1
|
Xie J, Maguire FB, Hofer BM, Cooley JJP, Chen HA, Parikh-Patel A, Keegan THM. Disparities in hysterectomy-corrected endometrial cancer incidence trends by histologic subtype among racial/ethnic groups in California, 2012-2019. Gynecol Oncol 2025; 197:34-42. [PMID: 40267558 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2025.04.581] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2024] [Revised: 04/05/2025] [Accepted: 04/15/2025] [Indexed: 04/25/2025]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Hysterectomy-corrected endometrial cancer incidence among racial/ethnic minority groups by histologic subtype and age group has not been well studied. To examine recent trends in hysterectomy-corrected endometrial cancer rates among California women by histologic subtype, race/ethnicity, and age group. METHODS We estimated hysterectomy prevalence from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. Hysterectomy-corrected age-standardized endometrial cancer incidence rates (per 100,000 women) by endometrioid and non-endometrioid subtypes, age at diagnosis, and race and ethnicity from 2012 to 2019 were calculated using California Cancer Registry data. Incidence rates and annual percentage changes (APC) were estimated. RESULTS Among endometrioid subtypes, American Indian women had the highest incidence (62.9 per 100,000). Incidence rates also significantly increased among Asians/Pacific Islanders (1.69 %), with an increase of 7.14 % and 7.39 % for women aged 45-54 and 55-64, respectively, though these did not reach statistical significance. In addition, Hispanics had an increased incidence rate (3.02 %) from 2012 to 2019, with a particularly sharp rise (18.42 %) observed in Hispanics aged 25-34 years between 2016 and 2019. For non-endometrioid subtypes, non-Hispanic Blacks had the highest incidence (29.4 per 100,000), with the ≥65 age group showing an upward trend (9.39 % increase from 2012 to 2016) before significantly declining by 8.16 % from 2017 to 2019. American Indians had the second-highest incidence (14.1 per 100,000), but no significant trend was observed, likely due to the small sample size of this population. CONCLUSIONS Our findings show that race/ethnicity is associated with endometrial cancer incidence and underscore the importance of jointly examining racial/ethnic disparities with age and histologic subtype.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jingjing Xie
- Graduate Group in Epidemiology, University of California Davis, Davis, CA, United States of America; California Cancer Reporting and Epidemiologic Surveillance Program, University of California Davis Comprehensive Cancer Center, Sacramento, CA, United States of America.
| | - Frances B Maguire
- California Cancer Reporting and Epidemiologic Surveillance Program, University of California Davis Comprehensive Cancer Center, Sacramento, CA, United States of America
| | - Brenda M Hofer
- California Cancer Reporting and Epidemiologic Surveillance Program, University of California Davis Comprehensive Cancer Center, Sacramento, CA, United States of America
| | - Julianne J P Cooley
- California Cancer Reporting and Epidemiologic Surveillance Program, University of California Davis Comprehensive Cancer Center, Sacramento, CA, United States of America
| | - Hui A Chen
- Department of Gynecology Oncology, University of California Davis Comprehensive Cancer Center, Sacramento, CA, United States of America
| | - Arti Parikh-Patel
- California Cancer Reporting and Epidemiologic Surveillance Program, University of California Davis Comprehensive Cancer Center, Sacramento, CA, United States of America
| | - Theresa H M Keegan
- California Cancer Reporting and Epidemiologic Surveillance Program, University of California Davis Comprehensive Cancer Center, Sacramento, CA, United States of America; Center for Oncology Hematology Outcomes Research and Training (COHORT), University of California Davis Comprehensive Cancer Center, Sacramento, CA, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Pittman J, Gerstl B, Walch A, Lotz M, Deans R, Morrison N. Psychological well-being of women with uterine infertility before considering uterus transplantation as a treatment option. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2025; 65:263-268. [PMID: 39530245 DOI: 10.1111/ajo.13895] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2024] [Accepted: 10/17/2024] [Indexed: 11/16/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND While uterus transplantation offers a promising treatment option for women with uterine factor infertility (UFI), the potential for graft failure and lack of organ availability could have subsequent psychological repercussions for women. Exploring baseline psychological well-being for women with UFI who could become uterine transplant recipients is essential to identify specific psychological challenges to be considered prior to transplantation. UFI can be congenital uterine absence, namely Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser syndrome (MRKH), or acquired uterine absence (hysterectomy). OBJECTIVE To analyse baseline psychological well-being among women with UFI. DESIGN AND SETTING A survey including demographic data and two internationally validated psychological questionnaires, Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale (DASS-21),13 and Fertility Quality of Life (FertiQoL), was disseminated to women with UFI. Data from these instruments was compared between groups and then to data that uses these tools in the general infertility population. RESULTS/OUTCOMES The study included 39 women (mean age 29.54 years). Higher scores for moderate symptoms of depression, anxiety, and stress were reported for the entire UFI cohort. More women with congenital UFI showed 'severe' symptoms for depression/anxiety, compared to women with acquired UFI. Women with acquired UFI showed poorer FertiQoL scores compared to both women with congenital UFI and to the general infertility population scores in previously published data. CONCLUSION Clinicians should consider accessing increased psychological support for women with UFI when discussing fertility options including uterine transplant, and they may need to tailor this support depending on whether the patient has congenital or acquired UFI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jana Pittman
- Western Sydney University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- School of Women's and Children's Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- The Royal Hospital for Women, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Brigitte Gerstl
- School of Women's and Children's Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- The Royal Hospital for Women, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Anna Walch
- School of Women's and Children's Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- The Royal Hospital for Women, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Mianna Lotz
- Department of Philosophy, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Rebecca Deans
- School of Women's and Children's Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- The Royal Hospital for Women, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Natalie Morrison
- Western Sydney University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Translational Health Research Unit, Western Sydney University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Marozoff S, Karim ME, Asamoah-Boaheng M, Dummer TJB. Maternal age at first birth and uterine cancer risk: A comprehensive analysis using NHANES data (2003-2018). Curr Probl Cancer 2025; 55:101184. [PMID: 39933214 DOI: 10.1016/j.currproblcancer.2025.101184] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2025] [Accepted: 01/28/2025] [Indexed: 02/13/2025]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Several reproductive factors, including parity and age at menarche, have been identified as risk factors for uterine cancers. However, the association between maternal age at first birth and uterine cancer remains conflicting. METHODS This cross-sectional study included females aged 20 years and older with at least one live birth across eight National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) cycles (2003-2018). We used design-adjusted logistic regression, with multiple imputation for missing data, to explore the association of age at first birth and uterine cancer. As a sensitivity analysis, the sample was restricted to post-menopausal females; logistic regression analyses were repeated. RESULTS Among 7095 participants, 104 had uterine cancer. The adjusted odds ratio (aOR) for uterine cancer for participants with a first live birth at ≥25 years was 0.66 (95 % confidence interval (CI): 0.33-1.35) compared to those with a first birth at <20 years. For participants with a first birth between 20-24 years, the aOR was 0.93 (95 % CI: 0.51-1.69). Multiple imputation and sensitivity analyses yielded similar non-significant results. CONCLUSION Our findings suggest no statistically significant association between maternal age at first live birth and uterine cancer, aligning with existing literature. Further research is needed to explore other reproductive factors and their role in uterine cancer risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shelby Marozoff
- School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, 2206 East Mall, Vancouver, British Columbia V6T 1Z3, Canada.
| | - Mohammad Ehsanul Karim
- School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, 2206 East Mall, Vancouver, British Columbia V6T 1Z3, Canada; Centre for Advancing Health Outcomes, 570-1081 Burrard Street, St. Paul's Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia V6Z 1Y6, Canada
| | - Michael Asamoah-Boaheng
- Centre for Advancing Health Outcomes, 570-1081 Burrard Street, St. Paul's Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia V6Z 1Y6, Canada; Department of Emergency Medicine, University of British Columbia, 11th Floor - 2775 Laurel Street, Vancouver, British Columbia V5Z 1M9, Canada; British Columbia Resuscitation Research Collaborative, 4th Floor - 1190 Hornby Street, Vancouver, British Columbia V6Z 2K5, Canada
| | - Trevor J B Dummer
- School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, 2206 East Mall, Vancouver, British Columbia V6T 1Z3, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Rodriguez VE, Tanjasiri SP, Ro A, Hoyt MA, Bristow RE, LeBrón AMW. Trends in endometrial cancer incidence in the United States by race/ethnicity and age of onset from 2000 to 2019. Am J Epidemiol 2025; 194:103-113. [PMID: 38960701 PMCID: PMC12034838 DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwae178] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2023] [Revised: 05/04/2024] [Accepted: 06/27/2024] [Indexed: 07/05/2024] Open
Abstract
Endometrial cancer is one of few cancers that has continued to rise in incidence over the past decade, with disproportionate increases in adults younger than 50 years old. We used data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Registry (2000-2019) to examine endometrial cancer incidence trends by race/ethnicity and age of onset among women in the United States. Case counts and proportions, age-adjusted incidence rates (per 100 000), and average annual percent changes were calculated by race/ethnicity, overall and stratified by age of onset (early vs late). We found a disproportionate increase in endometrial cancer incidence among women of color, for both early and late onset endometrial cancer. The highest increases in early onset endometrial cancer (<50 years old) were observed among American Indian/Alaska Native women (4.8), followed by Black (3.3), Hispanic/Latina (3.1), and Asian and Pacific Islander women (2.4), whereas White women (0.9) had the lowest increase. Late onset (≥50 years old) endometrial cancer incidence followed a similar pattern, with the greatest increases for women of color. The increasing burden of endometrial cancer among women of color, particularly those younger than 50 years old, is a major public health problem necessitating further research and clinical efforts focused on health equity. This article is part of a Special Collection on Gynecological Cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Victoria E Rodriguez
- Department of Health, Society, and Behavior, University of California Irvine, Irvine, California, United States
| | - Sora Park Tanjasiri
- Department of Health, Society, and Behavior, University of California Irvine, Irvine, California, United States
- Chao Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California Irvine, Irvine, California, United States
| | - Annie Ro
- Department of Health, Society, and Behavior, University of California Irvine, Irvine, California, United States
| | - Michael A Hoyt
- Population Health and Disease Prevention, University of California Irvine, Irvine, California, United States
- Chao Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California Irvine, Irvine, California, United States
| | - Robert E Bristow
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology School of Medicine, University of California, Irvine, Orange, California, United States
| | - Alana M W LeBrón
- Department of Health, Society, and Behavior, University of California Irvine, Irvine, California, United States
- Department of Chicano/Latino Studies, University of California Irvine, Irvine, California, United States
- Chao Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California Irvine, Irvine, California, United States
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Francoeur AA, Liao CI, Johnson CR, Argueta C, Tian C, Darcy KM, Kapp DS, Bristow RE, Chan JK. Trends in the incidence and mutational landscape of advanced uterine cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2025; 35:100013. [PMID: 39878271 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijgc.2024.100013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2024] [Accepted: 11/10/2024] [Indexed: 01/31/2025] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to examine disparities in 20-year incidence trends and mutations in advanced-stage uterine cancer in the United States, given poor survival rates. METHODS Data were obtained from the United States Cancer Statistics for patients from 2001 to 2019 with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics 2009 stage IVA and IVB uterine cancer. SEER∗Stat 8.3.9.2 and Joinpoint Regression Program 4.9.0.0 were used to calculate cancer incidence per 100,000 women, annual percentages, and average annual percent change (AAPC). The mutational landscape of advanced uterine cancer was explored using data from the Genomic Data Commons. RESULTS In United States Cancer Statistics, 75,450 patients with advanced uterine cancer were identified with an annual percentage increase of 2.63% between 2001 and 2019 and significantly higher rates in Black, Hispanic, and Asian patients compared with White patients (AAPC Black: 3.56%, AAPC Hispanic: 3.12%, and AAPC Asian 3.06% vs AAPC White: 2.07%, each p < .001). AAPC in patients with serous carcinomas increased by 6.32% in Black vs 3.91% in White patients (p < .001). Furthermore, AAPC was 3.0% for Black patients vs 0.7% for White patients with leiomyosarcoma (p < .001). In the Genomic Data Commons, TP53 mutations were more common, and PTEN was less common in Black vs White patients, older vs younger patients, advanced vs early stage, or high- vs low-risk histologic subtypes (p < .05). Mutations in BRCA1, BRCA2, POLE, and PMS2 were less common in high- vs low-risk histologic subtypes (p < .05). CONCLUSION Advanced-stage uterine cancer rates are rising in the United States, particularly affecting Black and Hispanic women. Molecular differences exist by age, race, stage, and histology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alex A Francoeur
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of California, Irvine, Orange, CA, USA.
| | - Cheng-I Liao
- Division of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Pingtung Veterans General Hospital, Pingtung, Taiwan
| | - Caitlin R Johnson
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, California Pacific Medical Center Research Institute, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Chris Argueta
- College of Medicine, Charles R. Drew University of Medicine & Science, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Chunqiao Tian
- Gynecologic Cancer Center of Excellence, Department of Gynecologic Surgery and Obstetrics, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD, USA; The Henry M. Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine Inc, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Kathleen M Darcy
- Gynecologic Cancer Center of Excellence, Department of Gynecologic Surgery and Obstetrics, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD, USA; The Henry M. Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine Inc, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Daniel S Kapp
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Robert E Bristow
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of California, Irvine, Orange, CA, USA
| | - John K Chan
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, California Pacific/Palo Alto/Sutter Health Research Institute, San Francisco, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Wijayabahu AT, Shiels MS, Arend RC, Clarke MA. Uterine cancer incidence trends and 5-year relative survival by race/ethnicity and histology among women under 50 years. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2024; 231:526.e1-526.e22. [PMID: 38925206 PMCID: PMC11499002 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2024.06.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2024] [Revised: 06/19/2024] [Accepted: 06/20/2024] [Indexed: 06/28/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Uterine cancers diagnosed before age 50 years are increasing in the U.S., but changes in clinical characteristics and survival over time across racial/ethnic groups have not been previously described. OBJECTIVE To investigate age-adjusted, hysterectomy corrected incidence rates and trends, and 5-year relative survival rates of uterine cancer in women aged <50 years, overall and stratified by race/ethnicity and histology. STUDY DESIGN We included microscopically confirmed uterine cancer cases (diagnosed 2000-2019) in women aged 20 to 49 years from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program. Age-adjusted incidence and 5-year relative survival rates, and 95% confidence intervals were computed using Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) ∗Stat and compared across time periods (2000-2009 and 2010-2019). Incidence rates were adjusted for hysterectomy prevalence using Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System data, and trends were computed using the Joinpoint regression program. RESULTS We included 57,128 uterine cancer cases. The incidence of uterine cancer increased from 10.1 per 100,000 in 2000-2009 to 12.0 per 100,000 in 2010-2019, increasing at an annual rate of 1.7%/y for the entire period. Rising trends were more pronounced among women <40 years (3.0%/y and 3.3%/y in 20-29 and 30-39 years, respectively) than in those 40 to 49 years (1.3%/y), and among underrepresented racial/ethnic groups (Hispanic 2.8%/y, non-Hispanic-Black 2.7%, non-Hispanic-Asian/Pacific Islander 2.1%) than in non-Hispanic-White (0.9%/y). Recent (2010-2019) incidence rates were highest for endometrioid (9.6 per 100,000), followed by sarcomas (1.2), and nonendometrioid subtypes (0.9). Rates increased significantly for endometrioid subtypes at 1.9%/y from 2000 to 2019. Recent endometrioid and nonendometrioid rates were highest in non-Hispanic-Native American/Alaska Native (15.2 and 1.4 per 100,000), followed by Hispanic (10.9 and 1.0), non-Hispanic-Asian/Pacific Islander (10.2 and 0.9), non-Hispanic-White (9.4 and 0.8), and lowest in non-Hispanic-Black women (6.4 and 0.8). Sarcoma rates were highest in non-Hispanic-Black women (1.8 per 100,000). The 5-year relative survival remained unchanged over time for women with endometrioid (from 93.4% in 2000-2009 to 93.9% in 2010-2019, P≥.05) and nonendometrioid subtypes (from 73.2% to 73.2%, P≥.05) but decreased for women with sarcoma from 69.8% (2000-2009) to 66.4% (2010-2019, P<.05). CONCLUSION Uterine cancer incidence rates in women <50 years have increased from 2000 to 2019 while survival has remained relatively unchanged. Incidence trends can be primarily attributed to increasing rates of cancers with endometrioid histology, with the greatest increases observed among non-Hispanic-Black, Hispanic, and non-Hispanic-Asian/Pacific Islander. Sarcomas, while much rarer, were the second most common type of uterine cancer among women <50 years and have poor prognosis and apparent decreasing survival over time. Rising rates of uterine cancer and the distinct epidemiologic patterns among women <50 years highlight the need for effective prevention and early detection strategies for uterine cancer in this age group.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Akemi T Wijayabahu
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, MD.
| | - Meredith S Shiels
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, MD
| | - Rebecca C Arend
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology-Gynecologic Oncology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL
| | - Megan A Clarke
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, MD
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Ferris JS, Prest MT, Hur C, Chen L, Elkin EB, Melamed A, Kong CY, Myers ER, Havrilesky LJ, Blank SV, Hazelton WD, Wright JD. Trends in uterine cancer incidence in the United States: The contribution of age, period and cohort effects. Gynecol Oncol 2024; 187:151-162. [PMID: 38781746 PMCID: PMC11309905 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2024.04.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2024] [Revised: 04/20/2024] [Accepted: 04/30/2024] [Indexed: 05/25/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE In the U.S., uterine cancer incidence is rising, with racial and ethnic minorities experiencing the largest increases. We performed age-period-cohort analyses using novel methods to examine the contribution of age at diagnosis (age), year of diagnosis (period), and birth cohort (cohort), to trends in uterine cancer incidence. METHODS We used uterine cancer incidence data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Result (SEER) 12 database (1992-2019), and performed hysterectomy-correction. We generated hexamaps to visualize age, period, and cohort effects, and used mutual information to estimate the percent contribution of age, period, and cohort effects, individually and combined, on uterine cancer incidence, overall and by race and ethnicity and histology. RESULTS Hexamaps showed an increase in uterine cancer in later time periods, and a cohort effect around 1933 showing a lower incidence compared with earlier and later cohorts. Age, period, and cohort effects combined contributed 86.6% (95% CI: 86.4%, 86.9%) to the incidence. Age effects had the greatest contribution (65.1%, 95% CI: 64.3%, 65.9), followed by cohort (20.7%, 95% CI: 20.1%, 21.3%) and period (14.2%, 95% CI: 13.7%, 14.8%) effects. Hexamaps showed higher incidence in recent years for non-Hispanic Blacks and non-endometrioid tumors. CONCLUSIONS Age effects had the largest contribution to uterine cancer incidence, followed by cohort and period effects overall and across racial and ethnic groups and histologies. IMPACT These findings can inform uterine cancer modeling studies on the effects of interventions that target risk factors which may vary across age, period, or cohort.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer S Ferris
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY, USA; Department of Medicine, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY, USA
| | - Matthew T Prest
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY, USA; Department of Medicine, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY, USA
| | - Chin Hur
- Department of Medicine, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY, USA; Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; New York-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | - Ling Chen
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY, USA
| | - Elena B Elkin
- Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Joseph L. Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Alex Melamed
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Chung Yin Kong
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Evan R Myers
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology at the Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Laura J Havrilesky
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology at the Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Stephanie V Blank
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Science, and Population Health Science and Policy, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - William D Hazelton
- Herbold Computational Biology Program, Division of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Jason D Wright
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY, USA; Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; New York-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Ayodele A, Obeng-Gyasi E. Exploring the Potential Link between PFAS Exposure and Endometrial Cancer: A Review of Environmental and Sociodemographic Factors. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:983. [PMID: 38473344 PMCID: PMC10931119 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16050983] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2023] [Revised: 02/01/2024] [Accepted: 02/27/2024] [Indexed: 03/14/2024] Open
Abstract
This exploratory narrative review paper delves into the intricate interplay between per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) exposure, sociodemographic factors, and the influence of stressors in the context of endometrial cancer. PFAS, ubiquitous environmental contaminants notorious for their persistence in the ecosystem, have garnered attention for their potential to disrupt endocrine systems and provoke immune responses. We comprehensively examine the various sources of PFAS exposure, encompassing household items, water, air, and soil, thus shedding light on the multifaceted routes through which individuals encounter these compounds. Furthermore, we explore the influence of sociodemographic factors, such as income, education, occupation, ethnicity/race, and geographical location and their relationship to endometrial cancer risk. We also investigated the role of stress on PFAS exposure and endometrial cancer risk. The results revealed a significant impact of sociodemographic factors on both PFAS levels and endometrial cancer risk. Stress emerged as a notable contributing factor influencing PFAS exposure and the development of endometrial cancer, further emphasizing the importance of stress management practices for overall well-being. By synthesizing evidence from diverse fields, this review underscores the need for interdisciplinary research and targeted interventions to comprehensively address the complex relationship between PFAS, sociodemographic factors, stressors, and endometrial cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aderonke Ayodele
- Department of Built Environment, North Carolina A&T State University, Greensboro, NC 27411, USA
- Environmental Health and Disease Laboratory, North Carolina A&T State University, Greensboro, NC 27411, USA
| | - Emmanuel Obeng-Gyasi
- Department of Built Environment, North Carolina A&T State University, Greensboro, NC 27411, USA
- Environmental Health and Disease Laboratory, North Carolina A&T State University, Greensboro, NC 27411, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Gopalani SV, Dasari SR, Adam EE, Thompson TD, White MC, Saraiya M. Variation in hysterectomy prevalence and trends among U.S. States and Territories-Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, 2012-2020. Cancer Causes Control 2023; 34:829-835. [PMID: 37329443 PMCID: PMC10643045 DOI: 10.1007/s10552-023-01735-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2023] [Accepted: 06/01/2023] [Indexed: 06/19/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE We estimated up-to-date state- and territory-level hysterectomy prevalence and trends, which can help correct the population at risk denominator and calculate more accurate uterine and cervical cancer rates. METHODS We analyzed self-reported data for a population-based sample of 1,267,013 U.S. women aged ≥ 18 years who participated in the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System surveys from 2012 to 2020. Estimates were age-standardized and stratified by sociodemographic characteristics and geography. Trends were assessed by testing for any differences in hysterectomy prevalence across years. RESULTS Hysterectomy prevalence was highest among women aged 70-79 years (46.7%) and ≥ 80 years (48.8%). Prevalence was also higher among women who were non-Hispanic (NH) Black (21.3%), NH American Indian and Alaska Native (21.1%), and from the South (21.1%). Hysterectomy prevalence declined by 1.9 percentage points from 18.9% in 2012 to 17.0% in 2020. CONCLUSIONS Approximately one in five U.S. women overall and half of U.S. women aged ≥ 70 years reported undergoing a hysterectomy. Our findings reveal large variations in hysterectomy prevalence within and between each of the four census regions and by race and other sociodemographic characteristics, underscoring the importance of adjusting epidemiologic measures of uterine and cervical cancers for hysterectomy status.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sameer V Gopalani
- Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, 30341, USA
- Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education, Oak Ridge, TN, 37830, USA
| | | | - Emily E Adam
- Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, 30341, USA
- Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education, Oak Ridge, TN, 37830, USA
| | - Trevor D Thompson
- Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, 30341, USA
| | - Mary C White
- Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, 30341, USA
| | - Mona Saraiya
- Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, 30341, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Somasegar S, Bashi A, Lang SM, Liao CI, Johnson C, Darcy KM, Tian C, Kapp DS, Chan JK. Trends in Uterine Cancer Mortality in the United States: A 50-Year Population-Based Analysis. Obstet Gynecol 2023; 142:978-986. [PMID: 37678887 PMCID: PMC10510793 DOI: 10.1097/aog.0000000000005321] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2023] [Revised: 04/14/2023] [Accepted: 04/20/2023] [Indexed: 09/09/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To analyze mortality trends in uterine cancer in the United States over 50 years with an emphasis on age and race and ethnicity. METHODS Data on uterine cancer deaths from 1969 to 2018 were obtained from the National Center for Health Statistics. Trends were examined by age and race and ethnicity after adjustment for the hysterectomy rate and pregnancy. RESULTS Uterine cancer mortality decreased between 1969 and 1997 (from 6.03 to 4.00/100,000) but increased between 1997 and 2018 (from 4.00 to 5.02/100,000). From 2001 to 2018, mortality rates increased by 1.25-fold across all age groups. In 2018, the mortality rate from uterine cancer for patients aged 70 years or older and 60-69 years was sixfold and threefold higher, respectively, than in younger patients (aged 50-59 years) (54.87/100,000 vs 27.80/100,000 vs 8.70/100,000). The mortality rate for non-Hispanic Black women was 2.2-fold higher than for non-Hispanic White, Hispanic, and non-Hispanic Asian or Pacific Islander women (17.6/100,000 vs 7.82/100,000, 6.54/100,000, and 4.24/100,000, respectively). On an intersection analysis of age and race, non-Hispanic Black women aged older than 60 years had a threefold higher mortality rate than non-Hispanic White women (72/100,000 vs 24/100,000). A notable finding was that young non-Hispanic Black and Hispanic women (30-39 years) had the highest annual increases in mortality at 3.3% and 3.8% per year compared with 2.2% in non-Hispanic White women. CONCLUSION Since 2001, the uterine cancer mortality rate has increased across all four racial and ethnic groups examined, with the highest increase seen among non-Hispanic Black women. The largest increase in mortality was observed among younger non-Hispanic Black and Hispanic women.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sahana Somasegar
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology and the Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, and the Division of Gynecologic Oncology, California Pacific/Palo Alto/Sutter Health Research Institute, Palo Alto, California; the Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, New Hampshire; the Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan; the California Pacific Medical Center Research Institute, San Francisco, California; and the Gynecologic Cancer Center of Excellence Program, Department of Gynecologic Surgery and Obstetrics, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, and the Henry M. Jackson Foundation for Advancement of Military Medicine, Inc., Bethesda, Maryland
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Dou Y, Katsnelson L, Gritsenko MA, Hu Y, Reva B, Hong R, Wang YT, Kolodziejczak I, Lu RJH, Tsai CF, Bu W, Liu W, Guo X, An E, Arend RC, Bavarva J, Chen L, Chu RK, Czekański A, Davoli T, Demicco EG, DeLair D, Devereaux K, Dhanasekaran SM, Dottino P, Dover B, Fillmore TL, Foxall M, Hermann CE, Hiltke T, Hostetter G, Jędryka M, Jewell SD, Johnson I, Kahn AG, Ku AT, Kumar-Sinha C, Kurzawa P, Lazar AJ, Lazcano R, Lei JT, Li Y, Liao Y, Lih TSM, Lin TT, Martignetti JA, Masand RP, Matkowski R, McKerrow W, Mesri M, Monroe ME, Moon J, Moore RJ, Nestor MD, Newton C, Omelchenko T, Omenn GS, Payne SH, Petyuk VA, Robles AI, Rodriguez H, Ruggles KV, Rykunov D, Savage SR, Schepmoes AA, Shi T, Shi Z, Tan J, Taylor M, Thiagarajan M, Wang JM, Weitz KK, Wen B, Williams CM, Wu Y, Wyczalkowski MA, Yi X, Zhang X, Zhao R, Mutch D, Chinnaiyan AM, Smith RD, Nesvizhskii AI, Wang P, Wiznerowicz M, Ding L, Mani DR, Zhang H, Anderson ML, Rodland KD, Zhang B, Liu T, Fenyö D. Proteogenomic insights suggest druggable pathways in endometrial carcinoma. Cancer Cell 2023; 41:1586-1605.e15. [PMID: 37567170 PMCID: PMC10631452 DOI: 10.1016/j.ccell.2023.07.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2022] [Revised: 03/25/2023] [Accepted: 07/18/2023] [Indexed: 08/13/2023]
Abstract
We characterized a prospective endometrial carcinoma (EC) cohort containing 138 tumors and 20 enriched normal tissues using 10 different omics platforms. Targeted quantitation of two peptides can predict antigen processing and presentation machinery activity, and may inform patient selection for immunotherapy. Association analysis between MYC activity and metformin treatment in both patients and cell lines suggests a potential role for metformin treatment in non-diabetic patients with elevated MYC activity. PIK3R1 in-frame indels are associated with elevated AKT phosphorylation and increased sensitivity to AKT inhibitors. CTNNB1 hotspot mutations are concentrated near phosphorylation sites mediating pS45-induced degradation of β-catenin, which may render Wnt-FZD antagonists ineffective. Deep learning accurately predicts EC subtypes and mutations from histopathology images, which may be useful for rapid diagnosis. Overall, this study identified molecular and imaging markers that can be further investigated to guide patient stratification for more precise treatment of EC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yongchao Dou
- Lester and Sue Smith Breast Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA; Department of Molecular and Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA; Dan L Duncan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Lizabeth Katsnelson
- Institute for Systems Genetics, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016, USA; Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Pharmacology, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016, USA
| | - Marina A Gritsenko
- Biological Sciences Division, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA 99354, USA
| | - Yingwei Hu
- Department of Pathology and Oncology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21231, USA
| | - Boris Reva
- Department of Genetics and Genomic Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, USA
| | - Runyu Hong
- Institute for Systems Genetics, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016, USA; Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Pharmacology, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016, USA
| | - Yi-Ting Wang
- Biological Sciences Division, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA 99354, USA
| | - Iga Kolodziejczak
- International Institute for Molecular Oncology, 20-203 Poznań, Poland; Postgraduate School of Molecular Medicine, Medical University of Warsaw, 02-091 Warsaw, Poland
| | - Rita Jui-Hsien Lu
- Department of Medicine and Genetics, Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA; McDonnell Genome Institute, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO 63108, USA
| | - Chia-Feng Tsai
- Biological Sciences Division, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA 99354, USA
| | - Wen Bu
- Lester and Sue Smith Breast Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA; Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Wenke Liu
- Institute for Systems Genetics, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016, USA; Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Pharmacology, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016, USA
| | - Xiaofang Guo
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine and Tampa General Hospital Cancer Institute, Tampa, FL 33606, USA
| | - Eunkyung An
- Office of Cancer Clinical Proteomics Research, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD 20850, USA
| | - Rebecca C Arend
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35249, USA
| | - Jasmin Bavarva
- Office of Cancer Clinical Proteomics Research, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD 20850, USA
| | - Lijun Chen
- Department of Pathology and Oncology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21231, USA
| | - Rosalie K Chu
- Environmental Molecular Sciences Division, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA 99354, USA
| | - Andrzej Czekański
- Wroclaw Medical University and Lower Silesian Oncology, Pulmonology and Hematology Center (DCOPIH), Wrocław, Poland
| | - Teresa Davoli
- Institute for Systems Genetics, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016, USA; Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Pharmacology, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016, USA
| | - Elizabeth G Demicco
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Mount Sinai Hospital and Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5G 1X5, Canada
| | - Deborah DeLair
- Department of Pathology, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016, USA
| | - Kelly Devereaux
- Department of Pathology, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016, USA
| | - Saravana M Dhanasekaran
- Department of Pathology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA; Michigan Center for Translational Pathology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
| | - Peter Dottino
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Science, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, USA
| | - Bailee Dover
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35249, USA
| | - Thomas L Fillmore
- Environmental Molecular Sciences Division, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA 99354, USA
| | - McKenzie Foxall
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35249, USA
| | - Catherine E Hermann
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016, USA
| | - Tara Hiltke
- Office of Cancer Clinical Proteomics Research, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD 20850, USA
| | | | - Marcin Jędryka
- Wroclaw Medical University and Lower Silesian Oncology, Pulmonology and Hematology Center (DCOPIH), Wrocław, Poland
| | - Scott D Jewell
- Van Andel Research Institute, Grand Rapids, MI 49503, USA
| | - Isabelle Johnson
- Institute for Systems Genetics, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016, USA; Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Pharmacology, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016, USA
| | - Andrea G Kahn
- Department of Pathology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35249, USA
| | - Amy T Ku
- Lester and Sue Smith Breast Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Chandan Kumar-Sinha
- Department of Pathology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA; Michigan Center for Translational Pathology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
| | - Paweł Kurzawa
- Heliodor Swiecicki Clinical Hospital in Poznan ul. Przybyszewskiego 49, 60-355 Poznań, Poland; Poznań University of Medical Sciences, 61-701 Poznań, Poland
| | - Alexander J Lazar
- Department of Genomic Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA; Department of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Rossana Lazcano
- Department of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Jonathan T Lei
- Lester and Sue Smith Breast Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA; Department of Molecular and Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA; Dan L Duncan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Yi Li
- Lester and Sue Smith Breast Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA; Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Yuxing Liao
- Lester and Sue Smith Breast Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA; Department of Molecular and Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA; Dan L Duncan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Tung-Shing M Lih
- Department of Pathology and Oncology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21231, USA
| | - Tai-Tu Lin
- Biological Sciences Division, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA 99354, USA
| | - John A Martignetti
- Department of Genetics and Genomic Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, USA
| | - Ramya P Masand
- Department of Pathology & Immunology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Rafał Matkowski
- Wroclaw Medical University and Lower Silesian Oncology, Pulmonology and Hematology Center (DCOPIH), Wrocław, Poland
| | - Wilson McKerrow
- Institute for Systems Genetics, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016, USA; Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Pharmacology, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016, USA
| | - Mehdi Mesri
- Office of Cancer Clinical Proteomics Research, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD 20850, USA
| | - Matthew E Monroe
- Biological Sciences Division, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA 99354, USA
| | - Jamie Moon
- Biological Sciences Division, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA 99354, USA
| | - Ronald J Moore
- Biological Sciences Division, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA 99354, USA
| | - Michael D Nestor
- Biological Sciences Division, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA 99354, USA
| | - Chelsea Newton
- Van Andel Research Institute, Grand Rapids, MI 49503, USA
| | | | - Gilbert S Omenn
- Department of Computational Medicine and Bioinformatics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA; Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA; Department of Human Genetics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA; School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
| | - Samuel H Payne
- Department of Biology, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT 84602, USA
| | - Vladislav A Petyuk
- Biological Sciences Division, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA 99354, USA
| | - Ana I Robles
- Office of Cancer Clinical Proteomics Research, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD 20850, USA
| | - Henry Rodriguez
- Office of Cancer Clinical Proteomics Research, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD 20850, USA
| | - Kelly V Ruggles
- Institute for Systems Genetics, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016, USA; Division of Precision Medicine, Department of Medicine, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016, USA
| | - Dmitry Rykunov
- Department of Genetics and Genomic Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, USA
| | - Sara R Savage
- Lester and Sue Smith Breast Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA; Department of Molecular and Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA; Dan L Duncan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Athena A Schepmoes
- Biological Sciences Division, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA 99354, USA
| | - Tujin Shi
- Biological Sciences Division, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA 99354, USA
| | - Zhiao Shi
- Lester and Sue Smith Breast Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA; Department of Molecular and Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA; Dan L Duncan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Jimin Tan
- Institute for Systems Genetics, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016, USA; Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Pharmacology, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016, USA
| | - Mason Taylor
- Department of Biology, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT 84602, USA
| | - Mathangi Thiagarajan
- Leidos Biomedical Research Inc., Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Frederick, MD 21702, USA
| | - Joshua M Wang
- Institute for Systems Genetics, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016, USA; Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Pharmacology, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016, USA
| | - Karl K Weitz
- Biological Sciences Division, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA 99354, USA
| | - Bo Wen
- Lester and Sue Smith Breast Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA; Department of Molecular and Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA; Dan L Duncan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - C M Williams
- Broad Institute of Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Harvard, Cambridge, MA 02142, USA
| | - Yige Wu
- Department of Medicine and Genetics, Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA; McDonnell Genome Institute, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO 63108, USA
| | - Matthew A Wyczalkowski
- Department of Medicine and Genetics, Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA; McDonnell Genome Institute, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO 63108, USA
| | - Xinpei Yi
- Lester and Sue Smith Breast Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA; Department of Molecular and Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA; Dan L Duncan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Xu Zhang
- Office of Cancer Clinical Proteomics Research, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD 20850, USA
| | - Rui Zhao
- Environmental Molecular Sciences Division, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA 99354, USA
| | - David Mutch
- Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO 63110, USA
| | - Arul M Chinnaiyan
- Department of Pathology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA; Michigan Center for Translational Pathology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA; Department of Computational Medicine and Bioinformatics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
| | - Richard D Smith
- Biological Sciences Division, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA 99354, USA
| | - Alexey I Nesvizhskii
- Department of Pathology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA; Michigan Center for Translational Pathology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA; Department of Computational Medicine and Bioinformatics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
| | - Pei Wang
- Department of Genetics and Genomic Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, USA
| | - Maciej Wiznerowicz
- International Institute for Molecular Oncology, 60-203 Poznań, Poland; Heliodor Swiecicki Clinical Hospital in Poznan ul. Przybyszewskiego 49, 60-355 Poznań, Poland; Poznań University of Medical Sciences, 61-701 Poznań, Poland
| | - Li Ding
- Department of Medicine and Genetics, Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA; McDonnell Genome Institute, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO 63108, USA
| | - D R Mani
- Broad Institute of Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Harvard, Cambridge, MA 02142, USA
| | - Hui Zhang
- Department of Pathology and Oncology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21231, USA
| | - Matthew L Anderson
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine and Tampa General Hospital Cancer Institute, Tampa, FL 33606, USA.
| | - Karin D Rodland
- Biological Sciences Division, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA 99354, USA; Department of Cell, Developmental, and Cancer Biology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR 97221, USA.
| | - Bing Zhang
- Lester and Sue Smith Breast Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA; Department of Molecular and Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA; Dan L Duncan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
| | - Tao Liu
- Biological Sciences Division, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA 99354, USA.
| | - David Fenyö
- Institute for Systems Genetics, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016, USA; Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Pharmacology, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Lin S, Xu Y, Liu B, Zheng L, Cao C, Wu P, Ding W, Ren F. A novel cuproptosis-related gene signature for overall survival prediction in uterine corpus endometrial carcinoma (UCEC). Heliyon 2023; 9:e14613. [PMID: 37035374 PMCID: PMC10073764 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e14613] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2022] [Revised: 03/06/2023] [Accepted: 03/14/2023] [Indexed: 03/18/2023] Open
Abstract
Cuproptosis is a copper-dependent model of cell death involved in tumor genesis and progression. Its roles in uterine corpus endometrial carcinoma (UCEC) remains elusive. Here, we aimed to explore the expression and prognostic values of cuprotosis-related genes (CRGs) in UCEC. Expression profiles and clinical data of UCEC were downloaded from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA), and randomly divided into testing or training cohort (1:1 ratio). The CRG signature was identified by LASSO regression analysis. The differentially expressed genes and their functional enrichment analysis were performed by the "limma" R package and Metascape, respectively. The immunocytes infiltration was measured by TIMER, and "GSVA" R package. In total, seven differentially expressed prognostic genes of CRGs in UCEC were identified, and four genes (GLS, CDKN2A, PC, and SUCLG1) were selected to construct a predictive model in training cohort. UCEC patients from training and testing cohorts were further divided into high- or low-risk groups according to the median risk score. High-risk group favored poor prognosis compared to low-risk group. Functional enrichment analysis revealed this CRG signature were got involved in the process of cell-cell adhesion and immune activities (e.g., IL-1 signaling pathway, cellular response to cytokine stimulus). Further analyses revealed there were significant differences between high- and low-risk patients regarding immunocytes infiltration, chemokines, and chemokine receptors. Finally, the expression and biological functions of identified CRGs were confirmed by UCEC samples and experimental methods in vitro. In summary, the CRG signature was significantly correlated with patients' overall survival, which could provide insights into the diagnosis and prognosis prediction for UCEC.
Collapse
|
13
|
Endometrial Cancer Detection Using a Cervical DNA Methylation Assay (MPap) in Women with Abnormal Uterine Bleeding: A Multicenter Hospital-Based Validation Study. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14174343. [PMID: 36077877 PMCID: PMC9454900 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14174343] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/05/2022] [Revised: 08/28/2022] [Accepted: 09/01/2022] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary We conducted a multicenter validation study using a methylation assay, named MPap, to detect EC. MPap is used to identify the DNA methylation status of two genes, BHLHE22 and CDO1, from cervical scrapings, and the results are combined with age and body mass index. In two stages of validation, the sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were 92.5~92.9%, 71.5~73.8%, 39.8~40.2%, and 98.0~98.1%, respectively. The MPap test is a feasible alternative tool that provides physicians with a reference for assessing susceptibility to endometrial cancer. Abstract Background: We describe a DNA methylation assay, named MPap test, using cervical scraping as an alternative technique for endometrial cancer detection. Methods: A multicenter hospital-based, two-stage validation study was conducted to validate the cancer detection performance of the MPap test. The MPap value was determined from the DNA methylation status of two genes (BHLHE22, CDO1) and combined with two other clinical variables (age, BMI). The cutoff threshold of the MPap value was established in stage 1 and validated in stage 2. A total of 592 women with abnormal uterine bleeding were enrolled from five medical centers throughout Taiwan. Results: In stage 1, the sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of the MPap test for detecting endometrial cancer were 92.9%, 71.5%, 39.8%, and 98.0%, respectively. These values were validated in stage 2, being 92.5%, 73.8%, 40.2%, and 98.1%. Moreover, MPap outperformed transvaginal ultrasound in sensitivity and negative predictive values for detecting endometrial cancer. When we applied the algorithm for triage of endometrial cancer detection by MPap in the Taiwan National Health Insurance dataset, we found that it may reduce invasive procedures by 69~73%. Conclusions: MPap may provide a feasible alternative for endometrial cancer detection and can be considered as a triage test to reduce unnecessary invasive procedures.
Collapse
|
14
|
Sallée C, Margueritte F, Marquet P, Piver P, Aubard Y, Lavoué V, Dion L, Gauthier T. Uterine Factor Infertility, a Systematic Review. J Clin Med 2022; 11:jcm11164907. [PMID: 36013146 PMCID: PMC9410422 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11164907] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2022] [Revised: 08/16/2022] [Accepted: 08/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Uterine factor infertility (UFI) is defined as a condition resulting from either a complete lack of a uterus or a non-functioning uterus due to many causes. The exact prevalence of UFI is currently unknown, while treatments to achieve pregnancy are very limited. To evaluate the prevalence of this condition within its different causes, we carried out a worldwide systematic review on UFI. We performed research on the prevalence of UFI and its various causes throughout the world, according to the PRISMA criteria. A total of 188 studies were included in qualitative synthesis. UFI accounted for 2.1 to 16.7% of the causes of female infertility. We tried to evaluate the proportion of the different causes of UFI: uterine agenesia, hysterectomies, uterine malformations, uterine irradiation, adenomyosis, synechiae and Asherman syndrome, uterine myomas and uterine polyps. However, the data available in countries and studies were highly heterogenous. This present systematic review underlines the lack of a consensual definition of UFI. A national register of patients with UFI based on a consensual definition of Absolute Uterine Factor Infertility and Non-Absolute Uterine Factor Infertility would be helpful for women, whose desire for pregnancy has reached a dead end.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Camille Sallée
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Mother and Child Hospital, University Hospital Center of Limoges, 87000 Limoges, France
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +33-555-055-555
| | - François Margueritte
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Intercommunal Hospital Center of Poissy-Saint-Germain-en-Laye, 78103 Poissy, France
| | - Pierre Marquet
- Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Limoges, 87042 Limoges, France
| | - Pascal Piver
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Mother and Child Hospital, University Hospital Center of Limoges, 87000 Limoges, France
| | - Yves Aubard
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Mother and Child Hospital, University Hospital Center of Limoges, 87000 Limoges, France
| | - Vincent Lavoué
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hopital Universitaire de Rennes, 35000 Rennes, France
| | - Ludivine Dion
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hopital Universitaire de Rennes, 35000 Rennes, France
| | - Tristan Gauthier
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Mother and Child Hospital, University Hospital Center of Limoges, 87000 Limoges, France
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
BHLHE22 Expression Is Associated with a Proinflammatory Immune Microenvironment and Confers a Favorable Prognosis in Endometrial Cancer. Int J Mol Sci 2022; 23:ijms23137158. [PMID: 35806162 PMCID: PMC9266305 DOI: 10.3390/ijms23137158] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2022] [Revised: 06/21/2022] [Accepted: 06/26/2022] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Endometrial cancer (EC) rates are rising annually. Additional prediction markers need to be evaluated because only 10–20% of EC cases show an objective response to immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Our previous methylomic study found that BHLHE22 is hypermethylated in EC tissues and can be detected using a Pap-smear sample. BHLHE22, a basic helix loop helix transcription factor family member, is known as a transcriptional repressor and is involved in cell differentiation. However, the role of BHLHE22 in EC remains poorly understood. Herein, we analyzed BHLHE22 expression in 54 paired cancer and normal endometrial tissue samples, and confirmed with databases (TCGA, GTEx, and human protein atlas). We found that BHLHE22 protein expression was significantly downregulated in EC compared with normal endometrium. High BHLHE22 expression was associated with microsatellite-instable subtype, endometrioid type, grade, and age. It showed a significant favorable survival. BHLHE22 overexpression inhibited the proliferation and migration of EC cells. Functional enrichment analysis showed that BHLHE22 was significantly associated with immune-related pathways. Furthermore, BHLHE22 was positively correlated with proinflammatory leukocyte infiltration and expression of chemokine genes in EC. In conclusion, BHLHE22 regulates immune-related pathways and modulates the immune microenvironment of EC.
Collapse
|
16
|
Executive Summary of the Uterine Cancer Evidence Review Conference. Obstet Gynecol 2022; 139:626-643. [PMID: 35272316 PMCID: PMC8936160 DOI: 10.1097/aog.0000000000004711] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2021] [Accepted: 11/18/2021] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
Abstract
Evidence for uterine cancer prevention, diagnosis, and special issues from the Uterine Cancer Evidence Review Conference is summarized. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recognized the need for educational materials for clinicians on the prevention and early diagnosis of gynecologic cancers. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists convened a panel of experts in evidence review from the Society for Academic Specialists in General Obstetrics and Gynecology and content experts from the Society of Gynecologic Oncology to review relevant literature, best practices, and existing practice guidelines as a first step toward developing evidence-based educational materials for women's health care clinicians about uterine cancer. Panel members conducted structured literature reviews, which were then reviewed by other panel members and discussed at a virtual meeting of stakeholder professional and patient advocacy organizations in January 2021. This article is the evidence summary of the relevant literature and existing recommendations to guide clinicians in the prevention, early diagnosis, and special considerations of uterine cancer. Substantive knowledge gaps are noted and summarized to provide guidance for future research.
Collapse
|
17
|
Islami F, Guerra CE, Minihan A, Yabroff KR, Fedewa SA, Sloan K, Wiedt TL, Thomson B, Siegel RL, Nargis N, Winn RA, Lacasse L, Makaroff L, Daniels EC, Patel AV, Cance WG, Jemal A. American Cancer Society's report on the status of cancer disparities in the United States, 2021. CA Cancer J Clin 2022; 72:112-143. [PMID: 34878180 DOI: 10.3322/caac.21703] [Citation(s) in RCA: 140] [Impact Index Per Article: 46.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2021] [Accepted: 09/07/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
In this report, the authors provide comprehensive and up-to-date US data on disparities in cancer occurrence, major risk factors, and access to and utilization of preventive measures and screening by sociodemographic characteristics. They also review programs and resources that have reduced cancer disparities and provide policy recommendations to further mitigate these inequalities. The overall cancer death rate is 19% higher among Black males than among White males. Black females also have a 12% higher overall cancer death rate than their White counterparts despite having an 8% lower incidence rate. There are also substantial variations in death rates for specific cancer types and in stage at diagnosis, survival, exposure to risk factors, and receipt of preventive measures and screening by race/ethnicity, socioeconomic status, and geographic location. For example, kidney cancer death rates by sex among American Indian/Alaska Native people are ≥64% higher than the corresponding rates in each of the other racial/ethnic groups, and the 5-year relative survival for all cancers combined is 14% lower among residents of poorer counties than among residents of more affluent counties. Broad and equitable implementation of evidence-based interventions, such as increasing health insurance coverage through Medicaid expansion or other initiatives, could substantially reduce cancer disparities. However, progress will require not only equitable local, state, and federal policies but also broad interdisciplinary engagement to elevate and address fundamental social inequities and longstanding systemic racism.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Farhad Islami
- Cancer Disparity Research, Department of Surveillance and Health Equity Science, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Carmen E Guerra
- Department of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Adair Minihan
- Screening and Risk Factors Research, Department of Surveillance and Health Equity Science, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - K Robin Yabroff
- Health Services Research, Department of Surveillance and Health Equity Science, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Stacey A Fedewa
- Screening and Risk Factors Research, Department of Surveillance and Health Equity Science, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Kirsten Sloan
- Public Policy, American Cancer Society Cancer Action Network, Washington, District of Columbia
| | - Tracy L Wiedt
- Health Equity, Prevention and Early Detection, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Blake Thomson
- Cancer Disparity Research, Department of Surveillance and Health Equity Science, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Rebecca L Siegel
- Surveillance Research, Department of Surveillance and Health Equity Science, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Nigar Nargis
- Tobacco Control Research, Department of Surveillance and Health Equity Science, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Robert A Winn
- Massey Cancer Center, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia
| | - Lisa Lacasse
- American Cancer Society Cancer Action Network, Washington, District of Columbia
| | - Laura Makaroff
- Prevention and Early Detection, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Elvan C Daniels
- Extramural Discovery Science, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Alpa V Patel
- Department of Population Science, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - William G Cance
- Office of the Chief Medical and Scientific Officer, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Ahmedin Jemal
- Department of Surveillance and Health Equity Science, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, Georgia
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Incidence trends for twelve cancers in younger adults-a rapid review. Br J Cancer 2022; 126:1374-1386. [PMID: 35132237 PMCID: PMC9090760 DOI: 10.1038/s41416-022-01704-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2021] [Revised: 12/10/2021] [Accepted: 01/06/2022] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Many cancer referral guidelines use patient’s age as a key criterium to decide who should be referred urgently. A recent rise in the incidence of colorectal cancer in younger adults has been described in high-income countries worldwide. Information on other cancers is more limited. The aim of this rapid review was to determine whether other cancers are also increasing in younger age groups, as this may have important implications for prioritising patients for investigation and referral. We searched MEDLINE, Embase and Web of Science for studies describing age-related incidence trends for colorectal, bladder, lung, oesophagus, pancreas, stomach, breast, ovarian, uterine, kidney and laryngeal cancer and myeloma. ‘Younger’ patients were defined based on NICE guidelines for cancer referral. Ninety-eight studies met the inclusion criteria. Findings show that the incidence of colorectal, breast, kidney, pancreas, uterine cancer is increasing in younger age groups, whilst the incidence of lung, laryngeal and bladder cancer is decreasing. Data for oesophageal, stomach, ovarian cancer and myeloma were inconclusive. Overall, this review provides evidence that some cancers are increasingly being diagnosed in younger age groups, although the mechanisms remain unclear. Cancer investigation and referral guidelines may need updating in light of these trends.
Collapse
|
19
|
US hysterectomy prevalence by age, race and ethnicity from BRFSS and NHIS: implications for analyses of cervical and uterine cancer rates. Cancer Causes Control 2022; 33:161-166. [PMID: 34546462 PMCID: PMC8738136 DOI: 10.1007/s10552-021-01496-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/28/2020] [Accepted: 09/07/2021] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Previous reports of gynecologic cancer rates have adjusted for hysterectomy prevalence with data from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) or the National Health Interview Survey (NHIS). We sought to determine if BRFSS and NHIS produce similar estimates of hysterectomy prevalence. METHODS Using data from BRFSS and NHIS, we calculated hysterectomy prevalence for women aged 20-79 years, stratified by 10-year age groups, survey year (2010, 2018), and race/ethnicity (Hispanic, non-Hispanic American Indian or Alaskan Native, non-Hispanic Asian, non-Hispanic Black, non-Hispanic White, non-Hispanic all other race groups). RESULTS BRFSS and NHIS produced similar increasing trends in hysterectomy prevalence by age and directional differences by race and ethnicity. Fewer than 2% of women aged 20-29 years and more than 4 out of 10 women aged 70-79 years reported having had a hysterectomy. CONCLUSION Our analyses suggest adjustment for hysterectomy prevalence with data from either survey would likely reduce distortion in cervical and uterine cancer rates. BRFSS, a survey which has a larger sample size than NHIS, may better support analyses of hysterectomy estimates for smaller subpopulations.
Collapse
|
20
|
Islami F, Ward EM, Sung H, Cronin KA, Tangka FKL, Sherman RL, Zhao J, Anderson RN, Henley SJ, Yabroff KR, Jemal A, Benard VB. Annual Report to the Nation on the Status of Cancer, Part 1: National Cancer Statistics. J Natl Cancer Inst 2021; 113:1648-1669. [PMID: 34240195 PMCID: PMC8634503 DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djab131] [Citation(s) in RCA: 303] [Impact Index Per Article: 75.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2021] [Revised: 04/12/2021] [Accepted: 06/28/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The American Cancer Society, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Cancer Institute, and North American Association of Central Cancer Registries collaborate to provide annual updates on cancer incidence and mortality and trends by cancer type, sex, age group, and racial/ethnic group in the United States. In this report, we also examine trends in stage-specific survival for melanoma of the skin (melanoma). METHODS Incidence data for all cancers from 2001 through 2017 and survival data for melanoma cases diagnosed during 2001-2014 and followed-up through 2016 were obtained from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention- and National Cancer Institute-funded population-based cancer registry programs compiled by the North American Association of Central Cancer Registries. Data on cancer deaths from 2001 to 2018 were obtained from the National Center for Health Statistics' National Vital Statistics System. Trends in age-standardized incidence and death rates and 2-year relative survival were estimated by joinpoint analysis, and trends in incidence and mortality were expressed as average annual percent change (AAPC) during the most recent 5 years (2013-2017 for incidence and 2014-2018 for mortality). RESULTS Overall cancer incidence rates (per 100 000 population) for all ages during 2013-2017 were 487.4 among males and 422.4 among females. During this period, incidence rates remained stable among males but slightly increased in females (AAPC = 0.2%, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.1% to 0.2%). Overall cancer death rates (per 100 000 population) during 2014-2018 were 185.5 among males and 133.5 among females. During this period, overall death rates decreased in both males (AAPC = -2.2%, 95% CI = -2.5% to -1.9%) and females (AAPC = -1.7%, 95% CI = -2.1% to -1.4%); death rates decreased for 11 of the 19 most common cancers among males and for 14 of the 20 most common cancers among females, but increased for 5 cancers in each sex. During 2014-2018, the declines in death rates accelerated for lung cancer and melanoma, slowed down for colorectal and female breast cancers, and leveled off for prostate cancer. Among children younger than age 15 years and adolescents and young adults aged 15-39 years, cancer death rates continued to decrease in contrast to the increasing incidence rates. Two-year relative survival for distant-stage skin melanoma was stable for those diagnosed during 2001-2009 but increased by 3.1% (95% CI = 2.8% to 3.5%) per year for those diagnosed during 2009-2014, with comparable trends among males and females. CONCLUSIONS Cancer death rates in the United States continue to decline overall and for many cancer types, with the decline accelerated for lung cancer and melanoma. For several other major cancers, however, death rates continue to increase or previous declines in rates have slowed or ceased. Moreover, overall incidence rates continue to increase among females, children, and adolescents and young adults. These findings inform efforts related to prevention, early detection, and treatment and for broad and equitable implementation of effective interventions, especially among under resourced populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Farhad Islami
- Department of Surveillance and Health Equity Science, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Elizabeth M Ward
- North American Association of Central Cancer Registries, Springfield, IL, USA
| | - Hyuna Sung
- Department of Surveillance and Health Equity Science, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Kathleen A Cronin
- Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Florence K L Tangka
- Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Recinda L Sherman
- North American Association of Central Cancer Registries, Springfield, IL, USA
| | - Jingxuan Zhao
- Department of Surveillance and Health Equity Science, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Robert N Anderson
- National Center for Health Statistics, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Hyattsville, MD, USA
| | - S Jane Henley
- Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - K Robin Yabroff
- Department of Surveillance and Health Equity Science, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Ahmedin Jemal
- Department of Surveillance and Health Equity Science, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Vicki B Benard
- Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Yang F, Zhao R, Huang X, Wang Y. Diagnostic and prognostic factors, and two nomograms for endometrial cancer patients with bone metastasis: A large cohort retrospective study. Medicine (Baltimore) 2021; 100:e27185. [PMID: 34516519 PMCID: PMC8428737 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000027185] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2021] [Accepted: 08/19/2021] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Patients with endometrial cancer (EC) who develop bone metastasis (BM) always imply a poorer prognosis. However, reliable predictive models associated with BM from EC are currently limited.We retrospectively analyzed data on 54,077 patients diagnosed with primary EC in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to determine independent predictors of BM from EC. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were used to determine independent prognostic factors for EC with BM. Based on independent predictors and prognostic factors, we constructed a diagnostic nomogram and prognostic nomogram separately. Besides, calibration curves, receiver operating characteristic curves, and decision curve analysis were used to evaluate the models.A total of 54,077 patients with EC from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database were included in this study, 364 of whom had BM. Multivariate analysis in the logistic model showed that lung metastasis, liver metastasis, brain metastasis, N stage, T stage, histologic grade, and race were risk factors for BM from EC. Multivariate analysis in the Cox model showed that liver metastasis, brain metastasis, chemotherapy, surgery, and histologic type had a significant effect on overall survival. Moreover, the receiver operating characteristic curve, calibration curve, and decision curve analysis indicated the good performance of both diagnostic and prognostic nomograms.Two clinical prediction model was constructed and validated to predict individual risk and overall survival for EC with BM, respectively. Diagnostic nomogram and prognostic nomogram are complementary, improving the clinician's ability to assess the patient's prognosis and enhancing prognosis-based decision making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fengkai Yang
- Department of Postgraduate Medical School, Chengde Medical College, Chengde, Hebei Province, China
| | - Ruhan Zhao
- Department of Oncology, Affiliated Hospital of Chengde Medical University, Chengde, Hebei Province, China
| | - Xiaohui Huang
- Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, China
| | - Yucheng Wang
- Department of Orthopedics, Taizhou Municipal Hospital, Taizhou, Zhejiang Province, China
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Simms KT, Yuill S, Killen J, Smith MA, Kulasingam S, de Kok IMCM, van Ballegooijen M, Burger EA, Regan C, Kim JJ, Canfell K. Historical and projected hysterectomy rates in the USA: Implications for future observed cervical cancer rates and evaluating prevention interventions. Gynecol Oncol 2020; 158:710-718. [PMID: 32723676 PMCID: PMC8723888 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.05.030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2020] [Accepted: 05/16/2020] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND SEER-reported cervical cancer incidence rates reflect the total female population including women no longer at risk due to hysterectomy. Hysterectomy rates have been declining in the United States as alternative treatments have become available, which could result in an apparent increase in SEER-reported cervical cancer rates. We aimed to obtain nationally representative historical data on hysterectomy rates in USA, use trends analysis to project rates back to 1935 and forward to 2035, and then predict the impact of changing hysterectomy rates on SEER-reported cervical cancer rates. METHODS We performed a systematic search of Medline, Embase, Premedline, Cochrane Central databases and extracted nationally-representative hysterectomy incidence data from 1965 to 2009, including data on the number of cervix-preserving (subtotal) procedures. We then projected rates back to 1935, and forward to 2035 based on trends from joinpoint regression. These rates were then used to estimate hysterectomy prevalence out to 2035, and then to predict the impact of changing hysterectomy rates on SEER-reported cervical cancer rates to 2035. We examined alternative assumptions regarding projected hysterectomy incidence rates out to 2035, including a scenario in which rates decline no further from 2009 rates, and a scenario where rates decline at twice the baseline rate. RESULTS Estimated age-standardized hysterectomy incidence increased from 2.4 to 10.6 per 1000 women between 1935 and 1975. Thereafter, rates are predicted to fall to 3.9 per 1000 by 2035. Subtotal hysterectomy procedures declined from being the predominant method in 1935 to less than 12% of procedures from 1970 onwards. Consequently, holding all else constant, an increase in SEER-reported age-standardized cervical cancer incidence rates (ages 0-85+) of 9% is expected from 2009 to 2035. The predictions were minimally impacted by alternative scenarios for future hysterectomy rates. CONCLUSIONS Declining hysterectomy rates have implications for the interpretation of SEER-reported cervical cancer rates. A background increase in cervical cancer rates due to decreasing population hysterectomy exposure may partially offset expected decreases from recent cervical screening changes recommended by the US Preventive Services Task Force. Evaluations of new cervical cancer prevention opportunities should consider the background impact of historical and projected hysterectomy rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kate T Simms
- Cancer Research Division, Cancer Council NSW, 153 Dowling Street, Woolloomooloo, Sydney, NSW 2011, Australia; School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Australia.
| | - Susan Yuill
- Cancer Research Division, Cancer Council NSW, 153 Dowling Street, Woolloomooloo, Sydney, NSW 2011, Australia; School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Australia.
| | - James Killen
- Cancer Research Division, Cancer Council NSW, 153 Dowling Street, Woolloomooloo, Sydney, NSW 2011, Australia
| | - Megan A Smith
- Cancer Research Division, Cancer Council NSW, 153 Dowling Street, Woolloomooloo, Sydney, NSW 2011, Australia; School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Australia
| | | | - Inge M C M de Kok
- Erasmus MC - University Medical Center, Department of Public Health, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | - Emily A Burger
- Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, USA; Department of Health Management and Health Economics, University of Oslo
| | | | - Jane J Kim
- Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, USA
| | - Karen Canfell
- Cancer Research Division, Cancer Council NSW, 153 Dowling Street, Woolloomooloo, Sydney, NSW 2011, Australia; School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Ojamaa K, Veerus P, Baburin A, Everaus H, Innos K. Increasing incidence and survival of corpus uteri cancer in Estonia over the past two decades. Cancer Epidemiol 2019; 62:101566. [PMID: 31326850 DOI: 10.1016/j.canep.2019.101566] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2019] [Revised: 07/07/2019] [Accepted: 07/08/2019] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Corpus uteri cancer has become the fourth most common female cancer in Europe. In Estonia, the prevalence of obesity is increasing, and corpus uteri cancer survival has been relatively low. The aim of the study was to evaluate incidence, mortality and survival trends of corpus uteri cancer in Estonia by age, stage and histological subtypes with an emphasis on surgical treatment. METHODS Estonian Cancer Registry data on incident cases of corpus uteri cancer were used to examine incidence trends (1995-2016) and calculate relative survival ratios (RSR) (1996-2016). Cases were classified by morphology and FIGO stage. Causes of Death Registry data were used to analyse corrected mortality (1995-2017). RESULTS A total of 4281 cases were diagnosed in 1996-2016. A significant increase was seen in age-standardized incidence from 2009, while mortality remained stable throughout the study period. Significant increases were observed for type I cancers and age groups ≥65 years. Overall age-standardized 5-year RSR improved from 70% in 1996-2002 to 78% in 2010-2016. Survival increased for type I cancers, all age groups and all stages (significantly for stage IV). The proportion of surgically treated cases increased significantly from 85% to 89%, with the largest increases seen in older age groups and later stages. DISCUSSION The rising corpus uteri cancer incidence in Estonia is driven by the type I cancer trend. Survival gain for later stages and older age groups likely reflected more frequent surgical treatment. To reduce mortality, further efforts are necessary to ensure appropriate care for all patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kristiina Ojamaa
- East Tallinn Central Hospital, Oncology Center, Ravi St 18, 10138 Tallinn, Estonia.
| | - Piret Veerus
- National Institute for Health Development, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Hiiu St 42, 11619 Tallinn, Estonia; West Tallinn Central Hospital, Womens' Clinic, Paldiski St 68, 10617 Tallinn, Estonia.
| | - Aleksei Baburin
- National Institute for Health Development, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Hiiu St 42, 11619 Tallinn, Estonia.
| | - Hele Everaus
- Tartu University Hospital, Haematology and Oncology Clinic, L. Puusepa St 1A, 50406 Tartu, Estonia.
| | - Kaire Innos
- National Institute for Health Development, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Hiiu St 42, 11619 Tallinn, Estonia.
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Brooks RA, Fleming GF, Lastra RR, Lee NK, Moroney JW, Son CH, Tatebe K, Veneris JL. Current recommendations and recent progress in endometrial cancer. CA Cancer J Clin 2019; 69:258-279. [PMID: 31074865 DOI: 10.3322/caac.21561] [Citation(s) in RCA: 298] [Impact Index Per Article: 49.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Endometrial cancer is the most common gynecologic cancer in the United States, and its incidence is rising. Although there have been significant recent advances in our understanding of endometrial cancer biology, many aspects of treatment remain mired in controversy, including the role of surgical lymph node assessment and the selection of patients for adjuvant radiation or chemotherapy. For the subset of women with microsatellite-instable, metastatic disease, anti- programmed cell death protein 1 immunotherapy (pembrolizumab) is now approved by the US Food and Drug Administration, and numerous trials are attempting to build on this early success.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebecca A Brooks
- Associate Professor, Department of Gynecologic Oncology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL
- Dr. Brooks is now the Associate Professor and Chief of the Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of California Davis School of Medicine, Davis, CA
| | - Gini F Fleming
- Professor of Medicine and Director, Medical Oncology Breast Program, Department of Medical Oncology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL
| | - Ricardo R Lastra
- Assistant Professor, Department of Pathology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL
| | - Nita K Lee
- Assistant Professor of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Department of Gynecologic Oncology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL
| | - John W Moroney
- Associate Professor of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Department of Gynecologic Oncology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL
| | - Christina H Son
- Assistant Professor, Department of Radiation and Cellular Oncology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL
| | - Ken Tatebe
- Resident, Department of Radiation and Cellular Oncology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL
| | - Jennifer L Veneris
- Instructor of Medicine, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Clarke MA, Devesa SS, Harvey SV, Wentzensen N. Hysterectomy-Corrected Uterine Corpus Cancer Incidence Trends and Differences in Relative Survival Reveal Racial Disparities and Rising Rates of Nonendometrioid Cancers. J Clin Oncol 2019; 37:1895-1908. [PMID: 31116674 PMCID: PMC6675596 DOI: 10.1200/jco.19.00151] [Citation(s) in RCA: 199] [Impact Index Per Article: 33.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Uterine corpus cancer incidence rates have been projected to increase, a prediction often attributed to the obesity epidemic. However, correct estimation of these rates requires accounting for hysterectomy prevalence, which varies by race, ethnicity, and region. Here, we evaluated recent trends in hysterectomy-corrected rates by race and ethnicity and histologic subtype and estimated differences in relative survival by race and ethnicity, subtype, and stage. METHODS We estimated hysterectomy prevalence from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. Hysterectomy-corrected age-standardized uterine corpus cancer incidence rates from 2000 to 2015 were calculated from the SEER 18 registries. Incidence rates and trends were estimated separately by race and ethnicity, region, and histologic subtype. Five-year relative survival rates were estimated by race and ethnicity, histologic subtype, and stage. RESULTS Hysterectomy-corrected incidence rates of uterine corpus cancer were similar among non-Hispanic whites and blacks and lower among Hispanics and Asians/Pacific Islanders. Endometrioid carcinoma rates were highest in non-Hispanic whites, whereas nonendometrioid carcinoma and sarcoma rates were highest in non-Hispanic blacks. Hysterectomy-corrected uterine corpus cancer incidence increased among non-Hispanic whites from 2003 to 2015 and among non-Hispanic blacks, Hispanics, and Asians/Pacific Islanders from 2000 to 2015. Overall incidence rates among non-Hispanic blacks surpassed those of non-Hispanic whites in 2007. Endometrioid carcinoma rates rose among non-Hispanic blacks, Hispanics, and Asians/Pacific Islanders but were stable among non-Hispanic whites; however, nonendometrioid carcinoma rates rose significantly among all women. Non-Hispanic blacks had the lowest survival rates, irrespective of stage at diagnosis or histologic subtype. CONCLUSION Among all women, rates of nonendometrioid subtypes have been rising rapidly. Our analysis shows profound racial differences and disparities indicated by higher rates of nonendometrioid subtypes and poorer survival among non-Hispanic black women.
Collapse
|
26
|
DeSantis CE, Miller KD, Goding Sauer A, Jemal A, Siegel RL. Cancer statistics for African Americans, 2019. CA Cancer J Clin 2019; 69:211-233. [PMID: 30762872 DOI: 10.3322/caac.21555] [Citation(s) in RCA: 522] [Impact Index Per Article: 87.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
In the United States, African American/black individuals bear a disproportionate share of the cancer burden, having the highest death rate and the lowest survival rate of any racial or ethnic group for most cancers. To monitor progress in reducing these inequalities, every 3 years the American Cancer Society provides the estimated number of new cancer cases and deaths for blacks in the United States and the most recent data on cancer incidence, mortality, survival, screening, and risk factors using data from the National Cancer Institute, the North American Association of Central Cancer Registries, and the National Center for Health Statistics. In 2019, approximately 202,260 new cases of cancer and 73,030 cancer deaths are expected to occur among blacks in the United States. During 2006 through 2015, the overall cancer incidence rate decreased faster in black men than in white men (2.4% vs 1.7% per year), largely due to the more rapid decline in lung cancer. In contrast, the overall cancer incidence rate was stable in black women (compared with a slight increase in white women), reflecting increasing rates for cancers of the breast, uterine corpus, and pancreas juxtaposed with declining trends for cancers of the lung and colorectum. Overall cancer death rates declined faster in blacks than whites among both males (2.6% vs 1.6% per year) and females (1.5% vs 1.3% per year), largely driven by greater declines for cancers of the lung, colorectum, and prostate. Consequently, the excess risk of overall cancer death in blacks compared with whites dropped from 47% in 1990 to 19% in 2016 in men and from 19% in 1990 to 13% in 2016 in women. Moreover, the black-white cancer disparity has been nearly eliminated in men <50 years and women ≥70 years. Twenty-five years of continuous declines in the cancer death rate among black individuals translates to more than 462,000 fewer cancer deaths. Continued progress in reducing disparities will require expanding access to high-quality prevention, early detection, and treatment for all Americans.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carol E DeSantis
- Principal Scientist, Surveillance and Health Services Research, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA
| | - Kimberly D Miller
- Senior Associate Scientist, Surveillance and Health Services Research, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA
| | - Ann Goding Sauer
- Senior Associate Scientist, Surveillance and Health Services Research, Intramural Research, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA
| | - Ahmedin Jemal
- Vice President, Surveillance and Health Services Research, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA
| | - Rebecca L Siegel
- Scientific Director, Surveillance Research, Surveillance and Health Services Research, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA
| |
Collapse
|