Validation of prognostic significance of the proposed uniform classification framework in neuroendocrine neoplasms of the breast

The clinicopathological and molecular features of primary high-grade neuroendocrine tumour in the breast

AIMS

Nottingham grade for breast cancers, rather than gastro-entero-pancreatic (GEP) grade for neuroendocrine tumours (NETs), is currently applied to primary breast NETs, which need further clarification. High-grade NETs in breast also remain poorly recognised.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Among 595 breast carcinomas with diffuse synaptophysin (Syn) or chromogranin A (CgA) immunostaining (≥ 90%), 197 eligible cases were selected, including 69 NETs, 123 invasive breast carcinomas of no special type (IBC-NSTs) and five neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs). The prognostic significance of these two grading systems in breast NETs was assessed. Furthermore, the clinicopathological features were compared in Nottingham G3 cases among three entities. Targeted sequencing and immunostaining (INSM1/p53/Rb/p16) were also performed in all Nottingham G3 NETs, NECs and 10 Nottingham G3 IBC-NSTs. All Nottingham G3 NETs (9 of 69, 13.0%) fell into GEP G3 cases (20 of 69, 29.0%). Nottingham grade provided better prognostic discrimination between G1/G2 and G3 NETs than GEP grade. Among Nottingham G3 cases, there was a trend towards reduced progression-free survival (PFS) in NETs compared with IBC-NSTs (P = 0.057), and the former were more often immunoreactive for INSM1 (44.4 versus 0%, P = 0.033). Nottingham G3 NETs were all of luminal-like phenotype (P < 0.001) and exhibited less aberrant p53 patterns (11.1 versus 80.0%, P = 0.023) as well as more favourable PFS (P = 0.012) and disease-specific survival (P = 0.002) than NECs. Rb loss (4 of 5, 80%), p16 overexpression (5 of 5, 100%) and RB1 mutation (2 of 5, 40%) were observed exclusively in NECs. Based on expression data, epithelial-mesenchymal transition and KRAS signalling pathways were significantly up-regulated in Nottingham G3 NETs (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Nottingham grade, rather than GEP grade, holds important prognostic significance in primary breast NETs. Nottingham G3 NETs represent a small proportion of breast NETs, and may demonstrate distinct clinicopathological and molecular features from other high-grade breast carcinomas with diffuse neuroendocrine markers expression.

Primary Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of Breast: Changing Paradigm

Neuroendocrine carcinomas are one of the most rare malignancies of the breast. Theoretically they can arise from any organ of the body, but incidence in breast is very rare. Due to the ever-changing definition of the disease, no specific therapeutic guideline is available in current literature. Currently WHO defines neuroendocrine carcinoma of breast as malignant lesions that expresses > 90% of neuroendocrine markers like synaptophysin, chromogranin A with characteristic histopathology features with exclusion of solid papillary carcinoma, and hypercellular-type mucinous carcinoma.

Primary neuroendocrine tumor of the breast: A case report

Primary neuroendocrine neoplasm of the breast (PNENB) is a rare subtype of breast cancer, accounting for <1% of all breast tumors. The morphological features of PNENB are similar to those of neuroendocrine tumors originating in the lungs or gastrointestinal system, with tumor cells exhibiting the strong expression of neuroendocrine markers, including chromogranin A and synaptophysin. Since this type of cancer was first reported, the definition, classification and diagnostic criteria of PNENB have evolved and changed. However, accurate diagnostic criteria and standard treatment guidelines are lacking. The present report describes a specific case of PNENB, which was consistent with the morphological and molecular features of other cases in most previous studies. In addition, the current body of literature on PNENB, including its development, diagnosis, molecular features, treatment and prognosis is reviewed.

Neuroendocrine Neoplasms of the Breast: Current Insights and Future Directions

BACKGROUND

The breast neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) represent a heterogeneous group of tumors and account for less than 1% of all NENs. The 5th edition of the WHO Classification of Breast Tumors in 2019 introduced a more stringent definition for breast NENs including neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) (G1, G2) and neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs) (small cell carcinoma, large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma). While the diagnostic criteria and treatment of breast NENs still have some unsolved issues.

OBJECTIVE

We aim to discuss the diagnosis, treatment progress, existing problems, and future development direction of breast NENs.

METHODS

We provide a comprehensive review and evaluation of the diagnostic criteria, pathological features, utilization of immunohistochemical markers, molecular characteristics, pathogenesis, clinical significance, treatment options for breast NENs.

RESULTS

(1) Under the new definition, "pure" breast NENs are extremely rare. (2) Breast NETs are graded according to Nottingham grading System. Grading criteria utilized in other systems for NENs, such as mitotic count, ki67 proliferation index, and necrosis, have not been applied to breast NENs. (3) The WHO has not yet acknowledged the existence of NET G3 clearly. (4) The expression of NE markers may differ in breast NECs. (5) The treatment of breast NENs is still based on IBCs-NST, and without any difference from invasive carcinoma with NE features. (6) The prognosis of breast NENs remains unclear, while the prognosis for NECs is significantly poorer than invasive breast carcinomas of no special type (IBCs-NST) has been confirmed.

CONCLUSION

Strict adherence to criteria is the key to correctly diagnose breast NENs with the exclusion of metastasis from other sites. Further exploration is required to determine the tissue origin of breast NENs and understand the pathogenesis. Efforts are still needed to establish unified diagnostic criteria and a unique diagnosis and treatment consensus for breast NENs.

Non-metastatic primary neuroendocrine neoplasms of the breast: a reference cancer center's experience of a heterogenous entity

Background

Primary neuroendocrine neoplasms of the breast (Br-NENs) are rare. The classification has been updated in recent years making interpretation of the data published challenging. It is unclear whether neuroendocrine differentiation is associated with poorer prognosis and what treatment approaches should be applied.

Methods

The database for breast cancer patients treated between 2009 and 2022 at the Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology Branch Krakow was explored to search for Br-NENs. Patients' medical and pathological data were collected and analyzed.

Results

We included 22 females with Br-NEN without metastases at the time of diagnosis. The median age was 64 years (range: 28-88), Of the cases, 18 were hormone receptor positive, all were HER-2 negative, the median Ki67 was 27% (10-100%). The median tumor size at the time of diagnosis was 29.5mm (7-75mm), 9 patients were N-positive. DCIS was present in 5 cases. Only one case was negative for chromogranin and synaptophysin staining, but data were missing for 4 cases. Nine patients received adjuvant chemotherapy, mainly based on anthracyclines and taxanes, while 16 received adjuvant hormonal therapy and 15 received postoperative radiotherapy. Radical surgery was performed in all patients, but two underwent suboptimal tumorectomy. One patient had local recurrence, three experienced metastatic disease, all involving the lungs, but these patients are still alive. The median follow-up was 96 months (8-153). Two patients died, with a follow up time of no recurrence >4 years. Our results were compared to twelve case series collecting clinical data on Br-NENs, with median patient number of 10.5 (range: 3-142).

Conclusion

Br-NENs represent a heterogenous group of diseases, lacking data from prospective studies or clinical trials. There are no established treatment standards tailored for Br-NENs. Our patients' cohort exhibited a favorable prognosis, potentially attributed to lower tumor stage and Ki67 index compared to other reported case series. We suggest that radical surgery and postoperative radiotherapy be administered akin to standard treatment for breast cancer of no special type. ESMO also advocates for this approach in systemic treatment, although we recommend considering platinum-based chemotherapy for patients with poorly differentiated Br-NENs exhibiting high Ki67.

Clinical outcome and therapeutic impact on neuroendocrine neoplasms of the breast: a national cancer database study

PURPOSE

Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) of the breast are rare and not well-studied. NEN are subcategorized as well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumor (NET) and poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC). The objectives of the current study were to review the clinicopathologic features of NENs, therapeutic efficacy of current systemic therapy and clinical outcomes of NEN of the breast.

METHODS

Between 2004 and 2015, 420 NET, 205 NEC, 146 Adenocarcinoma with NE differentiation (ACNED) and 1,479,520 of invasive carcinoma, not otherwise specified (IC-NOS) of the breast were identified in the National Caner Database. Overall survival was compared among groups using Kaplan-Meier method and Log-rank test. Multivariate analyses were performed to identify prognostic factors.

RESULTS

After adjusting for other prognostic factors, both NET and NEC of the breast showed significantly worse OS than IC-NOS (HR (95% CI) = 1.41 (1.17, 1.72), p = 0.005 and HR (95% CI) = 2.11 (1.67, 2.67), p < 0.001, respectively). Both NET and NEC benefited from endocrine therapy if the tumors were hormonal receptor positive (median OS for treated with vs without: 125 vs 57 months in NET, not reached vs 29 months in NEC). NEC also benefited from chemotherapy (median OS for treated with vs without: 42 vs 34 months), but not NET.

CONCLUSION

NEN is a unique pathologic and clinical entity, which has worse clinical outcome compared to IC-NOS of the breast. Current therapeutics used in the treatment of IC-NOS improve, but do not fully mitigate, the poorer prognosis of NEN patients. More effective therapy for patients with this unique tumor type are needed.

A high-quality model for predicting the prognosis of breast neuroendocrine carcinoma to help clinicians decide on appropriate treatment methods: A population-based analysis

•

The incidence of breast neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC) was approximately 1.96–2.37%.

•

Breast NEC had poor prognosis than breast invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC).

•

Patients with breast NEC may benefit from surgery plus chemotherapy.

•

Efficient models were constructed to guide the treatment of breast NEC.

Background

Breast neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC) is a rare malignancy with unclear treatment options and prognoses. This study aimed to construct a high-quality model to predict overall survival (OS) and breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) and help clinicians choose appropriate breast NEC treatments.

Patients and methods

A total of 378 patients with breast NEC and 349,736 patients with breast invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) were enrolled in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database between 2010 and 2018. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to balance the clinical baseline. Prognostic factors determined by multivariate Cox analysis were included in the nomogram. C-index and calibration curves were used to verify the performance of the nomogram.

Results

Nomograms were constructed for the breast NEC and breast IDC groups after PSM. The C–index of the nomograms ranged from 0.834 to 0.880 in the internal validation and 0.818–0.876 in the external validation, indicating that the nomogram had good discrimination. The risk stratification system showed that patients with breast NEC had worse prognoses than those with breast IDC in the low-risk and intermediate-risk groups but had a similar prognosis that those in the high-risk group. Moreover, patients with breast NEC may have a better prognosis when undergoing surgery plus chemotherapy than when undergoing surgery alone or chemotherapy alone.

Conclusions

We established nomograms with a risk stratification system to predict OS and BCSS in patients with breast NEC. This model could help clinicians evaluate prognosis and provide individualized treatment recommendations for patients with breast NEC.

Primary Neuroendocrine Tumor of the Breast: Current Understanding and Future Perspectives

Primary neuroendocrine carcinoma of the breast (NECB) is characterized with heterogeneity, rarity, and poor differentiation, which is probably an underestimated subtype of breast cancer, including small cell NECs and large cell NECs. The diagnostic criteria for NECB have been constantly updated as the disease changes and the understanding increases. According to the latest WHO Classification, primary neuroendocrine neoplasm (NEN) of the breast consists of well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors (NET), extremely aggressive neuroendocrine carcinomas (NEC) as well as invasive breast cancers of no special type (IBCs-NST) with neuroendocrine differentiation. The accurate diagnosis of NECB remains a challenge for its low incidence, which needs multi-disciplinary methods. For the rarity of the disease, there is a lack of large samples and prospective clinical research. For these invasive tumors, there are no standardized therapeutic guidelines or norms, and the treatment often refers to nonspecific breast cancer. In addition, the prognosis of such patients remains unknown. In 2003, the World Health Organization (WHO) listed NECB as an independent entity for the first time, while few features of NECB were clarified. In this review, it presents the WHO Classification, clinicopathologic characteristics, diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis of these patients. In addition, it summarizes the latest studies on molecular features of NECB, aiming to provide new therapeutic perspectives for the disease.

Clinical and genomic analyses of neuroendocrine neoplasms of the breast

Breast neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) constitute a rare histologic subtype that includes both neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) and neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs). In this study, we aimed to gain insight into the clinical and molecular characteristics of NENs of the breast. NEN and paired distant normal fresh tissues and clinicopathological data were obtained from 17 patients with NENs, and clinicopathological data were collected from 755 patients with invasive breast carcinomas of no special type (IBCs-NST). We compared the clinicopathological characteristics of NENs and IBCs-NST and performed whole-exome sequencing (WES) of both NEN and paired normal tissues. Compared with the IBC-NST patients, the NEN patients had a higher mean age, lower clinical stage, and lower pathological nodal (pN) stage (P < 0.001, P < 0.001, and P = 0.017, respectively). The most frequently mutated gene in NENs was KMT2C (3/17, 17.6%). NENs had copy number variations (CNVs) of 8q, 11q, and 17q amplification and 17q and 11q deletion and harbored the following specific genes related to tumorigenesis: (i) suppressor genes with loss of heterozygosity (LOH) such as ACE (2/17, 11.8%); (ii) tumor driver genes such as GATA3 (2/17, 11.8%); and (iii) susceptibility genes such as MAP3K4 (17/17, 100%) and PDE4DIP (17/17, 100%). The oncogenic/likely oncogenic mutations of NETs in PI3K pathway genes (50.0%, 18.2%; P < 0.001) and MAPK signaling pathway genes (83.3%, 18.2%; P = 0.035) affected higher proportions than those of NECs. In conclusion, this study provides certain clinical and molecular evidence supporting NENs as a distinct subtype of breast cancer and provides some potential molecular features for distinguishing NETs from NECs.

Head to head: Do neuroendocrine tumours in the breast truly exist?

Breast cancer (BC) is a heterogeneous disease with a spectrum of morphological features. Concepts of histogenesis and differentiation in BC remain controversial. Recent evidence supports differentiation rather than histogenesis as the underlying mechanism for the myriad morphological appearances of BC. Prognosis and response to therapy are determined by a combination of factors including tumour grade, stage and receptor status whereas tumour histological types play an independent role in only limited examples. Neuroendocrine tumours (NETs) comprise one of the most debated entities in the breast since their first description. Apart from the rare small cell NE carcinoma (NEC) which has well-characterised features similar to their counterparts in other organs, the true existence, diagnostic criteria and clinical significance of NE neoplasms (NENs) in the breast are shrouded in controversy. At the core of this discussion is whether normal NE cells exist in the breast, and if breast NETs have distinct morphology and clinical behaviour. When NETs are encountered in the breast, metastatic origin has to be excluded. The more frequent situation in which NE differentiation is observed in breast cancers is in the context of recognisable, morphologically well described special type neoplasms like the hypercellular mucinous carcinoma and solid papillary carcinoma. In this review, arguments for and against maintaining the category of NENs in the breast are articulated in relation to existing literature on this group of unusual tumours.

Epidemiology, Treatment and Prognosis Analysis of Small Cell Breast Carcinoma: A Population-Based Study

BACKGROUND

Primary small cell breast carcinoma (SCBC) is an uncommon malignancy with highly invasive behavior. The aim of this study was to find out more about the incidence, clinicopathologic characteristics and identify potential prognostic factors of SCBC.

METHODS

Data of patients with primary diagnosis of SCBC between 1975 and 2018 were extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. The incidence after adjustment for age and percentage change per year in incidence were calculated. Disease-specific survival (DSS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed among these SCBC patients identified from the SEER database. The whole cohorts were randomized into training and validation cohorts as ratio of 7: 3. Cox regression analysis was performed to determine predictors of survival with the training cohorts. Predictive models were constructed with training cohorts, and nomogram validation was performed using receiver operating characteristic curves, concordance indices and calibration curves in both training and validation cohorts.

RESULTS

323 SCBC patients were enrolled finally during the research period. The overall incidence after adjustment for age between 1990 and 2018 was 0.14 per million per year, and the prevalence of the incidence has plateaued. Most of these tumors were poorly differentiated or undifferentiated. The most prevalent presenting stage was Stage II. Patients identified in this study were randomly divided into training (n = 226) and testing (n = 97) cohorts. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards model showed that chemotherapy, surgery and stage were important predictors of DSS and OS.

CONCLUSION

SCBC is considered an infrequent breast neoplasm with aggressive characteristics. Tumor stage is associated with poor prognosis. Combination of surgery and chemotherapy is the main treatment for SCBC.

Neuroendocrine Neoplasms of the Breast: The Latest WHO Classification and Review of the Literature

Simple Summary

Breast tumors exhibiting neuroendocrine differentiation are a heterogeneous group of tumors that have been variously defined in previous World Health Organization (WHO) classifications. In the WHO Classification of Tumours, 5th edition, neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) and neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs) of the breast, both of which are invasive cancers, are classified as neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) of the breast. However, the clinical significance of NE differentiation in breast cancers, especially in NETs of the breast, is not yet fully understood, and a large overlap appears to exist between breast cancers showing NE differentiation and invasive breast cancer of no special type (IBC-NST). While breast NECs show distinct clinical and morphological features, diagnosis of NETs based on the morphological characteristics alone can be challenging; one reason is that breast NETs do not necessarily have the same morphological characteristics as those of NENs arising in other organs. Thus, the heterogeneity of breast tumors with neuroendocrine differentiation and the changes in their classifications over the years have left many open issues that still need to be resolved. In this review, we shall summarize the history of breast “NENs,” including of mixed types of tumors and the characteristics of these tumors, and discuss their differences from NENs arising in other organs.

Abstract

Breast tumors with neuroendocrine (NE) differentiation comprise an uncommon and heterogeneous group of tumors, including invasive breast cancer of no special type (IBC-NST) with NE features, neuroendocrine tumors (NETs), and neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC). The most recent World Health Organization (WHO) classification in 2019 defined neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) of the breast (Br-NENs) as tumors in which >90% of cells show histological evidence of NE differentiation, including NETs (low-grade tumors) and NEC (high-grade). Due to the low prevalence of these tumors and successive changes in their diagnostic criteria over the years, only limited evidence of these tumors exists, derived mainly from case reports and retrospective case series. Breast tumors with NE differentiation are usually treated like the more commonly occurring IBC-NSTs. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) of breast tumors with NE differentiation usually shows a hormone receptor (HR)-positive and human epidermal growth factor type 2 (HER2)-negative profile, so that hormonal therapy with cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK)4/6 inhibitors or other targeted agents would be reasonable treatment options. Herein, we present a review of the literature on breast tumors with NE differentiation as defined in the latest WHO 2019 classification, and discuss the clinical management of these tumors.

The classification of neuroendocrine neoplasms of the breast and its clinical relevance

Neuroendocrine neoplasms of the breast (Br-NENs) are rare tumors of the mammary gland. Their definition and classification have been a matter of discussion for more than half a century, as they present some degree of overlap with other malignancies in the mammary gland. The recent evolutions in the understanding of the pathogenesis of neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) as well as the novel tools in the diagnostic arsenal of the pathologists, and a better correlation with clinical data, have led to improved classification schemes for these entities, beginning from those arising in digestive and thoracic organs. These new classification concepts have been recently expanded to NENs arising in every anatomical site, with the proposal of a common classification framework that has been applied in the 5th edition of the WHO classification of tumors. These concepts include the recognition of two distinct families of NENs (neuroendocrine tumors, NETs, and neuroendocrine carcinomas, NECs), the identification of mixed neuroendocrine/non-neuroendocrine neoplasms, and the application of definite morphological and immunohistochemical criteria for the diagnosis of NENs. The last WHO classification of Br-NENs, however, still seems to leave several unanswered questions and unmet needs in the understanding of diagnostic and clinical features of these entities. This review will critically revise the current classification of Br-NENs, underlining its lights and shadows and focusing on the identification of diagnostic histopathological criteria that can help the univocal recognition of Br-NET, Br-NEC, and Br-MiNEN.