Subcutaneous trastuzumab with pertuzumab and docetaxel in HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer: Final analysis of MetaPHER, a phase IIIb single-arm safety study

Pertuzumab in Combination with Trastuzumab and Docetaxel as Adjuvant Doublet Therapy for HER2-Positive Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review

Breast cancer is the most clinically relevant pathology of the mammary gland and is currently the most diagnosed malignant disease among women worldwide. In breast cancer prevention, it is important to consider that the risk of developing the disease is not the same for the entire population. This pathology presents heterogeneous clinical manifestations and the most common classification is related to the following hormonal receptors: estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), and triple-negative (TNBC). Currently, a new class of therapy is being used for cancer treatment: anti-body-drug conjugates. A bibliographic search was performed by establishing keywords and then combining them using Boolean operators OR and AND. Thus, the search equation was formulated according to the PICO search question to be used in the PubMed database. Results: Fifteen studies that met the established inclusion criteria were analyzed, and their methodological quality was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute approach, demonstrating high reliability in the results obtained, the analyzed studies focus on the combination of adjuvant Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab with chemotherapy for the treatment of HER2-positive breast cancer. Scientific evidence suggests that the combination of pertuzumab and trastuzumab not only improves the survival of patients with HER2-positive breast cancer but also provides a safe and flexible treatment option.

A Clinical Review of Subcutaneous Trastuzumab and the Fixed-Dose Combination of Pertuzumab and Trastuzumab for Subcutaneous Injection in the Treatment of HER2-Positive Breast Cancer

Therapy directed against human epidermal growth factor receptor type 2 (HER2) is the standard of care for patients with early-stage and metastatic HER2-positive breast cancer. Treating patients with HER2-positive breast cancer with anti-HER2-monoclonal antibodies, specifically trastuzumab and pertuzumab, is considered standard of care in the neoadjuvant and adjuvant settings and in the first-line setting for metastatic HER2-positive breast cancer. Pertuzumab and trastuzumab are commonly administered intravenously. Subcutaneous (SC) formulations of trastuzumab alone and as a combined product of pertuzumab and trastuzumab are now available for clinical use. Phase III trial results demonstrate that the efficacy and safety of SC trastuzumab and fixed-dose combination of pertuzumab, trastuzumab, and hyaluronidase-zzxf for subcutaneous (PH FDC SC) injection and the intravenous (IV) formulation counterparts are comparable. SC formulations of anti-HER2 monoclonal antibodies offer several advantages over IV counterparts, including shorter administration time, less need for IV access, and better resource utilization for treatment facilities. This review summarizes the clinical data supporting the use of SC trastuzumab and PH FDC SC injection in treating early-stage and metastatic HER2-positive breast cancer and highlights the benefits of SC injection compared to the IV formulations.

Landscape of Subcutaneous Administration Strategies for Monoclonal Antibodies in Oncology

In recent decades, subcutaneous (SC) administration of monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) has emerged as a promising alternative to intravenous delivery in oncology, offering comparable therapeutic efficacy while addressing patient preferences. This perspective article provides an in-depth analysis of the technological landscape surrounding SC mAb administration in oncology. It outlines various technologies under evaluation across developmental stages, spanning from preclinical investigations to the integration of established methodologies in clinical practice. Additionally, this perspective article explores emerging trends and prospective trajectories, shedding light on the evolving landscape of SC mAb administration. Furthermore, it emphasizes key checkpoints related to quality attributes essential for optimizing mAb delivery via the SC route. This review serves as a valuable resource for researchers, clinicians, and healthcare policymakers, offering insights into the advancement of SC mAb administration in oncology and its implications for patient care.

Chemotherapy-Induced Alopecia by Docetaxel: Prevalence, Treatment and Prevention

Docetaxel is a commonly used taxane chemotherapeutic agent in the treatment of a variety of cancers, including breast cancer, ovarian cancer, prostate cancer, non-small cell lung cancer, gastric cancer, and head and neck cancer. Docetaxel exerts its anti-cancer effects through inhibition of the cell cycle and induction of proapoptotic activity. However, docetaxel also impacts rapidly proliferating normal cells in the scalp hair follicles (HFs), rendering the HFs vulnerable to docetaxel-induced cell death and leading to chemotherapy-induced alopecia (CIA). In severe cases, docetaxel causes persistent or permanent CIA (pCIA) when hair does not grow back completely six months after chemotherapy cessation. Hair loss has severe negative impacts on patients' quality of life and may even compromise their compliance with treatment. This review discusses the notable prevalence of docetaxel-induced CIA and pCIA, as well as their prevention and management. At this moment, scalp cooling is the standard of care to prevent CIA. Treatment options to promote hair regrowth include but are not limited to minoxidil, photobiomodulation (PBMT), and platelet-rich plasma (PRP). In addition, a handful of current clinical trials are exploring additional agents to treat or prevent CIA. Research models of CIA, particularly ex vivo human scalp HF organ culture and in vivo mouse models with human scalp xenografts, will help expedite the translation of bench findings of CIA prevention and/or amelioration to the clinic.

A clinical systematic literature review of treatments among patients with advanced and/or metastatic human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 positive breast cancer

Aim: This systematic literature review aims to summarize the efficacy/effectiveness of treatments, including eribulin (ERI)-based and anti-human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) treatments in advanced/metastatic HER2+ breast cancer. Methods: Three databases from 2016 to September 2021 were searched for clinical trials and observational studies in patients receiving first-line (1L) standard of care (SOC), second-line (2L) SOC or third-line or subsequent lines (3L+). Results: 2692 citations were screened, and 38 studies were included. Eleven studies were randomized-controlled trials (RCTs; 5 in 1L, 6 in 3L+), 6 were single-arm trials (5 in 1L, 1 in 3L+) and 21 were observational studies (13 in 1L, 6 in 2L, 4 in 3L+ [note that studies with subgroups for 1L, 2L, 3L+ are double-counted]). Longer overall survival (OS) was associated with 1L and 2L treatment, and for 3L+ studies that included ERI, ERI or trastuzumab (Tmab) + ERI led to longer OS than treatments of physician's choice (median OS of 11, 10 and 8.9 months, respectively). Progression-free survival was 9 months in Tmab + pertuzumab (Pmab) + ERI, 4 months in Tmab + ERI and 3.3 months in ERI. Conclusion: Available treatments provide a wide range of efficacy. However, later lines lack standardization and conclusions on comparative effectiveness are limited by differing trial designs. Thus, the chance of prolonged survival with new agents warrants further research.

Standard-of-Care Treatment for HER2+ Metastatic Breast Cancer and Emerging Therapeutic Options

Prior to the advent of the HER2-targeted monoclonal antibody trastuzumab, HER2+ breast cancer (BC) was considered an aggressive disease with a poor prognosis. Over the past 25 years, innovations in molecular biology, pathology, and early therapeutics have transformed the treatment landscape. With the advent of multiple HER2-directed therapies, there have been immense improvements in oncological outcomes in both adjuvant and metastatic settings. Currently, 8 HER2-targeted therapies are approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of early-stage and/or advanced/metastatic disease. Nonetheless, approximately 25% of patients develop recurrent disease or metastasis after HER2-targeted therapy and most patients with HER2+ metastatic breast cancer (MBC) die from their disease. Given the many mechanisms of resistance to HER2-directed therapy, there is a pressing need to further personalize care for patients with HER2+ MBC, by the identification of reliable predictive biomarkers, and the development of novel therapies and combination regimens to overcome therapeutic resistance. Of particular interest are established and novel antibody-drug conjugates, as well as other novel therapeutics and multifaceted approaches to harness the immune system (checkpoint inhibitors, bispecific antibodies, and vaccine therapy). Herein, we discuss standard-of-care treatment of HER2+ MBC, including the management of breast cancer brain metastases (BCBM). Furthermore, we highlight novel treatment approaches for HER2+ MBC, including endeavors to personalize therapy, and discuss ongoing controversies and challenges.

A disproportionality analysis of adverse events associated to pertuzumab in the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS)

BACKGROUND

Pertuzumab is widely used for the treatment of HER2 + breast cancer. But its safety in the real world should be continuously monitored. So, we evaluated the safety of pertuzumab by pharmacovigilance analyze based on related adverse events (AEs) from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) and find whether potential or uncertain adverse events were present.

METHODS

In disproportionality analysis, four algorithms were employed to detect the signals of pertuzumab from the FAERS between 2012 and 2022. In addition, we also used MYSQL 8.0, Navicat Premium 15, and Microsoft EXCEL 2019 to analyze the potential and high-ROR (reporting odds ratio) signals of pertuzumab. We also collected the onset times of pertuzumab-associated AEs.

RESULTS

From January 2012 to December 2022, there are 39,190,598 AEs reported from the FAERS database, of which 14,707 AEs listed pertuzumab as the 'primary suspected (PS)' drug. A total of 115 (46 potential) significant disproportionality preferred terms (PTs) conforming to the four algorithms were retained. Finally, we detected that the pertuzumab-induced AEs occurred in 12 organ systems. For pertuzumab, unexpected and significant PTs of AEs were found, including but not limited to below PTs: haematotoxicity, cardiotoxicity, cardiomyopathy, mitral valve incompetence, tachycardia, intestinal perforation, hemorrhoids, erysipelas, dehydration, pneumonitis, skin toxicity, onychomadesis, cyanosis, and circulatory collapse. We found there were 9 strong signals (5 potential safety signals) and 68 medium intensity signals (21 potential safety signals) according to IC025 (information component). The potential strong signals (IC025 > 3.0) were myelosuppression, cardiotoxicity, cardiac dysfunction, ejection fraction decreased, interstitial lung disease, and onychomadesis. Excluding unreported or unreasonable onset time reports, a total of 2016 AEs reported onset time and the median onset time was 117 days (4, 96), as median (Q1, Q3). Notably, most of the all AEs (n = 1133, 56%) and cardiac-related events (n = 405, 53%) all occurred within one month after pertuzumab therapy.

CONCLUSION

Analysis of FAERS data identified pertuzumab-associated AEs, and our findings supported continuous clinical monitoring, pharmacovigilance, and further studies of pertuzumab. A significant association was detected between pertuzumab and some potential adverse events which should be regarded with some care. We have to pay attention to the first month after pertuzumab therapy and prepare emergency measures, especially for the elderly and patients with cardiovascular diseases.

Immunotherapy for HER-2 positive breast cancer

Immunotherapy is a developing treatment for advanced breast cancer. Immunotherapy has clinical significance for the treatment of triple-negative breast cancers and human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 positive (HER2+) breast cancers. As a proved effective passive immunotherapy, clinical application of the monoclonal antibodies trastuzumab, pertuzumab and T-DM1 (ado-trastuzumab emtansine) has significantly improved the survival of patients with HER2+ breast cancers. Immune checkpoint inhibitors that block programmed death receptor-1 and its ligand (PD-1/PD-L1) have also shown benefits for breast cancer in various clinical trials. Adoptive T-cell immunotherapies and tumor vaccines are emerging as novel approaches to treating breast cancer, but require further study. This article reviews recent advances in immunotherapy for HER2+ breast cancers.

Drug delivery improvements to enable a flexible care setting for monoclonal antibody medications in oncology - Analogue-based decision framework

INTRODUCTION

The substantial acceleration in healthcare spending together with the expenditures to manage the COVID19 pandemic demand drug delivery solutions that enable a flexible care setting for high-dose monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) in oncology.

AREAS COVERED

This expert opinion introduces an analogue-based framework applied to guide decision-making for associated product improvements for mAb medications that are either already authorized or in late-stage clinical development. The four pillars of this framework comprise (1) the drug delivery profile of current and emerging treatments in the market, (2) the needs and preferences of people treated with mAbs, (3) existing healthcare infrastructures, and (4) country-dependent reimbursement and procurement models. The following product optimization examples for mAb-based treatments are evaluated based on original research and review articles in the field: subcutaneous formulations, an established drug delivery modality to reduce parenteral dosing complexity, fixed-dose combinations, an emerging concept to complement combination therapy, and (connected) on-body delivery systems, an identified future opportunity to support dosing outside of a controlled healthcare institutional environment.

EXPERT OPINION

Leveraging existing synergies and learnings from other disease areas is a measure to reduce associated development and commercialization costs and thus to provide sustainable product offerings already at the initial launch of a medication.

A Systematic Review of Time and Resource Use Costs of Subcutaneous Versus Intravenous Administration of Oncology Biologics in a Hospital Setting

BACKGROUND

The introduction of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-targeted treatment options, including dual HER2 blockade, has improved the prognosis for patients with HER2-positive breast cancer (BC) substantially. However, most of these treatments are administered via the intravenous (IV) route, which can present many challenges, such as long infusion and observation times, issues associated with repeated IV access, and increased strain on time and resources of medical centers and healthcare professionals. A fixed-dose combination of pertuzumab and trastuzumab for subcutaneous (SC) injection (pertuzumab, trastuzumab, and hyaluronidase-zzxf (PHESGO^®, F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Basel, Switzerland; PH FDC SC)) has been approved for use alongside chemotherapy for early-stage and metastatic HER2-positive BC.

OBJECTIVES

This systematic literature review was performed to identify evidence relating to time/resource use and resulting cost differences between SC and IV administration of oncology biologics in a hospital setting, and, ultimately, to inform economic modeling and associated health technology assessment of PH FDC SC.

METHODS

Electronic databases (Embase, MEDLINE, and EconLit) were searched on 9 April 2020. Additional hand searches were performed to identify publications not captured in the electronic database search. Publication screening and data extraction (study characteristics, participants, interventions, costs, and time/resource use) were carried out per the standard Cochrane review methodology. The quality of economic evidence of cost analyses was assessed using the 36-item checklist of the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence Single Technology Appraisal Specification for submission of evidence (January 2015).

RESULTS

The database search identified 2,740 records, of which 237 underwent full text screening. Full text screening, prioritization of publications about patients with a cancer diagnosis, and the addition of four citations identified during the hand search resulted in 72 final included publications, relating to 71 unique studies. This included 40 publications that described the time/resource use and/or costs associated with SC versus IV trastuzumab administration for the treatment of HER2-positive BC, and 28 publications that described time/resource use and/or costs associated with rituximab SC versus IV administration for the treatment of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma/follicular lymphoma and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. The majority of publications showed substantial time savings for preparation and administration of SC versus IV therapy, and cost savings associated with reductions in healthcare professional time and resource use for SC administration.

LIMITATIONS

There was a lack of consensus between publications regarding time and cost measurements. In addition, the search was limited to publications related to anticancer drugs; the majority of the studies included were performed in European countries.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

This review indicated a substantial body of evidence showing time/resource and cost savings of SC versus IV administration of oncology biologics in a hospital setting, which can be used to inform economic evaluations of PH FDC SC.

Incidence and severity of anaphylaxis and hypersensitivity in trials of intravenous pertuzumab plus trastuzumab or the fixed-dose combination of pertuzumab and trastuzumab for subcutaneous injection for HER2-positive breast cancer

AIM

To characterise risk of anaphylaxis/hypersensitivity with intravenous pertuzumab plus trastuzumab (PH IV), the fixed-dose combination of pertuzumab and trastuzumab for subcutaneous injection (PH FDC SC) or concomitant chemotherapy to support potential administration of PH FDC SC by healthcare professionals outside clinics.

METHODS

A cumulative search for anaphylaxis/hypersensitivity (Roche Standard Adverse Event Group Terms) was performed for all pivotal trials cited in the current EMA P IV/PH FDC SC summaries of product characteristics: MBC: NCT00567190, NCT02402712; EBC: NCT01358877, NCT00545688, NCT00976989, NCT02132949, NCT03493854 and NCT03674112. Occurrence, incidence and severity of events were analysed and a time-trend analysis (by cycle) was performed.

RESULTS

This analysis includes 4772 patients who received PH IV and/or PH FDC SC. Incidence of all-grade (grade ≥3) anaphylaxis/hypersensitivity events: 3-11% (≤2%) for PH IV MBC trials; 1-13% (0-3%) for PH IV EBC trials; and 2-3% (<1%; not related to PH FDC SC) for PH FDC SC EBC trials. Discontinuations due to anaphylaxis/hypersensitivity were rare for PH IV (generally <1% except two arms of TRYPHAENA: 1% and 3%); no discontinuations of PH FDC SC have been recorded so far. Time-trend analysis showed that most events were reported during the first 6-8 cycles with concurrent chemotherapy, with a decrease in later cycles (except MetaPHER).

CONCLUSION

PH IV and PH FDC SC were well tolerated, with few grade ≥3 anaphylaxis/hypersensitivity events reported with PH IV and no grade ≥3 related events with PH FDC SC. Most events occurred during chemotherapy.

Preclinical and clinical studies of bintrafusp alfa, a novel bifunctional anti-PD-L1/TGFβRII agent: Current status

Bintrafusp alfa (anti-PD-L1/TGFβRII) is a first-in-class bifunctional agent designed to act both as a checkpoint inhibitor and as a "trap" for TGFβ in the tumor microenvironment (TME). This article is designed to review the preclinical studies interrogating the mode of action of bintrafusp alfa and to present a comprehensive overview of recent bintrafusp alfa clinical studies. Preclinical studies have demonstrated that bintrafusp alfa immune-mediating and antitumor activity can be enhanced by combining it with a human papillomavirus (HPV) therapeutic cancer vaccine, a tumor-targeting interleukin 12 (IL-12) immunocytokine and/or an IL-15 superagonist. The importance of TGFβ in HPV-associated malignancies is also reviewed. The clinical studies reviewed span extended phase I cohorts in patients with a spectrum of malignancies, two randomized phase II studies in lung and one in biliary tract cancers in which bintrafusp alfa did not demonstrate superiority over standard-of-care therapies, and provocative results in patients with HPV-associated malignancies, where as a monotherapy, bintrafusp alfa has shown response rates of 35%, compared to overall response rate (ORR) of 12-24% seen with other Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved or standard-of-care agents. This article also reviews preliminary phase II study results of patients with HPV+ malignancies employing bintrafusp alfa in combination with an HPV therapeutic vaccine and a tumor-targeting IL-12 immunocytokine in which the combination therapy outperforms standard-of-care therapies in both checkpoint naïve and checkpoint refractory patients. This review thus provides an example of the importance of conducting clinical studies in an appropriate patient population - in this case, exemplified by the role of TGFβ in HPV-associated malignancies. This review also provides preclinical and preliminary clinical study results of the combined use of multiple immune-modulating agents, each designed to engage different immune components and tumor cells in the TME.

Improving Biologics' Effectiveness in Clinical Oncology: From the Combination of Two Monoclonal Antibodies to Oligoclonal Antibody Mixtures

Simple Summary

The approval of the two antibody combinations trastuzumab/pertuzumab and ipilimumab/nivolumab in oncology has paved the way for novel antibody combinations or oligoclonal antibody mixtures to improve their efficacy in cancer. The underlying biological mechanisms and challenges of these strategies will be discussed using data from clinical trials listed in databases. These therapeutic combinations also lead to questions on how to optimize their formulation and delivery to induce a therapeutic polyclonal response in patients with cancer.

Abstract

Monoclonal antibodies have revolutionized the treatment of many diseases, but their clinical efficacy remains limited in some other cases. Pre-clinical and clinical trials have shown that combinations of antibodies that bind to the same target (homo-combinations) or to different targets (hetero-combinations) to mimic the polyclonal humoral immune response improve their therapeutic effects in cancer. The approval of the trastuzumab/pertuzumab combination for breast cancer and then of the ipilimumab/nivolumab combination for melanoma opened the way to novel antibody combinations or oligoclonal antibody mixtures as more effective biologics for cancer management. We found more than 300 phase II/III clinical trials on antibody combinations, with/without chemotherapy, radiotherapy, small molecules or vaccines, in the ClinicalTrials.gov database. Such combinations enhance the biological responses and bypass the resistance mechanisms observed with antibody monotherapy. Usually, such antibody combinations are administered sequentially as separate formulations. Combined formulations have also been developed in which separately produced antibodies are mixed before administration or are produced simultaneously in a single cell line or a single batch of different cell lines as a polyclonal master cell bank. The regulation, toxicity and injection sequence of these oligoclonal antibody mixtures still need to be addressed in order to optimize their delivery and their therapeutic effects.

Photodynamic Therapy and Hyperthermia in Combination Treatment-Neglected Forces in the Fight against Cancer

Cancer is one of the leading causes of death in humans. Despite the progress in cancer treatment, and an increase in the effectiveness of diagnostic methods, cancer is still highly lethal and very difficult to treat in many cases. Combination therapy, in the context of cancer treatment, seems to be a promising option that may allow minimizing treatment side effects and may have a significant impact on the cure. It may also increase the effectiveness of anti-cancer therapies. Moreover, combination treatment can significantly increase delivery of drugs to cancerous tissues. Photodynamic therapy and hyperthermia seem to be ideal examples that prove the effectiveness of combination therapy. These two kinds of therapy can kill cancer cells through different mechanisms and activate various signaling pathways. Both PDT and hyperthermia play significant roles in the perfusion of a tumor and the network of blood vessels wrapped around it. The main goal of combination therapy is to combine separate mechanisms of action that will make cancer cells more sensitive to a given therapeutic agent. Such an approach in treatment may contribute toward increasing its effectiveness, optimizing the cancer treatment process in the future.