adjuvant treatment.

Objectives

The primary objective was to evaluate the variability of biomarkers prior to and following neoadjuvant therapy. Secondary objectives were to determine which tumour subtype (as determined by immunohistochemical markers) most frequently achieved pathological complete response (pCR); whether the biomarker variation resulted in a change in immunophenotype and subsequently modification to the adjuvant treatment.

Materials and methods

A retrospective observational analysis was carried out on patients with a diagnosis of breast cancer who had neoadjuvant therapy prior to surgery in the Breast Care Service of the Buenos Aires British Hospital between January 2009 and June 2020.

Results

One hundred and seventy-two patients were included. The pCR rate was 28.5%. The tumour immunophenotype that achieved pCR most frequently was the hormone receptor negative /HER2+ group with a value of 85.2%. The analysis was carried out on the 123 patients with residual disease. The observed variability for oestrogen receptors (ER) was 8.9%, for progesterone receptors (PR), 29.9% and for HER2, 13.8%. These changes were statistically significant. There were changes to the tumour immunophenotype in 26 cases (21.1%) with modifications to the adjuvant treatment in nine of these (34.6%; 7.3% of all tumours with residual disease).

Conclusions

In this study, we observed statistically significant variability in the expression of ER, PR and HER2 prior to and following neoadjuvant treatment, which identified modifications in the tumour immunophenotype in 21.1%, and changes to the adjuvant treatment in 7.3% of all tumours with residual disease, justifying the re-assay of biomarkers in the surgical specimen.

Adipocytokines visfatin and resistin in breast cancer: Clinical relevance, biological mechanisms, and therapeutic potential

Obesity is one of the major modifiable risk factors in breast cancer, with obese adipose tissue showing a pathological role in breast cancer development and malignancy via the release of secretory factors, such as proinflammatory cytokines and adipocytokines. The current article focuses on visfatin and resistin, two such adipocytokines that have emerged over the last two decades as leading breast cancer promoting factors in obesity. The clinical association of circulating visfatin and resistin with breast cancer and their biological mechanisms are reviewed, in addition to their role in the context of tumor-stromal interactions in the breast cancer microenvironment. Recent findings have unraveled several mediators of visfatin and resistin that are involved in the crosstalk between breast cancer cells and adipose tissue in the breast tumor microenvironment, including growth differentiation factor 15 (GDF15), interleukin 6 (IL-6), and toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4). Finally, current therapeutics targeting visfatin and resistin and their respective pathways are discussed, including future therapeutic strategies such as new drug design or neutralizing peptides that target extracellular visfatin or resistin. These hold promise in the development of novel breast cancer therapies and are of increasing relevance as the prevalence of obesity-related breast cancer increases worldwide.

Glycemic variability and subsequent malignancies among the population without diabetes

BACKGROUND

Glycemic variability has been suggested to be related to some unfavorable outcomes, but malignancy development has not been evaluated. The aim of this study was to evaluate the association of glycemic variability with malignancy development among the population without diabetes.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study at a large teaching hospital in Tokyo, Japan, from 2005 to 2016. We included all participants without diabetes who underwent voluntary health check-ups. Our outcome was the development of any malignancy. As a measure of glycemic variability, we calculated the quotient of CV in HbA1c and categorized subjects into quartile groups. A Cox proportional hazard model was applied, adjusting for patient demographics and social and family histories.

RESULTS

A total of 42,731 participants were included in this study; the mean age was 53.8 and 48.3% were male. During the median follow up of 2639 (interquartile range (IQR):1787-3662) days, 2435 participants (5.7%) developed malignancies. Participants who had larger glycemic variability (CV in HbA1c; hazard ratio (HR) 1.15, 95%confidence interval (CI):1.02-0.31 for the second quartile group; HR 2.20, 95%CI:1.95-2.48 for the third quartile group, HR 4.66, 95%CI:4.16-5.21 for the fourth quartile group, compared to first quartile group) had a significantly higher risk of malignancies.

CONCLUSION

We found an association between large glycemic variability and a high risk of future malignancies in a dose-dependent manner among people without diabetes. This finding suggests that maintaining a constant level of glucose may have favorable effects on cancer prevention in people without diabetes.

Pathologic reporting practices for breast cancer specimens after neoadjuvant chemotherapy-a survey of pathologists in academic institutions across the United States

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy is increasingly being used to treat primary invasive breast carcinoma. Response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy is an important determinant of prognosis. A multidisciplinary group published recommendations for standardization of pathologic reporting of postneoadjuvant chemotherapy specimens. Based on these recommendations, we sent a survey to 26 pathologists currently practicing breast pathology in academic centers across the United States. The survey consisted of six questions with yes/no answers. The pathologists were encouraged to add comments. We received responses from 23 breast pathologists from 19 centers. The questions and responses were as follows: 1. Do you grade tumors after neoadjuvant chemotherapy?-17 (74%) responded yes and 6 (26%) responded no. 2. Do you routinely repeat hormone receptors, HER2/Neu results after neoadjuvant chemotherapy?-15 (65%) responded yes and 8 (35%) responded no. 3. If there are features of tumor regression/tumor bed at the margin but no actual tumor at the margin do you report this?-11 (48%) responded yes and 8 (35%) responded no and 4 (17%) reported a variable practice. 4. Do you report number of nodes with fibrosis/changes of regression?-17 (74%) responded yes and 6 (26%) responded no. 5. Do you report residual cancer burden score on your report or at least provide information on your report so clinicians can calculate residual cancer burden?-17 (74%) responded yes and 6 (26%) responded no. 6. Do you have a specific synoptic for cases after neoadjuvant chemotherapy?-5 (22%) responded yes and 18 (78%) responded no. The major reasons provided for nonadherence to recommended guidelines included pathologists were unaware of prognostic importance of providing the information, reporting practices were clinician driven and some pathologists were unaware of the recommendation. We document that academic breast pathology practices show significant variability in reporting of postneoadjuvant chemotherapy cases. We document barriers to standard practice and provide recommendations we hope will contribute to a more uniform reporting practice for these complex specimens.

Evaluation of Breast and Axillary Lymph Node Specimens in Breast Cancer Patients Treated With Neoadjuvant Systemic Therapy

Breast and axillary lymph node specimens from breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant systemic therapy are being encountered by pathologists with increasing frequency. Evaluation of these specimens presents challenges that differ from those encountered during the examination of other types of breast specimens. This article reviews the key issues regarding the gross and microscopic evaluation of post-neoadjuvant systemic therapy breast and lymph node specimens, and emphasizes the importance of accurate specimen evaluation in assessing treatment response.

Breast specimen handling and reporting in the post-neoadjuvant setting: challenges and advances

Neoadjuvant systemic therapy is becoming more commonly used in patients with earlier stages of breast cancer. To assess tumour response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy, pathological evaluation is the gold standard. Depending on the treatment response, the pathological examination of these specimens can be quite challenging. However, a uniform approach to evaluate post-neoadjuvant-treated breast specimens has been lacking. Furthermore, there is no single universally accepted or endorsed classification system for assessing treatment response in this setting. Recent initiatives have attempted to create a standardised protocol for evaluation of post-neoadjuvant breast specimens. This review outlines the necessary information that should be collected prior to macroscopic examination of these specimens, the recommended and most pragmatic approach to tissue sampling for microscopic examination, describes the macroscopic and microscopic features of post-therapy breast specimens, summarises two commonly used systems for classifying treatment response and outlines the critical variables that should be included in the final pathology report.

Hormone Receptors and Human Epidermal Growth Factor (HER2) Expression in Fine-Needle Aspirates from Metastatic Breast Carcinoma - Role in Patient Management

Introduction:

Estrogen receptors (ER), progesterone receptors (PR), and epidermal growth factor (HER2) are prognostic and predictive factors for breast carcinoma. We determined them by immunohistochemistry (IHC) on cell blocks from fine-needle aspirates (FNA) of metastatic breast carcinoma to axillary lymphnodes and compared them with that reported in the primary breast carcinoma (PBC) to document any change in their expression for future management.

Materials and Methods:

ER, PR, and HER2 by IHC and HER2 oncogene by fluorescent in-situ hybridization (FISH) were studied on cell blocks of FNA of axillary lymphnodes in 53 of 94 PBC cases from 2012 to 2016.

Results:

In 25 of 38 (65.8%) ER, PR negative PBC the metastasis on FNA was ER, PR+, whereas the 15 (28.3%) ER, PRPBC remained negative. In 10 of 11 (91%) of HER2-IHC+, PBC the metastatic tumor was HER2-IHC+. 7 of 32 (21.9%) HER2-IHC negative PBC were HER2-IHC+ in metastatic tumor. HER2-FISH was performed in 37 cases on FNA. Six of 37 were HER2 amplified/positive, whereas 9 and 19 remained equivocal and negative for HER2 copy number, and 3 were not interpretable. All the 6 HER2-FISH+ cases were positive by IHC. In our study, 34.2% of ER, PR+ cases of PBC became ER, PR– in the metastatic tumor and 21.9% of HER2-IHC negative PBC became HER2-IHC+ in the metastatic aspirate.

Conclusion:

ER, PR, and HER2 by IHC in cell blocks of metastatic lymphnodes are reliable. Change in receptor (34.2%) and HER2 status (21.9%) was documented, which is of clinical significance as these patients warrant a change of management.

Circulating Tumor Cells and Implications of the Epithelial-to-Mesenchymal Transition

The majority of cancer-related deaths result from metastasis, the process by which cancer cells escape the primary tumor site and enter into the blood circulation in order to disseminate to secondary locations throughout the body. Tumor cells found within the circulation are referred to as circulating tumor cells (CTCs), and their detection and enumeration correlate with poor prognosis. The epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) is a dynamic process that imparts epithelial cells with mesenchymal-like properties, thus facilitating tumor cell dissemination and contributing to metastasis. However, EMT also results in the downregulation of various epithelial proteins typically utilized by CTC technologies for enrichment and detection of these rare cells, resulting in reduced detection of some CTCs, potentially those with a more metastatic phenotype. In addition to the current clinical role of CTCs as a prognostic biomarker, they also have potential as a predictive biomarker via CTC characterization. However, CTC characterization is complicated by the unknown biological significance of CTCs possessing an EMT-like phenotype, and the ability to capture and understand this CTC subpopulation is an essential step in the utilization of CTCs for patient management. This chapter will review the process of EMT and its contribution to metastasis; discusses current and future clinical applications of CTCs; and describes both traditional and novel methods for CTC enrichment, detection, and characterization with a specific focus on CTCs with an EMT phenotype.

Modern therapies and iatrogenic changes in breast pathology

Iatrogenic changes within the breast can provide challenges for the histopathologist in routine practice. Diagnostic procedures, such as core biopsies, result in reactive changes and can cause displacement of benign and malignant cells, the interpretation of which may cause difficulties in the resection specimen. Breast augmentation surgery with implants or injection of fillers, performed for cosmetic reasons or as part of a reconstructive process following removal of breast cancer, also produces reactive changes locally and at distant sites that may mimic cancer. The entity of implant-associated anaplastic large-cell lymphoma is now well recognized, with progress in our understanding of the underlying biological factors that drive its development. Chemotherapy and radiotherapy used in the treatment of breast cancer causes characteristic changes in normal breast tissue, and can alter the histological appearance and receptor status of the tumour. Radiotherapy to the breast, for breast cancer or childhood malignancies, increases the risk of developing a secondary malignancy in the breast long after treatment. In this review, we describe some of the iatrogenic changes that may be seen in histological specimens from the breast.

Nanotechnology: Future of Oncotherapy

Recent advances in nanotechnology have established its importance in several areas including medicine. The myriad of applications in oncology range from detection and diagnosis to drug delivery and treatment. Although nanotechnology has attracted a lot of attention, the practical application of nanotechnology to clinical cancer care is still in its infancy. This review summarizes the role that nanotechnology has played in improving cancer therapy, its potential for affecting all aspects of cancer care, and the challenges that must be overcome to realize its full promise.

Plasma S100P level as a novel prognostic marker of metastatic breast cancer

Metastasis is the main cause of death in breast cancer patients. The development of reliable and cost-effective biomarker to evaluate the prognosis of metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients is of great importance. S100P is a member of S100 family and has been proved to be associated with metastasis establishment.

METHODS

We investigated the plasma S100P levels in 60 healthy controls, 48 primary and 273 metastatic breast cancer patients. The MBC patients were followed-up for disease progression and death up to 3.5 years after recruitment. Radiographic response of MBC patients were also analyzed for investigation on treatment monitoring value of plasma S100P level. We found a robust association between high plasma S100P level (>7 ng/mL) and poor prognosis of metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients (median progression-free survival time: 5.0 vs. 8.7 months, log-rank test p < 0.001; median overall survival time: 22.5 vs. 31.6 months, log-rank test p < 0.001). The plasma S100P level added additional prognostic relevance to the conventional prognostication model with clinicopathological factors and CTC enumeration. The plasma S100P level decreased significantly after treatment, while the reduction correlated with the radiographic response of the MBC patients. This finding indicates the value of plasma S100P in dynamic evaluation of treatment outcome. We hereby suggest plasma S100P level as a simple and cost-effective marker for the prognosis of metastatic breast cancer.

HER-2, ER, PR status concordance in primary breast cancer and corresponding metastatic lesion in lymph node in Chinese women

AIMS AND BACKGROUND

To compare the expression of estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER-2) in the primary site and the metastatic lesion of lymph nodes in invasive breast cancer for investigating whether the expression of these biomarkers in the primary site could act as a surrogate to the lymphatic metastatic lesion in the same patient.

METHODS

In lymphatic metastatic lesion and corresponding primary lesion of 107 cases of invasive breast cancer, ER and PR statuses were assessed by immunohistochemistry (IHC). HER-2 expression level was evaluated by IHC and/or fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH).

RESULTS

In the primary lesions, 43.9% were ER positive; 46.7% were PR positive; 34.6% were HER-2 positive. In corresponding lymphatic metastatic lesions, the HER-2 status was concordant in 90 patients; 9 patients were diagnosed positive in metastatic lesion while negative in primary lesion; 8 patients were negative in metastatic lesion while positive in primary site (agreement, 84.1%; κ=0.647). A change in ER status was observed in 24 cases: 17 cases positive in metastatic site while negative in primary site; 7 cases negative in metastatic site while positive in primary site (agreement, 77.6%; κ=0.534). PR status discordance between the primary lesion and the metastatic regional lymph nodes was reported in 19 cases (agreement, 82.2%; κ=0.640).

CONCLUSIONS

This study revealed that there was only a moderate concordance of ER, PR and HER-2 status between primary tumors and metastatic lymph nodes. These results indicate that it was inappropriate to predict the status of ER, PR and HER-2 in metastatic lymph nodes based on the results of evaluation of that in primary lesions.

Standardization of pathologic evaluation and reporting of postneoadjuvant specimens in clinical trials of breast cancer: recommendations from an international working group

Neoadjuvant systemic therapy is being used increasingly in the treatment of early-stage breast cancer. Response, in the form of pathological complete response, is a validated and evaluable surrogate end point of survival after neoadjuvant therapy. Thus, pathological complete response has become a primary end point for clinical trials. However, there is a current lack of uniformity in the definition of pathological complete response. A review of standard operating procedures used by 28 major neoadjuvant breast cancer trials and/or 25 sites involved in such trials identified marked variability in specimen handling and histologic reporting. An international working group was convened to develop practical recommendations for the pathologic assessment of residual disease in neoadjuvant clinical trials of breast cancer and information expected from pathology reports. Systematic sampling of areas identified by informed mapping of the specimen and close correlation with radiological findings is preferable to overly exhaustive sampling, and permits taking tissue samples for translational research. Controversial areas are discussed, including measurement of lesion size, reporting of lymphovascular space invasion and the presence of isolated tumor cells in lymph nodes after neoadjuvant therapy, and retesting of markers after treatment. If there has been a pathological complete response, this must be clearly stated, and the presence/absence of residual ductal carcinoma in situ must be described. When there is residual invasive carcinoma, a comment must be made as to the presence/absence of chemotherapy effect in the breast and lymph nodes. The Residual Cancer Burden is the preferred method for quantifying residual disease in neoadjuvant clinical trials in breast cancer; other methods can be included per trial protocols and regional preference. Posttreatment tumor staging using the Tumor-Node-Metastasis system should be included. These recommendations for standardized pathological evaluation and reporting of neoadjuvant breast cancer specimens should improve prognostication for individual patients and allow comparison of treatment outcomes within and across clinical trials.

Could the Breast Prognostic Biomarker Status Change During Disease Progression? An Immunohistochemical Comparison between Primary Tumors and Synchronous Nodal Metastasis

BACKGROUND

Prognostic biomarkers in breast cancer are routinely investigated in the primary tumors to guide further management. However, it is proposed that the expression may change during the disease progression, and may result in a different immune profile in the metastatic nodes. This work aimed to investigate the expression of breast prognostic biomarkers in primary tumors and in its axillary nodal metastasis, to estimate the possible discordant expression.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

60 paired primary and axillary nodal metastasis samples were collected from patients with primary breast cancer with positive nodal deposits, diagnosed at the Maadi Military Hospital, Cairo, Egypt, during the year 2013. ER, PR and HER2 expression was assessed by immunohistochemistry in all samples

RESULTS

48.3% of the included cases showed concordant results for both ER and PR receptors between the primary tumor and its nodal metastasis while 51.7% showed discordant results and the discordance level was statistically significant. On the other hand, 70% of the cases showed concordant Her2 results between the primary tumors and the nodal deposits, 30% showed discordant results and the difference was significant.

CONCLUSIONS

The study indicated that the discordance in ER and PR receptor expression between the primary breast tumor and their nodal metastasis may be significant. The possible switch in the biomarker status during the disease progression is worth noting and may change the patient therapeutic planning. So, whether the treatment selection should be based on biomarkers in the lymph node is a topic for further studies and future clinical trials.

Recommendations for standardized pathological characterization of residual disease for neoadjuvant clinical trials of breast cancer by the BIG-NABCG collaboration

Neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NAST) provides the unique opportunity to assess response to treatment after months rather than years of follow-up. However, significant variability exists in methods of pathologic assessment of response to NAST, and thus its interpretation for subsequent clinical decisions. Our international multidisciplinary working group was convened by the Breast International Group-North American Breast Cancer Group (BIG-NABCG) collaboration and tasked to recommend practical methods for standardized evaluation of the post-NAST surgical breast cancer specimen for clinical trials that promote accurate and reliable designation of pathologic complete response (pCR) and meaningful characterization of residual disease. Recommendations include multidisciplinary communication; clinical marking of the tumor site (clips); and radiologic, photographic, or pictorial imaging of the sliced specimen, to map the tissue sections and reconcile macroscopic and microscopic findings. The information required to define pCR (ypT0/is ypN0 or ypT0 yp N0), residual ypT and ypN stage using the current AJCC/UICC system, and the Residual Cancer Burden system were recommended for quantification of residual disease in clinical trials.

The prevalence of estrogen receptor-negative breast cancer in Ethiopia

Background

In contrast with breast cancers (BCs) in other parts of the world, most previous studies reported that the majority of BCs in sub-Saharan Africa are estrogen-receptor (ER) negative. However, a recent study using the US SEER database showed that the proportion of ER-negative BC is comparable between US-born blacks and West-African born blacks but substantially lower in East African-born blacks, with over 74% of patients Ethiopians or Eritreans. In this paper, we provide the first report on the proportion of ER-negative BC in Ethiopia, and the relation to progesterone-receptor (PgR) status.

Methods

We analysed 352 female patients with ER results available out of 1208 consecutive female BC patients treated at Addis Ababa-University Hospital, Ethiopia, from June 2005 through December 2010. The influences of age, stage, and histology on the probability of ER-negative tumours were assessed by a log-linear regression model.

Results

Of the 352 patients, only 35% were ER-negative. The proportion of ER-negative tumours decreased with advancing age at diagnosis and was not affected by histology or stage. For age, the proportion decreased by 6% for each additional 5 years (stage-adjusted prevalence ratio PR = 0.94, 95% CI: 0.89–1.00). About 31% were ER- and PgR-negative, and 69% were ER- and/or PgR-positive.

Conclusions

Contrary to most previous reports in other parts of sub-Saharan Africa, the majority of patients in Ethiopia are ER-positive rather than ER-negative. These findings are in line with low proportions of ER-negative BCs from East African immigrants within the SEER database, and they have clinical implications for management of BC patients in Ethiopia and other parts of sub-Saharan Africa where ER-status is not ascertained as part of routine management of the disease. Since the majority of patients showed ER-positive BC, Tamoxifen-therapy should be given to all patients even with unknown ER status.

Recent advances in the molecular characterization of circulating tumor cells

Although circulating tumor cells (CTCs) were first observed over a century ago, lack of sensitive methodology precluded detailed study of these cells until recently. However, technological advances have now facilitated the identification, enumeration, and characterization of CTCs using a variety of methods. The majority of evidence supporting the use of CTCs in clinical decision-making has been related to enumeration using the CellSearch® system and correlation with prognosis. Growing evidence also suggests that CTC monitoring can provide an early indication of patient treatment response based on comparison of CTC levels before and after therapy. However, perhaps the greatest potential that CTCs hold for oncology lies at the level of molecular characterization. Clinical treatment decisions may be more effective if they are based on molecular characteristics of metastatic cells rather than on those of the primary tumor alone. Molecular characterization of CTCs (which can be repeatedly isolated in a minimally invasive fashion) provides the opportunity for a "real-time liquid biopsy" that allows assessment of genetic drift, investigation of molecular disease evolution, and identification of actionable genomic characteristics. This review focuses on recent advances in this area, including approaches involving immunophenotyping, fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), multiplex RT-PCR, microarray, and genomic sequencing.